Board Agenda July 8, 1993RFCD 8, Agenda Julyboard Board Countyof Commissioners July 20, 1993

Home , Clark County Commission

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS

JULY 8,1993

8:30 A.M.

CLARK COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBERS

225 EAST BRIDGER AVENUE

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89155

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER

301 EAST CLARK AVENUE, SUITE 301

LAS VEGAS NEVADA 89101

455-31 39 BFB FILE COPY POSTED:JULY 1, 1993

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS 2200 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE NORTH LAS VEGAS, NV 89030

CLARK COUNTY BRIDGER BUILDING 225 EAST BRIDGER AVENUE LAS VEGAS, NV 89155

CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY HALL 400 EAST STEWART LAS VEGAS, NV 89101

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 301 EAST CLARK, SUITE 301 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101

BY: ROXlE TINSLEY Agenda RFCD - Board of Directors July 8, 1993 Page 2

9) KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - NORTH LAS VEGAS

A) ACTIONTO ACCEPTA PROJECT PRESENTATION ON THE KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN

8) ACTION TO APPROVEA MASTER PLAN CHANGE ON THE KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - This & a Pub/ic Hearing

C) ACTION TO APPROVEA REQUEST BY THE CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS TO AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PROJECT LIST AND THE TEN-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

D) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMANTO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN

10) ACTION TO APPROVE A MASTER PLAN CHANGE ON THE LOWER DUCK CREEK DETENTION BASIN - CLARK COUNTY - This is a Public Hearing

IV. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

11) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGNTHE FIRSTSUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MEADOWS-ALTA STORM DRAIN - CITY OF LAS VEGAS

12) RAMPART STORM DRAIN - CITYOF LAS VEGAS

A) ACTION TO ACCEPTA PROJECT PRESENTATION BY THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS ON THE RAMPART STORM DRAIN (ANGELPARK - PECCOLE I)

B) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMANTO SIGN THEINTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF RAMPART STORM DRAIN (ANGEL PARK - PECCOLE I) Agenda RFCD - Board of Directors July 8, 1993 Page 3

13) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMANTO SIGNTHE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACTFOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNNAMED WASH IN LAUGHLIN, NEVADA - CLARK COUNTY

14) RAWHIDE CHANNELPHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS - CLARKCOUNTY

A) ACTIONTO ACCEPTPROJECTA PRESENTATION BY CLARK COUNTY ON THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS (MOJAVE ROAD AND PEARL STREET CROSSINGS)

B) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMANTO SIGN THE THIRD SUPPLEMENTALINTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE RAWHIDE CHANNELPHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS (MOJAVE ROAD AND PEARL STREET CROSSINGS)

15) VAN BUSKIRKCHANNEL PHASE IIAAND VI IMPROVEMENTS - CLARK COUNTY

A) ACTION TO ACCEPTPROJECTA PRESENTATION BY CLARK COUNTY ON THE VAN BUSKIRKCHANNEL PHASE IIAAND VI IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING SITES A AND E

B) ACTIONTO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMANTO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASEIIA AND VIIMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING SITES A AND E

16) ACTION TO APPROVEA REQUEST BY THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS FORA VARIANCE FROM THE UNIFORM REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF DRAINAGE - RAINBOW LIBRARY

17) ACTIONTO APPROVE A REQUESTBY CLARK COUNTY FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 ON THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS PROJECT

18) ACTIONTO ACCEPTA RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS FOR AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THEOAKEY DETENTION BASIN AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEM - PHASE I Agenda RFCD - Board of Directors July 8, 1993 Page 4

19) ACTION TO ACCEPT A RECOMMENDATION FROM CLARK COUNTY FOR AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNNAMED WASH IMPROVEMENTS IN LAUGHLIN, NEVADA

V. ADMINISTRATION

20) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMANTO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH CLARKCOUNTY FOR GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SERVICES

21) RECEIVEA STATUS REPORT REGARDINGTHE PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECTS,TEN-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM AND FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PROJECT LIST AND DIRECT STAFF AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE

22) ACTION TO APPROVERESOLUTION NO. 93-3 PROCLAIMINGTHE WEEK OF SUNDAY, JULY 11 THROUGH SATURDAY, JULY 17,1993 AS CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLASH FLOOD AWARENESS WEEK

23) RECEIVEA STATUS REPORT FROMTHE CONSULTANT REGARDING ADVERTISINGSERVICES PROVIDED FOR THEDISTRICT'S PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM

24) ACTIONTO ACCEPTTHE PROJECT STATUS REPORTS

25) PROJECTSCLOSEOUTS

A) ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORTS AND THE PROJECT CLOSEOUTS FOR FUND 443

B) ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT AND THE PROJECT CLOSEOUT FOR FUND 444

26) ACTION TO ACCEPTTHE FINANCIAL REPORTS

27) GENERALMANAGER'S REPORT

28) CITIZENSPARTICIPATION No action can be taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the Board can direct that it be placed on a future agenda ARK COUNTY t?ffiDNA-Lf LOO13 CONTROL DISTRICT

Virginia Valentine, P.E. Chlef EnglneerlGenerai Manager

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEMORANDUM

Michael R. Harris Chalrrnan Cny 01 Henderson JULY 1, 1993

Iris Bletsch Vlce-Chalrman TO: BOARDDIRECTORS OF City of Boulder Clty

Yvonne Atkinson Gates Clark County FROM:VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF Themn Goynes ENGINEER City of North Las Vega Scott Higginson SUBJECT:MEETING OF JULY 8, 1993 Clry Of Las Vegas

Bruce Jensen City of Mesqulte

Jan Laverty Jones 1. CALL TO ORDER / APPROVAL OF AGENDA City of Las Vega

Bruce L. Woodbury Clark County 1) ACTIONTO CALL THEMEETING TO ORDER ANDTO APPROVE THE AGENDA The agenda is in order for approval.

II. INTRODUCTION / RECOGNITION OF BOARD MEMBERS / ELECTIONS '/ , I' INTRODUCTION OF NEW BOARD MEMBER: At the time of agenda preparation, staff had no information as to whom the appointments40 theBoard would be. The City of Henderson representative will be appointed on July 6, 1993, and the Mesquiterepresentative on July 13, 1993. The Henderson introduction will be made at the July 8 Board meeting, however, the Mesquite introduction will have to be made at a subsequent meeting.

RECOGNITION OF MICHAEL R. HARRIS AND BRUCE JENSEN FOR THEIR SERVICE ON THE BOARD: Plaques commemoratingMichael R. Harris' and Bruce Jensen's service on the Board have been prepared for presentation at the meeting.

ACTION TO ELECT A CHAIRMAN, VICE-CHAIRMAN, AND A SECRETARY TO THE BOARD: NRS 543.330 requires thatthe Board hold elections annually in July. Staff recommends that elections be held for the Chairman and Vice-chairman, and due to the nature

301 E. Clark Avenue, Suite 301 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702)4553139 FAX: (702) 455-3870 CLARK OUNTY KEt;DNAL fLTSTjt3 6NTROL DISTRICT

Memorandum Board of Directors July 1, 1993 Page 2

of thesecretary‘s responsibilities, that Deanna Lefko of the District’s staff, be re-elected as Secretary.

5) ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF JUNE 10, 1993: The minutes are in order for approval.

111. ITEMSHELD FROM THE JUNE 10, 1993 MEETING

6) ACTIONTO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMAN TOSIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAMS FOR THECITIES OF BOULDER CITY, HENDERSON, LAS VEGAS,MESQUITE, NORTH LAS VEGAS AND THE COUNTY OF CLARK: In accordance with the Operations and Maintenance Manual, the entities are required to prepare interlocal contracts to request funding for maintenance of flood control facilities. The District is in receipt of each of the entities’ interlocal contract requests along with the related work plans. The total amount for the FY 93/94 program is $1,979,650. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.

7) ACTIONTO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AMONG THE STATEOF NEVADA, CITY OF LASVEGAS AND THE DISTRICT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THEFREEWAY CHANNEL PROJECT: A Cooperative Agreement among NDOT, the City of Las Vegas and the District is requested to provide construction funding for the upgrade of the Freeway Channel project locatedbetween Sahara Avenue and lvanhoe Way. Funding is also requested for plan review and coordination bythe City during design and construction. NDOThas submitted ninety percent(90%) plans and specifications for CLARK COUNTY KffiDNN fLUUt3 CONTROL DI5TRICT

Memorandum i Board of Directors July 1, 1993 Page 3

the project, and right-of-way for construction exists. The amount requested is $710,000 which exceeds the amount programmed by $110,000. The project is identified on the FY 92/93Project List and funding is available from Pay-As- You-Go funds (Fund 443). The DistrictAttorney has reviewed the contract as to form.Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.

8) ACTIONTO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMAN TO SIGNTHE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR RIGHT-OF- WAY ACQUISITION FOR WASHINGTON AVENUE - UPPER SYSTEM: The City of las Vegas has submitted an Interlocal Contract to request funding for the acquisition of private right-of- way for the Washington Avenue System located between Sagman Street and Las Vegas Creek. This section of the Washington Avenue Systemis in theupper reach and right- of-way is required prior to thecontinuation of construction. The amount requested is $270,000 which was programmed onthe FY 92/93 ProjectList. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.

9) KYLE CANYONDETENTION BASIN - NORTHLAS VEGAS

A) ACTIONTO ACCEPTA PROJECT PRESENTATION ON THE KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN: Discussions are continuing with the cities of North LasVegas and LasVegas, Clark County and the District regarding the construction of the detention basin prior to construction ofthe outfall. Several alternativesfor theoutfall have been considered. Each alternative would provide for the protection of life and property from catastrophic flood events in the northwest area of the Las Vegas Valley. While Memorandum Board of Directors July 1, 1993 Page 4

the discharge of the outfall is yet to be established, staff is of the opinion that the detention basin is a critically important feature of the Master Plan. Staff recommends that the Project Presentation be held in conjunction withthe InterlocalContract request (Item No. 9D). The TAC took no action on theitem; the CAC recommends acceptance theof presentation.

B) ACTIONTO APPROVEA MASTER PLAN CHANGE ON THE KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - This is a PubJic Hearing: A change in location of the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin has been requested by the City of North Las Vegas. The proposed change will relocate the detention basin approximately one mile east of the location identified in the current MasterPlan. City of North Las Vegas staff has demonstrated that with the change in location, overall costs including the outfall, will be less than the costs for the location proposed in the current MasterPlan. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval and recommend that the Board finds thatthe Master PlanChange: 1) is hydraulically similar to the facility proposed in the Master Plan; 2) is the most cost-effective structural or regulatory means of controlling flood waters; and 3) does not adversely affectthe continued implementation of the Master Plan.

C) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST BY THE CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS TO AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PROJECTLIST ANDTHE TEN-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM: The City ofNorth LasVegas is requesting that constructionfunding be expeditedfor the Kyle LARK COUNTY k€dONPrL fLWD CONTROL DISrRICT

1 Memorandum i BoardDirectorsof j J~I~I, 1993 Page 5 I

Canyon Detention Basin project by including funding on the FY 92/93 Project List. Because the project is proposed on the1 O-Year Construction Program with funding in FY 93/94, there is no longer a need to expedite funding in FY 92/93.

The fiscal impactsof the projecthave been examined and differentfunding scenarios as shownon the table in the backup reflect the impacts the project would have on other projects. As evidenced from the table, Scenario 2 would have the most minimal impactin programming thefunding for projects requested by each of the entities. Also, considering the proposed bidopening dates forthe Buffalo Channel (Westcliff to Doe) and the Rampart Storm Drain, this scenario appears to fulfill the schedules. Allprocedural obligations have been satisfied and necessary permitsobtained for the Kyle Canyon project. Staff and TAC recommend that the item be held to further consider the impacts the project has onother projects. The CAC recommends the approval.

D) ACTIONTO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THEINTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN: The Cityof North Las Vegas has submitted an InterlocalContract request constructionfor engineering, desert tortoisemitigation, and constructionof the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin project. The amount requested is $13,113,000. Funding is contingent upon: 1 ) approval of a Master Plan change; 2)approval of a modificationto the 10- Year Construction Program; and 3) availability of ARK COUNTY k€bNhL fLOOD CONTROL DIgRICT

Memorandum Board of Directors July 1, 1993 Page 6

Pay-As-You-Go funds(Fund 443). Discussion continues between the entities regarding the fiscal impacts the project wouldhave on other projectsand the issue of constructing the detentionbasin prior to constructing the outfall. Staff and TAC recommend that the item be held. The CAC recommends that the item be held until sufficient funds accrue.

10) ACTION TO APPROVE A MASTER PLAN CHANGE ON THE LOWERDUCK CREEK DETENTIONBASIN - CLARK COUNTY - This is a Public Hearing: A change in location of the Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin has been requested by Clark County. The proposed change will relocate the detention basin entirely west of Bermuda Road in lieu of the current Master Plan location east of Bermuda Road. Clark Countystaff has demonstrated that with the change in location, the right-of- way and construction costs will be less than the costs for thelocation proposed in thecurrent Master Plan. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval and recommend that the Board finds thatthe Master Plan Change: 1) is hydraulically similar to the facility proposed in the Master Plan; 2) is the most cost-effective structural or regulatory means ofcontrolling flood waters; and 3) does not adversely affectthe continued implementation ofthe Master Plan.

IV. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

11) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGNTHE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF MEADOWS- ALTA STORM DRAIN - CITY OF LAS VEGAS: The City of Las Vegas has submitted a request for a First Supplemental Interlocal Contractto modify the award ofbid CLAR COUNTY KffiDNPcl fLbP CONTROL DITKICT

1 Memorandum I Board of Directors July 1, 1993

date for the Meadows Phase V Storm Drain project located in Aka Drive. The City proposes to change the award of bid date from January 31, 1993 to October 31 , 1993, due to the delays as stated on the City's agenda item. This request has no fiscalimpact. The DistrictAttorney has reviewed the contract as to form. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.

12) RAMPARTSTORM DRAIN - CITY OF LASVEGAS

A) ACTIONTO ACCEPTA PROJECT PRESENTATION BY THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS ON THE RAMPART STORM DRAIN (ANGEL PARK - PECCOLE I): The City of Las Vegas will make a presentation on the Rampart Storm Drain project generally located between Vegas Drive and Charleston Boulevard. The presentation is in accordance with District Policies and Procedures and NRS 543.580. The backup submittedby the City indicates thatright-of-way necessary for the construction of the project does not exist; however, it is expected to be obtained by the end of June 1993. Staff,TAC and CAC recommend acceptance of the presentation.

B) ACTIONTO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF RAMPARTSTORM DRAIN (ANGEL PARK - PECCOLE I): The City of Las Vegas has submitted an Interlocal Contract request for construction engineering and construction of the Rampart Storm Drain generally locatedbetween Vegas Drive and Charleston Boulevard. The District'sportion of the project is part of a larger streetimprovement project. The amount requested is $200,000. The City has ARK COUNTY t%&DNhL f LOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

~ Memorandum Board of Directors 1 July 1, 1993 I Page a

submittedninety percent (90%) plans and specifications and right-of-way dedication is expected to be finalized by the end of June 1993. This project is identified on the proposed FY 93/94 Project List. Funding is contingent upon approval of the FY 93/94 Project List andthe availability of Pay- As-You-Go funds (Fund 443). Funds for this request will not be available for several months if previously requested projects are approvedfor funding. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.

13) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TOSIGN THE SECOND SUPPLEMENTALINTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THEUNNAMED WASH IN LAUGHLIN, NEVADA - CLARK COUNTY: Clark County has submittedarequest for a Second Supplemental Interlocal Contractto modify the award of bid and completion dates for the Unnamed Washproject in Laughlin. The proposed dates are August 17, 1993, for awardof bid and June 30, 1994 forcompletion. The primary reason for delay of the project is the acquisition of an Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit. There is no fiscal impact. The District Attorney has reviewed the contractas to form. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.

14) RAWHIDECHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS - CLARK COUNTY

A)ACTION TO ACCEPTA PROJECT PRESENTATION BY CLARK COUNTY ON THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS (MOJAVE ROAD AND PEARL STREET CROSSINGS): In accordance with District Policies and Procedures and NRS 543.580, Clark County will make a ARK COUNTY t%CbNAL f LOO13 CONTROL DITRICT

Memorandum Board of Directors July 1, 1993 Page 9

presentation onthe Rawhide Channel Phase IV (Mojave Road and Pearl Street) project. Staff, TAC andCAC recommendacceptance theof presentation.

B) ACTION TOAPPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THERAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS (MOJAVE ROAD AND PEARL STREET CROSSINGS): Clark County has submitted a request for a Third Supplemental lnterlocal Contractto modify thescope of work and to fund the construction of Phase IV, including improvements to the channel crossings at Mojave Road and Pearl Street.The additional funding request is $34,515, bringing the total of the ThirdSupplemental Interlocal Contract to $2,820,000. The amount requested is programmed on theBond Project Listand funding is available from Fund 444. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form.Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.

15) VAN BUSKIRKCHANNEL PHASE ANDIIAVI IMPROVEMENTS - CLARK COUNTY

A) ACTIONTO ACCEPT A PROJECTPRESENTATION BYCLARK COUNTY ON THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNELPHASE IIAAND VI IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING SITES A AND E: In accordance with District Policies and Procedures and NRS 543.580, Clark County will make a project ARK COUNTY t%DNhL f LTx>D CONTROL DIR-RICT

Memorandum Board of Directors July 1, 1993 Page 10

presentation on the Van Buskirk Channel (Phase IIA and VI)Improvements. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend acceptance of the presentation.

B) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THEINTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNELPHASE IIAAND VI IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING SITES A AND E: Clark County has submittedarequest for an Interlocal Contractto provide funding from theBond Fund (Fund 444) for the construction engineering and construction of theVan BuskirkChannel System (Phases IIA and VI).The $5,895,200 request exceeds the amount programmed on the Bond List by $1,516,000; however, this amount was requested on the first year of the proposed 10-Year Construction Program. The Bond Fund has a sufficient balance to fund the $5,895,200 request. Ninety percent (90%) plans and specifications have been submitted. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form. Staff recommends approval of the request subject to acceptance of the project presentation and recommends that theproposed 10- Year Construction Program reflecta decrease of $1,516,000. The TAC and CAC recommend approval.

16) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST BY THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS FOR VARIANCEA FROM THE UNIFORM REGULATIONS FOR THECONTROL OF DRAINAGE - RAINBOW LIBRARY: On March 1, 1993, a Notice of Violation was sent to the City of Las Vegas after the District’s field technician noted unauthorizedconstruction onthe RainbowLibrary (SE ARK COUNTY kffiDNA f LOU13 CONTROL 1315;rKICT

Memorandum Board of Directors July 1, 1993 Page 1 1

Corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Buffalo Road). The project has Regional Significance, however, the City failed to obtain District concurrence prior to issuance of permits which authorized the start of construction. Due to City delays, the current constructionschedule for theCheyenne Channel improvements will leave the adjacentlibrary unprotectedfrom flooding and erosion for six to nine months.

In an effort to allow construction of thelibrary to proceed, the City proposed a 55-foot channel setback wherein no library improvements would be constructed. In addition, if circumstances should arise which further delay completion of the channel, the Library District would be required to construct temporary channel improvements. The absence of an approved drainage plan and the proposed temporary channelsetback are both in conflict with theUniform Regulations and the District‘s Design Manual. The District has informed the City thatproper resolution of theviolation would require a variance from the Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage.

Approval of the variance would allow construction of the library to continue without an approved drainage plan. The Library District’sadherence to the temporary setbackwould provide some protection to the building until such time as improvements to the Cheyenne Channel are complete. In accordance with the District Attorney’s request, the City has agreed to prepare holda harmless agreement indemnifying the District against any claims. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval subject to submittal of a hold harmless agreement.

17) ACTIONTO APPROVE A REQUEST BY CLARK COUNTY FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 ON THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS PROJECT: CLARK COUNTY

Memorandum Board of Directors July 1, 1993 Page 12

Clark County has negotiated a change order forthe Rawhide Channel Crossings (Phase II) project. The change order represents costs incurredwhile resolving a construction interference with a 16-inch water line. The net increase for Change Order Number 1 is $55,914.24 or a 6.0% increase to the original contract amount with Las Vegas Paving Corporation.Current lnterlocal Contract funding is sufficient to cover the increase. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.

18) ACTIONTO ACCEPT A RECOMMENDATIONFROM THE CITY OF LASVEGAS FOR AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE OAKEY DETENTION BASINAND CONVEYANCE SYSTEM - PHASE I: The City of Las Vegas opened bids for theOakey Detention Basin Phase I project on June 8, 1993. Three bids were received. The project consists of offsiteimprovements (Bid Group 11, sanitary sewer improvements (Bid Group 2) and landscaping (Bid Group 3). The District's participation in theproject is limited to$1 58,677.00, Bid Group 3 - landscaping. Other sources of funding will be utilized for the other aspects of the project. The lnterlocal Contract identifies landscaping costs at $200,000. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend acceptance ofthe City of LasVegas recommendation to awardthe bid to LasVegas Paving Corporation in the amount of $567,950.05, which includes all the bid groups.

19) ACTION TO ACCEPT A RECOMMENDATION FROM CLARK COUNTY FOR AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THEUNNAMED WASH IMPROVEMENTS IN LAUGHLIN, NEVADA : Clark County will open bids onJuly 2, 1993,for the Unnamed Wash Improvements project located in Laughlin. The bid opening was scheduled after preparation of the CLAP COUNTY KffiDNAL f LbDCONTROL DISrKICT

Memorandum Board of Directors July 1, 1993 Page 13

agenda, therefore, Clark County will presentthe bid abstract and recommendation for contract award at the July 8, 1993 meeting.The construction funding will be provided by the District and through establishment of a Special Improvement District. The interlocal contract states that the request for construction funding shall not exceed $3,798,000. The TAC will hear the item at 8:15 a.m. on July 8 prior to the Board meeting.

V. ADMINISTRATION

20) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH CLARK COUNTY FOR GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SERVICES: The annual agreement provides $35,000 to Clark County to offset their costs associated with the development and implementation of theGIS and allows the District toaccess the database filescreated and maintained by other participants in the program. It alsoprovides network service support for accessing thedatabases and makes the database filescreated and maintained bythe District available to other participants. Staff recommends approval of the agreement.

21) RECEIVE A STATUS REPORT REGARDINGTHE PRIORITIZATIONOFPROJECTS, TEN-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM AND FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PROJECTLIST AND DIRECTSTAFF AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE: The 1 O-Year Construction Program is updatedon an annual basis. This item was first on the TechnicalAdvisory Committee agenda in February 1993. The backup includes currentinformation submitted thebyentities for development of anupdated program. The Technical Advisory Committee, atthe June 24, 1993 meeting, ARK COUNTY k€&NAL f LOOD CONTROL DlXRlCT

Memorandum Board of Directors July 1, 1993 Page 14

recommended that the itembe held until their July meeting to allow for further review of theprogram and to consider the fiscal impacts. This item will be presented to theBoard in finalform atthe August 1993 meeting.Staff recommends that the Board receive the report and direct staff as deemed appropriate.

22) ACTIONAPPROVETO RESOLUTION NO. 93-3 PROCLAIMINGTHE WEEK OFSUNDAY, JULY 11 THROUGHSATURDAY, JULY 17, 1993 ASCLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLASH FLOOD AWARENESS WEEK: Resolution No. 93-3 has been prepared for the Board of Directors to declare the week of July 11-1 7, 1993 as "Clark County Regional Flash Flood Awareness Week". Staff and the CAC recommend approval.

23) RECEIVE A STATUS REPORT FROM THE CONSULTANT REGARDING ADVERTISING SERVICES PROVIDED FORTHE DISTRICT'S PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM: A representative from Merica, Burch & Dickerson will report on the status of their work under the current contract. Staff and the CAC recommend that the Board receive the report and direct staff and/or the consultant as deemed appropriate.

24) ACTIONTO ACCEPT THE PROJECT STATUS REPORTS: The usual monthly Project Status Reports are in order for acceptance.

25) PROJECTSCLOSEOUTS

A)ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORTS ANDTHE PROJECT CLOSEOUTS FOR FUND 443: Upon approval bythe Board, no further funds canbe ARK COUNTY kffiDNhC f LOO13 CONTROL DISTRICT

Memorandum Board of Directors July 1, 1993

expended on the projects referred to on theagenda item. The interlocal contracts will be closed out and any funds being returnedwill be used for reallocation to other projects. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.

B) ACTIONTO APPROVE THE FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT AND THE PROJECT CLOSEOUTFOR FUND 444: Upon approvalby theBoard, no further funds canbe expended on the project referred to on the agenda item. The interlocal contract will be closed out and any funds being returnedwill be used for reallocation to other projects. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.

ACTION TO ACCEPT THE FINANCIAL REPORTS: The usual monthly Financial Reports are in order for acceptance.

GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT: The General Manager will report on state and federal legislation of floodcontrol. The backup includes a newspaper article regarding action takenby a House Panel in Washington D.C. on June 17, 1993.

CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: No action can be taken on any matterdiscussed under this item, although the Board can direct that it be placed on a future agenda

General ManagerKhief Engineer CLARKCOUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

SUBJECT:

INTRODUCTION OF BOARD MEMBER PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:

RECOGNIZE AND INTRODUCE BOARD MEMBER

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

As a result of the June 8, 1993 local city elections, two new members will be appointed to the Board of Directors. At the time of agenda preparation, staff had no informationas to whom the Cityof Henderson and City of Mesquiterepresentatives would be. Appointment of the Henderson representative willbe made at the Council meeting of July 6, 1993 and the Mesquite appointment will be madeat the July 13, 1993 Council meeting. Introduction of the Henderson representativewill be made at theJuly 8, 1993 Boardmeeting. The City of Mesquite representative will be introduced at a subsequent Board meeting.

Respectfully submitted, RFCD AGENDA

Date: 7/8/93

Virbia Valentine, P.E. General ManagerKhief Engineer CLARKCOUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

RECOGNITION OF CHAIRMAN MICHAEL R. HARRTS AND COUNCILMAN BRUCE JENSEN FOR THEIR SERVICE ON TKE BOARD

~~~ PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: PRESENT PLAQUES OF APPRECIATION

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

Councilman Harris’ term as representative of theCity of Henderson ended June 1993. He servedas Vice-chairman of theBoard from July 1990 to January 1991 when hebecame Chairman. He served as Chairman of the Board from January 1991 to June 1993 (2.5 years).

Councilman Jensen’s term as representative of the City of Mesquite ended June 1993. He has served as a member of the Board since October 1992. Plaques commemorating their service have been prepared for presentation at the meeting.

Respectfully submitted, RFCD AGENDA

ht~!:71a193

Vir&ia Valentine, P.E. General ManagerKhief Engineer CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E.. GENERAL MANAGWCHIEF ENGINEER

OF PETITIONER:

THAT THE BOARD ELECT A CHAIRMAN, VICE-CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

NRS 543.330 requires that the Board meet in July of each year to elect one of its members as Chairman of the Board and President of the District, and elect a Secretary of the Board and of the District, who may or may not be a member of the Board. Staff recommends that Deanna Le&o fromthe District staff be elected to the positionof Secretary. The Policies and Procedures adopted by the Board require the electionof a Vice-Chairman to act on behalf of the Chairman in hidher absence.

Respectfully submitted, RFCD AGENDA m"4 I Dak 1/8/93 I

ViGinia Valentine, P.E. General ManagedChief Engineer MINUTES CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS JUNE 10,1993

MEETING NOTICES: Public Notices of the meeting were posted June 4, 1993, by Jon Downer ofthe Regional Flood Control Districtin the following locations: Las Vegas City Hall, North Las Vegas City Hall, Clark County Bridger Building, andthe Clark County Regional Flood Control District offices.

Public Notices of the meeting werealso mailed on June 4, 1993 to the cities of Boulder City, Henderson, Laughlin, and Mesquite for posting on community noticeboards.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Iris Bletsch, Vice-chairman, City of Boulder City Bruce Woodbury, Clark County Scott Higginson, City of Las Vegas Bruce Jensen, City of Mesquite Theron Goynes, City of North Las Vegas

MEMBERS ABSENT: Michael R. Harris, Chairman, City of Henderson Yvonne Atkinson-Gates, Clark County Jan Laverty-Jones, City of Las Vegas

STAFF: Virginia Valentine, General Manager Gale Wm. Fraser 11, Assistant General Manager Deanna Lefko, Management Analyst I Zev Kaplan, Deputy District Attorney Kevin L. Eubanks, Senior Engineer Joe Gumiensky, Manager of Business & Finance Catherine Razor, Project Administration Coordinator Michael Cuddy, Civil Engineer I1 Marcia Karlstedt, Office Assistant I

JNTERESTED PARTIES: Nevada Department of Transportation Dennis Fritz, VTN-Nevada Ken Gilbreth, VTN-Nevada Board Minutes June 10, 1993 Page 2

1. CALLTO ORD.ER AND MINUTES

Vice-chairman Bletsch called the meeting to order at 8:37 a.m.

1) 1TI NT A

Councilman Goynes movedto approve theagenda. There beingno furtherdiscussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS

2) ACTION TO APPROVETHE MINUTES OF THEREGULARLY SCHEDULED J’dEETlNG OF MAY 13. 1993

CouncilmanHigginson moved to approvethe minutes. Therebeing nofurther discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS

II. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

3) FREEWAY CHANNEL PROJECT - NEVADA DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION

A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PROJECTPRESENTATION ON THEFREEWAY CHANNEL PROJECT - SAHARA AVENUE TO IVANHOE WAY

A representative from the Nevada Department of Transportation, made the project presentation.

Councilman Higginson moved to accept the project presentation. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS Board Minutes June 10, 1993 Page 3

B) ACTION TO APPROVF AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTAMONG THE STATEOF NEVADA, CITY OF LAS VEGAS AND THEDISTRICT FOR CONSTRUCTION OFTHE FREEWAY CHANNEL PROJECT

Ms. Valentine stated that approval of this item wouldrequire a minimum of six votes from the Board members. Since five members were present, staff recommended the item be held.

Councilman Higginson moved to hold the interlocal contract until the July 8, 1993 Board Meeting for two-thirds of the members to be present. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS

4) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMANTO SIGNTHE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION FOR WASHINGTON AVENUE - UPPER SYSTEM

Ms. Valentine said that staff recommended the item be held.

Councilman Higginson moved to hold the interlocal contract until the July 8, 1993 Board Meeting for two-thirds of the members to be present. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS

5) KYLECANYON DETENTION BASIN - NORTH LAS VEGAS

A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PROJECTPRESENTATION ON THEKYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN

Dennis Fritz and Ken Gilbreth, VTN-Nevada made the project presentation.

No action was taken. The project presentation will be heard at the July 8, 1993 Board Meeting. Board Minutes June 10, 1993 Page 4

B) ACTION TOAPPROVE A MASTER PLAN CHANGEON THE KYLE ANYON DETENTION BASIN - This is a Public Hearing

Vice-chairman Bletsch opened thePublic Hearing. There was no public participation.

Councilman Higginson asked what change was being requested and if the level of floodcontrol and protection for downstream residents would beaffected. Ms. Valentinesaid that the detention basinwas being relocated downstream, which eliminated the need to acquire mining claims. Mr. Fritz said that the estimated $1.3 million savings would be realized by reducing construction costs, due to shortening the length of the outfall structure.He added that neither protection nor flood control would be compromised by relocating the structure downstream.

Vice-chairman Bletsch closed thePublic Hearing.

No action was taken. The item will be heard at the July 8, 1993 Board Meeting.

C) ACTION TOAPPROVE A REQUESTBY THE CITY OFNORTH LAS VEGAS TO AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PROJECT LIST AND THF TEN-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

Ms. Valentine said that staff recommended this itembe held.

Vice-chairman Bletsch moved to hold theamended FY 1992/93 Project List and 10- Year Construction Program until the July8, 1993 Board Meeting for two-thirds of the members to be present. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS

Dl ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE UTERI .OCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE KYLECANYON PFTENTION BASIN

Ms. Valentine said that staff recommended this itembe held.

Councilman Goynes moved to holdthe interlocal contractuntil the July 8, 1993 Board Meetingfor two-thirds of the members to be present.There being nofurther discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS Board Minutes June 10, 1993 Page 5

For the record, Councilman Higginson commentedthat discussions between District staff and City staff had been held concerning downstream mitigation which may be necessary.He asked staff to continue discussions to find a resolution to those questions. Ms. Valentine acknowledged the request.

6) ACTION TO APPROVF A MASTER PLAN CHANGE ON THELOWER DUCK CREFK DFTFNTION BASIN - CLARK COUNTY - This is a Public Hearing

Ms. Valentine said that staff recommended this item be held.

Vice-chairman Bletschopened the Public Hearing. There was no public participation.

Councilman Higginson asked what change was being requested and if the level of floodcontrol and protectionfor downstream residents would be affected.Ms. Valentine stated that thebasin had originally been locatedat a confluence ofseveral tributaries toDuck Creek. Developershave since added waterand sewer improvements to the project site property, thus increasing right-of-way acquisition costs. Ms. Valentine added that in relocating the structure, it was necessary to extend thedams to catchone of thetributaries to maintain flood control and thelevel of protection for downstreamresidents. While construction costsare basically similar to theoriginal estimate,a cost savings would be realized in acquisition of the right-of- way.

Vice-chairman Bletsch closed thePublic Hearing. No action was taken. Theitem will be heard at the July 8, 1993 Board Meeting.

7) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUESTBY CLARK COUNTY FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE UNIFORM REGULATIONS FOR THECONTROL OF DRAINAGE - STONEBRIDGE DlB SUBDIVISION

Ms. Valentine said that this property is identified within the current flood insurance restudy.She added that the hazard no longer exists because of upstream improvements; however, the propertyis currently designated as being locatedwithin a special flood hazard area. Staff recommended approval of the variance.

Vice-chairmanBletsch moved to approvethe variance. Therebeing nofurther discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS Board Minutes June 10, 1993 Page 6

111. ADMINISTRATION

8) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMAN TO SIGNTHE JNTERLOCAL CONTRACTSFOR FISCALYEAR 1993/94 MAINTENANCEWORK PROGRAMS FOR THE CITIES OF BOULDER CITY, HENDERSON, LAS VEGAS, JVlESQUlTE. NORTH I AS VEGAS. AND THE COUNTY OF CLARK

Ms. Valentine said that staff recommended this item be held.

Vice-chairman Bletsch movedto hold theinterlocal contracts until the July 8, 1993 Board Meeting for two-thirds of the members to be present. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS

9) ACTION TO ACCEPTTHE PROJECT STATUS REPORTS

Ms. Valentine stated that to date there are 39 projects which are completed, 11 projects currently in construction, and 25 projects in a phase of design or waiting construction. The Board reviewed the projected reportsas Ms. Valentine gavea brief report on the entities'projects. Ms. Valentine noted that there wasa date change on the Winnick Avenue project due-tosome water line coordinationhelocation issues with the Water District. Staff recommended acceptance of the reports.

Councilman Goynes movedto accept the reports. There being no furtherdiscussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS

10) ACTION TO ACCEPT THF FINANCIAL REPORTS

Ms. Valentine said the financial reports were in order for the Board's acceptance.

CouncilmanHigginson moved to acceptthe reports.There being nofurther discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS Board Minutes June 10, 1993 Page 7

11) ACTIONTO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZETHE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SOLUTION 93-2 TO AUGMENTTHE FISCAL YEAR 1993193 DISTRICT FUND ;IT 1

Ms. Valentine explained that the District was able to fundan additional $2 million in flood control projects duringFiscal Year 1992/93 than originally budgeted. She added that the resolution reflects a transfer of those funds fromthe District’s general fund (Fund 286) tothe District’s constructionfund (Fund 443). Staff recommended approval.

CouncilmanHigginson moved to approvethe resolution.There being nofurther discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS

12) GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

Ms. Valentine reported that bill SB 363, which would allow for a two-thirds vote of members present, was still in the Government Affairs Committee.She said staff has been in contact with the Carson City lobbyist and the Committee Chairman, and understands the Bill will pass through Committee some time next week.

CouncilmanHigginson said heauthorized staff to call theCity Lobbyists and encourage them to participate in expediting this Bill. The proceedings of this Board Meeting served as a good exampleof thenecessity of passing the Bill. He suggested that Channel 10 might share their video transcript of the meeting, and that staff could send the transcript to Carson City representatives as evidence that several items of importance to the Valley and flood control were held todaybecause the Bill has not been passed.

13) CITVENS PARTICIPATION

Vice-chairman Bletsch said that Chairman Harris had asked that on his behalf, she express how very much he has enjoyed workingwith the members and staff of the Regional Flood Control District. He has received great satisfaction in being a part of the commoncause to make the County,as well as the City ofHenderson, asafer and better place to live, and apologized for his absence. Board Minutes June 10, 1993 Page 8

ADJOURNMENT There being no further business,Vice-chairman Bletsch adjournedthe meeting atg:O4 a.m.

R espectfully submitted, Attest: submitted, Respectfully 1993

VIMNIAVALENTINE, P.E. IRIS BLETSCH GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER VICE-CHAIRMAN CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

INTERLOCAL CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAMS FOR THE CITIES OF BOULDER CITY, HENDERSON, LAS VEGAS, MESQUITE, NORTH LAS VEGAS AND THE COUNTY OF CLARK

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve and authorizeSTAFF:Approveand the Chairman to sign.

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: Approve.

CITIZENSCOMMITTEE: Approve.

JUNE 10, 1993 BOARD: Hold for two-thirds of themembers to be present,

ITEMU 6 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

SUBJECT: INTERLOCAL CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAMS' PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:

THAT THE BOARD APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN

FISCAL IMPACT: $1,979,650

BACKGROUND: Staff requested each of the entities to prepare their Fiscal Year 1993/94 Work Maintenance Programs and submit the interlocals for approvalby the Board. The interlocal contracts, along with an itemized listing of the facilities identifiedin each work planare attached for your review and approval. The following indicates the amount requested for FY 93/94,by entity:

FY 1993/94 Entitv Brognmed Pages Boulder City $ 106,300 1-9 Clark County 1,121,250 10 - 37 Henderson 177,082 38 - 55 Las Vegas 43 1,500 56 - 65k Mesquite 45,493 66 - 73 North Las Vegas 98.025 74 - 93 $1,979,650

Upon approval, the interlocal contracts will become effective July1, 1993 and expire June 30, 1994. The remaining unencumbered fund balances for each entity at the end of FY 1992/93 will be returned to the District's operating fund for subsequent reallocation. Staff has requested that any uncompleted scope of work be included into the new fiscal year programs.

Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA

Date!: 05/27/93 Date: 06/10/93 RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 6 General ManagedChief Engineer DATE: 7/08/93 Regional Mood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Staff Discussion: I Date: 6/28/93

INTERLOCAL CONTRACTS FOR FY 1993/94 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAMS In accordance with the Operations and Maintenance Manual, the entities have prepared interlocal contracts to request funding for maintenance of flood control facilities. The related work plans for fiscal ear 1993/94 are included with the contracts. The total amount programmed for FY 1993/94 is $1,!K 79,650.

Staff Recommendation: Approve and authorize the Chairman to sign.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: I AGENDA #5 Date: 5/27/93

Recommendation: Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA #5 Date: 6/1/93

Recommendation: Approve.

Discussion by Board: I AGENDA #8 Date: 6/10/93

At the June 10, 1993 meeting, the Board held the item for two-thirds of the members to be present to vote.

Recommendation: Hold until July 8, 1993. - CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: 1993-1994Annual Maintenance Program for Boulder City.

PETITIONER: City of Boulder City. r-RECOMMENDATION: That the Clark County Regional Flood Control District authorize the Chairman to sign an Interlocal Contract for the 1993-1994 Flood Control Facilities Annual Maintenance Program for Boulder City.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The 1993/ 1994Interlocal Contract is for $106.300.

BACKGROUND: The proposed contract provides for maintenance by the City of Boulder City of certain flood control facilities identified in the District's Master Plan. The work will be in accordance with Performance Standards of the Clark County Regional Flood Control District Operation and Maintenance Manual.

This Interlocal Contract will include channel inspections,cleaning and reshaping channels, vegetation control, repair of lined channels, cleaning and flushing culverts, erosion control maintenanceand repair and maintenanceof fencing. See Exhibit "A" (attached) for specifics.

Respectfully submitted,

b- Alan F. GoGe. P.E. Public Works Director Boulder City, Nevada City, Boulder 5/19/93 7/8/93

1 KNTERLOCAL CONTRACT BOULDER CITY 1993-94 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this day of

-t 1993, by and between the CITY OF BOULDER CITY, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, hereinafter referred to as "City", and the CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, hereinafter referred toas "District,"

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the NevadaRevised Statutes, the District may approve and fund projectsto maintain flood control improvements; and WHEREAS, the City desires to maifitaid flood control improvenlents within the City in accordance with the maintenance program set forth herein, and hereinafterreferred to as "Project"; and WHEREAS, thefacility upon which maintenance will be done is a facilitydescribed in the District's Master Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements and promises of the parties hereto, the District authorizesthe Project as it is mutually understood and agreed as follows:

SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT This Interlocal Contractapplies to the maintenance of flood control facilities, which areidentified in the District's Master Plan facilities including updates and amendments subsequentlyapproved. The basic improvements to the facility will be: channel inspections,cleaning and reshaping channels,vegetation control, repair of lined channels,cleaning and flushing culverts, erosion co~~trolmaintenance and repair, and maintenance of fencing.The Project is more specifically described in Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

Page 1. of 6 Interlocal Contract Boulder City 1993-94 Annual Maintenance Program

SECTION II - PROJECT COSTS

The District agrees to providereimbursement for Projectcosts within the limitsspecified below: 1. The Project costs shall. not exceed $106,300,00, A written request must be made to the District and a Supplemcnkd InterlocalContract approved to increasethe amount noted above prior to payment of anyadditional funds.

2. The City and District will comply with Section 4,12 of the Operation and Maintenance Manual. In accordance with said manual the City shall submit invoicestogether with a detailed summary report of the maintenance serviceperformed, The City shall submit an Invoice Voucher prepared in duplicatein the manner prescribed by the District. The vouchers shall include such information as is necessary for theDistrict to determine the nature of all expenditures, Each voucher will clearly indicate that it is for servicesrendered in performance of maintenance activities under this contract and is composed of completed elements set forth in theannual work program. All invoicesmust be submitted for payment to: ClMk County Regional Flood Control District 301 East Clark Avenue, Suite 301 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attention: Virginia Bax-Valentine General Manager/ChiefEngineer

Payment shall be considered timely if made by the District within 45 days. Pursuant to Section IV, Paragraph 6, the District may, in its soIe discretion, withhold payments to the City for services rendered if the City fails to satisfactorily comply with any term or condition of this contract and/or the District'sOperation and Maintenance Manual.

Page 2 of 6 3 hktlocal Contract Bouldcr City 1993-94 Annual Maintenance Program

SECTION XXI - PROJECT TIM3

TheCity agrees to performthe Project to thesatisfaction of the District prior to June 30. 1994. The District may grant extensions or terminate this contract and require all sums advanced to the City to be repaid if the City fails to perform by said date.

SECTION Tv - GENERAL

1. The citywill complete the Project as set forth in Exhibit "A". The City staff personnel responsible for coordination work under this contract are as listed below:

Mr, Alan F, Gove, Director of Public Works Mr, Phillip T, Henry, City Engineer Mr, Howard Clarke, Public Woks Superintendent

2. In addition to the specific terms set forth in this Contract the parties hereto shall be subject to and governed by the District's Operation and Maintenance Manual, and any applicable portions of the Policies alld Procedures adopted by the District.

3. It is the intent of the Disuict that scheduling of maintenance and repair of drainage and flood control facilities in general and Master Plan Facilities spccifically be coordinated among entities, Therefore, in those cases whereMaster Plan approved and District-funded projects have regional flood control significance impacting more than one entity,the City will allow all impacted entities an opportunity to review the nlaintenlznce schedule in order to coordinate maintenance efforts.

Page 3 of 6 4 Intcrlocnl Contract Boulder City 1993-94 Annual Maintenance Program

4. The Chief Engineer of the District shall be: responsible for monitoring tho performance of the City, approval for payment of billings and expenses submitted by the City and the acceptance of any reports providcd by thc City. The City shall be responsible for monitoring performance of City staff or private contractors, and the City shall maintain detrriled records of all payments made to contractors and make such recordsavailable to theDistrict upon request.

5. The City shall provide right of access to its facilities to the District or Chief Engineer at all reasonable times, in order to monitor and evaluate performance,compliance, and/or quality assurance under this contract,

6. In the event the City fails to perform the ~naintenance according to the standards specified in this contract and in the District's Operation and Maintenance Manual, the District may perform or cause to be performed the maintenancenecessary to assure proper operation of the facility. Cost incurred by the District shall be reimbursed by the City or be deducted from the amount authorized by this contract. The District may not exercise the right without giving the City specific written notice of the maintenance required and allowingthe City 60 days within which to perform said maintenance. The notice required by this provision mst be sent to: Mx, Alan F. Gove, Director of Public Works 401 California Avenue P. 0,Box 61350 Boulder City, NV 89006-1350

7. The records of the City and/or private contractors pertaining to the subject matter of this contractshall at allreasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by the District, County Auditor or an Agent of the District.

Page 4 of 6 5 Intctlocal Contract Boulder City 1993-94 Annual Maintenance Program

8. If any provision of this contract shall be deemed in conflict with any statute or rule of law, such provision shall be deemed modified to be in conformance with said statute or ruIe of law,

9. All parties to this contract shall comply with applicable local, state, and federal laws.

10. Any costs found to be improperly allocated in the project will be refunded by the City to the District.

11, It is specifically understood and agreed to by and betwcen the parties hereto that it is not intended by any of the provisions of any part of this contract to createin the public or any member thereof a third party beneficiary hereunder, or to authorize anyone not a party to this contract to maintain a suit for personalinjuries or property damage pursuant to the term orprovisions of this contract.

12. The City hereby indemnifies and shall defend and hold hamless the District,its representatives and their employees (or their authorizedrepresentatives) from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or adminis txative proceedings,claims, demands, damages, liabilities, interest, attorney's fees, costs and expenses whatsoever of any kind or naturewhether arising before or after completion of the work hereunder and in any mannerdirectly or indirectly caused, occasioned or contributed to in whole or in part, by reason of any act, omission, ftdult or negligence whether activeor passive of the City, of anyone acting under its direction or control, or on its behalf in connection with or incident to the performance of thisContract. The City's aforesaid indemnity and hold harmless obligations, or portions or applications thereof, shall apply to the fullest extent permitted by law, but in no event shall they apply to liability caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the party indemnified or held harxnless.

6 Page 5 of 6 Inlerlocal Contract Boulder City 1993-94 Annual Maintenance Program

ATTESTT: CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEANNA LEFKO, Secretary MICHAEL HARRIS, Chairman

Date of Board Action:

Approved as to Legality and Form;

BY; i CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Deputy District Attorney

ATTEST CITY OF BOULDER CIIY

By: VICKI G. BERGDALE, City Clerk ERIC LUNDGAARI), Mayor

Date of Council Action:

Page 6 of 6

7 c I

? CITY OF BOULDER CITY FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM BUDGET REQUEST RFCD Board Approved 7/9\92, Item B12 interlocal Contract dated 7/9/92 Page 2 of 2

I 0090 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS 0095 MSlGNENGlNEERMG 1 4,400 1 2,500 I 6,900

W CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITY MAINTENANCE PETITIONER:

M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF CLARK COUNTY.

FISCAL IMPACT:

$1,121,250 FUNDED BY THEREGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

BACKGROUND:

The Clark County Regional Flood Control District has programmed fundsfor the maintenance of flood control facilities which are shown on the Master Plan. Clark County Public Works is proposing this Interlocal Contract to provide funds to maintain those facilities shown on the Master Plan and located in the unincorporated areas of Clark County.

This year's programfeatures include repairs to the Laughlin Bridge Canyon Storm Drain Outfall, Sloan Channel, and Flamingo Wash facilities.

The maintenance program is identified in Exhibit "A" of the Interlocal Contract.

Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA

Date: 5/27/93 Date:6/10/93 7/8/93 Director of Public Wor MJM:GS:mc Attachment

10 INTERLOCAL CONTRACT

ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

THISCONTRACT, made and enteredinto daythis of , 1993, by and between the County of Clark, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, hereinafter referred to as "County", and the CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "District".

WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the District may approve and fund projects to maintain flood control improvements; and

WHEREAS, The County desires to maintain flood control improvements located in (see Exhibit "A") accordance with the maintenance program set forth herein, and hereinafter referred to as "Project"; and

WHEREAS, the facility upon which maintenance will be done is a facility described in the District's Master Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the parties hereto, the District authorizes the Project as it is mutually understood and agreed as follows:

SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT

11 accordance with performance standards of the Operations and Maintenance Manual. The Project is more specifically described in Exhibit "A"which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS The District agrees to provide reimbursement for Project costs within the limits specified below: 1. The Projectcosts shall not exceed $1,121,250.00. The amounts allocated to each individual facility within the Project must be specified in Exhibit "A'. Any changes to said allocated amounts must be approved by the District's Chief Engineer.

A written request must be made to the District and a Supplemental Interlocal Contract approved to increase the amount noted above prior to payment of any additional funds.

2. The County and District will comply with Section 4.12 of the Operation and Maintenance Manual. In Accordance with said manual the County shall submit invoices together with a detailed summary report of the maintenance service performed. The County shall submit an Invoice Voucher prepared in duplicate in the manner prescribed by the District. The vouchers shall include such information as is necessary for the District to determine the nature of all expenditures. Each voucher will clearly indicate that it is for services rendered in performance under this contract. Each voucher will also be accompanied by a written certification from the County stating that it is for performance of maintenance activities under this contract and is composed of ,completed elements set forth in the annual work program.

2 12 All invoices must be submitted for payment to: Clark County Regional Flood Control District 301 E. Clark Avenue, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89155 Attn: Virginia Bax-Valentine General Manager/Chief Engineer Payment shall be considered timely if made by the District within 45 days. Pursuant to Section IV, Paragraph 6, the District may, in its sole discretion, withhold payments to the County for services rendered if the County fails to satisfactorily comply with any term or condition of this contract and/or the District's Operation and Maintenance Manual.

SECTION 111 - PROJECT TIME The County agrees to perform the Project to the satisfaction of the District prior to June 30, 1994. The District may grant extensions or terminate this contract and require all sums advanced to the County to be repaid if the County fails to perform by said date.

SECTION IV - GENERAL 1. The County will complete the Project as set forth in Exhibit "A'. The County staff personnel responsible for coordination work under this contract are as listed below: M. J. Manning, Director of Public Works, or his designee:

It is understood that staff named above will be responsible for work coordination throughout the period of this contract unless the District is informed in writing of changes in these personnel assignments.

3 13 District. 3. It is the intent of the District that scheduling of maintenance and repair of drainage and flood control facilities in general and Master Plan Facilities specifically be coordinated among entities. Therefore, in those cases where Master Plan approved, and District - funded projects have regional flood control significance impacting more than one entity, the County will allow all impacted entities an opportunity to review the maintenance schedule in order to coordinate maintenance efforts.

4. The Chief Engineer of the Districtshall be responsiblefor monitoring the performance of the County, approval for payment of billings and expenses submitted by the County, and the acceptance of any reports provided by the County. The County shall be responsible for monitoring performance of County staff or private contractors, and the County shall maintain detailed records of all payments made to contractors and make such records available to the District upon request.

5. The Countyshall provide right of access to itsfacilities to the District or Chief Engineer at all reasonable times, in order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance, and/or quality assurance under this contract.

6. In the event the Countyfails to perform the maintenance according tothe standards specified in this contract and in the District’s Operation and Maintenance Manual, the District may perform or cause to be performed the maintenance necessary to assure proper operation of the facility. Cost incurred by the District shall be reimbursed by the County or be deducted from the amount authorized by this contract. The District may not exercise this right without giving the County specific written notice of the maintenance required and allowing the County 12 months within which to perform said maintenance.

4 The notice required by this provision must be sent to: M. J. Manning, Director Department of Public Works 6655 W. Sahara Ave. Bldg. C-204 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102

7. The records of the County and/or private contractors pertaining to the subject matter of this contract shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by the District, County Auditor or an Agent of the District.

8. If any provision of this contract shall be deemed in conflictwith any statute or rule of law, such provision shall be deemed modified to be in conformance with said statute or rule of law.

9. All partiesto this contract shallcomply with applicable local, state, and federal laws.

10. Any costs found to be improperly allocated in the project will be refunded by the County to the District.

11. It is specifically understood and agreed to by and between the parties hereto that it is not intended by any of the provisions of any part of this contract to create in the public or any member thereof a third party beneficiary hereunder, or to authorize anyone not a party to this contract to maintain a suit for personal injuries or property damage pursuant to the terms of provisions of this contract.

12. The County hereby indemnifies and shall defend and hold harmless the District, its representatives and their employees (or their authorized representatives) from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims, demands, damages, liabilities, interest, attorney’s fees, costs and expenses whatsoever of any kind or nature whether arising before or after completion of

5 the work hereunder and in any manner directly or indirectly caused, occasioned or contributed to in whole or in part, by reason of any act, omission, fault or negligence whether active or passive of the County, of anyone acting under its direction or control, or on its behalf in connection with or incident to the performance of this Contract. The County’s aforesaid indemnity and hold harmless obligations, or portions or applications thereof, shall apply to the fullest extent permitted by law, but in no event shall they apply to liability caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the party indemnified or held harmless.

6 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF: The parties have cuased this contract to be executed the day and year first above written.

ATEST: CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

BY: LORETTA BOWMAN,County Clerk JAY BINGHAM, Chairman

ATTEST: DISTRICTCONTROL FLOOD REGIONAL

BY: DEANNA LEFKO, MICHAEL R. HARRIS Secretary to the Board Chairman

Approved as to Legality and Form:

BY: CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Deputy District Attorney

7 17 CLARK COL.dTY FISCAL YEAT; 1993-94 MAINTENANCE WORK PhnJGRAM BUDGET REQUEST PAGE 1 OF 4

CIAO1 CIA02 CIA03 CIAO4 CIA05 PAGE FLAMINGO IAS VEGAS DUCK CREEK SLOAN LV RANGE TOTALS i: i: WASH WASH CHANNEL WASH 0005 CLEANllNSP INlOUTLET STRUCTURES 5,500 2,250 2,500 1,000 1,250 12,500 001 0 INSPECTION(CHANNELS) 2,000 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,500 0015 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES 0020 VEGETATION CONTROL 45,000 28,000 35,0006,000 5,000 119,000

EXHIBIT A CLARK COUNTY FISCAL YEAR. 1993-94 MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM BUDGET REQUEST PAGE 2 OF 4

CLA06 CLA07 CLA08 CLAOS CLAlO PAGE TROPICANA AIRPORT MONSON RAWHIDE VAN TOTALS WASH CHANNEL CHANNEL BUSKIRK CHANNEL CHANNEL n It I I I I I 0005 CLEANllNSP INlOUTLET STRUCTURES 1,000 1,250 2,250 1 ,500 2,500 8,500

0010 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 1,000 500 500 1,000 1,000 4,000 0015 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES 11 0020 I VEGETATIONCONTROL 4,000 I 3,200 I 7,000 I 4,000 I 2,000 I 20,200 I 0025 STORM SEWER REPAIR 0030 CLEAN 81 RESHAPE CHANNELS

0035 CLEAN/INSPECT DET BASINS 5,000 5,000 0040 REPAIR LINED CHANNELS 0045 VEGETATION CNfRLlDET BASIN 0050 CLEANlFLUSH PlPESlCULVERTS 0055 PROVlDE/MAlNT EROSION CONTROL 0060 DEBRIS REMOVAL

0065 EROSIONREPAIR

0070 FENCE REPAIR 1 ,500 1,500 1,500 4,500 ~~~~~ ~~~~ ----- 0075 REPAIR INlOUTLET STRUCTURE

0080 MISCELLANEOUS 500 500 1,000 0085 MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 0090 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS 0095 DESIGN I ENGINEERING

$ 7,000 $ 5,950 $ 12,250 $ 9,500 S 11,500 S 46,200 CLARK COvlJTY FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 MAINTENANCE WORK k1adGRAM BUDGET REQUEST PAGE 3 OF 4

CLAl 1 CIA12 CIA13 CIA14 CLAl5 PAGE FLAM WASH DETENTION RFCD MAINT LAUGHLIN OVERTON TOTALS I _I NO FORK BASINS PROGRAM WASHES TOWN WASH 0005 CLEANllNSP INlOUTLET STRUCTURES 1,250 1,000 3,000 2,500 7,750 0010 INSPECTION (CHANNELS] 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,500 0015 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES 0020 VEGETATION CONTROL 500 1,000 500 2,000 4,000 ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ 0025 STORM SEWER REPAIR 200,000 200,000 0030 CLEAN 81 RESHAPE CHANNELS 0035 CLEANlINSPECT DET BASINS 1,500 1,500

I 0040 REPAIR LINED CHANNELS 0045 VEGETATION CNTRLlDET BASIN

0050 CLEANlFLUSH PlPESlCULVERTS I 0055 PROVlDElMAlNT EROSION CONTROL

0060 DEBRIS REMOVAL 20,000 20,000 - 0065 EROSION REPAIR 0070 FENCE REPAIR 1,000 1,000 0075 REPAIR INlOUTLET STRUCTURE

0080 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 1,000 0085 MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 15,000 2,000 1,00020,000 2,000 0090 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS 45,000 45,000 i 0095 DESIGN I ENGINEERING 5,000 5,000

1 $ 18,250 $ 7,500 $ 45,000 $230,500 $ 7,500 $308,750

N ! 0 4 CLARK COUNTY FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM BUDGET REQUEST PAGE 4 OF 4 CIA16 BLUE DIAMOND WASH

0005 CLEANllNSP INlOUTLET STRUCTURES 500

0010 (CHANNELS)INSPECTION 500

0015 CLEAN STORM SEWERL:NES

0020 VEGETATION CONTROL

0025 STORM SEWER REPAIR

0030 CLEAN & RESHAPECHANNELS

0035 CLEANlINSPECTDETBASINS

0040 REPAIRLINED CHANNELS

0045 VEGETATION CNTRLlDETBASIN

0050 CLEANlFLUSHPlPESlCULVERTS 0055 PROVIDE/NIAINT EROSIONCONTROL

0060 DEBRIS REMOVAL

0065 EROSIONREPAIR

0070 FENCEREPAIR 0075 REPAIR INlOUTLET STRUCTURE 0080 MISCELLANEOUS 300 0085 MAINTAIN ACCESSROADS ~ 0090 SUW ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS 0095 DESIGN I ENGINEERING .I

$ 1,300 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARKCOUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY1993 17,

'ROJECT: FLAMINGO WASH

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE CLEANllNSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 5,500 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 2,000 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 45,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS 70,000 CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS 5,000 VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL 60,000 DEBRIS REMOVAL 40,000 EROSION REPAIR 20,000 FENCE REPAIR 1,000 REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS 1,500 MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 20,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING 11,000 TOTAL $281,000 ~~~ DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURkENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

ONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR: CLARK COUNTY PP3JECTMANAGER:,. GTL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT ENTITY: CLARKCOUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17. 1993 PR O JE CT : LAS VEGAS LAS PROJECT: WASH -

FORCE APPROVED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK PERCENTCOMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 2,250 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 500 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 35,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR 2,000 REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS 500 MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 1,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING S 41.250 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:CLARK COUNTY - PROJECT MANAGER: GTL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540

23 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT ENTITY:CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATEPREPARED: MAY 199317,

PROJECT: DUCK CREEK

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 2,500 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 1,000 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 28,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS 53,000 CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR 1 ,000 REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 3,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESlGNlENGlNEERlNG

TOTAL $ 89,500 LDELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NE= QUARTER:

I CONSULTANTKONTRACT0R:CLARK COUNTY ROJECTMANAGER: GJL SUCKOW PHONENUMBERz455-7540

24 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT ENTITY:CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17, 1993 PROJECT: SLOAN CHANNEL -

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN DATE CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 1,000 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 1,000 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 6,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS 250,000 VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR 2,000 REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 1 ,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING 4,000 TOTAL $266,000 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:: CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:: - PROJECTMANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540

25 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 199317, PROJECT: LAS VEGAS RANGE WASH

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 1,250 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 1 ,000 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 5,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS 70,000 VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR 2,000 REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 2,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING 5,000 S 87,250 cDELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

I CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR: CLARK COUNTY . ROJECTMANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540

26 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY199317, PROJECT: WASH TROPICANA -

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN DATE CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 1,000 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 1,000 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 4,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPESKULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 1,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING S 7,000 ~~~~ DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANTKONTRACTOR: CLARKCOUNTY - PROJECT MANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540

27 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17, 1993

PROJECT: AIRPORT CHANNEL

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENTCOMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN CLEAN/INSP IN/OU,TLET STRUCTURES 1,250 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 500 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 3,200 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 1,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING

TOTAL $ 5,950

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR: CLARK COUNTY AOJECTMANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540

28 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT ENTITY: CLARKCOUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17, 1993 PROJECT: MONSON CHANNEL

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN DATE CLEANANSP INIOUTLET STRUCTURES 2,250 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 500 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 7,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN 81 RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR 1,500 REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 1,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING

$ 12,250 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:CLARK COUNTY PROJECTMANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540 29 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY1993-1 994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17, 1993 PROJECT: RAWHIDECHANNEL

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENTCOMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN DATE CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 2,500 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 1,000 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 4,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSHPIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR 1,500 REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS 500 MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING TOTAL $ 9,500 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANTKONTRACTOR: CLARK COUNTY .3OJECT MANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT ENTITY:CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17, 1993 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 1 ,500 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 1,000 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 2,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN 81 RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS 5,000 REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR 1,500 REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS 500 MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING

$ 11,500 DELAYS OR IPROBLEM AREAS: f

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:CLARK COUNTY PROJECTMANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540

31 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17, 1993

PROJECT: FLAMINGO WASH - NORTH FORK

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENTCOMPLETION- CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 1,250 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 500 CLEAN STORM SEWERLINES VEGETATION CONTROL 500 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPESKULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR 1,000 REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 15,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING TOTAL S 18.250

~~ ~~ DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

1 WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANTKONTRACTOR: CLARK COUNTY ROJECT MANAGER: GTL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540

32 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT ENTITY:CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17, 1993 PROJECT:DETENTION BASINS

FORCE APPROVED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN COMPLETE CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 1,000 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 1,000 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 1,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEAN/INSPECT DET BASINS 1,500 REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRLlDET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,000 MAlNTAlN ACCESS ROADS 2,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING

$ 7.500 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

A CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:CLARK COUNTY PROJECT MANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540

33 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT ENTITY:CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17, 1993 PROJECT:RFCD MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES INSPECTION (CHANNELS) CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSHPIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS 45,000 DESIGN/ENGINEERING S 45.000 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:CLARK COUNTY AOJECTMANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540 34 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT ENTITY:CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17. 1993 PROJECT: LAUGHLIN WASHES -

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENTCOMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN CLEANANSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 3,000 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 1 ,000 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 500 STORM SEWER REPAIR 200,000 CLEAN 81 RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL 20,000 EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 1,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING 5,000 TOTAL $230,500 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

~~ ~~ WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANTKONTRACTOR: CLARKCOUNTY PROJECT MANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540 35 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

ENTITY:CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17, 1993

PROJECT:OVERTON TOWN WASH

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN DATE CLEAN/INSP IN/OUTLET STRUCTURES 2,500 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 1,000 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL 2,000 STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS 2,000 SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING

TOTAL $ 7,500 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANTKONTRACTOR: CLARKCOUNTY AOJECTMANAGER: GTL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540 36 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT ENTITY:CLARK COUNTY 1993-1994 DATE PREPARED: MAY 17, 1993 PROJECT:BLUE DIAMOND WASH

FORCE APPROVED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK COMPLETION ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN CLEANANSP INlOUTLET STRUCTURES 500 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 500 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES VEGETATION CONTROL STORM SEWER REPAIR CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS REPAIR LINED CHANNELS VEGETATION CNTRL/DET BASIN CLEAN/FLUSH PIPES/CULVERTS PROVIDE/MAINT EROSION CONTROL DEBRIS REMOVAL EROSION REPAIR FENCE REPAIR REPAIR IN/OUTLET STRUCTURE MISCELLANEOUS 300 MAINTAIN ACCESS ROADS SUPV ANNUAL BID CONTRACTS DESIGN/ENGINEERING

TOTAL $ 1,300

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:CLARK COUNTY - PROJECTMANAGER: GIL SUCKOW PHONENUMBER: 455-7540 -

37 CLARK COUNTY

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTUOL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement 1993/1994 Maintenance Work Program

PETITIONER:City of Henderson

RECOMMEh9ATION OF PETITIONER:

That the Clark County Regional Flood Control District approve the 199311994 Interlocal Agreement for the Maintenance Work Program.

FISCAL IMPACT: $177,082.00 from Maintenance funds.

BACKGROUND: The 1993/1994 Maintenance Work Program has been developed to maintain Regional Flood Control facilities within the City of Henderson. The locations of the facilities to be maintained are shown on Exhibit "A" of the proposed Interlocal Agreement, and the work to be perfonned is described in the work program which is attached.

Respectfully submitted,

Mark T. Calhoun, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA Date: Date: WCC:jn 5/27/93 6/10/93 May 11, 1993 7/8/93

38 1 INTERLOCAL CONTRACT 2 1993/1994 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 3 THISCONTRACT, made and entered into this day of , 1992, by

4 and between the CITY OF HENDERSON, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, hereinafter

5 referred to as "City", and the CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT,

6 hereinafter referred to as "District". 7 WITNESSETH: a WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the District may 9 approve and fund projects to maintain flood control improvements; and 10 WHEREAS, the City desires to maintain flood control improvements within the City in 11 accordance with the maintenance program set forth herein, and hereinafter referred to as "Project"; 12 13 and 14 WHEREAS, the facility upon which maintenance will be done is a facility described in the 15 District's Master Plan. 16 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and

17 promises of the parties hereto, the District authorizes the project as it is mutually understood and

18 agreed as follows:

1C SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT 2c This Interlocal Contract applies to the maintenance of flood control facilities, which are 21 identified in the District's Master Plan facilities including updates and amendments subsequently 2: approved. The basic maintenance to the facilities will be in accordance with performance stancards 21 of the Operation and Maintenance Manual. The Project is more specifically described in Exhibit "A", 24 which is attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herein. 2: 2( 2; Page 1 of 5 2t SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS

The District agrees to provide reimbursement for Project costs within the limits specified below:

1. The Project costs shall notexceed $177,082.00.

The amounts allocated to each individual facility within the Project must be specified in

Exhibit A. Any changes to said allocated amounts must be approved by the Chief Engineer of the

Clark County Regional Flood Control District.

A written request must be made to the District and a Supplemental Interlocal Contract approved to increase the amount noted above prior to payment of any additional funds.

2. The City and District will comply with Section 4.12 of the Operation and

Maintenance Manual. In accordance with said manual the City shall submit invoices together with a detailed summary report of the maintenance service performed. The City shall submit an Invoice

Voucher prepared in duplicate in the manner prescribed by the District. The vouchers shall include such information as is necessary for the District to determine the nature of all expenditures. Each voucher will clearly indicate that it is for services rendered in performance under this contract. Each voucher will also be accompanied by a written certification from the City stating that it is for performance of maintenance activities under this contract and is composed of completed elements set forth in the annual work program. All invoices must be submitted for payment to:

Virginia Bax-Valentine, General ManagerKhief Engineer Clark County Regional Flood Control District 301 East Clark, Suite 301 Las Vegas, NV 89 101

Payment shall be considered timely if made by the District within 45 days. Pursuant to

Section IV, Paragraph 6, the District may, in its sole discretion, withhold payments to the City for services rendered if the City fails to satisfactorily comply with any term or condition of this contract and/or the District’s Operation and Maintenance Manual.

Page 2 of 5

40 1 SECTION I11 - PROJECT TIME 2 The City agrees to perform the Project to the satisfaction of the District prior to June 30,

3 1994. The District may grant extensions or terminate this contract and require all sums advanced to

4 the city to be repaid if the City fails to perform by said date.

5 SECTION IV - GENERAL 6 1. The City will complete the Project as set forth in Exhibit “A“. The City staff 7 personnel responsible for coordination work under this contract are as listed below: 8 Mark T. Calhoun, Director of Public Works 9 W. Curtis Chandler, Land Development Manager Carl Noyes, Support Services Manager 10 2. In addition tothe specific terms set forth in this Contract,the parties hereto shall be 11 subject to and governed by the District’s Operation and Maintenance Manual, and any applicable 12 13 portions of the Policies and Procedures adopted by the District. 14 3. It is the intent of theDistrict that scheduling of maintenance and repair of drainage 15 and flood control facilities in general and Master Plan Facilities specifically be coordinated among 16 entities. Therefore, in those cases where Master Plan approved and District-funded projects have

17 regional flood control significance impacting more than one entity, the City will allow all impacted

18 entities an opportunity to review the maintenance schedule in order to coordinate maintenance efforts.

19 4. The Chief Engineer of theDistrict shall be responsible for monitoring the 20 performance of the City, approval for payment of billings and expenses submitted by the City and the 21 acceptance of any reports provided by the City. The City shall be responsible for monitoring . 22 performance of City staff or private contractors, and the City shall maintain detailed records of all 23 payments made to contractors and make such records available to the District upon request. 24 25 26 27 Page 3 of 5 28 41 1 5. The City shall provide right of access to its facilities to the District or Chief Engineer

2aIt all reasonable times, in order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance, and/or quality

3aLssurance under this contract.

1 6. In the event the City fails to perform the maintenance according tothe standards

5specified in this contract and in the District's Operation and Maintenance Manual, the District may

jerform or cause to be performed the maintenance necessary to assure proper operation of the

7facility. Cost incurred by the District shall be reimbursed by the city or be deducted from the amount B authorized by this contract. The District may not exercise this right without giving the City specific 9 V vritten notice of the maintenance required and allowing the City 60 days within which to perform 0 S aid maintenance. The notice required by this provision must be sent to: 1 Mark T. Calhoun, Director of Public Works 2 240 Water Street 3 Henderson, NV 89015 i 7. The records of the City and/or private contractors pertaining to the subject matter of j tl his contract shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by the District, County

61iuditor, or an Agent of the District.

7 8. If any provision of this contract shallbe deemed in conflict withany statute or rule of

8 1;aw, such provision shall be deemed modified to be in conformance with said statute or rule of law.

9 9. All parties to this contract shall comply with applicable local, state, and federal laws. 0 10. Any costs found to be improperly allocated in the project willbe refunded by the City 1 tl o the District. 2 11. Itis specifically understood and agreed to byand between the parties hereto that itis 3 rlot intended by any of the provisions of any part of this contract to create in the public or any 4 nember thereof a third party beneficiary hereunder, or to authorized anyone not a party to this 5 6 7 Page 4 of 5 8 42 1 contract to maintain a suit for personal injuries or property damage pursuant to the terms or 2 provisions of this contract. 3 12. The City hereby indemnifies and shall defend andhold harmless theDistrict, its

4 representatives gdtheir employees (or their authorized representatives) from and against any and all

6 suits, actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims, demands, damages, liabilities, interest,

€ attorney’s fees, costs and expenses whatsoever of any kind or nature whether arising before or after c 1 completion of the work hereunder and in any manner directly or indirectly caused, occasioned or

contributed to in whole or in part, by reason of any act, omission, fault or negligence whether active E or passive of the City, of anyone acting under its direction or control, or on its behalf in connection 1c with or incident to the performance of this Contract. The City’s aforesaid indemnity and hold 11 harmless obligations, or portions or applications thereof, shall apply to the fullest extent permitted by 12 law, but in no event shall they apply to liability caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct 13 14 of the party indemnified or held harmless. 15 ...... CITY OF HENDERSON 16 Date of Council Action: 17 BY: LORNA KESTERSON, Mayor 1E ATTEST: l! COLLEEN BELL, City Clerk 2r ...... 2: CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 21 Date of District Action: 2: BY: MICHAEL HARRIS, Chairman 21 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 21 DEANNA LEFKO, Board Secretary 2( CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS, Deputy District Attorney 29 Page 5 of 5 21 1993-1994 MAINTENANCE PROGRAM - -.-I-, I r' CITY OF HENDERSON I I \\ L

I EXHIBIT - A faster Halctenance Chacne! Pro!! TO Yaictenance Flan NumkerFlan ?r!n To Nare Alaount Nugber KC! ii!N 61 0184 am c- 1 Olsen Street !Uss~onDrive S2i, 324 CGW BEN 82 eeae 0083 Greenway C-! Channel BlackHtn Golf Course 58,225 PTVW HBN 03 5237 8389 Van Wagenen Sake Nead 9!ve Avenue Yelor Sll,lE3 PTGB BKN 04 0057 0288 Glb30n Boulder Highway WarnSprlngs Road $18,387 PTDC IIKN 05 0014 0237 Lower Pittman Russell Road WarmSprings Road S16,067 PTWABKN 06 leaf 0411 Upper Pittman Warm Springs$40,148 Road Road Pebble PTRW HKN 87 0000 0131 UPRR Pittlnan Wash Road Pecos s10,073 FTSW BIN 08 00110 0105 Sandwedge Pittaan Wash DriveHeadLake sgma WWDC RSN 09 0069 Whit ney Ranch Pittman $16,049Wash Road Sunset DCWA HKN 10 6646 0763 Duck Creek Sunset Road Road Pecos S11,816 Total 5177,082

45 I CITY OF EBNDBRSON CLARK COUNTY RtXIONRL PLOOO CONTROL DISTRICT 199311994 HRINTBNRNCE WORK PROGRRH \ ClCE 199311991StreetFAON Oleen ERN I1 I181-I635 TO HlsslonDrive Iter Category Iter Unlts Ire uency Plannin HaintHalntPent BqulLabor Nalnt Halnt Haterlal llqulprent VI I Stanbar8 RPoulred Oor Suo Worker Pnromnn Worker Forenan TotalCoat ~ ~- 8 IS200ldayl IS3llldayl IOII Inspect Channels 5.1 rllee 100 1.5 nllday 1 Su ervlsor 0.0’ $468 $620 SI 911 S1,038 1 dnt Yorker I E Oper L. Supervlsor I Plckup 8ttI VegetationControl 1.0 rlles 1eo 1.5 mllday 1 Su ervleor 8.0 0.0 SI so SI SI se 1 Hah Worker Bq Oper b Supervisor I Sprayer I I131 Clean and Reshape - 3.8 rlles 67 9.5 lllday 1 Su ervlsor 10.2 5.1 S1,tlE SI, 548 $11,891 $5,991 S21,619 Channels 1 Naht Worker 2 Bq 0 er b Supervisor 1 Duap!.ruck,scraper, gradall I10 Repalrllned 2.0 eech 18 1.0 ealday 1 Su ervlsor 0.0 0.4 980 $61 $228 SI 5369 channel8 2 Haynt Worker B Oper L 6u ervlsor P?ckupflatled, concrete rlxer 050 Cleanlflush Culvert 3.1 e8Ch 1 IO 10.1 day 1 Su ervlsor 0.6 0.3 $61 $91 98 $361 S651 1 .Hafnt. - .. . Worker.. .. 2 Eq Oper b Supervisor I DUP~truck, uater tanker, vactor

It65 Broslon Control 100 Iln ft 109 259.9 1.ft.lday ervlsor1 Su 1.1 6.8 $16) $122 5366 S928 $192 Repairs 1 Hah Worker 1 Bq Oper L Supervlsar 1 Dump truck, alr compressor, plckup 1010 Ilalntaln1repalr 15201 lln ft 1.5 100.0 ervlsorftldayllnSu 1 0.1 I .5 $304 9231 $491 fencing 2 Hah Worker 4 Bq Oper b Supervlsor 1 Pence truck, concrete nlxer Total $26,013

I Rdnlnlstratlon 5. 0 percent s1,301 Total 1111 Nalntenance Rctlvltles $21.324 CITY 01 EBNDBRSON 1 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 199311994 NJUNTENRNCB WORK PROGERH PROHChannel199111994 C1 199211993 12 TO BlackNountein Golf Course Itea Category Itea Unlts Plennin Labor BqulPent Nalnt Nalnt hint hint Naterlal Bqulpaenttotal Standar! RequiredOpr e SupWorker Foremen Worker Foreran Cost Nan Dave Nan Days Man Days (SZIDlday) (9314lday) 1111 Inspect Channels 1.8 mlle8 2.5 allday I Su ervlsor 1.0' 8.3 8.3 $64 $91 $1 $2 $163 1 Na!nt Worker 1 B Oper b Supervlaor 1 Plckup 1120 Vegetation Control 1.2 alles 1.5 mllday 1 Su ervlsor 0.1 t.1 $53 SI1 $214 $53 $361 2 llah Worker Bq Oper C Supervisor 1 Sprayer 1138 Clean and Reshape 9.8 miles 1.5 nllday 1 Su ervisor 2.1 1.1 $214 $326 $2,291 S1,24I $1,556 Channel! 1 NaPnt Worker 2 Bq 0 er C Supervlsor 1 Dun !ruck,scraper, graiall 9841 Repalc lined 1.1 each 1.0 ealday 1 Su ervisor 8.9 9.1 $4) $31 $114 $1 $164 channels 2 dnt Worker B Oper b Su ervlsor Plckupflatled, concrete alter 0151 Cleanlflusb Culvert 5.) each 11.1 day 1 Su ervlsor 1*I 1.1 9100 SI52 SI 3 $611 $1,085 1 Nafnt Worker 2 Bq Oper b Supervisor 1 Dun truck, uater der, vactor

0865 BroslonControl lee lin ft 251.1 l.ft.1day 1 Su ervisor 8.4 SI61 $122 S366 SI92 $928 Repairs 2 Nah Worker I 'a4 1 Bq Oper b Supervlsor 1 Dump truck, alr compressor, pickup 117) Naintalnlrepalr 68et lln ft IO@.# lln ftlday 1 Su ervlsor 1.0 8.3 $121 $91 $158 9194 $563 f 1encng 2 naPnt Worker Bq Oper b Supervlsor I Pence truck, concrete mlier Total $7 ,833

Administration 5 .Ipercent $392 Total All Naintenance Activities S8,225 CITY OP BKNCBRSON CLARK COUNTY RIGIONAL PLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 199311994 KAINIBNRNCB HOAR PAOCRAN ervv 199311991PRONDrive Nead Lake I23?.:?89 TO Nalor iwenue em CategoryIt em Units !re uency Plennin Labor Bqui nent naint Naint naint 1 uip Opr Nalnt Rateriallqulpment Total ‘I\] Standar! Required Opr e Sup Worker Foreman Worker Super Foremen Cost Nan Days Ian Days Hen Day8 [S2901day) (S22lldayl (53O!lday) IO1IInspect Channels 1.5 rile3 111 2.5ervisor nilday Su 1 8.0 1.6 0.6 $120 so S182 SO 93 5385 1 naynt Worker O 1 Oper b Supervisor 1 PPckup I821 Vegetation Control 4.0 Biles 180 1 .5 nllday ervisor1 Su 0.0 9.0 0.9 St so SI S0 se SB 2 Rah Uorker Bq Oper b Supervlsor I 1 Sprayer IO38 Cleanand Reshape 1.5 riles 67 8.5 mllday 4.0ervisor 1 Su 2.1 2.0 S492 sea4 $61 1 S2,332$4,381 se, 530 Channels I Nah Worker 2 Bq 0 er b Supervisor 1 Dump!ruck,scraper, gradall 9Bl9 Repairlined 0.t each I8 1.0 ealday I Su ervlsor n,e 8.0 1.0 SI SI SO channels 2 Nsh Wcrker Bq Oper b Su ervisor Plckup, flatled, concrete mixer N5I C:eanlflush Culvert 4.1 each 1 ea 10.0 day 0.8ervisor 1 Su 8.4 0.4 sa1 $176 SI22 1 Nah Worker 2 tq Oper 6 Supervisor 1 Dum truck, uster tanfer, vactor

8365 Brosion Controlle0 lin It 109 2sa.8 l.ft,/day 1 su ervlsor 0.4 e.8 ,9.4 SI69 S88 SI22 5366 SI92 $928 Repair3 2 Neh Worker I 1 lq Opsr L Supervisor 1 Dunp truck, air I coapressor, pickup 0011 Naintainlrepair 0 lln ft 0.5 1I1.O lln ftlday 1 Supervisor 0.0 0.0 0.8 SI st SO SO SI SI d fenclng 2 Ha,nt Worker Iq Oper b Supervlsor 1 Pence truck, concrete mlner Total S10,631

I Administration 5.0 percent S532 Total 111 Naintenance Actlvlties $11,163

I P ? 00 CITY OF UNNDNRSON CLARK COUNTY RNCIONAL fLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 199311991 llAINT1NLNCN WORK PROCRRH PTCB FROnBoulder Uighuay 199311994 BNN Ok 105J-OlI8 TOWarm Springs Road Equipment Total Itea Category Itea Units Ire uency Plannin Labor NqulPentnaint naint Haint E uip Opr Naint Materiel Standar! RequiredWorkerfOremanSup Opr Worker I Super ?orenan cost ?tI Nan Oavs Nan Davs Han Davs IS280ldayl ISlZUdayl IS3Wdayl St 53 s315 8011 Inspect Channels 1.5 riles 1 II 2.5 lllday 1 Su ervisor 0.8' 1.6. 0.6. sile S6 SI82 1 Naynt Worker I Ka Oper L Supervisor 1 Pickup . SI 98 se 0029 VegetationControl 1.0 Piles 190 1.5 Illday 1 Su ervisor 0.0 0.0 SI $8 $1 2 Na!nt Worker Nq Oper C Supervisor 1 Sprayer 98,539 0030 Cleanand Reshape 1.5 miles 67 1.5 nilday 1 Su ervisor 1.0 2.0 S412 see4 S611 s4,391 S2,332 Chanstla 1 laht Worker 2 Nq 0 er C Supervlsor 1 Dump!ruck,scraper, gradall S0 S0 SO St 1818 Repairlined 0.0 each 11 1.1 ealday 1 Su ervlsor 0.0 0.0 so St channels 2 Naht Worker B Oper L Su ervisor PPckup, flatled, concrete lixer S4,88) 98,616 115I Cleenlfltsh Culvert 2.8 each 1 CI 1.5 day 1 Su ervisor 4.0 4.6 S888 91,768 S1,216 SI60 1 Maynt Worker 2 Nq Oper C Supervisor 1 Dum truck, water tanier, vector so S1 SI se I865 Nrosion Control 9 lin ft 101 250.8 1.ft.lday 1 Su ervisor 0.0 e.0 SI SI Repalrs 2 Naht Worker I 1 Nq Oper L Eupervlsor 1 DUMP truck, air conpressor, plckup so SI 0171 Nalntainlrepalr I lin ft 1.5 1M.t lin ftlday 1 Su ervlsor e.0 0.6 so $1 $8 s0 fencing 2 Naynt Worker Nq Oper C Supervlsor I Fence truck, concrete alxer $11,512 Total S816 Admlnlstratlon 5. t percent Total All naintefiance Actlvltles S18.381 P v) I

CITY OF’ MNDIRSON CLAM COUNTY RKCIONliL FLOOD COllTROL DISTRICT 199311994 NAINTBNANCK WORK PROCRRN PTDC PRONRoad Russell 199311994 BKN IS Ot11-.9!31 TO SpringsWarn Road Iter Category UnitsCategory Iter F‘rePlannln uency Labor #qui Kalnttent Kelnt Nalnt K ulp Opr Nelnt NaterlalBqulpaent Total ‘I\ 1 St andar8Required Opr Yorker1lorenan Sup Worker Poretan er? Su cost Nan DaysNan Days Nan Days (S2001day) (S22t1k3yl (S3041day) 1111Channels Iaspect 2.2 rlles 2.5 lee nllday ervisor 1 Su 0.6 1.9 0.P 9176 $0 5268 90 54 S44B 1 Na!nt Yorker 9 I Oper L Supervisor 1 Pqckup 0010 VegetationControl 8.8 niles 1 le 1.5 nllday ervisor 1 Su 0.0 0.0 0.0 SI S8 $0 St S8 SI 1 Hah Yorker Kg Oper C Supervlsor 1 Sprayer Clean and Reshape0838 and Clean 2.1 niles 61 t.5 milday 1 Su ervisor 5.9 2.9 2.9 $599 SI, 297 $896 ~6,319 slt,511~3,112) Chann-Is 1 Naht Worker 2 lq 0 et L Supervlsor 1 Dump!ruct,scraper, gradall 0040 Repair lined 1.1 each 1.1 ealday 1 Su ervisar 0.0 t.2 0.1 $49 S1 538 5114 SI Sl84 channels 2 NaPnt Worker K Oper C Su ervisor Pqctup f laded, concrete nixer 0051 CleanlflushCulvert 8.0 each 188 11.1 day 1 Su ervisot 1.0 1.1 8.) st S1 51 sa SI so 1 Nafnt Yorker 2 lq Oper C Supervlsor 1 Dum truck, water tanier, vactor

(165 KroslonControl 0 lin ft 110 250.9 1.ft.ldayervisor Su 1 1.9 9.1 /l.0 SO st st so SI $0 Repairs 2 Hah Worker I 1 Kq Oper L Supervisor 1 Duep truck, air Compressor, plckup 0178 Kalntainlrepalr !I100 lln It C.1 180.11ftlday lin Su ervisor 0.1 2.3 1 .2 $468 se $350 fencing Worker 2 Nafnt lq Oper C Supervisor 1 Fence truck, concrete nixer Total s1s,3e2 i Adeinistratlon 5. II percent $765 Total 1111 Naintenance Activities S16,OC’I ! cn # 0 CITY Or EBNDBRSON CLARK COUNTY RBGIONAL PLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 199311994 HAINTINRNCE WORK PROCRRH PTWl !RON Warm Sprln s Road199311991 ERN 06 OB90.-14ll TO Pebble Roa! Iter Category Iter Plannlnuency PreUnlts Labor HaintpentHaintBquiNalnt HalntBNaterlalOpr uip BqulPment Total St andar! RequiredOpc 1Worker Sup f'orernan WorkerSu er !OreMan cost Nan DaysNan Days Hen Days[Stttldayl IS2191f;ayllS3l1ldayl 1111 Inspect Channels k.1109 riles 2.5 Mildayervisor 1 Su 0.e 1.6 1.6 $328 $0 s499 $8 $6 $835 1 naPnt Worker 1 B Oper L Supervisor 1 P!ckup c' 9929 Vegetation Control 1.9 riles 198 1,s mllday 1 Su ervisoc 9.9 1.3 8.7 St67 $9 $203 S1 ,968 $267 S1,6I1 Downstream of Wlquan 2 Hah Worker Bq Oper C Supervisor 1 Sprayer 9130 Clean and Reshape 1.1 miles 67 8.5 rilday ervisor1 Su 11 .a 5.5 5.5 $11,757Sl,670S2,417 S1,899 S6,373 S23,317 Chamels 1 HaPnt Worker 2 Bq 0 er C Supervisor 1 Dunp!ruck,scraper, gradall 8619 Repair lined 1.9 each 10 ervisor1.9 ealdaySu 1 1.0 1.2 8.1 $40 SI $39 $114 so SI84 channels 2 dnt Worker B Oper C Su ervisor Pjckupflatled, concrefe mlxer 8951 CleanlflushCulvert 1.1 each lee 118.0 Cay Sue.2 ervisor 0.1 0.1 S2I $44 530 $3 $121 $217 1 Ha! nt Worker 2 8q Oper L Supervisor 1 Dum truck, water tanfer, vactor

8065 BroslonCmtral :Cta lin ft !00 3e.a 1.ft.lday 1 Supervisor 8.8 16.9 9.8 S3,NO $1,769 S2,+32 $7,328 S3,84I S18,560 Pepalrs Downstream Pepalrs of 2 Hamt Worker Wiguac 1 Wiguac lq Oper L Supervlsor 1 Dump truck, alr compressor, pickup $323 S161 $323 S939

Mal 545,855

A4a!nlstratlon 5. I percent 52,293 TQ'.ai 111 HalQecance kctlvit!os S48,118 i

PTRW PROH PittmanWash 159311994 EKN (7 I00W31 TOPecos Road em CategoryIt em Units Ire uency Plannln Labor Nalntment Equl hint hint E ulp Opr Naint Naterlal Bquipnent Total Standar! RequlredOpr e SupWorker foreman Worker !Super Foreman cast Nan Days Man Days Han Days (S20lldayl 1 S220lday) (S314lday) 1811 Inspect Channels 1.3 Biles 101 2.5 nilday 1 Su ervisor 0.1 0.5 0.5 SI04 S8 SI58 SI SI S265 1 nah Worker 0 B Oper L Supervisor -. 1 Pfckup 1020 Vegetatlon Control 0.0 alles 1 et 1.5 nllday ecvlsor1 Su 0.0 1.9 1.0 St SI $0 so SI St 2 nah Worker E9 Oper C Supervisor I 1 Sprayer 1130 Clean and Reshape 1.3 miles 67 O.S mllday 1 Su ervisor 3.5 1.1 1.1 S348 S166 5531 S3,728 S2,Ul $7,393 Channels 1 Iaht Yorker 2 Iq 0 er & Supervisor 1 Dump!ruct,scraper, gradal 1 0040 Repair lined 0.0 each 10 1.0 ealday 1 Superviaor 0.8 0.0 0.8 SS so S0 SI SI SO channels 2 naint Yorker E Oper L Su ervisor Pyckup, flatled, concrete mixer It4 1a.e ervlsor1 Su 0.4 1.2 1.2 048 $88 56 1 95 S24I 5434 1 nah Yorker 2 Rq Oper L Supervisor 1 Dum truck, water tanier, vactor

0865 !roslon Control I lin ft 100 250.0 I.ft.ldayervisor 1 Su 0.0 0.0 0.0 $9 SI SI SI SI $0 Repalrs 2 Haht Yorker 1 Eq Oper L Supervisor 1 Dump truck, air coapressor, pickup 1011 Yalntainlrepair IEI00 lin ft 1.5 188.0ervisor ftldaylinSu 1 0.0 1.6 0.8 S32I SI $243 SS16 s422 s1,sez 4 fencing 2 naht Worker Eq Oper 1 Supervlsor 1 fence truck, concrete mixer s9,593 Tot 3 1 i ldrlnistratlon 5. I percent S480 Total 1111 HalnterLance ActiVltie8 S10,073 .. I VI 4 I4 CITY OF ERNDIRSOH CLARK COUNTY RRCIONll PlOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 199311994 NAINTEtNNCI WORK PROCRRN PT SY 199311994Wash Plttaen FRON BIN IS oaea-0115 TO DriveHeadlake Item Category Item Unlta Plannin Labor Nalntment Bqui Na i nt Helnt B uip Opr Naint Naterlal Bquipqent Total Standar! RequlredOpr 1 SupWorker Foreman Worker su er Qorenan cost Nan Days Hen Days Nan Days Is2801dayl ,S2201~syl (S3041dayl 6OII Inspect Channels 1.1 ailes 2.5 ailday I Su ervisor 0.0- 0.4 0.4 sea SI 5134 SI s2 $224 1 NaPnt Worker 8 E Oper b Supervieor \ 1 Plckup 0020Vegetation Control 3.1 riles 1.5 nilday 1 6u ervleor 0.0 0.1 8.1 $21 so s20 SI07 $27 SI e0 2RP5 nt Worker 81 Oper 6 %pervisor I Sprayer 0830 Cleanand Reshape 1.1 mlles 0.5 mliday 1 Su ervisor 2.0 1.5 1.5 $295 S649 St48 s3,151 S1,118 SE, 256 Channels I Nah Worker 2 la Operb Supervisor 1 Dusptruck,sciaper, gradall I040 Repsirlined 1 .0 each 1.0 ealday 1 Su ervisor 0.0 0.: 0.1 S40 se $31 SI14 SI SIB4 channels 2 Hah Worker K Oper C Su ervisor Plckupflatled, concrete mlv.er I058 Cleanlflush Culvert 3.1 each 10.6 day 1 Su ervlsor 0.6 0.3 1.3 560 $132 s91 sa $368 S651 1 Hah Worker 2 Eq Oper 6 Supervisor 1 Dum truck, uater tanPer, vactor

0065 Brasion Control la0 lin ft 258.0 l.ft.1day 1 Su ervlsor 0.4 0.0 ,0*4 SI60 s00 SI22 $366 s192 $920 Repairs 2 Hah Worker 1 lq Oper b Supervisor 1 Dump truck, air conpressor; pickup 0011 Haintainirepair ll600 lia ft 100.1 lin ftlday 1 Su ervisor 0.0 1 .I 6.5 S26U SI S152$939 S264 SI23 fencing 2 !!ah Worker Eq Oper b Supervisor 1 Pence truck, concrete mixer Tat a 1 59,362

lJrlnistration 5. e percent $468 Tctal A11 H3lntenscce k:l~/liles $9,836 CITY OF EiNDIRSON CLARK COUNTY RBCIONIL FLOOD COtiTROL DISTRICT 1993/1994 HRINTBNINCK WORK PROGARH DCYA PAON 199311994SunsetRoad 10 8646-m TO PecosRoad Iten Category UnitsCategory Iten Pre uency Plannln Labor Equi sent Naint Haint hint Mint Heterial EquipmentTotal 711 Standar8 Required Opr Sup Yorker Poreean Worker Poreaan Coat Nan DaysP Han Day6 Hen Days (S200ldayl lS3041day) 6118 InspectChannels 1.2 nile3 I 11 2.5 milday ervisor 1 Su 1.1 1.5 0.5 $96 $146 SI 52 s244 I Nafnt Worker I K Oper 6 Supervlsor / 1 Plctup 8020 Veqetat!on Control 0.3 nlles 1 88 1.5 mllday 1 S3 ervisor 0.4 8.4 8.2 $80 S61 9228 $217 $684 2 HaPnt Yorker

I 0038 Clan andReshape 1.1 niles 67 9.5 nllday 1 Su ervisor2 .? 1.3 1.3 S268 5187 S2,86E $1,554 55,697 Channels I Hah Worker 2 Kq 0 er L Supervi6or I Dunp!ruck,scraper, gradall 1140 Repairllned 1 .o each 180 1.0 ealday ervlsor1 Su 0.0 2.0 1 .8 $400 $304 S1,148 St Sl,844 channels 2 NaPnt Yorker 19 Oper C Su ervlsor Pickup, flatled, concrete rlxer 8151 Cleanlf1u;h Culvert 8.0 each 118 II.0 day ervisor1 Su 0.0 0.0 1.8 so SE SI SI so 1 Haht Worker 2 Kq Oper C Supervlsor 1 Dum truck, uster tanler. vactor

0965 KroslonControl zeo lin ft 106 250.0 1.ft.lday 1ervleor Su 9.8 1.6 6.B $320 $241 $733 $381 S1,856 Repairs Repalr Eroslon UaEa e 2 HaPnt Worker I near Sunset Cllffs I(r1dge I Kg Oper C Supervleor 1 Dump truck, air I colcpressor, pickup 0178 Halntainlrepalr l00E0 lin ft 0.5 108.8 lln ftldayervisor 1 Su 0.0 1 .E 1.5 SZEE SI52 d fencing 1~ NaPnt. ~~ Worker Kq Oper C Supervlsor 1 Pence truck, concrete mlner Total $11,254 i Ilrlnistration 5.8 percent $563 Total All Haintenance Act Ivit!es 511,816

I v1 t P CITY 01 BBIKIERSON CLARK COUNTY RBGIOIIlL lLOODCGNTROL DISTRICT 1993l1994 HAINWNANC! WORK PAOGAAH WWDC PROM Plttran Wash 199311994 BIN E9 0800-1069 TO SunsetRoad Item Category Units Pre uency Plennin uency Pre Units Category Item Labor [qui lent Halnt Haint hint E Oprulp hint NaterlalBquipaent Total !\I Standar! Required OprSup WorkerForemanWorker ,j2;yier lareran COBt Hen Days Nan Day8 Han Days (S288ldayl ayI (S304ldayl 1014 Inspect1014 Channels 4.1 riles111 2.5 rilday ervisor1 Su 0.1 8.3 0.3 $56 SR $E5 SI 91 $143 1 Nah Worker 0 B Oper C Supervlsor 1 Pyckup 0920 VeqetationControl 9.1189 rlles 1.5 0llday ervisor1 Su 0.6 8.9 8.5 sle7 so SI42 s74e Sl87 $1,263 2 Hah Worker Bq Oper C Supervisor 1 Sprayer 0839 Clean and Reshspe 0.7 rlles 67 0.5 milday ervlsor1 Su 1.9 8.9 slee 8.9 Chamels Worker 1 MaPnt 1 51 ODer L SuDervisor 1 Ddnptruck,sciaper, gradall 8048lined Repalr 1.8 each I0 1.0 ea:day 1 Suoervlsor 0.0 0.2 0.1 SI0 channels Worker 2 Halnt B Oper C Su ervlsor Plckup, f laded, concrete 0ixer 0050 CleanlflcsbCulvert 2.0 each IOU 11.8 day ervlsor1 Su 8.4 0.2 0.2 S4R 1 nafnt Worker 2 Bg Oper C Supervlsor 1 Dump truck, uater tanker, vactor

I865 BroslonControlI865 :EO0 lin ft 100 150.8 l.ft./dayervisor Su 1 4.0 E.O 4.8 S1,608 see SI, 216 SI, 664 S1,920 SO, 289 ReF8lrS 2 Haht Worker 1 Eq Oper & Supervlsor 1 Dump truck, air compregsor, pickup 8075 Fepalr8075 In1et;Outflou 0 each ervisor100 Su 1 9.95 day p2r 0.0 0.0 0.0 SI Structures Worker 4 Hafntenance 2 Bq Operator C Supervisor 1 Dunp truck, loader, backhoe 0819 Halntalnlrepair 0 lin ft 0.5 ftlday lin100.0 1 Su ervlsor 0.0 0.0 e.0 $9 fenclng 2 fenclng Hah Worker Bq Oper C Scpervlsor 1 Pence truck, concrete mixer Total 515,2811 Administratian 5.8 percent $164 Total 1111 Haintenance Act!v:ties $16,149 CLARK COUNTY

REGIONALFLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT bGENDA ITEN

SUBJECT : INTERLOCALCONTRACT - ANNUALMINTENANCE PROGRAM

PETITIONER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

RECOMMENDATIONOF PETITIONER: Thatthe District approve thisInterlocal Contract for the maintenance of RegionalFlood Control facilities for FY 93-94.

FISCAL IMPACT: $43 1,500

BACKGROUND: The District has contracted with its member entities for the maintenance of RegionalFlood Control facilities located within their corporate boundaries. ThisInterlocal Contract will providefunding for the Maintenance Program out1 ined in Exhi bits "A" and "By to this Interlocal Contract.

Richard D. Goecke, Director 7/8/93 Department of Public Works 1 INTERLOCAL CONTRACT 2 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

3 THISCONTRACT, made enteredand into thisday of 9 4 1993, by and between the CITYOF LAS VEGAS, a political subdivisionof the State 5 of Nevada, hereinafter referred to as"CITY", the CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD 6 CONTROL DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT". 7 WITNESSETH 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the 9 DISTRICT may approve and fund projects to maintainflood control improvements; 10 and 11 WHEREAS, the CITY desires to maintain control flood improvements within the 12 CITY in accordance with the maintenance program set forth on the attached 13 Exhibits "A" and "B" and hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and 14 WHEREAS, the facilitiesupon which maintenancewill be done are facilities 15 described in the DISTRICT'S Master Plan. 16 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, 17 and promises of the parties hereto, the DISTRICT authorizes the PROJECTas it is 18 mutually understood and agreed as follows: 19 SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT 20 This Interlocal Contract applies to the maintenance of flood control 21 facilities, which are identifiedin the DISTRICT'S Master PlanUpdate. The basic 22 maintenance activities will be: channel inspections, cleaning and reshaping 23 channels, vegetation control, repair of lined channels, cleaning and flushing

57 1 culverts, erosion control maintenance and repair, and maintenance of fencing. 2 The PROJECT is more specifically described in Exhibits "A" and "B" which are 3 attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. 4 SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS 5 The District agrees to provide reimbursement for PROJECT costs within the 6 limits specified below: 7 1. The PROJECT costs shall not exceed $431,500. A written request must 8 be made to the DISTRICT and a Supplemental Interlocal Contract 9 approved to increase the amountnoted above prior to payment of any 10 additional funds. 11 2. The CITY and DISTRICT will comply with Section 4.12 of the Operation 12 and Maintenance Manual. In accordance with said manual the CITY 13 shall submit invoices together with a detailed summary ofreport the 14 maintenance service performed. The CITY shall submit an invoice 15 voucher prepared in dupl icate in the manner prescribed by the 16 DISTRICT.The vouchers shallinclude such information as is 17 necessaryfor the DISTRICT todetermine the nature of all 18 expenditures. Each voucher will clearly indicate that it is for 19 services rendered in performance under this Contract. Each voucher 20 will also be accompanied by a written certification from the CITY 21 stating that it is for performance of maintenance activities under 22 this Contract and is composed of completed elements set forthin the 23 annual work program.

2 1 All invoices must be submitted for payment to: 2 Clark County Regional Flood Control District 3 301 East Clark Avenue-Sui te 301 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 5 Attention: Virginia Bax-Valentine 6 General Manager/Chief Engineer 7 Payment shall be considered timelyif made by the DISTRICT within45 days. a Pursuant to Section IV, Paragraph 6, the DISTRICT may, in its sole discretion, 9 withhold payments to the CITY for services rendered if the CITY fails to 10 satisfactorily comply with any term or condition of this Contract and/or the 11 DISTRICT'S Operation and Maintenance Manual. 12 SECTION I11 - PROJECT TIME 13 The CITY agrees to perform the PROJECT to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT 14 prior to June 30, 1994. The DISTRICT may grant extensions or terminate this 15 Contract and require all sums advanced to the CITYbe torepaid if the CITY fails 16 to perform by said date. 17 SECTION IV - GENERAL 18 1. The CITY will complete the PROJECT as set forthin Exhi bits "A" and 19 "B". The CITY staff personnel responsible for coordination work 20 under this Contract are as listedbelow: 21 Richard D. Goecke, Director of Public Works 22 Charles Kajkowski, City Planning Engineer 23 It is understood that staffnamed above will be responsible for work

59 1 coordination throughout the period of this Contract unless the 2 DISTRICT is informed in writing of changes in these personnel 3 assignments. 4 2. In addition to the specific terms set forthin this Contract, the 5 parties hereto shall be subject to and governed by the DISTRICT’S 6 Operation and Maintenance Manual and any applicable portions of the 7 Pol icies and Procedures adopted by the DISTRICT. 8 3. It is the intent of the DISTRICT that scheduling of maintenanceand 9 repair of drainage and flood control facilities in general and 10 Master Plan Facilities specificallybe coordinated among entities. 11 Therefore, in those cases where Master Plan approvedand DISTRICT- 12 funded projects have regional flood control significance impacting 13 more than one entity, the CITYwill allow all impacted entities an 14 opportunityto review the maintenance schedule in orderto 15 coordinate maintenance efforts. 16 4. TheChief Engineer of the DISTRICT shall be responsiblefor 17 monitoring the performance of the CITY, approval for payment of 18 billings and expenses submitted by the CITY and the acceptance of 19 any reports provided by the CITY. The CITYshall be responsible for 20 monitoring performance of CITY staff or private contractorsand the 21 CITY shall maintain detailed records of all payments made to 22 contractors and make such records available to the DISTRICT upon 23 request.

4 1 5. The CITY shall provide right of access to its facilities to the 2 Chief Engineer of the DISTRICTat all reasonable times in order to 3 monitor and evaluateperformance, compliance, and/or quality 4 assurance under this Contract. 5 6. In the event the CITY fails to perform the maintenance according to 6 the standards specified in this Contract and in the DISTRICT’S 7 operation and Maintenance Manual, the DISTRICT may perform or cause 8 to be performed the maintenance necessary to assure proper operation 9 of the facility. Costs incurredby the DISTRICTshall be reimbursed 10 by the CITY or be deducted from the amount authorized by this 11 Contract. The DISTRICT may not exercise this right without giving 12 the CITY specific written notice of the maintenance required and 13 allowing the CITY60 days within which to performsaid maintenance. 14 The notice required by this provision must be sent to: 15 Richard D. Goecke, Director of Public Works 16 City of Las Vegas 17 400 East Stewart Avenue 18 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 19 7. The records of the CITY and/or private contractors pertaining to the 20 subject matter of this Contract shall at all reasonable times be 21 subject to inspection and audit by the DISTRICT, County Auditor or 22 an Agent of theDISTRICT. 23 a. If any provision of this Contractshall be deemed in conflict with

61 1 any statute or rule oflaw, such provision shallbe deemed modified 2 to be in conformance with said statute or rule law.of 3 9. All parties to this Contract shall comply with applicable local, 4 state and federal laws. 5 10. Any costs found to be improperly allocated in the PROJECT will be 6 refunded by the CITY to the DISTRICT. 7 11. It is specifically understood and agreed to by and between the 8 parties hereto that it is not intended by any of the provisions of 9 any part of this Contract to create in the pub1 ic or any member 10 thereof a third-party beneficiary hereunder or to authorize anyone 11 not a party to this Contract to maintain a suit for personal 12 injuries or property damage pursuant to the termsand provisions of 13 this Contract. 14 12. The CITY hereby indemnifies and shall defend and hold harmless the 15 DISTRICT, its representatives and theiremployees (or their 16 authorized representatives) from and against any and all suits, 17 actions, legal oradministrative proceedings, claims, demands, 18 damages, liabilities, interest, attorney’s fees, costs and expenses 19 whatsoever of any kind or nature whether arising before or after 20 completion of the work hereunder and in any manner directly or 21 indirectly caused, occasioned or contributed in to whole orin part, 22 by reason of any act, omission, fault or negligence whether active 23 or passive of the CITY, of anyone acting under its direction or

6 1 controlor on itsbehalf in connection with or incident to the 2 performance ofthis Contract. The CITY’S aforesaidindemnity and 3 holdharmless ob1 igations,or portions or appl ications thereof, 4 shall apply to the fullest extent permitted by law but, in noevent,

5 shallthey apply to 1 iabili ty causedby thesole negl igence or

6 willful misconduct of the party indemnified or held harmless.

7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this INTERLOCAL CONTRACT is herebyexecuted as of the 8 date first set forth above. 9 DATE OF DISTRICTACTION: CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD 10 CONTROL DISTRICT

11 ATTEST: BY :

12 MICHAEL R. HARRIS, CHAIRMAN 13 DEANNA LEFKO, SECRETARY 14 APPROVEDAS TO LEGALITY AND FORM: 15

16 CHRISTOPHERD. FIGGINS 17 DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY 18 DATE OF COUNCILACTION: CITY OF LAS VEGAS 19 BY : 20 ATTEST: JAN LAVERTY JONES, MAYOR 21 22 KATHLEENTIGHE, CITY CLERK

23 P:\M.ln93-4.RFC

63 EXHIBIT 'A"

CITY OFLAS VEGAS CLARKCOUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

1993-94 MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN

SUMMARY OF PROJECTS

PRO 3 ECT COST

PROJECT NO. 1. LAS VEGAS WASH, CHARLESTON TO OWENS S 248,000

PROJECT NO. 2. WASHINGTONAVENUE CHANNEL, BRUCE TO LAMB 41,000

PROJECT NO. 3. MEADOWS DETENTION BASIN & DISCHARGE CHANNEL 16,000 PROJECT NO. 4. EXPRESSWAYCHANNEL, RANCHO TO MARTIN LUTHER KING 6,000 PROJECT NO. 5. ANGELPARK DETENTION BASIN (SOUTH HALF) 9,000 PROJECT NO. 6. ANGELPARK OUTFALL AND BUFFALO CHANNEL 20 ,000 PROJECT NO. 7. GOWAN DETENTIONBASINS 49,000 PROJECT NO. 8. GOWAN OUTFALL,DETENTION BASIN TO DECATUR 7 ,000 PROJECT NO. 9. CEDARAVENUE CHANNEL, PECOS TO LAS VEGAS WASH 15,000 PROJECT NO. 10. OAKEY DETENTION BASIN 9,500

PROJECTNO. 11. OAKEY DETENTION BASIN COLLECTION SYSTEM & OUTFALL 11.000 TOTAL 0 & M FOR 93/94 $43 1,500 I U 1. LAS VEGAS WASH, Owens to Charleston 2. WASHINGTONCHANNEL, Bruce to Lamb 3. MEADOWS DETENTIONBASIN AND DISCHARGE CHANNEL 4. EXPRESSWAY(L.V. CREEK) CHANNEL, Rancho to Martin Luther King 5. ANGEL PARK DETENTION BASIN (SOUTH HALF) 6. ANGEL PARK OUTFALL AND BUFFALO CHANNEL 7. GOWAN DETENTIONBASINS (NORTH & SOUTH) 8. GOWAN DETENTIONBASINS OUTFALL, Detention basins to Decatur 9. CEDAR AVENUECHANNEL, Pecos to Las Vegas Wash 10. OAKEY DETENTIONBASIN 11. OAKEYDETENTION BASIN COLLECTION n SYSTEM AND OUTFALL

Operation and Maintenance Projects

EXHIBIT "B" 65 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93

‘TY:of Citv Las DATEVeaas PREPARED: 5/10/93

PROJECT: Maintenance No. 1 Las Veclas Wash, Charleston to Owens

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE

Clean and inspect Inlet/Outlet Structures Inspect Channels Contract Clear and Reshape Channels $248,000 6/94 Vegetation Control Repair Lined channels Clean/Flush Culverts Clean Storm Sewer Lines Storm Sewer Repair Clean and inspect Detention Basins Vegetation Control Detention Basins - Provide/Maintain Erosion Control Erosion Repair Repair InIetlOutflow Structures Fence Repair Maintain Access Road Miscellaneous Work Activities LDELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $248,000

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

C SULTANT/CONTRACTOR: N/A

PROJECT MANAGER: Ed Neddelstrom, P.E. PHONE NUMBER: 229-6272 65a MA1NTENANCE:FORMS 10-18-91 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93

ENTITY: CitvDATEVeaas of Las PREPARED: 5/10/93 PhdJECT: Maintenance No. 2 Washinaton Avenue Channel, Bruce to Lamb

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE Clean and Inspect Inlet/Outlet Structures Inspect Channels

Clear and Reshape Channels FA Vegetation Control $6000 6/94 + Repair Lined channels FA Clean/Flush Culverts 6/94' $10,000 Clean Storm Sewer Lines Storm Sewer Repair Clean and Inspect Detention Basins Vegetation Control Detention Basins Provide/Maintain Erosion Control Erosion Repair $25,000 6/94 * Repair Inlet/Outflow Structures Fence Repair Maintain Access Road Miscellaneous Work Activities

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $41,000

+ Typically these activities are storm related.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CJWSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:.'. N/A PBOJECT MANAGER:HauqsnessLarrv PHONE NUMBER: 229-6227

MA1NTENANCE:FORMS 65b 10-18-91 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93

ITY: Citv of LasDATE Veaas PREPARED: 5/10/93 PROJECT: Maintenance No. 3 Meadows Detention Basin and Discharae Channel

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE FA Clean and Inspect inlet/Outlet Structures $4800 6/94' Inspect Channels Clear and Reshape Channels Vegetation Control Repair Lined channels Clean/Flush Culverts Clean Storm Sewer Lines Storm Sewer Repair FA Clean and Inspect Detention Basins $1 1,200 6/94' Vegetation Control Detention Basins Provide/Maintain Erosion Control - Erosion Repair Repair Inlet/Outflow Structures Fence Repair Maintain Access Road LMiscellaneous Work Activities DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $16,000

+ Typically these activities are storm related.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:N/A PpqJECTMANAGER: LarrvHauasness PHONE NUMBER: 229-6272 65c 1NTENANCE:FORMS a-18-91 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93

EblTITY: Citv of Las DATEVeaas PREPARED: 5/10/93 PhOJECT: Maintenance No. 4 EXDreSSwav Channel. Rancho to Martin Luther Kina

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE FA Clean and Inspect Inlet/Outlet Structures $3000 I6/94' FA Inspect Channels $1 500 6/94 Clear and Reshape Channels FA Vegetation Control $1500 6/94 Repair Lined channels Clean/Flush Culverts Clean Storm Sewer Lines Storm Sewer Repair Clean and Inspect Detention Basins Vegetation Control Detention Basins Provide/Maintain Erosion Control Erosion Repair

* Repair Inlet/Outflow Structures Fence Repair Maintain Access Road Miscellaneous Work Activities DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $6,000 I Typically these activities are storm related.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR: N/A PpqJECT MANAGER: Larrv Hauasness PHONENUMBER: 229-6227 k. CNANCE:FORMS 10-18-91 65F REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93

ENTITY:Citv of Las DATEVeqas PREPARED: 5/10/93 tdJECT: Maintenance No. 5 Anael Park Detention Basin (South Half)

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK PERCENTWORK COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE FA Clean and Inspect In'letlOutlet Structures $1 000 6/94' Inspect Channels Clear and Reshape Channels Vegetation Control Repair Lined channels CleanIFlush Culverts Clean Storm Sewer Lines Storm Sewer Repair FA Clean and Inspect Detention Basins $8000 6/94" Vegetation Control Detention Basins Provide/Maintain Erosion Control Erosion Repair - Repair InletlOutflow Structures Fence Repair Maintain Access Road Miscellaneous Work Activities - DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $9,000

Typically these activities are storm related.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:N/A PBqJECTMANAGER: LarrvHaugsness PHONE NUMBER: 229-6272

1INTENANCE:FORMS 65e .1B-91 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93

EF'TITY:Citv of LasDATE Veaas PREPARED: 5/10/93 PhOJECT: Maintenance No. 6 Anael Park Outfall and Buffalo Channel

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE FA Clean and Inspect InletlOutlet Structures $2000 6/94'

FA Inspect Channels $400 6/94' FA Clear and Reshape Channels $2000 6/94 + Vegetation Control Repair Lined channels

FA Clean/Flush Culverts $1000 6/94 +

FA Clean Storm Sewer Lines $3000 6/94 + Storm Sewer Repair Clean and Inspect Detention Basins Vegetation Control Detention Basins Provide/Maintain Erosion Control Erosion Repair Repair Inlet/Outflow Structures FA Fence Repair $1 1,600 6/94' Maintain Access Road Miscellaneous Work Activities

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $20.000

+ Typically these activities are storm related.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANTKONTRACTOR:N/A Pr'?JECT MANAGER: Larrv HauasnessPHONENUMBER: 229-6272

MA1NTENANCE:FORMS 65f 10-18-91 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM Fy 92/93 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93 ENTITY: Citv of Las Vegas DATE PREPARED: 5/10/93

* JECT: Maintenance No. 7 GowanDetention Basins

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE FA Clean and Inspect lnlet/Outlet Structures $14,000 6/94 inspect Channels Clear and Reshape Channels Vegetation Control Repair Lined channels Clean/Flush Culverts Clean Storm Sewer Lines Storm Sewer Repair FA Clean and Inspect Detention Basins $34,000 6/94" Vegetation Control Detention Basins Provide/Maintain Erosion Control Erosion Repair Repair Inlet/Outflow Structures 'A Fence Repair $1,000 6/94 * Maintain Access Road LMiscellaneous Work Activities DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $49,000 * Typically these activities are storm related.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR:N/A

F JECTMANAGER: Larrv Haucasness PHONENUMBER: 229-6272

,NTENANCE:FORMS 10-18-91 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93

EF'TITY:of Citv Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 5/10/93 PROJECT: Maintenance No. 8 Gowan Outfall from Detention Basin to Decatur

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE FA Clean and Inspect Inlet/Outlet Structures $3,000 6/94 Inspect Channels Clear and Reshape Channels Vegetation Control Repair Lined channels CleanIFlush Culverts FA Clean Storm Sewer Lines $4.000 6/94' Storm Sewer Repair Clean and Inspect Detention Basins Vegetation Control Detention Basins Provide/Maintain Erosion Control Erosion Repair Repair Inlet/Outflow Structures Fence Repair Maintain Access Road Miscellaneous Work Activities DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $7,000

Typically these activities are storm related.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

C"YSULTANT/CONTRACTOR: N/A PROJECTMANAGER: Larrv Hauasness PHONENUMBER: 229-6227

MA1NTENANCE:FORMS 65h 10-18-01 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93

ENTITY: Citv of LasDATE Veaas PREPARED: 5/10/93 PROJECT: Maintenance No. 9 Cedar Avenue Channel, Pecos to Las Veaas Wash

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION CONTRACT ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE FA Clean and Inspect Inlet/Outlet Structures $6,000 6/94'

FA Inspect Channels $3,000 6/94 + Clear and Reshape Channels FA Vegetation Control $3,000 6/94 FA Repair Lined channels $2,000 6/94 Clean/Flush Culverts Clean Storm Sewer Lines Storm Sewer Repair Clean and Inspect Detention Basins Vegetation Control Detention Basins - Provide/Maintain Erosion Control Erosion Repair Repair Inlet/Outflow Structures Fence Repair $1,000 6/94 Maintain Access Road Miscellaneous Work Activities - LDELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $1 5,000

+ Typically these activities are storm related.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

C JSULTANT/CONTRACTOR: N/A .4OJECT MANAGER: Larrv HauasnessPHONE NUMBER: 229-6272 f..AINT€NANC~:FORNS 65i 10-18-91 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93

ENTITY:Citv of Las DATEVeaas PREPARED: 5/10/93 PROJECT: Maintenance No. 10 Oakev Detention Basin

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION-~ ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE FA Clean and Inspect Inlet/Outlet Structures $1,000 6/94 * Inspect Channels Clear and Reshape Channels Vegetation Control Repair Lined channels Clean/Flush Culverts Clean Storm Sewer Lines Storm Sewer Repair FA Clean and Inspect Detention Basins $8,000 6/94 Vegetation Control Detention Basins Provide/Maintain Erosion Control Erosion Repair Repair InletlOutflow Structures FA Fence Repair $500 6/94 Maintain Access Road Miscellaneous Work Activities L L DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $9,500

* Typically these activities are storm related. WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER: 4

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

C ISULTANT/CONTRACTOR:N/A PROJECTMANAGER: Larrv HauasnessPHONENUMBER: 229-6227 MA1NTENANCE:FORMS 10-18-91 65j REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROPOSED MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92/93

EWTITY: Citv of LasDATE Veaas PREPARED: 5/10/93 dJECT: Maintenance No. 11 Oakev Detention Basin Collection Svstem & Outfall

FORCE PROPOSED AMENDED SCHEDULED ACCOUNT/ WORK WORK PERCENT COMPLETION ACTIVITY PLAN PLAN COMPLETE DATE Clean and Inspect in'let/Outlet Structures $4000 6/94' Inspect Channels Clear and Reshape Channels Vegetation Control Repair Lined channels Clean/Flush Culverts Clean Storm Sewer Lines $7.000 6/94 * Storm Sewer Repair Clean and Inspect Detention Basins Vegetation Control Detention Basins ProvideIMaintain Erosion Control Erosion Repair Repair Inlet/Outflow Structures Fence Repair Maintain Access Road IMiscellaneous Work Activities DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: TOTAL $1 1,000

* Typically these activities are storm related.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR: N/A PWJECTMANAGER: Larrv HauasnessPHONE NUMBER: 229-6272

'NTENANCE:FORMS 65k

I 8-91 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: I Interlocal Contract for the City of Mesquite Annual Maintenance Program for the 1993/94 fiscal year.

' PETITIONER: City of Mesquite

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: Recommend for approval of the Interlocal Contract for the City's Annual Maintenance Program for the 1993/94 fiscal year.

FISCAL IMPACE $45,493.00

BACKGROUND. This Interlocal Contract is for the maintenance of the flood control facilities within the City of Mesquite. The City's maintenance program as developed conforms with the performance standards outlined in the Clark County Regional Flood Control District's Operations and Maintenance Manual. The maintenance program locations and cost breakdown is identified in the City of Mesquite Maintenance Work Program Budget Request.

RFCD AGENDA

t 7/8/93 66 INTERLOCAL CONTRACT

CITY OF MESOUITE

ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

THISCONTRACT, madeandentered intothisdayof , 1993, by andbetween the CITY OF MESQUITE, apolitical subdivision of the State ofNevada, hereinafter referred to as "City", and the CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "District",

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the District may approve and fund projects to maintain flood control improvements; and

WHEREAS, the City desires to maintain flood control improvements within the City in accordancewith the maintenance program set forth herein, and hereinafterreferred to as "Project"; and

WHEREAS, the facility upon which maintenance will be done is a facility described in the District's Master Plan.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the parties hereto, the District authorizes the Project as it is mutually understood and agreed as follows:

SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT

This Interlocal Contract applies to the maintenanceof flood control facilities, which are identified in the District's Master Plan facilities including updates and amendments subsequently approved. The basicmaintenance to the facilities will be in accordancewith performance standards of the Operation and Maintenance Manual. The Project is more specifically described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herbin.

SECTION 11 - PROJECTCOSTS The District agrees to provide reimbursement for Project costs within the limits specified below:

1 1. The Project costs shall not exceed $45,493.00. The amounts allocated to each individual facility within the Project are specifled in Exhibit A. Any changes to said allcxxtterl amounts must be approved by the Chief Engineer of the Clark County Regional Flood Control District. A wrim request must be made to the District and a Supplemental Interlocal Contract approved to increase the amount now above prior to payment of any additional funds, 2, The City and District will comply with Section 4.12 of the Operation and Maintenance Manual. In accordance witb said manual, the City shall submit imtoices tamer with a detailed summy qwrl of llle lllaintcnancc service pcrformad. "he City shall submit an Invoice Voucher prepred in duplicate in the manner plnscribed by the District. The vouchers shall include such information as is necessary for the District to determine the nature of all expenditures. Each voucher will clearly indicate that it is for sesvices rendered in performance under this contract. Each voucher will also be accompanied by a written certification from the City stating that it is for pcffarmancc of maintcnanoe activities under this contract and is composed of completed elements set forth in the annual work program. All invoices must be submitted for paymat to:

Clark County Regional Flood Cantrot District 301 Bast Clark Avenue, Suite 301 tas Vqas, Nv 89101 Attention: Virginia Bax-Valentine General Manager/Chief Enpeer

Payment shall be considd tidyif made by the District wit.hin 45 Qnys. Prlr?rwtnt tn Section Iv, Paragraph 6, the District may, in its sole discretian, withhold payments to the City for services rendered if the City fails to satisfactorily comply with any term or condition of this contract andlor the Disuict's Operation and Maintenance Manual.

SECTION III - PROJECT TIME

The City agrees to perform the Project or) the satisfactiun of the Diytyjc;~,yrior w fuut: 30, 1994. The District may gnat extensions or terminate this con- and require all sums advanced to the City to be repaid if the City fails to perform by said date.

SECTION IV - GENERAL 1, The City will campletr: the project as set forth in Exhibit "A". The City staff

68 personnel responsible for coordination work under this contract are as listed below:

Cresent Hardy, Flood Control Administrator Paul Henderson, City Manager

2. In addition to the specific terms set forth in this Contract, the parties hereto shall be subject to and governed by the District’s Operation and Maintenance Manual, and any applicable portions of the policies and procedures adopted by the District.

3. It is the intent of the District that scheduling of maintenance and repair of drainage and flood controlfacilities ingeneral and MasterPlan facilities specifically be coordinated among entities.Therefore, inthose cases where Master Plan approved,the District-funded projects have regional flood control significance impacting more than one entity, the City will allow all impactedentities an opportunityto review the maintenance schedule in orderto coordinate maintenance efforts.

4. TheChief Engineer of theDistrict shall be responsible for monitoring the performance of the City, approval for payment of billings and expenses submitted by the City and the acceptance ofany reports provided by the City. The City shall be responsible for monitoring performance of City staff or private contractors, and the City shall maintain detailed records of all payments made to contractorsand make such records availableto the Districtupon request.

5. The City shall provide rightof access to its facilities to the Districtor Chief Engineer at all reasonable times,in order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance,and/or quality assurance under this contract.

6. In the event the City fails to perform the maintenance according to the standards specified in this contract and in the District’s Operation and Maintenance Manual, the District may perform or cause to be performed the maintenance necessary to assure proper operations of the facility. Cost incurred by the District shall be reimbursed by the City or be deducted from the amount authorized by this contract. The District may not exercise this right without giving the City specific written noticeof the maintenance required and allowing the City60 days within which to perform said maintenance. The notice required by this provision must be sent to:

Cresent Hardy, Flood Control Administrator P.O. Box 69 Mesquite, NV 89024

7. The records of the City and/or private contractors pertainingto the subject matter of this contract shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by the District, County Auditor or an Agent of the District.

3 8. If any provision of this contract shall be deemed in conflict with any statute or law, such provision shall be deemed modified to be in conformance with said statute or rule of law.

9. All parties to this contract shall comply with applicable local, state, and federal laws.

10. Any costs found to be improperly allocated in the project willbe refunded by the City to the District.

11. It is specifically understood and agreed to by and between the parties hereto that it is not intended by any of the provisionsof any part of this contract to create in the publicor any member thereof a third party beneficiary hereunder, or to authorize anyone not a party to this contract to maintain a suit for personal injuries or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of this contract.

12.The City hereby indemnifies and shall defend and holdharmless the District, its representatives and their employees (or their authorized representatives) from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims, demands, damagers, liabilities, interest, attorney’s fees, costs and expenses whatsoever of any kind or nature whether arising before or after completion of the work hereunder and in any manner directly or indirectly caused, occasioned or contributed to in whole or in part, by reason of any act, omission, fault or negligence whether active or passive of the City, of anyone acting under its direction or control, or on its behalf in connection with or incident to the performance of this Contract. TheCity’s aforesaid indemnity and holdharmless obligations, or portionsor applications thereof, shall apply to the fullest extent permitted by law, but in no event shall they apply to liabilitycaused by sole negligence or willful misconduct of theparty indemnified or held harmless.

......

CITY OF =QUITE

Date of Council Action:

By: Bill 0. Lee, Mayor

70 Attest:

Carol Woods, City Clerk ......

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

Date of District Action:

By: MICHAEL R. HARRIS, CHAIRMAN

Attest:

APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dana Lefko, Board Secretary

Christopher Figgins Deputy District Attorney

5 71 CITY OF MESQUITE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM BUDGET REQUEST

PAGE 1 OF 1 MESOl MESO2 MESO3 MES04 MESO5 1993-94 MESOUITE ABBOlT MESQUITE TOWN WASH MESQUITE BUDGET TOWN WASH avo BRIM;€ DETENTION BLVD STORM REQUEST WASH CHANNEL BASH SEWER I TOTALS 0005 CLEAIWINSP mmunn STWC 1000.00 500.00 0010 INSPECTION (CHANNELS) 310.00 310.00 0015 CLEAN STORM SEWER LINES 0020 VEGETATION CONTROL 3660.003400.00 0025 STORM SEWER REPAIR 0030 CLEAN & RESHAPE CHANNELS 3900.0010280.00 0035 CLEANANSPECT DET BASINS 0040 REPAIR LINED CHANNELS 0045 VEGETATION CNTRL DET BASIN I I 0050 CLEANRUSH PIPESKULVERTS I 3640.00 0055 PROVIOUMAINT EROSION GIRL =El=3640.00 OO60 DEBRIS REMOVAL 2080 .OO 0065 EROSION REPAIR

~~ OfM-lSUPV ANNUAl BID CONTRACTS 702.50 I 852.50 278.00 I 1833.00 I I

~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ - ~~ 14752,50 I 17902.50 I 1200.00 5838.00 I,5800.00 1 45493.0; I

i CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA mM

SUBJECT: INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THE 1993-94 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

~~ PETITIONER: City of North Las Vegas

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:

It is recommended that the District approve the interlocal contract for the City's Fiscal Year 93-94 Maintenance Program.

FECAL IMPACT: $ 98,025

BACKGROUND: The proposed contract provides for maintenance by the City of North Las Vegas of certain flood control facilities identified in the District's Master Plan. The work will be in accordance with performance standards of the Clark County Regional FloodControl District's Operation and Maintenance Manual. The program is more specifically described in Exhibit "A" of the proposed contract attached.

AG-218 Respectfully rubmitted,

ITEM # ITEM #

74 INTERLOCAL CONTRACT ANNUAL MAINTENANCEPROGRAM

THISCONTRACT, made and entered into this day of I

1993, by and between the City of North Las Vegas, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, hereinafter referred to as ttCityll;and the Clark County Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred toas llDistrictll. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the District may approve and fund projects to maintain flood control improvements; and WHEREAS,the City desires to maintain flood control

improvements locatedon The1993/94 Annual Maintenance Work Planin accordance with the maintenance program set forth herein and hereinafter referred toas ltProjectll, and WHEREAS, the facility upon which maintenance will isbe done a facility describedin theDistrict's Master Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the parties hereto, the District authorizes the Projectas itis mutually understood and agreedas follows: SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT This interlocal contract applies to the maintenance of flood control facilities which are identified in the District'sMaster Plan, including updates and amendments subsequently approved. The basic maintenanceof the facilities will be in accordance with

Page 1 of 7 performance standards of the Operation and Maintenance Manual. The Project is more specifically described in Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and bythis reference incorporated herein. SECTION 11-PROJECT COSTS The District agreesto provide reimbursement for Project cost within the limits specified below:

1. The Project costs shall not exceed$98,025. The amounts allocated to each individual facility within the Project must be specified in Exhibit lfA1l.Any changes to said allocated amounts must be approved by the District's Chief Engineer. A written request must be made to the District and a supplemental interlocal contract approved to increase the amount noted above priorto payment of any additional funds.

2. The City and District will comply with Section4.12 of the Operation and Maintenance Manual. In accordance with said manual, the City shall submit invoices together with a detailed summary report of the maintenance service performed. The City shall submit an invoice voucher prepared in duplicate in the manner prescribed by the District. The vouchers shall include such information as is necessary for the District to determine the nature of all expenditures. Each voucher will clearly indicate that it is for services rendered in performance under this contract. Each voucher will also be accompanied by a written certification from the City stating itthat is for performanceof maintenance activities under this contract and is composed of completed elements set forthin annual work program. Page 2 of 7 .

76 All invoices must be submitted for payment to: Clark County Regional Flood Control District 301 East Clark Avenue, Suite300 Las Vegas, Nevada89155 Attention:Virginia Bax-Valentine General Manager/Chief Engineer

Payment shall be considered timely if made by the District within 45 days. Pursuant to Section IV, Paragraph6, the District may, in this sole discretion, withhold payment to the City for services rendered if the City fails to satisfactorily comply with any term or condition of this contract and/or the District's Operation and Maintenance Manual. SECTION III-PROJECT TIME The City agrees to perform the Project to the satisfaction of the District prior to June 30, 1994. The District may grant extensions or terminate this contract and requiresums advancedall to the City to be repaid if the City fails to perform by said date. SECTION IV-GENERAL 1. The City will complete the Project as set forth in Exhibit I1At1. The City staff personnel responsible for coordination work under this contract areas listed below: Gary W. Holler, P.E. , Director of Public Works, or his designee. It is understood that staffnar ed above will be responsible for work coordination throughout the period of this contract unless the Districtis informed in writing of changesin these personnel assignments. 2. In addition to the specific terms set forthin this

Page 3 of 7 contract, the parties hereto shall be subject to and governed by the District's Operation and Maintenance Manual and any applicable portions of the Policies and Procedures adopted by the District. 3. It is ,the intent of the District that scheduling of maintenance and repair of drainage and flood control facilities in general and Master Plan facilities specifically be coordinated among entities. Therefore, in those cases where Master Plan approved and District-funded projects have regional flood control significance impacting more than one entity, the City will allow all impacted entities an opportunity to review the maintenance schedule in orderto coordinate maintenance efforts. 4. The Chief Engineer of the District shall be responsible for monitoring the performance of the City, approval for payment of billings and expenses submitted by the City, and the of acceptance any reports provided by the City. The City shall be responsible for monitoring performance of City staffor private contractors, and City shall maintain detailed recordsof all payments made to contractors and make such records available to the District upon request. 5. The City shall provide right of access to its facilities to the Districtor Chief Engineer at all reasonable intimes order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance, and/or quality assurance underthis contract. 6. In the event theCity fails to perform the maintenance according to the standards specifiedin this contract and in the District's Operation and Maintenance Manual, the District may Page 4 of 7 perform or cause to be performed the maintenance necessary to assure proper operation of the facility. Cost incurred by the District shall be reimbursed by the Cityor be deducted from the amount authorized by this contract. The District may not exercise this right without giving the City specific written notice of the maintenance required and allowing the 60 City days within which to perform said maintenance. The notice required by this provision must be sent to: Gary W. Holler, P.E. Director of Public Works City of North Las Vegas Post OfficeBox 4086 North Las Vegas, Nevada89036-4086 7. The records of the City and/or private contractors pertaining to the subject matter of this contract shall, at all reasonable times, be subject to inspection and duty by the District, County Auditor, or an agent of the District. 8. If any provision of this contract shall be deemed in conflict with any statuteor rule of law, such provision shall be deemed modified to inbe conformance with said statuteor rule of law.

9. All parties to this contract shall comply with applicable local, state, and federal laws.

10. Any costs foundto be improperly allocatedin the project will be refunded by the City to the District. 11. It is specifically understood and agreed to by and between the parties hereto thatit is not intended byany of the provisions of any part of this contract into thecreate public or Page 5 of 7 any member thereof a third party beneficiary hereunder, or to authorize anyone not a partyto this contract to maintain a suit for personal injuriesor property damage pursuantto the terms or provisions of this contract. 12. The City hereby indemnifies and shall defend and hold harmless the Districtits representatives and their employees(or their authorized representatives) from and against any and all suits,actions, legal or administrativeproceedings, claims, demands, damages, liabilities, interest, attorney's fees, orcosts expenses whatsoever of any kind or nature whether arising before or after completion of the work hereunder and in any manner directly or indirectly caused, occasioned,or contributed toin whole or in part, by reason of any, omission, act fault, or negligence, whether active or passive of the City, of anyone acting under its direction or controlor on its behalf in connection withor incident to the performance of this Contract. The City's aforesaid indemnity and hold harmless obligations, or portions of applications thereof, shall applyto the fullest extent permitted by law but in no event shall they apply to liability caused by the sole negligence or willful misconductof the party indemnifiedor held harmless. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have caused this contractto be executed the day andyear first above written......

Page 6 of 7

80 ......

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS Date of Council Action:

JAMES K. SEASTRAND, Mayor Attest:

EILEEN SEVIGNY, City Clerk

......

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

Date of Council Action:

MICHAEL R. HARRIS, Chairman Attest:

DEANNA LEFKO CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Board Secretary Deputy District Attorney

Page 7 of 7

81 EXHIBIT "A" Page i

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROLDISTRICT 1993/94 MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN SUMMARY FACILITY DESCRIPTION COST

Las Vegas Wash 3,660 Las Vegas Wash North Reach 12,855 Northern Tributary of NW Tributaries 36,535 of Las Vegas Wash

Las Vegas Range Wash - West Branch 4 ,885 Gowen Outfall 5,590

Craig Road RCB Bridges 690 Cheyenne Avenue RCB Bridges 230 Carey Ave./W. Lake Mead Detention Basin 11,800 North Las Vegas Detention Basin TOTAL

82 EXEIBIT "A" CITY OF NORTH Us VEGAS Page 1 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1993194 ANNUAL MAINTENANCEWORK PLAN

I t- # Maintenance Ooits to Rec-nd Planning Labor Equipment Opr. mint. hint. Equipment Opr. Equip. 6 cos e Category be Maintained Frequency Standard Requirements h Supervisor Worker Worker 6 Supervisor Materials Total Annua 1 Annual $125/Day $160/Day Ihn Days llan Days

FACILITY: V~ASuAsn - NOR^ REACE Ilocassio Rd. to Northern Tributary of Northwestern Tribularics of Las Vegas Wash

2 Inspect A1 1 11 Mi lOO%/yr 2.5 Mi/Day 1 Supervisor 4.5 $ 720 $ 210 S 930 Master Plan Designated Channels

FACILITY: NORTAERN TRIBUTARY OF NORTRUESTERN TRIBOTARIES OF IAS VEGAS WASn Ann Rd. to Ias Vegas Wash North Reach Junction

2 Inspect All 5 Mi lOOX/yr 2.5 Mi/Day 1 Supervisor 2.0 S 320 S 90 S 410 Master I'lan Designated Channels

FACILITY: Us WAS RANGE WASR- WEST BRANCE Tropical Pkwy to Craig Rd.

2 Inspect All 3 Mi 100Xlyr 2.5 MilDay 1 Supervisor 1.0 S 160 s 50 $ 210 I Master Plan Designated Channels EXHIBIT "A" CITY OFNORTB US VECAS Page 2 CLARK COUNTY REGIONALFLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1993194 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN

It- # hintenanceUnits to Bee-nd Planning labor EquipmentPlaint.Uaint.EquipmentOpr. Equip. Opr. 6 cost Category be bintaioedFrequency Standard Requirements L SupervisorWorkerWorker L SupervisorUaterials Total Annua 1 $125/DayAnnual$16O/Day Man Days Plan Days

FACILITY: US WEAS WE- EAST WE MEAD BLVD. to CHEYENNE ED.

2 Inspect All 2 Mi 100Xlyr1.0 Mi/Day 1 Supervisor $ 160 $ 50 $ 210 MasterPlan DesignatedChannels

FACILITY: GOWEN OUTFALL CEANNEL Commerce St. to Ferrell

2 Inspect All 3 Mi LOOXlyr 2.5 Mi/Day 1 Supervisor 1.0 S 160 $ 50 $ 210 MasterPlan DesignatedChannels SUB TOTAL $1,970 CITY OF NORTB Us VEGAS CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1993194 ANNUAL MALNTENANCE WORK PLAN

Item # kintenanceUnits to RecoPnend Planning Labor Equip-ntUaint.Opr. Mint. EquipmentEquip.Opr. L cost Category be kintaioed FrequencyStandard Requirements 6 Supervisor WorkerWorker 6 Supervisor Materials Total A nnual Annual $125/DayAnnualAnnual $16O/Day Uao Days Uan Days

FACILITY: US =AS UASA- NORTB PEACE Betveen1-15 L Cheyenne Ave.

31.0 andClean Hi 67Xlyr 0.5 Mi/Day 1 Supervisor/9.0 $1,400 $1,000 $2,400 R esha pe 3.5 Equip Oprs. Equip 3.5 Reshape

FACILITY: Us WAS USA- No. PEACB Between Craig (i Ea-r Ave.

3 Clean and 1.25 Mi 67Xlyr 0.5 Mi/Day 1 Supervisor/ 22.5 $3.500$6,000 $2,500 R esh ape 3.5 Equip Oprs. Equip 3.5 Reshape

FACILITY: NORTBEPN TUIBUTARY NORTrmESTERN TR IBUTAUIES OF LAS VEGAS UASA Cheyenne Ave. to CivicCenter

3 andClean -50 Mi 6 7X By Private Reshape Contractor $ 30,000

SUB-TQIAL $38,400 CITY OF NORTE Us WAS CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1993194 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN

Item # bioteoance Uoitsto Recweod PlaooiogLabor Equiprent Opr. bint.bint. Equipleot Opr. Equip. h cost Category be llaiotaioed Frequency StandardRequirements h SupervisorWorker Worker h SupervisorMaterials Total Aanua 1 Annual $125/Day $16O/Day UanDays Ma0 Days

FACILITY: NORTBEBN TRIBUTARY OF NORTRUESTERN TRIBUTARIES OF LAS VEGAS WASE Cheyeooe Ave. to 1-15

4 Perform .75 Hi 100%/yr 1.5 Mi/Day2 Maint Workers 1.0 $125 $ 600 $ 125 Vegetation Control

FACILITY: LAS VEGAS WASH E. Lake Mead Blvd. to CbeyeoneAwe.

4 Perform 2.0 Mi LOOIlyr 2 hint Workers 2.5 $300 $1,500 $1,800 Vegetation Control

FACILITY: NORTBERN TRIBUTARY OF NORTWESTERN TRIBUTARIES OF us WAS VASE 1-15 to Alexander

4 Perform .5 Mi 100Xlyr 2 Maint Workers 1.0 $125 $ 600 $ 725 Vegetation Control

SUB TOTAL $3,250 CIN OF WORTB Us VEGAS EXHIBIT "Ave CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Page 5 1993/94 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN

Item # lbintenance Units to Peco-nd Planning labor EquipmentOpr. &ant. hint. Equipment Equip.Opr. 6 cost Category llaintained FrequencyStandard Requirements 6 Supervisor WorkerWorker 6 Supervisor Materials Tota I Annual Annual $125/DayAnnualAnnual $16O/Day hn Days Uan Days

FACILITY: NORTREPN TRIBUTARY OF NU IPIBOTARIES OF TBE Us VEGAS WASE @ Fifth St. Four 8 X 8 P.C.B. 6 CleanlFlush 4 5O%/yrEa. 10 Ea/Day 1 Equipment Opr. 0.4 0.4 $ 50 $ 64 S 346 $ 460 Culverts Worker 1 Maint

FACILIN: NOBTEERI ~IBIITARY OF NU IPI BOTARIES OF TBE us WAS WASH e Craig Ed. Dbl 6.5 X 8 L Four 8 X 8 P.C.B. 6 CleanlFlush 6 Ea. 50%I yr 10 Ea/Day 1 Equipment Opr. 0.6 0.6 $ 75 $ 96 $ 519 $ 690 Culverts 1 Haint Worker

FACILITY: CRAIG ED. 114 Hi Vest of 5th St. Dbl IO'U X 5'D P.C.B. 6 Clean/Flush 2 50%/yrEa. 10 Ea/Day 1 Equipment Opr. 0.2 0.2 $ 173 $ 230 Culverts 1 Maint Worker .

FACILITY: CRAIG ROAD 600' East of Northern Tributary of the Ry Tributaries of the las Vegas Wash 5' W x 3* D Elliptical P.C.P. 6 CleanlFlush 4 Ea. 50Xlyr EalDay 1 Equipment Opr. 0.4 0.4 $ 50 $ 64 $ 346 $ 460 Culverts 1 Maint Worker

FACILITY: CHEYEllllP. AYE. 6 1-15 i Dbl 8*Y X 10'D R.C.B. 6 ClesnlFlush liO%/yr2 Ea. Ea.Day 1 Equipment Opr. 0.2 0.2 $ 25 $ 32 $ 173 $ 230 Culverts 1 Haint Worker CITY OF CITY mlPTU LAS VEGAS EXB I BIT "A" CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRlCT PageDISTRlCT CONTROL FLOOD REGIONAL COUNTY CLARK 6 1993194 ANNUAL MAINTENANCEWORK PLAN

Item # MaintenanceUnitsPecoaendto Planning Labor Equipment Opr. hint. Maint. Equipment Opr.. Equip. b cost CategoryMaintained Frequeocy Standard Requirelents 6 SupervisorWorkerWorker b SupervisorMaterials Total Annua 1 Annual$125/Day $lLO/Day ManDays hn Days FACILITY: Us VEGAS BAWGE UASU WEST BRANCU e Craig Ed. Dbl LO X 4 P.C.B.

6 Clean/Flush2 Ea. 50ZIyr 10 Ea/Day 1 Equipment Opr 0.2 0.2 $ 25 ' $ 32 $ 173 $ 230 Culverts 1 Maint Worker

FACILITY: Us VEGAS RANGE UASU WEST BEANCU 1st Culverts No. of Craig Pd. Dbl 10 14P.C.B.

6 CleanlFlush 2 Ea. 50Xlyr 10 Ea/Day 1 Equipment Opr 0.2 0.2 $ 173 $ 230 Culverts 1 Haint Worker Haint 1 Culverts

FACILITY: Us VEGAS RANGE VASE- VEST BPAIICB 2nd Culverts No. of Craig Ed. Dbl 10 I 3 P.C.B.

6 Clean/Flush 2 Ea. 50ZIyr EalDay 1 Equipment Opr. 0.20.2 $ 173 $ 230 Culverts 1 Maint Worker

FACILITY: US VEGAS RANGE UASU- WEST BpAwca 3rd Culverts No. of Craig Pd. Dbl 10 X 3 P.C.B.

6 CleanlFIush 2 Ea. 5OZlyr Ea/Day 1 Equipment Opr. 0.2 0.2 $ 173 $ 230 Culverts 1 Maint Worker

FACILITY: US VEGAS RANGE UASE- VEST BPARCB e tone Htn. Pd. Dbl 10 X 3 R.C.B.

6 CleanlFlush 2 Ea. 50ZIyr Ea.Day 1 Equipment Opr. 0.2 0.2 $ 173 $ 230 Culverts 1 Maint Worker 00 00 CITY OF NORTM Us VEGAS FmIBIT "A" CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Page 7 1993194 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN

Item # MaintenanceUnits to Recurnoend Planning Labor Equipment Opr. hint. Ihint.Equipment Opr, Equip. 6 cost Category be I(aintained FrequencyStandard Requirelents 6 SupervisorWorker Worker 6 SupervisorHaterials Total Annua 1 Annual$125/Day $16O/Dag ManDays hnDays FACILITY: GOUEN OUTFALL CBANNEL e Carina A1 Norte 2-16' I 7' R.C.B.

6 CleanlFlusb 2 Ea. 50Xlyr 10 Ea/Day I Equipment Opr. 0.2 0.2 $ 177 $ 230 Culverts 1 Maint Worker

FACILITY: GOWEN 001PAI.L C"5L e Clayton 3 - 12' I 5' P.C.B.

6 CleanlFlush 3 Ea. 5OXlyr 10 EalDay 1 Equipment Opr. 0.3 0.2 $ 260 $ 350 Culverts 1 Maint Worker

FACILITY: GOWEN 001PAI.L e Si-os 3 - 12' I 5' P.C.B.

6 CleanlFlush 3 Ea. 50%/yr 10 EalDay 1 Equipment Opr. 0.3 0.2 .$ 260 $ 350 Culverts Worker 1 Maint

FACILITY: NORTREBN 'IPIBIIIARY OF NORTRyEsWl 'IBIBDTARIES OF us VecAS WASE e Civic Center 3 - 30' X 9' P-C-B-

6 CleanlFlush 3 Ea. 5OXlyr 10 Ea/Day 1 Equipment Opr. 0.3 $ 260 .$ 350 Culverts 1 Maint Worker

FACILITY: IK)PTBPPN 1pIBOTAEY OF NOR'IBvesWR 'IBIBUTARIES OF IAS vecw WASH i @ Losee 90' X 9' Trapezoidal Bridge

6 CleanlFlush 1 Ea. 50Xlyr 10 Ea/Day 1 Equipment Opr. 0.3 0.2 Culverts Worker 1 Maint EXHlBfT "A" Page 8 CITY OF NOBTB Us VEGAS CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1993194 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN

Item # fiintenance Units to Becomnd Planning Labor Quiwot Ihint.Opr.Maint. EquipmentOpr.Equip. 6 cost Category be lhintainedFrequency Standard Bequirerents 6 Supervisor WorkerWorker h Supervisor lbterials Total Annual Annual $125/Day$16OIDayAnnualAnnual ha Days Ibo Days

FACILITY: US VEGu WASB- NORTR REAm Betveeo 1-15 6 Cheyenoe Ave.

14 HaintIRepair 300 LF 2OXlyr 100 LF/Day 2 Maint Wkrsl 5.0 7 $87 5 $800 $200 $1,875 Fenc i ng Oprs. 1.5 Equip

14 HaintIRepair 300 LF 2OXlyr 100 LF/Day 2 Haint Wkrs/ 5.0 $8007 $875 $200 $1,875 Fencing 1.5 Equip Oprs.

14 HaintlRepair 300 LF 2OXlyr 100 LFlDayHaint 2 Wkrsl 5.0 7 $875 $800 $200 $1,875 Fencing 1.5 Equip Oprs.

FACILITY: Goan OUTFALL -

14 MaintlRepair 4.0 HI 2OXlyr 100 LFlDayHaint2 Wkrsl 10.0 14 $1750 $1600 $400 $?, 750 Fencing 1.5 Equip Oprs. SUB TQTN. $9.375 !

EXHI BIT "A" Page 9 CITY OF WOPW US VeCAS CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1993194 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN

Itel # bintenance Units to Pec-nd Planning Labor 4uipment Opr. hint. hint. Equipment Opr. Equip. b cost Category be MaintainedFrequency Standard Requirements h Supervisor Worker Worker b Supervisor Materials Tota 1 Annua I Annual $125/Day $16O/Day Ihn Days Uan Days

FACILITY: Us VEGW WASH- NORW puce Between 1-15 h Cheyenne Ave.

16 Misc/Complt10 EA 100Xlyr 2 EAlDay 1 Maint Wkrs/ 5.0 5 $625 $800 $1,650 $225 Response 1 Equip Oprs.

16 MisclComplt 10 EA 100Ilyr EAlDay 2 1 Maint Wkrs/ 5.0 5 $625 $800 $1,650 $225 Response 1 Response Equip Oprs.

FACILITY: US VECU WASH- WEST BBMCB Between Craig b H8-r Are.

16 Misclcomplt10 EA lOOXlyr EA/Day 2 1 Maint Wkrs/ 5.0 5 $625 $800 $225 $1,650 Response 1 Equip Oprs.

FACILITY: US VEGU WWll- Betveen E. Lnke Head Blvd. 6 Cheyenne Are.

16 MisclComplt 10 EA lOOXlyr 2 EAlDay 1 Maint Wkrsi 5.0 5 $625 $800 $225 $1,650- Res ponse 1 Response Equip Oprs. SUB TOTAL $6,600 2 EXRIBIT "A" Page 10 CITY OF NORTE Us VEGAS CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1993194 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN

L cost It- # llaintenance Oaits to Recaend Planning Labor Quiplent Opr. Phiat. hint. Equipeat Opr. Equip. 6 Worker Worker b Supervisor Materials Total Category be Maintained Frequency Standard Requirerents Supervisor Annu al Aonual $125/Day$16O/DayAonualAnnual Man Days Man Days

FACILITY: CAREY Am./W. LAItE DETENTION BASIN

$2,000 9 CleanlInspect 1 EA lOOXlyr 1 EAlDay 3 Equipment Oprs. 6.0 4.0 $ 500 $1,000 $3,500 2 Maint. Workers

$2,000 $3,600 LO Veg Control 50Xlyr40 AC 4 AClDay 1 Equipment Oprs. 10 $1,600

$ 600 $3,000 14 MaintIRepair 5000 LF 20Xlyr 100 LFtDaY 1.5 Equip. Oprs. 15 20 $2,500 $2,400 Fencing 2 Maint. Workers

16 MieclComplt 10 EA 100Xlyr 2 EA/Day 1 Equipment Opr. 5 5 $ 650 $ 800 $1,700$ 275 Response 1 Maint. Worker SUB-TOTAL $11,800 EXHr BIT "A" Page 11 CITY OFNORTH Us WAS CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1993194 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN

Item # MaintenanceUnitsto Pec-nd Planning Labor Equipment Opr. Maint. Ihint.Equipment Opr. Equip. h cost I Category be MaintainedFrequency Standard Requirements h SupervisorWorkerWorker 6 SupervisorMaterials Total Annual $125/DayS16OIDayAnnual Uan Days Uan Days

FACILITY: NOPlW Ibs WAS DETENTION BASIN =4

9 CleanlInspectEA 1 lOOX/yrEAlDay1 3 Equipment Oprs. 6.0 4.0 $$1,000 500 $3,500 $2,000 2 Maint. Workers

10 Veg ControlVeg10 40 AC 50Xlyr 4 AC/DayEquipment1 Oprs. 10 $1,600 $3,600 $2,000

12Erosion Repair 1000 LF 100Xlyr250 LF/Day 1.5 Equip. Oprs.1 6 8.0 $1,000 $ 960 $2,960 $1,000 2 Maint Wrkrs

14 Maint/Repair14 1000 LF 20%/yr 100LFlDay 1.5 Equip. Oprs. 7.5 10 $1,200$1,250 $ 300 $1,500 Fencing 2 Maint. Workers

15 Maintain 15 Access Rd. 1.50 MI 5OXlyr 0.5 MIlDayEquip. 2 Oprs. 12 $1,920 $5,000 $6,920

16 HisclComplt20 EA 100XIyrEA/Day 2 Equipment 1 Opr. 10 LO $1,600$1,250 $ 450 $3,300 Response 1 Maint. Worker SUB-TOTAL $21,780

GRAND TOTAL $ 98,025 i CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

NDOT FREEWAY CHANNEL PROJECT (SAHARA AVENUE TO IVANHOE WAY) - COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (LAS.M.C.93)

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve and authorize the Chairman to sign.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Approve.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Approve.

JUNE 10,1993 BOARD: Hold for two-thirds of the members to be present,

RFCD AGENDA

Date: 7/08/93 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

SUBJECT:

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NDOT FREEWAY CHANNEL PROJECT (SAHARA AVENUE TO IVANHOE WAY)

PETITIONIER:

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:

THAT THE BOARD APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FREEWAY CHANNEL PROJECT (SAHARA AVENUE TO IVANHOE WAY)

FISCAL IMPACT:

$710,000 (Fund 443)

BACKGROUND: The Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) will be constructing improvements to the Sahara AvenudI-15 Interchange. The project, located north of Sahara Avenue and on the west side of 1-15, coincides with the Clark County Regional Flood Control District Master Plan Freeway Channel between Sahara Avenue and Ivanhoe Way for a distance of approximately 1,700 feet. The Freeway Channel projectas shown in the Master Plan, extends from the1-191- 515 interchange southerly to Desert Inn Road. The Freeway Channel System would intercept runoff contributing to the Charleston Underpass and direct the flow to the Las Vegas Creek (Washington Avenue System), which is currently being improved through different phases of construction. Construction of this segment of the Freeway Channel would allow for connection to other segments as the system is extended. The Cooperative Agreement provides construction funding, $700,000 or fifty percent of the construction costs associated with upgrading the drainagefacility, and $lO,ooO to the City ofLas Vegasfor plan reviewand coordination during design and construction. The remaining construction funding, approximately $1,200,000, will be provided by NDOT.

TAC AGENDA RFCDAGENDA lm#gB 1-#38 1 Dotc: 05/27/93 -6/10/93 RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 7 DATE: 7/08/93 Agenda Item NDOT Cooperative Agreement Page 2

NDOT’s willingness to: 1) provide funding for the facility required to perpetuate the drainage paths and; 2) provide funding for one-half the cost to upgrade the facility in accordance thewith Master Plan, reduces future costs that would be incurred by the District.

Respectfully submi tted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM #8B ITEM # 3B

RFCD AGENDA Virginia Valentine, P.E. ITEM# 7 General ManagerlChief Engineer DATE: 7/08/93 Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Staff Discussion: I Date: 6/28/93 NDOTFREEWAY CHANNEL PROJECT (SAHARA AVENUE TO IVANHOEWAY) - COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT LAS.06.C.93 A Cooperative Agreement between the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT), the City of Las Vegas, and the District is requestedto provide construction funding for the upgradeof the Freeway Channel project between Sahara Avenue and Ivanhoe Way. Funding is also requested for plan review and coordination by the City of Las Vegas during design and construction. NDOT has submitted ninety percent (90%) plansand specifications for the project,and right-of-way for construction exists. The amount requested is $710,000 which exceeds the amount programmed by $llO,OOO. The project is identified on the FY 92/93Project List and funding is available from Pay- As-You-GoFunds (Fund 443). Changes as requestedby the attorneyshave been made and the contract is in order for approval.

~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ Staff Recommendation:

Approve and authorize the Chairman to sign.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:

The TAC voted for approval of the contract subject to the minor changes as requested by staff, the INDOT Attorney and the District Attorney. Recommendation: IApprove. Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee:

The CAC voted for approval of the contract subject to the minor changes as requested by staff, the INDOT Attorney and the District Attorney. Recommendation: IApprove. Discussion by Board: IOn June 10, 1993, the Board held the item for two-thirds of the members to be present to vote. Recommendation: IHold until July 8, 1993. EA 71435 Agreement No. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THISAGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of

, 1993, by and between the STATE OF NEVADA, Department of Transportation, hereinafter called @@STATE@', the Clark County Regional Flood Control District, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, hereinafter called '@CCRFCD@@, andthe City of Las Vegas, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, hereinafter called '@CITY@@. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, agreements between the STATE and public entities are authorized under Chapter 277 of the Nevada Revised Statutes for the work described herein; and WHEREAS, the Director is authorized to enter into agreements pursuant to Chapter 408 of the Nevada Revised Statutes; and WHEREAS, the parties have a mutual interest in the design and construction of the flood control facilities along the 1-15 corridor; and WHEREAS, the work will consist of constructing a new flyover ramp at the I-lS/Sahara Avenue Interchange with related appurtenances for a project (STP-IR-DE-0105(801)), hereinafter called the llPROJECT@t,at milepost IR-15-CL-40.55, in Clark County; and

WHEREAS, the STATE owns, controls, and maintains all property ' within the 1-15 right-of-way corridor and the CCRFCD desires to 1 of 8 place aportion of a Flood Control Master Plan Facility within the STATE'S right of way, within the limits of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the CITY is the lead entity charged with implementing Flood Control Master Plan Facilities within its jurisdictional boundaries, where thePROJECT is located, and desires to cooperate in the construction of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the drainage design and construction will be upgraded from the original plan of perpetuating the existing flows with an 8' X 4' reinforced concrete box, accommodating the flows designated in the CCRFCD's The Master Plan UDdate of the Las Veaas Valley,

dated August 1991, with adouble 10' X 8' reinforced concrete box, hereinafter called the WPGRADEv8;and WHEREAS, the PROJECT and the UPGRADE will benefit the STATE by completing the construction relating to the UPGRADE at the same time the interchange construction is completed, thus avoiding future costs to the STATE and CCRFCD and inconvenience to the motoring public; and WHEREAS, the UPGRADE will benefit the CCRFCD by advancing construction of their drainage master plan; and WHEREAS, the PROJECT and the UPGRADE will benefit the CITY by installing upgraded flood control facilities in conjunction with the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost for construction of the original plan of an 8' x 4, reinforced concrete box is $623,529.00; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost for construction of the UPGRADE is $1,971,627.00; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost for the construction of the UPGRADE over and above the estimated cost for construction of the original plan of an 8' X 4' reinforced concrete box is $1,348,098.00; and

.. 2 of 8 , ! ' .: . f' WHEREAS, the CCRFCD and the STATE haveagreed to a 50/50 sharing of the costs for the UPGRADE over and above the cost for construction of the original plan of an 8, X 4, reinforced concrete box. This 50/50 sharing cost is estimated to be $674,049.00 for each party. Preliminary engineering and construction engineering costs shall beborne by the STATE. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, it is agreed as follows: CCRFCD AGREES to:

1. Reimburse the STATE $700,000 or 50% (fifty percent), whichever is the lesser, of all the actual construction costs associated with the construction of the UPGRADE, including change orders relative to the UPGRADE. The 50% will be applied after deducting the cost of the original plan of an 8' X 4' reinforced concrete box based upon bid item unit costs as they appear on the contractor's bid proposal. Upon completion of the UPGRADE and within ninety (90) days of receipt of an invoice from the STATE, the CCRFCD shall reimburse the STATE for the CCRFCD's portion of all construction costs, as indicated in this paragraph, associated with construction of the UPGRADE. Reimbursement shall be made in one payment subsequent to completion of construction of the UPGRADE.

2. Supply the STATE with all the design criteria and standards necessary to adequately design the UPGRADE.

3. Review and approve the plans, specifications and estimates relativeto theUPGRADE prior to advertising. 4. Reimburse the CITY for design and construction coordination, quality control, citizen complaint response and other related administrative expenses at a cost not to exceed $10,000.

5. The UPGRADE in the PROJECT will be perpetuated at both

.. 3 of 8 ai its upstream and its downstream termini and will continue to be identified as a CCRFCD Flood Control Master Plan Facility in the CCRFCD Flood Control Master Plan and subsequent updates to the Flood Control Master Plan.

6. Design a signto identify the Clark County Regional Flood Control District as a funding agency for drainage improvements, and provide the sign design to the STATE to include as an incidental item to the UPGRADE. The cost of construction, installation and maintenance of said sign shall be incidental to theUPGRADE. CITY AGREES to:

1. The UPGRADE in the PROJECT will be perpetuated at both its upstream and its downstream termini and will continue to be identified as a CCRFCD Flood Control Master Plan Facility in the CCRFCD Flood Control Master Plan and subsequent updates to the Flood Control Master Plan.

2. Participate with the STATE and the CCRFCD where the CCRFCD Flood Control Master Plan coincides with future improvements to 1-15, within its jurisdictional boundaries.

3. Supply the STATE with all the design criteria and standards necessary to adequately design the UPGRADE. 4. Review and approve the plans, specifications and estimates relativeto theUPGRADE prior to advertising. STATE AGREES to:

1. Fund the UPGRADE $700,000 or 50% (Fifty Percent) whichever is the lesser, of all the actual construction costs associated with the construction of the UPGRADE, including change orders relative to the UPGRADE. The 50% will be applied after adding the cost of the original plan of an 8' X 4' reinforced concrete box based upon bid item unit costs as they appear on the contractor's bid proposal.

4 of 8 2. Maintain the UPGRADE within the limits of the STATE'S right of way until a future time when the CCRFCD Flood Control Master Plan Facility is constructed on both ends of the UPGRADE.

3. Perform, or have performed, the preliminary engineering, in compliancewith all applicable portions of the current edition of the CCRFCD's Policies and Procedures, the Hydraulic Criteria and Drainage Design Manual, and the Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage. Preliminary engineering includes, but is not limited to, design of the reinforced concrete box culvert(s) and any and all incidentals in conjunction with design of the UPGRADE within the limits of the PROJECT. 4. Pay all preliminary engineering and construction engineering costs related to theUPGRADE.

5. Prepare plans, specifications, and estimates for construction of the UPGRADE.

6. Allow the CCRFCD and the CITY to review and approve plans, specifications and estimates for the UPGRADE prior to advertising.

7. During the construction stage of the PROJECT, submit to the CCRFCD and the CITY for review and comments all change orders and modifications that pertain to construction of the UPGRADE.

8. Advertise, award and administer the contract for construction of the UPGRADE along with the PROJECT.

9. Invoice CCRFCD for their portion of all construction costs associated with construction of the UPGRADE upon completion of construction of the UPGRADE, as shown in paragraph 1 under,

"CCRFCD AGREES to :It, above. 10. In future improvements to the 1-15 Freeway System from Desert Inn Road to the Spaghetti Bowl, and upon availability of

CCRFCD funding, allow for the continued implementation of the 1-15 .- "; ,f ' ...... 5 of 8 >. Freeway Channel System within NDOT's right-of-way, as depicted in the CCRFCD's Flood Control Master Plan,

11. Comply with the Local Government Purchasing Act, Chapter 332 of the Nevada Revised Statutes.

,12, Comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, statutes, rules, and regulations in effect at the time workis performed on the PROJECT. 13. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to theUPGRADE will be refunded to theCCRFCD.

14. To include the sign in the bid and PROJECT as identified

in paragraph 6 under, IICCRFCD AGREES to:", above.

15. Provide the CITY and CCRFCD with the same information as any prospective bidder, including, but not limited to, a complete set of plans, specifications and bid documents. Also add the CITY and CCRFCD to thelist of plan holders and ensure that the CITY and CCRFCD receive any addenda or additional information sent to prospective bidders. Upon completion of the PROJECT provide the CITY and CCRFCD a complete set of the record drawings for the PROJECT. 16. Make aformal presentation regarding the PROJECT/UPGRADE design to the CCRFCD's Citizens Advisory and Technical Advisory Committees and the CCRFCD's Board prior to request for construction

funding as required in NRS 543.580. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED

1. The initial addresses of the parties to which all notices under this Agreement shall be sent are as follows: STATE Garth F. Dull, Director Nevada Department of Transportation 1263 South Stewart Street Carson City, MI 89712 (702) 687-5440

6 of 8 . >: , . CCRFCD Michael Harris, Chairman Clark County Regional Flood Control District 301 E. Clark Ave., Suite 301 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 455-3139 CITY Jan Laverty Jones, Mayor city of Las Vegas 400 E. Stewart Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 229-6276

2. Construction costs will be computed using contract agreement bid items complete and in place. Said contract bid item quantities may increase or decrease during construction from those shown on the engineer's estimate.

3. The STATE will award the contract in accordance with its rules and procedures to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder based on the estimated construction costs.

4. Should the actual construction costs for the UPGRADE require more than $700,000 from each the STATE and CCRFCD for a 50/50 split, the terms of cost sharing shall be re-negotiated at the time. 5. Similar cooperative agreements may be required when future 1-15 improvements from Desert Inn Road to theSpaghetti Bowl coincide withthe CCRFCD Flood Control Master Plan Facilities.

6. That both the CITY ti CCRFCD will continue to implement the flood control system presently depicted in the CCRFCD's Flood Control Master Plan asprogrammed fhnding permits.

7. Each respective party agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the other parties to theextent provided by law, including but not limited to Nevada Revised Statutes, chapter 41, from and against any liability arising out of the performance of this Agreement proximately caused by any act or omission of its officers, agents and employees.

7 of 8 8. The laws of the State of Nevada shall be applied in interpreting and construing this Agreement.

9, The UPGRADE must be completed by July 1, 1995. 10. This Agreement constitutes the entire contract between the parties and shall not be modified unless in writing and signed by all parties. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their authorized officers the day and year first abovewritten,

STATE OF NEVADA CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Garth F. Dull, Director Michael Harris, Chairman Reviewed : Attest: District Engineer Deanna Lefko, Secretary Approved as toLegality and Form: Approved as toForm: By: Deputy Attorney General Christopher Figgins, Nevada Department of Deputy District Attorney Transportation CITY OF LAS VEGAS

Jan Laverty Jones, Mayor Attest: a:I15435.CLl Clark Kathy Tighe, City Clerk

8 of 8 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

WASHINGTON AVENUE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM (SAGMAN STREET TO LAS VEGAS CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY) - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAS.W.F.93)

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF:Approveand authorize the Chairman to sign.

TECHNICALCOMMI'ITEE: Approve.

CITIZENSCOMMI'ITEE: Approve.

JUNE 10,1993 BOARD: Holdfor two-thirds of themembers to be present

RFCD AGENDA

Date: 7/08/93 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEq

I I SUBJECT: INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FORRIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION FOR WASHINGTON I AVENUE - UPPER SYSTEH I PETITIONER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: Thatthe District approve this InterlocalContract for right-of-way acquisition for Washington Avenue- Upper System.

FISCAL IMPACT: Engineering and right-of-way design and right-of-wayand acquisition $270,000

BACKGROUND: This Interlocal Contractappl ies to a1 1 costs associated withthe acquisition of private property located along the Washington Avenue Channel between Sagman Street and Las Vegas Creek. This right-of-way acquisition is required prior to the Start of any construction of the Upper System which is a continuation of the Washington Avenue ConveyanceSystem.

TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM 9 ITEM# 4 Richard D.Goecke, Director RFCD AGENDA Department of Public Works ITEM# 8 DATE: 7/08/93 Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT L Discussion: Date: Staff Discussion: 6/28/93 WASHINGTONAVENUE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM (SAGMAN STREET TO LASVEGAS CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY) - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT LAS.09.F.93 The City of Las Vegas has submitted an Interlocal Contract to request funding for the acquisition of

~ privateright-of-way for the Washington Avenue System between Sagman Street and Las Vegas Creek. This section of the Washington Avenue System is in the upper reach and right-of-way is requiredprior to thecontinuation of construction. The amount requested is $270,000 and was rogrammed on the FY 92/93 Project List. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to !Om.

Staff Recommendation: Approve and authorize the Chairman to sign.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: AGENDA #9 Date: 5/27/93

Recommendation: Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA #9 Date: 6/1/93

Recommendation: Approve.

Discussion by Board: AGENDA #3B Date: 6/10/93

At the June 10, 1993 meeting, the Board held the item for two-thirds of the members to be present to vote.

Recommendation: Hold until July 8, 1993. 1 INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR 2 RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION FOR WASHINGTON AVENUE- UPPER SYSTEM 3 THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT, made and entered into as of the day of 4 , 1993 by and between the ClarkCounty Regional Flood Control 5 District, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT" and City of Las Vegas, a 6 Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the"CITY". 7 WITNESSETH 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the 9 DISTRICT may approve aproject todesign and construct flood control 10 improvements ; and 11 WHEREAS, the Project is a regional facility described in the Master Plan 12 with the following structure numberobtained from the Master Plan: WAPR 0000 13 hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and 14 WHEREAS, the PROJECT is identified and shown on the attached Exhibit "A"; 15 and 16 WHEREAS, the PROJECT is a Priority Project approvedby the Board in their

17 Fiscal Year 92-93 Project List; and . 18 WHEREAS, the PROJECThas regional flood controlsignificance and is located 19 in the samehydrographic area asClark County, City of Henderson, the City of Las 20 Vegas and the City of North Las Vegas; and 21 WHEREAS, the CITY ispresently prepared to acquire necessary 22 right-of-way and is seeking funding for this purpose. 23 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements

1 1 and promises of the parties hereto, the DISTRICT authorizes the CITYproceed to 2 with the PROJECT as'itis mutually understood and agreed as follows: 3 SECTION I - SCOPE OF THE PROJECT 4 This INTERLOCAL CONTRACT applies to all costs associated with the 5 acquisition of private property located along the Washington Avenue Channel 6 between Sagman Street and Las Vegas Creek. A cursory right-of-way examination 7 indicates land acquisition will be necessary at thelocations shown on 8 Exhibit "A". 9 SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS 10 The DISTRICT agrees to provide funding for PROJECT costs and shall not 11 exceed the limits specified below: t 1. Engineering and right-of-way design and right-of-way acquisition 13 costs shall not exceed $270,000. 14 2. Total PROJECT cost shall not exceed $270,000 which includes all 15 i tems described in Paragraph 1 above. 16 A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and a supplemental 17 interlocal contract approved to increase anyof the amountsnoted above prior to 18 payment of any additional funds. 19 SECTION I11 - GENERAL 20 1. The CITY will comply with the Local Purchasing Act, Chapter 332 of 21 the Nevada Revised Statutes. 22 2. The CITY, its employees and representatives shall at all times 23 comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, statutes, rules and

2 1 regulations in effect at the time workis performed on thePROJECT. 2 3. The CITY shall provide all impacted entities and the DISTRICT with 3 the opportunity to provide the CITY with input relative to the 4 following processes: scope of services development; consultant 5 selection;design, construction and maintenancereview; and 6 monitoring of the effectivenessand impacts of facilities on flood 7 flows. 8 4. Any and a1 1 appl icable portions of the current editions of the 9 DISTRICT’S Policies and Procedures, the Hydrologic Criteria and 10 Drainage Manual and the Uniform Regulations forControl of Drainage 11 adopted by the DISTRICTwill apply in developing this PROJECTunless 12 specifically superseded by the Inter1 oca1 Contract. 13 5. Purchases of right-of-way in excess of that actually needed for 14 construction will not be allowed unless a comparison between the 15 costof excess acquisition and neededacquisition, including 16 damages, indicates that benefits from such a transaction would 17 result. Title to residual property will be vested in the name of 18 the CITY. Revenues derived from the sale of theseproperties, less 19 the cost of the sale of theseproperties, will be forwarded to the 20 DISTRICT. 21 6. Administrativesettlements and acceptance ofcounter offers 22 involving right-of-way may only be made following a reviewapproval 23 by the DISTRICT.

3 1 7. The DISTRICT will make payment to the CITY, its contractor or its 2 consultant each month for PROJECT costsas outlined in SECTION I1 - 3 PROJECT COSTS. Invoices must identify and allocate all costs to the 4 categories noted below: 5 a. Right-of-way 6 1. Design and Surveying 7 2. Appraisals, negotiations, land acquisition, legal fees, a escrow stamps, recording fees, etc. 9 b. Pre-design Engineering (all work prior to design, excluding 10 right-of-way) 11 c. DesignEngineering -2 d. Construction (all work after award of construction contract) 13 8. Accurate documentation ofall work performed and payments madewill 14 be maintained by the CITY for a period of three (3) years in hard 15 copy form after final PROJECT approval and payment. Following the 16 three-year period, the CITY shall keep records forpermanent storage 17 in original form or in microfilm/fiche media. 18 9. The DISTRICT reserves theright to review and/or audit all records 19 pertaining toall projects both during and after PROJECTcompletion. 20 10. The CITY will be responsible for any loss, damage, liability, cost 21 or expense caused by the actions or inactions of its employees, 22 consultants, contractors or agentsarising under this Contractand 23 hereby holds the DISTRICT harmless therefrom.

4 1 11. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to this PROJECT will be 2 refunded by the CITY to theDISTRICT. 3 12. The CITY, as the administering agency, will provide the DISTRICT 4 with the information requiredin NRS 543.580 and shall present that 5 information orally to the Citizens Advisory Committee, Technical 6 Advisory Committee and the Boardof Directors. 7 13. The items covered in SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS mustbe completed to 8 the satisfaction of the DISTRICT prior to December 31, 1995. The 9 DISTRICT may, at any time thereafter, grant extensionsor terminate 10 this Contract after thirty(30) days noticeand may require all sums 11 advanced to the CITY be repaid. 12 14. The CITY at its own discretion may use the servicesof a consultant 13 for the completion of work identified in SECTION I - SCOPE OF 14 PROJECT and the DISTRICT will not be a party to such an agreement. 15 However, the use of any consultant will not entitle CITY to 16 additional funds beyond that specifiedin SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS 17 as hereinabove set forth.

18 ... . 19 ... 20 ... 21 ... 22 ... 23 ...

5 1 15. The CITY will providethe DISTRICT withpreliminary plans, 2 specifications and costestimates for review and comments. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this INTERLOCAL CONTRACT is herebyexecuted as of the 4 date first setforth above. 5 DATE OF DISTRICT ACTION: REGIONAL FLOODCONTROL DISTRICT 6 BY: 7 ATTEST: MICHAEL R. HARRIS, CHAIRMAN 8 9 DEANNALEFKO, SECRETARY 10 11 APPROVEDAS TO LEGALITY ANDFORM: 2 13 CHRISTOPHERD. FIGGINS 14 DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

15 16 DATE OF COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

17 BY:-. . 18 ATTEST: JAN LAVERTYJONES, MAYOR 19 20 KATHLEEN TIGHE,CITY CLERK 21 ... 22 ...

23 P:\UashUpSy.RCY

6 EXHIBIT A Right-of-way for Upper Washington Avenue System

- -= I RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION UPPER WASHINGTON AVENUE I CHANNEL 'PARALLEL SYSTEW I 3

c,9 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - PROJECT PRESENTATION (NLV.06.A.91)

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Hold.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: None. No actionwas taken. -1

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Acceptthepresentation.

JUNE 10,1993 BOARD:Noaction wastaken.

I 1 RFCD AGENDA

Date 7/08/93 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECE PROJECT PRESENTATION - KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN AND DIVERSION DIKE 1 ofCity North Las Vegas

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:

The City of North Las Vegas will answer questions from the Board.

FISCAL IMPACE None by this action.

BACKGROUND: Acquisition of right-of-way for the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin and Diversion Dike is complete; plans and specifications are 95% complete. The City of North Las Vegas wishes to present the project to the Board. Representatives of the City of North Las Vegas and VTN Nevada will describe the project and answer questions from the Board.

FC-19.59.14.00-A AG-211 Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM # 10A ITEM # SA D8te: 5/27/93 Datc:6/10/93 RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 9A k- DATE: 7/08/93 Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

Staff Discussion: Date: 6/28/93 KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - PROJECT PRESENTATION (NLV.06.A.91) A City of North Las Vegas representative will make a presentation on the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Project. The presentationis in accordance with DistrictPolicies and Procedures and NRS 543.580. Discussions are continuing with the cities of North Las Vega and Las Vegas, Clark County and the District regarding the construction of the detention basin prior to construction of the outfall. Several alternatives for the outfall have been considered. Each alternative would provide for the protection of life and property from catastrophic flood events in the northwest area of the Las Vegas Valley. While the discharge of the outfall is yet to be established, staff is of the opinion that the detention basin is a critically important feature of the Master Plan. The presentation was made at the Citizens Advisory Committee meeting on June 1, 1993 at 3:OO pm.

Staff Recommendation: Hold.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:

The item was heard at the TAC meeting on May 27, 1993 and no action was taken.

Recommendation: None.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: T# 10A Date: 6/1/93 Recommendation: Accept the presentation. 1 Discussion by Board: I AGENDA #5A Date: 6/10/93 I At the June 10, 1993 meeting, the Board took no action on the presentation. I Recommendation:

I None. KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Kyle Canyon Detention Basin will be located 2-1/2 miles southwest of the intersection of U. S. Route 95 and Kyle Canyon Road. It will intercept approximately 3,200 acre-ft. of floodwaters originating from a 59 square mile area in the mountains to the west. It will fully protect an area of at least 28 square miles immediately downstream from the basin against the 100-year flood originating in the mountains mentioned above. This fully protected area is located within three entity boundaries:

Clark County: 9 square miles City of Las Vegas: 16 square miles City of North Las Vegas: 3 square miles

The 100-year storm will produce a peak flow of over 13,000 cubic feet per second. The basin and its outlet works are sized and designed so that the peak release flow may be reduced to as little as 350 cubic feet per second.

Using methods and assumptions developedlocally for similar conditions,we estimate conservatively that the damages resulting froman undetained flow of 13,000 cubicfeet per second and intermediate storms will be not less than $80,000,000 and could easily be a great deal more.

The project consists of the six components listed below:

PROJECT COMPONENT COST CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Earthen Dam: $5,460,000

Rock Slope Protection: 1,780,000

Drop-Basins (Upstream Erosion Control): 1,860,000 overflow spillway (Damprotection for100-year and greaterstorms): 3,200,000

Controlled Release Structures: 620,000

Access Road, CollectionDike, Weather Station, etc.: 70,000

TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PHASE: $13,100,000

The project design is intended to meet the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEW).

A complete hydrologic analysisof the watershed was performed, using the HEC-1 computer simulation model and based uponcriteria and methods specifiedin the CCRFCD "Hydrologic criteria and Drainage DesignManual". Final design elements were based upon facilitysizing concepts, cost estimates, alternative considerations, and coordinated with the Master Plan Update.

FC-19.52.14.00-A KYLE20 -==- Majorroutes of uncontrolled flow during100-yeara storm,

,-m- ,-m- - - Area vulnerable to major damage and threat to life during a 100-year storm.

0 e * 00 limit of 28 square mile area immediately downstream. --I---

i VICINITY MAP .-

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS t I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 5-MILEs PROJECT PRESENTATION KYIE CANYON DETENTION BASIN CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT PRESENTATION EXHIBIT "A" KYI E CANYON DETENTION BASIN c I

i CITY OF NORTH LAS =GAS DEPART"I'MNT OF PUBLIC WORKS "UNDIVERTED"FLOW ROUTE KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN DETENTION BASIN AND COLLECTION DIKE LAYOUT EXHIBIT "A"

COLLECTED FLOW TOP OF BACKSLOPE

I TOE OF SLOPE (Back Hinge Point

TOE OF SLOPE

SCALE: 1" = 500'

TO PAINTED DESERT ESTATES KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN PRELIMINARY OUANTITIES AND ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSLaUCTlON COSTS Page 1 of 2

4 Subgrade Preparation 33 1,080 SY I *Ob 33 1)66 5 DmEmbankment 1,800,000 CY 150 2.700,000.00 6 Horizontal Drainage Blanket 2 15,000 CY 350 752500.00 11 7 I Cut Off Trcnch I 8,533 I LF I 10.00 I 85.330.00 11 ~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~- 8 Rip Rap Type I 134,696 SY 10.00 1,346,960.00 9 Rip Rap Type I1 380 SY 20.00 7,600.00 10 Rip Rap Type 111 30.71 9 SY 8.00 245,752.00 11 Toe Orain 8533 LF 10.00 85,330.00

~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ 1% Inlet Structure 1 RCC 8,147 CY 16.00 130,352.00 12B Inlet Structure 1 Cement for RCC 1,128 TON 65.00 . 73,320.00 12C Inlet Structure 1 Flyash €or RCC 246 TON 36.00 8,856.00 13 Inlet Structure 2 1 Ls 50341 .OO 50,541.OO 13A Inlet Structure 2 RCC 8,075 CY 16.00 129,200.00 13B Inlet Structure 2 Cement for RCC 1,118 TON 65.00 72,670.00 13C Inlet Structure 2 Flyash for RCC 244 TON 36.00 8,784.00 14 Inlet Structure 3 1 Ls 373540.00 373,540.00 14A Inlet Structure 3 RCC 30,109 CY 16.00 481,744.00 14B Inlet St.ucturc 3 Cement for RCC 4,169 TON 65.00 270,985.00 14C Inlet Structurc 3 Flyash for RCC 909 TON 36 .OO 32,724.00 KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN PRELIMINARY OUANTITIES AND ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Page 2 of 2

Ittm . Udl No. Ilcm Quantity Unit Price Toial IS Spillway 1 u 766,473.00 766,473.00 15A Spilhvav RCC 803 18 CY 16.00 1,288,288.00 I 15B Spillway Cement for RCC 11,148 TON 65.00 724,620.00 15C SpillwayFlyash for RCC 2,430 TON 36.00 87,480.00 16 OutletStmcture A 1 Ls 100,O00.00 100.OOO.00 17 Access Roadway 4,180 LF 5 .00 20,900.00 18 Diversion Dike I Ls 13,974.00 13,974.00 19 Tortoise Fencing LF N/A MlA 20 6 ft Fence 1500 LF 10.00 15,000.00 21 Weather Station 1 Ls 5,000.00 5,000.00 22 Inlet Structure A 1 Ls 250,o0O.00 250,000.00 23 72 Inch RCP 380 LF 325.00 123500.00 24 Gabions 2,146 CY 90.00 193,140.00 25 Monitering Well 3 EACH 750.00 2,250.00 26 Permanent Signs 40 EACH 150.00 6,000.00 27 Watering 1 Ls 756,bOO ~~ ~ 750,600 28 Over Excavation 1.Ooo CY 20.00 20.000.00

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATION: 650,000 TORTOISE MITIGATION AND RELATED : ~00,Ob~

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE : $13,11$0@ CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - MASTER PLAN CHANGE (NLV.M.A.91)

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING

STAFF: Approve and find the Master Plan Change is hydraulically similar to the facility proposed in the Master Plan; is the mostcost-effective structural orregulatory means of controlling flood waters; and does not adversely affect the continued implementation of the Master Plan.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE:. Follow staff recommendation.

CITIZENS COMMI'ITEE: Follow staff recommendation.

JUNE 10,1993 BOARD: Hold for two-thirds of the members to be present,

RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 9B Date: 7/08/93 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: MASTER PLAN CHANGE - KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN

PETITIONER: CITY OF NORTH USVEGAS

RECOMMENDATION OF PFI1TIONER

I APPROVE MASTER PLAN CHANGE TO RELOCATE PROPOSED MASTER PLAN FACILITY LVMD 3315 AND 3150 TO THE EAST OF THE CURRENT LOCATION.

FISCAL IMPACT: REDUCE COST OF MASTER PLAN FACILITY BY $1,387,000.00

BACKGROUND: The 1991 Clark County Regional Flood Control District Master Plan Update, Kyle Canyon Detention Basin (LVMD 3315) is located in the southwest quarter of Section 15 and the northeast of Section 23 of Township 19 South,Range 59 Easton BLMland. This proposed change moves the KyleCanyon Detention Basin approximately 4,000 LF east of the MPU location to the east half of Section 14 and 23, Township 19, South. Range 59 East. The new location will also be on BLM property. This change is proposed for the following reasons:

1. It moves thedetention basin and diversion dike off of eaisting mining claims.

2. Topographically,the new site is abetter location to interceptthe runoff from the Hanis Springsand Lyle Canyon watersheds.

3. Theproposed location reduces the overall length of the outfall structure by 4,000 ft.

4. Eliminatesthe north rock leveeincluded in the MPU (LVMD 3315).

A study prepared by VTN Nevada indicates that the realigned facilities will reduce the Cost of the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Outfall Structure (LVMD 3150) by approximately S1,387,000.00.

TM: AGENDA lVCD AGENDA ITEM# 10B ITEBSd 5B Da- 5/27/93 D8te:6/10/93 RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 9B DATE: 7/08/93 Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Staff Discussion: I Date: 6/1/93 - KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - MASTER PLAN CHANGE PUBLIC HEARING NLV.06.A.91 A change in location of the Kyle Can on Detention Basin has been requested by the City of North Las Vegas. The proposed change wi E relocate the detention basin approximately one mile east of the location identified in the current Master Plan. City of North Las Vegas staff has demonstrated that with the change in location, overall costs, including the outfall, will be less than the costs for the location proposed in the current Master Plan.

Staff Recommendation: Approve and recommend that the Board frnds the Master Plan Change: 1. Is hydraulicallysimilar to the facility proposed in the Master Plan; 2. Is themost cost-effective structural or regulatory means of controlling flood waters; and 3. Does notadversely affect the continued implementation of the Master Plan.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: #10B Date: 5/27/93

Recommendation: Follow staff recommendation.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: 1 AGENDA #10B Date: 6/1/92

Recommendation: Follow staff recommendation.

Discussion by Board:

At the June 10, 1993 meeting, the Board held the item for two-thirds of the members to be present to vote.

Recommendation: Hold until July 8, 1993. KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN

MASTER PLAN CHANGE

May 10, 1993

SUBMITTED BY: CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS

PREPARED BY: VTN NEVADA I. INTRODUCTION I. This report has been prepared as technical support for a request to change the Clark County Regional Flood Control District (CCRFCD)Master Plan. According to the Master Plan Update (MPU) the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin (LVMD 3315) is located in the southwest quarter of Section 15 and the northeast of Section 23 of Township 19 South, Range 59 East on BLM land. This proposed change moves the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin approximately4,000 LF east of the MPU location to the east half of Section 14 and 23, Township 19, South, Range 59 East. The new location will also be on BLM property. The structures to be relocated are identified as "LVMD 3315 and 3150" on FigureF-1 and F-5 of the CCRFCD 1991 MPU (Figure 1, attached). This change is proposed for the following reasons:

1. It moves the detention basin and diversion dike off of existing mining claims.

2. Topographically,the new site is a better location to intercept the runoff from the Harris Springs and Lyle Canyon watersheds. 3. The proposed location reduces the overall length of the outfall structure by 4,000 ft. 4. Eliminatesthe north rock leveeincluded in the MPU (LVMD 3315).

NRS 543.597, Paragraph 3 allows for a change in size, type or alignment of a facility may be authorized by the board without amending the Master Planif the change:

1. Ishydraulically similar to a proposed facility included in the Master Plan;

2. Is the mostcost effective structural or regulatorymeans of controlling flood water in the district; and

3. Doesnot adversely affect the continued implementation of theMaster Plan.

All three of these subparagraphs are examined in Section I1 of this report. It is demonstrated that this change is in accordance with the requirementsof these subparagraphs and the general principal set forth in subsection 3 of NRS 543.590 for the Master Plan.

II. DISCUSSION OF STATUTE REQUIREMENTS FOR MASTER PLAN CHANGE A. HYDRAULICALLY SIMILAR

The proposed MPU change will perform the Same function as the current MPU location. Both locations intercept runoff from approximately57 square miles of watershed from the Harris Springs and Lyle Canyon. The outfall structure for the proposed Master Plan change is compatible with the MPU location for the Kyle Canyon Outfall Structure. B.MOST COST EFFECTIVE STRUCTURE Thecurrent location of the detention basin is within the boundary of a mining claim. The construction of the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin would require the purchase of these claims. The moving of the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin to the east will eliminate the cost of purchasing the existing mining claims. The additional benefit of this change is the elimination of 4,000 LF of the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Outfall Structure (LVMD 3150). The cost estimate for the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Outfall Structure (LVMD 3150) effected by this change is $3,121,300.00, for approximately 9,000 LF. The MPU change will shorten this facility by approximately 4,000 LF with a cost savings of $1,387,000.00. C. EFFECT OF MASTER PLAN CHANGEON CONTINUED IMPLEMENTATION OF MASTER PLAN.

This proposed Master Plan Change represents a minor modification in location from the current facilities in the 1991 CCRFCD MPU. This location will not adversely effect the current Kyle Canyon Outfall Facilities nor any other facilities.

In conclusion, thisstudy has demonstrated that the proposed change requestedis in accordance with NRS Section 543.597 requirements.

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - AMENDED FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST (NLV.M.B.93)

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Hold.

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: Hold for Technical Advisory Committee Meeting on July 29, 1993.

CITIZENSCOMMITTEE: Approve.

JUNE 10, 1993 BOARD: Holdfor two-thirds of the members to be present.

ITEM# 9C CLARKCOUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

~~ SUBJECT: APPROVED PROJECT, FISCAL YEAR 92-93 PROJECT LIST - KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN PETITIONER: City of North Las Vegas

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: It is recommended that the District place the full Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Project on the Fiscal Year 92-93 Project List.

FISCALIMPACT: NONE BY THISACTION ($13,113,000)

BACKGROUND: The Kyle Canyon Detention Basin is currently scheduled as follows:

FY 1993194: $6,400,000 FY 1994195: $4,800,000

The request to expedite full funding for thisproject to the 1992/93 Fiscal Year is based on the following warrants:

High vulnerability of downstream properties to heavy damage due to existing flood control improvements which are expected to fail during a very heavystorm. - Highrelative benefit/cost ratio of the project. - All right-of-way and permits for the project have been acquired and plans are virtually complete.

FC-19.5214.00-A AG-217

Respectfully submitted,

RFCD AGENDA ITEM # 1Oc ITEM # 5C

TACAGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM #8A ITEM#9C DATE: 6/24/93 DATE: 7/08/93 Re ional Flood Control District AGENDX ITEM DEVELOPMENT I Staff Discussion: I Date: 5/17/93 KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - AMENDED FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST (NLV.M.B.93) TheCi of North Las Vega has uestedthat construction funding be exited for the Kyle CanyonfYDetention Basin Pro~ectby inc"I uding funding for the project on the F 92/93 Project List. The District Policies and. PrOcBdures, Section 2.6 state in part: e"l "In order to expedite projects, revenue not committed to repayment of bonds may be made available for the construcbon of projects on a first come, first served basis. To be considered for construction funding, a ro'ectmust: be includedon the topfive years of the 10-Year plan; have ninety rent (&%jof design complete; have all right-of-entry for construction purposes obtainzand have all n permits, includingenvironmental i.e., 404 permits). An en& item must be prepred7 y the enbty requesting that the project L moved to the current Fscal year Project Lrst ...." uests that $6,400,000 in funding rogrammed in FY 93/94 (Year 2 of the 10-Year plan) E$mE programmed in FY 94/95 (Bear 3 of the 10-Year plan) be moved to the current fiscal year. This resultsin $11,200,000 bein moved to the current fiscal year;however, that mount remains $1,913,000 short of the total $ f 3,113,000 requested. Based upon cost estimates at thetime the 10-YearConstruction Program was repared,it appeared that sufficient funding was programmed for construction of the Kyle Canyon 8etention Basin. It is recommended that $1,913,000 of additional funding be included in FY 92/93 of the 10-Year Construction Program. Theroject meets all other requirements for expedited fundin The backup includes the Ci Nod Las Vegas' 10-Year Construction Program identifying be changes to account for the x yleOf Canyon Detenbon Basin in FY 92/93.

Staff Recommendation: Hold to evaluate input from the entities. I Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:

The TAC held the item to evaluate the fiscal impacts. Recommendation: Hold for June 24, 1993 TAC meeting. Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA #1OC Date: 6/1/93 I Recommendation: I

Discussion by Board: #5C Date: 6/10/93 IAt the June 10, 1993 meeting, the Board held the item for two-thirds of the members to be present I Recommendation: I I Hold until July 8, 1993. ~ 1 Page 1 Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

Date: 06/28/937 KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - AMENDED FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST (NLV.06.B.93) The proposed 10-Year Construction Program accounts for the funding of the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Project in FY 93/94. The 10-Year Construction Program will be considered by the Board at the July 1993 meeting. At the May 1993 Technical Advisory Committee meeting, the fiscal impacts and different funding scenarios were requested from staff to determine the impacts the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin project would have on other projects. The backup includes those funding scenarios as prepared by staff. All of the scenarios account for an uncommitted bond fund balance of $3,800,000 and indicate a FY 93/94 estimatedfunding shortfall of $755,077. Scenario 1 assumes all projects,including Kyle Canyon, would be funded from Pay-As-You-Go funds (Fund 443). The uncommitted bond fund balance of $3,800,000would be utilized to fundother proposed FY 93/94projects. Scenario 2 assumesthe

~ uncommitted bond fund balance of $3,800,000 would be applied to Kyle Canyon, thereby reducing the fiscal impact to Fund 443 from $13,113,000 to $9,313,000. Thebackup includes a tablesummarizing the different funding scenarios. As evidenced from the table,Scenario 2 wouldhave the most minimal impact in programming funding for the projects requested by the entities. Also, considering the proposed bid opening dates for the Buffalo Channel (Westcliff to Doe) and the Rampart Storm Drain, this scenario appears to fulfill the schedules. All procedural obligations have been satisfied and necessary permits obtained for the Kyle Canyon project.

~~ ~ ~ Staff Recommendation: Hold.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: I AGENDA I #8A Date: 6/24/93 Discussion was held regarding the financial impacts the project would have on other projects. The discussionregarding construction of the detention basin prior to construction of the outfall also Icontinued. The TAC voted to hold the item until the July 29, 1993 meeting for further deliberation. Recommendation: IHold until July 29, 1993. Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: I AGENDA # Date: ISee CAC discussion/recommendation of June 1, 1993. IRecommendation: Page 2 \

/ Kyle Canyon - Estimated Fmcd Impacts Scenario 1: Pay-As-You-Go Funding (Fund 443) 611 5/93

JuI-93 $11,814,573 includes project clos

Funding for R-0-W acquisition; on Fy 92/93 Prom U.t

$1,100,000 $13,254,923 Funding for construction; funding origiruuV plogrrmud for FY 93/94 end FY 94/85

Funding for design; proposed on FY 93/94 Prom Lbt

Feb-94 $1,100.000 $2,963,323 Buffdo Ch.(Doa to Wwtdff) $2,015,000 $918,923 Funding for construction oversizing; pmpond on FY 93/94 Prow Lint; bid 0p.n 12/93 Rampart Storm Drain $200,000 $718,923- Funding for construction oversizing; pmpoood on FY 83/84 Prow u.1; bid 0p.n 11193 Mar-94 $1,100,000 $1,818,923 Apr-94 $1,100,000 $2,918,923 Lower Duck CreekDot. &sin $2,300,000 $618,923, Funding for R-0-W acquisition; propoud on FY 83lO4 Projoat list May94 $1,100,OOO $1,718,923 Jun-94 ~1,100,OOO $2,818,923 Incommitted Bond Funds $3,800,000 $6,618,923

'ojoct.romaininp on propaod Cy 93/94Projoa bt: Mission Hills Cdlection Syr. $1.3 18,000 R-0-W end Construction; bid wn9/93 Angel Park Expamion $100,000 COMtNCtiOn Projects programmedfor funding on Bond u.t: Chewnne Channd $841,000 COMtNCtiOn; bid open 10193 Confluence Detention Wnfor $8,620,000 Chownne Channd Crossing. $120,000 Design Hendsrson (Mission Hills Collection) for $1,752,200 Sloan Channd $20400,000 COMtNCtiOn; bid Open 9/93 Goodsprings 8303,000 Construction; bid open 1 1/93 Searchlight $195,000 Construction; bid open 1 1/93 BunkeMlle $297,000 Design MuddyRivar Levee $1,800,000 R-0-W Totd $7,374,000 Funds Available $6,618,923 Funding Shortfall ($755.077) Kyle Canyon - Estimated Fhcd Impacts Scenario 2: Pay-As-YouGo Funding (Fund 443)6 Uncommitted Bond Funds (Fund 4441 to the Kyle Project 611 5/93 Funding Roquntm booked btlmetod Funding (os of 6/15/93) Amount Revenues I Aveileble I Remaining Notes C proposed bid opening oahodulo Ju!-93 0 11.81 4,573 includtm project dose out amount MaintenonceWork Progrwm $1,979,650 $9,834,923 Work PIOM for Maintenonce Activities in FY 93/94 1-15 FreeweyChennel 07 10,000 $9,124,923 Funding for construction oversizing with NDOT; bid owed 8/93 WeshingtonAvenue System $270,000 $8,854,923 Funding for R-0-W acquisition; on FY 92/93 Project List AUQ-93 $1,100,000 $9,954,923 Kyle Cenyon Dot. Bwin OS,313,000 $641,923 Funding for construction; funding originally programmed for FY 93/84 and FY 94/96 Eque strian Dot. BesinEquestrianDot. 0478,000 $163,923 Funding for design; proposod on FY 93/94 Project List Sop93 $l,l00,OOO b 1,263,923 Oct-93 $1,100,000 $2,363,323 Buffalo Ch.(Doe to WomtdiffJ 02,045,000 $318,923 Funding for comtruction owmizing; propoeed on FY 93/94 Project List; bid open 12193 Rempert Storm Drain $200,000 S 1 18,923 Funding for construction oveizing; proposed on M 83/84 Project List; bid open 1 1/S3 Nov-93 01,100,000 01,218,923 Doc-93 $1,100,000 02,318,923 Lower Duck CreekDot. Besin i2,300,000 0 18,923 Funding for R-0-W acquisition; propoud on FY 93/84 Project List Jan-94 $1,100,000 $1,118,923 Fob-94 $1,100,000 $2,218,923 Mer-94 $1,100,000 03,318,923 Apr-94 $1,100,000 $4,418,923 Mey-94 01,100,OOO $5,518,923 Jun-94 $1,100,000 $6,618,923

'0i.cta romeinlng on propmod FY 93/94 Project U.1 Uncommlttod Bond Fun&: Mission Hills Collection Sy.. O1.318.000 R-0-W end Construction; bid opening 9/93 Bond Fund Bdence is mpproximetdy 014,200,000 Angel Perk Expenrion 0 100,000 Construction Projects progrdfor funding on Bond Lirt: Cheyenne Chennel $841,000 Construction; bid opening 10193 Confluence Detention Besin for 08,620,000 Cheyenne Channel Cronings $120.000 Design Henderson (Mission Hills Collection) for 0 1,752,200 Sloen Channel 02,400,000 Construction; bid opening 9/93 Amount remaining uncommitted is epproximatdy $3,800,000 Goodsprings 0303,000 Construction; bid opening 1 1/93 Applying this emount to Kyle Cenyon Detention binreduces impmct to SeercMight 0 195,000 Construction; bid opening 1 1/93 Fund 443 from $13.1 13,000 to $9,313,000 BunkeMlle 0297,000 Design MuddyLevee River $1,800,000 R-0-W Totd $7,374,000 Funds Available $6,618,923 Funding Shortfall ($755,077) Summary of funding scenarJ08

Funding Time Frame Projects (a) I Amount Scenario 1 I Scenario 2 Maintenance Work $1,979,650Programs Jut-93JuI-93 1-1 5 ChannelFreeway $710,000 JuI-93JuI-93 System $270,000 Jut-93 WashingtonAvenueJut-93 Kyle Canyon Det. Basin 8 13,113,000 NOV-93 Aug-93 Equestrian Det. Basin 5478,000 Basin Det. Equestrian AUQ-93Dec-93 Buffalo Ch.(Doe to Westcliff)$2,045,000 Oct-93Feb-94 R am part Storm Drain Storm Rampart $200,000 Oct-93Feb-94 L ower Duck Creek Det. Basin$2,300,000LowerCreekDuckDet. Dec-93Apr-94 (a) - Projects which requests for fundinghave been made by a agenda item

Scenario 1 : Assumes all projects, including Kyle Canyon, would be funded fromPay-As-You-Go (Fund 443). The uncommitted bond fund balance of $3,800,000 would be utilized to fund other proposedFY 93/94 projects.

Scenario 2 : Assumes the uncommitted bond fund balance of $3,800,000 would be applied to Kyle Canyon, thereby reducing the fiscal impact of Kyle Canyon to Fund 443 from $13,113,000 to 59.3 13,000. CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (NLV.06.B.93)

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Hold.

TECHNICAL COMMITEE: HoldforTechnical Advisory Committee Meeting on July 29, 1993.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Hold for sufficient funds to accrue.

JUNE 10,1993 BOARD: Holdfor two-thirds of themembers to be present.

ITEM# 9D CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN AND DIVERSION DIKE - I INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION I City of North Las Vegas

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:

It is recommended that the Regional Flood Control District Board approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the Interlocal Contract between the Regional Flood Control District and the City of North Las Vegas for the construction, construction engineering and desert tortoise mitigation of the KyleCanyon Detention Basin and Diversion Dike.

FISCAL IMPAW.

$ 13,113,000

BACKGROUND

The Regional Flood Control Districtpreviously entered into an Interlocal Contract to fund the engineering design and acquisition of right-of-way for the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin and DiversionDike. Right-of-way has been acquired. Plans and specifications are 95% complete. This Interlocal Contract will provide fundingfor construction, construction engineeringand desert tortoise mitigation to complete the project.

FC-19.52.14.00-A Rerpectfuuy rubmitted, AG-212

10D

TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM #8B ITEM# 9D DATE: 6/24/93 DATE: 7/08/93 Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ Discussion: Date: Staff Discussion: 5/17/93 KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN - NIERLOCAL CONTRACT (NLV.M.B.93) The City of North Las Vegas has submitted a request for an Interlocal Contract for construction engineering, desert tortoise mitigation during construction, and construction for the Kyle Canyon DetentionBasin project. The amountrequested is $13,113,000.00. Funding in this amountis contingent upon: 1) approval of a Master Plan change; 2) approval of modifications to the 10-Year ConstructionProgram; and 3) availabilityof sufficient District revenues (Fund 443) to fund the project. Based upon current revenue and expense rojections, it is estimated that a sufficient District fund balance to allow for approval and funding oP the Interlocal Contract would occur no later than December 1993. The Distnct has received ninety percent (90%)plans and specifications, right-of- way has been obtained, and environmental issues have been addressed. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form.

Staff Recommendation: Hold to evaluate input from the entities.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: 1 AGENDA #10D Date: 5/27/93 The TAC voted to hold the item to evaluate the fiscal impacts.

Recommendation: Hold until June 24, 1993 TAC meeting.

I Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee:

The CAC voted to hold the item until sufficient funds are available.

Recommendation: Hold.

Discussion by Board: AGENDA I #5D Date: 6/10/93 At the June 10, 1993 meeting, the Board held the item for two-thirds of the members to be present to vote.

Recommendation: Hold until July 8, 1993.

Page 1 Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

Staff Discussion: I Date: 06/28/93

KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN * INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (NLV.M.B.93) At the May Technical Advisory Committee meeting considerable discussion centered around the fiscal impacts of funding the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Project and the interim outfall impacts that may exist prior to construction of the outfall as indicated in the Master Plan Update. The fiscal impacts were addressed in a separate agenda item. The outfall impacts were reviewed in the field with City of Las Vega and District staff. In order to mitigate concerns with the basin draining for an extended period of time and the impacts this would have on the existing road network, the following points were considered based upon the field visit: 1. That the basinbe built as designedwith a 350 cfs outfall. 2. Durango Road presently has armored dip sections that allow for passage of flow over the road. If the depth and velocity of the road overflow are within the criteria established in the "Clark County Regional Flood Control District Hydrologic Criteria and Drainage Design Manual", then no improved crossing would be needed at this time. 3. Farm Roadis a graveledroad with a unarmoreddip section. A temporarycrossing with the capacity of 350 cfs should be installed to allow continued use of the road. 4. Theinterim outfall path downstream of Farm Roadis unclear. Itis suggestedthat District funding from Operation and Maintenance be utilized to respond to any inconvenience that may be caused by thebasin's outfall discharge. This mayinclude the placement of additional temporary crossings after the outfall path is defined. Thefiscal impacts of Nos. 2 and 3 aboveare minimal and theexisting funding request appears sufficient enough to fund these aspects.

Staff Recommendation: Hold.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: 1 AGENDA #8B Date: 6/24/93 Discussion was held regarding the financial impacts the project would have on other projects. The discussionregarding construction of the detention basin prior to construction of the outfall also continued. The TAC voted to hold the item until the July 29, 1993 meeting for further deliberation.

Recommendation: Hold until July 29, 1993.

See CAC discussion/recommendation of June 1, 1993.

Recommendation:

Page 2 INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN AND DIVERSION DIKE

THIS INTERLOCALCONTRACT is made and entered into thisday of -1993, by and between the Clark County Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT', and the CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, hereinafter referred to as "CITY'.

WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada RevisedStatutes, the DISTRICT may approve a project to design and construct flood control improvements; and WHEREAS, the flood control improvements proposed herein are the same as those identified in the Master Plan Update of August, 1991, Structure No. LVMD 3315, hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT'; and WHEREAS, the PROJECT is identified and shown on the attached Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the PROJECT has been approved by the DISTRICT on the F.Y. 1992/ 93 Project List; and WHEREAS, the PROJECT has regional flood control significance and is located in the same hydrographic area as is Clark County and the Cities of Las Vegas, North Las Vegas and Henderson. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, contracts and promises of the parties hereto, the DISTRICT and the CITY agree to the following:

SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT

This INTERLOCAL CONTRACT applies to construction, construction engineering and desert tortoise mitigationassociated with the Kyle Canyon Detention Basin and DiversionDike. The basicimprovements shall consist of floodwater control facilities; including anearthen dam,pipes, energy dissipators, anearthen diversiondike, slope protection, a spillway, an access road, dike embankment, channel protection and appurtenances as may be necessary to control floodwaters. The improvements shall be funded through DISTRICT funds as herein described. This project is further identified and shown on the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 11 - PROJECT COSTS

The DISTRICT agrees to fund project costs within the limits specified below:

1. Construction engineering, testing, inspection, surveyingand related work at a costnot to exceed $650,000.

2. Desert tortoise mitigation and related work at a cost not to exceed $100,000.

3. Construction at a cost not to exceed $12,363,000.

4. The total cost of this contract shall not exceed $13,113,000, which includes all work listed in paragraphs 1 through 3 above.

A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and a supplemental interlocal contract approved to increase any of the amounts noted above prior to payment of any additional funds.

SECTION I11 - GENERAL

1. The title sheet of both the plans and the specifications shall show the Regional Flood Control District of Clark County as the funding agency.

2. The award ofbid for this PROJECT shall occur no later than August 4, 1993. The CITY will take all reasonable steps possible to avoid delays in the construction of District funded projects. Project delays more than four months, as measured from the award date, may be subject to a formal review by both the Technical Advisory Committee and the District Board of Directors. At the review, the CITY will have an opportunity to present information relativeto the delays, measures taken to avoid the delays and the likelihood of those delays continuing. The Board will make a determination, in view of the delays and limited available funding, whether project funding should continue. In the case that the Board chooses to discontinue funding, the Board may cancel any Interlocal Contract(s) associated with the project and discontinuefunding for the remainder of the project.Funding already spent or

2 appropriated by the CITY will not be required to be refunded to the District. Project funding can be reconsidered at any time when the CITY can demonstrate that the project can proceed on an acceptable schedule.

3. The CITY will comply with all the Local Purchasing Act, Chapter 332 of the Nevada Revised Statutes.

4. The CITY,its employees, and representatives shall at alltimes comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, statutes, rules and regulations in effect at the time work is performed on the PROJECT.

5. The CITY will require appropriate financialsecurity for the construction of the PROJECT.

6. The CITY shall provide all impacted entities and the DISTRICT with the opportunity to provide the CITY with input relative to the following processes: scope of services development; consultant selection; design, constructionand maintenance review; and monitoring of the effectiveness and impacts of facilities on flood flows.

7. Applicable portions of the current editions of the Policies and Procedures, the Hydrologic Criteria and Drainage Design Manual, and Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage will apply in developing thisPROJECT unless superseded by this CONTRACT.

8. Purchases ofright-of-way in excess of that actually needed for construction will not be allowed unless a comparison between the cost of excess acquisition and needed acquisition, including damages, indicatesthat benefits from such a transaction would result. Title to residual property will be vested in the name of the CITY. Revenues derived from the sale of these properties, less the cost of the sale of these properties, will be forwarded to the DISTRICT.

9. Administrative settlements and acceptance of counter offersinvolving right-of-way may only be made following a review and approval by the DISTRICT.

3 10. The DISTRICT will make payment to the CITY,its contractor or its consultant, each month for project costs as outlined in SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS. Invoices must identify and allocate all costs to the categories noted below:

a. Right-of-way

1. Design & Surveying

2. Appraisals,negotiations, land acquisition, legal fees, escrow stamps, recording fees, etc.

b. PredesignEngineering (all work prior to design,excluding right-of-way)

c. DesignEngineering

d. Construction (allwork after award of construction contract)

e. Desert Tortoise Mitigation

11. Accurate documentation of allwork performed and payments made will be maintained by the CITY for a period of three (3) years in hard copy form after final project approval and payment. Following the three year period, the CITY shall keep records for permanent storage in original form or in microfilm/fiche media.

12. The DISTRICT reserves the right to review and/or audit all records pertaining to all projects both during and after completion.

13. The CITY will be responsible for any loss, damage, liability, cost or expense caused by the actions or inactions of its employees, consultants,contractors or agents arising under this Contract and hereby holds the DISTRICT harmless therefrom.

4 14. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to this PROJECT will be refunded by the CITY to the DISTRICT.

15. The items covered in SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS must be completed to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT prior to October 15,1994. The DISTRICTmay, at any time thereafter, grant extensions or terminate this Agreement after thirty (30) days' notice.

Date of District Action: Regional Flood Control District

MICHAEL R. HARRIS, Chairman ATTEST

DEANNA LEFKO, Secretary

Approved as to Form:

CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS, Deputy District Attorney

Date of Council Action: CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS

JAMES K. SEASTRAND, Mayor

ATTEST

EILEEN SEVIGNY, City Clerk

FC-19.59.14.00-A C-213

.I I 7-

-+--+--+I I IoI pg -+--+ ; i- I@;@1I -t--t--t

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT PRESENTATION i KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN 5-MILES EXHIBIT "A" CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA IT"

SUBJECT: LOWER DUCK CREEK DETENTION BASIN - MASTER PLAN CHANGE (CLA.08.A.92)

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

THISISAPUBLICHEARING

STAFF: Approve and find the Master Plan Change is hydraulically similar to the facility proposed in the Master Plan; is the mostcost-effective structural or regulatorymeans of controlling flood waters; and does not adversely affect the continued implementation of the Master Plan.

TECHNICAL COMMITIEE: Follow staff recommendation.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Follow staff recommendation.

JUNE 10,1993 BOARD: Hold for two-thirds of the members to be present.

ITEM# 10 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

SUBJECT:

MASTER PLAN CHANGE - LOWER DUCK CREEK DETENTION BASIN PETITIONER:

M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

~______RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIO- THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHANGE TO THE MASTER PLAN FOR THE LOCATION OF THE LOWER DUCK CREEK DETENTION BASIN.

FISCAL IMPACT:

NONE

BACKGROUND:

The Regional Flood Control District previously entered into an agreement with Clark County to fund the preliminary engineering for the Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin. The purpose of the preliminary engineering was to determinethe approximate location and size forthe Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin. The results of the pre-design study have indicated that a larger basin is required and the location for the Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin is further west than indicated in the current Regional Flood Control District Master Plan.

Clark County Public Worksis requesting a change to the Regional Flood Control District Master Plan to locate the Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin entirely west of Bermuda Road. The current Master Plan has a portion of this basin located east of Bermuda Road. The attached Exhibit "A" indicates the results of the feasibility study showing a comparison of cost between the location, which would be partially east of Bermuda Road, and that which would be located entirely west of Bermuda Road. Clark County believes the most cost effective solution to the control of flooding in this area would be for location of the detention basin west of Bermuda Road.

Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 11 Date: 5/27/93 RFCD AGENDA M. ITEM# 10 of Public Works Public Director of DATE: 7/08/93 MJM:DLC:mcc Attachment Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Staff Discussion: I Date: 6/28/93 I LOWER DUCK CREEK DETENTION BASIN - MASTER PLAN CHANGE PUBLIC HEARING CLA.08.A.92 A change in location of the Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin has been requested by Clark Coun . The proposed change will relocate the detention basin entirely west of Bermuda Road in lieu of 2e current Master Plan location east of Bermuda Road. Clark County staff has demonstrated that with the change in location, the right-of-way and construction costs will be less than the costs for the location proposed in the current Master Plan.

~~ ~ Staff Recommendation: Approve and recommend that the Board finds the Master Plan Change: 1. Is hydraulicallysimilar to thefacility proposed in the MasterPlan; 2. Is themost cost-effective structural or regulatory means ofcontrolling flood waters; and 3. Does notadversely affect thecontinued implementation of the Master Plan. I Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: #11 Date: 5/27/93

Follow staff recommendation

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA #11 Date: 6/1/93

Recommendation: Follow staff recommendation.

~~ ~~ Discussion by Board:

At the June 10, 1993 meeting, the Board held the item for two-thirds of the members to be present to vote.

Recommendation: Hold until July 8, 1993. EXHIBIT 'I A"

Table 7.1 Alternative 1-MPU Site

Mobilization Ls 200,000.00 1 200,000.00 Excavation CY 2.25 745,360 1,677,060.OO Low Level Outlet Ls 50,000.00 1 50,000.00 PMF Spiliway Ls 750,000.00 1 750,000.00 Land Cost ACRE 30,000.00 52 1,560,000.00 Land Cost ACRE 125,0o0.00 43 5,375,000.00 SUB-TOTAL 9,592,060.00 20% CONTINGENCY 1,918,412.00 TOTAL 11,510,472.00

7.2 Alternative 2-West of Bermuda Road

Mobilization Ls 200,000.00 1 200,000.00 Excavation CY 2.25 745360 1,677,060.00 Low Level Outlet Ls 50,000.00 1 50,000.00 PMF Spillway Ls 750,000.00 1 750,000.00 Crossing @ Bermuda Ls 50,000.00 1 50,000.00 Land Cost ACRE 30,000.00 100 3,000,000.00 SUB-TOTAL I 5,807,060.00 11

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

MEADOWS PHASE V STORM DRAIN - FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAS. 12.A.92) I RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve andChairman authorize the to sign.

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: Approve.

CITIZENS COMMITEE: Approve.

I I RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 11 Date: 7/08/93 CLARK COUNTY REGIONALFLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITm

SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTALINTERLOCAL CONTRACT -0 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MEADOWS- ALTA STORM DRAIN (MEADOWS - PHASE V STORM DRAIN) I PETITIONER: I 1 CITY OF LAS VEGAS I

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: That theDistrict approve this Supplemental InterlocalContract for constructionof the Meadows-Alta Storm Drain (Meadows - Phase V Storm Drain) . FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Completion ofthe design of thisProject was delayed because ofthe fol 1owing : 1. Certain necessary changes tothe design had to bedone in-house as a result of the consultant firm closing its LasVegas office. 2. Bid packagehad to be revised to include the added connection of a 12- inch storm drain onJones Boulevard to a60-inch storm drain on Alta Drive. The City determined that it was necessary to connect intothe Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) storm drain mentioned above. In order to make this connection, it is necessary forthe City to obtain a permit from NDOT. At this time the City has not received this permit from NDOT but it is anticipatedthat this permit will be received within the next ten (10) days. 3. Revision to bid package a1 so had to bemade concerning the raising of a 60-inch RCP storm drain in Alta Drive five to six feet. 4. In-house manpower forconstruction management wi 11 not be available until September1993. Because of the above circumstances, theProject will not be advertised for biduntil June 1993 withthe award ofbid taking place in July 1993. Therefore, we are supplementingour interlocalcontract for construction of thisProject to show the award of bidfor this Project occurring no later than October 31, 1993. . TAC AGENDA RFCDAGENDA ITEM# ITEM# 7 ,I 10 11 .Date: 6/24/93 Date: 7/08/93 Richard D. Goecke, Director Department of Public Works Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

Discussion: Date: Staff Discussion: 06/28/93 MEADOWS PHASE V STORM DRAIN - FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAS.12.A.92)

The City of Las Vegas has submitted a request for a First Supplemental Interlocal Contract to modify theaward of bid date for the Meadows Phase V Storm Drain project located in Alta Drive. The original contract dated August 13, 1992 had an award of bid date of January 31, 1993 and the City proposes to change that date to October 31, 1993 due to the delays as stated on the City’s agenda item. It is noted that the City of Las Vegas did not request a modification to the completion date of June 30, 1994 in the Interlocal Contract approved on August 13,1992. This request has no fiscal impact. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form.

Staff Recommendation:

Approve and authorize the Chairman to sign.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: AGENDA # 10 Date: 6/24/93

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA I # 10 Date: 6/28/93 1 SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE 2 MEADOWS-ALTA STORM DRAIN (MEADOWS - PHASE V STORM DRAIN) 3 THISSUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT, made and enteredinto this 4 day of 1993, by and between CLARKCOUNTYthe 5 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROLDISTRICT, created pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada 6 Revised Statutes hereinafter called the "DISTRICT", and the CITY OF LAS VEGAS, 7 a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "CITY". a WITNESSETH: 9 WHEREAS, an Interlocal Contract dated August 13, 1992 was entered into 10 between the DISTRICT and the CITY for the construction of flood control 11 improvements describedin the DISTRICT MasterP1 an as MEAL 0060 (Falcon Lane to 12 Jones Boulevard a1 ong A1 ta Drive) as depicted in Exhibit "A". 13 WHEREAS, it is the desire of theCITY to extend the date foraward of bid 14 of this PROJECT. 15 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of thecovenants, conditions, agreements, 16 and promises of the parties hereto, the DISTRICT authorizes theCITY to proceed 17 with the PROJECT as it is mutually understood and agreed as follows: 18 SECTION I1 I - GENERAL 19 1. Paragraph 2 of Section I11 - GENERAL of the or'iginal Interlocal 20 Contract dated August13, 1992 shall be revised to read as follows: 21 2. The award of bid for this PROJECT shall occur no later than 22 October 31,1993. The CITY will take a1 1 reasonable steps 23 possible to avoid delays in the construction of DISTRICT-

1 1 funded projects. PROJECT delays more than four months, as 2 measured from the award date, may be subject to a formal 3 review of both the Technical Advisory Committee and the 4 DISTRICT Board of Directors. At the review, the CITY will 5 have an opportunity to present information relative to the 6 delays, measures taken toavoid the delaysand the 1 ikel ihood 7 of thosedelays continuing. The Board will make a 8 determination, in view of the delays and limited available 9 funding, whether PROJECTfunding should continue. In the case 10 that the Board chooses to discontinuefunding, the Board may 11 cancel any Interlocal Contract (s) associated with the PROJECT and discontinue funding for the remainder of the PROJECT. 13 Funding already spentor appropriated by the CITY will not be 14 required to be refunded to the DISTRICT. Project funding can 15 be reconsidered at any time when the CITY can demonstratethat 16 the PROJECT canproceed on an acceptable schedule. 17 ... 18 ... 19 ... 20 ... 21 ... 22 ... 23 ...

2 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM - SUBJECT:

RAMPART STORM DRAIN - PROJECT PRESENTATION &AS. 11.B.) RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: presentation. the Accept

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: Accept the presentation.

CITIZENSCOMMITTEE: None.

RF'CD AGENDA ITEM# 12A 1Date: 7/08/93 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

~~~ I SUBJECT: I RAMPART STORM DRAIN (ANGEL PARK - PECCOLE 1) -- Project Presentation PETITIONER: City of Las Vegas

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: That the Board of Directors receive the Project presentation on the construction of Rampart Storm Drain (Angel Park - Peccole 1).

FISCAL IMPACT: None.

BACKGROUND: This Project involves the Rampart Storm Drain. The basic improvements shall consist of floodwater facilities including piping and inlet systems, channels, embankments and other appurtenances as may be necessary to control floodwaters. An Interlocal Contract for construction funding is pending. District Policies and Procedures require this project presentation.

/J L ”( Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT 1 Staff Discussion: I Date: 06/28/93 RAMPART STORM DRAIN - PROJECT PRESENTATION

I~ (LAS. 11.B.)

~ The City of Las Vega will make a presentation on the Rampart Storm Drain project generally located

~ between VegasDrive and CharlestonBoulevard. The presentation is in accordance with District

~ Policies and Procedures and NRS 543.580. The backup submitted by the City of Las Vegas indicates that right-of-way necessary for the construction of the project does not exist; however, it is expected to be obtained by the end of June 1993.

Staff Recommendation: Accept the presentation.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: PY#12A Date: 6/24/93

Accept the presentation.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGEM)A #11A Date: 6/28/93 No representative from the City of Las Vegas was present to make the presentation. The CAC took no action.

Recommendation:

None. mAwu JAN LAVERTY JONES COCx:CILME\ VEGAS BOB NOLEX ARNIE ADAMSEX SCOTT HI(X1NSOS FRAU HAWKISS JR.

CITY U(AY4GER WILLIAM J. NOONAS

June 7, 1993

Ms. Virginia Bax-Valentine, P.E. General ManagerKhief Engineer CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 301 E. Clark Avenue - #300 Las Vegas, NV 891 01

RE: RAMPART BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENTS STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES

Dear Virginia:

Please find enclosed the design plans for Rampart Boulevard- Charleston Boulevard to Vegas Drive at 90% completion. We are pleased to present the design of this project to the Technical Advisory Committee and DistrictBoard.

In compliance with NRS 543.580 we present the following:

Proiect Cost:

Engineering and Design $ 71 6,750.00 Construction 8,366,860.00 Construction Management 538,200.00 TOTAL $ 9,621.81 0.00

Cost Breakdown by Funding Source:

Regional TransportationCommission 7,872,086.00 City of Las VegasSpecial Improvement District 1,533,074.00 ClarkCounty Region Flood Control District 181,203.00 City of City Las SanitationVegas35,447.00 Funds RAMPART BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENTS June 8, 1993 Page Two

Riaht of Wav:

The right of way is currently being dedicated by the adjacent properties with the exception of property already owned by the City of Las Vegas. Right of way dedication should be completed in approximately two weeks.

Proiect Economic Benefit:

TheRampart Boulevard 72" storm drain facility has an estimated cost of approximately $700,000. It provides protection to over300 acres downstream, including over 60 acres of existing single family residences and apartments valued at over $30,000,000.

I trustthat this provides the information required. If any further information is required, please contact me at 229-6272.

Sinfierely,

DENIS ATWOOD, P.E. Design Engineer Department of Public Works

DLA/ks

Enclosures cc:Dennis Anderson, P.E. T I

I I- I- H D H I X I W

z 2 ----+--- S3NOr 0

w 0 p: P( I I

RAMPART BOULEVARD- 90 X CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE G.C. WALLACE, INC. JUNE 7,1993 PAGE 1 OF 3 -I CONTRACT UNIT R.T.C. C C.RF.C 0. s.10. 1405 NON 6.1.0. TOTAL OUANnlY AMOUNT OUANTITV AMOUNT -UNf OUANTlW PRICE T QUANmY wmAMOUNT CONTRACT Ls 1 sm,000.00 05% $180,000.00 5% sm.m.00

La 1 $100,oo000 w.70~ sea.700 00 8.30% s100.ooo.00

LS 1 $lO.OoO.00 5ow s5.000.00 5ow t10,m.Ca

LF 2883 $2.00 2883.00 $5,788.00 $5.768.00 LF 121 $2 00 121 00 $242.00 5242.00 LF 805 62.00 m5.m s1,8to.m $1,810.00 m 13500 $1.00 13500.00 s13.m.m $13,500.00 LF BM $1.50 800 00 s 1,3x).00 51.35000 EA 1 8350.00 1.00 $350.00 SJJO.00 EA 1 s.lJo.00 1.00 $450 00 suo.00 LF 81 S20.00 61.00 $1,220.00 Ll.220.00 LF 15 525.00 15.00 $375.00 c375.00 LF 294 $25.00 284.00 $7,350.00 s7.Jw.00 LF 40 s10 00 40.00 $400 00 s1oQ.00 €A 1 $400 00 1.00 $400 00 s4oo.M)

CY 23570 54 00 230482.25 $021,829.00 5285.75 f90.072.00 CY looa, E15.00 1oooO.00 5150.o0O00 s15o.ooo.00 CY 28ooo $4.00 5500 00 122.000.00 2o500.00 s104.m.00 SY 105100 $1.00 84858 24 S84.858.24 10241.78 LlM.100.00

CY so0 s15.00 500.00 $7.330 00 s7.5Qo.00

Ls 1 sBo.m.00 1.00 580,000.00 se0.ooo.m LF 2648 58.00 2048.00 521.168.rn $21.16a8.00 LF 1505 s12.00 1505.00 s1e,oao.oo S18.080.00 LF 818 125.00 818.00 520,450 00 S20.4SO.W

roF 33120 $7.00 27057.23 $185.700 01 5162.77 S231,6U).Q) w 23Mo $24.00 21708.10 ~520.888.32 1m1.e.2 L5BB.4oo.00 rm 680 $25.00 680.00 s1e,m00 $16.500.00 rm 5750 529.00 5227.04 3151.504.18 472.88 SlOS,Ja).00 SY 7maS 50.30 0728.35 s2o.81e 61 815685 S23.065.3Q SY 14065 m.30 14065.00 $4.219.50 S4.210.M

la 1 $471.200.00 1.00 $471,200.00 $471,2Q).00 La 1 sn3.500.00 1.00 683,500.00 SE3,SOO.W LS 1 $111.800.00 1.00 Slll,Bo000 Slll,(aO.M La 2 $2,200.00 roo s2.m.00 1 m s4.4oo.m La 1 $175,000.00 1.00 s175.m.00 s175.ooo.00 Ls 1 IBBs.m.00 1.00 u)B5,000.00 m5.000.00 Ls 1 $781,000.00 1.00 s781,mm $78 1 .o00.00 LF 150 535.00 150 00 $5.250 00 $5,250.00 D. - P

I I I I 1: Ii I

RAMPART BOULEVARD- 90 K CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE O.C. WALLACE, INC. JUNE 6,1993 PAGE 2 OF 3

I I I I I ITFU I CONTRACTI UNIT I R.T.C. I C C R.F.C 0. S.I.D. 1405 I UNll AMOUNT I OUAW AMOUNT I WNTT?N?&JNT

80301 6' PYC OFLAIN PIPE, SCHEDULE 10 LF 138 530 00 138.00 BO3.02 18-INCH RCP STOW MWN (13Joq LF 518 $50 00 dl6 00 803.03 18-INCH RCP STORM DRAIN CF 1840 580.00 1840 00 803.04 18-INCH RCP STORM DWN(jomq LF 824 570 00 824.00 W3.05 24-INCH RCP STORM OWN (1- Lf 510 580 00 51000 BO3.08 SINCH RCP STORM ORAlN (13- LF 300 575.00 3oa.m 803.07 =INCH FCP STORM DRAlN (IJSoq LF 148 $90 00 148 00 803.08 wNcn RCPSTORM OWN (2oooq Lf 524 SIOi)00 524.00 W3.08 48-INCH RCP STORM OWN (zooOq LF 245 5130.00 155.00 ea00 51 1,700.00 305.10 72-INCH RCP STORM ORAlN (13509 LF 478 It8000 7% 25% 521,555 00 803.11 72-lNCH RCP STORM MWN (2OCCq LF 1444 520000 7% 25% 572.200 00 803.12 72-INCH FCP STORM DRAIN cnoool . LF 1155 5225 00 75% 25% 564,968 75

809.01 EA e 52.000.00 800 08.02 EA 1 54,moo 1.00 m.03 EA 4 54,00000 4.00 BO9.04 EA 0 57.400.00 75x 25% Sll.100.00 m.05 1s 1 511.00000 75x 25% 52,750.00 m.08 EA 8 52,200.00 000 08.07 EA 8 12,800.00 600 m.08 EA 8 53.Mo.00 600 e0e.m EA 3 53.J00.00 300 00.10 EA 5 55,000.00 500 wo.lt EA 3 57.00000 3.00 m.12 EA 3 s3,J00.00 3.00 m. 13 EA 1 Sl,J0000 1.00 000.14 EA 4 52,200.00 4.00 rs.so0.W 000.15 EA 2 tZ.aw.00 2.00 $5.800.00 608.18 EA 1 5425.00 1 BY 10001 515.w( lo00 515,00000 I 013.01 LF 17008 55.00 8412.4S 82M.51 541,202.55 013.02 SF 44800 $2.00 41111.46 3480.54 u),B77.00 013.03 LF 13876 54 00 13878.00 013.04 SF 401 53.00 401.00 813.W SF 631 53.50 031.00 t2.2oe.M 813.08 SF 12228 52.50 1?228.00 530,570.00 I

i I I

RAMPART BOULEVARD- 90 K CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE O.C. WALLACE, INC. JUNE 6,1993 PAGE 3 OF 3

ITEM CONTRACT UNIT R T.C. T C.C.A.F.C.0 I 5.1.0. llos I TOTAL NO mu M8CRrn PRICE OUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY CONTRACT =I= E10.01 CHAIN LINK FENCE RELOCATIOlWlE~NN I LsI 1 $8,700.00 1 se.7oo.w 818.01 GALVANIZED QUAAORU - TUPLE mATW)NS LF 2% $35.00 250 se.750 w 818.02 BREAKAWAYCABLE TERMINALB EA 4 sew.00 4 S3.200.W

819.01 GUlM POSTS.FLDOBLE EA 88 $25 00 88 s1.700.w

821.01 MONUMENTS, TYPE I EA S $800.00 5 s3.ow.00 821.02 MONUMENTS. TYPE II EA 5 5600.00 5 s3.m.w w1.w MONUMENTS, TYPE n1 EA S 5600.00 5 $3.000 w rnT.01 Ls 1 s[n.m 00 1 se0.ooO.w 5237.02 LF 2508 $9.00 2508 s22.581.00 3231.03 LF 8118 57 00 e11e s5e,l32e.w

-01 EA 38 $2,800.00 38.00 t100.e00.w E23LO2 EA 4s $3.600.00 14 00 650,400 w 31.00 $1 11,m.w 623L03 EA 11 seo0.w 11.00 M,MO.OO B23LM EA 11 c5,m.Oa 11.w $57.200.00 SmM EA 3 f2.Mn.00 3.00 S8.ooO.00 rmoB EA 4 $1.800.00 100 s1.m.w 3.w U*bM).00 923L.07 LF 134Jo $5.00 6557 00 532.7es.w I3002.M $34,510.00 323LoB EA 3 $400.00 3.00 t1.m.w

827.01 PERMANENT 8KiW @#wM) MUJNTEQ SF 14.56 $25.00 luB.00 bJg,Ux).w 827.02 PERMANENT SGNS (OVEAHEAq SF 175 53s.00 175 00 ~B.I~S.OO 827.43 PERMANENT SIGNS (BWKIE “ED) SF 348 $55.00 wmo s19.1es.m 627.04 PERMANENT SIGN SUPPORT 8TRK;TuRE EA 1 n5.m.00 1 s2s.000.00 827.05 SIGN REMOVAL EA 40 s3axxY 40 s12,mw

620.01 TRAFFIC SWM- PAVEMENT UAAKINGS SF 4308 $4.50 4309.00 619.750.50 m.02 TRAFFIC STRIPIN - PAINTED PAVEMENT MAAKlNQS SF 10070 $1.00 10070.00 s10.070.w m.01 LF 172 $35.00 172.00 $8,020.00 620.02 LF 828 $42.00 a.00 ml.378.00 620.4) LF 430 $46.00 430.00 $19,780.00 620.04 LF 140 $70 00 140.00 620.05 Is 1 s12.m.00 1.00 620.W la 1 $4,750.00 1.00 $4,750.00

LF 22u $34.00 w.2454 se7,se3.w 11.20% cQ.oce.40 LF 275 Loo.00 275.00 s24.750.00 s1o.m.00 1.00 -s1o.m.m - se.642.26e.J8 $172.573.7S $853,M8.40 s33.7w.u) S332.11342 M.826 68 $32.778.42 $1.887.92 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

ISUBJECT:

RAMPART STORM DRAIN - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAS.ll.B.) L RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Assign a priority for funding the project subject to submittal of documentation that right-of-way exists for construction of the project; and acceptance of the project presentation.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Followstaff recommendation.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: None.

RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 12B CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT : INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTIONOF RAMPART STORM DRAIN(ANGEL PARK - PECCOLE 1) PETITIONER: City of Las Vegas

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: Thatthe Board ofDirectors approve the Interlocal Contract for the construction of Rampart Storm Drain (Angel Park - Peccole 1).

FISCAL IMPACT: Construction $185,000 ConstructionEngineering 15.000 TOTAL $200,000

BACKGROUND: On July 9, 1992 the District approved an Interlocal Agreement for the design and right-of-way engineering of Rampart Storm Drain(Angel Park - Peccole 1). Design and right-of-way engineering are substantially completeand the City is now ready to advertise for a construction contract. This Interlocal Contract would provide fundingfor construction and construction engineering.

TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 12~ ITEM# 12B Date: 6/24/93 Date: 7/08/93 Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Istplt DiscLon: Date: 6/28/93 RAMPART STORM DRAIN - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT I(LAS. 11.B.) The City of Las Vegas has submitted an Interlocal Contract request for construction engineering and constructionfor the Rampart Storm Drain generally located between Vegas Drive and Charleston Boulevard. The District’s portion of the project is part of a larger street improvement project. The amount requested is $200,000. The City of Las Vegas has submitted ninety percent (90%) plans and specifications and right-of-way dedication is expected to be finalized by the end of June 1993. This project is identified on the proposed FY 93/94Project List. Funding for the construction engineering and construction is contingent upon approval of the FY 93/94 Project List and the availability of Pay- As-You-Go funds (Fund 443). Pay-As-You-Go funds for this request will not be available for several months if previously requested projects are approved for funding. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form.

Staff Recommendation:

Assign a priority for funding the project subject to the following: 1. Submittal of documentationthat right-of-way exists for construction of theproject; and I2. Acceptanceof the project presentation. IDiscussion by Technical Advisory Committee:

Recommendation:

Follow staff recommendation.

I Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA #llB Date: 6/28/93

The CAC took no action on the item. 1 INTERLOCALCONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 2 RAMPART STORM DRAIN (ANGEL PARK - PECCOLE 1) 3 THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT, made and enteredinto as ofthe day of 4 , 1993 by and between theClark County Regional Flood Control 5. District,hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT" and City of Las Vegas, a 6 municipalcorporation, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY". 7 WITNESSETH 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 ofthe Nevada RevisedStatutes, the

9 DISTRICT may approve a projecttodesign and constructflood control 10 improvements; and

11 WHEREAS, the project is a regionalfacility described in the Master Plan

12 withthe following structure number obtainedfrom the Master Plan: APPl 0000 13 hereinafterreferred to as "PROJECT"; and

14 WHEREAS, the PROJECT is identified and shown on theattached Exhibit "A";

15 and

16 WHEREAS, the PROJECT is a Priority Project approvedby the DISTRICT Board

17 of Directors on the Bond List; and 18 WHEREAS, the PROJECT has regional flood control significance and is located

19 in the same hydrographicarea as Clark County, the City of Henderson, the City

20 of Las Vegas and the City of North Las Vegas; and 21 WHEREAS, the CITY is prepared to initiate advertisement for a construction 22 contract and is seekingfunding for this work. 23 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of thecovenants, conditions, agreements

1 1 and promises of the parties hereto, the DISTRICT authorizes the CITY to proceed 2 with the PROJECT as it is mutually understood and agreed as follows: 3 SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT 4 This INTERLOCAL CONTRACT applies to all costsfor construction and 5 construction engineering to placein service the Rampart Storm Drain. The basic 6 improvements shall consist of floodwater facilities including piping and inlet 7 systems, channels, embankments and other appurtenances as may be necessary to 8 control floodwaters. The improvements shall be funded through DISTRICT funds as 9 herein described. This PROJECT is further identified and shown on the attached 10 Exhibit "A". 11 SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS 12 The DISTRICT agrees to provide funding for PROJECT costs and shall not 13 exceed the limits specified below: 14 1. Constructionshall not exceed $185,000. 15 2. Construction engineering shall not exceed $15,000. 16 3. Total cost of this PROJECT shall not exceed $200,000. 17 A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and a supplemental 18 interlocal contract approved to increase any of the amounts noted above prior to 19 payment of any additional funds. 20 SECTION I11 - GENERAL 21 1. The DISTRICT shall be shown on the title sheet of both the plans and 22 specifications as the funding agency. 23 2. Theaward of bid forthis PROJECT shall occur no later than

2 1 September 30, 1993. The CITY will take a1 1 reasonablesteps 2 possibleto avoid delays in theconstruction of DISTRICT-funded 3 projects. PROJECT delays more thanfour months, as measured from 4 the award date, may be subjectto a formalreview by both the

5 TechnicalAdvisory Committee and the DISTRICT Board ofDirectors.

6 At thereview, the CITY will have an opportunity. to present 7 informationrelative to the delays, measures taken toavoid the 8 delays and the 1 ikel ihood of thosedelays continuing. The Board 9 will make a determination, in view ofthe delays and limited 10 availablefunding, whether PROJECT fundingshould continue. In the 11 case thatthe Boardchooses todiscontinue funding, the Board may 12 cancel any InterlocalContract (s) associatedwith the PROJECT and 13 discontinuefunding for the remainder of the PROJECT. Funding 14 already spent or appropriated by the CITY will not be required to be 15 refunded tothe DISTRICT. Projectfunding can be reconsideredat

16 any time when the CITY can demonstrate that the PROJECT canproceed 17 on an acceptableschedule. 18 3. The CITY will comply withthe Local Purchasing Act, Chapter 332 of

19 the Nevada RevisedStatutes. 20 4. The CITY, its employees and representativesshall at all times

21 comply withall applicable laws,ordinances, statutes, rules and 22 regulations in effect at the time work is performed on the PROJECT. 23 5. TheCITY will requireappropriate financial security for PROJECT

3 1 construction. 2 6. The CITY shall provide all impacted entities and the DISTRICT with 3 the opportunity to provide the CITY with input relative to the 4 following processes: scope of services development; consultant 5 selection;design, construction and maintenancereview; and 6 monitoring of the effectiveness and impacts of facilities on flood 7 flows. 8 7. Any and all applicable portions of the current editions of the 9 DISTRICT’S Policies and Procedures, the Hydrologic Criteria and 10 Drainage Manual and the Uniform Regulations for Control of Drainage 11 adopted by the DISTRICT will apply in developing this PROJECTunless 12 speci f ical lysuperseded by the Interlocal Contract. 13 8. Purchases of right-of-way in excess of that actually needed for 14 construction will not be a1 lowed unless a comparison between the 15 cost ofexcess acquisition and neededacquisition, including 16 damages, indicates that benefits from such a transaction would 17 result. Title to residual property will be vested in the name of 18 the CITY. Revenues derived from the sale of theseproperties, less 19 the cost of the sale of theseproperties, will be forwarded to the 20 DISTRICT. 21 9. Administrativesettlements and acceptance of counteroffers 22 involving right-of-way may only be made followinga review approval 23 by the DISTRICT.

4 1 10. The DISTRICT will make payment to the CITY, its contractor

2 consultant each month forproject costs as out1 ined in SECTION I1 -. 3 PROJECT COSTS. Invoices must identify and allocate all costs to the 4 categories noted below: 5 a. Construction 6 b. Construction engineering 7 11. Accurate documentation ofall work performed and payments made will 8 be maintained by the CITY for a period of three (3) years in hard 9 copy form after final PROJECT approval and payment. Foll owing the 10 three-year period, the CITY shall keep records for permanent storage 11 in original form or in microfilm/fiche media. 12 12. The DISTRICT reserves theright to review and/oraudit all records 13 pertaining toall projects both during and after PROJECTcompletion. 14 13. The CITY will be responsible for any loss, damage, liability, cost 15 or expense caused by the actions or inactions of its employees, 16 consultants, contractors or agentsarising under this Contract and 17 hereby holds the DISTRICT harmless therefrom. 18 14. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to this PROJECTwill be 19 refunded by the CITY to the DISTRICT. 20 15. The CITY, as the administering agency, will provide the DISTRICT 21 with the information required in NRS 543.580 and shall present that 22 information orally to the Citizens’ AdvisoryCommittee, Technical 23 Advisory Commi ttee and the Board of Directors.

5 1 16. The items covered in SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS 2 the satisfaction of the DISTRICT prior to September30, 1994. The 3 DISTRICT may, at any time thereafter, grant extensionsor terminate 4 this Contract after thirty(30) days noticeand may require all sums 5 advanced to the CITY be repaid. 6 17. The CITY at its own discretion may use the servicesof a consultant 7 for the completion of work identified in SECTION I - SCOPE OF 8 PROJECT and the DISTRICT will not be a party to such an agreement. 9 However,the use of any consultant will notentitle CITY to 10 additional funds beyond that specified in SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS 11 as hereinabove set forth. 12 ... 13 ... 14 ... 15 ... 16 ... 17 ... 18 ... 19 ... 20 ... 21 ... 22 ... 23 ...

6 1 18. The CITY will provide the DISTRICT with prel imi nary 2 specifications and cost estimates for review and comments. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Contract is hereby executed as of the 4 date first set forth above. 5 DATE OF DISTRICTACTION: REGIONALFLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 6 BY :

7 ATTEST: MICHAELR. HARRIS, CHAIRMAN 8

9 DEANNA LEFKO,SECRETARY 10 APPROVEDAS TO LEGALITY AND FORM: 11 12 CHRISTOPHERFIGGINS 13 DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

14 15 DATE OF COUNCILACTION: CITY OF LAS VEGAS 16 BY : 17 ATTEST: JANLAVERTY JONES, MAYOR 18 ~ ~ ~~ 19 KATHLEENTIGHE, CITY CLERK 20 ... 21 ... 22 ...

23 P:\AACIPCONS.SD

7 I

I S3NOf

& w ca r3 I 0 P= P4

IVdTVnH .. . .. CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

UNNAMED WASH, LAUGHLIN - SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAU.Ol.B.92) RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve and authorize Chairman to sign.

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: Approve.

CITIZENSCOMMITTEE: Approve.

RFCD AGENDA lW" 13 Date: 7/08/93 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

UNNAMED WASH, LAUGHLIN PETITIONER:

M.J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT TO ALLOW FOR AN EXTENSION OF CONSTRUCTION TIME.

FISCAL IMPACT:

NONE

BACKGROUND:

On March 12, 1992 the Regional Flood Control District approved an Interlocal Contract to provide funds for construction and construction engineering for the Unnamed Washin Laughlin, Nevada.

Clark County has been pursuing an Army Corps of Engineers (COE) 404 Permit, as well as an Engineering Services Contract, to provide a wetlands mitigation plan. As far back as January, Clark County hadbeen informed by COE representatives that a permit was forthcoming, however, the County only recently received formal notification of the permit. In addition, on June 1, 1993 an Engineering Services Contract was executed between the Board of County Commissioners and Cella Barr Associates to provide for wetlands mitigation engineering.

This Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract providesfor an extension of time. Advertisement for construction bids began on June 4, 1993.

Respectfully submitted,

Director of Public Wok+ hfJM:DLC: WCB:ncc Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Staff Discussion: I Date: 06/28/93 UNNAMED WASH, LAUGHLIN - SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAU.01 .B.92)

Clark County has submitted a request for a Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract to modify the award of bid date for the Unnamed Wash project in Laughlin. The District entered into an Interlocal Contract with Clark County on March 12, 1992 and a later supplemental contract dated January 14, 1993. The original Interlocal Contract had an award of bid date of August 31, 1992 and a completion date of July 1, 1993; the First Supplemental Interlocal Contract changed these dates to February 28, 1993and December 31, 1993, respectively. The Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract now requeststhat the dates changed to August 17, 1993,for award of bid and June 30,1994, for completion. The primary reason for delay of the project is to acquire an Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit. The project is currently out to bid and an award of bid is expected in the near future. This request has no fiscal impact. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form.

Staff Recommendation:

Approve and authorize the Chairman to sign.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: 1 AGENDA #14 Date: 6/24/93

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: I AGENDA #13 Date: 6/28/93

Recommendation:

Approve. SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCALCONTRACT FOR UNNAMED WASH, LAUGHLIN

THIS SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT,made and entered into thisday of ,1993, by and betweenthe County of Clark, a political subdivision,hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY",and the ClarkCounty Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT'.

WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, on March 12, 1992, the DISTRICT approved an Interlocal Contract to provide funds for the construction engineering, and construction of the Unnamed Wash in Laughlin, Nevada; and

WHEREAS, on January 14, 1993, the DISTRICT approved a First Supplemental Interlocal Contract to provide an extension of construction time to allow for wetlands mitigation engineering; and

WHEREAS, design of the flood control improvements identifiedin the Master Plan Amendment for Unnamed Wash in Laughlin, Nevada is completed and propertyappraisals have been obtained; and

WHEREAS, it is necessary to provide engineering designof wetlands mitigation, to the satisfaction of the USEPA as a requirement of the U.S. Corps of Engineers 404 Permit; and

WHEREAS, to effect engineered design of wetlands mitigation additional design completion time is required.

1mnuacd2.ric DLCWCB NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises hereto, it is mutually understood and agreedto supplement the Interlocal Contract approved March 12, 1992 as follows:

SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT shall be changed to read as follows:

This Interlocal Contractapplies to floodcontrol facilities associated with the Unnamed Washin Laughlin, Nevada. The PROJECT shallconsist of the contract administration, construction engineering, inspection, testing, survey, and construction of a 200 acre-foot debris basin, 4,100 feet of unlined channel, 3,500 feet of soil cement lined channel, energy control devices, a bridge at Needles Highway, and outfall works into the Colorado River. Also included are an 800 foot earthen levee to control the confluence of Tributary "IC' Wash flood flow with Unnamed Wash and a 2,200 foot earthen levee or floodwall to control the confluence of Hiko Springs Wash flood effects upon Unnamed Wash.

The PROJECT is as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". ,

SECTION I11 - GENERAL paragraphs 2 and 15 shall be changed to read as follows:

2. The award ofbid forthis PROJECT shalloccur no later than August 17, 1993. The COUNTY will take all reasonable steps possible to avoid delays in the construction of DISTRICT funded projects. Project delays more than four months, as measured from the award date, may be subject to a formal review by both the Technical Advisory Committee andthe District Board of Directors. At the review, the COUNTY will have an opportunity to present information relative tothe delays, measurestaken to avoid the delays and the likelihood of those delays continuing. The Board will make a determination, in viewof the delaysand limited available funding, whether PROJECT funding should continue. In the case that the Board chooses to discontinue

1maancd2.sic DLC:WCB funding, the Board may cancel any Interlocal Contract(s) associated with the PROJECT and discontinue funding for the remainder of the PROJECT. Funding already spentor appropriated by the COUNTY will not be required to be refunded to the DISTRICT. PROJECT funding can be reconsidered at any time when the COUNTY can demonstrate that the PROJECT can proceed on an acceptable schedule. 15. The itemscovered in paragraphs one and two, SECTION I1 -PROJECT COSTS mustbe completed to thesatisfaction of the DISTRICT prior to June 30, 1994. The DISTRICT may, at any time thereafter, grant extensions or terminate this Contract after thirty (30) days notice and may require all sums advanced to the COUNTY be repaid.

urrmmcd2.sic DLC:WCB 3 The remainder of the Interlocal Contract dated March 12, 1992 remains unchanged.

CLARKCOUNTY ATI'EST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

BY LORETI'A BOWMAN,CountyBINGHAM,ClerkJAY Chairman

Date of Commission Action:

ATI'EST REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

BY DEANNA LEFKO, Secretary MICHAEL HARRIS, Chairman

Date of District Action:

Approved as to legality and form:

CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Deputy District Attorney -.

1mnrmbd2.sic DLCWCB txhibit A CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

RAWHIDE CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT PRESENTATION (CLA.02.F.92) RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: presentation. the Accept

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: Accept the presentation.

CITIZENSCOMMITTEE: Accept presentation.the

RFCD AGENDA ITEM # 14A CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE IV PETITIONER:

M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RECEIVE A PRESENTATION ON THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL (PHASE IV) CROSSINGS AT MOJAVE ROAD AND PEARL STREET

FISCAL IMPACT:

None

BACKGROUND:

The Regional Flood Control District has provided funding for the design of Rawhide Channel Phase IV. The design is nearing completion and Clark County Public Works is prepared to make a presentation on the proposed improvementsto the District.

Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA I'l'I" 15A ITEM # 14A

dlJM:DLC:JJC:mcc Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Staff Discussion: I Date: 6/28/93 RAWHIDE CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROLIMPROVEMENTS - PROJECTPRESENTATION (CLA.02.F.92)

In accordance with District Policies and Procedures and NRS 543.580,Clark County will make a presentation on the Rawhide Channel Phase IV (Mojave Road and Pearl Street) Project.

The presentation was made at the Citizens Advisory Committee meeting on June 28, 1993, at 3:OO p.m.

Staff Recommendation:

Accept the presentation.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: I AGENDA #15A Date: 6/24/93

Recommendation:

Accept the presentation.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA #14A Date: 6/28/93

Recommendation:

Accept the presentation. RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE IV FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS.- CROSSINGS I11 AT MOJAVE ROAD AND PEARL STREET

THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRS 543.580(20):

The Rawhide Channel Crossings at Mojave Road and Pearl Street are identified in the Clark County Regional Flood Control District's (CCRFCD) 1991 FloodControl Master Plan Update for the Las Vegas Valley, see Exhibit "A'.

In 1989, G. C. Wallace, Inc. prepared the Rawhide Channel Pre-Design Report which concluded that the 100-year peak storm flowsat Mojave Road and Pearl Street are 1002 cfs and 1221 cfs, respectively. The current flood control facilitiesat Mojave Road consist of 3- 48" reinforced concrete pipes with a flow capacity of 365 cfs, and at Pearl Street consisting of 4-48" reinforced concrete pipes with a flow capacity of470 cfs. Therefore, storm flow that exceeds the culvert capacities would flow over the roadway.

The proposed improvements for this phase ofthe Rawhide Channel Improvements consist of constructing a dual 12' x 4' reinforced concrete box culverts at Mojave Road and Pearl Street, capable of conveying the entire 100-year storm flow under the roadway crossings.

The proposed improvements will be built within dedicated rights-of-way. Therefore, no acquisition of property is necessary. The estimated costto the Clark CountyRegional Flood Control District for design, construction engineering and constructionof the proposed Phase IV improvements is $400,000.00.

The direct benefit of this project is to eliminate flood damage to the adjacent residential establishments, public facility infrastructures, not to mention the possibility of loss due to injury or death. The control of drainage at these road crossingsare necessary to assure that the Rawhide Channel 100-year storm flow is conveyedto the newly constructed floodcontrol improvements downstream from the proposed Phase IV project.

Construction is scheduled to begin in late November 1993, with completion anticipated by March 1994. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE FOR THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE IV CROSSINGS 111 AT MOJAVE ROAD AND PEARL STREET

ITEM ITEM APPROX UNIT UNIT UCT, NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE PRICE 105.01 Construction Survey 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 107.01 Traffic Control 60 Day 150.00 9,000.00 109.01 Construction Conflict 1 LS 25,000.00 25,000.00 200.01 Mobilization 1 LS 25,000.00 25,000.00 202.01 Remove Ex. Drainage Structure 1 LS 4,000.00 4,000.00 at Mojave Road 202.02 Remove Ex. Drainage Structure 1 LS 6,000.00 6,000.00 at Pearl Street 202.03 Remove Concrete Channel 5000 SF 2.00 10,000.00 202.04 Remove Curb and Gutter 160 LF 400.00 2.50 202.05 Remove Concrete Sidewalk 800 SF 1 .oo 800.00 202.06 Remove and Salvage Chain Link 160 LF 320.00 2.00 Fence 203.01 Roadway Evaluation 200 CY 10.00 2000.00 209.01 Drain Backfill 110 CY 30.00 3300.00 302.01 Type I1 Aggregate Base 90 CY 1620.00 18.00 402.00 Plantmix Bituminous Surface 90 Tons 50.00 4,500.00 502.01 Transition Structure and Headwall 1 1 LS 16,000.00 16,000.00 502.02 Transition Structure and Headwall 2 1 LS 22,000.00 22,000.00 502.03 Transition Structure and Headwall 3 1 LS 14,000.00 14,000.00 502.04 Transition Structure and Headwall 4 1 LS 21,400.00 21,400.00 502.05 Drop Structure 1 LS 1 ,o00.00 1 ,Ooo.Oo 502.06 Cut-off Wall 96 LF 10.00 960.00 605.01 12' x 4' Precast RCB 520 LF 270.00 140,400.00 609.01 4' Modified Type "A" Drop Inlet 4 EA 8,000.00 2,000.00 I! ITEM ITEM APPROX UNIT UNIT EX- NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE PRIC, 61 1.01Concrete Slope Paving 1000 SF 8.00 8,000.00 613.01 Type "L" Curb and Gutter 160 LF 10.00 1,600.00 613.02 4" Concrete Sidewalk 800 SF 2.50 2,000.00 1- I 1 I 616.01 72" Chainlink Fence 160 LF 10.00 1,600.00 627.01 Permanent Sign and Post 4 EA 200.00 800.00 629.01 Relocate 6"Waterline 100 LF 60.00 6,000.00 629.021,000.00 Vertically Adjust Water Valve Box 2 EA 2,000.00

ConstructionCost ...... $347,700.00

Contingency ...... xm

TOTAL COST ...... $399,855.00

Rawhide Channel IV Page 2 EXHIBIT "A"

"0.a Lo2 1 5 z 2 z 0 I- .'=E z 3 0 SLNSET R0,9D I 1 4' 0027 MP FACILITY NO. (DCRH) 0 CULVERT CROSSING' IMPROVEMENT 0CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

RAWHIDE CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS - THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (CLA.02. F. 92) RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve the authorize the Chairman to sign subject to acceptance of the project presentation.

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: Approve.

CJTIZENSCOMMITTEE: Approve.

ITEM# 14B CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE IV PETITIONER M. J. MANNING. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

~~ ~~ RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THERAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS AT THE MOJAVE ROAD AND PEARL STREET CROSSINGS.

FISCAL IMPACT: $1,391,000 OriginalInterlocal Contract 1,394,485 Supplemental Nos. 1 and2Increase Cost 34.5 15 Increase inConstruction Administration and Engineering $2,820,000 Total per SupplementalInterlocal Contract No. 3

BACKGROUND: On December 10,1992 the RegionalFlood Control Districtapproved the Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract for Rawhide Channel Phase I11 improvements at Annie Oakley Drive and Tomiyasu School. Construction for this phase began on May 10, 1993.

Clark County is nearing completion of construction plans and special provisions for the Rawhide Channel Phase IV improvements at the Mojave Road and Pearl Street crossings. All right-of-way necessary for constructing these improvements has been obtained.

Clark County is proposing thisThird Supplemental Interlocal Contract to expand the scope of services and provide funding for construction administration and construction costsof the Phase IV flood control improvements.

Respectfully submitted,

ITEM #15B

NING

UIM:JJCslh Attachment Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

I Staff Discussion: I Date: 06/28/93 RAWHIDE CHANNELFLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS - THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (CLA.02.F.92)

Clark County has submitted a request for a Third Supplemental Interlocal Contract to modify the scope of work and to fund the construction of Phase IV, including improvements to the channel crossings at Mojave Road and Pearl Street. The additional funding request is $34,515, bringing the total of the Third Supplemental Interlocal Contract to $2,820,000. The amount requested was programmed on the Bond Project List and funding is available from Fund 444. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form.

Staff Recommendation:

Approve and authorize the Chairman to sign subject to acceptance of the project presentation.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: I AGENDA #15B Date: 6/24/93

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: E#14B Date: 6/28/93

Recommendation:

Approve. THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR RAWHIDE CHANNEL

THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this ofday ,1993, by anc d between the County of Clark, a political subdivision, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY", and the Clark County Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT'.

WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, on February 13,1992 the DISTRICT approvedan interlocal contract to provide funds for the preliminaryengineering, engineering design, right-of-way engineering, contract administration, inspection, testing, survey, and costof construction on Rawhide Channel from Annie Oakley Drive to Palm Avenue; and

WHEREAS, on July 9,1992 the DISTRICT approved the first supplemental interlocal contract to expand the Scope of Services to include the Rawhide Channel crossings at Pecos Road, Sandhill Road and Mountain Vista Street; and

WHEREAS, on December 10,1992 the Districtapproved the second supplemental interlocal contract to expand the scope of services to include the Rawhide Channel Crossings at Annie Oakley Drive and Tomiyasu School; and

WHEREAS, the COUNTY now desires to expand the Scope of Services to include the Rawhide Channel Crossings at Mojave Road and Pearl Street; and

WHEREAS, the flood control improvementsproposed herein are the same as those identified in the Master Plan as facilities DCRH 0027, 0052, 0053, 0094, 0096, 0102, 0130, 0161, 0188, and 0218, hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT'; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT is a priority project and hasbeen approved by the DISTRICT on its annual project priority list; and nwhide3 Page 1 DLCJJCmcc WHEREAS, the PROJECT has regional flood control significance and is located in the h Vegas Valley hydrographic area; and

WHEREAS, it is desirable to proceed with the construction of the project in accordance with the Master Plan, and to provide funding for construction engineering inspection, inspection, testing, survey, and construction costs thefor Rawhide Channel crossingsat Mojave Road and Pearl Street.

NOW, THEREFORE, inconsideration of the covenants,conditions, agreements, and promises of the parties hereto, the DISTRICT authorizes the COUNTY to proceed with the construction engineering, inspection, testing, and survey and construction of this project as is mutually understood and agreed to supplement the Interlocal Contract approved on February 13, 1992, First Supplemental Interlocal Contract approved on July 9, 1992, and Second Supplemental Interlocal contract approved on December 10, 1992 as follows:

SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT shall be changed to read as follows:

This Interlocal Contract applies to flood control facilities associated with the Rawhide Channel system from Pecos Road to Mountain VistaStreet and shall consist ofthe following phases of construction:

PHASE I - Rawhide Channel facilities from Annie Oakley Driveto Palm Avenue consisting of the design and constructionof two channel crossings and approximately 3,000 linear feet of channel, inlet and outlet structures and other necessary and related construction.

PHASE I1 - Rawhide Channel facilities consisting of three channel crossings located at Pecos Road, Sandhill Road, andMountain Vista Street, channel transitions and other necessary and related construction.

PHASE 111 - Rawhide Channel facilities consisting of a channel crossing at Annie Oakley Drive and a closed conveyance system approximately 750 feet in length located upstream of Annie Oakley Drive through the Tomiyasu School grounds. nwhidd DU3:JJC:mcc PHASE IV- Rawhide Channel facilities consistingof two channel crossings at Mojave Road and Pearl Street, channeltransitions, drop inlets and other necessaryand related construction.

SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS shall be changed to read as follows: The DISTRICT agrees to provide funding for project costs withinthe limits specified below:

1. Design,construction engineering, contract administration, inspection, testing, and survey shall not exceed $233,924.00.

2. The cost of constructionnot to exceed $2,586,076.00.

3. The total cost of thisContract shall not exceed $2,820,000.00.

A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and a supplemental interlocal contract approved to increase any of the amounts noted above prior to payment of any additional funds.

SECTION I11 - GENERAL - Change paragraph 16 to read as follows:

16. The items covered in paragraphs one and two of SECTION I1 - PROJECT'S COSTS must be completed to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT prior to July 1, 1994. The DISTRICT may, at any time thereafter, grant extensions or terminate this Contractafter thirty (30) days notice and may require all sums advanced to the COUNTY be repaid.

SECTION I11 - GENERAL - Change the following paragraph to read as follows:

20. The award of bid for this PROJEn shall occur no later than February 28,1994. The Lead Entity will take all reasonable steps possibleto avoid delays in the construction of District funded projects. Project delays more than four months, as measured from the award date, may be subject to a formal review by both the Technical Advisory Committee and the District Board of Directors. At,the review, the lead Entity will have an opportunity to present information relative to the delays, measures taken to avoid the delays and the nwhidC3 Rgc 3 DLC:JJC:mcc likelihood of those delays continuing. The Board will make a determination, in view of the delaysand limited available funding, the Board may cancelany Interlocal Contract(s) associated with the projectand discontinue funding for the remainder of the project. Funding already spent orappropriated by the entity will not be required to be refunded to the District. Project funding can be reconsidered at any time when the Lead Entity can demonstrate that the project can proceed on an acceptable schedule.

The remainder of the Interlocal Contract dated February 13, 1992, First Supplemental Interlocal Contract dated July 9, 1992, and Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract dated December 10, 1992 remains unchanged. CLARK COUNTY ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

LORE'ITA BOWMAN, CountyClerk JAY BINGHAM, Chairman

Date of Commission Action:

ATTEST: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

DEANNA LEFKO, Secretary MICHAEL R. HARFUS, Chairman

Date of District Action:

Approved as to Legality and Form:

BY: CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Deputy District Attorney nwhidC3 DLC:JJC:rncc EXHIBIT "A"

0027 MP FACILITY NO. (DCRH)

0 CULVERT CROSSING IMPROVEMENT-- - . 0CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA I"

SUBJECT:

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL (PHASE IIA AND PHASE VI) - PROJECT PRESENTATION (CLA.03.H.) RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Accept the presentation.

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: Accept the presentation.

CITIZENSCOMMITTEE: Accept presentation.the

RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 15A Date: 7/08/93 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IIA AND VI IMPROVEMENTS PETITIONER

M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

~~ ~ RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RECEIVE A PRESENTATION ON THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IIA AND VI IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING DETENTION BASIN SITES A AND E, AND APPURTENANT COLLECTION AND DISCHARGE FACILITIES.

FISCAL IMPACT

None

BACKGROUND:

The Regional Flood Control District has providedfunding for the design of the Van Buskirk Channel Phase IIA and Phase VI improvements. This project design is 90% complete and has been reviewed by the County and Flood Districts staffs.

The project consistsof rectangular channel sections, reinforcedconcrete box culvert sections, and two detention basins. All right-of-way is within dedications or easements.

ClarkCounty Public Works is prepared to make a presentation onthe proposed improvements to the District.

Respectfully submitted, TACAGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM ITEM # 15A

Director of Public korks MJM: WCB:slh Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Discussion: Date: Staff Discussion: 6/28/93 VAN BUSIURK CHANNEL(PHASE IIA AND PHASE VI) - PROJECTPRESENTATION (CLA.03.H.)

In accordance withDistrict Policies and Procedures and NRS 543.580, Clark County will make a project presentation on the Van Buskirk Channel (Phase IIA and VI) Improvements. Thepresentation was made at the CitizensAdvisory Committee meeting on June 28, 1993, at 3:00 p.m.

~~ Staff Recommendation:

Accept the presentation.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: I AGENDA #16A Date: 6/24/93

Recommendation:

Accept the presentation.

~ Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: e#15A Date: 6/28/93

~ Recommendation:

Accept the presentation. PROJECT PRESENTATION VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - PHASE IIA AND VI IMPROVEMENTS In accordance with the requirements of NRS Chapter 543.580, we are now proposing to proceed with Van BuskirkChannel Phase IIA and VI Improvements. These lie between the intersections of Rocheile/Hildebrand and Pecos-McLeod/Viking, includingDetention Basin "E and Maryland Parkway/Reno and Thompkins/Euclid, including Detention Basin "A". These projects represent two remaining key elements of the Van Buskirk Channel flood control system.They are identified on the Regional Flood Control District's 1991 Las Vegas Valley Master Plan Update as Facility Nos. VBVR oooO,OO49 and 0060; also, VBTM 0000,0015,0027,0038, 0064,0065,0084 and 0137. Implementation of these improvements will conclude a majority of the Van Buskirk system key elements established to control the 100-year return storm event.

Although not specifically identifiedas being located within flood hazard zones,both of these project areas have exhibited periodsof localized street and privateproperty flooding during relatively minor storm events. Such flooding was due primarily to lack of peaking storage capacity, coupled with undersized conveyances.

These two projects lie adjacent to three majorcommercial centers, several apartment complexes and numerous single family residences. Without the improvements posed by Phases IIA and VI these neighborhoods would feel incalculable financial lossesin terms of property damage, loss of business and extended motorist travel time;not to mention public facilitydamage and possible human injury. Suchlosses may well exceed $10 million resulting from a 100-year return storm event, if these improvements are not constructed.

Project funding for these two key phases of the Van Buskirk Channel improvements are estimated to be approximately $5,895,200. Fundsto be expended are broken-down as follows: $4,379,200 from 1991 flood control bonds (Fund 444); and, $1,516,000 by pay-as- you-go funding (Fund 443). Appropriate agenda items will allocate these monies. EXHIBIT "A"

ROAD

LEGEND

PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN SITE AVENUE amamma PROPOSEDCHANNEL/CULVERT ' ALIGNMENT -

m 8 8 8 ROCHELLEAVENUE -8 I UNIVERSITY AVENUE I I I

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROLFACILITIES

VANBUSK 9/28/90 KTL CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL (PHASE IIA AND PHASE VI) - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (CLA.03.H.) RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve and authorize Chairman to sign subject to acceptance of the project presentation.

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: Approve.

CITIZENSCOMMI'ITEE: Approve.

ITEM # 15B CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

~~ SUBJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IIA AND VI IMPROVEMENTS PETITIONER:

M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

~~~ RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING FOR THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IIA AND VI IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING DETENTION BASIN SITES A AND E, AND APPURTENANT COLLECTION AND DISCHARGE FACILITIES.

FISCAL IMPACT:

$5,895,200 FUNDED BY THE REGIONALFLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOND (FUND 444)

BACKGROUND:

The Regional Flood Control District has provided funding for the design of the Van Buskirk Channel Phase IIA and VI segments. These project designs are 90% complete and have been reviewed by the County and Flood District staffs.

The project consists of rectangular channel sections, reinforced concrete box culvert sections, and stormwater detention basins, all right-of-way is within dedications or easements. The Van Buskirk Channel is on the Bond List Projects.

ClarkCounty Public Works is proposingthis Interlocal Contract for construction and construction engineering.

Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 15B Date. Date: 7/08/93

MJM:DLC: WCB:mcc Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

Staff Discussion: I Date: 06/29/93 VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL (PHASE IIA AND PHASE VI) - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (CLA.03.H.) Clark County has submitted a request for an Interlocal Contract to provide funding from the Bond Fund (Fund 444) for the .construction engineering and construction of the Van Buskirk Channel System (Phases IIA and VI). The $5,895,200 request exceeds the amount programmed on the Bond List by $1,516,000;however, this amount was requestedon the first year of the proposed10-Year Construction Program. The Bond Fund has a sufficient balance to fund the $5,895,200 request. Staff recommendsapproval of the request and recommendsthe proposed 10-Year Construction Program reflect a decrease of $1,516,000.

Ninetypercent (90%) plans and specificationshave been submittedto the District.The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form.

~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ Staff Recommendation: rApprove subject to acceptance of the project presentation. Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: AGENDA #16B/16C Date: 6/24/93

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA #15B/15C Date: 6/28/93

Recommendation:

Approve. INTERLOCAL CONTRACT VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL

THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT made and entered into as of the -day of , 1993 by and between the Clark County Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT, and County of Clark hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY".

WITNESSETH WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada RevisedStatutes, the DISTRICT may approve a project to design and construct flood control improvements, and;

WHEREAS, the flood control improvements proposedherein are the same as those identified in the Master Plan Update, Structures No. VBTM 0137, 0084, 0065, 0064, 0038, 0027, and 0000; and VBVR 0060, 0049, and 0000; hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT'; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT is identified and shown on the attached Exhibit "A; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT has been approved by the DISTRICT on its annual project priority list; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT has regional flood control significance and is located in the same hydrographic area as the Las Vega Valley.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, contracts, and promises of the parties hereto , the DISTRICT and the COUNTY agree to the following:

SECTION I - SCOPE OF THE PROJECT This INTERLOCAL CONTRACTapplies to construction and construction engineering of improvementsassociated with the Van Buskirk Channel between the

vmbualririr.fund 444 DLC:mcc intersections of Maryland Parkway and Thompkins/Euclid including Detention Basin "A"; and betweenthe intersections of Rochelle/Hildebrand and Pecos-McLeod/Viking, including Detention Basin "E'. The basicimprovements shall consist of flood water facilities including a detention basin, pipes, channels, channel structures, channel access and other appurtenances as may be necessary to control flood waters. The improvements shall be funded through DISTRICT fundsas herein described. This project isfurther identified and shown on the attached Exhibit "A'.

SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS The DISTRICT agrees to fund project costs withinthe limits specified below: 1. The construction to includecontract administration, construction engineering, inspection, testing and survey shall not exceed $5,895,200. 2. The total cost of this CONTRACT shall not exceed $5,895,200 which includes all the items described in paragraph one above.

A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and a supplemental interlocal contract approved to increase any of the amounts noted above prior to payment of any addition funds.

SECTION I11 - GENERAL

1. The title sheet of both the plans and the specifications shall show the Regional Flood Control District of Clark County as the funding agency. 2. The award ofbid for this PROJECT shall occur no later than December 15,1993. The COUNTY will take allreasonable steps possible to avoiddelays in the construction of District funded projects. Project delays more than four months, as measured from the award date, may be subject to a formal review by both the Technical Advisory Committee and the District Board of Directors. At the review, the COUNTY will have an opportunity to present information relativeto the delays, measures taken to avoid the delays and the likelihood of those delays continuing. The Board will make a determination, in view of the delays and limited available

v.nbuskirlr.fmd 444 Page 2 DLC:mcc funding, whether project funding should continue.In the casethat the Board chooses to discontinue funding, the Board may cancel any Interlocal Contract@)associated with the project and discontinue funding for the remainderof the project. Funding already spentor appropriated by the COUNTY will not be required to be refunded to the District. Project funding canbe reconsidered at anytime when the COUNTY candemonstrate that theproject can proceed on an acceptable schedule. The County agrees that the construction on this project will not commence until the adjoining downstream section is under construction. 3. The COUNTY will complywith the Local Purchasing Act, Chapter 332 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. 4. The COUNTY, its employees, and representatives shallat all times comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, statutes, rules, and regulationsin effect at the time work is performed on the PROJECT'. 5. The COUNTY will require appropriate financial security for the constructionof the PROJECT. 6. The COUNTY shall provide all impacted entities and the DISTRICT with the opportunity to provide the COUNTY with input relativeto the following processes: scope of servicesdevelopment; consultant selection; design, construction and maintenance review; and monitoringof the effectiveness and impacts of facilities on flood flows. 7. Applicableportions of the currenteditions of thePolicies and Procedures, the Hydrologic Criteria and Drainage Design Manual, and Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainageadopted by theDISTRICT willapply indeveloping this PROJECT unless specifically superseded by this CONTFWCT. 8. Purchases of right-of-way in excess of that actually needed for construction will not be allowed unless a comparison between the cost of excess acquisition and needed acquisition including damages, indicates that benefitsfrom such a transactionwould result. Title to residual property will bevested in the name of the COUNTY. Revenues derived from the saleof these properties, lessthe cost of the sale of these properties, will be forwarded to the DISTRICT. 9. Administrative settlements and acceptance of counter offers involving right-of-way

vmburlirl.fund444 . Page 3 DLCmcc may only be made following a review and approval by the DISTRICT. 10. The DISTRICT will make payment to the COUNTY, its contractor or its consultant, each month for project costs as outlinedin SECTiON II - PROJECTCOSTS. Invoices must identify and allocate all costs to the categories noted below: a. Right-of-way 1. Designand Surveying 2. Appraisals,negotiations, land acquisition, legal fees, escrow stamps, recording fees, etc. b.Predesign Engineering (all work prior to design,excluding right-of-way) c. DesignEngineering d. Construction(all work after award of construction contract) e. FloodInsurance Rate Map amendmentsor revisions 11. Accurate documentation of all work performedand payments made will be maintained by the COUNTY for a period of three(3) years in hard copy form after final project approval and payment. Followingthe three year period, the COUNTY, shall keep records for permanent storage in original form or in microfilm/fiche media. 12. The DISTRICT reserves the right to review and/or audit all records pertaining to all projects both during and after project completion. 13. The COUNTY will be responsiblefor any loss, damage, liability, cost or expense caused by the actions or inactions of its employees, consultants,contractors or agents arising under this Contract and hereby holds the DISTRICT harmless therefrom. 14. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to this PROJECT will be refunded by the COUNTY to the DISTRICT.

v.nbuskik.fuod444 . Page 4 DLC:mcc 15. The items covered in SECTION 11 - PROJECT COSTS must be completed to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT priorto July 1, 1994. The DISTRICTmay, at any time thereafter, grant extensions or terminate this CONTRACT after thirty (30) days notice.

CLARK COUNTY ATTEST BOARDOFcouNTyco"ISSIONERS

BY: LORETTA BOWMAN, County Clerk JAY BINGHAM, Chairman

Date of Commission Action:

ATTEST REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

BY: DEANNA LEFKO, Secretary MICHAEL HARRIS, Chairman

Date of District Action:

Approved as to legality and form:

CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Deputy District Attorney

vmburkirir.fund 444 ' Page 5 DEmcc EXHIBIT "A"

LEGEND

PROPOSEDDETENTION BASIN SITE

mmmmmm PROPOSED CHANNEL/CULVERT ALIGNMENT

"E" 1 FLAMINGO ROAD

ROCHELLE AVENUE I UNIVERSITY AVENUE LI {ARMONAVENUE I

'OMPKINS AVENUE

W 4n iI

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES

VANBUSK 9/28/90 Kn CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: RAINBOW LIBRARY - VARIANCE REQUEST RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve subject to submittal by the City of Las Vegas of a hold harmless agreement indemnifying the District againstall claims/demands/causes of action.

TECHNICALCOMMIl'TEE: Follow staff recommendation.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Follow staff recommendation.

RFCD AGENDA ITEMU 16 CLARK COUNTY REGIONALFLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF VARIANCE TOTHE UNIFORM REGULATIONSFOR THE CONTROL OF DRAINAGE SECTION 12.025(E)(l)(c) AND (9) REGARDING THE RAINBOW LIBRARY PETITIONER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

I RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: Thatthe District approve thevariance tothe Uniform Regulations for the Control of DrainageSection 12.025(e)(l)(c) and (9) regardingthe Rainbow Library. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: City staff has been working with the Las Vegas-ClarkCounty Library District (LibraryDistrict) on the Rainbow Library which iscurrently under constructionadjacent to the CheyenneChannel atthe southeast corner of CheyenneAvenue and BuffaloDrive. Construction of the Cheyenne Channel is scheduled forcompletion approximately five months afterthe Library construction is finished. Per an agreement with theLibrary District, the City couldrequire constructionof temporary Channel liningto protect the Library site at a costof approximately $60,000. City staff has opted torequire Library constructionto stay 55 feetsouth of the Channel centerline shown on the Library's plans. By doing so, the Library wi 11 be protected from any Channel floodingthat might occur. We anticipatethat a temporary certificateof occupancywould bea1 lowed whilethe Channel is under construction. The District has requestedthis process be formalizedwith a variancefrom the UniformRegulations for the Control of Drainage. An itemregarding this variance was approvedby the City Counci 1 on Hay 19,1993.

Section 13.020 of the Uni form Regulations for the Control of Drainage states that "...The District may grant a variancefrom the strict enforcementof these Regulations only if granting the variance will not: (1) Detractfrom the public good (2) Impair any affectednatural resources (3) Deviatefrom the intent and purpose of the Master Plan.' City staffbelieves this variance will notviolate any ofthe above constraints. Moreover, it will save approximately $60,000 ofLibrary District funds. A Res TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 17 ITEM# 16 Date: 6/24/93 Date: 7/08/93 Richard D. Goecke. Director Department of Public Works Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Staff Discussion: I Date: 06/28/93 RAINBOW LIBRARY - VARIANCE REQUEST

On March 1, 1993, a Notice of Violation was sent to the City of Las Vegas after the District's field technician noted unauthorized construction on the Rainbow Library (SE Comer of Cheyenne Avenue andBuffalo Road). The Libraryproject lies partially within afederally designated Special Flood HazardArea and is adjacent to DistrictMaster Plan facilities(Cheyenne Channel and Gowan DetentionBasin). As such, the projecthas regional flood controlsignificance as defined in the UniformRegulations for the Control of Drainage(Regulations). In accordance with Section 12.035(B)(2) of the Regulations, if a project is found to have Regional Significance, the entity must obtain District concurrence prior to issuance of any permits which authorize the start of construction. OnMarch 2, 1993,the District received pertinent designdocuments from the consultant for the Library. A review of these materials indicated that they failed to meet the minimum criteria outlined in the District's Hydrologic Criteria and Drainage Design Manual. The consultant contended that the "Cheyenne Channel concerns" were not included in the scope of their contract.

An interlocal contract to fund design and right-of-way engineering of the Cheyenne Channel in this location was signed by the Chairman of the District's Board of Directors on September 10, 1992. On March 2, 1993, theCity had notselected a designconsultant for the channelproject. Hence, the currentconstruction schedule for the CheyenneChannel will leave the Library improvements unprotected from flooding and erosion for six to nine months.

Inan effortto allow construction of the Libraryto proceed, the City proposed a 55-foot channel setback wherein no Library improvements would be constructed. In addition, if circumstances should arisewhich further delay completion of the channel, the Library District would be requiredto construct temporary channel improvements.

The absence of an approved drainage plan and the proposed "temporary channel setback" are both in conflict with the UniformRegulation and the District's Design Manual. Therefore, the District informed the City that proper resolution of the violation would require a variance from the Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage.

The City is requesting a variance from Section 12.025 (E)(l)(c) and (g) of the Uniform Regulations. These passages address the requirements of a drainage plan and the plan's inclusion of specifications for the proposed alteration of a watercourse.

Approval of the variance would allow construction of the Library to continue without an approved drainageplan. The LibraryDistrict's adherance to thetemporary setback would provide some protection to the building until such time as improvements to the Cheyenne Channel are complete.

Approve, subject to submittal by the City of Las Vegas of a hold harmless agreement indemnifying the District against all claims/demands/causesof action.

Page 1 Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: *GENDAU17 Date: 6/24/93 RAINBOW LIBRARY - VARIANCE REQUEST

The District Attorney had concerns with approval of the variance and requested that the City of Las Vegas prepare a hold harmless agreement to indemnify the District against any claims/demands/causes of action. The City of Las Vegas agreed to the condition.

Recommendation:

Approve,subject to submittalof a holdharmless agreement indemnifying the District against any claims/demands/causes of action.

~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ IDiscussion by Citizens Advisory Committee:

Recommendation:

Approve, subject to submittal of a hold harmless agreement indemnifying the District against any claims/demands/causes of action.

Page 2 I CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: I RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSING - CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 (CLA.02.F.92) RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve.

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: Approve.

CITIZENSCOMMITTEE: Approve.

RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 17 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM I SUBJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 I PETITIONER

M.J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE CONTRACT WITH LAS VEGAS PAVING CORPORATION TO CONSTRUCT THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS, BID NO. 2873-92.

FISCAL IMPACT: Change Order No. 1 represents an increase of $55,914.24 or approximately 6% of the original contract amount of $875,819.00

BACKGROUND: This project provided for the construction of Precast RCB at Pecos Road, Sandhill Road and Mt. Vista Street on the Rawhide Channel.

This change order represents the expense to resolve a construction interference of a 16" water main within our 12'x14' Precast RCB on Sandhill Road.

These work modifications weredone on a force accountby the contractor and the costs have been reviewed by Public Works staff.The attached Change Order documents details of the cost for this work.

Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM # 18 ITEM # 17

Director of Public Wdks Mm(:HWN:dh Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

Staff Discussion: I Date: 06/28/93 RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSING - CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 (CLA.02.F.92)

Clark County has negotiated a change order for the Rawhide Channel Crossings (Phase n) project. The change order represents costs incurred while resolving a construction interference with a 16-inch water line. The net increase for Change Order Number 1 is $55,914.24 or a 6.0% increase to the original contract amount with Las Vega Paving Corporation. Current interlocal contract funding is sufficient to cover the increase.

Staff Recommendation:

Approve.

~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: 1 AGENDA #18 Date: 6/24/93

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: E#17 Date: 6/28/93

Recommendation:

Approve. CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM

Issue: RawhideChannelCrossings - ChangeOrder Number One W*p:

EARL HAWKES, DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES

hat the Board of County Commissioners approve Change Order No. 1 to the contract with Las Vegas Paving Corporation to construct the Rawhide Channel Crossings, Bid No. 2873-92.

FISCAL IMPACT: Change Order No. 1 represents an increase of $55,914.24 or approximately 6% of the original contract amount of $875,819.00. Monies are available in Fund 444.

BACKGROUND: This pro-ject providedfor the construction of Precast RCB at Pecos Road, Sandhill Road and Mt. Vi&St;eet on the Rawhide Channel.

This change order represents the expense to resolve a construction interference of a 16" water main within our 12'x14' Precast RCB on Sandhill Road.

These work modifications were done on a force account by the contractor and the costs have been reviewed by Public Works staff. The attached Change Order documents detailsof the cost for this work.

Respectfully submitted, Cleared for Agenda I

CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUUWRKS

PROJECT NO. PROJECT F911101 SHEET 1 ' OF-

comNo. 2873-92 '''- DATE MAY 18. 1993 PROJECT NAME RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS

(XMRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1' Tb US VEMS PAVING CORPORAION , Contractor. You are hereby directed to mke the herein describe changes fran the plans and Epecifications, or do the follcwing described n-k not included in the plans and specifications on this amtract. Change requested by CLARKCOUNTY PUBLIC WRKS

(1) Estimate of increases and/or decreases in ax~tractitems at tmntractprices:

Original Contract sum ...... S- . Net change by previcusly authorized chsnqe Orders ...... S -0- lbotal -st this Utange &der (increase) B...... S! NetCantractSum ...... $931.733.24 PREPARED BY: We, the undersigned Contractor, have .. given careful consideration to the change pmposed and hareby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we . will provide all equiplmt, furnish all materialr, except as my otherwise be mbBd above, snl petform all servicas necessary for the work above specified, and will accept a3 full paylmt therefore the prices ShCMn abave.

' pc i5 I 31SF>UTE q TK AbnorcrR '1 ~y reason of this praposed change,@& VJ OU 43 Cays extension or decrease of tunel d10.i~d. c; .\ -: - c;;> DATE ACCEPTED -' Gv . L. ESLIE R. HENLEY, RE. 1 DIVISION

DATE , , MEMORANDUM M. J. MANNING DIRECTOR

Department of Public Works A - - TO: DISTRIBUTION

FROM: LESLIEMANAGER, R HENLEY, MSION SUBJECX CHANGEORDER PROCESSING REQUEST

DATE: June 4, 1993

Attached is signed Change Order No. 1, supporting back-up material, and signed agenda item(s) for Bid No. 2873-92 , Project No. F911101, Rawhide Channel Crossings.

Funding for this change order is from Fund No. 444.

Please process this Change Order in order to make the following approval schedule:

RFCD TechnicalCommittee June 24, 1993 Board Agenda July 8, 1993RFCD 8, Agenda JulyBoard Board Countyof Commissioners July 20, 1993

DISTRIBUTION: Jim Mulcahy, origs. of C.O., BCC agenda & copies of b/u Gale Fraser, orig. RFCD agenda, copies of all other b/u Mary Jo Crist, copies of all material Las Vegas Paving, copies of all material

LRH:JC:mcc Attachments RECEIVED cc: Gus Cederburg John Cimino, Project Engineer CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBTECT: OAKEY DETENTION BASIN PHASE 1 (LANDSCAPING) - AWARD OF BID (LAS.M.D.92) RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Accept the City of Las Vega recommendation.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Follow staff recommendation.

CITIZENS COMMrrrEE:Follow staff recommendation.

RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 18 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT bGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: Bid Award for the Construction of theOakey Detention Basin and Conveyance System - Phase I

PETITIONER: City of Las Vegas

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: That the Board approve bid award to Las Vegas Paving.

FISCAL IMPACT: The low bid submitted by Las Vegas Paving was in the amount of $567,950.05.

Funding avai 1 ab1 e: * $200,000 - Clark County Regional Flood Control District $340,000 - Regional Transportation Comnission $200,000 - City of Las Vegas Sanitation Funds

BACKGROUND: Bid opening on the off-site improvements portion of this Project took place on June 8, 1993 with the low bid submitted by Las Vegas Paving in the amount of $567,950.05. The bid tabulation and engineer’s recommendation is attached. * Funding provided by the District applies solely to those items included in Bid Group 111.

Respec 11 ubmitt TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 19 ITEM# 18 Date: 6/24/93 Date: 7/08/93 Richard-1 D. Goecke, Director Department of Public Works Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

Discussion: Date: Staff Discussion: 6/28/93 OAKEY DETENTION BASIN PHASE 1 (LANDSCAPING) - AWARD OF BID (LAS.W.D.92)

The City of Las Vega opened bids for the Oakey Detention Basin Phase 1 project on June 8, 1993. Three bids were received. The project consists of offsite improvements (Bid Groupl), sanitary sewer improvements(Bid Group 2) andlandscaping (Bid Group 3). The District’sparticipation in this project is limited to $158,677.00, BidGroup 3 - landscaping.Other sources of funding will be utilized for the other aspects of the project. The Cityof Las Vegas recommends that the District accept their recommendation for award of bid to Las Vega Paving Corporation in the amount of $567,950.05, which includes all the bid groups. The Interlocal Contract identifies landscaping costs at $200,000.

Staff Recommendation: Accept the City of Las Vegas recommendation to award the bid to Las Vegas Paving Corporation in the amount of $567,950.05.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: I AGENDA #19 Date: 6/24/93

Recommendation:

Accept the recommendation.

~~~ ~ ~ ~ Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA I # 18 Date: 6/28/93

Recommendation:

Accept the recomm,ndation. 2 00000 co 2 0003oooggg OQCQmW ma3

3 goooooooooo 00 3 C*)OCOm00hm00 00

3 ooooooomooo 00 3 h40wW00Nm00 00 0 N030mm00N00~mo 3 mONhmOOOON m 0. 0 2CQm4FINoONoN 3 Wh0m4mOm4m4 m FIN -03 2z .-

000000 0 00 mmombo8zs80 00 Nm000hm000~mo s N 8 m WNE d u, N N

v) I

z z c c 3 du U -l W U m E 0 p: n

4 4444NrnFI444N 4N 0 00000000000 00 BID ABSTRACT & AWARD RECOMMENDATION PAGE # 2 BIDTITLE: OAKEY DETENTIONBASIN - OFF-SITEIMPROVE- LAS VEGAS PAVING CORP. WELLS CARGO, INC. DA PAVINC .

1 MENTS RID 93.1730.32 ~~ ~~ ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION TOTAL TOTAL U.P. TOTAL 6 13.01 3267 L.F. "L" TYPE CURBAND GUTTER 16008.3 17968.50 5.20 16988.40 613.02 16388 S. F CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1.75 28679. OC 1.80 29498.40 1.90 31137.20 613.03 364 S.F. CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 4.50 4338. OC 4.55 4286.20 4.80 4627.20 613.04 100 S.F. COMMERCIALDRIVEWAY 4.50 450. OC 4.50 4EO. 00 4.50 450.00

613.05 3 EA. SIDEWALK RAMPS 255.00 765. OC 244.00 732.00 238.70 716.10

435. OC 3.10 449.50 I 613.06 145 S.F. BUSSTOP LOADING PAD 3. OC 3.20 464.00 623.01 15 EA. STREETLIGHT STANDARDFOUNDATIONS 420.00 6300. OC 420.00 6300.00 423.90 6358.50 FOR A7 OR 11 GUAGE LIGHTING i STANDARDS 623.02 1 EA. STREETLIGHT STANDARDSTYPE "H" 2660. OC 2660. OC 2665.00 2665.00 2689.40 2689.40 FOUNDATIONWITH ADAPTER

623.03 16 EA. STREETLIGHT STANDARDS WITHLUMINAR 870. OC 13920. OC 865.00 13840.00 873.20 1397 1.20 IES AND WIRING

623.04 2800 L.F. 1-1/4" ELECTRICALCONDUIT WITH WIRE 5.7c 15960. OC 5.70 15960.00 5.80 16240. OC + ANDFUSE HOLDERS

0 623.05 1250 L.F. 2" ELECTRICALCONDUIT 2.8C 3500. OC 2.80 3500.00 2.80 3500.00 ' 623.06 400 L.F. 3" ELECTRICALCONDUIT WITH WIRE AND 8. OC 3200.01 8.00 3200.00 8.10 3240.00 FUSEHOLDERS ' 623.07 2 EA. 3-1/2 PULL BOX 90. oc 180. 92.00 184.00 92.20 184.40 I OC

i BID ABSTRACT & AWARD RECOMMENDATION PAGE# 3 LAS VEGAS PAVING CORP WELLS CARGO, INC. SOUTHERN NEVADA PAVING,INC. MENTS RID It 93.1730.32 ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION U.P. TOTAL U.P. TOTAL 62m7 EA. 15 PULL BOX 840.0 119.00 833.00 119.70 837.90

623.09 1 EA. X7 PULL BOX 230.00 230.0 229.00 229.00 231.00 231.00

623.10 1 L.S. MODIFY EXISTINGELECTRICAL SERVICE 160.00 160.0 158.00 158.00 159.00 159.00

627.01 6 EA. RELOCATE TRAFFIC/STREETSIGN 280.00 1680.0 47.25 283.50 47.70 286.20

628.01 2500 L.F. PAINT TYPE 2 CENTERLINESTRIPING 0.31 775.0 0.32 800.00 0.30 750.00

629.01 2 EA. ADJUST VALVE BOX 160.00 320.0 150.00 300.00 317.90 635.80

629.02 1 EA. INSTALL 1-1/2 WATERMETER WITHLA- 1260.00 1260.0 1100.00 1100.00 2331.30 2331.30 TERAL

633.01 532 EA. TYPE B PAVEMENTMARKERS 1.35 718.2 1.37 728.84 1.40 744.80

633.02 196 EA. TYPE C PAVEMENTMARKERS 2.40 470.4 2.42 474.32 2.40 470.40

714.01 L.S. HOT APPLIED CROSSWALK MARKING 670.00 670.01 672.00 672.00 678.20 678.20

714.02 L.S. PAINT CROSSWALK MARKING 72.00 72.01 71.40 71.40 72.10 72.10

TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID ITEMS - BID 3240 13. O! 342381.36 310089.40 GROUP I

BID GROUP I1

630.01 4 EA. PVC LINEDSANITARY SEWERMANHOLE ' 2700.00 10800.0I 2500.00 10000.00 3139.08 12556.32 I

. '. BID ABSTRACT & AWARD RECOMMENDATION PAGE# 4 BIDTITLE: OAKEY DETENTIONBASIN - OFF-SITE IMPROVE- LAS VEGAS PAVING CURP. WELLS CARGO, INC. SOUTHERN NEVADA PAVING,INC. MENTS I RIDI# 93. T ITEM QTY. TOTAL U.P. TOTAL 630.02 1460 L. F. 30" SANITARY SEWER PIPE 66430.00 97.50 142350.00 INDICATE TYPE OF PIPEBID - HDPE CLASS 63 - PVC LINED RCP TOTAL AMOUNT OF BIDITEMS-BID GROUP 85260.0 76430.00 154906.32 11

BID GROUP I11 ! 4 212.00 27 EA. TREE PLANTING - 48" BOX 1150.00 31050.00 1145.00 30915.00 1165.60 31471.20 EA. TREE PLANTING BOX 4 212.01 30 - 36" 490.00 24500.00 482.00 24100.00 485.30 24265.00 212.02 1,302 EA. SHRUB PLANTING 14.00 18228. OC 14.00 18228.00 13.80 17967.60 212.03 1,500 S.F TURF 0.65 2925. OC 0.65 2925.00 0.70 3150.00 213.01 L 306 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 15500.00 15500. OC 15580.00 15580.00 15714.90 15714.90 213.02 1 EA. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER 980.00 980. OC 966.00 966.00 974.90 974.90 + 276.01 1 JOB EARTHWORK 6000.00 6000. OC 6090.00 6090.00 6145.00 6145.00 276.02 !l,OOOS.F 1/2" MINUS DECOMPOSED GRANITE 0.45 9450. OC 0.45 9450.00 0.50 10500.00 i * 276.03 )5,000 S. 3/4" MINUS DECOMPOSED GRANITE 0.47 44650. OC 0.46 43700.00 0.50 47500.00 4

I BID ABSTRACT & AWARD RECOMMENDATION PAGE# 5 ~~ ~~ BIDTITLE: OAKEY DETENTIONBASIN - OFF-SITE IMPROVE- .ASVEGAS PAVING CCRP. WELLS CARGO, INC. SOUTHERN NEVADA PAVING,INC. NENTS RID T ITEM U.P. TOTAL U.P. TOTAL U.P. TOTAL 613.00 8.2( 1394.00 8.20 1394.00 8.30 1411.00 726.03 LANDSCAPE BOULDERS 80.0( 4000.00 78.00 3900.00 78.50 3925.00 TOTAL AKOUNT OF BIDITEMS-BID GROUP 158677.00 157248.00 162024.60 I11

TOTAL FOR BID GROUP I 324013.05 342381.36 310089.40 TOTAL FOR BID GROUP I1 85260.00 76430.00 154906.32 TOTAL FOR BID GROUP I I I 158677.00 157248.00 162024.60 TOTAL BID AMOUNT 567950.05 576059.36 627020.32 BID ABSTRACT & AWARD RECOMMENDATION PACE# 6 BIDTITLE: OAKEY DETENTIONBASIN- OFF-SITE IMPROVE- LAS VEGAS PAVING CORP. WELLS CARGO, INC. iOUTHERNNEVADA PAVING, INC. MENTS 93.1730. ~~ - - QIY. I)ESCRII”rION - U.P. TOTAL - U.P. - TOTAL U.P. TOTAL KS 1NI-mlUN ELECTRICAL D ESERT CON r. IDESERT CO iT. IESERT con iT. CONCRETE S TEWART & JNDELL STEWART & ;UNDELL iTEWPRT & SUNDELL LANDSCAPING H LS COMPAN 3 IHLS COMPA ES iLS COMPAF [ES TRAFFIC CCNTROL T RAFFIC TERCO. TRAFFIC M ;TER CO. rRAFFIC W ;TER CC. PAVING S ELF SELF UNDERGROUND W‘ELLS CARG ZCME ELECl tIC

- A

i BID ABSTR ,CT & AWARD RECOMMEN:Dl 9T I ON PAGE # 7 BID TITLE: OAKEY DETENTION BASIN - OFF-SITE IMPROVE- LAS VEGAS PAVING CORP. kELLS CARGO, INC. ;OUTHERN NEVADA PAVING, I! MENTS 4420 SO. DECATUR 7770 SPRING MOUNTAIN j555 POLARIS AVE. BID 'BOND REQD : YES EST: $ 690,575.00 LAS VEGAS,NV 89103 LAS VEGAS,NV 85117 .ASVEGAS, NV 89103 BID #: 93.1730.32 INV. SENT: 48 0 BUYER: RKD h.IC#. .C11633205436 LIC#: 1°13 ,IC#.C119152867 DESCRIPTION U.P. TOTAL -. U.P. -- TOTAL U.P. TOTAL STATE OFNV CONTRACTOR'S LIC#: 5507 27 3 1088

CONTRACTOR'S CLASSIFICATION: AB AB I

LIMITATIONS:

STATE CONTRACTORS LICENSE BOARD

BID BOND YES YES 'ES

BIDQUALIFIES FOR PREFERENCE YES YES 'ES UNDERNRS 338.147 ACKNOWLEDGEADDENDUM #1 YES YES 'ES

I I- I A - . -(easa review and furnish recopmendation To: Purchasing and Contrects. for Commission award on lowest responsive bidder - LasVegas Paving. &/-YZ meotlDivision SignaturemeotlDivision Date CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: UNNAMED WASH IMPROVEMENTS,LAUGHJJN - AWARD OF BID (LAU.Ol.B.92) RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: To be thegiven at meeting.

TECHNICALCOMMITTEE: To be heardat the Special TechnicalAdvisory Committee Meeting July 8, 1993 at 8:15 a.m.

RF'CD AGENDA ITEM# 19 Date: 7/08/93 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT v

SUBJECT:

UNNAMED WASH, LAUGHLIN PETITIONER:

M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMl'lTEE SCHEDULE A SPECIAL TECHNICAL ADVISORY COM"EE MEETING FOR JULY 8,1993 TO RECEIVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR CONTRACT AWARD.

FISCAL IMPACT:

NONE

BACKGROUND:

On July 2, 1993, bids will be opened, a bid result abstract issued and recommendation for contractaward made to the TechnicalAdvisory Committee for consideration at aSpecial Technical Advisory Committee meeting on July 8, 1993.

Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM # lTEM# 19 Date: Date: 7/08/93

M. J, MANNING 1 DirecKr of Public Wo& MJM:DLC:WCB:mcc Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

~ Staff Discussion: I Date: 6/29/93 UNNAMED WASH, LAUGHLIN - AWARD OF BID (LAU.Ol.D.92)

Clark County will open bids on July 2, 1993, for the Unnamed Wash Improvements project located in Laughlin. The bid opening was scheduled after preparation of the agenda, therefore, Clark County will present the bid abstract and recommendation for contract award at the July 8, 1993 meeting. The construction funding will be provided by the District and through establishment of a Special Improvement District. The interld contract states that the request for construction funding shall not exceed $3,798,000.

Staff Recommendation: To be given at the meeting.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: IThe TAC scheduled a special meeting on July 8, 1993 at 8:15 a.m. to hear the item.

Recommendation:

To be given at the meeting.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA # Date:

The CAC did not hear the item. IRecommendation: CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM - AGREEMENT

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve and authorize the Chairman to sign.

RFCD AGENDA ITEM # 20 ~pte:~~93 CLARKCOUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

SUBJECT:

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEFiR

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE BOARD APPROVE THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN

FISCAL IMPACT:

$35,000 BACKGROUND:

Clark County, in cooperation with the incorporated cities and other agencies in the Las Vegas Valley, is developing and implementing a regional Geographic Information System (GIS) with the capabilities of automatic graphic display and analysis of various records, resources and facilities. This Agreement provides the District with access tothe GIS database files developed and maintained by other participants and provides network service support for the next year(FY 1993/94). The Agreement also makes the GIS database created bythe District available to other participants.

Respectfully submitted,

ITEM # 20 &&d& &&d& Vd&nia Valentine, P.E. General ManagedChief Engineer THIS AGREEMENT isofdayentered made thisand into 9 1993, by and between the County of Clark, State of Nevada, herein referred to as “County”; and the Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as “RegionalFlood Control”; which are political subdivisions of the State of Nevada.

WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, each of the parties hereto is in the process of implementing a Geographic Information System, hereinafter referred to as“GIs”, with the capability for automated graphic display and analysis (after pertinent digitized data is converted andinput into the system) to provide multiple map layers and information (e.g. land records, resource and facilities); and . WHEREAS, both parties have incurred considerable costs associated with the development and implementation of a GIS and desire to enter intoa cooperative effort to fund the creationof selected GIs resources and data sets which are defined under theterms hereof; and WHEREAS, the parties further desire to share selected GIS resources and data sets which are defined under theterms hereof; and WHEREAS, the County has incurred significant costs associated with the creation of products to improve geodetic control and positional accuracy that can be utilizedby both parties to develop GIS resources and to facilitate the sharing of data and the integration of GIS applications; and WHEREAS, staff members of the parties have met periodically, together with staff representatives of other political subdivisions located within ClarkCounty, all who sharecommon interests in the development of their respective Geographic Information Systems; and

1 Rev. May 24,1993 WHEREAS; the above mentioned meetings have resulted in conceptual agreement on certain areas of common concern, including GIS data and cost sharing, whichare reflected in a report dated May 25,1990, and WHEREAS; the parties are exploring marketsand marketing techniques for GIS data in order to lower costs for governmental agencies and political subdivisions that initially participateso that said participants will enjoy more favorable terms over the lifetime of the agreement; NOW, WHEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual covenantsand agreements herein contained, the parties agree as follows: 1. Regional Flood Control shall pay to the Countythe sum of Thirty-five Thousand and no/l00’s dollars ($35,000.00) withinthirty (30) calendar days after receipt an of invoice from the County and any future sums are tobe determined at an annual review of the Agreement.This sum reflects the participation level developed by the Finance Subcommitteeand assigned to Regional Flood Control in the May 25, 1990 report. In return for the payment referenced above, the County shall within thirty (30) calendar days: a. Permit Regional Flood Control to copy or otherwise reproduce any or all orthophotos acquired by the County; b. Furnish at no additional cost to Regional Flood Control a complete copyof the street centerline Ne produced by the County inArchfo format on nine-track magnetictape; c. Provide all control point data and documentation, including first and second order perimeter points, utilized in the preparation of the orthophotos; and all survey control data developed by the County Department of Public Works. 2. The County shall provide RegionalFlood Control within three (3) weeks of approval of the Agreement by both governing boards and throughout the initial term hereof and upon any renewal of the Agreement afterthe initial term if this Agreement is renewed,in ASCII Archfo EXPORT format on nine-track magnetictape, or on-line access should communication links exist or be installed during the agreementperiod:

2 Rev. May 24,1993 a. Access to all spatial and tabular land parcel data that has been convertedinto Arc/Info format by or for the Clark CountyAssessor’s Office; b. Access to an edited DIME file in ASCII or EBCIDIC format on nine-track tape, including versions thatare regularly updated and rectified to the stfeet centerline file; c. Access to updates of all land parcel, street centerline, and control point file data maintained by County agencies and departments Arc/Infoin format on the CountyGIs. d. Network service support to all participants to facilitak easier data exchange. e. Approved future products and services provided bythe County Geographic Information System Management Office (GISMO). f. Throughout the agreement period, the County GISMO shall provide Regional Flood Control with staff assistance in the design and implementation of a user based GIS program specifically suited to RegionalFlood Control’s application requirements. The County GISMO shall provide informal training for RegionalFlood Control staff as a function of the design and implementation activities. Regional Flood Control understands this assistance is limited by GISMO resources. 3. Regional Flood Control shall provide the County throughout the initialterm hereof and upon renewal of the Agreement after the initial term if this Agreement is renewed, in ASCII Arcnnfo EXPORT format on nine-track magnetic tape, or on-line access should communication links exist orbe installed during the agreementperiod: a Access to all authorized layers of RegionalFlood Control’s GIS data base for Regional Flood Control’s functional areas as created in a timely fashion in Arc/Info format on nine-track magnetic tape. Regional Flood Control hereby authorizes the County access to the following spatial and tabular data files and coverages: 1) Drainage Network and Boundaries 2,) Master Plan and Existing Facilities 3) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)

3 Rev. May 24,1993 4) Hydrologic Soil Group 5) Storm Water Discharge Points 6) Assessor’s Parcel Relate Table b. Access to all updates of the aforementioned spatial and tabular data maintained by Regional Flood Control’s departments on RegionalFlood Control’s GIS inArchfo format. 4. Regional Flood Control and County agree to notify the other party of any proposed changes to the data base designor data structure forany layers of its GIS data base. 5. It is understoodthat the County and RegionalFlood Control agree to the following: a. All costs and responsibilityfor hardware, software, computer communications equipment and supplies, data conversion, and extraordinary support services not expressly identified herein are the responsibility of the respective parties to this agreement; b. Access to data is herein defined as the right to copies of datain digital &/Info format at no cost to either party by exchange of data on nine-track magnetic tape, by modem, or by communications network. c. The rights and benefits of this agreement include the right of both parties to this agreement to utilize the aforementioned dataas permitted by law; d. Electronic data exchanged under the terms of this agreement cannot be sold or disseminated by the recipient party with the exception of the party’s contractors in which case the data can only be used for contracted work. This limitation must be included in the contractors’ contract. Regional Flood Control hereby specifically proscribes the dissemination, with or without cost, of the following spatial and tabular filesand coverages, whether digitalor non-digital, toany non-governmentalorganization: None. e. The Parties may disseminate information to the public as prescribed by legislative acts and with the written approval of the source agency. This dissemination shall be paper, mylar, or other non-digital products.

4 Rev. May 24,1993 f. No warranties or guarantees are expressed or implied as to the accuracy of the aforementioned data by any County or Regional Flood Control departments or agencies; g. The rights and benefits of this agreement may not be assigned without the written consent of both parties hereto. h. This agreement shall remain in force from the date ofthis Agreement until June 30, 1994, with the optionto review at least annually and renew annually on or before the expirationdate of this Agreement. Regional Flood Control may terminate this agreement with thirty (30) days prior written notice. RegionalHood Control's contribution shallnot be refunded in the event of the agreement termination. i. Should any dispute arise between any participants concerning the terms of this Agreement, data standards, data content, or data format the following procedure shall be used before any judicial remedy is sought:

1) The parties willattempt to resolvethe problem(s) through discussions and negotiations under the auspices of the County Geographic Information Systems Management Office; 2) In the event that agreement cannot be reached, the issue(s) will be presented for resolution to a committee composed of one staff member familiarwith GIS matters from each of the following: Regional Transportation Commission, Regional Flood Control District, Clark County Sanitation District,Las Vegas Valley Water District, Clark County School District, City of Las Vegas, City of North Las Vegas, City of Henderson, City of Boulder City, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Clark County, Clark County Building Department, McCarran International Airport, and any future participants. A majority of a quorum of the above described committee may act to resolve any such issues.A quorum shall be no lessthan half plus one ofthe total number of currentcommittee members. j. It is not the intent of either party to violate any laws the of State of Nevada or of the United States. The parties agreethat in the eventany provision of the Agreement is held by a court

5 Rev. May 24,1993 -.

of competent jurisdiction to be in contravention of any such laws, the parties will enter into immediate negotiations thereon torectify the clauseor clauses in contravention. The remainder of the Agreement shallremain in full force andeffect. k. In the event that a private enterprise or organization enters into a contract with the County to participatein GIS development or to obtain access toGIS data through a subscription agreement, any funds receivedwill be used to offset the next contributionof the initial governmental participants. Regional Flood Control will have the option to waive this contribution offset 1. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding the of parties hereto and supersedes all other oral and written negotiations, agreements and understandingsof every kind.The parties understand, agree and declare that no promise, warranty, statement or representation of any kind whatsoever, which is not expressly stated in this agreement, has been made by any party hereto or its officers, employees, or other agents to induce execution of this Agreement. m. In the event the County wishes to enter into an agreement with an organization other than the Regional Transportation Commission, RegionalFlood Control District, Clark County Sanitation District, Las Vegas Valley Water Dismct, Clark County School Dismct, City of Las Vegas, City of North Las Vegas, City of Henderson, City of Boulder City, or Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department to participatein geographic information database development or data dissemination, the Countywill present that agreement to theGIS Policy Committee for review. Invoices, payments and notices shallbe delivered to the parties by personal service, hand delivery, or United Statesmail at the following addresses:

TOCOUNTY: Clark County Treasurer Treasurer’s Office 225 Bridger Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89155 ...

6 Rev. May 24,1993 TO REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL Regional Flood Control District 30 1 E. Clark Avenue, Suite 30 1 Las Vegas, NV 89101 IN WTNJ3S WHEREOF,the parties hereto haveset their hands the day and yearfmt above written. CLARKCOUNTY Board of Commissioners

By: Jay Bingham, chairman ATIEST

Loretta Bowman, County Clerk Date of Commission Action:

ATIEST CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

By: By: dean^ Lefko, Board Secretary Michael R. Harris, Chairman Date of Board Action:

Approved as to Legality: Approved as to Form:

Paul Johnson Christopher Figgins Deputy District Attorney Deputy District Attorney

7 Rev. May 24,1993 Office of the County Manager Clark WNALO L. "kt"SHALMY COUNTY MANAGER County DALE W. MKRW, CPA ASSISTAM COUNTY MANAGER

JAMIE L. LEY ASSEXAM COUNTY MANAGER

CLARK COUNTY BRIDGER BUlLOlNG 225 ERIDGER AVENUE LAS VEGAS. NEVADA E9155 PO21 455-3530

May 24,1993

Ms Virginia Valentine Regional Flood Control District 301 E. Clark Avenue, Suite301 Las Vegas, NV 89101

Dear -y, Thank you for your support of the local GIS cooperative agreements. Enclosedaxe two originals of the Interlocal Agreement between Clark County and your entity. Please have your portion ratified and return both originalsto my attention at Clark CountyGIS Management office, 401 S. Fourth Street, Las Vegas, NV 89101. One completed original will be returned to you. We look forwardto working closely with youto further develop and enhanceGIS efforts in the Clark Countyarea This next yearwill see the completion of the parcel record database. The leadershipyou have shown in supporting the GIS cooperative agreementswill be vindicated by the availability of the streetfies, approximately 440 sqw miles of parcel data, and anonline capability to access a geographic information central repository.It is important to the County that your organizationfeels your continued participationis worthwhile. If there axe any services we can provideto assist in your GIs development activities, please let us know. Sincerely, GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS PANAGEMEW OFFICE

David R. Edwards GIS Manager DWjal RECEIVED Enclosure MAY 28 1993

COMMlOSlONERb Jay Einghsm. Chairman Karen Hayes, Vice-Cbim Paul J. Christensen. Thelia M. Dondero. William U. Peereon. Don Schlesinger. Bruce L. Woodbury CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FXOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SURTECT:

PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECTS, 10-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM AND FISCAL 1993/94 PROJECT LIST - STATUS REPORT RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Receive the report and direct staff as deemed appropriate.

ITEMU 21 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL F'LOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECTS, 10-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM AND FISCAL YEAR 1993/1994 PROJECT LIST

PETITIO=

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGWCHIEF ENGINEER

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: RECEIVE STATUS REPORT AND DIRECT STAFF AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

On June 11, 1992 the Board approved the Prioritization of Projects in theLas Vegas Valley, the 10-Year Construction Program (FY 1992/1993 through FY 2001/2002) and the Fiscal Year 1992/1993 Project List. These lists were subsequently amended by Board action on August 13, 1992, November 12, 1992, December 10, 1992, and March 11, 1993. It is necessary to review and update these lists for the 10-year period from FY 1993/1994 through FY 2002/2003.

Included in the backup are the following:

Exhibit A - Planning Area Percentages. This exhibit includes costs for all Phase 1 Flood Control Facilities and attributes percentages based upon costs of Phase 1 Flood Control Facilities for each planning area. This exhibit is unchanged from what was presented to the Board on June 11, 1992.

TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM # lTEM # 21 Date: Date: 7/8/93 Exhibit B - pliority Values, Adlitions to the 10Yew Construction hgmm. This exhibit summarizes the two projects quested to be prioritized for inclusion as a Phase 1 Flood Control Facility. The projects are the Colorado Avenue System located in the Central Basin and the Cheyenne Avenue Crossings located in the Gowan Basin. All other priority values assigned to flood control facilities in the Las Vega Valley remain unchanged. Those priority values and subsequent requests were approved by the Board on June 11, 1992. ExhW C - IO-Year Construction hgmm. This exhibit is the 10-Year Construction Program for the FY 93/94 through FY 02/03 period. The requested changes and/or additionsby the entities have been includedin the 10-Year Program.The 10-Year Program totals $152,814,000. Exhibit D - Summary of Funding. This exhibit is a summary of funding encumbered or requested on past agendas through June 4, 1993; remaining funding programmed on the Bond Project List; and funding requested on the 10-Year Construction Program. Based upon percentages of Phase 1 Flood Control Facilities identified on Exhibit A, this exhibit demonstrates the present funding level for each planningarea and indicates which planning area is over or under the programmed funding at the end of the 10-Year Program (FY 02/03).

The exhibits do not reflect the COELocal Share (local match) required for theU.S. Army Corps of Engineers TropicanalFlamingo Washes Project. The COE Local Share is estimated to be $45,000,000over a ten year period.This amount includes the local sponsor’s federal requirement to provide lands, easementsand rights-of-way to construct the TropicanalFlamingo WashesProject. The Local Sharefor the COE project would be required when federal appropriations are made.

Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM # 21 &&&J- Date: Date: 7/8/93 Vi@ia Valentine, P.E. General ManagerKhief Engineer Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

~ PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECTS, 10-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM AND FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PROJECT LIST - STATUS REPORT

The 10-Year ConstructionProgram is updated on an annual basis. This item was !kst on the Technical Advisory Committee agenda in February 1993. The backup includes current information submitted by the entities for development of an updated 10-year Construction Program. The Technical Advisory Committee, at the June 24, 1993 meeting, recommended that the item be held until their July meeting to allow for further review of the program and to consider the fiscal impacts. This item will be presented to the Board in final form at the August 1993 meeting.

Staff Recommendation: IReceive the report and direct staff as deemed appropriate. Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: I AGENDA # Date:

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: I AGENDA # Date:

IRecommendation: EXHIBIT A Exhibit A

PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM file:m:\excel\l mpuper.xls Phase 1 Percent of Entity Area Planning I costs Phase 1 Henderson : C -1 Channel Planning AreaPlanningChannel C-1 (a) 527,000,000 PittmanPlanningArea Wash (c) $37,188,000 T o tal $64,188,000Total 16.3% Las Vegas (Central La8 Vegas Valley) : C e ntra l Basin PlanningAreaBasin Central (b) $53,560,000 G o w a n Planning Area (a) $45,720,000 (a) Area Planning Gowan T ota l $99,280,00025.3%Total North Las Vegas ( Northern Lss Vegas Valley) : Nothern LasVegas Wash Planning Area (a) $52,740,000 R a ng e Wash Planning AreaPlanningWash Range (a) $28,560,000 Lower LasVegas Wash Planning Area (a) $ 12,440,000 T o tal $93,740,000Total 23.9% Clark County (Southwest Las Vegas Valley) : Duck Cr/BlueDiamond Planning Area (a) $33,000,000 Flamingo/TropicanaPlanningArea (a) $57,440,000 T o tal $90,440,000Total 23.0% Clark County (Outlying Area) : O u tlying Planning Area Planning Outlying (f) $39,083,000 T o tal $39,083,000 Total 9.9% Boulder City : B o uld er City Planning CityBoulder Area (dl $4,220,000 T o tal $4,220,000 1.1%$4,220,000 Total Mesquite : Mesquite Planning Area (e) $2,040,000 Total $2,040,000 0.5% TOTAL 5392,991,000 100.0%- ~~

Notu: (a) - Phase 1 Construction Program from 'The Master Plan Update of the Las Vegas Valley," dated August 1991, by JMM (b) - Phase 1 Construction Program from "The Master Plan Update of the Las Vegas Valley," dated August 1991, by JMM, modified by City of Las Vegas (c) - Phase 1 Construction Program from "The Master Plan Update of the Las Vegas Vdley," dated August 199 1, by JMM, modified by City of Henderson

(d) - Pha8e 1 Construction Program 'rom "Boulder City flood Control Master Plan ,Idated July 1990, by Coe and Van Loo (e) - Phase 1 Construction Program from "City of Mesquite flood Control Master PlanUpdate," dated October 1991, by CH2M Hill (f) - Phase 1 Construction Program totals $39,083,000 for the Outlying Areas from the following sources : $5,310,000 - from "flood Control Master Plan, Mospa Valley, Nevada," dated December 1988, by The Mark Group 3 1,863,000 - from "flood Control Master Plan, Bunkerville, Nevada," dated May 1990, by The Mark Group $19,800,000 - from "Hiko Springs and Unnamed Wash, Laughlin - Big Bend Area," dated May 1989, by Boyla $9,640,000 - from "Bridge Canyon Wash Flood Control Master Plan," dated September 1990, by Coe and Van Loo $2,470,000 - from "Master Plan Update, Outlying Areas," dated September 1991, by G.C. Wallace, the following : Blue Diamond : $ 169,881 Goodsprings : $352,737 Indian springs : $594,700 Nelson : $193.8 10 Searchlight : $405,807 Stateline : $750,892 EXHIBIT B Projects Prioritization (Changes or Additions) to 10-Year Program

611 6/93 m:\axcd\2prior.xlr Ranning Pop. ]Land IPublic IAccesr IAvoid. IFunding IRelation. Ifnrplm. IEnviron. Ihlkinten. ITOTAL I FacilityDescription Area I vd (5.0) Ival (4.5) Ivd (4.0) lvd (3.5) Ivd (3.0) lvd (2.5) Ivd (2.0) Ivd (1.5) Ivd (1.0) Ivd (0.5) Ivd I

(a) - ratincs provided by Clark County Public Workr 4/27/93 (b) - ratings provided by the City of Lor Vegas Public Works 6/14/93 (c) - ratings asrigned in FY 86/87 (d) - ratings provided by CCRFCD rtnff 6/16/93 N-:

PAGE 1 OF 1 MAYOR JAN LAVERTY JONES COUNCILMEN BOB NOLEN CITY of LAS VEGAS ARNE ADAMSEN SCOTT HIGGINSON FRANK HAWKINS JR. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY MANAGER RICHARD D. COECKE WILLIAM J. NOONAN DIRECTOR

June 14, 1993

Virginia Bax Valentine, PE - General Manager/Chief Engineer Clark County Regional Flood Control District 301 E. Clark Avenue, Suite301 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

SUBJECT : CLV 10-Year Priority List

Dear Virginia: Attached are proposed rankingsfor the Cheyenne Channel crossings and the Colorado Avenue System.These rankings are consistent with the needsof other projects inthe Central Las Vegas Basin. The ranking is attached for the Colorado Avenue System because Clark County recently submitteda request to include this project on the Las Vegas (Central Las Vegas Basin) 10-Year Priority List. Unfortunately, we were not consulted regarding the ranking which Clark County submitted to the District. Our ranking is consistent with rankings of other projects in the Central Basin. We have also considered the previous ranking given to this project inFY 86-87 of 1169.5",recent development in the area, and the change in project route from the 1986 Master Plan. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, MJ Richard D. Goecke, Director Department of Public Works cc: Charles Kajkowski, PE- CLV CITY OF IAS VEGAS PROJECT PRIORITIZATION (CHANGES OR ADDITIONS) TO IO-YEAR PROGRAM

FILE: \RFC~TENYEAR\93PRlORi EXHIBIT C

T -' H PAGE 1 OF 12 6/28/93 In 98/99 In 99m In OODl In 01102 I FY 02103 1 (Year 8) (Year 7) (Year 8) (Year 9) Planning Facility Dewription Area

PAGE 2 OF 12 ! PAGE 3 OF 12 6/28/93 IFY 98/99 In 99m In Oom In 01102 IfV 02103 1 (Year 6) (Year 7) (Year 8) Planning F acility Deocription Area Value Area Deocription Facility mow

PAGE 4 OF 12 8/28/93 M 93194 In 94195 IFV 95196 IFY 96/97 In 97/98 I (Veer 1) (Veer 2) (Year 3) (Year 4) Planning D escription Area Facility Description CmntslNoter

I I 3.306 I 4.045 I 3.458 I 3.696 I 4.377

PAGE 5 OF 12 PAGE 6 OF 12

IO-YEAR CONSTRUC~K~moaw Ilm*OdWlWJdr

J 6/28/93 FY 98/99 M 99/00 FY 00101 M 01102 M 02103 (Year 6) (Year 7) (Year 8) (Year 9) P lanning Const. Design Const. Damgn Const. Design Const. Planning D escription Area Facility Description mow mow

I YearFiscalTotalsper x $1,OOO,OOO~~ 3.670 I 4.710 I 4.470 I 0.780 I O.OO0

PAGE 8 OF 12 In 93194 IFY 95/96 In 97/98

PAGE 9 OF 12 6/28/93 M 98199 M 99m M OODl M OlD2 FY 02m3 (Year 8) (Year 7) (Year 8) (Year 9) (Yew 10) Plann ing Const. Design Const. Design Const. Design Const. Planning corn. D..ign comt. F acility Description Ares Description Facility mow mow mow

PAGE 10 OF 12 PAGE 11 OF 12 10-YEAR CoNSTRucfKm PROGRAM fhrn:buoR210*rpo.x*

r 6/28/93 FY 98/39 M 99/00 FY ooD1 M 01D2 FY 02D3 (Year 6) (Year 7) (Year 8) (Year 9) (Year 10) P lanning Priority Design Const. DesignConst. Design Priority Planning Facility Description Area Value Area Description Facility /ROW /ROW

I Totalsper FiscalYear ( x S 1 ,OOO.~~~ 1.478 I 1.518 I 1.520 I 1.517 I 1.500

PAGE 12 OF 12 EXHIBIT D

J M 02103 Amourt I $61,123,133 15.4%1$61,123,133 (0.9%)

..... $j $50,553,344 688,401,344 26.7% 1.4% ...... :::< .....") $4,693,907 .i...:.:...... ?

... (2.4%) 20.6% $68,380,587 ($7,873,448)

$85,SS7,08 1 2.1 26.0% n #6,960,668 4 ... m,687,a10 2.0% O.@% $3,129,238

Mooquiu : 1.3% $4,362,146 0.8% I $2,642,130 $28,396,800 8.0% (2.0%) ($6,655,836)

I TOTAl $331,348,401 I l00.0%1 (a) includes Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Includes Project CloseOuts, Interlocd Contracts Approved and Requested, Funds Rdningon FY 92193 Project List and Bond Ropct List CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 93-3 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLASH FLOOD AWARENESS WEEK 1993 RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve and authorizeChairman the to sign.

CITIZENSCOMMITTEE: Approve.

m" 22 CLARKCOUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

SUBJECT:

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLASH FLOOD AWARENESS WEEK 1993

PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE BOARD APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN RESOLUTION NO. 93-3 PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF SUNDAY, JULY 11, THROUGH SATURDAY, JULY 17, AS CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLASH FLOOD AWARENESS WEEK

FISCAL IMPACT:

NONE.

BACKGROUND:

Over the past several years the District has dedicated oneweek each year to focus on flash flood awareness. The week chosen for 1993 is from Sunday, July 11, through Saturday, July 17, which is within the historically flood-prone months of July through September. While the flood awareness program is now virtually a year-round program, extra emphasis will be placed upon further heightening awareness during this particularweek. Interviews have been arrangedwith several of thelocal television stations for showing during the week. The District’s advertising consultant, Merica, Burchand Dickerson, will be placing television, radio and newspaper spots during the week. Placement of a flood safety message will continue on billboards and through Skyview Traffic Reports. The Citizens Advisory Committee will be distributing a flood safety poster to the year-round schools. Also, several private and public organizations have assisted in the disseminationof this vital safety information. The attached resolution has been prepared to proclaim the week of July 11 - 17th as Clark County Regional Flash Flood Awareness Week. Staff recommends that the Board adopt the resolution and authorize the Chairman to sign.

Respectfully submitted, I I 1 CAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA lTEM#l9 ITEM# 22 Date: 6/28/93 Date: 7/8/93

Project Administration Coordinator Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Discussion: Date: Staff Discussion: 6/ 14/93 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLASH FLOOD AWARENESS WEEK 1993

Resolution No. 93-3 has been prepared for the Board of Directors to declare the week of July 11-17 as "Clark County Regional Flash Flood Awareness Week".

Staff Recommendation:

Approve and authorize the Chairman to sign.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: I AGENDA # Date:

The item was not heard by the Technical Advisory Committee.

~ ~~ Recommendation:

~~ Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA#19 Date: 6/28/93

Recommendation:

Approve. UUURESOLUTION93-~MWW DECLARATION OF CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLASH FLOOD AWARENESS WEEK SUNDAY, JULY 11, THROUGH SATURDAY, JULY 17, 1993

WHEREAS, the Board of the ClarkCounty Regional Flood Control District is dedicated to preventing loss of life and property due to flash floods; and

WHEREAS, it is importantfor all citizens to beinformed and reminded of the dangers of flash flooding which can be life-threatening and damaging to public and private property; and

WHEREAS, the population of the ClarkCounty region continues to grow, with many new residents unfamiliar with desert conditions and the dangers of flash flooding; and

WHEREAS, theClark County Regional Flood Control District andthe County of Clark, the City of Las Vegas, the City of North Las Vegas, the City of Henderson, the City of Boulder City, and the City of Mesquite have worked diligently to ensure maximum possible protection from flash flooding; now

THEREFORE, we dohereby proclaim the weekof July 11 - 17, 1993 as: LARK COUNTY REGIONAL ELASH FLOOD AWARENESS WEEK”

in the Clark County regional area, and urge all citizens to guard , against the dangers associated with flash flooding by staying away from flooded and wash areas, and by staying alert and acting appropriately to broadcast messages of flash flood watches and warnings.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this eighth day of July, 1993.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

Chairman

Attest:

Board Secretary CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

FLOOD AWARENESS PROGRAM CONSULTANT STATUS REPORT RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Receive the reportand direct staff and/orconsultant, as deemed appropriate.

CITIZENSCOMMITTEE: Follow staff recommendation.

RFTD AGENDA ITEM# 23 CLARKCOUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

~ ~~~~ SUBJECT: FLOOD AWARENESS PROGRAM CONSULTANT STATUS REPORT

PETITIONER. VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:

THAT THE BOARD RECEIVE A REPORT FROM MERICA, BURCH & DICKERSON REGARDING ADVERTISING SERVICES PROVIDED AND DIRECT THE CONSULTANT OR STAFF, IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

The Board awarded a contract for advertising services to Merica, Burch & Dickerson (MBD) on February 11,1993. Attached is MBD’s most current status report. A monthly update report on the overall program, including the work accomplished by District staff, continues to be included as part of the Project Status Report agenda item. A representative of the firm will present the highlights of their work to this point and will be available to answer questions the Boardmay have. No action is necessary, however, the Board may take any action deemed appropriate to direct the consultantor staff.

Respectfully submitted, RFCD AGENDA lTEM # 20 ITEM#23

Project Administration Coordinator Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Staff Discussion: I Date: 6/14/93 FLOOD AWARENESS PROGRAM CONSULTANT STATUS REPORT

A representative of Merica, Burch & Dickerson will present the status of their work on the current contract and will be available to answer questions from the Board.

~. Staff Recommendation:

No action is necessary; however, the Boardmay take any action deemed appropriate to direct the consultant or staff.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: AGENDA # Date: The item was not heard by the Technical Advisory Committee

~ ~~ Recommendation:

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA#20 Date: 6/28/93

Recommendation:

Receive the report. 08/30/93 21:58 a702 380 9231 MBD ADVERTISING moo2

Status Report

As of Junc 30,1993

Outdoor Posters Post another SO% showing On schedule July 10 Y .*. .~ Flood Posters (22” x 28”) Delivered in May Done. Currently being distributed by CCRFCD, Milk cartom Second run to start July 9th Second run to coincide with Flood Awarm~ssWeek. __I

, Fox 5 Kids Club Running through end of the year. New spot begins next week. Paid spots began week of May 31 to run every other wtck for 20 weeks. Bonus spot to m in dternative weeks with mid scat. II Television Flood Safcty July 12, 1993 Spots to run through Flood Message Awarcness Wcck. Donatcd spots expected to be matched again this year, Newspaper Flood Safcty To run through Flood Message Awareness Weck in outlying area newspapers. CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

PROJECT STATUS REPORTS PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER I

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE REPORTS

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

The following Project Status Reportsfor the month of June 1993 are submitted for your review:

92/93 PROJECT LIST AND BOND PROJECTS

1 - 4 Project Charts 5 - 8 ProjectSummary Sheets 9 - 32 Clark County 33-46 City of Las Vegas 47-52 City of Henderson 53-57 City of North Las Vegas

OTHER PROJECTS OF INTEREST

58-64 Regional Flood Control

Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 24 Date: Date: 7/08/93

Cathy &or Y Project Administration Coordinator FLAMINGO BRIDGE @ PALOS VERDE CLARK COUNTY OUTLYING - I PROJECT STATUS CHART 1993 I 1994 AS OF 6/30/93 AugSop Oct Nov Doc Jan Fob Mar Apr May Jun ;Jut AugSep Oct Nov Dac Jan Fob I I BUNKERVILLE CHANNEL I I GOODSPRINGS

HlKO SPRINGS I I LOGAN WASH - Area 1 Area 2

MUDDY RIVER WEST LEVEE

I NELSON FLOOD CONTROL

SEARCHLIGHT FLOOD CONTROL

UNNAMED WASH

Page 2 CITY OF LAS VEGAS PR OJECT STATUS CHART STATUS PROJECT 1993 1394 AS OF 6/30/93 SopAug Oct Nov Doc Jan Fob Mar Apr May Jun IJul SopAug Oct Nov Doc Jan Fob I ALTA STORM DRAIN (Meadow V)

ANGEL PARK DB EXPANSION

BUFFALO CHANNEUDw-Westclifftf)

BUFFALO CH(Summerlin-Vegas)

BUFFALO CH(Westcliff-Summedin)

CHEYENNE CHANNEL

CAREY/LAKE MEAD DET. BASIN

GOWANEAM 10 & LONE MTN

GOWAN DETENTION BASIN

GOWAN OUTFALL

OAKEY BL DET BASIN SYSTEM

RAMPART STORM DRAIN

WASHINGTON/SANDHILL OUTLET

WASHINGTON / SANDHILL-VIRGIL WASHINGTON I VIRGIL - LENA I PRO JECT STATUS CHART STATUS PROJECT 1993 1992 I 1994 AS OF 6/30/93 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fob Mar Apr May Jun lJul Aug Sop Oct NovDOC Jan hb I I I I BOULDER CITY I I HEMENWAY WASH I I I HENDERSON I

- W Diversion Facility - Lake Mead to &Irkholder PITTMAN WASH - PHASE 111 SUNSET DETENTION BASIN

UPRR CHANNEL

MESQUITE TOWN WASH DET. BASIN

NORTH LAS VEGAS GOWAN OUTFALLSHASE I

KYLE CANYON DET. BASIN

NLV DETENTION BASIN-OUTLET

UPPER LV WASH DET BASIN

WEST RANGE WASH DIKE S2.820.000 dl phases $2,785,485 DONEDONE 2/92 DONE 5/92 DONE 9/92 construction period extended another month seeabove see above seeabove DONEDONE 6/92 NOW 1/93 7/93 d + 3 due to relocation of gas & weter lines

seeabove see above seeabove DONE DONE 1/93 NOW 05/93d + 1 08/93 NOW 06/93 09/93 12/93 5400.000 NOW 08/93 11/93 11/94

$8,000,000 $200,000 phasesSee delay to coordinate with Phase IIB.design ...... " ...... NOW 6/93 d+l 12/93 d+4 4/94d+2 NOW 10/93 d + 2 12/93 d+2 6/94d+2 ...... "....I ...... " ...... "...... " ...... 5921,800 DONEDONE 6/92 DONE 10/92 DONE4/93 ...... ".."...... $1,072,OOO DONE DONE 10/92 NOW 3/93 8/93 d + 2 construction delayed due to materiel delivery DONEDONE 8/92 NOW 3/938/93 d + 2 weather delay UI to coincide with Phase IV s...... s...... "...... " ...... S1.627,OOO"...... " ..... NOW 06/93 11/93 d+2 2/94 d + 2 deley due to saniterysewer conflict

I 1 I I I ROW 02/93 I I I Shading indie++ Band fund d + indicates cumulative ddsy in month...... , .:.If:, . .. indicates partially funded by carryoverfrom previous fiscal war Isince 3/31 193 SHEET AS OF

Page 6 $ 954,800 $954,800 $954,800 DONE DONE 1/93 12/93d+5

delays due to add'l storm 2/94 d +4 2/95 d +5 druewer 81 SID work

UOW4/93d + 1

UOW 6/92 36/93

12/93 35/94 CareyAake Mead Detention Basin )ONE 11/91 DONE 8/92

UOW 7/92 37/93

)ONE 4/92 DONE 1/93

JOW 1/93 12/93

1/94d+l 1/95d+l

)/93d+l

)ONE 3/92 DONE 8/92

Iconstruction DONEDONE 5/92 sow 1/93 36/93 d + indicates monthsdel* since 3131/93 DISTRICT SUMMARY SHEET AS

Camino AI Norte Culvert 8300,000 $300,000 DONE 1/93 DONE 3/93 Gowan Outfall - Phase 1 and Stimson Channel DONE DONE 11/90 NOW 4/91 05/93 Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Design 8100,000 8 156.W NOW 04/93 11/93 11/94 North Las Vegas Detention Basin - I I I I I I 1 DONE 5/91 /NOW 5/92 r/93 ichweconstruction delayed to make plans 8 specification IDONE 5/92 9/93d+36/94d+4 d + indicates month delay since 03/31/93

Page 8 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: DUCK CREEK BRIDGESAT TOMIYASUAND PACHUCA (LA CASITA) DESCRIPTION: NEW BRIDGES OVER DUCK CREEK AT PACHUCA (LA CASITA)AND TOMIYASU

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 12/01/92 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 02/22/93 CONSTRUCTION START 05/15/93 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 08/15/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: HEFNER CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTING

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: COORDINATION WITHAND EASEMENT REQUIRED FROM PROPERTY OWNERS.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONSTRUCTED PIER WALLSAND CHANNEL LINING AT TOMIYASU. EXCAVATED CHANNEL AND PLACED RIP-RAP ATBOTH SITES.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE CONSTRUCTION.

PROJECT MANAGER: GEORGE PHONE #: 455-8332 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS =PORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: RANGE WASH DETENTION FACILITY DESCRIPTION: DETENTION BASIN AND 0UTLET.CHANNEL FACILITIES

PERCENT COMPLETE: -8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $9,387.500.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 07/01/93 R/W CLEARANCES 08/01/93 __ ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 09/02/93 OPEN BIDS CONSTRUCTIONSTART 12/13/93 CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE10/28/94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROPERTY ACQUISITION MAY DELAYADS (APPRAISALS BEGAN6/1/93). USAF II WORK MAY WARRANT SPLIT PHASES (ADS 9/28/93, PRE-BID 10/4/93, OPEN BIDS ll 10/21/93, AWARD 11/16/93 - IF SPLIT).. ADDITIONAL DESIGN-mLOCATION 11 FOR USAF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES ll

I! WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: 11 BEGAN REVIEW OF 95% PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. PROPERTIES BEING APPRAISED.

11 WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: FINALIZE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. DETERMINE ACQUISITION COSTSAND -11 REQUEST FUNDING.

PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT if? PHONE #: 455-7707 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: FLAMINGO WASH AT WINNICK AVENUE DESCRIPTION: COLLECT FLAMINGO WASH AND DISCHARGE AT KOVAL

PERCENT COMPLETE: -7% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $2,700,000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 03/29/93 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 07/15/93

~~ CONSTRUCTION START 11/01/93 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 04/01/94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G.C. WALLACE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

II I DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: COORDINATION WITH WATER DISTRICT.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: HELD PRE-BID ON 06/04/93.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: OPEN BIDS ON 07/15/93.

PROJECT MANAGER: HAND PHONE #: 455-8339 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: LOWER DUCK CREEK DETENTION BASIN DESCRIPTION: PRE-DESIGN ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE BASIN SIZEAND ROW NEEDS.

PERCENT COMPLETE: -1% ESTIMATEDCOST OF PROJECT: $0.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 09/01/93 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN CONSTRUCTION START CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PRE-DESIGN ONLY -- NO FINAL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CREATED AGENDA ITEM FOR RFCD BOARDON MASTER PLAN CHANGE.

11 WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXTMONTH: ISSUE~~ ~ ~ NTPTO VTN TO BEGIN PRE-DESIGN. RFCD BOARD TO CONSIDER MASTER PLAN CHANGE ON07/06/93.

PROJECT MANAGER: HAND PHONE #: 455-8339 /i.i- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT c

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I1- CROSSINGS DESCRIPTION: PECOS, SANDHILL,MTN VISTA - COMPLETE REMAINING PROJECT COMPONENTS

PERCENT COMPLETE: 99% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT:$3.000.000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 06/30/92 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 09/18/92 CONSTRUCTION START 01/04/93 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 07/15/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT WAGER: CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: LAS VEGAS PAVING

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: RELOCATION OF 20" GAS MAIN & 16" WATER MAIN ON SANDHILL.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENTMONTH: INSTALLED BOXES CROSSING MTN.VISTA AND INSTALLED RCB.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: COMPLETE FENCING.

I' 9

PROJECT WAGER: NEWBOLD PHONE #: 455-7747 I3 REGIONAL FLOOD COmROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PHASEI11 - CROSSINGS I1 DESCRIPTION: TOMIYASU ELEMENTARY SCHOOLAND ANNIE OAKLEY

PERCENT COMPLETE: 30% ESTIMATEDCOST OF PROJECT: $3,000,000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 01/15/93 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN BIDS 03/15/93 CONSTRUCTIO N START 05/10/93CONSTRUCTION START CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE 08/20/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: GRANITE CONSTRUCTION

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: REMOVED OLD STORM DRAIN, INSTALLED ANDRCB, POURED APPROACH SLAB.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE RCB INSTALLATION. FORM AND POUR INLET AND OUTLET CONCRETE STRUCTURES.

PROJECT MANAGER: NEWBOLT, PHONE #: 455-7747 ~ REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE IV- CROSSINGS I11 DESCRIPTION: IMPROVE STORM FLOW CAPACITY AT MOJAVEAND PEARL CROSSINGS

PERCENT COMPLETE: -5% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $0.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 06/30/93 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 08/30/93 CONSTRUCTION START 09/20/93 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 12/28/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED DESIGN. MET WITH RFCD ON PROJECT. SUBMITTED90% PLANS & SPECS AND COST ESTIMATES. FOR REVIEW. COMPLETED HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS. SUBMITTED AGENDA ITEMS FOR SUPPL. AND ILC MADE PRESENTATION TO RFCD TECHNICAL COMMITTEE.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: MAKE PRESENTATION TO BCC ON07/06/93. FINALIZE PLANS & SPECS AND ADVERTISE ON 07/28/93.

PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE 6 PHONE #: 455-8309 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT II PROJECTSTATUS REPORT ll

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: SLOAN CHANNEL -- LAS VEGAS WASH TO OWENS DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS.

PERCENT COMPLETE: -1% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $0.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 08/01/93 R/W CLEARANCES

~~ ~~ ~~ ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 09/01/93 OPEN BIDS CONSTRUCTI ON START 11/01/93CONSTRUCTION START

~~ ~ CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 11/01/94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT WAGER: G.C. WALLACE CONSTRUCTION PRIMG CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: BEGAN DESIGN.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING MONTH:NEXT CONTINUE DESIGN.

PROJECT MANAGER: HAND PHONE #: 455-8339

R - REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IIA) DESCRIPTION: ROCHELLE/HILDEBRAND TO PECOS-MCLEOD& VIKING - ALSO DETENTION BASIN E

PERCENT COMPLETE: -8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3,500,000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 06/15/93 R/W CLEARANCES 04/05/93 ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 09/23/93 CONSTRUCTION START 12/06/93 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 04/29/94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: SEA CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: CONSULTANT WORKING WITH PHASE IIB CONSULTANT ON FLOW SPLITS TO MAXIMIZE FLOW HANDLING AT LESSER OVERALL COST.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETING FINAL PLANSAND SPECIFICATIONS.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: ACQUIRE EASEMENT. SECURE CONSTRUCTION FUNDING.

I’ ~ ~ ‘I

PHONE #: 455-7707 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IIB) DESCRIPTION: TWAIN/MONUMENT TO PECOS/FLAMINGO INCL. DETENTION BASIN0

PERCENT COMPLETE: -1% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,300,000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 10/15/93 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 11/15/93 OPEN BIDS CONSTRUCTIONSTART 12/15/93 CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE06/15/94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT WAGER: VTN CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: 1) CONTINUED NEGOTIATIONS WITHVTN FOR DESIGN SERVICES ON BASIN E

II OUTFALL. WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: FILE FOR MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT.

#: PROJECT MANAGER: HAND /$ PHONE 455-832 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE 111) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES - ROCHELLE TO UNIVERSITY/MCLEOD.

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 06/08/92 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 08/05/92 CONSTRUCTION START 10/13/92 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 04/30/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: MEA CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTOR

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: 30 CALENDAR DAY EXTENSION GRANTED DUETO WEATHER DELAYS AND ADDITIONAL WORK.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENTMONTH:

PROJECT MANAGER: GEORGE PHONE #: 455-8332 fi- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT // PROJECTSTATUS REPORT //

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IV) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES& DETENTION BASIN C BETWEEN MCLEOD/UNIVERSITY & HARMON/HARRISON INTERSECTIONS

PERCENT COMPLETE: -43% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,072,000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES1 DESIGN 10/08/92 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN BIDS 12/17/92 CONSTRUCTION START 03/22/93 CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE 08/15/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: DELTA ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PRIm CONTRACTOR: MAX RIGGS

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: DELAY IN DELIVERY OF MATERIALS. ADDED 8" PERFORATED DRAIN UNDER CHANNEL.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED 80% OF GABION WALLS. INSTALLED ADDITIONAL13' OF 24' STORM DRAIN PIPE. EXCAVATED CHANNEL PORTION OF BASIN.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXTMONTH: CONTINUE CONSTRUCTIONOF GABION WALLS, CHANNELAND BASIN EXCAVATION. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CHANNEL LINING.

PROJECT MANAGER: MACE PHONE #: 455-8318 20 REGIONAL PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE V) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES BETWEEN HARMON/HARRISON INTERSECTION & TROPICANA AVE.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 40% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,627,000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 08/14/92 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 12/17/92 CONSTRUCTION START 03/22/93 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 08/15/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: PENTACORE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: MAX RIGGS

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: I( WEATHER. PROJECT ADJUSTED TO COINCIDE W/VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL IV BASIN c CONSTRUCTION. TWO DETENTION c PARCELS-PREVIOUSLY ACQUIRED (SEE PHASE IV).

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED EXCAVATION AND INSTALLATION OF CHANNEL LINING. RELOCATED6" ll WATER LINE AT TOPAZ/TOMPKINS. COMPLETED TRAPAZOIDAL SECTIONS. II INSTALLED 1172.1 OF FENCING AND ONE DROP INLET.

PROJECT MANAGER: HALL 27 PHONE #: 455-7749 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE VI) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES - EASTERN/TOMPKINS TO MARYLAND/RENO & SPENCER - TROPICANA TO RENO AND DETENTION BASIN A

PERCENT COMPLETE: -8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $4,870,000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 06/15/93 C LEARANCES 03/20/93R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN BIDS 08/19/93 CONST RUCTION START 11/01/93CONSTRUCTION START CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE02/25/94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: JM MONTGOMERY CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: SANITARY SEWER DESIGN.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENTMONTH: REVIEWED 100% DESIGN ON 06/14/93.

#: PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT 27- PHONE 455-7707

m REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - ROW ACOUISTION DESCRIPTION: APPRAISE AND ACOUIRE ROW FOR DETENTION BASIN SITES.

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN R/W CLEARANCES 02/26/93 ENVIR CLEARAEJCES BIDS OPEN CONSTRUCTION START CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

PROJECT MANAGER: LAND PHONE #: 455-8300 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: BUNKERVILLE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT CONCRETE LINED CHANNEL FROM HIGHWAY THRU & TOWN EARTHEN CHANNEL FROM EDGE OF TOWNTO VIRGIN RIVER. DESIGN ONLY.

PERCENT COMPLETE: -8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,714,648.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: DESIGN (DATES) 10/22/92 R/W CLEARANCES 04/15/92 ENVIR CLEARANCES 08/01/93 BIDS OPEN

~~ CONSTRUCTION START CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: THE MARK GROUP CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

11 DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT ON HOLD DUE TO PROJECT PROTEST BY BUNKERVILLE TAB. PROJECTII WILL BE DELAYED DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS.

RECO~NDEDMASTER PLAN FACILITIES.. RFCD TO INVESTIGATE MASTER PLAN UPDATE. TAB WILL NOTIFY COUNTY OF ACCEPTABLE DESIGNALT.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: AWAIT TAB RECOMMENDATIONS.

PROJdCT MANAGER: CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: GOODSPRINGS - FLOOD CONTROL DESCRIPTION: DESIGN & CONSTRUCT BERM & CHANNEL ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF TOWN AND WIDEN CHANNEL ALONG PACIFIC ST. ON NORTH SIDE OF TOWN.

PERCENT COMPLETE: -7% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT:$99.000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 09/01/93 R/W CLEARANCES 03/15/92 ENVIR CLEARANCES 08/01/93 BIDS OPEN 11/01/93 CONSTRUCTION START 12/15/93 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 03/31/94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G. C. WALLACE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: REVISION TO DRAINAGE PLAN IN SAN PEDRO. REQUIRE ADDITIONAL DELAYS-- ONE ACRE OFLAND TO BE ACQUIRED.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED DESIGN. RECEIVED BIOLOGICAL OPINION FROM USFW& INCORPORATED TORTOISE MITIGATION INTO DESIGN. PREPARED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR ROW ALONG SAN PEDRO. BEGAN GEOTECHNICAL STUDY.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING MONTH: NEXT COMPLETE REVIEW OF 90% PLANS & SPECS. INITIATE APPRAISALS FOR ROW ALONG SAN PEDRO.

d. d.

PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE ys.’ PHONE #: 455-8309 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: LAUGHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS DESCRIPTION: DESIGN FACILITY ON HIKO SPRINGS TO CONTROL100-YEAR FLOWS. FACILITIES INCLUDE DETENTION BASIN, CHANNEL,AND FIVE BRIDGES.

PERCENT COMPLETE: -4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $19,000.000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: DESIGN (DATES)

R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN CONSTRUCTION START CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: BOYLE ENG'G CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: SCHEDULE IS DEPENDENT ON SID FUNDING,LESSTHAN 50% SUPPORT AT PRESENT I! I WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: SCHEDULED SID STEPS TO DETERMINE ACCEPTANCE LEVEL.

INE ACCEPTANCE LEVEL. SOLICIT

PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707 2% REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN WASH DIVERSION/CHANNEL AREA1

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 08/24/92 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN 10/26/92 CONSTRUCTION START 01/04/93 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 04/29/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: DAMES & MOORE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: RON WILLIAMS

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: CONTRACTOR REQUESTING DELAYS DUE TO PERCEIVED SOIL REPORT INACCURACIES AND WEATHER CONDITIONS.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CLOSED-OUT PROJECT.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

PROJECT WAGER: WONDRA/KOLHOSS PHONE #: 455-7748 27 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN WASH DIVERSION/CHANNEL AREA2 DESCRIPTION: INLET STRUCTURE AT UPRR BRIDGE, TWO 10' X 8' RCBS. CROSSING AT SR 169 AND OPEN CHANNEL.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 100% ESTIMATEDCOST OF PROJECT: $3,269.540.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 01/03/92 02/15/92 EN VIR CLEARANCES 02/15/92CLEARANCES ENVIR BI DS OPEN 04/23/92 OPEN BIDS CON STRUCTION START 09/21/92CONSTRUCTION START CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE03/11/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: GREINER CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: MEADOW VALLEY

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: RAIN. NEWTON PROPERTY CAUSED DELAY. NEWTON DEDICATED ROW. IN-HOUSE UNDERGROUND DESIGNAND BCC APPROVED $200,000 CHANGE ORDERTO CONSTRUCT 2 10' CAST IN PLACE PIPES INSTEADOF OPEN CHANNEL.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CLOSED-OUT PROJECT.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXTMONTH:

PROJECT MANAGER: WONDRA/KOLHOSS PHONE #: 455-7748 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - MUDDY RIVER (WEST) LEVEE DESCRIPTION: DESIGN EARTH LEVEE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE RIVER TO CONTAIN 100-YEAR STORM.

PERCENT COMPLETE : -7% ESTIbrLATED COST OF PROJECT: $2,439,118.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES1 DESIGN R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARAETCES BIDS OPEN CONSTRUCTION START CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: THE MARK GROUP CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONT€UiCTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT SCHEDULE& DATES TO BE REVISED ONCE PROJECT PROBLEMS RESOLVED. ID & ACQUISITION OF ROW& EASEMENTS FROM THE60 PLUS PROPERTY OWNERS WILL BE EXTREMELY LENGTHY.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: DETERMINED PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED.

I’ It

PROJECT MANAGER: AINSWORTH PHONE #: 455-8365 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT c

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: NELSON FLOOD CONTROL DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT DIVERSION BERM UPSTREAM OF ROAD. WIDEN CHANNEL AND DIP.

PERCENT COMPLETE: -1% ESTIMATEDCOST OF PROJECT: $70,000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN

~~ ~ R/W CLEARANCES

~~ ENVIR CLEARANCES BIDS OPEN CONSTRUCTION START CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G C WALLACE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: COST OF FACILITIES EXCEEDS BUDGETEDAMOUNT. MASTER PLAN UPDATE PROPOSES ACQUIRING PROPERTYIN LIEU OF BUILDING FACILITIES.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: MEET WITH RFCD TO DISCUSS COURSEOF ACTION FORTHE RECOMMENDED MASTER PLAN FACILITIES. UPDATE CURRENT INTERLOCAL CONTRACT.

PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STAmS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: SEARCHLIGHT - DIKE DESCRIPTION: MASTER PLAN STRUCTURES#5014, 5015, 5016 & 5017

PERCENT COMPLETE: -7% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $172,000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES1 DESIGN 10/28/93 R/W CLEARANCES ENVIR CLEARANCES 08/01/93 BIDS OPEN 11/30/93 CONSTRUCTION START CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 03/30/94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G C WALLACE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: ACQUIRE ROW.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: RECEIVED FINAL PLANSAND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REVIEW. BEGAN APPRAISALS 06/15/93.

I! ‘I WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING MONTH:NEXT CONTINUE ROW APPRAISAL.

PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309 31 CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 06/30/93 REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUNE 1 TO: JUNE 30 PROJECT: LAUGHLIN - UNNAMED WASH DESCRIPTION: DESIGN FACILITY TO CONTROL100-YEAR STORM FLOWS, INCLUDING CHANNEL, SED. BASIN& BRIDGE.

PERCENT COMPLETE: -8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $8,000.000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES) DESIGN 06/15/91

R/W CLEARANCES 12/20/91 ENVIR CLEARANCES ENVIR 12/01/91 BIDS OPEN BIDS 07/02/93 CONSTRUCTIONSTART 09/13/93 CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE 05/27/94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: SIMONS, LI & ASSOCIATES CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROV. ORDER 06/04/91--64% PROTEST. 2ND SID TRY. REC. 47 ACRES FROM COL. RIVER COMM. ADS 6/04/93, PRE-BID 6/14/93, & AWARD 7/20/93.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: ADVERTISED ON 06/04/93. BEGAN MITIGATION MEASURES.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: NEGOTIATE STATE PARKS AGREEMENT. ACQUIRE EASEMENT.

PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707 32 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Las Vegas DATE PREPARED:06/23/93 DATEENTITY: Vegas Citv of Las REVIEWPERIOD FROM:05/22/93 TO:06/18/93

Project: Meadows Detention BasinPhase V

Description:Storm drain installation on Aka Drive from Falcon to Jones.

PercentComplete: 100% DesianEstimated Cost of Project: $954,800

Schedule for Completion Complete

Design /18/93 01 _.X

R /W Clearances R/W /18/93 01 -X

E nvir ClearancesEnvir 01 /I 8/93 -X B ids Open 0911 Open Bids 4/93

Start Construction 12/09/93 Construction Complete 04/08/94

Consultant/ProjectManager: In-house redesign

Construction Prime Contractor:

Delays or problems area: Add 12" storm drain on Jones. Requires NDOT permit (add approx. 4 weeks to schedule). Raise 60" RCP in Aka 5-6 ft. Revise bid package to include above changes. Redo changes on design sheets. Original AutoCadd drawings unavailable (RANPAC closed Las Vegas office). In-house manpower for construction management not available until September, 1993.

Work completed during month: Permits from NDOT.

Work to be completed during next month: Project to begin advertising 07/30/93.

P roject Manager: Joe Christensen,ProjectManager:Joe P.E. Phone:229-2212

33 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:06/16/93 DATEENTITY: Veaas Citv of Las REVIEWPERIOD FROM:05/22/93TO:06/18/93

Project: BuffaloDrive: Sahara to Westcliff Description:Construction of full immovements between Sahara and Westcliff; includes a flood control channel between Doe and Westcliff.

Percent Complete: 90% Design Estimated Cost of Project: $11,523,500 Schedule for Completion Complete

Design 09/16/93 - R/W Clearances 09/16/93 -

Envir Clearances 09/16/93 -

Bids Open 1 1 /I4/93 -

Start Construction 02/04/94 -

Construction Complete 02/28/95 - r \sultant/Project Manager: VTNEnaineerina; Roger Sorenson, P.E.

Construction Prime Contractor:

Delays or problems area: Delays due to additional design work. 4000' of additional storm drain, 2000' of 30" sewer, 2000' of 8" sewer, and SID work on sidestreets will cause a two month delay.

I I

Work completed during month: Enter into an interlocal agreement with RTC, and Flood Control District to obtain funds for construction.

I I

Work to be completed during next month: Continue with design.

t dject Manager: John O'Connell. P.E. Phone:229-6735 34 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Las Venas DATE PREPARED:06/23/93 DATEENTITY: Venas Citv of Las REVIEW PERIOD FROM:05/22/93TO:06/18/93

Project: Buffalo Channel:Summerlin Parkwav to Vegas

Description:Construction of a flood control channel from Summerlin Parkwav to Veaas Dr.

PercentComplete: 45% ConstructionEstimated Cost Project: of $1,908,000 Sche dule for Completion CompleteCompletion for Schedule

Design 08/31 /92 -X

R/W Clearances 10/30/92 -X

Envir Clearances 08/31 /92 -X

Bids Open 01 /26/93 -X

Start Construction 04/2 1193 -X

Construction Complete 0811 8/93 -

Consultant/ProjectManager: VTN Engineers, KenGilbreth, P.E. Construction Prime Contractor:Meadow Vallev Contractors

Delays or problems area: None.

Work completed during month: Excavation for channel is 95% complete. Placing of concrete is 40% complete.

Work to be completed during next month: Continue with construction.

P roject Manager: Joe Christensen.ProjectManager:Joe P.E. Phone:229-2212 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:06/23/93

REVIEWPERIOD FROM:05/22/93 TO:06/18/93 Project: Buffalo lnterchancae Descripti0n:Desiqn and construction of an interchange on Buffalo atSummerlin Parkwav includina a box culvert from Westcliff to Washington

PercentComplete: 99 % Construction EstimatedCost of Project: $7,361,000 for CompletionSchedule for Complete

Design 04/22/9 1 -X

R/W Clearances 04/22/91 -X

Envir Clearances 04/22/9 I -X

Bids Open 03/3 I/92 -X

Start Construction 06/15/92 -X Construction Complete 06/09/93 -

sultant/Project Manager:G B & L Consultants, George Brizendine. P.E. Construction Prime Contractor:Max Rims Construction

Delays or problems area: None.

Work completed during month: Project substantially complete 6-23-93.

I J

I I Work to be completed during next month: Final punchlist is in the process of being completed.

Project Manager:ProjectAnderson,Dennis P.E. Phone:229-6082 3lfl REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: Citv of Las Veclas DATE PREPARED:06/16/93 REVIEWPERIOD FROM:05/22/93TO:06/18/93

Project: Chevenne Channel;Buffalo to Gowan Detention Basin

Description:Desian the construction of Chevenne Channel from Buffalo to Gowan Detention Basin.

PercentComplete: 25% DesianEstimated Cost of Project: $1,376,000 ScheduleComplete for Completion

Design 08/06/93 -

R/W Clearances 09/13/93 -

Envir Clearances 09/13/93 -

Bids Open 10/26/93 - Start Construction 12/13/93 -

Construction Complete 05/12/94 -

Consultant/ProjectManager: Church EnaineerindTodd Kenner, P.E.

Construction Prime Contractor:

Delays or problems area: None

completed during month: Draft report comments returned to consultant. 30% design submittal.

Work to be completed during next month: Continue with design.

P roject Manager:ProjectDenis Atwood, P.E. Phone:229-6740 37 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:06/29/93

REVIEWPERIOD FROM:05/26/93TO:06/29/93

Project: Cam lO/LoneMountain Detention Basins

Descripti0n:Predesiqn for Cam 1O/Lone Mountain Detention Basins.

PercentComplete: 0% PreDesian EstimatedCost of Project: $8,770,000 for CompletionSchedule for Complete

Design 06/17/93 - R/W Clearances -!-L -

Envir Clearances -L-L.- - Bids Open -.LL-. -

Start Construction -!-!- - Construction Complete u - r lsultant/Project Manager: MontaomervWatson/Lonnie C. Rov, PE Construction Prime Contractor:

Delays or problems area:

I I

I Work completed during month: Contract approved by City Council.

Work to be completed during next month: Begin Project

- b. d]ect Manager: Randv L. Fultz, P.E. Phone:229-6276 58 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT

ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:06/29/93

REVIEWPERIOD FROM:05/26/93 T0:05/29/93

Project: GowanNorth and South Detention Basins

Description:Construction of the Detention Basins and 72-inch connector DiDe.

PercentComplete: 99 Construction EstimatedCost of Project: $6,300,000 ScheduleComplete for Completion

Design -LL -X R/W Clearances u -X Envir Clearances -u- -X Bids Open 06/15/92 -X

Start Construction 07/15/92 -X Construction Complete 07/3 1/93 -

Consultant/ProjectManager: Poaaemever Design GroudLarrv Carrol

Construction Prime Contractor:American AsDhalt

Delays or problems area:

Work completed during month: CLV landscaping concerns expressed to Poggemeyer.

Work to be completed during next month: Finish final punchlist items. Correction of landscaping concerns.

ProjectManager: Thomas D. Chiatovich. P.E. Phone:229-6276 34 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY:PREPARED:06/19/93 Citv DATE of Las Veaas REVIEW PERIOD FROM:05/26/93TO:06/29/93

Project: GowanNorth Channel(Phase II Proiect)

Descripti0n:Channel to interceot and convev flows from the Northwest into the Gowan North Detention Basin.

PercentComplete: 100 Pre-desianEstimated Cost of Project: $7,490,000

ScheduleComplete for Completion Design u - R/W Clearances -L.-!- - Envir Clearances -!-L - Bids Open /97 07/01 -

Start Construction/97 07/01 - Construction Complete/97 07/01 - r -)sultant/ProjectManager: Church Enaineering/Todd Kenner, P.E. Construction Prime Contractor:

Delays or problems area:

Work completed during month: Ongoing work on presentation information.

I 1 Work to be completed during next month: Approve presentation information.

I I k,JJect Manager: Randv L. Fultz, P.E. Phone:229-6276 +:7 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:06/29/93 REVIEWPERIOD FROM:05/26/93TO:06/29/93

Project: Gowan Detention Basin Outfall

Description:Construction of 5'x 8' RCB from Decatur to Tenava alona Gowan Road.

PercentComplete: 99 Construction EstimatedCost of Project: $4,300,000 ScheduleComplete for Completion

Design u -X R/W Clearances L -X Envir Clearances L -X

Bids Open -L.-l!- -X

Start Construction 04/15/92 -X

Construction Complete 01/30/93 -

Consultant/ProjectManager: Poggemever Design GrouD/Larrv Carroll

Construction Prime Contractor:Las Veaas Pavina

Delays or problems area:

I I

I Work completed during month: Open grading complete on Gowan Road. Project essentially complete.

~~ Work to be completed during next month: Final punch list to be approved.

ProjectManager: Randv L. Fultz, P.E. Phone:229-6276 I Yl REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

La s Veaas DATE PREPARED:06/17/93 DATEofENTITY: Veaas Citv Las REVIEW PERIOD FROM:05/22/93TO:06/18/93

Project: Oakev Detention Basinand Convevance Svstem

Description:Construction of flood control facilities which include basin, collection svstem and outfall.

PercentComplete: 35%Construction Estimated CostProject: of $7,655,000

Sch edule for Completion CompleteCompletion for Schedule

Design 08/01/92 -X

R /W Clearances R/W 08/01/92 -X

E nvir ClearancesEnvir 10/2 1 /92 -X

B ids Open Bids 1 1/24/92 -X

S tart Construction Start 01 /27/93 -X

C onstruction Complete 12/05/93 CompleteConstruction - r vultant/ProjectManager: Bovle Ennineerina,Gerald Moleton, P.E. Construction Prime Contractor:Las Veaas Pavina

Delays or problems area: None.

Work completed during month: Continue basin structure construction. Continue outfall installation.

Work to be completed during next month: Continue outfall installation and basin structure construction.

t I ,JJect Manager:Seevers.Dave P.E. Phone:229-6337 +.%- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT

Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:06/16/93 DATEENTITY: Veaas Citv of Las

REVIEWPERIOD FROM:05/22/93 TO:06/18/93

Project: RamDart Interchange - Charleston to Veaas Description:New arterial roadwav and 100-Yr Storm Drain to extend RamDart from Charleston to Veaas including interchanae at Summerlin Park

PercentComplete: 90% DesianEstimated Cost of Project: $9,900,000

Schedule for Completion Complete

Design 07/30/93

R/W Clearances R/W 07/30/93

Envir Clearances Envir 07/30/93 Bids Open Bids 1 1 /09/93

Start ConstructionStart 0 1/03/94

Construction Complete /02/9501

Consultant/Project Manager: G. C. Wallace / Scott Plummer, P.E.

Construction Prime Contractor:

Delays or problems area: Change in bid opening date due to SID delay. SID expected to form on or about 9-15-93.

Work completed during month: 90% design submittal.

Work to be completed during next month: Review 90% submittal. RTC-TAC presentation. RFC-TAC presentation.

Project Manager:Denis Atwood, P.E. Phone:229-6740 43 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Las Vegas DATE PREPARED:06/23/93 DATEofENTITY: Vegas Citv Las REVIEW PERIOD FROM:05/22/93TO:06/18/93

Project: Washinqton Ave. Svstem I Virqil to Lena

Description:Trir>le 12' x 8' RCB in Washinqton Ave. from Virgil to Lena.

PercentComplete: 100% DesignEstimated Cost of Project:$2,437,000 S chedule for Completion CompleteCompletion for Schedule

Design 08/03/92 -X

R/W Clearances 08/03/92 -X

Envir Clearances 08/03/92 -X

Bids Open 09/12/93 - Start Construction 1 1 /I5/93 -

Construction Complete 07/23/94 - r c)sultant/ProjectManager: MEA / LaurnalGubler, P.E.

Construction Prime Contractor:

Delays or problems area: Process of obtaining funding from RTC. Redesign project to include paving, traffic signal upgrades, and sidewalk ramps will delay bidding of project by three months.

Work completed during month: Funding Agreements for construction costs and design costs are placed on RTC agenda for July 8, 1993.

Work to be completed during next month: Agreement for engineering services to do design work and construction management placed on CLV City Council Agenda for August 4, 1993.

t ~ ,ject Manager:Christensen,Joe P.E. Phone:229-2212 YY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:06/23/93 DATEENTITY: Veaas Citv of Las REVIEWPERIOD FROM:05/22/93 TO:06/18/93

Project: Washinaton Ave. Svstem / Sandhill Outfall

Descripti0n:TriDle 12' x 8' RCB from the Las Veaas Wash to Washinaton Ave.

PercentComplete: 100% Construction Estimated Cost of Project: $1,802,000 Schedule for Completion Complete

Design /91 12/01 -X

R/W Clearances 12/01/91 _.X

Envir Clearances 12/01/91 -X

Bids Open 01 /07/92 -X

Start Construction 03/01 /92 -X

Construction Complete 08/09/92 -X

Consultant/Project Manager:MEA / LaurnalGubler, P.E. Construction Prime Contractor: J.A. Tiberti Construction

Delays or problems area: None.

Work completed during month: Project is complete.

Work to be completed during next month: 1 I Project Manager: Joe Christensen, P.E. Phone: 229-222 1 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY:PREPARED:06/23/93 Citv DATE of Las Veaas REVIEW PERIOD FROM:05/22/93TO:06/18/93

Project:Washincrton Ave. Svstem I Sandhill to Virclil

Description:Trir>le 12' x 8' RCB in Washinston Ave. from Sandhill to Virail.

PercentComplete: 99%Construction Estimated Cost of Project:$2,437,000 ScheduleComplete for Completion

Design /92 05/31 -X

R/W Clearances 05/3 1/92 -X

Envir Clearances 05/31/92 ~X

Bids Open 10/27/92 -X

Start Construction 01 /I1 /93 -X

Construction Complete 06/24/93 -

lsultant/ProjectManager: MEA / Laurnal Gubler, P.E.

Construction Prime Contractor:Max Riaas Construction

1 Delays or problems area: None.

Work completed during month: Inlet and outlet grates placed.

Work to be completed during next month: Finalize project.

1 1

ProjectManager: Christensen.Joe P.E. Phone: 229-222 1 4& SENT BY :PUBLIC WORKS ; 8-28-83 ; 2:43PM7025655887+ Clark Cnty RFCD;# 4

CLARK (XWN'IY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ' PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY, Cie of -son DA'IE-

REVEW PERlOD: FROM: JU1993 TO: June 30. 1993 ~ .. PROJECT:, C-1 -rn D-won HU Deaim of hllissipp Hill-n Basin

DESCRIPTION: IDeSiep of 6 milesafe channel. 2 miles of -nim. and two basing with about 500 AP of storwe.) PERCENT COMPLETE: 100 96 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $7.150.000

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (dam)

DESIGN

R/W CLEARANCES - Cornthte ENVIRCLEARANCES COmDlste BIDS OPEN Julv 1991

START CONSTRUCTION -her 1993

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE , June 1994 MANAGER: VTN/Ken

CONSTRUCTION PRIME C0N"CTOR:B

1 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: If I II WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Advertised the project to receive bids.

WORK TO BE COMpLETaD DURING NEXT MONTH: Open bids July 6, 1993, review bids. and recommend award.

PROJECT MANAGER: Curt wler PHONE # 565-2329 C;\WO~DATA\O#T form -psr 10/26190

...... PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY Citv ~~oferson DATE June 29. 1993 REVIEW PERIOD: FROM:, June 1. 1993 TO: June 30. 1993 __

PROJECT: C-1 Channel S-im lWesternQyg&m Facilitv)

DESCRIPTION: pesim ch annel. 2 miles of m, and two detention bwwith abou of stor- PERCENT COMPLETE: 90 ESTlMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3.500.000

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (dam) DESIGN -!ubuu-

R/W CLEARANCES Au- 1993

ENVIR CLEARANCES -t. 1993

BIDS OPEN Sebtember. 1993

START CONSTRUCTION

CONSTRUCI'XON COMPLETE ApriL 1994

CONSULTANT/PROJECTMANAGER: VTNKen Gilhreth CONSTRUCTION PRlME CONTRACT0R:B

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Right-of-way acquisition.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Received 90 percent construction plans,

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Continue design.

PROJECT MANAGER: -dla PHONE # 565-m C:\WORDPeELP\PA7A\CCRPM\naeROlrr form -psr 10/26/90 PROJECT STATUS REPORT

PERCENT COMPLETE: 90 96 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $2J50.000

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (dam) DESIGN Ausyat 1993

WW CLEARANCES Auml.qt 1993 ENVIR CLEAUNCES Au- 1993 , BIDS OPEN START CONSTRUCTION - CONSTRUCX’ION COMPLETE -None vet CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER:mbreth CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: None

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

PROJECT MANAGER: Curt wdler PHONE #-565-2329 C:\WoRD~PRON’T form -par 10/26/90 SENTPUBLIC BY: WORKS ; 6-28-93 ; 2:44PM ; 7025655687+ Clark Cnty RFCD;# 7

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY Citv of Henderson DATE June 29. 1993

REVIEW PERIOD: FROM: June 1. 1993 To:

PROJECT: Pi man Wash ChmeIII-A

DESCRIPTION: Qmrete lined ch annelanproximatelv 4500 feet lo-citv of 10.600 cfs. ExteBdsfiQlg Duck Creek to.Stmhaniew.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 90 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $~800.000 SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (dam) DESIGN July 1992

WW CLEARANCES Qxmlete ENVIR CLEARANCES Bmolete

BIDS OPEN Julv 1993

START CONSTRUCTION mber1993 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 1994 CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: Ponnemevm Carroll CONSTRUCTION PlUMFi CONTRACPIY)R:JQD~

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Rightof-way acquisition,

WORK COMPLETBD DURJNG ClJRlU3NT MOW: Completed review of Phase 3A.

WORK To BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Make final cotrections to the plans.

PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Wler PHONE #: 565-2329 C:\WORDPERALUTAWCRFCDWFROMT form -pa 10/26/90 SENT BY: PUBLIC WORKS ; 6-29-93 ; 2 i44PM ; 7025655687+ Clark Cnty RFCDtSt 6

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY City of He- DATE- 29. 1993 REVIEW PERIOD: FR0M:June 1. 1993 TO: June 30. 1993

PROJECT: Sunset Dateption B~~gnisition . .. DESCRIPTION: Pt ' and acwon of -t+f- way.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 70 96 STIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1385.ooO,

ENWR CLEARANCES Undetefllrined BIDS OPEN rJ- START CONSTRUaON ed CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Unwed CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER:~_Gilbretb/VTN-Neuada CONSTRUCTION PRlME CONTRACTOR: None

G CURRENT MONTH:

PROJECT MANAGER:- Abmad PHONE R: 565-2432 C\WOLDWATAWCDW?ROIST form -psr 10/26/90 SENT BY :PUBLIC WORKS ; 6-28-93 ; 2 :43PM i 7025655687+ Clark Cnty RFCD;# 5

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL F'LOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY City of Henderson DATE Jup6 29. 1993 REVIEW PERIOD: FROM: June 1, 1993 TO: June 30. 1993 PROJECT: UPRR Chm DESCRIPTION: lvction 3 miles lptlp from Pecos Road to -t Pi-t of wav.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 98 -% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $2.300.000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (dates)

DESIGN CQDIDla

WW CLEARANCES Icpmplete ENVIR CLEARANCES Cbmalete BIDS OPEN Comnlete START CONSTRUCTION June. 1992

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE -Comolete

CONSULTANT/PROJECX' MANAGER: Ci. C. W~/Calv~~. CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRAC'IUR:~

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Recent rains have deIayed the final compIetion of this project. WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Completed construction. WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Walk-through of the project and wmplete punch list items.

PROJECT MANAGER:Cud.Clhandler PHONE #- C: 3BRADATAWRPCDWk6ST form -psr 10/2(5/90 6L REGIONALPLOODCONTROL~TRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: Cityof NorthLas Veqas DATE PREPARED: 06/29/93

REVIEWFROM: PERIOD 06/01/93 TO: 06/30/93

PROJECT. Gowan Outfall Structure DESCRI~TIO~Construction of the outfall structure for the Gowan Road Detention Basin system

12,729,000 SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (date4

DESIGN Complete mcLEARANcEs Complete

ENVIRCLEARANCES Complete

BIDS OPEN Complete

START CONSTRUCTION April 1991

CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE Apr l9

CONSULTANT/PROJECTMANAGER: VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas CONSTRUC;TIONpm ~~~0~: Las Veqas Pavinq Corporation

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS

WORK COMPLETED DUIUNG CURRENT MONTH:

Construction substantially completed.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

Finalize project.

Jerry Stegeman 649-0261 * Cil * PHONE #a PROJECTMANAGER: hv- Cilnina _. -0NAL PLOOD CONTROL DXSTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITE City of North Las Vegas DATEPREPARED: 06/29/93

RFVIEW PERIOD FROM: 06/01/93 TO 06/30/93 Western Tributary to theLas Vegas Wash (Stimson Channel)

DESCRIPTION. Lined channel between Commerce Street and Lone Mountain Road, and channel entrance protection.

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (dates)

DESIGN Complete

BIDS OPEN Complete

START CONSTRUCTION November 1992

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE May 1993

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas

CONSTRUCTION pFuMECONTRACTOR: Las Vegas Paving Corporation

DELRIS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: - Project substantially complete and operational.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

- Prepare punch list.

PROJECT MANAGERPROJECT 1 GI PHONE #: - 6 -OW PLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: Cityof North Las Vegas DATEPREP- 06/29/93

REVIEWFROM: PERIOD 06/01/93 To: 06/30/93 Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Design and prepare plans and specifications for detention basin and collection dikes

~~ PERCENTCOMPLETE; 99 % ESTIMA ED COST OFPROJECI': 1 510,000 design phase deslgnmase onTy ,ooo,ooo constructlon

DESIGN April 1993 February 1993 R/wcLEARANcEs

ENVIRCLEARANCES March 1993

BIDS OPEN September1993

START CONSTRUCTION November 1993

CONSTRUCI'IONCOMPLETE November l9 CONSULTANT/PROJECTMANACER VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas

CONSTRUCTIONPRIME CONTRACTOR N/A

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

- Need to reconcile differing views schedulingon and funding outfall system.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: - Presented project to TAC; prepared Master Plan amendment and related. - Project scheduling and cooperative agreement held in abeyance.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: - Present project to Board. - Reconcile outfall system scheduling. - Reconcile basin construction scheduling.

.. PROJECTMANAGER Rvr PHONE#. 399 - 5156 65 =ON& FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJEXT STATUS REPORT

ENTIlY City of North Las Veqas DATE PREPARED: 06/29/93

REVIEWFROM: PERIOD 06/01/93 To: 06/30/93

PROJECT. Upper Las Vegas Wash Detention Basin DESCRIPTION. Construct detention basin and associated facilities in the vicinity of Floyd Lamb State Park

PERCENTCOMPLETE: 98% ESTIMATEDCOST OF PROJECT: $ '

DESIGN May 1991

ww CLEARANCES November 1991

ENVIRCLEARANCES November 1991

BIDS OPEN March 1992

START CONSTRUCTION May 1992

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER Black and Veatch/City of North Las Vegas

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: - Substantial completion of all functional items. - Basin fully operational.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

- Prepare punch list. REGIoNlIL FLOOD CONTROL DBTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTIm City of North Las Veqas DATE PREPARED: 06/29/93

REVIEWFROM: PERIOD 06/01/93 TO 06/30/93 West Range Wash Diversion Dike

DE~~RI~T~~~.Design and prepare plans and specifications for 5-1/2 mile long dike and appurtenances

PERCENTCOMPLETE 9c%ESTIMATED COSP OF PROJECT: $ design phase

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: w-1

DESIGN Completed

R/w CLEARANCES Completed

ENVIRCLEARANCES NLT April 17, 1993

BIDS OPEN July 1993

START CONSTRUCTION September 1993

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE June 1994 CONSU~~~~~~~~MANACER Boyle Engineering/City of North Las Vegas

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: - Delayed bid opening to make plan/specification modifications.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

- Receive and evaluate bids and make award recommendation.

.. PROJECT M2WAGER:Rv.l n PHONE#. 399 - 5156 67 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICTDate Prepared: 07/01/93

Review Period From: 06/01 /93 To =0/93

PROJECT: JroDicana/Flaminao Washes (AREA 1) Riaht-of-Wav Acauisition Plan DESCRIPTION: Produce a centerline alianment. leaal wons.riaht-of-wav mam and BLM riaht-of-way armlications for the U. S. Armv Corm of Enaineers TroDicana/Flaminno Washes Proiect located aenerally ymtream from the Umer Flaminao Wash Detention Basin

PERCENTCOMPLETE: 70 % ESTIMATEDCOST OF PROJECT: $ 157,000

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates)October 1993 (revised)

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G. C. Wallace, Inc. / Calvin Black. P.E.

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

Received review comments from Summerlin which requested modifications to the proposed alignments. The information submitted by Summerlin has been forwarded to the Corps of Engineers for their review. Waiting for Corps of Engineers review comments on Summerlin proposal.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

None.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

Corps of Engineers will review Summerlin proposal and based upon this review a meeting will probably be held with Summerlin. Contingent upon resolution of Summerlin proposal, the consultant will begin to finalize the alignments.

PROJECTMANAGER: GALE WM., FRASER, II. P.E. PHONE #: 455-31 39 L!z REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 07/01/93

ReviewPeriod From: 06/01/93 To 06/30/93

PROJECT: TroDicana/Flaminao Washes (AREA2) Riaht-- of Wav Acauisition Plan DESCRIPTION: Produce a centerline alianment. leaal descriotions. riaht-of-wav mans and BLM riaht-of-way apdications for the U. S. Armv Corm of Enaineers TroDicana/Flaminao Washes Proiect located Denerallv wstream from the DlODOSed TroDicana Wash Detention Basin excludina Area 1.

PERCENTCOMPLETE: 70 % ESTIMATEDCOST OF PROJECT: 9 150,960

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) SeDtember 1993 (revised)

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Church Enaineerina of Nevada, Inc. / Todd Kenner, P.E.

~~ I~LAYIOR PROBLEM AREAS: Corps of Engineers review comments were anticipated at a earlier date.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

Transmitted Corps of Engineers review comments. Issued notice to proceed with finalization of the right-of-way plan.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

Consultant will begin finalizing the alignments.

PROJECTMANAGER: GALE WM.. FRASER. II. P.E. PHONE #: 455-3139

277 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 07/01/93

ReviewPeriod From: 06/01/93 To 06/30/93

PROJECT: &loaDa VallevMaster PlanUDdate DESCRIPTION: Perform a Master Plan UDdate of the MoaDa Vallev which includes the communitiesof MoaDa, Glendale. LoDandale and Overton.

~~ ~ ~ PERCENTCOMPLETE: 70 % ESTIMATEDCOST OF PROJECT: $ 120,000

SCHEDULEFOR COMPLETION: (Dates)Seotember 1993 (revised) CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Montaomerv Watson / Lonnie Roy, P.E.

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

Completion of draft report has been delayed due to over allocation of time and projects by the consultant’s project manager.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

Review of draft report and meeting with consultant to go over review comments. Consultant revising draft based upon review comments.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

Consultant submit anothel draft report for review by District and Clark County. Update draft and schedule meetings with Moapa Valley, Moapa, and Glendale TABS to present draft report and solicit comments.

PROJECTMANAGER: FRASER,WM.,GALE II, P.E. PHONE #: 455-3139 Lo. REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 06 / 29 / 93

ReviewPeriod From: 06 / 01 / 93 To 07 / 01 I93

PROJECT:TroDicana FloodInsurance Studv

DESCRIPTION: Flood Insurance Rate MaD DreDaration for the TroDicana Wash to the confluence with the Flaminao Wash. Base Flood Elevation determinationfor north, central and southern branches andamroxirnaa limits determined for minor tributaries.

PERCENTCOMPLETE: 97 % ESTIMATEDCOSTPROJECT: OF $ 213,600

SCHEDULEFOR COMPLETION: 06 / 15 / 93

CONSULTANT/PROJECTMANAGER: CHZM Hill / TedDavis, P.E.

I1 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

No further delays since last report. - WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

Additional information requested by FEMA's Technical Evaluation Contractor on 6/24/93.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

Respond to FEMA questions and comments as necessary. 1

PROJECTMANAGER:EUBANKS.KEVIN P.E. PHONE #: 455-31 39 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 06 / 29 / 93 Review PeriodFrom: 06 / 01 / 93 To 07 / 01 / 93

PROJECT: Northwest Area Flood Insurance Studv

DESCRIPTION: Flood Insurance Rate MaD DreDaration for the Northwest Area bound bv AnnRd., Washinaton Ave.. Buffalo Dr. and 1-15.

PERCENTCOMPLETE: 10 % ESTIMATEDCOST OF PROJECT: $247,500

SCHEDULEFOR COMPLETION: 02 / 01 / 94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Coe & Van Loo/ Pentacore - Paul W.R. Hoskin

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

Project on schedule since notice to proceed

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

Topographic Mapping of detailed study area. Existing data retrieved. Data review started. Field reconnaissance.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

Continue data review. Finalize topographic mapping.

PROJECTEUBANKS, MANAGER:KEVIN P.E. PHONE #: 455-3139 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 06/ 28 / 93

ReviewPeriod From: 061 01 / 93 To 07 / 01 / 93

PROJECT: Hiko SDrinas/BridoeCanvon. Lauahlin. NV.. Flood Insurance Studv

DESCRIPTION: Lauahlin. Nevada..

PERCENTCOMPLETE: 10 % ESTIMATEDCOST OF PROJECT: $191,400

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: 01 I 15 / 94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Church/PBS&J - Todd Kenner

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

Project is on schedule.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

Data collection and verification. Determine likelihood of coalescing alluvial fans and map flow patterns from field and data research..

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

Begin alluvial fan modeling. Continue preliminary flood hazard work map preparation.

PR OJEC T MANAGER: KEVIN EUBANKS,PROJECTMANAGER:KEVIN P.E. PHONE #: 455-3139 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Entity:REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared:June 29. 1993

ReviewPeriod From: 6/1/93 PROJECT: FloodAwareness and Safetv Prooram DESCRIPTION: lmdement a flood awareness and safetv Drooram to inform the taroet QrouDS of children and motorists of the danoers of floodino. Work is accomdished bv both RFCD staff and a consultant.

~~ PERCENTCOMPLETE: 31 % ESTIMATEDCOST PROJECT:OF $170.000 (consultantl SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) consultant contract ends in Feb.. 1994 CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Merica, Burch & Dickerson / John Earv

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

NONE

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

See Attachment A

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

STAFF: .Perform activities for Clark County Regional Flood Safety Week, July 1 1-17 (Attachment B) =Continue work with Nevada Cooperative Extension on school Curriculum =Continue work on Flood Safety video for adult motorists mpresentations to year round schools =Print Spanish-language flood Safety flyer .Assist CAC in the distribution of the flood safety Posters

CAC: =Distribute posters - .Assist at NEC Home Show July 9-1 1 .

PRO JECT MANAGER: CATHY RAZOR PHONERAZOR CATHYMANAGER: PROJECT #: 455-3139 FLOOD SAFETY PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, 1993

rn TV interviews during June: June 23 - Channel 13, House Detective (Real Estate Show), Interviewee-Virginia Valentine June 27 - Channel 13, 9:00 a.m. House Detective interview was broadcast.

Scheduled several interviews for Flash Flood Awareness Week in July with TV and radio stations. rn Distributed press releases for Flash Flood Awareness Week to be published in several local newsletters, newspapers, magazines and produced on local TV and radio segments. rn Continued work with Nevada Cooperative Extension for school lesson plan materials. rn Obtained the assistance of other safety organizations for Flood Awareness Week.

rn Provided flood awareness brochures for several home-buyers seminars in the community ((Greater Las Vegas Assoc. of Realtors, Executive Associates Realty, Century 21 Moneyworld)

rn Obtained the graphic design for the Spanish-language flood awareness flyer.

rn Prepared the film script for a new flash flood safety video targeted at motorists.

rn Obtained support of the Safe Kids Coalition members for Flood Awareness Week,

rn Worked with MBD on new script for Fox-5 commercial.

rn Continued the development of a glossary of terms for school grades 4-1 2.

rn Coordinated the distribution of posters to local libraries, parks, and the year-round schools. &-Attachment A 06/30/93 21:56 e702 386 9231 MBD ADVERTISING B 002

Status Report

As of Juoc 30,1993

11 Outdoor Posters Post another SO% showing On schedule July 10 11 Flood Posters (22" x 28") Delivered in May Done. Currently being distributed by CCRFCD. Second run to start July 9th Second run to coincide with Flood Awarcncss Week. July 2, 1993 Running through end of the year. New spot begins next week. Done Paid spots began week of May 31 to run every other weak for 20 weeks. Bonus spot to TUYIin alternative weeks with paid spot. Tclcvision Flood Safety July 12, 1993 Spots to run through Flood Message Awarcness Wcck. Donatcd spots expected to be matched again this year. Newspaper Flood !hfcty July 12, 1.993 To run through Flood Message Awareness Week in outlying area newspapers. PLANNED ACTIVITIES FOR REGIONAL FLASH FLOOD AWARENESS W'EEK July 11 - 17, 1993

TV Interviews: TV-5 Community Affairs TV-3 Action Seniors TV-3 Live at Noon other interviews pending at this time

TV and radio news segments Currently working with news directors to secure coverage during the week.

Meeting with the Public NEC Home Show at the Las Vegas Convention Center, July 9-11 National Weather Service Open House, July 17 School presentations

Posters Displayed at year-round schools Libraries Recreation centers Sunrise Hospital several other local businesses

National Weather Service Support Will issue press releases each day over the "Weather Wire" Open House highlighting flash flood awareness, July 17.

Commercials and Public Service Announcements Arranged by Merica, Burch & Dickerson to run from July 8-17.

Billboards Continue at a 50% showing

Fox-5 Kids Club TV Infomercial played twice per day Monday thru Friday and once each Saturday. Quarterly magazine contains a Flash Flood Awareness Message. Phone line for children will give flash flood safety message.

Newspaper Advertisements Placed by MBD in newspapers in outlying areas not easily reached by the billboard campaign.

Skyview Traffic 4 spots to be broadcast during the week.

Flood Awareness Literature Distribution will occur all week (brochures, posters, flyers).

byc Attachment B CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

I PROJECT CLOSEOUTS - CFUND 443) I RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Follow staff recommendation.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Follow staff recommendation.

RFCD AGENDA llW" 25A Dak: 7/08/93 CLARKCOUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

SUBJECT:

FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT AND PROmCLOSEOUTS - FUND 443 PETITIO-

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER

* RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORTS AND CLOSE OUT THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS

FISCAL IMPACT: $623,495.86 - Transfer from Fund 443 to Fund 286 for project reallocation

BACKGROUND:

Final accounting reports havebeen prepared for and approved by the corresponding entities for District funded projects which have either been completed or expired. The attached reports represent an accurate accounting of the charges and the remaining balances. Upon approval, no additional funds can be expended for these projects. PROJECT ENTITY BALANCE Flamingo Wash Bridge @ Eastern (CLA.04.A.89) Clark County $ 0.00 Rawhide Channel Eastern Outfall (CLA.02.C.90) Clark County 0.00 Rawhide Channel Eastern to Topaz (CLA.02.D.90) Clark County 195,747.93 Van Buskirk Channel Outfall (CLA.03.B.90) Clark County 427,747.93 Laughlin - Hiko Springs Bridge Canyon Remap (LAU.02.B.92) Clark County u TOTAL $ 623,495.86

Respectfully submitted, \ TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 6A ITEM # 25A

Virgdia Valentine, P.E. General ManagerKhief Engineer I ..

FINALACCOUNTING REPORT As of 2 February 1993

PROJECT NO. F31A - CLA.04.A.89DECEMBERDATE:DROP 199031, PROJECTNAME: .FLAMINGO WASH BRIDGEEASTERNAT AVENUE

INTER LOC AL AMOUNT:INTERLOCAL $61,900.00

ILA VALUE: $61,900.00 ENCUMBERED BY P.O.: ENCUMBERED BY P.O.: ...... $61,900.00 EXPENDED: UNENCUMBERED: $0.00 UNEXPENDED:

CONCUR I

Chrlsell -Hon-Jones ,.

As OF 13-Apt-93 RAWHIDE AVDNI OrmALt

CLh02C90

$115,000.00

$0.00

AMOUIWS TO BE TO THE REGIONAL PLOOD CONI'ROL DISTRICT

CONCUR: '. .-

As 15-Apr-93 INTERLa AGREEMENT:

PRaTECT NUMBER: CZA02D90

ILA VALUE: $1,265,000.00

PURCHASE ORDERS:

P.O. NUMBER BALANCE

cr.ARK COUNTY 12391 $77,000.00 $67,615.66 $9,304.34 C.C. WALLACE 12309 $93,150.00 $05,493.05 $7,656.95 MEADOW VALLEY CONT. 14900 ------$926,077.84 ------$916,143.36 $10,734.40 $1,097,027.04$1,069,252.07 $27,775.77

ILA VALVE: $1,265,000.00 ENCUMBERBD BY P.O.: $1,097,027.84

ENCUMBERED BY P.O.: $1,097,027.04 EXPENDED : $1,069,252.07

UNENCUMBERED: $167,972.16 UNEXPENDED: $27,775.77

CONCUR : AND APPROVED:

DATE .

PROJECT COSTS TRACKING SHEET RUN DATE 13-Apr-93 PROJECT NO. CLA.03.B.90 DROP DATE: APRIL 17, 1992 PROJECT NAME: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL OUTFALL

PROJECT COSTS TRACKING SHEET RUN DATE 13--2-93 FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT

PROJECT NO. CLA.03.0.90 DROP DATE: APRIL 17, 1992 PROJECT NAME: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL OUTFALL

ORIGINAL AGMT: $300,000.00 SUPPLEMENTAL AGMT: ------$3,460,000.00 TOTAL AGREEMENT AMOUNT: $3,760,000.00

PURCHASE ORDERS PURCHASE ORDERREXAININC EXPENDED AMOUNT CLARK COUNTY 13951 $80,141.25 $8OO141.2SD $0.00 CLARK COUNTY 28876 $49,293.00 $41.273.45i, $8,019.55 CONVERSE 14546 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 k'oul $0.00 SWIFT BLUEPRINTING 88355 $277.44 $277.44 3 $0.00 GC WALLACE 25133 $1,081.00 $1,081.00 D $0.00 CONTRI 25498 $3,097,041.21 $3,097,041.21C $0.00 GC WALLACE 28153 S150.000.00 -G s55.587.27 $3,395,833-90 $3,332,227.08$63,606.82 ILA VALUE: $3,760,000.00

ENCUMBERED $3,395,833.90 EXPENDED $3,332,227.08

UNENCUMBERED $364,166.10 UNEXPENDED $63,606.82

AMOUNT TO BE RETURNED TO FUND 286 FOR mPmTRE PROJECT USE

UNENCUMBERED : $364,166.10 UNEXPENDED : 563.606.82 $427,772.92

KEPTR AND APPROVED

ACCOUNTING PROJECT COSTS TRACKING SHEET RUN DATS 15-Apr-93 PROJECT NO. ~~u.oa.s.sa DROP DATE: JUL 1, 1993 PROJECT NAME: LAUCHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS BRIDGEI CANYON REMAP

PROJBCT COSTS TRACKINGSHEET RUN DATE 15-Apr-93 PROJBCT NO. LAIJ.02.8.92 DROP DATE: JUL 1, 1993 PROJBCT NAME: LAUCHLIN - HIKO SPRINGSBRIDGE CANYON RKMAP INTERLOCAL AMOUNT: $9,500.00 FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT LLJmmER VALUE ExwiKmn wllFu!3 BOYLE31783 ENGINEERING 8,000.00 8,000.00 0.00 CLARK COUNTY 31782 1.500.00 p9p 1.500.00 9,500.00 8,000.00 1,500.00

ILA VALUE: S9,soo.oo

ENCUMBERED $9,500.00 EXPENDED -0 - UNENCUMBERED $0.00 UNEXPENDED

AMOUNTS TO BE RETURNED TO THE REGIONAL FLOOD DISTRICT

UNENCUMBERED $0.00 -0.- UNEXPENDED &km&MP- i -0- TO BE RETURNED TO FUND 286 FOR FUTURE PROJECT USE

ACCEPTED AND APPROVED:

ACCOUNTING/ENGINEERING CLARKCOUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

PROJECT CLOSEOUTS - FUND 444 RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Follow staff recommendation.

CITIZENSCOMMI'ITEE: Follow staff recommendation.

RF'CD AGENDA ITEM# 25B CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

SUBJECT:

FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT AND PROJECT CLOSEOUT - FUND 444 I PETITIONER: 1 VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT AND CLOSE OUT THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT

FISCAL IMPACT:

$203,687.07 - Return to Fund 444 for Reallocation

BACKGROUND:

A final accounting report has been prepared for and approved by the corresponding entity for a District funded project which has either been completed or expired. The attached report represents an accurate accounting of the charges and the remaining balance. Upon approval, no additional funds can be expended for the project. PROJECT ENTITY BALANCE Washington Avenue Conveyance SandhillOutfall (LAS.09.C.91) Las Vegas 203.687.07

TOTAL $ 203,687.07

Respectfully submitted,

I. TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA I ,'7 ITEM# 6B lTEM# 25B Date: 6/24/93 Date: 7/08/93

Virgtffia Valentine, P.E. General Mar,ager/ChiLf Engineer FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT

RUN DATE 14-Apr-93

PRWBCT NO. LAs.09.c.91 DROP MTS: JANUARY 1, 1994 PROJECT NAME: WASHINGTON AVENUB SYSTEH - SANDHILL OUTPAU INTERLOCAL AMOUNT: 1,700,000.00

VALW wpENDE13 BALANCE CLV -29351 $1,~700,000.00 $1,496,108.21$203,791.79

ILA VALUE: $1,700,000.00 TOTAL mCUKBERED: $1,700,000.00 TOTAL ENCUMBERED: 1,700,000.00 TOTAL KXPENDSD:

UNENCUMBERED: $0.00

UNENCUMBERED : UNEXPENDED :

TO BE RETURNEDFOR t, FUTURE PROJECTS

RECEIVED

APR 19 1993 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

SUBJECT: FINANCIAL REPORTS PETITIONER: VIRGINIA VALENTINE. P.E., GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE REPORTS

FISCAL IMPACT: None .

BACKGROUND: The following Financial Reports for the Monthof May 1993. are submitted for your review: Section DescriDtion Paeels) A Fund 286: ...... 1-7 Fund Balance Report ...... 1 Sales Tax Revenue Report ...... 2 Monthly Expenditure Report ...... 3 Accounts Payable ...... 4 Open PurchaseOrders ...... 5-6 Contracts Approved .Not yet encumbered ...... 7 B Fund 330: Fund Balance Report ...... 8 C Fund 443: ...... 9-34 Fund Balance Report ...... 9 Monthly ExpenditureReport ...... 10 Accounts Payable ...... 11 Maintenance Work Program Report ...... 12 ILA Approved .Not yet transferred ...... 13 PurchaseOrder Status Report ...... 14-21 Current Project Expense Summary ...... 22-32 Capital Improvement Program-Cumulative Reporting .... 33-34 D Fund444: ...... 35-43 Fund Balance Report ...... 35 Monthly ExpenditureReport ...... 36 Current Project Expense Summary ...... 37-40 PurchaseOrder Status Report ...... 41-42 Capital Improvement Program-Cumulative Reporting ...... 43 E Funding Request & Priorities Report/Sum ...... 44-45 Respectfully submitted. TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEMU 26 Date: 06/24/93 Date: 7/08/93 f b .. vC* *-k ge. of Business & Finance FUND 288 - FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAY 1993

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE AB 494 Funds - Principal 44,887 AB 494 Funds - Cumulative Interest 32,527 Unused Tax Revenues _-___------12,989,744 TOTAL BALANCE 13.087.1 68 REVENUES: Sales Tax Interest Earned (May) Sale of Materials Other

TOTAL REVENUES EXPENSES: Salaries 81 Benefits Supplies 8I Services Professional Services Capital Expenditures Credit for Check Not Released Transfer tolfrom Fund 443

TOTAL EXPENSES

ENDING FUND BALANCE (FUND 286)

OBLIGATIONS AGAINST FUND BALANCE: P.O. Balances - Prof Serv and Operating Costs LA'S Approved-funds not yet transfered to Fund 443 Bond Fund 330 - Principal 81 Interest Accrual 288 Contracts Awarded - funds not yet encumbered Accounts Payable

TOTAL FUND OBLIGATIONS

FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR COMMITMENT 1 1.1 91,077 =====I=

FISCAL CURRENT FUNDING REQUESTS IMPACT ...... ALL MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM X5 1,979,850 NDOT NDOT COOPERTAIVE AGREEMENT X8 710,000 LAS VEGAS RIGHT OF WAY ACQUlSTlON FOR WASHINGTON AVENUE 270,000 N. LAS VEGAS KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN ILC X1 OD 08/10/93 13,113,000 HENDERSON EQUESTRIAN DETENTION BASIN 478,000 LAS VEGAS BUFFALO CHANNEL 2,045,000 LAS VEGAS RAMPART STORM DRAIN 200,000 CLARK COUNTY LOWER DUCK CREEK DETENTION BASIN 2,300,000 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SERVICES CONTRACT 36,000 PROJECT CLOSE OUTS (623,496)

TOTAL REQUESTS FOR FUNDING 20,607,164

AVAILABLE BALANCE

-1- SALES TAX REVENUE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 199211 993

DIFFERENCE MONTH SALES 114 CENT SALES SALES TAX OVERIWNDER) CUM REVENUE TAX RECEIVED TAX ESTIMATE REVENUES FROM ESTIMATE FY 92/93

JULY 1,919,727 1,877,861 (41,866) 1,877,861

AUGUST 1,880,600 1,968,253 87,653 3,846,114

SEPTEMBER 1,827,050 1,907,836 80,786 5,753,950

OCTOBER 1,849,400 1,890,649 41,249 7,644,599

NOVEMBER 1,865,550 2,069,998 204,448 9,714,597

DECEMBER 1,928,1011,804,900 123,201 11,642,698

JANUARY 1,852,950 1,956,871 103,921 13,599,569

FEBRUARY 2,050,800 2,349,269 298,469 15,948,838

MARCH 1,695,300 1,780,502 85,202 17,729,340

APRIL 1,850,585 1,658,800 191,785 19,579,925

MAY 2,170,038 1,902,125 267,913 21,749,964

JUNE 1,832,900 0 0 - - - -

TOTAL: 1,442,76221,749,964 22,140,102 21,749,964

-2- May Salaries 47,156.00 May Benefits 15.6o7.00 862,763.00

P. 0. Invoi ce Invof ce Expense Vendor Number Number Date C1ass Amount A.C. Houston 34277 1546574 4/27/93 7060 27.03 Anacomp 43509 C842630 4/26/93 7210 300.00 ATT 4/22/93 7140 1,011.92 ATT 511 2/93 7140 1,013.61 ATT 4/7/93 7140 69.08 ATT 4/22/93 7140 82.56 ATT 3/3/93 7140 87.53 Avis 7270 227.08 Avnet Computer 34726 54008554 2/23/93 8040 100.00 Central Telephone 386401 1 3/8/93 7140 1,014.91 Dames and Moore 76007 001-071 80 3/26/93 7210 27,946.57 Dames and Moore 76007 001-07254 4/23/93 7210 21,790.71 Dept Con & Nat Res. 512 1193 7310 20.00 Desert Decor 35759 37108 4/22/93 7010 33.05 Federal Express 496357966 5/5/93 7250 21.75 Sprint Cellular LV03679 511 8/93 7140 147.20 G.C. Wallace 35530 5500109 511 3/93 7210 18.18 Graphics West 43261 22548 4130193 7280 2,221 .oo Kavouras 35043 29800 5/4/93 7330 21 0.00 Merica Burch Dickerson 313 1193 7210 11,838.28 Pro Process 34563 16076 411 9/93 7030 18.95 Pro Process 34563 15941 3/26/93 7030 42.25 R eview JournalReview 2.273E+ 10 4/27/93 7310 14.00 R eview Journal Review 15077503 3/7/93 7280 561.52 Teachers Realty 34367 APR93P 5/3/93 7330 40.80 Teachers Realty 34367 MAR93P 411 193 7330 74.40 Xerox 35697 37150040 411 4/93 7240 92.68 Central SupplyCC Central 45994 4/9/93 7010 745.75 CC Mail Center 45988 4/9/93 7250 51 1.03 CCDuplicating Central 47592 411 2/93 7280 332.50 870,614.34

-3- Regional Flood Contrd Disbid Accounts Payable Fund 286 May 1994

P.O. Invoice Iavoice Rxpenrre Vendor lOIlrber Her Date C1.88 Amount Federal Express 494488537 41 1 4/93 7250 21.75 Aqua Vision vvl993 4/26/93 7310 30.00 CC Automotive 4/9/93 71 10 1,640.00 CC Central Duplicating 47534 511 1/93 7280 870.43 CC Mail 47545 511 1 193 7250 550.85 cc Supply 47552 511 1 193 701 0 246.10 Clear Span Tents 114 5385 3/23/93 71 20 146.00 Computer Warehouse 183981 4/29/93 7060 76.29 Dazey Travel 0504vev 4/28/93 7270 262.00 Dazey Travel 4/6/93 7270 181 .OO Dazey Travel 4/5/93 7270 70.00 Dazey Travel 512 1 193 7270 62.00 Dazey Travel 5/26/93 7270 156.00 Dazey Travel 5/27/93 7270 121 .oo Kinkos 2871 7 5/3/93 7280 39.00 Michael Cuddy 4/5/93 7270 15.70 Treasurer (travel) 4130193 7270 34.56 Treasurer (travel) 4120193 7270 75.00 Treasurer (travel) 5/6/93 7270 35.00 Treasurer (travel) 5/26/93 7270 41.56 Treasurer (travel) 5/25/93 7270 12.33 V. Valentine 5/25/93 7270 2.00 V. Valentine 512 1 193 7270 38.22 Will & Muys 7210 5/7/93 7210 21.51 1.98 $26,238.77

-4- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROLDISTRICT FUND 286 - OPEN PURCHASE ORDERS MAY 1993 EXPENS E P.O. EXPENSE TOTAL VENDOR CLASS NUMBER P.0 AMT INVOICED BALANCE

------I_-- __---

HOLMAN'S OF NEVADA 7010 35758 745.00 580.20 164.80 DESERT DECOR 7010 35759 400.00 33.05 366.95 XEROX CORP 7010 35697 800.00 312.48 487.52 PARAGON REPRODUCTIONS 7010 38017 342.00 341.92 COMPLETE

__I_------2,287.00 1,019.27

AC HOUSTON LUMBER 7030 34277 600.00 121.86 378.14 PRO-PROCESS 7030 34563 750.00 5 285.1 464.85

1,250.00 663.29

SEARS 7060 3430 1 250.00 15.02 2 34.98 SARRRT FURNITURE 7060 3541 2 457.00 0.00 457.00 MICROSOFT CORP 7060 35499 297.00 297.00 0.00 HOLMAN'S OF NEVADA 7060 35758 345.00 205.27 199.73 FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO 7060 36995 285.64 295.04 COMPLETE ALFAX 7060 4787 1 125.00 0.00 125.00

_---I----_------_ 1,759.64 936.75

TEACHER'S REALTY 71 20 24463 80,964.78 76,467.70 COMPLETE TEACHERS REALTY 7 12017330 34367 92,739.48 62,379.06 30,360.42 AHERN RENTERS 71 20 34270 750.00 0.00 750.00

--___--_-______-_-1__-1_---- 174,454.26 31,110.42

JAMES M MONTGOMERY 7210 101 327,749.98 146,065.79 181,684.19 MERICA BURCH & DICKERSON 7210 31 112 50.02 3,150.02 0.00 WILL & MUYS 7210 103 25,000.00 16,020.01 8,979.99 PlERCY BOWLER TAYLOR 7210 105 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 JM MONTGOMERY 7210 107 120,000.00 108,227.01 11,772.99 JM MONTGOMERY 7210 110 227,527.00 12,459.35 215,067.65 MERICA BURCH & DICKERSON 7210 111 170,000.00 0.00 170,000.00 JM MONTGOMERY 7210 16902 240,000.00 239,765.88 234.1 2 SHOSHONA S 7210 21736 1,500.00 970.00 530.00 MERICA, BURCH & DICKERSON 7210 29 184 150,000.00 140,098.49 9,901.51 CH2M HILL 7210 33280 270,400.00 230,099.51 40,300.49 G.C. WALLACE, INC 7210 35530 157,000.00 132,623.22 24,376.78 CHURCH ENGINEERING 7210 35531 150,960.00 105,600.00 45,360.00 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7210 35899 112,500.00 65,500.00 47,000.00 PRODUCTION COMPANY 7210 3641 5 300.00 0.00 COMPLETE SHOSHONA SOUTH, INC. 7210 36603 1,o00.00 0.00 1,o00.00 ALL-AROUND VIDEO LABS 7210 37018 450.00 55.00 395.00 EASTRIDGE 7210 39792 3,000.00 1,093.44 1,906.56 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 7210 115 84.49 0.00 84.49 DAMES & MOORE 7210 76007 910,996.00 749,068.60 161,927.40 ------_ 2,875,617.49 920,52 1.1 7

-5- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286 - OPEN PURCHASE ORDERS MAY 1993 EXPENSE P.O. TOTAL VENDOR CLASS NUMBER P.0 AMT INVOICED BALANCE

------I - ---- I

LANDISCOR 7310 104 450.00 0.00 450.00 TRW-RED1 7310 106 578.20 590.00 COMPLETE ---- 1,028.20 450.00

TEACHERS REALTY 7330l7 120 34367 1,200.00 565.20 634.80 WASHINGTON FED REP. 7330 116 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 KAVOURAS 733018040 35043 800.00 210.00 590.00

------I--. -----___-----I__---_---- 26,000.00 25,224.80

XEROX 7240 19037 5,241.60 3,422.31 COMPLETE

HANDAR 7240 341 13 3,000.00 810.00 ' 2,190.00 XEROX 7240 35697 5,000.00 2,155.25 2,844.75 -----I------_------_-_--- 13,241.60 5,034.75

JEFF WOLFLEY 81 ASSOC 7280 102 3,385.00 3,385.00 COMPLETE ACCENT PRESENTATIONS 7280 108 CANCELLED 0.00 CANCELLED GONZALES GRAPHICS 7280 109 500.00 45.00 455.00 NEVADA PHOTO 7280 28303 300.00 186.1 1 113.89 MERCURY BLUEPRINT 7280 33483 2,000.00 65.82 1,934.18 WRC ENGINEERING 7280 3688 1 633.15 633.15 COMPLETE NEVADA PHOTO GRAPHICS 7280 3691 1 500.00 58.52 441.48 KINKO'S 7280 37084 200.00 246.60 COMPLETE GRAPHICS WEST 7280 38399 3,496.00 3,845.00 COMPLETE ------_-----_--____--- 11,014.1 5 2,944.55

AVNET COMPUTER 8040 34726 41,067.31 40,169.03 898.28 KAVOURAS 804017330 35043 17,375.00 16,445.00 930.00 HANDAR, INC 8040 35047 52,834.00202.29 52,631.71 VALCOM 8040 35449 990.81 990.81 COMPLETE VALCOM 8040 35496 353.46 353.46 COMPLETE GOODMANS 8040 37391 1,250.00 1,417.64 (167.64) VALCOM 8040 39516 1.1 76.54 1,176.54 COMPLETE

I 115.047.12 1,862.93

-6- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286 - MAY 1993

ILA'S APPROVED IN JUNE NONE 0

TOTAL TRANSFERS TO FUND 443

FUND 286 CONTRACTS AWARDED AND NOT YET ENCUMBEREDEXPENDED

DISPARITY 23 01.14.93 CC ILA DISPARITY STUDY 30,000.00 PROF 25 01.14.93 WILL AND MUYS, DC COUNSEL 26,000.00 PROF 8 05.13.93 HlKO SPRINGS INSURANCE REMAP 191,400.00 PROF 7 05.13.93 NORTHWEST INSURANCE REMAP 247,500.00 PROF 9 05.13.93 DAMES & MOORE 176.104.001 494,900.00

-7- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 330 - FUND BALANCE REPORT MAY 1993

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $2,300,919

REVENUES: INTEREST INCOME 1,134 TRANSFERS IN 0

1,134 EXPENSES/ACCRUALS: BANK OF AMERICA SERVICE CHARGE 0 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT 2,283,580

2,283,580

ENDING FUND 330 BALANCE

-8- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443 - FUND BALANCE REPORT MAY 1993

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 81 9,742,525

REVENUES: TRANSFER IN FROM FUND 286 RETURN OF FUNDS TO FUND 286

EXPENSES: 9999 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 3560 - MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM

ENDING FUND BALANCE (FUND 443)

COMMllTED IMPACTS TO FUND BALANCE: ILA'S APPROVED - FUNDS NOT TRANSFERRED 0 PJT CLOSEOUTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT TRANSFERRED 0 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE (297,599)

TOTAL COMMITMENTS (297,599) (297,599)

COMMIITED FUND BALANCE (FUND 443)

-9- Regional Flood Control District Monthly Expenses Fund 443 May 1994 P. 0. Invoice rnvoi ce Project NlImber Vendor Number D.to Amou t CLA9293 23 Boulder Construction 3 4/26/93 16,464.53 CLA06A9 1 30698 Boyle 30698 411 4/93 15,300.77 SEA0 1A88 74274 CC Public Works 46956 418 193 739.48 LASl 1A92 50 City of Las Vegas 8973 411 9/93 724.14 LAS 13A92 67 City of Las Vegas 8970 411 9/93 375.30 LAS02D92 51 City of Las Vegas 8968 411 9/93 1,005.75 LAS02C91 4 City of Las Vegas 0969 411 9/93 5,747.90 LAS02B91 50 City of Las Vegas 9005A 411 9/93 11,039.55 LAS09D92 47 City of Las Vegas 8975 411 9/93 9,267.81 LAS09D92 47 City of Las Vegas 9050 5/3/93 660,795.00 LAS09B9 1 29349 City of Las Vegas 29349 4/6/93 2,484.31 LAS09B9 1 29349 City of Las Vegas 29349 41619 3 44,833.86 LAS02A87 67 139 City of Las Vegas 8967 411 9/93 787.41 LAS03B89 3 CLV 9007 411 9/93 2,939.1 3 LAS03B89 3 CLV 9007 411 9/93 11,320.88 NLV03C9 1 231 37 CNLV AR2770 511 1/93 583.65 NLV04A89 38352 CNLV AR2407 1 111 3/93 1,962.31 HEN01A87 65831 COH 65831 412 2193 467.88 HEN03A9 1 39 G.C.Wallace 504385 3/24/93 466.00 HEN03A9 1 39 G.C.Wallace 504385 4/28/93 210.00 NLV04A89 10002 Las Vegas Paving 04A89 313 1193 248,296.50 CLA04C90 22635 Max Riggs RETEN 5/3/93 33,640.95 MOA02B92 10001 MVC 02B928 411 8/93 95,823.41 NLV06A9 1 59 North Las Vegas AR2767 511 1/93 4,301.72 CLA03D9 1 28 155 Pentacore 28155 411 2/93 588.00 MOA02B92 10002 Ron Williams Construction 28924 411 9/93 47,464.35 CLA9293 48 Telecar 3R 311 1193 8,269.04 HEN05A92 3 VTN 4392 411 193 10,915.35 HEN04A91 31268 VTN 1 SUPP 411 193 28,013.47 HEN04A9 1 31268 VTN 2 SUPP 5/3/93 59,630.16 HEN04A9 1 31268 VTN 12 04a91 411 193 56,08 1.71 HEN04A91 31268 VTN 13 04a91 511 193 42,059.1 4 BOU01A87 28872 Coe Van Loo 2052 411 3/93 1,619.1 3 MOA02B92 6 Greiner 9882 4/6/93 28,187.82 MOA02B92 6 Greiner 9882 311 1/93 36,469.68 HEN05A92 54 COH 16477 4/22/93 426.66 HEN9293 46 COH 16320 411 4/93 6,792.65 BOU01A87 28874 Max Riggs 15 313 1193 18.1 1 1.09 $1,514,206.49 -10- Regional Flood Control District Monthly Payables Fund 443 May 1994 P. 0. rnvoi ce Iavoi ce Pro j ec t Number Vendor Number Date Amout LAS 1 OA9 1 30080 City of Las Vegas 80.464/19/93 8972 HEN9293 46 COH 16475 2,736.704/22/93 CIA9293 44356001 MVC 1 3/19/93143,445.00 CLA9293 44356002 MVC 1 311 9/93 1 10,084.00 HEN04893 4481 2VTN 1 048935/3/9341,253.42 $297,599.58

-11- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443 - MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 OF AS 14-Jun-93 MAY 1993

CLARK COUNTY 973.835.00 21 100,000.00 0.00 23.830.05 m169.95 778.1 43.1 3 22 37,800.00 22 0.00 17,959.00 19,841 .OO 23 8 1,450.00 1a,464.53 53,975.1 2 27.474.88 4 4 12,244.00 44 0.00 11,294.00 950.00 4 8 170,778.20 48 a.269.04 a8,633.70 82,144.50 --- --I 402,272.20 195,691.87206.580.33

LAS VEGAS 5aa.oo0.00 0.00 0.00 588,000.00-_ 5aa,ooo.oo 0.00 5aa.ooo.oo

NORTHLASVEGAS 50.aao.00 36,747.00

50.880.00

HENDERSON 453,170.00 165.1 19.57

MESQUITE 46,021.5046,021.50 38 46,021.50

46,021.50

BOULDER CITY 85.ao0.00 0.00 14.171,698.67 01.33 71.698.67

TOTAL MWP

-12- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443 - MAY 1993

PROJECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD SCOPE FISCAL NUMBER ITEM APPRVL DATE IMPACT

ILA'S APPROVED IN MAY

NONE

ILA'S APPROVED IN JUNE NONE

TOTAL TRANSFERS TO FUND 443 $0.00

-13- Purchase Order Status Report 0611 1193 fund 443 BUN01A90 P.Vendor 0. Number SpentP.Amount 0 Amount 12900 MARKGROUP 143,000.00 140,700.00 13950 CLARKCOUNTY PW 10,000.00 7,938.17 20339 APPR.SERVICES 9,400.00 9,400.00 30225 LEGALPROCESS SERVICE 129.50 129.50

Totals $162,529.50 $158,167.67 CLA02E9 1 P.Vendor 0. Number SpentP.Amount 0 Amount 28143 CLARKCOUNTY PW 105,000.00 89,735.00 28845 SWIFT 860.00 434.00

Totals $105,860.00 $90,169.00 CLA03C90 P.Vendor 0. Number SpentP.Amount 0 Amount 35 CLERK/COURT 94,500.00 94,500.00 36 NEVADA TITLE 632,32 1.OO 632,321 .OO 15157 CLARK COUNTY PW 30,000.00 14,248.30 19869 K.E. LAMB 10,850.00 10,850.00 23355 STEWART TITLE 130,505.20 130,505.00 251 52 CLERKKOURT 1,020,500.00 1,020,500.00 26982 LAND TITLE 1,253,878.50 1,253,879.00

Totals $3,172,554.70 $3,156,803.30

CLA03D9 1 P. 0.Number Vendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 20 SWIFT 171.OO 171.OO 55 VTN 143,500.00 73,238.00 28145 DELTA ENGINEERING 77,250.00 67,366.80 281 54 MEA 50,000.00 34,434.00 281 55 PENTACORE 98,500.00 94,862.00 281 56 CLARK COUNTY PW 30,000.00 26,324.00 29354 SEA 175,265.00 142,588.00 30697 JMM 226,000.00 142,438.00

Totals $800,686.00 $581,421.80

-14- Purchase Order Status Report 06/11I93 CLA04C90 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 15156 CLARK COUNTY PW 186.82 186.82 15935 MEA 21 6,620.00 21 5,487.92 22635 MAX RlGGS 1,445,936.32 1,444,935.99 23856 CLARK COUNTYPW 33,584.36 27,392.33 30739 DONREY 55,672.50 55,672.50 Totals $1,752,000.00 $1,743,675.56 CLA04D93 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 Amount Amount SDent 64 BUREAU OR REC. 7,650.00 7,650.00

Totals $7,650.00 $7,650.00 CLA05A91 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 28875 CLARKCOUNTY PW 5,140.00 4,568.46 30740 HEFNERENG 139,860.00 1 14,833.40

Totals $145,000.00 $1 19,401.86 CLA06A91 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 28883 CLARK COUNTYPW 31,000.00 7,954.38 30698 BOYLEENG 449,000.00 294,529.84

Totals $480,000.00 $302,484.22 CLA07A92 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 Amount Amount Spent 57 CLARK COUNTYPW 100,000.00 561 .OO Totals $100.000.00 $561 .OO CLAO8A92 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 Amount Amount Spent 62 VTN 230,000.00 22,710.00

Totals $230,000.00 522'710.00

-15- Purchase Order Status Report 06/11/93 GSPOl A88 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount S,pent 29342 G.C. WALLACE 32,980.00 14,278.00 74273 CLARKCOUNTY PW 13,000.00 6,857.23 Totals $45,980.00 $21, 135.23 HEN01 A87 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 19837 POGGEMEYER 240,000.00 21 9,117.00 65831 CITY OF HENDERSON 562,225.00 287,605.10 67490 TRANSMAP 9,775.00 9,775.00 Totals $81$516,497.102,000.00 HEN03A91 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 14 CITY OF HENDERSON 25,000.00 7,583.90 31 FIRST AMERICAN 10,440.00 10,440.00 39 G.C. WALLACE 5,500.00 3,849.00 26077 G.C. WALLACE 99,050.00 99,050.50 Totals $139,990.00 $120,923.40 HEN04A9 1 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 Amount Amount Spent 31268 VTN 744,400.00 778,749.03 31 270 CITY OF HENDERSON 105,600.00 17,549.51

Totals $850,000.00 $796,298.54 HEN04B93 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 AmountAmountSpent 4481 2 VTN 170,000.00 41,253.42

Totals $170,000.00 $41,253.42 HEN05A92 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 53 VTN 143,250.00 63,416.35 54 CITY OF HENDERSON 50,000.00 4,900.09

Totals $193,250.00 $68,316.44

-16- Purchase Order Status Report 06/11 /93 LASO1A87 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 19838 CITY OF USVEGAS 354317.85 346,939.58 65883 G.C. WALLACE 45,432.15 47,987.1 5 66871 CITY OF USVEGAS 350.00 350.00 Totals $395,276.73$400,300.00 LAS02A87 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 4568 KJC 4,000.00 4,000.00 65834 G.C. WALLACE 217,211.95 212,211.95 67139 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 4,314,735.05 3,936,964.91 Totals 84,535,947.00 $4153,176.86 LAS02B91 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 AmountAmountSpent 5 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 130,000.00 125,936.68

Totals $130,000.00 $125,936.68 LAS02C91 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 99996 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 588,898.00 849,229.84 Totals $588,898.00 $849,229.84 LASO2092 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 51 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 93,000.00 2,856.75

Totals $93,000.00 $2,856.75 LAS03B89 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 3 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 4,618,375.00 3,930,247.01 5396 CITY OF USVEGAS 2,500.00 2,500.00 5435 POGGEMEYER 668,726.00 668,726.00 16819 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 53,774.00 26,761.48 29345 CITY OF LAS VEGPS 57,625.00 55,125.00 Totals $5,401,000.00 $4,683,359.49

-17- Purchase Order Status Report 06/11/93 LAS04B90 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 14229 BOYLE ENG 471,645.00 464,121 .OO 18446 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 90,355.00 79,248.00 Totals $543,369.005562,000.00 LAS08A89 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 AmountAmountSpent 13505 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 6,750,000.00 6,085,387.27

Totals 86,750,000.00 $6,085,387.27 LASO9B91 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 29349 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 471,000.00 162,798.39

Totals $471,000.00 $162,798.39

LAso9c9 1 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 Amount Amount Spent 29351 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 1,700,000.00 1,496,417.93

Totals $1,700,000.00 $1,496,417.93 LAS09D92 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 47 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 2,437,000.00 990,767.88

Totals $2,437,000.00 $990,767.88 LASlOA91 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 30080 CITY OF USVEGAS 1 10,000.00 100,551.91

Totals $1 10,000.00 $100,551.91 LASl 1A92 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 50 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 65,000.00 724.14

Totals- $65,000.00 $724.14

-18- Purchase Order Status Report 06/11/93 LASl3A92 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount SDent 52 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 67,000.00 375.30 T otals 867,000.00 Totals $375.30 LAUOl A89 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount SDent 3205 CLARKCOUNTY PW 14,000.00 13,818.36 6051 REVIEWJOURNAL 106.04 106.04 12388 SIMONS Ll 314,293.96 314,174.07 31264 ACQUISITION 21,600.00 21,600.00 T otals $350,000.00 $349,698.47$350,000.00 Totals LAUO2A89 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 5410 REVIEWJOURNAL 106.04 106.04 6050 CLARKCOUNTY PW 470.55 470.55 12386 SIMONSLI 47,750.00 47,750.00 15744 BOYLE ENG 31 8,000.00 31 5,730.06 15745 CLARK COUNTY PW 3,673.41 936.79 Totals 5370,000.00 $364,993.445370,000.00 Totals

MOA0 1 889 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 1502 CLARKCOUNTY PW 10,000.00 5,807.82 261 9 REVIEW JOURNAL 43.00 43.00 91 66 THE MARK GROUP 180,000.00 170,485.00

Totals $190,043.00 $176,335.82 MOA02A89 P.O. NumberVendor P.0 AmountAmountSpent 2791 CLARKCOUNTY PW 39,933.96 6,846.20 6073 REVIEWJOURNAL 106.04 106.04 21650 DAMES & MOORE 209,960.00 209,960.00 25132 APPRAISERS 300.00 300.00 28882 UPRR 600.00 600.00

Totals 5250,900.00 Totals $217,812.24

-19- Purchase Order Status Report 0611 1/93 MOA02B92 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 AmountAmountSpent 6 GREINER 341,930.00 384,771.99 33 CLARKCOUNTY PW 65,748.00 8,748.00 60 DAMES 81 MOORE 130,000.00 124,324.00 1001 MVC 2,569,552.412,589,130.00 99999 RON WILLIAMS 388,951436,415.35 .e3

Totals $3,523,811.75$3,515,759.63 NELO1 A88 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 74275 CLARKCOUNTY PW 12,000.00 2,962.20

Totals $12,000.00 $2,962.20 NLV03C91 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 23137 CITY OF N. LAS VEGAS 350,000.00 339,338.87

~~ Totals $350,000.00 $339,338.87 NLV04A89 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 AmountAmountSpent 3207 CITY OF N. LAS VEGAS 360,000.00 360,000.00 321 3 CITY OF N. LAS VEGAS 61 9,817.52 61 9,817.52 18666 L.V.PAVING 1 1,685,198.00 1 1,566,627.72 38352 CITY OF N. LAS VEGAS 86,117.64 43,414.37 99998 L.V. PAVING 668,368.00 496,593.00 Totals $13,419,501.16 $13,086,452.61 NLV05A89 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 7776 CITY OF N. LAS VEGAS 1,650,000.00 1,595,142.00

Totals $1,650,000.00 $1,595,142.00 NLV06A9 1 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 59 CITY OF N. LAS VEGAS 156,000.00 30,762.78 26070 SlTY OF N. LAS VEGAS 450,000.00 449,999.47

Totals $606,000.00 $480,762.25

-20- Purchase Order Status Report 06/11/93 SEA01A88 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 29343 G.C. WALLACE 35,500.00 25,600.00 74247 CLARK COUNTY PW 22,300.00 9,523.84 Totals 557,800.00 535.1 23.84

Fund Totals $53,250,64a.99 547,5 1 0,130.20

-21. Current Project Expense Summary 06/11/93 Fund 443 C/ark County BUN01A90 BunkervilleChannel Windmill Wash Expiration Date 12/31/91 lnterlocal Amount $541,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign

31 6,000 0 225,000 0 0 0

Amount SpentAmount by Category Design 103,869.50 ROW 54,298.17 Total SpentProjecton 8 158,167.67

CLA02E91Rawhide Channel Mcleod to Mtn. VistaExpiration Date 07/01/92 Interlocal Amount $180,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign

0 0 180,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 90, 169.00 TotalProject Spent on $90,169.00

CLA03C90 BuskirkVan Channel Right-of-way ExpirationDate 07/01/93 Interlocal Amount $3,575,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right Of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 3,575,000 0 0 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category ROW 3,156,803.30 Total SpentProjecton $3,156,803.30

CLA03D91ExpirationDateSystemBuskirk Van 03/01/93 lnterlocal Amount $850,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right Of WayOther Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign

30,000 0 820,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 573,132.80 ROW 8,289.00 TotalProject Spenton $581,421.80 -22- Current Project Expense Summary 06/11/93 CLA04C90 FlamingoWash Brdgs. Paradise, Palos Verde Expiration Date 06/01/92 lnterlocal Amount 8 1,752,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 0 0 255,000 1,497,000 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Construction 1,500,608.49 Design 243,067.07 Total SpentProjecton $1,743,675.56

CLA04D93 FlamingoWashWinnickExpiration Ave Date 07/01/94 lnterlocal Amount $3,000,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right ofOther Way Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 0 0 0 2,700,000 300,000 0

Amount Spent by Category Eng.Con. 7,650.00 TotalProject onSpent $7,650.00

CLA05A91 Duck CreekChannel Pachuca & TomiyasuExpiration Date 10/01/93 Interlocal Amount $855,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign Con. Eng. Other 2,00022,374 687,6260 143,000 0

Amount SpentCategory by Design 1 19,327.86 ROW 74.00 Total SpentProjecton $119,401.86

CLA06A91 Range Wash Detention BasinFacilities Expiration Date 07/01/92 lnterlocal Amount $480,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign

80,000 0 400,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design ROW TotalProject Spenton $302,484.22

-23-8 Current Project Expense Summary 0611 1193 CLA07A92DateExpiration Channel Sloan 07/01193 Interlocal Amount 8400,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 0 0 400,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 561 .OO TotalProject Spent on $561.OO

CLA08A92 LowerDuck Creek Detention Basin Expiration Date 07/01/93 lnterlocal Amount 8300,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 0 300,000 0 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Predesign 22,710.00 TotalProject Spent on $22,710.00

GSPOl A88 GoodspringsFlood Control Improvements Expiration Date 12/31/92 Interlocal Amount $99,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng.

4,000 0 40,400 54,600 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 21,135.23 TotalProject Spent on $21,135.23

LAUOlA89 ExpirationDateUnnamedLaughlinWash 06/30/93 lnterlocal Amount $350,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 48,000 0 302,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 297,328.64 ROW 52,369.83 TotalProject Spenton $349,698.47

-24- Current Project Expense Summary 06/11 I93 LAU02A89Expiration SpringsDateLaughlinHiko /9012/31 Interlocal Amount 8370,000 Amount Interlocal Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 25,000 0 345,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 340,246.80 ROW 24,746.64 TotalProject Spent8364,993.44on

MOA01889 MoapaValley Muddy River West Levee Expiration Date 12/31 /90 A moun t 8200,000lnterlocal Amount lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 50,000 0 150,000 0 0 0

Amount SpentAmount by Category Design 148,546.00 ROW 27,789.82 Total SpentProjecton S 176,335.82

MOA02A89 MoapaValley Logan & BesonWash ExpirationDate 12/31/91 A mount 8340,000lnterlocal Amount lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right ofOther Way Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign

1 13,000 0 187,000 0 0 40,000

Amount Spent by Category Design 21 3,196.36 ROW 4,615.88 Total SpentProjecton 8217,812.24

MOA02B92 MoapaValley Logan Wash Construction Expiration Date 07/31/93 lnterlocal$4,2 Amount 16,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 182,297 3,637,703 41 6,0000 41 0 3,637,703 182,297 0

AmountSpent by Category Eng.Con. 393,519.99 C onstruction 3,005,967.76Construction Desig'n 124,324.00 Total SpentProjecton $3,523,811.75

-25- Current Project Expense Summary 06/11193 NELOl A88 NelsonFlood Control ImprovementsExpiration Date 12/31/89 Interlocal Amount $70,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 3,000 0 9,000 58,000 0 0

Amount Spent by Category 2,962.20Design TotalProject onSpent $2,962.20

SEA01A88 SearchlightFlood Control Improvements Expiration Date 12/31/93 Interlocal Amount $323,300 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign Con. Eng. Other

158,300 0 50,000 115,000 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 35,123.84 TotalProject Spent on $35,123.84

Henderson HEN01A87 PittmanChannel Wash Expiration Date 03/01/92 Interlocal Amount $937,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 300,000 0 637,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 495,790.46 ROW 20,706.64 Total SpentProjecton $516,497.10

HEN03A91 UPRR Channel Expiration Date 07/01192 Interlocal Amount $ 150,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 0 1 5,000 135,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 676.00 Predesign 120,247.40 . Total Spent on Project $120,923.40

-26- Current Project Expense Summary 06/11/93 HEN04A91 C-1Expiration SystemDateChannel 07/01/95 lnterlocal Amount 8850,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng.

50,000 0 800,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 794,929.68 ROW 1,368.86 TotalProject Spenton $796,298.54

HEN04B93BurkholderC1 to LakeMead DriveExpiration Date 12/31/95 lnterlocal Amount 8200,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 0 0 200,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 41,253.42 TotalProject Spent on $41,253.42

HEN05A92Sunset DetBasin Collection & Outfall ExpirationDate 07/01/93 Interlocal Amount $1,385,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng.

1,050,000 0 335,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 65,435.05 ROW 2,881.39 Total Spent on Project $68,316.44

-27- Current Project Expense Summary 0611 1193 Las Vegas LAS01A87 AngelPark Detention Basin Structure ExpirationDate 01 /01/91 Interlocal Amount 8400,300 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 500 2,200 5 1,900 345,700 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Construction 345,695.00 Design 44,676.73 Predesign 2,122.00 ROW 2,783.00 Total Spent on Project $395,276.73

LAS02A87 Buffalo ChannelAngel Park Detention Basin Expiration Date 12/3 1/93 Interlocal Amount $4,535,965 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign Other

0 134,200 248,750 4,153,015 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Construction 3,846,102.73 Design 21 7,635.86 Predesign 89,438.27 Total Spent on Project $4,153,176.86

LAS02B91 Buffalo ChannelSummerlin to Vegas Drive Expiration Date 01 /31/94 Interlocal Amount $130,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 130,000 0 0 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 125,936.68 TotalProject Spenton $125,936.68

-28-

... -. . - Current Project Expense Summary 06/11I93 LAS02C91 Buffalo Channel Westcliff SummerlinExpiration Date 1213 1193 lnterlocal Amount $588,898 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign Con. Eng. Other

0 0 30,166 519,750 38,982 0

Amount Spent by Category 57,95Eng.Con. 1.62 Construction 786,186.24 D esign 5,091.98 Design TotalProject Spenton $849,229.84

LAS02D92 Buffalo ChannelDesign Doe Westcliff ExpirationDate 12/3 1194 lnterlocal Amount 893,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign Con. Eng. Other 93,000 0 0 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category ROW 2,856.75 TotalProject onSpent $2,856.75

LAS03B89Gowan Detention Basinand Outfall ExpirationDate 12/3 1/93 lnterlocal Amount $5,401,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 8,000 0 743,000 4,392,375 200,000 57.625

Amount Spent by Category Eng.Con. 200,000.00 Construction 3,728,150.58 Design 693,830.19 O ther 57,625.00 Other ROW 3.753.72 Total Spent on Project$4,683,359.49

Oakey Blvd. System Expiration DateExpirationLAS04B90 System Blvd. Oakey 01 /31/94 Interlocal Amount $624,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 624.000 0 0 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category ROW 543,369.00 . TotalProject Spenton $543,369.00 -29- Current Project Expense Summary 06/11I93 LASO8A89Carey Avenue Lake Mead Detention BasinExpiration Date 12/31/93 Interlocal Amount 86,750,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 535,000 0 630,000 5,585,000 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Construction 5,044,797.02 Design 538,254.26 ROW 502,335.99 Total Spent on Project86,085,387.27

LAS09B91 Washington AvenueSystem Sandhill to Bruce Expiration Date 01/01/94 Interlocal Amount $471,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 471,000 0 0 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category ROW 162,798.39 Total SpentProjecton $162,798.39

I LAS09C91 Washington AveSystem Sandhill Outfall Expiration Date 12/01 /95 Interlocal Amount $1,700,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 0 0 150,000 0 18550,000 0

Amount Spent by Category Eng.Con. 135,325.95 Construction 1,361,091.98 Total Spent on Project $1,496,417.93

LAS09D92 Washington AveSystem Construction Expiration Date 11 /01/94 Interlocal Amount $2,437,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng.

0 0 0 2,187,000 250,000 0

Amount Spent by Category Eng.Con. 19,176.72 Construction 971,591.1 6 ~~~~~ Total Spent on Project $990,76788

-30- Current Project Expense Summary 06/11I93 LASlOA91 Gowan North Channel Expiration Date /9412/31 Interlocal Amount $ 110,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 1 10,000 0 1 0 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Predesign 100,551.91 Total Spent on Project $100,551.91

LASl 1A92 Angel ParkPeccole 1 Rampart Strom Drain Expiration Date 12/31/94 Interlocal Amount 865,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 65,000 0 0 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category ROW 724.14 Total Spent on Project $724.14

LASl3A92 CheyenneChannel Buffalo Gowan Detention Expiration Date 12/31/94 Interlocal Amount $67,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 0 0 67,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 375.30 Total Spent on Project $375.30

North Las Vegas

NLV03C91 West RangeWash DiversionDike Expiration Date 07/01 /92 Interlocal Amount $350,00(3 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way PredesignDesign Construction Con. Eng. Other 25,000 0 325,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Con.Eng. 583.65 Design 321,544.86 ROW 17.21 0.36 . Total Spenton Project $339,338.87 -31- Current Project Expense Summary 06/11/93 NLV04A89 Gowan Detention Basin Outfall Structure ExpirationDate 07/01/94 Interlocal Amount 8 13,420,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign Con. Eng. Other 0 0 457,000 12,304,000 659,000 0

Amount Spent by Category Eng.Con. 555,901.06 Construction 12,063,220.72 Design 467,330.83 Total SpentonProject $13,086,452.61

NLV05A89 UpperWashLV Detention Basin Expiration Date 12/31/91 Interlocal Amount $1,650,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign Con. Eng. Other 0 0 1,650,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 1,595,142.00 Total Spent on Project $1,595,142.00

, NLV06A91 CanyonKyle Detention Basin Expiration Date 06/30/93 Interlocal Amount $606,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 65,000 0 541,000 0 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Design 480,762.25 Total Spent on Project $480,762.25

-32- Regional Flood Control District 06/07/93 Capital Improvement Projects - Cumulative Reporting Pay As You Go Funds (Fund 443) Project Name status Total

Boulder City BOUO1A87 Hemenway Wash Open 4,649,000.00 BOUOl B88 Hemenway Wash Debris Basin Closed 145,000.00 BOUO2A88 Georgia Avenue Channel Closed 613,590.00 BOU03A88 Buchannan Blvd. Channel Closed 41 2,720.00 55,820,310.00

Clark County BUN01A90 Bunkerville Channel WindmillWash Open 541,000.00 CLAOl A87 Upper Flamingo Wash Det. Basin & Outfall Closed 6,987,933.00 CLA02A88 Rawhide Channel Closed 69,932.00 CLA02B90 Rawhide Channel Eastern Ave Closed 155,540.00 CLA02C90 Rawhide Channel Eastern Ave Outfall Closed 115,000.00 CLA02D90 Rawhide Channel Eastern to Toapz Open 1,265,000.00 CLAO2E9 1 Rawhide Channel Mcleod to Mtn. Vista Open 180,000.00 CLA03A88 Van Buskirk Channel Predesign Closed 1 18,463.00 CLA03B90 Van Buskirk Channel Outfall Open 3,760,000.00 CLA03C90 Van Buskirk Channel Right-of-way Open 3,575,000.00 CLA03D9 1 Van Buskirk System Open 850,000.00 CLA04A89 Flamingo Wash Bridge at Eastern Avenue Closed 61,900.00 CLA04B89 Flamingo Wash Bridge at Arville Closed 294,819.00 CLA04C90 Flamingo Wash Brdgs. Paradise, Palos Verde Open 1,752,000.00 CLA04D93 Flamingo Wash Winnick Ave Open 3,000,000.00 CLA05A9 1 Duck Creek Channel Pachuca & Tomiyasu Open 855,000.00 CLA06A9 1 Range Wash Detention Basin Facilities Open 480,000.00 CLA07A92 Sloan Channel Open 400,000.00 CLA08A92 Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin Open 300,000.00 GSPO1 A88 Goodsprings Flood Control Improvements Open 99,000.00 LAUO1A89 Laughlin Unnamed Wash Open 350,000.00 LAU02A89 Laughlin Hiko Springs Open 370,000.00 LAU02B92 Laughlin Hike SpringsRemap Closed 9,500.00 MOA01A89 Moapa Cooper Ave Crossing Closed 185,000.00 MOA01889 Moapa Valley Muddy River West Levee Open 200,000.00 MOA02A89 Moapa Valley Logan & Beson Wash Open 340,000.00 MOA02B92 Moapa Valley Logan Wash Construction Open 4,216,000.00 NELOl A88 Nelson Flood Control Improvements Open 70,000.00 SEA01 A88 Searchlight Flood Control Improvements Open 323,300.00 530,924,387.00

Henderson HENOl A87 Pittman Wash Channel Open 937,000.00 HENOl 887 Warm Springs Stephanie Bridges Closed 1,666,309.00 HENOl C90 Pittman Wash Chnl Phase I Construction Closed 2,744,110.00 HEN02A89 Green Valley Parkway Bridge Closed 1,128,514.00 HEN03A91 UPRR Channel Open 150,000.00 HEN04A91 C-1 Channel System Open 850,000.00 HEN04B93 C1 Burkholder to Lake Mead Drive Open 200,000.00 HEN05A92 Suhset Det Basin Collection & Outfall Open 1,385,000.00 -33- 59,060,933.00 Regional Flood Control District 06/07/93 Capital Improvement Projects - Cumulative Reporting Pay As You Go Funds (Fund 443) Project N8me St8tlJS Total

Las Vegas LASO1 A87 Angel Park Detention Basin Structure Open 400,300.00 LASO2A87 Buffalo Channel Angel Park Detention Basin Open 4,535,965.00 LAS02B91 Buffalo Channel Summerlin to Vegas Drive Open 130,000.00 LAS02C91 Buffalo Channel Westcliff Summerlin Open 588,898.00 LAS02D92 Buffalo Channel Design Doe Westcliff Open 93,000.00 LAS03A89 Gowan Rd. Detention System Closed 195,685.00 LAS03B89 Gowan Detention Basin and Outfall Open 5,401,000.00 LAS04A87 Oakey System Predesign Closed 111,107.00 LAS04B90 Oakey Blvd. System Open 624,000.00 LAS04C9 1 Oakey Blvd Det & Convey at Decatur Closed 33,314.00 LAS05A87 Meadows Detention Basin Design Closed 120,000.00 LAS05B87 Meadows Detention Basin Construction Closed 3,445,946.00 LAS06A87 Major Conveyance West of I15 Closed 232,793.00 LAS06B87 Major Conveyance East of I1 5 Closed 29,500.00 LAS07A89 Durango Storm Drain Closed 596,059.00 LAS08A89 Carey Avenue Lake Mead Detention Basin Open 6,750,000.00 LAS09A89 Washington Ave. Convey System Closed 313,727.00 LASO9B9 1 Washington Avenue System Sandhill to Bruce Open 471,000.00 LAS09D92 Washington Ave System Construction Open 2,437,000.00 US1OA91 Gowan North Channel Open 1 10,000.00 LASl OB93 CAM 10 & Lone Mt Detention Basin Open 200,000.00 LASl 1A92 Angel Park Peccole 1 Rampart Strom Drain Open 65,000.00 LASl2A92 Aka Storm Drain Open 954,800.00 LAS13A92 Cheyenne Channel Buffalo Gowan Detention Open 67,000.00 $27,906,094.00

Mesquite MESO1 A88Town Wash ROW Engineering Closed 9,600.00 MESOlB89 Town Wash Detention Basin Closed 660,000.00 $669,600.00

North Las Vegas NLVOl A87 LVWash "A" Channel Improvements Closed 304,000.00 NLVOlB87 LVWash Craig Civic Center +(King Charles) Closed 2,415,412.00 NLV02A87 West Trib LVWash Craig Alex Closed 1,268,171 -00 NLV02B87 West Trib LVWash Upper Mendenhall Closed 1,057,430.00 NLV03A88 EastRange Wash Oetention Basin Closed 273,068.00 NLV03B88 EastRange Wash Detention BasinPredesign Closed 30,000.00 NLV03C91 West RangeWash DiversionDike Open 350,000.00 NLV04A89 Gowan Detention Basin Outfall Structure Open 13,420,000.00 NLV05A89 UpperLVWash Detention Basin Open 1,650,000.00 NLV06A91 KyleCanyon Detention Basin Open 606,000.00 NLV07A92 Camino AI Norte Open 300,000.00

~~~~ $21,674,081 .OO

Total Funded $96,055,405.00 -34- FUND 444 - FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAY 1993

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 60,675,838

REVENUES: 3550 - INTEREST EARNED

EXPENSES: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXPENDITURES

ENDING FUND BALANCE (FUND 444)

CURRENT OBLIGATIONS AGAINST BOND FUNDS

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BALANCE REMAINING ON PROJECTS FUNDED TO DATE

UNOBLIGATED BOND FUNDS

CURRENT FUNDING REQUESTS

TOTAL REQUESTS FOR FUNDING

BALANCE

-35 - Regional Flood Control District Monthly Expenditures Fund444 May 1994 P. 0. InMf C. Inwf ce Project Number VdOr Number Date Amout LAS02E92 9 City of Las Vegas 9005b 411 9/93 557.96 LAS04D92 4 City of Las Vegas 9049 5/3/93 665,706.50 LAS03C9 1 30079 City of Las Vegas 8971 411 9/93 6,304.91 LAS03C9 1 30079 City of Las Vegas 897 1 411 9/93 155,341.08 LAS03C91 30079 City of Las Vegas 897 1 411 9/93 12,240.00 NLV03D93 44358 CNLV AR42093 4120193 8,700.00 NLV 05B92 30741 CNLV AR2769 511 1193 345.86 CLAO2F92 11 El Mundo 13 2/5/93 37.70 NLV05B92 31 267Granite 12 511 0193 1,186,597.35 NLV05B92 31 267Granite 11 4/7/93 477,100.84 CLA02F92 39543 Las Vegas Paving 02F924 411 9/93 166,467.55 CLA03G92 10001 Max Riggs 036921 411 9/93 106,033.50 CLA03F92 1002 Max Riggs 03f92-1 411 9/93 63,316.80 CLA03E92 10002 Progressive 3E927 411 9/93 109,978.98 LAS09C9 1 29351 City of Las Vegas 2935 1 411 5/93 104.72 $2,958,833.75

-36- Current Project Expense Summary 06/11/93 Fund 444 CIark County CLA02F92Rawhide Channel McLeod Mtto VistaExpiration Date 09/30/93 lnterlocal Amount $2,7a5,4a5 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign

0 0 0 2,586,076 199,409 0

Amount Spent by Category Eng.Con. 55,120.00 Construction 1,447,587.25 Total SpentProjecton $1,502,707.25

CLA03E92VanBuskirk System Rochell McLeod Expiration Date 07/01/93 Interlocal Amount $921,800 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng.

0 0 0 92 1,800 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Eng.Con. 869,814.61 TotalProject Spenton $869,814.61

CLA03F92 VanBuskirk Channel Phase V ImprovementsExpiration Date 07/01/93 lnterlocal Amount $1,627,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 0 0 0 1,627,000 0 0

Amount Spent by Category Construction 127,843.80 Total SpentProjecton 8127,843.80

CLA03G92 VanBuskirk Channel Phase IV ImprovementsExpiration Date 07/01/93 lnterlocal Amount 8 1,072,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign OtherCon. Eng. 0 0 75,0000 997,000 0

Amount Spent by Category Eng.Con. 6,268.00 Construction 106,033.50 Total SpentProjecton $112,301.50 -37- Current Project Expense Summary 06/11/93 Henderson HENOlD91Pittman WashChannel Phase II ExpirationDate 07/31192 Interlocal Amount Interlocal 82,066,871 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign

0 0 0 2,016,809 50,062 0

Amount Spent by Category Con. Eng. 50,062.33 Construction 2,016,809.90Construction Total SpentProjecton 82,066,872.23

HEN03B92 DateUPRRExpiration Channel 12/31/93 Interlocal Amount $2,600,000 Amount Interlocal Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign

36,000 0 146,000 0 2,418,000 0

Amount Spent by Category Eng.Con. 32,293.42 Construction 1,894,408.61Construction Total SpentProjecton 81,926,702.03

Las Vegas LAS02E92Buffalo Channel Summerlin VegasExpiration Date 01 /31/94 Interlocal AmountInterlocal S 1,920,950 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign 0 0 145,500 0 1,775,450 0

Amount Spent by Category Eng.Con. 557.96 Design 693.00 TotalProject81,250.96 onSpent Current Project Expense Summary 0611 1 193 LAS03C 91 Gowan Detention Basin Expiration DateExpiration Basin DetentionLAS03C91Gowan 03/31 I94 Interlocal Amount 87,500,000 Amount Interlocal Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way PredesignDesign Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 6,970,000 500,000 30,000

Amount Spent by Category Con.Eng. 434,456.97 Construction 5,844,054.33 Other 12,240.00 Total Spent on Project $6,290,751.30

LAS04D92 OakeyBlvd Detention Basin Expiration Date 11 /01/94 A mount $7,196,300lnterlocal Amount Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign Con. Eng. Other 0 250,000 6,924,0000 22,300 0

Spent by CategoryAmount by Spent Eng.Con. 1,918.00 C onstruction 1,122,923.50Construction Total SpentProjecton $1,124,841.50

North Las Vegas NLV03D93West ExpirationDateDike Wash Range 08/05/94 Interlocal Amount $5,200,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of OtherWay Eng.Construction Con.DesignPredesign

0 0 0 4,710,000 400,000 90,000

Amount SpentCategory by Environmental8,700.00 TotalProject onSpent $8,700.00

-39- Current Project Expense Summary 0611 1 193 NLV05B92 Upper Las Vegas Wash Detention Basin Expiration Date 07/30/93 lnterlocal Amount 88,950,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way ConstructionDesignPredesign Con. Eng. Other 500,000 0 0 7,800,000 650,000 0

Amount Spent by Category Con. Eng. 405,874.89 Construction 6,497,517.79 Total SpentProject on 86,903,392.68

-40- Purchase Order Status Report 06/11/93 Fund 444 CLA02F92 P. 0.Number Vendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 2 KLEINFELDER 55,000.00 45,258.00 11 CLARK COUNTY PW 71,000.00 9,862.00 31 052 MVC 752,052.95 752,054.00 39543 L.V. PAVING 833,122.50 695,495.55 99993 EL MUNDO 37.00 37.70

Totals $1,711,212.45 $1,502,707.25 CLA03E92 P. 0.Number Vendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 7 G.C. WALLACE 8,300.00 5,146.00 8 CLARK COUNTY PW 135,434.40 48,393.63 99995 PROGRESSIVE 778,065.60 81 6,274.98

Totals $869,814.61$921,800.00 CLA03F92 P. 0.Number Vendor P.0 Amount Amount Spent 12 CLARK COUNTY PW 50,000.00 1,171 .OO 15 SWIFT 39.00 39.00 99990 MAX RlGGS 1,288,441 .OO 126,633.80

Totals $1,338,480.00 $1 27,843.80

CLA03G92 P. 0. Number Vendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 13 CLARK COUNTY PW 13,000.00 6,202.00 99992 SWIFT 66.00 66.00 99997 MAX RIGGS 898,966.70 106,033.50

Totals $912,032.70 $1 12,301.50 HEN01 D91 P. 0. Number P. Vendor 0 Amount Amount Spent 10 BLACK &VEATCH 25,605.00 1 1,730.00 28879 FREHNER 2,045,727.40 2,016,809.90 30082 CITY OF HENC,ERSON 448,667.60 38,332.33 Totals $2,520,000.00 $2,066,872.23

-41- Purchase Order Status Report 06/11/93 HEN03692 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 30 CITY OF HENDERSON 150,000.00 68,432.01 99991 MAX RlGGS 2,062,469.95 1,858,270.02

Totals $2,212,469.95 $1,926,702.03 LAS02E92 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 9 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 145,500.00 1,250.96

Totals $145,500.00 $1,250.96 LAS03C9 1 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 30079 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 7,500,000.00 6,290,751.30

Totals $7,500,000.00 $6,290,751.30 LAS04D92 P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 AmountAmount Spent 4 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 1,124,841.507,196,300.00

Totals $1,124,841.50$7,196,300.00 NLV03D93 I P. 0. NumberVendor P. 0 Amount Amount Spent 44358 CITY OF N. LAS VEGAS 90,000.00 8,700.00

Totals $90,000.00 $8,700.00 NLV05692 P. 0. NumberVendor P.0 Amount Amount Spent 30741 CITY OF N. LAS VEGAS 1,100,000.00 405,874.89 31 267 GRANITE 7,077,777.00 6,497,517.79

Totals $8,177,777.00 $6,903,392.68

Fund Totals $32,725,572.10$20,935,177.86

-42- Regional Flood Control District 06/11 /93 Capital Improvement Projects - Cumulative Reporting Bond Fund (Fund 444) Project Name Status Total Boulder Cify BOUOl A87 HemenwayWash Open 867,000.00 5867,000.00

Clark County CLA02F92 Rawhide Channel McLeod to Mt Open 2,785,485.00 CLA03E92 Van Buskirk System Rochell Open 921,800.00 CLA03F92 Van Buskirk Channel Phase V Open 1,627,000.00 CLA03G92 Van Buskirk Channel Phase IV Open 1,072,000.00 CLAO6A East Range Wash Detention Basin Unstarted 0.00 LAUOlB92 Unnamed Wash Open 4,100,000.00 $10,506,285.00

Henderson HEN01 A Pittman Wash Phase Ill Open 910,000.00 HEN01 D91 Pittman Wash Channel Phase II Open 2,520,000.00 HEN03B92 UPRR Channel Open 2,600,000.00 HEN04C93 C1 Channel Mission Hills Open 7.1 50.000.00 $13,180,000.00

Las Vegas LAS02E92 Buffalo Channel Summerlin Vegas Open 1,920,950.00 LAS03C91 Gowan Detention Basin Open 7,500,000.00 LAS04D92 Oakey Blvd Detention Basin Open 7,196,300.00 LAso9c91 Washington Ave System Sandhill Open 1,700,000.00 LAS09E93 Washington Ave Virgil Lena Open 3.350.000.00 $21,667,250.00

Mesquite MESO1 889 Town Wash DetentionBasin Closed 3,692,546.00 $3,692,546.00

North Las Vegas NLV03D93West RangeWashDike Open 5,200,000.00 NLV05B92UpperVegas Las Wash Detention Open 8,950,000.00 $14,150,000.00

Total Funded $64,063,081 .OO

-43- -PP-

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT

PETITIONER: VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER

I RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: RECEIVE A STATUS REPORT ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION OF FLOOD CONTROL

~~~~ FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

The General Manager will reporton the status of state and federal legislation of flood control. The agenda backup includes a copy of a local newspaper article related to action taken by a House Panel in Washington D.C. on Thursday, June 17, 1993.

Respectfully submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA lTEM# 27 &&LA/& Date: Date: 7/8/93 Virbia Valentine, P.E. General ManagerKhief Engineer Friday, June 18, 1993/Las Vegas Review=Joumalllb $3 hillion urged for valley washes,

By Tony Batt early as December. aRerconstruction had begun.” I Donrey Washington Bureau The project is expected to be Rep. Barbara Vucanovich, R- WASHINGTON - A House completed by the end of the de- Nev.,who is a member of the panel voted Thursday to earmark cade at an estimated cost of $204 committee, said she askedfor the $3 million in 1994 to begin con- million, with Clark County tax- money on behalf of the county. structing flood-control improve- payers paying about$60 million. Flood flows from both the ”Yo- ments along two washes in the Bax-Valentine said Thursday’s picana and Flamingo washespose I.m Vegas Valley. action by the House Appropria- a threat to about 12,000 residents If Congress approves the pan- tionsCommittee was “a mile- who live in thefloodplain in east- el’s funding,construction could stone.” em Las Vegas. Clark County &I- begin by February 1994 on the ‘This is verysignificant be- cials approached the U.S. Army Tropicana and Flamingo washes cause the mostdifficult step is Corps of Engineers about thepro- project, said Virginia Bax-Valen- getting money to begin construc- ject after floods in 1984 resulted tine,general manager of the tion,” she said. “I talked to the in seven deaths and millions bf Clark County Flood Control Dis- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dollars in property damage.

trict..~~ ~ yesterdayand they said they TheTropicana and Flamingo ’. Bax-Valentinesaid construc- don’t know of any project that washes begin in themountainous tion bids could be advertised as stopped receiving appropriations region west of Las Vegas.