Intimate Ubiquitous Computing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Intimate Ubiquitous Computing Intimate Ubiquitous Computing Genevieve Bell Intel Research Tim Brooke Intel Research Elizabeth Churchill FX Palo Alto Laboratory Eric Paulos Intel Research Date: Sunday, 12 October 2003 Time: 09:00 - 17:00 Where: UbiComp 2003, Blakely Room, Westin Hotel, Seattle, WA URL: http://www.intimateornot.com Ubiquitous computing has long been associated with intimacy. Embedded in the literature we see intimacy portrayed as: knowledge our appliances and applications have of us; physical closeness, incarnated on the body as wearable computing and in the body as nanobots; and computer mediated connection with friends, lovers, confidantes and colleagues. As appliances and computation move away from the desktop, and as designers move toward designing for emotion and social connection rather than usability and utility, we are poised to design technologies that are explicitly intimate and/or intimacy promoting. This workshop will: critically reflect on notions of intimacy; consider cultural and ethical issues in designing intimate technologies; and explore potential socio- technical design methods for intimate computing. Table of Contents Workshop Proposal Paper: Intimate (Ubiquitous) Computing 3 Genevieve Bell, Tim Brooke, Elizabeth Churchill, and Eric Paulos Accepted Workshop Papers: Reflections on Friendster, Trust and Intimacy 7 Danah Boyd, (UC Berkeley) Intimate Media and Ambient Intelligence 11 Jon Cass, Lorna Gouden, Slava Kozlov, and Fiona Rees (Philips Design) Reality Instant Messaging 15 Mei Chuah (Accenture) Tracing Technological Intimacies: UbiComp Assemblages 19 Anne Galloway (Carleton University) The Sensing Beds 23 Elizabeth Goodman and Marion Misilim (ITP NYU) Of Blogs and Journals: How We Express Our Most Intimate Thoughts 26 Gillian Hayes (Georgia Tech) Scale, Form, and Time: Creating Connected Sociable Spaces 30 Karrie Karahalios and Judith Donath (MIT Media Lab) Designing for Intimacy: Bridging the Interaction Challenges of Conversation 34 Kristine Nagel and Gregory Abowd (Georgia Tech) My Trombone 38 Trevor Pering (Intel Research) Utilizing Online Communities to Facilitate Physical World Interactions 42 Mike Perkowitz (University of Washington), Matthai Philipose (Intel Research) and Joseph McCarthy (Intel Research) Appropriate Expressions of Intimacy: Lessons of Digital Jewelry and Large Displays 46 Daniel Russell (IBM Almaden) 3° and the Net Generation: Designing for Inner Circles of Friends 50 Melora Zaner, EK Chung, and Tammy Savage, (Microsoft) Contact: [email protected] Intimate (Ubiquitous) Computing Genevieve Bell*, Tim Brooke*, Elizabeth Churchill+, Eric Paulos~ *Intel Research +FX Palo Alto ~Intel Research Intel Corporation Laboratory, 2150 Shattuck #1300 Hillsboro, OR 97124 3400 Hillview Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94704 [email protected] Palo Alto, CA 94304 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Ubiquitous Computing to: address and account for people’s Ubiquitous computing has long been associated with embodied, lived experiences; explore the ways in which intimacy. Within the UbiComp literature we see intimacy computing technology could and should be more intimate; portrayed as: knowledge our appliances and applications and join us in considering possible pitfalls along the design have about us and the minutiae of our day-to-day lives; path to such intimacy. physical closeness, incarnated on the body as wearable Intimacy as a cultural category/construct computing and in the body as ‘nanobots’; and computer What might intimacy have to do with technology and mediated connection with friends, lovers, confidantes and computers, beyond the obvious titillation factor? In the colleagues. As appliances and computation move away United States in particular and the west more broadly, there from the desktop, and as designers move toward designing is a persistent slippage between intimacy and sex, which is for emotion and social connection rather than usability and not to say that there isn’t a place to talk about the utility, we are poised to design technologies that are relationship between sex, intimacy and technology [see explicitly intimate and/or intimacy promoting. This 15]. However, in this workshop, we want to cast our net workshop will: critically reflect on notions of intimacy; more broadly. We are interested in other constructions of consider cultural and ethical issues in designing intimate intimacy; intimacy as something that relates to our technologies; and explore potential socio-technical design innermost selves, something personal, closely felt. Such a methods for intimate computing. construction could include love, closeness, or spirituality. Keywords Or perhaps it is in the way we understand, feel and talk Intimacy, computing, emotion, identity, body, play, about our lives, our bodies, our identities, our souls. In all bioethics, design methods, socio-technical design these ways, intimacy transcends technology, and has a role INTRODUCTION to play in shaping it. As we move towards designing for Intimate. adj. Inmost, deep seated, pertaining to or connecting communication, emotion, reflection, exploration and with the inmost nature or fundamental character of the thing; relationship, we need to critically reassess our reliance in essential, intrinsic ... Pertaining to the inmost thoughts or design on outmoded conventions and old models of feelings, proceeding from, concerning, or affecting one's inmost computation and connection. We need to employ new self, closely personal. metaphors and create new models. We inhabit a world in which the classic computing A BRIEF HISTORY OF (INTIMATE) UBIQUITOUS paradigm of a PC sitting on your desk is giving way to a COMPUTING more complicated and nuanced vision of computing Having said that, there has been an idea of intimate technologies and power. This next era is predicated on a computing for as long as there has been a vision of sense that the appliances and algorithms of the future will ubiquitous computing. The two are inexorably linked in the respond better to our needs, delivering ‘smarter’ more pages of the September 1991 issue of Scientific American. context-appropriate, computing power. Underlying such a In that month’s issue of the magazine, Mark Weiser, vision is the notion that computers in their many forms will articulated his vision of ubiquitous computing – “we are be pervasive and anticipatory. Arguably, to achieve this, trying to conceive a new way of thinking about computers computing appliances will have to become more intimate, in the world, one that takes into account the natural human more knowing of who we are and what we desire, more environment and allows computers themselves to vanish woven into the fabric of our daily lives, and possibly into the background” [25]. In the article that follows, Alan woven into the fabric of our (cyber)bodies. Kay used ‘intimate’ as a modifier to computing in an essay In this workshop we address the notion of ‘intimate reflecting on the relationship between education, computers computing’. We invite designers within the area of and networks [10]. He wrote, “In the near future, all the be possible if they were proximate. Examples include representations that human beings have invented will be explicit actions (e.g. erotically directed exoskeletons [19]), instantly accessible anywhere in the world on intimate, non-verbal expressions of affection or “missing” [22], and notebook-size computers.” This conjoining of intimate computationally enhanced objects, like beds, that offer “a computers and ubiquitous computing within an issue of shared virtual space for bridging the distance between two Scientific American dedicated to Communications, remotely located individuals through aural, visual, and Computers and Networks is perhaps not a coincidence – tactile manifestations of subtle emotional qualities.” [5]. both represents complementary parts of a future vision. These computationally enhanced objects are all the more How has this conjunction been expressed more recently? effective because they themselves are rich (culturally Broadly, there are 3 manifestations in the (predominantly) specific) signifiers. Dodge states of the bed, it is “very technology literature. 1. intimacy as cognitive and "loaded" with meaning, as we have strong emotional emotional closeness with technology, where the technology associations towards such intimate and personal (typically unidirectionally) may be aware of, and experiences”[5]. responsive to, our intentions, actions and feelings. Here our INTIMATE COMPUTING TODAY AND TOMORROW technologies know us intimately; we may or may not know So where are we to go with intimate computing in the age them intimately. 2. intimacy as physical closeness with of ubiquitous and proactive computing and the tentative technology, both on the body and/or within the body. 3. realities of pervasive computing [23]? Clearly, as we move intimacy through technology: technology that can express to the possibility of computing beyond the desktop and of our intentions, actions and feelings toward others. home office, to wireless hubs and hotspots, and from fixed In the first category, Lamming and Flynn at Rank Xerox devices to a stunning array of mobile and miniature form Research Center in the UK in the mid-1990s invoked factors, the need to account for the diversities of people’s ‘intimate computing’ as a broader paradigm within which embodied, daily life starts to impose itself into the debate. to situate their ‘forget-me-not’ memory aid. They wrote,
Recommended publications
  • Ubiquitous Computing
    Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2201 Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing International Conference Atlanta, Georgia, USA, September 30 - October 2, 2001 Proceedings Bearbeitet von Gregory D Abowd, Barry Brumitt, Steven Shafer 1. Auflage 2001. Taschenbuch. XIII, 375 S. Paperback ISBN 978 3 540 42614 1 Format (B x L): 15,5 x 23,5 cm Gewicht: 1210 g Weitere Fachgebiete > EDV, Informatik > Informationsverarbeitung > Ambient Intelligence, RFID Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Preface Ten years ago, Mark Weiser’s seminal article, ”The Computer of the 21st Cen- tury,” was published by Scientific American. In that widely cited article, Mark described some of the early results of the Ubiquitous Computing Project that he lead at Xerox PARC. This article and the initial work at PARC has inspired a large community of researchers to explore the vision of ”ubicomp”. The variety of research backgrounds represented by researchers in ubicomp is both a blessing and a curse. It is a blessing because good solutions to any of the significant prob- lems in our world require a multitude of perspectives. That Mark’s initial vision has inspired scientists with technical, design, and social expertise increases the likelihood that as a community we will be able to build a new future of inter- action that goes beyond the desktop and positively impacts our everyday lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Anhong Guo's Curriculum Vitae
    Anhong Guo Curriculum Vitæ Bob and Betty Beyster Building 3741 https://guoanhong.com 2260 Hayward Street +1 (678) 899-3981 Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA [email protected] Academic Positions 01/2021 – University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Assistant Professor, Computer Science and Engineering (EECS); School of Information (by courtesy) 09/2020 – Carnegie Mellon University 12/2020 Postdoctoral Fellow, Human-Computer Interaction Institute, School of Computer Science Education 08/2014 – Carnegie Mellon University 08/2020 Ph.D. in Human-Computer Interaction M.S. in Human-Computer Interaction Human-Computer Interaction Institute, School of Computer Science Thesis: Human-AI Systems for Visual Information Access Advisor: Jeffrey P. Bigham; Committee: Chris Harrison, Jodi Forlizzi, and Meredith Ringel Morris 08/2012 – Georgia Institute of Technology 05/2014 M.S. in Human-Computer Interaction School of Interactive Computing Thesis: BeyondTouch: Extending the Input Language with Built-in Sensors on Commodity Smartphones Advisor: Gregory Abowd 09/2008 – Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT) 06/2012 B.Eng. in Electronic Information Engineering School of Information and Communication Engineering Awards and Honors 2021 CHI 2021 Best Paper Honorable Mention [C.23] 2021 Forbes’ Top 30 Scientists Under 30 (‘30 Under 30’) 2020 ASSETS 2020 Best Paper Nominee [C.21] 2019 ASSETS 2019 Best Artifact Award [C.17] 2018 CMU Swartz Innovation Fellowship 2018 McGinnis Venture Capital Award 2017 Snap Inc. Research Fellowship 2017 W4A 2017 Paciello Group Accessibility Challenge Delegates Award [A.5] 2016 Qualcomm Innovation Fellowship Finalist 2016 MobileHCI 2016 Best Paper Honorable Mention [C.8] 2014 ISWC 2014 Best Paper Honorable Mention [C.1] Peer-Reviewed Conference and Journal Papers Anhong Guo — curriculum vitæ, page 1 [C.24] Solon Barocas, Anhong Guo, Ece Kamar, Jacquelyn Krones, Meredith Ringel Morris, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Duncan Wadsworth, Hanna Wallach.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Sunyoung Kim | Curriculum Vitae Assistant Professor Department of Library & Information Science School of Communication & Information Rutgers University, the State University of New Jersey [email protected] http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~sk1897 RESEARCH INTERESTS Human-Computer Interaction, Ubiquitous computing, Technology for Health care, Everyday wellbeing & Environmental sustainability Application areas: Chronic healthcare, Everyday health and wellbeing, Healthy aging, Citizen science, Technology empowerment, Environmental sustainability, Environmental protection, Community wellbeing EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION 2014-2016 Postdoctoral fellow, Center for Research on Computation and Society John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA Advisors: Krzysztof Z. Gajos & Barbara J. Grosz 2014 Ph.D. in Human-Computer Interaction Human-Computer Interaction Institute, School of Computing Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Committee: Eric Paulos (co-chair), Jennifer Mankoff (co-chair), Niki Kittur, Jason Ellis Thesis: “SENSR: a flexible framework for authoring mobile data-collection tools for citizen science” (C.8, C.10) 2008 M.S. in Human-Computer Interaction School of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA Advisor: Gregory Abowd Thesis: “Are you sleeping?: sharing portrayed sleeping status within a social network” (C.1) 2000 B.S. in Architecture & Housing and Interior Design Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCES 2016 - present
    [Show full text]
  • Sauvik Das, Ph.D. — Curriculum Vitae | @Scyrusk on Twitter | [email protected]
    Updated: 7/28/21 Sauvik Das, Ph.D. — Curriculum Vitae https://sauvik.me | @scyrusk on Twitter | [email protected] Professional appointment Georgia Institute of Technology Assistant Professor January 2018—Present School of Interactive Computing On partial leave for 2021 Selected Honors and Awards NSA Best Scientific Cybersecurity Paper Award – Honorable Mention [P8] UbiComp Best Paper [P5] SOUPS Distinguished Paper Award [P21] CHI Best Paper Honorable Mention x3 [P21, P15, P12] Most Innovative Video Nomination, AAAI Video Competition [DV1] NSF EAPSI Fellowship (2016) Qualcomm Innovation Fellowship (2014) National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship (2012-15) Stu Card Graduate Fellowship (2011-12) CMU CyLab CUPS Doctoral Training Program Fellowship (2011-13) Grants & Competitive Gifts 2021 NSF PI Collaborative Research: SaTC: CORE: Medium: Privacy Through Design: A Design $1,199,651 Methodology to Promote the Creation of Privacy-Conscious Consumer AI *($669,163) (w/ Jodi Forlizzi, CMU) 2020 NSF PI SaTC: CORE: Small: Corporeal Cybersecurity: Improving End-User Security and $499,892 Privacy with Physicalized Computing Interfaces (w/ Gregory Abowd, Georgia Tech & Northeastern University) 2019 Facebook PI Explainable Ads: Improving Ad Targeting Transparency with Explainable AI $50,000 (sole PI) 2018 NSF PI CRII: SaTC: Systems That Facilitate Cooperation and Stewardship to Improve $175,000 End-User Security Behaviors (sole PI) * indicates portion specifically allocated to Das where applicable Academic Training & Education Carnegie Mellon University, 2011-2017 Updated: 7/28/21 M.S. / Ph.D. in Human-Computer Interaction Advisers: Dr. Jason I. Hong and Dr. Laura A. Dabbish Committee: Dr. Jeffrey P. Bigham (CMU) and Dr. J.D. Tygar (UC Berkeley) University of Tokyo, 2016 Visiting Student Researcher (as part of NSF EAPSI Grant) Adviser: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Abowd College of Computing and GVU Center Georgia Institute of Technology
    Programming environments: A grand challenge Gregory D. Abowd College of Computing and GVU Center Georgia Institute of Technology We are all familiar with Weiser’s eloquent vision of ubiquitous computing (ubicomp) described in the September 1991 issue of Scientific American. Over the past few years, attempts to approximate that vision have lead me to believe there is a very important, and mostly unsung, challenge that stands in our way. We need to build more programmable environments. Our computing ancestors leveraged metaphors from the physical world to make computing easier for the masses to use. Now the tables are turned and to make ubicomp easier we need to leverage experience from the computing world and consider the physical world as a programmable input/output environment. Getting there involves overcoming some significant challenges in rethinking what we mean by input and output and how we can provide programmatic control to unleash the creative power of interaction designers of tomorrow. A lot of the early progress in interactive computing appealed to our understanding and comfort with phenomena in the physical world. We are all comfortable with objects in an office and familiar with actions like filing papers in a cabinet, so it was natural to appeal to that physical metaphor, the desktop, to draw us easily into the world of personal computing. Direct manipulation flourished because it was the creation of a digital world of objects reflecting some of the properties and behaviors of objects in the physical world. We have even gone so far as to create all-encompassing virtual worlds that recreate many of the aspects of the physical world.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Statement Gregory D. Abowd
    Research Statement Gregory D. Abowd My entire research career has targetted the intersection between Software Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). I am interested in pursuing challenging problems that involve the construction and human impact of computing technology. The vast majority of com- puting technologies are used by humans, so techniques to facilitate the design, implementation and evaluation of these systems is of obvious importance. Before arriving at Georgia Tech, my research style was classical with respect to both Software Engineering and HCI. There was no inherent problem with the method of my research. The problem I perceived was that I was inclined to apply classical techniques to classical problems. I was developing techniques to help people build the kinds of systems that they had been building for 10-15 years already. To heighten the chance that my research would have impact in either the HCI or Software Engineer- ing research or practicing communities, I decided to shift my focus toward applications and com- puting systems that were not currently commonplace. My research would then serve the role of a leading indicator on computing practice and not a lagging indicator. My research direction was influenced by the writings and work of the late Mark Weiser and his Ubiquitous Computing research project at Xerox PARC. Mark and his colleagues at PARC dem- onstrated Alan Kay’s spirit of prediction by creating and using an environment enriched with new kinds of interaction devices, from handheld to wall-sized. They showed how a number of signifi- cant Computer Science research problems are unveiled when computation is spread throughout an environment and the use of the computation goes beyond traditional desktop computing tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program 2007 Conference at a Glance 2007 Conference at a Glance
    conference on human factors in computing systems San Jose, California, USA April 28–May 3, 2007 Conference Program 2007 Conference at a Glance 2007 Conference at a Glance Course 1 Course 2 Course 3 Course 4 Intro to HCI — 18:00—21:30 Intro to CSCW — 18:00—21:30 HCI History — 18:00—19:30 Drawing Ideas — 18:00—21:30 San Jose Ballroom IV San Jose Ballroom III Room A3 Room A4 & A5 SUN CIVIC A1 A2 A3 A4 & A5 A8 B1—B4 C2 AUDITORIUM 8:30– Opening Plenary: Bill Moggridge — Reaching for the Intuitive 10:30 CHI MADNESS Interactive SIG Papers Papers Papers Experience Papers: Interactivity Session Beyond Usability: Faces & Bodies in Attention & Capturing Life Reports Large Displays Shake, Rattle, and 11:30– Usability from the Social, Situational, Interaction Interruption Experiences On the Move Roll: New Forms of 13:00 CIO’s Perspective Cultural, & Input and Output Contextual Factors Interactive Papers Papers Papers Papers Papers SIG Papers Session Ubicomp Tools Mobile Interaction Politics & Activism Navigation & Medical Challenges in Task & Attention 14:30– Who Killed Design? Interaction International Usability 16:00 MONDAY Interactive Papers Papers Papers Papers Experience Papers ALT.CHI Session Expert/Novice Mobile Navigation Photo Sharing Reports Empirical Studies Evaluating 16:30– Taking CHI for a Applications Qualitative of Web Interaction Evaluation 18:00 Drive Research Methods 9:00– Social Impact Award: Gary Marsden — Doing HCI Differently — Stories from the Developing World 10:30 CHI Madness Interactive SIG Papers Papers Papers Experience
    [Show full text]
  • Ubiquitous Computing for Capture and Access Full Text Available At
    Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000014 Ubiquitous Computing for Capture and Access Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000014 Ubiquitous Computing for Capture and Access Khai N. Truong University of Toronto Canada [email protected] Gillian R. Hayes University of California, Irvine USA [email protected] Boston { Delft Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000014 Foundations and Trends R in Human{Computer Interaction Published, sold and distributed by: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 1024 Hanover, MA 02339 USA Tel. +1-781-985-4510 www.nowpublishers.com [email protected] Outside North America: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 179 2600 AD Delft The Netherlands Tel. +31-6-51115274 The preferred citation for this publication is K. N. Truong and G. R. Hayes, Ubiq- uitous Computing for Capture and Access, Foundations and Trends R in Human{ Computer Interaction, vol 2, no 2, pp 95{173, 2008 ISBN: 978-1-60198-208-7 c 2009 K. N. Truong and G. R. Hayes All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publishers. Photocopying. In the USA: This journal is registered at the Copyright Clearance Cen- ter, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by now Publishers Inc for users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC).
    [Show full text]
  • (Rev. 08/12), Biographical Sketch Format Page
    Program Director/Principal Investigator (Last, First, Middle): Kumar, Santosh BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Provide the following information for the Senior/key personnel and other significant contributors in the order listed on Form Page 2. Follow this format for each person. DO NOT EXCEED FOUR PAGES. NAME POSITION TITLE Gregory Abowd Regent’s and Distinguished Professor eRA COMMONS USER NAME (credential, e.g., agency login) GREGORYABOWD EDUCATION/TRAINING (Begin with baccalaureate or other initial professional education, such as nursing, include postdoctoral training and residency training if applicable.) DEGREE INSTITUTION AND LOCATION MM/YY FIELD OF STUDY (if applicable) University of Notre Dame B.S. 1986 Honors Mathematics University of Oxford, UK M.Sc. 1987 Computation University of Oxford, UK D.Phil. 1991 Computation Please refer to the application instructions in order to complete sections A, B, C, and D of the Biographical Sketch. A. Personal Statement My expertise is in using novel mobile and embedded technologies to develop human-centered applications in real environments such as homes, schools, and healthcare settings. Since 1998, I have been interested in applications of information technologies to a variety of health related challenges including those linked to aging, chronic diseases, and autism. I teach courses on interactive system development and mobile/ubiquitous computing applications development. I also created a unique experimental lab at Georgia Tech, the Aware Home, which is ideal for developing and prototyping different kinds of applications prior to deployment in real homes. I have commercialized several of my research efforts relating to autism and home sensing. I also helped in establishing the Child Study Lab and helped to found the Center for Behavior Imaging at Georgia Tech that is funded by the National Science Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae for David Garlan May 2021
    Curriculum Vitae for David Garlan May 2021 Address School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2890 412-268-5056 [email protected] www.cs.cmu.edu/~garlan Education Ph.D., Computer Science 1987 Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA. Dissertation: Views for Tools in Integrated Environments Advisor, A. N. Habermann B.A., M.A. (Oxon) Honours in Mathematics 1973 University of Oxford, Oxford, England. B.A. Mathematics magna cum laude, phi beta kappa 1971 Amherst College, Amherst MA. Employment Associate Dean for Master’s Programs in the School of Computer Science 2018-present Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science 2004-present Professor Director of Software Engineering Professional Programs 2002-2016 Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science 1996-2004 Associate Professor Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science 1990-96 Assistant Professor Tektronix, Inc., Computer Research Labs Senior Computer Scientist 1987-90 Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Computer Science 1987 Post-Doctoral Research Fellow Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Computer Science 1980-86 Research Assistant Awards and Honors Nancy Mead Award for Excellence in Software Engineering Education 2017 IEEE TCSE Distinguished Software Education Award 2017 Allen Newell Award for Research Excellence 2016 Master of Software Engineering “Coach” Award 2016 Fellow of the ACM 2013 Fellow of the IEEE 2012 ACM SIGSOFT Outstanding Research Award (joint with Mary Shaw) 2011 IBM Faculty Research Award 2011
    [Show full text]
  • Context-Aware Computing
    Introduction to This Special Issue on Context-Aware Computing Thomas P. Moran IBM Almaden Research Center Paul Dourish University of California, Irvine To be published in Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 16, Numbers 2-3, 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pervasive Computing is a term for the strongly emerging trend toward: • Numerous, casually accessible, often invisible computing devices • Frequently mobile or embedded in the environment • Connected to an increasingly ubiquitous network infrastructure composed of a wired core and wireless edges [from the call for a conference on Pervasive Computing1] For most of us, computing has been done during the last two decades on personal computer workstations and laptops. Interacting with computational artifacts and networked information has been largely a “desk experience.” This is now changing in a big way … Ubiquitous/Pervasive Computing Computation is now packaged in a variety of devices. Smaller and lighter laptop/notebooks, as powerful as conventional personal computers, free us from the confines of the single desk. Specialized devices such as handheld personal organizers are portable enough to be with us all the time. Wireless technology allows devices to be fully interconnected with the electronic world. Cameras and VCRs are being supplanted by digital equivalents, while we increasingly listen to music on devices that are digital and solid-state. Cell phones are really networked computers. The distinction between communication and computational is blurring, not only in the devices, but also in the 1 http://www.nist.gov/pc2001/. - 1 - variety of ways computation allows us to communicate, from email to chat to voice to video. On a different scale, computation is also moving beyond personal devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Heather Richter Lipford CURRICULUM VITAE Heather Richter Lipford Department of Software and Information Systems University of North Carolina at Charlotte 9201 University City Boulevard Charlotte, NC 28223 Phone: +1 (704) 687-8376; Fax: +1 (704) 687-4893 [email protected] http://www.sis.uncc.edu/~richter 1 Education 1997 - 2005 Ph.D. College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology “Designing and Evaluating Meeting Capture and Access Services” Advisor: Dr. Gregory Abowd 1992 - 1995 B.S. Computer Science, Michigan State University Advisor: Dr Betty H.C. Cheng 2 Professional Experience 2011 - present Associate Professor, Department of Software and Information Systems. University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC. 2005 – 2011 Assistant Professor, Department of Software and Information Systems. University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC. 1997 – 2005 Research and Teaching Assistant. Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA. 2000 - 2001 Technical Intern. IBM T.J. Watson Research Laboratories. Hawthorne, NY. 1997, 1998 Technical Intern. Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Palo Alto, CA. 1995 Undergraduate research assistant. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. 3 Licenses and Certifications 4 Career Highlights • Established HCI as a core area in the department by founding the HCI Lab and developing 2 new HCI courses at UNC Charlotte. • Core contributor to the usable security and privacy community with my work on privacy and social network sites. July, 2011 Curriculum Vitae Page 1 of 17 Heather Richter Lipford • Honorable mention award at CHI 2010. • Active leadership roles in usable security and privacy by serving in conference and workshop organizing roles, such as the CHI and CSCW program committees and co-chair of the SOUPS 2011 and 2012 technical program.
    [Show full text]