DOCSLIB.ORG

A Description and Evaluation of the Montgomery County Art In-Public Architecture Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Description and Evaluation of the Montgomery County Art In-Public Architecture Program -- -- - ___ \ (> '' J OLO Report No. 90-3 January 29, 1991 A DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION OF THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY ART IN-PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM I. SUMMARY OF MAJOR CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS • • • • • • . la II. AUTHORITY, SCOPE, METHODOLOGY, AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ••••••••• 2 A. Authority • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 B. Scope •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 2 C. Methodology • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 D. Acknowledgements •••••.•••••••••••••••• 3 III. DEFINITIONS . 3 IV. BACKGROUND AND EVOLUTION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ART IN PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM COMPONENTS ••••••••••• 5 A. History of Montgomery County Percent-for-Art Legislation. 5 B. Establishment of Montgomery County Public Art Program Components •••••••••••••• 10 V. DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ART IN PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE LEGISLATION ••••••••••••••• 11 A. Overview • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11 B. Bill No. 30-83 and Emergency Bill No. 15-88 ••••••• 12 C. Emergency Bill No. 37-90 • • • • • • • ·• • • • • • • • • • 19 VI. DESCRIPTION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ART IN PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM. 20 A. MCPS Public Art Program Component • . • . • • . • . • . 20 B. Executive Branch Public Art Program Component . • . 22 c. M-NCPPC Public Art Program Component. • . • • . • . • 23 D. Montgomery College Public Art Program Component . • . • 25 VII. PUBLIC ART PROGRAMS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS. • • • • .. • • ••• 26 A. OLO Survey ••••••••••• . • ••• 26 B. Arts Extension Survey ••••• • • • • • • • • • •••• 29 VIII. EVALUATION/ANALYSIS OF THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY ART IN PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM ••••••••••••••••• 33 A. Evaluation/Analysis of the MCPS Program Component •••• 33 1. Evaluation of the MCPS Public Art Program Component. 33 2. Analysis of MCPS Capital Projects and Public Art Appropriations •••••••••••• 39 B. Evaluation/Analysis of the Executive Branch Program Component •••••••••••••••••••• 42 1. Evaluation of the Executive Branch Public Art Program Component •••••••••••••••••• 42 2. Analysis of Executive Branch Capital Projects and Public Art Appropriations •••••••••••• 46 Office of Legislative Oversight 100 Maryland Avenue, Rockv~e, Maryland 20850, 301/217-7990 l) Page C. Evaluation/Analysis of the M-NCPPC ?rogram Component ••••49 1. Evaluation of the M-NCPPC Public Art Program Component. 49 2. Analysis of M-NCPPC Capital Projects and Public Art Appropriations ••••••••••••••• 53 D. Evaluation/Analysis of the Montgomery College Program Component • .. • • ., • • • • ., • • .. • • ., • 56 1. Evaluation of the Montgomery College Public Art Program Component. • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 56 2. Analysis of Montgomery College Capital Projects and Public Art Appropriations ••••• • 57 IX. RELATED MATTERS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ., • • • 59 A. Optional Method of Development Public Artworks. • ••• 59 B. Other County Public Artwork Acquisitions •••••••••• 60 x., CONCLUSIONS • • • • • • • a • • • • • • • • 61 XI. RECOMMENDATIONS • • 65 XII. DEPARTMENT AND AGENCY COMMENTS. 0 68 EXHIBITS A. Code Chapter 8, Article V, as of May 12, 1988 A-1 B. Emergency Bill No. 37-90 B-1 c .. Listing of Percent-for-Art Programs_ in the U.S. C-1 D. Listing of Council Approved Public Art Commissions D-1 E. Recommendations Section from Report by the Study Committee on Artwork in the Optional Method · of Development E-1 ADDENDUM I. Qualitative Aspects of the Montgomery County Art in Public Architecture Program . ADD-1 LISTING OF CHARTS AND TABLES Charts of Expected Versus Approved CIP Expenditures 1. MCPS CIP Expenditures FY85 Through FY89 7 2. Executive Branch CIP Expenditures FY85 Through FY89 7 3. M-NCPPC CIP Expenditures FY85 Through FY89 .. ., ., •• 7 4. Montgomery College CIP Expenditures FY85 Through FY89 8 5. MCPS CIP Expenditures FY89 Through FY93 9 6. Executive Branch CIP Expenditures FY89 Through FY93 9 7. M-NCPPC GIP Expenditures FY89 Through FY93 •• ., • • 9 8. Montgomery College CIP Expenditures FY89 Through FY93 •••• 10 Tables Relating to the MCPS Public Art Program Component Page 1. Schedule of Council Approved Commissions •• .3"4" 2. Listing of Artists Approved for Five or More Commissions •• 35 3. Listing of Scho'ols Approved for $50,000 or More in Art Commissions • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • II • • • • • • 36 4. Schedule of Approved Appropriations Versus OLO Estimated Requirements • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• 40 5. Schedule of Appropriations and Expenditures as of June 30, 1990 ••••••••••••••• • • 41 Tables Relating to the Executive Branch Public Art Program_ Component 6. Schedule of Council Approved Commissions •••••••••• 43 7. Listing of Artists Approved for Commissions of $30,000 or More • • 11 • • ., ., • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ., • • • • • 44 Listing of Sites Approved for $30,000 or More in Art Commissions • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ·• • • • • • •• 45 9. Schedule of Approved Appropriations Versus OLO Estimated Requirements • ., • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 47 10. Schedule of Appropriations and Expenditures as of June 3 0 , 19 90 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 9 Tables Relating to the M-NCPPC Public Art Program Component 11. Schedule of Council Approved Commissions •••• • 50 12. Listing of Artists Approved for Public Artwork Commissions •• 51 13. Listing of Sites Approved for $25,000 or More in Art Commissions ••••••••••••• e e e G e 0 • • 52 14. Schedule of Approved Appropriations Versus OLO Estimated Requirements •••••••••••••••••••••••• 54 15. Schedule of Appropriations and Expenditures as of June 30, 1990 •••••••••••• • 55 Tables Relating to the Montgomery College Public Art Program Component 16. Schedule of Approved Appropriations Versus OLO Estimated Requirements • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ., 58 Tables Relating to the Overall Art in Public Architecture Program 17. Cumulative Schedule of Appropriations and Expenditures as of June 30, 1990 •••••••••••• 61 18. Cumulative Schedule of Approved Appropriations Versus OLO Estimated Requirements •••••••••••••• 62 I. SlJMMARY OF MAJOR CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BACKGROUND In FY84, the Council enacted legislation which created the County's Art in Public Architecture program and specified _that one percent of the construction cost of certain capital improvement projects be set aside for acquiring and installing art in public places. The law was subsequently modified as follows: Emergency Bill No. 15-88, effective May 12, 1988, reduced the percentage required to be appropriated for public art from one percent to one-half percent for those County construction projects receiving initial appropriations for detailed architectural and engineering design during fiscal years 1989, 1990 or 1991; and, Emergency Bill No. 37-90, effective May 4, 1990, reduced the percentage to be appropriated for public art from one-half percent to one=quarter' percent henceforth, established a cumulative maximum amount of $100,000 to be expended for public art at a County facility, and clarified the definition of sites eligible to receive public art to include any County facilitye The Executive branch, Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS), Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC), and Montgomery College each established a public art program component, which has been coordinated with the Montgomery County Arts Council through its participation on art selection panels.· The four County agencies independently interpreted and applied the percent-for-art law somewhat differently. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS • The County has not adopted standard policies, guidelines or procedures under which all four public art program components must operateo Although four County agencies have developed effective program components, each has operated independently of the others with little coordination or sharing of information among the components. Each agency has operated its program component under a different interpretation for applying the public art percentage and a different policy regarding expenses chargeable to its public art appropriationso • Since no common interpretation of the percent-for-art law existed, the Office of Legislative Oversight (010) examined the law and created a standard interpretation by which each program component could be measured. Based on the 010 interpretation, shortfalls may have occurred in appropriations approved for the County's public art program componentse A majority of these shortfalls relate to timing of agency requests for public art appropriations, and represent funding which has not yet been requested by the program components. • Some County departments and agencies have acquired or are planning to acquire public artworks independently of the Art in Public Architecture program. These placements are not currently required to be coordinated with the County's public art program, nor are placements under the Optional Method reported to the public art program components so that County placements may be coordinated. -la- -"- I • When the original percent-for-art law was enacted, the Council envisioned the Art in Public Architecture program as a long-range program to which the County would have a fairly level financial· commitment. However, the art percentage is tied to the Capital Improvements Program (CIP), and there has been substantial growth of the.CIP over the- past six years._ As a result, the Council has twice adjusted the law to bring the County's financial commitment more in line with what was originally planned. MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS • The Council
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Creating a Sustainable Main Street
    Creating A Sustainable Main Street Woodbury, CT SDAT Report Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 MARKET 2 COMMUNITY DESIGN 12 ARTS & ARTISANS 34 MOBILITY & LIVABILITY 38 PLACEMAKING 50 MOVING FORWARD 58 TEAM ROSTER & THANKS 61 APPENDICES 64 INTRODUCTION • Inclusive and Participatory Processes. Public participation is the foundation of good community design. The SDAT involves a wide range of stakeholders and utilizes short feedback loops, resulting In December of 2014, Woodbury, CT submitted a proposal to the in sustainable decision-making that has broad public support and ownership. American Institute of Architects (AIA) for a Sustainable Design Assessment Team (SDAT) to assist the community and its citizens in • Objective Technical Expertise. The SDAT Team is assembled to include a range of technical addressing key issues facing the community. The issues included experts from across the country. Team Members do not accept payment for services and serve in economic development, mobility, and urban design. The AIA accepted a volunteer capacity on behalf of the AIA and the partner community. As a result, the SDAT Team the proposal and, after a preliminary visit by a small group in July has enhanced credibility with local stakeholders and can provide unencumbered technical advice. 2015, recruited a multi-disciplinary team of volunteers to serve on the • Cost Effectiveness.Through SDAT, communities are able to take advantage of leveraged resources SDAT Team. In October 2015, the SDAT Team members worked closely for their planning efforts. The AIA contributes up to $15,000 in financial assistance per project. The with local officials, community leaders, technical experts, non-profit SDAT team members volunteer their labor and expertise, allowing communities to gain immediate organizations and citizens to study the community and its concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2018 Newsletter
    YOUR MONTHLY GUIDE TO PORT’S LIBRARY BOOKINGS MAY 2018 HARMONY AND HUMANITY WITH THE LEVINS QUICK READS Wednesday, May 16 at 7:30 p.m. Holiday hours Known for their sun-splashed songwriting that celebrates The library will be closed over our common humanity, The Levins were 2016 Northeast Memorial Day weekend: Satur- Regional Folk Alliance (NERFA) Formal Showcase Artists and day, May 26 through Monday, were voted 2014 Falcon Ridge Emerging Artists. May 28. The Levins’ recordings have garnered them invitations to Port Fest perform in Amsterdam, England, and throughout the U.S. They have received recognition and numerous songwrit- Visit the library’s booth at this ing awards in the Children’s, Jewish, Folk, and Indie music fun community gathering! Meet communities. Their unique harmonies and tightly blended and chat with staff, learn about unison vocals, along with their guitar and piano interplay, the latest library offerings, see reflect the couple’s own musical and personal relationship. some new tech, and find ac- tivities for kids. Saturday, May Their 2015 release Trust debuted in the Top 10 Folk chart 19 from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. on and the Top 20 Roots chart. Tom Staudter of The New York the track between Weber and Times wrote that the album “underscores positive mes- Schreiber. sages of love, peace, and self-awareness. Each tune serves as another stepping stone toward a better day and a richer FOL Book & Author life.” The disc’s title song, “Trust,” was a Top 10 song of 2015 Luncheon for WFUV’s John Platt, who said, “The Levins speak to our There’s still time to reserve your better selves with their crystalline harmonies and uplifting seat—but hurry! The Friends of lyrics.” the Library’s 49th Annual Book & Author Luncheon is on Friday, May 11 at 11 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Emplacing and Excavating the City: Art, Ecology, and Public Space in New Delhi
    Transcultural Studies 2015.1 75 Emplacing and Excavating the City: Art, Ecology, and Public Space in New Delhi Christiane Brosius, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Every claim on public space is a claim on the public imagination. It is a response to the questions: What can we imagine together?… Are we, in fact, a collective; is the collective a site for the testing of alternatives, or a ground for mobilising conformity? (Adajania 2008) Introduction Contemporary art production can facilitate the study of a city’s urban fabric, its societal change, and its cultural meaning production; this is particularly the case when examining exhibition practices and questions of how, why, when, where, and by whom artworks came to be emplaced and connected to certain themes and concepts.* Emplacement here refers to the process of constructing space for certain events or activities that involve sensory and affective aspects (Burrell and Dale 2014, 685). Emplacing art thus concerns a particular and temporary articulation of and in space within a relational set of connections (rather than binaries). In South Asia, where contemporary “fine art”1 is still largely confined to enclosed spaces like the museum or the gallery, which seek to cultivate a “learned” and experienced audience, the idea of conceptualising art for and in rapidly expanding and changing cities like Delhi challenges our notions of place, publicness, and urban development. The particular case discussed here, the public art festival, promises—and sets out—to explore an alternative vision of the city, alternative aspirations towards “belonging to and participating in” it.2 Nancy Adajania’s question “What can we imagine together” indirectly addresses which repositories and languages are available and can be used for such a joint effort, and who should be included in the undertaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Survey Written Responses
    Family Members What place or memorial have you seen that you like? What did you like about it? 9/11 memorial It was inclusive, and very calming. 9/11 Memorial It was beautiful. Park with a wall with names on it. Angels status. Water fountain. Water fountain area and location. Touchscreen info individual memorials Oklahoma City Memorial memorabilia collections 9-11 memorial Place to reflect and remember; reminder of the lessons we should Several Washington DC memorials learn from hateful acts Love that all the names were 911 New York City Place on a water fall Before the 911 Memorial was erected; I visited the site a month after the event. I liked its raw state; film posters adverts still hanging up from films premiered months prior. The brutal reality of the site in baring its bones. The paper cranes left by the schoolchildren. The Holocaust Museum along with the Anne Frank Haus spoke to me; the stories behind the lives of these beautiful people subjected to nothing but hate for who they loved and who they were. The educational component to the Holocaust Museum in D.C. spoke volumes to me. To follow the journey of a Holocaust victim... For Pulse, I see a blend of all of this. To learn the stories of why so many sought refuge and enjoyment there. Why did so many leave their "families"? Because they could not be who they were. I find it is important that we teach this lesson-it's okay to be who you are-we have your back-we love you-we will dance with you-in any form of structure.
    [Show full text]
  • TOM LOESER DEPARTMENT of ART 2826 Lakeland Ave 6241
    TOM LOESER DEPARTMENT OF ART 2826 Lakeland Ave 6241 Humanities Building Madison, WI 53704 University of Wisconsin-Madison Mobile: 608-345-6573 Madison, WI 53706 Email: [email protected] www.tomloeser.com EDUCATION 1992 MFA, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA 1983 BFA, Furniture Design, Boston University, Boston, MA 1979 BA, Sociology and Anthropology, Haverford College, Haverford, PA ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2002-present Professor of Art, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 2017 Program Leader, UW in London Program 2009-2014 Department Chair, Art Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison 1996-2002 Associate Professor of Art, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 1992-1996 Assistant Professor of Art, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 1991-1992 Instructor, Art Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 1989-1990 Adjunct Professor, California College of Arts and Crafts, Oakland, CA 1988 Instructor, Rhode Island School of Design, Providence, RI 1987 Instructor, Rhode Island School of Design, Providence, RI 1987 Instructor, Swain School of Design, New Bedford, MA HONORS AND AWARDS 2015-present University of Wisconsin, Vilas Research Professor 2015-2020 University of Wisconsin, WARF Named Professorship 2013 Wisconsin Visual Art Lifetime Achievement Award, awarded by the Museum of Wisconsin Art, Wisconsin Visual Artists and the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences. 2012 Elected to American Craft Council College of Fellows 2006 Wisconsin Arts Board Visual Arts Fellowship 2006 University of Wisconsin Kellett Mid-Career Award 2004
    [Show full text]
  • National Endowment for the Arts FY 2017 Fall Grant Announcement
    National Endowment for the Arts FY 2017 Fall Grant Announcement State and Jurisdiction List Project details are accurate as of December 7, 2016. For the most up to date project information, please use the NEA's online grant search system. The following categories are included: Art Works, Art Works: Creativity Connects, Challenge America, and Creative Writing Fellowships in Poetry. The grant category is listed with each recommended grant. All are organized by state/jurisdiction and then by city and then by name of organization/fellow. Click the state or jurisdiction below to jump to that area of the document. Alabama Louisiana Oklahoma Alaska Maine Oregon Arizona Maryland Pennsylvania Arkansas Massachusetts Rhode Island California Michigan South Carolina Colorado Minnesota South Dakota Connecticut Mississippi Tennessee Delaware Missouri Texas District of Columbia Montana Utah Florida Nebraska Vermont Georgia Nevada Virginia Hawaii New Hampshire Virgin Islands Illinois New Jersey Washington Indiana New Mexico West Virginia Iowa New York Wisconsin Kansas North Carolina Wyoming Kentucky Ohio Some details of the projects listed are subject to change, contingent upon prior Arts Endowment approval. Information is current as of December 7, 2016. Alabama Number of Grants: 6 Total Dollar Amount: $120,000 Alabama Dance Council, Inc. (aka Alabama Dance Council) $30,000 Birmingham, AL Art Works - Dance To support the 20th anniversary of the Alabama Dance Festival. The statewide festival will feature performances and a residency by CONTRA-TIEMPO. The festival also will include a New Works Concert featuring choreographers from the South, regional dance company showcases, master classes, workshops, community classes, and a Dance for Schools program.
    [Show full text]
  • Altoona Parks & Recreation Committee
    ALTOONA PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE AGENDA March 22, 2021 at 6:00 PM THE MEETING WILL BE HELD ON ZOOM TELECONFERENCE / VIDEO CONFERENCE. DUE TO CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 RESIDENTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO ATTEND THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIA THE APPLICATION, ZOOM UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. AN INSTRUCTION PAGE WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE NEXT PAGE SHOWING HOW TO PARTICIPATE. You may join the March 22 meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone via WEBSITE: https://zoom.us/join WEBINAR ID: 895 5762 8450 WEBINAR PASSWORD: 311683 Or you can also dial in using your phone. CALL IN PHONE NUMBER: 1-312-626-6799 WEBINAR ID: 895 5762 8450 WEBINAR PASSWORD: 311683 To make a public comment Raise your hand by pressing *9 on your telephone keypad. You will be called upon in the order received. 1. Call Meeting to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Maintenance Report 4. Recreation Report 5. Discuss/consider approval of the minutes from the February 22, 2021 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting. 6. Discuss/consider the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Altoona and the Altoona Lions Club-Lions Club Use of City Facilities at Cinder City Park, Altoona City Park and Devney Park during Cinder City Days. 7. Discuss preliminary draft of the Altoona Place Plan (Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan). 8. Discussion of Plan Commission Resolution 3A-21 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Preparation 9. Discuss/consider renewing the Centennial Park Trail Improvement and Maintenance Agreement with CORBA. 10. Public Comments and Concerns 11. Adjournment Debra Goldbach Recreation Manager Altoona Parks & Recreation Department The Altoona Parks & Recreation Department's Mission is to provide the City of Altoona with quality of life enhancement through athletic, recreational, and leisure activities for all age groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Religare Arts Initiative Ltd. 7 Atmaram Mansion, Level 1, Scindia House, K
    Religare arts initiative Ltd. 7 Atmaram Mansion, Level 1, Scindia House, K. G. Marg, CP, New Delhi - 110001 T + 91-11-43727000 / 7001 email: [email protected] website: www.religarearts.com Religare arts initiative presents the an exhibition showcasing works created by the resident artists of the Curated by Sumakshi Singh and Paola Cabal 2010 Connaught Place: The WhyNot Place residency programme Tuesday 10th August - Tuesday 31st August, 2010 during the months of June and July, 2010 Artwork by Raffaella Della Olga Qutub Minar, Devi Art Foundation Direct Connect Direct Connect Talk: Ravi Agarwal, Paola Cabal Talk: Vivan Sundaram, Sumakshi Singh NGMA Dinner at Sumakshi’s Khoj Opening Slide show - Sumakshi 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Field Trip, Connaught Place - led by Gagandeep Singh Direct Connect Old Mehrauli walk Talk: Atul Bhalla - led by Sohail Hashmi Old Delhi, Shajahanabad Sarai Foundation Opening - led by Atul Bhalla Open Studio Night Purnna Behera Brad Biancardi Becky Brown Rebecca Carter The 2010 WhyNot Place Summer Residency Programme at arts.i Raffaella Della Olga Garima Jayadevan The Transforming State 2010 Greg Jones Kavita Singh Kale Table of Contents 20 Purnna Behera by Sumakshi Singh 84 Megha Katyal by Sumakshi Singh Megha Katyal Nidhi Khurana 28 Brad Biancardi by Sumakshi Singh 92 Nidhi Khurana by Paola Cabal Jitesh Malik Koustav Nag [front end-pages] Residency Activities June 36 Becky Brown by Paola Cabal 100 Jitesh Malik by Paola Cabal Rajesh Kr Prasad 9 The Religare
    [Show full text]
  • Thanks Giving, by Pegi Christiansen by Pegi Christiansen, Art City Contributor Nov
    Thanks Giving, by Pegi Christiansen By Pegi Christiansen, Art City contributor Nov. 25, 2009, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel (Note from Mary Louise Schumacher: I'd like to introduce Pegi Christiansen, who many of you will know because of her involvement with In:Site, the temporary public art group, and the Performance Art Showcase, which she's championed for years. Pegi is also a performance artist and artist model. She's reflected on her role as the latter in many ways over the years. Pegi came to a session at the Journal Sentinel that gallery owners, museum officials and arts groups were invited to. At that meeting, I asked: What would happen if we all commited ourselves to open, rigorous, meaningful engagement about art in Milwaukee? Her response was to volunteer to write regularly for Art City. This is her first contribution. Thank you Pegi). Sometimes, Milwaukee gets it right. The Menomonee River Valley is my notion of nirvana. Yes, there are natural retreats in this state I adore that do not abut a major freeway. Yet the urban wilderness in the valley has everything. It has the river and the railroad, reeds and rust cheek to jowl. Thanks to Melissa Cook, Department of Natural Resources manager of the Valley's Hank Aaron State Trail (HAST), and Annemarie Sawkins, chair of the Friends of the Hank Aaron State Trail public art committee, last month a piece of permanent public art was installed at the beginning of the art loop that starts at 13th and Canal Streets. "A Place to Sit" (shown) by local artist kathryn e.
    [Show full text]
  • To Your Health Community Newsletter
    Nonprofit Org. U.S. Postage PAID Saginaw, MI Permit No. 120 4005 Orchard Drive Midland, MI 48670 ourour REACHING RESIDENTS THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE OF MICHIGAN M A Y / J U N E / J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 5 HEALTH RECOGNIZED FOR HELP WITH CARING Ann Fillmore, FOR OLDER ADULTS. director of Junior Achievement A new MIDLAND CLINICAL free booklet, Helping Older EXCELLENCE Adults Remain Independent and Healthy, COMMUNITY LEADERS, PATIENTS, AND MIDMICHIGAN EMPLOY- answers difficult ques- EES AND PHYSICIANS RECENTLY SHARED THEIR THOUGHTS tions such as “How can ABOUT QUALITY AT THE MEDICAL CENTER IN MIDLAND, I decide whether my relative can still live at INCLUDING THE RECENT DISTINGUISHED HOSPITAL AWARD home?” and “How can I FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE™ FROM HEALTHGRADES. Jim Bicknell, M.D., evaluate an older As a community leader, Ann Fillmore, director of Junior Achievement in emergency room adult’s driving ability?” Midland, knows that “this commitment to excellence starts at the top and physician You’ll find nutrition and filters down through the whole organization. The hospital plays an impor- exercise tips, a guide to prescription drug tant role in providing education for the community—so not only do they programs, and a list of provide exceptional inpatient and outpatient care, but they also improve local and national the quality of our lives through their community educational programs.” resources for seniors When Fillmore and her husband needed to find the best oncologist and and their caregivers. To the best treatment center, “We found them right here in our community, request a free copy, visit at MidMichigan.” www.midmichigan.org /independence or call When emergency room physician Jim Bicknell, M.D., was asked how Nancy Badour, MidMichigan Health MidMichigan achieves such excellence, he said, “For a hospital this size, food service Line toll-free at (800) the technology we have is amazing—everything from the most up-to- 999-3199.
    [Show full text]
  • 05 Recommendations
    Trees Shrubs and Grasses Trees are the most important design element in Over time, security and maintenance issues have shaping scenery. They form edges to paths and reduced the number of shrubs in the Basin land- open space, create canopies, frame views, and scape. The judicious use of shrubs in the park- are the object of the view themselves—the wil- land, however, can improve the character of par- lows at the Esplanade, for example. ticular areas, screen intrusive views, facilitate maintenance where banks need to be stabilized Within the small number of tree species that or grass maintenance is difficult, and control use have been planted, some are poorly suited to the where short-cut paths have degraded park areas. Basin’s needs and should be phased out or used THE MUDDY RIVER urban context, there has been a tendency to sparingly with greater attention to their place- Grass is currently the universal ground cover AT CHARLESGATE, plant trees in straight lines even where there is ment. The bushy, full form of the American lin- throughout the Basin. Many park areas need THE MISSING LINK enough room to relieve that urban linearity den, for example, blocks water views. Mature mown turf to support use and visual character. BETWEEN THE EMERALD NECKLACE with informal massing of vegetation. The tran- Norway maples require deeper, better soil than However, alternative treatments such as tall AND THE BASIN. sition spaces between different areas of the the parkland can provide and CHERRY TREES AT THE Basin and at major approaches should have a should be phased out entirely.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Public Art in Madison Sela Gordon, Andrew King, and Catherine Streiffer Abstract Where Is the Public
    Permanent Public Art in Madison Sela Gordon, Andrew King, and Catherine Streiffer Abstract Where is the public art in Madison and who is served by it? We catalogued, photographed, and geotagged 81 permanent, publicly owned, outdoor artworks in Madison, creating a GIS layer from their locations and other attributes. We compared the distribution of art to socio­economic data and analyzed how far different parts of Madison are from the art. We interviewed an art professor/public artist, and did an artwork visual analysis, coding for site setting and theme. 86% of the art is located in and near the isthmus. The majority was art + utility themed, and the smallest amount was art + social justice themed. The Madison public is served as viewers, artsy­branded neighborhoods, students’ art education, cultural tourism’s economic benefits, and communities whose issues are addressed. Many artworks and their locations were determined by donors, and one artwork was removed because it functioned as a gathering place for the homeless. Introduction “The history of art has sometimes been presented as a history of styles. The history of public art will more likely be seen as a history of intentions” (Miles 1989, 39, in Knight 2008, 22). Public art is not thought of as art for art’s sake. The artworks serve a purpose beyond the act of creative expression. It is instead thought of as art with a purpose beyond the act of creative expression. In the first half of the 20th century, public art was meant to edify the populace, to instill in them the civic virtues, to memorialize veterans, or to commemorate wars (Rajer and Style 1999, 13).
    [Show full text]