DOCSLIB.ORG

National Student Satisfaction and Priorities Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Student Satisfaction and Priorities Report 2009 NATIONAL RESEARCH REPORT National Student Satisfaction and Priorities Report Are college students satisfi ed with their educational experiences? Each year, the National Student Satisfaction and Priorities Report examines this subject, compiling data from hundreds of thousands of students attending four-year public campuses, four-year private institutions, two-year community colleges, and private two-year career schools. This report highlights some key areas, including how satisfaction levels differ by student demographic variables, how satisfaction varies by institutional choice, and whether today’s students— if they had to do it all over—would choose the campuses they currently attend. Table of contents... The 2009 study: Discovering national trends and opportunities for improvement .............................................................................. 3 Satisfaction and likelihood to re-enroll: The overall results ................. 4 Institutional choice: A key element in satisfaction ............................... 4 2008 fi rst-year students: College choice also impacts satisfaction ........ 5 Ethnicity reports: Lower satisfaction among African-American and Asian students ........................................................................... 7 GPA reports: Academic success breeds satisfaction ............................ 8 Class level reports: Declining likelihood of re-enrolling at private institutions ........................................................................... 9 Gender reports: Greater satisfaction levels from female students ........ 10 Region reports: Geographic differences in satisfaction ....................... 11 Closing ideas: Assessment and benchmarking often show the way to greater institutional success ........................................................ 12 Appendix ....................................................................................... 13 For more results classifi ed by institution type, visit www.noellevitz.com/benchmark2009 2 © 2009 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • 2009 National Student Satisfaction-Priorities Report—Executive Summary Do campuses have resources they can afford to waste? How these results were measured While the Student Satisfaction Inventory The answer to that question may seem like an obvious, resounding “no.” Yet surveys a whole range of campus items, the many college campuses waste precious resources by not knowing what their top general satisfaction results in this report are priorities should be. based on three summary items at the end of the survey. The fi rst item asks students to Tracking student satisfaction and priorities plays a critical role in using those indicate if their educational experiences have resources effi ciently and effectively. Student satisfaction is a key component met their expectations. Most students indicate that their experiences are about what they of student life and learning, a gauge of whether an institution is providing expected or better than they expected. an experience that students deem worthwhile. By simultaneously assessing The other two summary items are the focus satisfaction and priorities, campuses can determine which areas demand their of this report: greatest attention and make decisions that will have the greatest impact on the Rate your overall satisfaction with your student experience. experience here thus far. 1. Not satisfi ed at all However, there is no one student population on any campus. Different 2. Not very satisfi ed genders, ethnicities, class levels, and other subpopulations will often express 3. Somewhat dissatisfi ed varying satisfaction levels, even if they have had similar college experiences. 4. Neutral Understanding the differences among these populations can help institutions 5. Somewhat satisfi ed enact initiatives and allocate resources that will strengthen satisfaction among 6. Satisfi ed 7. Very satisfi ed these diverse groups. The percentage indicated in this report The 2009 National Student Satisfaction and Priorities Report explores these refl ects students who answered issues and presents a national snapshot of students’ opinions about their 6 (satisfi ed) or 7 (very satisfi ed). educations, across different demographic groups and institution types. In All in all, if you had it to do over again, particular, the report shows whether students’ expectations are being met would you re-enroll here? 1. Defi nitely not and whether they feel their educations have been worthwhile. 2. Probably not 3. Maybe not 4. I don’t know The 2009 study: Discovering national trends and opportunities 5. Maybe yes for improvement 6. Probably yes 7. Defi nitely yes The 2009 National Student Satisfaction and Priorities Report presents the responses The percentage indicated in this report to the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory™ (SSI) from more than 686,000 refl ects students who answered students at nearly 1,000 four-year and two-year public and private institutions 6 (probably yes) or 7 (defi nitely yes). across North America. The results include student responses over a three-year The larger data sets are segmented by academic time period from the fall of 2006 through the spring of 2009. institution type and by identifi ed key demographic variables. The most recent results reveal some opportunities to improve the experiences of specifi c populations. In particular, these fi ndings stand out: • Greater satisfaction among students at community colleges than other institutions. • The variation of satisfaction based on whether the institution was the fi rst, second, or third choice of the student. • Much lower levels of satisfaction among African-American and Asian-American students attending four-year institutions. • Higher levels of satisfaction among female students than male students across all institution types. • Lower satisfaction from students attending institutions in the East. © 2009 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • www.noellevitz.com 3 Satisfaction and likelihood to re-enroll: The overall results The table below shows the composite scores of all students by institution type. In this report, “likelihood to re-enroll” does not necessarily mean that students answering negatively do not intend to return to their institutions. Instead, it really addresses this question: If students had to repeat their education, would they enroll again at their institutions? In other words, do they feel that attending their chosen institutions has been worth it? This response shows whether the In this report, academic offerings and student experiences provided by these institutions are the best fi t for ‘likelihood to the students they have enrolled. re-enroll’ does not necessarily Overall scores Percent satisfi ed Likelihood to re-enroll mean that students Four-year public 53% 60% answering negatively do not Four-year private 55% 58% intend to return to Two-year community colleges 60% 70% their institutions. Two-year career and private schools 56% 56% Instead, it really addresses this Two-year community and technical colleges show the highest percentage of satisfi ed students and question: If the largest percentage of likelihood to re-enroll scores. Career schools then have the next highest students had percentage of overall satisfaction, with a very similar percentage of likelihood to re-enroll. Students to repeat their at four-year private institutions refl ect fi fty-fi ve percent satisfaction, but only a fi fty-eight percent education, would likelihood to re-enroll, while students at four-year publics have slightly lower satisfaction levels they enroll again at (53%), but have a higher likelihood to re-enroll result (60%). their institutions? It’s possible that price may play a key role in these overall results. Given that community college In other words, students usually have made a much smaller fi nancial investment than students at four-year do they feel that institutions, they may be more inclined to feel that their education was “worth it.” attending their chosen institutions Institutional choice: A key element in satisfaction has been worth it? The data from four-year and two-year institutions show that institutional choice is a very signifi cant factor in forecasting students’ satisfaction and how likely they are to remain at their institutions. Regardless of the institution type, students who enroll at their fi rst-choice institution express greater satisfaction and likelihood to re-enroll. Four-year public Percent satisfi ed Likelihood to re-enroll First choice 63% 72% Second choice 46% 50% Third choice 28% 26% Four-year private Percent satisfi ed Likelihood to re-enroll First choice 64% 68% Second choice 46% 46% Third choice 29% 26% 4 © 2009 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • 2009 National Student Satisfaction-Priorities Report—Executive Summary Two-year community colleges Percent satisfi ed Likelihood to re-enroll Every institution First choice 69% 79% will have a Second choice 51% 59% signifi cant Third choice 31% 31% number of students who did not choose that Two-year career and private schools Percent satisfi ed Likelihood to re-enroll school as their fi rst choice. It is First choice 66% 68% especially critical Second choice 47% 45% for campuses to Third choice 26% 21% fi nd ways to make these students Comparing the fi rst-choice group and third-choice group, there are signifi cant differences in feel welcome and satisfaction and re-enrollment across all institution types, with a thirty-fi ve percent to forty percent comfortable, for difference in satisfaction ratings and a forty-two to forty-eight percent difference in likelihood to they are likely
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Alliance for Higher Education Fall 2016 Statistics Report
    Fall 2016 Statistics Report The Alliance for Higher Education These statistics are compiled based on the numbers that our endorsed AG schools have submitted to the Alliance office Table of Contents Students Headcount Enrollment Totals.…………………………………………………...…….….…………..1 Headcount Enrollment Totals - Decade Summary...………………….……………..……….………..2 Enrollment by Student Type………………………………………………………..…………………3 Enrollment by Gender……………………………………………………….…….………………….4 Enrollment by Ethnic Identity……………………………………………….……..………………….5 Ethnic Identity - Decade Summary.………...………………………….…………....……………….6 Admissions.……………………………………………..…………………………..…………..…….7 Retention.…..………………………………………………………...………………….....………….8 Retention Summary…………………………………………………………………………………9 Full-time, First-time Undergraduates Receiving Financial Aid……..……………….…...………….10 AG Students.………………………………………………………...……………..……...………….11 AG Students - Decade Summary….......………………………………………...…....………..……..12 Student Housing.....………………………………………………………..……..……………………13 Headcount Enrollment Geography in AG Higher Education Institutions….…………...…………….14 Faculty Student / Faculty Ratio.…………………………………………………………………...…………..15 AG Teaching Faculty.……………………………………………...….………………..…………….16 Non-AG Faculty Comparative Data…………………………………………………...………………17 Academics 2016 Degrees & Diplomas.…………………………………………………………...……………….18 2016 Undergraduate Degrees Granted by Major.……………………………………...………………19-22 2016 Graduate Degrees Granted by Major.……………………………………………....……………23 2016 MDiv Doctorate……………………………………………………………………………. 24 Ministry Degrees.……………………………………………………………………...………..…….25
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Baccalaureate 45Th Commencement Celebration
    2018 Baccalaureate 45th Commencement Celebration Thursday, May 3, 2018 12 Noon William J. Seymour Chapel at the Assemblies of God Theological Seminary 1435 N. Glenstone Avenue, Springfield, Missouri Baccalaureate Program accalaureate at the Assemblies of God Theological Seminary (AGTS) Backnowledges several streams of influence. The medieval academic tradition is part of the seminary culture, so there are measures of formality: robes that reflect various academic disciplines and certain ceremonial dimensions that are integral to this event. AGTS is firmly rooted in the Pentecostal faith tradition. We affirm worship that is celebratory and vibrant, and we welcome the dynamics of the Holy Spirit in our congregational life. We are committed to the redemptive ministry of Jesus Christ that is empowered by the Holy Spirit. These elements of the Pentecostal tradition are also integral to the AGTS baccalaureate. AGTS is committed to thoroughness in graduate theological education. Ceremonial dimensions of this event acknowledge our graduates’ significant achievements in study. The celebratory dimensions demonstrate our belief that today’s graduates are people of destiny in God’s eternal plan of redemption. *PRELUDE AND PROCESSIONAL INVOCATION AND WELCOME RENÉE GRIFFITH CAROL A. TAYLOR RANDY C. WALLS President, Evangel University “In Christ Alone” Keith Getty and Stuart Townend DEAN’S REMARKS *CELEBRATORY WORSHIP TIMOTHY A. HAGER Vice President, Evangel University RENÉE GRIFFITH Dean, Assemblies of God Theological RANDY C. WALLS Seminary “Great Are You Lord” David Leonard, Jason Ingram, and BACCALAUREATE ADDRESS Leslie Jordan “CONFIRM YOUR CALL” *SCRIPTURE READING TIMOTHY A. HAGER 2 PETER 1:3-11 TIMOTHY L. GILLIGAN, SR. Doctor of Ministry Candidate MICHAEL D.
    [Show full text]
  • College Fair
    Oak Grove High School 605 SE 12th Street, Oak Grove, Missouri 64075 Phone: Main Office— 816-690-4152, Counseling Office Fax—816-690-3180 College Profiles 2014-2015 Information helpful in assisting students and parents in college selection Colleges in Alphabetical Order: 1. Avila University 35. Northwest Missouri State University 2. Baker University 36. Ottawa University 3. Benedictine College 37. Park University 4. Bethel College 38. Peru State College 5. Bradley University 39. Pinnacle Career Institute 6. Brown Mackie College 40. Pittsburg State University 7. Central Methodist College 41. Ranken Technical School 8. Centriq Training 42. Research Medical Center (School of 9. College of the Ozarks Radiologic Technology) 10. Columbia College 43. Rockhurst University 11. Culver-Stockton College 44. Saint Louis University 12. DeVry University 45. Southeast Missouri State University 13. Drake University 46. Southwest Baptist University 14. Drury University 47. Spartan College of Aeronautics and 15. Fontbonne University Technology 16. Graceland University 48. State Fair Community College 17. Hannibal-LaGrange College 49. Stephens College 18. Illinois College 50. St. Louis School of Pharmacy 19. Johnson County Community College 51. Truman State University 20. Johnson & Wales University 52. University of Arkansas 21. Kansas City Art Institute 53. University of Central Missouri 22. Kansas State University 54. University of Kansas 23. Lincoln Technical Institute and Lincoln 55. University of Minnesota Technical College 56. University of Missouri 24. Lindenwood University 57. University of Missouri – Kansas City 25. Linn State Technical College 58. University of Missouri – St. Louis 26. Maryville University 59. University of Saint Mary 27. Metropolitan Community Colleges 60. Vatterott College 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the American Arbitration Association Denver, Colorado
    BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION DENVER, COLORADO MICHAEL MENSCH, an individual; TYRONE BAILEY, an individual; JESSICA ROSALES, an individual; COURTLAND WALKER, an individual; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Claimants, CLASS ARBITRATION ALTA COLLEGES, INC., a Delaware corporation; WESTWOOD COLLEGE, INC., a Colorado Corporation, TRAV CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation d/b/a Westwood College and Westwood College Online, GRANT CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation d/b/a Westwood College, WESGRAY CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation d/b/a Westwood College, EL NELL, INC., a Colorado corporation d/b/a Westwood College, PARIS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a Delaware corporation d/b/a Redstone College, ELBERT, INC., a Colorado corporation d/b/a Westwood College, and BOUNTY ISLAND CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation formerly d/b/a Redstone College, Respondents. ___________________________________ DEMAND FOR CLASS ACTION ARBITRATION Plaintiffs, Michael Mensch, Tyrone Bailey, Jessica Rosales and Courtland Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, demand class arbitration of this dispute with Alta Colleges, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Westwood Colleges, Inc., a Colorado corporation, TRAV Corporation, a Colorado corporation, Grant Corporation, a Colorado corporation, Wesgray Corporation, a Colorado corporation, El Nell, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Paris Management Company, a Delaware corporation, Elbert, Inc., a Colorado corporation, and Bounty Island Corporation, a Delaware corporation, for unlawful, deceptive and misleading practices in the state of Colorado, and for violations of state law as more fully defined and discussed within. 1 NATURE OF THE CASE Respondents, through their institutions of Westwood College, Westwood College Online and Redstone College (collectively “Westwood College” or “Westwood”) have perfected the art of playing on the hopes and dreams of vulnerable students who are in a desperate search for a better life.
    [Show full text]
  • School Name STATE NCATE TEAC RU/VH RU/H LINK TO
    PSC School Name STATE NCATE TEAC RU/VH RU/H LINK TO THE SITE APPROVED ALABAMA Alabama A&M University AL YES NO NO NO www.aamu.edu/ Alabama State University AL YES NO NO NO www.alasu.edu/ American Sentinel University AL NO NO NO NO www.americansentinel.edu Amridge University AL NO NO NO NO www.amridgeuniversity.edu Andrew Jackson University AL NO NO NO NO www.aju.edu Athens State University AL YES NO NO NO www.athens.edu/ Auburn University AL YES NO NO YES www.auburn.edu Auburn University Montgomery AL YES NO NO NO http://www.aum.edu/ Birmingham-Southern College AL YES NO NO NO http://www.bsc.edu/ Columbia Southern University AL NO NO NO NO www.columbiasouthern.edu Faulkner University AL YES NO NO NO http://www.faulkner.edu/ Huntington College AL NO NO NO NO www.huntingdon.edu Jacksonville State University AL YES NO NO NO http://www.jsu.edu/ Judson College AL NO NO NO NO http://www.judson.edu/ Miles College AL YES NO NO NO http://www.miles.edu/ Oakwood University AL YES NO NO NO http://www.oakwood.edu/ Samford University AL YES NO NO NO http://www.samford.edu/ Spring Hill College AL NO NO NO NO www.shc.edu Stillman College AL YES NO NO NO http://www.stillman.edu/ Talladega College AL NO NO NO NO http://www.talladega.edu/ Troy University AL YES NO NO NO http://www.troy.edu/ Tuskegee University AL YES NO NO NO http://www.tuskegee.edu/ United States Sports Academy AL NO NO NO NO http://www.ussa.edu University of Alabama AL YES NO NO YES http://www.ua.edu/ University of Alabama at Birmingham AL YES NO YES NO http://www.uab.edu/ University
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Directory for Barton Community College
    Employee Directory for Barton Community College Please note: to view the employee directory in more detail, please click on one of the links below to navigate to that section in this document. Voters Board of Trustees President of Barton Community College Assistant to the President Vice President of Administration Bookstore Business Office Facility Management Human Resources Printing Services Director of Athletics Coaches Sports Information Sports Medicine Director of Grants Chief Information Officer Information Services—Information Technology Director of Institutional Research Institutional Research Executive Director of Institutional Advancement Public Relations & Marketing Shafer Gallery Vice President of Instruction Academics Center for Innovation & Excellence Learning Resources Liberal Arts and Sciences Mathematics, English and Essential Skills Military Academics, Technical Education and Outreach Programs Healthcare & Public Service Education Workforce Training and Community Education Workforce Training & Economic Development Vice President of Student Services Admissions Child Development Center Educational Opportunity Center (EOC) Enrollment Services Financial Aid Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) Student Life Student Support Services (SSS) Testing, Advisement & Career Services Title IX Coordinator Upward Bound (BCUB) Upward Bound (CKUB) BOARD OF TRUSTEES | https://bartonccc.edu/community/boardoftrustees PRESIDENT | All phone numbers have a 620 area code unless otherwise indicated. * On-campus extensions are the last 3 digits of the phone number. Carl Heilman President A-Bldg., Rm. 120, 792-9301 [email protected] Ph.D. Iowa State University President Emeritus (Deceased) Jimmie L. Downing, Ph.D. PRESIDENT | Assistant to the President Amye Schneider Assistant to the President A-Bldg., Rm. 122, 792-9302 [email protected] A.A.S. Barton County Community College Lora Zink Administrative Assistant A-Bldg., Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • ALLEN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE CONTACT Home | Stats | Schedule/Scores | Roster | Letter of Intent Signees 1801 N
    Home College Login: Password: Today's NJCAA NJCAA Membership Marketing Careers Contact Us ALLEN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE CONTACT Home | Stats | Schedule/Scores | Roster | Letter of Intent Signees 1801 N. Cottonwood BASEBALL I | ROSTER Iola, KS 66749 PH: 620-365-5116 X Ryan Herrig #7 213 FX: PROFILE 620-365-7406 Class: Sophomore www.allencc.edu Hometown: Mulvane, Ks Height: 5'11 Position: RF PRESIDENT Dr. John Masterson SCHEDULE STATS CURRENT AS OF 05/10/2010 ATHLETIC DIRECTOR DATE VS AB RUNS H 2B 3B HR RBI SB IP HITS R ER BB SO Randy Weber 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 02/19/09 Bossier Parish Community College ATHLETIC 02/20/09 Bossier Parish Community College 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRAINER Ed Wilkerson 02/21/09 Murray State College 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 REGION 6.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 02/22/09 Murray State College 6 02/25/09 Evangel College JV (non-member school) 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENROLLMENT 02/25/09 Evangel College JV (non-member school) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1963 03/03/09 Brown Mackie College 4.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 03/03/09 Brown Mackie College 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 03/05/09 Butler Community College - KS 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 03/07/09 Neosho County Community College 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 03/07/09 Neosho County
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes September 15, 2015
    Approved December 8, 2015 September 15, 2015 Education Committee Meeting Kansas Board of Nursing Landon State Office Building, Room 509 Education Committee Minutes September 15, 2015 Time: 8:30 a.m. – 11:35 a.m. Committee Members Present: Patsy Zeller, MSN, APRN, NP-C, V. Chair Jeanne Catanzaro, MSN, RN Anita Mills, MSN, RN Christine Hober, PhD, MSN, RN-BC, CNE Jane Weilert, EdD, RN Susan White, RN, BSN, MS Staff: Mary Blubaugh, MSN, RN, Executive Administrator Carol Moreland, MSN, RN, Education Specialist Jill Simons, Senior Administrative Assistant Call to Order: The meeting was called to order by Patsy Zeller, MSN, APRN, NP-C, V. Chair, at 8:30 a.m. in Room 509 of the Landon State Office Building. Add./Rev. Agenda: The Committee will recess into executive session, with its legal counsel to seek legal advice that is privileged information in the attorney client relationship. Re. Onsite Pack: There was nothing for the onsite packet. Minutes: The minutes from June 2015 meeting were reviewed. It was moved to approve the minutes from June 15, 2015 as amended. Motion #1 White/Catanzaro Adopted. Announcements: Patsy Zeller presented Anita Mills, MSN, RN with a certificate of appreciation for her time served on the Education Committee. Patsy also announced Mary Struble, LPN appointment to the Board. Educ. Spec. Rpt: Carol Moreland, nursing program updates, and her projects. (See Education Committee packet for the full report.) Executive Session: It was moved that, pursuant to K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 75-4319(b)(2), the Committee recess into executive session, with its legal counsel, Assistant Attorney General Janet Arndt, and Mary Blubaugh and Carol Moreland who are included as the client, for 40 minutes to seek legal advice that is privileged information in the attorney-client relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Catalog 2019 - 2020
    COURSE CATALOG 2019 - 2020 mc3.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS COLLEGE FACULTY AND STAFF.................................................................................................2 1 COLLEGE FACULTY AND STAFF Cheryl L. Dilanzo, R.T. (R), Director of Radiography B.S. Thomas Jefferson University M.S. University of Pennsylvania Therol Dix, Dean of Arts and Humanities COLLEGE FACULTY B.A. University of California, Los AngelesM.A. University of Pennsylvania J.D. Georgetown University AND STAFF Bethany Eisenhart, Part-Time Career Coach ADMINISTRATION B.S. DeSales University Kimberly Erdman, Director of Dental Hygiene A.A.S., B.S. Pennsylvania College of Technology Office of the President M.S. University of Bridgeport Victoria L. Bastecki-Perez, President Katina Faulk, Administrative Director for Academic Initiatives D.H. University of Pittsburgh A.S., B.S. Pennsylvania College of Technology B.S. Edinboro University of Pennsylvania M.B.A. Excelsior College M.Ed, Ed.D. University of Pittsburgh Gaetan Giannini, Dean of Business and Entrepreneurial Initiatives Candy K. Basile, Administrative Support Secretary B.S. Temple University A.A.S. Montgomery County Community College M.B.A. Seton Hall University Deborah Rogers, Executive Assistant to the College’s Board of Trustees Ed.D. Gwynedd Mercy University A.A.S. Montgomery County Community College Suzanne Vargus Holloman, WIF Grant Project Director B.S. Syracuse University Academic Affairs M.B.A. Drexel University Gloria Oikelome, Interim Vice President of Academic Affairs and Dean of Sean Hutchinson, Coordinator of Integrated Learning Health Sciences B.A., M.A. La Salle University B.S. Bethel University Alfonzo Jordan, Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Lab M.S. Long Island University Manager Ed.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarship Information and College Planning Guide
    Mount Union Area High School Scholarship Information and College Planning Guide 2020-2021 Online www.muasd.org *Scholarship Packet prepared by MUAHS business classes/saved in Cooper Scholarship folder *Revised October 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Programs for your MU College Bound Senior .................................................................... Page 1 College Planning Calendar for Seniors………………………………………… ................ Page 2 How Colleges Make Decisions About Who Gets Admitted ................................................ Page 3 Early Decision. Early Action. Rolling. What Does It All Mean? ..................................... Page 3 A (Honest) Note About Financial Aid ................................................................................. Page 4 Online Resources and Scholarship Information .................................................................. Page 5 PASFAA Website Resource Guide ................................................................................ Pages 6-7 Mount Union Area Alumni Association Scholarship .......................................................... Page 8 Mount Union Area Education Association Scholarship ...................................................... Page 9 Mount Union Area Education Trust .................................................................................... Page 9 The John S. Morrison Scholarship ..................................................................................... Page 10 The Soroptimist Foundation Scholarship ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SEVP Approved Schools As of Tuesday, June 08, 2010 Institution Name Campus Name City/State Date Approved - 1
    SEVP Approved Schools As of Tuesday, June 08, 2010 Institution Name Campus Name City/State Date Approved - 1 - 1st Choice International, Inc. 1st Choice International, Inc. Glenview, IL 10/27/2009 1st International Cosmetology School 1st International Cosmetology School Lynnwood, WA 11/5/2004 - 4 - 424 Aviation Miami, FL 10/7/2009 - A - A F International School of Languages Inc. A F International School of Languages In Thousand Oaks, CA 6/3/2003 A. T. Still University of Health Sciences Kirksville Coll of Osteopathic Medicine Kirksville, MO 3/10/2003 ABC Beauty Academy, INC. Flushing, NY 4/28/2009 ABC Beauty Academy, LLC ABC Beauty Academy Garland, TX 3/30/2006 Aberdeen Catholic School System Roncalli Aberdeen, SD 8/14/2003 Aberdeen College of English Los Angeles, CA 1/22/2010 Aberdeen School District 6-1 Aberdeen Central High School Aberdeen, SD 10/27/2004 Abiding Savior Lutheran School Abiding Savior Lutheran School Lake Forest, CA 4/16/2003 Abilene Christian Schools Abilene Christian Schools Abilene, TX 1/31/2003 Abilene Christian University Abilene Christian University Abilene, TX 2/5/2003 Abilene Independent School District Abilene Independent School District Abilene, TX 8/8/2004 Abington Friends School Abington Friends School Jenkintown, PA 7/15/2003 Above It All, Inc Benchmark Flight /Hawaii Flight Academy Kailua-Kona, HI 12/3/2003 Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College Tifton Campus Tifton, GA 1/10/2003 Abraham Joshua Heschel School New York, NY 1/22/2010 ABT Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis School ABT Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis School New York, NY 6/22/2006 Abundant Life Academy Kanab, UT 2/15/2008 Abundant Life Christian School Abundant Life Christian School Madison, WI 9/14/2004 Abundant Life School Sherwood, AR 10/25/2006 ABX Air, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice Program
    Evangel University Department of Behavioral & Social Sciences Academic Programs Review Fall, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 II. DEPARTMENT MISSION AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................. 1 III. PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS AND CAPACITY ................................................................................................................ 3 IV. PEER INSTITUTIONS/BENCHMARKING ...................................................................................................................... 8 V. ASSESSMENT DATA FOR THE DEPARTMENT ............................................................................................................ 10 VI. ASSESSMENT DATA FOR THE COUNSELING PROGRAM ........................................................................................... 12 A. STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND THREATS ................................................................................................... 13 B. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT REPORT ...................................................................................................................................... 15 C. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED UPON FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................... 17 D. ACTION ITEMS .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]