DOCSLIB.ORG

Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Greenways Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Greenways Plan NOORTHWESTRTHWEST PEENNSYLVANIANNSYLVANIA GRREENWAYSEENWAYS PLLANAN CClarionlarion CountyCounty CrawfordCrawford CountyCounty ErieErie CountyCounty ForestForest CountyCounty LLawrenceawrence CCountyounty MercerMercer CountyCounty VenangoVenango CountyCounty WarrenWarren CountyCounty DDCNRCNR PProjectroject NNo.o. BBRC-12.5.2RC-12.5.2 This project was funded in part by a grant from the Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation Fund under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, and, by a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. Pashek Associates May 29, 2009 AAcknowledgementscknowledgements Northwest Pennsylvania Greenways Steering Committee Mr. Matt Gilara Northwest Commission A special thanks go to all of the citizens of Northwest Ms. Twila Rifenberrick Clarion County Planning Department Pennsylvania for their Mr. Jack Lynch Crawford County Planning Offi ce enthusiasm and input Ms. Marissa Gerkey Crawford County Planning Offi ce (alternate) during this study. Also, the Mr. Jake Welsh Erie County Department of Planning Mr. John Morgan Erie County Department of Planning (alternate) contribution and input of the Mr. Doug Carlson Forest County Planning Commission following individuals were Ms. Amy McKinney Lawrence County Planning Department important to the successful Mr. Frank Gingras Lawrence County Planning Department (alternate) development of this plan: Mr. Dan Gracenin Mercer County Regional Planning Commission Ms. Judy Downs Venango County Regional Planning Commission Mr. Dan Glotz Warren County Planning and Zoning Ms. Doniele Andrus Beaver County & Lawrence County Shared Greenways and Environmental Planner Ms. Debra Frawley Oil Region Greenways and Open Space Coordinator Northwest Pennsylvania Ms. Marilyn Black Oil Region Alliance of Business, Industry, and Regional Planning and Tourism Mr. Tim Bruno PA DEP - Northwest Regional Offi ce Development Commission Mr. Kim McCullough PA DCNR - Bureau of Recreation and Conservation Ms. Denise McCloskey, Executive Ms. Julia Eagles Erie - Western Pennsylvania Port Authority Director Mr. Gary Frank PA DCNR - Bureau of Forestry Ms. Cecile Stelter PA DCNR - Cornplanter State Forest Mr. W. Randy Rice, Director Mr. Jim Holden Allegheny Valley Trail Association of Community Development & Mr. Dennis Miller PA DCNR - Pymatuning State Park Planning Mr. Andy Walker Pennsylvania Environmental Council Mr. Denny Puko PA DCED Mr. Matt Gilara, Project Manager Mr. Ron Steffey Allegheny Valley Land Trust Ms. Jan Beichner Venango County Commissioner Mr. Jerry Schill Titusville Area Chamber of Commerce Ms. Erin Wiley Moyers PennDOT Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Ms. Diane Kripas, Chief, Greenways and Conservation Partnerships Mr. Alex MacDonald, Greenways and Conservation Partnerships Ms. Kim McCullough, Regional Parks and Recreation Advisor Pennsylvania Department of Transportation District 1-0 Ms. Erin Wiley Moyers, Transportation Planning Specialist This project was funded in part by a grant from the Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation Fund under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, and, by a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. NORTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA REGION Greenways Plan including Clarion County Crawford County Erie County Forest County Lawrence County Mercer County Venango County Warren County Prepared for: Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission 395 Seneca Street P.O. Box 1127 Oil City, PA 16301 814-677-4800 By: Pashek Associates, Ltd. 619 East Ohio Street Pittsburgh, PA 15212 (412) 321-6362 May 29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Planning Efforts ............................................................................................................ 4 What is a Greenway? ................................................................................................................... 7 Why a Greenways Plan for Northwest Pennsylvania? ................................................................ 8 Preserving Northwest Pennsylvania’s Defining Characteristics ......................................... 8 Tourism and Ecotourism ............................................................................................... 9 Hunting and Fishing ...................................................................................................... 9 Boating ........................................................................................................................ 10 Wildlife Watching ....................................................................................................... 10 Economic Benefits of Greenways ..................................................................................... 11 Transportation Benefits ............................................................................................... 13 Recreation Benefits ..................................................................................................... 13 Health and Wellness Benefits ..................................................................................... 14 Ecological Benefits ..................................................................................................... 15 Educational Benefits ................................................................................................... 16 Protecting Pennsylvania’s Rural Legacy ........................................................................... 16 Economic Benefits of Natural Systems Greenways .......................................................... 17 Conserving Priority Habitats ............................................................................................. 17 Sound Land Use and Sustainable Growth ......................................................................... 17 How is a Greenways Plan Developed? ...................................................................................... 19 Three – Step Process ......................................................................................................... 19 Public Participation ........................................................................................................... 19 Purpose of the Greenways Plan ......................................................................................... 20 Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................................... 20 The Greenways Plan as a Decision Making Tool.............................................................. 21 HOW DO WE GET THERE? ............................................................................................. 22 Plan Organization ....................................................................................................................... 23 Management Structure ............................................................................................................... 24 The Vision for Northwest Pennsylvania’s Greenways .............................................................. 36 The Structure of the Network .................................................................................................... 36 Proposed Natural System Greenways ........................................................................................ 36 The Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 37 Natural Infrastructure Building Blocks ....................................................................... 37 The Process ....................................................................................................................... 45 The Results ........................................................................................................................ 45 Proposed Vital Priority Natural Systems Greenway Corridors................................... 46 Proposed Exceptional Priority Natural Systems Greenway Corridors ....................... 49 Proposed Significant Priority Natural Systems Greenway Corridors ......................... 59 Proposed High Priority Natural Systems Greenway Corridors .................................. 67 Discussion Regarding Forest Resources ........................................................................... 75 Fossil Fuel Extraction and Renewable Energy .................................................................. 76 Natural Systems Greenway Corridors and County Natural Heritage Inventory Planning Interrelation...................................................................................... 77 Map: Northwest Pennsylvania Greenways ................................................................................ 81 Summary Tables: Proposed Recreation and Transportation Trails, Water Trails & Trail Towns ........................................................................................... 83 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary Tables: Proposed Natural Systems Greenway Corridors ......................................... 84 Recreation and Transportation Greenways ................................................................................ 85 The Process ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parks and Open Space Plan (PDF)
    February 2010 BRC-TAG-12-5-23 The contributions of the following agencies, groups, and individuals were vital to the successful development of this Comprehensive Recreation, Parks, and Open Space Plan. They are commended for their interest in the project and for the input they provided throughout the planning process. Venango County Commissioners Timothy S. Brooks, Chair Troy A. Wood, Vice-Chair Janet D. Beichner Venango County Regional Planning Commission Judith Downs, Executive Director Project Study Committee Marilyn Black, Oil Region Alliance, Heritage Development, Vice President Judy Downs, Venango County Regional Planning Commission, Executive Director Jacob Weiland, Oil Creek State Park, Park Manager Deb Frawley, Council on Greenways and Trails Mike Henderson, Oil Region Alliance, Project Manager Jim Holden, Allegheny Valley Trails Association, President Debb Kapp, Venango County Regional Planning Commission Steve Kosak, Charitable Trust, Consultant Lori Sloss, UMPC – Employee Health Cecile Stelter, DCNR – Dept. of Forestry, District Forester David Strickland, Two Mile Run Park Advisory Board Richard Mahalic, Two Mile Run Park Director This project was fi nanced, in part, by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program, Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation Fund, under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Additional funding was provided by: • Oil Region Alliance of Business, Industry, and Tourism • Edith C. Justus
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020
    2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020 Tom Wolf Governor Yassmin Gramian, P.E. Secretary, PA Department of Transportation Chairperson, State Transportation Commission Larry S. Shifflet Deputy Secretary for Planning State Transportation Commission 2021 12-Year Program ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The Pennsylvania State Transportation Commission (STC) serves as the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s (PennDOT) board of directors. The 15 member board evaluates the condition and performance of Pennsylvania’s transportation system and assesses the resources required to maintain, improve, and expand transportation facilities and services. State Law requires PennDOT to update Pennsylvania’s 12-Year Transportation Program (TYP) every two years for submission to the STC for adoption. PAGE i www.TalkPATransportation.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION....i THE 12-YEAR PROGRAM PROCESS............................................................9 Planning and Prioritizing Projects.....................................................9 TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................................ii Transportation Program Review and Approval...............................10 From Planning to Projects...............................................................11 50TH ANNIVERSARY........................................................................................1 TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.............................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Open Space Plan Appendix (PDF)
    February 2010 VENANGO COUNTY - PUBLIC RECREATIONAL RESOURCES BY PLANNING UNIT g PLANNING UNIT MUNICIPALITY FACILITY Picnic Pavilion Concession Stand Baseball Field Softball Field Box Press Batting Cage Tennis Court Basketball Court Miniature Golf Court Bocce Horse Shoe Court Playground Racquetball Court Skate Park Hockey Dek Trail Pond/Lake/River Center Nature/History Community Center Court Volleyball Volleyball Court-Sand Football Field Track Gazebo Maintenance Building Camping grounds Boat/Canoe Launch Ice Arena Pool Amphitheater Bandstand Field Soccer Neighborhood Park Acrea Community Park Acreage Other acreage Allegheny NORTHERN Township 00000000000000000000000000000000 Canal Township 00000000000000000000000000000000 Cherrytree Township Cherrytree Pavilion Park 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 Cooperstown Cooperstown Aluminum Borough Park 3 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.01 Cornplanter Township Pithole Historic Park 10000000000000010100000000000000 95 Jackson Township 00000000000000000000000000000000 Oakland Township Two Mile Run County Park 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 2,595 Oil Creek Township Drake Well Museum 10000000001000011100000010000000 173 Oil Creek Township Oil Creek State Park 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,294.70 Pine Grove Township Harvest Home Park 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.84 Pleasantville Borough Merrick Street Complex 01200100000100000000000010000000
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-45 Long Range Transportation Plan
    2020-45 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN ADOPTED JUNE 23, 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2 Northwest Pennsylvania Commission 2020-45 Long Range Transportation Plan Prepared for: Northwest Commission 395 Seneca Street P.O. Box 1127 Oil City, PA 16301 (814) 677-4800 http://northwestpa.org/transportation/ By: Michael Baker International 4431 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 213-2900 June 23, 2020 Our Regional Geographic Position The Northwest PA region includes a 5-county area located in the northwestern corner of Pennsylvania. It is one of the state’s smallest transportation planning regions by population, yet consists of nearly 3,600 square miles of land area (or an area roughly half the size of New Jersey). The region’s location just off the shores of Lake Erie also makes it an area with one of the harshest environments in the state. The region is situated within the winter snowbelt, and annually receives upwards of 100 inches of snowfall, along with 40-48 inches of rain. PennDOT typically spends anywhere from 100 to 150 days a year de-icing the region’s roadways. Geologically, the region is located within the broader Appalachian Plateau region, with deposits of glacial till that can run more than 200 feet deep. This environmental phenomenon can substantially drive up the costs of bridge maintenance and construction, just as much as the region’s freeze and thaw cycles can adversely affect roadway conditions. The region in general is very rural, with a population density of only 64 persons per square mile. In addition, significant portions of the region are quite remote and inaccessible, with limited access to the national Interstate system.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014
    PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014 What is Primitive Camping? Primitive camping is a simplistic style of camping. Campers hike, pedal or paddle to reach a location and spend the night without the presence of developed facilities. This primitive camping experience takes place off the beaten path, where piped water, restrooms and other amenities are not provided. You pack in all you need, exchanging a few conveniences for the solitude found in the back country setting. Fresh air, fewer people and out-of-the-way natural landscapes are some of the benefits of primitive camping. Once off the beaten path, however, additional advantages begin to surface such as a deeper awareness and greater appreciation of the outdoor world around you. Primitive camping also builds outdoor skills and fosters a gratifying sense of self-sufficiency. Where to Camp Pennsylvania has 2.2 million acres of state forest land with 2,500 miles of trails and 5,132 miles of Camping at rivers and streams winding through it. Hiking, biking and multi-use trails traverse most state forest districts and six districts have designated water trails that transect state forest land. Forest Districts State parks are not open to primitive camping. However, with the exception of William Penn State Forest, all state forest districts are open to this activity. Camping is not permitted in designated STATE FOREST DISTRICTS: natural areas or at vistas, trail heads, picnic areas and areas that are posted closed to camping. Bald Eagle State Forest (570) 922-3344 Contact a forest district office for specific information, maps and Camping Permits (if needed).
    [Show full text]
  • FALL FOLIAGE REPORT October 1 – October 7, 2020
    Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry PENNSYLVANIA WEEKLY FALL FOLIAGE REPORT October 1 – October 7, 2020 TIOGA CAMERON BRADFORD To predict peak season from the colors, use these guidelines: ➢ Dark Green/No Change= peak is three weeks to a month away ➢ Light Green/Starting to Change= peak is approximately two to three weeks away ➢ Yellow/Approaching Best Color= peak is approximately one week away ➢ Orange/Best Color= foliage is peaking this week ➢ Red/Starting to Fade= still some nice color but won’t last more than a few more days ➢ Brown/Past Peak= all or nearly all color is gone Statewide Fall Foliage Overview What a difference a week makes! Cold and frosty nights and very dry conditions have ushered in marked changes across the northern tier, where foliage is at its spectacular peak. Sugar and red maples are the stars of the show, contrasting beautifully with the still-green oak canopies. Another cold snap could jumpstart much of the Appalachian and Allegheny mountain regions, setting the table for back to back weeks of fantastic fall foliage viewing opportunities across wide swaths of the commonwealth. Northwestern Region The district manager in Cornplanter State Forest District (Warren, Erie counties) reports that cooler nights have spurred fall colors in northwest Pennsylvania. Many oaks are still quite green, but maples (sugar and red) are displaying brilliant colors. Aspen, hickory, and birch are continuing to color the landscape with warm yellow hues. Route 6 to Chapman State Park is a recommended fall foliage corridor in Warren County. Exciting fall color can be found at Chapman State Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources
    WATER RESOURCES Major Tributaries The French Creek watershed has ten major tributaries whose sub-basins cover at least 50 square miles (Figure 3). In addition, those major sub-basins can be broken down further into the Pennsylvania State Water Plan designated small watersheds (Figure 13). The PA portion of the main stem of French Creek is classified as a warm water fishery (WWF) by the PA Department of Environmental Protection’s Water Quality Standards (PA Title 25, Chapter 93). West Branch of French Creek The West Branch of French Creek originates in Chautauqua County, New York and flows southwest into Erie County, Pennsylvania before turning south. It joins French Creek from the right side (facing downstream), near Wattsburg, at river mile 84.42 and drains 77.7 square miles. It drains portions of Northeast, Greenfield, and Venango townships and Wattsburg Borough in Pennsylvania. The low gradient West Branch and all of its tributaries are classified as WWF. The West Branch sub-basin contains the most extensive wetlands, including rare fens, of any Pennsylvania headwater area. Although this sub-basin still contains blocks of contiguous forest and undeveloped riparian areas, it is beginning to see development pressure from the city of Erie and North East. Work by Dr. J. Stauffer, et al, Penn State University, and other historic records have documented 26 species of fish from the West Branch sub-basin (Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, 1992). These include the PA threatened mountain brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon greeleyi), and Ohio lamprey (Ichthyomyzon bdellium). According to surveys by WPC biologists, this stream also supports 13 freshwater mussel species, including a “viable population of the [former] federal candidate Epioblasma triqueta (snuffbox)” (Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 93, Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Ch. 93 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 25 CHAPTER 93. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 93.1. Definitions. 93.2. Scope. 93.3. Protected water uses. 93.4. Statewide water uses. ANTIDEGRADATION REQUIREMENTS 93.4a. Antidegradation. 93.4b. Qualifying as High Quality or Exceptional Value Waters. 93.4c. Implementation of antidegradation requirements. 93.4d. Processing of petitions, evaluations and assessments to change a designated use. 93.5. [Reserved]. WATER QUALITY CRITERIA 93.6. General water quality criteria. 93.7. Specific water quality criteria. 93.8. [Reserved]. 93.8a. Toxic substances. 93.8b. Metals criteria. 93.8c. Human health and aquatic life criteria for toxic substances. 93.8d. Development of site-specific water quality criteria. 93.8e. Special criteria for the Great Lakes System. DESIGNATED WATER USES AND WATER QUALITY CRITERIA 93.9. Designated water uses and water quality criteria. 93.9a. Drainage List A. 93.9b. Drainage List B. 93.9c. Drainage List C. 93.9d. Drainage List D. 93.9e. Drainage List E. 93.9f. Drainage List F. 93.9g. Drainage List G. 93.9h. Drainage List H. 93.9i. Drainage List I. 93.9j. Drainage List J. 93.9k. Drainage List K. 93.9l. Drainage List L.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Wilds
    PENNSYLVANIA WILDS OUTDOOR DISCOVERY ATLAS Ramm Road Vista, Lycoming County Lycoming Vista, Ramm Road I-80 Frontier Landscape I-80 Frontier Landscape Groundhog Day Celebration, Punxsutawney Celebration, Day Groundhog PA WILDS’ WELCOME MAT, FAST TRACK TO THE WILDS Whether you’re coming from the east, south or west, the I-80 Frontier is the quintessential welcome mat to the PA Wilds. With its proximity to Pennsylvania’s southern population centers of Philadelphia, Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, not to mention close by New York City and Cleveland on the western side, it’s easy to plan a trip for each season. Home to forested state parks and storied towns and places, any given exit off the interstate is a surefire way to find and explore the natural and hidden wonders of the region. Going from east to west, three I-80 Frontier towns – Williamsport, Lock Haven “The fastest way into The and Clearfield – all feature beautiful riverfront parks and walking paths on the Wilds is via Interstate 80, West Branch of the Susquehanna River. Roughly central to the 1-80 frontier is which parallels its Clearfield, where you can grab a bite to eat before heading south to Bilger’s rocks in the tiny borough of Grampian, where you’ll find towering boulders Millionaires’ Row, Williamsport Row, Millionaires’ southern reaches.” and rock formations set throughout the forest. Or stop off in Punxsutawney - Newsday and visit the world’s most famous weather-predicting groundhog, Phil! If you’re a New Yorker, Clevelander, Philadelphian, or Pittsburgher, a visit (or two) to the PA Wilds I-80 Frontier will undoubtedly change your perception on that long and winding interstate that welcomes you to your PA Wilds adventure.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-State Trails Initiative
    18 County Workshop Report PA/WV/OH DRAFT March 29, 2011 Tri-State Trails Initiative Tri-State Trails Initiative March 29, 2011 The National Park Service – River, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program Ohio and West Virginia Field Offices coordinated the Tri State Trail Workshop on Tuesday, March 29, 2011, from 12:30-5pm. The purpose of the meeting was to build upon efforts started in 2002 and continue to make connections across state lines, to work with multiple groups to update existing and proposed trail maps, identify gaps, communicate needs and concerns, share successes and challenges and continue local efforts as part of a larger system of linking trails. The focus was on trail corridors across three states and eighteen (18) counties bordering Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia. The counties included in Pennsylvania: Beaver, Crawford, Erie, Greene, Lawrence, Mercer, Washington; in Ohio: Ashtabula, Belmont, Columbiana, Jefferson, Mahoning, Monroe, Trumbull; and in West Virginia: Brooke, Hancock, Marshall, and Ohio. All types of trails were included in the discussion -- land and water trails, motorized and non-motorized trails. Within this report… Introductions notes – organizations represented and trail efforts Breakout groups - challenges, successes, key stakeholders, opportunities and next steps Combined challenges Combined next steps Plus/Delta of the workshop for future planning OrganizationsSpokesperson represented introduce groupsand contact represented information or absent but important 2 | Page Tri-State Trails Initiative March 29, 2011 Each county, from north to south was given five minutes to discuss what organizations are represented and briefly report on trail efforts. ASHTABULA (OH) Western Reserve Greenway is the northern end of Great Ohio Lake to River Greenway (GOLRG), and runs to the southern border to Trumbull and Mahoning.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017
    TOWN OF DEDHAM HERITAGE RAIL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY 2017 PLANNING DEPARTMENT + ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully recognize the Town of Dedham’s dedicated Planning and Environmental Department’s staff, including Richard McCarthy, Town Planner and Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator, each of whom helped to guide this feasibility study effort. Their commitment to the town and its open space system will yield positive benefits to all as they seek to evaluate projects like this potential rail trail. Special thanks to the many representatives of the Town of Dedham for their commitment to evaluate the feasibility of the Heritage Rail Trail. We also thank the many community members who came out for the public and private forums to express their concerns in person. The recommendations contained in the Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study represent our best professional judgment and expertise tempered by the unique perspectives of each of the participants to the process. Cheri Ruane, RLA Vice President Weston & Sampson June 2017 Special thanks to: Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator Richard McCarthy, Town Planner Residents of Dedham Friends of the Dedham Heritage Rail Trail Dedham Taxpayers for Responsible Spending Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Community Outreach and Public Process 3. Base Mapping and Existing Conditions 4. Rail Corridor Segments 5. Key Considerations 6. Preliminary Trail Alignment 7. Opinion of Probable Cost 8. Phasing and Implementation 9. Conclusion Page | 2 Introduction and Background Weston & Sampson was selected through a proposal process by the Town of Dedham to complete a Feasibility Study for a proposed Heritage Rail Trail in Dedham, Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]