DOCSLIB.ORG

Protected Areas 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protected Areas 3 River Basin Management Plan North West River Basin District Annex D: Protected area objectives Contents D.1 Introduction 2 D.2 Types and location of protected areas 3 D.3 Monitoring network 12 D.4 Objectives 19 D.5 Compliance (results of monitoring) including actions (measures) 22 for Surface Water Drinking Water Protected Areas and Natura 2000 Protected Areas D.6 Other information 172 D.1 Introduction The Water Framework Directive specifies that areas requiring special protection under other EC Directives and waters used for the abstraction of drinking water are identified as protected areas. These areas have their own objectives and standards. Article 4 of the Water Framework Directive requires Member States to achieve compliance with the standards and objectives set for each protected area by 22 December 2015, unless otherwise specified in the Community legislation under which the protected area was established. Some areas may require special protection under more than one EC Directive or may have additional (surface water and/or groundwater) objectives. In these cases, all the objectives and standards must be met. Article 6 requires Member States to establish a register of protected areas. The types of protected areas that must be included in the register are: • areas designated for the abstraction of water for human consumption (Drinking Water Protected Areas); • areas designated for the protection of economically significant aquatic species (Freshwater Fish and Shellfish); • bodies of water designated as recreational waters, including areas designated as Bathing Waters; • nutrient-sensitive areas, including areas identified as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones under the Nitrates Directive or areas designated as sensitive under Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD); • areas designated for the protection of habitats or species where the maintenance or improvement of the status of water is an important factor in their protection including 1 relevant Natura 2000 sites. 1 The relevant Natura 2000 sites include water dependent Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Special Protection Areas for Birds (SPAs) identified in accordance with Article 6 of the Water Framework Directive, using the list of qualifying Natura features in Guidance on the Identification of Natura Protected Areas (UKTAG, 2003). These are referred to in this plan as ‘Natura 2000 Protected Areas’. Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District Annex D: Protected areas December 2009 2 You can find the register of protected areas at http://www.environment- agency.gov.uk/research/planning/33346.aspx. The register was first published in 2004 and has been updated for this plan. This Annex describes the objectives for each Water Framework Directive protected area and assesses compliance with them. Many Water Framework Directive protected areas are also water bodies; and for these, the protected area objectives apply in addition to the requirement to achieve the water body status objectives, which are set out in Annex B. Where protected areas coincide with water bodies, this is indicated in the water body tables in Annex B. It is important to note that water body status objectives in Annex B will not always be the same as the protected area objectives in this Annex even where the element is the same, for example phosphate. This can be for a number of reasons, for example the size and scale of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive may be larger than waters identified as protected areas; or the use of a particular environmental standard or condition varies under the different parent legislations governing the protected area from that of the Water Framework Directive - and so, the achievement of objectives in one is not always comparable with the other. Where water body boundaries overlap with protected areas, the most stringent objective applies – that is the requirements of one particular EC Directive should not undermine the requirements of another. Where possible, the predicted outcomes for each water body set out in Annex B have taken into account the actions 2 that will be carried out to achieve protected area objectives. Annex C describes the actions needed to achieve and maintain compliance with one or more protected area standards or objectives. Actions identified for relevant Surface Water Drinking Water Protected Areas and Natura 2000 Protected Areas are also described in more detail in this Annex. Annex E describes the actions appraisal and justifications for alternative objectives for water bodies. The appraisal of and justification for alternative objectives set for Surface Water Drinking Water Protected Areas and Natura 2000 Protected Areas are located in this Annex. For Surface Water Drinking Water Protected Areas, this Annex also includes reference to the relevant decision tree in Annex E. D.2 Types and location of protected areas In the North West River Basin District there are: 156 Drinking Water Protected Areas (DrWPAs); 830 Freshwater Fish Waters; 9 Shellfish Waters; 34 Bathing Waters; 16 UWWTD Sensitive Areas; 20 water dependent Special Areas of Conservation (SAC); 7 water dependent Special Protection Areas (SPAs). In addition, 46 % of the land area of the North West River Basin District has been identified as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZs) (NVZs subject to appeals). 2 This term is widely used in the River Basin Management Plans and is also known as measures in the Water Framework Directive. Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District Annex D: Protected areas December 2009 3 The locations of these protected areas are shown in figures: D.1-D.3 Drinking Waters – DrWPAs D.4 Economically significant species – Freshwater Fish & Shellfish Waters D.5 Recreational waters – Bathing Waters D.6 Nutrient sensitive areas – Nitrate Vulnerable Zones & UWWTD Sensitive Areas (NVZs subject to appeals) D.7 Conservation sites – Natura 2000 Protected Areas (water dependent SACs & SPAs) Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District Annex D: Protected areas December 2009 4 Figure D.1 Location of drinking waters – DrWPA (groundwater and surface water) © Environment Agency copyright and / or database right 2009. All rights reserved. This map includes data supplied under licence from: © Crown Copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey licence number 100026380 and BGS © NERC 2009. Some river features of this map are based on digital spatial data licensed from the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, © CEH. Licence number 198 version 2. Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District Annex D: Protected areas December 2009 5 Figure D.2 Location of groundwater DrWPAs including safeguard zones © Environment Agency copyright and / or database right 2009. All rights reserved. This map includes data supplied under licence from: © Crown Copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey licence number 100026380 and BGS © NERC 2009. Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District Annex D: Protected areas December 2009 6 Figure D.3 Location of surface water DrWPAs including safeguard zones © Environment Agency copyright and / or database right 2009. All rights reserved. This map includes data supplied under licence from: © Crown Copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey licence number 100026380. Some river features of this map are based on digital spatial data licensed from the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, © CEH. Licence number 198 version 2. Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District Annex D: Protected areas December 2009 7 Figure D.4 Location of economically significant species – Freshwater Fish & Shellfish Waters © Environment Agency copyright and / or database right 2009. All rights reserved. This map includes data supplied under licence from: © Crown Copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey licence number 100026380. Some river features of this map are based on digital spatial data licensed from the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, © CEH. Licence number 198 version 2. Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District Annex D: Protected areas December 2009 8 Figure D.5 Location of recreational waters – Bathing Waters © Environment Agency copyright and / or database right 2009. All rights reserved. This map includes data supplied under licence from: © Crown Copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey licence number 100026380. Some river features of this map are based on digital spatial data licensed from the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, © CEH. Licence number 198 version 2. Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District Annex D: Protected areas December 2009 9 Figure D.6 Location of nutrient sensitive areas – Nitrate Vulnerable Zones & UWWTD Sensitive Areas (NVZs subject to appeals) © Environment Agency copyright and / or database right 2009. All rights reserved. This map includes data supplied under licence from: © Crown Copyright and database right 2009. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey licence number 100026380 and BGS © NERC 2009. Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District Annex D: Protected areas December 2009 10 Figure D.7 Location of conservation sites – Natura 2000 Protected Areas (water dependent SACs & SPAs)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electoral Review of Salford City Council
    Electoral review of Salford City Council Response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s consultation on Warding Patterns August 2018 1 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Salford in 2018 has changed dramatically since the city’s previous electoral review of 2002. Salford has seen a turnaround in its fortunes over recent years, reversing decades of population decline and securing high levels of investment. The city is now delivering high levels of growth, in both new housing and new jobs, and is helping to drive forward both Salford’s and the Greater Manchester economies. 1.2 The election of the Greater Manchester Mayor and increased devolution of responsibilities to Greater Manchester, and the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, is fundamentally changing the way Salford City Council works in areas of economic development, transport, work and skills, planning, policing and more recently health and social care. 1.3 Salford’s directly elected City Mayor has galvanised the city around eight core priorities – the Great Eight. Delivering against these core priorities will require the sustained commitment and partnership between councillors, partners in the private, public, community and voluntary and social enterprise sectors, and the city’s residents. This is even more the case in the light of ongoing national policy changes, the impending departure of the UK from the EU, and continued austerity in funding for vital local services. The city’s councillors will have an absolutely central role in delivering against these core priorities, working with all our partners and residents to harness the energies and talents of all of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 0661 EIA Vol 6 Appendix 7 1 Prelimina
    Haweswater Aqueduct Resilience Programme - Proposed Marl Hill Section Volume 6 Proposed Ribble Crossing Appendix 7.1: Preliminary Water Environmental Regulations Compliance Assessment June 2021 Volume 6 P ro posed Rib ble C rossin g Appe ndix 7.1: Prelimin ary Wate r E nviro nment al R egul atio ns Comp liance Assessment United U tilities Wate r Limite d Volume 6 Proposed Ribble Crossing Appendix 7.1: Preliminary Water Environmental Regulations Compliance Assessment Haweswater Aqueduct Resilience Programme - Proposed Marl Hill Section Project No: B27070CT Document Title: Volume 6 Proposed Ribble Crossing Appendix 7.1: Preliminary Water Environmental Regulations Compliance Assessment Document Ref.: RVBC-MH-RC-TA-007-001 Revision: 0 Date: June 2021 Client Name: United Utilities Water Ltd Jacobs U.K. Limited 5 First Street Manchester M15 4GU United Kingdom T: +44 (0)161 235 6000 F: +44 (0)161 235 6001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2021 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. i Volume 6 Proposed Ribble Crossing Appendix 7.1: Preliminary Water Environmental Regulations Compliance Assessment Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the North West Heritage Tourism Programme August 2008
    Evaluation of the North West Heritage Tourism Programme August 2008 Prepared for Culture Northwest By Mulrany, Church Road, Lilleshall, Shropshire, TF10 9HJ [email protected] | 01952 604000 | 07973 337684 ‘each region, province, and country possess a common natural, built, human and non physical heritage which collectively it has to learn to recognise, appreciate, preserve and share’ François Le Blanc 1993 Tourism “the activities of persons travelling to and staying in places outside their usual environment for not more than one consecutive year for leisure, business and other purposes not related to the exercise of an activity remunerated from within the place visited” World Tourism Organisation and UN CONTENTS Page GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS………………………………………………………….(i) 1 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND ......................................1 1.1 The Heritage Tourism Programme...........................................................................1 1.2 Background to the Project........................................................................................1 1.3 Heritage and the Region ..........................................................................................3 1.4 The Purpose of the Evaluation.................................................................................3 1.5 The Heritage Tourism Programme in Detail.............................................................3 1.6 Summary .................................................................................................................5 2 METHODOLOGY
    [Show full text]
  • North West Water Authority
    South Lancashire Fisheries Advisory Committee 30th June, 1976. Item Type monograph Publisher North West Water Authority Download date 29/09/2021 05:33:45 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/27037 North W est Water Authority Dawson House, Great Sankey Warrington WA5 3LW Telephone Penketh 4321 23rd June, 1976. TO: Members of the South Lancashire Fisheries Advisory Committee. (Messrs. R.D. Houghton (Chairman); T.A.F. Barnes; T.A. Blackledge; R. Farrington; J. Johnson; R.H. Wiseman; Dr. R.B. Broughton; Professor W.E. Kershaw; and the Chairman of the Authority (P.J. Liddell); The Vice-Chairman of the Authority (J.A. Foster); and the Chairman of the Regional Fisheries Advisory Committee (J.R.S. Watson)(ex officio). Dear Sir, A meeting of the SOUTH LANCASHIRE FISHERIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE will be held at 2.30 p.m. on WEDNESDAY 30TH JUNE, 1976, at the LANCASHIRE AREA OFFICE OF THE RIVERS DIVISION, 48 WEST CLIFF, PRESTON for the consideration of the following business. Yours faithfully, G.W. SHAW, Director of Administration. AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence. 2. Minutes of the last meeting (previously circulated). 3. Mitton Fishery. 4. Fisheries in the ownership of the Authority. 5. Report by Area Fisheries Officer on Fisheries Activities. 6. Pollution of Trawden Water and Colne Water - Bairdtex Ltd. 7. Seminar on water conditions dangerous to fish life. 8. Calendar of meetings 1976/77. 9. Any other business. 3 NORTH WEST WATER AUTHORITY SOUTH LANCASHIRE FISHERIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE 30TH JUNE, 1976 MITTON FISHERY 1. At the last meeting of the Regional Committee on 3rd May, a report was submitted regarding the claim of the Trustees of Stonyhurst College to the ownership of the whole of the bed of the Rivers Hodder find Ribble, insofar as the same are co- extensive with the former Manor of Aighton.
    [Show full text]
  • New Additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives
    Cumbria Archive Service CATALOGUE: new additions August 2021 Carlisle Archive Centre The list below comprises additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives from 1 January - 31 July 2021. Ref_No Title Description Date BRA British Records Association Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Moor, yeoman to Ranald Whitfield the son and heir of John Conveyance of messuage and Whitfield of Standerholm, Alston BRA/1/2/1 tenement at Clargill, Alston 7 Feb 1579 Moor, gent. Consideration £21 for Moor a messuage and tenement at Clargill currently in the holding of Thomas Archer Thomas Archer of Alston Moor, yeoman to Nicholas Whitfield of Clargill, Alston Moor, consideration £36 13s 4d for a 20 June BRA/1/2/2 Conveyance of a lease messuage and tenement at 1580 Clargill, rent 10s, which Thomas Archer lately had of the grant of Cuthbert Baynbrigg by a deed dated 22 May 1556 Ranold Whitfield son and heir of John Whitfield of Ranaldholme, Cumberland to William Moore of Heshewell, Northumberland, yeoman. Recites obligation Conveyance of messuage and between John Whitfield and one 16 June BRA/1/2/3 tenement at Clargill, customary William Whitfield of the City of 1587 rent 10s Durham, draper unto the said William Moore dated 13 Feb 1579 for his messuage and tenement, yearly rent 10s at Clargill late in the occupation of Nicholas Whitfield Thomas Moore of Clargill, Alston Moor, yeoman to Thomas Stevenson and John Stevenson of Corby Gates, yeoman. Recites Feb 1578 Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Conveyance of messuage and BRA/1/2/4 Moor, yeoman bargained and sold 1 Jun 1616 tenement at Clargill to Raynold Whitfield son of John Whitfield of Randelholme, gent.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Assessment (November 2020)
    November 2020 5020/R/006/01 Horwich Moor Farm Habitat Assessment Permit Application Prepared for: Booth Ventures Limited Booth Ventures Limited Habitat Assessment Horwich Moor Farm Habitat Assessment Permit Application November 2020 Carried Out For: Prepared By: Harwood Quarry Bold Business Centre Brookfold Lane Bold Lane Harwood Sutton Bolton St. Helens BL2 4LT WA9 4TX Telephone: 01925 291111 Horwich Moor Farm Recovery Activity Habitat Assessment DOCUMENT INFORMATION AND CONTROL SHEET Document Status and Approval Schedule Report No. Title 5020/R/006/01 Horwich Moor Farm: Habitat Assessment Issue History Issue Status Date Contributors Signature Date Prepared By: November C Finney 2020 Issued to November Checked By: November 1 EA 2020 C Finney 2020 Approved by: November P Roberts 2020 DISCLAIMER This consultancy contract was completed by TerraConsult Ltd on the basis of a defined programme and scope of works and terms and conditions agreed with the client. This report was compiled with all reasonable skill, and care, bearing in mind the project objectives, the agreed scope of works, the prevailing site conditions, the budget, the degree of manpower and resources allocated to the project as agreed. TerraConsult Ltd cannot accept responsibility to any parties whatsoever, following the issue of this report, for any matters arising which may be considered outwith the agreed scope of works. This report is issued solely to the client and TerraConsult cannot accept any responsibility to any third parties to whom this report may be circulated, in part or in full, and any such parties rely on the contents at their own risk. November 2020 5020/R/006/01 Horwich Moor Farm Recovery Activity Habitat Assessment CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Fisheries Statistics 1985
    DIRECTORATE OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING. SUMMARY OF FISHERIES STATISTICS 1985. ISSN 0144-9141 SUMMARY OF FISHERIES STATISTICS, 1985 CONTENTS 1. Catch Statistics 1.1 Rod and line catches (from licence returns) 1.1.1 Salmon 1.1.2 Migratory Trout 1.2 Commercial catches 1.2.1 Salmon 1.2.2 Migratory Trout 2. Fish Culture and Hatchery Operations 2.1 Brood fish collection 2.2 Hatchery operations and salmon and sea trout stocking 2.2.1 Holmwrangle Hatchery 2.2.1.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.1.2 Salmon and sea trout planting 2.2.2 Middleton Hatchery 2.2.2.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.2.2 Salmon, and sea trout planting 2.2.3 Langcliffe Hatchery 2.2.3.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.3.2 Salmon and sea trout planting - 1 - 3. Restocking with Trout and Freshwater Fish 3.1 Non-migratory trout 3.1.1 Stocking by Angling Associations etc., and Fish Farms 3.1.2 Stocking by NWWA 3.1.2.1 North Cumbria 3.1.2.2 South Cumbria/North Lancashire 3.1.2.3 South Lancashire 3.1.2.4 Mersey and Weaver 3.2 Freshwater Fish 3.2.1 Stocking by Angling Associations, etc 3.2.2 Fish transfers carried out by N.W.W.A. 3.2.2.1 Northern Area 3.2.2.2 Southern Area - South Lancashire 3.2.2.3 Southern Area - Mersey and Weaver 4. Fish Movement Recorded at Authority Fish Counters 4.1 River Lune 4.2 River Kent 4.3 River Leven 4.4 River Duddon 4.5 River Ribble Catchment 4.6 River Wyre 4.7 River Derwent 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Restocking with Salmon, Trout and Freshwater Fish 80
    North West fisheries report 2002 Item Type monograph Publisher Environment Agency North West Download date 07/10/2021 13:25:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/24896 I www.environment-agency.gov.uk • North West Fisheries Report 2002 Published by: Environment Agency Richard Fairclough House Knutsford Road Warrington WA4 1HG Tel: 01925 653999 Fax: 01925 415961 ISBN: 1844322076 © Environment Agency All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any other means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Environment Agency. NORTH WEST FISHERIES REPORT 2002 Contents Page Note on organisational changes 2 North West Region Fisheries and Recreation staff 3 Regional Fisheries Ecology, Recreation Advisory Committee 5 Consultative association contacts 6 Introduction 7 North Area Annual Report for 2002 Team report: South-West Cumbria 8 Team report: Eden 12 Team report: West Cumbria 14 Projects 15 Central Area Annual Report for 2002 Team reports 17 Projects 20 Survey reports 28 South Area annual report for 2002 Team reports 34 Survey reports 39 Projects 42 Note on Organisational Changes In the past year the Environment Agency has undergone major organisational changes. The area teams were previously organised in relation to work areas, e.g. we had an Area Fisheries Ecology and Recreation Manager, and a Fisheries team in each of our area offices. Since October 1, 2002 the old 'functional' structure has gone and the work is now split along geographic lines. The three areas now have two or more Environment Managers who are responsible for delivery of all Agency work (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Colne Park High School
    Admissions Policy 2020 – 2021 13510 Colne Park High School This is an academy school. Venables Avenue 11-16 Mixed Colne Head: Dr P Parkin BB8 7DP Number on Roll:1041 Oct 2018 01282 865200 Admission Number: 215 Admission number for September 2020: 215 SUMMARY OF POLICY Colne Park High is a school serving its local community. This is reflected in its admissions policy. Children will be admitted to the school in the following priority order: a. Looked after children and previously looked after children, then b. Children who have exceptionally strong medical, social or welfare reasons for admission associated with the child and/or family which are directly relevant to the school concerned, then c. Children living in the school's geographical priority area who will have a sibling (1)* in attendance at the school at the time of transfer, then d. Children who have attended for the whole of Year 5 in a primary school that is part of The PENNiNE Trust before the closing date for application, then e. Children of current employees of the school who have had a permanent contract for at least two years prior to the admissions deadline or with immediate effect if the member of staff is recruited to fill a post for which there is a demonstrable skills shortage, then f. Children living within the school's geographical priority area (2)*, then g. Children living outside of the school's geographical priority area who will have a sibling in attendance at the school at the time of transfer, then h. Children living outside of the school's geographical priority area.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Baseline Report PDF 642 KB
    July 2013 Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report – Environmental Baseline Report 1 Local Flood Risk Management Strategy SEA Environmental Baseline The collection and review of baseline information is a crucial part of the SEA process. It is essential to gather sufficient baseline information on the current and likely future state of the environment in order to be able to adequately predict and assess the significant effects of a plan. The data collected to characterise the evidence base for the SEA of the strategy has been derived from numerous secondary sources and no new investigations or surveys have been undertaken as part of the scoping process. The information presented in this Scoping Report represents an outline of the evidence base by environmental topics. It may be necessary to collect further data against which to assess the potential environmental effects of the LFRMS with regard to monitoring requirements. 2 1 Introduction 1.1 The Borough of Bury is located in the North West of England, situated within the Greater Manchester metropolitan area. As an integral part of Greater Manchester, Bury has an important role to play in accommodating the spatial priorities for the North West region. Bury also has strong links with parts of Lancashire located, towards the north, via the M66 corridor and Irwell Valley. Bury is bounded to the south by the authorities of Manchester and Salford, to the east by Rochdale, to the west by Bolton and to the north by Rossendale and Blackburn and Darwen. 1.2 Bury benefits from good transport links with the rest of Greater Manchester and beyond, which has led to the Borough’s attractiveness as a commuter area.
    [Show full text]
  • A6 Corridor Study Final Report Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
    A6 Corridor Study Final Report Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council August 2014 A6 Corridor Study Final Report Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for use in relation to the A6 Corridor Study. Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 202 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5115815 Document ref: Final Report Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.1 Draft - Client comment AB PB GR GR 14/12/12 Rev 1.2 Draft - Client comment GR AB NM NM 26/2/13 Rev 1.3 Draft - Client comment GR AB NM NM 26/6/13 Rev 1.4 Draft - Client comment GR AB NM NM 31/7/13 Final Draft – Client Rev 1.5 GR NM NM NM 20/12/13 comment Rev 1.6 Final Draft GR NM NM NM 20/02/14 Rev 2.0 Final GR NM NM NM 04/07/14 Rev 2.1 Final GR NM NM NM 31/07/14 Rev 2.2 Final GR NM NM NM 13/08/14 Atkins Final Report | Version 2.2 | August 2014 | 5115815 A6 Corridor Study Final Report Table of contents Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 4 Study Brief 4 Background to Commission 4 2. Setting the Context for an A6 Corridor Transport Strategy 6 SEMMMS 6 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road 7 A6MARR Traffic Model 7 Traffic Growth/ A6MARR Scheme Impact 9 Existing Traffic Conditions 12 Understanding Travel Demands 23 3.
    [Show full text]
  • (X0.95) As "Modern," Both Val- Ues Treated As Constants, with AD 1950 As the Reference Year
    [RADIOCARBON, VOL 29, No. 1, 1987, P 78-99] HARWELL RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS V A J WALKER, R S KEYZOR*, and R L OTLET Isotope Measurements Laboratory, Nuclear Applications Centre, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell, Oxfordshire, OXl l ORA, UK INTRODUCTION The results presented in this list include some recently measured sam- ples (1984) but mostly ones from our earlier years of operation which had not been previously published in RADIOCARBON. It is the first of a number of special lists prepared over the last year so that the backlog of unpub- lished dates of this laboratory will be cleared. The samples are all archaeo- logic from the United Kingdom most of which have originated from "res- cue"-type excavations. As in previous lists, all samples were measured by liquid scintillation counting (Otlet & Warchal,1978), and the error term quoted is the 10r stan- dard deviation estimate of the full replicate sample reproducibility (Otlet, 1979). The list was produced semi-automatically from the Harwell data base stored on the main frame computer using the procedures described in Otlet and Walker (1983). Calculations are based on the Libby half-life of 5568 years, using NBS oxalic acid standard (x0.95) as "modern," both val- ues treated as constants, with AD 1950 as the reference year. All results are corrected for fractionation according to the quoted b13C (wrt PDB) values measured in this laboratory. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to acknowledge the work of our colleagues, G A Bradburn and D G Humphreys, with the laboratory measurements and of E F Westall, S E Hasler, and M Gibson with the preparation of the data in computer readable form.
    [Show full text]