DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Report 4.11: Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Report 4.11: Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report Technical Report 4.11: Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report Water Management Resources Plan 2020-2080 March 2020 Page intentionally left blank Security Notice This Document is classified as official sensitive in accordance with the Security and Emergency Measures Directive as it includes specific location details of public water supply sources. This document is only reviewed by designated persons and must not be disclosed or published to third parties or placed on a website. A redacted version of this document is available for publication. This page left intentionally blank Affinity Water Draft Final Water Resources Management Plan 2019: Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report Project Number: 60344725 May 2019 fWRMP19 Environmental Report Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Alastair Peattie Steve Smith Steve Smith Associate Director Technical Director Technical Director Graham McGrath Assistant Consultant Rosie Cox Environmental Planner Cheryl Beattie Environmental Planner Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position 1.0 10 October 2017 Draft for internal review Alastair Peattie Principal Consultant 2.0 16 October 2017 Updated to reflect receipt of Alastair Peattie Principal Consultant preferred plan & alternative plan 3.0 24 October 2017 Draft for client review Alastair Peattie Principal Consultant 4.0 02 November 2017 Draft following initial client Alastair Peattie Principal Consultant review 5.0 12 November 2017 Revised final draft following Alastair Peattie Principal Consultant amendments to the dWRMP19 6.0 14 November 2017 Revised final draft following Alastair Peattie Principal Consultant further client review 7.0 24 November 2017 Revised final for consultation Alastair Peattie Principal Consultant alongside the dWRMP19 8.0 26 February 2018 Revised following Alastair Peattie Principal Consultant communications with key stakeholders 9.0 21 January 2019 Revised to reflect Alastair Peattie Associate Director consultation responses and the revised draft WRMP 10.0 14 February 2019 Revised to reflect QA Alastair Peattie Associate Director comments 11.0 18 February 2019 Revised to reflect further QA Alastair Peattie Associate Director comments 12.0 26 February 2019 Revised to reflect legal Alastair Peattie Associate Director review 13.0 17 May 2019 Revised to reflect Alastair Peattie Associate Director consultation responses and the fWRMP19 14.0 24 May 2019 Revised to reflect QA Alastair Peattie Associate Director comments AECOM fWRMP19 Environmental Report Prepared for: Affinity Water, Tamblin Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9EZ Prepared by: AECOM Limited 3rd Floor Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA UK T: +44 117 901 7000 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. AECOM fWRMP19 Environmental Report THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK AECOM fWRMP19 Environmental Report Table of Contents Glossary ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... i 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 What is SEA? ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Compliance with other environmental legislation .......................................................... 4 1.3 Purpose and structure of this Environmental Report .................................................... 5 2. The Water Resource Management Plan ................................................................................. 6 2.1 Introduction to Affinity Water ......................................................................................... 6 2.2 About the WRMP .......................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Development of the WRMP19 .................................................................................... 10 2.4 Sustainability reductions ............................................................................................. 10 3. Scoping Information .............................................................................................................. 11 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Consultation on the scope .......................................................................................... 11 3.3 Spatial scope ............................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Temporal scope ........................................................................................................... 11 3.5 Key issues ................................................................................................................... 12 3.6 SEA objectives ............................................................................................................ 13 4. SEA of Options ....................................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 15 4.2 Unconstrained options ................................................................................................ 15 4.3 Constrained options .................................................................................................... 18 5. SEA of the Alternative Programmes and final WRMP19 Decision Making ...................... 34 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 34 5.2 Affinity Water’s Decision Making Process ................................................................... 34 5.3 Identifying reasonable alternative programmes .......................................................... 40 5.4 SEA of reasonable alternative programmes for the final WRMP19 ............................ 43 5.5 Outline reasons for the selection and rejection of reasonable alternative programmes .............................................................................................................. 141 6. Summary findings for the final WRMP19 ........................................................................... 144 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 144 6.2 The final WRMP19 .................................................................................................... 144 6.1 HRA findings ............................................................................................................. 153 6.2 WFD assessment findings ........................................................................................ 155 6.3 SEA findings .............................................................................................................. 155 7. Cumulative Effects of the final WRMP19 with other Plans, Programmes and Projects ................................................................................................................................. 179 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 179 7.2 Other Affinity Water Plans ......................................................................................... 179 7.3 Other WRMPs ........................................................................................................... 181 7.4 Other Drought Plans ................................................................................................. 183 AECOM fWRMP19 Environmental Report 7.5 Other plans and programmes ................................................................................... 183 7.6 Summary of cumulative effects assessment............................................................. 187 8. Mitigation and areas for further investigation .................................................................. 190 8.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 190 8.2 Mitigation measures and areas for further investigation ........................................... 190 9. Next steps and monitoring .................................................................................................. 196 9.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Main Report Issue No. 1
    Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Main Report Issue No. 1 Project Owner: Alison Murphy Project Manager: Tom Kelly August 2019 SES Water WRMP 2019 Document Revision History Rev Purpose Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Initial draft for Director 1 AM AM TK TK 24/8/18 Approval Final draft for submission 2 AM AM TK TK 3/9/18 – Issue 1 Revised to include Defra 3 further information AM AM TK TK 6/5/19 requests – Issue 2 Final plan – authorisation 4 AM AM TK TK 20/8/19 to publish given by Defra Final Plan Page 2 of 112 20 August 2019 SES Water WRMP 2019 Security Statement This statement is to certify that this plan does not contain any information that would compromise national security interests. It also does not contain any information that may be considered commercially confidential. No information been excluded from this plan on these grounds. Final Plan Page 3 of 112 20 August 2019 SES Water WRMP 2019 Contents 1.0 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ................................ ................................ .................... 6 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 8 2.1 Overview of the Water Resources Management Plan Process ..................... 8 2.2 Our supply area ................................................................................................ 9 2.3 Links to other plans ........................................................................................10 2.4 Water Resources in the South East Group ...................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Charges in 2021-22 and CMA Redeterminations
    Centre City Tower, 7 Hill Street, Birmingham B5 4UA 21 Bloomsbury Street, London WC1B 3HF By email Anglian Water, Bristol Water, Northumbrian Water and Yorkshire Water Business retailers NAVs MOSL CCW Other parties 8 January 2021 Dear stakeholder Charges in 2021-22 and CMA redeterminations This letter sets out our view on the appropriate approach to making adjustments to normal charging arrangements to support the implementation of the CMA redeterminations for the four disputing companies. We are setting this out now to facilitate company statements on significant changes in charges which are due to be published on 11 January 2021 and wholesale charges which are due to be published on 13 January 2021. Four companies: Anglian Water, Bristol Water, Northumbrian Water and Yorkshire Water have asked the CMA for a redetermination of their price controls for the 2020-25 period. Following a request from three of the disputing companies for amendments to the charging rules to allow implementation of the CMA’s redetermination, my letter of 21 December 2020 consulted on the practical consequences and impact of making an accommodation under our normal charging rules with respect to three options for the implementation of the CMA’s redetermination: Implementation of changes over 4 years from 1 April 2021, which three of the four disputing companies (Anglian Water, Bristol Water and Northumbrian Water) suggested would be possible if the CMA issued its redetermination no later than the week commencing Monday, 8 February 2021 and Ofwat allowed them to publish 2021-22 charges no later than Friday, 19 February 2021. Implementation of changes during the 2021-22 charging year, which would allow charges to change during the charging year (potentially after six months) to reflect any differences in the price limits that the CMA sets such that the CMA’s price limits are smoothed over 3.5 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits Made Under S31(6) Highways Act 1980
    Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits made under s31(6) Highways Act 1980 and s15A(1) Commons Act 2006 For all enquiries about the contents of the Register please contact the: Public Rights of Way and Highway Records Manager email address: [email protected] Telephone No. 0345 603 7631 Highway Highway Commons Declaration Link to Unique Ref OS GRID Statement Statement Deeds Reg No. DISTRICT PARISH LAND DESCRIPTION POST CODES DEPOSITOR/LANDOWNER DEPOSIT DATE Expiry Date SUBMITTED REMARKS No. REFERENCES Deposit Date Deposit Date DEPOSIT (PART B) (PART D) (PART C) >Land to the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops Christopher James Harold Philpot of Stortford TL566209, C/PW To be CM22 6QA, CM22 Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton CA16 Form & 1252 Uttlesford Takeley >Land on the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops TL564205, 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated. 6TG, CM22 6ST Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4LN Plan Stortford TL567205 on behalf of Takeley Farming LLP >Land on east side of Station Road, Takeley, Bishops Stortford >Land at Newland Fann, Roxwell, Chelmsford >Boyton Hall Fa1m, Roxwell, CM1 4LN >Mashbury Church, Mashbury TL647127, >Part ofChignal Hall and Brittons Farm, Chignal St James, TL642122, Chelmsford TL640115, >Part of Boyton Hall Faim and Newland Hall Fann, Roxwell TL638110, >Leys House, Boyton Cross, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM I 4LP TL633100, Christopher James Harold Philpot of >4 Hill Farm Cottages, Bishops Stortford Road, Roxwell, CMI 4LJ TL626098, Roxwell, Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton C/PW To be >10 to 12 (inclusive) Boyton Hall Lane, Roxwell, CM1 4LW TL647107, CM1 4LN, CM1 4LP, CA16 Form & 1251 Chelmsford Mashbury, Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM14 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • Harlow District Council Local Wildlife Site Review
    HARLOW DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE REVIEW 2010 FINAL March 2011 EECOS Abbotts Hall Farm, Great Wigborough, Colchester, Essex, CO5 7RZ 01621 862986, [email protected] Company Registered No. 2853947 VAT Registered No. 945 7459 77 IMPORTANT NOTES Nomenclature The terms "Site of Importance for Nature Conservation" (SINC), “Wildlife Sites” and “County Wildlife Site” (CoWS) used in previous reports are here replaced by the currently generally accepted term of “Local Wildlife Site” (LoWS). The term should be viewed in a national context, with “Local” referring to county level significance. Rationale It is hoped that this identification of Local Wildlife Sites is not seen as a hindrance to the livelihood of those landowners affected, or an attempt to blindly influence the management of such sites. It is an attempt to describe the wildlife resource we have in the county as a whole, which has been preserved thus far as a result of the management by landowners. The Essex Wildlife Trust and the Local and Unitary Authorities of Essex hope to be able to help landowners retain and enhance this biodiversity for the future. In recent years, the existence of a Local Wildlife Site on a farm has been seen as an advantage when applying for grant-aid from agri-environment schemes, with such grants favouring areas with a proven nature conservation interest. Public Access Identification as a Local Wildlife Site within this report does not confer any right of public access to the site, above and beyond any Public Rights of Way that may exist. The vast majority of the Sites in the county are in private ownership and this should be respected at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • AFW Delivering Outcomes for Customers Appendices
    AFW Delivering Outcomes for Customers Appendices March 2019 AFW Delivering Outcomes for Customers Appendices 3 Contents Appendix Action ref(s) OC.A1.1 PR19 resilience & environmental bespoke AFW.OC.A1, A2, A3, A36 commitments working group minutes (Nov 17) OC.A1.2 CCG update on bespoke commitments (13 Dec AFW.OC.A1, A2, A3 17) OC.A1.3 PR19 SteerCo: Bespoke Commitments AFW.OC.A1, A2, A3 Resilience Paper (Feb 18) OC.A1.4 Atkins Technical Assurance Report March 2019 AFW.OC.A1, A2, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10, A11, A12, A13, A14, A15, A16, A17, A18, A19, A20, A21, A23, A24, A25, A26, A27, A28, A29, A30, A31, A36, A37, A38, A39, A40, A41, A42, A43, A45, A46, A47, A48 OC.A1.5 Verve customer research report March 2019 AFW.OC.A1, A12, A43 OC.A1.6 Cyber Security and Resilience PC Definition AFW.OC.A1 OC.A2.1 Ofwat, “Delivering Water 2020: consultation on AFW.OC.A2 PR19 methodology, Appendix 3: Outcomes technical definitions”, 11 July 2017 OC.A3.1 Supplementary report to Ofwat from the Affinity AFW.OC.A3, A33, A35 Water Customer Challenge Group (29 March 2019) OC.A4.1 Ofwat, “Technical Appendix 1: delivering AFW.OC.A4, A10, A13, A14, A15, outcomes for customers” Jan 2019, page 28 A20, A23, A25 OC.A11.1 rdWRMP Atkins report AFW.OC.A11, A19 OC.A11.2 NERA Economic Consulting - Assessing AFW.OC.A11 Ofwat’s Funding and Incentive Targets for Leakage Reduction OC.A12.1 Leakage customer engagement evidence AFW.OC.A12 OC.A19.1 Drought resilience matrix AFW.OC.A19 OC.A32.1 SMS feedback analysis (PC2) AFW.OC.A32, A34 OC.A32.2 Financially vulnerable by channel
    [Show full text]
  • Help with Payment Problems
    Help with payment problems Advice and information We’re here to help If you are having problems paying your water bill, please get in touch with us as soon as possible. We understand that some customers can have difficulties and we are always ready to help. This leaflet explains how we and other agencies can offer advice and solutions if you are having payment issues. Our advisers will discuss We promise not payment arrangements to take action if: with you and look at ways to reduce your water bill. You follow the • guidance in This leaflet is one of a group this leaflet of leaflets which forms our Code of Practice and is • And you make All calls are confidential approved by our regulator a payment and our friendly staff will Ofwat. arrangement offer simple and helpful and keep to it. advice especially for you, You should also get in so don’t be afraid to pick touch if you don’t think you up the phone and call us on are responsible for paying 0800 697 982. the water bill, or if you disagree with the amount you have been charged. 2 Help with payment problems Ways to reduce your water bill Saving water Low Income Tariff (LIFT) Fit a water meter We want to help you reduce If your annual household It may be possible to reduce the amount of water you income is less than £16,105£16,010 the amount you pay for use. We offer advice and or you are in receipt of water in the future by free water saving products housing benefit or Income having a meter fitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at West Sumners Harlow Design Vision Document
    LAND AT WEST SUMNERS HARLOW DESIGN VISION DOCUMENT JANUARY 2018 HARLOW WEST / VISION DOCUMENT 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CONTENTS ........................................................ 2 Epping Forest District Council, Harlow Council and East STRATEGIC MASTERPLAN Hertfordshire Council are working in partnership together with INTRODUCTION ................................................. 2 The draft Local Plan expects development proposals for sites all stakeholders including land owners and promoters, to bring within the Garden Town communities to be in general conformity RELEVANT PLANNING POLICIES .......................... 3 forward transformational growth in the form of Harlow and Gilston with a Strategic Masterplan endorsed by Epping Forest District Garden Town. Council and where appropriate Harlow District Council. The ALLOCATION SITE CHARACTERISTICS ................. 4 The proposed approach to the delivery of the Garden Town means preparation of a single Strategic Masterplan for the Water Lane WEST SUMNERS SITE ......................................... 5 that the new communities will not only provide a long-term supply community is expected in order to ensure that the area is planned of new homes, but will also deliver a quality of development, and developed in a co-ordinated and cohesive manner. SITE PHOTOS .................................................... 6 environment, infrastructure, services and community that would not Whilst the land parcels comprising the Water Lane Area share CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Water Everywhere?
    Water, water everywhere? Delivering resilient water & waste water services (2018-19) Overview Key Highlights The amount of time that consumers were extent to which metering is encouraging In this report we present water and/ left without water reduced by 39.9% in consumers to reduce their water use. or sewerage companies’ (referred to as 2018-19. Although this appears to be a companies) performance in 2018-19 in significant reduction, the starting point It is good to see a reduction in sewer the key service areas that can have a big was much higher due to the widespread flooding, both inside and outside impact on consumers. The report identifies supply interruptions experienced during the home. However, any flooding is poor performing companies, as well as the ‘Beast from the East’ and Storm Emma unacceptable to customers and so good practice that can be shared across in early 2018. Looking back prior to this companies still have more to do in the industry. The data contained within incident, supply interruptions have in this area. We were disappointed to this report has been supplied directly to us fact increased by 21.8% since 2016-17. see the disbanding of the 21st Century by companies, unless otherwise stated. All We, therefore, question what has been Drainage Board and hope that the company specific data is included in the learnt from this incident and emphasise work started on sewer misuse can appendices of this report for reference. the importance for companies to learn continue through different channels. from these experiences. Companies must recognise the need to plan for extremes For water quality in England, the figure in our weather or one-off events, which for public water supply compliance are becoming more common due to with the EU Drinking Water Directive climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Regional Water Resource Solutions: Preliminary Feasibility Assessment Gate One Submission for South East Strategic R
    Strategic regional water resource solutions: Preliminary feasibility assessment Gate one submission for South East Strategic Reservoir Option (SESRO) Date: 5th July 2021 Template version: draft 10, 9 February 2021 Note: visualisation of SESRO conceptual design 1 Contents 1. Executive summary 1 2. Solution description 3 3. Outline project plan 6 4. Technical information 10 5. Environmental and drinking water quality considerations 14 6. Initial outline of procurement and operation strategy 20 7. Planning considerations 23 8. Customer and stakeholder engagement 24 9. Key risks and mitigation measures 27 10. Option cost/benefits comparison 29 11. Impacts on current plan 32 12. Board statement and assurance 33 13. Solution or partner changes 34 14. Efficient spend of gate allowance 34 15. Proposed Gate 2 activities and outcomes 38 16. Conclusions and recommendations 39 Glossary Scheme Partners Affinity Water and Thames Water Abbreviations AA Appropriate Assessment (under the Habitats Regulations Assessment) ACWG All Company Working Group AFW Affinity Water AIC Average Incremental Cost AOD Above Ordinance Datum AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty BNG Biodiversity Net Gain BNL Biodiversity Net Loss CCW Consumer Council for Water CPO Compulsory Purchase Order DAF Dissolved Air Flotation DCO Development Consent Order DNO Distribution Network Operator DPC Direct Procurement for Customers ECI Early Contractor Involvement ENCA Enabling a Natural Capital Approach GAC Granular Activated Carbon HRA Habitat Regulations Assessment ICA Instrumentation,
    [Show full text]
  • Affinity Water‒ Delivering Outcomes for Customers Final Decisions
    December 2019 Affinity Water‒ Delivering outcomes for customers final decisions www.ofwat.gov.uk PR19 final determinations: Affinity Water – Delivering outcomes for customers final decisions PR19 final determinations: Affinity Water – Delivering outcomes for customers final decisions In our draft determinations we published the ‘40TDelivering outcomes for customers actions and interventions40T’ document for each company. This document set out the actions from our initial assessment of plans, a summary of the company’s response to the action, our assessment of the company’s response, and the interventions we made as part of the draft determination. It also set out any interventions that did not result from an initial assessment of plans action, which we made as part of the draft determination. This final determination document sets out the decisions we make for the final determination in response to representations received on our draft determinations and any other changes for the final determination. Table 1 below sets out the draft determination decisions on performance commitments that were the subject of representations from the company, a summary of the company representation, our assessment and rationale for the final determination decision and our decisions for the final determination. Table 2 sets out the draft determination decisions on performance commitments that were the subject of representations from other stakeholders, a summary of the other stakeholder representations, our assessment and rationale for the final determination decision and our decisions for the final determination. Table 3 sets out any changes for the final determinations that are not resulting from representations received relating to the company. Each performance commitment has a unique reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Our Finances
    Understanding our finances November 2020 Contents Glossary of key Affinity Water at a glance 3 water industry terms Chief Financial Officer’s introduction 4 AMP – Asset Management Plan Ml/d – Megalitres per day PR – Periodic Review Our shareholders 5 The five-year price control period covered by The amount of water used in one day. The price determination process undertaken Understanding our group structure 6 a company’s Business Plan. AMP6 ran from One megalitre is equal to one million litres. by Ofwat ahead of each new AMP. The PR19 2015-20 and AMP7 runs from 2020-25. process has set price controls for AMP7. Our investment 7 MZC – Mean Zonal Compliance C-MeX – Customer Measure A measure of water quality compliance RCV – Regulatory Capital Value Understanding our borrowings 8 of Experience derived from monitoring samples taken The economic value of the regulated business, A measure of customer service levels used from customers’ taps. as determined by Ofwat’s price control regime. Understanding our bills 9 by Ofwat in AMP7. Our rewards and penalties 11 ODI – Outcome Delivery Incentive RORE – Return On Regulated Equity CCW – Consumer Council for Water The mechanism for financial rewards and A financial metric used by Ofwat to determine Understanding our executive remuneration 13 The regulator tasked with investigating penalties which underpins the Performance the profitability of the regulated company. customer complaints relating to service, Commitments submitted in a company’s Understanding our taxes 14 price and value for money. Business Plan. SIM – Service Incentive Mechanism Frequently asked questions 16 A measure of customer service levels used CRI – Compliance Risk Index Ofwat – Water Services by Ofwat in AMP6.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government and Society in Early Modern England: Hertfordshire and Essex, C
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2003 Local government and society in early modern England: Hertfordshire and Essex, C. 1590-- 1630 Jeffery R. Hankins Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Hankins, Jeffery R., "Local government and society in early modern England: Hertfordshire and Essex, C. 1590-- 1630" (2003). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 336. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/336 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SOCIETY IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND: HERTFORDSHIRE AND ESSEX, C. 1590--1630 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of History By Jeffery R. Hankins B.A., University of Texas at Austin, 1975 M.A., Southwest Texas State University, 1998 December 2003 Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Victor Stater for his guidance in this dissertation. Dr. Stater has always helped me to keep the larger picture in mind, which is invaluable when conducting a local government study such as this. He has also impressed upon me the importance of bringing out individual stories in history; this has contributed greatly to the interest and relevance of this study.
    [Show full text]