Why Is the Project Needed, and What CHAPTER 1 Evidence Established These Needs?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why Is the Project Needed, and What CHAPTER 1 Evidence Established These Needs? OHV-Sand Camping Project Environmental Assessment Siuslaw National Forest South Zone District Lane, Douglas, and Coos Counties, Oregon Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Jose Linares, Forest Supervisor Siuslaw National Forest 4077 Research Way Corvallis, OR 97333 For Information Contact: Paul Thomas, South Zone Team Leader South Zone District 4480 Hwy. 101, Building G. Florence, Oregon 97439 (541) 902-6985 [email protected] The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326- W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. OHV Sand Camping Project Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposed action and will be available for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, those who only submit anonymous comments will not have standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR part 215. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27 (d), any person may request the agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality. Person requesting such confidentiality should be aware that, under the FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very limited circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. ii OHV Sand Camping Project Contents Chapter 1. Why is this project needed, and what evidence established this need? 1 [“Purpose of and Need for Action”] The Proposed Project 1 The Planning Area 2 The Problems (Issues) To Be Addressed 2 Evidence Used by the Forest Supervisor in Deciding to Address These Problems 3 Help From Other Agencies and the Public 5 Decision Framework 6 Chapter 2. What alternatives were developed to meet the identified needs? 9 [“Alternatives Including the Preferred Alternative”] Alternatives Considered But Eliminated from Detailed Study 9 Alternatives Considered in Detail 10 Alternative 1: No action 11 Alternative 2: Number of campsites based on current high-use periods; developed staging capacity higher than that identified in the Dunes Plan 11 Alternative 3: Number of campsites based on permits issued in 1998 and 1999; developed staging capacity at the level identified in the Dunes Plan 12 Alternative 4: Number of campsites based on the estimated maximum capacity (proposed project); developed staging capacity higher than that identified in the Dunes Plan 13 Comparison of Alternatives 14 Chapter 3. What environmental effects are predicted for each alternative? 41 [“Environmental Consequences”] Predicted Effects of Designating Dispersed Sand Camping Sites and Increasing Staging Area Capacity on Addressing the Problems 42 Recreation Experience 42 Employee Safety 45 Visitor Safety 46 Ability To Prevent Violations and Enforce Regulations 47 Predicted Effects of Designating Dispersed Sand Camping Sites and Increasing Staging Area Capacity on Other Resources 48 Wildlife Species 48 Botanical Resources 51 Soil Productivity 55 Fish Species and Habitats 55 Water Quality 58 Riparian Reserves and Aquatic Conservation Strategy 59 Heritage Resources 61 Scenery 61 Fire 62 Public and Management Access 63 iii OHV Sand Camping Project Other Predicted Effects 64 Cumulative Effects 64 Short-Term Uses and Long-Term Productivity 69 Unavoidable Adverse Effects 69 Irreversible Resource Commitments 69 Irretrievable Commitment of Resources 69 Environmental Justice 70 Other Disclosures 70 Chapter 4. Who was consulted about this project? 71 [“Consultation With Others”] Consultation with Regulatory Agencies 71 Consultation with Indian Tribes 71 Consultation with Other Agencies and Local Entities During Scoping 71 References 75 Glossary 78 Table Titles Table 1. Comparing the key quantitative differences of Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4 14 Table 2. Comparing likely effects of Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4, based on how well they address the need and associated problems 15 Table 3. Comparing the Dunes Plan and alternative staging area capacities 44 Table 4. Acres infested by noxious weeds and invasive plants on the ODNRA 54 Table 5. Gamefish present in lakes in OHV riding areas of the ODNRA 56 Table 6. Cost summary for Horsfall staging area 64 Table 7. Alternative capacity analysis summary 66 Maps Project vicinity Alternative 2—North, Umpqua, South Alternative 3—North, Umpqua, South Alternative 4—North, Umpqua, South Dunes Plan Management Areas—North, Umpqua, South Appendices Appendix A. OHV-Sand Camping Project Design Criteria Appendix B. List of Contributors Appendix C. Preliminary Analysis Comments and Resolutions iv Why is the project needed? Why is the project needed, and what CHAPTER 1 evidence established these needs? Chapter titles are framed as questions intended to focus the writing and to alert readers to judge whether the answers provided are adequate. For readers accustomed to earlier environmental documents, chapter 1 is equivalent to the "Purpose and Need for Action" section. The Proposed Project Introduction—The Forest Supervisor proposed the OHV-Sand Camping Project (the Project) to designate the quantity and locations of dispersed sand camping sites in the off-highway vehicle (OHV) areas (Management Areas 10B and 10C) of the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area (ODNRA). The Forest Supervisor also proposed to build a new staging area facility in the Horsfall area (Bark Road; Management Area 10D). Implementation of the permit system for designated sand-camping sites is expected to begin January 2005. Building the staging area will occur when funding is secured, possibly three years from now. Sand camping and the staging area activities are connected actions because the proposed staging area facility occupies sites that have been used as sand camps in the past. In addition, both of these uses affect the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) class of semi-primitive motorized recreation experience, serve the needs of off-highway vehicle users, and affect the natural resources of the area. The proposed project is designed to address the problems discussed in The Problems To Be Addressed. As mitigation for changes to existing dispersed camping and staging area opportunities, the capacity of the staging area would be greater than that described in the Management Plan for the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area (Dunes Plan; USDA 1994), requiring a non-significant amendment to the Dunes Plan. Alternative 4 is considered and displayed as the proposed project. Descriptions of the proposed project and other alternatives are located in chapter 2, pages 8 to 11. Relationship to the Siuslaw Forest Plan—Congress passed legislation establishing the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area for the purposes of “…public outdoor recreation use and enjoyment … and the conservation of scenic, scientific, historic, and other values contributing to public enjoyment of such lands and waters, …” (PL92-260). The Siuslaw Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Siuslaw Forest Plan; USDA 1990), as amended by the Northwest Forest Plan (USDA, USDI 1994b) and the Dunes Plan, described the resource management practices, levels of management, and suitability of Forest lands for resource management. On the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area, it established: • Multiple-use goals and ecosystem management objectives; • Standards and guidelines to fulfill requirements of the National Forest Management Act of 1976; • Separate management areas with different resource emphases; and 1 Why is the project needed? • Management area direction, including management area prescriptions and standards and guidelines for management activities in specific management areas. All relevant aspects of the amended Siuslaw Forest Plan—such as management area standards and guidelines—apply to this project. Thus, this assessment is tiered to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Siuslaw National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (USDA 1990), as amended by the Final Environmental Impact Statement on Management of Habitat for Late-Successional and Old-Growth Forests Related Species Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl (Northwest Forest Plan; USDA, USDI 1994a), and the Final EIS and Management Plan for the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area (USDA 1994). Riparian reserve, as prescribed by the Northwest Forest Plan, is located in the project area. The Planning Area The Project area is located on the ODNRA between Florence and North Bend, Oregon and is about 55 air miles southwest of Eugene, Oregon (map 1). It involves about 12,440 acres of land managed by U.S. Forest Service. The project area is located in portions of Township 19 South, Range 12 West, sections 3-5, 7-10, 15, 16, 20-22, 27-29, 32, and 33; Township 22 South, Range 12 West, sections 24-26, 28, 35, and 36; Township 23 South, Range 13 West, sections 22, 23, 26, 27, 33, and 34; and Township
Recommended publications
  • 20924-D01-2016
    Decision 20924-D01-2016 AltaLink Management Ltd. South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development Cooking Lake, Saunders Lake, Wabamun and Leduc Developments July 15, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 20924-D01-2016 AltaLink Management Ltd. South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development Cooking Lake, Saunders Lake, Wabamun and Leduc Developments Proceeding 20924 Applications 20924-A001 and 20924-A003 to 20924-A016 July 15, 2016 Published by the: Alberta Utilities Commission Fifth Avenue Place, Fourth Floor, 425 First Street S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3L8 Telephone: 403-592-8845 Fax: 403-592-4406 Website: www.auc.ab.ca Contents 1 Decision summary ................................................................................................................. 1 2 Legislative scheme ................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 The process for new transmission development in Alberta ........................................... 2 2.2 Public interest ................................................................................................................. 3 3 Background ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission System Reinforcement needs identification document approval ................................................................................... 4 3.2 Interventions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Directory 1 Our Readers Enjoy Many Oregon Newspaper Platform Options to Get Their Publishers Association Local News
    2019 ANNUAL DIRECTORY 1 Our readers enjoy many OREGON NEWSPAPER platform options to get their PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION local news. This year’s cover was designed by 2019 Sherry Alexis www.sterryenterprises.com ANNUAL DIRECTORY Oregon Newspaper Publishers Association Real Acces Media Placement Publisher: Laurie Hieb Oregon Newspapers Foundation 4000 Kruse Way Place, Bld 2, STE 160 Portland OR 97035 • 503-624-6397 Fax 503-639-9009 Email: [email protected] Web: www.orenews.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 2018 ONPA and ONF directors 4 Who to call at ONPA 4 ONPA past presidents and directors 5 About ONPA 6 Map of General Member newspapers 7 General Member newspapers by owner 8 ONPA General Member newspapers 8 Daily/Multi-Weekly 12 Weekly 24 Member newspapers by county 25 ONPA Associate Member publications 27 ONPA Collegiate Member newspapers 28 Regional and National Associations 29 Newspaper Association of Idaho 30 Daily/Multi-Weekly 30 Weekly 33 Washington Newspaper Publishers Assoc. 34 Daily/Multi-Weekly 34 Weekly Return TOC 2018-19 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Oregon Newspaper Publishers Association PRESIDENT president-elect IMMEDIATE PAST DIRECTOR PRESIDENT Joe Petshow Lyndon Zaitz Scott Olson Hood River News Keizertimes Mike McInally The Creswell Corvallis Gazette Chronical Times DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR John Maher Julianne H. Tim Smith Scott Swanson Newton The Oregonian, The News Review The New Era, Portland Ph.D., University of Sweet Home Oregon Roseburg DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR Chelsea Marr Emily Mentzer Nikki DeBuse Jeff Precourt The Dalles Chronicle Itemizer-Observer The World, Coos Bay Forest Grove News / Gazette-Times, Dallas Times - Hillsboro Corvallis / Democrat- Tribune Herald, Albany Oregon Newspapers Foundation DIRECTOR DIRECTOR PRESIDENT TREASURER Mike McInally Therese Joe Petshow James R.
    [Show full text]
  • Langdon Lake
    LANGDON LAKE MCWD H/H and Pollutant Loading Study – 2003 C-1 Emmons and Olivier Resources, Inc. Volume IV: Watershed Modeling and Discussion Langdon Lake Table of Contents C. Langdon Lake............................................................................................................................ 3 C.1. General Description............................................................................................................ 3 C.2. Physical Features................................................................................................................ 6 C.2.a. Land Cover/Land Use.................................................................................................. 6 C.2.b. Geology ..................................................................................................................... 10 C.2.c. Soils ........................................................................................................................... 11 C.2.d. Groundwater.............................................................................................................. 11 C.3. Water Quantity ................................................................................................................. 16 C.3.a. Watershed Hydrology................................................................................................. 16 C.3.b. Watershed Hydraulics ................................................................................................ 19 C.3.c. Water Quantity Findings and Discussion..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Siltcoos Lake Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant: Water Quality Conditions and Nutrient Sources
    Portland State University PDXScholar Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations Center for Lakes and Reservoirs 3-2010 Siltcoos Lake Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant: Water Quality Conditions and Nutrient Sources Mark D. Sytsma Portland State University, [email protected] Rich Miller Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Sytsma, Mark D. and Miller, Rich, "Siltcoos Lake Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant: Water Quality Conditions and Nutrient Sources" (2010). Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations. 52. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub/52 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY, CENTER FOR LAKES AND RESERVOIRS Siltcoos Lake Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant Water quality conditions and nutrient sources Mark Sytsma and Rich Miller, Portland State University, Center for Lakes and Reservoirs 3/18/2010 Final report to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality for project number W08714 Siltcoos Lake
    [Show full text]
  • The Park, Trail and Open Space Plan
    ____________________________________________________ CITY OF MINNETRISTA THE PARK, TRAIL AND OPEN SPACE PLAN ADOPTED MARCH 2004 Revised March 2005 Revised January 2010 CONTENTS PAGE 1: INTRODUCTION ______________________________________________2 Credits Plan Intent and Use Planning Process 2: INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS __________________________________6 Existing Park Service Analysis Existing Natural Resources 3: THE PARK, TRAIL AND OPEN SPACE PLAN ____________________12 The Vision and Guiding Principles Park and Trail Plan Other Recreation Opportunities Open Space and Greenway Opportunities Plan 4: IMPLEMENTATION __________________________________________34 Overview Comprehensive Plan Park Dedication Ordinance Other Land Acquisition Strategies Park Development Continued Planning Capital Improvement Plan APPENDIX A: Minnetrista Park Dedication Ordinance (revised) B: Area Recreational Organizations and Opportunities C: Individual Existing Park Aerials and Inventory D: Park Development Costs E: Park Maintenance Table F: Park, Trail and Open Space Public Input Summaries G: Resource List H: CAC Recommendation Summary I: Fig. 1 – Park Matrix of Existing Facilities J: Fig. 2 – Park Service Analysis Map K: Fig 3 – Natural Resources Inventory Map L: Fig 4 – Park, Trail and Open Space Plan M: Fig 5 – Greenway Opportunities Plan Map N: Fig 6 – City Owned Trail Easements & Trails MINNETRISTA PARK, TRAIL AND OPEN SPACE PLAN CONTENTS PAGE 1 CREDITS_______________________________________ This planning process was undertaken with the guidance and review
    [Show full text]
  • Some Recent Physical Changes of the Oregon Coast
    rOREGON STATE UNIVERS TY LIBRARIES IIIIII 111IIIII1 IIII III 12 0002098016 65458 .8 05 cop .3 FINAL RE PORT (Report on an investigation carried out under Contract Nonr-2771 (04), Project NR 388-062, between the University of Oregon and the Office of Naval Research, U. S. Department of the Navy.) Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. SOME RECENT PHYSICAL CHANGES OF THE OREGON COAST by Samuel N. Dicken assisted by Carl L. Johannessen and Bill Hanneson Department of Geography University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon November 15, 1961 Reprinted in the public interest by the EugeneRegister-Guard and the Lane County Geographical Society,Inc., April, 1976. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The subject of coastal changes is of interest to many people living on or near the Oregon coast and, as a result, numerous interviews, only a few of which can be acknowledged, furnished much information not otherwise available. Valuable assistance came from persons concerned professionally with some aspect of coastal change. The staff of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, was most helpful, especially H. A. Kidby of the Rivers and Harbors Section, Lloyd Ruff of the Geology Section, Mr. Charles Oros of the Photogrammetry Office and Dorothy McKean, Librarian. Mr. E. Olson of the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey located copies of old charts and other materials.Ralph Mason of the Oregon State Department of Geology and Mineral Industriescon- tributed notes on Ecola Park and other areas. Robert L. Brown and the staff of the U. S. Soil Conservation Service furnished photographs andspec- ific information on vegetation changes of the dunes.Park Snavely of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 -- Administration
    PLAN FOR CCDF SERVICES IN: OREGON FOR THE PERIOD 10/1/09 – 9/30/11 CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND PLAN FOR: OREGON FFY 2010-2011 This Plan describes the CCDF program to be conducted by the State/Territory for the period 10/1/09 – 9/30/11. As provided for in the applicable statutes and regulations, the Lead Agency has the flexibility to modify this program at any time, including changing the options selected or described herein. The official text of the applicable laws and regulations govern, and the Lead Agency acknowledges its responsibility to adhere to them regardless of the fact that, for purposes of simplicity and clarity, the specific provisions printed herein are sometimes paraphrases of, or excerpts and incomplete quotations from, the full text. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 162.5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Form ACF 118 Approved OMB Number: 0970-0114 expires April 30, 2012 CCDF Plan Effective Date: October 1, 2009 Page 1 Amended Effective: 10-1-10 PLAN FOR CCDF SERVICES IN: OREGON FOR THE PERIOD 10/1/09 – 9/30/11 TABLE OF CONTENTS AMENDMENTS LOG PART 1 ADMINISTRATION 1.1 Lead Agency Information 1.2 State/Territory Child Care (CCDF) Contact Information 1.3 Estimated Funding 1.4 Estimated
    [Show full text]
  • MINNETRISTA 20 S M H 26 L
    d r 7 T nd 5 a R sl d Rice I d 1 er G b R d Tim R D n n R H 157 w y o a e A l $ t e n + r l i e l S e t r L Lake a p u C 110 D Fox Ridge Cir o c W e $ c + 4 z C c t u MUNICIPALITY OF M 0 n 84 L u 6 0 1 +$ FRANKLIN d INDEPENDENCE IR K 1 CSAH 19 C R +$ 1 i n r w H F o o f rt A a o e d i t t S r d w s a R C i a l r W R i n y C n a 20 r o R id irway w g D a T $ s e F r + e o t r R r d e e id i t g g 19 s Ba a n e y I s +$ y id W C e a R 92 t d +$ B T 2 9 -2 3 5 H "26 A Sõ d O S x C Y R C CR o -2 ke 6 S C A i m r r H a r F 1 D 1 e 0 MINNETRISTA 20 s M H 26 l m SA " 6 l ea C Sõ -2 i d 20 a R o 7 H H C n w A G L S 0 g C v Ox n Hillsdale Dr i 1 i e l C m l B url Oa r w ks Ct Bu r o S l Yoke A O D A R a h 135 r H k t 127 Lake r " s +$ Sõ o 1 D 1 r N Hainlin Dr Sunset Dr 0 North Arm Dr North Arm Dr lawn ood R D d 2 'c W 110 h 1 110 PREPARED BY THE CR- en 2 e 1 6 C 26 ir " d 1 Sõ e v R n Trails End Cir e A d O CSA Peterson Pond L H v n 92 a n St And t r k n L e e e A MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION e w S e n E tr s t k n e Rd l S d r ti ter i S 0 h in t n s C a a i 2 r i H P a r P a A r D t r e S d L C L K a s e P D a T k t R u e r e v g i k r e u E n lm S 8 w t e o CR-26 A P L OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT M C i 0 n n h a d n r r e 7 C 26 R- S S k t 1 P a w o 2 a N 26 n " i A n h a 1 o Sõ G k t t - e H e y r r a rs t th e r v H R o l C 1 A i ir u A g p C o N r 1 L h m l p C a a 0 e n Millman Lake N d c D A k s t r e L n n s v e i r e W r w u a P l ar B h kw C e r ay IN COOPERATION WITH a Pin n c h e kev v La ie R o 2 w C d y C 1 e l o W Deer Creek Rd 151 i 151 u 1 l Rd a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Agents Feel the Burden
    HAPPY HOMECOMING Powers beats Gilchrist, B1 Serving Oregon’s South Coast Since 1878 SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2013 Affordable Care Act Insurance agents feel the burden I Some agents reluctant consists of an online, self-paced general overview about Cover Ore- to sign a contract with gon, insurance exchanges and the ACA. It also has a full-day, in-per- Cover Oregon son session that has technical instruction and portal training. BY EMILY THORNTON While two of Ellingsen’s agents The World have undergone training, he said he and other agents have been reluc- COOS BAY — The Affordable tant to sign a contract with Cover Care Act is causing some signifi- Oregon for several reasons, even cant changes in the health insur- though the contract is the only way ance world. agents can work with Cover Ore- “We’re changing a whole lot of gon. Photos by Alysha Beck, The World things,” said Ed Ellingsen, presi- One of the reasons Ellingsen and Twenty-seven microbrews are on tap at Coastal Growlers, a new growler station inside Ashworth’s Market in North Bend. dent and owner of Nasburg & others are reluctant is that the Company Insurance in Coos Bay. work involved to help consumers “It’s an enormous undertaking for could be pointless when con- all of us.” sumers can begin going When Oregon’s health through the portal them- care exchange begins selves beginning mid- signups Oct. 1, specially October. That means that trained insurance agents N a consumer could deal Growlers O are going to be on the directly with an insurance G front lines in the effort to E company without the get uninsured individuals R help of agents like Markets hop on the bandwagon and families enrolled in O Ellingsen and his agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Dailies and Weeklies in Oregon, Washington and Idaho
    delivering dailies and weeklies in Oregon, Washington and Idaho. OREGON • Albany Democrat-Herald, Albany 18,800 North County News, Sutherlin 1,013 Marysville Globe and Arlington Times, Woodinville Register, Woodinville 32,500 • Ashland Daily Tidings, Ashland 4,400 The New Era, Sweet Home 2,228 Marysville 11,553 • Yakima Herald Republic, Yakima 40,980 • Daily Astorian, Astoria 8,900 • The Dalles Chronicle, The Dalles 4,635 Mattawa Area News, Mattawa 1,000 Nisqually Valley News, Yelm/Ranier/Roy 4,200 • Baker City Herald, Baker City 3,550 Tigard Times, Tigard 7,400 Mercer Island Reporter, Mercer Island 5,200 IDAHO • The Record-Courier, Baker City 3,200 Headlight-Herald, Tillamook 8,300 Mill Creek Enterprise, Mill Creek 10,254 Bandon Western World, Bandon 2,600 Malheur Enterprise, Vale 1,800 Monroe Monitor Valley News, Monroe 3,985 Aberdeen Times, Aberdeen 855 Beaverton Valley Times, Beaverton 8,200 West-Lane News, Veneta 2,000 Grays Harbor County Vidette, Montesano 3,500 Power County Press, American Falls 2,010 • The Bulletin, Bend 30,586 The Columbia Press, Warrenton 968 East County Journal, Morton 3,020 Arco Advertiser, Arco 1,834 • Curry Coastal Pilot, Brookings 7,304 West Linn Tidings, West Linn 4,300 • Columbia Basin Herald, Moses Lake 8500 Morning News, Blackfoot 3,903 The Times, Brownsville 1,000 Wilsonville Spokesman, Wilsonville 3,450 • Skagit Valley Herald, Mount Vernon 19,762 Idaho Business Review, Boise 2,000 • Burns Times-Herald, Burns 31,500 Woodburn Independent, Woodburn 4,250 Mukilteo Beacon, Mukilteo 8,900 Idaho Statesman,
    [Show full text]
  • Column Widths for Oregon Newspapers Updated 01/01/2015
    Column widths for Oregon newspapers Updated 01/01/2015 DAILIES NEWSPAPER PAGE SIZE 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 COL 6 COL Albany Democrat-Herald/Corvallis Gazette-Times 6x21.5" 1.611 3.339 5.067 6.794 8.522 10.250 Ashland, Daily Tidings 5x11.25" 1.833 3.806 5.778 7.750 9.722 Astoria, The Astorian 6x21.5" 1.611 3.389 5.167 6.944 8.722 10.500 Bend, The Bulletin 6x20.25" 1.646 3.458 5.271 7.083 8.896 10.708 Coos Bay, The World 6x21.5" 1.556 3.222 4.889 6.556 8.222 9.889 Eugene, The Register-Guard 6x21" 1.549 3.264 4.979 6.694 8.410 10.125 Grants Pass Daily Courier 6x21.5" 1.837 3.820 5.800 7.785 9.767 11.750 Klamath Falls, Herald and News 6x20.25" 1.646 3.417 5.188 6.958 8.729 10.500 LaGrande, The Observer 6x21" 1.640 3.440 5.240 7.040 8.840 10.600 Medford, Mail Tribune 6x21.5" 1.833 3.806 5.778 7.750 9.722 11.694 Ontario, Argus Observer 6x21.25" 1.528 3.222 4.917 6.611 8.306 10.000 Pendleton, East Oregonian 6x21.5" 1.625 3.400 5.175 6.950 8.725 10.500 Portland, The Oregonian 6x14" 1.625 3.400 5.175 6.950 8.725 10.500 Roseburg, News-Review 6x21.5" 1.530 3.220 4.920 6.610 8.305 10.000 Salem, Statesman Journal 6x21.5" 1.560 3.250 4.940 6.630 8.310 10.000 The Dalles Chronicle 6x21" 1.583 3.292 5.000 6.708 8.417 10.125 WEEKLIES NEWSPAPER PAGE SIZE 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 COL 6 COL Baker City Herald 6x21" 1.640 3.440 5.240 7.040 8.840 10.600 Baker City, Record-Courier 5x21" 1.900 3.925 5.950 7.975 10.000 Bandon Western World 6x21.5" 1.556 3.222 4.889 6.556 8.222 9.889 Beaverton Valley Times 6x21" 1.700 3.500 5.375 7.200 9.000 10.875 Brookings,
    [Show full text]
  • LANE COUNTY OREGON MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Page | 46
    3. RISK ASSESSMENT 44 CFR Requirement §201.6(c) (2) [The plan shall include] A risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities proposed in the strategy to reduce losses from identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide sufficient information to enable the jurisdiction to identify and prioritize appropriate mitigation actions to reduce losses from identified hazards The purpose of risk assessment is to identify and describe hazards that affect Lane County and analyze potential losses for human life and material assets. Through better understanding of potential hazards and the degree of risk they pose, more successful mitigation strategies can be developed and implemented. This risk assessment follows the four-step process described in the FEMA publication 386-2, Understanding Your Risks: Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses, listed as follows: Step 1: Identify Hazards Step 2: Profile Hazard Events Step 3: Inventory Assets Step 4: Estimate Losses This section is organized into three subsections that address the four steps of the risk assessment process. 3.1 Identifying Hazards. This subsection addresses Step 1 and lists the hazards considered during the planning process and those ultimately profiled in the plan. It also describes methods, definitions and data sources used for the hazard identification and profile process. 3.2 Hazard Profile. This subsection addresses Step 2 and presents a detailed outline for each identified hazard. Each hazard profile is addressed as a plan subsection and includes a general description, affected geographic area, and discussion of previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, magnitude and severity and an assessment of overall vulnerability to each hazard.
    [Show full text]