Asian Development Bank Pcr: Taj 33483

ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK PCR: TAJ 33483

PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

ON THE

EMERGENCY FLOOD REHABILATION Loan 1714-TAJ (SF)

TAJIKISTAN

June 2004

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

Currency Unit – somoni (TJS)

At Appraisal At Project Completion (as of 31 October 1999) (as of 1 Aug 2003) TJS1.00 = $0.0007 $3.09 $1.00 = TJS1,436 TJS 0.32362

ABBREVIATIONS

ADTA – advisory technical assistance CLCND – Center for Liquidation of the Consequences of Natural Disaster DEES – Department of Environment and Emergency Situations DME – disaster management expert GBAR – Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region GDP – gross domestic product EA – executing agency IA – implementation agency PIU – project implementation unit RRS – Regions of Republican Subordination SDR – special drawing rights TA – technical assistance UNOCHA – United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs WB – The World Bank

NOTE

In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

CONTENTS

Page

BASIC DATA i MAP v I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. EVALUATION OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 A. Relevance of Design and Formulation 2 B. Project Outputs 2 C. Project Costs 3 D. Disbursements 3 E. Project Schedule 3 F. Implementation Arrangements 3 G. Conditions and Covenants 4 H. Related Technical Assistance 4 I. Consultant Recruitment and Procurement 4 J. Performance of Consultants, Contractors, and Suppliers 4 K. Performance of the Borrower and the Executing Agency 5 L. Performance of ADB 5 III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 6 A. Relevance 6 B. Efficacy in Achievement of Purpose 6 C. Efficiency in Achievement of Outputs and Purpose 6 D. Preliminary Assessment of Sustainability 6 E. Environmental, Sociocultural, and Other Impacts 6 IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 A. Overall Assessment 7 B. Lessons Learned 7 C. Recommendations 7 APPENDIXES 1. Project Cost Estimates and Actual Costs 10 2. Implementation Schedule 11 3. Implementation Arrangements 12 4. Loan Covenants 13 5. TA Completion Report 17 6. Domestic Consultant Contracts 18 7. Civil Work Contracts 19 8. Material and Equipment Procurement Contracts 25 9. Overall Rating of the Project 29

BASIC DATA

A. Loan Identification

1. Country Tajikistan 2. Loan Number 1714 3. Project Title Emergency Flood Rehabilitation 4. Borrower Republic of Tajikistan 5. Executing Agency Department of Environment and Emergency Situations 6. Implementing Agency Center for Liquidation of the Consequences of Natural Disasters 7. Amount of Loan SDR3,601,000 ($5 million equivalent at appraisal) 8. PCR Number PCR: TAJ 810

B. Loan Data 1. Fact-Finding – Date Started 18 August 1999 – Date Completed 28 August 1999

2. Loan Negotiations – Date Started 25 October 1999 – Date Completed 29 October 1999

3. Date of Board Approval 2 December 1999

4. Date of Loan Agreement 22 December 1999

5. Date of Loan Effectiveness – In Loan Agreement 21 March 2000 – Actual 7 January 2000 – Number of Extensions

6. Closing Date – In Loan Agreement 30 June 2002 – Actual 20 March 2003 – Number of Extensions 1

7. Terms of Loan – Interest Rate 0 – Maturity (no, of years) 32 – Grace Period (no. of years) 8

8. Disbursements a. Dates Initial Disbursement Final Disbursement Time Interval

29 March 2000 20 March 2003 36 mo.

Effective Date Original Closing Date Time Interval

07 January 2000 30 June 2002 30 mo.

b. Amount (SDR) Category or Original Last Amount Net Amount Undisbursed Subloan Allocation Revised Canceled Amount Disbursed Balance Allocation Available Civil Works: Main 763,000 634,774 510 634,264 634,264 0 Civil Works: Minor 195,000 105,806 105,806 105,806 0 Municipal Construction 1,635,000 2,383,132 2,383,132 2,383,132 0 Materials Equipment 302,000 300,587 300,587 300,587 0 Public Infrastructure 180,000 33,405 33,405 33,405 0 -Resettlement Consulting Serv. 50,000 50,638 50,638 50,638 0 Remuneration Consulting Services 36,000 13,716 13,716 13,716 0 Equip. & Vehicles Consulting 22,000 42,942 161 42,781 42,781 0 Services: Training Interest Charge 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 0 Unallocated 382,000 0 Total 3,601,000 3,601,000 671 3,600,329 3,600,329 0

9. Local Costs (Financed) – Amount ($) 1,339,975 – Percent of Local Costs 78.2 – Percent of Total Cost 22.9

C. Project Data

1. Project Cost ($‘000)

Cost Appraisal Estimate Actual

Foreign Exchange Cost 3,250 4,140 Local Currency Cost 3,000 1,713 Total 6,250 5,853

2. Financing Plan ($‘000)

Cost Appraisal Estimate Actual Implementation Costs Borrower-Financed 1,250 1,193 ADB-Financed 4,950 4,614 Other External Financing 0 0 Total 6,200 5,807

IDC Costs Borrower-Financed 0 0 ADB-Financed 50 46 Other External Financing 0 0 Total 6,250 5,853 ADB = Asian Development Bank, IDC = interest during construction.

iii

3. Cost Breakdown by Project Component ($‘000) Component Appraisa l Estimate Actual A. Civil Works 2,380 2,014 B. Construction Materials 2,270 3,087 C. Equipment 420 388 D. Resettlement 350 70 E. Consulting Services and Incremental Costs 150 248 F. Contingencies 1. Physical 290 0 2. Price 340 0 Subtotal (A-F) 6,200 5,807 G. Interest During Construction 50 46

Total 6,250 5,853

4. Project Schedule Item Appraisal Estimate Actual Date of Contract with Consultants 31 Oct 1999 02 Jan 2000 Completion of Engineering Designs Civil Works Contract Date of Award 15 Nov 1999 02 Dec 1999 Completion of Work 31 Dec 2001 31 Dec 2002 Equipment and Supplies Dates First Procurement 01 Nov 1999 03 Dec 1999 Last Procurement 30 Nov 1999 26 Oct 2001

5. Project Performance Report Ratings Ratings

Development Implementation Implementation Period Objectives Progress From 02 December 1999 to 31 December 1999 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 January 2000 to 31 March 2000 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 April 2000 to 30 June 2000 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 July 2000 to 30 September 2000 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 October 2000 to 31 December 2000 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 January 2001 to 31 March 2001 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 April 2001 to 30 June 2001 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 July 2001 to 30 September 2001 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 October 2001 to 31 December 2001 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 January 2002 to 31 March 2002 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 April 2002 to 30 June 2002 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 July 2002 to 30 September 2002 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 October 2002 to 31 December 2002 Satisfactory Satisfactory From 01 January 2003 to 31 March 2003 Satisfactory Satisfactory

D. Data on Asian Development Bank Missions No. of No. of Specialization Name of Mission Date Persons Person-Days of Membersa Fact-Finding 18–28 August 1999 3 26 a, a, c Inception 11–17 December 1999 2 14 a, e Special Loan Administration 16–21 February 2000 1 6 a Review Mission 1 17–21 August 2000b 2 10 d, e Review Mission 2 22 Nov–1 Dec 2001b 2 20 b, e Review Mission 3 26–31 August 2002b 2 12 b, e Project Completion Reviewc 15–25 August 2003 2 22 b, e a a = senior project specialist, b = transport specialist, c = senior programs specialist, d = senior financial specialist, e = associate project analyst and project officer. b In conjunction with other projects: TA 3319TAJ Flood Disaster Management (ADB. Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors on a Proposed Loan and Technical Assistance Grant to the Republic of Tajikistan for the Emergency Flood Rehabilitation Management. Manila). c The project completion review mission consisted of Kari Saari, transport specialist and mission leader; and Nimfa de los Reyes, project officer.

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. Floods and landslides in July 1999 damaged public infrastructure in Tajikistan significantly. The need was urgent to help the Government cope with the disaster, especially considering its budgetary constraints, which were expected to continue over the medium term. The Emergency Flood Rehabilitation Project was initiated to help the Government rehabilitate public infrastructure in the affected areas, and to mitigate the risk that these expenditures would disrupt the Government’s macroeconomic stabilization and post-conflict development programs. In line with the policy of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to support rehabilitation efforts of its developing member countries after disasters, the Project was designed to enable Tajikistan to continue with development expenditures that otherwise would have been diverted for disaster rehabilitation.

2. The Project’s immediate objective was to help restore public infrastructure that the severe floods and landslides had damaged in the hardest-hit areas of Tajikistan. The long-term objective was to reduce poverty; it was expected to help rehabilitate the infrastructure, on a sustainable basis, in impoverished areas. ADB’s Board of Directors approved a loan of SDR3.6 million (equivalent to $5.0 million) from its Asian Development Fund sources on 2 December 1999. The Loan Agreement was signed on 22 December 1999 and the loan became effective on 7 January 2000.

3. Rehabilitation was to be for damage in seven rayons of the Sughd Oblast (known as the Leninabad Oblast when the loan was approved), seven rayons of Khatlon Oblast, and seven rayons of the Regions of Republican Subordination (RRS) and the Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region (GBAR). Project priorities were established jointly with government authorities at the national and local levels, and the World Bank (WB). The planned Project comprised the following components: (i) civil works for rehabilitation or replacement of 81 kilometers (km) of priority roads, 300 meters (m) of bridges, 38 km of riverbank protection works, 47 km of irrigation canals, and 52 hectares (ha) of irrigation works, along with minor municipal civil works for the reconstruction of 17 km of water supply networks, 37 km of power distribution lines, 17 km of telephone lines, and 5 schools; (ii) construction materials comprising sand, stone, bitumen, reinforcing steel, cement, fuel and lubricating oil, drainage and sewer pipes, poles and cables for electrical and telephone lines, school building materials, and fittings; (iii) equipment for damaged irrigation and water supply pumps, water flow meters and regulators, electric power transformers, telephones, and fittings, as well as school furniture, educational equipment, and textbooks; (iv) resettlement works for public infrastructure comprising access roads, power, water supply, and schools in two resettlement areas for 288 households in the Asht Rayon of Sughd Oblast; (v) 290 person-months of domestic consulting services for design and review, construction supervision, quality control, and monitoring of environment and social impacts. Training was to be provided by the Disaster Management Expert (DME) of the Advisory Technical Assistance (ADTA) Project 3319-TAJ,1 or through fellowships for government bodies and community groups in disaster project management.

1 ADB,1999.. Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors on a Proposed Loan and Technical Assistance (TA) Grant to the Republic of Tajikistan for the Emergency Flood Rehabilitation Management. Manila (TA 3319-TAJ: Flood Disaster Manangement, for $250,000, financed from the Japan Special Fund, was approved 2 December 1999 and completed in March 2003).

II. EVALUATION OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION

4. At appraisal, the following risks were envisaged: (i) breakdown of the post-conflict political peace accord in Tajikistan; (ii) subsequent landslides and flooding that would damage the completed works; (iii) inadequate construction supervision because of the relative inexperience of the Implementing Agency (IA), Center for Liquidation of Consequences of Natural Disasters (CLCND); (iv) inadequate multisectoral coverage over a widespread area; and (v) inadequate maintenance of completed works. The risks were to be reduced by reducing the tensions that foster conflict, giving wide geographic coverage and flexibility to avoid direct conflict, close guidance and advice from ADB, and regular ADB review missions.

A. Relevance of Design and Formulation

5. The Project was proposed under ADB’s policy on rehabilitation assistance after disasters. The need was urgent to help the Government cope with the disaster despite severe budget constraints. The Project was regarded highly relevant from start to finish.

6. The Project would have been more successful had it financed an international consultant to assist the IA, which had only limited experience in international cooperation. ADB assumed that the IA was already trained by a similar WB3 loan approved a year earlier. But in fact, the WB project encountered serious problems, and the loan was canceled in April 2001 after 81% disbursements due to misprocurement. The Borrower was asked to pay back $588,462 for the concerned contracts. The WB loan project provided no training to the IA personnel. The training was planned to be given through the TA attached to the ADB loan. But the TA was implemented poorly during the first 20 months of the Project, so the training envisaged was too late to meet the Project’s development objectives.

B. Project Outputs

7. Following are project outputs: (i) Through the civil works component, 58 km of priority roads were rehabilitated, plus 12 bridges totaling 477 m, and 32 km of riverbank protection works. Five public schools were rehabilitated, and two new schools were built. Also rehabilitated were 44 irrigation wells, 4 irrigation pumps and regulators, 5 headworks (water intakes), and 18.5 km of irrigation canals, along with minor municipal civil works, for the reconstruction of 14 km of water supply networks. The rehabilitation of irrigation systems also included works to strengthen river banks at 46 sites; (ii) Through the municipal power and telephone networks component, 35.4 km of power distribution lines of 0.4, 10, and 35 KV capacity were restored (this included installation of transformers at some sites), as well as 17 km of telephone lines; (iii) Construction materials were procured separately for all civil works contracts. These materials comprised sand, stones, bitumen, reinforcing steel, cement, fuel and lubricating oil, drainage and sewer pipes, poles and cables for electrical and telephone lines, school building materials, furniture, and educational equipment.

2 Report and Recommnedation of the President (RRP), para. 32-33 indicate that the performance CLCND was performing satisfactorily in implementing the WB loan. 3 World Bank, 1998. Emergency Flood Assistance Project. Washington DC (Credit Numbers 31230 and 31231 for SDR3.8 million and SDR1.5 million).

(iv) Equipment was provided to repair water pumps and other equipment associated with rehabilitation of municipal irrigation and water supply systems, and telephone lines, transformers and other equipment necessary to rehabilitate municipal telephone networks; (v) Two hundred eighty-eight households were resettled in two areas in the Asht Rayon of Leninabad Oblast, including provision of land, new permanent housing, and public infrastructure (comprising 7 km of access roads, power and water supply systems, telephone facilities, and building of schools for 500 students); and (vi) Domestic consulting services for 300 person-months were provided for design review, construction supervision, quality control, and monitoring of environmental and social impacts. The TA consultants gave some training to CLCND staff and community groups in disaster management.

C. Project Costs

8. The Project was estimated to cost $6.25 million equivalent, of which $3.25 million (52%) was in foreign exchange and $3.00 million equivalent (48%) in local currency (Appendix 1). Cost estimates included land acquisition and compensation for resettled persons, and physical and price contingencies, but excluded taxes and duties. The financing sources envisaged at appraisal were ADB: $5.00 million (SDR3.6 million), equivalent to 80% of the project cost; and Government of Tajikistan: $1.25 million, 20% of the project cost. The actual total project cost was $5.85 million, consisting of ADB’s share, $4.66 million; and the Tajikistan Government’s share, $1.19 million. The decrease in actual project cost in dollars was caused by the decline of the exchange rate of Special Drawing Rights from $1.37 to $1.25 during project implementation.

D. Disbursements

9. The Government established an imprest account to expedite project implementation through timely release of loan proceeds. After loan effectiveness, ADB advanced an initial $100,000 to the account to assess the EA’s ability to handle imprest funds before remitting the agreed $0.5 million. The amount initially transferred to the account was unusually small because of the Project’s emergency nature and approved retroactive financing. More than 6 months later, ADB completed its initial assessment and remitted the full amount. Imprest funds were limited, so procurement of materials and civil works slowed, and contractors stopped working due to lack of materials. That is also why retroactive financing was not used. The imprest account was established in the Orien Bank, Dushanbe, Tajikistan, and was liquidated in accordance with ADB’s Loan Disbursement Handbook. ADB’s statement of expenditures procedure was used to reimburse expenditures and to liquidate the imprest account for payments of $50,000 or less. CLNCD maintained records of the imprest account and expenditures by accepted accounting standards.

10. The undisbursed loan proceeds of SDR670.61 ($918.52 equivalent) were cancelled and the loan account was closed 20 March 2003.

E. Project Schedule

11. During appraisal the Project was expected to be implemented over a 2-year period, with completion by 31 December 2001. However, the Project was actually completed in September 2002, with some counterpart funded work not completed until December 2002. the delay in 4 project completion resulted from delays in establishing the full imprest account, which in turn, delayed the design, mobilization, and implementation of the civil works contracts. Severe weather in the spring of 2002 also contributed to the delays. Appendix 2 shows the planned and actual implementation schedules. The scheduled loan closing date of 30 June 2002 was extended by 6 months to 31 December 2002, but the loan accounts were actually closed 20 March 2003. F. Implementation Arrangements

12. The Executing Agency (EA) for the Project was the Department of Environment and Emergency Situations (DEES), headed by a Deputy Prime Minister. The IA for the Project was CLCND, headed by its director who reports to the DEES head. The CLCND director was supported by a project implementation unit (PIU) headed by his deputy. The PIU had an accountant, a translator-interpreter, social and environmental specialists, a team of ADB- financed domestic consultants in Dushanbe, and field engineers in the affected districts who helped design and supervise the Project civil works. The Project’s implementation arrangements were adequate except for its institutional weaknesses (Appendix 3). G. Conditions and Covenants

13. All the major covenants were complied with, and on time (Appendix 4). Progress reports were submitted to ADB on regular basis and the Borrower’s project completion report was submitted in April 2003. However, the usage of some materials financed from loan proceeds could not be ascertained.

H. Related Technical Assistance

14. An advisory technical assistance on flood disaster management (footnote 1) was approved together with the loan. The TA was to help CLCND in project implementation, including in project management, design reviews, improvement of construction supervision methods, and project reporting. The TA was also to build capacity in the efficient coordination of preparedness, relief, and rehabilitation response phases of disaster management; to train CLDND personnel; and for fellowships for training in disaster project management for government bodies and community groups. Appendix 5 is the TA completion report. The TA failed to meet its development objectives and to provide the planned training due to changes of the DMEs and delays in their inputs. The domestic social and environmental specialists working through the loan used their time without being able to finalize their tasks because of a 10-month absence (August 2000–May 2001) of the assigned DME (the consultant who was selected left the Project, and finding a replacement was a lengthy process), and the failure of the first replacement DME (May–June 2001) to contribute to the TA objectives. Concurrently with this TA, ADB financed TA 3495-TAJ: Overall Disaster Management,5 which helped the second replacement DME (September 2001–January 2002) review the social and environmental policy issues, and assess the institutional aspects of TA 3319-TAJ (which the domestic specialists were supposed to have done, guided by the first two DMEs), and to include them in the TA evaluation and monitoring.

I. Consultant Recruitment and Procurement

15. Domestic consultants were recruited for 300 person-months, using ADB’s Guidelines on the Use of Consultants. There were difficulties in upgrading the consultants’ professional skills

5 ADB. 2000. Technical Assistance to the Republic of Tajikistan for Strategy fo Improved Flood Management. Manila (TA 3495-TAJ, approved on 5 September 2000, for $550,000). 5 because they were not familiar with external quality control of a civil works contract (the DME of TA 3319-TAJ was intended to train them, but that did not happen for reasons already explained). But the 19 domestic consultants performed satisfactorily. Appendix 6 lists the consultants.

16. Goods were procured in accordance with ADB’s Guidelines for Procurement. Bids from international contractors were unlikely because of the small size, the emergency situation, and the scattered nature of the contracts and project components. Hence, civil works for all project components were carried out by the respective state enterprises that operated under the Ministry of Transportation and Roads Authority, Ministry of Irrigation and Water Resources, and Regional Power Network Enterprises. Tajik procurement methods acceptable to the ADB were used in their selection and some works were carried out using force account procedures. Designs were by Tajikistan state design institutions. The civil works comprised 57 major contracts, 14 minor contracts, and 4 contracts for public infrastructure for resettlement. Appendix 7 lists civil works contracts.

17. Procurement of construction materials and equipment was through international shopping (IS) and direct purchase. Fifty-one contracts for materials supply, and 10 contracts for equipment supply, were awarded through the Project. Appendix 8 lists materials and equipment contracts.

J. Performance of Consultants, Contractors, and Suppliers

18. Performance of the domestic consultants was generally evaluated as satisfactory. The consultants reviewed the detailed designs and recommendations submitted for CLCND approval. The consultants supervised construction effectively, and provided quality control. They prepared contract documents and reports, which were included in the field visit reports of TA 3319-TAJ. The domestic social and environmental specialists prepared a resettlement plan for 288 people who lost homes during the 1999 floods.

19. The contractors’ performance was rated satisfactory as works were completed as scheduled and the quality of works was generally good. All civil works contracts were completed, and handed over to responsible organizations.

20. Initial difficulties were encountered in procurement of goods. The problem was in following ADB’s guidelines on procurement, which led to delays in procurement and full disbursement of advances for the imprest account. Also, CLCND had limited experience in handling ADB-financed projects. But once the necessary experience and knowledge were acquired, procurement of materials and equipment was satisfactory. The goods procured met the technical specifications of the contracts, and Tajikistan’s requirements. The performance of the suppliers was considered satisfactory.

K. Performance of the Borrower and the Executing Agency

21. The Loan Agreement was signed and became effective on time. The Project was implemented successfully, despite initial difficulties, and completed only 6 months later than planned. The Borrower’s performance was satisfactory.

22. The attached advisory TA failed to help IA improve its institutional capacity as planned. The IA personnel made up for the lack of DME advice by learning through work. The IA suffered a serious blow when the CLCND director was removed in November 2001 after allegations of corruption in use of the WB loan funds. 6

23. The CLCND deputy director, who later became director, was dedicated, and managed the Project successfully during its last year. CLCND gained such excellent skills and experience from the Project that, after loan closing, it was made a disaster management unit of the Ministry of Nature Protection.

L. Performance of ADB

24. During project preparation and appraisal, ADB helped the Government to prepare action needed to meet the conditionalities required for loan effectivity. This allowed the loan to become effective within 1 month of signing. An inception mission was fielded within one month after loan effectiveness to start disbursements and assist the IA in opening the imprest account. ADB decided to delay in making full advances to the imprest account as ADB was concerned with the capability of the IA to manage such funds. ADB would initially advance only $100,000 to the imprest account, which was insufficient to pay the advance payments for the numerous civil works contracts and material procurement contracts. The originally planned $500,000 imprest fund limit was reached only in September 2000; that delayed civil works considerably. ADB also failed to ensure that the DME of the attached TA would train the designers, supervisors, environmental specialists, and social protection specialists. The second brief loan review mission was fielded in August 2000 in association with another loan review mission. Based on the mission’s recommendation, ADB transferred the full advance of $0.5 million to the imprest account in the following months.

25. ADB administered the loan project more intensively only after September 2001, when it noted the poor performance of the second DME of the TA. ADB had to ask the consultant firm to nominate a third DME. A midterm review mission was fielded in November 2001. That mission advised the IA on proper reporting and accounting procedures. The new DME then started training CLCND personnel in office technology and reporting, and began training the supervising consultants.

26. ADB’s performance was rated only partly satisfactory because performance was unsatisfactory during March 2000–August 2001. That was because of delays in remitting the full imprest funds, delays in fielding the Midterm Review Mission, and failure to effectively supervise the DMEs of TA 3319-TAJ. ADB’s performance improved from September 2001 until loan closing, since there were no delays in the processing of withdrawal applications or contract approvals. ADB’s loan review missions visited most contract sites and paid closer attention to project implementation. ADB also asked the DME to visit all construction sites, to advise civil works supervisors, and to prepare progress reports on all contracts and sites.

III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE

A. Relevance

27. The Project was highly relevant because it helped repair flood damage to public infrastructure (roads, power lines, and telephone lines), helped relocate 288 persons to safe locations from a river valley that was prone to renewed floods, and helped in the building of flood protection levees for several thousand hectares of farmland. The Project was completed as initially planned, except that loan funds were used to procure all materials and to finance 56% of the civil works while government counterparts financed the remaining 44% of the civil works.

B. Efficacy in Achievement of Purpose

28. The Project fully achieved its immediate objective, and contributed to ADB and the Government’s development goals for flood disaster management. Risks recognized during project preparation were mitigated through wide geographic coverage and flexibility, which avoided direct conflict. But the Project failed to give the promised close guidance and advice to CLCND. Funds were limited, so the Project could not rehabilitate new damage caused by floods during project implementation. The Project is accordingly rated as less efficacious.

C. Efficiency in Achievement of Outputs and Purpose

29. The investment was used efficiently to counter flood damage to public infrastructure in the selected communities and sites. During project implementation, new floods occurred and rehabilitation needs were far larger than the loan allowed. The Government mitigated effects of these new disasters using knowledge and experience gained in the Project. The Project is rated as efficient

D. Preliminary Assessment of Sustainability

30. The project results are sustainable, if the Government provides sufficient funds for maintenance. The civil works suffered only minor damage from new floods during project implementation. Only one site was completely destroyed. That was in Roshtkala, Gorno- Badakhsan Autonomous Region (GBAR), where a natural dam burst above a village on the opposite side of a river, destroying river bank protection works and wiping out the village, killing its 27 inhabitants. The loan should have included contingencies for repair of flood damage during project implementation. Since Government funding for maintenance works is not assured, the Project is less likely to be sustainable.

E. Environmental, Sociocultural, and Other Impacts

31. The Project had no adverse environmental impacts. Its environmental and sociocultural impacts were positive. The Project alleviated the effects of floods and subsequent relocation of people and infrastructure to safer locations, and protected infrastructures. In fact the new and strengthen riverbank protection works have reduced the adverse impact of new floods in the project area. The knowledge and experience gained from the Project has enabled the local officials to cope with new floods in a more professional and systematic manner. The new schools constructed have allowed students to attend classes, even during flooding season. The institutional impacts were rated as moderate.

IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A. Overall Assessment

32. The Project was implemented as appraised—but 12 months later (ADB financed works 6 months and some government financed works 12 months later) than envisaged at appraisal. Its overall rating is “successful” (Appendix 9).

B. Lessons Learned

33. The Project was divided into unnecessarily small contracts: 87 civil works and 61 materials procurement contracts. Management of so many contracts suffered because the number of supervisors was limited and the IA was inexperienced and weak, and the sites were scattered across Tajikistan which rendered effective supervision difficult.

34. Materials should not have been procured separately and should have been included in the respective civil works, mechanical and electrical works contracts. The large number of contracts with materials to be supplied by other suppliers made the use of materials difficult to monitor and supervise. CLCND could not verify exact consumption of fuel, cement, and bitumen for each contract. WB cancelled its loan due to misprocurement, because material bids came from nonexistent companies. It would have been better to have had fewer contractors (even if there were many sites), with the contractors responsible for procuring the materials.

35. The Tajik procurement systems and designs were used in civil works. But due to the large number of contracts, the design and supervision were not always done properly.

36. The Project would have benefited from a full-time international consultant particularly during the first year of implementation to train and supervise the project implementation staff, domestic designers, and supervisors. ADTA 3319-TAJ, which was to provide those required services during five 1-month DME field visits, failed to do that. CLCND personnel and supervisors needed training—even in office technology.6

37. The loan should have included plans and covenants to stimulate the Government to finance maintenance of the rehabilitated/repaired structures, such as roads, levees, and schools. Only 3 years after the original repair, the embankments again need repair—but no funds are available.

C. Recommendations

1. Project-Related

38. Future Monitoring. The Government should monitor performance of the rebuilt infrastructures and provide funds for their maintenance.

39. Covenants. There is no need to monitor any of the covenants after project completion.

40. Further Action or Follow-Up. ADB should follow up on financing of maintenance of sites rehabilitated through the loan.

41. Additional Assistance. Mitigation of the effects of the constant natural catastrophes (avalanches, landslides, mudflows, floods) requires constant external aid because Tajikistan’s resources are limited. Scientists have predicted, and are looking into, potential large-scale catastrophes such as the possible failure of the natural dam that made Sarez Lake in a tributary of the Panj River. Various international aid agencies such as WB, the Aga Khan Foundation, and some NGOs are investigating these potential catastrophes.

6 For example, CLCND staff need training in preparation of tables using spreadsheets. During the first 2 years, CLCND staff prepared numerous large tables by hand, calculating the sums by abacus and having them typed using Micrtosoft Word. Later, the third DME of the ADTA gave training in spreadsheet (Excel) calculation. 9

42. Timing of the Project Preparation Audit Report. The Project Preparation Audit Report can be made at any time, but should preferably be in 2005 to draw the Government’s attention to maintenance of the completed civil works.

2. General

43. The following should be considered during appraisal of emergency projects:

(i) Even an emergency project benefits from an explicit, well-prepared logical framework, but this Project had none. A good logical framework would have helped ADB to administer the Project better; (ii) The EA’s capacity for rehabilitation of flood damage should not have been overestimated, even if the Project had an ongoing flood rehabilitation project financed by other institutions (WB in this case). An indepth assessment of the institutional capacity of the EA and IA should be routinely carried out during appraisal and appropriate institutional measures should be provided prior to project implementation. The EA was assumed to be familiar with internationally financed projects which turned out to be incorrect. Problems encountered in the WB project were transferred to the ADB-financed project; (iii) Generally, more time should be spent estimating project costs. In this case, the costs were estimated correctly, largely because the local contract sums were based on fixed, predetermined rates imposed on the contractors; (iv) In rehabilitation projects for flood disaster, contingency is necessary to prepare for additional rehabilitation needs that new floods cause during project implementation; (v) Emergency rehabilitation projects must be implemented immediately, so planning must be quick. Thus, it is important to engage an experienced full-time consultant to direct the planning, in cooperation with the EA, for each emergency rehabilitation project; and (vi) Activities of similar projects in one country should be closely coordinated. ADB should have coordinated the flood disaster TAs 3319-TAJ and 3495-TAJ, which partially duplicated one another.

44. The following should be considered during implementation:

(i) Use of an imprest account is a good practice in an emergency rehabilitation project, but the transfer of funds to the account should be planned carefully, in cooperation with the Borrower and the consultant; and the capacity of the EA to manage such imprest funds should be thoroughly assessed. Imprest funds should be sufficient to meet the urgent needs of the EA for at least three months; and (ii) The EA, PIU, and supervisors should have been supported by an international consultant to help in overall management of the contracts (even when local procurement practice is followed) when institutional weaknesses were noted in (a) preparing the designs and cost estimates, (b) preparing the bidding documents, (c) inviting and evaluating bids, (d) supervising the works (especially explaining the tasks, rights, and responsibilities of the engineer), (e) preparing withdrawal applications, (f) preparing project reports, and (g) evaluating performance. 10 Appendix 1 PROJECT COST ESTIMATES AND ACTUAL COSTS

Table A1: Project Cost Estimates and Actual Costs ($‘000) Appraisal Estimate Actual

Item Foreign Local Total Foreign Local Total Exchange Currency Cost Exchange Currency Cost A. ADB Financing 1. Civil Works a. Main 451 369 820 i. Leninabad 250 230 480 ii. Khatlon 230 220 450 iii. RRS and GBAR 90 40 130 b. Minor 69 68 137 i. Leninabad 120 130 250 ii. Khatlon 5 5 10 iii. RRS and GBAR 5 5 10 2. Construction Materials a. Leninabad 610 300 910 1,345 0 1,345 b. Khatlon 620 370 990 1,321 0 1,321 c. RRS and GBAR 300 70 370 421 0 421 3. Equipment a. Leninabad 285 0 285 335 0 335 b. Khatlon 110 0 110 47 0 47 c. RRS and GBAR 25 0 25 6 0 6 4. Resettlement (Leninabad) 180 70 250 26 17 43 5. Consulting Services a. Remuneration 0 70 70 0 66 66 b. Equipment 50 0 50 18 0 18 c. Training 20 10 30 55 0 55 6. Contingencies a. Physical 140 100 240 0 0 0 b. Price 160 130 290 0 0 0 7. Interest and Other Charges 50 0 50 46 0 46 During Construction Subtotal (A) 3,250 1,750 5,000 4,140 520 4,660 B. Government Financing 1. Civil Works a. Main i. Leninabad 0 370 370 0 381 381 ii. Khatlon 0 335 335 0 412 412 iii. RRS and GBAR 0 160 160 0 172 172 b. Minor i. Leninabad 0 160 160 0 71 71 ii. Khatlon 0 15 15 0 7 7 iii. RRS and GBAR 0 10 10 0 14 14 2. Resettlement (Leninabad) 0 100 100 0 27 27 3. Contingencies a. Physical 0 50 50 0 0 0 b. Price 0 50 50 0 0 0 4. Incremental Costs 0 0 0 0 109 109 Subtotal (B) 0 1,250 1,250 0 1,193 1,193 Total 3,250 3,000 6,250 4,140 1,713 5,853 ADB = Asian Development Bank, RRS = Regions of Republican Subordination; GBAR = Gomo-Badakhshan Autonomous Region.

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Planned and Actual

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Activity Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

1. Civil Works a. Roads, Bridges, and River bank protection b. Power and Telephone Facilities c. Irrigation and Water Supply d. Schools e. Resettlement Structures

2. Procurement of Equipment a. Power and Telephone Facilities b. Schools c. Resettlement Structures

3. Construction Materials a. Steel b. Cement c. Diesel/Lube Oil

4. Consulting Services a. Financed from Loan (Domestic Consultants) b. TA Consultant (international)

Counterpart Officers c. Financed by the Government

Preparation of contract documents for procurement, and selection of consultants

Finalization of designs, and signing of contracts Appendix 2 Implementation of works, procurement of equipment and materials, and consulting services.

11 12 Appendix 3

IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS

President's Administration

Division of Ecology and Emergency Situations

Center for Liquidation of Consequences of Natural Disasters

International Disaster Management Expert of Project Implementation Unit TA 3319-TAJ

Domestic Consultants

Contract 1 Contract 2 Contract n

Appendix 4 13

LOAN COVENANTS

Covenant Reference to Status of Loan Document Compliance 1. The Borrower shall have the Project carried out with Loan Agreement Complied due diligence and efficiency, and conforming with sound (LA) with administrative, financial, engineering, environmental, Section 4.04 (a) infrastructural, and social practices.

2. The Borrower shall make available, as quickly as LA, Section 4.02 Complied needed, the funds, facilities, services, land, and other with resources that are required, in addition to loan proceeds, to carry out of the Project and to operate and maintain project facilities.

3. In carrying out the Project, the Borrower shall have LA, Section 4.03 Complied competent and qualified consultants and contractors, (a) with acceptable to the Borrower and the Asian Development Bank (ADB), employed to an extent and upon terms and conditions satisfactory to the Borrower andADB.

4 The Borrower shall have the Project carried out in LA, Section 4.03 Complied accordance with plans, design standards, specifications, (b) with work schedules, and construction methods acceptable to the Borrower and ADB. The Borrower shall furnish, or have furnished, to ADB, promptly after their preparation, plans, design standards, specifications, and work schedules, and any subsequent material modifications, in such detail as ADB reasonably requests.

5. The Borrower shall maintain, or have maintained, LA, Section 4.06 Partly records and accounts adequate to identify the eligible items (a) Complied financed from loan proceeds, to disclose their use in the with as Project, to record progress of the Project (including costs), usage of and to reflect, in accordance with sound and consistently some loan- maintained accounting principles, the operations and financed financial condition of the Borrower’s agencies that are materials responsible for carrying out the Project and for operation of could not be Project facilities. ascertained.

6, The Borrower shall (i) maintain, or have maintained, LA, Section 4.06 Complied separate accounts for the Project; (ii) have such accounts (b) with. Audited and related financial statements audited annually, in project accordance with appropriate auditing standards that are accounts for applied consistently by independent auditors whose FY2001 were qualifications, experience, and terms of reference are received on acceptable to ADB; (iii) furnish to ADB, as soon as 4 Apr 2002; available but no later than 9 months after the end of each and for 2002, fiscal year, certified copies of such audited accounts and on 25 financial statements, and the auditors’ report relating to February those accounts and statements (including the auditors’ 2003. 14 Appendix 4

Covenant Reference to Status of Loan Document Compliance opinions on use of the loan proceeds and compliance with covenants of the Loan Agreement, as well as on the use of the procedures for imprest account/statements of expenditures), all in English; and (iv) furnish to ADB other information concerning such accounts and financial statements, and their audits, as ADB reasonably requests.

7. The Borrower shall furnish, or have furnished, to ADB all LA, Section 4.07 Complied reports and information that ADB reasonably requests (a) with concerning (i) the loan, and the expenditure of loan proceeds and maintenance of its service; (ii) goods and services financed from loan proceeds; (iii) the Project; (iv) the administration, operations, and financial condition of the Borrower’s agencies responsible for carrying out the Project and operation of the Project facilities; (v) financial and economic conditions in the Borrower’s territory, and the Borrower’s international balance of payments position; and (vi) any other matters relating to purposes of the loan.

8. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the LA, Section 4.07 Complied Borrower shall furnish, or have furnished, to ADB monthly (b) with and annual reports on how the Project is carried out, and on operation and management of Project facilities. Such reports shall be submitted in the form, and in such detail, and within the time period that ADB reasonably requests. The reports shall also indicate progress made and problems encountered during the quarter under review, steps taken or proposed to remedy the problems, and the proposed program of activities and expected progress during the following quarter.

9. Soon after physical completion of the Project, but no LA, Section 4.07 Complied later than 3 months later or by a date that the Borrower and (c) with. The ADB agree on, the Borrower shall prepare and furnish to report was ADB a report, in the form and detail that ADB reasonably received on requests, on the Project’s initial operation and execution, 11 April including its cost, the Borrower’s performance of its 2003. obligations under the Loan Agreement, and accomplishment of the loan’s purposes.

A. Project Executing Agency

10. In its capacity as the Project’s Executing Agency, the LA, Schedule 6, Complied Department of Environment and Emergency Situations para. 1 with shall be responsible for overall execution and coordination of the Project.

B. Project Implementation Agency

Appendix 4 15

Covenant Reference to Status of Loan Document Compliance 11. The Center for Liquidation of the Consequences of LA, Schedule 6, Complied Natural Disaster (CLCND) shall be the project implementing para. 2 with unit (PIU), with responsibility for day-to-day project implementation, in close coordination with technical departments of the project oblasts.

12. Within CLCND, a PIU shall be established before the LA, Schedule 6, Complied effective date of the Loan. The CLCND deputy director shall para. 3 with be head of the PIU. The PIU shall be responsible for: (i) review of project designs; (ii) recruitment and supervision of consultants; (iii) supervision and quality control of civil works, and equipment installation; (iv) ensuring feedback from beneficiaries; (v) liaison with ADB and submission of reports and information required under this agreement.

C. Project Implementation Unit

13. The head of PIU shall be assisted on a full-time basis LA, Schedule 6, Complied by an adequate number of domestic consultants recruited para. 4 with pursuant to Schedule 5 of this agreement. The skills and numbers of such staff shall be agreed by the Borrower and ADB.

D. Midterm Review

14. The Borrower and ADB shall jointly carry out a midterm LA, Schedule 6 Complied review during the second year of project implementation to (5) with assess, among other things, (i) the status of project implementation, (ii) design and construction standards, (iii) physical progress and disbursements made in relation to the implementation schedule, (vi) performance of consultants and contractors, and (v) status of compliance with the covenants stipulated in the Loan Agreement.

E. Maintenance of Project Facilities

15. The Borrower shall ensure that project facilities are LA, Schedule 6, Partly maintained in accordance with sound administrative para. 6 complied policies and practices by the project oblasts through their with concerned departments, and the utility companies that operate and maintain such facilities.

F. Environment

16. In implementing the Project, the Borrower shall ensure LA, Schedule 6, Complied that all mitigating measures described in the summary initial para. 7 with environmental examination for the Project are fully implemented at the concerned sites. The Borrower shall 16 Appendix 4

Covenant Reference to Status of Loan Document Compliance also ensure prompt attainment of all necessary environmental permits and approvals, and that any environmental impact assessment required by the Project is conducted in accordance with the Borrower’s regulations and ADB’s requirements for environmental assessment.

Appendix 5 17

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COMPLETION REPORT

Division: ECTC TA No. and Name Amount Approved: 205,000.00 3319-TAJ: Flood Disaster Management Revised Amount: 205,000.00 Executing Agency: Department of Environment Source of TA Amount Undisbursed TA Amount Utilized and Emergency Situations of the President’s Office Funding: Implementing Agency: Center for Liquidation of JSF 32,755.62 172,244.38 the Consequences of Natural Disasters Date Completion Date Approval Signing Fielding of Consultants Original Actual 02 Dec. 1999 27 Dec. 1999 15 Feb. 2000 31 December 2001 31 March 2003 Closing Date Original Actual 31 December 2001 17 February 2004 Description

The floods and landslides of July 1999 caused substantial damage to private property and public infrastructure throughout the Republic of Tajikistan. There was an urgent need to help the Government to cope with the disaster, given its budgetary constraints. This TA was attached to the Loan 1714-TAJ: Emergency Flood Rehabilitation Project (the Loan).

Objectives and Scope

The TA was to build the Government’s capacity to manage flood disasters. The TA was designed to help improve flood disaster management and provide suitable training. The TA was also supposed to provide guidance in dealing with the requirements and opportunities available through international funding agencies and NGO’s and to provide useful basis for the preparation of a long-term management plan.

Evaluation of Inputs

Three separate international disaster management experts (DME) were engaged for a total of 217 calendar days of intermittent services between 14 February 2000 and 31 January 2003 to assist the Government in building its capacity for flood disaster management. Six field visits were made by the three DMEs. The first DME returned to conduct two workshops in Gissar and Varzob Rayons near Dushanbe, jointly with the third DME. The first DME prepared a draft disaster management plan and benefits monitoring plan for the Loan. The second DME did not contribute to the objectives of the TA and ADB asked for him to be replaced by the firm of the first DME. The third DME monitored and evaluated the civil works of the Loan and assisted the EA in reporting on the Loan Project. Domestic consultants for design, supervision, and monitoring and evaluation were financed by the Loan. The TA was completed within the budget.

Evaluation of Outputs

An Inception Report, six field visit reports and a Final Report were submitted by the experts. A preliminary plan for flood disaster management, and a plan for benefit monitoring and social assessment of the Loan were prepared, but the plans were not implemented because the first DME left the Project and the second one came only nine months later, and ADB Midterm Review Mission of the Loan was fielded after all procurement was done and civil works contracts were being completed. Two community based disaster management workshops were conducted. The workshops helped to propose recommendations for strengthening community based flood disaster management capacity. The third DME visited all project sites of the Loan. Most of the sites were found in satisfactory and good conditions. Some sites were found to lack proper construction supervision. Recommendations were made to correct the quality of works and to improve construction supervision. The DME assisted in the preparation of project data sheets for each project site, and the Borrower’s draft project completion report for the Loan. Due to the changes of the DMEs and nine month period between the first and second DME’s inputs, the objectives of the TA could not be fully accomplished, as the DMEs did not: (i) properly train the staff of the PIU and the supervisors of the civil works, only the third DME gave training in office technology to the staff of the implementing agency ; (ii) review the designs of the civil works before commencement of the works; (iii) assist the domestic social specialists in preparing base line data and monitoring the benefits of the Loan; (iv) assist the Executing Agency (EA) in finding additional financing; and (v) seek cooperation of NGOs.

18 Appendix 5

Overall Assessment and Rating

The TA is rated as partly successful. Due to the changes of the DMEs the TA failed to fully meet its development objectives. Only the third DME did a satisfactory job in preparing descriptions of the completed works of the Loan and their technical, social, and environmental impacts.

Major Lessons Learned

The original, directly selected DME should not have been allowed to leave the TA before an equally competent replacement had been identified. ADB’s Project Officer who developed the Project retired before the implementation started and there was no continuity in the project administration, and only one brief review mission was fielded 18 months after the commencement of the TA and civil works under the Loan. ADB’s TA supervision should have been more intensive during 2000-2001.

Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions

The Government should implement the disaster management plans as recommended by the first DME, which is possible because the personnel of the PIU of the TA have gained experience in disaster management and have been nominated to form a disaster management office in the Ministry of Environment and Emergency Situations.

Prepared by Kari Saari Designation Transport Specialist

Appendix 6 19

DOMESTIC CONSULTANT CONTRACTS TABLE A6: LOAN 1714-TAJ(SF): EMERGENCY FLOOD REHABILITATION PROJECT Start End Total Monthly Amount Total Amount PCSS Date of Date of No. of Rate of Contract Amount Disbursed No. Expertise Services Services Mos. ($) ($) ($) ($) 0022 Deputy Director 4-Jan-00 31-Dec-02 33 500 16,459 16,459 16,459

0023 Project Engineer - Irrigation 4-Jan-00 31-Dec-00 12 100 1,200 1,800 1,800 2-Jan-01 30-Jun-01 6 600 0024 Project Engineer - Power 4-Jan-00 30-Apr-01 11 150 1,650 1,650 1,650

0025 Project Engr-Roads and Bridges 4-Jan-00 31-Dec-00 6 150 879 879 879 0118 26-Jun-00 30-Sep-02 27 100 2,704 2,704 2,704

0026 Procurement Specialist 4-Jan-00 30-Sep-02 34 150 5,100 5,100 5,100

0105 Accountant 18-May-00 30-Sep-02 26 150 3,847 3,847 3,847

0027 Project Leader (Supervisor) 4-Jan-00 31-Jul-02 31 200 6,180 6,180 6,180

0028 Field Engineer - Dushanbe 4-Jan-00 31-Dec-00 12 150 1,800 4,200 4,200 1-Jun-01 30-Sep-02 16 150 2,400

0029 Field Engineer - Khujand 4-Jan-00 30-Jun-00 6 100 562 562 562

0119 21-Jun-00 30-Nov-00 5 100 433 433 433

0030 Field Engineer - Khatlon 4-Jan-00 30-Jun-00 6 100 562 562 562 0120 21-Jun-00 30-Apr-02 22 100 2,133 2,133 2,133

0031 Field Engineer - Irrigation 4-Jan-00 30-Sep-02 33 100 3,390 3,390 3,390

0032 Environmental Specialist 4-Jan-00 30-Apr-00 4 100 400 400 400 0033 Social Impact Analyst 4-Jan-00 31-May-00 5 100 500 500 500 0034 Social Impact Analyst 16-Jan-00 31-May-00 5 100 495 495 495

0035 Support Services for Translation 14,349 14,349 14,349 And Communications 300 65,643 65,643 65,643

Mos.=Months, No.=Number, PCSS=Procurement Contract Summary Sheet, SF=Special Fund, TAJ=Tajikistan

Source: ADB staff estimates.

CIVIL WORKS CONTRACTS

TABLE A7: LOAN 1714-TAJ(SF): EMERGENCY FLOOD REHABILITATION PROJECT 0

Date of Contract PCSS Amount of Revised Amount Amount Contract No. Approved Signed No. Name of Contract Location Code Contractor Contract Cont. Amt. Financed Disbursed A ppe

EFRP1999-1 2-Dec-99 30-Dec-99 0003 Panj River – Moskovsky K3 Mobile Mechanized Column No. 39 48,102 48,102 26,456 26,456 n d

Section 6-7 (PMK 39) of Dangaravodstroy Trust, ix 7 MWMLR EFRP1999-1A 2-Dec-99 30-Dec-99 0009 Panj River - Section 6-7 Moskovsky K3 Mobile Mechanized Column (SPMK) 48,102 48,102 26,456 26,456 Bogbunyod, MWMLR EFRP1999-2 2-Dec-99 30-Dec-99 0004 Kizil-Su River Parkharsky K4 Pharkhar Dist. Industrial Repair and 28,945 28,945 15,920 15,920 Maint. Assoc. (PDIRM), MWMLR EFRP1999-3 2-Dec-99 30-Dec-99 0005 Panj River - Section 3 Parkharsky K4 Mobile Mechanized Column No. 39 73,129 73,129 40,221 40,221 (PMK 39) of Dangaravodstroy Trust EFRP1999-4 2-Dec-99 30-Dec-99 0006 Yakh-Su River Combine Kulyab K1 Mobile Mechanized Column No. 16 34,693 34,693 19,081 19,081 (PMK 16) of Dangaravodstroy Trust EFRP1999-4A 2-Dec-99 30-Dec-99 0007 Yakh-Su River Khanabad Kulyab K1 Mobile Mechanized Column No. 12 31,691 31,691 17,380 17,380 MWMLR EFRP1999-4B 2-Dec-99 30-Dec-99 0008 Yakh-Su River -Sewerage Kulyab K1 Mobile Mechanized Column No. 31 37,729 37,729 20,751 20,751 (PMK 31) of Dangaravodstroy Trust, MWMLR EFRP 2000-4 11-Jan-00 1-Feb-00 0010 Bank Strength. Works Kodjamas- K-2 Specilaized Mobile Mechanized 20,668 20,668 11,367 11,367 Vaksh River (Ribkhoz and tonsky Column 7 (SPMK-7) of the MWMLR Komsomol) EFRP 2000-5 11-Jan-00 1-Feb-00 0011 Reconstruction of mud Muninabadsky K-5 Self-Supporting Repair Construction 7,495 7,495 4,122 4,122 flows pro. dike Exploitation Melioration Union (Muminabad) (KTPREMO), MWMLR EFRP 2000-6 11-Jan-00 10-Feb-00 0018 BSW on Panj River Rushansky G-2 Gorno-Badakshan Regional Indust'l. 13,801 13,801 7,591 7,591 Takob-jangal and Vomar Repair-Exploitation Melioration Unit (GBOPREMO), MWMLR Continued on next page.

No.= Number, PCSS= Procurement Contract Summary Sheet, SF= Special Fund Table A7.1- continued

Date of Contract PCSS Amt. Of Revised Amount Amount Contract No. Approved Signed No. Name of Contract Location Code Contractor Contract Cont. Amt. Financed Disbursed. 10-Feb- EFRP 2000-7 11-Jan-00 00 0019 BSW on Roshtkala River Roshtkalinsky G-3 Gorno-Badakshan Regional Indust'l. 8,440 8,440 3,642 3,642 Repair-Exploitation Melioration Roshtkala Union(GBOPREMO), MWMLR EFRP 2000-8 18-Jan-00 1-Feb- 0012 Bank Strengthening Kafernigansky R-2 Specilaized Mobile Mechanized 20,000 20,000 11,000 11,000 00 Works Column 10 (SPMK-10) of the Elok River (Turkobod, MWMLR Gulis ton, and Okhjar EFRP 2000-9 18-Jan-00 1-Feb- 0013 Reconst. of head water Baldjuvansky K-7 Mobile Mechanized Column No. 1 15,000 15,000 8,250 8,250 00 intake (HWI) (Baldjuvan) (PMK-1), MWMLR SF=Special

EFRP 2000-17 7-Feb-00 14-Feb- 0020 Reconstruction of siphon Gissarsky R-1 Gissar Inter-district Industrial Repair 20,000 20,000 11,000 11,000 00 over Khanaka River Rayon Exploitation Melioration Union (GMPREMO) of the MWMLR EFRP 2000-18 7-Feb-00 14-Feb- 0021 Reconstruction of Road Kafernigansky R-2 Mobile Mechanized Column No. 1 20,000 20,000 11,000 11,000 00 in Kafernigan Rayon (PMK-1) of State Construction Co. "Tajikstroy"

EFRP 2000-19 4-May-00 24-Feb- 0036 Reconstruction of Roads Gissarsky R-2 Road Exploitation Dept. 21 (DEU- 20,000 20,000 11,000 11,000 00 in Gizzar Rayon 21) of the Ministry of Transport and Road EFRP 2000-25 4-May-00 20-Mar- 0037 Reconstruction of Road Ashtsky L-1 Road Const. Dept. 2 of Industrial 30,000 30,000 16,500 16,500 00 Shaidon-Dagana Union "Khudjandroh" of MOTRA

EFRP 2000-27 4-May-00 20-Mar- 0038 Reconstruction of Road Ashtsky L-1 Industrial Union "Khudjandroh" of 30,000 30,000 16,500 16,500 00 Shaidon-Pongas MOTRA

EFRP 2000-28 4-May-00 20-Mar- 0039 Reconstruction of Road Matchinksy L-3 Road Const. Dep. 2 of Industrial 30,000 30,000 15,747 15,747 A

00 Buston-Altin-Topkan Union "Khudjandroh" of MOTRA ppe

ndix 7 EFRP 2000-26 4-May-00 4-Apr- 0049 Reconst. Of Road in Kanibadam- L-7 Road Repair-Const. Dept. 14 5,322 5,322 2,927 2,927 00 Kanibadam (DRSU-14) of Indust. Union sky "Khudjandroh" EFRP 2000-29 4-May-00 20-Mar- 0050 Reconst. Of Bridge in Ashtsky L-1 Road Construction Dept. 2 of Indus. 60,000 60,000 33,000 33,000 00 7 km of Shaidon-Dagana Union "Khudjandroh" of MOTRA 21

Continued on next page. 22 Appe

Table A7.1- continued n

Amount d

Date of Contract PCSS Amt. Of Revised Amount i x

Contract No. Approved Signed No. Name of Contract Location Code Contractor Contract Cont. Amt. Finance Disbursed. 7

EFRP 2000-30 4-May-00 20-Mar-00 0051 Reconst. Of Bridge in Ashtsky L-1 Indus. Union "Khujandroh" of the 61,000 61,000 33,366 33,366 Gagurov-Pungan MOT& Road (MOTRA) EFRP 2000- 4-May-00 4-Apr-00 0052 Reconst. Of Bridge in Ashtsky L-1 Indus. Union "Khujandroh" of the 61,000 61,000 33,081 33,081 30A Pungan Road MOT & Road (MOTRA) EFRP 2000-38 4-May-00 28-Mar-00 0053 Bank Strengthening Penjikentsky L-5 Zeravshan Valley Indus. Repairing & 17,252 17,252 9,488 9,488 Maint. Melioration Union Works on Khalifa-Khasan (ZDPREMO) EFRP 2000-43 4-May-00 23-Mar-00 0054 Reconst. Of "Muk" Canal Dzhirgital- R-3 PMK-21 (SIU) "Tadjikselezashita" 5,190 5,190 2,855 2,855 & Head Water Intake sky of MWMLR EFRP 2000-21 8-May-00 20-Mar-00 0058 Reconstruction of Bridge Moskovsky K-3 Joint-Stock Open Co. "Dehotsoz" of 40,000 40,000 22,000 22,000 State Cooperative Over "Chubek" Canal "Tojikdehsokhtmon" Kanibadamsky Dist. Indus. EFRP 2000-35 8-May-00 20-Mar-00 0059 Reconstruction of Kaniba- L-7 Repairing 15,000 15,000 8,250 8,250 & Maint. Meliorative Union Unitized Spillway damsky (KRPREMO) EFRP 2000-36 8-May-00 20-Mar-00 0060 Dept. of Mechanized Works (UMR) 69,999 69,999 38,499 38,499 Bank Strengthening of Leninabad Union (LU) Works on Dagana River Ashtsky L-1 "Irsovkhozstroy" EFRP 2000-39 8-May-00 20-Mar-00 0062 Bank Strengthening Ashtsky L-1 Mobile Mechanized Column 26 6,332 6,332 3,483 3,483 Works on Shaldan River (PMK 26) "Irsovkhozstroy", MWMLR EFRP 2000-41 8-May-00 20-Mar-00 0063 Reconst. Of Irrigation Aininsky L-6 Mobile Mechanized Column 44 7,055 7,055 3,880 3,880 Canal In Dar-Dar "Leninabadvodstroy", MWMLR EFRP 2000-42 8-May-00 20-Mar-00 0064 Reconst. Of Shor-su & Isfarinsky L-4 Mobile Mechanized Column 42 15,262 15,262 8,394 8,394 Protecting Meas. -Flood "Leninabadvodstroy", MWMLR EFRP 2000-44 8-May-00 20-Mar-00 0065 Bank Strengthening Mobile Mechanized Column 26 31,000 31,000 17,050 17,050 Works on Pongaz River Ashtsky L-1 (PMK 26) "Irsovkhozstroy", MWMLR EFRP 2000- 8-May-00 20-Mar-00 0066 Bank Strengthening Ashtsky L-1 "Leninabadstroy" Trust of the Mins. 49,000 49,000 26,950 26,950 44A Works on of Water Mngt. & Land Rec. Pongaz River (MWMLR) EFRP 2000-20 17-Jun-01 3-Apr-00 0078 Reconst. Of Bridge in Kulyab K-1 Bridge Const. Dept. 33 (MSU-33) of 52,000 52,000 28,238 28,238 Sino Str. - Kulyab "Mostospetsstroy" OJSC, MOTRA

Continued on next page.

Table A7.1- continued

Date of Contract PCSS Amt. Of Revised Amount Amount Contract No. Approved Signed No. Name of Contract Location Code Contractor Contract Cont. Amt. Financed Disbursed. Specialized Mobile Mech. Column EFRP 2000-60 17-Jun-01 26-Apr-00 0083 Recons. Of Bridge - Isfarinsky L-4 35 20,000 20,000 11,000 11,000 (SPMK 35) Isfara-Zumrad II "Tojikselkhozvodoprovodstroy" EFRP 1999- 1A/1 29-Jan-01 16-Oct-00 0124 BSW on Panj River SPMK "Bogbunyd" of MWMLR 38,988 38,988 21,443 21,443 EFRP 2001-01 5-Feb-01 29-Dec-00 0125 Head Water Intake in Keferni- R-2 PMK-1 of SCC "Tajikstroy" 49,697 49,967 27,333 27,333 Dashtibed Village gansky Reconst. Of Nushor EFRP 2001-03 5-Feb-01 29-Dec-00 0126 Canal Tajika- R-4 Tajikabad Unit of Irrig. System (Tuis 8,585 8,535 4,722 4,722 & Head Water lntake badsky MWMLR EFRP 2001-05 5-Feb-01 29-Dec-00 0127 Reconst. Of Road Parkharsky K-4 PMK-40 of MWMLR 48,314 48,314 26,573 26,573 Somonchi-Prkhar EFRP 2001-07 5-Feb-01 29-Dec-00 0128 BSW on River Isfarinsky L-4 SPMK 35 Head Admin. 20,718 20,718 11,395 11,395 Isfarninka "Tojikselhozvodopro" EFRP 2001-08 5-Feb-01 29-Dec-00 0129 Reconst. Of HW Intake Prenji- L-5 OJSC, Intereconomy Mobile Mech. 9,977 9,977 5,487 5,487 of Eshan Canal kentsky Column (IMMC) EFRP 2001-09 5-Feb-01 29-Dec-00 0130 Reconst. Of HW Intake Prenji- L-5 Zeravshan Valley Indus. Repairing & 13,415 13,415 7,252 7,252 Main. Melioration Union of Toksan Korez Canal kentsky (ZDPREMO) EFRP 2001-10 5-Feb-01 15-Jan-01 0131 Reconst. Of Road Samgar Adrasman L-2 Road Reconst. Dept. No. 2 of Head 27,000 27,000 14,843 14,843 Adrasman Dept. "Khudjandroh" EFRP 2001-02 28-Feb-01 29-Dec-00 0133 Reconst. Of HW Intake Dzhirgi- R-3 PMK-21 of Scientific Indust. Union 6,117 6,117 3,364 3,364 on Piyozi Canal talsky "Tadjikselezashit" EFRP 2001-04 28-Feb-01 5-Feb-01 0134 Reconst. Of Bridge in Baldjuvansky K-7 MSU-23 of "Mostrospesstroy" 15,660 15,660 8,613 8,613 Baldjuvan Settlement (JOSC) EFRP 2001-12 28-Feb-01 5-Feb-01 0135 BSW on Obi-Mazor River Baldjuvansky K-7 PMK-11 of the MWMLR 43,567 43,567 23,962 23,962

8,240

EFRP 2001-14 28-Feb-01 2-Feb-01 0136 BSW and Reconst. Of HW Kanibadmsky L-7 Society of Limited Respn. "Binokor" 14,982 14,982 8,240 A Intake of Ravtsky (SLR "Binokor") of CSS ppe EFRP 2001-16 28-Feb-01 5-Feb-01 0137 Reconst. Of Road Murgabsky G-1 DSU No. 34 of Indus. Enterprise 9,969 9,969 5,483 5,483 ndix 7 "Badkhshonroh" of MOT

23 Continued on next page. 24

Table A7.1- continued Appe

Date of Contract PCSS Amt. Of Revised Amount Amount ndix 7 Contract No. Approved Signed No. Name of Contract Location Code Contractor Contract Cont. Amt. Finance Disbursed.

EFRP 2001-17 28-Feb-01 5-Feb-01 0138 Reconstruction of Bridge Murgabsky G-1 DSU No. 34 of Indus. Enterprise 9,034 9,034 4,969 4,969 EFRP 2001-18 28-Feb-01 5-Feb-01 0139 Reconstruction of Road Roshtka- G-3 DSU No. 34 of "Badakhshonroh" 7,830 7,830 4,307 4,307 linsky of MOT EFRP 2001-06 28-Feb-01 29-Dec-00 0140 BSW of Murgab River Murgabsky G-1 Gorno-Badakshan Regional Indus. 8,692 8,692 4,781 4,781 in Murgab Settlement Repair Exploi. Melioration Unit EFRP 2001-19 28-Feb-01 12-Feb-01 0142 Reconst. Of Bridge on Penji- L-5 MSU - 18 of Head Dept. 20,000 20,000 11,000 11,000 27 km of Road kenstsky "Khujandroh" MOT EFRP 2001-20 28-Feb-01 12-Feb-01 0143 Reconst. Of Bridge in Dzhirgi- R-3 DSU No. 22 of Indus. Road Const. 6,979 6,979 3,838 3,838 Yangy-Shar Village talsky Enterprise (IRCE) EFRP 2001-21 28-Feb-01 12-Feb-01 0144 Reconst. Of Road Dzhirgitalsky R-3 DSU No. 22 of Indus. Road Const. 12,981 12,981 7,140 7,140 Dushanbe-Dzhirgital Enterprise (IRCE) EFRP 2001-13 27-Mar-01 28-Feb-01 0145 Reconst. Of Road Tajika- R-4 Road Exploit. (DEU) No. 70 of Tajik 13,327 13,327 7,330 7,330 Tajikabad-Dzhirgital badsky State Concern (TSC) "Roh" of MOT Self-Supporting Repair Const. EFRP 2001-14 27-Mar-01 28-Feb-01 0146 BSW on Khanaka River Gissarsky R-1 (SRCS) 23,877 23,877 13,132 13,132 of GMPREMO EFRP 2001-30 13-Aug-01 20-Mar-01 0150 BSW on Panj River Mokovsky K-3 PMK 31 of "Dangaravodstroy" of 32,282 32,282 17,755 17,755 MWMLR

57 Contracts TOTAL 1,495,198 1,495,417 819,407 819,407

Continued on next p a ge.

Table A7.1- continued Table A7-2: Public Infrastructure for Resettlement Area (Category 04)

Date of Contract PCSS Amt. Of Revised Amount Amount Contract No. Approved Signed No. Name of Contract Location Code Contractor Contract Cont. Amt. Financed Disbursed

EFRP 2000- 45 8-May-00 20-Mar-00 0067 Reconst. Of Intersettle. Ashtsky L-1 Road Const. Dept. (DSU-2) of Indus. 19,503 19,503 11,702 11,702 Streets in Guishan Union "Khudjandroh" of MOTRA Settlement EFRP 2000- 46 17-Jun-01 20-Mar-00 0080 Const. Of School for Ashtsky L-1 Open Joint-Stock Co. (OJSC) 23,968 23,968 14,381 14,381 200 seats in Shaidon "Bunyod" of "Tojikdehsokhtmon" EFRP 2000- Mobile Mechanized Column 47 17-Jun-01 3-Apr-00 0081 Const. Of School for 300 Ashtsky L-1 26(PMK) 26,501 26,501 15,900 15,900 seats in Dagana of Leninabad "Irsovkshozstroy" EFRP 2000- 80 20-Dec-00 26-May-00 0121 Construction for Repair Khojund Open Joint Stock Co. (OJSC) 1,126 1,126 1,126 1,126 of Office in Khojund "Bunyo" of "Tojikdehsokhtmon"

Total 71,098 71,098 43,109 43,109

Grand Total 1,566,296 1,566,515 862,516 862,516

Grand Total Including Minor Works 1,796,537 1,796,756 999,632 999,632 A ppe ndix 7

25 26 Appendix 8

MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT CONTRACT

Table A8.1: LOAN 1714-TAJ(SF): EMERGENCY FLOOD REHABILITATION PROJECT

Date of Contract PCSS Name of Contract Amount Contract No. Approved Signed No. Contract Supplier Amount Disbursed Portland Cement M- EFRP 1999-5 1-Dec-99 3-Dec-99 0001 400 Interwest Trading LLC, USA 195,000 195,000

EFRP 1999-6 1-Dec-99 3-Dec-99 0002 Fuel and Oil Materials Interwest Trading LLC, USA 177,588 177,588

Portland Cement M- EFRP 2000-1 18-Jan-00 21-Jan-00 0014 400 Interwest Trading LLC, USA 99,525 99,525

Welding Rod and EFRP 1999-7 29-Dec-99 31-Dec-99 0015 Timber Small Private Co., "Rashid," TAJ 13,000 13,000 EFRP 2000-2 9-Feb-00 11-Feb-00 0016 Large-size Stone Carrier "Surhob," Trust, MWMLR, 36,000 36,000

PMK – 46 Trust, EFRP 2000-3 9-Feb-00 11-Feb-00 0017 Large-size Stone Dangaravodstroy, 80,000 80,000 EFRP 2000-16 9-Feb-00 11-Feb-00 0055 Large-size Stone SPMK-7, MWMLR, TAJ 22,400 22,400

Gorno-Bandakhshan EFRP 2000-23 4-May-00 21-Feb-00 0056 Large-size Stone (GBOPREMO) 5,000 5,000

Large-size Stone- Gorno-Bandakhshan EFRP 2000-24 4-May-00 21-Feb-00 0057 Jangal (GBOPREMO) 3,500 3,500 Private Const. Many Profiled EFRP 2000-51 8-May-00 24-Mar-00 0068 Steel Pipes - Khojent "Dilshod" 18,045 18,045

EFRP 2000-52 8-May-00 30-Mar-00 0069 Steel Pipes - Kulyab Trading Co. "D & D," TAJ 27,600 27,600

Individual Indus.-Commercial EFRP 2000-55 8-May-00 7-Apr-00 0072 Road Metal & Sand Firm 1,632 1,632

Road Metal., Sand, EFRP 2000-56 8-May-00 7-Apr-00 0073 etc. Indus. Union "Khujandroh," TAJ 45,869 45,869

Road-Const. Dept. 2 (DSU 2), EFRP 2000-57 8-May-00 7-Apr-00 0074 Road Metal and Sand TAJ 7,210 7,210

Timber and Wood Private-Const. Many Profiled EFRP 2000-58 8-May-00 14-Apr-00 0075 Fibrous "Dilshod" 85,624 85,624

Benzin, Electroded, Indus.-Tech. Unit EFRP 2000-59 8-May-00 14-Apr-00 0076 etc. "Tajikstroikomplect" 27,626 27,626

Fuels, Oils and EFRP 2000-50 26-Apr-00 28-Apr-00 0077 Bitumen Dexter Construction Corp., USA 374,390 374,390

Paint, window Pane, Indus.-Techno Unit EFRP 2000-62 19-Jun-00 19-Apr-00 0085 etc. "Tajikstroikomplect" 38,935 38,935

Mobile Mech. Column 21, SIU EFRP 2000-63 19-Jun-00 26-Apr-00 0086 Steel Pipes Tajikselezashita 5,490 5,490

Gravely-Optimal Mobile Mechnized Column 1 EFRP 2000-70 23-Jun-00 16-May-00 0092 Mixture (PMK 1), TAJ 3,600 3,600

Continued on next page. Table A8.1- continued Appendix 8 27

Date of Contract PCSS Contract Amount Contract No. Approved Signed No. Name of Contract Supplier Amount Disbursed Mobile Mechnized Column 1 EFRP 2000-71 23-Jun-00 16-May-00 0093 Steel Pipes (PMK 1), TAJ 1,215 1,215

Road Exploit. Dept. 21 (DEU) of EFRP 2000-77 23-Jun-00 23-May-00 0094 Hot Asphalt Concrete MOTRA, TAJ 19,282 19,282

Bridge Const. Dept. 33 (MSU 33) EFRP 2000-79 23-Jun-00 26-May-00 0095 Hot Asphalt Concrete of MOTRA, TAJ 15,757 15,757

Diversified Industrial Firm EFRP 2000-34 25-Jul-00 10-Apr-00 0097 Oil and Fuel "Golchev" 19,259 19,259

EFRP 2000-69 25-Jul-00 15-May-00 0098 Construction Materials Amudarya, TAJ 63,139 63,139

Mobile Mechanized Column 11 EFRP 2000-78 25-Jul-00 25-May-00 0100 Ruberoid, Bitumen (PMK-11), TAJ 4,194 4,194

EFRP 2000-81 25-Jul-00 26-May-00 0101 Metal (Steel) Dehotsoz, TAJ 21,364 21,364

EFRP 2000-83 31-Jul-00 23-Jun-00 0102 Oil, Fuel and Cement Interwest Trading LLC, USA 87,732 87,732

Metal (Steel EFRP 2000-84 31-Jul-00 23-Jun-00 0103 Reinforcement) Wentis Europe, Inc. USA 84,532 84,532

Metal (Steel EFRP 2000-87 31-Jul-00 30-Jun-00 0104 Reinforcement) Wentis Europe, Inc. USA 82,246 82,246

Leonex Vertriebsgesellschaft, EFRP 2000-72 15-Sep-00 19-May-00 0107 Oil, Fuel & Cement GER 40,523 40,523

Metal (Steel Import-Export Alexander EFRP 2000-73 15-Sep-00 19-May-00 0108 Reinforcement) Brotzmann, GER 63,958 63,958

EFRP 2000-82 15-Sep-00 11-Aug-00 0110 Oil, Fuel & Cement Farang, TAJ 65,291 65,291

EFRP 2000-85 15-Sep-00 23-Jun-00 0111 Metal (Steel, etc.) Zam-Zar, TAJ 16,228 16,228

Electrode, Steel, EFRP 2000-86 15-Sep-00 23-Jun-00 0112 Timber, etc. Safar, TAJ 17,092 17,092

Large stone, asphalt, EFRP 2000-89 15-Sep-00 24-Jul-00 0113 etc. SPMK No. 35, TAJ 3,762 3,762

EFRP 2000-90 15-Sep-00 2-Aug-00 0114 Electrode, Timber, etc. Bekhruz - 96, TAJ 3,292 3,292 Metal (Steel Rein., EFRP 2000-91 14-Sep-00 18-Sep-00 0115 etc.) Wentis Europe, Inc., USA 194,700 194,700 Metal (H-Beam, Steel, EFRP 2000-92 4-Sep-00 19-Sep-00 0116 etc) Interwest Trading LLC, USA 152,636 152,636

EFRP 2000-93 29-Jan-01 6-Oct-00 0123 Road Metal & Sand "Tojikdehsokhtmon, TAJ 1,223 1,223

Oil & Fuel, Cement, EFRP 2001-23 27-Mar-01 16-Feb-01 0147 etc. Saho-Sho, TAJ 43,184 43,184

EFRP 2001-24 27-Mar-01 19-Feb-01 0148 Steel Pipes Malik, TAJ 9,253 9,253 Continued on next page 28 Appendix 8 Table A8-1- Continued

Date of Contract PCSS Name of Contract Amount Contract No. Approved Signed No. Contract Supplier Amount Disbursed

EFRP 2001-25 27-Mar-01 27-Feb-01 0149 Metal (Sheet Steel) Chorsabaz, TAJ 21,921 21,921

Diesel Fuel, Bitumen, EFRP 2001-29 17-Aug-01 27-Apr-01 0151 etc. Montebello Group, USA 253,621 253,621

EFRP 2001-26 16-Aug-01 03-14-2001 0152 Diesel, Fuel & Cement Arkadash, TUR 93,868 93,868

EFRP 2001-27 17-Aug-01 16-Mar-01 0153 Fuel & Oil Materials Fermer, USA 80,512 80,512

EFRP 2001-28 17-Aug-01 30-Mar-01 0154 Fuel & Oil Materials Ramz (ELR), TAJ 37,291 37,291

EFRP 2001-31 17-Aug-01 6-Apr-01 0155 Fuel & Oil Materials Safary (FLR), TAJ 74,466 74,466

Lubricants, Metal & Industrial Cooperative "Aksam", EFRP 2001-32 17-Aug-01 8-May-01 0156 Timber TAJ 40,110 40,110

EFRP 2001-33 17-Aug-01 22-Aug-01 0157 Diesel Fuel & Cement Fisher & Gross, GER 156,426 156,426

Pump, Electrical EFRP 2001-34 7-Feb-02 26-Oct-01 0159 Materials Integrated Financial Corp., TAJ 51,216 51,216

51 Contracts 3,087,327 3,087,327

Continued on next pag e

Appendix 9 29 Table A8.2: LOAN 1714-TAJ(SF): Emergency Flood Rehabilitation Project List of Contracts for Equipment

Date of Contract PCSS Contract Amount Contract No. Approved Signed No. Name of Contract Supplier Amount Disbursed Individual Indus. EFRP 2000- Deep Well Pump ECV- Commercial Firm 53 8-May-00 31-Mar-00 0070 10 (IICF), TAJ 1,500 1,500 Dept. of Indus. Tech. EFRP 2000- Rehab. Of Telephone Complication Assoc., 54 8-May-00 31-Mar-00 0071 Lines TAJ 30,403 30,403

EFRP 2000- Scientific-Indus. Enter. 64 19-Jun-00 28-Apr-00 0087 Transformer Substation "Edelveis," TAJ 62,680 62,680

EFRP 2000- Matls. Power Trans. Scientific-Indus. Enter. 65 19-Jun-00 20-Apr-00 0088 Lines "Edelveis," TAJ 99,306 99,306

EFRP 2000- Matls. Power Trans. Scientific-Indus. Enter. 66 19-Jun-00 28-Apr-00 0089 Lines "Edelveis", TAJ 24,652 24,652

EFRP 2000- Matls. Power Trans. Multyprofile "Djahon," 67 19-Jun-00 28-Apr-00 0090 Lines TAJ 46,740 46,740

EFRP 2000- Matls. Power Trans. Scientific-Indus. Enter. 68 23-Jun-00 5-May-00 0091 Lines "Edelveis," TAJ 19,341 19,341

EFRP 2000- Materials for Pump 76 25-Jul-00 22 May-00 0099 Station Sony, TAJ 4,162 4,162

EFRP 2000- 74 15-Sep-00 22 May-00 0109 Centrifugal Pumps 24 Firm Al-Farabi, KAZ 77,800 77,800

EFRP 2000- 88 18-Oct-00 4-Sep-00 0117 Equipment and Materials Askan 21,137 21,137 10 Contracts 387,721 387,721 TOTAL INCLUDING EDUIPMENT 3,475,048 3,475,048

30 Appendix 9 OVERALL RATING OF THE PROJECT

Table A9: Rating of the Project

Criterion Assessment Rating Weight Weighted Rating value Relevance Highly Relevant 3 0.2 0.6 Efficacy Less Efficacious 1 0.25 0.25 Efficiency Efficient 2 0.2 0.4 Sustainability Less Likely 1 0.2 0.2 Institutional Impacts Moderate 1 0.15 0.15 Overall Rating Successful 1.6

Source: Asian Development Bank Estimates.