DOCSLIB.ORG

Mechanical Systems Qualification Standard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mechanical Systems Qualification Standard Mechanical Systems Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1161-2008 August 2012 Reference Guide The Functional Area Qualification Standard References Guides are developed to assist operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff in the acquisition of technical competence and qualification within the Technical Qualification Program (TQP). Please direct your questions or comments related to this document to Patrick C. Romero, Deputy TQP Manager, Office of Leadership and Career Management, NNSA Albuquerque Complex, 505.845.6371. This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... v TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... vii VIDEOS ......................................................................................................................................... vii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ ix PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1 PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 TECHNICAL COMPETENCIES ............................................................................................... 2 1. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of steady-state heat transfer. ............................................................................................................................ 2 2. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of thermodynamics. ...................................................................................................................... 5 3. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of fluid mechanics. ............................................................................................................................. 14 4. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the concepts, theories, and principles of basic material science. ................................................................. 21 5. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge concerning the selection of appropriate components and materials in support of a mechanical system design or modification. ...................................................................................................................... 46 6. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of mechanical diagrams, including: .............................................................................................................. 56 7. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of installed mechanical equipment. .......................................................................................................... 60 8. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of a typical diesel generator, including support systems. ......................................................................... 61 9. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the construction and operation of heat exchangers. ..................................................................... 69 10. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the theory and operation of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. ..................... 77 11. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate working level knowledge of general piping systems. ................................................................................................................................ 100 12. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the general construction, operation, and theory of valves. ..................................................................... 116 13. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of safety and relief devices. ....................................................................................................................... 127 ii 14. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of pump theory and operation. ...................................................................................................................... 131 15. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of strainers and filters. ................................................................................................................................... 144 16. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the basic components, operations, and theory of hydraulic systems. ................................................. 151 17. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the components, operation, and theory of pneumatic systems. ................................................. 163 18. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the basic design, construction, and operation of glovebox systems. .................................................. 168 19. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the principles of lubrication. ...................................................................................................... 182 20. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a familiarity level knowledge of reading and interpreting electrical diagrams and schematics. .......................................................... 191 21. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a familiarity level knowledge of reading and interpreting electrical logic diagrams. ........................................................................... 196 22. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the requirements of DOE O 420.1B, Facility Safety, and the associated guidance of DOE G 420.1-1, Nonreactor Nuclear Safety Design Criteria and Explosives Safety Criteria Guide for Use with DOE O 420.1, Facility Safety; and DOE G 420.1-2, Guide for the Mitigation of Natural Phenomena Hazards for DOE Nuclear Facilities and Nonnuclear Facilities. ........ 199 23. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of safety in design as described and required in DOE O 413.3A, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and DOE M 413.3-1, Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and DOE-STD-1189-2008, Integration of Safety into the Design Process. .................................................................................................................... 206 24. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the following standards related to natural phenomena hazards: ................................................ 211 25. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of DOE maintenance management requirements as defined in DOE O 433.1A, Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities. ............................................................ 213 26. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of DOE standard DOE-STD-1073-2003, Configuration Management. ............................................ 217 27. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a familiarity level knowledge of the codes and standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)*. .................... 219 28. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the codes and standards of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. ..................................... 221 29. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a familiarity level knowledge of the following organizations’ non-mechanical systems-specific codes and standards: .............. 227 iii 30. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a familiarity level knowledge of the codes and standards of the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). ......................................................................................................... 228 31. Mechanical system personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of the quality control inspection techniques described in sections V and XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code and the verification of mechanical system integrity, including: ....... 229 MANAGEMENT, ASSESSMENT, AND OVERSIGHT ...................................................... 238 32. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of problem analysis principles and the ability to apply techniques necessary to identify problems, determine potential causes of problems, and identify corrective action(s). ........................ 238 33. Mechanical systems personnel shall demonstrate a working level knowledge of assessment techniques (such as the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Catalogue Milestones of Lunar Mapping and Photography Four Centuries of Selenography on the Occasion of the 50Th Anniversary of Apollo 11 Moon Landing
    Special Catalogue Milestones of Lunar Mapping and Photography Four Centuries of Selenography On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11 moon landing Please note: A specific item in this catalogue may be sold or is on hold if the provided link to our online inventory (by clicking on the blue-highlighted author name) doesn't work! Milestones of Science Books phone +49 (0) 177 – 2 41 0006 www.milestone-books.de [email protected] Member of ILAB and VDA Catalogue 07-2019 Copyright © 2019 Milestones of Science Books. All rights reserved Page 2 of 71 Authors in Chronological Order Author Year No. Author Year No. BIRT, William 1869 7 SCHEINER, Christoph 1614 72 PROCTOR, Richard 1873 66 WILKINS, John 1640 87 NASMYTH, James 1874 58, 59, 60, 61 SCHYRLEUS DE RHEITA, Anton 1645 77 NEISON, Edmund 1876 62, 63 HEVELIUS, Johannes 1647 29 LOHRMANN, Wilhelm 1878 42, 43, 44 RICCIOLI, Giambattista 1651 67 SCHMIDT, Johann 1878 75 GALILEI, Galileo 1653 22 WEINEK, Ladislaus 1885 84 KIRCHER, Athanasius 1660 31 PRINZ, Wilhelm 1894 65 CHERUBIN D'ORLEANS, Capuchin 1671 8 ELGER, Thomas Gwyn 1895 15 EIMMART, Georg Christoph 1696 14 FAUTH, Philipp 1895 17 KEILL, John 1718 30 KRIEGER, Johann 1898 33 BIANCHINI, Francesco 1728 6 LOEWY, Maurice 1899 39, 40 DOPPELMAYR, Johann Gabriel 1730 11 FRANZ, Julius Heinrich 1901 21 MAUPERTUIS, Pierre Louis 1741 50 PICKERING, William 1904 64 WOLFF, Christian von 1747 88 FAUTH, Philipp 1907 18 CLAIRAUT, Alexis-Claude 1765 9 GOODACRE, Walter 1910 23 MAYER, Johann Tobias 1770 51 KRIEGER, Johann 1912 34 SAVOY, Gaspare 1770 71 LE MORVAN, Charles 1914 37 EULER, Leonhard 1772 16 WEGENER, Alfred 1921 83 MAYER, Johann Tobias 1775 52 GOODACRE, Walter 1931 24 SCHRÖTER, Johann Hieronymus 1791 76 FAUTH, Philipp 1932 19 GRUITHUISEN, Franz von Paula 1825 25 WILKINS, Hugh Percy 1937 86 LOHRMANN, Wilhelm Gotthelf 1824 41 USSR ACADEMY 1959 1 BEER, Wilhelm 1834 4 ARTHUR, David 1960 3 BEER, Wilhelm 1837 5 HACKMAN, Robert 1960 27 MÄDLER, Johann Heinrich 1837 49 KUIPER Gerard P.
    [Show full text]
  • A Ballistics Analysis of the Deep Impact Ejecta Plume: Determining Comet Tempel 1’S Gravity, Mass, and Density
    Icarus 190 (2007) 357–390 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus A ballistics analysis of the Deep Impact ejecta plume: Determining Comet Tempel 1’s gravity, mass, and density James E. Richardson a,∗,H.JayMeloshb, Carey M. Lisse c, Brian Carcich d a Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA b Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA c Planetary Exploration Group, Space Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, USA d Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Received 31 March 2006; revised 8 August 2007 Available online 15 August 2007 Abstract − In July of 2005, the Deep Impact mission collided a 366 kg impactor with the nucleus of Comet 9P/Tempel 1, at a closing speed of 10.2 km s 1. In this work, we develop a first-order, three-dimensional, forward model of the ejecta plume behavior resulting from this cratering event, and then adjust the model parameters to match the flyby-spacecraft observations of the actual ejecta plume, image by image. This modeling exercise indicates Deep Impact to have been a reasonably “well-behaved” oblique impact, in which the impactor–spacecraft apparently struck a small, westward-facing slope of roughly 1/3–1/2 the size of the final crater produced (determined from initial ejecta plume geometry), and possessing an effective strength of not more than Y¯ = 1–10 kPa. The resulting ejecta plume followed well-established scaling relationships for cratering in a medium-to-high porosity target, consistent with a transient crater of not more than 85–140 m diameter, formed in not more than 250–550 s, for the case of Y¯ = 0 Pa (gravity-dominated cratering); and not less than 22–26 m diameter, formed in not less than 1–3 s, for the case of Y¯ = 10 kPa (strength-dominated cratering).
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Constants'
    Package ‘constants’ February 25, 2021 Type Package Title Reference on Constants, Units and Uncertainty Version 1.0.1 Description CODATA internationally recommended values of the fundamental physical constants, provided as symbols for direct use within the R language. Optionally, the values with uncertainties and/or units are also provided if the 'errors', 'units' and/or 'quantities' packages are installed. The Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) is an interdisciplinary committee of the International Council for Science which periodically provides the internationally accepted set of values of the fundamental physical constants. This package contains the ``2018 CODATA'' version, published on May 2019: Eite Tiesinga, Peter J. Mohr, David B. Newell, and Barry N. Taylor (2020) <https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/>. License MIT + file LICENSE Encoding UTF-8 LazyData true URL https://github.com/r-quantities/constants BugReports https://github.com/r-quantities/constants/issues Depends R (>= 3.5.0) Suggests errors (>= 0.3.6), units, quantities, testthat ByteCompile yes RoxygenNote 7.1.1 NeedsCompilation no Author Iñaki Ucar [aut, cph, cre] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-5550>) Maintainer Iñaki Ucar <[email protected]> Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2021-02-25 13:20:05 UTC 1 2 codata R topics documented: constants-package . .2 codata . .2 lookup . .3 syms.............................................4 Index 6 constants-package constants: Reference on Constants, Units and Uncertainty Description This package provides the 2018 version of the CODATA internationally recommended values of the fundamental physical constants for their use within the R language. Author(s) Iñaki Ucar References Eite Tiesinga, Peter J. Mohr, David B.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Accuracy of the Numerical Values of the Estimates Some Fundamental Physical Constants
    Improving the accuracy of the numerical values of the estimates some fundamental physical constants. Valery Timkov, Serg Timkov, Vladimir Zhukov, Konstantin Afanasiev To cite this version: Valery Timkov, Serg Timkov, Vladimir Zhukov, Konstantin Afanasiev. Improving the accuracy of the numerical values of the estimates some fundamental physical constants.. Digital Technologies, Odessa National Academy of Telecommunications, 2019, 25, pp.23 - 39. hal-02117148 HAL Id: hal-02117148 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02117148 Submitted on 2 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Improving the accuracy of the numerical values of the estimates some fundamental physical constants. Valery F. Timkov1*, Serg V. Timkov2, Vladimir A. Zhukov2, Konstantin E. Afanasiev2 1Institute of Telecommunications and Global Geoinformation Space of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Senior Researcher, Ukraine. 2Research and Production Enterprise «TZHK», Researcher, Ukraine. *Email: [email protected] The list of designations in the text: l
    [Show full text]
  • October 2006
    OCTOBER 2 0 0 6 �������������� http://www.universetoday.com �������������� TAMMY PLOTNER WITH JEFF BARBOUR 283 SUNDAY, OCTOBER 1 In 1897, the world’s largest refractor (40”) debuted at the University of Chica- go’s Yerkes Observatory. Also today in 1958, NASA was established by an act of Congress. More? In 1962, the 300-foot radio telescope of the National Ra- dio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) went live at Green Bank, West Virginia. It held place as the world’s second largest radio scope until it collapsed in 1988. Tonight let’s visit with an old lunar favorite. Easily seen in binoculars, the hexagonal walled plain of Albategnius ap- pears near the terminator about one-third the way north of the south limb. Look north of Albategnius for even larger and more ancient Hipparchus giving an almost “figure 8” view in binoculars. Between Hipparchus and Albategnius to the east are mid-sized craters Halley and Hind. Note the curious ALBATEGNIUS AND HIPPARCHUS ON THE relationship between impact crater Klein on Albategnius’ southwestern wall and TERMINATOR CREDIT: ROGER WARNER that of crater Horrocks on the northeastern wall of Hipparchus. Now let’s power up and “crater hop”... Just northwest of Hipparchus’ wall are the beginnings of the Sinus Medii area. Look for the deep imprint of Seeliger - named for a Dutch astronomer. Due north of Hipparchus is Rhaeticus, and here’s where things really get interesting. If the terminator has progressed far enough, you might spot tiny Blagg and Bruce to its west, the rough location of the Surveyor 4 and Surveyor 6 landing area.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights from Forested Catchments in South-Central Chile
    Institute for Earth and Environmental Science Hydrological and erosion responses to man-made and natural disturbances – Insights from forested catchments in South-central Chile Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at the University of Potsdam, Germany for the degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences (Dr. rer. nat.) in Geoecology Christian Heinrich Mohr Potsdam, September 2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License: Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 3.0 Germany To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ Published online at the Institutional Repository of the University of Potsdam: URL http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2014/7014/ URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-70146 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-70146 View from Nahuelbuta National park across the central inner valley towards the Sierra Velluda, close to the study area, Biobío region, Chile. Quien no conoce el bosque chileno, no conoce este planeta... Pablo Neruda The climate is moderate and delightful and if the country were to be cleared of forest, the warmth of ground would dissipate the moisture… The Scot Lord Thomas Cochrane commanding the Chilean navy in a letter to the Chilean independence leader Bernardo O’Higgins about the south of Chile, 1890, cited in [Bathurst, 2013] Preface When I started my PhD studies, my main intention was to contribute new knowledge about the impact of forest management practices on runoff and erosion processes. To this end, together with our Chilean colleagues, we established a network of forested catchments on the eastern slopes of the Chilean Coastal Range with water and sediment monitoring devices to quantify water and sediment fluxes associated with different forest management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • View Responses of Scouts, Scout Leaders, and Scientists Who Were Scouts
    ABSTRACT This study of science education in the Boy Scouts of America focused on males with Boy Scout experience. The mixed-methods study topics included: merit badge standards compared with National Science Education Standards, Scout responses to open-ended survey questions, the learning styles of Scouts, a quantitative assessment of science content knowledge acquisition using the Geology merit badge, and a qualitative analysis of interview responses of Scouts, Scout leaders, and scientists who were Scouts. The merit badge requirements of the 121 current merit badges were mapped onto the National Science Education Standards: 103 badges (85.12%) had at least one requirement meeting the National Science Education Standards. In 2007, Scouts earned 1,628,500 merit badges with at least one science requirement, including 72,279 Environmental Science merit badges. ―Camping‖ was the ―favorite thing about Scouts‖ for 54.4% of the boys who completed the survey. When combined with other outdoor activities, what 72.5% of the boys liked best about Boy Scouts involved outdoor activity. The learning styles of Scouts tend to include tactile and/or visual elements. Scouts were more global and integrated than analytical in their thinking patterns; they also had a significant intake element in their learning style. ii Earning a Geology merit badge at any location resulted in a significant gain of content knowledge; the combined treatment groups for all location types had a 9.13% gain in content knowledge. The amount of content knowledge acquired through the merit badge program varied with location; boys earning the Geology merit badge at summer camp or working as a troop with a merit badge counselor tended to acquire more geology content knowledge than boys earning the merit badge at a one-day event.
    [Show full text]
  • Certain Investigations Regarding Variable Physical Constants
    IJRRAS 6 (1) ● January 2011 www.arpapress.com/Volumes/Vol6Issue1/IJRRAS_6_1_03.pdf CERTAIN INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING VARIABLE PHYSICAL CONSTANTS 1 2 3 Amritbir Singh , R. K. Mishra & Sukhjit Singh 1 Department of Mathematics, BBSB Engineering College, Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab, India 2 & 3 Department of Mathematics, SLIET Deemed University, Longowal, Sangrur, Punjab, India. ABSTRACT In this paper, we have investigated details regarding variable physical & cosmological constants mainly G, c, h, α, NA, e & Λ. It is easy to see that the constancy of G & c is consistent, provided that all actual variations from experiment to experiment, or method to method, are due to some truncation or inherent error. It has also been noticed that physical constants may fluctuate, within limits, around average values which themselves remain fairly constant. Several attempts have been made to look for changes in Plank‟s constant by studying the light from quasars and stars assumed to be very distant on the basis of the red shift in their spectra. Detail Comparison of concerned research done has been done in the present paper. Keywords: Fundamental physical constants, Cosmological constant. A.M.S. Subject Classification Number: 83F05 1. INTRODUCTION We all are very much familiar with the importance of the 'physical constants‟, now in these days they are being used in all the scientific calculations. As the name implies, the so-called physical constants are supposed to be changeless. It is assumed that these constants are reflecting an underlying constancy of nature. Recent observations suggest that these fundamental Physical Constants of nature may actually be varying. There is a debate among cosmologists & physicists, whether the observations are correct but, if confirmed, many of our ideas may have to be rethought.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Planck's Constant
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 29 January 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202101.0612.v1 Variable Planck’s Constant: Treated As A Dynamical Field And Path Integral Rand Dannenberg Ventura College, Physics and Astronomy Department, Ventura CA [email protected] Abstract. The constant ħ is elevated to a dynamical field, coupling to other fields, and itself, through the Lagrangian density derivative terms. The spatial and temporal dependence of ħ falls directly out of the field equations themselves. Three solutions are found: a free field with a tadpole term; a standing-wave non-propagating mode; a non-oscillating non-propagating mode. The first two could be quantized. The third corresponds to a zero-momentum classical field that naturally decays spatially to a constant with no ad-hoc terms added to the Lagrangian. An attempt is made to calibrate the constants in the third solution based on experimental data. The three fields are referred to as actons. It is tentatively concluded that the acton origin coincides with a massive body, or point of infinite density, though is not mass dependent. An expression for the positional dependence of Planck’s constant is derived from a field theory in this work that matches in functional form that of one derived from considerations of Local Position Invariance violation in GR in another paper by this author. Astrophysical and Cosmological interpretations are provided. A derivation is shown for how the integrand in the path integral exponent becomes Lc/ħ(r), where Lc is the classical action. The path that makes stationary the integral in the exponent is termed the “dominant” path, and deviates from the classical path systematically due to the position dependence of ħ.
    [Show full text]
  • Testable Criterion Establishes the Three Inherent Universal Constants
    Applied Physics Research; Vol. 8, No. 6; 2016 ISSN 1916-9639 E-ISSN 1916-9647 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Testable Criterion Establishes the Three Inherent Universal Constants Gordon R. Kepner1 1 Membrane Studies Project, USA Correspondence: Gordon R. Kepner, Membrane Studies Project, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Received: September 11, 2016 Accepted: November 18, 2016 Online Published: November 24, 2016 doi:10.5539/apr.v8n6p38 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/apr.v8n6p38 Abstract Since the late 19th century, differing views have appeared on the nature of fundamental constants, how to identify them, and their total number. This concept has been broadly and variously interpreted by physicists ever since with no clear consensus. There is no analysis in the literature, based on specific criteria, for establishing what is or is not an inherent universal constant. The primary focus here is on constants describing a relation between at least two of the base quantities mass, length and time. This paper presents a testable criterion to identify these unique constants of our local universe. The value of a constant meeting these criteria can only be obtained from experimental measurement. Such constants set the scales of these base quantities that describe, in combination, the observable phenomena of our universe. The analysis predicts three such constants, uses the criterion to identify them, while ruling out Planck’s constant and introducing a new physical constant. Keywords: fundamental constant, inherent universal constant, new inherent constant, Planck’s constant 1. Introduction The analysis presented here is conceptually and mathematically simple, while going directly to the foundations of physics.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.3.43The First Relativistic Models of the Universe
    AN INTRODUCTION TO GALAXIES AND COSMOLOGY 5.3.43The first relativistic models of the Universe According to general relativity, the distribution of energy and momentum determines the geometric properties of space–time, and, in particular, its curvature. The precise nature of this relationship is specified by a set of equations called the field equations of general relativity. In this book you are not expected to solve or even manipulate these equations, but you do need to know something about them, particularly how they led to the introduction of a quantity known as the cosmological constant. For this purpose, Einstein’s field equations are discussed in Box 5.1. BOX 5.13EINSTEIN’S FIELD EQUATIONS OF GENERAL RELATIVITY When spelled out in detail the Einstein field equations planetary motion in the Solar System and to predict the are vast and complicated, but in the compact and non-Newtonian deflection of light by the Sun. powerful notation used by general relativists they can Einstein published his first paper on relativistic be written with deceptive simplicity. Using this modern cosmology in the following year, 1917. In that paper he notation, the field equations that Einstein introduced in tried to use general relativity to describe the space–time 1916 can be written as geometry of the whole Universe, not just the Solar −8πG System. While working towards that paper he realized G = T (5.7) c 4 that one of the assumptions he had made in his 1916 paper was unnecessary and inappropriate in the broader Different authors may use different conventions for context of cosmology.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Constant - Wikipedia
    4/17/2018 Physical constant - Wikipedia Physical constant A physical constant, sometimes fundamental physical constant, is a physical quantity that is generally believed to be both universal in nature and have constant value in time. It is contrasted with a mathematical constant, which has a fixed numerical value, but does not directly involve any physical measurement. There are many physical constants in science, some of the most widely recognized being the speed of light in vacuum c, the gravitational constant G, Planck's constant h, the electric constant ε0, and the elementary charge e. Physical constants can take many dimensional forms: the speed of light signifies a maximum speed for any object and is expressed dimensionally as length divided by time; while the fine-structure constant α, which characterizes the strength of the electromagnetic interaction, is dimensionless. The term fundamental physical constant is sometimes used to refer to universal but dimensioned physical constants such as those mentioned above.[1] Increasingly, however, physicists reserve the use of the term fundamental physical constant for dimensionless physical constants, such as the fine-structure constant α. Physical constant in the sense under discussion in this article should not be confused with other quantities called "constants" that are assumed to be constant in a given context without the implication that they are in any way fundamental, such as the "time constant" characteristic of a given system, or material constants, such as the Madelung constant,
    [Show full text]