DOCSLIB.ORG

The Power of Place

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Power of Place Headquarters 6262 N. Swan Rd., Ste. 105 Tucson, AZ 85718 P 520.529.2521 F 520.529.2499 Washington D.C. Office 10 G St. NE, Ste. 710 Washington D.C. 20002 P 202.248.5026 F 202.248.5099 www.aurp.net • A NATIOnaL STRATEGY FOR BUILDING AMERICA’S COMMUNITIES OF InnOVATION WHITE PAPER ADVISORY COMMITTEE ASSOCIATION OF DEFENSE COMMUNITIES Michael A. Houlemard, Board President Executive Officer, Fort Ord Reuse Authority COUNCIL ON COMPETITIVENESS Deborah L. Wince-Smith, President Samuel Leiken, Senior Director of Policy Studies GOVERNMENT-UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RESEARCH ROUNDTABLE Susan Sauer Sloan, Director THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES Charles W. Wessner, Director, Technology, Innovation, & Entrepreneurship NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SEED AND VENTURE FUNDS Richard A. Bendis, Acting Chair President, Chief Executive Officer, Bendis Investment Group LLC NATIONAL BUSINESS INCUBATION ASSOCIATION Dinah Adkins, President, Chief Executive Officer NATIONAL CENTER FOR SMART GROWTH RESEARCH & EDUCATION Gerrit Knaap, Professor, Executive Director NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TECH TRANSFER Tony Stanco, Executive Director NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION Raymond C. Scheppach, Executive Director Erin Lamos, State Technology Policy Analyst STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE Dan Berglund, President, Chief Executive Officer THE UNIVERSITY FINANCING FOUNDATION Kevin Byrne, Chief Investment Officer The individuals named above served in their individual capacities. The endorsement of the views expressed in this document, of each advisory committee member or their associated organizations, is not implied. tors, university financing foundations, seed and venture capital groups, and science and technology development organizations. The Power of Place explores a number of suggested federal initiatives, reforms OCTOBER 2, 2008 and investments that will leverage the power of innovation in this country. DEAR COLLEAGUES: With the new Presidential Administra- tion and Congress in 2009, we hope The last decade vividly demonstrates The Power of Place stimulates discus- the economic forces leading to the sion, legislation, and the expansion globalization of science and innova- of and support for Communities of tion. Delegations of federal officials Innovation within the United States. have visited China, India, the Middle East and other countries, and returned The Power of Place: Better Science; amazed at the speed and scale at Better Innovation; A Better World. which national governments outside of the United States are developing university research and science parks Sincerely yours, and centers, national laboratories, and other physical manifestations of sci- ence and technology. J. Michael Bowman Within our own nation, research and President, Association of University science parks, technology incubators, Research Parks venture accelerators and research Chairman and President universities traditionally have been the Delaware Technology province of state and local govern- Park Incorporated ments. Individual entrepreneurship, local financial investment, and world- class research universities are part of the genius of the American innovation Michael Bowman system that still leads the world. The United States government annually funds billions of dollars of Brian Darmody research and development, and it AURP Power of Place Advisory Board plays a major role in setting national Chair and Principal Author economic development programs. Associate Vice President for Research Earlier this year, the Association of and Economic Development University Research Parks (AURP), in University of Maryland conjunction with the National Academy of Sciences, conducted a forum in Washington D.C. to examine the role of research and science parks within the global context. As a result of that forum, AURP has developed a set of recommendations and assembled an advisory board who represent research and science parks, technology incuba- RECOMMENDATIONS SUstaininG MemBers and SPonsor List 4 5 introdUction6 CreatinG CommUnities OF InnoVation reWardinG commUnities OF innoVation 10 CollaBoration and Commerciali15Zation 17INVestinG in CAPital concl18Usion 20 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS · Establish American Innovation · Reform Federal Tax Provisions · Establish a Federal Zones: The Innovation Zones would for Facilities Funded by Technology Foundation serve as the centerpiece of efforts Tax-Exempt Financing: A federal technology foundation to modernize the U.S. approach to Current federal policy on corporate should be established to work with fostering competitive research and sponsored and/or funded research government managed federal labs. development. Innovation Zones are performed in facilities funded through A foundation modeled on existing a critical next step towards Ameri- tax-exempt bonds unduly restricts university research foundations could can competitiveness, encourag- flexibility in negotiating corporate enable these laboratories to more ing research in such a way as to intellectual property (IP) rights. Elimi- effectively commercialize technology accelerate investment and economic nating the current IRS restrictions or and use existing federal research development around research clus- increasing the safe harbors under assets for local technology-led eco- ters. The Innovation Zone approach IRS regulations in American Zones of nomic development. envisions establishing objective Innovation to allow greater flexibility in criteria for national innovation assets, intellectual property negotiations will · Develop Comprehensive including research parks, technol- improve U.S. competitiveness, and Government-wide Database ogy incubators, universities, federal increase the likelihood that corporate Access to a government-wide laboratories, and adjacent proper- R&D will stay in the U.S. database on all federal R&D funding ties, and then providing regulatory is necessary to ensure that impor- reforms and economic incentives for · Create Enhanced Preferences tant national innovation assets are their accelerated development. for Small Business Innovative properly understood and leveraged Research (SBIR)/Small Business for technology innovation. · Enact Federal Innovation Zone Technology Transfer (STTR) and Partnership Program: The federal National Institute of Standards · Fully Fund the America government should establish a plan and Technology (NIST) Technol- COMPETES Act to competitively create research ogy Innovation Program (TIP): The The U.S. Congress took a great centers within the Innovation Zones federal government should provide step forward in passing the America that would require matching grants incentives to small technology start- COMPETES Act in 2007. The Act from state governments, local gov- up companies located in American authorizes a substantial federal ernments and private industry. These Zones of Innovation to be awarded investment in high risk, high reward centers would focus on areas of high SBIR, STTR, and NIST’s new TIP research and improves funding to national needs, including energy contracts and grants. Cluster devel- many of the U.S. science agencies. research, homeland security, food opment, collaboration, and target- Research institutions and companies safety, and global climate change. ing the benefits of federal research in Innovation Zones stand to benefit dollars will provide incentive for new from the America COMPETES Act, · Build Sustainable Communities of investment in the Innovation Zones, but the Act has not been fully funded Innovation: Incentives for sustain- and improve the quality of research by Congress. The new Administra- able ‘smart growth’ development through greater cooperation among tion and the next Congress must should be central to establishing public and private researchers. make funding the America COM- American Innovation Zones. The PETES Act a priority. U.S. Department of Housing should · Solidify the Tax Benefits for explore best practices nationally to Research and Development: · Import Innovation: Research parks encourage density and mixed-use By reauthorizing the research and and incubators in American Innova- development in American Innova- development tax credit, Congress tion Zones should be targeted to tion Zones in urban areas, which will will return the U.S. to an even playing recruit foreign technology companies encourage researchers and entrepre- field with many of its global competi- using ‘soft landing’ techniques similar neurs to live where they work, and tors for research investment. Beyond to those pioneered by the National reduce sprawl. this first step, Congress should offer Business Incubation Association an enhanced benefit for companies (NBIA). · Encourage Federal Leasing and that perform their research within an Federal Lab Construction in Innovation Zone, or who contract · Welcome Human Innovation Capi- Innovation Zones: The federal gov- with Innovation Zones entities for tal to the U.S.: In order to ensure ernment should target federal leases research or development. continued retention of highly-skilled for research and federal lab construc- researchers and technicians, the tion and related activities within Ameri- · Expand Enhanced Use Leasing U.S. must offer competitive im- can Innovation Zones. (EUL) Authority: Expand current migration incentives that welcome enhanced use lease authority to foreigners into our Communities of all federal agencies to create more Innovation, and retain their talents American Innovation Zones adjacent through the H-1B visa process. to federal labs. THE POWER OF PLACE P5 ASSOCIATION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Science Parks to Innovation Districts
    From Science Parks to Innovation Districts Research Facility Development in Legacy Cities on the Northeast Corridor Working Paper 2015/008 August 2015 Eugenie L. Birch Lawrence C. Nussdorf Professor of Urban Research Department of City and Regional Planning School of Design Co-Director, Penn Institute for Urban Research University of Pennsylvania Contact Information: [email protected] Understanding our cities…. Understanding our world From Science Parks to Innovation Districts 2 Introduction Research and development (R&D) drives advanced economies worldwide. It is this that provides the foundation for the new knowledge, products, and processes that, in turn, become new industries, create jobs and serve as the source of economic growth. Key areas for R&D are in what is called the knowledge and technology industries (KTI) that consist of high technology manufacturing (e.g. aircraft, spacecraft, pharmaceuticals) and knowledge-intensive services (commercial business, financial and communication services). KTI, which account f or 27% of the worldwide Gross Domestic Product (GDP), are extremely important to the United States, in particular, representing 40% of the U.S. GDP. In fact, the U.S is the world’s largest KTI producer – contributing 27% of the total HT manufacturing and 32% of the KI services.1 In order to grow and maintain these positions, the United States, like its peers in Europe and Asia who are also large contributors, has built an extensive R&D infrastructure composed of three strong players: the private sector, the public sector and universities. In terms of expenditures and numbers of employees, the private sector dominates the R&D enterprise, but the university sector, largely funded by the US government, is also an important component both directly and indirectly.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District Designation Report
    Cover Photograph: Court Street looking south along Skyscraper Row towards Brooklyn City Hall, now Brooklyn Borough Hall (1845-48, Gamaliel King) and the Brooklyn Municipal Building (1923-26, McKenzie, Voorhees & Gmelin). Christopher D. Brazee, 2011 Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District Designation Report Prepared by Christopher D. Brazee Edited by Mary Beth Betts, Director of Research Photographs by Christopher D. Brazee Map by Jennifer L. Most Technical Assistance by Lauren Miller Commissioners Robert B. Tierney, Chair Pablo E. Vengoechea, Vice-Chair Frederick Bland Christopher Moore Diana Chapin Margery Perlmutter Michael Devonshire Elizabeth Ryan Joan Gerner Roberta Washington Michael Goldblum Kate Daly, Executive Director Mark Silberman, Counsel Sarah Carroll, Director of Preservation TABLE OF CONTENTS BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP ................... FACING PAGE 1 TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ................................................................................ 1 BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ............................. 1 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 THE HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT ........................................................................................ 5 Early History and Development of Brooklyn‟s Civic Center ................................................... 5 Mid 19th Century Development
    [Show full text]
  • Bankrupt Golf Courses: an Historical Analysis And
    BANKRUPT GOLF COURSES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIES FOR REPURPOSING by BLAKE JEFFREY CONANT (Under the Direction of Ron Sawhill) ABSTRACT More than 800 golf courses have closed since 2003 and approximately 1,000 to 2,500 are projected to close in the next decade. Many of these courses are repurposed as high-end mixed-use development, high-density residential, or big-box development. The sustainable benefits the golf course once provided either diminish or leave completely. As our countryʼs 21st Century needs shift towards food, water, and energy security, bankrupt golf courses can offer repurposing opportunities to plan for those needs. The goal of golf course repurposing should be to provide similar or greater sustainable benefits as the golf course once did. Understanding how that land can be sustainably repurposed is vital for local communities, environments, and economies to thrive in the 21st Century. This thesis will offer suggestions, strategies, and solutions for repurposing bankrupt golf courses that have yet to be implemented in the United States. INDEX WORDS: Golf, Golf Architecture, Golf Course, Golf Course Development, Land Use, Sustainability BANKRUPT GOLF COURSES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIES FOR REPURPOSING by BLAKE JEFFREY CONANT Bachelor of Fine Arts, The University of Montana, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2013 © 2013 Blake Conant All Rights Reserved BANKRUPT GOLF COURSES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIES FOR REPURPOSING by BLAKE JEFFREY CONANT Major Professor: Ron Sawhill Committee: Katherine Melcher Gary Green Tom Doak Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2013 DEDICATION For my mother, Margaret, who always gives me encouragement, support, and love.
    [Show full text]
  • 50The 50 Largest U.S. Seniors Housing Real Estate Owners and Operators
    2020 ASHA The 50 largest U.S. 50seniors housing real estate owners and operators The Hacienda at the River in Tucson, Arizona, operated by Watermark Retirement Communities. Special supplement to n Seniors Housing Business n Heartland Real Estate Business n Northeast Real Estate Business An exclusive n Southeast Real Estate Business report from the n Texas Real Estate Business American Seniors n Western Real Estate Business Housing Association Excellence. Sustained. Strong relationships with true industry leaders are more vital than ever in these unprecedented times. For more than 20 years, Ventas has been a proud partner and investor supporting best-in-class senior living operators and providers. We continue to be inspired by their tireless work in helping to keep seniors safe and well. As one of the world’s premier capital providers, Ventas remains deeply committed to the success of our shareholders and business partners, and to the individuals and families they serve. ventasreit.com SENIOR HOUSING | MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS | RESEARCH & INNOVATION HEALTH SYSTEMS | POST ACUTE CARE TRUSTED SENIORS HOUSING ADVISORS FOR ALL YOUR Excellence. INVESTMENT NEEDS Sustained. Our nationally-recognized platform has expertise Strong relationships with true industry leaders are more vital in projects of all sizes and scopes than ever in these unprecedented times. For more than 20 years, Ventas has been a proud partner and investor supporting best-in-class senior living operators and providers. We continue to be inspired by their tireless work in helping to keep seniors safe and well. As one of the world’s premier capital providers, Ventas remains deeply committed to the success of our shareholders and business partners, and to the individuals and families they serve.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial/Research/Hi-Tech Parks in Southeast Michigan Are Economic Activity Hot Spots
    Industrial/Research/Hi-Tech Parks in Southeast Michigan are Economic Activity Hot Spots Industrial/research/hi-tech parks in Southeast Michigan are Oakland County has the largest number of parks, with 135 (on home to a variety of businesses, from manufacturing to distri- 7,687 acres), while Wayne County has the most acres of land bution to automotive suppliers to corporate headquarters. They in parks, 8,618 (in 125 parks). St. Clair County is third in the are economic generators in their own right — providing jobs, number of acres in parks, with 6,462 acres, but with just 16 revenue, and a solid tax base for the community. Industrial/ parks. Macomb County has 89 parks with 4,548 acres. research/hi-tech parks parks can also be a very attractive op- tion for companies looking for land, because the infrastructure The community with the most number of parks is Livonia with is already provided, saving time and money. 27, followed by Farmington Hills and Troy, each with 17. Greenwood Township has the largest acreage in parks at 3,600, The Southeast Michigan region has 438 industrial/research/hi- Auburn Hills is second with 1,967 acres, and Port Huron Town- tech parks covering more than 34,000 acres of land. The majority ship is third with 1,490 acres. The largest industrial/research/ of parks were built within a few miles of a major highway, al- hi-tech park in the region is the Greenwood Energy Center lowing faster product distribution and easy access for customers Industrial Park in Greenwood Township at 3,600 acres, and workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan-And-Manage-A-Science-Park-In
    Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 1 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 2 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 1 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 2 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 3 SUMMARY PAGE 4 INTRODUCTION PAGE 11 CHAPTER I SCIENCE PARK PLAYERS AND PARTNERS 1. The stakeholders 13 2. The role of the State 15 3. Strategies to mobilize the private sector 17 4. Enhancing the innovation environment 20 PAGE 25 CHAPTER II STRATEGIC POSITIONING OF SCIENCE PARKS 1. The positioning of the science park 28 2. Consensus building in positioning strategies 35 3. Sustainability of the science park 39 4. Project development and opportunities 44 PAGE 51 CHAPTER III DEVELOPMENT OF A SCIENCE PARK OR TECHNOPOLE AND URBAN INTEGRATION 1. The science park development context 55 2. The programming chart and the implementation of inputs: facilities, land and services 58 3. Conditions for integrating a science park into the host metropolis 63 PAGE 66 CHAPTER IV FINANCING SCIENCE PARK ACTIVITIES 1. Introduction 68 2. The financial environment 70 3. The funding options 79 4. Key points 89 PAGE 90 CHAPTER V SUPPORT FOR FIRMS AND PROJECTS Part A: Individual services 1. The role of coaching and mentoring in supporting innovative projects 93 2. Strategic marketing and operational positioning 98 3. Strategic alliance support 102 4. Financial assistance and relations with investors 105 Part B: Collective services 1. Marketing and communication for innovative projects 109 2. Stimulate and support networking and development of collaborative projects 112 3. Business Development (BizDev) actions 116 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Hill Golf Course Community Survey Table of Contents
    Hyoung Chang, The Denver Post Park Hill Golf Course Community Survey Table of Contents . Introduction . Points of Interest . Methodology . Demographics . Community Parks, Open Space and Recreation Needs/Priorities . Other Community Needs/Priorities . Neighborhood Mobility and Transportation . Communication . Comments 2 Introduction RRC conducted two surveys on the future of Park Hill Golf Course. 1. A paper survey was mailed on March 8th and responses were tabulated through April 16th. 100% of respondents live within one mile of PHGC. Results from this survey are referred to in this report as the “mailed survey” or “mailed invite.” The mailed survey is statistically valid. 2. The second survey was online only and was open to the general public. These results were tabulated from March 25th through April 30, 2021. 57% of respondents reported that they did not live near the golf course site. The results from this survey are referred to in this report as the “online survey” or “open online.” 3 Points of Interest Points of Interest: Land Use Allocation . 68% of mailed survey respondents allocated some portion of the site to parks and 61% favored dedicating a portion to open space. No other use garnered more than 50%. 70% of mailed survey respondents also favored some development. 22% favored only green space and 8% favored only development-oriented uses. Other land use options that respondents identified as priorities: . retail/restaurant (46%) . recreational facilities (42%) . affordable (income-restricted) housing (35%) . golf (24%) 5 Points of Interest: Resident Priorities & Needs . When asked about specific types of recreational uses, more than half of respondents favored open space, picnic areas, general park uses and playgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Springs Golf Course – Potential Park Use Option
    NINE SPRINGS GOLF COURSE – POTENTIAL PARK USE OPTION MASTER PLAN APPENDIX C: Health Impact Assessment June 2014 Executive Summary Appendix Contents: Executive Summary This appendix presents the findings of the collaborative, Health Impact Assessment community-based Nine Springs Health Impact Assessment Project Overview (HIA) completed to support the planning process for the Partners future use of the Nine Springs Golf Course property. The Methods HIA includes a report on the health impacts of the Existing Conditions alternative park and golf course plans as well as research Literature Review regarding high priority focus areas that were identified by Health Equity Analysis the Community Advisory Committee, including: physical Recommendations activity, social cohesion (community connectedness), Monitoring safety, and environmental health. Evaluation Conclusion Key findings from this Health Impact Assessment include: Obesity The area surrounding the golf course lies within the Fitchburg census block group (014.03.2) ranked #1 for obesity. Nearly 1 in 4 (24%) children ages 2-17 in this area are obese. Within the #2 ranked census block group (014.02.3), 46% of children ages 2-17 were overweight/obese. Mothers giving birth residing in the area also show a higher rate of obesity (30%), when compared to the rest of Fitchburg (21%) and Dane County (22%). Physical Activity Residents and stakeholders perceive there is inadequate open green space and play space for the neighborhood. Residents and stakeholders perceive that access to physical activity opportunities outside of the neighborhood is limited due to language and transportation barriers. Residents living in the Pines apartment complex are perceived to be particularly isolated and lack opportunities for physical activity.
    [Show full text]
  • HIAWATHA GOLF COURSE AREA MASTER PLAN Aligning Water Management and Use
    HIAWATHA GOLF COURSE AREA MASTER PLAN Aligning Water Management and Use AMENDMENT TO THE NOKOMIS-HIAWATHA REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN FEBRUARY 17, 2021 HIAWATHA GOLF COURSE AREA MASTER PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The MPRB would like to thank the following people and organizations for their dedicated participation in the master planning process, along with the general public who is passionate about this piece of land in the heart of South Minneapolis. This plan is a reflection of the input received from the Community Advisory Committee (CAC), the general public, collaborating agencies and other project stakeholders, and MPRB staff. Dakota Land Organizations involved with the Master Plan Amendment MPRB Project Staff Consultants The MPRB acknowledges the land subject to this master plan Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board amendment is Bdote, lands once richly inhabited by the Dakota and City of Minneapolis Michael Schroeder, PLA other Indigenous peoples. Under the hands of the MPRB, that land Assistant Superintendent of Planning Services changed dramatically and in ways that fail to resonate with the spirit Minnehaha Creek Watershed District of the Dakota and the honor they bring to the land. In crafting a Neighborhood Organizations Tyrize Cox master plan to guide the future of this land, we bring good intentions Assistant Superintendent of Recreation Bancroft Neighborhood Association of healing what we have so dramatically disturbed, and with good hearts hope to restore the vital functions of the land and the water Field Regina Northrup Neighborhood Group Tyler Pederson, PLA that passes through it. We are striving for a more holistic balance Hale Page Diamond Lake Community Association Design Project Manager than has existed here for the past century, one that can better sustain Nokomis East Neighborhood Association Standish-Ericsson Neighborhood Association Joe Green all peoples for the next centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Cemetery Report
    BEAVERCREEK CEMETERIES ANNUAL REPORT Michael Thonnerieux, PASD Steve Croucher 2019 I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The City of Beavercreek currently owns seven (7) cemeteries, of which three (3) are active and registered with the State of Ohio, and four (4) are inactive/historic cemeteries. Active Cemeteries: A. Aley Cemetery B. Hawker Cemetery C. Mt. Zion Park Cemetery Inactive / Historic Cemeteries: A. Coy Cemetery B. Reese-Petro Cemetery C. Sunnyside Cemetery D. George C. Zimmerman Cemetery The cemeteries are operated under the Cemetery Division of the Public Administrative Services Department, reorganized in 2009 from the former Parks, Recreation and Culture Department by the Beavercreek City Council. As such, previous annual reporting occurred as a part of the annual Parks, Recreation and Culture – Annual Report. II. ORGANIZATION The cemetery operation of the City of Beavercreek is managed with a minimum of manpower by utilizing full-time employees of other divisions as partial contributors as well as back up personnel to the one (1) full time Cemetery Sexton, along with two (2) seasonal workers during the mowing season and (1) part time Cemetery Clerk. The Public Administrative Services Director, as the party with overall responsibility for policy development and budget, is aided by the Superintendent of Parks, Recreation & Culture Division and the Assistant Superintendent of Parks, Recreation & Culture Division related to manpower management, and the Secretary for the Parks, Recreation & Culture Division for day to day accounting activities, and a Cemetery Clerk to assist with day to day support and special projects. During any absence of the Cemetery Sexton or his seasonal employee, the cross-training of Streets and Parks employees allows for supplemental manpower and back-up expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Urban Cemetery: Innovative and Sustainable Design for Memorializing Our Deceased Loved Ones
    RETHINKING THE URBAN CEMETERY: INNOVATIVE AND SUSTAINABLE DESIGN FOR MEMORIALIZING OUR DECEASED LOVED ONES By BRADLEY W. BENMOSHÉ A MASTER’S RESEARCH PROJECT (MRP) PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURAL STUDIES WITH A CONCENTRATION IN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 © 2017 Bradley W. Benmoshé 1 To my family, friends, and teammates 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my committee members, Dr. Nawari Nawari and Dr. William L. Tilson, of the University of Florida’s College of Design, Construction, and Planning, for steering me in the right direction, and for being as passionate about this research project as I have been. I would also like to thank Dr. Michael Kung, of the University of Florida’s College of Design, Construction, and Planning, for his valuable comments on this thesis, as well as for his continued support throughout my time at the University of Florida. Furthermore, I would like to thank my dearest friends, family, classmates, and colleagues for their many contributions to this thesis. Finally, I must express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my incredible spouse, for providing me with unfailing support, honest criticism, continuous encouragement throughout my years of study, and through the process of researching and writing this thesis, especially during the long nights and early mornings. This astonishing accomplishment truly would not have been possible with him! 3 TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Offset Cores: Trends, Drivers and Frequency in Tall Buildings
    CTBUH Research Paper ctbuh.org/papers Title: Offset Cores: Trends, Drivers and Frequency in Tall Buildings Authors: Philip Oldfield, Director of the Architecture Program Faculty of the Built Environment, University of New South Wales Bronte Doherty, Architectural Graduate, BVN Architecture Subject: Architectural/Design Keyword: Core Publication Date: 2019 Original Publication: CTBUH Journal 2019 Issue II Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Philip Oldfield; Bronte Doherty Architecture/Design Offset Cores: Trends, Drivers and Frequency in Tall Buildings Abstract This research explores the trends, drivers and frequency of offset cores in the world’s tallest buildings. It charts the history of tall building layouts, exploring the motivation behind offset-core morphologies emerging in the second half of the 20th century. Drawing from the literature, it then provides a definition for central, perimeter, mixed and offset cores, allowing for the categorization of the future 500 Dr. Philip Oldfield Bronte Doherty tallest buildings in terms of core position. It also identifies the tallest 20 buildings in the world with offset cores. The Hanking Center Tower in Shenzhen, at 358.9 meters Authors in height, was confirmed as the world’s tallest building with an offset core, as of the Dr. Philip Oldfield, Director of the Architecture Program end of 2018. Given a recent increase in the vertical development of smaller sites in Faculty of the Built Environment, UNSW Sydney Room 2009, Red Centre West Wing dense urban environments, and increased emphasis on passive design and Sydney NSW 2052, Australia +61 2 9385 6821 environmental performance, the authors expect a greater diversity of core [email protected] locations to emerge among the world’s tallest buildings in the future.
    [Show full text]