DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology of Parts of Grant, Adams, and Franklin Counties, East-Central

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

,1)dfl!J1- ~ // c;.,cuGv ! GEOLOGY OF PARTS OF .... ~ z GRANT, ADAMS, AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES, ~ N.... EAST-CENTRAL WASHINGTON By M.J.GROLIER AND J.W.BINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES BULLETIN NO. 71 1978 GEOWGY OF PARTS OF GRANT. ADAMS, AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES, EAST-CENTRAL WASHINGTON FRONTISPIECE "Dry Falls When Wet" This late Pleistocene scene of Grand Coulee, o few miles north of the study area, shows the course of the Columbia River down the coulee and over the present Dry Falls. The previously estab­ lished (and present) course of the river around the northern margin of the Columbia Plateau lava flows was blocked temporarily-and several times-by the Okanogan Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet that entered Washington from Canada during the ice age. The illustration shows the ice sheet in the back­ ground and the large melt-water discharge of the Columbia River, which cut Grand Coulee and formed the Dry Falls escarpment by the headword (northward) plucking away of the layers of columnar-jointed basalt. From here the water discharged across the study area, and returned to the established course of the Columbia River by way of the Quincy Basin, Lower Crab Creek volley, and Posco Basin. From an oii painting by Dee MoZenaa:t', aou:rtesy of the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission . STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BERT L. COLE, Commissioner of Public Lands RALPH A. BESWICK, Supervisor DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES VAUGHN E. LIVINGSTON, JR., State Geologist BULLETIN NO. 71 GEOLOGY OF PARTS OF GRANT, ADAMS,AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES, EAST-CENTRAL WASHINGTON BY M.J.GROLIER and J.W. BINGHAM Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of Energy, and the Washington State Department of Ecology 1978 For sale by Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington PRICE $1.50 CONTENTS Abstract .•..... ..... .....••.... .......... .•. , . ..•.. • · · · . •. • · • • · • • · · • • · · · • Introduction ...... ... •.....• . •... ...... .......••..•.. .... ..• , , .... .... .•. , , 2 Location .....•.•..• . •. ..... .. ............ .. , .• . • . .. ........•. , . • • . 2 Background of study . .. .. • . .. •.....•...... • . ..•..•.•.• .. .. , .. ... .• , . , • . 2 Acknowledgments .... • . ..... .. .......... .......•. .. .•..... .. • , , 4 Geographic setting ...•...•..... .. ... ........ ........... .............. .. , . 5 Londforms .. ..•..•.•... .. .......... ...• . • ..... .. ......•... .• , . 5 Drainage.. ...... ...... ..... .. .. ..... ........... .. ..... ... 5 Climate ........• . .................•......... .. .....•........ ........ ,.. 8 Geologic history . • . • . • . • . • . l 0 Miocene and Pliocene Epochs . • . • . • . 10 Late Pliocene and early Pleistocene Epochs . • . • . • . • . • • . • . • . 13 Pleistocene Epoch . • . • . • • . • . 14 Middle Pleistocene •........ ....... , . • . • . • . • . • . • . • • . 14 Late Pleistocene . • . • • . • . • . • • . • . 15 Great flooding and runoff . • . 15 Origin of, and sedimentation in, Lake Lewis . • . • • . • 18 Holocene Epoch . • . • . • . • . • . • 19 Stratigraphy . .... , . • . • • . • . • . • • • . • . 19 Miocene and Pliocene rocks . • . 19 Yakima Basalt . • . • • . 19 Lower basa It . • . • . 22 Vantage Sandstone Member . • • . 23 Frenchman Springs Member . • . • • . 23 Roza Member . • . • • . 25 Priest Rapids Member . • . • • . • . • . • . • . • . • 27 Saddle Mountains Member . • • . • . • 29 Beverly Member of the Ellensburg Formation .... .. • . .... .•.. ... , . , . , • . 34 Conglomerate .• . ........ .•.•.... ..• . •. ..•. ..•• , . • . • . 34 Pumi cite ..••. • . .. , .... .•... ...•. •.•.•...... .•....... , • . 35 Tuffaceous sand, sil t, and clay . • . • . • . • . 36 Offlap relationship of the flows . • . •.... .....•••... ..•.. • ••... ..• , . 37 Variation in thickness of the flows ........• . .• .•.......... •. .... , •. , 37 Directions of lava movement ...... ..... ..... ........ ............. ....... 38 V CONTENTS Stratigraphy-Continued Pliocene and Pleistocene Ringold Formation 38 Brown tuffaceous sand .....• . ...•.. ..... ....•...• . .•.... .... 44 Quartzitic conglomerate ....•..... ............ .• . .•.... .... 46 Buff laminated clay ............ .•............. .. ....•..•. .. 47 Basaltic fanglomerate ...... ..... •...... .• . .. .. ... ...•.... 49 Grovel deposits in wind gaps .............•.. .... ............ 50 Pleistocene deposits .. ......... .. .. .. ..... ... • . ............. .. .. 51 Alluvium older than glociofluvial deposits ........... ...•. .. ......... 51 Conglomerate in Esquatzel Coulee . .. ......•.• . •........ .... 51 Gravel deposit in Old Maid Coulee . ........•................... 51 Gravel deposits in the Quincy Basin ....... .. .. .. ..• . ........ 51 Grovel deposit in Lynch Coulee . ... ... .••...•••...•. •. .. 52 Glociofluvial deposits . ........•.... ... .........•..... •........ 52 Lacustrine fine sand and si It 52 Glaciofluvial gravel or sand . • . • . 55 Holocene deposits . • . • . • • • . • . • . 57 Eolian deposits . • • . • . • . • . • . 57 loess . • . • • • . • . • . 57 Dune sand . • . • . • . 58 Alluvium . • . • . • . • • . • . • . 58 Colluvium. .. ............ ........................ ..... ............ 59 Landslide debris . • . • . 60 Structure • • •• • • f •••••••••••• •• • • ••••••••• •• •••• • ••••••••••••••• •• • • •• • • • •• • •• • ••••••• 60 Regional subsidence. ...... ......... .............. .. .. .. .... ........ 61 Folding and faulting . • . • . 61 East- trending folds and faults • . • . • • . • . • . • . • . 61 Saddle Mountains anticline . 61 Frenchman Hills anticline . • . • . 64 Lind Coulee Fault . • . • . • . • . • . 65 Pinto Ridge anticline . • • . • . • . 65 Soap Lake anticline . • . • • . • • . • . • . • . • . • . 65 Minor sags and anticlinal flexures .. • . .•. .. .•.. • . ..• . .. , 65 Northeast-trending folds . 66 Lynch Coulee anticline and syncline .. ...• . ..... , •.•.......• , . • 66 Beezley Hills monocline . .............. .. .. .. ....... .... 66 VI CONTENTS Structure- Continued Folding and faulting- Continued Northeast-trending folds- Continued Unnamed monocline across Lower Grand Coulee 67 Minor sags and intermediate anticlinal flexures , .. , • . • ... •.•• 67 Northwestward- trending folds ..... .. • . .•. • • . .••. • .. .. •..• . •.•••..••.• . 67 Bibliography 69 References cited •.•. ...• . .. .•... .•..•..•.••... .•... .• . •••.•....•.. 69 Selected additional references 73 Appendix I Well-numbering system •.••.••.•.••..........•••••....••••.•. •..• . •. •.•. ...• 75 Appendix II Selected drillers' logs of wells .. • •• • • . .•..•..••• , ••••. • . •• • •• • .• •.. , .. • . •. , • , , 77 Appendix 111 Depth intervals of stratigraphic units as penetrated by selected wells . • , • , •• , •. , , , . , 87 Appendix IV Gradients of the red marker bed and basalt surface, and change in thickness of the Ringold Formation in Ringold Coulee ...... .. ................... • · • .. · • · • · · 91 VII ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. In dex map showing location of the project area , • .••. • . ••..•••• , .. • •. , .• , •, • • 2 2. Cultural features within the project area ...... .. • • , .•...•.. •. • • • , .• , • . • 3 3. Generalized land-surface altitudes within the project area . .... ..•..• . , • . • . • . 6 4. Physiographic features of the project area . ..•• , . • . • • • . • • • . 7 5. Aerial photograph of Potholes Coulee . • . • . • . • . • . • • • . • . • • • . • . 8 6. Aerial photograph of Frenchman Springs Coulee •. .. .•..•.•...•••... •. , • • . • • • • 9 7. Aeria I photograph of Parsons Canyon . • • . • • • . • . • • . • • • • • . • . • . • . • . • 15 8. Relief map of Columbia Plateau, showing pattem of coulees in channeled scabland ..•..••.•.• . .. • . ••...••...•• . ..• , .•.••. , .. ...•. , . , 16 9. Stratigraphic sequence and relationship of principal rock units ..• , ••. , •. , • , , , •• , 20 10. Outer rim of ringlike depression in a basalt flow of the Priest Rapids Member . • 22 11. Platy swirls near center of ringlike depression in basalt flow of Priest Rapids Member . ....•••.••..•.. .... ... .. ...•.•. • • . .. •• • •... .... •• •. , , . 22 12. Pi llow- palagonite zone in basal part of Frenchman Springs Member . , •.•. , , , , , 24 13. Roza basalt flow contacts exposed near the Great Blade in Lower Grand Coulee . , 26 14. Columnar jointing in Priest Rapids basalt ..••.•. .. .• ...••.. .. , . • .... .. • . , 27 15. Quincy Diatomite Bed . • . • . • . • . • . • . 28 16. Aerial view of two synclines cut by fault scarp on north face of Saddle Mountains .....•• .•.. .. ...• . .....•.... ... .•........ , , •..... , . , . 31 17. Aerial view of sharp syncline on north face of Saddle Mountains . ...•• , •..... , • , , 32 18. Aerial view of Warden- Othello flow tongue northwest of Othello ... .. , , •.. , , . 33 19. Diagrammatic section showing apparent regional unconformity due to offlap of individual basalt flows .. .. • . .• .••. •..•.•...•.. : • • . • • • • • • . • 37 20 . Diagrammatic section showing unconformable relationships.
Recommended publications
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report

    Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report

    RECONNAISSANCE SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING OF THE LATE CENOZOIC SEDIMENTS OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN, WASHINGTON by James G. Rigby and Kurt Othberg with contributions from Newell Campbell Larry Hanson Eugene Kiver Dale Stradling Gary Webster Open File Report 79-3 September 1979 State of Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, Washington CONTENTS Introduction Objectives Study Area Regional Setting 1 Mapping Procedure 4 Sample Collection 8 Description of Map Units 8 Pre-Miocene Rocks 8 Columbia River Basalt, Yakima Basalt Subgroup 9 Ellensburg Formation 9 Gravels of the Ancestral Columbia River 13 Ringold Formation 15 Thorp Gravel 17 Gravel of Terrace Remnants 19 Tieton Andesite 23 Palouse Formation and Other Loess Deposits 23 Glacial Deposits 25 Catastrophic Flood Deposits 28 Background and previous work 30 Description and interpretation of flood deposits 35 Distinctive geomorphic features 38 Terraces and other features of undetermined origin 40 Post-Pleistocene Deposits 43 Landslide Deposits 44 Alluvium 45 Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Older Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Colluvium 46 Sand Dunes 46 Mirna Mounds and Other Periglacial(?) Patterned Ground 47 Structural Geology 48 Southwest Quadrant 48 Toppenish Ridge 49 Ah tanum Ridge 52 Horse Heaven Hills 52 East Selah Fault 53 Northern Saddle Mountains and Smyrna Bench 54 Selah Butte Area 57 Miscellaneous Areas 58 Northwest Quadrant 58 Kittitas Valley 58 Beebe Terrace Disturbance 59 Winesap Lineament 60 Northeast Quadrant 60 Southeast Quadrant 61 Recommendations 62 Stratigraphy 62 Structure 63 Summary 64 References Cited 66 Appendix A - Tephrochronology and identification of collected datable materials 82 Appendix B - Description of field mapping units 88 Northeast Quadrant 89 Northwest Quadrant 90 Southwest Quadrant 91 Southeast Quadrant 92 ii ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.
  • Central Washington V. Western Washington Central Washington University

    Central Washington V. Western Washington Central Washington University

    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU CWU Athletics Events Programs CWU Athletics Collections Fall 10-21-1967 Central Washington V. Western Washington Central Washington University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/ cwu_athletics_event_programs Recommended Citation Central Washington University, "Central Washington V. Western Washington" (1967). CWU Athletics Events Programs. 35. http://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/cwu_athletics_event_programs/35 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the CWU Athletics Collections at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in CWU Athletics Events Programs by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. .. ~ ~ shington • '. ton .) y· ber 21, 1967 "Floral Designs for All Occasions" Remember, We're Closest to the College 510 North Ruby Phone 925-2166 or 962-9477 COACH TOM PARRY ARCTIC CIRCLE DRIVE-IN "The Home of the I 9c Hamburger" 8th and Walnut Phone 925-9292 COACH JOHN PEARSON • Your Health and Prescoiption Center - NOW TWO LOCATIONS TO SERVE YOU Ostrander's Uptown Medical Arts Pharmacy 4th and Pine 704 East Manitoba Phone 925-5344 Phone 962-9600 11 BUTCH HILL BILL'S BOWL Clean, Healthful Exercise Free Instruction Student Rates 900 North Poplar Phone 925-121 I 31 DENNIS ESSER "Best in Campus Wear" Phone 925-2 122 Ellensburg, Wash. 37 VINCE BROWN Central Washington State College Now in its 7 6th year, the College holds as its primary aim the preparation of professional ed­ ucators, and it has gained national recognition for its achievements. To reach this goal and to better serve the people of Washington, a strong liberal arts program also was develop­ ed under President James E.
  • Washington Geology

    Washington Geology

    JULY 1978 VOLUME 6 - NUMBER 3 A PLBLICATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WASHINGTON GEOWGIC NEWSLETTER BERT L.COLE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS RALPH A BESWICK, Supervisor VAUGHN E. LIVINGSTON,JR.,State Geologist DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Of NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES, OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON, 98504 LOCATION MAP : DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES DEPT. SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES t ~ i~L f ...J ~ i ,...... N g a: ~ ~OGY ANO EARTH <t tt RESOURCES D u -, t STATE CAPITOL ... TACOMA S~TILE- IDEPT. HIGHWAYS CITY CENTER FREEWAY EXIT PORTLA~ STATE CAPITOL EXIT Vaughn E. (Ted) Livingston, Jr., Supervisor Geologic Staff J. Eric Schuster, Assistant Supervisor Minerals and Energy Geologists Land Use Geologists Carl McFarland James G. Rigby Allen J. Fiksdal Keith L. Stoffel Clint Milne Glennda B. Tucker Kurt L. 0th berg Gerald W. Thorsen Wayne S. Moen Ellis R. Vonheeder Pamela Palmer Weldon W. Rau Charles W. Walker Regulations and Operations Surface Mined Land Reclamation and Oil and Gos Conservation Act Donald M. Ford, Assistant Supervisor Publications: Library: Laboratory: Secretaries: Loura Broy Connie Manson Arnold W. Bowman Patricia Ames Keith Ikerd Cherie Dunwoody Wonda Walker Kim Summers Pamela Whitlock Mailing address: Deportment of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resou rces Olympia, WA 98504 (206) 753-6183 ORIGIN OF THE GRAND COULEE AND DRY FALLS by Ted Livingston Washington State hos many interesting geo­ original terrain until in the Grand Coulee area it was logic features. Among the more outstanding dre the completely buried. During the course of these erup­ Grand Coulee and Dry Falls .
  • Periodically Spaced Anticlines of the Columbia Plateau

    Periodically Spaced Anticlines of the Columbia Plateau

    Geological Society of America Special Paper 239 1989 Periodically spaced anticlines of the Columbia Plateau Thomas R. Watters Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560 ABSTRACT Deformation of the continental flood-basalt in the westernmost portion of the Columbia Plateau has resulted in regularly spaced anticlinal ridges. The periodic nature of the anticlines is characterized by dividing the Yakima fold belt into three domains on the basis of spacings and orientations: (1) the northern domain, made up of the eastern segments of Umtanum Ridge, the Saddle Mountains, and the Frenchman Hills; (2) the central domain, made up of segments of Rattlesnake Ridge, the eastern segments of Horse Heaven Hills, Yakima Ridge, the western segments of Umtanum Ridge, Cleman Mountain, Bethel Ridge, and Manastash Ridge; and (3) the southern domain, made up of Gordon Ridge, the Columbia Hills, the western segment of Horse Heaven Hills, Toppenish Ridge, and Ahtanum Ridge. The northern, central, and southern domains have mean spacings of 19.6,11.6, and 27.6 km, respectively, with a total range of 4 to 36 km and a mean of 20.4 km (n = 203). The basalts are modeled as a multilayer of thin linear elastic plates with frictionless contacts, resting on a mechanically weak elastic substrate of finite thickness, that has buckled at a critical wavelength of folding. Free slip between layers is assumed, based on the presence of thin sedimentary interbeds in the Grande Ronde Basalt separating groups of flows with an average thickness of roughly 280 m.
  • Newsletter 3-1-2016

    Newsletter 3-1-2016

    The Newsletter of the American Pilots’ Association March 1, 2016 Page 1 (NAVTECH) will meet on Wednesday afternoon. In addition to discussing the latest issues in electronic navigation practice and equipment, plans are under way to have NAVTECH members hear from various While many pilots government officials with responsibilities for naviga- around the country are tion programs. dealing with the chills The Suppliers’ Exhibition, an excellent oppor- of winter, a warm is- tunity to meet with maritime and pilotage related land breeze is on the vendors to discuss their products, will be held on way. Plans are well Wednesday and Thursday. underway for the 2016 As always, several social events will be held Biennial Convention, which is being held from Octo- during the week, including a Welcome Reception on ber 24-28 at the beautiful Fairmont Kea Lani Hotel Monday, a traditional luau on Wednesday, and a and Resort in Maui. The Convention is an un- closing Gala on Friday. matched opportunity for the Nation’s pilots to gather, To make attendance arrangements, go to share ideas and strengthen the pilotage system in the www.americanpilots.org and click “2016 APA U.S. This year’s Convention is hosted by the nine Convention.” There, pilots and other attendees can pilot associations in the Pacific Coast States: Alaska book flights, make hotel reservations, and register Marine Pilots, Columbia River Pilots, Columbia Riv- for the Convention. Pilots can also view the Exhibi- er Bar Pilots, Coos Bay Pilots, Hawaii Pilots, Puget tor Directory by clicking on “Exhibitor Registration” Sound Pilots, San Francisco Bar Pilots, Southeast and dragging the mouse over the booth diagrams.
  • Faults and Joints

    Faults and Joints

    133 JOINTS Joints (also termed extensional fractures) are planes of separation on which no or undetectable shear displacement has taken place. The two walls of the resulting tiny opening typically remain in tight (matching) contact. Joints may result from regional tectonics (i.e. the compressive stresses in front of a mountain belt), folding (due to curvature of bedding), faulting, or internal stress release during uplift or cooling. They often form under high fluid pressure (i.e. low effective stress), perpendicular to the smallest principal stress. The aperture of a joint is the space between its two walls measured perpendicularly to the mean plane. Apertures can be open (resulting in permeability enhancement) or occluded by mineral cement (resulting in permeability reduction). A joint with a large aperture (> few mm) is a fissure. The mechanical layer thickness of the deforming rock controls joint growth. If present in sufficient number, open joints may provide adequate porosity and permeability such that an otherwise impermeable rock may become a productive fractured reservoir. In quarrying, the largest block size depends on joint frequency; abundant fractures are desirable for quarrying crushed rock and gravel. Joint sets and systems Joints are ubiquitous features of rock exposures and often form families of straight to curviplanar fractures typically perpendicular to the layer boundaries in sedimentary rocks. A set is a group of joints with similar orientation and morphology. Several sets usually occur at the same place with no apparent interaction, giving exposures a blocky or fragmented appearance. Two or more sets of joints present together in an exposure compose a joint system.
  • Washington's Channeled Scabland

    Washington's Channeled Scabland

    t\D l'llrl,. \·· ~. r~rn1 ,uR\fEY Ut,l\n . .. ,Y:ltate" tit1Washington ALBEIT D. ROSEWNI, Governor Department of Conservation EARL COE, Dlnctor DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Bulletin No. 45 WASHINGTON'S CHANNELED SCABLAND By J HARLEN BRETZ 9TAT• PIUHTIHO PLANT ~ OLYMPIA, WASH., 1"511 State of Washington ALBERT D. ROSELLINI, Governor Department of Conservation EARL COE, Director DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Bulletin No. 45 WASHINGTON'S CHANNELED SCABLAND By .T HARLEN BRETZ l•or sate by Department or Conservation, Olympia, Washington. Price, 50 cents. FOREWORD Most travelers who have driven through eastern Washington have seen a geologic and scenic feature that is unique-nothing like it is to be found anywhere else in the world. This is the Channeled Scab­ land, a gigantic series of deeply cut channels in the erosion-resistant Columbia River basalt, the rock that covers most of the east-central and southeastern part of the state. Grand Coulee, with its spectac­ ular Dry Falls, is one of the most widely known features of this ex­ tensive set of dry channels. Many thousands of travelers must have wondered how this Chan­ neled Scabland came into being, and many geologists also have speculated as to its origin. Several geologists have published papers outlining their theories of the scabland's origin, but the geologist who has made the most thorough study of the problem and has ex­ amined the whole area and all the evidence having a bearing on the problem is Dr. J Harlen Bretz. Dr.
  • Impact Cratering

    Impact Cratering

    6 Impact cratering The dominant surface features of the Moon are approximately circular depressions, which may be designated by the general term craters … Solution of the origin of the lunar craters is fundamental to the unravel- ing of the history of the Moon and may shed much light on the history of the terrestrial planets as well. E. M. Shoemaker (1962) Impact craters are the dominant landform on the surface of the Moon, Mercury, and many satellites of the giant planets in the outer Solar System. The southern hemisphere of Mars is heavily affected by impact cratering. From a planetary perspective, the rarity or absence of impact craters on a planet’s surface is the exceptional state, one that needs further explanation, such as on the Earth, Io, or Europa. The process of impact cratering has touched every aspect of planetary evolution, from planetary accretion out of dust or planetesimals, to the course of biological evolution. The importance of impact cratering has been recognized only recently. E. M. Shoemaker (1928–1997), a geologist, was one of the irst to recognize the importance of this process and a major contributor to its elucidation. A few older geologists still resist the notion that important changes in the Earth’s structure and history are the consequences of extraterres- trial impact events. The decades of lunar and planetary exploration since 1970 have, how- ever, brought a new perspective into view, one in which it is clear that high-velocity impacts have, at one time or another, affected nearly every atom that is part of our planetary system.
  • Top 26 Trails in Grant County 2020

    Top 26 Trails in Grant County 2020

    and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units For more information, please contact: Grant County Tourism Commission P.O. Box 37, Ephrata, WA 98823 509.765.7888 • 800.992.6234 In Grant County, Washington TourGrantCounty.com TOP TRAILS Grant County has some of the most scenic and pristine vistas, hiking trails and outdoor 26 recreational opportunities in Washington State. and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units Grant County is known for its varied landscapes on a high desert plateau with coulees, lakes, in Grant County Washington reservoirs, sand dunes, canals, rivers, creeks, and other waterways. These diverse ecosystems Grant County Tourism Commission For Additional copies please contact: support a remarkable variety of fish and PO Box 37 Jerry T. Gingrich wildlife species that contribute to the economic, Ephrata, Washington 98837 Grant County Tourism Commission recreational and cultural life of the County. www.tourgrantcounty.com Grant County Courthouse PO Box 37 Ephrata, WA 98837 No part of this book may be reproduced in (509) 754-2011, Ext. 2931 any form, or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, without permission in For more information on writing from the Grant County Tourism Grant County accommodations Commission. www.tourgrantcounty.com © 2019, Grant County Tourism Commission Second printing, 10m Trails copy and photographs Book, map and cover design by: provided by: Denise Adam Graphic Design Cameron Smith, Lisa Laughlin, J. Kemble, Veradale, WA 99037 Shawn Cardwell, Mark Amara, (509) 891-0873 Emry Dinman, Harley Price, [email protected] Sebastian Moraga and Madison White Printed by: Rewriting and editing by: Mark Amara Pressworks 2717 N. Perry Street Watchable Wildlife copy and Spokane, Washington 99207 photographs provided by: (509) 462-7627 Washington Department of [email protected] Fish and Wildlife Photograph by Lisa Laughlin CONTENTS CONTENTS Grant County Trails and Hiking Grant County Watchable Wildlife Viewing Upper Grand Coulee Area 1.
  • Structural Geology

    Structural Geology

    2 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY Conventional Map A map is a proportionate representation of an area/structure. The study of maps is known as cartography and the experts are known as cartographers. The maps were first prepared by people of Sumerian civilization by using clay lens. The characteristic elements of a map are scale (ratio of map distance to field distance and can be represented in three ways—statement method, e.g., 1 cm = 0.5 km, representative fraction method, e.g., 1:50,000 and graphical method in the form of a figure), direction, symbol and colour. On the basis of scale, maps are of two types: large-scale map (map gives more information pertaining to a smaller area, e.g., village map: 1:3956) and small: scale map (map gives less information pertaining to a larger area, e.g., world atlas: 1:100 km). Topographic Maps / Toposheet A toposheet is a map representing topography of an area. It is prepared by the Survey of India, Dehradun. Here, a three-dimensional feature is represented on a two-dimensional map and the information is mainly represented by contours. The contours/isohypses are lines connecting points of same elevation with respect to mean sea level (msl). The index contours are the contours representing 100’s/multiples of 100’s drawn with thick lines. The contour interval is usually 20 m. The contours never intersect each other and are not parallel. The characteristic elements of a toposheet are scale, colour, symbol and direction. The various layers which can be prepared from a toposheet are structural elements like fault and lineaments, cropping pattern, land use/land cover, groundwater abstruction structures, drainage density, drainage divide, elongation ratio, circularity ratio, drainage frequency, natural vegetation, rock types, landform units, infrastructural facilities, drainage and waterbodies, drainage number, drainage pattern, drainage length, relief/slope, stream order, sinuosity index and infiltration number.
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms

    Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms

    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
  • Lesson 1 the Columbia River, a River of Power

    Lesson 1 the Columbia River, a River of Power

    Lesson 1 The Columbia River, a River of Power Overview RIVER OF POWER BIG IDEA: The Columbia River System was initially changed and engineered for human benefit Disciplinary Core Ideas in the 20th Century, but now balance is being sought between human needs and restoration of habitat. Science 4-ESS3-1 – Obtain and combine Lesson 1 introduces students to the River of Power information to describe that energy curriculum unit and the main ideas that they will investigate and fuels are derived from natural resources and their uses affect the during the eleven lessons that make up the unit. This lesson environment. (Clarification Statement: focuses students on the topics of the Columbia River, dams, Examples of renewable energy and stakeholders. Through an initial brain storming session resources could include wind energy, students record and share their current understanding of the water behind dams, and sunlight; main ideas of the unit. This serves as a pre-unit assessment nonrenewable energy resources are fossil fuels and fissile materials. of their understanding and an opportunity to identify student Examples of environmental effects misconceptions. Students are also introduced to the main could include loss of habitat to dams, ideas of the unit by viewing the DVD selection Rivers to loss of habitat from surface mining, Power. Their understanding of the Columbia River and the and air pollution from burning of fossil fuels.) stakeholders who depend on the river is deepened through the initial reading selection in the student book Voyage to the Social Studies Pacific. Economics 2.4.1 Understands how geography, natural resources, Students set up their science notebook, which they will climate, and available labor use to record ideas and observations throughout the unit.