DOCSLIB.ORG

Fireline Production Rates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fireline Production Rates U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Fireline National Technology & Development Program Production 5100—Fire Management 1151 1805—SDTDC April 2011 Rates FIRELINE PRODUCTION RATES by George Broyles, Fire Project Leader Forest Service San Dimas Technology and Development Center San Dimas, CA 91773 Information contained in this document has been developed for the guidance of employees of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, its contractors, and cooperating Federal and State agencies. The USDA Forest Service assumes no responsibility for the interpretation or use of this information by other than its own employees. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official evaluation, conclusion, recommendation, endorsement, or approval of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Introduction Fireline production rates are used for strategic Over the years there have been many changes fire management purposes to ensure that the in fire management and in the fire environment. appropriate number and type of crews are Increased fire behavior and larger fires are assigned to meet management objectives. now more common. Although new technology These production rates also are used for and tools are available to firefighters and fire planning purposes and in fire growth estimation managers, one thing has remained constant: the models. Existing rates were outdated and often single most common resource used to control overestimated actual crew capability, which wildland fire is still hand crews. Hand crews hinders accurate resource assignments and remain the most effective tool fire managers adversely affects model outputs. Through direct have to contain and control wildland fire. Hand observation of crews on active fires throughout crews perform this function by digging a handline the United States, new production rates have directly along a fire’s edge or indirectly at some been established, which reflect a 95-percent distance from the fire. confidence limit. An upper and lower range of fireline production capability is also presented in Fireline production rates are defined as the this report. expected length of fireline that can be constructed by a crew (or other resource type) in a given time. KEY POINTS These rates are used continually for strategic q Current published fireline production rates fire management planning purposes and to do not reflect actual production rates. determine yearly fire management programs. To q Accurate fireline production rates were more effectively utilize hand crews and develop needed. tactics with a high probability for success, fire managers must know how far any given hand q Multiple variables in the fire environment crew can construct a fireline in a given period of need to be evaluated and measured. time under various conditions. Lack of accurate q New rates with a 95-percent confidence fireline production rates may cause fire managers limit were developed for all crew types. to send too few crews to a division, which may q New values include an upper and lower result in a situation where the control objectives range for line construction rates. are not met and the fire eventually spreads beyond the projected control line. This not only q Hand crews spend less than 5 percent of a increases the time and cost for containment, but daily shift in rest breaks. also needlessly expends the resources of the q Hand crews spend about 34 percent of a hand crews, increases their exposure to hazards, daily shift constructing fireline. and requires them to reengage in another location q Hand crews spend about 18 percent of a to start over. daily shift driving and/or hiking. Production rates also are used in decisionmaking, q Hand crews spend the majority of their time specifically the Wildland Fire Decision Support engaged in other mission-related activities, System (WFDSS) and planning for resource such as briefings, travel, and safety-related ordering. Correct assignment of resources for operations. development of the WFDSS and evaluation q Methods used in this project can be of alternative depends on the resources’ replicated to determine production rates for fireline production rates. Firefighting resource all other firefighting resources. 1 Fireline Production Rates outputs (fireline production rates) will aid staff The fireline production rates are published in the in determining the estimated costs versus Fireline Handbook (PMS 410-1, NFES 0065). the values protected associated with each Although the Fireline Handbook is updated on a alternative. Also, production rates are used in periodic basis, the production rates in use today new large-fire growth estimation models and were developed over 40 years ago (Hornby for effective preplanning and prepositioning of 1936; Lindquist 1970). Many fire managers resources during times of high fire danger. Lack and fire operations personnel recognized that of accurate production measures may cause the published rates were no longer valid, and a units to be understaffed, in which case effective study by Haven et al. (1982) confirms that earlier initial attack would be compromised; or the published rates “vary by as much as 500% [sic].” unit could be overstaffed, creating a shortage There are several reasons why the old rates in other areas of need. In these scenarios, the are no longer representative of the actual rates. allocation of financial resources is not optimized. Perhaps most importantly, the published rates Outputs from models used for preplanning were gathered many years ago and very few of or decision support will show significant bias the rates were measured while hand crews were when inaccurate production rates are used. actively engaged in fire suppression (Barney et Because fire size estimation is based in part al. 1992). This fact alone has a strong influence on production capability, basing dispatch or on the accuracy of the old rates. Although there assignment decisions on these outputs could has been previous research done to establish cause errors in fire size estimation, suppression fireline production rates, this research was often expenditures, and probability of success. Fireline limited in geographic scope, in the quantity of production rates are used in several fire size observations of active fire suppression activities, estimation models, as well as models designed and in crew type observations. In some cases, to determine resource effectiveness and large- the research relied on expert opinion rather fire management efficiency. More accurate than field observations (Fried et al. 1989). rates are important, particularly when these Barney et al. (1992) state that the limited data values are used for modeling purposes. Haven in their production rate study had precluded et al. (1982) state, “Errors in production models them from developing a detailed production values have the potential for radically biasing rate model. Haven et al. (1982) point out that the simulated results. Significant planning errors fireline production rates need to be determined can be made by blind reliance on published under actual fire conditions. They also state that rates.” Additionally, these rates are a critical production rates determined under simulated input for the Fire Program Analysis (FPA); conditions tend to overestimate actual production because the preparedness module (PM) of the rate values. FPA system relies on models, the accuracy of inputs, such as fireline production rates, must These factors—combined with increased fire be quantified if the results are to be presented behavior, new crew types, new crew performance with specified confidence. The fireline production standards and training, and, most especially, with rate information is one of the most sensitive recent changes in safety and risk management values in relation to the system outputs, and guidelines—made it clear that new production these standards are needed to operationalize the rates were needed. It was evident that in order to system. establish rates with a high degree of confidence, actual field observations by trained observers 2 Field Data Acquisition were necessary. The San Dimas Technology FIELD DATA ACQUISITION and Development Center (SDTDC) of the U.S. A data collection matrix (see appendix A) was Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, developed that would provide a rich data set for National Technology and Development Program, analysis. Today, crews are tasked with many developed a set of protocols to meet these different
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Smokejumper STEM Challenge!
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION STEM PATHWAYS Smokejumper STEM Challenge! The Problem The U.S. Forest Service is seeking a parachute design that enables smokejumpers to jump in higher winds and glide to a safe landing. The parachute system needs to help reduce injuries to ankles, legs and hips during landings. The Challenge The U.S. smoke jumping program began in 1939 with the first fire To design a smokejumper’s parachute that has jump made in 1940 in Idaho. Today, more than 300 a controlled descent assuring a safe landing on smokejumpers battle wildfires from about June 1 through October the designated wildfire target. in the U.S. Parachutes are also used to drop food, water and fire fighting tools to the men and women battling wildfires. Find a Solution ASK: What are some possible ideas? Design Materials & Supplies PLAN: Test out your ideas Newspaper Tissue paper CREATE: Put your ideas to the test Garbage bags Miniature Napkins smokejumpers TEST: How well did your idea work? (toy paratroopers Paper Towels 1 ½ inches to 4 IMPROVE: Review results & make changes Kite string inches tall). You can also use washers, Tape clothespins or other Things to Consider Hole Punch similar items if you do Scissors not want to purchase toy figures. 1. What types of materials are used to make Ruler parachutes? 2. Which design material will work best to SAFETY ALERT: Scissors are sharp! Adult supervision descend your smokejumper to the wildfire? required when releasing smokejumper from elevated test sight (balcony, staircase, step ladder, etc.). 3. How will the parachute’s shape and size factor into your design? 4.
    [Show full text]
  • AHSC Tips: Community Climate Resiliency
    AHSC Tips: Community Climate Resiliency Communities will experience effects of climate change in various ways, including increased likelihood of heatwaves, droughts, sea level rise, flooding, wildfires, and severe weather. To be resilient to climate change, it is important to understand if the surrounding community is experiencing specific climate risks and how your AHSC project aims to address specific concerns. This section is worth 3 out of 15 points of the narrative, and includes a required supplemental Climate Adaptation Assessment Matrix (Matrix). STEP 1 - IDENTIFY CLIMATE RISKS: If available, use a local climate vulnerability assessments created by the city, county, regional council of government (COG), or metropolitan planning organization (MPO) to gather information about local climate risks to the project area. You can search for local climate vulnerability assessments on the Adaptation Clearinghouse. If no local assessment is available, or if the local assessment does not provide sufficient data, Cal-Adapt.org is a recommended state website to use. To fill out your Climate Adaptation Assessment Matrix for the AHSC program, you will need to use the Local Climate Change Snapshot Tool and Sea Level Rise Tool. They are both easy-to-use and come with downloadable data specific to your project’s geographic area. See general tips about Cal-Adapt immediately below, then the Appendix that starts on page 7 for screenshots of the Local Climate Change Snapshot Tool and Sea Level Rise Tool and guidance on how to take data from the tool to fill out the Matrix for each climate projection. Last Updated 3.11.21 1 Tips for using Cal-Adapt: ● After you have selected the tool, your next step will be to narrow in on the most localized data that is available.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory Great Basin Coordination and Dispatch
    Directory Chapter 50 CHAPTER 50 - DIRECTORY GREAT BASIN COORDINATION AND DISPATCH CENTERS QUICK REFERENCE CENTER PRIMARY NUMBER PAGE NUMBER Eastern Great Basin Coordination Center 801-531-5320 50 - 2 Western Great Basin Coordination Center 775-861-6455 50 - 3 Boise Dispatch Center 208-384-3400 50 - 4 Central Idaho Interagency Fire Center 208-756-5157 50 - 5 Central Nevada Interagency Dispatch Center 775-623-1555 50 - 6 Coeur d'Alene Interagency Dispatcher Center 208-772-3283 50 - 7 Color Country Interagency Fire Center 435-865-4600 50 - 8 Eastern Idaho Interagency Fire Center 208-524-7600 50 - 9 Elko Interagency Dispatch Center 775-748-4000 50 - 10 Ely Interagency Communications Center 775-289-1925 50 - 11 Great Basin Smokejumpers - BLM NIFC 208-387-5426 50 - 12 Las Vegas Interagency Communications Center 702-515-5300 50 - 13 Moab Interagency Fire Center 435-259-1850 50 - 14 Nevada Division of Emergency Management Dispatch 775-315-2757 50 - 15 Northern Utah Interagency Fire Center 801-908-1900 50 - 16 Payette National Forest Dispatch 208-634-2757 50 - 17 Richfield Interagency Fire Center 435-896-8404 50 - 18 Sierra Front Interagency Dispatch Center 775-882-9187 50 - 19 South Central Idaho Interagency Dispatch Center 208-886-2373 50 - 20 Teton Interagency Dispatch Center 307-739-3630 50 - 21 Uintah Basin Interagency Fire Center 435-789-7021 50 - 22 50 - 1 2012 Great Basin Mobilization Guide Directory Chapter 50 UNIT: FIRE PHONE NUMBER: 801-531-5320 EASTERN GREAT BASIN COORDINATION CENTER NIGHT OR 24 HR PHONE NUMBER: 5500 W. Amelia Earhart
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide
    A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide PMS 210 April 2013 Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide April 2013 PMS 210 Sponsored for NWCG publication by the NWCG Operations and Workforce Development Committee. Comments regarding the content of this product should be directed to the Operations and Workforce Development Committee, contact and other information about this committee is located on the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Questions and comments may also be emailed to [email protected]. This product is available electronically from the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Previous editions: this product replaces PMS 410-1, Fireline Handbook, NWCG Handbook 3, March 2004. The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has approved the contents of this product for the guidance of its member agencies and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone else. NWCG’s intent is to specifically identify all copyrighted content used in NWCG products. All other NWCG information is in the public domain. Use of public domain information, including copying, is permitted. Use of NWCG information within another document is permitted, if NWCG information is accurately credited to the NWCG. The NWCG logo may not be used except on NWCG-authorized information. “National Wildfire Coordinating Group,” “NWCG,” and the NWCG logo are trademarks of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names or trademarks in this product is for the information and convenience of the reader and does not constitute an endorsement by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group or its member agencies of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Smoke and Your Health When Smoke Levels Are High, Even Healthy People May Have Symptoms Or Health Problems
    PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION http://Public.Health.Oregon.gov Wildfire Smoke and Your Health When smoke levels are high, even healthy people may have symptoms or health problems. The best thing to do is to limit your exposure to smoke. Depending on your situation, a combination of the strategies below may work best and give you the most protection from wildfire smoke. The more you do to limit your exposure to wildfire smoke, the more you’ll reduce your chances of having health effects. Keep indoor air as clean as possible. Keep windows and doors closed. Use a Listen to your body high- efficiency particulate air (HEPA) and contact your filter to reduce indoor air pollution. healthcare provider Avoid smoking tobacco, using or 911 if you are wood-burning stoves or fireplaces, burning candles, experiencing health incenses or vacuuming. symptoms. If you have to spend time outside when the Drink plenty air quality is hazardous: of water. Do not rely on paper or dust masks for protection. N95 masks properly worn may offer Reduce the some protection. amount of time spent in the smoky area. Reduce the amount of time spent outdoors. Avoid vigorous Stay informed: outdoor activities. The Oregon Smoke blog has information about air quality in your community: oregonsmoke.blogspot.com 1 Frequently asked questions about wildfire smoke and public health Wildfire smoke Q: Why is wildfire smoke bad for my health? A: Wildfire smoke is a mixture of gases and fine particles from burning trees and other plant material. The gases and fine particles can be dangerous if inhaled.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Service Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center Wildland Fire
    Forest Service Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center Wildland Fire Program 2016 Annual Report Weber Basin Job Corps: Above Average Performance In an Above Average Fire Season Brandon J. Everett, Job Corps Forest Area Fire Management Officer, Uinta-Wasatch–Cache National Forest-Weber Basin Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center The year 2016 was an above average season for the Uinta- Forest Service Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Job Corps Participating in nearly every fire on the forest, the Weber Basin Fire Program Job Corps Civilian Conservation Statistics Center (JCCCC) fire program assisted in finance, fire cache and camp support, structure 1,138 students red- preparation, suppression, moni- carded for firefighting toring and rehabilitation. and camp crews Weber Basin firefighters re- sponded to 63 incidents, spend- Weber Basin Job Corps students, accompanied by Salt Lake Ranger District Module Supervisor David 412 fire assignments ing 338 days on assignment. Inskeep, perform ignition operation on the Bear River RX burn on the Bear River Bird Refuge. October 2016. Photo by Standard Examiner. One hundred and twenty-four $7,515,675.36 salary majority of the season commit- The Weber Basin Job Corps fire camp crews worked 148 days paid to students on ted to the Weber Basin Hand- program continued its partner- on assignment. Altogether, fire crew. This crew is typically orga- ship with Wasatch Helitack, fire assignments qualified students worked a nized as a 20 person Firefighter detailing two students and two total of 63,301 hours on fire Type 2 (FFT2) IA crew staffed staff to that program. Another 3,385 student work assignments during the 2016 with administratively deter- student worked the entire sea- days fire season.
    [Show full text]
  • FIGHTING FIRE with FIRE: Can Fire Positively Impact an Ecosystem?
    FIGHTING FIRE WITH FIRE: Can Fire Positively Impact an Ecosystem? Subject Area: Science – Biology, Environmental Science, Fire Ecology Grade Levels: 6th-8th Time: This lesson can be completed in two 45-minute sessions. Essential Questions: • What role does fire play in maintaining healthy ecosystems? • How does fire impact the surrounding community? • Is there a need to prescribe fire? • How have plants and animals adapted to fire? • What factors must fire managers consider prior to planning and conducting controlled burns? Overview: In this lesson, students distinguish between a wildfire and a controlled burn, also known as a prescribed fire. They explore multiple controlled burn scenarios. They explain the positive impacts of fire on ecosystems (e.g., reduce hazardous fuels, dispose of logging debris, prepare sites for seeding/planting, improve wildlife habitat, manage competing vegetation, control insects and disease, improve forage for grazing, enhance appearance, improve access, perpetuate fire- dependent species) and compare and contrast how organisms in different ecosystems have adapted to fire. Themes: Controlled burns can improve the Controlled burns help keep capacity of natural areas to absorb people and property safe while and filter water in places where fire supporting the plants and animals has played a role in shaping that that have adapted to this natural ecosystem. part of their ecosystems. 1 | Lesson Plan – Fighting Fire with Fire Introduction: Wildfires often occur naturally when lightning strikes a forest and starts a fire in a forest or grassland. Humans also often accidentally set them. In contrast, controlled burns, also known as prescribed fires, are set by land managers and conservationists to mimic some of the effects of these natural fires.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnison River Interagency Handcrew Operating Guidelines
    Gunnison River Interagency Handcrew Operating Guidelines Updated 5/25/16 Gunnison River Interagency Handcrew Operating Guidelines Table of Contents Mission 2 Code of Conduct 2 Zero Tolerance Policy 2 Disciplinary Action Procedures 3 Safety 3 Crew Organization 3 Equipment Guidelines 7 Crew Boss Responsibilities 8 Logistics and Purchasing 9 Contact Name and Number 10 Appendix A 11 Appendix B 12 Appendix C 13 Appendix D 1 Gunnison River Interagency Handcrew Operating Guidelines The Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest, Southwest District of the Bureau of Land Management, Black Canyon National Park, and Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control agree to participate in a Type 2 Initial Attack (IA) or Type 2 Handcrew following the guidelines and components outlined in this document. The crew will be listed as CRW2 IA or CRW2 in ROSS based on qualifications of assigned personnel. (See Appendix A). **Other wildland fire management agencies may provide crew members, when a position is available and they have qualified personnel to fill the position from within the Montrose Dispatch Area. The crew name is Gunnison River Interagency Handcrew, and is hereinafter referred to as “the crew” or “GRC”. Oversite of the crew will come from the Montrose Coordinating Group and is hereinafter referred to as “MTCG”. A working group comprised of agency representatives will be formed to review this document annually. This group will work with MTCG for review and approval of operating guidelines to ensure compliance with agency policies. Mission The Gunnison River Interagency crew will provide safe, effective support for wildland fire operations as well as other all-risk incidents within the qualifications and skills of crew personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Dispatching Practices for Interagency Hotshot Crews to Reduce Seasonal Travel Distance and Manage Fatigue
    CSIRO PUBLISHING International Journal of Wildland Fire 2018, 27, 569–580 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF17163 Examining dispatching practices for Interagency Hotshot Crews to reduce seasonal travel distance and manage fatigue Erin J. BelvalA,D, David E. CalkinB, Yu WeiA, Crystal S. StonesiferB, Matthew P. ThompsonC and Alex MasarieA ADepartment of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA. BUSDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 800 E Beckwith Avenue, Missoula, MT 59801, USA. CUSDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 W Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Interagency Hotshot Crews (IHCs) are a crucial firefighting suppression resource in the United States. These crews travel substantial distances each year and work long and arduous assignments that can cause accumulated fatigue. Current dispatching practices for these crews are supposed to send the closest resource while adhering to existing fatigue- management policies. In this research, we designed a simulation process that repeatedly implements an optimisation model to assign crews to suppression requests. This study examines the potential effects of using an optimisation approach to shorten seasonal crew travel distances and mitigate fatigue. We also examine the potential benefits of coordinating crew-dispatch decisions to meet multiple requests. Results indicate there is substantial room for improvement in reducing travel distances while still balancing crew fatigue; coordinating crew dispatching for multiple requests can increase the assignment efficiency, particularly when both fatigue mitigation and travel distances are jointly optimised. This research indicates implementing an optimisation model for dispatching IHCs is promising.
    [Show full text]
  • Hood River/Cascade Locks, Oregon
    US Department of Agricuture FFoorreesstt SSeerrvviiccee Pacific Northwest Region (Region 6) EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Wildland Fire Crews GS-0462-03,04,05 Handcrew/Engine Crews Hood River/Cascade Locks, Oregon Find rewarding and challenging work with the USDA Forest Service at the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. We are recruiting crew members for our Initial Attack Handcrew based in Cascade Locks and our Wildland Fire Engines based in either Cascade Locks or Hood River. THE POSITIONS These positions are temporary seasonal employment as THE COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE NSA part of our 10-person IA Crew or our Wildland Fire Engine The Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area stretches program. Our positions begin in June, and continue into along the Columbia River between the Deschutes River November. Applications for both the Handcrew and and the Sandy River in Oregon, and Maryhill and Engine crews can be found at https://www.usajobs.gov/ Washougal on the Washington side. The cities of Hood River, The Dalles, Stevenson, White Salmon, and several Prior wildland firefighting experience is preferred, but all smaller communities all fall within the Scenic Area. The applicants with a strong work ethic and a desire to work Portland Metro area borders the Scenic Area 30 miles West outdoors in a challenging and dynamic environment are of Cascade Locks on Interstate 84. More information encouraged to apply. Applicants are expected to arrive in about the Columbia River Gorge NSA can be found at excellent physical condition, and must be able to commit to http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/crgnsa/home. a fire season of uncertain schedules and extremely long shifts of 16 hours or more.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Incident Review Summary “No One Ever Made a Decision Because of a Number
    Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center 2019 Incident Review Summary “No one ever made a decision because of a number . They need a story.” Daniel Kahneman Psychologist and professor known for his work on the psychology of judgment and decision-making. Contents 1. Introduction……………………………..…………………………. 2 2. Fatalities……..………….………….……….….…………………… 3 3. Stop the Bleed……….…………………………………………….. 4 4. Horizontal Hazards…….………….…….………………………. 5 5. Wheels Up………..…………………………………………………. 6 6. Entrapments……...........………………………………………… 7 7. The Point Is . ……………………………………………………. 8 8. Ash Pit Burn Injuries……………………………………………..10 1. Introduction The information in this report comes from wildland fire incidents—from various agencies—submitted to and gathered by the Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center (LLC) in 2019. The primary source of data is accident reports (FLA, RLS, SAI, etc.). Most of these reports have been posted to the LCC’s Incident Reviews Database. SAFENETs and other data sources have been included when no actual report could be located. This year we collected information on 95 incidents. We have combed through these reports and extracted specific lessons and compiled a few numbers. Use this information to inform your future operations. Turn these lessons into learning. Throughout this report, this Action Icon identifies training curriculum related to the topic. If you are an instructor, you will need to look at each exercise ahead of time to pull up videos or to print reading material. 2 2. Fatalities In 2019 there were nine wildland fire-related fatalities reported, ten fewer than 2018. There were no multiple-fatality events. Fort Jackson Prescribed Fire Fatality Occurred on a prescribed fire during ATV firing operations. Spring Coulee Fire Entrapment Fatality Entrapment, severe burn injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Plains Interagency Handcrew Standard Operations Guide
    MID-PLAINS INTERAGENCY HANDCREW STANDARD OPERATIONS GUIDE MID-PLAINS INTERAGENCY CREW Service, Growth, Leadership 1 Service, Growth, Leadership 2 Table of Contents Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 4 Defining “Interagency” ............................................................................................... 4 Mission Statement ....................................................................................................... 4 Code of Conduct ......................................................................................................... 4 Crew Guiding Principals ............................................................................................. 4 Safety .......................................................................................................................... 5 Briefing Checklist ....................................................................................................... 5 Maintaining Reliability and Performance ................................................................... 5 Driving / Travel........................................................................................................... 5 Qualifications .............................................................................................................. 6 Organization ................................................................................................................ 6 Schedule .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]