For-Profit Schools: the Student Recruitment Experience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For-Profit Schools: the Student Recruitment Experience S. HRG. 111–1160 FOR-PROFIT SCHOOLS: THE STUDENT RECRUITMENT EXPERIENCE HEARING OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON EXAMINING FOR-PROFIT SCHOOLS, FOCUSING ON THE STUDENT RE- CRUITMENT EXPERIENCE, AND UNDERCOVER TESTING TO OBSERVE MARKETING PRACTICES AUGUST 4, 2010 Printed for the use of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 78–780 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS TOM HARKIN, Iowa, Chairman CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee PATTY MURRAY, Washington RICHARD BURR, North Carolina JACK REED, Rhode Island JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia BERNARD SANDERS (I), Vermont JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah KAY R. HAGAN, North Carolina LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon TOM COBURN, M.D., Oklahoma AL FRANKEN, Minnesota PAT ROBERTS, Kansas MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado CARTE P. GOODWIN, West Virginia DANIEL E. SMITH, Staff Director PAMELA SMITH, Deputy Staff Director FRANK MACCHIAROLA, Republican Staff Director and Chief Counsel (II) CONTENTS STATEMENTS WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2010 Page Harkin, Hon. Tom, Chairman, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, opening statement ............................................................................... 1 Enzi, Hon. Michael B., a U.S. Senator from the State of Wyoming, opening statement .............................................................................................................. 3 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 6 Kutz, Gregory D., Managing Director, Forensic Audits and Special Investiga- tions, Government Accountability Office, Arlington, VA .................................. 10 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 13 Franken, Hon. Al, a U.S. Senator from the State of Minnesota .......................... 38 Isakson, Hon. Johnny, a U.S. Senator from the State of Georgia ....................... 40 Casey, Hon. Robert P., Jr., a U.S. Senator from the State of Pennsylvania ...... 42 Burr, Hon. Richard, a U.S. Senator from the State of North Carolina ............... 44 Goodwin, Hon. Carte P., a U.S. Senator from the State of West Virginia .......... 45 Mikulski, Hon. Barbara, a U.S. Senator from the State of Maryland ................ 47 Bennet, Hon. Michael F., a U.S. Senator from the State of Colorado ................. 50 Hawkins, David, Director of Public Policy and Research, National Association for College Admission Counseling, Arlington, VA ............................................. 52 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 54 McComis, Michale S., Ed.D., Executive Director, Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges, Arlington, VA ...................................................... 69 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 71 Pruyn, Joshua, Former Admissions Representative, Alta College, Inc., Denver, CO .......................................................................................................................... 81 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 83 Alexander, Hon. Lamar, a U.S. Senator from the State of Tennessee ................ 99 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL Statements, articles, publications, letters, etc.: Ingnorance by Degrees, article ........................................................................ 5 Senator Bennet ................................................................................................. 120 Response by Gregory D. Kutz to questions of: Senator Enzi .............................................................................................. 121 Senator Hagan ........................................................................................... 125 Senator Alexander ..................................................................................... 126 Response by David Hawkins to questions of: Senator Enzi .............................................................................................. 127 Senator Hagan ........................................................................................... 139 Senator Alexander ..................................................................................... 140 Response by Michale S. McComis, Ed.D. to questions of: Senator Enzi .............................................................................................. 141 Senator Hagan ........................................................................................... 146 Senator Alexander ..................................................................................... 148 (III) FOR-PROFIT SCHOOLS: THE STUDENT RECRUITMENT EXPERIENCE WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2010 U.S. SENATE, COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:03 a.m., in Room SD–106, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Tom Harkin, chair- man of the committee, presiding. Present: Senator Harkin, Mikulski, Casey, Hagan, Merkley, Franken, Bennet, Goodwin, Enzi, Alexander, Burr, and Isakson. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR HARKIN The CHAIRMAN. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions will come to order. This is the second in a series of hearings by this committee focus- ing on the growing Federal investment in for-profit colleges and universities. This industry has grown at an extraordinary pace. Over the last 10 years, enrollment has increased from 600,000 stu- dents to over 2 million students. Federal financial aid to students at for-profit colleges has ballooned from $4.6 billion a decade ago to more than $23 billion a year, today. The question is: What is driving the explosive growth in this industry? As you may know, I also chair the Appropriations Subcommittee that funds the Pell grant program. And CBO has given me some figures here that are quite startling. For example, in 2006, our obli- gation on Pell grants was $12,826,000,000. Last year, it was $26 billion, next year it will go to $30 billion—$30.6 billion that our Ap- propriations Committee will have to come up with just to fund the Pell grant program. And so, this explosive growth at a time where we have huge defi- cits, and we’re trying to get our budgets in order, causes us real concern. The question we have to ask with this explosive growth, and with CBO estimates that over the next 10 years we’ll spend somewhere close to $300 billion to $350 billion just on Pell grants, we have to ask the question, Are the students—and the U.S. tax- payers—getting a good value for the billions of taxpayers dollars they are investing in these for-profit schools? In our first hearing, in June, this committee heard testimony from witnesses about the pressures for for-profit companies to re- lentlessly enroll more students in order to increase profits and, in the case of publicly traded companies, to meet the expectations of (1) 2 investors. The committee issued a report showing that, in order to boost recruitment, many publicly traded for-profit schools spend huge sums of title IV dollars. Title IV dollars, which are taxpayer dollars. They spend a huge amount on TV advertisements, bill- boards, phone solicitations, and Web marketing, and as we shall see shortly, an aggressive sales staff. According to the Chairman’s report, an analysis of the eight pub- licly traded schools shows that, on average, they spend 31 percent of revenues on recruiting and marketing. Thirty-one percent. This spending by for-profit schools sets them radically apart from other colleges. By contrast, community colleges typically spend just 1 or 2 percent on marketing; a tiny fraction of the money spent by publicly traded for-profits. However numbers only tell a part of the story. Much can be re- vealed, too, by the experience that students, who are perhaps the first in their family to go to college, have when they sit down to talk to a recruiter or admissions officer. That is why I asked the Government Accountability Office to investigate this key encounter during the recruitment process at for-profit institutions. GAO’s findings make it disturbingly clear that abuses in for-prof- it recruiting are not limited to a few rogue recruiters or even a few schools with lax oversight. To the contrary, the evidence points to a problem that is systemic to the for-profit industry: a recruitment process specifically designed to do whatever it takes to drive up en- rollment numbers, more often than not to the disadvantage of stu- dents. There is a cruel irony, here, that deserves special focus. One os- tensibly admirable aspect of for-profit colleges is that they seek out and enroll large numbers of minority and low-income students, of- fering them opportunities they might not have. In choosing to en- roll in a for-profit college,
Recommended publications
  • Certified School List MM-DD-YY.Xlsx
    Updated SEVP Certified Schools January 26, 2017 SCHOOL NAME CAMPUS NAME F M CITY ST CAMPUS ID "I Am" School Inc. "I Am" School Inc. Y N Mount Shasta CA 41789 ‐ A ‐ A F International School of Languages Inc. Monroe County Community College Y N Monroe MI 135501 A F International School of Languages Inc. Monroe SH Y N North Hills CA 180718 A. T. Still University of Health Sciences Lipscomb Academy Y N Nashville TN 434743 Aaron School Southeastern Baptist Theological Y N Wake Forest NC 5594 Aaron School Southeastern Bible College Y N Birmingham AL 1110 ABC Beauty Academy, INC. South University ‐ Savannah Y N Savannah GA 10841 ABC Beauty Academy, LLC Glynn County School Administrative Y N Brunswick GA 61664 Abcott Institute Ivy Tech Community College ‐ Y Y Terre Haute IN 6050 Aberdeen School District 6‐1 WATSON SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL Y N COLD SPRING NY 8094 Abiding Savior Lutheran School Milford High School Y N Highland MI 23075 Abilene Christian Schools German International School Y N Allston MA 99359 Abilene Christian University Gesu (Catholic School) Y N Detroit MI 146200 Abington Friends School St. Bernard's Academy Y N Eureka CA 25239 Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College Airlink LLC N Y Waterville ME 1721944 Abraham Joshua Heschel School South‐Doyle High School Y N Knoxville TN 184190 ABT Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis School South Georgia State College Y N Douglas GA 4016 Abundant Life Christian School ELS Language Centers Dallas Y N Richardson TX 190950 ABX Air, Inc. Frederick KC Price III Christian Y N Los Angeles CA 389244 Acaciawood School Mid‐State Technical College ‐ MF Y Y Marshfield WI 31309 Academe of the Oaks Argosy University/Twin Cities Y N Eagan MN 7169 Academia Language School Kaplan University Y Y Lincoln NE 7068 Academic High School Ogden‐Hinckley Airport Y Y Ogden UT 553646 Academic High School Ogeechee Technical College Y Y Statesboro GA 3367 Academy at Charlemont, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the American Arbitration Association Denver, Colorado
    BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION DENVER, COLORADO MICHAEL MENSCH, an individual; TYRONE BAILEY, an individual; JESSICA ROSALES, an individual; COURTLAND WALKER, an individual; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Claimants, CLASS ARBITRATION ALTA COLLEGES, INC., a Delaware corporation; WESTWOOD COLLEGE, INC., a Colorado Corporation, TRAV CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation d/b/a Westwood College and Westwood College Online, GRANT CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation d/b/a Westwood College, WESGRAY CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation d/b/a Westwood College, EL NELL, INC., a Colorado corporation d/b/a Westwood College, PARIS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a Delaware corporation d/b/a Redstone College, ELBERT, INC., a Colorado corporation d/b/a Westwood College, and BOUNTY ISLAND CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation formerly d/b/a Redstone College, Respondents. ___________________________________ DEMAND FOR CLASS ACTION ARBITRATION Plaintiffs, Michael Mensch, Tyrone Bailey, Jessica Rosales and Courtland Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, demand class arbitration of this dispute with Alta Colleges, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Westwood Colleges, Inc., a Colorado corporation, TRAV Corporation, a Colorado corporation, Grant Corporation, a Colorado corporation, Wesgray Corporation, a Colorado corporation, El Nell, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Paris Management Company, a Delaware corporation, Elbert, Inc., a Colorado corporation, and Bounty Island Corporation, a Delaware corporation, for unlawful, deceptive and misleading practices in the state of Colorado, and for violations of state law as more fully defined and discussed within. 1 NATURE OF THE CASE Respondents, through their institutions of Westwood College, Westwood College Online and Redstone College (collectively “Westwood College” or “Westwood”) have perfected the art of playing on the hopes and dreams of vulnerable students who are in a desperate search for a better life.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Catalog 2019 - 2020
    COURSE CATALOG 2019 - 2020 mc3.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS COLLEGE FACULTY AND STAFF.................................................................................................2 1 COLLEGE FACULTY AND STAFF Cheryl L. Dilanzo, R.T. (R), Director of Radiography B.S. Thomas Jefferson University M.S. University of Pennsylvania Therol Dix, Dean of Arts and Humanities COLLEGE FACULTY B.A. University of California, Los AngelesM.A. University of Pennsylvania J.D. Georgetown University AND STAFF Bethany Eisenhart, Part-Time Career Coach ADMINISTRATION B.S. DeSales University Kimberly Erdman, Director of Dental Hygiene A.A.S., B.S. Pennsylvania College of Technology Office of the President M.S. University of Bridgeport Victoria L. Bastecki-Perez, President Katina Faulk, Administrative Director for Academic Initiatives D.H. University of Pittsburgh A.S., B.S. Pennsylvania College of Technology B.S. Edinboro University of Pennsylvania M.B.A. Excelsior College M.Ed, Ed.D. University of Pittsburgh Gaetan Giannini, Dean of Business and Entrepreneurial Initiatives Candy K. Basile, Administrative Support Secretary B.S. Temple University A.A.S. Montgomery County Community College M.B.A. Seton Hall University Deborah Rogers, Executive Assistant to the College’s Board of Trustees Ed.D. Gwynedd Mercy University A.A.S. Montgomery County Community College Suzanne Vargus Holloman, WIF Grant Project Director B.S. Syracuse University Academic Affairs M.B.A. Drexel University Gloria Oikelome, Interim Vice President of Academic Affairs and Dean of Sean Hutchinson, Coordinator of Integrated Learning Health Sciences B.A., M.A. La Salle University B.S. Bethel University Alfonzo Jordan, Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Lab M.S. Long Island University Manager Ed.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarship Information and College Planning Guide
    Mount Union Area High School Scholarship Information and College Planning Guide 2020-2021 Online www.muasd.org *Scholarship Packet prepared by MUAHS business classes/saved in Cooper Scholarship folder *Revised October 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Programs for your MU College Bound Senior .................................................................... Page 1 College Planning Calendar for Seniors………………………………………… ................ Page 2 How Colleges Make Decisions About Who Gets Admitted ................................................ Page 3 Early Decision. Early Action. Rolling. What Does It All Mean? ..................................... Page 3 A (Honest) Note About Financial Aid ................................................................................. Page 4 Online Resources and Scholarship Information .................................................................. Page 5 PASFAA Website Resource Guide ................................................................................ Pages 6-7 Mount Union Area Alumni Association Scholarship .......................................................... Page 8 Mount Union Area Education Association Scholarship ...................................................... Page 9 Mount Union Area Education Trust .................................................................................... Page 9 The John S. Morrison Scholarship ..................................................................................... Page 10 The Soroptimist Foundation Scholarship ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:03-Cv-08884 Document 107 Filed 05/01/2006 Page 1 of 152
    Case 1:03-cv-08884 Document 107 Filed 05/01/2006 Page 1 of 152 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DAVID TAUBENFELD, Individually, and On Case No. 03 C 8884 Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Honorable Joan H. Lefkow Situated, CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, THIRD AMENDED CONSOLIDATED vs. COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS CAREER EDUCATION CORPORATION, JOHN M. LARSON and PATRICK K. PESCH, Demand For Jury Trial Defendants. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Lead Plaintiff, Thomas Schroder (“Lead Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by his undersigned attorneys, alleges the following based upon personal knowledge as to himself, and information and belief as to all other matters based upon, inter alia, the investigation of Lead Plaintiff’s counsel, which included a review of United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings by Career Education Corp. (“CEC” or the “Company”), as well as securities analysts’ reports concerning the Company, Department of Education audits of CEC schools, press releases, media reports, other public statements issued by the Company, documents and e-mails prepared by the Company, and interviews with dozens of confidential witnesses, including the 27 former employees of the Company cited herein. This Complaint directly addresses the matters raised in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 28, 2006. Among other things, it (a) adds as a named representative an individual who purchased
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Actions Were Taken by the Council at Its August 2005 Meeting
    COUNCIL ACTIONS The following actions were taken by the Council at its August 2005 meeting. All grants of accreditation expire on December 31 of the indicated year unless otherwise noted. INITIAL GRANT OF ACCREDITATION GRANT ENDS Art Institute of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 2009 Ascension College, Gonzales, LA 2009 NEW GRANT OF ACCREDITATION Angley College, Deland, FL 2008 Bryman College, San Bernardino, CA 2009 Chaparral College, Tucson, AZ 2013 Connecticut Training Center, East Hartford, CT 2013 Daymar College, Louisville, KY 2010 Daymar College, Owensboro, KY 2010 Department of Defense Polygraph Institute, Columbia, SC 2013 Detroit Business Institute-Downriver, Riverview, MI 2011 Detroit Business Institute-Southfield, Southfield, MI 2011 EduTek Training Center, Akron, OH 2009 Empire College, Santa Rosa, CA 2013 Hawaii Business College, Honolulu, HI 2008 ITT Technical Institute, Burr Ridge, IL 2008 ITT Technical Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL 2008 ITT Technical Institute, Fort Wayne, IN 2008 ITT Technical Institute, Lathrop, CA (West Covina, CA) 2008 ITT Technical Institute, San Diego, CA 2008 ITT Technical Institute, Seattle, WA 2009 ITT Technical Institute, Troy, MI 2008 ITT Technical Institute, West Covina, CA 2008 Kee Business College, Chesapeake, VA 2008 Kee Business College, Newport News, CA 2008 Key College, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 2007 Mountain West College, West Valley, UT 2008 New School of Architecture and Design, San Diego, CA 2007 Trumbull Business College, Warren, OH 2009 Tucson Design College, Tucson, AZ 2010 West Virginia Career
    [Show full text]
  • National Student Satisfaction and Priorities Report
    2009 NATIONAL RESEARCH REPORT National Student Satisfaction and Priorities Report Are college students satisfi ed with their educational experiences? Each year, the National Student Satisfaction and Priorities Report examines this subject, compiling data from hundreds of thousands of students attending four-year public campuses, four-year private institutions, two-year community colleges, and private two-year career schools. This report highlights some key areas, including how satisfaction levels differ by student demographic variables, how satisfaction varies by institutional choice, and whether today’s students— if they had to do it all over—would choose the campuses they currently attend. Table of contents... The 2009 study: Discovering national trends and opportunities for improvement .............................................................................. 3 Satisfaction and likelihood to re-enroll: The overall results ................. 4 Institutional choice: A key element in satisfaction ............................... 4 2008 fi rst-year students: College choice also impacts satisfaction ........ 5 Ethnicity reports: Lower satisfaction among African-American and Asian students ........................................................................... 7 GPA reports: Academic success breeds satisfaction ............................ 8 Class level reports: Declining likelihood of re-enrolling at private institutions ........................................................................... 9 Gender reports: Greater satisfaction
    [Show full text]
  • Government Investigations/Lawsuits of For-Profit Schools
    NCLC® ensuring NATIONAL CONSUMER educational LAW integrity CENTER ® 10 STEPS TO IMPROVE STATE OVERSIGHT OF FOR-PROFIT SCHOOLS © Copyright 2014, National Consumer Law Center, Inc. GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS AND LAWSUITS INVOLVING FOR-PROFIT SCHOOLS1 (2004 – MAY 2014) ©2014 National Consumer Law Center www.nclc.org Ensuring Educational Integrity, In Their Own Words 5 1 Note: Chart is organized alphabetically by government agency. SCHOOLS OUTCOME OR OFFER ONLINE/ SCHOOLS/ GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATION PENDING ACCREDITOR DISTANCE OWNERS AGENCY OR LAWSUIT? DATE ALLEGATIONS OR ISSUES (AS OF JUNE 1, 2014) (IF ANY) PROGRAMS? CREDENTIALS OFFERED Corinthian AGs from AR, Multi-state 1/2014 Organizational information; tuition, loan Pending National— Everest Univ. Certificates, Associate, Colleges, Inc.2 AZ, CO, CT, HI, Investigation and scholarship information; lead generation Everest Colleges (ACCSC); Online; Everest Bachelor’s and Master’s ID, IA, KY, MO, activities; enrollment qualifications Everest Univ. Online (ACICS); College Phoenix Degrees NC, NE, NM, for students; complaints; accreditation; Wyotech (ACCSC); OR, PA, TN, WA completion and placement statistics; graduate Regional— certification and licensing results; student Everest College Phoenix (HLC); lending activities. Heald (WASC Senior College and University Commission)3 ITT Educational AGS from AR, Multi-state 1/2014 Marketing and advertising, recruitment, Pending National (ACICS)5 Yes Associate, Bachelor’s and Services, Inc.4 AZ, CT, ID, IA, Investigation financial aid, academic advising, career Master’s Degrees KY, MO, NE, NC, services, admissions, licensure exam pass OR, PA, TN and rates, accreditation, student retention, WA graduation rates and job placement rates. Career Education AGs from AR, Multi-state 1/2014 Student-recruitment practices, graduate Pending National— Yes Certificate, Associate, Corp.6 AZ, CT, ID, IA, Investigation employment statistics, graduate employment Sanford-Brown.
    [Show full text]
  • Westwood College Borrower Defense Executive Summary
    Westwood College Borrower Defense Executive Summary Pursuant to 34 C.F.R. §685.222(e)(3), the Department of Education (“Department”) is charged with conducting a fact-finding process to determine whether each borrower defense application states a basis for a borrower defense. In adjudicating each individual borrower defense application, the Department must consider not only the borrower’s application and accompanying evidence, but also any relevant information in records in the possession of the Department and in submissions from the school, as well as any other information obtained in connection with the fact-finding process. The Borrower Defense Group (“BDG”) has completed a review of the evidence within the Department’s possession relating to Westwood College (“Westwood”) as it relates to four issues: 1) Westwood’s operational and procedural history; 2) Westwood’s aggressive recruitment practices; 3) Westwood’s misrepresentations about borrowers’ employment prospects in law enforcement in Illinois if enrolled in Westwood’s Criminal Justice program; and 4) Westwood’s misrepresentations about the transferability of Westwood’s credits. Additional summaries regarding specific types of borrower claims are forthcoming and will be submitted for approval separately. Westwood operated campuses in six states and operated an online program. In 2010, Westwood enrolled approximately 19,190 students. To date, the Department has received over 5,000 borrower defense applications relating to Westwood. Applying a preponderance of the evidence standard, BDG has prepared a series of summaries of the evidence relating to Westwood. Together, these summaries form a common statement of facts that will be applied in the individual adjudication of borrower defense applications from Westwood borrowers that are adjudicated pursuant to 34 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Davenport, Iowa City Administrator
    city of davenport, iowa city administrator the community Nestled in the heart of America along the mighty Mississippi River, Davenport, Iowa, is a bustling, vibrant community of more than 100,000 people. Located halfway between Chicago and Des Moines in Scott County, with easy access to I-80 and I-74, Davenport covers 65 square miles, is the third largest city in Iowa, the largest of the Quad Cities with a regional population of roughly 385,000 people, and has been declared “The Most Livable Small City in America.” The community boasts a thriving downtown and business-friendly environment, with a focus on development and revitalization. Residents enjoy the endless array of recreational and leisure activities Davenport affords them and take pride in the city’s rich history, traditions, and culture. Established on May 14, 1836, by US Army interpreter Antoine LeClaire, Davenport was named after Colonel George Davenport, a veteran of the War of 1812, and was the site of the signing of the Black Hawk Treaty. The City was incorporated in 1839. Its convenient location on the Mississippi River made it a center for commerce. Davenport's ties to the military remain strong and the city was was recognized in 2015 by G.I. Magazine as a Top 5 Military community. Presently, there are over 15,000 veterans residing in Davenport and Scott County. Today, Davenport is the economic engine of the bi- state Quad Cities area and is a premier place to build or expand a business. With over 37 million people living within a 300-mile radius, Davenport’s central location provides businesses with a strong network of customers and suppliers as well as easy access to the river, major thoroughfares, and excellent public transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Annual Report 1 to Our Shareholders
    THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY NEWSPAPER/ONLINE PUBLISHING TELEVISION BROADCASTING MAGAZINE PUBLISHING CABLE TELEVISION EDUCATION 2005 Annual Report CONTENTS Financial Highlights, 1 Letter to Shareholders, 2 Corporate Directory, 12 Form 10-K FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (in thousands, except per share amounts) 2005 2004 % Change Operating revenue $ 3,553,887 $ 3,300,104 + 8% Income from operations $ 514,914 $ 563,006 – 9% Net income $ 314,344 $ 332,732 – 6% Diluted earnings per common share $ 32.59 $ 34.59 – 6% Dividends per common share $ 7.40 $ 7.00 + 6% Common shareholders’ equity per share $ 274.79 $ 251.11 + 9% Diluted average number of common shares outstanding 9,616 9,592 – OPERATING REVENUE INCOME FROM OPERATIONS NET INCOME ($ in millions) ($ in millions) ($ in millions) 05 3,554 05 515 05 314 04 3,300 04 563 04 333 03 2,839 03 364 03 241 02 2,584 02 378 02 204 01 2,411 01 220 01 230 DILUTED EARNINGS RETURN ON AVERAGE COMMON PER COMMON SHARE SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ($) 05 32.59 05 12.4% 04 34.59 04 14.9% 03 25.12 03 12.3% 02 21.34 02 11.6% 01 24.06 01 14.4% 2005 ANNUAL REPORT 1 TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS 2005 was a somewhat disappointing year. Our newspaper, TV and magazine businesses turned in poor- er results than their managers expected when the year began. Cable ONE was having a spectacular year until Hurricane Katrina devastated our Mississippi Gulf Coast systems. Kaplan’s brick-and-mortar college business missed its goals badly, disappointing Jonathan Grayer and me. These are the facts, and I’ll set them out for you in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Annual Conference Program Sessions
    24 CAA Conference Information 2006 ARTspace is a conference within the Conference, tailored to the interests and needs of practicing artists, but open to all. It includes a large­ audience session space and a section devoted to the video lounge. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL ARTSPACE EVENTS ARE IN THE HYNES CONVENTION GENTER, THIRD LEVEl, ROOM 312. WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22 ------------------- 7:30 AM-9:00 AM MORNING COFFEE, TEA, AND JUICE 9:30 AM-NOON SlOPART.COM BRIAN REEVES AND ADRIANE HERMAN Slop Art corporate representatives will share popular new product­ distribution and expression-formatting strategies they've developed to address mounting consumer expectation for increasing affordability, portability, familiar formatting, and validating brand recognition. New franchise opportunities, including the Slop Brand Shippable Showroom™, will be outlined. Certified Masterworks™ and product submission guidelines FREE to all attendees. 12:30 PM-2:00 PM RECENT WORK FROM THE MIT MEDIA LAB Christopher Csikszelltlnihalyi, a visual artist on the faculty at the MIT Media Lab, coordinates a presentation featuring recent faculty work from the MIT Media Lab; see http;llwww.media.mit.edu/about! academics.htm!. 2:30 PM-5:00 PM STUDIO ART OPEN SESSIOII PAINTING Chairs; Alfredo Gisholl, Brandeis University; John G. Walker, Boston University Panelists to be announced. BOSTON 25 THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23 2:30 PM-5:00 PM STUDIO ART OPEN SESSIOII 7:30 AM-9:00 AM PRINTERLY PAINTERLY: THE INTERRELATIONSHIP OF PAINTING AND PRINTMAKING MORNING COFFEE, TEA, AND JUICE Chair: Nona Hershey, Massachusetts College of Art Clillord Ackley, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston 9:00 AM-5:30 PM Michael Mazur, independent artist James Stroud, independent artist, Center Street Studio, Milton Village, VIDEO lOUNGE: EXPANDED CINEMA FOR THE DIGITAL AGE Massachusetts A video screening curated by leslie Raymond and Antony Flackett Expanded Cinema emerged in the 19605 with aspirations to explore expanded consciousness through the technology of the moving image.
    [Show full text]