A Multi-Case Study of Elementary Classroom Teachers' Transitions to Reform-Based Mathematics Instruction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Multi-Case Study of Elementary Classroom Teachers' Transitions to Reform-Based Mathematics Instruction AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Elizabeth Busch White for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education presented on April 19, 2004. Title: A Multi-Case Study of Elementary Classroom Teachers' Transitions to Reform-Based Mathematics Instruction. Abstract approved: Redacted for privacy M. Higgins The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics published their vision of active, problem-centered instruction with a goal of conceptual understanding in 1989. Fifteen years after these reforms were proposed the changes are reflected in school policy and elementary mathematics curriculum, but only limited change has actually occurred in classroom instruction. With the belief that the classroom teacher is the key person affecting educational change, thiscase study examines the journey of five elementary classroom teachers as they transformed their mathematics instruction from traditional to reform-based, with thepurpose of identifying the key elements that influenced the changes. This is a multi-case study involving five elementary classroom teachers who have recently been the ecipient of the Elementary Presidential Award for Excellence in Teaching Mathematics. All of these teachers began teaching with traditional textbook programs and have changed their teaching to reform-based, problem- centered instruction. Over the course of two one-hour interviews each teacher told the story of his or her changes, explaining the influences, the key resources, the influential people, and the support they received in the process. The cases are individually presented; then all five are examined together in a cross-case analysis using a constructivist theoretical perspective. Three key elements were found to be influential in the teachers' change journeys. First, all five were self-motivated to make changes in their mathematics instruction. They were looking for practices that would give their students both better understanding and positive dispositions. All believed the reform-based instruction met these goals.Second, all five engaged in rich professional discussions about the changes they were making. These discussions were in groups with high levels of trust, in which the teachers freely shared concerns and successes, asked questions, and compared experiences. They were learning communities that supported the teachers' development of pedagogy and knowledge, allowing them to become confident practitioners. Finally, all five teachers were passionate about their teaching. The learning of their students and the improvement of their teaching were the prime considerations in the changes they adopted and the knowledge and skills they developed. © Copyright by Elizabeth Busch White April 19, 2004 All Rights Reserved A Multi-Case Study of Elementary Classroom Teachers' Transitionsto Reform-Based Mathematics Instruction Elizabeth Busch White A DISSERTATION Submitted to Oregon State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Presented April 19, 2004 Commencement June 2004 Doctor of Philosophy dissertation of Elizabeth Busch White presented on April 19, 2004 APPROVED: Redacted for privacy Major Professor, representing Redacted for privacy ation Redacted for privacy Dean of the/Grad'uate School I understand that my dissertation will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my dissertation to any reader upon request. Redacted for privacy Elizabeth Busch White, Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When I retired from teaching elementary school five years ago, this day was nowhere on my imagined horizon. Thinking I would keep in touch with education, I pursued the idea of supervising student teachers. But thanks to the encouragement of Nancy, Karen, and Ken I found myself teaching classes to the MAT cohort. Iwas hooked. And I have never doubted the decision to take this road. I first want to express my appreciation to all the denizens of Education Hall. The people that I encounter every day in the halls, at the mailboxes,on the stairs, and in the offices have, without exception, always been friendly and supportive. How fortunate I feel to have such a nurturing place to work and study. If the world knew how very special educators are, there wouldnever be a shortage of teachers. I would like to give thanks to the five incredible women on my committee. Karen's mentoring of my teaching, my research, andmy writing has been invaluable. She has a perfect sense of balance between giving me the independence to work things out on my own and the support of right-on suggestions that guideme to success. Nora, Eileen, Dale and Sharon have offered their clear thinking and helpful advice throughout this process. I consider all five role modelswhat examples they are for me in their scholarship, their service, and their caring. Three friends who started the doctoral program with me have been important in my reaching this goal. Kathy was instrumental in getting the participants inmy research. Our talks about mathematics teaching have helpedme in both my own teaching and in my research. Kathy, Kirky, and Diane have been encouragers, emotional supporters and friends through the long hours of work. It is amazing how they seem to know just when I need a call or e-mail. Their listening to me, my listening to them, and our shared experiences have made the process less lonely. They have celebrated with me as I reached each benchmark. It is great to have guides and supporters, but there is something extra special about fellow travelers. I want to thank the five teachers who so willingly let me into their classrooms and who openly shared their stories with me. With so much bad news about schools these days, it was refreshing to spend time with these positive, upbeat, enthusiastic teachers. I hope I have represented their stories so that readers will be encouraged that education is not failing and that excellent teaching is thriving. I hope the stories will help us understand how to help teachers develop the passion that these teachers find in their teaching. Finally, thank you to Hugh and Sarah. Without their being behind this silly idea one hundred percent, I never could have done it. Who retires from a thirty-three year career and then gets a doctorate? Their understanding and acceptance of the time and energy that flowed into this accomplishment has been what has allowed me to get through. It can never be denied that getting a doctorate is a family effort. I feel blessed by all their supportive encouragement and cheering-on. I have kept a quote by my computer these last few months. It says, "Crossing the finish line takes only seconds. Let me enjoy the wonderful process it takes to reach it." I have enjoyed the process, and that is primarily because all the people mentioned above had made it so wonderful. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION The Problem 1 Background 2 The Questions 9 Significance of the Study 9 Researcher's Connections 11 Definition of Terms 12 CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF THE LiTERATURE Introduction 16 Change 17 Introduction 17 Individual Change 18 Educational Reform 26 Constructivism 30 Background 30 Classroom Practices 36 Teacher Knowledge for Mathematical Reform 40 Content Knowledge 40 Pedagogical Knowledge 43 Summary 49 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY Introduction 52 Choosing Participants 53 Informed Consent 55 Data Collection 55 First Interview 55 Observations 56 Second Interview 57 Award Application Packet 58 Summary 59 Analysis 60 Introduction 60 Single Cases 60 Cross-Case Analysis 62 Validity and Reliability 63 Introduction 63 Validity and Reliability 64 Reflexivity of Researcher 67 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS Introduction 69 The Case of Patsy Miller 72 The Case of Skip Munson 89 The Case of Michael Patrick 107 The Case of Rose Sharon 123 The Case of Jane White 138 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page Summary 153 CHAPTER 5: CROSS-CASE ANALYSIS Introduction 155 Theoretical Perspective 157 Analysis 160 Introduction 160 Motivation and Introduction to Innovations 160 Initial Support 163 Ongoing Support and Continued Development 170 Summary 174 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS Introduction 177 Summary of Methods and Research Questions 177 Key Findings 179 Beliefs 179 Community 180 Teaching Connections 181 Limitations of the Study 182 Discussion on Findings 183 Recommended Applications 185 Recommendations for Further Research 186 Concluding Thoughts 187 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page REFERENCES APPENDICES Appendix A: Questionnaire 198 Appendix B: Informed Consent Document 200 Appendix C: General Inquiry for First Interview 205 Appendix D: Observation Protocol 207 Appendix E: Guiding Questions 209 Appendix F: Chart Summaries of Key Elements 212 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1.Patsy Miller's Journey 88 2.Skip Munson's Journey 106 3.Michael Patrick's Journey 122 4. Rose Sharon's Journey 137 5.Jane White's Journey 152 LIST OF CHARTS Chart Page 1. Summary of The Characteristics of the Five Teachers 69 2. Summary of Key Elements of Patsy Miller's Change Journey 213 3. Summary of Key Elements of Skip Munson's Change Journey 214 4. Summary of Key Elements of Michael Patrick's Change Journey 215 5. Summary of Key Elements of Rose Sharon's Change Journey 216 6. Summary of Key Elements of Jane White's Change Journey 217 7.Meta-Matrix of Key Elements in All Five Cases 161 A MULTI-CASE STUDY OF ELEMENTARY CLASSROOM TEACHERS' TRANSITIONS TO REFORM-BASED MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION Chapter 1: Introduction The Problem The purpose of this qualitative study
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 13 National Science Foundation Systemic Initiatives
    Chapter 13 National Science Foundation Systemic Initiatives: How a small amount of federal money promotes ill-designed mathematics and science programs in K-12 and undermines local control of education Michael McKeown Mathematically Correct David Klein California State University, Los Angeles Chris Patterson Education Connection of Texas Since its inception in 1950, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has played a strong, positive role in making American scientific research and technological application the best in the world. Through its funding of peer-reviewed, investigator-initiated research proposals, it has supported basic research in a wide variety of scientific disciplines, such as mathematics, biology, physics, chemistry, geology, astronomy, and psychology. American science owes much to the support it has received, and continues to receive, from NSF. This chapter deals with a program in the Education and Human Resources Division called the NSF Systemic Initiatives Program, not with NSF programs related directly to the support of basic research. We are highly critical of this particular NSF program. Not only do the Systemic Initiatives undermine local control of education, but, as our analysis in this chapter suggests, they also seem to lower academic standards for mathematics education and weaken the educational base for American science. This chapter is composed of three sections. The first section, an overview of NSF Systemic Initiatives, was written by Michael McKeown. The second section, an analysis of the development and 288 Standards Wars features of the Los Angeles Systemic Initiative, was written by David Klein. The third section, an analysis of the development and features of the Texas Statewide Systemic Initiative, was written by Chris Patterson.
    [Show full text]
  • AVAILABLE from ABSTRACT DOCUMENT RESUME Exemplary
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 434 033 SE 062 877 TITLE Exemplary and Promising Mathematics Programs. INSTITUTION Department of Education, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 1999-00-00 NOTE 71p.; Prepared by the "Math and Science Education Expert Panel." AVAILABLE FROM ED Pubs, P.O. Box 1389, Jessup, MD. Tel: 877-433-7827 (Toll Free); Web site: <http://www.enc.org>. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Academic Standards; Demonstration Programs; Elementary Secondary Education; Mathematics Curriculum; *Mathematics Education; *Program Descriptions; *Program Evaluation ABSTRACT Selecting programs, textbooks, and curriculum materials is one of the most important decisions educators make. An Expert Panel on Mathematics and Science was established by the U.S. Department of Education to develop a high-quality, research-based process for selecting programs and to use that selecting process to identify exemplary and promising programs. This booklet describes eight mathematics programs designated as exemplary or promising. A detailed explanation of the submission and selection process and an explanation of how the programs were separated into exemplary and promising categories is included. The four characteristics used for the selection criteria include quality of program, usefulness to others, educational significance, and evidence of effectiveness and success. Each characteristic has multiple criteria with specific indicators of achievement. Each program is described in terms of the four selection characteristics and professional
    [Show full text]
  • May 2001 What Are the Children Learning and Who Decides
    May 2001 THE TEXTBOOK CONUNDRUM What are the Children Learning and Who Decides? Introduction With the quality of education in the United States now the biggest domestic concern, demands for accountability are in vogue. The drive for better schools however, is usually limited to issues of standards, testing, choice and teachers. Missing from most discussions is the role that textbooks play in the achievement of children. A few facts to consider: • In more than twenty states, the state (state board of education, department of education, secretary or commissioner of education, or another specially designated state textbook committee) picks the textbooks for every classroom in the state – either through outright text selection, or recommendations from a short list. To control curriculum, they tie funding to compliance with the states’ textbook adoption policy. • Textbooks supplied to three states, California, Texas and Florida – all of which give significant influence to state agencies for textbook selection – account for 30 percent of the more than $3.3 billion K-12 textbook market in 1998, the most recent year for which statistics are available.i • Four publishers (McGraw-Hill, Houghton Mifflin, Harcourt, and Pearson) control 70 percent of the industry. Size means money means influence in the textbook world. They are a strong, quiet interest group that works behind the scenes and through major education groups to ensure that the process favoring them stays exactly the way it is. The process for putting books in front of children then, looks something like this: The “big three” states draw up textbook adoption policies to which the “big four” publishers try to align their textbook content.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Mathematics Education Dr. Barry Fagin Professor Of
    Reforming K-12 Mathematics Education Dr. Barry Fagin Professor of Computer Science USAFA (opinions are mine, not USAFA’s) What’s the problem? 8th grade math scores, IAEEA 2000 Report 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 y n a a a A ia n ca re a i ri S n ra ri o p ss ysi a U a rke I f p u la lg u A a Ja a m T g R u o th in M B R u S o S 1. Singapore 2. Korea 3. China 13. Australia 4. Hong Kong 2. Czechoslovakia 5. Japan 3. Finland 1. Moldova 6. Belgium 4. Malaysia 2. Thailand 7. Netherlands 5. Bulgaria 3. Israel 8. Slovak Rep. 6. USA 4. Tunisia 9. Hungary 7. England 5. Macedonia 10.Canada 8. New Zealand 6. Turkey 11.Slovenia 9. Lithuania 7. Jordan 12.Russia 10.Italy 8. Iran 11.Cyprus 9. Indonesia 12.Romania 10.Chile 11.Philippines 12.Morocco 13.South Africa % CSAP Advanced or Proficient (5th grade) 100 90 80 70 60 W 50 H 40 B 30 20 10 0 2001 2002 2003 % CSAP Advanced or Proficient (8th grade) 100 90 80 70 60 W 50 H 40 B 30 20 10 0 2001 2002 2003 % CSAP Advanced or Proficient (10th grade) 100 90 80 70 60 W 50 H 40 B 30 20 10 0 2001 2002 2003 Class of 2005 100 90 80 70 60 W 50 H 40 B 30 20 10 0 8th (2001) 9th (2002) 10th (2003) What’s the cause? Widespread adoption of curricula that: • Emphasize process over content • De-emphasize math facts • Embrace constructivism • Encourage calculator use in early grades • Encourage group work How did this happen? Open letter of protest published in Post, Carter elected DOE forms expert signed by > 200 panel to identify mathematicians and DOE created noteworthy math scientists programs Reagan elected, Secretary
    [Show full text]
  • Student Centered Mathematics in an Isolated Skill Environment- Constructivist Methods in Mathematics
    Student Centered Mathematics in an Isolated Skill Environment- Constructivist Methods in Mathematics by Amy Katherine Sorensen A Research Paper Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY Bemidji, Minnesota, USA April 2013 Constructivist Methods in Mathematics 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR Brief quotations from this research paper are allowable without special permission, provided accurate acknowledgement of the source is indicated. Requests for permission to use extended quotations or reproduce the manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by Department of Mathematical Studies, School of Graduate Studies when the proposed purpose is in the interest of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. Signed: APPROVAL BY RESEARCH PAPER ADVISOR THIS RESEARCH PAPER HAS BEEN APPROVED ON THE DATE SHOWN BELOW: Dr. Glen Richgels Date Committee Chair Professor of Mathematics Dr. Derek Webb Date Professor of Mathematics Dr. Todd Frauenholtz Date Professor of Mathematics Dr. Patricia L. Rogers Dean, School of Graduate Studies Date Constructivist Methods in Mathematics 3 THE IMPORTANCE OF CONSTRUCTIVISM IN A MATHEMATICS CLASSROOM Amy Katherine Sorensen Write a brief statement (not necessary for the proposal) describing what you did and what you found. Consider that some people will read only your abstract so it should represent exactly what your paper is about. One paragraph (perhaps two) is all that should be included here. Approved by Dr. Glen Richgels Date Committee Chair Dr. Derek Webb Date Committee Member Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinvent Mathematics Education and You Change the World
    Reinvent Mathematics Education and You Change the World Gary S. Stager, Ph.D. ASB Unplugged Workshop Handouts February 2018 [email protected] @garystager constructingmodernknowledge.com cmkfutures.com/gary cmkpress.com inventtolearn.com APPLYING THE CBM THE MATH SOLUTION HELIX PROCESS OF MATH MATH MODELS QUESTIONS NEW KNOWLEDGE MATH ANSWERS Transform the math models Prepare the questions as math into math answers with the models ready for computing power of computers, or by Did the math answers solve the Think through the scope and the answer. Select from hand-calculating. Identify original problem? Fix mistakes details of the problem; define standard techniques or and resolve operational issues or refine by taking another turn manageable questions to tackle. formulate algorithms. during the computation. around the Solution Helix. DEFINE TRANSLATE COMPUTE INTERPRET QUESTIONS TO MATH ANSWERS RESULT Why Use Math? Computer-Based Math (CBM)… Because it's the most powerful way to get answers to a wide range of real-world questions. Several factors contribute to math’s …is building a completely new math power. One is its ability to describe a large number of apparently diferent situations in precise and standardized ways. Another is curriculum with computer-based because these descriptions come with highly efective methods for working out, or “computing,” answers. Math may look cryptic computation at its heart, while but it’s by this “abstraction” from the problem at hand that the same methods can be reused and refined on so many diferent campaigning at all levels to redefine problems. Math also scales well. Whizz around the CBM Solution Helix in a few seconds for everyday problems like “How fast do I math education away from need to go?”, or apply it over years at the cutting edge of research to solve problems like “How can I make a car go 1000 mph?” historical hand-calculating techniques and toward real-life What Is Computation? problem-solving situations that Clearly defined procedures backed up by proven logic for transforming math questions into math answers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Math Wars California Battles It out Over Mathematics Education Reform (Part II)
    comm-calif2.qxp 6/12/97 4:27 PM Page 817 The Math Wars California Battles It Out over Mathematics Education Reform (Part II) Note: The first part of this article appeared in the June/July issue of the Notices, pages 695–702. The Numbers Battle examinations but also group assignments, long- “Show us the data, show us that this program term projects, and portfolios of work done over works,” demands Michael McKeown, the head of a period of time. Some also favor the idea of judg- Mathematically Correct, the San Diego-based ing the efficacy of curricular programs by criteria group critical of mathematics education reform. other than standardized tests, such as the num- McKeown makes his living in the data-driven ber and type of mathematics courses students field of biology, as a researcher at the Salk In- subsequently take. stitute and an adjunct faculty member at UC Such are the views in that portion of the math San Diego. One of the things he finds most vex- wars devoted to testing. The scramble to find ing about the reform is that it has been imple- numbers to support certain viewpoints has led mented without having been subject to large- to some questionable uses of data. For example, scale, well-designed studies to show that student the anti-reform group HOLD (Honest Open Log- achievement rises when the reform materials ical Debate on mathematics reform) recently cir- are used. He points out that what convinced culated an e-mail message containing data on the everyone that there is a problem in mathemat- Elementary Level Mathematics Examination, ics education was low scores on tests like the Na- which is administered in the California State tional Assessment of Educational Progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Connected Mathematics on Student Achievement In
    THE EFFECT OF CONNECTED MATHEMATICS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN SELECTED MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES Ruth Gharst Waggoner B.A., Mid America Nazarene University, 1981 M.S., University of Kansas, 1991 Submitted to the Graduate Department and Faculty of the School of Education of Baker University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership May 6, 2009 Copyright 2009 by Ruth Gharst Waggoner Clinical Research Study Committee ___________________________________________________________ Major Advisor ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Defended May 6, 2009 ii Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of Connected Mathematics Project on the mathematics achievement of sixth and seventh grade students in the Olathe School District. The design of this study was an experimental, control group. The treatment variable was the type of mathematics instruction taught in the classroom. Students in the control group received mathematics instruction in a traditional, lecture‐ based setting. The treatment for the experimental group was mathematics instruction using CMP. The study focused on 357 seventh grade students at 5 participating junior high schools. The researcher analyzed scores from a sample of students (n=119) who received two years of mathematics instruction using CMP, a sample of students (n=119) who received one year of mathematics instruction using CMP, and a sample of students (n=119) who received no mathematics instruction using CMP. The study also examined the effects of CMP on students qualifying for special education services and students of low SES. The dependent variable, mathematics achievement, was measured using scores obtained from the 2008 seventh grade Kansas Mathematics Assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinating Resources to Support Standards-Based Mathematics Education Programs
    Coordinating Resources to Support Standards-Based Mathematics Education Programs By Sally L. Bond Sally E. Boyd Diana L. Montgomery April 1999 Prepared for: US Department of Education 400 Maryland Avenue – SW Washington, DC 20202-0498 National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22230 Prepared by: Horizon Research, Inc. 111 Cloister Court – Suite 220 Chapel Hill, NC 27514-2296 Introduction: Mathematics Improvement and Title I The results of the recent Third International Mathematics and Science Studies (TIMSS) are encouraging with respect to the state of elementary mathematics education. However, the 8th and 12th grade results reinforced concerns about the condition of middle and high school mathematics education. In the wake of the TIMSS reports, educators nationwide are asking how they can best support the development and implementation of challenging, standards-based mathematics education programs at all grade levels. There is a growing knowledge base among US educators about how children learn mathematics. Available research points to the need for increased academic expectations for all students and for a major re-tooling of curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development in mathematics education. Given the magnitude of resources needed to implement high quality, standards-based programs and the limitations of state and district budgets, a number of state and local education agencies have sought external funds (most notably systemic reform grants from the National Science Foundation) with which to improve their mathematics education programs. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act and other US Department of Education programs are already available to support mathematics instruction; and yet these resources, particularly those of Title I, the largest source of federal funding for elementary and secondary schools, remain largely untapped for standards-based mathematics education.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are School Districts Abandoning the Core-Plus Mathematics Curriculum?
    WHY ARE SCHOOL DISTRICTS ABANDONING THE CORE-PLUS MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM? by Amber Rae Richgels ___________________ A Research Paper Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY Bemidji, Minnesota, USA July 2005 i STATEMENT BY AUTHOR Brief quotations from this research paper are allowable without special permission, provided accurate acknowledgement of the source is indicated. Requests for permissions to use extended quotations or reproduce the manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the Mathematics Department or the Dean of Graduate Studies when the proposed purpose is in the interest of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. Signed:___________________________________ __________________________________________________ APPROVAL BY RESEARCH PAPER ADVISOR THIS RESEARCH PAPER HAS BEEN APPROVED ON THE DATE SHOWN BELOW: ______________________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Todd Frauenholtz, Date Committee Chair Assistant Professor of Mathematics ____________________________________ ______________________________ Dean of Graduate Studies Date ii WHY ARE SCHOOL DISTRICTS ABANDONING THE CORE-PLUS MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM? Amber Rae Richgels In this paper, the author establishes that high schools are abandoning the Core-Plus Mathematics curriculum and determines the need for curricular reform and the motivation to develop such standards-based programs. She discovers that although Core- Plus is a nationally recognized, exemplary mathematics curriculum, school districts are deciding to discontinue the curricular option of Core-Plus. The author reviewed literature and interviewed teachers from schools that have recently decided to abandon Core-Plus in attempt to determine factors leading to these decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION: a CASE STUDY of MATHLAND by HAROLD DENNIS MILLS Bachelor of Science Fitchburg State College Fitchburg
    CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION: A CASE STUDY OF MATHLAND By HAROLD DENNIS MILLS Bachelor of Science Fitchburg State College Fitchburg, Massachusetts 1975 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION August, 2003 CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION: A CASE STUDY OF MATHLAND Thesis Approved: 11 DEDICATION For My Father, Harold J. Dad, you were my first and biggest hero. Even after I had grown, I still looked up to you. Your courage has given me the courage and determination to do my best. Not a day goes by that I do not think of you. I wish that you were here to share this special time ... 111 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my thanks to my dissertation adviser, Dr. Adrienne Hyle, for her friendship, guidance, and encouragement throughout my doctoral program. My appreciation extends to all members ofmy dissertation committee, Dr. Kay Bull, Dr. Ed Harris, and Dr. Deke Johnson for their willingness to serve on my committee. I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Scarlett Rehrig for allowing me to conduct research in the Isles District schools. My thanks are extended to the administrators and teachers of the Isles School District who gave so freely of their time, expertise, and the warm welcome they extended to me in their classrooms. Special thanks to my colleague and good friend Ira Lee White for the long hours of proofreading, encouragement, suggestions, and support. Words could not begin to express what his friendship has meant to me. My love and appreciation to my wife, Linda, and my family, Patrick and, Sarah, for managing to stretch their understanding, support, encouragement, and patience throughout this study.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Mathematics Education
    A Brief History of Mathematics Education The 1920‘s to the Present The 1920‘s/Progressive Education The —progressive“ movement arose from a period (1890-1920) during which Americans were looking at the effects of the concentrations of corporate power and private wealth. Based on the work of John Dewey. Sought to end academic education for a few and narrow vocational training for the masses. Mathematicians Object Mathematical Association of America appoint committee called the National Committee on Mathematical Requirements and publish the 1923 Report. The 1923 Report Extensive survey of secondary school curricula Documented the training of mathematics teachers in other countries Discussed issues related to the psychology of learning mathematics Justified the study of mathematics for its applications and intrinsic values. Underscored the importance of Algebra to —every educated person“. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Founded in 1920 Established at the encouragement of MAA Would —keep the values and interests of mathematics before the educational world“ Created as a counterpart to Progressive Education. The 1930‘s Education journals, textbooks, and courses for administrators and teachers advocated the themes of Progressivism. School curriculum was determined by the needs and interests of the children, as determined by professional educators, not by professionals in the various academic subjects. The Activity Movement The Activity Movement Integration of subjects Reading and multiplication tables were not legitimate activities —We teach children, not subject matter“ The 1940‘s Army recruits know so little math that the army itself has to teach arithmetic needed for basic bookkeeping and gunnery. (Similar in other branches of the military.) The Life Adjustment Movement The Life Adjustment Movement Secondary schools are —too devoted to an academic curriculum“.
    [Show full text]