DOCSLIB.ORG

Jewish State’ and Human Rights

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jewish State’ and Human Rights The ‘Jewish State’ and human rights Israel and the Family of Nations: The Jewish Nation-State and Human Rights by Alexander Yakobson & Amnon Rubinstein (reviewed by Haviv Rettig in The Jerusalem Post, Oct. 23, 2008): …. Released in English translation in Britain in July, Israel and the Family of Nations: The Jewish Nation-State and Human Rights, though accessible to the educated layman, is a thoroughly researched academic work. … The authors are Hebrew University history professor Alexander Yakobson, a former Meretz activist and Peace Now member with a regular op-ed column in Haaretz, and renowned professor of constitutional law Amnon Rubinstein, a Meretz minister of education in the Oslo years [and a retired Meretz MK– ed.] and author of the Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty. This background informs their argument. This is not a book that defends government policies. As Yakobson explained in a recent interview with The Jerusalem Post, … the two scholars are tackling … “an ideological assault … on the basic premise of a Jewish state and the two-state solution.” “Internationally this is a very widespread argument,” Yakobson notes. “Tony Judt in the New York Review of Books wrote that the very idea of a Jewish state is … an anachronism….” The significance: Judt “is not some Trotskyite or radical. He belongs to the liberal mainstream. …” … they quote Israeli sociologist Baruch Kimmerling arguing that Israel must change its Law of Return for the sake of the “normalization and democratization of the state.” Kimmerling is one representative of those learned detractors who argue that Israel’s relationship to the Jews of the world, its favoring a particular group of non-citizens (the Jewish Diaspora) over other non-citizens, is discriminatory and even racist. But, note Yakobson and Rubinstein, this view … is actually opposed to the theory and practice of democratic states, particularly in Europe. Their proof is exhaustive. In 2001, they write, a commission of European legal scholars was convened to advise the Council of Europe on constitutional issues “that conform to the standards of Europe’s constitutional heritage.” It concluded, in the authors’ words, that “it is a recognized European norm that a nation-state can maintain official ties with its [ethno-cultural] ‘kin’ outside its borders and treat them preferentially in certain areas, including immigration and naturalization.” Thus, the European lawyers, sitting as the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the “Venice Commission”), not only praised the connection of “kin minorities” abroad to their “kin states” through ethnic and cultural ties, but in their report noted “favorably the growing tendency of kin states” to act to protect their ethnic minorities abroad – minorities who are not and have never been citizens of that state. In fact, legislation offering both favorable naturalization and some benefits without naturalization to non-citizen “kin minorities” can be found in Ireland, Greece, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Russia and Armenia. International agreements protecting kin minorities exist between Austria and Italy (establishing specific rights for German-speakers in Tyrol), Denmark and Germany, Italy and Slovenia and among several “new democracies” in Eastern Europe. In Germany, the constitution and subsequent legislation have conferred on all ethnic Germans from ex-USSR countries the right to automatic citizenship. As the book explains, “This applied to a large population of ethnic Germans living in those areas for hundreds of years, without any civic or geographic connection with the modern German state.” Even Finland, “a long-standing Western liberal democracy” with a national identity that includes all citizens, the Swedish-speaking alongside the Finnish-speaking, has a Finnish-speaking law of return. According to this legislation, ethnic Finns who emigrated from modern-day Finland to lands in Russia and Estonia as far back as the 17th century enjoy Finnish governmental assistance in preserving their ethno-cultural identity where they live, while their immigration to Finland is expedited and defined by the state as a “repatriation” to their homeland. … Indeed, the Palestinians themselves will enjoy such a relationship with their own extensive diaspora, Yakobson points out. “Everyone understands that if and when there is a Palestinian Arab state it will have a law of return within its boundaries. …” … In dealing with the argument equating Zionism with colonialism – a favorite in both academia and Arab politics – the authors once again bring homegrown Israeli anti-Zionists into the ring. The claim that Zionism was “a movement of ‘pure’ colonialist settlement” is taken from the writings of Ben-Gurion University professor Oren Yiftachel, who explains in passing that this is true despite a few “clear differences when compared to other colonialist movements.” These differences, he elaborates in a footnote, are “the character of Zionism as an ethnic-national project rather than an economic one; the refugee status of most of the [immigrating] Jews; a loosely connected network of Jewish communities in the Diaspora rather than well-organized mother states; and the concept of ‘the Return to Zion’ anchored in the Jewish tradition.” In other words, Yakobson and Rubinstein note with some sarcasm, “Zionism is in every sense a colonialist phenomenon … except for its being a national movement not motivated by an economic profit motive, that it grew out of Jewish distress and was implemented by people definable as refugees, that the settlers did not have a colonial mother state and that the connection to the Land of Israel was part of the traditional historic identity of the Jewish people.” …. one is left with the sense that those arguing against the possibility of a Jewish and democratic state (and often against the viability of modern Israel) are more the victims of intellectual laziness than rabid ideology. Perhaps the clearest example of this is the claim made often in the Arab world and Western academia – and even among some Jews – that the Jews are merely a religious community and not a people, and therefore don’t “qualify” for a nation-state. “On the Left, it is usually said that ‘peoplehood’ should be defined by the people in question and not externally. This is why we rejected Golda Meir’s statement that the Palestinian Arabs are not a distinct ‘Palestinian people.’ We claim for the Jews the same privilege,” Yakobson insists. “The international community explicitly recognized the Jews as a people with national rights – the UN in voting for partition and a Jewish state in 1947, and the League of Nations which supported a ‘Jewish national home’ in Mandatory Palestine. Even those who speak of a binational state, like Judt, must base this on the premise that there are two national peoples, two national communities.” Most importantly, the Palestinians themselves “accept that there are two peoples here. In all their constitutional documents, the Palestinians define themselves as the Palestinian Arab people, part of the Arab nation. They never claimed that the Jews in this country are a religious community within the Palestinian people. In fact, maybe the only thing Jews and Palestinians agreed on is that they belong to two different peoples.” In short, he says, “the whole argument is absurd.” So absurd, in fact, that Yakobson wonders if “the right to national self-determination is some kind of a club with a ‘no Jews allowed’ sign hanging at the entrance. The principles of national self-determination are widely accepted by the Left worldwide as a universal principle. We support this right when it comes to the Palestinians. Why do many people on the Left refuse to apply this principle to the Jewish people?” AT THE end of the day, Yakobson and Rubinstein are doves, and their motive for writing the book reflects that sensibility. Efforts to undermine Israel’s legitimacy as a Jewish state are not just intellectually dishonest, Yakobson argues, but they are actually preventing peace…. “Whoever supports a two-state solution should know that you cannot then evade the question of the legitimacy of the Jewish state. If you attack the idea of a Jewish national home as colonialism and imperialism, you are contributing to the conflict and to the price the Palestinians have paid. And clearly,” Yakobson adds, “it is the Palestinians who have paid most of the price.” This article can be read in full at the Jeruselam Post Website..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israeli Politics Rutgers University – New Brunswick Department of Political Science Fridays 11:30Am – 2:30Pm Scott Hall Room 206
    Israeli Politics Rutgers University – New Brunswick Department of Political Science Fridays 11:30am – 2:30pm Scott Hall Room 206 Instructor: Geoffrey Levin Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Fridays, Upon Request Course Description: In proportion to its size, Israel is perhaps the most discussed and debated country in the world. Yet despite the global focus on Israel, few onlookers actually have a strong understanding of Israel’s complex and fragmented political system. This course will help you gain such an understanding by introducing you to the many political institutions, ideological visions, and demographic divisions that have driven Israeli politics from 1948 through the present day. While the course will familiarize you with many of the specifics of Israel – a Jewish state located in the Middle East – it also aims to give you a broader understanding of politics and how political institutions operate. Politics is, in a basic sense, the interaction between people and governing institutions. As a result, a considerable focus will be on the political institutions and peoples of modern Israel. Institutions include state organs such as the Knesset (the Israeli parliament), the judiciary, the premiership, and the military, as well as intermediaries such as political parties and the ideologies that guide them. You will also learn about the many ways people in Israel define themselves – Druze Arabs, the ultra-Orthodox (Haredim), Palestinian Christian citizens of Israel, Ethiopian Jews, Religious Zionist Jewish settlers, African asylum seekers, Ashkenazi Jews, Mizrahi/Sephardic Jews, LGBT Israelis, Israeli Arab Muslims, and others, with a focus on how these groups identify politically and how they interact with the Israeli political system.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Arabs and Jews: Dispelling the Myths, Narrowing the Gaps
    I SRA€LI ARABS ANDJ€WS Dispelling the Myths, Narrowing the Gaps Amnon Rubinstein THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE The Dorothy and Julius Koppelman Institute on American Jewish-Israeli Relations The American Jewish Committee protects the rights and freedoms of Jews the world over; combats bigotry and anti-Semitism and promotes human rights for all; works for the security of Israel and deepened understanding between Americans and Israelis; advocates public policy positions rooted in American democratic values and the perspectives of the Jewish heritage; and enhances the creative vitality of the Jewish people. Founded in 1906, it is the pioneer human-relations agency in the United States. Israeli Arabs and Jews: Dispelling the Myths, Narrowing the Gaps By Am non Rubinstein Dorothy and Julius Koppelman Institute on American Jewish-Israeli Relationsof the American Jewish Conmmittee The Dorothy and Julius Koppelman Institute on American Jewish-Israeli Relations, founded in 1982 as an arm of the American Jewish Committee, is an interpreter of Israeli and American Jewry to each other, and seeks to build bridges between the world's largest Jewish communities. Specifically, its goals are achieved programmatically through a variety of undertakings, including: • Exchange programs over the years bringingIsraeli politicians, academicians, civil servants, and educators to the United States so that they may learn about the religious pluralism and political dynamism of the American Jewish com- munity. Hundreds of Israelis have participated in these dialogue-oriented mis- sions cosponsored by the Institute and itsIsraeli partners, the Jerusalem Municipality, the Oranim Teacher Training Institute, and the Ministry of Education, Government of Israel. • Studies of the respective communities, particularlyof their interconnectedness, published in both Hebrew and English, in conjunction with the Argov Institute of Bar-han University.
    [Show full text]
  • HERZLIYA CONFERENCE SPEAKERS and MEMBERS of the BOARD Michal Abadi-Boiangiu Executive Vice President, Comptroller Division, First International Bank of Israel
    HERZLIYA CONFERENCE SPEAKERS AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD Michal Abadi-Boiangiu Executive Vice President, Comptroller Division, First International Bank of Israel. Served as Deputy Director General of the Ministry of Health while also serving as Chairperson of MI Holdings, a position in which she led the privatization of Israel Discount Bank. Holds a B.A. in Economics and Accounting. Leah Achdut Deputy Director General for Research & Planning of the National Insurance Institute of Israel. Served as Director of the Institute for Economic and Social Research, and as Economic Advisor to the Trade Union Federations. Received an M.A. in Economics from the HebrewUniversity of Jerusalem. Aharon Abramovitch Director-General of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Served as Director- General of the Ministry of Justice, and as a legal advisor for the Jewish Agency, the World Zionist Organization, the World Jewish Restitution Organization and Keren Hayesod. Served as a member of the board of directors of the Israel Museum, the Israel Lands Administration and El Al. Earned a degree in law from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Prof. Oz Almog Professor of Land of Israel Studies at Haifa University. Author of Sabra: The Creation of the New Jew and Farewell to Srulik - Changing Values Among the Israeli Elite. His research areas focus on semiotics, the sociological history of Israeli society, and Israeli popular culture. Holds a Ph.D. in Sociology from Haifa University. Chen Altshuler Founder of the Green Fund and Director of Research at Altshuler Shaham. Previously, Chief Analyst at Altshuler Shaham and director of various public companies. Earned a B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Galchinsky on Yakobson and Rubinstein, 'Israel and the Family of Nations: the Jewish Nation-State and Human Rights'
    H-Human-Rights Galchinsky on Yakobson and Rubinstein, 'Israel and the Family of Nations: The Jewish Nation-State and Human Rights' Review published on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 Alexander Yakobson, Amnon Rubinstein. Israel and the Family of Nations: The Jewish Nation- State and Human Rights. London: Routledge, 2008. x + 246 pp. (cloth), ISBN 978-0-415-46441-3. Reviewed by Michael Galchinsky (Georgia State University)Published on H-Human-Rights (September, 2010) Commissioned by Rebecca K. Root The Theory and Practice of a "Jewish and Democratic" State Israel’s Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty (passed in 1992) classifies Israel as a “Jewish and Democratic State.” Alexander Yakobson and Amnon Rubinstein, a historian and a law professor respectively, examine whether a state built to satisfy the national aspirations of its majority population can be a democratic state for all its citizens. Rather than comparing Israel’s practice to abstract rights norms or principles of democratic theory, Israel and the Family of Nations measures the state’s behavior against that of Western democracies. Hence the authors’ approach is comparative and pragmatic. Their response to the question of whether a Jewish state and a liberal democracy are compatible is that “no ... contradiction exists” (p. 2). The early chapters provide a history of the origins of Zionism and the founding of the state, while the later chapters offer direct comparisons with other democracies. Much of the early focus is on defending the idea that the Jews are primarily a national rather than religious group. The authors demonstrate that the state gained recognition--in the Balfour Declaration and the UN Partition Plan-- in large part because the British government of 1917 and the UN General Assembly of 1947 decided Jews were a nation with a right to self-determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating the Arab-Palestinian Minority in Israeli Society: Time for a Strategic Change Ephraim Lavie
    Integrating the Arab-Palestinian Minority in Israeli Society: Time for a Strategic Change Ephraim Lavie Contributors: Meir Elran, Nadia Hilou, Eran Yashiv, Doron Matza, Keren Aviram, Hofni Gartner The Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research Integrating the Arab-Palestinian Minority in Israeli Society: Time for a Strategic Change Ephraim Lavie Contributors: Meir Elran, Nadia Hilou, Eran Yashiv, Doron Matza, Keren Aviram, Hofni Gartner This book was written within the framework of the research program on the Arabs in Israel and was published thanks to the generous financial support of Bank Hapoalim and Joseph and Jeanette Neubauer of Philadelphia, Penn. Institute for National Security Studies The Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), incorporating the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, was founded in 2006. The purpose of the Institute for National Security Studies is first, to conduct basic research that meets the highest academic standards on matters related to Israel’s national security as well as Middle East regional and international security affairs. Second, the Institute aims to contribute to the public debate and governmental deliberation of issues that are – or should be – at the top of Israel’s national security agenda. INSS seeks to address Israeli decision makers and policymakers, the defense establishment, public opinion makers, the academic community in Israel and abroad, and the general public. INSS publishes research that it deems worthy of public attention, while it maintains a strict policy of non-partisanship. The opinions expressed in this publication are the authors’ alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute, its trustees, boards, research staff, or the organizations and individuals that support its research.
    [Show full text]
  • 91 Liberal Zionism, Comparative Constitutionalism, and the Project Of
    Liberal Zionism, Comparative Constitutionalism, and the Project of Normalizing Israel Nimer Sultany* In the !rst half of the 1990s two important constitutional laws were enacted by the Israeli Knesset - Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty and Basic Law: Freedom of Occupation. The enactment of these laws meant that Israel had, for the !rst time, a partial bill of rights. Equally novel was the appearance of the phrase “Jewish and democratic” with both laws emphasizing in their statement of purpose “the values of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.” Whereas the ethnic element was emphatically present, the notion of equality was deliberately absent. Behind this absence was the status of the Palestinian minority and relations between religious and secular Jews.1 In spite of this glaring omission, this came to be known as a “constitutional revolution.” Amnon Rubinstein – law professor, former member of the Knesset and minister – is considered to be one of the main minds and forces behind it. The second half of the 1990s witnessed the forceful introduction of the phrase “a state for all its citizens,” into the Israeli public debate, mainly by leaders and intellectuals of the Palestinian minority. Palestinian citizens of Israel challenged the Jewishness of the state and demanded democratization and equality. In reaction to these challenges, many Zionists formulated defenses of the “Jewish and democratic” state. Others attempted to enact laws and draft constitutions or consensus-formation *Nimer Sultany is a Lecturer in Public Law at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. A previous version of this article was published in The Palestine Yearbook of International Law, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unexplored Option: Jewish Settlements in a Palestinian State
    Penn State International Law Review Volume 25 Article 4 Number 1 Penn State International Law Review 7-1-2006 The nexU plored Option: Jewish Settlements in a Palestinian State David Morris Philip Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr Recommended Citation Philip, David Morris (2006) "The nexU plored Option: Jewish Settlements in a Palestinian State," Penn State International Law Review: Vol. 25: No. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol25/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Penn State International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Unexplored Option: Jewish Settlements in a Palestinian State David Morris Phillips* I. Introduction The withdrawal of Israeli settlers and soldiers from the Gaza Strip in August and September 2005 inevitably focused both Israeli and world attention upon the fate of Jewish settlements on the West Bank.' World focus only intensified with formation of a new Israeli government led by the Kadima party and its head, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert,2 following Hamas' victory in the Palestinian National Authority elections.3 In accord with prior campaign pledges,4 0 lmert announced his intention to * Professor of Law, Northeastern University School of Law. This article was presented at faculty seminars at Touro Law School and Northeastern University School of Law. The author would like to thank Darleen Cantelo, Sholom Fine and Stacey Dippong, Northeastern University law students, and Sue Zago, Sharon Persons, and Alfreda Russell, Northeastern University law librarians, for their invaluable research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen 23. März – 5. April 2008
    Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 23. März – 5. April 2008 1. Jüdische Siedlungen im a head-on collision with international law and with Westjordanland our friends overseas. But the second question is relevant even to Israelis Anfang März war in israelischen Medien von einem who do not agree with my premises. […] Is it Deal zwischen dem Verteidigungsministerium und desirable, from a viewpoint of purely Israeli self- Vertretern der jüdischen Siedler im Westjordanland interest, to flout international public opinion and berichtet worden, demzufolge 18 Außenposten der disregard our friends' advice in order to establish Siedler aufgelöst und im Gegenzug neue Häuser in settlements in which a small fraction of our anderen, größeren Siedlungen gebaut werden population lives? […] würden. Premierminister Olmert bestätigte Ende des In order to survive, we must rely on the active help Monats den angestrebten Bau von neuen of others. It is folly to antagonize these others, and Wohneinheiten in Ostjerusalem und Givat Ze’ev. above all the US, in order to satisfy the religious and Außenposten sind indes noch nicht geräumt political wishes of a minority. Rice's admonition worden, auch wenn das Verteidigungsministerium should be heard loud and clear in Jerusalem.” ankündigte, eine Räumung werde bald beginnen. Amnon Rubinstein, JPO 25.03.08 Die amerikanische Außenministerin Rice rief Israel dazu auf, die Siedlungserweiterungen einzustellen Fooling ourselves und betonte, dass diese nicht den Obligationen der "Had Peace Now not published reports from time to Roadmap entspreche. time, it is doubtful anyone would have been aware of Palästinenser hatten die Siedlungstätigkeiten zuvor the continuing construction in the settlements. […] als größtes Hindernis für den Friedensprozess It is difficult to understand the point of the High bezeichnet.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Election (2021) Special ‘Who I Am Voting for on 23 March’
    Israel Election (2021) Special ‘Who I am voting for on 23 March’ CALEV BEN-DOR INTRODUCTION FLEUR HASSAN-NAHOUM ‘WHY I AM VOTING FOR LIKUD’ TERRY NEWMAN ‘WHY I AM VOTING FOR YESH ATID’ EMMANUEL NAVON ‘WHY I AM VOTING FOR NEW HOPE’ PETER LERNER ‘WHY I AM VOTING FOR LABOUR’ MK ODED FORER ‘WHY I AM VOTING FOR YISRAEL BEITEINU’ GULI DOLEV-HASHILONI ‘WHY I AM VOTING FOR THE ARAB JOINT LIST’ SHRAGA ALWEISS ‘WHY I AM VOTING FOR YAMINA’ ITTAY FLESCHER ‘WHY I AM (RELUCTANTLY) VOTING FOR MERETZ’ 1 Indispensable reading for anyone who wishes to understand Middle Eastern politics; well researched, balanced, deeply committed to Israel but equally reading to ask tough questions about its policies; a unique combination of values and realpolitik. Shlomo Avineri, Professor of Political Science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. Fathom is a great publication that I thoroughly enjoy and always find useful. Hussein Agha has been involved in Palestinian politics for almost half a century. He was an Academic Visitor at St. Antony’s College, Oxford and is co-author of A Framework for a Palestinian National Security Doctrine. Fathom’s great: accessible and expert analysis on strategic, cultural and economic issues relating to Israel. Amidst a lot of a sloganeering, Fathom provides nuanced discussion. As such, it fills a real gap. Amnon Rubinstein, Israeli law scholar, politician, and columnist. A member of the Knesset between 1977 and 2002, he served in several ministerial positions. The importance of the Israel/Palestine conflict for world peace is sometimes exaggerated, but for those of us focused on the conflict, for those of us who hope for peace here, even amidst the surrounding chaos, ‘two states for two peoples’ remains the necessary guiding idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming Israel: War, Peace, and the Politics of Israel's Identity POL 345 Y1
    Becoming Israel: War, Peace, and the Politics of Israel's Identity POL 345 Y1 Professor Emanuel Adler Fall 2013-Winter 2014 Lectures: Wednesday 2:00-5:00 Office Hours: Monday 2:00-4:00 Office: Munk School of Global Affairs, at the Observatory 315 Bloor Street, Room 218; Phone: 416-946-8931. E-mail Address: [email protected] Teaching Assistant: Israela Stein: [email protected] Israelis probably are among the few peoples in the world who, even after several generations of independent existence, still ask: "who were we?," "who are we?," "who is we?," "what are we?, "where are we?," and "who will we become?" Attempting to show why this is so, this course introduces students to Israeli politics, society, institutions and political practice from the distinctive perspective of the development of Israeli identity (identities). Special attention will be given to the sources of Israeli identity, the main players involved in its politics, and the role of regional war and the peace process in its development and inner conflicts. In particular, the course will trace the construction of Israeli identity, starting from the early times of Zionism and ending with the contemporary identity conflicts over the failed Oslo peace process with the Palestinians and the recent Intifada. I will try to show that there is a direct connection between Zionist constituting ideologies, the nature of Israel's institutions and society, and the split soul of Israeli identity. Course requirements: A review paper (20%) on Yael Zerubavel’s book Recovered Roots (maximum 5 pages, double space), which is due on November 6, 2013; a mid-term paper (30%) on the origins of Israeli political and social institutions (maximum 10 pages, double space), which is due on March 5, 2014 and two exams (25% each) at the end of the fall and winter semesters.
    [Show full text]
  • Box Folder 19 13 Shinui. 1976
    MS-763: Rabbi Herbert A. Friedman Collection, 1930-2004. Series F: Life in Israel, 1956-1983. Box Folder 19 13 Shinui. 1976. For more information on this collection, please see the finding aid on the American Jewish Archives website. 3101 Clifton Ave, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220 513.487.3000 AmericanJewishArchives.org Here is soiaething new - real news How come only Shinui can publish this ad ? Many polltical parties advertise in many newepapera. In their ada, which are paid for from the fundl paid to them by the Treuury, they show pictures, graphic design.a and cheap commercial slogans. · Only SBINUl - .financed exclualvely by it. membera' voluntary contributions - can call you to join tta rank8 aa a full fledged equal member. Our equality tmpliel equality in rights u well u in obllgationa. In two montlll, our .internal elections wlll be held. We wW elect our repreeenUv tlvea to our counclL Our elections are direct, pentem&l and secret. We have no ruerved seats for sectors, atara, oldtimers or new ollm. We practise the democracy we believe lD. Therefore only SBINUJ can publllh thll ad. •Be our partner . Stop grumbling abOut the time.a and join thoae who are actively doing something to change them. Become a member of SHINUI. Vote in our - your - elections. 8BINUI bellevee uncomprcmillngly in the rule of law; SlllNl1I believes that our only route to economic independence la increasing productivity &Dd curbing expenditure budgeted for public service•; 8lllNUI believes in electoral ref<Orm; 8BINl1I bellevea fn citizens' involvement ln the pollUcal process. TEL AVIV: G, Bebov Shir TeL 2!6606 llAJFA: 4S, Bebov Rutb Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming Israel: War, Peace, and the Politics of Israel's Identity POL 345 Y 1 Y
    Becoming Israel: War, Peace, and the Politics of Israel's Identity POL 345 Y 1 Y Professor Emanuel Adler Fall 2018-Winter 2019 Lectures: Tuesday 2:00-4:00pm Office Hours: Tuesday 10:00-12:00am Office: Munk School of Global Affairs, at the Observatory 315 Bloor Street, Room 218; Phone: 416-946-8931. E-mail Address: [email protected] Teaching Assistant: Reut Marciano E-mail Address: [email protected] Israelis probably are among the few peoples in the world who, even after several generations of independent existence, still ask: "who were we?," "who are we?," "who is we?," "what are we?, "where are we?," and "who will we become?" Attempting to show why this is so, this course introduces students to Israeli politics, society, institutions and political practice from the distinctive perspective of the development of Israeli identity (identities). Special attention will be given to the sources of Israeli identity, the main players involved in its politics, and the role of regional war and the peace process in its development and inner conflicts. In particular, the course will trace the construction of Israeli identity, starting from the early times of Zionism and ending with the contemporary identity conflicts over the failed Oslo peace process with the Palestinians and the recent Intifada. I will try to show that there is a direct connection between Zionist constituting ideologies, the nature of Israel's institutions and society, and the split soul of Israeli identity. Course requirements: A review paper (20%) on Yael Zerubavel’s book Recovered Roots (maximum 5 pages, double space), which is due on November13, 2018; a mid-term paper (30%) on the origins of Israeli political and social institutions (maximum 10 pages, double space), which is due on March 5, 2019; a midterm exam (25%) on December 4, 2018, and a final exam, whose date will be determined by the Faculty of Arts and Science.
    [Show full text]