Hindu Interpretation of Christ from Vivekananda to Radhakrishnan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
. Hindu Interpretation of Christ from Vivekananda to Radhakrishnan · BALWANT A.M. PARADKAR Th() purpose of this paper is not to furnish an exhaustive survey of Hindu interpretations of Chdst, but to view the high lights, particularly the interpretations of some leading and responsible Hindu figures whose views influence strong move ments1 in the ongoing Hindu renaissance. These . may be indicated as follows : I. Swami Vivekananda } II. Swanri AJdhilananda The Ramakrishna Mission III. Mahatma Gandhi . The Sarvodaya Movement IV. Bhai Manilal C. Parekh } v. Dr. S. Radhakrishnan New Hindu Secularism I Recent research has shown that Swami Vivekananda was much more indebted to tll.e Brahmo Samaj for his religious awakening than is commonly realized. It is from this contact that his warm appreciation of Christ is to be traced. It is signi ficant that -Swami Vivekananda inaugurated the Ramakrishna Mission. after his master's death, on Christmas Eve. But we touch the heart of Vivekananda's interpretation of Christ when we note three things. First, his approach to Christ was not that of a seeker but that of one who found satisfaction in philosophical-mystical Hinduism. Second, he is influenced by a certain historical scepticism, due apparently to being influenced by the Christ-myth speculation of the late nine.teenth century. Third, he viewed everything at all times from the angle ' In the period before us, there are two other outstanding names: Dr. Bhagavan Das of the Banaras Hindu University, and Shri Aurobindo of the Poridicherry Ashram. Neither of these ·gave much sustained atten tion to the Christ theme. Shri .Aurobindo's 'integralism' is of growing East-West significance. · · 65 of Advaita Vedanta. 'It is', he said, 'the Vedanta, and Vedanta alone that can become the universal religion of man .. ·. no other is fitted for that role '. 2 He felt that 'Christianity with all its boasted civilization .is but a collection of little bits of Inqian thought. Ours is the religion of which Buddhism, with all its greatness, is a rebel child, and. of which . Christianity is a very, 3 patchy imitation'. .: In Vivekananda's treatment of Christ there is an unresolved problem. There is a vein of historical scepticism. He admires Christ greatly. But how can one consistently admire a person whose historicity is open to question ? Except Hinduism, he says, ' All the other religions have. been built around the life of what they think is an historical man, and what they think is the strength of the religion is really the weakness, for disprove the historicifyt of the man and the whole fabric tumbles to the ground.. The glory of Krishna is not that he was Krishna but that be was the great teacher of Vedanta . Thus our allegiance is to principles always, and not to the person.' 4 With reference to Christianity' he said, ' If there is one blow dealt . to the historicity of that life (Christ's), as bas been the case in modem times ... if that rock of historicity, as they pretend to call it, is shaken and shattered, the whole building tumbles down, broken absolutely, never to regain its lost status.' 5 Thus, spring ing as it does from such a sceptical attitude, one can attach noth- . ing more than rhetorical· significance to Vivekananda's statement, 'Truth· came to Jesus of Nazareth and we must all obey him.' 6 We do not in Vivekananda find a systematic discussion of the outline of the life of Christ. He rejected outright Nicholas Noto vitch's speculation that Christ had been tutored by Brahmin priests in the temple of Jagannath in Puri (Orissa). 7 But regarding the central fact of the passion of Christ, the Crucifixion, Vivekananda said, 'Christ was God incarnate ; they could not kill him. That which was crucified was only a semblance, a mirage.' 8 According to Vivekananda, Christ was a Bhakta and essentially a Sanyasin. Vivekananda believed that Christ believed in reincarnation. 9 The Johannine claims for Christ's divinity (in an exclusive and final revelation) do not present any problems at aU to Viveka nanda. For, 'Christ', be says, 'preached dualism to the masses • Vivekananda, Lectures from Colombo. to Almora, p. 90. ~ Ibid., p. 195. ' Ibid., pp. 200-201. • Ibid., pp. 90-91. We cannot go here into the question of the his toricity of Christ. The Christ"myth theory has several times been refuted, and notably by H. G. Wood, Did Christ Really Live? (S.C:M. 1938). For satisfying critical reconstruction of the life of Christ sea the two outstand ing lives by Vincent Taylor arid Ethelbert Stauffer. • Ibid., p. 204. ' Ibid., pp. 182, 3. • Gambhirananda, History of the Ramakrishna Math and Mission, P. 39. • VivekanaiJ.da, The Complete Works, vol. I, P; 319. '66 and non-dualism to His disciples.' 10 It is entirely in the light of such a reductionist · orientation that Vivekananda's interpreta tion of Christ must be understood. Hence the Ramakrishna Mission finds no difficulty at all in quoting liberally the great Mahavakyas of the Gospels such as 'I and my Father are one', or the sayings of Jesus concerning his authority in Thus Spake the CHrist (which reached the 30,000th printed copy in Viveka nanda's birth centenary year, 1963): There, Vivekananda is quoted as saying: So we find jesus of Nazareth, in the first place, the true son of the Orient . He was a soul! Nothing but a soul, just working in a body for the good of humanity ; and that was all his relation to the body. He was a disembodied, unfettered, unbound spirit . In him is embodied all that is best and greatest in His own race and He Himself is the impetus for the future, not only to his own, but also to the unnumbered other races of the world. If I, as an Oriental. am to worship Jesus of Nazareth, there is only one way left to me, that is to worship Him as God and nothing else.U It is clear from these that for Vivekananda the Atonement is no problem, for (according to him) Christ really did not suffer. If Vivekananda calls him God, it is on the Advaita understanding that God (lsh1vara) is a lower and not the absolute spiritual reality. Indeed, Vivekananda's interpretation of the doctrine of maya follows an extreme line which few Advaita apologists would be prepared to accept today. For him it is nothing more and nothing less than cosmic illusionism. Hence the docetic overtones to his handling of the body, person and significance of JesU's. The teal difficulty for Advaitins (and Vedantins) in accepting the finality of the self-revelation of the Supreme Spirit in Christ Jesus i'S that they eschew ultimate metaphysical personalism. With this -follows an ambivalence in regard to creation and a suspicion of the significance of time. Without a change of meta physical premise, it will be impossible for Advaitins to see the absolute significance of Christ. n The Ramakrishna Mission, when it establi'shed a firmer footing in the Western hemisphere, required a fuller adumbnitiori of the. Hindu interpretation of Christ. A book supplying this was furnished by a leading Swami of the Mission two years after India achieved political independence. The book is published by no Ie~ a concern than the Philosophical Library, New York. 10 Vivekananda, The Complete Works, Vol. II, pp. 142-3, 351 ; Vol. IV, ~- 144. ' Swami Suddhasatwananda (Ed.), Thus Spake the Christ, quoting Vivekananda, pp. xvi-xvii (from his Complete Works, Vol. IV, p. 143). 67 Swami Akbilananda's Hindu View of Christ (pp: 291), owing to its insidious challenge to Christian orthodoxy, deserves to be much better known than it is. Here we find the attempt to work out in a more orderly way, in a strictly Vedanta setting, 'the numerous scattered suggestions of Swami Vivekananda. This volume contains an 'Introduction' by Walter G. Muelder, Dea:n of the School of Theology, Boston University. Dean Muelder misleads the public into thinking that Swami Akhilananda suc ceeds in 'giving the Christian equivalent of Hindu thought and the Hindu equivalents of synoptic and Johannine teachings 'Y Muelder declares that the Swami ·i's not baffied by the Christian thought of conversion because Jesus' word to Nicodemus, 'You must be born anew ' is fully acceptable. The author comes to terms not only with Christian teaching but with Christ himsel£. 13 This is a dangerously misleading statement, as the. Swami's book does nothing of the kind ; rather he strongly attacks the evangel ical emphasis on conversion experience. 14 In fact, one of the things that is striking about Akhilananda's bibliography (pp. 285- 287) is that it is heavily weighted with literature .of the quest for . the Jesus of history of the Liberal period. 15 The post-liberal, conservative critical reconstruction has not been reckoned with. Moreover, the bibliography is weighted with books interested. in the psychology of Jesus and questions of general 'religious consciousness'! .A notably striking feature of the work through 10 chapters is frequent quotations from the writings of ~ri Rama krishna, Swami Vivekananda and Swami Brahmananda. So much so that one wonders whether it was his intention, in giving the ' Hindu ' view of Christ, to · infuse a conscious Vedanta apologetic. Akhilananda regards Christ a:s an Incarnation. He says Incarnations have the following characteristics: · 16 (1) They have a purpose, goal and method of life. _ (2) They come to fulfil the crying need of the age? 7 (3) Incarnations are at peace .with themselves?S (4) 'However, the Hindus believe that there have been numerous incarnations (Avataras) in the history of the world, of whom Jesus was one, while .