A New Stratigraphic Framework and Constraints for the Position of the Paleocene–Eocene Boundary in the Rapidly Subsiding
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)
Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 33 (2003) Repository 12-20-2003 December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)" (2003). Volume 33 (2003). 51. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003/51 This December is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 33 (2003) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 33 Number 51 Saturday, December 20, 2003 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 6197—6396 Agencies in this issue: The Governor The Courts Department of Aging Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Revenue Fish and Boat Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Public School Employees’ Retirement Board State Board of Education State Board of Nursing State Employee’s Retirement Board State Police Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 349, December 2003 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents). -
Geological Survey of Wyoming
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WYOMING SELECTED REFERENCES USED TO CO~IPILE THE ~IETALLIC AND INDUSTRIAL MI ERALS ~IAP OF WYOMING by Ray E. Harris and W. Dan Hausel OPEN FILE REPORT 85-1 1985 This report has no~ been reviewed for conformity with the editorial standards of the Geological Survey of Wyoming. CONTENTS District or Region Page Introduction . iii Absaroka Mountains ...........................•.......................... 1 Aladdin District . 1 Barlow Canyon District . 1 Bear Lodge District . 1 Big Creek District . 2 Bighorn Basin . 2 Bighorn Mountains ...•................................................... 3 Black Hills . 4 Carlile District ...........•............................................ 5 Centennial Ridge District . 5 Clay Spur District ...................................•.................. 5 Colony District . 6 Cooke City - New World District . 6 Copper Mountain District .........................................•...... 7 Cooper Hill District . 7 Crooks Gap-Green Mountain District . 7 Deer Creek District . 8 Denver Basin . 8 Elkhorn Creek District . 8 Esterbrook District . 8 Gas Hills District . 8 Gold Hill District . 9 Grand Encampment District . 9 Granite Mountains . 9 Green River Basin ................................•...................... 10 Gras Ventre Mountains ..................•...............•................ 11 Hanna Basin . 11 Hartville Uplift . 12 Hulett Creek District .........................................•......... 13 Iron Mountain District . 13 Iron Mountain Kimberlite District ......•............................... -
Fullerton Arboretum Friday, April 22, 2016
Department of Geological Sciences California State University, Fullerton Fullerton Arboretum Friday, April 22, 2016 The Department of Geological Sciences at California State University, Fullerton is an interdisciplinary education and research community whose members are active mentors and role-models. Our mission is to provide a student-centered educational and research experience that emphasizes critical thinking, communication, and scientific citizenship. ‘Research Day’ is an extension of this mission, where students are afforded the opportunity to share their research findings and scientific experiences with faculty, student peers, friends, family, and members of the professional geological community in an informal and supportive environment. Thank you for participating in this year’s event! 7th Annual Geology Research Day California State University, Fullerton ~ Department of Geological Sciences Fullerton Arboretum April 22, 2016 Abstract Volume Table of Contents Undergraduate Proposal Category EXAMINING THE GEOCHEMICAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE TWENTYNINE PALMS AND QUEEN MOUNTAIN PLUTONS IN JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK Student: Alexander Arita Faculty Advisor: Dr. Vali Memeti EXPLORING THE MOJAVE-SNOW LAKE FAULT HYPOTHESIS USING LASER- INDUCED BREAKDOWN SPECTROSCOPY Student: Eduardo Chavez Faculty Advisor: Dr. Vali Memeti INVESTIGATING SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATIONS IN SEDIMENTATION ON INTERTIDAL MUDFLATS Student: Dulce Cortez Faculty Advisor: Dr. Joseph Carlin A PALEOECOLOGY OF PLEISTOCENE OYSTER BEDS, SAN PEDRO, CALIFORNIA Student: Ditmar, Kutcher, Rue Faculty Advisor: Dr. Nicole Bonuso USING K-FELDSPAR MEGACRYSTS AS RECORDERS OF MAGMA PROCESSES IN THE TWENTYNINE PALMS PLUTON IN JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK Student: Lizzeth Flores Urita Faculty Advisor: Dr. Vali Memeti ORGANIC AND INORGANIC CARBON ANALYSES OF SHALLOW SEDIMENTS AT OVERFLOW LAKE, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA. Student: Shayne Fontenot Faculty Advisor: Dr. -
Eocene Green River Formation, Western United States
Synoptic reconstruction of a major ancient lake system: Eocene Green River Formation, western United States M. Elliot Smith* Alan R. Carroll Brad S. Singer Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, 1215 West Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA ABSTRACT Members. Sediment accumulation patterns than being confi ned to a single episode of arid thus refl ect basin-center–focused accumula- climate. Evaporative terminal sinks were Numerous 40Ar/39Ar experiments on sani- tion rates when the basin was underfi lled, initially located in the Greater Green River dine and biotite from 22 ash beds and 3 and supply-limited accumulation when the and Piceance Creek Basins (51.3–48.9 Ma), volcaniclastic sand beds from the Greater basin was balanced fi lled to overfi lled. Sedi- then gradually migrated southward to the Green River, Piceance Creek, and Uinta ment accumulation in the Uinta Basin, at Uinta Basin (47.1–45.2 Ma). This history is Basins of Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah Indian Canyon, Utah, was relatively con- likely related to progressive southward con- constrain ~8 m.y. of the Eocene Epoch. Mul- stant at ~150 mm/k.y. during deposition of struction of the Absaroka Volcanic Prov- tiple analyses were conducted per sample over 5 m.y. of both evaporative and fl uctuat- ince, which constituted a major topographic using laser fusion and incremental heating ing profundal facies, which likely refl ects the and thermal anomaly that contributed to a techniques to differentiate inheritance, 40Ar basin-margin position of the measured sec- regional north to south hydrologic gradient. loss, and 39Ar recoil. -
Albian Rudist Biostratigraphy (Bivalvia), Comanche Shelf to Shelf Margin, Texas
Carnets Geol. 16 (21) Albian rudist biostratigraphy (Bivalvia), Comanche shelf to shelf margin, Texas Robert W. SCOTT 1, 2 2 Yulin WANG 2 Rachel HOJNACKI Yulin WANG 3 Xin LAI 4 Highlights • Barremian-Albian caprinids biostratigraphic zones are revised and integrated with ammonites and benthic foraminifers. • New caprinid rudist species are the key to revising long-held correlations of Albian strata on the Co- manche shelf, Texas. • On the San Marcos Arch, central Texas, the shallow shelf Person Formation is the upper unit of the Fredericksburg Group. • The Person underlies the basal Washita Group sequence boundary Al Sb Wa1 and the Georgetown Formation. Abstract: Rudists were widespread and locally abundant carbonate producers on the Early Cretaceous Comanche Shelf from Florida to Texas, and on Mexican atolls. As members of the Caribbean Biogeogra- phic Province, their early ancestors emigrated from the Mediterranean Province and subsequently evol- ved independently. Comanchean rudists formed biostromes and bioherms on the shelf interior and at the shelf margin. Carbonate stratigraphic units of the Comanche Shelf record rudist evolution during the Barremian through the Albian ages and an established zonal scheme is expanded. This study documents new Albian rudist occurrences from the Middle-Upper Albian Fredericksburg and Washita groups in Central and West Texas. Rudists in cores at and directly behind the shelf margin southeast of Austin and San Antonio, Texas, complement the rudist zonation that is integrated with ammonites and foraminifers. These new rudist data test long-held correlations of the Edwards Group with both the Fredericksburg and Washita groups based solely on lithologies. Rudist and foraminifer biostratigraphy indicate that the Edwards Group is coeval with the Fredericksburg not the Washita Group. -
Mineral Occurrence and Development Potential Report Rawlins Resource
CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose of Report ............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Lands Involved and Record Data ....................................................................................1-2 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF GEOLOGY ...............................................................................................2-1 2.1 Physiography....................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Stratigraphy ......................................................................................................................2-3 2.2.1 Precambrian Era....................................................................................................2-3 2.2.2 Paleozoic Era ........................................................................................................2-3 2.2.2.1 Cambrian System...................................................................................2-3 2.2.2.2 Ordovician, Silurian, and Devonian Systems ........................................2-5 2.2.2.3 Mississippian System.............................................................................2-5 2.2.2.4 Pennsylvanian System...........................................................................2-5 2.2.2.5 Permian System.....................................................................................2-6 -
The Earliest Bioturbators As Ecosystem Engineers
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 27, 2021 Engineering the Cambrian explosion: the earliest bioturbators as ecosystem engineers LIAM G. HERRINGSHAW1,2*, RICHARD H. T. CALLOW1,3 & DUNCAN MCILROY1 1Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Prince Philip Drive, St John’s, NL, A1B 3X5, Canada 2Geology, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK 3Statoil ASA, Stavanger 4035, Norway *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: By applying modern biological criteria to trace fossil types and assessing burrow mor- phology, complexity, depth, potential burrow function and the likelihood of bioirrigation, we assign ecosystem engineering impact (EEI) values to the key ichnotaxa in the lowermost Cambrian (Fortunian). Surface traces such as Monomorphichnus have minimal impact on sediment properties and have very low EEI values; quasi-infaunal traces of organisms that were surficial modifiers or biodiffusors, such as Planolites, have moderate EEI values; and deeper infaunal, gallery biodiffu- sive or upward-conveying/downward-conveying traces, such as Teichichnus and Gyrolithes, have the highest EEI values. The key Cambrian ichnotaxon Treptichnus pedum has a moderate to high EEI value, depending on its functional interpretation. Most of the major functional groups of mod- ern bioturbators are found to have evolved during the earliest Cambrian, including burrow types that are highly likely to have been bioirrigated. In fine-grained (or microbially bound) sedimentary environments, trace-makers of bioirrigated burrows would have had a particularly significant impact, generating advective fluid flow within the sediment for the first time, in marked contrast with the otherwise diffusive porewater systems of the Proterozoic. -
Geology and Coal Resources Op North Park, Colorado
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOR' 596 GEOLOGY AND COAL RESOURCES OP NORTH PARK, COLORADO BY A. L. BEEKLY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction _ ______ _,___________ 7 Location and area__ _ _ _____. __________1___ 7 Accessibility_________________________________ 8 Explorations in the region________________________ 8 Preparation of the map___________________________ 10 Base map_.______________________________ 10 ' Field work_______________________________ 10 Office work______________._________ __ 11 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 11 Geography ______________ ______________________ 12 Relief______________________________________ 12 Major features..____________.________________ 12 Medicine Bow Range_______.________ ______ 12 Park Range____________________________ 13 Continental Divide____________.___________ 13 Floor of the park____________ '._.___________ 13 Minor features________________:_. ______ 14 Drainage___________________ ______________ 16 Settlement__________i_______________________ 18 Stratigraphy __________ __________.___________ 19 Sedimentary rocks ______________________________ 19 Age and correlation.. ______!____ .___________ 19 Geologic section________________._________'_ 20 Carboniferous (?) system_______________________ 21 Pennsylvanfan or Permian (?) series______________ 21 Distribution and character_____.___________ 21 Stratigraphic relations________.___________ 21 Fossils_____________________________ 22 Triassic (?) -
The Hell Creek Formation, Montana: a Stratigraphic Review and Revision Based on a Sequence Stratigraphic Approach
Review The Hell Creek Formation, Montana: A Stratigraphic Review and Revision Based on a Sequence Stratigraphic Approach Denver Fowler 1,2 1 Badlands Dinosaur Museum, Dickinson Museum Center, Dickinson, ND 58601, USA; [email protected] 2 Museum of the Rockies, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA Received: 12 September 2020; Accepted: 30 October 2020; Published: date Supporting Information 1. Methods: Lithofacies Descriptions Facies descriptions follow methodology laid out in Miall (1985). Descriptions mostly follow those of Flight (2004) for the Bearpaw Shale and Fox Hills Sandstone. Additional lithofacies are described for the Colgate sandstone, ?Battle Formation, an undivided Hell Creek Formation, and the lowermost 5–10 m of the Fort Union Formation. It was desirable to stay as close to Flight's (2004) definitions as possible in order to facilitate cross comparison between measured sections and interpretation; however I have also chosen to remain true to the intentions of Brown (1906) in keeping the Basal Sandstone (and associated basal scour) as the first unit of the Hell Creek Formation, rather than the tidal flats identified by Flight (2004). This analysis is not as concerned with the nature of the basal contacts as much as internal stratigraphy within the Hell Creek Formation itself, hence some of the stratal and facies relationships described by Flight (2004) were not directly observed by myself, but I have included them here to ease comparisons. 1.1. Bearpaw Shale The Bearpaw Shale is the basalmost formation considered in this study; as such only the uppermost 10–20 m have been observed in outcrop. In this upper 20 m or so, the Bearpaw Shale generally coarsens upwards, predominantly comprising shale with occasional interbedded sandstone. -
Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802 -
Paleogene: Paleocene) Of
Cainozoic Research, 8(1-2), pp. 13-28, December2011 Chondrichthyans from the Clayton Limestone Unit of the Midway Group (Paleogene: Paleocene) of Hot Spring County, Arkansas, USA ¹, ² Martin+A. Becker Lauren+C. Smith¹ & John+A. Chamberlain+Jr. 1 Department ofEnvironmentalScience, William Paterson University, Wayne, New Jersey 07470; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department ofGeology, Brooklyn College andDoctoralProgram in Earth and EnvironmentalSciences, City University ofNew YorkGraduate Center, New York 10016; email:[email protected] Received 7 September 2010; revised version accepted 26 June 2011 LimestoneUnit of The Clayton the Midway Group (Paleocene) in southwestern Arkansas preserves one ofthe oldest chondrichthyan Cenozoic from the Gulf Coastal Plainofthe United assemblages yet reported States. Present are at least eight taxa, including; Odontaspis winkleriLeriche, Carcharias cf. whitei Carcharias Anomotodon 1905; (Arambourg, 1952); sp.; novus (Winkler, 1874); Cretalamnasp.; Otodus obliquus Agassiz, 1843; Hypolophodon sylvestris (White, 1931); Myliobatis dixoni Agassiz, 1843; and a chimaeridofindeterminate affiliation.Also present are lamnoid-type and carcharhinoid-type chondrichthyan vertebral centra. The Clayton chondrichthyan assem- blage derives from an outcrop locatedonly a few kilometersfrom a site exposing an assemblage ofMaastrichtianchondrichthyans from Because and the upper Arkadelphia Marl. these assemblages are closely spaced stratigraphically geographically, they provide data on chondrichthyan taxonomic turnover -
Meddelelser139.Pdf
MEDDELELSER NR. 139 Soviet Geological Research in Svalbard 1962-1992 Extended abstracts of unpublished reports Edited by: A.A. Krasil'scikov Polar Marine Geological Research Expedition NORSK POLARINSTITUTT OSLO 1996 Sponsored by: Russian-Norwegian Joint Venture "SEVOTEAM", St.Petersburg lAse Secretariat, Oslo ©Norsk Polarinstitutt, Oslo 1996 Compilation: AAKrasil'sCikov, M.Ju.Miloslavskij, AV.Pavlov, T.M.Pcelina, D.V.Semevskij, AN.Sirotkin, AM.Teben'kov and E.p.Skatov: Poljamaja morskaja geologorazvedocnaja ekspedicija, Lomonosov - St-Peterburg (Polar Marine Geological Research Expedition, Lomonosov - St.Petersburg) 189510, g. Lomonosov, ul. Pobedy, 24, RUSSIA Figures drawn by: N.G.Krasnova and L.S.Semenova Translated from Russian by: R.V.Fursenko Editor of English text: L.E.Craig Layout: W.K.Dallmann Printed February 1996 Cover photo: AM. Teben'kov: Field camp in Møllerfjorden, northwestem Spitsbergen, summer 1991. ISBN 82-7666-102-5 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY REMARKS by W.K.DALLMANN 6 PREFACE by A.A.KRASIL'SCIKOV 7 1. MAIN FEATURES OF THE GEOLOGY OF SVALBARD 8 KRASIL'SCIKOV ET 1986: Explanatory notes to a series of geological maps of Spitsbergen 8 AL. 2. THE FOLDED BASEMENT 16 KRASIL'SCIKOV& LOPA 1963: Preliminary results ofthe study ofCaledonian granitoids and Hecla TIN Hoek gneis ses in northernSvalbard 16 KRASIL'SCIKOV& ABAKUMOV 1964: Preliminary results ofthe study of the sedimentary-metamorphic Hecla Hoek Complex and Paleozoic granitoids in centralSpitsbergen and northern Nordaustlandet 17 ABAKUMOV 1965: Metamorphic rocks of the Lower