DOCSLIB.ORG

The Idea of the Neutrino Laurie M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Idea of the Neutrino Laurie M The idea of the neutrino Laurie M. Brown Citation: Physics Today 31, 9, 23 (1978); doi: 10.1063/1.2995181 View online: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2995181 View Table of Contents: http://physicstoday.scitation.org/toc/pto/31/9 Published by the American Institute of Physics Articles you may be interested in Fermi's Theory of Beta Decay American Journal of Physics 36, 1150 (1968); 10.1119/1.1974382 Corrections Physics Today 32, 66 (1979); 10.1063/1.3043360 Neutrino physics Physics Today 10, 12 (1957); 10.1063/1.3060455 The Multiple-Mirror Telescope Physics Today 31, 30 (1978); 10.1063/1.2995182 Proton or prouton?: Rutherford and the depths of the atom American Journal of Physics 65, 707 (1997); 10.1119/1.18640 The image of scientists in The Big Bang Theory Physics Today 70, 40 (2017); 10.1063/PT.3.3427 The idea of the neutrino To avoid anomalies of spin and statistics Pauli suggested in 1930 that a neutral particle of small mass might accompany the electron in nuclear beta decay, calling it (until Chadwick's discovery) the neutron. Laurie M. Brown During the 1920's physicists came to ac- tron, and that both are created at their which conflict with data on the hyperfine cept the view that matter is built of only moment of emission. Perhaps because of structure of atomic spectra. two kinds of elementary particles, elec- the rapid acceptance of Fermi's theory • Although both alpha and gamma decay trons and protons, which they often and the tendency to rethink history "as it show the existence of narrow nuclear en- called1 "negative and positive electrons." should have happened," the true nature ergy levels, the electrons from a given A neutral atom of mass number A and of Pauli's proposal has been partly over- beta-decay transition emerge with a broad atomic number Z was supposed to contain looked and its radical character insuffi- continuous spectrum of energy. A protons, all in the nucleus, and A neg- ciently emphasized. Contrary to the The strong contrast between the suc- ative electrons, A — Z in the nucleus and impression given by most accounts, Pau- cesses and the failures of quantum me- the rest making up the external electron li's "neutron" has some properties in chanics applied to the nucleus are no- shells of the atom. Their belief that both common with the neutron James Chad- where more evident than in a book by protons and negative electrons were to be wick discovered in 1932 as well as with George Gamow.3 In it, all the passages found in the nucleus arose from the ob- Fermi's neutrino. concerning electrons in the nucleus are set servations that protons could be knocked off in warning symbols (skull and cross- out of light elements by alpha-particle Flaws in the model bones in the original manuscript). bombardment, while electrons emerged By the end of 1930, when our story be- Some physicists (among them Niels spontaneously (mostly from very heavy gins, quantum mechanics had triumphed Bohr and Werner Heisenberg4) took these nuclei) in radioactive beta decay. Any not only in atomic, molecular and crystal difficulties to indicate that a new dy- other elementary constituent of the atom physics, but also in its treatment of some namics, possibly even a new type of would have been considered superfluous, nuclear processes, such as alpha-particle space-time description, might be appro- and to imagine that another might exist radioactivity and scattering of alpha priate on the scale of nuclear distances was abhorrent to the prevailing natural particles from nuclei (including the case and energies, just as quantum mechanics philosophy. of helium, in which quantum-mechanical begins to be important on the atomic Nevertheless, in December 1930 interference effects are so important). scale. These physicists were impressed However, the situation regarding elec- by the similarity of the nuclear radius to Wolfgang Pauli suggested a new elemen- z 2 tary particle that he called a neutron, trons in the nucleus was felt to be critical. the value e' /mc , the classical electron with characteristics partly like that of the The main difficulties of the electron- radius of H. A. Lorentz. At this distance nucleon we now call by that name, and proton model of the nucleus were: it had been anticipated that electrody- partly those of the lepton that we now call • The symmetry character of the nuclear namics would probably fail (and maybe, neutrino (more precisely the electron wave function depends upon A, not Z as with it, the special theory of relativity). antineutrino, but this distinction is not predicted by the model; when A — Z is Bohr was willing to relinquish the con- needed here). Pauli's neutron-neutrino odd the spin and statistics of the nucleus servation of energy, except as a statistical idea became well-known to physicists are given incorrectly. For example, ni- law, in parallel with the second law of even before his first publication of it, trogen (Z = 7, A = 14) was known from thermodynamics. At the same time Heisenberg was considering the intro- which is in the discussion section fol- the molecular band spectrum of N2 to lowing Heisenberg's report on nuclear have spin 1 and Bose-Einstein statis- duction of a new fundamental length into structure at the Seventh Solvay Confer- tics. the theory. It seemed that anything 2 ence, held in Brussels in October 1933. • No potential well is deep enough and might be considered acceptable as a way narrow enough to confine a particle as out of the dilemma—or perhaps anything Shortly after attending this conference, except a new elementary particle. Enrico Fermi published his theory of beta light as an electron to a region the size of decay, which assumes that a neutrino al- the nucleus (the argument for this is ways accompanies the beta-decay elec- based on the uncertainty principle and Pauli's proposal relativistic electron theory). It was in this context of ideas that Pauli Laurie M. Brown is a professor in the Department • It is hard to see how to "suppress" the dared to suggest the existence of a new of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern Uni- very large (on the nuclear scale) magnetic neutral particle. His proposal, intended versity, Evanston, Illinois. moments of the electrons in the nucleus, to rescue the quantum theory of the nu- 0031-9228/78/3109-023$0.50 © 1978 American Institute of Physics PHYSICS TODAY / SEPTEMBER 1978 23 GOUDSMIT COLLECTION, AIP NIELS BOHR LIBRARY 1957 Zurich lecture. After pointing out one of the major difficulties with the nu- clear model containing only protons and electrons (the symmetry argument men- tioned above), Pauli says: "I tried to connect this problem of the spin and statistics of the nucleus with the other of the continuous beta spectrum, without giving up the energy theorem, through the idea of a new neutral parti- cle." Neutrinos—ejected or created? It is often overlooked in discussing the history of the neutrino idea that Pauli suggested his particle as a constituent of the nucleus, with a small but not zero mass, together with the protons and the electrons. (Chien-Shiung Wu, for ex- ample, emphasizes the non-conservation of statistics that would occur in beta decay without the neutrino.67'9 However, Pauli refers rather to the spin and statistics of stable nuclei such as lithium 6 and nitro- gen 14.) This point is of some signifi- cance; had Pauli proposed in 1930 that neutrinos were created (like photons) in transitions between nuclear states, and that they were otherwise not present in the nucleus, he would have anticipated by PAULI ON THE WAY TO PASADENA, 1931 three years an important feature of Fer- mi's theory of beta decay. Pauli did not cleus from its contradictions, was pre- discrete quantum states of the nucleus (as claim to have had this idea when he wrote sented in good humor as a "desperate indicated by alpha and gamma emission), the Tubingen letter, but he did say (in his remedy," although it was a serious one. some workers, including Meitner, thought Zurich lecture) that by the time he was (The Viennese version would have been, that the beta rays were radiating some of ready to speak openly of his new particle, according to the old joke: desperate, but their energy as they emerged through the at a meeting of The American Physical not serious.) During the next three years strong electric field of the nucleus.5'67 Society in Pasadena, held in June of 1931, he lectured on what he called the "neu- This led C. D. Ellis and William he no longer considered his neutrons to be tron" at several physics meetings and he Wooster at the Cavendish Laboratory in nuclear constituents. It is for this reason, discussed it privately with colleagues. Cambridge, England, who did not believe he says, that he no longer referred to them Pauli's first proposal was put forward in the radiation theory, to perform a ca- as "neutrons"; indeed, that he made use only tentatively, as he recalled in a lecture lorimetric experiment with radium E of no special name for them. However, he delivered in Zurich in 1957, after re- (bismuth) as a source. Their result, later there is evidence, as we shall see, that ceiving news of the experiments con- confirmed in an improved experiment by Pauli's recollections are incorrect; that at firming parity violation in beta decay.5 Meitner and W. Orthmann,8 was that the Pasadena the particles were called neu- Invited to a physics meeting in Tubingen, energy per beta decay absorbed in a trons and were regarded as constituents Germany, which he was unable to attend thick-walled calorimeter was equal to the of the nucleus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ft-216-1.982
    CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS INSTITUTE FOR PHYSICS AND NUCLEAR ENGINEERING Department of Fundamental Physics \tiu- FT-216-1.982 . September THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF RELATIVIST1C INDUCED INTERACTIONS IN THE BETA DECAY OF 17oTm D.Bogdan, Amand Faessler , M.I. Cristu, Suzana HoIan ABSTRACT : The log ft-values, the spectrum shape functions, and the beta-gamma angular correlation coefficients of the 17o Tm beta decay are computed in the framework of relativistic formfactor formalism using asymmetric rotor model wavefunctions, Main vector and axi*l vector hadron currents being strongly bindered, the relative importance of induced interaction matrix elements is accurately estimated» Good agreement with experi - ment is obtained for the beta decay observables when the main induced interaction terms were taken into account. The contri­ bution of the pseudos'îalar term was found insignificant. *) Permanent address : Institut fur Theoretische PhysiJc, Universităt Tubingen, D-7400 Tubingen, West - Germany 1 - 1. INTRODUCTION The theoretical evaluation of observables in the first forbidden beta decay provides an excellent mean to assess the relative importance of the so-called induced interaction cor - rection terms contributing to the beta decay probability when vector and axial vector nuclear beta matrix elements are strongly hindered by either mutual cancellation or selection rules. In this paper the log ft-values, the shape of the beta spectrum and the beta-gamma angular correlation were computed for the l" -* 2 and l" •• 0* beta transitions of the Tm ground 170 state towards the first excited and the ground state of Yb nucleus, respectively. For the Tm nucleus which is strongly deformed ( 02 = = 0.28)*the dominant coupling scheme should be the strong coupling.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Goudsmit
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SAMUEL ABRAHAM GOUDSMIT 1 9 0 2 — 1 9 7 8 A Biographical Memoir by BENJAMIN BEDERSON Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2008 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. Photograph courtesy Brookhaven National Laboratory. SAMUEL ABRAHAM GOUDSMIT July 11, 1902–December 4, 1978 BY BENJAMIN BEDERSON AM GOUDSMIT LED A CAREER that touched many aspects of S20th-century physics and its impact on society. He started his professional life in Holland during the earliest days of quantum mechanics as a student of Paul Ehrenfest. In 1925 together with his fellow graduate student George Uhlenbeck he postulated that in addition to mass and charge the electron possessed a further intrinsic property, internal angular mo- mentum, that is, spin. This inspiration furnished the missing link that explained the existence of multiple spectroscopic lines in atomic spectra, resulting in the final triumph of the then struggling birth of quantum mechanics. In 1927 he and Uhlenbeck together moved to the United States where they continued their physics careers until death. In a rough way Goudsmit’s career can be divided into several separate parts: first in Holland, strictly as a theorist, where he achieved very early success, and then at the University of Michigan, where he worked in the thriving field of preci- sion spectroscopy, concerning himself with the influence of nuclear magnetism on atomic spectra. In 1944 he became the scientific leader of the Alsos Mission, whose aim was to determine the progress Germans had made in the development of nuclear weapons during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF (1.21
    High Precision Measurement of the 19Ne Lifetime by Leah Jacklyn Broussard Department of Physics Duke University Date: Approved: Albert Young Calvin Howell Kate Scholberg Berndt Mueller John Thomas Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2012 Abstract (Nuclear physics) High Precision Measurement of the 19Ne Lifetime by Leah Jacklyn Broussard Department of Physics Duke University Date: Approved: Albert Young Calvin Howell Kate Scholberg Berndt Mueller John Thomas An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2012 Copyright c 2012 by Leah Jacklyn Broussard All rights reserved except the rights granted by the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Licence Abstract The lifetime of 19Ne is an important parameter in precision tests of the Standard Model. Improvement in the uncertainty of experimental observables of this and other 1 T = 2 mirror isotopes would allow for an extraction of Vud at a similar precision to that obtained by superallowed 0+ → 0+ Fermi decays. We report on a new high precision measurement of the lifetime of 19Ne, performed at the Kernfysich Versneller MeV 19 Instituut (KVI) in Groningen, the Netherlands. A 10.5 A F beam was used to 19 produce Ne using inverse reaction kinematics in a H2 gas target. Contaminant productions were eliminated using the TRIμP magnetic isotope separator. The 19Ne beam was implanted into a thick aluminum tape, which was translated to a shielded detection region by a custom tape drive system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, Samuel A
    A Selected Bibliography of Publications by, and about, Samuel A. Goudsmit Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 10 January 2020 Version 1.03 Title word cross-reference $3.50 [Bar30, Rid47]. 136 [Cha72]. 138 [Cha72]. 140 [Cha72]. 142 [Cha72]. g [Gou25g]. Sa [Ive10]. Z [LHLT64]. Za [Ive10]. -dependent [LHLT64]. -Werte [Gou25g]. 1947 [Hen48, Whi48]. 1952 [Gou53b]. 1953 [Gou53a]. 1964 [Gou65a]. 1978 [Bed08b, Dre79]. 1983 [Moy84]. 1987 [Lug69]. 1988 [DGS89]. 3d [Tho97]. A-Bomb [Rec91, LRD+91, Bro93, Mac85]. Abides [Gla00]. Abraham [Bed08a, Bed08b]. Absorption [ZHG36]. Abstracts [GT66a, GT68, Gou69a]. Academy [Coc77, Jew77]. accept [Ano54a]. Acceptance [Gou72b]. Account [Lan54]. Ad [Gou72a]. Affirm [ACU+54]. 1 2 Again [GT66c, Gou73e, Rai85]. Age [Lan48, Sul78, Lan59a, Lan59b, Lap59]. AIP [Ano75]. Alamos [Bet91]. Alan [Gou78b]. Alfred [Hol93a, LH93]. Allies [Hol93b]. Alsos [Gou48c, Ano12, Gou47g, Gou47h, Gou47e, Gou48c, Gou51, Gou62, Gou83, Gou96, Pas69, Pas80, Ano48a, Gue50, Hen48, Moy84, Tre83, Whi48]. ALSOS. [Rid47]. Am [Gou74b]. amend [NG70]. American [EBU+52, Gou47b]. Americans [Lan54]. Among [Tre83]. Analyses [BG32, BG68]. Analysis [Gou74a, Wer10]. Analyzed [Gou47c]. Ancient [Gou81]. Angeles [Moy84, Tre83]. Angeles/San [Tre83]. Angewandte [Gou50a]. Angle [Win89, Win87]. Angry [Gou63]. Angular [BL96, NLCS05]. Announcement [Gou58c, Gou58d, Gou58e, Gou68d]. Anomalies [GB33]. Anomalous [Ben38]. anonymity [WG67]. antiquities [RG82]. Application [Hei47a, Hei47b, MU56]. applications [Ike17]. Applied [Gou50a]. Appraisal [Hei49]. Arbeiten [Hei46].
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of a Strange Particle
    10 extraordinary papers Within days, Watson and Crick had built a identify the full set of codons was completed in forensics, and research into more-futuristic new model of DNA from metal parts. Wilkins by 1966, with Har Gobind Khorana contributing applications, such as DNA-based computing, immediately accepted that it was correct. It the sequences of bases in several codons from is well advanced. was agreed between the two groups that they his experiments with synthetic polynucleotides Paradoxically, Watson and Crick’s iconic would publish three papers simultaneously in (see go.nature.com/2hebk3k). structure has also made it possible to recog- Nature, with the King’s researchers comment- With Fred Sanger and colleagues’ publica- nize the shortcomings of the central dogma, ing on the fit of Watson and Crick’s structure tion16 of an efficient method for sequencing with the discovery of small RNAs that can reg- to the experimental data, and Franklin and DNA in 1977, the way was open for the com- ulate gene expression, and of environmental Gosling publishing Photograph 51 for the plete reading of the genetic information in factors that induce heritable epigenetic first time7,8. any species. The task was completed for the change. No doubt, the concept of the double The Cambridge pair acknowledged in their human genome by 2003, another milestone helix will continue to underpin discoveries in paper that they knew of “the general nature in the history of DNA. biology for decades to come. of the unpublished experimental results and Watson devoted most of the rest of his ideas” of the King’s workers, but it wasn’t until career to education and scientific administra- Georgina Ferry is a science writer based in The Double Helix, Watson’s explosive account tion as head of the Cold Spring Harbor Labo- Oxford, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • A Measurement of Neutral B Meson Mixing Using Dilepton Events with the BABAR Detector
    A measurement of neutral B meson mixing using dilepton events with the BABAR detector Naveen Jeevaka Wickramasinghe Gunawardane Imperial College, London A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London and the Diploma of Imperial College December, 2000 A measurement of neutral B meson mixing using dilepton events with the BABAR detector Naveen Gunawardane Blackett Laboratory Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Prince Consort Road London SW7 2BW December, 2000 ABSTRACT This thesis reports on a measurement of the neutral B meson mixing parameter, ∆md, at the BABAR experiment and the work carried out on the electromagnetic calorimeter (EMC) data acquisition (DAQ) system and simulation software. The BABAR experiment, built at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Centre, uses the PEP-II asymmetric storage ring to make precise measurements in the B meson system. Due to the high beam crossing rates at PEP-II, the DAQ system employed by BABAR plays a very crucial role in the physics potential of the experiment. The inclusion of machine backgrounds noise is an important consideration within the simulation environment. The BABAR event mixing software written for this purpose have the functionality to mix both simulated and real detector backgrounds. Due to the high energy resolution expected from the EMC, a matched digital filter is used. The performance of the filter algorithms could be improved upon by means of a polynomial fit. Application of the fit resulted in a 4-40% improvement in the energy resolution and a 90% improvement in the timing resolution. A dilepton approach was used in the measurement of ∆md where the flavour of the B was tagged using the charge of the lepton.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1210.3065V1
    Neutrino. History of a unique particle S. M. Bilenky Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, R-141980, Russia TRIUMF 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver BC, V6T 2A3 Canada Abstract Neutrinos are the only fundamental fermions which have no elec- tric charges. Because of that neutrinos have no direct electromagnetic interaction and at relatively small energies they can take part only 0 in weak processes with virtual W ± and Z bosons (like β-decay of nuclei, inverse β processν ¯ + p e+n, etc.). Neutrino masses are e → many orders of magnitude smaller than masses of charged leptons and quarks. These two circumstances make neutrinos unique, special par- ticles. The history of the neutrino is very interesting, exciting and instructive. We try here to follow the main stages of the neutrino his- tory starting from the Pauli proposal and finishing with the discovery and study of neutrino oscillations. 1 The idea of neutrino. Pauli Introduction The history of the neutrino started with the famous Pauli letter. The exper- imental data ”forced” Pauli to assume the existence of a new particle which later was called neutrino. The hypothesis of the neutrino allowed Fermi to build the first theory of the β-decay which he considered as a process of a quantum transition of a neutron into a proton with the creation of an electron-(anti)neutrino pair. During many years this was the only experi- arXiv:1210.3065v1 [hep-ph] 10 Oct 2012 mentally studied process in which the neutrino takes part. The main efforts were devoted at that time to the search for a Hamiltonian of the interaction which governs the decay.
    [Show full text]
  • History Newsletter CENTER for HISTORY of PHYSICS&NIELS BOHR LIBRARY & ARCHIVES Vol
    History Newsletter CENTER FOR HISTORY OF PHYSICS&NIELS BOHR LIBRARY & ARCHIVES Vol. 43, No. 1 • Summer 2011 Taking Technology Through the “Valley of Death,” Physicists Don’t Fear Risk As the History of Physics Entrepreneur- Physicists are highly skilled in risk Two other issues surprised us by ship (HoPE) project transitions from the analysis and few, if any, appear inclined the degree to which they influenced interview phase to the analysis phase, to venture into activity at which they physics-based innovation in the US. The new and intriquing insights have begun do not feel confident they will succeed role of the federal SBIR/STTR programs to bubble to the surface. The project even though they are aware that they in providing resources to enable high staff have completed 114 interviews with are bringing new technologies through tech innovation appears critical. SBIR/ physicist entrepreneurs, STTR grants play at least 11 interviews with univers- two important roles. At ity intellectual property one level they provide transfer offices, and two critical seed funding for interviews with venture ideas and innovations capitalists throughout that have not yet the U.S. With field trips reached a stage that will to Georgia and Colorado attract venture capital remaining on the agenda, or angel investment. we expect to interview At another level they another ten to fifteen provide an essential physicist entrepreneurs resource for companies and five or six venture whose technologies are capitalists. We’ll then nearly fully developed spend the last year of but have not yet found the three-year study their proper market coding and analyzing and for whom venture the interviews and other capitalists are either resources and compiling our findings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Measurement and Interpretation of Superallowed 0+ to 0+ Nuclear
    REVIEW ARTICLE The measurement and interpretation of superallowed 0+→ 0+ nuclear β decay J C Hardy and I S Towner Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3366, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Measurements of the decay strength of superallowed 0+→ 0+ nuclear β transitions shed light on the fundamental properties of weak interactions. Because of their impact, such measurements were first reported 60 years ago in the early 1950s and have continued unabated ever since, always taking advantage of improvements in experimental techniques to achieve ever higher precision. The results helped first to shape the Electroweak Standard Model but more recently have evolved into sensitively testing that model’s predictions. Today they provide the most demanding test of vector-current conservation and of the unitarity of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix. Here, we review the experimental and theoretical methods that have been, and are being, used to characterize superallowed 0+→ 0+ β transitions and to extract fundamentally important parameters from their analysis. 1. Introduction In 1953, Sherr and Gerhart published a paper [1] on “Experimental evidence for the Fermi interaction in the β decay of 14O and 10C.” It was less than five years since Sherr had first discovered these two nuclei [2], yet already the two authors were using the decays to probe for the first time the fundamental nature of β decay. They were arXiv:1312.3587v1 [nucl-ex] 12 Dec 2013 able to identify superallowed transitions in both decays – they called them “allowed favoured transitions” – and recognized that the Fermi theory of β decay predicted that the comparative half-lives, or ft values, for the two transitions should be the same, a prediction they could test.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRESS in RESEARCH April 1, 2002 – March 31, 2003
    PROGRESS IN RESEARCH April 1, 2002 – March 31, 2003 Cyclotron Institute Texas A&M University College Station, Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... ix R.E. Tribble, Director SECTION I: NUCLEAR STRUCTURE, FUNDAMENTAL INTERACTIONS AND ASTROPHYSICS Isoscalar giant dipole resonance for several nuclei with A ≥ 90.......................................................... I-1 Y. –W. Lui, X. Chen, H. L. Clark, B. John, Y. Tokimoto, D. H. Youngblood Giant resonances in 46, 48Ti ................................................................................................................... I-4 Y. Tokimoto, B. John*, X. Chen, H. L. Clark, Y. –W. Lui and D. H. Youngblood Determination of the direct capture contribution for 13N(p,γ)14O from the 14O →13N + p asymptotic normalization coefficient ..................................................................................................... I-6 X. Tang, A. Azhari, C. Fu, C. A. Gagliardi, A. M. Mukhamedzhanov, F. Pirlepesov, L. Trache, R. E. Tribble, V. Burjan, V. Kroha and F. Carstoiu Breakup of loosely bound nuclei at intermediate energies as indirect method in nuclear 8 astrophysics: B and the S17 astrophysical factor.................................................................................. I-8 F. Carstoiu, L. Trache, C. A. Gagliardi, and R. E. Tribble Elastic scattering of 8B on 12C and 14N ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: a Study in German Culture
    Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft838nb56t&chunk.id=0&doc.v... Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project A Study in German Culture Paul Lawrence Rose UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford © 1998 The Regents of the University of California In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday ― ix ― ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For hospitality during various phases of work on this book I am grateful to Aryeh Dvoretzky, Director of the Institute of Advanced Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, whose invitation there allowed me to begin work on the book while on sabbatical leave from James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia, in 1983; and to those colleagues whose good offices made it possible for me to resume research on the subject while a visiting professor at York University and the University of Toronto, Canada, in 1990–92. Grants from the College of the Liberal Arts and the Institute for the Arts and Humanistic Studies of The Pennsylvania State University enabled me to complete the research and writing of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: the PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 Vincent Jonathan Houghton, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jon T. Sumida Department of History The subject of this dissertation is the U. S. atomic intelligence effort against both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in the period 1942-1949. Both of these intelligence efforts operated within the framework of an entirely new field of intelligence: scientific intelligence. Because of the atomic bomb, for the first time in history a nation’s scientific resources – the abilities of its scientists, the state of its research institutions and laboratories, its scientific educational system – became a key consideration in assessing a potential national security threat. Considering how successfully the United States conducted the atomic intelligence effort against the Germans in the Second World War, why was the United States Government unable to create an effective atomic intelligence apparatus to monitor Soviet scientific and nuclear capabilities? Put another way, why did the effort against the Soviet Union fail so badly, so completely, in all potential metrics – collection, analysis, and dissemination? In addition, did the general assessment of German and Soviet science lead to particular assumptions about their abilities to produce nuclear weapons? How did this assessment affect American presuppositions regarding the German and Soviet strategic threats? Despite extensive historical work on atomic intelligence, the current historiography has not adequately addressed these questions. THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 By Vincent Jonathan Houghton Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Jon T.
    [Show full text]