Xavier MESMIN 15 Juin 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Xavier MESMIN 15 Juin 2018 RÉSUMÉ ABSTRACT La régulation naturelle des insectes ravageurs des cultures légu- Pest natural regulation in vegetable crops and its consequences on mières et ses conséquences sur la production : quantifi cation du ser- crop production: quantifi cation of the service and investigation of vice fourni et recherche de leviers pour son intensifi cation levers for its intensifi cation Le développement d’une agriculture moins dépendante des Developping farming systems that use less pesticides is partly pesticides repose en partie sur la maximisation des services based on the intensifi cation of ecosystem services. The main aim écosystémiques. L’objectif principal de cette thèse était de quan- of this thesis was to quantify the insect pest regulation service pro- tifi er le service de régulation des insectes ravageurs par leurs vided by their natural enemies, both in experimental plots and in ennemis naturels, en conditions expérimentales et en situation farmers fi elds. We worked on brassicaceous vegetables that are de production. Le travail a porté sur les brassicacées légumières confronted to pest attacks on above- and belowground organs soumises aux attaques de ravageurs aériens et souterrains (pu- (aphids and the cabbage root fl y). We assessed their harmfulness, cerons et mouche du chou). Nous avons évalué leur nuisibilité in order to quantify the injuries and damage these pests can infl ict pour quantifi er les dégâts et dommages qu’ils peuvent générer. to plants. Our results confi rm that aphids are less harmful than Nos résultats confi rment la moindre nuisibilité des pucerons par the cabbage root fl y. On fl ower vegetables, the latter not only leads rapport à celle de la mouche du chou. Pour celle-ci, la nuisibi- to plant mortality but can also slow plant development. We also lité sur légume-fl eur s’exprime non seulement par la mortalité showed that ground dwelling predators signifi cantly reduce the po- des plants mais aussi par un effet sur leur développement. Nous pulations of both pests, leading, for the cabbage root fl y, to a strong avons également montré que les prédateurs épigés réduisaient decrease in plant mortality rate. Finally, simplifying soil tillage in signifi cativement les populations des deux ravageurs, ce qui, the spring did not favor ground dwelling predators overwintering pour la mouche du chou, conduit à une baisse conséquente inside the fi eld and neither did it increase natural regulation ser- de la mortalité des plants. Enfi n, simplifi er le travail du sol au vice in the short term. However, early ground dwelling predators printemps n’a pas permis de favoriser les prédateurs hivernant are fundamental and must be favored by tailored practices both dans la parcelle, ni d’augmenter le service de régulation à court inside and around the fi elds. The knowledge gained in the present terme. Cependant les prédateurs précoces sont déterminants et thesis show the potential of conservation biological control for the doivent être favorisés par des pratiques intra- et péri-parcellaires agroecological management of insect pest populations ciblées. Les connaissances acquises dans ce travail démontrent le potentiel de la lutte biologique par conservation pour une ges- Keywords: natural regulation; ecosystem services; conservation bio- tion agro-écologique effi cace des insectes ravageurs. logical control; cabbage root fl y; aphids; brassicaceous vegetables Mots-clefs : régulation naturelle ; services écosystémiques ; lutte biologique par conservation ; mouche du chou ; pucerons ; brassi- Xavier MESMIN • 15 juin 2018 cacées légumières Thèse AGROCAMPUS OUEST ÉCOLE DOCTORALE • Écologie, Géosciences, Agronomie et sous le label de l’Université Bretagne Loire Alimentation (EGAAL) pour obtenir le grade de LABORATOIRE D’ACCUEIL • UMR INRA / AGROCAMPUS OUEST / DOCTEUR D’AGROCAMPUS OUEST Université de Rennes 1, Institut de génétique, environnement et La régulation naturelle des insectes ravageurs des cultures légumières et ses conséquences sur la production : la production sur conséquences ses et cultures légumières des ravageurs des insectes naturelle La régulation cation intensifi son pour de leviers recherche cation du service et fourni quantifi Spécialité Sciences agronomiques protection des plantes (IGEPP) Philippe LETERME La régulation naturelle des Professeur émérite AGROCAMPUS OUEST, UMR SAS / président AGROCAMPUS OUEST • Institut supérieur des sciences agronomiques, Isabelle BADENHAUSSER agroalimentaires, horticoles et du paysage insectes ravageurs des Ingénieure de recherche, UMR CEBC / rapporteure 65 rue de Saint-Brieuc – CS84215 – F-35042 Rennes Cedex Jean-Noël AUBERTOT Tél. : 02 23 48 50 00 Directeur de recherche, UMR AGIR / rapporteur www.agrocampus-ouest.fr cultures légumières et ses •MESMIN Xavier •MESMIN Françoise LESCOURET Directrice de recherche, UR PSH / examinatrice conséquences sur la production : Adrien RUSCH Chargé de recherche, UMR SAVE / examinateur quantifi cation du service fourni Anne LE RALEC Professeure AGROCAMPUS OUEST, UMR IGEPP / directrice de thèse Anne-Marie CORTESERO et recherche de leviers Professeure Université Rennes1, UMR IGEPP / co-directrice de thèse C-134 — 2018-11 Vincent FALOYA pour son intensifi cation Ingénieur de recherche, UMR IGEPP / co-encadrant de thèse Thèse Thèse Anaïs MASSE Ingénieure, Agrial / membre invitée THESE / AGROCAMPUS OUEST Sous le label de l’Université Bretagne Loire pour obtenir le diplôme de : DOCTEUR D’AGROCAMPUS OUEST École doctorale : Écologie, Géosciences, Agronomie et Alimentation (EGAAL) Spécialité : Sciences agronomiques présentée par : Xavier Mesmin La régulation naturelle des insectes ravageurs des cultures légumières et ses conséquences sur la production : quantification du service fourni et recherche de leviers pour son intensification Soutenue le 15/06/2018, devant le jury composé de : Isabelle Badenhausser Ingénieure de recherche, UMR CNRS-ULR CEBC / rapporteure Jean-Noël Aubertot Directeur de recherche, UMR INPT-INRA AGIR / rapporteur Françoise Lescourret Directrice de recherche, UR INRA PSH / examinatrice Adrien Rusch Chargé de recherche, UMR BSA-INRA- ISVV SAVE / examinateur Philippe Leterme Professeur émérite, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, UMR AO-INRA SAS / examinateur Anne Le Ralec Professeure, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, UMR AO-INRA-UR1 IGEPP / directrice de thèse Anne-Marie Cortesero Professeure, Université de Rennes 1, UMR AO-INRA-UR1 IGEPP / co-directrice de thèse Vincent Faloya Ingénieur de recherche, UMR AO-INRA-UR1 IGEPP / co-directeur de thèse Anaïs Masse Ingénieur service agronomique et protection des cultures, Agrial / membre invitée Cette œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. 2 Remerciements C’est un grand plaisir que d’avoir ici l’occasion de remercier toutes les personnes qui m’ont accompagné, aidé, encadré, durant cette thèse, et sans qui ce travail n’aurait jamais pu être possible. D’abord un grand merci à Anne Le Ralec, Anne-Marie Cortesero et Vincent Faloya pour avoir écrit ce beau projet de thèse et merci également à la Chaire AEI et à la Région Bretagne d’avoir cru en l’utilité d’un tel projet en apportant leur financement. Merci de nouveau aux trois individus susnommés pour avoir relu ma prose un nombre incalculable de fois (vraiment : incalculable !). Merci d’avoir rayé, reformulé, raturé, gribouillé les différentes parties qui suivent malgré vos emplois du temps tous plus surchargés les uns que les autres. On parle beaucoup de la quantité de travail des doctorants mais j’ai été bien placé pour voir qu’une thèse représente également un investissement hors du commun du côté des encadrants. Merci particulièrement à Anne pour tes relectures conscienceuses (nous avions bien compris dès le début que rien ne partirai sans que tu l’aies relu), pour être venue de temps en temps sur le terrain, pour les séances de rédaction en commun, pour le voyage d’étude PPE, pour m’avoir donné un aperçu de ce qu’est la vie d’un enseignant-chercheur (pas toujours réjouissant, soyons honnête) et pour ton humour qui a permis de passer les périodes de turbulences en faisant un pas de côté, en prenant un peu de recul. Un merci spécial à Anne-Marie pour tes relectures et pour la forme particulièrement bien tournée de tes remarques, jamais cassantes, et constructives. Difficile en effet de faire parvenir des idées avec un ton approprié à un interlocuteur avec qui on échange presqu’exclusivement par documents Word. Merci à Vincent pour tous les conseils agronomiques sur la mise en place des essais, merci pour les nombreuses discussions sur la conception des expériences et merci d’avoir annulé un après-midi de bureau pour venir planter des choux en urgence, un jour de printemps 2016. Enfin merci à tous les trois pour avoir toujours cru qu’on allait y arriver ! Ensuite merci aux deux personnes qui m’auront le plus appris en termes pratiques et techniques durant cette thèse : merci à Marion Maret et à Loïc Daniel. Merci à la première d’avoir accueilli avec bienveillance un jeune parvenu, parachuté d’on ne sait où pour plus ou moins lui piquer son boulot. Merci de m’avoir transmis ton expérience sur les cultures légumières, sur l’entomologie, sur l’organisation d’un terrain. Et merci de t’être investie sans compter dans un essai sur lequel tu n’avais objectivement pas beaucoup d’intérêt à t’arracher. Loïc, merci pour ton aide extrêmement précieuse au champ et au laboratoire. J’espère (et je crois savoir) que nous t’avons bien accueilli dans notre équipe. J’étais aux
Recommended publications
  • Egg-Mimics of Streptanthus (Cruciferae) Deter Oviposition by Pieris Sisymbrii (Lepidoptera: Pieridae)
    Oecologia (Berl) (1981) 48:142-143 Oecologia Springer-Verlag 198l Short Communication Egg-Mimics of Streptanthus (Cruciferae) Deter Oviposition by Pieris sisymbrii (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) Arthur M. Shapiro Department of Zoology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA Summary. Streptanthus breweri, a serpentine-soil annual mus- appear to decrease the attractiveness of mature S. glandulosus tard, produces pigmented callosities on its upper leaves which to ovipositing females (Shapiro, in press). are thought to mimic the eggs of the Pierid butterfly Pieris The efficacy of the suspected egg-mimics of S. breweri was sisymbrii. P. sisymbrii is one of several inflorescence - infructes- tested afield at Turtle Rock, Napa County, California (North cence-feeding Pierids which assess egg load visually on individual Coast Ranges). The site is an almost unvegetated, steep serpen- host plants prior to ovipositing. Removal of the "egg-mimics" tine talus slope with a S to SW exposure. S. breweri is the domi- from S. breweri plants in situ significantly increases the probabili- nant Crucifer (S. glandulosus also occurs) and P. sisymbrii the ty of an oviposition relative to similar, intact plants. dominant Pierid (Anthocharis sara Lucas and Euchloe hyantis Edw., both Euchloines, are present). On 10 April 1980 I prepared two lists of 50 numbers from a random numbers table. On 11 April, 100 plants of S. breweri "Egg-load assessment" occurs when a female insect's choice in the appropriate phenophase (elongating/budding, bearing egg- to oviposit or not on a given substrate is influenced by whether mimics) were numbered and tagged. Each was measured, its or not eggs (con or heterospecific) are present.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 12 - Number 1 March 2005
    Utah Lepidopterist Bulletin of the Utah Lepidopterists' Society Volume 12 - Number 1 March 2005 Extreme Southwest Utah Could See Iridescent Greenish-blue Flashes A Little Bit More Frequently by Col. Clyde F. Gillette Battus philenor (blue pipevine swallowtail) flies in the southern two- thirds of Arizona; in the Grand Canyon (especially at such places as Phantom Ranch 8/25 and Indian Gardens 12/38) and at its rims [(N) 23/75 and (S) 21/69]; in the low valleys of Clark Co., Nevada; and infrequently along the Meadow Valley Wash 7/23 which parallels the Utah/Nevada border in Lincoln Co., Nevada. Since this beautiful butterfly occasionally flies to the west, southwest, and south of Utah's southwest corner, one might expect it to turn up now and then in Utah's Mojave Desert physiographic subsection of the Basin and Range province on the lower southwest slopes of the Beaver Dam Mountains, Battus philenor Blue Pipevine Swallowtail Photo courtesy of Randy L. Emmitt www.rlephoto.com or sporadically fly up the "Dixie Corridor" along the lower Virgin River Valley. Even though both of these Lower Sonoran life zone areas reasons why philenor is not a habitual pipevine species.) Arizona's of Utah offer potentially suitable, resident of Utah's Dixie. But I think interesting plant is Aristolochia "nearby" living conditions for Bat. there is basically only one, and that is watsonii (indianroot pipevine), which phi. philenor, such movements have a complete lack of its larval has alternate leaves shaped like a not often taken place. Or, more foodplants in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review: Suomen Kiitajat Ja Kehraajat
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 52(3), 1998,342-.343 BOOK REVIEWS PAPILIONIDAE Y PIEHIDAE DE MEXICO: DlSTHIBUCI6N GEOGHAFICA E ILUSTRACI6N, by Jorge E. Llorente-Bousquets, Leonor Onate-Ocana, Armando Luis-Martine z, and Isabel Vargas-Femandez. Illustrations by Pal Janos. 1997. Published by Comision Nacional Para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) and Facultad de Ciencias, Uni­ versidad Nacional Autanoma de Mexico. 227 + 8 pages, 28 color plates, 116 distribution maps. Softcover, glossy pape r, 21.5 x 28.0 cm, ISBN 968-36-6456-3. Available from the Museo d e Zoologfa, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, Apdo. Postal 70-399, Ciudad Universi­ taria, 04510, Mexico D.F., e-mail: [email protected]. for about u.s. $35.00. Since its formation in 1978, the "Alfonso L. Herrera" Zoology Museum (MZFC) in the Sciences Department at Mexico's National Autonomous Unive rsity has been one of the leading Mexican natural history research institutions, with collections and specialists in groups such as ectoparasites, fish, reptiles, amphibians, birds, mammals, and Lepidoptera, especially butterflies. In the last 20 years, tbis institution has amassed and assembled one of the largest and most complete collections of Mexican butterflies. Published results of fieldwork by museum faculty in the Mexican states of Veracruz, Oaxaca, Guerre ro, Colima, and Jalisco bave revealed a much more diverse butterfly fauna in those states than was pre­ viously believed, and have made available a tremendous amount of new information on tbe temporal and geographical distribution of the butterfly fauna in westem Mexico. For a nation with approxi mately 2000 species of butterflies (including skippers), sur­ priSingly few regional lists of species and no comprehensive field gUides to any group of butterflies are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Review of the United States Forest Service
    SCIENCE REVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND MANAGEMENT Summary Report 1255 23 rd Street, NW, Suite 275 Washington, DC 20037 http://www.resolv.org Tel 202-965-6381 | Fax 202-338-1264 [email protected] April 2011 SCIENCE REVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND MANAGEMENT Summary Report Science Reviewers*: Dr. John P. Hayes, University of Florida Dr. Alan T. Herlihy, Oregon State University Dr. Robert B. Jackson, Duke University Dr. Glenn P. Juday , University of Alaska Dr. William S. Keeton, University of Vermont Dr. Jessica E. Leahy , University of Maine Dr. Barry R. Noon, Colorado State University * Order of authors is alphabetical by last name RESOLVE Staff: Dr. Steven P. Courtney (Project Lead) Debbie Y. Lee Cover photo courtesy of Urban (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Muir_Wood10.JPG). is a non-partisan organization that serves as a neutral, third-party in policy decision-making. One of RESOLVE’s specialties is helping incorporate technical and scientific expertise into policy decisions. Headquartered in Washington, DC, RESOLVE works nationally and internationally on environmental, natural resource, energy, health, and land use planning issues. Visit http://www.resolv.org for more details. Contact RESOLVE at [email protected] . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The US Forest Service asked RESOLVE to coordinate an external science review of the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for National Forest System Land Management Planning. The basic charge of the review process was to ‘evaluate how well the proposed planning rule Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) considers the best available science.
    [Show full text]
  • Work in Progress VASCULAR PLANTS
    3.C Biological Resources Table 3C-1 Church of the Woods Sensitive Plants VASCULAR PLANTS Flowering CNPS Occurrence Scientific Name Common Name Period Federal State List Preferred Habitat Distribution On-Site Acanthoscyphus Cushenbury June-Sept. FE NONE 1B.1 Limestone talus from 4,800 to Endemic to northern slopes NE parishii var. oxytheca 7,500 feet. of the San Bernardino goodmaniana Mountains. Arabis parishii Parish’s rock cress Apr.-May NONE NONE 1B.2 Pebble pavement on dry slopes Bear Valley and Sugarloaf NE from 6,500 to 9,800 feet. Yellow Peak. pine forest, red fir forest. Arenaria ursina Big Bear Valley May-Aug. FT NONE 1B.2 Pebble pavement on dry slopes Endemic to San Bernardino NE sandwort from 6,000 to 7,000 feet. Pinyon Mountains, known only and Juniper woodland. from Big Bear and Baldwin Lakes. Astragalus Big Bear Valley May-July NONE NONE 1B.2 Pebble pavement from 6,000 to Known from the central San NE leucolobus woolly pod 8,000 feet. Upper montane Gabriel Mountains, San coniferous forest. Pinyon and Bernardino and Santa Rosa juniper woodland and sagebrush Mountains. scrub. Berberis nevinii Nevin’s barberry Mar.-Apr. FE SE 1B.1 Sandy and gravelly places below Known from the hills south NE 2,000 feet. Coastal sage scrub and of Loma Linda in San chaparral. Bernardino County and in the area around Vail Lake in Riverside County. Calochortus palmeri Palmer’s mariposa May-July NONE NONE 1B.2 Meadows and moist places from Known from the north San NE var. palmeri lily 3,500 to 6,500 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Ts Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports
    DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE & SCIENCE OF NATURE DENVER MUSEUM NUMBER 16, OCTOBER 11, 2019 SCIENCE.DMNS.ORG/MUSEUM-PUBLICATIONS Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports 2001 Colorado Boulevard (Print) ISSN 2374-7730 Denver, CO 80205, U.S.A. Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (Online) ISSN 2374-7749 REPORTS • NUMBER 16 • OCTOBER 11, 2019 • NUMBER 16 OCTOBER Cover photo: Oreas Anglewing (Polygonia oreas nigrozephyrus Scott, 1984), Gregory Canyon, Boulder County, Colorado, USA, 2 October 1973, leg. Michael G. Pogue. Photo: Bob Livingston. The Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (ISSN Frank Krell, PhD, Editor and Production 2374-7730 [print], ISSN 2374-7749 [online]) is an open- access, non peer-reviewed scientifi c journal publishing papers about DMNS research, collections, or other Program and Abstracts Museum related topics, generally authored or co-authored 30th Annual Meeting by Museum staff or associates. Peer review will only be arranged on request of the authors. of the High Country Lepidopterists October 11–12, 2019 The journal is available online at science.dmns.org/ Museum-Publications free of charge. Paper copies Denver Museum of Nature & Science are available for purchase from our print-on-demand publisher Lulu (www.lulu.com). DMNS owns the copyright of the works published in the Reports, which are Frank-Thorsten Krell (Ed.) published under the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial license. For commercial use of published
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Butterflies and Their Biology to Forward Such for Inclusion in the Larger Study
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39(2). 1985. 95-118 NEV ADA BUTTERFLIES: PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION GEORGE T. AUSTIN Nevada State Museum and Historical Society, 700 Twin Lakes Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 ABSTRACT. The distribution by county of the 189 species (over 300 taxa) of but­ terflies occurring in Nevada is presented along with a list of species incorrectly recorded for the state. There are still large areas which are poorly or not collected. Nevada continues as one of the remaining unknown areas in our knowledge of butterfly distribution in North America. Although a com­ prehensive work on the state's butterflies is in preparation, there is sufficient demand for a preliminary checklist to justify the following. It is hoped this will stimulate those who have any data on Nevada butterflies and their biology to forward such for inclusion in the larger study. Studies of Nevada butterflies are hampered by a paucity of resident collectors, a large number of mountain and valley systems and vast areas with little or no access. Non-resident collectors usually funnel into known and well worked areas, and, although their data are valu­ able, large areas of the state remain uncollected. Intensive collecting, with emphasis on poorly known areas, over the past seven years by Nevada State Museum personnel and associates has gone far to clarify butterfly distribution within the state. The gaps in knowledge are now more narrowly identifiable and will be filled during the next few sea­ sons. There is no all encompassing treatment of Nevada's butterfly fauna. The only state list is an informal recent checklist of species (Harjes, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Evaluation of Euchloe Olympia (W
    Volume 8, Number 6 ISSN 2643-4776 (print) / ISSN 2643-4806 (online) 27 April 2020 The Taxonomic Report OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEPIDOPTERA SURVEY Re-evaluation of Euchloe olympia (W. H. Edwards, 1871) (Pieridae: Pierinae) from a geographic and taxonomic perspective. Harry Pavulaan1 606 Hunton Place NE Leesburg, VA 20176 ABSTRACT. The taxonomic status of regional populations of Euchloe olympia (W. H. Edwards, 1871) is re- evaluated here. A review of pertinent literature and a critique of Clench & Opler (1983) are provided. The taxon rosa and two distinct populations of the Great Lakes “dune form” are each proposed for recognition at subspecific rank. The status of synonym anniha Ebner (1970) is addressed. Key words: Apical infuscation, dune form, inland form, isolates. ZooBank registration: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B12650ED-EC10-46D3-BAE2-74CA80ECE605 INTRODUCTION William Henry Edwards first described Anthocaris olympia (W. H. Edwards, 1871) as follows: 1 Staff Member, The International Lepidoptera Survey, Leesburg, VA. 1 Interestingly, the species was described from a pair taken at Coalburgh, West Virginia and a male taken at Dallas, Texas. While not illustrated with the original description, olympia was later illustrated in W. H. Edwards (1884) (Fig. 1) and a male [top left image of the TTR banner for this paper] was later illustrated in W.H. Edwards (1897). F. M. Brown (1973) designated a male lectotype for olympia from the W. H. Edwards collection in the Carnegie Museum of Natural History (fig. 3), which is illustrated in Fig. 1 of F. M. Brown (1973). The type locality was noted from Edwards’ original male lectotype label as “Kan”.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review, of Systematics of Western North American Butterflies
    (NEW Dec. 3, PAPILIO SERIES) ~19 2008 CORRECTIONS/REVIEWS OF 58 NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY BOOKS Dr. James A. Scott, 60 Estes Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226-1254 Abstract. Corrections are given for 58 North American butterfly books. Most of these books are recent. Misidentified figures mostly of adults, erroneous hostplants, and other mistakes are corrected in each book. Suggestions are made to improve future butterfly books. Identifications of figured specimens in Holland's 1931 & 1898 Butterfly Book & 1915 Butterfly Guide are corrected, and their type status clarified, and corrections are made to F. M. Brown's series of papers on Edwards; types (many figured by Holland), because some of Holland's 75 lectotype designations override lectotype specimens that were designated later, and several dozen Holland lectotype designations are added to the J. Pelham Catalogue. Type locality designations are corrected/defined here (some made by Brown, most by others), for numerous names: aenus, artonis, balder, bremnerii, brettoides, brucei (Oeneis), caespitatis, cahmus, callina, carus, colon, colorado, coolinensis, comus, conquista, dacotah, damei, dumeti, edwardsii (Oarisma), elada, epixanthe, eunus, fulvia, furcae, garita, hermodur, kootenai, lagus, mejicanus, mormo, mormonia, nilus, nympha, oreas, oslari, philetas, phylace, pratincola, rhena, saga, scudderi, simius, taxiles, uhleri. Five first reviser actions are made (albihalos=austinorum, davenporti=pratti, latalinea=subaridum, maritima=texana [Cercyonis], ricei=calneva). The name c-argenteum is designated nomen oblitum, faunus a nomen protectum. Three taxa are demonstrated to be invalid nomina nuda (blackmorei, sulfuris, svilhae), and another nomen nudum ( damei) is added to catalogues as a "schizophrenic taxon" in order to preserve stability. Problems caused by old scientific names and the time wasted on them are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS DDS-43, Status of Butterflies
    ARTHUR M. SHAPIRO Center for Population Biology University of California Davis, California 27 Status of Butterflies ABSTRACT alpine fell fields). Most of the Sierra is forested, yet most of its butterfly diversity is not found in the forest—a fact first noted The Sierra Nevada has an unusually rich butterfly fauna that, how- by Emmel and Emmel (1963b). ever, is distinguished by little endemism at either species or subspe- Butterflies are important for biodiversity and conservation cies levels. This may change soon, as more taxonomic subspecies biology because they are diverse enough that patterns in dis- are named. The fauna is structured altitudinally, latitudinally, and be- tribution and diversity are demonstrable; their taxonomy is tween east and west slopes. Maximum species richness occurs at in relatively good shape, at least compared with that of most middle elevations on the west slope and around lower passes. En- other invertebrates; they include both ecological generalists demism and relictualism are concentrated at high elevation (subal- and specialists, with some of these specialists tied to unusual pine and alpine) and on unusual soils at lower elevations. Some patterns and/or endangered habitats; they often have close and poten- of endemism and relictualism suggest a very dynamic biogeography tially coevolved relationships with larval host plants and some- in the Quaternary period, further supported by phylogeographic (ge- times with adult nectar sources; they are relatively easy to study netic) studies. The historic butterfly record is so poor that the effects of and are large enough to be marked individually (and are iden- land use and management on the fauna can only be guessed at.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotics As Host Plants of the California Butterfly Fauna
    Biological Conservation 110 (2003) 413–433 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Exotics as host plants of the California butterfly fauna Sherri D. Gravesa,*, Arthur M. Shapirob a1430 Castec Drive, Sacramento, CA 95864, USA bCenter for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA Received 22 August 2001; accepted 1 July 2002 Abstract Introduced species may impact native species and communities in many ways. One which has received relatively little attention is by serving as resources for natives, thereby altering their ecology. We address such impacts on the California butterfly fauna as currently understood. Eighty-two of California’s approximately 236 butterfly species (34%) are reported as ovipositing or feeding on introduced plant taxa. Many more utilize introduced plants as nectar sources. Interactions with introduced plant taxa are not distributed evenly among butterfly species. Alpine and desert butterflies interact with relatively few introduced plants because few exotic plant species have reached and successfully colonized these habitats. Other California butterfly species are specialists on particular plant families or genera with no exotic representatives in California and have thus far failed to recognize any introduced plants as potential foodplants. Some California butterflies have expanded their geographic ranges and/or extended their flight sea- sons by feeding on exotic plants. However, negative impacts of exotic plant species can also occur. At least three of the state’s butterfly species currently lay eggs on introduced taxa that are toxic to larvae. Impacts of introduced plant taxa on California’s butterflies are expected to increase as both habitat conversion and alien introductions accelerate. # 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Fe and Las Vegas, and Speyeria Nokomis Nigrocaerules W
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 49(2), 1995, 119~ 135 DISTRIBUTION OF SELECTED ANTHOCHARIS, EUCHLOE AND PONTlA (PIERIDAE) IN NEW MEXICO, TEXAS, CHIHUAHUA AND SONORA RICHARD HOLLAND 1625 Roma NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA ABSTRACT. This article presents the collecting history leading to the discovery of Euchloe guaymasensis Opler and documents extensions in the known range of four other pierids: Anthocharis sara, Anthocharis pima, Euchloe hyantis, and Pontia sisymbrii. Pontia sisymbrii transversa, originally described as a form of P. s. sisymbrii (Boisduval), is elevated to subspecific status. Additional key words: Anthocharis sara, Anthocharis pima, Euchloe hyantis, Pontia sisymbrii transversa, Euchloe guaymasensis. Prior to 1965, butterfly distribution records from New Mexico and northwestern Mexico (excluding Baja California) reflected the distri­ bution of collectors not butterflies. Extensive collecting in New Mexico had been done only around Albuquerque, Santa Fe, Jemez Springs, Las Vegas, Fort Wingate, and Alamogordo; each of these sites had had resident collectors (see next paragraph). Some field work also had been conducted near Silver City by Bruce Harris and near Los Alamos by Carl Cushing, although the records accumulated by these two lepidop­ terists were not widely communicated. [The Cushing were reported by Toliver, Holland, and Cary (1994). Some of the Harris records were lost, although many may have been passed on to Cliff Ferris or Dale Zimmerman, who eventually contributed to the Grant County, New Mexico list of Ferris (1976, 1977)], With the exception of the Townsend collection from Colonia Juarez, Chihuahua (Clench 1965), most pre- 1965 collecting in Chihuahua and Sonora was restricted to the vicinity of main highways.
    [Show full text]