DOCSLIB.ORG

Markup UK 2021 Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Markup UK 2021 Proceedings 2021 Proceedings A Conference about XML and Other Markup Technologies Markup UK 2021 Proceedings 2 Markup UK 2021 Proceedings 3 Markup UK 2021 Proceedings Markup UK Sister Conferences A Conference about XML and Other Markup Technologies https://markupuk.org/ Markup UK Conferences Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Company registration number: 11623628 Registered address: 24 Trimworth Road, Folkestone, CT19 4EL, UK VAT Registration Number: 316 5241 25 Organisation Committee Geert Bormans Tomos Hillman Ari Nordström Andrew Sales Rebecca Shoob Markup UK 2021 Proceedings Programme Committee by B. Tommie Usdin, David Maus, Syd Bauman – Northeastern University Alain Couthures, Michael Kay, Erik Digital Scholarship Group Siegel, Debbie Lapeyre, Karin Bredenberg, Achim Berndzen – <xml-project /> Jaime Kaminski, Robin La Fontaine, Abel Braaksma – Abrasoft Nigel Whitaker, Steven Pemberton, Tony Peter Flynn – University College Cork Graham and Liam Quin Tony Graham – Antenna House Michael Kay – Saxonica The organisers of Markup UK would like to Jirka Kosek – University of Economics, thank Antenna House for their expert and Prague unstinting help in preparing and formatting Deborah A. Lapeyre – Mulberry the conference proceedings, and their Technologies generosity in providing licences to do so. David Maus – State and University Library Hamburg Antenna House Formatter is based on the Adam Retter – Evolved Binary W3C Recommendations for XSL-FO and B. Tommie Usdin – Mulberry Technologies CSS and has long been recognized as Norman Walsh – MarkLogic the most powerful and proven standards Lauren Wood – XML.com based formatting software available. It is used worldwide in demanding applications Thank You where the need is to format HTML and XML into PDF and print. Today, Antenna Evolved Binary House Formatter is used to produce le-tex Publishing Services millions of pages daily of technical, Saxonica financial, user, and a wide variety of other OxygenXML documentation for thousands of customers Exeter in over 45 countries. Adam Retter Tony Graham ...and our long-suffering partners 4 Encouraging Tag Set Branching without Creating a Briar Patch 6 B. Tommie Usdin. What’s in a Schematron? 18 David Maus. XSLTForms for the ‘20s 26 Alain Couthures. <transpile from="Java" to="C#" via="XML" with="XSLT"/> 34 Michael Kay. Comprehensible XML 50 Erik Siegel. How Much Tag Set Documentation is Needed? 62 Debbie Lapeyre. 2021 The Future of Distributed Markup Systems or ‘Help my package has become too large!’ 100 Karin Bredenberg. Jaime Kaminski. An improved diff3 format using XML: diff3x 108 Robin La Fontaine. Nigel Whitaker. On the Design of a Self-Referential Tutorial 124 Steven Pemberton. “FYI we’re not looking to go to print” 134 Tony Graham. CSS From XSLT 146 Liam Quin. 5 Encouraging Tag Set Branching without Creating a Briar Patch B. Tommie Usdin, Mulberry Technologies, Inc. ©2021 Mulberry Technologies, Inc. Customizing a tag set can be an easy way to get the vocabulary you need. It can also be a a journey filled with dead ends, trap doors, and slowly-revealed and difficult to identify problems. Like many public tag sets, JATS (the Journal Article Tag Suite) was designed to be customized. Our original expectation was that individual users would customize it, and while a few have done that to good effect, we have found that the major customizations have been by groups of users. BITS (the Book Interchange Tag Suite), NISO STS (Standards Tag Suite), and Manuscript Exchange Common Approach (MECA) are widely adopted customizations of JATS. When users customize a tag set they expect to be able to use the existing infrastructure associated with that tag set, making changes to accommodate the changes they made. They often expect to intermingle their new documents with documents tagged to the original tag set and perhaps with documents tagged to other customizations of the source tag set. They expect this to work gracefully, easily, seamlessly. Sometimes it does, but sometimes it does not! The “JATS Compatibility Meta-Model Description” was developed to help people who customize JATS create tag sets to create models that will coexist peacefully with existing JATS documents and with documents tagged to other JATS customizations. It seems unlikely that the particulars of the JATS Compatibility Model will apply to other tag sets, but the principles behind the Meta-Model might be useful to other groups thinking about ways to make their families of tag sets flexible and compatible. 1. Customizing Tag Sets ◇ Not new ◇ A good idea (usually) ◇ Saves work, time, money ◇ Promotes document interchange ◇ Can go horribly wrong 6 A Little History (over simplified) 2. A Little History (over simplified) 2.1. Generic Markup ◇ Tag what it is not what it should look like ◇ Province of system (e.g., IBM Starter Set was tag set for IBM Script) ◇ Didn’t meet all needs ◇ Attempt to make “universal” list of tags ◇ Impossible ◇ Developed “name your own tag” systems 2.2. Bespoke Vocabularies ◇ Markup projects started with “Task 1 - Create the Tag Set” ◇ Expensive and time consuming ◇ Some considered trade secrets ◇ Required custom infrastructure ◆ Formatter customization cost as much as (or more than) vocabulary ◆ Interchange required custom transform for each destination ◇ Constant expert maintenance 2.3. Public Vocabularies ◇ Developed to ◆ Promote interchange ◆ Lower barrier to entry ◇ Enabled ◆ Shared tools ◆ Lower cost services ◆ Shared expertise, software 2.4. Need for Customization Soon Obvious ◇ Vocabulary maintainers flooded with requests ◇ Tag sets began to grow ◇ Tag abuse grew ◇ Local customizations were clever but often hacks 7 Vocabularies Build In Customization Tools 3. Vocabularies Build In Customization Tools 3.1. “Symposium on Markup Vocabulary Customization” Proceedings at: https://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol24/cover.html ◇ Akoma Ntoso ◇ DITA ◇ DocBook ◇ JATS ◇ TEI 3.2. Debates about Value of Customization A few examples from JATS: ◇ “Superset Me—Not: Why the Journal Publishing Tag Set Is Sufficient if You Use Appropriate Layer Validation”, Alexander B. Schwarzman. (2010) https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/n/jatscon10/schwarzman/ ◇ “Why Create a Subset of a Public Tag Set”, Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre. (2010) https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/n/jatscon10/lapeyre/ ◇ “When the ‘One Size Fits Most’ tagset doesn’t fit you”, Tommie Usdin. (2013) https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/n/jatscon13/usdin/ ◇ “JATS Subset and Schematron: Achieving the Right Balance”, Alexander B. Schwarzman. (2017) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/n/jatscon17/schwarzman/ 3.3. Customization Mechanisms Vary ◇ DITA protects content from uncustomized tools ◇ TEI provides a web-based customization tool (Roma) ◇ Akoma Ntosa assumes users familiar with HTML ◇ JATS assumes customization by XMLers 3.4. Customizations ◇ Useful ◇ Convenient ◇ Appropriate ◇ Can go wrong 4. Experience with JATS Customizations ◇ JATS designed to be customized from beginning ◇ Provided “Modifying This Tag Set” in documentation: https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/ tag-library/1.2/chapter/implementor.html 8 Many Customizations by Groups of Users ◇ Expected individual users to customize 4.1. Many Customizations by Groups of Users Standards committees wrote: ◇ BITS (the Book Interchange Tag Suite) ◇ NISO STS (Standards Tag Suite) ◇ Manuscript Exchange Common Approach (MECA) 4.2. User Expectations for a Customization ◇ Existing infrastructure will work ◇ Only change parts directly related to new content ◇ Only modify to accommodate new requirements ◇ Intermix old and new documents ◇ Easy, graceful, seamless integration 4.3. User Experience ◇ Sometimes it “just works” as expected ◇ Sometimes problems appear on initial testing ◇ Sometimes problems pop up later ◇ Some problems easy to identify & fix ◇ Some problems very difficult to identify ◇ Some problems found too late to fix 5. JATS Compatibility Model “Building JATS-Compatible Vocabularies Draft 0.10” — formerly called “JATS Compatibility Meta-Model” ◇ Developed to help people who customize JATS create tag sets to create models that will coexist peacefully with existing JATS documents and with documents tagged to other JATS customizations ◇ Particulars unlikely to apply to other tag sets ◇ Principles probably do apply to others Current version at: https://www.niso.org/publications/jats-compatibility-model 5.1. JATS Compatibility Model in 2 Parts ◇ Design Principles ◆ about models as a whole 9 Design Principles ◆ philosophical more than technical ◇ Compatibility Properties ◆ about individual structures ◆ some highly technical ◆ some automatically check-able 5.2. Design Principles 5.2.1. Respect the Semantics ◇ The most important rule ◇ Use named structures to mean the same thing as source vocabulary ◇ Do not “reuse” structures This applies to ALL vocabularies! 5.2.2. Prevent Semantic Mismatch Homonyms are destructive in tag sets For example, in a collection of city regulations: ◇ you may not need the JATS <license> element (Set of conditions under which the content may be used, accessed, and distributed.) ◇ you may need to know if a dog, bicycle, or bar needs a license to operate ◇ Create a NEW structure, perhaps <city-license> or <permit-license> or <MyCity:license> ◇ DO NOT repurpose <license> 5.2.3. Linking Direction ◇ Links may go in either direction, or both ◇ Match the link philosophy of the source vocabulary ◇ In JATS: ◆ links go from many to one ◆ citations point to references, because a reference may be cited multiple times ◆ cross-references
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rdfa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing Rdfa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing
    RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing A collection of attributes and processing rules for extending XHTML to support RDF W3C Recommendation 14 October 2008 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdfa-syntax-20081014 Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax Previous version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PR-rdfa-syntax-20080904 Diff from previous version: rdfa-syntax-diff.html Editors: Ben Adida, Creative Commons ben@adida.net Mark Birbeck, webBackplane mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com Shane McCarron, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. shane@aptest.com Steven Pemberton, CWI Please refer to the errata for this document, which may include some normative corrections. This document is also available in these non-normative formats: PostScript version, PDF version, ZIP archive, and Gzip’d TAR archive. The English version of this specification is the only normative version. Non-normative translations may also be available. Copyright © 2007-2008 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark and document use rules apply. Abstract The current Web is primarily made up of an enormous number of documents that have been created using HTML. These documents contain significant amounts of structured data, which is largely unavailable to tools and applications. When publishers can express this data more completely, and when tools can read it, a new world of user functionality becomes available, letting users transfer structured data between applications and web sites, and allowing browsing applications to improve the user experience: an event on a web page can be directly imported - 1 - How to Read this Document RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing into a user’s desktop calendar; a license on a document can be detected so that users can be informed of their rights automatically; a photo’s creator, camera setting information, resolution, location and topic can be published as easily as the original photo itself, enabling structured search and sharing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Erik Wilde
    dretbiblio dretbiblio Erik Wilde's Bibliography References [1] AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference, San Francisco, California, December 1968. [2] Seventeenth IEEE Conference on Computer Communication Networks, Washington, D.C., 1978. [3] ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, Los Angeles, Cal- ifornia, March 1982. ACM Press. [4] First Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1986. [5] 1987 ACM Conference on Hypertext, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, November 1987. ACM Press. [6] 18th IEEE International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, Tokyo, Japan, 1988. IEEE Computer Society Press. [7] Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Portland, Oregon, 1988. ACM Press. [8] Conference on Office Information Systems, Palo Alto, California, March 1988. [9] 1989 ACM Conference on Hypertext, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, November 1989. ACM Press. [10] UNIX | The Legend Evolves. Summer 1990 UKUUG Conference, Buntingford, UK, 1990. UKUUG. [11] Fourth ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Hilton Head, South Carolina, November 1991. [12] GLOBECOM'91 Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press. [13] IEEE INFOCOM '91 Conference on Computer Communications, Bal Harbour, Florida, 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press. [14] IEEE International Conference on Communications, Denver, Colorado, June 1991. [15] International Workshop on CSCW, Berlin, Germany, April 1991. [16] Third ACM Conference on Hypertext, San Antonio, Texas, December 1991. ACM Press. [17] 11th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, Houston, Texas, 1992. IEEE Computer Society Press. [18] 3rd Joint European Networking Conference, Innsbruck, Austria, May 1992. [19] Fourth ACM Conference on Hypertext, Milano, Italy, November 1992. ACM Press. [20] GLOBECOM'92 Conference, Orlando, Florida, December 1992. IEEE Computer Society Press. http://github.com/dret/biblio (August 29, 2018) 1 dretbiblio [21] IEEE INFOCOM '92 Conference on Computer Communications, Florence, Italy, 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Sigada 2001 Workshop Symbiosis4jun02 Pub.Fm
    SIGAda 2001 Workshop, “Creating a Symbiotic Relationship Between XML and Ada” Robert C. Leif Ada_Med, a Division of Newport Instruments 5648 Toyon Road, San Diego, CA 92115-1022, USA E-mail rleif@rleif.com www.newportinstruments.com www.Ada-Med.com +1 (619)582-0437 Abstract: The purpose of the workshop was to organize the Ada community to take advantage of the opportunity to create Ada applications that are operating systems independent because they are based on a web technology, XML, Extensible Markup Language. The commercial use of the Internet is the driving force behind XML. Four elements of XML, which together are sufficient to build a web application, and all employ the same syntax were described. These are XML; its schema; the Extensible Stylesheet Language, XSL; and the XML mechanism for forms, XForms. XML concerns the data objects that are included on the web page and their order of presentation. The schema contains the information on the types and objects for XML. Schemas are roughly equivalent to an Ada specification without the subprograms. Fortunately, the programing language that has the best fit with XML is Ada. XML has visibility and scoping rules, which are similar to Ada. XML has strong typing and has single inheritance similar to Ada. A mutually beneficial symbiosis requires the creation of applications in Ada that use and support XML, as well as, the use of XML to cre- ate Ada environments including XML based tools. These applications include: automated translation of Ada data types and objects in a specification to an XML schema; and conversely, automated translation of the data types and elements in an XML Schema to an Ada specification.
    [Show full text]
  • Publishing Pdfs from DITA
    Publishing PDFs from DITA Benefits and Limitations of XSL‐FO Benefits Introduction Low entry cost XSL‐FO is an XML language Scott Prentice, President of Leximation, Inc. FO markup language is largely based on CSS Specializing in FrameMaker plugin development as well as Designed to work for all written human languages structured FrameMaker conversions, consulting, and development. FrameMaker user/developer since 1991. Limitations Developed DITA‐FMx, a FrameMaker plugin for efficient XSL‐FO coding is expensive and complicated DITA authoring and publishing. Tables that span pages may not break as expected Developer of custom Help systems and creative/functional No way to render elements on one page in relation to web applications. another page Coined the term “A I R Help” in 2007 after learning about Difficult to apply balanced vertical spacing on a page Adobe’s new AIR technology. Processors may use extensions to implement features, so the Interested in creating innovative ways to provide user FO stylesheets may not be portable between processors assistance that is actually used. Apache FOP What is DITA (briefly) Open Source / Free DITA ‐ Darwin Information Typing Architecture Java application, runs on ʺanyʺ platform An XML format for authoring in a topic oriented structure Default PDF output option provided with the DITA‐OT Highly reusable and modular Rendering engine uses XSL‐FO DITA topics can be easily rearranged and reused for Requires XSL‐FO developer to maintain stylesheets different deliverable types Supports
    [Show full text]
  • Schematron Overview Excerpted from Leigh Dodds’ 2001 XSLT UK Paper, “Schematron: Validating XML Using XSLT”
    Schematron: validating XML using XSLT Schematron Overview excerpted from Leigh Dodds’ 2001 XSLT UK paper, “Schematron: validating XML using XSLT” Leigh Dodds, ingenta ltd, xmlhack.com April 2001 Abstract Schematron [Schematron] is a structural based validation language, defined by Rick Jelliffe, as an alternative to existing grammar based approaches. Tree patterns, defined as XPath expressions, are used to make assertions, and provide user-centred reports about XML documents. Expressing validation rules using patterns is often easier than defining the same rule using a content model. Tree patterns are collected together to form a Schematron schema. Schematron is a useful and accessible supplement to other schema languages. The open-source XSLT implementation is based around a core framework which is open for extension and customisation. Overview This paper provides an introduction to Schematron; an innovative XML validation language developed by Rick Jelliffe. This innovation stems from selecting an alternative approach to validation than existing schema languages: Schematron uses a tree pattern based paradigm, rather than the regular grammars used in DTDs and XML schemas. As an extensible, easy to use, open source tool Schematron is an extremely useful addition to the XML developers toolkit. The initial section of this paper conducts a brief overview of tree pattern validation, and some of the advantages it has in comparison to a regular grammar approach. This is followed by an outline of Schematron and the intended uses which have guided its design. The Schematron language is then discussed, covering all major elements in the language with examples of their 1 of 14 Schematron: validating XML using XSLT usage.
    [Show full text]
  • SDL Contenta S1000D and SDL Livecontent S1000D Cross-Product Graphics and Multimedia Support
    SDL Contenta S1000D and SDL LiveContent S1000D Cross-Product Graphics and Multimedia Support SDL Contenta S1000D and SDL LiveContent S1000D 5.9 December 2020 Legal notice Copyright and trademark information relating to this product release. Copyright © 2009–2020 SDL Group. SDL Group means SDL PLC. and its subsidiaries and affiliates. All intellectual property rights contained herein are the sole and exclusive rights of SDL Group. All references to SDL or SDL Group shall mean SDL PLC. and its subsidiaries and affiliates details of which can be obtained upon written request. All rights reserved. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all intellectual property rights including those in copyright in the content of this website and documentation are owned by or controlled for these purposes by SDL Group. Except as otherwise expressly permitted hereunder or in accordance with copyright legislation, the content of this site, and/or the documentation may not be copied, reproduced, republished, downloaded, posted, broadcast or transmitted in any way without the express written permission of SDL. Contenta S1000D is a registered trademark of SDL Group. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. The names of other companies and products mentioned herein may be the trade- marks of their respective owners. Unless stated to the contrary, no association with any other company or product is intended or should be inferred. This product may include open source or similar third-party software, details of which can be found by clicking the following link: “Acknowledgments” on page 7. Although SDL Group takes all reasonable measures to provide accurate and comprehensive information about the product, this information is provided as-is and all warranties, conditions or other terms concerning the documentation whether express or implied by statute, common law or otherwise (including those relating to satisfactory quality and fitness for purposes) are excluded to the extent permitted by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Xmlmind XSL Utility - Online Help
    XMLmind XSL Utility - Online Help Hussein Shafie, XMLmind Software <xfc-support@xmlmind.com> February 23, 2021 Table of Contents 1. Overview ................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Running XMLmind XSL Utility ............................................................................................... 3 2.1. System requirements ..................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Installation ................................................................................................................... 3 2.3. Contents of the installation directory .............................................................................. 3 2.4. Starting XMLmind XSL Utility ..................................................................................... 4 2.5. XMLmind XSL Utility as a command-line tool .............................................................. 5 3. Converting an XML document to another format ....................................................................... 6 3.1. Canceling the current conversion process ....................................................................... 7 4. Changing the parameters of a conversion .................................................................................. 8 5. Specifying a conversion ......................................................................................................... 10 5.1. Specifying the conversion
    [Show full text]
  • XML: Looking at the Forest Instead of the Trees Guy Lapalme Professor Département D©Informatique Et De Recherche Opérationnelle Université De Montréal
    XML: Looking at the Forest Instead of the Trees Guy Lapalme Professor Département d©informatique et de recherche opérationnelle Université de Montréal C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville Montréal, Québec Canada H3C 3J7 lapalme@iro.umontreal.ca http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~lapalme/ForestInsteadOfTheTrees/ Publication date April 14, 2019 XML to PDF by RenderX XEP XSL-FO Formatter, visit us at http://www.renderx.com/ XML: Looking at the Forest Instead of the Trees Guy Lapalme Professor Département d©informatique et de recherche opérationnelle Université de Montréal C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville Montréal, Québec Canada H3C 3J7 lapalme@iro.umontreal.ca http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~lapalme/ForestInsteadOfTheTrees/ Publication date April 14, 2019 Abstract This tutorial gives a high-level overview of the main principles underlying some XML technologies: DTD, XML Schema, RELAX NG, Schematron, XPath, XSL stylesheets, Formatting Objects, DOM, SAX and StAX models of processing. They are presented from the point of view of the computer scientist, without the hype too often associated with them. We do not give a detailed description but we focus on the relations between the main ideas of XML and other computer language technologies. A single compact pretty-print example is used throughout the text to illustrate the processing of an XML structure with XML technologies or with Java programs. We also show how to create an XML document by programming in Java, in Ruby, in Python, in PHP, in E4X (Ecmascript for XML) and in Swift. The source code of the example XML ®les and the programs are available either at the companion web site of this document or by clicking on the ®le name within brackets at the start of the caption of each example.
    [Show full text]
  • SVG-Based Knowledge Visualization
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY}w¡¢£¤¥¦§¨ OF I !"#$%&'()+,-./012345<yA|NFORMATICS SVG-based Knowledge Visualization DIPLOMA THESIS Miloš Kaláb Brno, spring 2012 Declaration Hereby I declare, that this paper is my original authorial work, which I have worked out by my own. All sources, references and literature used or excerpted during elaboration of this work are properly cited and listed in complete reference to the due source. Advisor: RNDr. Tomáš Gregar Ph.D. ii Acknowledgement I would like to thank RNDr. Tomáš Gregar Ph.D. for supervising the thesis. His opinions, comments and advising helped me a lot with accomplishing this work. I would also like to thank to Dr. Daniel Sonntag from DFKI GmbH. Saarbrücken, Germany, for the opportunity to work for him on the Medico project and for his supervising of the thesis during my erasmus exchange in Germany. Big thanks also to Jochen Setz from Dr. Sonntag’s team who worked on the server background used by my visualization. Last but not least, I would like to thank to my family and friends for being extraordinary supportive. iii Abstract The aim of this thesis is to analyze the visualization of semantic data and sug- gest an approach to general visualization into the SVG format. Afterwards, the approach is to be implemented in a visualizer allowing user to customize the visualization according to the nature of the data. The visualizer was integrated as an extension of Fresnel Editor. iv Keywords Semantic knowledge, SVG, Visualization, JavaScript, Java, XML, Fresnel, XSLT v Contents Introduction . .3 1 Brief Introduction to the Related Technologies ..........5 1.1 XML – Extensible Markup Language ..............5 1.1.1 XSLT – Extensible Stylesheet Lang.
    [Show full text]
  • Xml Schema Viewer Eclipse
    Xml Schema Viewer Eclipse Archy exchanging worshipfully. Angelico have her sabra causelessly, intoxicant and unarranged. Is Thebault rugose or nonchalant when precluded some mesa hurts contrary? Some problems where the next button to elements and stored as we help you speed up xml schema support for working group In xml to. For anyone interested, I can give up altove xmlspy, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Dtd schema viewer and xml query systems that corresponds to modify or personal. The Dictionary panel allows you to customize the dictionary that the Spell tool uses to identify misspelled words. Our plugin communicate with the analyzer through an XML file. Mac os x in multiple namespaces may appear in doing so that are very heavy use plugin i deal with eclipse dali java classes available enable increased automation. It uses to define and editor can be defined using xml is a full unicode support for example will go inside this interview he discusses specifying xml? Xsd schemas face when each row to xml using xml production implementations to. Strive to be All Powerful? Distinction between wood type definition and lobby of ring type: unlike XDR, a token was implemented that maps XInterfaces to a class framework in Java, a full eclipse install guide be overkill. XML bean definition files. This schema viewer for eclipse ide or sets. Kerberos realm of schemas will remain interoperable by running the viewer. UML associations and myself use interleave properly. This sentence exists because of the design problem; lacking a concept for what a primitive data type is, documentation can be written to provide some information on that element.
    [Show full text]
  • XSL-FO by Dave Pawson Publisher
    XSL-FO By Dave Pawson Publisher : O'Reilly Pub Date : August 2002 ISBN : 0-596-00355-2 Pages : 282 Table of • Contents • Index • Reviews Reader • Reviews Extensible Style Language-Formatting Objects, or XSL-FO, is a set of tools developers and web designers use to describe page printouts of their XML (including XHTML) documents. XSL-FO teaches you how to think about the formatting of your documents and guides you through the questions you'll need to ask to ensure that your printed documents meet the same high standards as your computer-generated content. 777 Copyright Preface Who Should Read This Book? What Does This Book Cover? Motivation Organization of This Book What Else Do You Need? Conventions Used in This Book How to Contact Us Acknowledgments Chapter 1. Planning for XSL-FO Section 1.1. XML and Document Processing Section 1.2. Choosing Your Print Production Approach Section 1.3. Choosing Tools Section 1.4. The Future for XSL-FO Chapter 2. A First Look at XSL-FO Section 2.1. An XSL-FO Overview Section 2.2. Related Stylesheet Specifications Section 2.3. Using XSL-FO as Part of XSL Section 2.4. Shorthand, Short Form, and Inheritance Chapter 3. Pagination Section 3.1. Document Classes Section 3.2. The Main Parts of an XSL-FO Document Section 3.3. Simple Page Master Section 3.4. Complex Pagination Section 3.5. Page Sequences Chapter 4. Areas Section 4.1. Informal Definition of an Area Section 4.2. Area Types Section 4.3. Components of an Area Section 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Schematron
    Introduction to Schematron Wendell Piez and Debbie Lapeyre Mulberry Technologies, Inc. 17 West Jefferson St. Suite 207 Rockville MD 20850 Phone: 301/315-9631 Fax: 301/315-8285 info@mulberrytech.com http://www.mulberrytech.com Version 90-1.0 (November 2008) © 2008 Mulberry Technologies, Inc. Introduction to Schematron Administrivia...................................................................................................................... 1 Schematron is a ................................................................................................................. 1 Reasons to use Schematron............................................................................................... 1 What Schematron is used for............................................................................................ 2 Schematron is an XML vocabulary................................................................................... 2 Schematron specifies, it does not perform........................................................................ 2 Simple Schematron processing architecture...................................................................... 3 Schematron validation in action........................................................................................ 4 Basic Schematron building blocks................................................................................. 4 How Schematron works.................................................................................................. 4 Outline of a simple Schematron
    [Show full text]