DOCSLIB.ORG

The New Zealand Gazette. 81

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The New Zealand Gazette. 81 JAN. 25.] THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. 81 Appointments in the New Zealand Naval l!'orces, Royal Naval Lieutenant-Commander Hugh Wynne Jones, Royal Naval Reserve (New Zea.land), and Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed to H.M.S." Philomel" Reserve (New Zealand). additional for duty in mine-sweepers, to date 23rd September, 1939. Navy Office, Lieutenant Douglas William Blacklaws, Royal Naval Wellington, 17th January, 1940. Reserve (New Zealand), appointed to H.M.S." Philomel '' IS Excellency the Governor-General has been pleased for special duty, to date 23rd October, 1939. H to approve the following appointments in the New Surgeon-Commander Harold Keith Corkill, M.B., Ch.B. Zealand Naval Forces, Roye,) Naval Reserve (New ·Zealand), (Edin.), F.R.C.S.E., V.D., Wellington Division, Royal and Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand):- Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed to H.M.S. "Leander " additional, to date 4th October, Probationary Sub-Lieutenant Henry Valentine Bla~eney 1939, and vice Keevil, and as Squadron Medical Officer, Williams, Royal Naval Reserve (New Zealand), appomted as from 5th October, 1939. to H.M.S. " Achilles" additional in continuation of Lieutenant-Commander Robert McDougall Brown, Royal present appointment, to date 29th August, 1939, and to Navy (Retired), appointed to H.M.S. "Phi!omel" H.M.S. " Achilles " as part complement, to date 4th additional for D.E.M.S. duties at Auckland, to date 4th September, 1939. September, 1939. Probationary Sub-Lieutenant Eric Primrose Chapman, Commander George Hamilton Dennistoun, D.S.O., Royal Royal Naval Reserve (New Zealand), appointed to Navy (Retired), appointed to H.M.S. "Philomel" H.M.S. "Achilles" additional in continuation of additional for duty as Naval Officer-in-Charge, Lyttelton., present appointment, to date 29th August, 1939, and to date 4th September, 1939. to H.M.S. "Achilles" as part complement, to date Lieutenant-Commander Douglas Alfred Bingley, Royal 4th September, 1939. Navy (Retired), appointed to H.M.S. "Philomel" Surgeon-Lieutenant Cecil Arthur Pittar, M ..B., B.S. additional for duty as Assistant King's Harbour Master (Sydney), F.R.A.C.S. (Opt.), Auckland Division, Royal and for Naval Control Sta:fl; duties, to date 4th September, Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed to 1939. H.M.S. "Achilles," to date 29th August, 1939. Commander Brian Lifford Hewitt, O.B.E., Royal Navy Lieute1\ant Arthur Allen Bell, Otago Division, Royal (Emergency List), appointed to H.M.S. "Philomel" Naval Volunteer Reserve (New ZealaJJ.d), appointe~ to additional for duty as Chief Staff Officer, Auckland, to H.M.S. " Phi!ornel " additional for duty in mme· date 4th September, 1939, and to H.M.S. " Philomel" s\1<cepers, to date 6th September, 1939. .. additional for temporary duty in Wellington, to date Lieutenant Henry Lester Hudson, Canterbury D1v!s10n, 14th October, 1939, and for duty in mine-sweepers Royal Naval Volunteer Reserv.e ~New Zealand), a;Ppo~ted (second group) to date 18th October, 1939. To serve in to H.M.S. " Philomcl" addit10nal for duty m mine- rank of Commander. sweepers, to date 6th Septem~er, 1939.. .. Lieutenant-Commander Hubert Alexander Rhind, Royal Lieutenant John Alexander Rhind, Wellington Division, Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand) (Retired), Royal Naval Volunteer Reserv!' (New Zealand), a_ppo~ted appointed to H.M.S. " Philomel" additional for duty as to H.M.S. " Philomel" addit10nal for duty in mme· District Intelligence Officer, Lyttelton, to date 4th sweepers, to date 6th September, 1939. September, 1939. Honorary Commander Victor Gordon Webb, Royal Naval Commander George Edwin Lisle Alderton, Royal Naval Reserve (New Zealand), appointed to H.M.S. "Philomel" Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand) (Retired), appointed additional as Honorary Mercantile Marine Liaison to H.M.S. " Philomel " additional for duty as District Officer to the New Zealand Naval Board, to date 4th Intelligence Officer, Auckland, to date 4th September, September, 1939. 1939. To serve as Lieutenant-Commander. Lieutenant John Arthur Kirk, Royal Naval Reserve (New Lieutenant-Commander Richard Percy Nisbet, D.S.C., Zealand), appointed to H.M.S. "Leander," to date V.D., Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand) 13th September, 1939. (Retired), appointed to H.M.S. " Philomel" additional Lieutenant Peter Corbett Saunders, Royal Naval Reserve for duty as Extended Defence Officer, Auckland, to (New Zealand), appointed to H.M.S. "Leander," to date 4th September, 1939. date 13th September, 1939. Lieutenant Alister Barclay Gilfillan, Auckland Division, Engineer-Lieutenant Joseph Burnett Laverty, R.D., Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed Royal Naval Reserve (Imperial) (Retired), appointed to H.M.S. " Philomel " additional for duty as Identifica­ to H.M.S. '' Philomel '' additional for duty with D.E.M.S. tion Officer, .Auckland, to date 4th September, 1939. at Auckland, to date 6th September, 1939. To serve Lieutenant Leo Ignatius Bell, Auckland Division, Royal in rank of Commissioned Engineer. Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed to Surgeon-Lieutenant Ian Brandon Ewart,M.D. (Edin)., Wel­ H.M.S. " Philomel" additional for duty as Identification lington Division, Royal Naval Volunteer ReservE! (New Officer, Auckland, to date 4th September, 1939. Zealand), appointed to H.M.S. "Leander," to date Lieutenant Ralph Eric Harding, Auckland Division, 13th September, 1939. Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed Probationary Sub-Lieutenant Raymond Victor Berry, to H.M.S. " Philomel" additional for duty as Identifica. Wellington Division, Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve tion Officer, Auckland, to date 4th September, 1939. (New Zealand), appointed to H.M.S. " Philomel" addi­ Lieutenant Arthur George Newell, Auckland Division, tional for duty with Examination Services at Auckland, Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed to date 8th September, 1939. .. to H.M.S. " Philomel " additional for duty as Identifica­ Lieutenant Charles George Palmer, Auckland Div~s10n, tion Officer, Auckland, to date 4th September, 1939, and Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appom~ed to H.M.S. " Philomel " additional for duty at Royal to H.M.S. " Philomel" additional for duty with Naval Volunteer Reserve Headquarters, Auckland, vice Examination Services at Auckland, to date 9th September, Howard, to date 22nd November, 1939. 1939. Lieutenant-Commander James Andrew Smyth, Wellington Lieutenant Ian Clendon Howard, Auckland Division, Division, Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed appointed to H.M.S. " Philomel " additional for duty as to H. M.S. " Philomel " additional for temporary duty Extended Defence Officer, Wellington, and at Royal at Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve Headquarters, Naval Volunteer Reserve Headquarters, Wellington, Auckland, to date 11th September, 19~~· and _t~ to date 4th September, 1939. H M S. " Philomel " additional for H.M.S. Monowai, Lieutenant Ebenezer Wallis Browne, Wellington Division, 0 to d~te 22nd November, 1939, and to H.M.S. "Monowai" Royal Naval Volunteer Rese;".e (New Zealand), appo~ted on commissioning. to H.M.S. " Philomel " add1t1onal for duty as Ident1fica. Lieutenant John Neat Allan, Otago Division, Royal tion Officer, Wellington, to date 4th September, 1939. Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand}, appointed to H.M.S. " Philomel" additional for temporary duty at Lieutenant John Blythe Stephenson, Wellington Division, Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve Headquarters, Dunedin, Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed to date 11th September, 1939. to H.M.S. " Philomel " additional for duty as Identifica­ Lieutenant Jcihn David Keay, Canterbury Division, Royal tion Officer, Wellington, to date 4th September, 1939. Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed to Probationary Temporary Lieutenant-Commander Raymond H.~f.S. "Philomel" additional for temporary duty at Rowsell Canterbury Division, Royal Naval Volunteer Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve Headquarters, Christ. Reserve'(New Zealand), appointed to H.M.S." Philomel" church, to date 11th November, 1939. additional for duty as Extended Defence Officer, Lyttel. Lieutenant-Commander John Churchill Elworthy, Royal ton, to date 4th September, 1939. Navy (Retired), appointed to H.M.S: "Philomel" Lieutenant Sydney Warren Hicks, Canterbury Division, additional for duty at Navy Office, Wellington, to date Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (New Zealand), appointed 5th September, 1939, and to H.M.S. " Philomel" to H.M.S. " Philomel " additional for duty as Identifica. temporarily, vice Michell, to date 24th September, 1939. tion Officer, Lyttelton, to date 4th September, 1939. B .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of the Loss of HMAS SYDNEY
    An analysis of the loss of HMAS SYDNEY By David Kennedy The 6,830-ton modified Leander class cruiser HMAS SYDNEY THE MAIN STORY The sinking of cruiser HMAS SYDNEY by disguised German raider KORMORAN, and the delayed search for all 645 crew who perished 70 years ago, can be attributed directly to the personal control by British wartime leader Winston Churchill of top-secret Enigma intelligence decodes and his individual power. As First Lord of the Admiralty, then Prime Minster, Churchill had been denying top secret intelligence information to commanders at sea, and excluding Australian prime ministers from knowledge of Ultra decodes of German Enigma signals long before SYDNEY II was sunk by KORMORAN, disguised as the Dutch STRAAT MALAKKA, off north-Western Australia on November 19, 1941. Ongoing research also reveals that a wide, hands-on, operation led secretly from London in late 1941, accounted for the ignorance, confusion, slow reactions in Australia and a delayed search for survivors . in stark contrast to Churchill's direct part in the destruction by SYDNEY I of the German cruiser EMDEN 25 years before. Churchill was at the helm of one of his special operations, to sweep from the oceans disguised German raiders, their supply ships, and also blockade runners bound for Germany from Japan, when SYDNEY II was lost only 19 days before the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor and Southeast Asia. Covering up of a blunder, or a punitive example to the new and distrusted Labor government of John Curtin gone terribly wrong because of a covert German weapon, can explain stern and brief official statements at the time and whitewashes now, with Germany and Japan solidly within Western alliances.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Era Correspondence Collection
    Civil War Era Correspondence Collection Processed by Curtis White – Fall 1994 Reprocessed by Rachel Thompson – Fall 2010 Table of Contents Collection Information Volume of Collection: Two Boxes Collection Dates: Restrictions: Reproduction Rights: Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must be obtained in writing from the McLean County Museum of History Location: Archives Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Biographical Sketches Anonymous: This folder consists of one photocopy of a letter from an unknown soldier to “Sallie” about preparations for the Battle of Allegheny Mountain, Virginia (now West Virginia). Anonymous [J.A.R?]: This folder contains the original and enlarged and darkened copies of a letter describing to the author’s sister his sister the hardships of marching long distances, weather, and sickness. Reuben M. Benjamin was born in June 1833 in New York. He married Laura W. Woodman in 1857. By 1860, they were residents of Bloomington, IL. Benjamin was an attorney and was active in the 1869 Illinois Constitutional Convention. Later, he became an attorney in the lead Granger case of Munn vs. the People which granted the states the right to regulate warehouse and railroad charges. In 1873, he was elected judge in McLean County and helped form the Illinois Wesleyan University law school. His file consists of a transcript of a letter to his wife written from La Grange, TN, dated January 21, 1865. He may have been part of a supply train regiment bringing food and other necessities to Union troops in Memphis, TN. This letter mentions troop movements. Due to poor health, Benjamin served only a few months.
    [Show full text]
  • Shas Chap 33+ End
    CHAPTER 35 NAVAL TRAINING IN NEW SOUTH WALES 1855 - 1983 "Many of the Colonial Governments, notably those of the Australian Colonies are now thoroughly aware of the necessity for providing for the protection of their ports against attack, in the event of Great Britain being involved in War". (Sir Cooper Key - First Sea Lord in 1884) Australia was born of Admiralty. She was discovered by seamen, who in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries opened her eastern oceans to the world. Her settlement was made possible by the courage and enterprise of seamen. From the beginning of settlement in Australia in 1788, the Colonists were characteristically aware the sea. The need for the defence of their sea borders was clear to the colonists and the method of defence was equally clear to them. The Royal Navy was the obvious weapon for the job. Cook the Discoverer, Phillip the first Governor and his successors Hunter, King and Bligh - all naval officers, brought their naval training, experience and attitudes to the young colony. The first major war vessel to visit Australia was HMS WARSPITE, a Ship of the Line which visited Sydney in 1826. Sydney saw ships of the Royal Navy East Indies Squadron from time to time after the l82O’s either on detached service or merely on visits. The British Admiralty was well aware of its responsibility for the naval defence of Britain’s Colonies. In all the Colonial States of Australia, little thought had been given to matters of naval defence until the 185O’s when rapid changes to Australia’s population, coupled with dramatic international events brought an awareness of the urgent need for the colonies to possess adequate naval defence forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: the Engagement
    CHAPTER 4 THE ENGAGEMENT Obviously the thing that is coming out of all of this is that NO ONE knows what happened to the Sydney and the Kormoran. Every thing appears to be heresay (sic) from all witnesses and all the information obtained from the prisoners of the Kormoran.1 The Debate Surrounding the Loss of Sydney 4.1 In the 57 years since Sydney was lost, theories about the battle and its aftermath have flourished, assisted by the lack of a complete documentary record of the incident. The absence2 of definitive records, and in particular any report of a Board of Inquiry, has frustrated researchers and in some cases led to suspicions of a cover-up. Quite contradictory theories about the loss of Sydney have developed. While they are open to challenge and criticism, the various theories raise questions about the accuracy of the official history, published in 1957. 4.2 The Terms of Reference for the inquiry asked that the Committee 'investigate and report on the circumstances of the sinking of HMAS Sydney off the West Australian coast ...'. The Committee, while hopeful of addressing some of the major issues related to the loss of Sydney, did not aim to examine in minute detail the technical dimensions of the engagement. The evidence about what might have occurred is often contradictory, and as LCDR Ean McDonald, RAN (Retd) observed: The whole point about this, as we must all appreciate, is that we are all guessing.3 4.3 The same claims and counter claims covered in works by Montgomery, Winter and Frame continue to be raised and merit some comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding HMAS Sydney (II)
    SEMAPHORE SEA POWER CENTRE - AUSTRALIA ISSUE 13, NOVEMBER 2008 FINDING HMAS SYDNEY (II) HMAS Sydney (II) was one of three modified British ship which had been well armed and converted into a Leander class light cruisers purchased by the Royal disguised raider. Australian Navy (RAN) in the years immediately prior to During a voyage of almost a year, Detmers had sunk 10 World War II. She gained fame early in the War for her Allied merchant ships and taken another as a prize. exploits while operating as part of the Royal Navy’s According to the German account on 19 November, Mediterranean fleet. On 19 July 1940, against superior Kormoran encountered Sydney approximately 120 odds, Sydney, under the command of Captain John nautical miles west of Steep Point, Western Australia. The Collins, RAN, engaged and destroyed the Italian light cruiser immediately challenged the unknown vessel’s cruiser Bartolomeo Colleoni and damaged another, the identity, but configured as the Dutch merchant ship Straat Giovanni Delle Bande Nere. This action became known Malakka, Kormoran feigned innocence while Sydney as the Battle of Cape Spada and in many ways mirrored continued to close. With the distance reduced to the earlier success of HMAS Sydney (I), when in 1914 approximately one nautical mile, and not satisfied with the she vanquished the German cruiser Emden. The second mysterious vessel’s responses, the cruiser issued a final Sydney likewise became the ‘darling’ ship of the challenge to reveal her secret call sign. Not knowing how Australian nation. to respond, Detmers de-camouflaged and opened fire on Sydney at the equivalent of point-blank range.
    [Show full text]
  • HMAS Sydney 1934-1941
    HMAS Sydney 1934-1941 Sources J. Collins, HMAS Sydney, The Naval Historical Society of Australia, 1971. T. Frame, HMAS Sydney, Loss and Controversy, 1998, (paperback ed.). R. Summerrell, The Sinking of HMAS Sydney. A Guide to Commonwealth Government Records, 1999. Parliamentary Inquiry, Report on the Loss of HMAS Sydney, 1999. W. Olson, Bitter Victory. The Death of HMAS Sydney, 2000. ______________________ HMAS Sydney - The Pride of the Fleet Launched in September 1934 from the Wallsend-on-Tyne shipyard, Sydney was a light cruiser of the modified Leander (or Perth) class. The Leander class cruisers were built to a basic late 1920s design.1 Modifications saw the installation of two separate machinery units rather than one, so reducing the possibility of a complete power failure, with each unit having its own funnel. Her armament was eight 6-inch guns (in four turrets), four 4-inch anti-aircraft guns, four 3-pounder saluting guns, three 4-barrel 0.5-inch machine guns and eight 21-inch torpedo tubes. Some of the modifications could be seen as compromising the ship’s battle worthiness. Weight was saved (so enhancing its speed) by only protecting the area between the funnels with armour. A pre-war captain, J. Waller, told the Naval Board that the primary gun control systems were ‘extremely vulnerable to gunfire and bombs, even of small calibre’.2 The fear was that a well-directed or lucky hit could knock out the main armament’s central control. The fire-control system was not however altered. Sydney served with distinction in the Mediterranean in 1940 under Captain John Collins.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 45, September 2020
    From the President Welcome to Edition 45 of Call the Hands (CTH) and accompanying occasional papers. I trust that you find them of interest. As always, your feedback and contributions are welcomed. Most stories included in this edition were compiled by Midshipman Lloyd Skinner whom the Society was fortunate to have allocated for several days in August. Having read our appeal for volunteers in the August edition of CTH, Midshipman Skinner responded and sought approval to be allocated to the Society as part of his Navy familiarization program. Lloyd is also a graduate of the last New Entry Officers’ Course during which he won the Naval Historical Society Essay Prize. His prize-winning essay entitled The Forming of the Royal Australian Navy is included in the September edition of the Society’s magazine, the Naval Historical Review (NHR). You have instant access to the NHR by becoming a member. It is inexpensive and easy to join. Simply visit the Society’s online shop at, https://www.navyhistory.org.au/shop/membership-2020-2021/. Occasional Paper 89 provides an overview of Operation Bursa conducted for over a decade from the late 1970s to protect Bass Strait oil facilities. OP 89 is based on a longer paper published by the Fleet Air Arm Association of Australia (FAAAA) which exists to unite former and serving Naval Aviation personnel. Occasional Paper 90 makes fascinating reading as it describes the psychology applied to setting the scene for the Japanese surrender ceremony onboard USS Missouri on 2 September 1945. Of interest is our video of the month.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Deep Light Learning Resource
    WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM LEARNING RESOURCE Year 10 HASS Images courtesy of Curtin University and the Western Australian Museum. © Western Australian Museum Overview of Exhibition The World War Two encounter between HMAS Sydney (II) and the disguised German raider HSK Kormoran off the Western Australian coast stands as Australia’s worst naval disaster. All 645 men on Sydney were lost; while 81 men from Kormoran were killed and 318 survived. For more than 66 years, the location of the two ships remained a mystery. Then, in 2008, the Finding Sydney Foundation and shipwreck expert David Mearns found the wrecks off Shark Bay, Western Australia. In 2015, the Western Australian and Curtin University, with vital assistance from DOF Subsea, the Commonwealth Government and other supporters, returned to the wreck sites. Using remotely controlled equipment, the team captured stunning underwater images that revealed the fate of the ships on the seabed, over two kilometres beneath the waves. In this poignant exhibition, remarkable images and footage allow us to witness a tragic moment in World War Two history, preserved in a remote world of solemn loss, wondrous creatures and surprising colour. Students will hear reflections from expedition team members and researchers, and have the unique opportunity to view the 3D film, From Great Depths, a permanent experience at the Museum of Geraldton. About this Learning Resource Deep Light: Illuminating the Wrecks of Sydney and Kormoran may be of particular interest to Year 10 History students with Depth Study
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for HMAS Sydney an Australian Story
    You are invited to the launch of The Search for HMAS Sydney An Australian Story Join us for the exclusive launch of the fascinating new book, The Search for HMAS Sydney: An Australian Story which tells of the history, loss, discovery and commemoration of HMAS Sydney II located by the Finding Sydney Foundation in 2008, solving one of the most baffling mysteries in Australia’s naval history. The book includes stories by family members of the men killed in Sydney and of how they and the nation coped with the huge outpouring of emotion that the discovery of Sydney’s wreck brought; it exposes the decades of false trails and false hopes which wasted lifetimes and money; it details the frustrating struggle for acceptance of a well-defined Australian solution of Sydney’s location that was only overcome by the addition of similar overseas expertise; it tells how the original Australian work defined a point within ‘spitting distance’ of the wreck of Kormoran which would 9781742234205 | Hardback | Sep 2014 have lead to a much earlier search to the wreck of Sydney; it | UNSW Press | 320pp | 220x240mm describes why Sydney sank and why were there was but one man | AUD$69.99 found, the unknown crewman washed ashore on Christmas Island months after the battle and tells the ongoing forensic journey to identify him. It includes how the small community of Geraldton in WA went about building and commissioning the National HMAS Sydney II Memorial by 2001 while the nation was still looking for a solution to the mystery of Sydney and her men.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Fight of the HMAS Sydney
    The Last Fight of the HMAS Sydney Encounter The captain was calm. “They will come by, say many thanks, wish us bon voyage and see you later,” Korvettenkapitän Theodor Detmers told the officers around him on the bridge of the Kormoran . They all had reason to be worried. Approaching across the blue ocean water was the curved bow of the HMAS Sydney , a cruiser of the Royal Australian navy and the very type of warship designed to hunt and destroy their ship. The Kormoran was a German commerce raider—an innocent-looking freighter outfitted with a hidden but lethal arsenal of guns and torpedoes. Their role in the enormous cat-and-mouse game of naval dominance was to surprise and sink Allied merchant shipping. But now they were suddenly playing the role of the meek mouse. When the raider’s lookouts first spotted the topmast of the enemy cruiser on the horizon, Detmers ordered his ship, currently disguised as a Dutch freighter, to flee to the west as fast as it could at14 knots. The Sydney , approaching at a top speed twice as fast, was closing the distance rapidly. It was late afternoon on November 19, 1941 and the two ships were converging at a spot in the Indian Ocean 150 miles off the coast of western Australia. So far this corner of the world had seen little action during the two-year old global conflict. All of the war’s major naval battles—the River Platte, the hunt for the Bismarck , Operation Pedestal—had occurred in the Atlantic or the Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2019 Nuts & Bolts V4 Issue 5
    ! NUTS & BOLTS ‘Every man needs a shed’ Vol 4 | Issue 5 | APRIL 2019 In this edition Page 2 Member’s News Message from the Editor Stroke Foundation Visit Hong Kong Police Visit Editor: Ray Peddersen Page 3 Sleep Apnoea Visit [email protected] Tony Shaw ARU Visit Peter Finch Self-Publishing Sausage Sizzle Opportunity Kevin Searle has sent me an article, on the 2011 site preparation for the construction of our shed at the Clem Jones Centre, which Page 4 CMS Beginnings appears in this issue. As we will be celebrating our shed’s tenth Page 5 Thank You Letters birthday this August I would like to feature similar articles, photos Page 6 CMS Code of Conduct and members stories, of our shed’s beginnings and development in future issues of Nuts & Bolts. Page 7 Bush Poetry Page 8 Diary of a War Baby I would also like to thank all other members who have contributed to this issue, Peter Finch for his “Diary of a War Baby”, Peter Page 9 Glamper’s Report Esk Carter for his Glamper’s report and Harry Davis for his article on his visit to the HMAS Sydney II Memorial – Lest we Forget. Page 11 HMAS Sydney II Memorial Page 13 Health and Welfare Corner Extracts –Sheds of Grey “When your friends begin to flatter you on how young you look, Page 14 Puzzles, Jokes & Trivia it's a sure sign you're getting old.” Mark Twain Mens Shed Carina Inc., Clem Jones Centre Ph: 07 3395 0678 56 Zahel Street E: [email protected] CARINA, QLD, 4152 W: www.carinamensshed.org.au Carina Men’s Shed valued supporters include: Amanda Van de Hoef 1 Nuts & Bolts Newsletter | Carina Men’s Shed Vol 4 | Issue 5 | April 2019 Member’s News Stoke Foundation Visit 25 February 2019 Mary Berry, from the Stroke Foundation, presentation detailed; how There are two types of stroke strokes occur, how to recognize the symptoms of a stroke and healthy living tips to minimize the risk factors of having a stroke.
    [Show full text]
  • On 19 November 1941, Sydney Was Involved in a Mutually Destructive Engagement with the German Auxiliary Cruiser Kormoran, and Was Lost with All 645 Aboard
    On 19 November 1941, Sydney was involved in a mutually destructive engagement with the German auxiliary cruiser Kormoran, and was lost with all 645 aboard. The wrecks of both ships were lost until 2008; Sydney was found on 17 March, five days after her adversary. Sydney's defeat is commonly attributed to the proximity of the two ships during the engagement, and Kormoran's advantages of surprise and rapid, accurate fire. However, the cruiser's loss with all hands compared to the survival of most of the Germans have resulted in controversy, with some alleging that the German commander used illegal ruses to lure Sydney into range, that a Japanese submarine was involved, and that the true events of the battle are concealed behind a wide-ranging cover up. The battle between the Australian light cruiser HMAS Sydney and the German auxiliary cruiser Kormoran[a] was a single ship action that occurred on 19 November 1941, off the coast of Western Australia. Sydney, with Captain Joseph Burnett commanding, and Kormoran, under Fregattenkapitän (Commander) Theodor Detmers, encountered each other approximately 106 nautical miles (196 km; 122 mi) off Dirk Hartog Island. Both ships were destroyed in the half-hour engagement. From 24 November, after Sydney failed to return to port, air and sea searches were conducted. Boats and rafts carrying survivors from Kormoran were recovered at sea, while others made landfall north of Carnarvon: 318 of the 399 personnel on Kormoransurvived. While debris from Sydney was found, there were no survivors from the 645-strong complement. It was the largest loss of life in the history of the Royal Australian Navy, the largest Allied warship lost with all hands during World War II, and a major blow to Australian wartime morale.[1] Australian authorities learned of Sydney's fate from the surviving Kormoran personnel, who were held in prisoner of war camps until the end of the war.
    [Show full text]