DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed LDC Article 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed LDC Article 6 Land Development Code Article 6 Technical Standards and Requirements[carla1] Division 1 General Provisions Sec. 6.1.1 Purpose and intent. The purpose of this article is to provide minimum technical standards and design requirements, as well as the procedural guidelines necessary to support applications outlined in Article 2, and to safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. Sec. 6.1.2 Applicability. This article applies to all projects except: A. A single family residence unless otherwise indicated herein. B. Projects which are vested from meeting the requirements of the Code by either a vesting determination or a Development Agreement. Sec. 6.1.3 Conflicts. Where the provisions of this article are in conflict with regulations of any other article of this Code, the more restrictive provisions shall take precedence. Sec. 6.1.4 Approval of alternative design standards. The County Engineer or designated representative may approve alternative design standards if demonstrated to be environmentally sensitive and technologically advanced, with proven capability or effectiveness, while adhering to the intent of this Code. Sec. 6.1.5 All requirements are to be implemented in conjunction with Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code, which may be subject to change as modified by the State of Florida. Division 2 Technical Plan Standards and Requirements Sec. 6.2.1 The following requirements apply to all supporting plans: A. Plans shall be prepared by a professional licensed by the State of Florida. The name, address, signature, date, license number, and seal of the responsible professional shall be shown on each plan sheet. The same shall be provided on the cover page of any supporting documents and calculations. B. Plans shall be legible and meet typical industry standards. C. Standardized sheet size shall be 24” x 36”. Any exceptions must be pre-authorized by the County Engineer. D. All sheets shall indicate each sheet number and the total number of sheets. Cross references between sheets is required. E. Provide drawing legend. F. Provide north arrow and graphic drawing and written scale. Sec. 6.2.2 Conceptual plans may be submitted and shall have with sufficient information needed to support discussions with staff, and potential permitting, as required by Growth ManagementServices, the Building Safety Department, or the Office of the County Engineer. Additional information regarding the Conceptual Plan application may be found in Article 2.10 Conceptual Plan. Sec. 6.2.3 General Application Requirements. Table 2.9 – 1 General Application Requirements provides a reference of the minimal requirements needed for: A comparable review, and/or Information that may be required to move the application efficiently through the approval process. Specific plan requirementsRequirements in this table may be cumulative to and/or dependent on other aspects of the application. 1 5/11/2013 Land Development Code Sec. 6.2.4 Application Technical Standards and Requirements. Table 6.2 – 1 Application Technical Standards and Requirements. Provides a reference between the Application Types and the Technical Standards and Requirements in Article 6.2.1 – 6.2.20 and may include a reference to the General Application Requirements information in Article 2.9. Sec. 6.2.3 . The following table provides specific plan requirements for applications outlined in Article 2. Each requirement is referenced in greater detail in Division 3 of this article. 2 5/11/2013 Land Development Code Table 6.2 – 1 Application Technical Standards and Requirements Application Types Application Section Mass Grading Pre Plat and Improvement Minor Site Major Site Technical Concept Master Plan Final Plat Reference Plan Cert Plan Plan Plan Requirements Environmental Assessment for 6.? X X X X X X Listed Species Final Plat and 6.? X X Certification Fire Protection 6.? X X X X Habitat Protection 6.? X X X X X Irrigation 6.? X X X X X X Karst Topography 6.? X X X X X X X and High Recharge Landscaping 6.? X X X X X X Outdoor Lighting 6.? X X X X Reuse Facilities 6.? X X X X X Stormwater 6.? X X X X X X X Management Survey and Mapping 6.? X X X X X X Traffic Management 6.? X X X X X Transportation 6.? X X X X X X Facilities Tree Protection and 6.? X X X X X X Replacement Wastewater 6.? X X X X X X Facilities Water and Wastewater 6.? X X X X X X Requirements Water Systems 6.? X X X X X X Application Section Mass Grading Pre Plat and Improvement Minor Site Major Site Technical Concept Master Plan Final Plat Reference Plan Cert Plan Plan Plan Requirements 3 5/11/2013 Land Development Code Specific Plan Requirements Reference. The following requirements are referenced as applicable in Table 6.2-1 above. Title block shall be shown on all sheets denoting type of application; project name, location, county, and state; and date of original and all revisions. Provide dimensions and location of all existing site improvements with dimensions to property lines or base (layout) lines; dimensions and location for all proposed site improvements with all setbacks dimensioned; and location and size of existing cross drains. Provide location and dimensions of any existing, proposed, and adjacent streets, including all rights-of-way serving the project. Show construction entrance and provide a route plan. All roads shall be identified by quadrant number as assigned by Marion County 911 Management. Show any known existing or proposed easement or land reservation. Demonstrate erosion and sedimentation control. Front page of the plan shall minimally include: Type of application; Project name centered at top of page; Name, address, phone number, and signature of the owner and applicant (these signatures are not required until the final submittal); Signed certification by the owner as follows: I hereby certify that I, my successors, and assigns shall perpetually maintain the improvements as shown on this plan (this signature is not required until the final submittal); Name, address, and phone number of the licensed professional; Each licensed professional is responsible for information shown within their particular field of practice and shall sign and seal, as applicable, as follows: Licensed Design Professional Certification: I hereby certify that these plans and calculations were completed in accordance with all applicable requirements of the Marion County Land Development Code, except as waived; Surveyor and Mapper Certification: I hereby certify that the survey represented hereon is in accordance with all applicable requirements of the Marion County Land Development Code and meets the minimum technical standards as set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers; A key location or vicinity map, with north arrow, at a scale suitable to show the location of the development with reference to surrounding properties, streets, municipal boundaries, sections, range, and township; A portrait oriented minimal 4” x 6”[C2] space in the top right quadrant shall remain blank to allow for a County approval stamp; Index of sheets; List of utility providers; List of approved waivers, their conditions, and the date of approval; Data block. The items below are required and shall be listed in order as shown. If an item does not apply, it shall be clearly indicated as not applicable. Parcel identification number; Land use designation; List of Development Agreements including Marion County Official Record Book and Page; Zoning information: Zoning classification. List of approved variances, their conditions, and the date of approval. Special Use Permit case number and resolution. Zoning requirements including lot area, width, setbacks, and building height. Overlay zones; Gross site acreage of all initial and anticipated parcels, and if different, the acreage of the development area, to the nearest hundredth of an acre; Existing and proposed uses; Existing and proposed building height; Listing of site coverage (in square footage, acreage and percentage): Existing and proposed building coverage by intended use with gross floor area and leasable/interior area; 4 5/11/2013 Land Development Code Existing and proposed gross impervious area; Proposed gross non-residential floor area ratio or residential density; Existing and proposed natural open space, improved open space, open water, and wetlands; Existing and proposed preserved natural areas; Number of required and provided parking spaces; Projected daily trip generation and a.m./p.m. peak hour traffic volume; and Proposed miles of road, number of lots, blocks and tracts, as applicable. Show building lot typicals including setback requirements for all proposed improvements and accessory uses i.e. screen rooms, pools, screen cages, patios, decks, etc. Show all proposed lot, tract and/or parcel lines with area in square feet. Listing of land uses giving general purpose of and character of the proposed development, acreage, of open space and parks, recreation areas and natural areas to be retained. Show all phases of development. Improvements must be in place to support each phase of development at time of phase completion. Show common outside storage areas. Provide site analysis map depicting existing and proposed drainage basins and drainage features including the existing one percent (100-year) flood plain as shown on FEMA maps with zone elevation and vertical datum noted; water line of lakes, wetlands, rivers, streams and canals; and other manmade or natural features. A note shall be provided detailing source and survey field methods used to obtain and verify data field methods of delineation of all lines shown. Statement identifying legal body responsible for maintenance and management of common areas and improvements. Show location and dimensions of required land use buffering. A statement shall be on the plan indicating how water, sewer, and fire flow services shall be provided to all lots. Division 3 Final Plat Notes and Certification Sec.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indian Lake State Forest Ten Year Resource Management Plan
    TEN-YEAR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE INDIAN LAKE STATE FOREST MARION COUNTY PREPARED BY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES DIVISION OF FORESTRY APPROVED ON FEBRUARY 24, 2011 TEN-YEAR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN INDIAN LAKES STATE FOREST TABLE OF CONTENTS Land Management Plan Executive Summary ...............................................................................1 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................2 A. General Mission, Goals for Florida State Forests, and Management Plan Direction ...............................................................................................2 B. Overview of State Forest Management Program .............................................................2 C. Past Accomplishments .........................................................................................................3 D. Future Goals and Objectives...............................................................................................3 E. Management Needs - Priority Schedule and Cost Estimates ...........................................9 II. Administration Section ..............................................................................................................12 A. Descriptive Information ......................................................................................................12 1. Common Name of Property .............................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • JOSE OLIVIA, in His Official Capacity As Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, Et Al., Defendants/Appellants, Case No
    Filing # 85428808 E-Filed 02/25/2019 12:13:33 PM IN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL JOSE OLIVIA, in his official capacity as Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, et al., Defendants/Appellants, Case No. 1D18-3141 v. L.T. Case Nos. 2018-CA-001423 2018-CA-002682 FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM A FINAL JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA INDEX TO APPENDIX TO AMICUS CURIAE FLORIDA SPRINGS COUNCIL, INC.’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES John R. Thomas Florida Bar No. 868043 Law Office of John R. Thomas, P.A. 8770 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Street North St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 (727) 692-4384; [email protected] RECEIVED, 02/25/201912:14:54 PM,Clerk,First District CourtofAppeal Page 1 AMICUS CURIAE FLORIDA SPRINGS COUNCIL’S APPENDIX TO BRIEF Pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.210 and 9.220, Amicus Curiae, Florida Springs Council, Inc. provides the following Appendix in support of its Amicus Curiae brief: DATE DESCRIPTION PAGES August 14, 2018 Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Department of 7 to 20 Environmental Protection Division of Water Restoration Assistance Springs Restoration Project Plan for the Legislative Budget Commission https://floridadep.gov/sites/default/files/ LBC%20Report%20FY2018-2019.pdf June 2018 June 2018 Florida Forever Five-Year Plan - 21 to 125 EXCERPT http://publicfiles.dep.state.fl.us/DSL/ OESWeb/FF2017/ FLDEP_DSL_SOLI_2018FloridaForever5Yr Plan_20180706.pdf June 2018 Suwannee River 126 to 243 Basin Management Action Plan (Lower Suwannee River, Middle Suwannee River, and Withlacoochee River Sub-basins) https://floridadep.gov/sites/default/files/ Suwannee%20Final%202018.pdf Page 2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I certify that the foregoing was prepared using Times New Roman, 14 point, as required by Rule 9.210(a)(2) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Conservation Land Assessment Proposed Surplus Sites August 20, 2013
    Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Conservation Land Assessment Proposed Surplus Sites August 20, 2013 State-Owned Acres Conservation Area Site Reference ID (GIS) County Section-Township-Range Allen David Broussard Catfish Creek Preserve State Park DRP-4 3.4 Polk County Section 018, Township 29-S, Range 29-E DRP-5 2.0 Polk County Section 018, Township 29-S, Range 29-E Anastasia State Park DRP-0 2.7 St. Johns County Section 021, Township 07-S, Range 30-E Atlantic Ridge Preserve State Park DRP-1 12.6 Martin County Section 34, Township 38-S, Range 42-E Avalon State Park DRP-2 2.2 St. Lucie County Section 03, Township 34-S, Range 40-E DRP-3 6.6 St. Lucie County Section 03, Township 34-S, Range 40-E Big Bend Wildlife Management Area FWC-BB 1 3.4 Dixie County Section 24, Township 10-S, Range 09-E FWC-BB 2 5.3 Dixie County Section 23, Township 10-S, Range 09-E Blackwater Heritage State Trail DRP-59 4.8 Santa Rosa County Section 010, Township 01-N, Range 28-W Blue Spring State Park FLMA_16 22.4 Volusia County Section 08, Township 18-S, Range 30-E Box-R Wildlife Management Area FWC-BX 1 26.0 Franklin County Section 021, Township 08-S, Range 08-W Bruner Bay Tract CF-836-25 43.9 Washington County Section 028, Township 03-S, Range 15-W Cayo Costa State Park DRP-10 0.2 Lee County Section 29, Township 44-S, Range 21-E DRP-11 0.1 Lee County Section 32, Township 44-S, Range 21-E DRP-12 0.2 Lee County Section 05, Township 45-S, Range 21-E DRP-13 0.4 Lee County Section 05, Township 45-S, Range 21-E DRP-14 0.2 Lee County Section 05, Township
    [Show full text]
  • Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Control Program Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Summary
    Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Control Program Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Summary Over one-and-one-half million acres of Florida’s public conservation land have been invaded by alien (exotic, nonnative, nonindigenous) plants such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, cogon grass, and climbing ferns. However, invasive alien plants respect no boundaries and millions of acres of agricultural and private land are also been affected. Florida’s nearly 11 million acres of public conservation land support a nature-based tourism economy valued at $10 billion annually (total tourism spending in 2015 equaled $89 billion). The Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s Invasive Plant Management Section (IPMS) is the designated lead entity in Florida responsible for coordinating and funding the statewide control of invasive aquatic and upland plants in public waterways and on public conservation land. The Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Management Program (a subsection of IPMS) was established in 1997 to address the need for a statewide coordinated approach to the terrestrial (vs. aquatic) invasive exotic plant problem. The “Uplands Program” incorporates place-based management concepts, bringing together regionally diverse interests to develop flexible, innovative strategies to address weed management issues at the local level. The program funds individual exotic plant removal projects statewide on public conservation land. Projects are considered for funding based upon recommendations from eleven Regional Invasive Plant Working Groups. The mission of the Uplands Program is to achieve maintenance control of invasive exotic plants like cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), Old World climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum), and Japanese climbing fern (L. japonicum) on public conservation land.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Division of Law
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Division of Law Enforcement Weekly Report Patrol, Protect, Preserve December 13, 2019 through December 26, 2019 This report represents some events the FWC handled over the past two weeks; however, it does not include all actions taken by the Division of Law Enforcement. NORTHWEST REGION CASES FRANKLIN COUNTY Officers M. McLeod, Bell, and Travis were patrolling the Apalachicola Management Area and observed suspicious activity on the Florida River Island after hearing multiple gun shots after dark. They encountered six subjects exiting the area and investigated. During the investigation, one of the subjects admitted to hunting hogs with dogs. While another subject was questioned about fresh blood on his dog box; he admitted to picking up a road killed fox. The subject also admitted to possessing a fox squirrel. The officers also found that another subject was in possession of deer meat without sex evidence. The appropriate citations were issued. Officers M. McLeod and Travis were on patrol on the Apalachicola River and encountered subjects camping on a house boat. After speaking with the subjects, they determined one of their party was actively placing corn on the wildlife management area. They found the subject, who admitted to placing the bait on public land, and cited him accordingly. GULF COUNTY Officers Gerber, Lipford, Basford and Lieutenant Allen were on patrol and saw several vessels near the north end of St. Joseph Peninsula State Park. There were six individuals wading in the shallow water working a large area of seine nets. A resource inspection found three of the nets connected, forming an outer perimeter around a shallow sand bar.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Year Anniversary Presentation
    Welcome! 3 Year Anniversary 2009-2012 Reception and Celebration Sponsored by Longleaf Partnership Council March 13, 2012 Atlanta, GA TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) TX-LA Longleaf Taskforce (Photo by Ross Anderson) Mark Hainds discusses understory diversity at Longleaf 101 Academy in Tifton, Georgia. (Longleaf Alliance) Prescribed Fire in Blackwater River State Forest (Photo by Vernon Compton) Eglin Air Force Base, FL (Photo by Vernon Compton) Eglin Air Force Base, FL (Photo by Vernon Compton) Eglin Air Force Base, FL (Photo by Vernon Compton) Eglin Air Force Base, FL (Photo by Vernon Compton) Eglin Air Force Base, FL (Photo by Vernon Compton) Eglin Air Force Base, FL (Photo by Vernon Compton) Eglin Air Force Base, FL (Photo by Vernon Compton) Eglin Air Force Base, FL (Photo by Vernon Compton) Eglin Air Force Base, FL (Photo by Vernon Compton) Ft. Benning ,GA (Photo by Vernon Compton) Ft. Benning ,GA (Photo by Vernon Compton) Ichauway Plantation, GA Ichauway Plantation, GA Ichauway Plantation, GA Ichauway Plantation, GA Ichauway
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Springs Basin Management Action Plan Working Group
    FINAL BASIN MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN for the Implementation of Total Maximum Daily Loads adopted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in the Silver Springs Basin Management Area for Silver Springs, Silver Springs Group, and Upper Silver River prepared by the Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Water Quality Restoration Program Florida Department of Environmental Protection Tallahassee, FL 32399 in cooperation with the Silver Springs Basin Management Action Plan Working Group October 2015 FINAL Basin Management Action Plan for Silver Springs, Silver Springs Group, and Upper Silver River, October 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Silver Springs Basin Management Action Plan was prepared as part of a statewide watershed management approach to restore and protect Florida’s water quality. It was developed with participation from affected local, regional, and state governmental interests, identified below; elected officials and citizens; and private interests. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Jon Steverson, Secretary LIST OF SILVER SPRINGS BMAP PARTICIPANTS - = Empty cell/no data TYPE OF ENTITY NAME City of Ocala Alachua County City of Belleview City of Hawthorne Marion County The Villages Local Governments Town of McIntosh Lake County Town of Lady Lake Town of Fruitland Park Putnam County Sumter County Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (including the Florida Forest Service and Office of Agricultural Water Policy) Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Central and Northeast
    [Show full text]
  • Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Control Program Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Summary
    Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Control Program Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Summary Over one-and-one-half million acres of Florida’s public conservation land have been invaded by alien (exotic, nonnative, nonindigenous) plants such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, cogon grass, and Asian climbing ferns. However, invasive alien plants respect no boundaries; millions of acres of agricultural and other private properties are also affected. Florida’s nearly 11 million acres of public conservation land support an outdoor recreation and nature tourism economy valued at over $58 billion annually. The Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s Invasive Plant Management Section (IPMS) is the designated lead entity in Florida responsible for coordinating and funding the statewide control of invasive aquatic and upland plants in public waterways and on public conservation land. The Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Management Program (a subsection of IPMS) was established in 1997 to address the need for a statewide coordinated approach to the terrestrial (vs. aquatic) invasive exotic plant problem. The “Uplands Program” incorporates place-based management concepts, bringing together regionally diverse interests to develop flexible, innovative strategies to address weed management issues at the local level. The program funds individual exotic plant removal projects statewide on public conservation land. Projects are considered for funding based upon recommendations from eleven Regional Invasive Plant Working Groups. The mission of the Uplands Program is to achieve maintenance control of invasive exotic plants such as cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), Old World climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum), and Japanese climbing fern (L. japonicum) on public conservation land.
    [Show full text]
  • ALBRIGHT & ASSOCIATES of Ocala, Inc
    Exhibit E - Recent Property Appraisal Report ALBRIGHT & ASSOCIATES of Ocala, Inc. Pine Oaks Golf Course 2201 NW 21st St Ocala, Florida Appraisal Report A&A File #2018.031.029.001 Certified to: Ms. Holly Lang, Fiscal Manager City of Ocala Growth Management Department 201 SE 3rd St, 2nd Floor Ocala, Florida 34471 Certified by: Stephen J. Albright, Jr., MAI State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ2392 Copyright © 2018, Stephen J. Albright, Jr., MAI All Rights Reserved Albright & Associates of Ocala, Inc. Published by: Albright & Associates of Ocala, Inc. 207 SE 8th Street, Ocala, FL 34471 This appraisal report is confidential and is protected by copyright; no part hereof may be reproduced, stored or introduced to a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the copyright owner, identified author and client of the report. A&A File #2018.031.029.001 Copyright © 2018 SJA E - 1 Exhibit E - Recent Property Appraisal Report ALBRIGHT & ASSOCIATES of Ocala, Inc. April 11, 2018 Ms. Holly Lang, Fiscal Manager City of Ocala Growth Management Department 201 SE 3rd St, 2nd Floor Ocala, Florida 34471 Ms. Romona Hills Re: Pine Oaks Golf Course @ 2201 NW 21st St, Ocala, Florida Dear Ms. Lang: Pursuant to your request, an appraisal has been prepared of the above captioned property document- ed by the enclosed text. The majority of the subject property is improved with, and operated as, the Pine Oaks Golf Course (publicly owned but privately operated since 2010). As a result of poor overall course conditions and declining revenues, the facility is facing closure in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Outstanding Florida Springs (OFS) Bmaps Table of Contents Introduction
    Florida Statewide Annual Report on Total Maximum Daily Loads, Basin Management Action Plans, Minimum Flows or Minimum Water Levels, and Recovery or Prevention Strategies, June 2018 Appendix B: Outstanding Florida Springs (OFS) BMAPs Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................2 Jackson Blue Spring and Merritts Mill Pond BMAP .................................................................5 Rainbow Springs BMAP .............................................................................................................11 Santa Fe River BMAP .................................................................................................................37 Silver River and Springs BMAP .................................................................................................45 Upper Wakulla River and Wakulla Springs BMAP ................................................................91 Wekiva River, Rock Springs Run, and Little Wekiva Canal BMAP ....................................105 Page 1 of 157 Florida Statewide Annual Report on Total Maximum Daily Loads, Basin Management Action Plans, Minimum Flows or Minimum Water Levels, and Recovery or Prevention Strategies, June 2018 Introduction The Florida Springs and Aquifer Protection Act (Part VIII of Chapter 373, F.S.), provides for the protection and restoration of the state's OFS, which comprise 24 first magnitude springs, 6 additional named springs, and their associated
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Priority Resources
    Appendix B. Ranking results based on analysis, by habitat type and region. Northwest Region ‐ Rivers and Streams HUC‐12 sub‐watershed rankings, showing all parameters used in analysis. ACCESS = Accessibility; RT = Recreational Trails; GFBWT = Great Florida Birding & Wildlife Trail; POP = Population w/in 50‐mile radius; FHO = Fishing & Hunting Opportunities; SE = Socio‐Economic Importance (category); WSM = Weighted Stream Miles; AFA = Avian Focus Areas; TE = Threatened, Endangered, & SGCN Wildlife Occurence (Freshwater Forested Wetlands); FW = Fish & Wildlife Populations (category); RFB = Riparian ‐ Freshwater Buffer; IW = Impaired Waterbodies; WRD = Weighted Road Density; IAP = Category 1 Invasive Aquatic Plants; ME ‐ FWF = Management Emphasis (category); Priority Ranks: 1 = Low; 2 = Medium Low; 3 = Medium; 4 = Medium High; 5 = High Sub- Sub- Sub-watershed Stream ACCESS GFBWT Region Sub-watershed (Name) watershed RT (Rank) POP (Rank) FHO (Rank) SE (Rank) WSM (Rank) AFA (Rank) TE (Rank) FW (Rank) RFB (Rank) IW (Rank) WRD (Rank) IAP (Rank) ME (Rank) watershed (HUC-12) Miles (Rank) (Rank) (Acres) (Rank) NW 031300110804 East River-Apalachicola River Frontal 39,713 169.61 3451 5 5 55 4 5 23254 5 NW 031300130504 Blounts Bay Frontal 25,504 81.33 4451 5 5 34 3 5 43224 5 NW 031300130503 Tates Hell Swamp-Cash Creek 20,453 80.20 4252 5 5 33 2 4 52225 5 NW 031403050602 White River 38,530 152.09 3155 5 5 51 5 4 33424 5 NW 031300110803 Brothers River 45,705 139.31 4352 5 5 52 4 5 21243 5 NW 031200011003 Lower St. Marks River 27,372 79.83 3312 5 4 35
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation
    BRIEFING BOOK – CONSERVATION DRAFT NOTE: Information is preliminary and subject to change BRIEFING BOOK – CONSERVATION This page is intentionally blank. BRIEFING BOOK – CONSERVATION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1 LANDS ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 WILDLIFE AND HABITAT .................................................................................................................................. 8 WATERS ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 AIR ................................................................................................................................................................ 14 STATEWIDE CONSERVATION INITIATIVES ...................................................................................................... 14 SUMMARY OF OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ...................................................................................... 18 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 19 APPENDIX LIST .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]