DOCSLIB.ORG

The Many Lives of Supergravity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Many Lives of Supergravity CERN Courier January/February 2017 CERN Courier January/February 2017 Antimatter and gravity Supergravity at 40 H and H+ antihydrogen atoms to interact with a beam of photons, promising a sensitivity in the 10–6 range. porous target Ps e+ porous target The many lives of Cooling matter e+ Ps double laser pulse In the case of AEgIS, the defl ectometer principle that underpins accelerating laser pulse the measurement has already been demonstrated with matter Ps* electric field atoms and with antiprotons, while the time-of-fl ight measure- p ment is straightforward in the case of GBAR. The diffi culty for supergravity p H beam the experiments lies in preparing suffi cient numbers of antiatoms p + Ps → H + e– * * – at the required low velocities. ALPHA has already demonstrated p + Ps → H + e + – H + Ps → H + e trapping of several hundred antiatoms at a temperature below The production of antihydrogen in AEgIS (left) and GBAR (right) 0.5 K, corresponding to random velocities of the order 10 m/s. The is performed via the interaction of antiprotons with positronium antiatoms are formed by letting the antiprotons traverse a plasma (Ps). In AEgIS, a plasma of antiprotons at rest in a Penning trap of positrons located within the same Penning trap. is showered with excited positronium atoms, producing excited A different scheme is used in AEgIS and GBAR to form and antihydrogen atoms that are accelerated to form a beam. In possibly cool the antiatoms and anti-ions. In AEgIS, antiprotons GBAR, a dense positronium cloud is traversed by a beam of are cooled within a Penning trap and receive a shower of positro- antiprotons to produce antihydrogen atoms and ions. nium atoms (bound e+e– pairs) to form the antiatoms. These are then slightly accelerated by electric fi elds (which act on the atoms’ to test such quantum effects. Any difference would probably not induced electric-dipole moments) so that they exit the charged change anything in the observable universe, but it would point to particle trap axially in the form of a neutral beam. For GBAR, the the necessity of having a quantum theory of gravity. antiproton beam traverses a cloud of positronium to form the anti- AEgIS plans to measure the vertical deviation of a pulsed hori- ions, which are then cooled to a few μK by forcing them to interact zontal beam of cold antihydrogen atoms, generated by bringing with laser-cooled beryllium ions. laser-excited positronium moving at several km/s into contact with In this race towards low energies, ALPHA and AEgIS are located cold antiprotons, travelling with a velocity of a few hundred m/s. on the beam at the AD, which delivers 5 MeV antiprotons. While The resulting highly excited antihydrogen atoms are then acceler- AEgIS is already commissioning its dedicated gravity experiment, ated horizontally and a moiré defl ectometer used to measure the ALPHA will move from spectroscopy to gravity in the coming vertical deviation, which is expected to be a few microns given the months. GBAR, which will be the fi rst experiment to make use of approximately 1 m-long fl ight tube of AEgIS. Reaching the lowest the beam delivered by ELENA, is now beginning installation and possible antiproton temperature minimises the divergence of the expects fi rst attempts at anti-ion production in 2018. ELENA will beam and therefore maximises the fl ux of antihydrogen atoms that decelerate antiprotons coming from the AD from 5 MeV to just Forty years after theorists married general In the early 1970s, grand unifi ed theories (GUTs), based on larger end up on the downstream detector. 100 keV, making it more effi cient to trap and store antimatter. Fol- gauge symmetries that include the SM’s “SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1)” In GBAR, which takes advantage of advances in ion-cooling lowing commissioning fi rst with protons and then with hydrogen relativity with supersymmetry, supergravity structure, did unify colour and charge – thereby uniting the strong – techniques, antihydrogen ions (H+) are produced with veloci- ions, ELENA should receive its fi rst antiprotons in the middle of and electroweak interactions. However, they relied on a huge new continues to carve out new directions in the 16 ties of the order of 0.5 m/s. In a second step, the anti-ions will be 2017 (CERN Courier December 2016 p16). Along with precision energy scale (~10 GeV), just a few orders of magnitude below the stripped of one positron to give an ultra-slow neutral antiatom that tests of CPT invariance, this facility will help to ensure that any search for a unifi ed theory. Planck scale of gravity (~1019 GeV) and far above the electroweak is allowed to enter free fall. The time of free fall over a height of differences in the gravitational antics of antimatter are not missed. Fermi scale (~10 2 GeV), and on new particles carrying both colour 20 cm is as long as 200 ms, which is easily measurable. These num- and electroweak charges. As a result, GUTs made the stunning pre- bers cor respond to the gravitational acceleration known for matter Résumé The early 1970s was a pivotal period in the history of particle phys- diction that the proton might decay at detectable rates, which was atoms, and the expected sensitivity to small deviations is 1% in the L’antimatière tombe-t-elle vers le haut ? ics. Following the discovery of asymptotic freedom and the Brout– eventually excluded by underground experiments, and their two fi rst phase of operation. Englert–Higgs mechanism a few years earlier, it was the time when widely separated cut-off scales introduced a “hierarchy problem” The ALPHA-g experiment will release antihydrogen atoms Le principe d’équivalence est au centre de la théorie de la relativité the Standard Model (SM) of electroweak and strong interactions that called for some kind of stabilisation mechanism. from a vertical magnetic atom trap and record their positions générale ; selon ce principe, testé avec une précision toujours plus came into being. After decades of empirical verifi cation, the theory A possible solution came from a parallel but unrelated devel- when they annihilate on the walls of the experiment. In a proof- fi ne au cours des dernières décennies, toute la matière tombe à received a fi nal spectacular confi rmation with the discovery of the opment. In 1973, Julius Wess and Bruno Zumino unveiled a new of-principle experiment using the original ALPHA atom trap, the la même vitesse. Trois collaborations (ALPHA, AEgIS et GBAR) Higgs boson at CERN in 2012, and its formulation has also been symmetry of 4D quantum fi eld theory: supersymmetry, which acceleration of antihydrogen atoms by gravity was constrained préparent actuellement des expériences auprès du Décélérateur recognised by Nobel prizes awarded to theoretical physics in 1979, interchanges bosons and fermions and, as would be better appreci- to lie anywhere between –110 g and 65 g. ALPHA-g improves d’antiprotons du CERN afi n de vérifi er si ce principe est valable 1999, 2004 and 2013. ated later, can also conspire to stabilise scale hierarchies. Super- on this original demonstration by orienting the trap vertically, également pour l’antimatière, en mesurant la manière dont It was clear from the start, however, that the SM, a spontaneously symmetry was inspired by “dual resonance models”, an early thereby enabling better control of the antiatom release and les atomes d’antihydrogène tombent sous l’effet de la gravité. broken gauge theory, had two major shortcomings. First, it is not version of string theory pioneered by Gabriele Veneziano and improving sensitivity to the vertical annihilation position. In the Toute différence par rapport à des atomes d’hydrogène normal a truly unifi ed theory because the gluons of the strong (colour) extended by André Neveu, Pierre Ramond and John Schwarz. Ear- new arrangement, antihydrogen gravitation can be measured at suggérerait que des effets quantiques entrent en ligne de compte ; force and the photons of electromagnetism do not emerge from a lier work done in France by Jean-Loup Gervais and Benji Sakita, the 10% level, which would already settle the question of whether nous aurions alors besoin d’une théorie quantique de la gravité. common symmetry. Second, it leaves aside gravity, the other fun- and in the Soviet Union by Yuri Golfand and Evgeny Likhtman, antimatter falls up or down, but improvements in cooling tech- damental force of nature, which is based on the gauge principle of and by Dmitry Volkov and Vladimir Akulov, had anticipated some niques will allow measurements at the 1% level. A long-term Patrice Perez, CEA-Irfu Saclay, Michael Doser, CERN, and general co-ordinate transformations and is described by general of supersymmetry’s salient features. ▲ aspiration of the ALPHA-g project is to use techniques that cause William Bertsche, University of Manchester. relativity (GR). An exact supersymmetry would require the existence of 40 41 CERNCOURIER www. V OLUME 5 7 N UMBER 1 J AARYN U /F EBRUARY 2 0 1 7 CERN Courier January/February 2017 CERN Courier January/February 2017 Supergravity at 40 Supergravity at 40 fi eld of supersymmetry, just like the photon is the gauge fi eld of internal circle rotations. If one or more local supersymmetries electromagnetic N helicity content electroweak 3 (whose number will be denoted by N) accompany general co- 1 [(2), ( 2 ( ] ordinate transformations, they grant the consistency of gravitino weak GUTs ? 2 3 interactions. In a subclass of “pure” supergravity models, super- [(2), 2 ( 2 ( , (1)] strong symmetry also allows one to connect “marble” and “wood” and 3 1 3 [(2), 3 ( 2 ( , 3(1), ( 2 ( ] therefore goes well beyond the KK mechanism, which does not supersymmetry? SSMs ? SUSY GUTs ? 4 [(2), 4 ( 3 ( , 6(1), 4( 1 ( , 2(0)] link Bose and Fermi fi elds.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Future of Fundamental Physics
    The Future of Fundamental Physics Nima Arkani-Hamed Abstract: Fundamental physics began the twentieth century with the twin revolutions of relativity and quantum mechanics, and much of the second half of the century was devoted to the con- struction of a theoretical structure unifying these radical ideas. But this foundation has also led us to a number of paradoxes in our understanding of nature. Attempts to make sense of quantum mechanics and gravity at the smallest distance scales lead inexorably to the conclusion that space- Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/daed/article-pdf/141/3/53/1830482/daed_a_00161.pdf by guest on 23 September 2021 time is an approximate notion that must emerge from more primitive building blocks. Further- more, violent short-distance quantum fluctuations in the vacuum seem to make the existence of a macroscopic world wildly implausible, and yet we live comfortably in a huge universe. What, if anything, tames these fluctuations? Why is there a macroscopic universe? These are two of the central theoretical challenges of fundamental physics in the twenty-½rst century. In this essay, I describe the circle of ideas surrounding these questions, as well as some of the theoretical and experimental fronts on which they are being attacked. Ever since Newton realized that the same force of gravity pulling down on an apple is also responsible for keeping the moon orbiting the Earth, funda- mental physics has been driven by the program of uni½cation: the realization that seemingly disparate phenomena are in fact different aspects of the same underlying cause. By the mid-1800s, electricity and magnetism were seen as different aspects of elec- tromagnetism, and a seemingly unrelated phenom- enon–light–was understood to be the undulation of electric and magnetic ½elds.
    [Show full text]
  • Supergravity and Its Legacy Prelude and the Play
    Supergravity and its Legacy Prelude and the Play Sergio FERRARA (CERN – LNF INFN) Celebrating Supegravity at 40 CERN, June 24 2016 S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 1 Supergravity as carved on the Iconic Wall at the «Simons Center for Geometry and Physics», Stony Brook S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 2 Prelude S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 3 In the early 1970s I was a staff member at the Frascati National Laboratories of CNEN (then the National Nuclear Energy Agency), and with my colleagues Aurelio Grillo and Giorgio Parisi we were investigating, under the leadership of Raoul Gatto (later Professor at the University of Geneva) the consequences of the application of “Conformal Invariance” to Quantum Field Theory (QFT), stimulated by the ongoing Experiments at SLAC where an unexpected Bjorken Scaling was observed in inclusive electron- proton Cross sections, which was suggesting a larger space-time symmetry in processes dominated by short distance physics. In parallel with Alexander Polyakov, at the time in the Soviet Union, we formulated in those days Conformal invariant Operator Product Expansions (OPE) and proposed the “Conformal Bootstrap” as a non-perturbative approach to QFT. S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 4 Conformal Invariance, OPEs and Conformal Bootstrap has become again a fashionable subject in recent times, because of the introduction of efficient new methods to solve the “Bootstrap Equations” (Riccardo Rattazzi, Slava Rychkov, Erik Tonni, Alessandro Vichi), and mostly because of their role in the AdS/CFT correspondence. The latter, pioneered by Juan Maldacena, Edward Witten, Steve Gubser, Igor Klebanov and Polyakov, can be regarded, to some extent, as one of the great legacies of higher dimensional Supergravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaluza-Klein Gravity, Concentrating on the General Rel- Ativity, Rather Than Particle Physics Side of the Subject
    Kaluza-Klein Gravity J. M. Overduin Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 3P6 and P. S. Wesson Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 and Gravity Probe-B, Hansen Physics Laboratories, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A. 94305 Abstract We review higher-dimensional unified theories from the general relativity, rather than the particle physics side. Three distinct approaches to the subject are identi- fied and contrasted: compactified, projective and noncompactified. We discuss the cosmological and astrophysical implications of extra dimensions, and conclude that none of the three approaches can be ruled out on observational grounds at the present time. arXiv:gr-qc/9805018v1 7 May 1998 Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 3 February 2008 1 Introduction Kaluza’s [1] achievement was to show that five-dimensional general relativity contains both Einstein’s four-dimensional theory of gravity and Maxwell’s the- ory of electromagnetism. He however imposed a somewhat artificial restriction (the cylinder condition) on the coordinates, essentially barring the fifth one a priori from making a direct appearance in the laws of physics. Klein’s [2] con- tribution was to make this restriction less artificial by suggesting a plausible physical basis for it in compactification of the fifth dimension. This idea was enthusiastically received by unified-field theorists, and when the time came to include the strong and weak forces by extending Kaluza’s mechanism to higher dimensions, it was assumed that these too would be compact. This line of thinking has led through eleven-dimensional supergravity theories in the 1980s to the current favorite contenders for a possible “theory of everything,” ten-dimensional superstrings.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory*
    Quantum Field Theory y Frank Wilczek Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Science, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 I discuss the general principles underlying quantum eld theory, and attempt to identify its most profound consequences. The deep est of these consequences result from the in nite number of degrees of freedom invoked to implement lo cality.Imention a few of its most striking successes, b oth achieved and prosp ective. Possible limitation s of quantum eld theory are viewed in the light of its history. I. SURVEY Quantum eld theory is the framework in which the regnant theories of the electroweak and strong interactions, which together form the Standard Mo del, are formulated. Quantum electro dynamics (QED), b esides providing a com- plete foundation for atomic physics and chemistry, has supp orted calculations of physical quantities with unparalleled precision. The exp erimentally measured value of the magnetic dip ole moment of the muon, 11 (g 2) = 233 184 600 (1680) 10 ; (1) exp: for example, should b e compared with the theoretical prediction 11 (g 2) = 233 183 478 (308) 10 : (2) theor: In quantum chromo dynamics (QCD) we cannot, for the forseeable future, aspire to to comparable accuracy.Yet QCD provides di erent, and at least equally impressive, evidence for the validity of the basic principles of quantum eld theory. Indeed, b ecause in QCD the interactions are stronger, QCD manifests a wider variety of phenomena characteristic of quantum eld theory. These include esp ecially running of the e ective coupling with distance or energy scale and the phenomenon of con nement.
    [Show full text]
  • UV Behavior of Half-Maximal Supergravity Theories
    UV behavior of half-maximal supergravity theories. Piotr Tourkine, Quantum Gravity in Paris 2013, LPT Orsay In collaboration with Pierre Vanhove, based on 1202.3692, 1208.1255 Understand the pertubative structure of supergravity theories. ● Supergravities are theories of gravity with local supersymmetry. ● Those theories naturally arise in the low energy limit of superstring theory. ● String theory is then a UV completion for those and thus provides a good framework to study their UV behavior. → Maximal and half-maximal supergravities. Maximal supergravity ● Maximally extended supergravity: – Low energy limit of type IIA/B theory, – 32 real supercharges, unique (ungauged) – N=8 in d=4 ● Long standing problem to determine if maximal supergravity can be a consistent theory of quantum gravity in d=4. ● Current consensus on the subject : it is not UV finite, the first divergence could occur at the 7-loop order. ● Impressive progresses made during last 5 years in the field of scattering amplitudes computations. [Bern, Carrasco, Dixon, Dunbar, Johansson, Kosower, Perelstein, Rozowsky etc.] Half-maximal supergravity ● Half-maximal supergravity: – Heterotic string, but also type II strings on orbifolds – 16 real supercharges, – N=4 in d=4 ● Richer structure, and still a lot of SUSY so explicit computations are still possible. ● There are UV divergences in d=4, [Fischler 1979] at one loop for external matter states ● UV divergence in gravity amplitudes ? As we will see the divergence is expected to arise at the four loop order. String models that give half-maximal supergravity “(4,0)” susy “(0,4)” susy ● Type IIA/B string = Superstring ⊗ Superstring Torus compactification : preserves full (4,4) supersymmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Mistakes
    Einstein’s Mistakes Einstein was the greatest genius of the Twentieth Century, but his discoveries were blighted with mistakes. The Human Failing of Genius. 1 PART 1 An evaluation of the man Here, Einstein grows up, his thinking evolves, and many quotations from him are listed. Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at 14 Einstein at 26 Einstein at 42 3 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at age 61 (1940) 4 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Born in Ulm, Swabian region of Southern Germany. From a Jewish merchant family. Had a sister Maja. Family rejected Jewish customs. Did not inherit any mathematical talent. Inherited stubbornness, Inherited a roguish sense of humor, An inclination to mysticism, And a habit of grüblen or protracted, agonizing “brooding” over whatever was on its mind. Leading to the thought experiment. 5 Portrait in 1947 – age 68, and his habit of agonizing brooding over whatever was on its mind. He was in Princeton, NJ, USA. 6 Einstein the mystic •“Everyone who is seriously involved in pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe, one that is vastly superior to that of man..” •“When I assess a theory, I ask myself, if I was God, would I have arranged the universe that way?” •His roguish sense of humor was always there. •When asked what will be his reactions to observational evidence against the bending of light predicted by his general theory of relativity, he said: •”Then I would feel sorry for the Good Lord. The theory is correct anyway.” 7 Einstein: Mathematics •More quotations from Einstein: •“How it is possible that mathematics, a product of human thought that is independent of experience, fits so excellently the objects of physical reality?” •Questions asked by many people and Einstein: •“Is God a mathematician?” •His conclusion: •“ The Lord is cunning, but not malicious.” 8 Einstein the Stubborn Mystic “What interests me is whether God had any choice in the creation of the world” Some broadcasters expunged the comment from the soundtrack because they thought it was blasphemous.
    [Show full text]
  • Duality and Strings Dieter Lüst, LMU and MPI München
    Duality and Strings Dieter Lüst, LMU and MPI München Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis. Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis. Duality of 4 - dimensional string constructions: • Covariant lattices ⇔ (a)symmetric orbifolds (1986/87: W. Lerche, D.L., A. Schellekens ⇔ L. Ibanez, H.P. Nilles, F. Quevedo) • Intersecting D-brane models ☞ SM (?) (2000/01: R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, L. Görlich, D.L., T. Ott ⇔ G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. Ibanez, F. Marchesano, R. Rabadan, A. Uranga) Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis. Duality of 4 - dimensional string constructions: • Covariant lattices ⇔ (a)symmetric orbifolds (1986/87: W. Lerche, D.L., A. Schellekens ⇔ L. Ibanez, H.P. Nilles, F. Quevedo) • Intersecting D-brane models ☞ SM (?) (2000/01: R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, L. Görlich, D.L., T. Ott ⇔ G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. Ibanez, F. Marchesano, R. Rabadan, A. Uranga) ➢ Madrid (Spanish) Quiver ! Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hole Production and Graviton Emission in Models with Large Extra Dimensions
    Black hole production and graviton emission in models with large extra dimensions Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften vorgelegt beim Fachbereich Physik der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat in Frankfurt am Main von Benjamin Koch aus Nordlingen Frankfurt am Main 2007 (D 30) vom Fachbereich Physik der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat als Dissertation angenommen Dekan Gutachter Datum der Disputation Zusammenfassung In dieser Arbeit wird die mogliche Produktion von mikroskopisch kleinen Schwarzen Lcchern und die Emission von Gravitationsstrahlung in Modellen mit grofien Extra-Dimensionen untersucht. Zunachst werden der theoretisch-physikalische Hintergrund und die speziel- len Modelle des behandelten Themas skizziert. Anschliefiend wird auf die durchgefuhrten Untersuchungen zur Erzeugung und zum Zerfall mikrosko ­ pisch kleiner Schwarzer Locher in modernen Beschleunigerexperimenten ein- gegangen und die wichtigsten Ergebnisse zusammengefasst. Im Anschluss daran wird die Produktion von Gravitationsstrahlung durch Teilchenkollisio- nen diskutiert. Die daraus resultierenden analytischen Ergebnisse werden auf hochenergetische kosmische Strahlung angewandt. Die Suche nach einer einheitlichen Theorie der Naturkrafte Eines der grofien Ziele der theoretischen Physik seit Einstein ist es, eine einheitliche und moglichst einfache Theorie zu entwickeln, die alle bekannten Naturkrafte beschreibt. Als grofier Erfolg auf diesem Wege kann es angese- hen werden, dass es gelang, drei 1 der vier bekannten Krafte mittels eines einzigen Modells, des Standardmodells (SM), zu beschreiben. Das Standardmodell der Elementarteilchenphysik ist eine Quantenfeldtheo- rie. In Quantenfeldtheorien werden Invarianten unter lokalen Symmetrie- transformationen betrachtet. Die Symmetriegruppen, die man fur das Stan­ dardmodell gefunden hat, sind die U(1), SU(2)L und die SU(3). Die Vorher- sagen des Standardmodells wurden durch eine Vielzahl von Experimenten mit hochster Genauigkeit bestatigt.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years of the Weyl Anomaly
    CTP-TAMU-06/93 Twenty Years of the Weyl Anomaly † M. J. Duff ‡ Center for Theoretical Physics Physics Department Texas A & M University College Station, Texas 77843 ABSTRACT In 1973 two Salam prot´eg´es (Derek Capper and the author) discovered that the conformal invariance under Weyl rescalings of the metric tensor 2 gµν(x) Ω (x)gµν (x) displayed by classical massless field systems in interac- tion with→ gravity no longer survives in the quantum theory. Since then these Weyl anomalies have found a variety of applications in black hole physics, cosmology, string theory and statistical mechanics. We give a nostalgic re- view. arXiv:hep-th/9308075v1 16 Aug 1993 CTP/TAMU-06/93 July 1993 †Talk given at the Salamfest, ICTP, Trieste, March 1993. ‡ Research supported in part by NSF Grant PHY-9106593. When all else fails, you can always tell the truth. Abdus Salam 1 Trieste and Oxford Twenty years ago, Derek Capper and I had embarked on our very first post- docs here in Trieste. We were two Salam students fresh from Imperial College filled with ideas about quantizing the gravitational field: a subject which at the time was pursued only by mad dogs and Englishmen. (My thesis title: Problems in the Classical and Quantum Theories of Gravitation was greeted with hoots of derision when I announced it at the Cargese Summer School en route to Trieste. The work originated with a bet between Abdus Salam and Hermann Bondi about whether you could generate the Schwarzschild solution using Feynman diagrams. You can (and I did) but I never found out if Bondi ever paid up.) Inspired by Salam, Capper and I decided to use the recently discovered dimensional regularization1 to calculate corrections to the graviton propaga- tor from closed loops of massless particles: vectors [1] and spinors [2], the former in collaboration with Leopold Halpern.
    [Show full text]
  • From Vibrating Strings to a Unified Theory of All Interactions
    Barton Zwiebach From Vibrating Strings to a Unified Theory of All Interactions or the last twenty years, physicists have investigated F String Theory rather vigorously. The theory has revealed an unusual depth. As a result, despite much progress in our under- standing of its remarkable properties, basic features of the theory remain a mystery. This extended period of activity is, in fact, the second period of activity in string theory. When it was first discov- ered in the late 1960s, string theory attempted to describe strongly interacting particles. Along came Quantum Chromodynamics— a theoryof quarks and gluons—and despite their early promise, strings faded away. This time string theory is a credible candidate for a theoryof all interactions—a unified theoryof all forces and matter. The greatest complication that frustrated the search for such a unified theorywas the incompatibility between two pillars of twen- tieth century physics: Einstein’s General Theoryof Relativity and the principles of Quantum Mechanics. String theory appears to be 30 ) zwiebach mit physics annual 2004 the long-sought quantum mechani- cal theory of gravity and other interactions. It is almost certain that string theory is a consistent theory. It is less certain that it describes our real world. Nevertheless, intense work has demonstrated that string theory incorporates many features of the physical universe. It is reasonable to be very optimistic about the prospects of string theory. Perhaps one of the most impressive features of string theory is the appearance of gravity as one of the fluctuation modes of a closed string. Although it was not discov- ered exactly in this way, we can describe a logical path that leads to the discovery of gravity in string theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Conformal Field Theory and String
    SLAC-PUB-5149 December 1989 m INTRODUCTION TO CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY AND STRING THEORY* Lance J. Dixon Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University Stanford, CA 94309 ABSTRACT I give an elementary introduction to conformal field theory and its applications to string theory. I. INTRODUCTION: These lectures are meant to provide a brief introduction to conformal field -theory (CFT) and string theory for those with no prior exposure to the subjects. There are many excellent reviews already available (or almost available), and most of these go in to much more detail than I will be able to here. Those reviews con- centrating on the CFT side of the subject include refs. 1,2,3,4; those emphasizing string theory include refs. 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 I will start with a little pre-history of string theory to help motivate the sub- ject. In the 1960’s it was noticed that certain properties of the hadronic spectrum - squared masses for resonances that rose linearly with the angular momentum - resembled the excitations of a massless, relativistic string.14 Such a string is char- *Work supported in by the Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76SF00515. Lectures presented at the Theoretical Advanced Study Institute In Elementary Particle Physics, Boulder, Colorado, June 4-30,1989 acterized by just one energy (or length) scale,* namely the square root of the string tension T, which is the energy per unit length of a static, stretched string. For strings to describe the strong interactions fi should be of order 1 GeV. Although strings provided a qualitative understanding of much hadronic physics (and are still useful today for describing hadronic spectra 15 and fragmentation16), some features were hard to reconcile.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Physics News University of Florida - Department of Physics Annual Alumni Newsletter 2005
    Florida Physics News University of Florida - Department of Physics Annual Alumni Newsletter 2005 University of Florida - Department of Physics 1 Contents Chair’s Corner 2 Chair’s Corner UF Teacher/Scholar Award 3 American Physical Society - Three New Fellows 5 APS Keithley Award 5 November 2005 marks the third anniversary of Professors Earn Positions in National Societies 6 my term as department chair, and I can say that the Columbia Shuttle Accident Investigation 7 Student Government Award 8 past year has been the most exciting one (“exciting” Academy Induction 8 in the sense of the ancient Chinese curse, “May you Faculty Promotions 8 Post-Doc Awarded Fellowship from L’Oreal Corporation 8 live in exciting times”). Two significant events come to Research Scholar Award 8 mind: the record 2004 hurricane season, and the July Travel Awards 9 Undergraduate Physics Newsletter - In Review 10 2004 implementation of the new Enterprise Resource Albert Einstein Institut Rewards Two Students 12 Planning so�ware from PeopleSo�, designed to Physics Teacher of the Year 12 manage UF’s financial, payroll, and human resources 25th Brandt-Ritchie Workshop 12 TannerFest 12 activities. As you know, Florida was hammered 45th Sanibel Symposium 13 by four hurricanes during last year’s season, and Faculty Retirement 13 Faculty Selected Publications 14 Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne directly hit Gainesville Davis Productivity Award 16 in September 2004. Although ultimately the damage to Staff Retirement 16 Employee Excellence Awardees 16 UF was minimal, with downed trees, power outages, Undergraduate Honors 16 and minor flooding, it was nonetheless a stressful time Outreach Program 17 Celebrating New PhD’s 18 for the many faculty, staff, and students who were Awards Made Possible By Alumni Donations 18 affected by the storms.
    [Show full text]