Durham E-Theses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Durham E-Theses Durham E-Theses The Neolithic Archaeology of the South west of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia AL-GHAMDI, SAUD,ABDULAZIZ How to cite: AL-GHAMDI, SAUD,ABDULAZIZ (2011) The Neolithic Archaeology of the South west of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3224/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The Neolithic Archaeology of the South west of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia S. Al-ghamdi PhD in Archaeology DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY DURHAM UNIVERSITY 2011 Chapter 3 CHAPTER 3: THE NEOLITHIC SEQUENCES OF THE NEAR EAST AND THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA AND A REVIEW OF THE HISTORY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN ARABIA 3.1 INTRODUCTION Having defined the geography of the Near East and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in Chapter 2, the aim of this chapter is to define a number of the core Neolithic sequences of the Near East and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and to critically evaluate the development of the discipline of archaeology within the Kingdom. Before commencing, however, it is first necessary to discuss some of the key models advanced to define the term Neolithic, and explain its development, within the Near East. The models range from Childe’s oasis theory of 1936 and Binford’s (1968) population expansion model based on post-Pleistocene adaptations, to Hodder’s (2000) focus on the way in which individual communities categorised plants and animals. As a Marxist, the first of these scholars was to attempt to roughly align the concept of archaeological ‘ages’ with that of the economic ‘stages’. He was also the first scholar to publically advocate the concept of a Neolithic ‘Revolution’ (Childe 1936:325), but this term has been criticised by several scholars (Helbaek, 1969), who believed that the change from food gathering to food production was largely evolutionary. Despite these criticisms, Childe was rather more flexible and held that the earliest domesticated animals and plants did not appear in one particular area, or at one point in time, but rather in different areas at different times and he warned that “The word ‘revolution’ must not be taken as denoting a sudden violent catastrophe, it is here used for the culmination of a progressive change in the economic structure and social organisation of communities that caused, or was accompanied by, a dramatic increase in the population affected – an increase that would appear as an obvious bend in the population graph were vital statistics available” (Childe 1950: 345). Accordingly, Childe suggested that a progressive desiccation in the Near East during the early Holocene led to the concentration of grasses, grass-eating animals, and humans around springs and oases and that this led to closer and closer relationship – resulting in domestication (Childe 1936: 77-78). 34 Chapter 3 This model, also known as the Propinquity theory, was subsequently criticised by a number of scholars for the lack of supporting environmental data, including Robert Braidwood (1960). Braidwood also disliked the terms ‘Mesolithic’ and ‘Neolithic’ because of the apparent confusion in differentiating between them and preferred to distinguish between an era of ‘food gathering’ and one of ‘food producing’ (1960). He advocated that the end of the food gathering phases was marked by a ‘terminal food- gathering phase’ and that the succeeding food producing stage was divisible into many eras and phases like the ‘incipient agriculture and domestication phase’ and successive eras of ‘primary village efficiency’, ‘established village efficiency’ in an era of ‘incipient urbanisation’ (Braidwood 1960). This model of cultural evolution sought to explain the emergence of highly specialised food-collecting adapted to certain highly specialised environments and, in turn, semi-permanent and permanent sedentary communities (Braidwood 1960). Being broadly descriptive in nature, however, Braidwood's model may have considered environmental data but failed in its turn to provide a clear driver or explanation for change. Such a driver was provided by Lewis Binford in 1968 when he argued that prehistoric populations developed until the food requirements of the group began to exceed the availability of unaltered standing crops in the local habitat. As no population could ever achieve a stable adaptation as it was continually expanding, its members would always be under strong selective pressure to develop new means of procuring food (Binford 1968). Binford thus suggested that the Neolithic arose through two main drivers; firstly, changes in the physical environment of a population, reducing the biotic mass of the region and thus the amounts of available food; or, secondly, the reduction of the biotic mass through population growth. In either of these events, the previous balance between population and standing unaltered crop was upset, and a more efficient extractive means would be favoured. Binford further suggested that if a population in the core zone of the natural distribution of particular crops and animals were forced into the edge zone with those species, adaptation or rather domestication would occur (Binford 1968: 331). For Binford, as with Childe before him, it was clear that such pressures would lead to the emergence of the Neolithic: “it is the context of such situations of strain in environment 35 Chapter 3 with plants and animals amenable to manipulation that we would expect to find conditions favouring the development of plant and animal domestication” (Binford 1968: 328). Further advancing these models, Colin Renfrew later adapted a model from geneticists (Cavelli Sforva 1960) in which this expanding population spread outwards from the ancient Near East through a process of adaptation and demic diffusion at a speed of 1 kilometre per year carrying with them the Neolithic and Indo-European languages (Renfrew 1987). In reaction to such processual models, Ian Hodder sought to shift the focus away from traditional studies of changes in terms of population growth, economic pressures and social competition, and attempted to focus instead on the enormous expansion of symbolic evidence from the home, settlements, and burials which had accompanied the spread of the Neolithic and began to ask why figurines, decorated ceramic, elaborate houses, and burial rituals appeared, and what their significance was (Hodder 1990)? In this way, Hodder argued that it was not just animals and plants that were domesticated, but human communities also as they adopted a collection of new concepts central to the origins of farming and the settled mode of life. In his view, these concepts related to the place of house and home, the ‘domus’, and that they provided both a metaphor and mechanism for social and economic transformation. In particular he argued that as: “economic change occurred larger Neolithic social groups were formed in order to produce more significant scales of domination and social prestige. Such arguments are facilitated by the fact that material culture is not only abstract structure, it is also practice thus the construction of major monuments involves real increases in labour input and the scale or intensity of social dependences.” (Hodder 1990: 310). Stressing that the domestication of plants and animals involved a delayed return for one’s labour, and the need for longer-term social structure and the protection of one’s interests, Hodder also anticipated this involved practical defence and warring as well as the need for social and structural change to provide everyday function (Hodder 1990). However 36 Chapter 3 disparate these models for the development of the Neolithic may appear, all appear to acknowledge that the Neolithic is a definable period within the archaeological sequences of the Near East and that this period may be recognised through key innovations such as the introduction of domesticated plants and animals, sedentary settlement and ground stone tools. 3.2 THE NEOLITHIC SEQUENCES OF THE NEAR EAST Having thus introduced a review of some of the core explanations and definitions of the Neolithic in the Near East, this section will examine the nature and character of the some of the earliest Neolithic sequences in the Near East, as this region was one of the earliest to experience these social and economic changes and is assumed to have played a key role in the transfer of such changes to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 3.2.1 IRAQ Over fifty years of sustained archaeological exploration of northern Iraq has provided much information as to the character and nature of the people who lived in this area and the presence of humans in the Kurdistan Mountains can now be traced back before 40,000 BC. It has been suggested that farming and animal husbandry developed in this area c. 8000 BC and that at c. 7250 BC communities moved down to the plains as illustrated by Jarmo and Al-Magzaliya (Braidwood 1950). These populations spread over the next millennia and colonised large areas of Iraq, including Hassouna and Samarra (Redman 1978). By 6000 BC clay utensils and vessels were manufactured and archaeologists can distinguish the various cultures and traditions in central and northern Iraq, for example Hassouna and Samarra, Halaf, Ubaid, Al-Warka, and Ninevite 5, of which, the Ubaid of southern Iraq were to have a considerable influence on Neolithic communities of Saudi Arabia.
Recommended publications
  • The Near & Middle East
    February 2021 February The Near & Middle East A Short List of Books, Maps & Photographs Maggs Bros. Ltd. Maggs Bros. MAGGS BROS. LTD. 48 BEDFORD SQUARE LONDON WC1B 3DR & MAGGS BROS. LTD. 46 CURZON STREET LONDON W1J 7UH Our shops are temporarily closed to the public. However, we are still processing sales by our website, email and phone; and we are still shipping books worldwide. Telephone: +44 (0)20 7493 7160 Email: [email protected] Website: www.maggs.com Unless otherwise stated, all sales are subject to our standard terms of business, as displayed in our business premises, and at http://www.maggs.com/terms_and_conditions. To pay by credit or debit card, please telephone. Cover photograph: item 12, [IRAQ]. Cheques payable to Maggs Bros Ltd; please enclose invoice number. Ellipse: item 21, [PERSIA]. THE ARABIAN PENINSULA Striking Oil in Abu Dhabi 1 [ABU DHABI]. VARIOUS AUTHORS. A collection of material relating to the discovery of oil in Abu Dhabi. [Including:] ABU DHABI MARINE AREAS LTD. Persian Gulf Handbook. Small 8vo. Original green card wrappers, stapled, gilt lettering to upper wrapper; staples rusted, extremities bumped, otherwise very good. [1], 23ff. N.p., n.d., but [Abu Dhabi, c.1954]. [With:] GRAVETT (Guy). Fifteen original silver-gelatin photographs, mainly focusing on the inauguration of the Umm Shaif oilfield. 9 prints measuring 168 by 216mm and 6 measuring 200 by 250mm. 14 with BP stamps to verso and all 15 have duplicated typescript captions. A few small stains, some curling, otherwise very good. Abu Dhabi, 1962. [And:] ROGERS (Lieut. Commander J. A.). OFF-SHORE DRILLING.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing a Chronology for Holocene Climate and Environmental Change from Mleiha, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates Adrian G
    Establishing a chronology for Holocene climate and environmental change from Mleiha, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates Adrian G. Parker, Frank Preusser, Joachim Eberle, Sabah Jasim and Hans-Peter Uerpmann Adrian Parker, Department of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxon, OX3 0BP Email: [email protected] The Holocene epoch has also been punctuated by a series of abrupt climatic events with several phases of hyper-aridity, which have coincided with changes observed in the archaeological record (Parker et al., 2006; Preston et al., 2012). To date, only a few fluvial or lacustrine records covering the early to mid-Holocene period from the region have been studied. Little or no information is available for the late Holocene from these geoarchive types (Parker and Goudie, 2008). The purpose of this ongoing study is to analyse sediments from geoarchives from the interior of SE Arabia in order to determine and build the past climatic context of the area against which the archaeology can be set. Key methods are being used to understand how changes in rainfall and aridity have varied over the time using physical, chemical and biological analyses. The Mleiha region of Sharjah Emirate provides a unique record for human occupation spanning the last 125,000 years from the Palaeolithic through to the modern day (Armitage et al., 2011; Uerpmann et al., 2013; Mouton, 1999). The Jebel Faya anticline forms a narrow, discontinuous bedrock ridge, which extends approximately 30 km from Jebel Buhais in the south, through Jabel Faya, Jebel Mleiha to Sha’biyyat As Saman, a few kilometres south-west of Dhaid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Al-Wahabi Movement and Its Historical Roots
    The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. Original Document Information ~o·c·u·m·e·n~tI!i#~:I~S=!!G~Q~-2!110~0~3~-0~0~0~4'!i66~5~9~"""5!Ii!IlI on: nglis Title: Correspondence, dated 24 Sep 2002, within the General Military Intelligence irectorate (GMID), regarding a research study titled, "The Emergence of AI-Wahhabiyyah ovement and its Historical Roots" age: ARABIC otal Pages: 53 nclusive Pages: 52 versized Pages: PAPER ORIGINAL IRAQI FREEDOM e: ountry Of Origin: IRAQ ors Classification: SECRET Translation Information Translation # Classification Status Translating Agency ARTIAL SGQ-2003-00046659-HT DIA OMPLETED GQ-2003-00046659-HT­ FULL COMPLETED VTC TC Linked Documents I Document 2003-00046659 ISGQ-~2~00~3~-0~0~04~6~6~5~9-'7':H=T~(M~UI:7::ti""=-p:-a"""::rt~)-----------~II • cmpc-m/ISGQ-2003-00046659-HT.pdf • cmpc-mIlSGQ-2003-00046659.pdf GQ-2003-00046659-HT-NVTC ·on Status: NOT AVAILABLE lation Status: NOT AVAILABLE Related Document Numbers Document Number Type Document Number y Number -2003-00046659 161 The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. Keyword Categories Biographic Information arne: AL- 'AMIRI, SA'IO MAHMUO NAJM Other Attribute: MILITARY RANK: Colonel Other Attribute: ORGANIZATION: General Military Intelligence Directorate Photograph Available Sex: Male Document Remarks These 53 pages contain correspondence, dated 24 Sep 2002, within the General i1itary Intelligence Directorate (GMID), regarding a research study titled, "The Emergence of I-Wahhabiyyah Movement and its Historical Roots".
    [Show full text]
  • Nile Valley-Levant Interactions: an Eclectic Review
    Nile Valley-Levant interactions: an eclectic review The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, Ofer. 2013. Nile Valley-Levant interactions: an eclectic review. In Neolithisation of Northeastern Africa, ed. Noriyuki Shirai. Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 16: 237-247. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:31887680 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP In: N. Shirai (ed.) Neolithization of Northeastern Africa. Studies in Early Near Eastern: Production, Subsistence, & Environment 16, ex oriente: Berlin. pp. 237-247. Nile Valley-Levant interactions: an eclectic review Ofer Bar-Yosef Department of Anthropology, Harvard University Opening remarks Writing a review of a prehistoric province as an outsider is not a simple task. The archaeological process, as we know today, is an integration of data sets – the information from the field and the laboratory analyses, and the interpretation that depends on the paradigm held by the writer affected by his or her personal experience. Even monitoring the contents of most of the published and online literature is a daunting task. It is particularly true for looking at the Egyptian Neolithic during the transition from foraging to farming and herding, when most of the difficulties originate from the poorly known bridging regions. A special hurdle is the terminological conundrum of the Neolithic, as Andrew Smith and Alison Smith discusses in this volume, and in particular the term “Neolithisation” that finally made its way to the Levantine literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Arabia.Pdf
    A saudi man with his horse Performance of Al Ardha, the Saudi national dance in Riyadh Flickr / Charles Roffey Flickr / Abraham Puthoor SAUDI ARABIA Dec. 2019 Table of Contents Chapter 1 | Geography . 6 Introduction . 6 Geographical Divisions . 7 Asir, the Southern Region � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �7 Rub al-Khali and the Southern Region � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �8 Hejaz, the Western Region � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �8 Nejd, the Central Region � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �9 The Eastern Region � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �9 Topographical Divisions . .. 9 Deserts and Mountains � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �9 Climate . .. 10 Bodies of Water . 11 Red Sea � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 11 Persian Gulf � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 11 Wadis � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 11 Major Cities . 12 Riyadh � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �12 Jeddah � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �13 Mecca � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Arabia 2019
    Saudi Arabia 2019 Saudi Arabia 2019 1 Table of Contents Doing Business in Saudi Arabia ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Market Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Market Challenges ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Market Opportunities ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Market Entry Strategy ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Political Environment................................................................................................................................................... 10 Selling US Products & Services .................................................................................................................................... 11 Agents and Distributors ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Establishing an Office .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Structure and Genetic Variation of a Mangrove Species (Avicennia Marina (Forssk.) Vierh) in the Farasan Archipelago
    Article Spatial Structure and Genetic Variation of a Mangrove Species (Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh) in the Farasan Archipelago Rahmah N. Al-Qthanin 1,* and Samah A. Alharbi 2 1 Biology Department, College of Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia 2 Biology Department, College of Applied Sciences, Umm-Al-Qura University, Makkah 21421, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 August 2020; Accepted: 18 November 2020; Published: 30 November 2020 Abstract: Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh is distributed in patches along the Farasan archipelago coast and is the most common mangrove species in the Red Sea. However, to date, no studies have been directed towards understanding its genetic variation in the Farasan archipelago. In this investigation, genetic variations within and among natural populations of Avicennia marina in the Farasan archipelago were studied using 15 microsatellite markers. The study found 142 alleles on 15 loci in nine populations. The observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity values were 0.351 and 0.391, respectively, which are much lower than those of earlier studies on A. marina in the Arabian Gulf. An inbreeding effect from self-pollination might explain its heterozygote deficiency. Population genetic differentiation (FST = 0.301) was similar to other mangrove species. Our findings suggest that the sea current direction and coastal geomorphology might affect genetic dispersal of A. marina. The more isolated populations with fewer connections by sea currents exhibited lower genetic variation and differentiation between populations. The genetic clustering of populations fell into three main groups—Group 1 (populations of Farasan Alkabir Island), Group 2 (populations of Sajid Island), and Group 3 (mix of one population of Farasan Alkabir Island and a population of Zifaf Island).
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Society for Arabian Studies 2009 Number 14 ISSN
    Bulletin of the Society for Arabian Studies 2009 Number 14 ISSN: 1361-9144 Registered Charity No. 1003272 2009 £5.00 1 Bulletin of the Society for Arabian Studies 2009 The Society for Arabian Studies President Bulletin of the Society for Arabian Studies Miss Beatrice de Cardi OBE FBA FSA Editor Dr Robert Carter Chairman Ms Sarah Searight Book Reviews Editor Mr William Facey Vice Chairman Dr St John Simpson Treasurer Col Douglas Stobie Honorary Secretary Mrs Ionis Thompson Grants Sub-Committee Prof. Dionisius A. Agius Honorary Secretary Dr St John Simpson Dr Lucy Blue Ms Sarah Searight Dr Harriet Crawford Dr Nelida Fuccaro Dr Nadia Durrani Dr Nadia Durrani Mr William Facey Dr Nelida Fuccaro British Archaeological Mission in Yemen Dr Paul Lunde (BAMY) Dr James Onley Mrs Janet Starkey Chairman Prof. Tony Wilkinson Dr Lloyd Weeks Prof. Tony Wilkinson Notes for contributors to the Bulletin The Bulletin depends on the good will of Society members and correspondents to provide contributions. News, items of general interest, ongoing and details of completed postgraduate research, forthcoming conferences, meetings and special events are welcome. Please contact the Honorary Secretary, Ionis Thompson. Email [email protected] Applications to conduct research in Yemen Applications to conduct research in Yemen should be made to the Society’s sub-committee, the British Archaeological Mission in Yemen (BAMY). Contact Professor Tony Wilkinson, Durham University, Department of Archaeology, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE. Tel. 0191 334 1111. Email [email protected] Grants in aid of research Applicants are advised to apply well ahead of the May and October deadlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Sea-Level Along the North Coast of Kuwait Bay
    Durham E-Theses Changing sea-level along the north coast of Kuwait bay Al-Asfour, Taiba Abdulmuhsen How to cite: Al-Asfour, Taiba Abdulmuhsen (1975) Changing sea-level along the north coast of Kuwait bay, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8119/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk CHANGING SEA-LEVEL ALONG THE NORTH COAST OF KUWAIT BAY by Taiba Abdulmuhsen Al-Asfour B.A. (Cairo) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Geography; at the University of Durham 1975 I I TO MY PARENTS i ABSTRACT Field investigations have been carried out to study the changes of sea level-along the north coast of Kuwait Bay. Four zones have been studied in detail viz: Kathma, Ghidhai, Mudairah and Al-Bahra.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery, Agriculture, and Malaria in the Arabian Peninsula
    Slavery, Agriculture, and Malaria in the Arabian Peninsula Benjamin Reilly OHIO UNIVERSITY PRESS ATHENS Contents List of Illustrations vii Preface and Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Traditional Arabian Agriculture 22 Chapter 2 Diggers and Delvers 49 African Servile Agriculture in the Arabian Peninsula Chapter 3 Case Study 82 Khaybar Chapter 4 Oasis Fever 102 Malaria as a Factor in Arabian Agricultural Slavery Chapter 5 Arabian Agricultural Slavery in the Longue Durée 123 Chapter 6 Conclusions 153 Notes 157 Glossary 181 Bibliography 185 Index 207 Introduction THE GOAL of this book is to describe, in as much detail as the sources permit, a system of slave and servile agricultural labor, employing mainly sub-Saharan Africans, which prevailed in the traditional Arabian Penin- sula. Previous studies of slavery in the Arabic world have focused almost exclusively on non-agricultural employments of slaves, most notably domestic labor, military servitude, or concubinage. The use of slaves in pro- ductive sectors of the economy such as agriculture has rarely been noticed in the literature, much less studied systematically. This book therefore is intended to address a quite considerable lacuna in our understanding of the institution of slavery, particularly African slavery, in the Arab world. As with most books about slavery, this book will deal heavily with the traditional concerns of social history: hierarchy, social mobility, demo- graphic processes, and the daily lives of subalterns. Nonetheless, this book belongs as much to the field of environmental history as it does to social history. As an academic subfield, the environmental history of the Middle East is only now beginning to be written.
    [Show full text]
  • Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic Foragers of the Karaburun Peninsula
    Journal of Field Archaeology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjfa20 Between Anatolia and the Aegean: Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic Foragers of the Karaburun Peninsula Çiler Çilingiroğlu , Malgorzata Kaczanowska , Janusz K. Kozłowski , Berkay Dinçer , Canan Çakırlar & Didem Turan To cite this article: Çiler Çilingiroğlu , Malgorzata Kaczanowska , Janusz K. Kozłowski , Berkay Dinçer , Canan Çakırlar & Didem Turan (2020): Between Anatolia and the Aegean: Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic Foragers of the Karaburun Peninsula, Journal of Field Archaeology To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1786929 Published online: 02 Aug 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yjfa20 JOURNAL OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1786929 Between Anatolia and the Aegean: Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic Foragers of the Karaburun Peninsula Çiler Çilingiroğlu a, Malgorzata Kaczanowskab, Janusz K. Kozłowskib, Berkay Dinçer c, Canan Çakırlar d, and Didem Turan a aEge University, Izmir, Turkey; bPolish Academy of Arts and Sciences, Krakow, Poland; cIstanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; dGroningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic periods of Turkey are poorly understood. The discovery of two sites Neolithization; prehistoric (Kocaman and Kayadibi) in the Karaburun Peninsula in coastal western Turkey opens a whole new Anatolia; lithics; Izmir; Turkey window into our understanding of these periods in Turkey and beyond by providing the first solid evidence for pre-Neolithic foragers. This article presents typological and technological properties of the lithics from these two open-air sites in terms of raw material selection, tool types, and technological preferences and discusses the results in relation to contemporary Anatolian, Aegean, southwest Asian, and southeast European industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Detrital Zircon Provenance of North Gondwana Palaeozoic Sandstones from Saudi Arabia
    Geological Magazine Detrital zircon provenance of north Gondwana www.cambridge.org/geo Palaeozoic sandstones from Saudi Arabia Guido Meinhold1,2 , Alexander Bassis3,4, Matthias Hinderer3, Anna Lewin3 and Jasper Berndt5 Original Article 1School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK; Cite this article: Meinhold G, Bassis A, 2Abteilung Sedimentologie/Umweltgeologie, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum Göttingen, Universität Göttingen, Hinderer M, Lewin A, and Berndt J (2021) Goldschmidtstraße 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany; 3Institut für Angewandte Geowissenschaften, Technische Detrital zircon provenance of north Gondwana 4 Palaeozoic sandstones from Saudi Arabia. Universität Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstrasse 9, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany; Eurofins water&waste GmbH, 5 Geological Magazine 158:442–458. https:// Eumigweg 7, 2351 Wiener Neudorf, Austria and Institut für Mineralogie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000576 Münster, Corrensstraße 24, 48149 Münster, Germany Received: 12 February 2020 Abstract Revised: 18 May 2020 Accepted: 18 May 2020 We present the first comprehensive detrital zircon U–Pb age dataset from Palaeozoic sand- First published online: 24 June 2020 stones of Saudi Arabia, which provides new insights into the erosion history of the East African Orogen and sediment recycling in northern Gondwana. Five main age populations Keywords: U–Pb geochronology; sediment provenance; are present in varying amounts in the zircon age spectra, with age peaks at ~625 Ma, detrital zircon; Palaeozoic; north Gondwana; ~775 Ma, ~980 Ma, ~1840 Ma and ~2480 Ma. Mainly igneous rocks of the Arabian– Saudi Arabia Nubian Shield are suggested to be the most prominent sources for the Ediacaran to middle Tonian zircon grains. Palaeoproterozoic and Archaean grains may be xenocrystic zircons or Author for correspondence: Guido Meinhold, Email: [email protected] they have been recycled from older terrigenous sediment.
    [Show full text]