DOCSLIB.ORG

Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit 2013 Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit 2013 Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit Hurn Parish Council Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit PAGE 1) Executive summary 4 2) Introduction 7 3) Purpose & aims 13 4) Geology, Topography & Climate 14 5) Historic landscape & land-uses 18 6) Ecological context 35 7) Current management 63 8) Public Enjoyment of Hurn Forest 74 9) Collation of existing records and surveys 78 10) Botanical Assessment 80 11) Fungi 139 12) Butterflies and Day-flying Moths 143 13) Moths 167 14) Invertebrates 172 15) Reptiles 185 16) Birds 216 17) Bats 233 18) Remaining gaps in knowledge 250 19) Habitat management considerations 251 20) Conclusions 257 21) Acknowledgements 259 22) Data Sources 260 23) Consultation 261 24) References 262 www.swenvironmental.co.uk email: [email protected] Page 2 of 389 Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit Hurn Parish Council Appendices Summary species data is included at the back of this report, and repeated in full in Appendix 2 Appendix 1: Base maps and aerial photographs Appendix 2: DERC data and subsequent special analysis by species groups Appendix 3: Conservation designations and condition assessments Appendix 4: Original survey reports Appendix 5: Photographs of Hurn Forest Tables and maps This report has been prepared by Simon Weymouth of SW Environmental on behalf of Hurn Parish Council. www.swenvironmental.co.uk email: [email protected] Page 3 of 389 Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit Hurn Parish Council 1) Executive summary The purpose of this report is, in part, to draw together the collective ecological knowledge of Hurn Forest in to one place. This includes current and historic records primarily sourced from the Dorset Environmental Records Centre (DERC) as well as the Forestry Commission (FC), in addition to any written reports for the Forest. The content of this report draws heavily on the previous work of Neil Sanderson (botanical assessment, landscape history and ecology, 2007) and the more recent records and reports from specialist surveys during 2013. These specialist surveys and their subsequent records and reports were conducted by Alan Lucas (fungi & birds), Mike Jeffes & David Evans (moths), Dr Sue Clarke & David Green (butterflies and day-flying moths), Dr Scotty Dodd (invertebrates), David Tamarind (reptiles), Simon Weymouth & Alan Lucas (birds), and Colleen Hope & Paul Hope (bats). Much of the content of this Biodiversity Audit comes directly from these respective survey reports, allowing the efficient preparation of this report. Hurn Forest is believed to be an important place for common, rare and protected wildlife alike. However, there has been a lack of data to support this belief, with only limited ecological data and wildlife records from the last 30-40 years. At 5 kilometres long, and some 370 hectares in area, it constitutes a substantial and valued area, whether as a wildlife reserve and corridor, as a landscape feature, as a place to produce timber and other renewable products, or as a place for people to enjoy. The starting point for this Biodiversity Audit was the limited existing data; DERC kindly provided the project with some 26,000 wildlife records for the area, which following analysis resulted in 1655 species recorded from the Forest, and 2347 species recorded from a 1 kilometre buffer around the Forest. DERC also provided maps showing the known priority habitats found here. The following table of results (Table 1.1) shows how the Biodiversity Audit has increased the understanding of Hurn Forest and wildlife it supports. Whilst these are just numbers, the detail of this report sets out the importance of these species and the habitats that support them. www.swenvironmental.co.uk email: [email protected] Page 4 of 389 Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit Hurn Parish Council Table 1.1: Summary of new finds Species DERC DERC Number of Number of Of these Total Group DATA DATA species new new number of Number of Number of recorded species species, species species in species in in Hurn recorded how many recorded Hurn 1km Forest in Hurn were not in Hurn Forest buffer study area Forest previously Forest study area around (2013 study area recorded study area Hurn surveys) (2013 from over last Forest surveys) buffer 30-40 area years Lower 134 115 67 21 10 155 plants (lichens, liverworts, mosses, horsetails, ferns) Fungi 14 31 269 257 240 271 Plants 326 625 265** 41 11 367 Moths 484 426 / 838* 380 107 57 / 10* 591 Butterflies 32 35 25 0 0 32 Other 518 898 333 235 167 753 insects (plus millipedes, centipedes, spiders, harvestman Molluscs 3 21 1 1 1 4 Birds 111 141 61 1 0 112 Reptiles 7 9 6 1 0 8 and amphibia Fish 10 10 - - - 10 Bats 3 6 7 4 1 7 Other 8 23 - - - 8 mammals Other 5 7 - - - 5 Total 1655 2347 / 1414 668 487 / 440* 2323 2759* * Includes records from Moors Close **2007 survey It should be noted that a small number of these species will be attributable to the Moors River channel, which forms the boundary of the study area. www.swenvironmental.co.uk email: [email protected] Page 5 of 389 Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit Hurn Parish Council From both the individual surveys, and their collective weight of evidence, it can be concluded that Hurn Forest is an important place for common, rare and protected wildlife. 668 new species have been recorded for the Forest. It should also be remembered that this Audit provides a snapshot, recording only those species that were encountered by the surveyors during their survey visits in 2013. There are no doubt hundreds of new species records for Hurn Forest still to be discovered. Managed by the Forestry Commission, Hurn Forest represents a multi-purpose forest in which conservation, recreation and timber production co-exist. These varied objectives are balanced through the Forest Design Plan or management plan for the Forest. Whilst there are a range of views about the management of forests on areas of former heathland, what is proven through this report is that the management of Hurn Forest has allowed a wide range of wildlife to thrive. The data does also show that there have been some species declines and losses from the site, some of these are attributable to a loss of ‘commoning’ activities and some to the change from open to wooded habitats. This Biodiversity Audit would not have been possible had Hurn Parish Council not been able to secure external funding. As such Hurn Parish Council is exceedingly grateful to the following for their generous support of this project: Bournemouth Airport Community Fund Lottery Awards for All Forestry Commission. And finally, this is your Forest. Hurn Parish Council encourages you to get out there and enjoy it! www.swenvironmental.co.uk email: [email protected] Page 6 of 389 Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit Hurn Parish Council 2) Introduction Hurn Forest runs approximately north-south, supporting over 370 hectares of woodlands and heathlands between the Moors River Valley and the Avon Valley. Located in Hurn Parish and the wider Borough of Christchurch, it lies to the north and east of Bournemouth Airport, and to the west of the main A338, with major population centres of Christchurch and Bournemouth only a few kilometres to the south. Hurn Forest is owned and managed by the Forestry Commission, and in accordance with their byelaws and the Countryside and Rights of Way Act (CRoW Act 2000), the public has a right of access to enjoy this fantastic resource. From public car parks on Matchams Lane to the east and Boundary Lane to the north, there is an array of formal tracks and informal paths through the Forest. These are extensively used by the local community and visitors alike for walking, orienteering, horse-riding, dog-walking, cycling and wildlife-watching. Hurn Forest is one of the major areas of green space for recreation in East Dorset. Since the 1990’s, Hurn Forest has undergone significant restructuring through the Forestry Commission’s Forest Design Plans to create a mosaic of woodland and open habitats, both to improve the biodiversity value of the Forest and to increase the internal landscape interest. The Forest remains a working environment with forestry and tenant farming activities, supporting and managing a wide range of wildlife across habitats including broadleaf woodland, conifer woodland, valley mires, heathland and grassland. A range of wildlife has been recorded in Hurn Forest, and some of this collective wildlife knowledge for the area has previously been collated (Sanderson, 2007). However, there were significant gaps in the knowledge base, and therefore it has been difficult to assess the overall wildlife value of this Forest. Hurn Parish Council has taken a lead to remedy this, and having successfully sought financial contributions from Bournemouth Airport Community Fund, Lottery Awards for All, and the Forestry Commission, has commissioned this www.swenvironmental.co.uk email: [email protected] Page 7 of 389 Hurn Forest Biodiversity Audit Hurn Parish Council Biodiversity Audit for Hurn Forest. The Audit has assessed the existing data, responded to knowledge gaps by undertaking further ecological surveys, and brought together all of the information in to one report. It is intended for this Biodiversity Audit to be used in a number of ways to inform any and all interested parties about the wildlife value of this Forest. The purpose of this report is, in part, to draw together the collective ecological knowledge of Hurn Forest in to one place. This includes current and historic records primarily sourced from the Dorset Environmental Records Centre (DERC) as well as the Forestry Commission (FC), in addition to any written reports for the Forest. The content of this report draws heavily on the previous work of Neil Sanderson (botanical assessment, landscape history and ecology, 2007) and the more recent records and reports from specialist surveys during 2013.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests
    Dissertationes Forestales 21 Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Esko Hyvärinen Faculty of Forestry University of Joensuu Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu, for public criticism in auditorium C2 of the University of Joensuu, Yliopistonkatu 4, Joensuu, on 9th June 2006, at 12 o’clock noon. 2 Title: Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Author: Esko Hyvärinen Dissertationes Forestales 21 Supervisors: Prof. Jari Kouki, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Docent Petri Martikainen, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Pre-examiners: Docent Jyrki Muona, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Docent Tomas Roslin, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Division of Population Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Opponent: Prof. Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Department of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden ISSN 1795-7389 ISBN-13: 978-951-651-130-9 (PDF) ISBN-10: 951-651-130-9 (PDF) Paper copy printed: Joensuun yliopistopaino, 2006 Publishers: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Finnish Forest Research Institute Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu Editorial Office: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Unioninkatu 40A, 00170 Helsinki, Finland http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes 3 Hyvärinen, Esko 2006. Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. ABSTRACT The main aim of this thesis was to demonstrate the effects of green-tree retention and controlled burning on beetles (Coleoptera) in order to provide information applicable to the restoration and conservation of beetle species diversity in boreal forests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Casmara Subagronoma (Lepidoptera
    insects Article The Biology of Casmara subagronoma (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae), a Stem-Boring Moth of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Myrtaceae): Descriptions of the Previously Unknown Adult Female and Immature Stages, and Its Potential as a Biological Control Candidate Susan A. Wineriter-Wright 1, Melissa C. Smith 1,* , Mark A. Metz 2 , Jeffrey R. Makinson 3 , Bradley T. Brown 3, Matthew F. Purcell 3, Kane L. Barr 4 and Paul D. Pratt 5 1 USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA; [email protected] 2 USDA-ARS Systematic Entomology Lab, Beltsville, MD 20013-7012, USA; [email protected] 3 USDA-ARS Australian Biological Control Laboratory, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Dutton Park QLD 4102, Australia; jeff[email protected] (J.R.M.); [email protected] (B.T.B.); [email protected] (M.F.P.) 4 USDA-ARS Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA; [email protected] 5 USDA-ARS, Western Regional Research Center, Invasive Species and Pollinator Health Research Unit, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA 94710, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-954-475-6549 Received: 27 August 2020; Accepted: 16 September 2020; Published: 23 September 2020 Simple Summary: Rhodomyrtus tomentosa is a perennial woody shrub throughout Southeast Asia. Due to its prolific flower and fruit production, it was introduced into subtropical areas such as Florida and Hawai’i, where it is now naturalized and invasive. In an effort to find sustainable means to control R. tomentosa, a large-scale survey was mounted for biological control organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • General News
    Biocontrol News and Information 27(4), 63N–79N pestscience.com General News David Greathead hoods. Both broom and tagasaste pods can be a seasonally important food source for kererū (an As this issue went to press we received the sad news endemic pigeon, Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae), par- of the untimely death of Dr David Greathead at the ticularly in regions where its native food plants have age of 74. declined. A previous petition for the release of G. oli- vacea into New Zealand was rejected by the New Besides being a dedicated and popular Director of Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in CABI’s International Institute of Biological Control 1998 on the grounds that there was insufficient (IIBC), David was the driving force behind the estab- information to assess the relative beneficial and lishment and development of Biocontrol News and harmful effects of the proposed introduction. Information. He was an active member of its Edito- rial Board, providing advice and ideas right up to his As part of the submission to ERMA, Landcare death. Research quantified the expected costs and benefits associated with the introduction of additional biolog- We plan that the next issue will carry a full obituary. ical control agents for broom1. Due to uncertainties Please contact us if you would be willing to con- regarding the costs, a risk-averse approach was tribute information: commentary, personal adopted by assuming a worse-case scenario where memories or anecdotes on the contribution that tagasaste was planted to its maximum potential David made. extent in New Zealand (10,000 ha), levels of non- target damage to tagasaste were similar to those on Contact: Matthew Cock & Rebecca Murphy C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sambia Succinica, a Crown Group Tenthredinid from Eocene Baltic Amber (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae)
    Insect Systematics & Evolution 43 (2012) 271–281 brill.com/ise Sambia succinica, a crown group tenthredinid from Eocene Baltic amber (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) Lars Vilhelmsena,* and Michael S. Engelb aNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark bDivision of Entomology (Paleoentomology), Natural History Museum and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, 1501 Crestline Drive, Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence KS 66045, USA *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Published 17 December 2012 Abstract Sambia succinica gen. et sp.n. from Eocene Baltic amber is described and illustrated. It is apparently the first amber fossil that can be definitively assigned to Tenthredininae. It displays two diagnostic forewing characters for this subfamily: having a bend distally in vein R and the junctions of veins M and Rs + M with vein R being some distance from each other. The variance and possible transitions between the anal vein configurations among the genera in Tenthredininae is briefly discussed. Keywords amber inclusion, sawfly, Tertiary, Eocene, taxonomy Introduction Tenthredinidae is the largest family of non-apocritan Hymenoptera by far, comprising more than 5500 described species (Huber 2009; Taeger & Blank 2010). Together with five other families they comprise the Tenthredinoidea or true sawflies. The larvae of the members of the superfamily are all herbivores and most are external feeders on green parts of angiosperms; however, other host plants and feeding modes (e.g., leafrolling, leafmining, or galling in leaves, buds and shoots; see Nyman et al. 1998, 2000) do occur. Recent comprehensive treatments of the phylogeny of the basal hymenopteran lineages, while providing strong support for the Tenthredinoidea, have consistently failed to retrieve the Tenthredinidae as monophyletic (Vilhelmsen 2001; Schulmeister 2003; Ronquist et al.
    [Show full text]
  • © Download a Contribution to the Sawfsy Fauna of Northern Greece (Hyme
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Beiträge zur Entomologie = Contributions to Entomology Jahr/Year: 1993 Band/Volume: 43 Autor(en)/Author(s): Blank Stephan M. Artikel/Article: A contribution to the sawfly fauna of northern Greece (Hymenoptera, Symphyta). 431-439 ©www.senckenberg.de/; download www.contributions-to-entomology.org/ Beitr. Ent. Berlin ISSN 0005-805 43(1993)2 S. 431-439 18.06.1993 A contribution to the sawfSy fauna of northern Greece (Hymenoptera? Symphyta) With one figure St e p h a n M . B l a n k 1 Abstract This contribution to the Greek sawfly fauna reports on 41 species of Symphyta from Macedonia and Epirus. Nineteen of them are recorded from Greece probably for the first time: Aprosthema austriaca (KONOW, 1892), Strongylogaster xanthocera STEPHENS, 1835, Scolioneura spec., Athalia cornuhiae BENSON, 1931, A. paradoxa K o n o w , 1886,Monostegia abdominalis (F a b r ic t u s , 1798),Allanlus cingulatus (SCOPOU, 1763), Tenthredo brevicornis (KONOW, 1886),T. livida LINNAEUS, 1758, T. maculata semseyi MOCSÄRY, 1883, T. marginella marginella FABRICIUS, 1793, T. notha notha KLUG, 1817, T. obsoleta KLUG, 1817, T. amoena GRAVENHORST, 1807, Rhogogaster viridis (LINNAEUS, 1758), Macrophya rufipes orientalis MOCSÄRY, 1891, M. rufopicta E n s u n , 1910, Aglaostigma aucupariae aucupariae (K l u g , 1817), Romania kriechbaumeri (K o n o w , 1901). The Lectotype of Empria abdominalis var. rufmotis ENSLIN, 1914 (= Monostegia abdominalis FABRICIUS, 1793) is fixed. Zusammenfassung Der vorliegende Beitrag zur griechischen Blattwespenfauna berichtet über 41 Blattwespenarten aus Makedonien und Epirus, von d en en 19 wahrscheinlich erstmals in Griechenland nachgewiesen werden: Aprosthema austriaca (KONOW, 1892),Strongyloga­ ster xanthocera STEPHENS, 1835, Scolioneura spec., Athalia cornubiae BENSON, 1931, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]
  • BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Non-Commercial Use Only
    BOLL.ENTOMOL_150_2_cover.qxp_Layout 1 07/09/18 07:42 Pagina a Poste Italiane S.p.A. ISSN 0373-3491 Spedizione in Abbonamento Postale - 70% DCB Genova BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA only ITALIANA use Volume 150 Fascicolo II maggio-agosto 2018Non-commercial 31 agosto 2018 SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA via Brigata Liguria 9 Genova BOLL.ENTOMOL_150_2_cover.qxp_Layout 1 07/09/18 07:42 Pagina b SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Sede di Genova, via Brigata Liguria, 9 presso il Museo Civico di Storia Naturale n Consiglio Direttivo 2018-2020 Presidente: Francesco Pennacchio Vice Presidente: Roberto Poggi Segretario: Davide Badano Amministratore/Tesoriere: Giulio Gardini Bibliotecario: Antonio Rey only Direttore delle Pubblicazioni: Pier Mauro Giachino Consiglieri: Alberto Alma, Alberto Ballerio,use Andrea Battisti, Marco A. Bologna, Achille Casale, Marco Dellacasa, Loris Galli, Gianfranco Liberti, Bruno Massa, Massimo Meregalli, Luciana Tavella, Stefano Zoia Revisori dei Conti: Enrico Gallo, Sergio Riese, Giuliano Lo Pinto Revisori dei Conti supplenti: Giovanni Tognon, Marco Terrile Non-commercial n Consulenti Editoriali PAOLO AUDISIO (Roma) - EMILIO BALLETTO (Torino) - MAURIZIO BIONDI (L’Aquila) - MARCO A. BOLOGNA (Roma) PIETRO BRANDMAYR (Cosenza) - ROMANO DALLAI (Siena) - MARCO DELLACASA (Calci, Pisa) - ERNST HEISS (Innsbruck) - MANFRED JÄCH (Wien) - FRANCO MASON (Verona) - LUIGI MASUTTI (Padova) - MASSIMO MEREGALLI (Torino) - ALESSANDRO MINELLI (Padova)- IGNACIO RIBERA (Barcelona) - JOSÉ M. SALGADO COSTAS (Leon) - VALERIO SBORDONI (Roma) - BARBARA KNOFLACH-THALER (Innsbruck) - STEFANO TURILLAZZI (Firenze) - ALBERTO ZILLI (Londra) - PETER ZWICK (Schlitz). ISSN 0373-3491 BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA only use Fondata nel 1869 - Eretta a Ente Morale con R. Decreto 28 Maggio 1936 Volume 150 Fascicolo II maggio-agosto 2018Non-commercial 31 agosto 2018 REGISTRATO PRESSO IL TRIBUNALE DI GENOVA AL N.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    UNIVERSITY THOUGHT doi:10.5937/univtho7-15336 Publication in Natural Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2017, pp. 1-27. Original Scientific Paper A CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE OF THE BALKAN LEPIDOPTERA. SOME PYRALOIDEA (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE & PYRALIDAE) ENCOUNTERED RECENTLY IN SOUTHERN SERBIA, MONTENEGRO, THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA AND ALBANIA COLIN W. PLANT1*, STOYAN BESHKOV2, PREDRAG JAKŠIĆ3, ANA NAHIRNIĆ2 114 West Road, Bishops Stortford, Hertfordshire, CM23 3QP, England 2National Museum of Natural History, Sofia, Bulgaria 3Faculty of Natural Science and Mathematics, University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia ABSTRACT Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera: Crambidae & Pyralidae) were sampled in the territories of southern Serbia, Montenegro, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Albania on a total of 53 occasions during 2014, 2016 and 2017. A total of 173 species is reported here, comprising 97 Crambidae and 76 Pyralidae. Based upon published data, 29 species appear to be new to the fauna of Serbia, 5 species are new to the fauna of Macedonia and 37 are new to the fauna of Albania. The data are discussed. Keywords: Faunistics, Serbia, Montenegro, Republic of Macedonia, Albania, Pyraloidea, Pyralidae, Crambidae. of light trap. Some sites were visited on more than one occasion; INTRODUCTION others were sampled once only. Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera: Crambidae and Pyralidae) have As a by-product of this work, all remaining material from been examined in detail in the neighbouring territory of the the traps was returned to Sofia where Dr Boyan Zlatkov was Republic of Bulgaria and the results have been published by one given the opportunity to extract the Tortricoidea. The remaining of us (Plant, 2016). That work presented data for the 386 species material was retained and sent by post to England after the end of and 3 additional subspecies known from that country.
    [Show full text]
  • Micro Moths on Great Cumbrae Island (Vc100)
    The Glasgow Naturalist (online 2017) Volume 26, xx-xx Micro moths on Great Cumbrae Island (vc100) P. G. Moore 32 Marine Parade, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae KA28 0EF E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Forsythia sp. Behind the office is a large mature Few previous records exist for miCro-moths from black mulberry tree (Morus nigra) and to one side is vC100. Data are presented from the first year-round a tall privet hedge (Ligustrum ovalifolium). To the moth-trapping exerCise accomplished on Great rear of my property is a wooded escarpment with Cumbrae Island; one of the least studied of the old-growth ash (Fraxinus excelsior) frequently ivy- Clyde Isles (vC100). Data from a Skinner-type light- Covered (Hedera helix), sycamore (Acer trap, supplemented by Collection of leaf mines from pseudoplatanus) and rowan (Sorbus aucuparia), local trees, revealed the presence of 71 species of with an undergrowth of hawthorn (Crataegus miCro moths, representing 20 new records for the monogyna), wild garliC (Allium ursinum), nettle vice-County. (Urtica dioica), bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) and bramble (Rubus fructicosus). Rhind (1988) detailed INTRODUCTION the vasCular plants found on Great Cumbrae Island The extensive nineteenth-century list of between 1985 and 1987 and delineated the history Lepidoptera in the 1901 handbook on the natural of the island's botanical investigations. Leaves of history of Glasgow and the West of SCotland issued brambles in my garden, beech trees (Fagus for the Glasgow meeting of the British AssoCiation sylvatica) and hazel (Corylus avellana) at other for the Advancement of SCience (Elliot et al., 1901) locations on the island (respectively Craiglea Wood inCluded few Cumbrae records.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Report Spring/Summer 2015 Contents
    Wimbledon and Putney Commons Monitoring Report Spring/Summer 2015 Contents CONTEXT 1 A. SYSTEMATIC RECORDING 3 METHODS 3 OUTCOMES 6 REFLECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 B. BIOBLITZ 19 REFLECTIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT 21 C. REFERENCES 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Location of The Plain on Wimbledon and Putney Commons 2 Figure 2 Experimental Reptile Refuge near the Junction of Centre Path and Somerset Ride 5 Figure 3 Contrasting Cut and Uncut Areas in the Conservation Zone of The Plain, Spring 2015 6/7 Figure 4 Notable Plant Species Recorded on The Plain, Summer 2015 8 Figure 5 Meadow Brown and white Admiral Butterflies 14 Figure 6 Hairy Dragonfly and Willow Emerald Damselfly 14 Figure 7 The BioBlitz Route 15 Figure 8 Vestal and European Corn-borer moths 16 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Mowing Dates for the Conservation Area of The Plain 3 Table 2 Dates for General Observational Records of The Plain, 2015 10 Table 3 Birds of The Plain, Spring - Summer 2015 11 Table 4 Summary of Insect Recording in 2015 12/13 Table 5 Rare Beetles Living in the Vicinity of The Plain 15 LIST OF APPENDICES A1 The Wildlife and Conservation Forum and Volunteer Recorders 23 A2 Sward Height Data Spring 2015 24 A3 Floral Records for The Plain : Wimbledon and Putney Commons 2015 26 A4 The Plain Spring and Summer 2015 – John Weir’s General Reports 30 A5 a Birds on The Plain March to September 2015; 41 B Birds on The Plain - summary of frequencies 42 A6 ai Butterflies on The Plain (DW) 43 aii Butterfly long-term transect including The Plain (SR) 44 aiii New woodland butterfly transect
    [Show full text]