DOCSLIB.ORG

(U) CV-22 BEDDOWN at YOKOTA AIR BASE 24 Feb 15

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(U) CV-22 BEDDOWN at YOKOTA AIR BASE 24 Feb 15 UNCLASSIFIED (U) AIR FORCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND (U) Hurlburt Field, Florida (U) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (U) FOR THE (U) CV-22 BEDDOWN AT YOKOTA AIR BASE 24 Feb 15 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED This page is intentionally blank. UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED (U) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page (U) List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................ iv (U) List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................................... iv (U) List of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Symbols ..................................................................................................... v (U) 1. PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION .............................................................................................1-1 (U) 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1-1 (U) 1.2 Overview of the SOCOM Mission ...............................................................................................1-1 (U) 1.3 Scope of the Environmental Review ............................................................................................1-5 (U) 1.3.1 Issues Eliminated from the Environmental Review ......................................................1-5 (U) 1.3.2 Issues Carried Forward in the Environmental Review ..................................................1-6 (U) 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES .....................................................2-1 (U) 2.1 Proposed Action ...........................................................................................................................2-1 (U) 2.1.1 Facilities Use and Construction ....................................................................................2-1 (U) 2.1.2 Aircraft Beddown and Associated Personnel Increase .................................................2-5 (U) 2.2 Alternative 1: Squadron Operations in Building 79......................................................................2-5 (U) 2.3 No Action Alternative ..................................................................................................................2-8 (U) 2.4 Comparison of Alternatives ..........................................................................................................2-8 (U) 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................................3-1 (U) 3.1 Airspace ........................................................................................................................................3-1 (U) 3.1.1 Definition of the Resource ............................................................................................3-1 (U) 3.1.2 Existing Conditions .......................................................................................................3-3 (U) 3.2 Noise .............................................................................................................................................3-7 (U) 3.2.1 Definition of the Resource ............................................................................................3-7 (U) 3.2.2 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................3-10 (U) 3.3 Air Quality ..................................................................................................................................3-12 (U) 3.3.1 Definition of the Resource ..........................................................................................3-12 (U) 3.3.2 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................3-13 (U) 3.4 Safety ..........................................................................................................................................3-13 (U) 3.4.1 Definition of the Resource ..........................................................................................3-13 (U) 3.4.2 Mishap and Event Classifications ...............................................................................3-14 (U) 3.4.3 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................3-15 (U) 3.5 Utilities .......................................................................................................................................3-21 (U) 3.5.1 Definition of the Resource ..........................................................................................3-21 (U) 3.5.2 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................3-21 (U) 3.6 Hazardous Materials/Waste and Solid Waste .............................................................................3-23 (U) 3.6.1 Definition of the Resource ..........................................................................................3-23 (U) 3.6.2 Policies and Regulations .............................................................................................3-24 (U) 3.6.3 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................3-26 (U) 3.7 Water Resources .........................................................................................................................3-31 (U) 3.7.1 Definition of the Resource ..........................................................................................3-31 (U) 3.7.2 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................3-31 (U) 3.8 Biological Resources ..................................................................................................................3-33 (U) 3.8.1 Definition of the Resource ..........................................................................................3-33 (U) 3.8.2 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................3-33 (U) 3.9 Cultural Resources ......................................................................................................................3-38 (U) 3.9.1 Definition of the Resource ..........................................................................................3-38 (U) 3.9.2 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................3-38 (U) 3.10 Transportation .............................................................................................................................3-39 (U) 3.10.1 Definition of the Resource ..........................................................................................3-39 (U) Environmental Review for the Page i CV-22 Beddown at Yokota AB UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED (U) 3.10.2 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................3-40 (U) 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................................................................4-1 (U) 4.1 Airspace ........................................................................................................................................4-1 (U) 4.1.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................4-1 (U) 4.1.2 Alternative 1 .................................................................................................................4-1 (U) 4.1.3 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................4-1 (U) 4.2 Noise .............................................................................................................................................4-2 (U) 4.2.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................4-2 (U) 4.2.2 Alternative 1 .................................................................................................................4-7 (U) 4.2.3 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................4-7 (U) 4.3 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................4-7 (U) 4.3.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................4-7 (U) 4.3.2 Alternative 1 .................................................................................................................4-9 (U) 4.3.3 No Action Alternative .................................................................................................4-10 (U) 4.4 Safety ..........................................................................................................................................4-11 (U) 4.4.1 Proposed Action ..........................................................................................................4-11 (U) 4.4.2 Alternative 1 ...............................................................................................................4-12 (U) 4.4.3 No Action Alternative .................................................................................................4-12
Load more

Recommended publications
  • If You Weren™T There December 6, You Missed a Great
    OFFICIAL BULLETIN OF THE VALIANT AIR COMMAND, INC. (a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization) SPACE COAST REGIONAL AIRPORT, TITUSVILLE, FL 32780-8009 VOLUME 25, ISSUE 1 JANUARY 2003 IF YOU WEREN’T THERE DECEMBER 6, YOU MISSED A GREAT PARTY!!! We’re just going to let George Damoff’s photos speak for them- selves!!! Commander Lloyd Morris and wife, Gay Executive Officer Hal Larkin and wife, Ruth Left: Commander Morris and Alice Iacuzzo, Personnel Officer, introduce distinguished guests. Center: Pieter Lennie, Finance Officer, digs in!! Right: Bob James, Maintenance Officer, and wife, Ann IN THIS ISSUE Calendar of Events 2 Airshow Meeting 3 Wright Brothers 3 Pilot Information 6 Airshow Info and Forms 8-12 Membership Application 13 Aviating with Evans 14 Yesterday’s Battles 17 The gift exchange turns vicious!!! Member Jan Catherwood tries to bribe Bob Kison, Mike McDonnough (center), Joan Dorrell New Members/Renewals 19 Facilities Officer (in Santa hat), with Chee- (left) and James Bond (right) enjoy the party tos so he won’t claim her gift!!! with a view of the crowd in the background. Officer Reports Throughout PAGE 2 UN-SCRAMBLE CALENDAR OF EVENTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS JANUARY 14, 2003 12:00 NOON VAC MUSEUM BOARD ROOM FEBRUARY 11, 2003 6600 Tico Road, Titusville, FL 32780-8009 12:00 NOON Tel (321) 268-1941 FAX (321) 268-5969 VAC MUSEUM BOARD ROOM EXECUTIVE STAFF AIRSHOW/MEMBERSHIP MEETING JANUARY 11, 2002 COMMANDER Lloyd Morris 1 P.M. (386) 423-9304 VAC LIBRARY EXECUTIVE OFFICER Harold Larkin CALL DOSSIE 407-677-1779 OR VAC 321-268-1941 FOR (321) 453-4072 RESERVATIONS OPERATIONS OFFICER Mike McCann Email: [email protected] (321) 259-0587 DID YOU KNOW??? MAINTENANCE OFFICER Bob James THE ENTIRE UN-SCRAMBLE IS NOW AVAIL- (321) 453-6995 ABLE ON THE WEBSITE IN PRINTABLE FOR- FINANCE OFFICER Pieter Lenie MAT, COLOR ON ALL PAGES!!! GO TO (321) 727-3944 WWW.VACWARBIRDS.ORG PERSONNEL OFFICER Alice Iacuzzo (321) 799-4040 FROM THE COMMANDER TRANSP/FACILITY OFFICER Bob Kison Another year has passed us by with many accom- (321) 269-6282 plishments at the Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • 35Th FIGHTER SQUADRON
    35th FIGHTER SQUADRON MISSION The “Pantons” provide combat-ready F-16 C/D fighter aircraft to conduct air operations throughout the Pacific theater as tasked by United States and coalition combatant commanders. The squadron performs air and space control and force application roles including counter air, strategic attack, interdiction, and close-air support missions. It employs a full range of the latest state-of –the-art precision ordnance, day or night, all weather. Employs 32 pilots, 11 operations support personnel, 21 aircraft, and resources valued in excess of $725 million to generate and fly over 4,200 sorties per year. Flies interdiction, counter-air, close air support, and forward air controller-airborne missions. Employs night vision goggles and precision guided munitions. LINEAGE 35th Aero Squadron organized, 12 Jun 1917 Demobilized, 19 Mar 1919 Reconstituted and redesignated 35th Pursuit Squadron, 24 Mar 1923 Activated, 25 Jun 1932 Redesignated 35th Pursuit Squadron (Fighter), 6 Dec 1939 Redesignated 35th Pursuit Squadron (Interceptor), 12 Mar 1941 Redesignated 35th Fighter Squadron, 15 May 1942 Redesignated 35th Fighter Squadron, Two Engine, 19 Feb 1944 Redesignated 35th Fighter Squadron, Single Engine, 8 Jan 1946 Redesignated 35th Fighter Squadron, Jet, 1 Jan 1950 Redesignated 35th Fighter-Bomber Squadron, 20 Jan 1950 Redesignated 35th Tactical Fighter Squadron, 1 Jul 1958 Redesignated 35th Fighter Squadron, 3 Feb 1992 STATIONS Camp Kelly, TX, 12 Jun–11 Aug 1917 Etampes, France, 20 Sep 1917 Paris, France, 23 Sep 1917 Issoudun,
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Region Directory
    DODEA PACIFIC DIRECTORY SY 2020 - 2021 Welcome to the 2020-21 edition of the DoDEA Pacific Directory! Inside these pages you will find helpful contact and location information, maps, and more.This document is accurate as of October 2019. We have made every effort to include the most current and accurate information. If you find an error, please know it is unintentional and we will gladly make a prompt correction to the online edition available on every PC desktop across the Pacific. Please submit all change requests to Ronald Hill @ [email protected]. or send an email request to: [email protected] Table of contents Leadership & Chain of Command .................................................................................................. 3 Advisory Councils ........................................................................................................................... 3 Office of the Director ....................................................................................................................... 4 Region Office Map ................................................................................................................ 4 Office of the Director ............................................................................................................. 5 Center for Instructional Leadership ...................................................................................... 6 Resource Management Division ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Airborne SIGINT Capabilities / Desmond Ball And
    IR / PS Stacks UNIVERSITYOFCALIFORNIA, SANDIEGO 1 W67 3 1822 02951 6903 v . 353 TRATEGIC & DEFENCE STUDIES CENTRE WORKING PAPER NO .353 JAPANESE AIRBORNE SIGINT CAPABILITIES Desmond Ball and Euan Graham Working paper (Australian National University . Strategic and Defence Studies Centre ) IR /PS Stacks AUST UC San Diego Received on : 03 - 29 -01 SDSC Working Papers Series Editor : Helen Hookey Published and distributed by : Strategic and Defence Studies Centre The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200 Australia Tel: 02 62438555 Fax : 02 62480816 UNIVERSITYOF CALIFORNIA, SANDIEGO... 3 1822 029516903 LIBRARY INT 'L DESTIONS /PACIFIC STUDIES , UNIVE : TY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO LA JOLLA , CALIFORNIA 92093 WORKING PAPER NO .353 JAPANESE AIRBORNE SIGINT CAPABILITIES Desmond Ball and Euan Graham Canberra December 2000 National Library of Australia Cataloguing -in-Publication Entry Ball , Desmond , 1947 Japanese airborne SIGINT capabilities . Bibliography. ISBN 0 7315 5402 7 ISSN 0158 -3751 1. Electronic intelligence . 2.Military intelligence - Japan . I. Graham , Euan Somerled , 1968 - . II. Australian National . University. Strategic and Defence Studies Centre . III Title ( Series : Working paper Australian( National University . ; Strategic and Defence Studies Centre ) no . 353 ) . 355 . 3432 01 , © Desmond Ball and Euan Graham 2000 - 3 - 4 ABSTRACT , Unsettled by changes to its strategic environment since the Cold War , but reluctant to abandon its constitutional constraints Japan has moved in recent years to improve and centralise its intelligence - gathering capabilities across the board . The Defense Intelligence Headquarters established in , , Tokyo in early 1997 is now complete and Japan plans to field its own fleet by of reconnaissance satellites 2002 . Intelligence sharing with the United States was also reaffirmed as a key element of the 1997 Guidelines for Defense Cooperation .
    [Show full text]
  • British Aircraft in Russia Bombers and Boats
    SPRING 2004 - Volume 51, Number 1 British Aircraft in Russia Viktor Kulikov 4 Bombers and Boats: SB-17 and SB-29 Combat Operations in Korea Forrest L. Marion 16 Were There Strategic Oil Targets in Japan in 1945? Emanuel Horowitz 26 General Bernard A. Schriever: Technological Visionary Jacob Neufeld 36 Touch and Go in Uniforms of the Past JackWaid 44 Book Reviews 48 Fleet Operations in a Mobile War: September 1950 – June 1951 by Joseph H. Alexander Reviewed by William A. Nardo 48 B–24 Liberator by Martin Bowman Reviewed by John S. Chilstrom 48 Bombers over Berlin: The RAF Offensive, November 1943-March 1944 by Alan W. Cooper Reviewed by John S. Chilstrom 48 The Politics of Coercion: Toward A Theory of Coercive Airpower for Post-Cold War Conflict by Lt. Col. Ellwood P. “Skip” Hinman IV Reviewed by William A. Nardo 49 Ending the Vietnam War: A History of America’s Involvement and Extrication from the Vietnam War by Henry Kissinger Reviewed by Lawrence R. Benson 50 The Dynamics of Military Revolution, 1300-2050 by MacGregor Knox and Williamson Murray, eds. Reviewed by James R. FitzSimonds 50 To Reach the High Frontier: A History of U.S. Launch Vehicles by Roger D. Launius and Dennis R. Jenkins, eds. Reviewed by David F. Crosby 51 History of Rocketry and Astronautics: Proceedings of the Thirtieth History Symposium of the International Academy of Astronautics, Beijing, China, 1996 by Hervé Moulin and Donald C. Elder, eds. Reviewed by Rick W. Sturdevant 52 Secret Empire: Eisenhower, the CIA, and the Hidden Story of America’s Space Espionage by Philip Taubman Reviewed by Lawrence R.
    [Show full text]
  • USFJ/JASDF Aeromedical Interoperability Conference
    UNCLASSIFIED USFJ/JASDF Aeromedical Interoperability Conference This briefing is for information only. No U.S. government commitment to sell, Col Talib Ali loan, lease, co-develop, or co-produce HQ PACAF/SGP defense articles or services is implied or intended. Lt Col Kenji Takano Lessons Learned 374 MDG/SGP UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Lessons Learned From Planning a Bilateral Aeromedical Conference Briefing Overview - Strategic Overview - USFJ Medical Operating Environment - Initial Planning Steps - Conference Execution - Post Event Outcome U//FOUO UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Strategic Overview (The Big Picture) Indo-Pacific Region “We will strengthen our long-standing military relationships and encourage the development of a strong defense network with our allies and partners.” - National Security Strategy of the United States of America December 2017 “The US has enduring national interests in the Indo- Asia-Pacific...Of the five global challenges that currently drive U.S. defense planning and budgeting- ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria), North Korea, China, Russia and Iran- four are in the Indo-Asia- Pacific.” – Admiral Harry Harris, Commander USPACOM 26 April 2017 U//FOUO UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Medical Forces in Japan • SG 5AF USFJ Col Ford- USFJ/5th AF SG- Yokota AB US Marine Corps US Navy US Air Force US Army CAPT Bigby- USNH-Y CO- Yokosuka CAPT Bigby- USNH-Y CO- Yokosuka NB Col Ford- 374 MDG CC- Yokota AB COL Emerson- MEDDAC-J/ USARJ SG- Camp Zama (NAF Atsugi, MCAS Iwakuni, Sasebo NB) (NAF Atsugi, MCAS Iwakuni, Sasebo NB)
    [Show full text]
  • United States-Japan Security Consultative Committee Document United States-Japan Roadmap for Realignment Implementation May 1
    United States-Japan Security Consultative Committee Document United States-Japan Roadmap for Realignment Implementation May 1, 2006 by Secretary of State Rice Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld Minister of Foreign Affairs Aso Minister of State for Defense Nukaga Overview On October 29, 2005, the U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee (SCC) members approved recommendations for realignment of U.S. forces in Japan and related Japan Self-Defense Forces (SDF) in their document, “U.S.-Japan Alliance: Transformation and Realignment for the Future.” In that document, the SCC members directed their respective staffs “to finalize these specific and interrelated initiatives and develop plans, including concrete implementation schedules no later than March 2006.” This work has been completed and is reflected in this document. Finalization of Realignment Initiatives The individual realignment initiatives form a coherent package. When implemented, these realignments will ensure a life-of-the-alliance presence for U.S. forces in Japan. The construction and other costs for facility development in the implementation of these initiatives will be borne by the Government of Japan (GOJ) unless otherwise specified. The U.S. Government (USG) will bear the operational costs that arise from implementation of these initiatives. The two Governments will finance their realignment-associated costs consistent with their commitments in the October 29, 2005 SCC document to maintain deterrence and capabilities while reducing burdens on local communities. Key Implementation Details 1. Realignment on Okinawa (a) Futenma Replacement Facility (FRF) The United States and Japan will locate the FRF in a configuration that combines the Henoko-saki and adjacent water areas of Oura and Henoko Bays, including two runways aligned in a “V”-shape, each runway having a length of 1,600 meters plus two 100-meter overruns.
    [Show full text]
  • 730 Air Mobility Squadron
    730 AIR MOBILITY SQUADRON MISSION The squadron is part of AMC's en route system to provide fixed and deployed maintenance, aerial port and command and control support to deployed AMC forces. The squadron's mission is to provide critical en route services to deployed forces worldwide. LINEAGE 630 Military Airlift Support Squadron constituted, 25 Nov 1968 Activated, 24 Dec 1968 Inactivated, 30 Jun 1975 Redesignated 630 Air Mobility Support Squadron, 26 May 1994 Activated, 1 Jul 1994 Redesignated 730 Air Mobility Squadron, 15 Mar 2001 STATIONS Rhein-Main AB, Germany, 24 Dec 1968-30 Jun 1975 Yokota AB, Japan, 1 Jul 1994 ASSIGNMENTS 435 Military Airlift Support Wing, 24 Dec 1968-30 Jun 1975 615 Air Mobility Support (later, 715 Air Mobility Operations) Group, 1 Jul 1994 515 Air Mobility Operations Group, 5 Jun 2008 COMMANDERS Col James Newton, 1970 Col Warren Hess, 1971 HONORS Service Streamers None Campaign Streamers None Armed Forces Expeditionary Streamers None Decorations Air Force Outstanding Unit Awards 1 Jul 1972-30 Jun 1974 1 Jul 1994-30 Jun 1996 1 Jul 1997-30 Jun 1999 1 Jul 1999-30 Jun 2001 1 Jul 2001-30 Jun 2003 1 Oct 2004-30 Sep 2005 1 Oct 2005-30 Sep 2006 1 Oct 2006-30 Sep 2007 1 Oct 2007-30 Sep 2008 1 Oct 2011-30 Sep 2013 EMBLEM Approved, 15 Nov 1994 MOTTO NICKNAME OPERATIONS Prior to the 435th OMS/Enroute section, Enroute existed in the form of the 630th MASS (Military Airlift Support Squadron). The base with the C-130 tactical airlift and the C-131 medical airlift squadrons were USAFE owned and MAC was a tenant on base.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Ground Investigation Board Report Released Jan. 25
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE GROUND ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BOARD REPORT Hazardous Materials Storage Building 18TH LOGISTICS READINESS SQUADRON 18TH WING KADENA AIR BASE, JAPAN TYPE OF ACCIDENT: FIRE LOCATION: BUILDING 3150, KADENA AIR BASE, JAPAN DATE OF ACCIDENT: 22 JUNE 2020 BOARD PRESIDENT: COLONEL DOMINIC A. SETKA, USAF Conducted lAW Air Force Instruction 51-307 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UNITED STATES AIR FORCE GROUND ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION Hazardous Materials Storage Building Fire Kadena Air Base, Japan 22 June 2020 On Monday, 22 June 2020, at approximately 0852 local time, a fire occurred at an 18th Logistics Readiness Squadron (LRS) hazardous materials storage building (MB), building 3150, Kadena Air Base, Japan. When the fire started, five Airmen from the 18th Civil Engineer Squadron Readiness and Emergency Management (EM) Flight, operating in two two-person teams with one team lead, were repackaging calcium hypochiorite (CH) into polycarbonate (plastic) and metal barrels for transportation to a hazardous waste disposal facility. The CH, also known as bleaching powder, has a strong oxidizing potential, which can make the chemical unstable when exposed to high heat and humidity. Approximately 90 minutes into the operation, an EM team member felt heat radiating from a pallet of CH in the southeast corner of the MB. Within minutes, the CH in the corner of the MB began to smoke and flames were observed near the southeast corner of the MB shortly after the EM team evacuated the building. Fire crews arrived on-scene within two minutes of the fire starting, coordinated with Security Forces to establish a cordon, and began to attack the fire with water.
    [Show full text]
  • 460 Reference
    Reference 1 Number of Nuclear Warheads Arsenals and Their Major Means of Delivery by Country United States Russia United Kingdom France China 400 334 60 Minuteman III 400 SS-18 46 DF-5 CSS-4 20 ICBM （ ） SS-19 30 DF-31（CSS-10） 40 (Intercontinental ― ― SS-25 63 Ballistic Missiles) SS-27 78 RS-24 117 Missiles 148 IRBM DF-4（CSS-3） 10 ― ― ― ― MRBM DF-21（CSS-5） 122 DF-26 30 Reference 336 192 48 64 48 SLBM (Submarine Trident D-5 336 SS-N-18 48 Trident D-5 48 M-45 16 JL-2 CSS-NX-14 48 Launched （ ） SS-N-23 96 M-51 48 Ballistic Missiles) SS-N-32 48 Submarines equipped with nuclear ballistic 14 13 4 4 4 missiles 66 76 40 100 Aircraft B-2 20 Tu-95 (Bear) 60 ― Rafale 40 H-6K 100 B-52 46 Tu-160 (Blackjack) 16 Approx. 3,800 Approx. 4,350 (including 215 300 Approx. 280 Number of warheads Approx. 1,830 tactical nuclear warheads) Notes: 1. Data is based on “The Military Balance 2019,” the SIPRI Yearbook 2018, etc. 2. In March 2019, the United States released the following figures based on the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty between the United States and Russia as of March 1, 2019: the number of deployed strategic nuclear warheads for the United States was 1,365 and the delivery vehicles involved 656 missiles/aircraft; the number of deployed strategic nuclear warheads for Russia was 1,461 and the delivery vehicles involved 524 missiles/aircraft. However, according to the SIPRI database, as of January 2018, the number of deployed U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Programs and Budget of Japan
    Defense Programs and Budget of Japan – Overview of FY2016 Budget Request – This is a provisional translation for reference purposes only. The original text is in Japanese. Concept of FY2016 Budget Request １ Ⅰ Effective deterrence and response to various situations ２ １ Ensuring security of seas and airspace surrounding Japan ２ ２ Respond to attacks on remote islands ５ （１） Develop continuous surveillance capabilities （２） Ensure and maintain air superiority （３） Ensure and maintain maritime supremacy （４） Enhance rapid deployment and response capabilities （５） Strengthen the infrastructure for C3I capabilities ３ Respond to ballistic missile attacks １１ （１） Respond to ballistic missile attacks （２） Enhancement of air and missile defense （３） Respond to attacks by guerillas and special operations forces ４ Response in outer space １３ ５ Response in cyberspace １４ Defense Programs （１） Enhance information gathering, research and analysis capabilities （２） Improvement/enhancement of operational infrastructure and Budget of Japan ６ Respond to large-scale disasters １５ （１） Maintenance/enhancement of function of military camps/bases to Overview of FY2016 serve as hubs for disaster response Budget Request （２） Implementation of exercises, etc. to respond to large-scale and unconventional disasters － Contents － （３） Acquisition, etc. of equipment contributing to disaster response ７ Strengthen intelligence capabilities １７ Ⅱ Support stabilization of the Asia-Pacific region and improvement of the １８ global security environment １ Respond to stabilization of the Asia-Pacific Region ２ Appropriately respond to improve global security environments Ⅲ Strengthen Japan-U.S. alliance ２０ １ Measures for mitigating the impact on local communities ２ SACO-related cost Ⅳ Measures concerning personnel and education ２１ １ Promote measures to secure high-quality human resources in charge of national defense ２ Promote measures to support further engagement of female personnel ３ Personnel management system reform Ⅴ Streamlining Initiatives ２４ １ Procurement of equipment, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports and Maps of the Military Geology Unit
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 97-175 Reports and Maps of the Military Geology Unit 1942-1975 compiled by Selma Bonham 1981 edited by William Leith 1997 Reston, Virginia 1997 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................... i i i WASHINGTON OFFICE. Series reports for office of the Chief of Engineers, 1942-1963, and Defense Intelligence Agency, 1963-1965 ................ 1 Strategic Engineering Studies, 1942 1945 .......................... 4 Engineering Notes, 1944 1953 .................................. 1 2 Joint Army-Navy Intelligence Studies, 1946-1948 ................. 13 Basic Map Compilations, 1949-1965 ............................. 14 Engineer Intelligence Studies, 1952-1964 ........................ 18 Engineer Intelligence Guides, 1957-1964 ...................... ... 21 Engineer Intelligence Notes, 1959 ................................ 21 Basic Terrain Studies, Alaska, 1960-1965 ........................ 22 Pacific Engineer Intelligence Program, 1960-1965 ................. 24 Special reports for: Office of the Chief of Engineers, 1942-1963 ....................... 25 Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, 1957-1970 ............. 39 Advanced Research Projects Agency, 1962-1973 ................... 42 Defense Intelligence Agency, 1963-1971 .......................... 45 Other agencies, 1942-1972 .................................... 4 6 HAWAII OFFICE Engineering and Terrain Intelligence Team Reports for Armed Forces Mid- Pacific, 1 944-1 945 .........................................
    [Show full text]