DOCSLIB.ORG

Reconstructing Salome: Feminism and Biblical Reconstruction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reconstructing Salome: Feminism and Biblical Reconstruction The Garden, the Serpent, and Eve: An Ecofeminist Narrative Analysis of Garden of Eden Imagery in Fashion Magazine Advertising by Shelly Carmen Colette Thesis presented to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies of the University of Ottawa as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Religious Studies) Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Pierluigi Piovanelli © Shelly Carmen Colette, Ottawa, Canada, 2012 ii ABSTRACT: Garden of Eden imagery is ubiquitous in contemporary print advertising in North America, especially in advertisements directed at women. Three telling characteristics emerge in characterizations of Eve in these advertising reconstructions. In the first place, Eve is consistently hypersexualized and over-eroticized. Secondly, such Garden of Eden images often conflate the Eve figure with that of the Serpent. Thirdly, the highly eroticized Eve-Serpent figures also commonly suffer further conflation with the Garden of Eden itself. Like Eve, nature becomes eroticized. In the Eve-Serpent-Eden conflation, woman becomes nature, nature becomes woman, and both perform a single narrative plot function, in tandem with the Serpent. The erotic and tempting Eve-Serpent-Eden character is both protagonist and antagonist, seducer and seduced. In this dissertation, I engage in an ecofeminist narratological analysis of the Genesis/Fall myth, as it is retold in contemporary fashion magazine advertisements. My analysis examines how reconstructions of this myth in advertisements construct the reader, the narrator, and the primary characters of the story (Eve, Adam, the Serpent, and Eden). I then further explore the ways in which these characterizations inform our perceptions of woman, nature, and environmentalism. Using a narratological methodology, and through a poststructuralist ecofeminist lens, I examine which plot and character elements have been kept, which have been discarded, and how certain erasures impact the narrative characterizations of the story. In addition to what is being told, I further analyze how and where it is told. How is the basic plot being storied in these reconstructions, and what are the effects of this version on the archetypal characterizations of Eve and the Garden of Eden? What are the cultural and literary contexts of the reconstructed narrative and the characters within it? How do these contexts inform how we read the characters within the story? Finally, I examine the cultural effects of these narrative reconstructions, exploring their influence on our gendered relationships with each other and with the natural world around us. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the generous financial assistance of the Department of Classics and Religious Studies at the University of Ottawa, and the Province of Ontario, for funding me through five years of research and writing. I would never have been able to finish this project without the support of my family, especially my father, who always understood the words “I can’t, Dad, I have to work” as I stared blankly at a computer screen, and my aunt, who took me in and listened to me blather on endlessly about sex and the devil. I would never have encountered narrative theory in the first place were it not for Beth McKim – thank you for introducing me to this tremendously gratifying field of study. I’m also grateful to Alison Belyea, who taught me long ago to never get so bogged down in theory that I forget my purpose. I’m forever indebted to my delightful colleagues and mentors, Fiona Black and Andrew Wilson, who took a chance on a small-town kid. Most of all, of course, I am grateful for the guidance and support of my dissertation advisor, Pierluigi Piovanelli who, with his unswerving dedication to student mentorship, always knew when to push me in the right direction and when to let me learn from my many (and likely ongoing) mistakes. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….. ii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………… iii Introduction………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Chapter One: Literature Review of Ecofeminism, Ecofeminist Literary Criticism, and Ecofeminist Perspectives on Genesis 1-3 ………………………………………….. 23 Part One: Ecofeminism and Ecofeminist Literary Theory………………………………. 23 Similarities Within Ecofeminism …………………………………………………….. 24 Differences Between Ecofeminisms ………………………………………………… 27 Romantic Ecofeminism ………………………………………………………………. 28 Cultural Ecofeminism ………………………………………………………………… 32 Post-structuralist Ecofeminism ………………………………………………………. 36 Part Two: Ecofeminist Literary Criticism and Green World Imagery …………………. 40 Ecocriticism ………………………………………………………………………….. 40 Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Anthropomorphism and ‘Telling theThing’ ……….. 42 Methods of Ecofeminist Literary Criticism ………………………………………….. 47 Part Three: Ecofeminist Biblical Analysis and the Garden of Eden Narrative ………… 52 Feminist and Ecological Studies of Creation ………………………………………… 55 Feminist and Ecological Studies of the Fall …………………………………………. 65 Ecofeminist Studies of Creation and Fall ……………………………………………. 69 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………... 73 Chapter Two: Literature Review of Myth, Metaphor, and Narrative Theory……….. 75 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… 75 Part One: Reading the Bible in a Narrative World ……………………………………… 77 Northrop Frye and the Great Biblical Code…………………………………………… 77 Paul Ricoeur: Metaphor, Narrative Identity, and Hermeneutics ……………………... 85 Frye and Ricoeur in Conversation…………………………………………………….. 96 Part Two: Mieke Bal, Narratology, and Narrative Analysis…………………………….. 100 Narrative at the Level of Text…………………………………………………………. 104 Narrative at the Level of Story………………………………………………………... 111 Narrative at the Level of Fabula………………………………………………………. 119 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………. 122 Chapter Three: Eroticizing Eve…………………………………………………………. 123 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… 123 Stuck in the Middle with You: Emplotment and Continuity……………………………. 124 Crisis, Continuity, and Characterization………………………………………………… 129 No, I am Spartacus: The Various Roles of the Reader………………………………….. 136 A Modern-Day Myth: Time in Narrative Construction…………………………………. 145 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….. 150 v Chapter Four: Through the Looking Glass: Adam and Eve Images in Advertising… 153 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… 153 Part One: Eve’s Gaze into the Camera…………………………………………………... 154 The Eye Knows: Eve’s Gaze as Sexual Power……………………………………….. 154 In and Out of Focus: Adam and Eve as Focalizing Agents…………………………… 162 Part Two: Eve Looks Away……………………………………………………………... 166 Getting Back to the Garden: Text and Context……………………………………….. 166 “Global Warning Ready”: Textual Irony in Context…………………………………. 172 The Fall of Man: Sexual Power and Agency in the New Eden………………………. 180 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………. 182 Chapter Five: Eve, Eden, and the Serpent Images in Advertising……………………. 186 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… 186 Part One: Eve and Eden…………………………………………………………………. 187 The Garden as Character……………………………………………………………… 187 Gendering Eden: A Wild World of Green…………………………………………….. 193 Part Two: Eve and the Serpent…………………………………………………………... 203 Conclusion: The Three Faces of Eve……………………………………………………. 215 Chapter Six: Implications: Eroticizing Environmentalism……………………………. 218 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… 218 Getting Back to the Garden……………………………………………………………… 219 Eden for Sale…………………………………………………………………………….. 223 Eroticizing Environmentalism…………………………………………………………... 235 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………. 240 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………… 242 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………. 251 Appendix A: Images Used………………………………………………………………… 274 Appendix B: A Selection of Images Not Used …………………………………………… 285 1 INTRODUCTION Stories, great flapping ribbons of shaped space-time, have been blowing and uncoiling around the universe since the beginning of time. And they have evolved. The weakest have died and the strongest have survived, and they have grown fat on the retelling… stories, twisting and blowing through the darkness. And their very existence overlays a faint but insistent pattern on the chaos that is history. Stories etch grooves deep enough for people to follow in the same way that water follows certain paths down a mountainside. And every time fresh actors tread the path of the story, the groove runs deeper. - Terry Pratchett, Witches Abroad (1991) The biblical Genesis/Fall narrative is ubiquitous in North American culture. Its primary narrative themes of creation, temptation, and punishment are found throughout the corpus of western Christian art and literature. The characters of the story are archetypal: Adam, Eve, the Creator God, the Serpent, even the Garden of Eden itself are characters who transcend the story in which they are situated. Genesis/Fall imagery is instantly recognizable. Who among us doesn’t immediately associate an image of a woman and a serpent with temptation in the Garden of Eden? An apple as an offering? A fig leaf as clothing? These images are so familiar, they have been reconstructed so often, that one sole image can evoke the entire narrative. The Genesis/Fall myth informs our understandings of who we are and what our roles are in the world. In Western culture, the Genesis/Fall myth is foundational to our relationships, both with each other and with the natural world. My interest in popular reconstructions of the Garden of Eden began in late July, 2005 with this image, the cover of a free daily newspaper
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eve's Answer to the Serpent: an Alternative Paradigm for Sin and Some Implications in Theology
    Calvin Theological Journal 33 (1998) : 399-420 Copyright © 1980 by Calvin Theological Seminary. Cited with permission. Scholia et Homiletica Eve's Answer to the Serpent: An Alternative Paradigm for Sin and Some Implications in Theology P. Wayne Townsend The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, `You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die. "' (Gen. 3:2-3) Can we take these italicized words seriously, or must we dismiss them as the hasty additions of Eve's overactive imagination? Did God say or mean this when he instructed Adam in Genesis 2:16-17? I suggest that, not only did Eve speak accu- rately and insightfully in responding to the serpent but that her words hold a key to reevaluating the doctrine of original sin and especially the puzzles of alien guilt and the imputation of sin. In this article, I seek to reignite discussion on these top- ics by suggesting an alternative paradigm for discussing the doctrine of original sin and by applying that paradigm in a preliminary manner to various themes in the- ology, biblical interpretation, and Christian living. I seek not so much to answer questions as to evoke new ones that will jar us into a more productive path of the- ological explanation. I suggest that Eve's words indicate that the Bible structures the ideas that we recognize as original sin around the concept of uncleanness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Synagogue of Satan
    THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN BY MAXIMILIAN J. RUDWIN THE Synagogue of Satan is of greater antiquity and potency than the Church of God. The fear of a mahgn being was earher in operation and more powerful in its appeal among primitive peoples than the love of a benign being. Fear, it should be re- membered, was the first incentive of religious worship. Propitiation of harmful powers was the first phase of all sacrificial rites. This is perhaps the meaning of the old Gnostic tradition that when Solomon was summoned from his tomb and asked, "Who first named the name of God?" he answered, "The Devil." Furthermore, every religion that preceded Christianity was a form of devil-worship in the eyes of the new faith. The early Christians actually believed that all pagans were devil-worshippers inasmuch as all pagan gods were in Christian eyes disguised demons who caused themselves to be adored under different names in dif- ferent countries. It was believed that the spirits of hell took the form of idols, working through them, as St. Thomas Aquinas said, certain marvels w'hich excited the wonder and admiration of their worshippers (Siiinina theologica n.ii.94). This viewpoint was not confined to the Christians. It has ever been a custom among men to send to the Devil all who do not belong to their own particular caste, class or cult. Each nation or religion has always claimed the Deity for itself and assigned the Devil to other nations and religions. Zoroaster described alien M^orshippers as children of the Divas, which, in biblical parlance, is equivalent to sons of Belial.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Magdalene: Varied Portrayals in Early Gospel Narratives
    Chapter 1 The Earliest Magdalene: Varied Portrayals in Early Gospel Narratives Edmondo Lupieri In the early writings produced by the followers of Jesus, Mary Magdalene is connected with key events in the narrative regarding Jesus: his death on the cross, his burial, and his resurrection.1 At first sight, her figure seems to grow in importance through time. Her name and figure, indeed, are completely ab- sent from the oldest extant texts written by a follower of Jesus, the authentic letters of Paul.2 This is particularly striking, since 1 Cor 15:5–8 contains the ear- liest known series of witnesses to the resurrection, but only men are named specifically.3 1 All translations are the author’s. The Greek text of the New Testament is from Eberhard Nestle et al., eds., Novum Testamentum Graece, 27th ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1993). 2 This phenomenon seems to parallel the minimal importance of the mother of Jesus in Paul’s letters. He mentions her only once and indirectly, when stressing that Jesus was born “of a woman” and “under the Law” (Gal 4:4). Besides using her existence to reaffirm the humanity (and Jewishness) of Jesus (for a similar use of a similar expression to describe the humanity of John the Baptist, see Luke 7:28 / Matt 11:11), Paul does not seem to care about who that “woman” was. This does not mean that Paul is particularly uninterested in Mary Magdalene or in Jesus’s mother, but that generally in his letters Paul does not seem to be interested in any detail regarding the earthly life of Jesus or in the persons who were around him when he was in his human flesh (see further n.
    [Show full text]
  • God Made Eve and Ordained Marriage
    GGOODD MMAADDEE EEVVEE aanndd oorrddaaiinneedd mmaarrrriiaaggee Several thousand years have passed since Adam and Eve became man and wife, but God hasn’t changed what he first instructed mankind regarding marriage in the Bible. Did you know that God was the One who decided that man and woman should marry? In Genesis 2 we find part of the wedding service spoken in many wedding ceremonies today. Men and women and marriage and children are very important to God. Marriage is not just a good idea… it’s a “God Idea”! But some people don’t know or don’t believe what God says about marriage. They say that marriage is something to be tried out to see if it will work—depending upon how you feel about it. Many folks are even suggesting that the idea of marriage is outdated. But what does the Bible say about marriage? Let’s take a look and find out! God decided that Adam needed a wife to help him and to be his companion. Genesis 2:18 The LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.” God decided that Adam should not live alone. - God was his Creator and knew what was best for him. - God didn’t ask Adam what he wanted or thought best. - God made the decision to make a wife for Adam. God loved Adam and wanted him to be complete. - God knew that Adam wouldn’t continue to be happy if he remained alone. - Because God loved Adam and wanted what was best for him, he decided to make a wife for him.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Look at Cain: from a Narrative Perspective
    신학논단 제102집 (2020. 12. 31): 241-263 https://doi.org/10.17301/tf.2020.12.102.241 Another Look at Cain: From a Narrative Perspective Wm. J McKinstry IV, MATS Adjunct Faculty, Department of General Education Presbyterian University and Theological Seminary In the Hebrew primeval histories names often carry significant weight. Much etymological rigour has been exercised in determining many of the names within the Bible. Some of the meaning of these names appear to have a consensus among scholars; among others there is less consensus and more contention. Numerous proposals have come forward with varying degrees of convincing (or unconvincing as the case may be) philological arguments, analysis of wordplays, possi- ble textual emendations, undiscovered etymologies from cognates in other languages, or onomastic studies detailing newly discovered names of similarity found in other ancient Semitic languages. Through these robust studies, when applicable, we can ascertain the meanings of names that may help to unveil certain themes or actions of a character within a narrative. For most of the names within the primeval histories of Genesis, the 242 신학논단 제102집(2020) meaning of a name is only one feature. For some names there is an en- compassing feature set: wordplay, character trait and/or character role, and foreshadowing. Three of the four members in the first family in Genesis, Adam, Eve, and Abel, have names that readily feature all the elements listed above. Cain, however, has rather been an exception in this area, further adding to Genesis 4’s enigmaticness in the Hebrew Bible’s primeval history. While three characters (Adam, Eve, and Abel) have names that (1) sound like other Hebrew words, that are (2) sug- gestive of their character or actions and (3) foreshadow or suggest fu- ture events about those characters, the meaning of Cain’s name does not render itself so explicitly to his character or his role in the narrative, at least not to the same degree of immediate conspicuousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Women with Jesus at the Cross and the Tomb Bible Study
    Women with Jesus at the Cross and the Tomb Bible Study [Please provide : musical accompaniment; Bibles, hymnals, and copies of the Bible study for attendees.] Beginning with Ash Wednesday and for 40 days following, we are in the period of the church year called Lent. It is a time to remember the suffering, death, and burial in preparation for the resurrection of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. As we approach and journey through Lent, let us focus on the women who were present when Jesus was crucified on Calvary and later at His tomb. Let us begin with prayer : Lord Jesus Christ, be with us as we study Your Word, meditating upon those women who were near You at the cross and the tomb. In Your holy name. Amen. Sing “When I Survey the Wondrous Cross” LSB 425 or 426, TLH 175, LW 114 or 115 I. Standing Near the Cross – read John 19:25-27 • Four women are mentioned: o Mary, the mother of Jesus o His mother’s sister – tradition holds this is Salome, mother of James and John, the sons of Zebedee o Mary, the wife of Clopas – the only time she or Clopas are mentioned o Mary Magdalene The women took a risk by being present at the cross. It took courage for them to stand there in the midst of the hatred and ridicule. Their attendance was intended to encourage Jesus. Jesus’ mother, Mary, is experiencing what Simeon had predicted years before in Luke 2:35. As she stood there, her grief must have been nearly unbelievable.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Mary Magdalene
    saint mary magdalene - relic tour Martha was the first to say, “Lord, I have believed that thou art Christ the Son of February 20 - March 22, 2013 the living God, who art come into this world” (John 11:27). Martha was witness to Jesus resurrection of her brother Lazarus (John 11:39-44). Martha’s relics are in Collégiale Sainte-Marthe in Tarascon. Early Christian Saints of God Mark Friedman and Janet Vogt A piece of the tibia of St. Mary Magdalene Saints of God, we stand be - fore you. This we ask you, pray for us. Ho - ly men and ho - ly wom - en, in your good - ness pray for us. 1. St. Ma - ry, God’s moth - er, our moth - er, 2. St. Jo-seph, St. Pe - ter, St. An - drew, 3. St. Mat - thew, St. Si - las, St. Bar - na - bas, 4. St. Mar - tha, St. Max-i-min, St. Ma-ry Sal-o-me, 1. All an - gels in heav - en, 1-4. pray for us. 2. St. Steph - en, St. Paul, 3. St. Luke, St. Ce-do-ni-us, 4. St. La - za - rus, St. Mar - tha, 1-4. pray for us. Ho - ly men and ho - ly wom - en, The Three Marys at the Empty Tomb Mary Magdalene, Mary Jacobe and Mary Salome 1. so ho - ly, 2. St. Law-rence, 3. St. Ma-ry Ja- co- be, pray for us. us. 4. St. Ma-ry Mag-da-lene. 1-4. in your good - ness, pray for us. us. 2, 4. Save us, Lord, from sin and ev - ‘ry A piece of the tibia of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Salome: the Image of a Woman Who Never Was
    Salome: The Image of a Woman Who Never Was Salome: The Image of a Woman Who Never Was; Salome: Nymph, Seducer, Destroyer By Rosina Neginsky Salome: The Image of a Woman Who Never Was; Salome: Nymph, Seducer, Destroyer, By Rosina Neginsky This book first published 2013 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2013 by Rosina Neginsky All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-4621-X, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-4621-9 To those who crave love but are unable to love. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations ..................................................................................... ix Epigraph: Poem “Salome” by Rosina Neginsky ........................................ xv Preface ...................................................................................................... xxi Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Part I: Creation of the Salome Myth Chapter One ................................................................................................. 8 History and Myth in the Biblical Story Chapter Two .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Adam and Eve—Community: Reading Genesis
    last day of creative work. In the second account, however, Man is created before anything else.2 Of course, it is not to be denied that the text did not spring up ex nihilo, created by a Volume 1, Issue 1 | Fall 2003 writer without reference to previous texts. The redactor undoubtedly had a number of Adam and Eve—Community: texts to which he could refer in creating the Reading Genesis 2-3 Genesis text, and he undoubtedly used works already familiar to him as sources. Or James E. Faulconer it is conceivable that there was no individual Brigham Young University redactor or set of redactors, but only the egin thinking about human community solidifying of an oral tradition. For our B and its possibility at the beginning, or purposes, it does not matter. In either case it almost at the beginning, one step after the is too much to assume that the final text is immemorial beginning.1 The biblical story merely contradictory. There may be of the creation of Man (’adam) and Woman contradictions within the text, but the more (’isha) and their expulsion from the garden obvious those contradictions are, the less places humans in the world in a particular likely it is that they are contradictions that way; it creates a habitation for human life so undo the text. It is too much to assume that that the history shared by humans and the the redaction of Genesis was a product of story that manifests community includes the blindness. A considerable amount of “cut possibility of gathering together all humans and paste” work was surely involved in the as unique individuals rather than simply as creation of the Genesis story, but unless we members of a collective.
    [Show full text]
  • Daughter of Eve, Femme Fatale, and Persecuted Artist: the Mythic Transgressive Woman in Oscar Wilde’S and Richard Strauss’ Salome
    MONOGRAFÍA Amaltea. Revista de Mitocrítica ISSN-e: 1989-1709 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/AMAL.51851 Daughter of Eve, Femme Fatale, and Persecuted Artist: The Mythic Transgressive Woman in Oscar Wilde’s and Richard Strauss’ Salome Corinne E. Blackmer1 Recibido: 1 de febrero de 2016 / Aceptado: 3 de julio de 2016 Abstract. Historically, Salome was a mundane figure who never catalyzed John the Baptist's death. However, in Christian Scripture, she becomes the seductress and fallen daughter of Eve. Her stepfather Herod promises Salome his kingdom if she dances for him, but she follows her mother’s wish to have John beheaded. In Strauss’s opera, after Wilde's Symbolist-Decadent play, Salome becomes independent of Herodias’ will, and the mythic avatar of the femme fatale and persecuted artist who Herod has killed after she kisses John's severed head. Her signature key of C# major, resolving to the C major sung by Herod and Jokanaan at her death, represents her tragic fate musically. Keywords: Salome; Herod; John the Baptist; femme fatale; Oscar Wilde; Richard Strauss; Symbolism; Decadence. Fille d’Éve, Femme Fatale, et l’Ártiste Persécutée: La Femme Transgressive Mythique dans la Salome d’Oscar Wilde et de Richard Strauss Résumé. Selon l’histoire, Salomé était une personnalité banale qui n’a jamais précipité la mort de Jean le Baptiste. En revanche, dans les textes chrétiens, elle devient la séductrice et la fille déchue d’Ève. Son beau-père Hérode promet à Salomé son royaume si elle danse pour lui, mais elle suit le souhait de sa mère qui exige la décapitation de Jean.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam, Eve, and the New and Everlasting Covenant
    Adam, Eve, and the New and Everlasting Covenant Jeffrey M. Bradshaw While the importance of account of the Creation and the Fall in Moses 1-4 cannot be overstated, a careful reading of Moses 5-8 is required to see the prior material in its overall context.1 Reeves observes: Most modern students of Bible fail to discern the pivotal significance which [the tale of Cain and Abel] plays in the present narrative structure of Genesis because of the enormous religious significance with which ancient, medieval, and modern Christian interpreters have invested the immediately preceding story of Adam and Eve in the Garden… I would like to suggest that while admittedly the episode of disobedience in the Garden was not a good thing, the story of Cain and Abel introduces something far worse into the created order… It represents a critical turning point in antediluvian history, and is… the key crime which leads ineluctably to the Flood.2 Foreseeing the similar rise of alluring wickedness in our own time, the Savior warned that “as it was in the days of Noah, so it shall be also at the coming of the Son of Man.”3 The illustration above is taken from Stephen Vincent Benét’s 1936 story The Devil and Daniel Webster, made into a popular film in 1941. Piazza characterizes the latter as “a fascinating allegory, filmed on the eve of World War II, of a society gone mad with materialism, a premonition of the opportunities and dangers awaiting the United States as it recovered from the Great Depression.”4 Old Scratch is portrayed as polite, refined, and soft-spoken—and as usual, he “gets the best lines” as he preaches his gospel of cold cash to a down-on-his-luck New Hampshire farmer.
    [Show full text]
  • God's Rejection of Cain Outside the Garden of Eden (Genesis 4:1-16)
    Concordia Seminary - Saint Louis Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary Master of Sacred Theology Thesis Concordia Seminary Scholarship Spring 5-18-2018 Falling Far from the Tree? God's Rejection of Cain outside the Garden of Eden (Genesis 4:1-16) Mark Remington Squire Concordia Seminary - St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.csl.edu/stm Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Squire, Mark Remington, "Falling Far from the Tree? God's Rejection of Cain outside the Garden of Eden (Genesis 4:1-16)" (2018). Master of Sacred Theology Thesis. 395. https://scholar.csl.edu/stm/395 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Concordia Seminary Scholarship at Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Sacred Theology Thesis by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FALLING FAR FROM THE TREE? GOD’S REJECTION OF CAIN OUTSIDE THE GARDEN OF EDEN (GENESIS 4:1–16) A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Department of Exegetical Theology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Sacred Theology By Mark Remington Squire April 2018 Approved by Dr. David L. Adams Advisor Rev. Thomas J. Egger Reader Dr. Joel C. Elowsky Reader © 2018 by Mark Remington Squire. All rights reserved. ii CONTENTS PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... v ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]