DOCSLIB.ORG

Shaping Iraq's Security Forces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Burke Chair in Strategy Shaping Iraq’s Security Forces US-Iranian Competition Series By Anthony H. Cordesman, Sam Khazai, and Daniel Dewit December 16, 2013 Request for comments: This report is a draft that will be turned into an electronic book. Comments and suggested changes would be greatly appreciated. Please send any comments to Anthony H. Cordsman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, at [email protected]. ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Shaping Iraqi Security Forces December 2013 1 Table of Contents SHAPING IRAQ’S SECURITY FORCES ............................................................................................... 3 Figure 1: Iraqi Security Forces as of October 10, 2011 ............................................................................................. 4 A Destabilizing Early US Departure ........................................................................................................................ 5 The Uncertain Development of Iraq’s Security Forces ............................................................................................ 7 Figure 2: Key Elements of Iraqi Security Forces in 2013 ........................................................................................... 9 Iraqi Dependence and the Failure to Create a Lasting US Presence ....................................................................... 10 The Uncertain Impact of Imposing a US Military Culture on Iraq ........................................................................... 11 A Focus that Did Not Provide Iraq With Effective Forces for External Defense ...................................................... 12 Reliance on a Limited US Office of Security Cooperation - Iraq (OSC-I).................................................................. 12 Figure 3: The Iran-Iraq Military Balance in 2003 and 2013 ..................................................................................... 14 The Uncertain Future of the US Effort .................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 4: Iraq Arms Sales Requests and Deliveries from the US: 2003-2013 .......................................................... 16 US Security Assistance to Iraq for FY2014 .............................................................................................................. 25 Figure 5: OCO Expenditures by Function/Category Breakout by Operation .......................................................... 26 Figure 6: Top Ten Recipients of State Department Foreign Operations Funds ...................................................... 27 The US Role in Shaping the Iraqi Security Forces .................................................................................................. 27 Iraqi Military Modernization and the US Role in Shaping the Iraqi Army ............................................................. 29 Modernization and Arms Sales ............................................................................................................................... 29 Iraqi Military Modernization and the US Role in Shaping the Iraqi Air Force........................................................ 30 Iraqi Military Modernization and the US Role in Shaping the Iraqi Navy .............................................................. 32 Military Training and Education ........................................................................................................................... 34 Cooperation in Counter Terrorism ....................................................................................................................... 35 The Iraqi Police and Security Forces .................................................................................................................... 36 Iraqi Federal Police Service (IFP) ............................................................................................................................. 36 Federal Intelligence and Investigative Agency (FIIA) .............................................................................................. 37 Iraqi Police Service .................................................................................................................................................. 37 Iraqi Correctional Service ........................................................................................................................................ 37 Border Guards ......................................................................................................................................................... 37 Iraqi Coast Guard .................................................................................................................................................... 38 General Commission for Customs........................................................................................................................... 38 Facilities Protection Service .................................................................................................................................... 38 Oil Police ................................................................................................................................................................. 38 Electrical Installation Police .................................................................................................................................... 39 Railway Police ......................................................................................................................................................... 39 Iraqi Intelligence Services ................................................................................................................................... 39 The Iraqi National Intelligence Service (INIS) .......................................................................................................... 39 Ministry of National Security (MoNS) ..................................................................................................................... 39 Office of Information and Security and Directorate General for Intelligence and Security (DGIS) ........................ 39 Shaping Iraqi Security Forces December 2013 2 Peshmerga Forces and Intelligence services of Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) ....................................... 40 Sunni Awakening Councils (Sons of Iraq - SOI) .................................................................................................... 40 US Role in Supporting the Iraqi Police Force and Ministry of Interior .................................................................... 41 Figure 7: Police Development Program Sites as of May 2012 ................................................................................ 42 The Maliki Visit of November 2013 ...................................................................................................................... 43 Options for US Policy ........................................................................................................................................... 44 Table of Figures Figure 1: Iraqi Security Forces as of October 10, 2011 ................................................................................................. 4 Figure 2: Key Elements of Iraqi Security Forces in 2013 .............................................................................................. 9 Figure 3: The Iran-Iraq Military Balance in 2003 and 2013 ........................................................................................ 14 Figure 4: Iraq Arms Sales Requests and Deliveries from the US: 2003-2013 ............................................................. 16 Figure 5: OCO Expenditures by Function/Category Breakout by Operation .............................................................. 26 Figure 6: Top Ten Recipients of State Department Foreign Operations Funds ........................................................... 27 Figure 7: Police Development Program Sites as of May 2012 .................................................................................... 42 Shaping Iraqi Security Forces December 2013 3 SHAPING IRAQ’S SECURITY FORCES The last active US combat forces left Iraq in August 2010, marking the end of Operation Iraqi Freedom and the beginning of Operation New Dawn.1 Some 49,000 advisory troops, four advisor assistance brigades, and a limited number of special operations forces (SOF) remained to train, advise, and assist Iraq’s security forces after that date, including the military, intelligence, and police.2 Until the end, these US troops continued to serve a number of other important security functions: carrying out kinetic operations against Iranian-backed and other militant groups; providing training to the ISF; taking part in joint patrols along the borders of the Kurdish provinces and helping integrate ISF and Kurdish forces; and acting as a deterrent to Iraq’s neighbors – in particular Iran.3 They left behind a mix of Iraqi security forces (ISF) with many strengths and many weaknesses. As Figure 1 shows, the Iraqi security forces or ISF had considerable manpower at the time US forces left, but they were an awkward mix of real military forces and police forces, were structured around internal security operations with very limited ability to defend against foreign threats, and were still very much in transition to a largely US-designed
Recommended publications
  • Askari Bank Limited List of Shareholders (W/Out Cnic) As of December 31, 2017

    Askari Bank Limited List of Shareholders (W/Out Cnic) As of December 31, 2017

    ASKARI BANK LIMITED LIST OF SHAREHOLDERS (W/OUT CNIC) AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017 S. NO. FOLIO NO. NAME OF SHAREHOLDERS ADDRESSES OF THE SHAREHOLDERS NO. OF SHARES 1 9 MR. MOHAMMAD SAEED KHAN 65, SCHOOL ROAD, F-7/4, ISLAMABAD. 336 2 10 MR. SHAHID HAFIZ AZMI 17/1 6TH GIZRI LANE, DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, PHASE-4, KARACHI. 3280 3 15 MR. SALEEM MIAN 344/7, ROSHAN MANSION, THATHAI COMPOUND, M.A. JINNAH ROAD, KARACHI. 439 4 21 MS. HINA SHEHZAD C/O MUHAMMAD ASIF THE BUREWALA TEXTILE MILLS LTD 1ST FLOOR, DAWOOD CENTRE, M.T. KHAN ROAD, P.O. 10426, KARACHI. 470 5 42 MR. M. RAFIQUE B.R.1/27, 1ST FLOOR, JAFFRY CHOWK, KHARADHAR, KARACHI. 9382 6 49 MR. JAN MOHAMMED H.NO. M.B.6-1728/733, RASHIDABAD, BILDIA TOWN, MAHAJIR CAMP, KARACHI. 557 7 55 MR. RAFIQ UR REHMAN PSIB PRIVATE LIMITED, 17-B, PAK CHAMBERS, WEST WHARF ROAD, KARACHI. 305 8 57 MR. MUHAMMAD SHUAIB AKHUNZADA 262, SHAMI ROAD, PESHAWAR CANTT. 1919 9 64 MR. TAUHEED JAN ROOM NO.435, BLOCK-A, PAK SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD. 8530 10 66 MS. NAUREEN FAROOQ KHAN 90, MARGALA ROAD, F-8/2, ISLAMABAD. 5945 11 67 MR. ERSHAD AHMED JAN C/O BANK OF AMERICA, BLUE AREA, ISLAMABAD. 2878 12 68 MR. WASEEM AHMED HOUSE NO.485, STREET NO.17, CHAKLALA SCHEME-III, RAWALPINDI. 5945 13 71 MS. SHAMEEM QUAVI SIDDIQUI 112/1, 13TH STREET, PHASE-VI, DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, KARACHI-75500. 2695 14 74 MS. YAZDANI BEGUM HOUSE NO.A-75, BLOCK-13, GULSHAN-E-IQBAL, KARACHI.
  • Iran Vies for More Influence in Iraq at a Budget Price by Farzin Nadimi

    Iran Vies for More Influence in Iraq at a Budget Price by Farzin Nadimi

    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 3405 Iran Vies for More Influence in Iraq at a Budget Price by Farzin Nadimi Dec 3, 2020 Also available in Arabic / Farsi ABOUT THE AUTHORS Farzin Nadimi Farzin Nadimi, an associate fellow with The Washington Institute, is a Washington-based analyst specializing in the security and defense affairs of Iran and the Persian Gulf region. Brief Analysis Tehran aims to earn hard currency for its relatively cheap military hardware, ideally boosting its leverage in Baghdad at a fraction of the cost that the United States has been spending there. n November 14, a large Iraqi defense delegation began a four-day visit to Tehran as a follow-up to previous O exchanges with Iranian officials. The trip was led by Sunni defense minister Juma Saadoun al-Jubouri and included the commanders of each Iraqi military branch. According to Jubouri, its main goal was to “deepen” bilateral military and security cooperation. Three days later, the commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF), Brig. Gen. Esmail Qaani, reportedly paid a secret visit to Baghdad. These exchanges are all the more notable because they came after the UN ban on arms deals with Iran expired in October. Tehran is now free to market and sell its weapons abroad, and several potential customers have already shown interest—not just Iraq, but also Syria, Venezuela, and other players. To be sure, all of these governments are financially constrained, and the United States will likely continue disrupting such deals via existing secondary sanctions, most of them based on UN Security Council resolutions adopted between 2006 and 2015.
  • Methodist University School of Graduate Studies

    Methodist University School of Graduate Studies

    catalogue_graduate_2013-2014.pdf METHODIST UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES ACADEMIC CATALOGUE 2013-2014 School of Graduate Studies & Office of Academic Affairs Methodist University Fayetteville, North Carolina 28311 catalogue_graduate_2013-2014.pdf CONTACT INFORMATION Methodist University 5400 Ramsey Street Fayetteville, North Carolina 28311 www.methodist.edu General University Policy President—Dr. Ben E. Hancock, Jr. (630-7005) Academic Information Executive Vice President and Academic Dean of the University—Dr. Delmas Crisp, Jr. (630-7031) Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs—Jane Weeks Gardiner (630-7158) Dean, School of Graduate Studies—Dr. George Hendricks (630-7056) Director, Master of Education Program— Dr. E. Sue Godwin (630-7060) Director, Master of Justice Administration Program —Dr. Darl H. Champion (630-7050) Director, M.M.S. in Physician Assistant Studies — Christina Beard (630-7215) Director, The Professional M.B.A. at Methodist University—Dr. James Marcin (630-7624) Admissions Information Vice President for Enrollment Services—Rick Lowe (630-7027) Director of Financial Aid—Bonnie Adamson (630-7192) Assistant Director of International Programs—Olga Polyak (630-7432) Director of Admissions, Physician Assistant Program—Jennifer Mish (630-7615) Program Coordinator, Master of Justice Administration—Kristine Thomas (630-7268) Program Coordinator, Professional MBA at Methodist University—Anne Way (630-7493) Program Coordinator, The Master of Education Program—Janice Luce (630-7511) Athletic Information Director
  • XVIII AIRBORNE CORPS ASSOCIATION SKY DRAGONS Spring 2012 ------82ND DOMINATES XVIII ABN CORPS NCO and SOLDIER of YEAR COMPETITION

    XVIII AIRBORNE CORPS ASSOCIATION SKY DRAGONS Spring 2012 ------82ND DOMINATES XVIII ABN CORPS NCO and SOLDIER of YEAR COMPETITION

    XVIII AIRBORNE CORPS ASSOCIATION SKY DRAGONS Spring 2012 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82ND DOMINATES XVIII ABN CORPS NCO AND SOLDIER OF YEAR COMPETITION Left to Right – CSM (Ret) Ted Gaweda, Pfc. Jeremy Shivick, Sgt. Jason Thomas, Alan Yeater On 5 April in a ceremony conducted at Sports USA, a huge sports bar at Ft. Bragg, North Carolina, two paratroopers of the XVIII Airborne Corps' 82nd Airborne Division were selected as the XVIII Airborne Corps' 2012 NCO and Soldier of the Year. They were Sgt. Jason T. Thomas, 26, and Pfc. Jeremy Shivick, 21. Both Soldiers are assigned to the 1st Platoon, C Company, 2nd Battalion, 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment, which is part of the division's 3rd Brigade Combat Team (BCT). This is 2 the first time that both winners were from the same unit. The competition was held from 2 to 4 April, and the winners were announced during the ceremony which was presided over by the Ft. Bragg Garrison Command Sergeant Major (CSM) Samuel Campbell and the command sergeant major of XVIII Abn Corps' NCO Academy, CSM Nicolino Parisi. These were four days of grueling, early morning and late night events which included basic Soldier skills, the Army physical fitness test, a written exam, urban map orienteering, M4 rifle qualification, a weapons event, and an interview board. The competition certainly challenged the confidence and motivation of the Soldiers. Twenty-one Soldiers competed, representing each subordinate unit of the XVIII Abn Corps. Spc. Michael C. Lauritzen, from Jackson, Michigan, assigned to the 716th MP Battalion, 16th MP Brigade, Ft. Campbell, Kentucky, was quoted saying, “I'm grateful for being here, glad that my leadership had the confidence in me to compete at this level.
  • Refugee Status Appeals Authority New Zealand

    Refugee Status Appeals Authority New Zealand

    REFUGEE STATUS APPEALS AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND REFUGEE APPEAL NO 76505 AT AUCKLAND Before: B L Burson (Chairperson) S A Aitchison (Member) Counsel for the Appellant: D Mansouri-Rad Appearing for the Department of Labour: No Appearance Date of Hearing: 3 & 4 May 2010 Date of Decision: 14 June 2010 DECISION [1] This is an appeal against the decision of a refugee status officer of the Refugee Status Branch (RSB) of the Department of Labour (DOL) declining refugee status to the appellant, a national of Iraq. INTRODUCTION [2] The appellant claims to have a well-founded fear of being persecuted in Iraq on account of his former Ba’ath Party membership in the rank of Naseer Mutakadim, and due to his father’s position as Branch Member of the al-Amed Organisation for the Ba’ath Party in City A. He fears persecution at the hands of members of the Mahdi Army – a Shi’a militia group in Iraq, the police who collaborate with them, and the Iraqi Government that is infiltrated by militias. [3] The principal issues to be determined in this appeal are the well- foundedness of the appellant’s fears and whether he can genuinely access meaningful domestic protection. 2 THE APPELLANT’S CASE [4] What follows is a summary of the appellant’s evidence in support of his claim. It will be assessed later in this decision. Background [5] The appellant is a single man in his early-30s. He was born in Suburb A in City A. He is one of three children, the youngest of two boys.
  • PROCEEDINGS of the 120TH NATIONAL CONVENTION of the VETERANS of FOREIGN WARS of the UNITED STATES

    PROCEEDINGS of the 120TH NATIONAL CONVENTION of the VETERANS of FOREIGN WARS of the UNITED STATES

    116th Congress, 2d Session House Document 116–165 PROCEEDINGS of the 120TH NATIONAL CONVENTION OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES (SUMMARY OF MINUTES) Orlando, Florida ::: July 20 – 24, 2019 116th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 116–165 THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 120TH NATIONAL CON- VENTION OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES COMMUNICATION FROM THE ADJUTANT GENERAL, THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 120TH NATIONAL CONVENTION OF THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES, HELD IN ORLANDO, FLORIDA: JULY 20–24, 2019, PURSUANT TO 44 U.S.C. 1332; (PUBLIC LAW 90–620 (AS AMENDED BY PUBLIC LAW 105–225, SEC. 3); (112 STAT. 1498) NOVEMBER 12, 2020.—Referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 40–535 WASHINGTON : 2020 U.S. CODE, TITLE 44, SECTION 1332 NATIONAL ENCAMPMENTS OF VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS; PROCEEDINGS PRINTED ANNUALLY FOR CONGRESS The proceedings of the national encampments of the United Spanish War Veterans, the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, the American Legion, the Military Order of the Purple Heart, the Veterans of World War I of the United States, Incorporated, the Disabled American Veterans, and the AMVETS (American Veterans of World War II), respectively, shall be printed annually, with accompanying illustrations, as separate House documents of the session of the Congress to which they may be submitted. [Approved October 2, 1968.] ii LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI September, 2020 Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Speaker U.
  • Iraq 2019 Human Rights Report

    Iraq 2019 Human Rights Report

    IRAQ 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Iraq is a constitutional parliamentary republic. The 2018 parliamentary elections, while imperfect, generally met international standards of free and fair elections and led to the peaceful transition of power from Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi to Adil Abd al-Mahdi. On December 1, in response to protesters’ demands for significant changes to the political system, Abd al-Mahdi submitted his resignation, which the Iraqi Council of Representatives (COR) accepted. As of December 17, Abd al-Mahdi continued to serve in a caretaker capacity while the COR worked to identify a replacement in accordance with the Iraqi constitution. Numerous domestic security forces operated throughout the country. The regular armed forces and domestic law enforcement bodies generally maintained order within the country, although some armed groups operated outside of government control. Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) consist of administratively organized forces within the Ministries of Interior and Defense, and the Counterterrorism Service. The Ministry of Interior is responsible for domestic law enforcement and maintenance of order; it oversees the Federal Police, Provincial Police, Facilities Protection Service, Civil Defense, and Department of Border Enforcement. Energy police, under the Ministry of Oil, are responsible for providing infrastructure protection. Conventional military forces under the Ministry of Defense are responsible for the defense of the country but also carry out counterterrorism and internal security operations in conjunction with the Ministry of Interior. The Counterterrorism Service reports directly to the prime minister and oversees the Counterterrorism Command, an organization that includes three brigades of special operations forces. The National Security Service (NSS) intelligence agency reports directly to the prime minister.
  • Army Guide Monthly • Выпуск

    Army Guide Monthly • Выпуск

    Army G uide monthly # 12 (15) Декабрь 2005 Польский WZM-5 демонстрирует опытный образец бронетранспортера Irbis Финляндия готовится принять на вооружение AMOS Более 100 машин DURO будет поставлено Великобритании Разработки XM307 получают дополнительное финансирование Канадская Армия заказывает RG-31 с противоминной защитой Rheinmetall не будет поставлять вооружение для чешского бронетранспортера Украина подарила Ираку бронемашины и оружие 29 комплексов Тор-М1 для Ирака GIAT и KMW изучают возможность создания совместного танка Изготовлен опытный образец гусеничной машины SEP Aselsan продемонстрировала две новые танковые системы В Израиле продемонстрирована автономная неуправляемая машина Spotter FIAT представил внедорожник Oltre, базирующийся на армейском LMV ADI расширяет семейство машин Bushmaster 4x4 Поддержание спокойствия: Машины внутренней безопасности Снижение заметности как один из способов повышения защищенности бронетехники Франция экспортировала в 2004 году ВиВТ на сумму 7,1 млрд. евро Германская пехота получает БМП Puma Военное Применение Гибридных Электроприводов Чили закупит в Германии 100 танков Леопард-2 Дания заказала 45 гусеничных БМП CV-90, заказ может увеличиться до 1170 машин. www.army-guide.com Army Guide Monthly • #12 (15) • Декабрь 2005 ВПК ZSMU-1,27 Kobuz, разработанным фирмой Obrum, с Польский WZM-5 демонстрирует пулеметом WKM-B калибра 1,27 мм фирмы ZM опытный образец бронетранспортера Tarnow. Irbis также оснащен модульной системой Irbis внутренней связи Fonet, фирмы WB Electronics и цифровой системой связи и управления. Irbis имеет заднюю рампу с гидравлическим управлением оригинальной конструкци. Бронетранспортер может иметь защиту нескольких уровней. Он полностью плавающий и может перевозиться военно-транспортным самолетом C-130. Возможны три варианта корпуса, отличающиеся высотой: вариант низкого корпуса, соеднего - для некоторых исполнений машины, таких как командирская, и высокий вариант.
  • Combating Political Violence Movements with Third-Force Options Doron Zimmermann ∗

    Combating Political Violence Movements with Third-Force Options Doron Zimmermann ∗

    Between Minimum Force and Maximum Violence: Combating Political Violence Movements with Third-Force Options Doron Zimmermann ∗ Introduction: Balancing the Tools of Counter-Terrorism In most liberal democratic states it is the responsibility of the police forces to cope with “internal” threats, including terrorism, since in such states terrorism is invariably defined as a criminal act rather than a manifestation of insurgent political violence. In many such instances, the resultant quantitative and qualitative overtaxing of law en- forcement capabilities to keep the peace has led to calls by sections of the public, as well as by the legislative and executive branches of government, to expand both the le- gal and operational means available to combat terrorism, and to boost civilian agen- cies’ capacity to deal with terrorism in proportion to the perceived threat. The deterio- rating situation in Ulster in Northern Ireland between 1968 and 1972 and beyond is an illustrative case in point.1 Although there have been cases of successfully transmogrifying police forces into military-like formations, the best-known and arguably most frequent example of aug- mented state responses to the threat posed by insurgent political violence movements is the use of the military in the fight against terrorism and in the maintenance of internal security. While it is imperative that the threat of a collapse of national cohesion due to the overextension of internal civil security forces be averted, the deployment of all branches of the armed forces against a terrorist threat is not without its own pitfalls. Paul Wilkinson has enunciated some of the problems posed by the use of counter-ter- rorism military task forces, not the least of which is that [a] fully militarized response implies the complete suspension of the civilian legal system and its replacement by martial law, summary punishments, the imposition of curfews, military censorship and extensive infringements of normal civil liberties in the name of the exigencies of war.
  • Iraq: U.S. Military Operations

    Iraq: U.S. Military Operations

    Order Code RL31701 Iraq: U.S. Military Operations Updated July 15, 2007 Steve Bowman Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Iraq: U.S. Military Operations Summary Iraq’s chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs, together with Iraqi long-range missile development and support for Al Qaeda terrorism, were the primary justifications put forward for military action. On March 17, 2003, President Bush issued an ultimatum demanding that Saddam Hussein and his sons depart from Iraq within 48 hours. On March 19, offensive operations began with air strikes against Iraqi leadership positions. By April 15, after 27 days of operations, coalition forces were in relative control of all major Iraqi cities and Iraqi political and military leadership had disintegrated. On May 1, 2003, President Bush declared an end to major combat operations. There was no use of chemical or biological (CB) weapons, and no CB or nuclear weapons stockpiles or production facilities have been found. The major challenges to coalition forces are now quelling a persistent Iraqi resistance movement and training/retaining sufficient Iraqi security forces to assume responsibility for the nations domestic security. Though initially denying that there was an organized resistance movement, DOD officials have now acknowledged there is regional/local organization, with apparently ample supplies of arms and funding. CENTCOM has characterized the Iraqi resistance as “a classical guerrilla-type campaign.” DOD initially believed the resistance to consist primarily of former regime supporters and foreign fighters; however, it has now acknowledged that growing resentment of coalition forces and an increase in sectarian conflicts, independent of connections with the earlier regime, are contributing to the insurgency.
  • The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict

    The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict

    The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict Dave van Zoonen Khogir Wirya About MERI The Middle East Research Institute engages in policy issues contributing to the process of state building and democratisation in the Middle East. Through independent analysis and policy debates, our research aims to promote and develop good governance, human rights, rule of law and social and economic prosperity in the region. It was established in 2014 as an independent, not-for-profit organisation based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Middle East Research Institute 1186 Dream City Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq T: +964 (0)662649690 E: [email protected] www.meri-k.org NGO registration number. K843 © Middle East Research Institute, 2017 The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of MERI, the copyright holder. Please direct all enquiries to the publisher. The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict MERI Policy Paper Dave van Zoonen Khogir Wirya October 2017 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................4 2. “Reconciliation” after genocide .........................................................................................................5
  • TRAFFICKING in PERSONS 2020 COUNTRY PROFILE North Africa and the Middle East Table of Contents − Algeria −

    TRAFFICKING in PERSONS 2020 COUNTRY PROFILE North Africa and the Middle East Table of Contents − Algeria −

    GLOBAL REPORT ON TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS 2020 COUNTRY PROFILE North Africa and the Middle East Table of Contents − Algeria − ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 − Bahrain − .................................................................................................................................................... 5 − Egypt − ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 − Iraq − ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 − Israel − ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 − Jordan − .................................................................................................................................................... 17 − The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia − ................................................................................................................ 18 − Kuwait − .................................................................................................................................................... 20 − Lebanon − ................................................................................................................................................