DOCSLIB.ORG

Screw U: a Random Walk Through the Diploma Mill “This Is An

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Screw U: a Random Walk Through the Diploma Mill “This Is An Screw U: A Random Walk Through The Diploma Mill “This is an industry that is ripe for, begging for, regulation.” -Senator Tom Harkin, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) As of last year, the for-profit education sector accounted for 13 percent of postsecondary students; however, they account for about 50 percent of all student loan defaults.1 One of the main causes of this disproportion is because the majority of students who attend for-profit schools never graduate; at the University of Phoenix, the flagship university of this sector, only about 9% of students graduate within six years (Only 5% graduate in their online program, which houses 175,200 students as of 2008).2 To exacerbate this problem, schools like University of Phoenix charge about four times the tuition of a typical non-profit institution.3 These schools prey on the vulnerable and disadvantaged, for they have the best access to federal aid and zero clue of what they are signing up for. In the past, we have seen multiple industries operate in the manner; notably the banking sector with sub-prime borrowers. In that case and in this one, employees are deluding the uneducated, and selling them the American Dream on borrowed money. As we know now, defaulted loans will dry up credit; with default rates growing exponentially, the federal credit line is about to stop. 1 U.S. Department of Education, IPEDS 12-month enrollment for 2011-12 and FY 2010 three-year CDRs. 2 The Education Trust, Subprime Opportunity: The unfulfilled promise of for-profit colleges and universities, November 2010. 3 For-Profit Higher Education: The failure to Safeguard the Federal Investment and Ensure Student Success, United States Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee. Downloaded from www.hvst.com by IP address 192.168.160.10 on 10/01/2021 Predatory Lending Predatory lending is legally described as any type of unscrupulous lending practice where a lender takes advantage of a borrower; if this sounds familiar, it’s because it is. This illegal practice is what led to the greatest financial crisis since the great depression: The Sub-Prime Mortgage Collapse. Akin to this crisis, for-profit institutions rely on predatory lending to entice ‘sub- prime’ students into their programs. Like the mortgage brokers of the last decade, recruiters from these institutions target the most vulnerable class of Americans: the bottom quintile of earners, also known as the lower class. For these institutions, lower class citizens made the ideal students: 1) They did not understand the education system, and 2) They had the highest probability of obtaining a government loan. Knowing this, it’s not surprising that approximately ninety percent of revenues in this industry stem from the federal government. 4 The fundamental concept behind this fraudulent behavior in regards to for-profit universities pertains to the manipulative and deceptive recruitment techniques imposed by the industry.5 According to a Senate report in 20126, recruiting materials indicate that at some for- profit colleges, admission representatives were trained to locate and push on the pain in students’ lives. They were also trained to “overcome objections” of prospective students in order to secure enrollments. Additionally, companies trained recruiters to create a false sense of urgency to enroll and inflate the prestige of the college. (Appendix 1) 4 The Future of Children, Journal Issue: Postsecondary Education in the United States Volume 23 Number 1 Spring 2013, For Profit Colleges, David J. Deming, Claudia Goldin, and Lawrence F. KatZ 5 National Association for College Admission Counseling, Federal Student Aid Program Integrity. 6 For-Profit Higher Education: The failure to Safeguard the Federal Investment and Ensure Student Success, United States Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) Committee. Downloaded from www.hvst.com by IP address 192.168.160.10 on 10/01/2021 The picture below was taken from a training manual from the Apollo Education Group, the parent company of the infamous University of Phoenix, the largest for- profit college in the country.7 As you can see, these accusations are not unfounded; recruiters deliberately delude prospective students and use aggressive ‘boiler room’ like tactics to pressure the uneducated and gullible. The low-income demographic is not the only one being taken advantage of by these tactics; military veterans have also been heavily targeted. In a study from the HELP committee, about 41 percent of the entire GI Bill ($1.7 billion) went to for- profit colleges. The epitome of “unscrupulous marketing”, as noted in the legal definition for predatory lending, can be found in the case of QuinnStreet, an internet marketing company. The company was forced to pay the government $2.5 million after they 7 For-Profit Higher Education: The Failure to Safeguard the Federal Investment and Ensure Student Success, United States Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) Committee. Downloaded from www.hvst.com by IP address 192.168.160.10 on 10/01/2021 registered gIBill.com and used the apparently official website to generate leads for for-profit colleges. 8 Legal action is not new to this industry, according to court records, the University of Phoenix agreed to pay the United States $67.5 million to resolve allegation that its student recruitment policies violated the False Claims act. The Phoenix-based University also agreed to pay an additional $9.8 million on similar charges without admitting any wrongdoing.9 Education The underlying problem with for-profit education is the current disconnect between tuition prices and education quality; unlike most things in life, you simply do not get what you pay for in this industry. As evidenced in SEC filings from all major players in this space, relatively small amount revenue goes towards instruction.10 According to a study by federal investigators, the University of Phoenix received close to 90 percent of revenues from the government; of that revenue, only about 17 percent went to actually educating the students. The majority of revenues from corporations like the University of Phoenix go towards marketing and recruiting efforts.11 On average, the cost to recruit the average new student at a large national chain is around $4,000, or about 25 percent of the average annual tuition.12 Unfortunately, only one-in-three of those students recruited will actually graduate. As for the 32 percent of students who actually graduate, they are now facing a grim outlook on future employment. Over the past several years, a negative stigma has attached itself to for-profit college degrees. As evidenced by employers past with for-profit college graduates, students in these institutions are simply not learning what they should be. 8 United States Securities And Exchange Commission, Form 10-Q, QuinStreet, Inc., Commission File No. 001-34628 9 United States of America ex rel. Mary Hendow and Julie Albertson v. University of Phoenix, case number 03-cv-00457, in the U.S. District Court for the Easter District of California. 10 For-Profit Higher Education: The Failure to Safeguard the Federal Investment and Ensure Student Success, United States Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) Committee. 11 U.S. government Accountability Office, For-Profit Colleges: Undercover Testing Finds Colleges Encouraged Fraud and Engaged in Deceptive and Questionable Marketing Practices. 12 See ‘10’. Downloaded from www.hvst.com by IP address 192.168.160.10 on 10/01/2021 Here is an excerpt from a professor of NTI, a subsidiary of Universal Technical Institute Corporation: “Every day that I come to work, I hear students tell me that they have encountered employers that point blank tell them that they do not hire NTI students because of consistent poor performance… [W]e at NTI are being told to pass students who should fail because we are ‘training every level technician who paid for their certificates like everybody else’… We have been reduced to merely ‘selling’ diplomas for $30,000”13 In 2005, an economist by the name of Raghuram Rajan of the International Monetary Fund presented his paper in Jackson Hole, Wyoming at annual gathering of high-powered economist. His paper, “Has Financial Development Made The World Riskier?” found that everyone in the mortgage industry had an incentive to bring in more loans because the risk would be transferred out. Come to find out, he was absolutely right. This same philosophy is ingrained in the for-profit college model, everyone from the recruiters to the CEOs have incentive to increase enrollment, because the risk is then transferred to the taxpayers. This theory explains the sub-par instruction in this industry; the teachers are part-time employees, not tenure professors like they are in traditional schools. With this, the only job that instructors are held accountable for is passing students. In an investigation by the gAO, a Career Point teacher told an undercover agent this after failing a few assignments: Those assignments you did not pass, I’ve opened them up so you can retake them. They are open book so there should not be any failure. All answers are right in the back of the book and there is no time limit. In addition to the lack of education, studies have also found that instructors do not hold students accountable for academic honesty and rarely check for plagiarism. In the same gAO investigation, an undercover deliberately submitted plagiariZed work and received this response from the teacher: It appears that you copied and pasted from the website. By doing so you put a lot of extra information that I didn’t need. Next time I would prefer if you would read the information and only include what is needed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senate Higher Education Committee Hearing on For-Profit Colleges and Schools Order of Testimony Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Hearing Room A, Legislative Office Building
    Senate Higher Education Committee Hearing on For-Profit Colleges and Schools Order of Testimony Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Hearing Room A, Legislative Office Building New York State Education Department Commissioner Mary Ellen Elia New York State Education Department Deputy Commissioner John D’Agati New York State Education Department, Office of Higher Education Deputy Commissioner Kevin Smith New York State Education Department Adult Career and Continuing Education Services DEGREE GRANTING Marc Jerome, President Monroe College Christopher Barto, VP of Government Relations and Community Affairs LIM College Francis Felser, President Bryant & Stratton College Michael Hatten, Chairman & CEO New York Automotive & Diesel Institute CONSUMER ORGANIZATIONS Kirsten Keefe, Senior Staff Attorney Empire Justice Center Ramond Curtis Veteran Education Success Gary M. Schacher, Commander and James Casey, Department Adjutant The American Legion Kyle Boxhorn, Paralegal Western New York Law Center Johnson Tyler, Senior Attorney-Consumer and Foreclosure Units Brooklyn Legal Services CAREER SCHOOLS Terence Zaleski, Executive Director & Counsel Coalition of New York State Career Schools Joseph Monaco Culinary Tech Center Frank Talty, Director Refrigeration Institute Beshoy Boshra, General Manager Austin Medical Assistant Training Anthony Civitano, Executive Director New York State Beauty School Association 2 THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Commissioner of Education E-mail: [email protected] President of the University of the State of New York Twitter:@NY5EDNews 89 Washington Avenue, Room 111 Tel: (518) 474-5844 Albany, New York 12234 Fax: (5181 473-4909 Statement of Commissioner MaryEllen Ella, New York State Education Department Good morning Chair Stavisky and members of the Senate Higher Education Committee here today.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Federal Investment in For-Profit Education
    S. HRG. 111–1000 EMERGING RISK? AN OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL INVESTMENT IN FOR-PROFIT EDUCATION HEARING OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON EXAMINING AN OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL INVESTMENT IN FOR- PROFIT EDUCATION JUNE 24, 2010 Printed for the use of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 57–222 PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:26 Jul 26, 2011 Jkt 035165 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\DOCS\57222.TXT DENISE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS TOM HARKIN, Iowa, Chairman CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee PATTY MURRAY, Washington RICHARD BURR, North Carolina JACK REED, Rhode Island JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia BERNARD SANDERS (I), Vermont JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona SHERROD BROWN, Ohio ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska KAY R. HAGAN, North Carolina TOM COBURN, M.D., Oklahoma JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon PAT ROBERTS, Kansas AL FRANKEN, Minnesota MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado DANIEL SMITH, Staff Director FRANK MACCHIAROLA, Republican Staff Director and Chief Counsel (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:26 Jul 26, 2011 Jkt 035165 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\DOCS\57222.TXT DENISE CONTENTS STATEMENTS THURSDAY, JUNE 24, 2010 Page Harkin, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • APC Bulletin Volume8
    2017 Winter Newsletter Serving New York’s Students and Employers Building partnerships with local employers enables Association of Proprietary Colleges members to develop relevant and meaningful curricula for an increasingly competitive marketplace. APC member institutions are nimble. They quickly adapt, developing and implementing programs based on workforce needs. This results in jobs in high demand fields that pay good salaries – an excellent outcome for students. The College of Westchester Announces a New Bachelor of Science Degree in Interactive Digital Media The College of Westchester and analyze it effectively, is (CW) is pleased to announce in high demand in several approval from the New York industries,” said Mary Beth State Board of Regents to Del Balzo, president and CEO. offer a Bachelor of Science “And we’re glad we’re able to (B.S.) degree in Interactive offer this unique program at Digital Media and Marketing. The College of Westchester. This program will prepare Not only will students students for the strategic and gather hands-on experience that has been designed to entrepreneurial aspects of and training in web design, prepare graduates for entry interactive digital and social gaming and digital arts, they into occupations such as media design, production and will also receive instruction commercial and industrial utilization for business. on the business of marketing designers, graphic designers utilizing the internet.” and various positions in social “A deep understanding of media, including content content, including how to This new degree program creators, managers and craft, design, produce, manage is a full 120-credit course strategists. 1 LIM College to Offer Bachelor of Science Degree in Fashion Media LIM College, which is located in the business of fashion “LIM College is ideally suited in New York City and focused and consumer behavior with to offer a degree in Fashion exclusively on the study of the development of creative Media.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Testimonyfrom Organizations Not Testifying Jane Azia, Bureau
    Written testimonyfrom organizations not testifying Jane Azia, Bureau Chief Consumer Frauds & Protection Bureau New York Attorney General’s Office Donna Stelling-Gurnett, President The Association of Proprietary Colleges Robert Shireman, Senior Fellow The Century Foundation Scott Shaw, Chief Executive Officer Lincoln Educational Service Corporation (Lincoln Tech) Michael Petersen, Chief Financial and Operating Officer Institute of Culinary Education Leah Brink, Corporate Recruiter & Student/Intern Program Manager Daktronics, South Dakota Anthony A. Stanziani, Group President, Northeast DeVry College Katarina Rdultovskaia Consumer Written Testimony of Jane Azia Bureau Chief Consumer Frauds & Protection Bureau New York Attorney General’s Office New York State Senate Standing Committee on Higher Education Hearing on Oversight over For-Profit Schools April 10, 2019 Thank you for this opportunity to submit testimony to the New York State Senate Committee on Higher Education concerning oversight of for-profit colleges. Each year, thousands of New York students attend for-profit colleges. Unfortunately, many for-profit colleges lure student with false promises of economic success and leave students with few job prospects and insurmountable debt. In the past several years, our office’s investigations of for-profit colleges have revealed widespread abuses by for-profit schools. Despite the proliferation of such abuses, and of poor student outcomes in the for-profit sector, the current federal administration has substantially weakened federal oversight of for-profit colleges and dismantled many protections for for-profit college students. In the absence of adequate federal oversight of for-profit colleges, state-level action is critically needed to protect New York students and to safeguard New York taxpayers’ investment in higher education.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Letter Law and the For-Profit College
    BLACK LETTER LAW AND THE FOR-PROFIT COLLEGE A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Michael S. Hollenbaugh December 2015 © Copyright, 2015 by Michael S. Hollenbaugh All Rights Reserved ii A dissertation written by Michael S. Hollenbaugh B.A., University of Akron, 2004 M.Ed., Kent State University, 2005 Ed.S., Kent State University, 2007 Approved by _________________________, Co-director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Stephen Thomas _________________________, Co-director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Jarrod Tudor _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Paul Gaston Accepted By _________________________, Director, School of Foundations, Leadership and Kimberly Schimmel Administration _________________________, Interim Dean, College of Education, Health, and Human Mark Kretovics Services iii HOLLENBAUGH, MICHAEL S., Ph.D., December 2015 Higher Education Administration BLACK LETTER LAW AND THE FOR-PROFIT COLLEGE (316 pp.) Co-Directors of Dissertation: Stephen B. Thomas, Ed.D. Jarrod Tudor, Ph.D. There is no single resource available to consumers of for-profit education or to owners and administrators of for-profit colleges and universities that aggregates consumer protection law. The purpose of this study is to examine the laws that regulate the operation of for-profit institutions, the marketing and advertising of for-profit institutions, the gainful employment
    [Show full text]
  • For-Profit Schools: the Student Recruitment Experience
    S. HRG. 111–1160 FOR-PROFIT SCHOOLS: THE STUDENT RECRUITMENT EXPERIENCE HEARING OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON EXAMINING FOR-PROFIT SCHOOLS, FOCUSING ON THE STUDENT RE- CRUITMENT EXPERIENCE, AND UNDERCOVER TESTING TO OBSERVE MARKETING PRACTICES AUGUST 4, 2010 Printed for the use of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 78–780 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS TOM HARKIN, Iowa, Chairman CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee PATTY MURRAY, Washington RICHARD BURR, North Carolina JACK REED, Rhode Island JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia BERNARD SANDERS (I), Vermont JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah KAY R. HAGAN, North Carolina LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon TOM COBURN, M.D., Oklahoma AL FRANKEN, Minnesota PAT ROBERTS, Kansas MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado CARTE P. GOODWIN, West Virginia DANIEL E. SMITH, Staff Director PAMELA SMITH, Deputy Staff Director FRANK MACCHIAROLA, Republican Staff Director and Chief Counsel (II) CONTENTS STATEMENTS WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2010 Page Harkin, Hon. Tom, Chairman, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, opening statement ............................................................................... 1 Enzi, Hon.
    [Show full text]