Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report November 2009 Contents Executive Summary i Abbreviations ix Glossary of Terms x 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives and Scope 1 1.3 Background to the Development of the Action 4 1.4 Relationship of the Action to Other Actions that May be Affected 5 1.5 Current Status of the Action 5 1.6 Consequence of the Action Not Proceeding 5 2. Description of the Action 7 2.1 Location 7 2.2 Detailed Proposal 10 2.3 Additional Licences / Permits and Approval Requirements required by the Project 15 3. Methodologies 23 3.1 Background and Approach 23 3.2 Demarcation of the Aquifer study area 23 3.3 Overview of Ecological Values Descriptions 26 3.4 PER Guidelines 26 3.5 Desktop and Database Assessments 27 3.6 Environmental Flows Assessment 30 3.7 Bore Testing and Modelling Verification 31 3.8 Derivation of Risk Assessment Methodologies 34 3.9 Stakeholder and Community Engagement 37 4. Description of the Environment – Physical Aspects 40 4.1 Information Sources 40 4.2 Climate 40 4.3 Topography 41 4.4 Surface Drainage Features 43 4.5 Soils 43 42/15610/99537 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report 4.6 Geology 48 4.7 Hydrogeology 51 4.8 Groundwater 53 4.9 Social Environment 54 5. Description of the Environment – Ecological 57 5.1 Information Sources 57 5.2 Species of National Environmental Significance 57 5.3 Queensland Species of Conservation Significance 65 5.4 Pest Species 68 5.5 Vegetation Communities 70 5.6 Regional Ecosystem Types and Integrity 73 5.7 Aquatic Values 76 5.8 World Heritage and National Heritage Values 95 6. Construction Phase Impacts 97 6.1 Background 97 6.2 Borefield Development Impacts 97 6.3 Social and Planning Construction Phase Impacts 98 6.4 Risk Assessment Matrices 99 7. Operational Phase Impacts 101 7.1 Background 101 7.2 River Processes and Interactions 101 7.3 Cultural/Social Assessment 109 7.4 Habitat Integrity and Availability 112 7.5 Environmental Flows 113 7.6 Flora of Conservation Significance 116 7.7 Fauna of Conservation Significance 119 7.8 Invasive Fauna and Flora Species 123 7.9 Climate Change 127 7.10 Risk Assessment Matrices 127 8. Prudent and Feasible Alternatives 139 8.1 Introduction 139 8.2 Comparative Impacts between Barron River (Lake Placid) Option and Mulgrave River Aquifer Scheme 140 8.3 Environmental Cost Benefit Comparison 152 8.4 “Do Nothing Option” 155 42/15610/99537 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report 9. Proposed Safeguards and Mitigation Measures 156 9.1 Environmental Management Plan 156 9.2 Environmental Triggers and Thresholds for Actions 158 10. Conclusions and Recommendations 162 10.1 Summary of Impacts 162 10.2 Justification for Proposed Action 162 10.3 Compliance with Principles of Ecologically Sustainable Development 163 10.4 Matters of National Environmental Significance 163 10.5 Environmental Acceptability 164 10.6 Technical Feasibility 164 10.7 Compliance with the Objectives of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 164 11. References 166 Table Index Table 1: Proposed Mitigation Measures for the Mulgrave River Aquifer Scheme vii Table 2 Summary of the Potential Impacts in Relation to Different Climatic Scenarios viii Table 3: Legislative Assessment Requirements 19 Table 4: Summary of NES Matters Protected under Part 3 of the EPBC Act 26 Table 5: Summary of World Heritage Values within/adjacent Aquifer Area of Influence 27 Table 6: Threat Criteria and Consequent Scales 35 Table 7: Likelihood Rating 36 Table 8: Risk Levels and Management Action (example) 37 Table 9: Details of Stakeholders Consulted 38 Table 10: Soil Type and Vertical Conductivity (from DNR, 1999) 44 Table 11: CSIRO Description of Soils in the study area 45 Table 12: Stratigraphic Units (after Muller 1975) 49 Table 13: Major Hydrogeological Units 51 Table 14 Population projections, medium growth – Population and Housing Fact Sheet – August 2009 – Department of Infrastructure and planning 54 42/15610/99537 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report Table 15: Tenure/Landuse in Proposed Infrastructure Areas 56 Table 16: Species of NES Identified as Occurring within the study area 58 Table 17: Summary of Regional Ecosystems and Groundwater Dependencies 71 Table 18: Freshwater Fish Species in the Mulgrave River 81 Table 19: Estuarine Fish Species in the Mulgrave River 92 Table 20: CRCWW, Summary Construction Risk Assessment, Mulgrave River Aquifer 100 Table 21: Summary of Potential Landuse Impacts 110 Table 22: Environmental Flow Calculations 115 Table 23: Summary of Potential Impacts on Threatened Flora Species/Ecological Communities 118 Table 24: Summary of Potential Impacts on Fauna of Conservation Significance 121 Table 25: Summary of Potential Impacts on Threatened Fauna Species 121 Table 26: Summary of Potential Impacts on Migratory Species or its Habitat 122 Table 27: Environmental Risk Assessment Matrix 128 Table 28: Social/Cultural Environmental Risk Assessment 135 Table 29: Risk Assessment Matrix for Numerically Modelled Groundwater Potential Impacts 137 Table 30: CRCWW, Summary Construction Risk Assessment, Mulgrave River Aquifer 142 Table 31: CRCWW, Summary Operational Risk Assessment, Mulgrave River Aquifer 143 Table 32: CRCWW, Summary Construction Risk Assessment, Lake Placid Scheme 144 Table 33: CRCWW, Summary Operational Risk Assessment, Lake Placid Scheme 146 Table 34: Infrastructure Construction/Maintenance Cost/Benefit Comparison 148 Table 35: Operational Cost/Benefit Comparison 150 Table 36: Environmental Cost/Benefit Comparison between Lake Placid and Mulgrave River Aquifer Scheme 153 Table 37: EMP Structure 157 Table 38: Environmental Values 158 42/15610/99537 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report Figure Index Figure 1: General Aquifer Study Area and Locality 9 Figure 2: Aquifer Testing Areas 12 Figure 3: Proposed Borefield Layout 13 Figure 4: Example of Production Bore Construction 14 Figure 5: PER study area and WHA Boundary 25 Figure 6: Topography and Surface Drainage Features 42 Figure 7: CSIRO Soil Mapping Units 47 Figure 8: Soil Associations and Potential Acid Sulfate Soils Areas 48 Figure 9: Geological Units in the study area 50 Figure 10: Regional Ecosystem Conservation Status and Protected Species Observations 67 Figure 11: Vegetation Communities and Groundwater Dependencies 75 Figure 12: Groundwater Flow Directions 103 Figure 13: Mulgrave River Valley 104 Figure 14: Wet Season: River to Aquifer Interactions 105 Figure 15: Dry Season Interactions and Drawdown 106 Figure 16: Mapped Extent of Pond Apple (WTMA 2004) 126 Appendices A Guidelines for the Content of a Draft Public Environment Report B Cairns Regional Council General Policy 1:04:43 C Draft Environmental Management Plan D Numerical Groundwater Modelling Technical Report E Hydrogeology Report F Flora and Fauna Survey Report G Responses to Draft PER H General PER Information 42/15610/99537 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report Executive Summary The Mulgrave River aquifer is currently the subject of a feasibility study as a supplementary urban water supply to Cairns City. As part of this study Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste have submitted the project to the Commonwealth for determination as to whether the project constitutes a “controlled action” under the provisions of the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The Commonwealth’s response is that there is potential for the project to impact on matters of National Environmental Significance (NES) (as defined by the EPBC Act), and that further information on the potential impacts of the project on matters of NES are to be submitted to the Commonwealth before a final decision can be reached. These further studies requested by the Commonwealth are to be commensurate with the Public Environment Report guidelines for the project issued to Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste (see Appendix A). This report conforms to the Commonwealth’s requirements for a Public Environment Report (PER) as necessary so that further information can be supplied to the Commonwealth. The primary objects of this PER are: 1. to present the necessary information requested by the Commonwealth in the format as prescribed under the guidelines for a Public Environment Report; 2. to present information on the likely impact of the project on matters of NES to Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste to assist in their deliberations of the environmental feasibility of the project. The Proposed Action The proposed action is the construction and operation of a borefield within an area of alluvium comprising part of the Mulgrave River aquifer. The borefield is designed to abstract up to 15 ML/day from up to ten bores, located in a general area between the Bruce Highway and the Mulgrave River, south of the small township of Aloomba (see Figure 1 for the study area). Each bore is to have an electric submersible pump and a connecting powerline that will form part of an underground pipe network alongside existing rural roads. This pipe network will ultimately connect into the Behana Creek water supply pipeline that exists adjacent to the project area. The only visible expression of the bores will be small security housing over each bore (approximately 2m by 3m) with a connecting powerline from the existing power grid. The borefield is designed as a supplementary water supply to service the south of Cairns. It will be operated on an “as needs” requirement, only when other existing water supplies reach their allocated limits. On this basis, given the monsoonal conditions of the Wet Tropics, the borefield may not operate (under normal climatic conditions) for up to three months in the wet season of January to March (inclusive). For periods outside the wet season, abstraction will be determined by a combination of population demand for water, allocation from existing water sources, and environmental triggers for abstraction thresholds.
Recommended publications
  • An Assessment of Agricultural Potential of Soils in the Gulf Region, North Queensland
    REPORT TO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT (RID), NORTH REGION ON An Assessment of Agricultural Potential of Soils in the Gulf Region, North Queensland Volume 1 February 1999 Peter Wilson (Land Resource Officer, Land Information Management) Seonaid Philip (Senior GIS Technician) Department of Natural Resources Resource Management GIS Unit Centre for Tropical Agriculture 28 Peters Street, Mareeba Queensland 4880 DNRQ990076 Queensland Government Technical Report This report is intended to provide information only on the subject under review. There are limitations inherent in land resource studies, such as accuracy in relation to map scale and assumptions regarding socio-economic factors for land evaluation. Before acting on the information conveyed in this report, readers should ensure that they have received adequate professional information and advice specific to their enquiry. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report neither the Queensland Government nor its officers or staff accepts any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result from any inaccuracy or omission in the information contained herein. © State of Queensland 1999 For information about this report contact [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors thank the input of staff of the Department of Natural Resources GIS Unit Mareeba. Also that of DNR water resources staff, particularly Mr Jeff Benjamin. Mr Steve Ockerby, Queensland Department of Primary Industries provided invaluable expertise and advice for the development of the agricultural suitability assessment. Mr Phil Bierwirth of the Australian Geological Survey Organisation (AGSO) provided an introduction to and knowledge of Airborne Gamma Spectrometry. Assistance with the interpretation of AGS data was provided through the Department of Natural Resources Enhanced Resource Assessment project.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Series
    VOLUME 4 PART 1 MEMOIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM CULTURAL HERITAGE SERIES © Queensland Museum PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone 06 7 3840 7555 Fax 06 7 3846 1226 Email [email protected] Website www.qmuseum.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 1440-4788 NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Director. Copies of the journal can be purchased from the Queensland Museum Shop. A Guide to Authors is displayed at the Queensland Museum web site www.qmuseum.qld.gov.au/resources/resourcewelcome.html A Queensland Government Project Typeset at the Queensland Museum DR ERIC MJÖBERG’S 1913 SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION OF NORTH QUEENSLAND’S RAINFOREST REGION ÅSA FERRIER Ferrier, Å. 2006 11 01: Dr Eric Mjöberg’s 1913 scientific exploration of North Queensland’s rainforest region. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, Cultural Heritage Series 4(1): 1-27. Brisbane. ISSN 1440-4788. This paper is an account of Dr Eric Mjöberg’s travels in the northeast Queensland rainforest region, where he went, what observations he made, and what types of Aboriginal material culture items he collected and returned with to Sweden in 1914. Mjöberg, a Swedish entomologist commissioned by the Swedish government to document rainforest fauna and flora, spent seven months in the tropical rainforest region of far north Queensland in 1913, mainly exploring areas around the Atherton Tablelands.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission DR130
    To: Commissioner Dr Jane Doolan, Associate Commissioner Drew Collins Productivity Commission National Water Reform 2020 Submission by John F Kell BE (SYD), M App Sc (UNSW), MIEAust, MICE Date: 25 March 2021 Revision: 3 Summary of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Current Situation / Problem Solution 3.0 The Solution 4.0 Dam Location 5.0 Water channel design 6.0 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act – Section 100 7.0 Federal and State Responses 8.0 Conclusion 9.0 Acknowledgements Attachments 1 Referenced Data 2A Preliminary Design of Gravity Flow Channel Summary 2B Preliminary Design of Gravity Flow Channel Summary 3 Effectiveness of Dam Size Design Units L litres KL kilolitres ML Megalitres GL Gigalitres (Sydney Harbour ~ 500GL) GL/a Gigalitres / annum RL Relative Level - above sea level (m) m metre TEL Townsville Enterprise Limited SMEC Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation MDBA Murray Darling Basin Authority 1.0 Introduction This submission is to present a practical solution to restore balance in the Murray Daring Basin (MDB) with a significant regular inflow of water from the Burdekin and Herbert Rivers in Queensland. My background is civil/structural engineering (BE Sydney Uni - 1973). As a fresh graduate, I worked in South Africa and UK for ~6 years, including a stint with a water consulting practice in Johannesburg, including relieving Mafeking as a site engineer on a water canal project. Attained the MICE (UK) in Manchester in 1979. In 1980 returning to Sydney, I joined Connell Wagner (now Aurecon), designing large scale industrial projects. Since 1990, I have headed a manufacturing company in the specialised field of investment casting (www.hycast.com.au) at Smithfield, NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • 189930408.Pdf
    © The University of Queensland and James Cook University, 2018 Published by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority ISSN: 2208-4134 Marine Monitoring Program: Annual report for inshore pesticide monitoring 2016-2017 is licensed for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logos of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, The University of Queensland and James Cook University, any other material protected by a trademark, content supplied by third parties and any photographs. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 This publication should be cited as: Grant, S., Thompson, K., Paxman, C., Elisei, G., Gallen C., Tracey, D., Kaserzon, S., Jiang, H., Samanipour, S. and Mueller, J. 2018, Marine Monitoring Program: Annual report for inshore pesticide monitoring 2016-2017. Report for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, 128 pp. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the National Library of Australia Front cover image: Turbid river plume emerging from the Russell-Mulgrave river mouth following several days of heavy rainfall in February 2015 © Dieter Tracey, 2015 DISCLAIMER While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this document are factually correct, UQ and JCU do not make any representation or give any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, currency or suitability for any particular purpose of the information or statements contained in this document. To the extent permitted by law UQ and JCU shall not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN BIODIVERSITY RECORD ______2007 (No 2) ISSN 1325-2992 March, 2007 ______
    AUSTRALIAN BIODIVERSITY RECORD ______________________________________________________________ 2007 (No 2) ISSN 1325-2992 March, 2007 ______________________________________________________________ Some Taxonomic and Nomenclatural Considerations on the Class Reptilia in Australia. Some Comments on the Elseya dentata (Gray, 1863) complex with Redescriptions of the Johnstone River Snapping Turtle, Elseya stirlingi Wells and Wellington, 1985 and the Alligator Rivers Snapping Turtle, Elseya jukesi Wells 2002. by Richard W. Wells P.O. Box 826, Lismore, New South Wales Australia, 2480 Introduction As a prelude to further work on the Chelidae of Australia, the following considerations relate to the Elseya dentata species complex. See also Wells and Wellington (1984, 1985) and Wells (2002 a, b; 2007 a, b.). Elseya Gray, 1867 1867 Elseya Gray, Ann. Mag. Natur. Hist., (3) 20: 44. – Subsequently designated type species (Lindholm 1929): Elseya dentata (Gray, 1863). Note: The genus Elseya is herein considered to comprise only those species with a very wide mandibular symphysis and a distinct median alveolar ridge on the upper jaw. All members of the latisternum complex lack a distinct median alveolar ridge on the upper jaw and so are removed from the genus Elseya (see Wells, 2007b). This now restricts the genus to the following Australian species: Elseya albagula Thomson, Georges and Limpus, 2006 2006 Elseya albagula Thomson, Georges and Limpus, Chelon. Conserv. Biol., 5: 75; figs 1-2, 4 (top), 5a,6a, 7. – Type locality: Ned Churchwood Weir (25°03'S 152°05'E), Burnett River, Queensland, Australia. Elseya dentata (Gray, 1863) 1863 Chelymys dentata Gray, Ann. Mag. Natur. Hist., (3) 12: 98. – Type locality: Beagle’s Valley, upper Victoria River, Northern Territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Flood Plumes in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    Spatial and temporal patterns of flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia Thesis submitted by Michelle Jillian Devlin BSc (Bendigo College of Advanced Education (Latrobe University) Msc (James Cook University) February 2005 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Tropical Environment Studies and Geography Department, James Cook University. Spatial and temporal patterns of flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia 1 STATEMENT OF ACCESS I, the undersigned, author of this work, understand that James Cook University will make this thesis available for use within the University Library and, via the Australian Digital Theses network, for use elsewhere. I understand that, as an unpublished work, a thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and; I do not wish to place any further restriction on access to this work. _________________________ ______________ Signature Date Spatial and temporal patterns of flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia 2 STATEMENT OF SOURCES DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institution of tertiary education. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given. ____________________________________ ____________________ Signature Date Spatial and temporal patterns of flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia 3 Papers arising from this thesis Devlin , M., Brodie, J, Waterhouse, J., Mitchell, A., Audas, D. and Haynes, D. (2003). Exposure of Great Barrier Reef inner-shelf reefs to river-borne contaminants.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Black Mangrove Cichlid (Tilapia Mariae) in Australia
    Distribution of the black mangrove cichlid (Tilapia mariae) in Australia The black mangrove cichlid or ‘spotted tilapia’ is a species of deep-bodied fish belonging to the family Cichlidae. Native to West Africa, its distribution extends from the The first documented Ivory Coast through Ghana and Nigeria to Cameroon1. Introduction to Australia: discovery of introduced black mangrove cichlids in Throughout this range the species is often found in the Australian waterways was in the 1970s in the Hazelwood deeper sections of larger rivers and lagoons but also pondage, Victoria. During the 1980s, a population of black moves into flowing streams during the rainy season1. mangrove cichlids was discovered in coastal rivers in the Black mangrove cichlids have become a desirable Wet Tropics World Heritage Area of north Queensland3. aquarium species as they are hardy, readily reproduce These introductions occurred despite the species being and have attractive body and fin colouration2. This on the prohibited import list since the 1960s. The precise popularity has led to the species being exported to many origin of the illegal importations is still unknown but it is countries outside Africa. The ability of black mangrove thought to have been through the ornamental fish trade. cichlids to adapt to a wide range of ecological conditions More black mangrove cichlids have since been released has enabled them to become a highly invasive pest. For into the wild, either deliberately or accidently, and have example, in the United States the black mangrove cichlid formed self-sustaining populations. has established self-sustaining populations in several states, including Florida, Arizona, California and Nevada3.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnstone River Floods February 2009
    Johnstone River Floods February 2009 1 2 1. Aquilina Meuibah Creek Flood Damage. 2. D’Urso Liverpool Creek Damage 06/02/09. Photos courtesy of the Cassowary Coast Regional Council. Note: 1. Data in this report has been operationally quality controlled but errors may still exist. 2. This product includes data made available to the Bureau by other agencies. Separate approval may be required to use the data for other purposes. See Appendix 1 for DNRW Usage Agreement. 3. This report is not a complete set of all data that is available. It is a representation of some of the key information. Table of Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Meteorological Summary............................................................................................................................ 1 3. Hydrology ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Table 3.1 Peak Height Comparison to Records for the 06/02/09................................................................... 2 Figure 3.1 Peak Height Map for the 48 hours to 9am on the 07/02/09. ......................................................... 3 Figure 3.2 Radar imagery for the period from 10am to 1pm on the 06/02/09. ............................................... 4 Figure 3.3 Radar imagery for the period from 2pm to 5pm on the 06/02/09. ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion Processes and Sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics Catchment (RP65G)
    Erosion processes and sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics catchment (RP65G) Synthesis Report Chemistry Centre, Landscape Sciences June 2015 Identifying erosion processes and sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics catchment (RP65G) – Synthesis Report Prepared by Project team members Joanne Burton a (Project Leader) Taka Furuichi a (KG2 Section Leader) Stephen Lewis b (KG3 Section Leader) Jon Olley c Scott Wilkinson d (KG1 Section Leader) Zoe Bainbridge b a: Department of Science, IT, Innovation and Arts, Brisbane, QLD b: Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD c: Australian River Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD d: CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, ACT Landscape Sciences Science Division Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation PO Box 5078 Brisbane QLD 4001 © The State of Queensland (Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation) 2015 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence Under this licence you are free, without having to seek permission from DSITI, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland, Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclone Sadie Flood Plumes in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: Composition and Consequences
    WORKSHOP SERIES No 22 Cyclone Sadie Flood Plumes in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: Composition and Consequences Proceedings of a workshop held in Townsville Queensland, Australia, 10 November 1994, at the Australian Institute of Marine Science. Edited by Andrew Steven GREAT BARRIERREEF MARINEPARKAUTHORMY 0 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 1997 ISSN 0156 5842 ISBN 0 642 23014 5 Published February 1997 by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority The opinions expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Cyclone Sadie flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon : composition and consequences: proceedings of a workshop held in Townsville, Queensland, Australia, 10 November 1994, at the Australian Institute of Marine Science. Bibliography.’ ISBN 0 642 23014 5. 1. Sediment transport - Queensland - Great Barrier Reef - Congresses. 2. Reef ecology - Queensland - Great Barrier Reef - Congresses. 3. Great Barrier Reef (Qld.) - Congresses. I. Steven, A. D. L. (Andrew David Leslie), 1962 - II. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (Australia). (Series : Workshop series (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (Australia)) ; no. 22). 574.52636709943 COVER PHOTOGRAPH Maria Creek, Kurramine in flood, 2 February 1994 Photograph by Andrew Elliott Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority GREATBARRIERREEF MARmEPARKAuTH0RITY PO Box 1379 Townsville Qld 4810 Telephone (077) 500 700 I Table of Contents Preface Workshop Program Contributed Papers Nutrients and suspended sediment discharge from the Johnstone River catchment during cyclone Sadie HM Hunter .. : . ............................................................. 1 Export of nutrients and suspended sediment from the Herbert River catchment during a flood event associated with cyclone Sadie AW Mitchell and RGV Bramley .
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Influence of Tropical River Plumes in the Great Barrier Reef: Application and Performance of an Airborne Sea Surface Salinity Mapping System
    Remote Sensing of Environment 85 (2003) 204–220 www.elsevier.com/locate/rse Structure and influence of tropical river plumes in the Great Barrier Reef: application and performance of an airborne sea surface salinity mapping system D.M. Burragea,*, M.L. Heronb, J.M. Hackerc, J.L. Millerd, T.C. Stieglitza, C.R. Steinberga, A. Prytzb a Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia b School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, James Cook University, Queensland 4811, Australia c Airborne Research Australia, Flinders University, Salisbury South, Adelaide, South Australia 5106, Australia d Ocean Sciences Branch, Naval Research Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, Hattiesburg, MS 39529, USA Received 29 August 2002; received in revised form 27 November 2002; accepted 2 December 2002 Abstract Input of freshwater from rivers is a critical consideration in the study and management of coral and seagrass ecosystems in tropical regions. Low salinity water can transport natural and manmade river-borne contaminants into the sea, and can directly stress marine ecosystems that are adapted to higher salinity levels. An efficient method of mapping surface salinity distribution over large ocean areas is required to address such environmental issues. We describe here an investigation of the utility of airborne remote sensing of sea surface salinity using an L-band passive microwave radiometer. The study combined aircraft overflights of the scanning low frequency microwave radiometer (SLFMR) with shipboard and in situ instrument deployments to map surface and subsurface salinity distributions, respectively, in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon. The goals of the investigation were (a) to assess the performance of the airborne salinity mapper; (b) to use the maps and in situ data to develop an integrated description of the structure and zone of influence of a river plume under prevailing monsoon weather conditions; and (c) to determine the extent to which the sea surface salinity distribution expressed the subsurface structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish and Aquatic Habitat Survey of Cape York Peninsula
    CAPE YORK PENINSULA NATURAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS PROGRAM (NRAP) FRESHWATER FISH AND AQUATIC HABITAT SURVEY OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA B. W. Herbert, J.A. Peeters, P.A. Graham and A.E. Hogan Freshwater Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY (CYPLUS) Natural Resources Analysis Program FRESHWATER FISH AND AQUATIC HABITAT SURVEY OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA B. W. Herbert, J. A. Peeters, P.A. Graham and A.E. Hogan Freshwater Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments Final report on project: NRlO - FISH FAUNA SURVEY Recommended citation: Herbert, B.W., Peeters, J.A., Graham, P.A. and Hogan, A.E. (1995). 'Freshwater Fish and Aquatic Habitat Survey of Cape York Peninsula'. (Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy, Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland, Brisbane, Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane.) Note: Due to the timing of publication, reports on other CYPLUS projects may not be fully cited in the REFERENCES section. However, they should be able to be located by author, agency or subject. ISBN 0 7242 6204 0 The State of Queensland and Commonwealth of Australia 1995. Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of the Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland and the Australian Government Publishing Service.
    [Show full text]