DOCSLIB.ORG

Learning from Stone: Using Lithic Artifacts to Explore the Transmission of Culture at Bridge River, British Columbia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Learning from Stone: Using Lithic Artifacts to Explore the Transmission of Culture at Bridge River, British Columbia University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2019 Learning From Stone: Using Lithic Artifacts to Explore the Transmission of Culture at Bridge River, British Columbia Anne V. Smyrl University of Montana, Missoula Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Smyrl, Anne V., "Learning From Stone: Using Lithic Artifacts to Explore the Transmission of Culture at Bridge River, British Columbia" (2019). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11485. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11485 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEARNING FROM STONE: USING LITHIC ARTIFACTS TO EXPLORE THE TRANSMISSION OF CULTURE AT BRIDGE RIVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA By ANNE VIRGINIA JOSETTE SMYRL Bachelor of Arts, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 2014 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Anthropology The University of Montana Missoula, MT December 2019 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Anna Marie Prentiss, Chair Department of Anthropology Dr. John Douglas Department of Anthropology Dr. H. Rafael Chacón Montana Museum of Art and Culture i ABSTRACT Smyrl, Anne, M.A., Fall 2019 Anthropology Chairperson: Dr. Anna Marie Prentiss Learning From Stone: Using Lithic Artifacts to Explore the Transmission of Culture at Bridge River, British Columbia Inherent in all tool-making traditions is the necessity of teaching the next generation of toolmakers. The learning process, although crucial to our understanding of past societies, is difficult to study archaeologically, due to its intangibility. However, some technologies leave visible traces of their production. Key among these are chipped stone tools, known as lithics, which leave distinct archaeological traces of each part of the creation processes. Modern experimenters have recreated these processes, and as a result, have revealed archaeologically-visible differences between novice and expert knappers. These can be identified in archaeological lithic assemblages, and serve as a starting point for identifying the potential presence of novice knappers at archaeological sites. The Bridge River site, a pithouse village site in British Columbia, has yielded a collection of stone projectile points ranging from expertly crafted to crude and unfinished. Using these projectile points, this project seeks to piece together the social context within which novice toolmakers learned to knap. In order to do so, the project examines the points themselves, but also places them in the context of ethnographic depictions of the St’át’imc, the village’s builders and inhabitants, and of the broader literature on craft learning. From these three lines of evidence, a model of the transmission process at the Bridge River village is suggested, one dominated by an informal, perhaps observation-based learning environment. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As is always the case, this thesis would not have been possible without the help of a great many people. First and foremost, I am indebted to the St’át’imc people, whose generosity in supporting the Bridge River archaeological project made my work possible. To the people of Xwísten in particular I owe a great debt. I also honor and acknowledge the Selis and Qlispe people, on whose land I have lived and conducted my research during my time in graduate school. I must also thank Dr. Anna Prentiss, my graduate adviser, for supporting and encouraging this research, and for her genuine enthusiasm and encouragement every step of the way. Her feedback and support has made me an undeniably better thinker, writer, and anthropologist. Dr. John Douglas has been part of this project from the beginning, and his time and patience had enriched it immeasurably. I am grateful to him for seeing it through to the end and serving on my committee. I am grateful also to Dr. Rafael Chacón for agreeing to jump into this project late in the process, despite the fullness of his schedule, and for the insights he brought to the project. Although I was not one of her students, Dr. Kelly Dixon has been an invaluable mentor to me during my time at the University of Montana. It is not an exaggeration to say that she shaped my entire graduate experience here, and I am grateful beyond words to her. Dr. Dixon provided support and enthusiasm, both personal and professional, and invaluable professional opportunities. I must also thank my friends, colleagues, and fellow students within the anthropology department. In particular, I must acknowledge Dr. Prentiss’ other graduate students, most notably Ethan Ryan Ashley Hampton, Haley O’Brien, Emma Vance, and Liz Dolinar. I also could not have made it through this experience intact without the friendship and camaraderie of Nikki Manning, Michaelle Machuca, Kaitlin Pipitone, Mary Casey, and Michaela Shifley. Despite its best efforts, graduate school did not consume my entire existence, and so I offer thanks to my colleagues at the Historical Museum at Fort Missoula for their encouragement and flexibility. Thanks also go out to my friends, for providing me with encouragement, hand-holding, and things to think about that had nothing at all to do with grad school. Special thanks to Isaac, Will, Clara, and Pilf. Thanks also to my family, for spending a lifetime encouraging me to follow my own academic path and for gracefully accepting all the times I fell off the face of the earth and didn’t reply to emails for months on end. Closer to home, my housemates provided stability, support, distractions, and a willingness to overlook unwashed dishes. To Jeremy, CJ, and most especially my partner Jeff, thank you. I would not have made it through this intact without you. iii Table of Contents 1 - Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 - Theoretical approaches ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 - Methodological approaches .......................................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 - Attribute-based lithic analysis ................................................................................................ 9 2.1.2 - Ethnographic and ethnoarchaeological comparisons ........................................................... 14 2.1.3 - Experimental archaeology .................................................................................................... 18 2.2 - Conceptual approaches ............................................................................................................... 21 2.2.1 - Cognitive archaeology .......................................................................................................... 21 2.2.2 - Postcolonial archaeology ...................................................................................................... 25 3 - Cultural transmission of lithic technologies ...................................................................................... 28 3.1 - Cultural transmission .................................................................................................................. 29 3.2 - Archaeological examples ............................................................................................................ 34 4 - Housepit 54 and the Bridge River Village ......................................................................................... 48 4.1 - The Mid-Fraser canyon ............................................................................................................... 51 4.2 - The archaeology of Housepit 54 ................................................................................................. 56 4.3 - Learning at Bridge River............................................................................................................. 60 4.3.1 - Evidence from Teit ............................................................................................................... 60 4.3.2 - Evidence from contemporary St'át'imc sources ................................................................... 65 4.3.3 - Evidence from archaeological sources ................................................................................. 67 4.4 - Hypotheses and test expectations ................................................................................................ 69 5 - Methods of analysis ........................................................................................................................... 72 5.1 - Skill indicators ............................................................................................................................ 75 5.2 - Creating a symmetry index ......................................................................................................... 77 5.3 - Mapping point location ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LITHIC ANALYSIS (01-070-391) Rutgers University Spring 2010
    SYLLABUS LITHIC ANALYSIS (01-070-391) Rutgers University Spring 2010 Lecture days/hours: Thursday, 2:15-5:15 PM Lecture location: BioSci 206, Douglass Campus Instructors: Dr. J.W.K. Harris J.S. Reti, MA [email protected] [email protected] Office: BioSci, Room 203B Office: BioSci, Room 204C Office Hours: Friday 11:00 – 1:00 Office Hours: Thursday 1:00 – 3:00 COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course is an integrated course that incorporates theoretical, behavioral, and practical aspects of lithic technology. Lithic Analysis is an advanced undergraduate course in human and non-human primate stone technology. Each student is expected to already have taken an introductory course in human evolution, primatology, and/or archaeology. Lithic Analysis is a sub-discipline of archaeology. The focus is on the inferential potential of stone tools with regard to human behavior. Early human ancestors first realized the utility of sharp stone edges for butchery and other practices. Arguably, without the advent of stone tools human evolution would have taken a different path. Stone tools allowed early hominins efficient access to meat resources and provided as avenue for cognitive development and three-dimensional problem solving. This course will provide a three-fold approach to lithic analysis: 1) study of archaeological sites and behavioral change through time relative to lithic technological changes, 2) insight into the art of laboratory lithic analysis and methods employed to attain concrete, quantitative behavioral conclusions, and 3) extensive training in stone tool replication. Such training will provide students with both an appreciation for the skills of our ancestors and with personal skills that will allow for further research into replication and human behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 34, Nos. 1 and 2 Massachusetts Archaeological Society
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Journals and Campus Publications Society 1-1973 Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 34, Nos. 1 and 2 Massachusetts Archaeological Society Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/bmas Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Copyright © 1973 Massachusetts Archaeological Society This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. BULLETIN OF THE MASSACI-IUSETTS ARCI-IAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOL. 34 NOS. 1 and 2 OCTOBER 1972 - JANUARY 1973 CONTENTS BULL BROOK: A PALEO COMPLEX SITE Page WD..LIAM S. FOWLER -- -- 1 THE CATTAIL CREEK FLUTING TRADITION FLOYD PAINTER __ __ __ 6 POSSIBLE PALEO-INDIAN MIGRATION ROUTES IN THE NORTHEAST HAROLD W. BORNS, JR -- 13 PROJECTILE IMPORTS: HOW TO RECOGNIZE THEM WILLIAM S. FoWLER 16 SEAVER FARM SALVAGE EXCAVATION WD..LIAM B. TAYLOR 24 RESTORING ARTIFACTS WILLIAM S. FOWLER 29 PUBUSHED BY THE MASSACHUSmS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. SOCIETY OFFICE, Bronson Museum, 8 No. Main Street, Attleboro. Mass. MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS President Ralph Bates 42 Leonard Street, Bridgewater, Mass. 02324 First Vice President Josephine Laugelli 219 Beechwood Street, Cohassett, Mass. 02025 Second Vice President Ross W. McCurdy 9 Manchester Street, Attleboro, Mass. 02703 Corresponding Secretary George S. Gibb 597 North. Main Street, Attleboro, Mass. 02703 Recording Secretary Jean-Jacques Rivard 1117 Boylston Street, Brookline, Mass. 02167 Financial Secretary Mabel A. Robbins 23 Steere Street, Attleboro, Mass. 02703 Treasurer Eleanor W. Athearn 5105 North Main Street, Fall River, Mass. 02720 Editor William S. Fowler Bronson Museum, Attleboro, Mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector Candidate Qualifications
    Inspector Candidate Qualifications Before you submit your questionnaire, please review the following information regarding our qualifications. You must first be approved (meet our qualifications) before you are invited to our Certification Training. Inspection Experience: You must have solely conducted the minimum of at least 250 number of commercial and/or residential inspections in which you were required to independently document the finding in a written report and to assess the physical condition of building and building systems including the roof, foundation, exterior walls, interior walls, electrical systems, mechanical systems, and all inspectable items associated with a multifamily commercial building. (This does not include termite inspections, appraisals, and site visits from property owners, managers, or real estate brokers.) * PLEASE NOTE THAT UNIT INSPECTIONS ARE NOT CONSIDERED AS A PROPERTY INSPECTION. Computer Skills: You must be able to perform the following: Emails: Send and receive messages Send an attached document with an e-mail Receive and open an attached document Access e-mails on a computer other than your primary computer Internet: Access a web site Search using a search engine tool Submit information to a web site successfully Download files and save them to a specific location on the computer Using Windows: Navigate in different folders Open and use multiple software applications at a time Create, copy, move, rename, and delete files and folders Install new software Use a computer to conduct inspections Technical Knowledge and/or General Knowledge in Residential and/or Commercial Building Trades The below list of major building trades used in commercial and residential construction, indicates those in which you must have technical knowledge or general knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Late Pleistocene and Holocene Stone Artefact Assemblages from Puritjarra Rock Shelter: a Long Sequence from the Australian Desert
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2006 Records of the Australian Museum (2006) Vol. 58: 371–410. ISSN 0067-1975 Characterizing Late Pleistocene and Holocene Stone Artefact Assemblages from Puritjarra Rock Shelter: A Long Sequence from the Australian Desert M.A. SMITH National Museum of Australia, GPO Box 1901, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. This paper presents the first detailed study of a large assemblage of late Pleistocene artefacts from the central desert. Analysis of the lithics shows show that Puritjarra rock shelter was used more intensively over time, with significant shifts in the character of occupation at 18,000, 7,500 and 800 B.P., reflecting significant re-organization of activities across the landscape. The same generalized flake and core technology appears to have been used for over 30 millennia with only limited change in artefact typology over this period. SMITH, M.A., 2006. Characterizing Late Pleistocene and Holocene stone artefact assemblages from Puritjarra rock shelter: a long sequence from the Australian Desert. Records of the Australian Museum 58(3): 371–410. Excavations at Puritjarra rock shelter provide a rare 2004). Ethno-archaeological studies involving the last opportunity to examine an assemblage of late Pleistocene generation of Aboriginal people to rely on stone artefacts artefacts from central Australia, dating as early as c. 32,000 have been very influential in this shift in perspective (Cane, B.P. This study presents a quantitative analysis of the flaked 1984, 1992; Gould, 1968; Gould et al., 1971; Hayden, 1977, stone artefacts at Puritjarra, comparing the Pleistocene and 1979; O’Connell, 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Lithic Raw Material Prospects in the Mojave Desert, California
    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Lithic Raw Material Prospects in the Mojave Desert, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8np7g12w Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 11(2) ISSN 0191-3557 Authors Wilke, Philip J. Schroth, Adella B. Publication Date 1989-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 146-174 (1989). Lithic Raw Material Prospects in the Mojave Desert, California PHILIP J. WILKE and ADELLA B. SCHROTH, Dept. of Anthropology, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521. A HIS paper discusses lithic raw material THEORETICAL BACKGROUND prospects (or simply "prospects"), places where potentially flakeable tool stone was Acquisition of tool stone by aboriginal assayed or tested for quality. It characterizes peoples was an industry that in terms of scale this site type and contrasts it with quarries, varied greatly from one situation to another. places where stone was obtained consistently The large and well-known quarries of the and in quantity, and places where stone was western United States represent one end of picked up, used, and discarded with little the spectrum. These include the AUbates modification. We believe prospects represent silicified dolomite quarries, Texas; Spanish a major archaeological site type that has re­ Diggings quartzite quarries, Wyoming; ceived inadequate attention in the literature. Tosawihi opalite quarries, Nevada; and Casa We describe here a prospect site (CA- Diablo and Coso obsidian quarries, California, SBr-5872), characterize its assemblage, and to name a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Ra Ising the Ba R
    12 Ra ising the Ba r Lithic Analysis and Archaeological Research in the Southeast William Andrefsky Jr. When I was asked to provide comments on the collection of lithic analysis pa- pers presented at the Southeastern Archaeological Conference (included within this volume), I did not realize the extent to which lithic tools and debitage had been overlooked in the region as a medium for interpreting past aboriginal practices and behaviors. According to the session abstract, the goal of the lithic symposium and this volume is to highlight contemporary methods and theory in lithic analysis to encourage researchers in the Southeast to integrate lithic data into their site interpretations. After a quick perusal of the literature for the region, it was apparent that very few Southeast lithics-related publications have appeared in the national peer-reviewed literature (Daniel2001; Shott and Ballenger 2007); slightly more lithic research occurs in regional journal venues (Carr and Bradbury 2000; Franklin and Simek 2008; Peacock 2004); and other contributions are found in edited volumes not necessarily focused specifically on lithics in the region (Anderson and Sassaman 1996; Carr 1994a; Henry and Odell1989; Johnson and Morrow 1987). Similar to the case of Mesoamerica and the American Southwest, there is a relatively low proportion of lithics- based research relative to ceramics and architecture. Such a trend comes as a surprise to me. However, I have been hooked on stone tool technology since the sixth grade when I first began looking at Louis Leakey's Oldowan pebble tools and wondering whether the broken cobbles in my local creek could have been made by Australopithecus.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch. 4. NEOLITHIC PERIOD in JORDAN 25 4.1
    Borsa di studio finanziata da: Ministero degli Affari Esteri di Italia Thanks all …………. I will be glad to give my theses with all my love to my father and mother, all my brothers for their helps since I came to Italy until I got this degree. I am glad because I am one of Dr. Ursula Thun Hohenstein students. I would like to thanks her to her help and support during my research. I would like to thanks Dr.. Maysoon AlNahar and the Museum of the University of Jordan stuff for their help during my work in Jordan. I would like to thank all of Prof. Perreto Carlo and Prof. Benedetto Sala, Dr. Arzarello Marta and all my professors in the University of Ferrara for their support and help during my Phd Research. During my study in Italy I met a lot of friends and specially my colleges in the University of Ferrara. I would like to thanks all for their help and support during these years. Finally I would like to thanks the Minister of Fournier of Italy, Embassy of Italy in Jordan and the University of Ferrara institute for higher studies (IUSS) to fund my PhD research. CONTENTS Ch. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Ch. 2. AIMS OF THE RESEARCH 3 Ch. 3. NEOLITHIC PERIOD IN NEAR EAST 5 3.1. Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) in Near east 5 3.2. Pre-pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) in Near east 10 3.2.A. Early PPNB 10 3.2.B. Middle PPNB 13 3.2.C. Late PPNB 15 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Micro Flint-Knapping by Craig Libuse
    Micro Flint-Knapping by Craig Libuse Scaling traditional techniques to extremely small sizes Dan White (pictured) has been able to create his own form of art, based on what was one of the first forms of art—flint-knapping (shaping stone by breaking off chips). He calls it "micro-knapping". Prehistoric cultures learned early on that flint could be chipped to create sharp edges for knives, arrow and spear tips. The ability to make quality points was critical, as it meant the difference between eating and going hungry. Shape and size varied widely based on use and culture, but the technique has changed very little in thousands of years. Old points are popular among collectors, and some modern craftsmen have taken to duplicating the ancient techniques, but Dan has taken it to the extreme small end of the size scale. Over the last few years Dan has made over 100 miniature stone arrowheads. He uses a stereo microscope to reproduce the stone-age technology of flint-knapping in miniature. After months of experimenting, headaches, and stabbing himself in the fingers, he has been able to develop a technique where he can make miniature stone arrowheads the size of a grain of rice that have all the same proportions and flaking as the full-size originals. Each miniature takes between 1 and 2 hours to complete. Tools of a new micro-trade His tool kit consists of a thick rubber pad, a fine grinding stone, various size small nails/pins for use as pressure flakers and Scotch tape. (He must wrap his finger 4 or 5 times with tape to prevent the smaller nails from stabbing him while flaking).
    [Show full text]
  • Skill and Cognition in Stone Tool Production F 695
    Current Anthropology Volume 43, Number 5, December 2002 ᭧ 2002 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved 0011-3204/2002/4305-0001$3.00 Assessing mental activity from the material residues of Skill and Cognition in behavior is a central problem for archaeologists working in any time period. In the case of Paleolithic archaeology, the endeavor is further weighted with evolutionary im- Stone Tool Production plications (e.g., Holloway 1969, Parker and Gibson 1979, Isaac 1986, Wynn 1993, Gowlett 1996, Ambrose 2001). Because of their persistence in the archaeological record An Ethnographic Case Study and because they provide evidence of individual tech- nical acts, knapped stone artifacts are commonly used from Irian Jaya1 as a source of information about prehistoric and pre- modern mental abilities. Although stone tools do not necessarily provide evidence of the full range of their makers’ mental abilities, they do indicate certain min- by Dietrich Stout imum required competences (Gowlett 1996). In order to assess these competences, we must ultimately rely upon models developed from actualistic research in the mod- ern world. Since it is impossible to observe the evolving Stone tools represent some of the best remaining evidence of pre- technological behaviors of extinct hominid species di- historic behavior and cognition. Interpreting this evidence prop- rectly, our reconstructions should at least be able to draw erly requires models based on observable phenomena in the mod- upon an understanding of the modern human condition. ern world. For this reason, ethnographic research was undertaken In order to contribute to the development of such among the adze makers of the village of Langda in Indonesian Irian Jaya.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Alberta
    University of Alberta A typological and technological analysis of stone artefacts from the Magubike archaeological site, Iringa Region, southern Tanzania by Katharine Virginia Alexander A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Anthropology ©Katharine Alexander Fall 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-68050-6 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-68050-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing with the Time. Experimental Archaeology and the Study of the Past
    PLAYING WITH THE TIME. EXPERIMENTAL ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE STUDY OF THE PAST Editors: Rodrigo Alonso, Javier Baena & David Canales 4th. International Experimental Archaeology Conference 8-11 may 2014, Museo de la Evolución Huma. Burgos, Spain. Experimenta (the Spanish Experimental Archaeology Association) is a non-profit association created, among other proposes, to organize international experimental archaeology conferences. Previous conferences were successively held in Santander (2005), Ronda (2008) and Banyoles (2011). Organization Scientific committee Experimenta (Asociación española de Arqueología Experimental) Carlos Díez (Universidad de Burgos) Museo de la Evolución Humana, Junta de Castilla y León Marta Navazo(Universidad de Burgos) Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Ángel Carrancho (Universidad de Burgos) EXARC José A. Rodriguez Marcos (Universidad de Burgos) Diego Arceredillo (Fundación Atapuerca) Cooperación institutions Marcos Terradillos (Fundación Atapuerca) Fundación Atapuerca Millán Mozota (Institut Milá i Fontanals, CSIC) Universidad de Burgos Xavier Terradas (Institut Milá i Fontanals, CSIC) Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - IMF, Barcelona Ignacio Clemente (Institut Milá i Fontanals, CSIC) Asociación Española para el Estudio del Cuaternaro (AEQUA) Antonio Morgado (Universidad de Granada) Gema Chacón (Institut de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social) Organizing committee Josep Maria Verges (Institut de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social) Alejandro Sarmiento (Museo de la Evolución Humana, Junta de Castilla
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    2016 Annual Report Board of Trustees Contents Message from the director 7 MANAGEMENT 9 About us: Big general data for 2016 11 Staff 14 Scientific Advisory Board 19 RESEARCH 21 Research Groups 23 Research Projects Hosted by IPHES 29 Research Projects not Hosted by IPHES 33 Research Fellowships 37 Publications 40 Activity as Referee 54 Fieldwork activity 58 Congresses, workshops & seminars 63 Short-term stay at other research centers 79 ACADEMY 83 Degrees and Doctoral Programme 85 PhD Thesis supervised and defended 87 Master Thesis supervised and defended 89 Participation in assessment Committees to evaluate PhD 93 OUTREACH 95 Conferences and talks 97 Outreach publications 104 Science education 105 Management of exhibitions 107 Participatory activities 109 Didactic contents and materials 109 Science Communication 110 KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER & SERVICES 117 2016 Message from the director Robert Sala, IPHES director/IPHES theless they still need an increase in st It is for me a pleasure to introduce the number of papers within the 1 the 2016 Annual Report of Activ- quartile. After accomplishing with ities of the Catalan Institute of Hu- good absolute figures is time for our man Palaeoecology and Social institute to gain the relative score in Evolution. IPHES is a mature institute excellence and increase our cur- st hosting very active research teams rent 31.8% of 1 quartile papers. devoted to the creation and social- isation of knowledge on the human The visibility of the research of an in- evolutionary process in all its dimen- stitute can be also measured by its sions and framework. The scientific presence in the main international activity of our institute is currently congresses.
    [Show full text]