DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Reports of State Corporation Rosatom for SD Management)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Reports of State Corporation Rosatom for SD Management) ANNUAL PUBLIC REPORT 2014 ROSATOM ROSATOM REPORT ANNUAL 2 About the Report The Annual Public Report of the State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom (hereinafter referred to as “ROSATOM” or “the Corporation”) for 2014 is the sixth report voluntarily published for a broad range of stakeholders. ROSATOM The top management and representatives of the stakeholders defined the priority topic of the Report as: “Improvement of ROSATOM’s positions in the world market of nuclear technologies and services”. ANNUAL Standards and regulatory requirements PUBLIC The Report was drafted in compliance with the requirements of • Policy in the field of public reporting and standards of annual public REPORT reporting of ROSATOM and its organisations, • <IR> International Framework, • Sustainability Reporting Guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI G4, Core ‘in accordance’ option), 2014 • AA 1000 Standards of AccountAbility, • The RSPP Recommendations for use in the practice of management and corporate nonfinancial reporting (key performance indicators). Stakeholder involvement The drafting of the Report was carried out with the input of stakeholders as per the International Standard AA1000SES to enhance the transparency, accountability, and materiality of the disclosed information. A study was conducted to determine the material aspects disclosed in the report, and two dialogues were held with stakeholders, including public consultations and discussions concerning the draft report in the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation. The Report takes into account all the main recommendations given by the representatives of stakeholders during these dialogues. See more information about the report and the process of determining the content of the Report in Appendix 1. PERFORMANCE RESULTS OF THE STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION “ROSATOM” 2 ROSATOM ANNUAL PUBLIC REPORT 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. STRATEGIC REVIEW 004 5. WORKING IN ONE TEAM 176 1.1. Rosatom today 006 5.1. Human Capital Development 178 1.2. Main results of activities in 2014 009 5.2. Contribution to the development of the territories of presence 193 1.3. The mission and strategy of ROSATOM 018 5.3. Interaction with Stakeholders 201 1.4. Business model, value-creation process and markets of presence 023 5.4. The Public Council of ROSATOM 212 2. ONE STEP AHEAD IN 2014 034 6. PLEDGING OF SECURITY 214 2.1. International Business 040 6.1. Provision of Nuclear and Radiation Safety 216 2.2. International Cooperation 059 6.2. “Nuclear legacy” Problem Solving 228 2.3. Innovative Development 069 6.3. Environmental Protection 234 2.4. Business Diversification 076 7. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN THE REPORT’S PREPARATION 256 3. KEY RESULTS 082 7.1. Public Reporting System 258 3.1. Financial and Economic Results 084 7.2. Dialogues with stakeholders and taking into 264 3.2. Mining Division 092 account stakeholder proposals 3.3. Fuel Division 096 7.3. Report’s Stakeholder Assurance Statement 268 3.4. Machine-Building Division 100 Abbreviations 272 3.5. Engineering Division 103 3.6. Power Generation Division 107 Glossary 274 3.7. Performance of Public Functions 111 Appendix 1. Information about the Report and about the process 278 3.8. Nuclear Weapons Division 119 for determining the content of the Report 3.9. Nuclear-Powered Icebreaker Fleet 125 Appendix 2. Tables of GRI (G4) standard disclosures and RSPP’s 282 key performance indicators 4. MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY 128 Appendix 3. Opinion of the Audit Commission on the financial 288 4.1. Corporate Governance 131 and business activities of ROSATOM and its organisations for 2014 4.2. Risk Management 138 Appendix 4. Opinion of the auditing procedures office of ROSATOM’s 295 4.3. Management of Financial and Investment Activity 145 Internal Control and Audit Department 4.4. ROSATOM Production System 158 Appendix 5. Report on results of independent assurance of the public annual 297 4.5. Management of Procurement Activity 164 report of the State Atomic Energy Corporation “Rosatom” for 2014 4.6. Internal Control System 171 Feedback form 299 4.7. Corruption and other legal offences countering systems 174 4 ROSATOM ANNUAL PUBLIC REPORT 5 STRATEGIC REVIEW 1.1. Rosatom today 006 1.2. Main results of activities in 2014 009 1.3. The mission and strategy of ROSATOM 018 1.4. Business model, value-creation process and markets of presence 023 6 ROSATOM ANNUAL PUBLIC REPORT 7 No. 1 in the world NO. 2 uranium enrichment In terms of the world’s (36% of the market) uranium reserves (13% of world ROSATOM production) TODAY 1 million euros per day Spent on research and 1 development billion rubles 1.1.1. investment Annual expenditure on social ROSATOM is one of the largest utilities in Russia and charity programs and one of the leading companies in the global nuclear technology market GENERAL INFORMATION State Atomic Energy Corporation "Rosatom" was ABOUT THE established on December, 18, 2007 (ROSATOM, ~ 17 % corporation). The status, purpose of creation and Share in the power CORPORATION its operations, functions and powers of the State generation in Russia Corporation "Rosatom" are defined in the Federal Law of December, 01, 2007 No. 317-FZ "On the 258,000 State Atomic Energy Corporation "Rosatom". Employees No. 1 in the number of simultaneously 33.2 ~ 350 constructed nuclear power plants billion rubles Organisations and enterprises abroad (29 blocks are already in are part of the Corporation Expenses on environmental our portfolio, 11 blocks are in the protection construction phase) The world's only Nuclear-Powered Icebreaker Fleet 8 ROSATOM ANNUAL PUBLIC REPORT 9 The Corporation is authorised on behalf of the • a global company that owns assets in all stages Russian Federation to fulfil the international of the nuclear power and industry production 1.2. obligations of Russia in the field of peaceful uses chain, including: the exploration of uranium of atomic energy and the observance of nuclear and its production, designing and building weapons in a non-proliferation regime. NPP, machine-building, generation of heat and electricity, uranium conversion and enrichment, ROSATOM is the fabrication of nuclear, and the management MAIN RESULTS OF of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and radioactive • responsible for the implementation of national waste (RAW). ACTIVITIES IN 2014 policy concerning the use of atomic energy, Key areas of activity of Rosatom Main results table* Nuclear Power Complex Indicator 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013, %** FRONT END OF NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE Geological Mineral Mining Nuclear Icebreaker Revenues according to International Financial 618.3 529.2 474.8 116.8 exploration processing Fleet Reporting Standards, billion rubles Mining division EBITDA, billion rubles*** 200.5 155.2 140.8 129.2 Designing New businesses Conversion Enrichment Fuel fabrication And engineering Net assets according to International Financial 1722.2 1550.1 1458.2 111.1 Reporting Standards, billion rubles Fuel division Intangible assets, billion rubles 48.0 48.3 44.8 99.4 NPP construction Portfolio of overseas orders for 10 years, billion US 101.4 72.7 66.5 139.5 POWER MACHINE BUILDING dollars Generation Engineering of electricity NPP service Machinery Machinery Number of power units in portfolio of overseas orders, 29 19 19 152.6 division On the NPP designing production units Mounting And Power Generation Machinery Implementation of state defence order, % 100 100 100 100.0 starting-up and Division staging adjustment Number of level “2” events and above, according to 0 0 0 – Service INES scale and modernisation Amount of NPP power generation in Russia, 180.5 172.2 177.3 104.8 Machine-Building Division billions of kilowatts per hour NPP Installed capacity utilisation factor, % 81.6 77.9 80.9 104.8 BACK END OF NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE Mineral feedstock of natural uranium (Russian assets), 524.7 541.9 550.5 – thousands of tonnes**** +224.1 +229.45 +155.0 SNF treatment Decommissioning RAW treatment Natural uranium mining, thousands of tonnes 7.85 8.3 7.6 94.6 Creation of innovations Lifecycle Back-end Division Environmental protection expenses, billion rubles 33.2 19.6 15.7 169.4 Consolidated labour productivity growth by 2011 37.5 28.5 17.7 131.6 The transition to the closed nuclear fuel cycle (return of the fuel into the cycle) the fuel into (return of the closed nuclear fuel cycle The transition to (in current prices without Nuclear Weapons Division), % Share of specialists under 35 years old, % 32.6 29.7 29.2 109.8 As of 31 December 2014, ROSATOM has is given in the Corporation’s annual web report. * The indicators established by the Supervisory Council for 2014 in the table are marked with colour. ** Calculating the indicators in the column “2014/2013, %” the figures for 2013 are assumed to be 100%. incorporated more than 350 different corporate *** Data is given in accordance with the fiscal consolidation perimeter. entities. A list of the organisations and enterprises **** The bottom line with a “+” shows the data of Uranium One Holding NV mineral resources base. Due to changes in the calculating methodology used in 2012, the data is given separately for Russian assets and for the Uranium One Holding NV mineral resource base. 10 ROSATOM ANNUAL PUBLIC REPORT 11 Key events table September • Signing of the Agreement concerning the development of the construction project of the first Jordanian nuclear power plant between JSC “Rosatom Overseas” and the January • Signing of the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and Atomic Energy Commission of the Jordan Hashemite Kingdom the Government
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Nuclear Security Policy
    Innovative approaches to peace and security from the Stanley Foundation POLICYANALYSISBRIEF THE STANLEY FOUNDATION | MAY 2015 Russia’s Nuclear Security Policy: Priorities and Potential Areas for Cooperation The crisis over Ukraine has led to a drastic reduction in regular official Russian-US contacts in most areas, including those where it is in the two countries’ mutual national security interests to work together. Bilateral cooperation on nuclear nonproliferation and nuclear security has been among the affected areas. The United States has suspended contacts with Russia in the framework of the G-8 and in the Russian-US Bilateral Presidential Commission’s Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Security Working Group. Implementation of the September 2013 agreement on Cooperation in Nuclear- and Energy- Related Scientific Research and Development (R&D Agreement), which Anton Khlopkov prioritizes joint efforts on nuclear nonproliferation and nuclear security, has also been put on hold, and exchanges between nuclear scientists of the two Author countries have been frozen. In turn, Russia has decided not to take part in Anton Khlopkov1 is director of the preparations for the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit. Moscow also notified Moscow-based Center for Energy and Washington that most of the joint nuclear security projects in Russia would Security Studies and editor in chief of the not be extended beyond December 31, 2014. journal Nuclear Club. He is a member of the Advisory Board under the Security This trend is a serious cause for concern, given that Russia and the United Council of the Russian Federation and States, which are depositaries of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of chairman of the Moscow Nonproliferation Nuclear Weapons (NPT), bear special responsibility for maintaining the Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    Annual Report 2017 Efficiency improvement and sustainable development Annual Report 2017 Efficiency improvement and sustainable development TVEL | ANNUAL REPORT 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 Table of Contents page page page page Key results Competencies of Second Social Partnership of TVEL enterprises of TVEL Business Core in the Territories 8 Fuel Company 80 Fuel Company 103 Development 131 of Presence Message From the Chairman of the Board 3 Governance Intellectual Сapital 101 5 Appendices of Directors 4 Corporate governance 51 Innovative Activities in the Nuclear Industry 101 1. Auditor’s Report 182 Message from President 6 Scheme of TVEL JSC Corporate Governance Bodies 53 Second Business Core Development 103 2. Financial Statements 184 Key results of TVEL Fuel Company 8 Board of Directors 54 Intellectual Property 109 3. Report of the Internal Control and Audit Department Milestones 2017 10 Report of the Board of Directors of TVEL JSC on the results Human Сapital 112 of TVEL JSC Following the Results of “Public Annual of the Company development in the priority fields 55 HR Policy 112 Reporting Preparation” Audit Process 195 Sole Executive Body 56 4. Independent Assurance Report 196 1 Staff Composition 112 About TVEL Fuel Company Share Capital Structure 57 5. Statement on Public Assurance 199 TVEL Fuel Company 15 Personnel Engagement 117 Related-Party Transactions and Major Transactions 57 6. RUIE Public Endorsement of the Report 201 World Market of Front End Nuclear Fuel Cycle 18 Motivation and Reward System 118 Management Efficiency
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No
    Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission - R550.1 Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No. 87055-13-0356 Final Report - July 3, 2014 RSP-0299 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission R550.1 Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No. 87055-13-0356 Final Report July 3, Released for Brian Gihm 0 Victor Snell Jim Sarvinis Milan Ducic 2014 Use Victor Snell Date Rev. Status Prepared By Checked By Approved By Approved By Client - CNSC H346105-0000-00-124-0002, Rev. 0 Page i © Hatch 2015 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission - R550.1 Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No. 87055-13-0356 Final Report - July 3, 2014 Executive Summary The objectives of this report are to perform a design survey of small modular reactors (SMRs) with near-term deployment potential, with a particular emphasis on identifying their innovative safety features, and to review the Canadian nuclear regulatory framework to assess whether the current and proposed regulatory documents adequately address SMR licensing challenges. SMRs are being designed to lower the initial financing cost of a nuclear power plant or to supply electricity in small grids (often in remote areas) which cannot accommodate large nuclear power plants (NPPs). The majority of the advanced SMR designs is based on pressurized water reactor (PWR) technology, while some non-PWR Generation IV technologies (e.g., gas-cooled reactor, lead-cooled reactor, sodium-cooled fast reactor, etc.) are also being pursued.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Mail: [email protected]
    ATOMENERGOMASH JSC Nuclear and Power Engineering Address: 28/3 Ozerkovsakaya nab., Moscow, 115184 Telephone: +7(495) 668-20-93 Fax: +7(495) 668-20-95 Website: http://www.aem-group.ru/en/ E-mail: [email protected] www.aem-group.ru/en/ 3 JSC Atomenergomash ABOUT US Аtomenergomash JSC (AEM, Сompany, Group) is a machine building division of ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation. One of the leading Russian power engineering companies, a supplier of efficient integrated solutions for nuclear and thermal power plants, natural gas and petrochemical industry, shipbuilding, hydroelectricity, demineralization, water treatment, water purification and special steel market. FIGURES AND FACTS ATOMENERGOMASH • The key developer and equipment manu- • AEM was established in 2006 as part of facturer for the reactor facility of the ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation. water-water energetic reactor (VVER). • The Holding includes about 20 • The key developer and equipement man- power engineering companies, R&D, ufacturer of fast nuclear reactors (FNR). manufacturing, construction and • Equipment manufacturer for the turbine construction companies located in Russia, island of NPP with VVER. Ukraine, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. • The only Russian manufacturer of steam • The Holding’s equipment is installed in generators and main circulation pumps more than 20 countries. for Russian-built NPPs. • 14% of global Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) • The key developer and manufacturer of and 40% of Thermal Power Plants (TPP) marine reactor plants for the Navy and in Russia and the former Soviet Union nuclear icebreakers. countries run our equipment. • One of the largest manufacturers of power plant boilers and Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) for medium and large Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) units.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Modular Reactor Design and Deployment
    INL/MIS-15-34247 Small Modular Reactor Design and Deployment Curtis Wright Symposium xx/xx/xxxx www.inl.gov INL SMR Activities • INL works with all vendors to provide fair access to the laboratory benefits • INL works with industry on SMR technology and deployment • INL is supporting multiple LWR SMR vendors – Small, <300MWe reactors and less expensive reactors compared to current LWR reactors (Small) – Often, but not always, multiple reactors at the same site that can be deployed as power is needed (Modular) – Primary cooling system and reactor core in a single containment structure, but not always (Reactors) – Factory built, usually, which improves quality and costs • Integrated PWR SMR’s are closest to deployment – designed to be inherently safer and simple – primary reactor system inside a single factory built containment vessel – Higher dependence on passive systems to simplify operation and design Reactor Power Nuclear Plant Power Los Angeles Class Submarine -26 MW 5000 Enterprise Class Aircraft Carrier 8x 4000 Unit Power Nimitz Class Aircraft Carrier 2x97MW, 194MW 3000 Plant Power NuScale Reactor 12 x 150MW, 1800MW 2000 Cooper BWR, 1743MW PowerThermal MW 1000 Westinghouse AP-1000, 3000MW 0 European Pressurized Reactor, 4953MW SMRs are Smaller VC Summer • Power less than 300MWe. Dearater – Current Plants 1000MWe – Physically smaller – Fewer inputs – Fits on power grid with less infrastructure – Built in a factory – Simplified designs VC Summer • Passive systems Core • Fewer components NuScale Reactor Multiple Units • SMR Nuclear
    [Show full text]
  • Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications Report Prepared for Alberta Innovates
    PNNL-25978 Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications Report Prepared for Alberta Innovates November 2016 SM Short B Olateju (AI) SD Unwin S Singh (AI) A Meisen (AI) DISCLAIMER NOTICE This report was prepared under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), as an account of work sponsored by Alberta Innovates (“AI”). Neither AI, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), DOE, the U.S. Government, nor any person acting on their behalf makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by AI, PNNL, DOE, or the U.S. Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of AI, PNNL, DOE or the U.S. Government. Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications SM Short B Olateju (AI) SD Unwin S Singh (AI) A Meisen (AI) November 2016 Prepared for Alberta Innovates (AI) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Executive Summary At present, the steam requirements of Alberta’s heavy oil industry and the Province’s electricity requirements are predominantly met by natural gas and coal, respectively. On November 22, 2015 the Government of Alberta announced its Climate Change Leadership Plan to 1) phase out all pollution created by burning coal and transition to more renewable energy and natural gas generation by 2030 and 2) limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from oil sands operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Afrikantov Okbm”
    JOINT STOCK COMPANY “AFRIKANTOV OKBM” RESULTS Status in the Industry JSC “Afrikantov OKBM” is within the management outline of Atomenergomash JSC, ROSATOM’s Mechanical Engineering Division. In 2017, the share of JSC “Afrikantov OKBM” in the revenue of Atomenergomash was 31.7%. JSC “Afrikantov OKBM” participates in solving tasks of ROSATOM’s first-tier financial responsibility centres of level 1, including tasks of the Directorate for Nuclear Arms Complex, Directorate for Nuclear Energy Complex, Directorate for Nuclear and Radiation Safety, Block of Innovation Management, Atomflot FSUE and others. Status and Functions Chief Designer and Packaged Equipment Supplier of reactor plants of various application. Lead Interdepartmental Entity for refueling problems of naval nuclear reactors. RPS-Enterprise with assigned status of RPS Leader since 2015. Main Activities Key competencies and complete package of activities and services at the lifecycle horizon of various types of reactor facilities and NPP equipment. To date JSC “Afrikantov OKBM” A total of 9 business areas. is a large scientific and production center of ROSATOM State Corporation with a multidiscipline design team and proprietary research, experimental and production Main Products facilities. R&D, Supplies and Services. 2 STRUCTURE DESIGN AND PROCESS DIVISIONS > 1,200 employees 125 employees have academic degrees and titles RESEARCH AND TESTING COMPLEX > 190 employees > 70 test facilities area of > 22,450 m2 PRODUCTION COMPLEX > 1,600 employees > 500 equipment units workshops production area of > 31,700 m2 3 FROM THE FIRST PERSON Dmitry L. Zverev General Director, General Designer of JSC ”Afrikantov OKBM“ 4 I am pleased to bring to your Extensive implementation and attention this information brochure: system-level integration of ROSATOM’s JSC “Afrikantov OKBM”.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy Data/Données Sur L'énergie Nucléaire 2017
    Nuclear Development Développement de l’énergie nucléaire 2017 Nuclear Energy Data Nuclear Energy Data D onnées sur l’énergie nucléaire 2017 2017 NEA Données sur l’énergie nucléaire Nuclear Development Développement de l’énergie nucléaire Nuclear Energy Data Données sur l’énergie nucléaire 2017 © OECD 2017 NEA No. 7365 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCE POUR L’ÉNERGIE NUCLÉAIRE ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DÉVELOPPEMENT ÉCONOMIQUES STATLINKS This publication contains “StatLinks”. For each StatLink, the reader will find a URL which leads to the corresponding spreadsheet. These links work in the same way as an Internet link. Cette publication contient des « StatLinks ». Fonctionnant comme un lien internet, un StatLink fournit l’accès à la feuille de calcul correspondante. 2 NUCLEAR ENERGY DATA/DONNÉES SUR L’ÉNERGIE NUCLÉAIRE 2017, NEA No. 7365, © OECD 2017 OVERVIEW Overview The 2017 edition of Nuclear Energy Data contains official information provided by NEA and OECD member countries,1 including projections of total electrical and nuclear generating capacities along with fuel cycle requirements and capacities to 2035. Also included are short narrative country reports that give updates of the status, trends and issues in nuclear energy programmes. In 2016, nuclear power continued to supply significant amounts of low-carbon baseload electricity, despite strong competition from low-cost fossil fuels and subsidised renewable energy sources. Nuclear electricity generation Total electricity generation in NEA member countries declined slightly from 2015 to 2016 (1.5%) and electricity production at nuclear power plants (NPPs) decreased by 0.5% over the same period. In the OECD area, total electricity generation also declined from 2015 to 2016 (1.6%) and electricity production at nuclear power plants decreased by 0.6%.
    [Show full text]
  • Jsc "Techsnabexport" Annual Report 2011 Contents 1.6.2
    ENTERPRISE OF THE STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM jsc "TechsnabexporT" annual report 2011 Contents 1.6.2. Factors influencing the business strategy of INFORMATION ABOUT THE RePORT JSC "TECHSNABEXPORT" 26 AND ITS PREPARATION 4 1.6.3. Key instruments for achieving the strategic objectives of STATEMENT FROM JSC "TECHSNABEXPORT" JSC "TECHSNABEXPORT" 27 TOP MANAGEMENT 6 1.7. ANALYTICAL SUPPORT OF THE STATE ATOMIC ENERGY JSC "TECHSNABEXPORT" KEY CORPORATION ROSATOM PROJECTS 28 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 7 1.7.1. Development of international cooperation 28 KeY EVENTS OF THE rEPORTING PERIOD 8 1.7.2. Improving legislation and formation of modern international legal framework of cooperation 29 1. General information 10 1.7.3. Participation in international nuclear industry organisations 31 " " 1.1. INFORMATION ON 2. jSC TechsnabexporT management system 32 JSC "TECHSNABEXPORT" 12 1.1.1. Information on charter capital 12 2.1. ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE 34 1.1.2. Information on shareholders 12 2.2. CORPORATE MANAGEMENT 36 1.1.3. Information on the auditor and registrar 12 2.2.1. Description of the corporate management system 36 1.1.4. Information on subsidiaries and affiliates as 2.2.2. Documents regulating the corporate management system 36 of 31 December 2011 13 2.2.3. Dividends 37 1.1.5. JSC "TECHSNABEXPORT" membership 2.2.4. Members of the Board of Directors 37 in professional organisations 2.2.5. Functions of the Board of Directors 40 and associations 13 2.2.6. Audit Commission members 40 1.1.6. Background 14 2.2.7. Functions of the Audit Commission and the Internal control and audit department 41 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • JSC Techsnabexport
    I would like to bring to your kind attention the Public Annual Report 2012 Information on JSC Techsnabexport of JSC Techsnabexport, one of the oldest Russian foreign trade organizations, which celebrates its 50th anniversary in the year of publication of this Report. is fact was certainly taken into consideration while preparing the Report, that provides detailed Name of the Company in Russian Открытое внешнеэкономическое акционерное общество information on the Company’s operating and nancial performance for the year under «Техснабэкспорт» review and in a three-year period as well as the scope and geography of the Company’s business in a retrospective review. Name of the Company in English Joint Stock Company Techsnabexport Address by the Chairman of the Board of Directors JSC Techsnabexport Location and postal address 28, bldg 3 Ozerkovskaya nab., Moscow, 115184, Russia » PAGE 9 Corporate website http://www.tenex.ru E-mail [email protected] Telephone +7 (499) 949-2683, +7 (495) 545-0045 Annual Report Fax +7 (495) 951-1790, +7 (495) 953-0820 Primary State Registration Number 1027700018290, registered on 11 July 2002 with the Department of the Ministry of Taxes and Levies of Russia for Moscow JSC Techsnabexport 2012 License for Handling Nuclear Materials During No. GN-05-401-1638 of 16.03.2007 Transportation » PAGE 14 Subsidiaries and associates of JSC Techsnabexport Russian S&A Ownership (%) JSC SPb IZOTOP 100 JSC NPK Khimpromengineering 52,00533 JSC TENEX-Logistika 100 LLC Kraun 99,9998 LLC TENEX-Komplekt 99,9999 Foreign S&A Ownership (%) Internexco GmbH, Germany 100 TENEX-Korea Co., Ltd., Republic of Korea 100 TENEX-Japan Co., Japan 100 Tradewill Limited, UK 100 TENAM Corporation, USA 100 Information on the Report and Results of Activities in the Performance its Preparation Reporting Period Management Annual Report 2012 » PAGE 15 » PAGE 4 » PAGE 44 » PAGE 58 Annual Report JSC Techsnabexport 2012 Approved by the resolution of the sole shareholder on 28.06.2013 Preliminarily approved by the Board of Directors on 28.05.2013 General Director L.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosatom Technical Academy” (Rosatom Tech)
    “Rosatom Technical Academy” (Rosatom Tech) Developments of Nuclear Technologies in Russia 3rd of Febuary 2020, STTN-BATAN Evgenii Varseev Assitant to vice-rector for international cooperation, Rosatom Tech © 2019 Rosatom Tech Self Introduction Eugeny Varseev Specialist in International training at Rosatom Tech since 2016 Education 2014-2016 – Master’s degree in “New-generation nuclear power technologies and advanced NFC” at National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia 2012-2016 – PhD student, Majoring in Development, operation and decommissioning of nuclear power facilities PhD dissertation title: «Masstransfer in circuits with liquid metal coolants», Institute for Physics and Power Engineering (IPPE), Obninsk, Russia 2006-2012 – Specialist degree (5.5 years) in “Nuclear reactors and power facilities” at Obninsk Institute for Nuclear Power Engineering (IATE NRNU MEPhI), Obninsk, Russia Work experience Since November 2019 – assistant to vice-rector o Rosatom Tech for int. cooperation 2016 - 2019 – Specialist of International Center at Rosatom Tech, Obninsk, Russia 2011 - 2016 – Research engineer at SSC RF - Institute for Physics and Power Engineering named after A.I. Leypunsky, Obninsk, Russia © Rosatom Tech 2 Rosatom in a Nut Shell • More than 260 000 people in 400 nuclear companies and R&D institutions - total number of employees • 80 000 people (30%) are employees under 35 years • 43 years old- average age of employees • More than 3 300 people employees with PhD and Doctor Degrees • 1800 graduates each year are recruited
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Reprocessed Uranium Current Status and Future Prospects
    IAEA-TECDOC-1529 Management of Reprocessed Uranium Current Status and Future Prospects February 2007 IAEA-TECDOC-1529 Management of Reprocessed Uranium Current Status and Future Prospects February 2007 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria MANAGEMENT OF REPROCESSED URANIUM IAEA, VIENNA, 2007 IAEA-TECDOC-1529 ISBN 92–0–114506–3 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2007 Printed by the IAEA in Austria February 2007 FOREWORD The International Atomic Energy Agency is giving continuous attention to the collection, analysis and exchange of information on issues of back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle, an important part of the nuclear fuel cycle. Reprocessing of spent fuel arising from nuclear power production is one of the strategies for the back end of the fuel cycle. As a major fraction of spent fuel is made up of uranium, chemical reprocessing of spent fuel would leave behind large quantities of separated uranium which is designated as reprocessed uranium (RepU). Reprocessing of spent fuel could form a crucial part of future fuel cycle methodologies, which currently aim to separate and recover plutonium and minor actinides. The use of reprocessed uranium (RepU) and plutonium reduces the overall environmental impact of the entire fuel cycle. Environmental considerations will be important in determining the future growth of nuclear energy. It should be emphasized that the recycling of fissile materials not only reduces the toxicity and volumes of waste from the back end of the fuel cycle; it also reduces requirements for fresh milling and mill tailings.
    [Show full text]