DOCSLIB.ORG

In This Issue Country

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In This Issue Country The Dwight D. Opperman Institute of Judicial Administration at NYU School of Law Issue Number 5 / Winter 2006–07 O’Connor Celebrates IJA and the Judiciary o celebrate the dedi- ecutive Co-Director, engaged cation and formal re- in a conversation on “The Im- naming of the Dwight portance of Judicial Indepen- D. Opperman Insti- dence,” attended by an au- Ttute of Judicial Administra- dience of four hundred Law tion, retired Justice Sandra faculty, students, and friends Day O’Connor of the Supreme of the Law School and IJA, Court of the United States vis- followed by a dinner honor- ited NYU School of Law on ing Board member Mr. Op- October 11, 2006. She and Os- perman for his long history car G. Chase, Russell D. Niles of unstinting service to the Professor of Law and IJA Ex- courts and generosity for ju- dicial education and recogni- tion programs throughout the In This Issue country. (For a profile of Mr. New Judges Seminar 2 Opperman and the Opper- Professor Oscar G. Chase and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor man Institute’s name change, IJA Summer Fellows 4 please refer to IJA Report No. urges, is under attack from the constitution,” said Jus- 3, which is available on the politicians and others who tice O’Connor, who favors the Special Tribute Section 5 IJA Web site). do not understand the role of more accurate description of Chinese Judges’ Program 6 A true independent spirit, courts in a free society. “a fair, impartial and inde- among her activities since Today, an atmosphere of pendent” judiciary. Workshop on retiring from the Supreme “angst about judges,” as Jus- In an op-ed published by Employment Law 7 Court, Justice O’Connor sits as tice O’Connor termed it, the Wall Street Journal on IJA Community News 9 visiting judge in the courts of seems to be encouraged by September 27, 2006, she appeals and a member of the the idea that judges should wrote, “An independent ju- Board of Directors 10 Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study be political, rather than serv- diciary does not mean, of 2006–07 Calendar 11 Group whose recommenda- ing as checks and balanc- course, that it is somehow im- tions the nation awaits. She es for the politically account- proper to criticize judicial de- Contact IJA 12 has decided to make her spe- able branches. Even the term cisions. To the contrary, it is a cial cause the promotion and “independent judiciary,” she healthy sign for a democracy Membership Form 13 protection of an independent says, has become negative- that the public is engaged IJA Membership 16 judiciary in the United States. ly loaded. “We use the term with the workings of the judi- Judicial independence, she independent because it’s in cial system.” During her conversation with Pro- norance about how our government dence. In Brown v. Board of Education, fessor Chase, Justice O’Connor listed works is the root of the problem. She for example, by deciding that “separate a number of features of the current cited an alarming statistic that only but equal” should not apply to public system that she felt impinged upon one-third of Americans are aware of education, the Court began a domino the independent nature of the judicial the judiciary branch. “No one knows effect that overturned laws promoting branch. Judicial elections were at the what we do,” she said. racial segregation. “It was an unbeliev- top of her list of threats to indepen- She seemed confident that a review able, necessary step, and trying to en- dence. Colorado has cut the terms of of the Court’s most historic cases would force it was hard,” she said. “But today, appellate judges in half so elections demonstrate the value of indepen- it’s history.” n and reshuffling occur more often to suit political groups’ agendas. Repeated at- tempts to dismantle Arizona’s method of judicial appointments, rather than 2006 Seminar for elections, often have been tried as well. “Our country can do better on judicial selection,” she said. New Appellate Judges Politically motivated limitations placed on the jurisdiction of courts have also become a dangerous trend with- in the past few years. Justice O’Connor referred to the Terry Schiavo case as a unique intervention by Congress and President Bush to take special mea- sures and force one hot-button case to the federal courts. Most disturbingly, however, she cited JAIL 4 Judges, the purposefully menac- ing name for a California-based interest group that placed on South Dakota’s November ballot an amendment that would eliminate judicial immunity and allow judges to be censured. Judges could even be subjected to jail time for making “wrong decisions.” Professor Chase asked what could Faculty and attendees of the New Appellate Judges Seminar be done about the threatened judicial branch, and how to combat some of n July 9-14, 2006 IJA hosted the Judges who attended the Seminar the support that has been garnered for New Appellate Judges Seminar, gave overall excellent evaluations of stripping away its equal standing with co-sponsored by NYU School of the program. In particular they high- the legislature and executive. Law and the Federal Judicial lighted the usefulness of the writ- “Bring back civics education,” said OCenter. The six-day conference, co- ten materials for future reference, the Justice O’Connor. She believes that ig- chaired by Professors Oscar G. Chase valuable opportunities to interact with and Samuel Estreicher, IJA Executive other judges, and the quality of the ex- Co-Directors, provided state and fed- perienced, practical-minded, and di- The 2007 eral judges with up to four years of verse faculty. experience on the appellate bench, in The Seminar opened with a recep- Brennan Lecture dialogue with a resident judicial and tion and dinner welcoming the judg- The Thirteenth Annual Brennan Lecture academic faculty, the opportunity to es. Keynote speaker Paul D. Clement, will be delivered by The Honorable explore the challenges inherent in judi- Solicitor General of the United States, Leah Ward Sears, Chief Justice of the cial decision-making and issues unique returned to IJA to deliver a keynote Supreme Court of Georgia, on February to appellate courts. The Seminar has address reviewing highlights of the Su- 22, 2007. All IJA members and alumni been held every years since 1956, and in preme Court’s 2005-2006 term. Previ- are invited to attend. recent years has been conducted with ous Solicitors General who have wel- the generous support of West Group comed the new judges to the Seminar and Cravath, Swaine & Moore. have included Theodore B. Olson, Ken- muid O’Scannlain (U.S. Court of Ap- peals for the Ninth Circuit), and Justice Save the Date! Bea Ann Smith (Court of Appeals of July 8–13, 2007 Texas for the Third District). The oral argument was followed by a discussion New Appellate Judges Seminar on appellate decision-making, moder- Judges with up to four years of ated by Professor Oscar G. Chase, with experience on the appellate bench Judge Rosemary Barkett (U.S. Court can apply to this Seminar. Please of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit), visit www.law.nyu.edu/institutes/ Judge Marsha Berzon (U.S. Court of judicial/programs/2007/new to Appeals for the Ninth Circuit), Judge download the application materials. Harriet Lansing (Minnesota Court of Appeals), and Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard (Supreme Court of Indiana). neth W. Starr, and Walter E. Dellinger The rest of the program included a (all IJA Board members), Drew S. Days, number of substantive sessions, includ- Solicitor General Paul D. Clement and Seth P. Waxman. ing Criminal Law (District Judge John The New Judges Seminar faculty Gleeson of the Eastern District of New Law School) joined Judge O’Scannlain includes a lineup of lawyers, academ- York and NYU School of Law Professor in a lively discussion of the judge’s role ics, and distinguished judges, many Rachel Barkow), Developments in in interpreting legislation. of whom are themselves alumni of the State and Federal Administrative Law This year the judges attended the Seminar and members of IJA. (Cardozo Law School and Visiting Tony Award-winning production of The Seminar began on Monday with NYU School of Law Professor Michael Sweeney Todd on Broadway, including Gibson Dunn & Crutcher lawyers Mat- Herz), and the Craft of Judging, with a talkback with cast members after the thew D. McGill and Julian W. Poon ar- the entire judicial faculty. Professor show, and a special lunchtime Q&A guing Cunningham v. California (heard Timothy Terrell (Emory University appearance by leading actor Michael by the U.S. Supreme Court on October School of Law) returned for his popu- Cerveris. On Thursday night they went 11, 2006), to decide whether Califor- lar sessions on Opinion Writing, with to a festive dinner at the waterfront nia’s Determinate Sentencing Law, by commentary provided by Judges Water Club Restaurant. permitting judges to impose enhanced Barkett and Berzon. Judge Berzon and Commenting on the week’s events, sentences based on determination of Justice Ireland with Professor Chase Professor Estreicher said, “Every year facts not found by jury or admitted by and NYU School of Law Professors we have a tremendous turnout of the defendant, violates the Sixth and Burt Neuborne and Liam Murphy judges from around the country and Fourteenth Amendments. The panel conducted a dialogue on Theories of beyond, and we’re especially proud of judges, presided over by Chief Jus- Constitutional Interpretation. Judge of those alumni who return to join us tice Shirley S. Abrahamson (Supreme Lansing, Chief Justice Shepard, and as Seminar faculty.” Professor Chase Court of Wisconsin), included Judge Professor Chase presented a number added, “The Seminar’s best advertising Martha Craig Daughtrey (U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Measuring Judicial Ideology Using Law Clerk Hiring Adam Bonica
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Economics 2016 Measuring Judicial Ideology Using Law Clerk Hiring Adam Bonica Adam S. Chilton Jacob Goldin Kyle Rozema Maya Sen Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Adam Bonica, Adam S. Chilton, Jacob Goldin, Kyle Rozema & Maya Sen, "Measuring Judicial Ideology Using Law Clerk Hiring" (Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics No. 767, 2016). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Measuring Judicial Ideology Using Law Clerk Hiring Adam Bonica, Adam Chilton, Jacob Goldin, Kyle Rozema, & Maya Sen∗ July 21, 2016 ∗Bonica: Stanford University, Department of Political Science, e-mail: [email protected]. Chilton: University of Chicago Law School, e-mail: [email protected]. Goldin: Stanford Law School, e-mail: js- [email protected]. Rozema: Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, e-mail: [email protected]. Sen: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, e-mail: maya [email protected]. For helpful com- ments, we are grateful to Omri Ben-Shahar, Erin Delaney, Joshua Fischman, Tom Ginsburg, William Hubbard, Tonja Jacobi, Jim Lindgren, Robin Kar, Anup Malani, Jonathan Masur, Richard McAdams, Jennifer Nou, Eric Posner, Max Schanzenbach, Matt Spitzer, Eugene Volokh, and seminar participants at the University of Chicago Law School and at the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • In a Lonely Place Arlen Specter Is the Same. It's the GOP That's Changed
    WEEK OF NOVEMBER 22, 2004 In A Lonely Place Arlen Specter is the same. ROBERTO WESTBROOK ROBERTO It’s the GOP that’s changed. BY T.R. GOLDMAN staff member was now 14 months away from being the longest serving senator in the history of Pennsylvania—after fellow The harsh glare of the single television spotlight made Arlen Republican Boise Penrose, who died in office on Dec. 31, 1921. Specter’s face shine unnaturally, and his smile was tight and He had survived a grueling primary against Rep. Patrick prearranged. Toomey (R-Pa.), and an unexpectedly tough general election The disembodied voice of CNBC’s Gloria Borger was work- against Rep. Joseph Hoeffel (D-Pa.). ing its way into Specter’s ear. Behind him, the rotunda of the But when Specter takes over the Senate Judiciary Committee Senate’s Russell Building glowed in the sunset. in January, as he now appears certain to do, he will be noted The conversation had turned to Richard Viguerie, the arch- more for surviving an infelicitous remark at a euphoric Nov. conservative direct mail guru, and one of those most promi- 3 press conference—that it was “unlikely” that the committee nently opposing the Pennsylvania Republican’s ascension to the would confirm any judicial nominee who would overturn Roe chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee. v. Wade—than for possessing what his supporters say is a long “I’m not about to make any deals with Richard Viguerie,” and distinguished career as one of the Senate’s few remaining said Specter, his eyes blinking with intensity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Partisan Politics on Minority Diversity of the Federal Bench
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 83 Issue 4 Article 11 Fall 2008 Only Skin Deep?: The Cost of Partisan Politics on Minority Diversity of the Federal Bench Sylvia R. Lazos Vargas William S. Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Lazos Vargas, Sylvia R. (2008) "Only Skin Deep?: The Cost of Partisan Politics on Minority Diversity of the Federal Bench," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 83 : Iss. 4 , Article 11. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol83/iss4/11 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Only Skin Deep?: The Cost of Partisan Politics on Minority Diversity of the Federal Bench SYLVIA R. LAZOS VARGAS* INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1423 I. WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS TO THE JUDICIARY FROM DIVERSITY? ....... .. .. .. .. 1426 A . D escriptive Diversity ........................................................................ 1428 B. Sym bolic D iversity............................................................................ 1430 C. Viewpoint D iversity .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 32 Issue 4 Article 14 2005 Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals Michael E. Solimine [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael E. Solimine, Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. (2006) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol32/iss4/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW JUDICAL STRATIFICATION AND THE REPUTATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS Michael E. Solimine VOLUME 32 SUMMER 2005 NUMBER 4 Recommended citation: Michael E. Solimine, Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals, 32 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 1331 (2005). JUDICIAL STRATIFICATION AND THE REPUTATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS MICHAEL E. SOLIMINE* I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1331 II. MEASURING JUDICIAL REPUTATION, PRESTIGE, AND INFLUENCE: INDIVIDUAL JUDGES AND MULTIMEMBER COURTS ............................................................... 1333 III. MEASURING THE REPUTATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS . 1339 IV. THE RISE AND FALL OF
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Section (PDF929KB)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2005 No. 67 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was ceed to executive session for the con- Yesterday, 21 Senators—evenly di- called to order by the President pro sideration of calendar No. 71, which the vided, I believe 11 Republicans and 10 tempore (Mr. STEVENS). clerk will report. Democrats—debated for over 10 hours The legislative clerk read the nomi- on the nomination of Priscilla Owen. PRAYER nation of Priscilla Richman Owen, of We will continue that debate—10 hours The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Texas, to be United States Circuit yesterday—maybe 20 hours, maybe 30 fered the following prayer: Judge for the Fifth Circuit. hours, and we will take as long as it Let us pray. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER takes for Senators to express their God of grace and glory, open our eyes The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The views on this qualified nominee. to the power You provide for all of our majority leader is recognized. But at some point that debate should challenges. Give us a glimpse of Your SCHEDULE end and there should be a vote. It ability to do what seems impossible, to Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, today we makes sense: up or down, ‘‘yes’’ or exceed what we can request or imagine. will resume executive session to con- ‘‘no,’’ confirm or reject; and then we Encourage us again with Your promise sider Priscilla Owen to be a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage City Project (Second Edition)
    A Prospectus for Investment in the World Heritage City Project (Second Edition) Delivering on the Promise of Philadelphia’s World Heritage City Status Through a New Mission- Oriented Approach Global Philadelphia Association 2018 The World Heritage City Logo and Its Symbolism The Philadelphia World Heritage City logo was designed for the World Heritage City Project by J2 Design Partnership. It has come to represent a city that is using a uniquely distinguished past to propel a dramatically new future. At the center of the logo is Independence Hall. This iconic building has been recognized by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) as a World Heritage Site. Independence Hall was seen as having “outstanding universal value” in that – in the words of UNESCO’s sixth criterion for inscription on the World Heritage List – it is “directly or tangibly associated with events or living traditions, with ideas, or with beliefs . of outstanding universal significance.” Having such a UNESCO‐ designated site within our borders, together with our later success in securing membership in the Organization of World Heritage Cities in 2015, has enabled Philadelphia to become a “World Heritage City”. The horizontal lines to the left of the tower represent motion, reflecting that we are not standing on our laurels but moving forward as a city. To the right is a star, representing the City’s aspirations for the future. Taken together, the horizontal lines and the star become a distillation of the stars and stripes of the American flag and the great country that was born here nearly two and one‐half centuries ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Tie Votes in the Supreme Court Justin Pidot
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 2016 Tie Votes in the Supreme Court Justin Pidot Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Pidot, Justin, "Tie Votes in the Supreme Court" (2016). Minnesota Law Review. 139. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/139 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Article Tie Votes in the Supreme Court Justin Pidot† INTRODUCTION What should the Supreme Court do with a tie vote? Since at least 1792, the Court has followed the rule that where the Justices are evenly divided, the lower court’s decision is af- firmed, and the Supreme Court’s order has no precedential ef- fect.1 Such cases are unusual but hardly scarce. Since 1866, an odd number of Justices have composed the Supreme Court, and when an odd number of individuals vote, that vote typically doesn’t result in a tie.2 Yet due to death, retirement, or recusal, there have been 164 tie votes in the Supreme Court between 1925 and 2015.3 These ties have largely, but not entirely, gone unnoticed, in part because few of them involved particularly contentious cases in the eye of the public.4 † Associate Professor, University of Denver Sturm College of Law. I would like to thank Bob Bone, Alan Chen, Lee Epstein, Tara Leigh Grove, Lee Kovarsky, Nancy Leong, Margaret Kwoka, Alan Morrison, Jim Pfander, Ju- dith Resnick, Allan Stein, and Ben Spencer for sharing their insights and also my research assistant Courtney McVean for all of her help.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Circuit
    Full_Name City State Last_Name Next Clerkship Opening Accepting Applications Mail, Email or OSCAR? Post Grad Experience? Notes Thomas L. Ambro Wilmington DE Ambro 2021 posted on OSCAR online preferred Stephanos Bibas Philadelphia PA Bibas 2020 and 2021 posted on OSCAR online, email, do not send paper preferred Michael A. Chagares Newark NJ Chagares 2022 posted on OSCAR online, paper requires district court clerkship Robert E. Cowen Trenton NJ Cowen No longer hiring term clerks n/a n/a D. Michael Fisher Pittsburgh PA Fisher 2020 posted on OSCAR online May be reducing workload/going to 2021 but not accepting applications 3 clerks. Does not want paper Julio M. Fuentes Newark NJ Fuentes now no online prefers prior clerkship or work experience applications, will post on OSCAR Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Newark NJ Greenaway 2020 yes paper requires one year post-grad work experience not hiring at this time, no other Morton I. Greenberg Trenton NJ Greenberg information no paper prefers prior clerkship Thomas M. Hardiman Pittsburgh PA Hardiman 2020 posted on OSCAR online Kent A. Jordan Wilmington DE Jordan 2021 yes paper Cheryl Ann Krause Philadelphia PA Krause 2021 posted on OSCAR online prefers prior clerkship Paul Matey Newark NJ Matey 2021 posted on OSCAR mail, email preferred Prefers candidates with a public interest background and work Theodore A. McKee Philadelphia PA McKee not accepting applications no paper experience Richard Lowell Nygaard Erie PA Nygaard No longer hiring term clerks n/a n/a David J. Porter Pittsburgh PA Porter 2020, 2021, 2022 posted on OSCAR online, paper, email May be reducing workload/going to Marjorie O.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting Judges
    Visiting Judges Marin K. Levy* Despite the fact that Article III judges hold particular seats on particular courts, the federal system rests on judicial interchangeability. Hundreds of judges “visit” other courts each year and collectively help decide thousands of appeals. Anyone from a retired Supreme Court Justice to a judge from the U.S. Court of International Trade to a district judge from out of circuit may come and hear cases on a given court of appeals. Although much has been written about the structure of the federal courts and the nature of Article III judgeships, little attention has been paid to the phenomenon of “sitting by designation”—how it came to be, how it functions today, and what it reveals about the judiciary more broadly. This Article offers an overdue account of visiting judges. It begins by providing an origin story, showing how the current practice stems from two radically different traditions. The first saw judges as fixed geographically, and allowed for visitors only as a stopgap measure when individual judges fell ill or courts fell into arrears with their cases. The second assumed greater fluidity within the courts, requiring Supreme Court Justices to ride circuit—to visit different regions and act as trial and appellate judges—for the first half of the Court’s history. These two traditions together provide the critical context for modern-day visiting. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38ZK55M67 Copyright © 2019 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications.
    [Show full text]
  • March 12, 2013
    REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES March 12, 2013 The Judicial Conference of the United States convened in Washington, D.C., on March 12, 2013, pursuant to the call of the Chief Justice of the United States issued under 28 U.S.C. § 331. The Chief Justice presided, and the following members of the Conference were present: First Circuit: Chief Judge Sandra L. Lynch Judge Paul J. Barbadoro, District of New Hampshire Second Circuit: Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, Eastern District of New York Third Circuit: Chief Judge Theodore A. McKee Judge Joel A. Pisano,1 District of New Jersey Fourth Circuit: Chief Judge William B. Traxler, Jr. Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow, District of Maryland 1Designated by the Chief Justice as a substitute for Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster, Western District of Pennsylvania, who was unable to attend. Judicial Conference of the United States March 12, 2013 Fifth Circuit: Chief Judge Carl E. Stewart Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance, Eastern District of Louisiana Sixth Circuit: Chief Judge Alice M. Batchelder Chief Judge Thomas A. Varlan, Eastern District of Tennessee Seventh Circuit: Chief Judge Frank H. Easterbrook Judge Ruben Castillo, Northern District of Illinois Eighth Circuit: Chief Judge William Jay Riley Judge Rodney W. Sippel, Eastern District of Missouri Ninth Circuit: Chief Judge Alex Kozinski Judge Robert S. Lasnik, Western District of Washington Tenth Circuit: Chief Judge Mary Beck Briscoe Judge Dee V. Benson, District of Utah Eleventh Circuit: Chief Judge Joel F. Dubina Judge W. Louis Sands, Middle District of Georgia 2 Judicial Conference of the United States March 12, 2013 District of Columbia Circuit: Chief Judge Merrick B.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing the Next Supreme Court Justice: an Empirical Ranking of Judicial Performance†
    Choosing the Next Supreme Court Justice: † An Empirical Ranking of Judicial Performance Stephen Choi* ** Mitu Gulati † © 2004 Stephen Choi and Mitu Gulati. * Roger J. Traynor Professor, U.C. Berkeley Law School (Boalt Hall). ** Professor of Law, Georgetown University. Kindly e-mail comments to [email protected] and [email protected]. Erin Dengan, Édeanna Johnson-Chebbi, Margaret Rodgers, Rishi Sharma, Jennifer Dukart, and Alice Kuo provided research assistance. Kimberly Brickell deserves special thanks for her work. Aspects of this draft benefited from discussions with Alex Aleinikoff, Scott Baker, Lee Epstein, Tracey George, Prea Gulati, Vicki Jackson, Mike Klarman, Kim Krawiec, Kaleb Michaud, Un Kyung Park, Greg Mitchell, Jim Rossi, Ed Kitch, Paul Mahoney, Jim Ryan, Paul Stefan, George Triantis, Mark Seidenfeld, and Eric Talley. For comments on the draft itself, we are grateful to Michael Bailey, Suzette Baker, Bill Bratton, James Brudney, Steve Bundy, Brannon Denning, Phil Frickey, Michael Gerhardt, Steve Goldberg, Pauline Kim, Bill Marshall, Don Langevoort, Judith Resnik, Keith Sharfman, Steve Salop, Michael Seidman, Michael Solimine, Gerry Spann, Mark Tushnet, David Vladeck, Robin West, Arnold Zellner, Kathy Zeiler, Todd Zywicki and participants at workshops at Berkeley, Georgetown, Virginia, FSU, and UNC - Chapel Hill. Given the unusually large number of people who have e-mailed us with comments on this project, it is likely that there are some who we have inadvertently failed to thank. Our sincerest apologies to them. Disclosure: Funding for this project was provided entirely by our respective law schools. One of us was a law clerk to two of the judges in the sample: Samuel Alito of the Third Circuit and Sandra Lynch of the First Circuit.
    [Show full text]
  • Falsities on the Senate Floor John Cornyn United States Senator
    University of Richmond Law Review Volume 39 Issue 3 Allen Chair Symposium 2004 Federal Judicial Article 13 Selection 3-2005 Falsities on the Senate Floor John Cornyn United States Senator Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview Part of the American Politics Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation John Cornyn, Falsities on the Senate Floor, 39 U. Rich. L. Rev. 963 (2005). Available at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol39/iss3/13 This Letter is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Richmond Law Review by an authorized editor of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FALSITIES ON THE SENATE FLOOR * The Honorable John Cornyn ** Throughout last night's historic round-the-clock session of the United States Senate, a partisan minority of senators defended their filibusters against the President's judicial nominees by mak- ing two basic arguments. Both were false. First, they claim that the Senate's record of "168-4"-168 judges confirmed, 4 filibustered (so far)-somehow proves that the cur- rent filibuster crisis is mere politics as usual.1 But, as I explained in an op-ed yesterday, this is not politics as usual; it is politics at its worst.2 * An earlier version of this Article was originally published on the National Review Online website on November 13, 2003. John Cornyn, Falsities on the Senate Floor, NAT'L REV. ONLINE, Nov.
    [Show full text]