DOCSLIB.ORG

Electronic Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Electronic Report 52 Bank Parade Burnley BB11 1TS Phone 01282 414649 / 458410 Our Ref: Park Rd/BB12 8ED/DESK/DL.13 Date: 17th July 2013 Andrew Morgan ADM Design Brook Lea Colne Road Sough Barnoldswick BB18 6TD Tel: 07931 557214 PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL UNIT PARK ROAD, PADIHAM, BB12 8ED PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT (DESK STUDY) INTRODUCTION It is proposed to build an industrial unit. The objective is to carry out a desk study, supplemented with a walk over survey, to form a Preliminary Risk Assessment to consider contamination and ground gas issues. SITE DESCRIPTION The site is an irregular, almost triangular, shaped yard about 55 by 60 metres. It is located to the east of Park Road in Padiham and centred on National Grid Reference 379150 433460. The site was inspected on 16/7/13 and comprises a predominantly concrete surfaced yard, sloping gently down to the west towards Park Road. Along the east and south sides are bales of plastic and at the southwest corner are storage containers To the north is a plant yard and shed, to the south is an area of allotments, to the west is a vehicle repair garage premises and to the east above the site level, is an currently undeveloped part of the former gas works. There are no notable features or indications of contamination, i.e. tank or operating areas. The site and general area slopes gently to the west at about 1 in 40. 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT It is proposed to build an industrial unit. The existing yard will remain, as existing, for car parking and access with the storage containers also remaining as is. LEGAL/COPYRIGHT Material may be included in this report from Ordnance Survey (Licence No. AL100031635), Landmark, Environment Agency, Coal Authority and others. It may be copyright and the usual restrictions apply. This report can only be relied upon if the invoice has been paid promptly and in full. This report may be signed by an individual, but only on behalf of Worms Eye Limited. This report is referred to as a “Desk Study” but also involves a site inspection. Alternative names for such reports are “Phase I Report” (Phase II being the intrusive work involving boreholes etc.) or a “Preliminary Risk Assessment” (PRA). DATA SOURCES The following data sources have been viewed in compiling this report: • BGS, Geological Map, 1:50000 Series, Sheet 68, Clitheroe, Solid and Dirt Editions. • BGS, On-shore Borehole Scans (none available). • Environment Agency, What’s in your Backyard? - Ground Water - Landfill Sites - Pollution Incidents • Ordnance Survey, Historical Mapping, 1:2500 and 1:10000 scale. • Walkover Survey, 16/07/13 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA A Landmark Envirocheck report has been obtained for the site and geological maps have been reviewed, the following is a summary of the combined data. The Envirocheck report indicated none of the following within 250 metres: • Contaminated land register entries • Water abstraction points • Source protection zones • Radioactive sites • Hazardous substances sites • Fuel stations • Sensitive land uses 3 Geology of Site The geological map indicates that a geological fault, with the down throw to the northeast, runs northwest to southeast across the site. Southwest of the fault are sandstone of the Dandy Rock horizon and to the northeast are undefined strata, likely to be mudstone and shale, both in the Pennine Lower coal measures. Surface drift is shown as glacial till (boulder clay) of unspecified thickness with an area of alluvium immediately to the west. Surface Water (Hydrology) The River Calder, GQA grade D (fair), flows south 55 metres to the west. The nearest discharge consent was for cooling water to enter the river 129 metres west.* There was a minor pollution incident 37metres northwest of partially burned pallets in the River Calder 1997.* In 1991 there was a significant pollution incident of oil in the River Calder, 115metres north.* The EA maps show an area of extreme flooding from the River Calder 14metres southwest and an area of ‘normal’ flooding 16metres southwest, i.e. clear of the site and about 60metres southwest of the proposed building. The area slopes down to the west and the flow of surface water is expected to be in this direction. * not relevant due to distance/severity/significance Groundwater (Hydrogeology) The solid rocks and superficial drift deposits under the site are indicated as Secondary A (formerly minor) aquifers. The surface soils are also shown as having a low permeability. Groundwater flow is likely to follow the topography and move to the west towards the river. 4 Landfill and Other Waste Sites The site itself is shown as a landfill site, filled by British Gas between 31st December 1987 and 8th March 1989. The EA indicates deposited waste was Inert Waste (cement, ceramics, glass, metals, slate, concrete, brick, soil, clay, sand, plastics, timber), this is likely to be the former gas holder excavations. 9 metres south of the site on Elizabeth Street another Landfill site is recorded, the waste material and date of the deposit is unknown. 74 metres south west of the site another landfill site (Padiham Power Station) is recorded and the deposited waste include inert, industrial and household waste. The site was previously licensed as a Household Waste Management Facility (licensed for car batteries, general household/commercial/industrial waste, household chemicals, mineral oil, household solvents, bonded asbestos) between 1993 and 2003. 21 metres north is a registered Vehicle Dismantlers, actually located over 50metres north* * not relevant due to distance/severity/significance Radon The site is in a lower probability radon area as less than 1% of homes in the area are above the radon action level. Radon protection measures are not required. Nearby Industry The nearest trade directory is a Recycling Centre 6metres northwest and is now inactive. Other nearby industries include: • Skillings Crushing Co, 4metres north, have two LA PPC listings for mobile screening and crushing processes. • Garages Services, 17metres west, active. • Recycling Centre, 37metres north, inactive.* • Pallets, Crates and Packing Cases, 43metres north, active.* • Commercial Vehicle Dealers, 54metres north, active.* • Garage Services, 58metres, north, active.* • Waste Disposal Services, 70metres north, inactive.* * not relevant due to distance/severity/significance 5 SITE HISTORY Date On Site Off Site River Calder 55m to the west. 1848 Site undeveloped field Padiham Green 240m to east. 1:10560 Undeveloped fields surround the site. Railway on embankment, 100m north and sidings 100m northeast. 1893 Site developed with a gasometer central on Railway Station 225m notheast. 1:2500 the site Houses constructed 125m southeast. Stream 100m south. Refuse Destructor 25m west. 1912 Road constructed around site. Mare park 1:2500 road. Building by northwest corner of site. Mortuary 25m west. Gas works buildings, immediately north of site. 1931 Little or no change Gasometer 30m northeast and tanks 10 and 20m north. 1:2500 Allotment gardens to the south, spreading southeast of site. Council depot 10m west. Destructor to west now show as works. 1960 Little or no change 1:2500 New buildings along west side of depot 40m west. 1969 Little or no change Little or no change 1:2500 Railway sidings to northeast is now a works. Railway line no longer active. 1993 Gasometer removed, excavation filled and 1:2500 site now household waste disposal centre Gas works building to the north demolished. Council depot to the west now a builders yard. Gasometer to the northeast removed. 2013 Site now vacant 1:10000 Small buildings constructed immediately north. DISCUSSION Contamination The site is currently a concrete/tarmac yard but was previously part of the gas works and contamination is expected. High levels of contamination are generally anticipated from gas works, especially hydrocarbons. The former household waste centre and current storage are not expected to have generated or introduced higher levels of contamination than the gas works. The yard preventing contaminants from reaching the underlying soils in significant quantities. 6 Regarding offsite industries, contaminants from those to the west would be expected to migrate to the west, down the hydraulic gradient and away from the site. Contaminants from the demolition construction to the north would be from storage/repair to vehicles and would not be expected to present as large a risk to the site as the gas works, most contaminants also migrating down to the west and away from the site. Similarly, contaminants from the area of the gas holder to the east, although likely to pass beneath the site, would be expected to be similar, if not the same, to those generated on site. The proposed development will be an industrial unit and yard. End-users will not have direct contact with the surface soils and potential pollutant linkages are: • Inhalant of vapours. • Direct contact with building. • Contaminants affecting service pipes. Although high contamination levels are expected, by being full hard surfaced only a moderate risk to end-users is expected. This being from inhalation of vapours and contaminants affecting drinking water pipes. Controlled Waters There is an underlying Secondary A aquifer beneath low permeability clay. The River Calder is 55 metres west. On completion, the building and car parking areas will cover the site thereby eliminating the risk of rainwater passing through the surface soils. If the site remains as a yard and building with no landscaping the risk to controlled water will remain as now. The anticipated underlying clay will also impede the migration of water and, on completion, only a low to medium risk is expected to controlled waters. It should also be remembered that the site is a small part of a wider industrial area where levels of contaminants are likely to be similar and, risks to controlled waters is greater in open areas.
Recommended publications
  • Agecroft in Steam

    Agecroft in Steam

    ( ?I ~- - - ~"~ _., -- ........... / -- . , ·--....., __ t) \ ,-- The 1960's saw a dramatic change m the use of The 'A' station system was abandoned early m steam locomotion in the North West of 1947 as construction of 'B' station cooling to Cl!Jton Junc1:c'n ) England. Within the short space of 8 years the towers severed the line. Between then and its QI✓ . familiar sight of a steam-hauled train closure the 'A' station received coal by road. {not all 1he rm,ways shown exi~ad al the some time vanished completely from British Rail. For a A Stallon .,:· :·, ,: ' _::' .·. ·-~ ·.. while steam continued to be used at some ·'..,·.'. _. 1, · ,_ c · ·n... c····. ~:·y···,--·· Reception Sidings industrial sites in Lancashire but now only II AG hopper Agecroft Power Station, near Manchester, .if •i•>,c': fp , ' . ,. Ill ·• continues the tradition. Three power stations (A, B and C ) have been A completely ne w coal handling system using developed on the Agecroft site smce 1925 and steam locomotives, was built on a separate each has used a rrnl system in its coal site· to se rve···•· both 'B ' and 'C' stations. A senes of handling. lines, approximately I mile lung, was coalslockmg construc ted running from the original gmundwilh ,:···. ~ ~ -c·,.' .-:B.ft. .,. ....:;: y ·:·:· conveyor to Agecroft Junc tion. The line passed crone lrack (standard gmrgel -.. ~~:: .. ·~&--... 2 loco sheds and fanned into wagon sidings ,,,. .-n:v ...' ... which converged lo pass through the tippler. .. .. A new conveyor was built to take the coal over . .. ... the British Rail line and the canal to the power The original 'A' statio,n used a 2' 6" gauge station.
  • Hyndburn Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Level 1)

    Hyndburn Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Level 1)

    Hyndburn Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Level 1) February 2010 Contents Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 5 Scope & Objectives 6 2. Methodology 7 Level 1 of the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 7 Level 2 of the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 8 3. Data Collection 9 Catchment Flood Management Plans 9 Integrated Catchment Management Plan for the Ribble 10 Flood Risk Zones within Hyndburn Borough Council 10 The Sequential Test 15 Delineation of High Risk Zone 3 17 Assessment of Actual Risk within Zone 3a 17 Delineation of Medium Risk Zone 2 18 Appropriate Uses for Zone 2 19 Delineation of Low Risk Zone 1 19 Requirement of development within Flood Risk Zone 3 19 Requirement of development within Flood Risk Zone 2 20 Requirement of development within Flood Risk Zone 1 20 The Exception Test 23 Non-Fluvial Flooding within Hyndburn 24 Identification of Localised Drainage Issues 25 Requirement of Development in COW catchments and 26 Reservoirs and other artificial water retaining structures 27 Development Pressure 27 Project Phoenix 28 Platt’s Lodge SPD 30 Accrington Area Action Plan 31 Emergency Planning 32 SFRA (Level 1) 2 February 2010 4. The Next Steps 33 Appendices 34 Appendix 1: Management Plans 34 Appendix 2: The Planning Framework 35 Appendix 3: The Environment Agency’s Indicative Floodplain Map (IFM) 38 List of Figures & Tables Figure 1: Flood Risk Zone Classification 12 Figure 2: Application of the Sequential Test 16 Figure 3: Flood Risk Vulnerability and Flood Zone Compatibility 21 Figure 4: Flood Risk Vulnerability Classification 22 Figure 5: Project Phoenix 29 Figure 6: Platt’s Lodge 31 Figure 7: Accrington Town Centre Masterplan 32 SFRA (Level 1) 3 February 2010 Executive Summary Situated in the East of Lancashire, the Borough of Hyndburn is composed of a number of townships and settlements within the rural area, some of which are susceptible to flood risk.
  • DEVELOPMENT VISION Blackburn Road, Padiham Huntroyde Estate

    DEVELOPMENT VISION Blackburn Road, Padiham Huntroyde Estate

    DEVELOPMENT VISION Blackburn Road, Padiham Huntroyde Estate June 2017 Revision F LAND SOUTH OF BLACKBURN ROAD, PADIHAM. CONTENTS Fig 1 Aerial Site Plan Fig 2 Historical Mapping 1893 1.0 Introduction Fig 3 Historical Mapping 1933 Fig 4 Plan Vue extract of Burnley BC’s original I&O plan 2.0 Site and Surroundings Fig 5 Composite Proposals Map Fig 6 Sustainability Plan Fig 7 Flood Risk Mapping 3.0 Site Context Fig 8 Personal Injury Collision Data Fig 9 General Arrangement Drawing of Proposed Site Access to Employment Site 4.0 Planning Policy Context Fig 10 Illustrative Masterplan 5.0 How the Site Meets NPPF Sustainability Requirements APPENDICES 6.0 How the Site Meets the Purposes of Green Belt Requirements A Letter of representations dated 10.2.15 to Burnley Borough Council (BBC) 7.0 Traffic & Transport Matters B Letter of representations dated 23.8.16 to BBC preferred 8.0 Commercial Market Demand I&O consultation C Letter of representations dated 26.5.17 to BBC proposed submissions 9.0 Vision for the Site consultation, including plan & letter of support from Maple Grove Developments 10.0 Conclusions Prepared by: TOWN PLANNING CONSULTANCY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONSULTANCY COMMERCIAL PROPERTY CONSULTANCY HIGHWAY CONSULTANCY Page 2 Page 3 LAND SOUTH OF BLACKBURN ROAD, PADIHAM. 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This site lies to the south of Blackburn Road, Padiham and provides an ideal infill employment site to provide additional employment land adjacent to Shuttleworth Mead Business Park and the western edge of Padiham. 1.2 It has easy access to and will contribute toward the existing services and facilities in Padiham, as well as good links to the wider area and access to the M65 J8.
  • Burnley Task Force Report

    Burnley Task Force Report

    BURNLEY TASK FORCE Page No CONTENTS 1-3 LISTEN TO US 4 PREFACE 5-6 CHAIR’S INTRODUCTION 7-9 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION PLAN 10-23 MAPS OF BURNLEY 24-26 SECTION 1 1.1 The origins of the Task Force, its 27-30 Membership and Terms of Reference 1.2 The First Meeting 30-31 1.3 The Consultation Process 31-34 SECTION 2 2.1. What Happened? 35-36 2.2. Why Did it Happen? 36-37 SECTION 3 3.1. Submissions and Task Force Responses 38-39 3.2. Housing 39-47 3.2.1. Ways Forward 3.2.2. Housing Market Renewal Fund 3.2.3. Partnership Management 3.2.4. The Borough’s Approach 3.2.5. Information from other Local Authorities 3.2.6. Private Landlords Page 1 of 87 3.2.7. Housing and Landlords Associations 3.3. Community Relations 4753 3.3.1. Funding of Race Relations Work 3.3.2. The Politicisation of Race 3.3.3. The Asian Heritage Communities 3.3.4. The White Community 3.4. Community and Voluntary Sector 54-57 3.5. Burnley Borough Council 58-62 3.5.1. Council’s Submission 3.6. Police 63-65 3.7. Summary of Newspaper Media Analysis 65-67 3.8. Education 67-68 3.9. Young People 68-77 3.9.1. How the Young People’s Group Operated 3.9.2. How the views of Young People were Obtained 3.9.3. Young People’s Questionnaire 3.9.4. Web Page and ROBOT 3.9.5.
  • N Orth W Est W Ater Dawson House, Great Sankey Warrington WA5 3LW

    N Orth W Est W Ater Dawson House, Great Sankey Warrington WA5 3LW

    Central Area Fisheries Advisory Committee 8th January, 1981 Item Type monograph Publisher North West Water Authority Download date 24/09/2021 15:59:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/27068 N o r t h W e s t W a t e r Dawson House, Great Sankey Warrington WA5 3LW Telephone Penketh 4321 F1/A26 30th December, 1980 To: Members of the Central Area Fisheries Advisory Committees (Messrs. W. Bailey; R. Barratt; J.M. Croft; R.A. Challenor; J.H. Fell; R. Harper; A.L. Harris; R.D. Houghton; J. Johnson; G. Jones; J.P. Lord; H.B. Whittam; G. Wilson; Dr. R.B. Broughton; Professor W.E. Kershaw; and the Chairman of the Authority (G. Mann); the Vice Chairman of the Authority (A. Richardson); and the Chairman of the Regional Fisheries Advisory Committee (T. A. F. Barnes) (ex officio)).. Dear S i r , A M eeting o f th e CENTRAL AREA FISHERIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE y ill be held cit 2.30 p.m. on THURSDAY, 8TH JANUARY, 1981, at th e LANCASHIRE AREA OFFICE o f th e RIVERS DIVISION, 48 WEST CLIFF, PRESTON, for consideration of the following business. Yours faithfully, G. W. SHAW, Director of Administration. AGENDA 1. Appointment of Chairman. 2. Apologies for absence. 3. Minutes of the meeting of the Regional Fisheries Advisory Committee held on 10th November, 1980. 4. Review of Fishery Byelaws. 5. Fish M ortality in Rivers Calder and Ribble. 6. Net Limitation Orders. 7. Worthington Lakes, Rivington group Reservoirs and River Wyre - Restocking. - 2- 8. Pishing Permits on Authority - owned River Fisheries.
  • Chemical Quality Status of Rivers for the Water Framework Directive: a Case Study of Toxic Metals in North West England

    Chemical Quality Status of Rivers for the Water Framework Directive: a Case Study of Toxic Metals in North West England

    Water 2011, 3, 649-666; doi:10.3390/w3020650 OPEN ACCESS water ISSN 2073-4441 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Article Chemical Quality Status of Rivers for the Water Framework Directive: A Case Study of Toxic Metals in North West England Phil Rowland 1,*, Colin Neal 2, Darren Sleep 1, Colin Vincent 1 and Paul Scholefield 1 1 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Library Ave, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (C.V.); [email protected] (P.S.) 2 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire， OX10 8BB, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +0044-0-152459800; Fax: +0044-0-152461536. Received: 17 April 2011; in revised form: 27 May 2011 / Accepted: 28 May 2011 / Published: 14 June 2011 Abstract: This paper provides data from two years of monitoring of the chemical quality of rivers and streams in North West England from the clean headwaters to polluted rivers just above the tidal reach and covers 26 sites including the Ribble, Wyre and the tributary rivers of the Calder and Douglas. Across the basins that include areas of rural, urban and industrial typologies, data is presented for three of the priority substances in the Water Framework Directive i.e., nickel (Ni), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb). Average concentrations are low and well below the Environmental Quality Standards values for all three of these substances. Cadmium and Pb appear in approximately equal proportions in the dissolved (<0.45 µm) and in the acid available particulate fractions (>0.45 µm) whilst Ni occurs predominantly in the dissolved form (92%).
  • The Martholme Greenway Gooseleach Wood to Simonstone Lane - Preliminary Accommodation Works Martholme Greenway January 2017

    The Martholme Greenway Gooseleach Wood to Simonstone Lane - Preliminary Accommodation Works Martholme Greenway January 2017

    The Martholme Greenway Gooseleach Wood to Simonstone Lane - Preliminary accommodation works Martholme Greenway January 2017 Martholme Greenway Supporters Railway Paths Ltd GREENWAYS AND CYCLEROUTES LTD The British Horse Society Clayton-Le-Moors Harriers Ribble Valley Live Steamers Burnley Bridleways Association Friends of Padiham Greenway Simonstone Parish Council Hyndburn Ramblers Padiham Community Action Hyndburn MP Graham Jones Brian Howarth, Community Great Harwood Community Action Group Burnley MP Julie Cooper Rail Development Offi cer Ribble Valley MP Nigel Evans The Martholme Greenway: Gooseleach Wood to Padiham Bypass section | Page 2 | January 2017 The Martholme Greenway: Great Harwood and Padiham The Martholme Greenway is named after The Greenway is based along the general Gooseleach Wood and Simonstone the magnifi cent railway viaduct which spans line of the former Yorkshire Railway built in Lane section the River Calder almost mid-point along the 1860. Over the years a number of sections 7-mile route. have been turned into fi ne public paths for This phase of the Martholme Greenway will the general use of walkers, cyclists and enable Padiham residents to walk out to the most pedestrians. A particularly excellent section attractive wood as a small recreational activity in is the one running south from Padiham its own right. The project will link to the existing which was built with Lottery Funds as part of public footpaths and will install seats and picnic the Connect 2 programme. tables to encourage local people to walk out into their countryside. And walkers can continue along the public footpaths which cross the railway at Gooseleach Wood. View of Padiham Greenway Martholme Viaduct © Alexander P Kapp Map (right) showing overall route Viaduct from Rishton to Padiham: 11km (7 miles) PADIHAM 1 Tarmac path from Station Road Great opposite page 3 - to be read - Binding Margin Harwood to Leeds and Liverpool Canal 3 towpath at Rishton.
  • Uk Regional Development Programme 1986-90

    Uk Regional Development Programme 1986-90

    EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England — South Yorkshire Section 7F: England — Workington Section 7G: England — Greater Manchester Section 7H: England — Greater Merseyside lUlaUmiãl· I U If ΦΟ DOCUMENT DOCUMENTI CUMENT DOCUMENTO DOK1 ¡NT ΕΓΓΡΑΦΟ DOCUMENT DI JMENTO DOCUMENT UUCUM TU ηυκυΜΕΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦΟηΐ (MENT DOCUMENTO OUCUMI MHB ΡΑΦΟΟΟΟΟΜΕΜ I tvivl COMMISSION POOGIIIÌEN^DOG OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦ( uranFrinii nni-iiupuiiiAnAni This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1987 Vol.3 : ISBN 92-825-7194-7 Vol. 1-7: ISBN 92-825-7199-8 Catalogue number: CB-98-87-00J-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium Commission of the European Communities European Regional Development Fund UK RE6I0NAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: EngLand - South Yorkshire Section 7F: EngLand - Workington Section 7G: EngLand - Greater Manchester Section 7H: EngLand - Greater Merseyside Document This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Copyright ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels - Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. / L European Regional Development Fund UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England - South Yorkshire d UCJ [ \j \ 1' UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 CONTENTS The Programme consists of detailed information on regional or sub-regional areas (Sections 7 to 10) preceded by general information on the United Kingdom (Sections 1 to 6).
  • Lancashire: a Chronology of Flash Flooding

    Lancashire: a Chronology of Flash Flooding

    LANCASHIRE: A CHRONOLOGY OF FLASH FLOODING Introduction The past focus on the history of flooding has been mainly with respect to flooding from the overflow of rivers and with respect to the peak level that these floods have achieved. The Chronology of British Hydrological Events provides a reasonably comprehensive record of such events throughout Great Britain. Over the last 60 years the river gauging network provides a detailed record of the occurrence of river flows and peak levels and flows are summaried in HiflowsUK. However there has been recent recognition that much flooding of property occurs from surface water flooding, often far from rivers. Locally intense rainfall causes severe flooding of property and land as water concentrates and finds pathways along roads and depressions in the landscape. In addition, intense rainfall can also cause rapid rise in level and discharge in rivers causing a danger to the public even though the associated peak level is not critical. In extreme cases rapid rise in river level may be manifested as a ‘wall of water’ with near instantaneous rise in level of a metre or more. Such events are usually convective and may be accompanied by destructive hail or cause severe erosion of hillsides and agricultural land. There have been no previous compilations of historical records of such ‘flash floods’or even of more recent occurrences. It is therefore difficult to judge whether a recent event is unusual or even unique in terms of the level reached at a particular location or more broadly of regional severity. This chronology of flash floods is provided in order to enable comparisons to be made between recent and historical floods, to judge rarity and from a practical point of view to assess the adequacy of urban drainage networks.
  • SACO Participants' Manual

    SACO Participants' Manual

    SACO Participants' Manual Adam L. Schiff University of Washington Libraries for the Program for Cooperative Cataloging Second Edition revised by the PCC Standing Committee on Training Task Group to Update the SACO Participants’ Manual (with minor revisions, February 28, 2019) Program for Cooperative Cataloging Washington, D.C. 2007 PCC Standing Committee on Training Task Group to Update the SACO Participants’ Manual Adam L. Schiff (Chair), University of Washington Karen Jensen, McGill University John N. Mitchell, Library of Congress Kay Teel, Stanford University Alex Thurman, Columbia University Melanie Wacker, Columbia University Table of Contents Acknowledgments for the Second Edition v Acknowledgments for the First Edition vi Introduction 1 Why Participate in SACO? 4 SACO Documentation 6 Practicalities 7 Subject Headings 13 When to Make a SACO Proposal 14 Authority Research for Subjects 16 Subject Authority Proposal Form 18 Guidelines for Formulating LC Subject Heading Proposals 20 Examples of Decisions Involved in Making New Subject Proposals 23 Examples A-D: Headings Supplying More Appropriate Level of Specificity 25 Log-periodic antennas 25 Systems librarians 26 Cataloging of cartographic materials 27 Chinese mitten crab 29 Examples E-J: Headings for Genres and Forms 31 Medical drama 31 Romantic comedy films 33 Reggaetón 35 Khim and Khim music 37 Banjo and double bass music 39 Cootie catchers 40 Examples K-L: Headings Based on an Existing Pattern 42 This (The English word) 42 Historical fiction, Chilean 43 Examples M-S: Headings for Geographic Places 44 Madhupur Jungle (Bangladesh) 44 Aleknagik, Lake (Alaska) 46 Auyuittuq National Park (Nunavut) 48 Fort Worden State Park (Port Townsend, Wash.) 50 Chiles Volcano (Colombia and Ecuador) 51 Lusatian Mountains 54 Spring Lake (Hays County, Tex.) 56 Bluewater Lake (Minn.) 59 Cavanaugh, Lake (Wash.
  • Neighbourhood Plan Flood Risk Assessment

    Neighbourhood Plan Flood Risk Assessment

    FLOOD RISK CONSULTANCY LIMITED Neighbourhood Plan Flood Risk Assessment Site 015 Black Carr Mill Client: Trawden Parish Council Report No: 2018-058-02 Date: 20/06/2018 OFFICE C54 NORTHBRIDGE HOUSE ELM STREET BUSINESS PARK BURNLEY BB10 1PD TEL: 01282 792591 EMAIL: [email protected] Neighbourhood Plan Flood Risk Assessment Site 015 Black Carr Mill Report No: 2018-058-02 Document Control Document Title: Flood Risk Assessment Project Number: 2018-058-01 Revision Date Issued to Status Comments / 20/06/2018 Trawden Parish Council FINAL Contract This report describes work commissioned by Adele Waddington of Trawden Parish Council, dated 23rd May 2018. Chris Vose and Donna Metcalf of The Flood Risk Consultancy carried out the work. Prepared by……………………………………………………….…..Chris Vose (Flood Risk Consultant) Reviewed by……………………………………………………….Donna Metcalf (Managing Director) Approved by…………………………………….…………………Donna Metcalf (Managing Director) Disclaimer This document has been prepared solely as a Flood Risk Assessment for Trawden Parish Council. The Flood Risk Consultancy accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. Registered Office: Flood Risk Consultancy Ltd C54 Northbridge House, Elm Street, Burnley, Lancashire BB10 1PD Registered in England & Wales No: 8895207 i | P a g e Neighbourhood Plan Flood Risk Assessment Site 015 Black Carr Mill Report No: 2018-058-02 Executive Summary Flood Risk Consultancy Ltd has been appointed by Trawden Parish Council, to provide a Flood Risk Assessment in support of allocation of Site 015 (Black Carr Mill) within the emerging Neighbourhood Plan for housing provision.
  • Network Rail North West

    Network Rail North West

    Private — for the use of authorised persons only. NETWORK RAIL NORTH WEST SECTIONAL APPENDIX TO THE WORKING TIMETABLES AND BOOKS OF RULES AND REGULATIONS GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS RELATING TO THE SPECIFIED OPERATING PUBLICATIONS (NOTE. THIS SECTION MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH GEOGRAPHICAL SECTIONS 1 — 10 OF THE SECTIONAL APPENDIX) MANCHESTER D.G. JONES 06 DECEMBER 2003 OPERATIONS & SAFETY MANAGER TEL: 0161 228 8623 ) Page G1 6 December 2003 NETWORK RAIL NORTH W EST SECTIONAL APPENDIX INTRODUCTION The Network Rail North Wes t Sectional Appendix (Sectional Appendix) consists of the following sections: 1. G en er al Inst ruct ions a n d Inst ruct ions relat in g t o t h e Sp ecifi ed Operating Publications. This section is divided into the following parts: • An explanation of the meaning of the terms and symbols used in Tables A, B and D of this publication. • General instructions and instructions relating t o specified operating publications (the General Section) applicable across Network Rail North West Region. (Note that the specified operating publications are listed in the Catalogue of Railway Group Standards.) • Indexes of line headings and locations, e.g signal boxes, shown in this publication. 2. Geographical Sections. The geographical sections are numbered 1 to 10 and each section contains the following parts: • A general map of the geographical area covered, with the Table A page numbers of the key routes identified. • An index of the lines included in the section. • Tables A, B and D for the lines included in the section. • Location specific instructions, (Local Instructions).