Ge E K S B E a R in G G If T S Je F F Ja R V Is

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ge E K S B E a R in G G If T S Je F F Ja R V Is GEEKS BEARING GIFTS GIFTS BEARING GEEKS GEEKS BEARING GIFTS cements Jeff Jarvis’s status as an endlessly imagina- tive and relentlessly innovative guide to our brave new media world. ARIANNA HUFFINGTON Jarvis once again leads the way in crisply articulating the business challenges which if not tackled will inhibit journalism’s survival. By recognising the importance of news as a service built on relationships he paints a new and exciting picture in which sustainable business models can be found. ANDREW MILLER, CEO, GUARDIAN MEDIA GROUP Makes a compelling case that the journalist’s role is not just to inform the pub- lic but to help them inform each other. in doing so he broadens the defi nition of news and paints a provocative vision for the future of the news industry. VIVIAN SCHILLER, TWITTER, NPR, NEW YORK TIMES ‘Defi ning ourselves as content creators is a trap,’ writes Je! Jarvis in GEEKS BEARING GIFTS. He thinks journalists don’t understand their own business anymore. But he’s written a lucid and practical guide to reversing that. It’s like a novella in which the hero—public service journalism—is sprung free to compete again for business success. I learned a lot from it, and I thought I knew what Jarvis had to say. If you thought so too, you’re probably wrong. JAY ROSEN, NYU AND PRESSTHINK.ORG Technology has disrupted the news industry—its relationships, forms, and JEFF JARVIS JEFF business models—but also provides no end of opportunities for improving, expanding, reimagining, and sustaining journalism. GEEKS BEARING GIFTS is a creative, thought-provoking and entertaining exploration of the possi- ble future(s) of news by Professor Jeff Jarvis, who leads the Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism and is one of the preeminent voices on emerging forms of journalism, news delivery, and community engagement. CUNY GRADUATE SCHOOL T O W - K N I G H T OF JOURNALISM C E N T E R F O R E N T R E P R E N E U R I A L JOURNALISM GEEKS BEARING GIFTS GIFTS BEARING GEEKS GEEKS BEARING GIFTS cements Jeff Jarvis’s status as an endlessly imagina- tive and relentlessly innovative guide to our brave new media world. ARIANNA HUFFINGTON Jarvis once again leads the way in crisply articulating the business challenges which if not tackled will inhibit journalism’s survival. By recognising the importance of news as a service built on relationships he paints a new and exciting picture in which sustainable business models can be found. ANDREW MILLER, CEO, GUARDIAN MEDIA GROUP Makes a compelling case that the journalist’s role is not just to inform the pub- lic but to help them inform each other. in doing so he broadens the defi nition of news and paints a provocative vision for the future of the news industry. VIVIAN SCHILLER, TWITTER, NPR, NEW YORK TIMES ‘Defi ning ourselves as content creators is a trap,’ writes Je! Jarvis in GEEKS BEARING GIFTS. He thinks journalists don’t understand their own business anymore. But he’s written a lucid and practical guide to reversing that. It’s like a novella in which the hero—public service journalism—is sprung free to compete again for business success. I learned a lot from it, and I thought I knew what Jarvis had to say. If you thought so too, you’re probably wrong. JAY ROSEN, NYU AND PRESSTHINK.ORG Technology has disrupted the news industry—its relationships, forms, and JEFF JARVIS JEFF business models—but also provides no end of opportunities for improving, expanding, reimagining, and sustaining journalism. GEEKS BEARING GIFTS is a creative, thought-provoking and entertaining exploration of the possi- ble future(s) of news by Professor Jeff Jarvis, who leads the Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism and is one of the preeminent voices on emerging forms of journalism, news delivery, and community engagement. CUNY GRADUATE SCHOOL T O W - K N I G H T OF JOURNALISM C E N T E R F O R E N T R E P R E N E U R I A L JOURNALISM GEEKS BEARING GIFTS CUNY JOURNALISM PRESS IS THE ACADEMIC IMPRINT OF THE CUNY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM, PART OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK 219 WEST 40TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10018 WWW.PRESS.JOURNALISM.CUNY.EDU © 2014 Jeff Jarvis All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except brief passages for review purposes. First printing 2014 Cataloging-in-Publication data is available from the Library of Congress. A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-1-939293-73-2 paperback ISBN 978-1-939293-74-9 e-book Cover and text design by Bathcat Ltd. Typeset by CBIGS Group, Chennai, India. Printed by BookMobile in the United States and CPI Books Ltd in the United Kingdom. For Steve Shepard — dean, editor, mentor, sounding board, supporter, friend. (It’s all his fault.) CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION: NEW RELATIONSHI P S , F ORMS, AND MODELS FOR NEWS 9 PART 1: RELATIONSHI PS 1 1 No Mas Mass Media 19 Content vs. Service 27 News as Platform 3 1 Ecosystems and Networks 39 Engagement, Collaboration, and Membership 4 5 Journalist as Organizer, Advocate, and Educator 51 PART 2: FORMS 53 The Article is Dead — Long Live the Article 59 Process Over Product: Adding Value to the Flow of News 67 Curation 71 Data as News 77 Mobile=Local=Me: Context Over Content 87 Reinventing TV News 95 Untapped Technologies 99 PART 3: MODELS 101 The Story So Far 105 Digital First — What Then? 115 Efficiency: The Final Cut 129 Beat Businesses as Building Blocks of News Ecosystems 139 Business Ecosystems 147 Advertising, the Myth of Mass Media, and the Relationship Strategy 1 5 9 Native Advertising: Fiend or Foe? 1 6 7 Paywalls 173 Patronage 1 7 7 The Pricing Paradox of Information 1 8 1 The Link Economy and Creditright 191 Metrics 197 Capital: Investment in the Future 207 A FTERWORD: A NOTE ON JOURNALI S M EDUCATION 215 ACK NOWLED GMENTS AND DISCLOSURES 219 NOTES INTRODUCTION N EW R ELATIONSHIPS, FOR M S , AND MODELS FOR N EWS These digital visionaries tell people like me that we just don’t under- stand them. They talk about the wonders of the interconnected world, about the democratization of journalism. The news, they say, is viral now — that we should be grateful. Well, I think all of us need to beware of geeks bearing gifts. Here we are in 2009 — more viral, less pro!table. Because news costs. Because quality costs. Because free sets the price too low. Because free isn’t sustainable. Because free is too expensive. —LES HINTON, THEN CEO OF DOW JONES, SPEAKING TO THE WORLD NEWSPAPER CONGRESS IN HYDERABAD, INDIA, DEC. 1, 20091 I am grateful for geeks’ gifts to news. Technology provides no end of opportunities for improving, expanding, reimagining, and sustain- ing news. Yes, technology has also disrupted the news industry — its relationships, forms, and business models. But in this essay, I will try not to dwell on the !eeting past. In their white paper, The Story So Far: What We Know About the Business of Digital Journalism, Bill Grueskin and his coauthors at Columbia’s School of Journalism examined how our industry arrived at where we are today.2 Also from Columbia’s Tow Center, Post-Industrial Journalism: Adapting to the Present by Emily Bell, Clay Shirky, and Chris Anderson proposed 1 ways for news organizations to exploit the opportunities that technol- ogy presents today to update, expand, and improve the craft.3 I now want to look to the future. Or rather, I want to examine many possible futures. I don’t want to predict where journalism will go. But I do want to imagine where it can go next and what is possible in the future. After the invention of that great disruptive technology, the print- ing press, it took half a century for the book to take its own form. At the start, printers still mimicked scribes’ work, using fonts designed to duplicate their handwriting. Printing was initially promoted as “automated writing.” We still de"ne the future in the terms of the past. Cars were “horseless carriages” propelled by “horsepower.” Radio was named what it wasn’t: “the wireless.” Today, we still “dial” and “hang up” phones, though those words have long since lost their literal meanings. For that matter, how soon will it be before it seems absurd to call smartphones “phones” when less and less we use them to talk and more and more we use them as — what? — computers, connectors, assistants, brains. On the internet today, newspapers, magazines, books, radio, and TV are each still substantially recognizable as their own forebears. Many have moved past the "rst phase of adaptation — shovelware, or simply pouring old wine into new skins — to take advantage of online’s added functionality. There was much oohing4 and aahing5 over a New York Times story about an avalanche with slideshows, video, photographic aerial maps, and graphics embedded in the tale.6 It’s lovely. But it still does what journalists do: It tells a story. It was still possible for The Times to print the narrative in the newspaper with little lost. We have arrived at what some may consider a destina- tion but I hope is merely a way station: the ful"llment of multimedia storytelling.
Recommended publications
  • Report on the 2020 FOSS Contributor Survey
    Report on the 2020 FOSS Contributor Survey The Linux Foundation & The Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard Frank Nagle Harvard Business School David A. Wheeler The Linux Foundation Hila Lifshitz-Assaf New York University Haylee Ham Jennifer L. Hoffman Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard Acknowledgments This report and the research behind it would not have been possible without the leadership of the Core Infrastructure Initiative’s Advisory Committee, composed of Josh Corman, Steve Lipner, Audris Mockus, Henning Piezunka, and Sam Ransbotham. Frank Nagle would also like to thank his fellow co-directors of the Core Infrastructure Initiative, Jim Zemlin at the Linux Foundation and Karim Lakhani at the Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard, for their counsel and direction throughout this project. Gratitude and thanks to Michael Dolan and Kate Stewart at the Linux Foundation for their ongoing commitment to this undertaking. Thank you to James Dana for laying the initial groundwork for this survey. Finally — and perhaps, most importantly — thank you to all the individuals who contribute to FOSS projects. Without their tireless efforts, our core digital infrastructure and the feats enabled by it would not be sustainable. REVISED: This report has been updated since its original release on 8 December 2020. This second version, released on 10 December 2020, corrects errors found in the original text and graphics. Contents Executive Summary 4 Introduction 7 Methodology 9 Overview of Findings 10 Demographics 10 Figure 1: Gender
    [Show full text]
  • Heberlein, Thomas A. 2017. Sweden
    Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, March 5, 2017 Sweden is safe Since President Donald Trump called attention to violence in Sweden, we have had American journalists show up here. One, Tim Pool — funded in part by right-wing editor Paul Joseph Watson who tweeted “Any journalist claiming Sweden is safe; I will pay for travel costs & accommodation for you to stay in crime ridden migrant suburbs of Malmo” — visited Rosengård, Malmö’s toughest immigrant area. He was followed by Swedish reporters and found what was no surprise to me, an American living in Sweden: “If this is the worst Malmö can offer never come to Chicago.” Pool claimed Chicago had about 750 murders last year. All of Sweden, which has three times the population of Chicago, had 112 murders in 2015 (the last year for which statistics are available). Malmö, with a population of 330,000, had 12 murders in 2016. Madison, with a population of 243,000 had nine. So per capita, you are about as safe in Malmö as in Madison. Pool also said after a few hours in Rosengård: “For anyone worried about violence in Malmö and worried that he will be robbed or attacked in Rosengård is ‘löliga’ (ridiculous).” On TV news, he was shown walking in the community and reported it was boring and the only danger he felt was from the ice on the sidewalks. Sweden, I admit, is not a perfect society: It does have problems keeping ice off the sidewalks, and thousands are injured in falls every year. Tom Heberlein emeritus professor University of Wisconsin-Madison Stockholm, Sweden http://www.jsonline.com/story/opinion/readers/2017/03/04/letters-march-walkers-prison-priorities- wrong/98723360/ .
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download 11.3 Mb
    THE PORTRAYAL OF MARIJUANA ON VICE.COM DOCUMENTARIES The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by GÖKÇE ÖZSU In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION AND DESIGN İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA August 2017 Scanned by CamScanner ABSTRACT THE PORTRAYAL OF MARIJUANA ON VICE.COM DOCUMENTARIES Özsu, Gökçe MA, The Department of Communication and Design Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Bülent Çaplı August 2017 This thesis aims to examine the representational attitude of vice.com (or VICE) documentaries covering marijuana, in the context of normalization. In this respect, this thesis mainly descriptively analyses three VICE documentaries covering marijuana in the setting of recreation, medicine and industry. VICE is a United States based media outlet which uses hybrid form of journalism combining conventional form of media operations and new media techniques. Normalization is a sociological concept for describing the the scale of social acceptance as a norm which was disseminated from the iii margins of the society towards mainstream scale. To implement descriptive analysis on vice.com documentaries, normalization and drug representation in the United States media has been evaluated in the socio-historical setting, and examined. As a major finding, even though vice.com documentaries represent marijuana as normal, the normative references of normalization of marijuana is not clear. In this respect, in the conclusion, the determiners and normative background of normalization of marijuana are tried to be discussed. Keywords: Documentary, Marijuana, Normalization, Stigmatization, VICE iv ÖZET VICE.COM BELGESELLERİNDE MARİJUANANIN TASVİRİ Özsu, Gökçe Yüksek Lisans, İletişim ve Tasarım Bölümü Danışman: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Write-Ins Race/Name Totals - General Election 11/03/20 11/10/2020
    Write-Ins Race/Name Totals - General Election 11/03/20 11/10/2020 President/Vice President Phillip M Chesion / Cobie J Chesion 1 1 U/S. Gubbard 1 Adebude Eastman 1 Al Gore 1 Alexandria Cortez 2 Allan Roger Mulally former CEO Ford 1 Allen Bouska 1 Andrew Cuomo 2 Andrew Cuomo / Andrew Cuomo 1 Andrew Cuomo, NY / Dr. Anthony Fauci, Washington D.C. 1 Andrew Yang 14 Andrew Yang Morgan Freeman 1 Andrew Yang / Joe Biden 1 Andrew Yang/Amy Klobuchar 1 Andrew Yang/Jeremy Cohen 1 Anthony Fauci 3 Anyone/Else 1 AOC/Princess Nokia 1 Ashlie Kashl Adam Mathey 1 Barack Obama/Michelle Obama 1 Ben Carson Mitt Romney 1 Ben Carson Sr. 1 Ben Sass 1 Ben Sasse 6 Ben Sasse senator-Nebraska Laurel Cruse 1 Ben Sasse/Blank 1 Ben Shapiro 1 Bernard Sanders 1 Bernie Sanders 22 Bernie Sanders / Alexandria Ocasio Cortez 1 Bernie Sanders / Elizabeth Warren 2 Bernie Sanders / Kamala Harris 1 Bernie Sanders Joe Biden 1 Bernie Sanders Kamala D. Harris 1 Bernie Sanders/ Kamala Harris 1 Bernie Sanders/Andrew Yang 1 Bernie Sanders/Kamala D. Harris 2 Bernie Sanders/Kamala Harris 2 Blain Botsford Nick Honken 1 Blank 7 Blank/Blank 1 Bobby Estelle Bones 1 Bran Carroll 1 Brandon A Laetare 1 Brian Carroll Amar Patel 1 Page 1 of 142 President/Vice President Brian Bockenstedt 1 Brian Carol/Amar Patel 1 Brian Carrol Amar Patel 1 Brian Carroll 2 Brian carroll Ammor Patel 1 Brian Carroll Amor Patel 2 Brian Carroll / Amar Patel 3 Brian Carroll/Ama Patel 1 Brian Carroll/Amar Patel 25 Brian Carroll/Joshua Perkins 1 Brian T Carroll 1 Brian T.
    [Show full text]
  • Goodbye Gutenberg NIEMAN REPORTS
    NIEMAN REPORTS THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY VOL. 60 NO. 4 WINTER 2006 Five Dollars Goodbye Gutenberg rward • Building C g Fo omm hin un us it P y • • F ge in n d a in h g C O e h u t r g F n o i o s t n i n e g S • • E s x d r p o a n W d g i n n i g k O a u T r • R s e n a o c i t h c • e n C n o o n C v e w r e g i N n g g n o i r n o l t h p e x E W e • b ‘… to promote and elevate the standards of journalism’ —Agnes Wahl Nieman, the benefactor of the Nieman Foundation. Vol. 60 No. 4 NIEMAN REPORTS Winter 2006 THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY Publisher Bob Giles Editor Melissa Ludtke Assistant Editor Lois Fiore Editorial Assistant Sarah Hagedorn Design Editor Diane Novetsky Nieman Reports (USPS #430-650) is published Editorial in March, June, September and December Telephone: 617-496-6308 by the Nieman Foundation at Harvard University, E-Mail Address: One Francis Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138-2098. [email protected] Subscriptions/Business Internet Address: Telephone: 617-496-2968 www.nieman.harvard.edu E-Mail Address: [email protected] Copyright 2006 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Subscription $20 a year, $35 for two years; add $10 per year for foreign airmail.
    [Show full text]
  • Publishing Research Software As Open Source on Github
    Publishing Research Software as Open Source on GitHub Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Scope & Goals 3. Science & Software i. Reproducibility ii. Software Quality iii. Software Development iv. Software Documentation v. Guide 4. Open Source Basics i. Mindset ii. Arguments against open source... and how to disprove them iii. Success Stories iv. Legal Stuff v. People vi. Guide 5. GitHub i. Basics: Accounts & Repositories ii. Fork & Pull Workflow iii. Social Coding iv. GitHub for Education 6. Software Communities i. Community Building and Openness ii. Marketing and Public Relations iii. Types of Contributors and Tasks iv. Open Source in Your Domain 7. Scientific Publishing of Data and Software 8. Contribute 9. Glossary 2 Publishing Research Software as Open Source on GitHub Introduction How can you publish research software as open source? And do so without too much overhead and actually gain impact by leveraging the open source approach? These questions are answered in this best practice "Publishing Research Software as Open Source on GitHub". It is published by the GLUES project's SDI team. LICENSE This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. About this best practice The "source code" of this document is hosted on GitHub and the book was written and published using GitBook. The text is designed to be read in the web view, but PDF and other formats, e.g. for e- readers, area available as well. Version: 0.1 Contributors Thanks to these people for providing contents, giving valuable feedback, reporting errors, ... Daniel Nüst Simon Jirka Ann Hitchcock Want to become a contributor? Check our contribution guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • SPAULDING, Mccullough & TANSIL LLP 2 90 South E Street, Suite 200 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 3 Telephone: (707) 524-1900 E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Robert W
    Case 3:18-cv-00341 Document 1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 16 Karin P. Beam, Esq. (Bar No. 112331) 1 SPAULDING, McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP 2 90 South E Street, Suite 200 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 3 Telephone: (707) 524-1900 E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Robert W. Payne, Esq. (Bar No. 73901) 5 PAYNE IP LAW 6 111 N. Market Street, Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95113 7 Telephone: (408) 981-4293 E-Mail: [email protected] 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 TWiT, LLC and LEO LAPORTE 10 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 TWiT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability ) NO. company, LEO LAPORTE, ) 15 ) COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF Plaintiffs, ) WRITTEN CONTRACT, BREACH OF 16 ) ORAL AGREEMENT, BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT, PROMISSORY 17 vs. ) ) ESTOPPEL, FALSE PROMISE, 18 TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION, ) INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE 19 Defendants. ) WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC ) ADVANTAGE, INTENTIONAL 20 ) MISREPRESENTATION, 21 ) NEGLIGENT INTERFERENCE WITH ) PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC 22 ) ADVANTAGE, TRADEMARK ) INFRINGEMENT, UNFAIR 23 ) COMPETITION, AND VIOLATION OF ) COMMON LAW TRADEMARK 24 ) RIGHTS 25 ) ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 26 27 28 COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF WRITTEN CONTRACT, BREACH OF ORAL AGREEMENT, BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT, PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL, etc.; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:18-cv-00341 Document 1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 2 of 16 1 Plaintiffs TWiT, LLC and Leo Laporte allege: 2 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3 1. This action is brought under the United States Trademark Act of 1946, as amended, 15 4 U.S.C. §§1051 et seq.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Fifteenth Workshop on Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing (Textgraphs-15), Pages 1–9 June 11, 2021
    NAACL-HLT 2021 Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing Proceedings of the Fifteenth Workshop June 11, 2021 ©2021 The Association for Computational Linguistics Order copies of this and other ACL proceedings from: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) 209 N. Eighth Street Stroudsburg, PA 18360 USA Tel: +1-570-476-8006 Fax: +1-570-476-0860 [email protected] ISBN 978-1-954085-38-1 ii Introduction Welcome to TextGraphs, the Workshop on Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing. The fifteenth edition of our workshop is being organized online on June 11, 2021, in conjunction with the 2021 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-2021). The workshops in the TextGraphs series have published and promoted the synergy between the field of Graph Theory (GT) and Natural Language Processing (NLP). The mix between the two started small, with graph theoretical frameworks providing efficient and elegant solutions for NLP applications. Graph- based solutions initially focused on single-document part-of-speech tagging, word sense disambiguation, and semantic role labeling, and became progressively larger to include ontology learning and information extraction from large text collections. Nowadays, graph-based solutions also target on Web-scale applications such as information propagation in social networks, rumor proliferation, e-reputation, multiple entity detection, language dynamics learning, and future events prediction, to name a few. The target audience comprises researchers working on problems related to either Graph Theory or graph- based algorithms applied to Natural Language Processing, Social Media, and the Semantic Web. This year, we received 22 submissions and accepted 17 of them for oral presentation (12 long papers and 5 short papers).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Feedback and Input on the Facebook Oversight Board for Content Decisions Appendix
    Global Feedback and Input on the Facebook Oversight Board for Content Decisions Appendix Appendix A 02 Appendix B 07 Appendix C 26 Appendix D 100 Appendix E 138 Appendix F 177 APPENDIX A Draft Charter: An Oversight Board for Content Decisions Every day, teams at Facebook make difficult decisions about Facebook takes responsibility for our content decisions, what content should stay up and what should come down policies and the values we use to make them The purpose of the board is to provide oversight of how we exercise that As our community has grown to more than 2 billion people, responsibility and to make Facebook more accountable we have come to believe that Facebook should not make so many of those decisions on its own — that people should be The following draft raises questions and considerations, while able to request an appeal of our content decisions to an providing a suggested approach that constitutes a model for independent body the board’s structure, scope and authority It is a starting point for discussion on how the board should be designed To do that, we are creating an external board The board will and formed What the draft does not do is answer every be a body of independent experts who will review Facebook’s proposed question completely or finally most challenging content decisions - focusing on important and disputed cases It will share its decisions transparently and We are actively seeking contributions, opinions and give reasons for them perspectives from around the world on each of the questions outlined below
    [Show full text]
  • Podcast List
    ACS Chemical Biology Materials Today - Podcasts Africa in Progress Meatball's Meatballs - Juicy and spicy audio meatballs. All Things That Fly Medically Speaking Podcast Annals of Internal Medicine Podcast MedPod101 | Learn Medicine APM: Marketplace Money MicrobeWorld's Meet the Scientist Podcast Are We Alone - where science isn't alien. MIT Press Podcast Asunto del dia en R5 NeuroPod Bandwidth, CBC Radio New England Journal of Medicine Bath University Podcast Directory NIH Podcasts and Videocasts Berkman Center NPR: Planet Money Podcast Beyond the Book NPR Topics: Technology Podcast Bibliotech NW Spanish News - NHK World Radio Japan Books and Ideas Podcast On the Media Brain Science Podcast One Planet Bridges with Africa Out of Their Minds, CBC radio feed Brookings Institute Persiflagers Infectious Disease Puscasts CBS News: Larry Magrid's Tech Report Podnutz - Computer Repair Podcast Chemistry World Podcast PRI: Selected Shorts Podcast Conversations in Medicine PRI's The World: Technology from BBC/PRI/WGBH Conversations Network QuackCast CyberSpeak's Podcast Quirks & Quarks Complete Show from CBC Radio Diffusion Science radio Regenerative Medicine Today - Podcast Digital Planet Science Elements Distillations Science in Action Documentaries, BBC Science Magazine Podcast Duke Office Hours Sciencepodcasters.org Earth Beat Security Now! EconTalk Society for General Microbiology Podcast Engines Of Our Ingenuity Podcast Sound Investing Escape Pod South Asia Wired ESRI Speakers Podcast Spark Plus from CBC Radio FORA.tv Technology Today Stanford's
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook's Newsfeed Changes
    LSE Business Review: Facebook’s newsfeed changes: a disaster or an opportunity for news publishers? Page 1 of 6 Facebook’s newsfeed changes: a disaster or an opportunity for news publishers? Social media and digital executives in newsrooms already have a tough job connecting their content to consumers via social media, but Facebook’s proposed changes in the algorithms of its ‘newsfeed’ are going to make it a lot harder. Social networks offer immense opportunities for reaching vast new audiences and increasing the engagement of users with journalism. The most important platform in the world is about to make that more difficult. Clearly, this is a blow for news publishers who have spent the last decade or so fighting a battle for survival in a world where people’s attention and advertising have shifted to other forms of content and away from news media brand’s own sites. They are clearly very concerned. Yet, could this be a wake-up call that will mean the better, most adaptive news brands benefit? The Atlantic’s Franklin Foer even argues that this is a good thing that could be the move that ends news media’s dependency on advertising and platforms like Facebook: “Facebook has just done media the biggest favor of them all. It has forced media to face the fact that digital advertising and ever-growing web traffic will never sustain the industry, especially if that traffic comes from monopolies like Facebook hoping to claim the entirety of digital advertising dollars for themselves.” I’m not going to argue that this is great news for news publishers, but blind panic or cynical abuse of Facebook is not a sufficient response.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Comprehension, Critical Thinking, and Meta-Cognitive Skills Thomas Nielsen Archibald
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2010 The Effect of the Integration of Social Annotation Technology, First Principles of Instruction, and Team-Based Learning on Students' Reading Comprehension, Critical Thinking, and Meta-Cognitive Skills Thomas Nielsen Archibald Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION THE EFFECT OF THE INTEGRATION OF SOCIAL ANNOTATION TECHNOLOGY, FIRST PRINCIPLES OF INSTRUCTION, AND TEAM-BASED LEARNING ON STUDENTS‘ READING COMPREHENSION, CRITICAL THINKING, AND META-COGNITIVE SKILLS By THOMAS NIELSEN ARCHIBALD A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 Students‘ Lack of Performance ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]