Platinum Metals Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Platinum Metals Review UK ISSN 0032-1400 PLATINUM METALS REVIEW A quarterly survey of research on the platinum metals and of developments in their application in industry VOL. 35 OCTOBER 1991 NO. 4 Contents Flow-Through Catalysts for Diesel Engine Emissions Control 178 Royal Commission Report on Diesel Emissions 187 Chemical Reaction Fronts on Platinum Surfaces 188 Platinum Catalyses the Conversion of Methane to Higher Alkanes 195 Metal-Hydrogen Systems 195 The Plastic Flow of Iridium 196 Ammonia Sensor Uses Platinum Films 200 Partners in Innovation Conference 20 1 Recovery of Platinum Group Metals from High Level Radioactive Waste 202 Platinum Silicide Temperature Detectors 208 Palladium Contact Materials 208 Second Grove Fuel Cell Symposium 209 Michael Faraday and Platinum 222 Abstracts 228 New Patents 24 1 Index to Volume 35 250 Communications should be addressed to The Editor, Platinum Metals Review Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company, Hatton Garden, London ECl N 8EE Flow-Through Catalysts for Diesel Engine Emissions Control PLATINUM COATED MONOLITHS REDUCE PARTICULATES By B. J. Cooper and S. A. Roth Johnson Matthey, Catalytic Systems Division, Wayne, Pennsylvania The treatment of vehicle emissions with an engine technology have greatly reduced the for- exhaust catalyst in order to reduce the level of mation of particulates, with the result that air three major air pollutants, namely carbon quality standards may now be met by the use of monoxide, unburnt hydrocarbons and nitrogen catalysed flow-through monoliths (9-1 1). oxides, is becoming a world-wide requirement These catalysts have the advantage of being for gasoline fuelled engines (1, 2). First stan- passive systems which do not require dards were introduced in the U.S.A. and Japan regeneration. during the early 1970s (3). Similar standards Catalysts for diesel engines must function dif- will be enforced in Europe beginning in ferently to those for gasoline engines because of 1992/93 (4, 5). Diesel engine exhaust poses an differences in the chemical composition of the additional challenge for emission control exhaust gas. Modern spark-ignition gasoline because, as compared to exhaust from gasoline powered automobiles, with emission control engines, it also contains particulate matter. Ear- devices, operate near stoichiometry (at an ly attempts at particulate control utilised airfuel ratio of - 14.7: 1) and under closed-loop catalytic trap oxidisers to filter the exhaust and electronic control. The catalyst typically oxidise the particulates (6-8). Catalytic trap ox- operates in the temperature range of 300 to idisers have the disadvantage of requiring an 9OOOC and functions by oxidising carbon active regeneration mechanism to remove monoxide and unburnt hydrocarbons to carbon particulate build-up. Recent advances in diesel dioxide and water, while oxides of nitrogen are ic HC Cal ter WET DIESEL EXHAUST DRY DIESEL EXHAUST Fig. 1 The compositions are given of typical particulates collected from the exhaust of diesel engines characterised using the European hot start Extra Urban Driving Cycle. The hydrocarbons derived from both the fuel and the lubrication oil constitute the soluble organic fraction, a high proportion of which indicates a “wet particulate”, while a high pro- portion of carbon occurs in a “dry particulate” Platinum Metals Rev., 1991, 35, (4), 178-187 178 Table I Current and Proposed World-wide Diesel Emission Laws I Market [ Test co NO, HC +NO, Particulate U.S. FTP 3.4 1.o 0.20 I 1987 I glmile _" California FTP LD 0.39" 7.0 0.4 0.08 1989 glmile U.S. HDT HD I 1.3 15.5 5.0 0.25 1991 glhph U.S. HDT HD 1.3 15.5 5.0 0.10 1994 glhph Japan 10 Mode 2.70 0.70 None 1990 glkm 2.70 0.84 None Japan 10glkm Mode 2.70 0.50 0.2 1994 g/kmglkm !:HD 0.62 2.70 1 1 f 1I::: !!!: 0.60 0.2 EC ECE+EUDC Auto 2.72 0.97 0.14 1992 glkm EC 1 proposed Stage 1 EC steady HD 1.1 4.5 8.0 0.36 1992193 state test glkWh Stage 2 EC steady HD 1.1 4.0 7.0 0.15 1995196 state test glkWh - - FTP Federal Test Procedure LD light duty * Non methane hydrocarbons HDT Heavy Duty Truck HD heavy duty EUDC Extra Urbm Driving Cyle reduced to nitrogen gas (12-16). The standard exhaust temperatures are typically cooler, 150 practice for gasoline exhaust treatment is to to 450°C, and are always oxidising. The diesel utilise a noble metal catalyst supported on a engine generates intrinsically low emission flow-through ceramic or metallic monolith, levels of gas phase hydrocarbons and carbon typically having 300 to 400 axial channels per monoxide, and when fitted with a conventional square inch of frontal area. The monolith walls oxidation catalyst there is little trouble meeting are coated with a thermally durable, high sur- regulated standards for these pollutants. The face area oxide on which are supported the ac- use of typical three-way catalysts to control tive catalyst components, generally platinum, nitrogen oxide emissions is impractical due to palladium and rhodium. the oxidising nature of the exhaust. Therefore, Combustion of diesel fuel occurs by high nitrogen oxide emissions must be controlled by pressure ignition, raker than by spark ignition, engine design and calibration, often at the ex- and at air:fuel ratios greater than 20:l. The pense of increased particulate emissions. As a Platinum Metals Rev., 1991, 35, (4) 179 Fig. 2 In the absence of platinum, the pressure drop across a catalyst monolith varies with time, due to pro- gressive obstruction of the axial passages by the build- up of carbon particulates TEST TIME ON ENGINE, hours result, the major challenge to diesel exhaust soluble organic fraction consists of hydrocar- emission control by catalytic means remains bons derived from both fuel and lubricating oil one of particulate removal. Additionally, in which condense as the exhaust cools, or adsorb Europe, where there is a combined hydrocar- during collection. The sulphuric acid/water bon + nitrogen oxide standard, removal of low fraction arises from oxidation of sulphur diox- temperature gas phase hydrocarbons is ide to sulphur trioxide and condensation with beneficial to meeting the overall design re- water vapour. quirements. There are a variety of diesel engine designs Importance of Sulphur in Diesel and these may be classified according to the Particulate Control method of fuel and air injection, as well as by Sulphur is present to some extent in all diesel the end-use application. Engines with indirect fuel and, as a result of the combustion process, injection of fuel are typically utilised for is emitted in the exhaust as sulphur dioxide. A passenger cars and light-duty trucks, while small fraction, typically about 2 per cent, is fur- direct injection engines have inherently better ther olddised to sulphur trioxide which con- fuel economy and are utilised in heavy duty denses with water in the exhaust as sulphuric vehicles. Many manufacturers are developing acid, and is then absorbed on carbonaceous soot high speed direct injection engines for use in particles, thus contributing to the total light-duty applications. Air is added to the measured mass of particulate emissions. The combustion chamber by natural aspiration or use of a catalyst can increase the fraction of fuel under pressure by turbocharging, and tur- sulphur converted to sulphate, and even a bocharging is often accompanied by intercool- modest increase in this fraction will result in the ing. World-wide emissions standards for diesel “manufacture” of significant particulate. For fuelled engines will finally require the use of example for a 0.05 weight per cent sulphur fuel, catalytic converters in the 1992-94 time frame, 100 per cent conversion of the sulphur in the see Table I. fuel to sulphuric acid would by itself result in a particulate emission five times higher than the Diesel Particulate Catalysis 1994 U.S. heavy duty truck standard. Particulate Composition Diesel particulate standards are measured via Particulate Control Strategy the weight increase of a fibre fiter placed in the A “flow-through’’ monolithic reactor, as op- diesel exhaust. The material collected consists posed to a particulate trap, achieves particulate of graphitic “hard” carbon or “soot”, a solu- reduction by catalytic oxidation of the soluble ble organic fraction (SOF), water, sulphuric organic fraction. However, this will result in acid and an inorganic ash residue. Typical par- minimal conversion of the hard carbon, and ticulate compositions are given in Figure 1. The therefore, the catalyst must be able to keep Platinum Metals Rev., 1991, 35, (4) 180 itself free from particulate fouling. During low Sulphur dioxide adsorbs strongly on platinum temperature operation particulate increase via at room temperature and inhibits carbon sulphuric acid formation is not significant, but monoxide, nitrogen monoxide and alkene ox- under these low temperature conditions it is idation. Sulphur dioxide oxidation is kinetically necessary for the catalyst to remove the soluble limited at low temperature and ther- organic fraction and the gas phase hydrocar- modynamically limited at high temperature, bons. During high temperature operation the but near 500 to 6OOOC can reach 80 to 90 per oxidation of hydrocarbon is facile, but the in- cent conversion. Factors which can limit crease of particulates due to sulphate formation sulphur dioxide oxidation activity in this must be minimised or eliminated. temperature range include oxygen concentra- tion, space velocity (Figure 3), and intrinsic Catalytic Carbon Oxidation catalytic activity. It has been reported previously that the removal of carbon requires reaction with Removal of the Soluble Organic nitrogen dioxide, which is formed by the oxida- Fraction tion of nitrogen monoxide over a platinum Hydrocarbon species in diesel exhaust consist catalyst (17). Palladium and rhodium are much of gaseous compounds as well as heavy, con- less effective for the oxidation of nitrogen densable hydrocarbons (soluble organic frac- monoxide at low temperatures, and their inclu- tion) which can be solubilised from the diesel sion with platinum in a catalyst formulation particulate.
Recommended publications
  • Batteries for Electric Cars
    Batteries for Electric Cars A case study in industrial strategy Sir Geoffrey Owen Batteries for Electric Cars A case study in industrial strategy Sir Geoffrey Owen Policy Exchange is the UK’s leading think tank. We are an independent, non-partisan educational charity whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas that will deliver better public services, a stronger society and a more dynamic economy. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development and retains copyright and full editorial control over all its written research. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thor- ough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Registered charity no: 1096300. Trustees Diana Berry, Andrew Feldman, Candida Gertler, Greta Jones, Edward Lee, Charlotte Metcalf, Roger Orf, Krishna Rao, Andrew Roberts, George Robinson, Robert Rosenkranz, Peter Wall. About the Author About the Author Sir Geoffrey Owen is Head of Industrial Policy at Policy Exchange. The larger part of his career has been spent at the Financial Times, where he was Deputy Editor from 1973 to 1980 and Editor from 1981 to 1990. He was knighted in 1989. Among his other achievements, he is a Visiting Professor of Practice at the LSE, and he is the author of three books - The rise and fall of great companies: Courtaulds and the reshaping of the man-made fibres industry, Industry in the USA and From Empire to Europe: the decline and revival of British industry since the second world war.
    [Show full text]
  • Platinum Metals Review
    PLATINUM METALS REVIEW A quarterly survey of research on the platinum metals and of developments in their application in industry VOL. 10 APRIL 1966 NO. 2 Contents Recent Advances in Industrial Platinum Resistance Thermometry 42 Petrochemicals by Platinum Reforming 47 Prevention of Corrosion in Paper Making Machines 48 Expansion in Platinum Production 52 Platinum-wound Furnaces in the Manufacture of Semiconductors 53 The Wetting of Platinum and its Alloys by Glass 54 Electrodeposition of Iridium 59 The Reaction between Hydrogen and Oxygen on Platinum 60 Catalysis of Olefin-to-Olefin Addition 65 Abstracts 66 New Patents 73 Communications should be addressed to The Editor, Platinum Metals Review Johnson, Matthey & Co Limited, Hatton Garden, London ECI Recent Advances in Industrial Platinum Resistance Thermometry By J. S. Johnston, B.s~.,A.R.C.S. Rosemount Engineering Company Limited, Bognor Regis The modern platinum resistance thermometer provides the most accurate and versatile method of industrial temperature measurement and control. This article gives details of a new design of platinum resistance thermo- meter element of small dimensions and good stability. It also describes a range of complete thermometers based on these elements together with a resistance-bridge system used for signal conditioning when the thermo- meters are used in data-logging or computer controlled systems. Two principal factors have contributed to a thermometer confers the advantages of better recent large increase in the use of platinum reproducibility and larger output signal resistance thermometers in industry. On the coupled with the ability to scale the output one hand new techniques of manufxture to fit the requirements of the instrumentation.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2020
    TB Saracen UK Alpha Fund September 2020 Fund Overview FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS ONLY • Objective: to achieve a higher rate of return than the MSCI UK All Cap Index by investing in a portfolio of primarily UK equity securities with the potential for long Retail investors should consult their term growth. financial advisers • The portfolio has a bias towards small and medium sized companies and a high active share compared to the benchmark. FUND DETAILS th (as at 30 September 2020) • The fund has significant capacity and liquidity at a competitive annual charge. • The Fund has, since launch in March 1999, outperformed its benchmark in 17 out Fund size: £10.3m of 21 years and in 8 out of the last 10 calendar years. Launch date: 05/03/99 • A concentrated portfolio of 25-35 holdings, with a focus on capital growth, backed by the Saracen research process. No. of holdings: 33 Active share: 93% Source: Bloomberg Performance Chart* TB Saracen UK Alpha Fund B Acc Denomination: GBP 5 Year Performance (%) MSCI UK All Cap Index (TR) Valuation point: 12 noon 170 160 Fund prices: A Accumulation: 395.73p 150 B Accumulation: 651.65p 140 Policy is not to charge a dilution levy except in exceptional circumstances. 130 120 ACD: 110 T. Bailey Fund Services Limited 100 90 80 Scott McKenzie David Clark Fund Manager Fund Manager 09/15 03/16 09/16 03/17 09/17 03/18 09/18 03/19 09/19 03/20 09/20 *Source: Bloomberg, as at 30th September 2020 Total Return, Bid to Bid, GBP terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation to Analysts / Investors Johnson Matthey in China
    Presentation to Analysts / Investors Johnson Matthey in China London Stock Exchange 27th / 28th January 2010 Cautionary Statement This presentation contains forward looking statements that are subject to risk factors associated with, amongst other things, the economic and business circumstances occurring from time to time in the countries and sectors in which Johnson Matthey operates. It is believed that the expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable but they may be affected by a wide range of variables which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated. Overview and Trading Update Neil Carson Chief Executive JM Executive Board • Neil Carson - Chief Executive • Robert MacLeod - Group Finance Director • Larry Pentz - Executive Director, Environmental Technologies • Bill Sandford - Executive Director, Precious Metal Products 4 Other Senior Management • John Walker Division Director, Emission Control Technologies • Neil Whitley Division Director, Process Technologies • Nick Garner Division Director, Fine Chemicals • Geoff Otterman Division Director, Catalysts, Chemicals and Refining • Linky Lai General Manager, Emission Control Technologies, China • Henry Liu Commercial Director, Emission Control Technologies, China • Peng Zhang Sales Director, Power Plant Industries, China • Wolfgang Schuettenhelm Director, Worldwide Power Plant Industries • Andrew Wright Managing Director, Syngas and Gas to Products • David Tomlinson President, Davy Process Technology • Vikram Singh Country Head (AMOG)
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Batteries at Johnson Matthey
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1595/205651315X686723 Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2015, 59, (1), 2–3 JOHNSON MATTHEY TECHNOLOGY REVIEW www.technology.matthey.com Guest Editorial Introduction to Batteries at Johnson Matthey It may surprise some readers to see an edition of this generation batteries and operates at two points in the journal dedicated largely to lithium-ion batteries, but value chain for lithium-ion batteries (Figure 1). this is a technology that Johnson Matthey considers Through a combination of in-house R&D and a major new business area for the company. acquisition the company is establishing itself as a Johnson Matthey has been involved in research and signifi cant player in the sector. From an initial position development (R&D) in the battery materials space for in lithium iron phosphate materials, further investments several years and launched its commercial business in the coming years will expand the product range, operations in the sector in 2012. Since then, the working with cell developers to commercialise improved company has made a series of acquisitions to establish and next generation materials. itself both as a global supplier of cathode materials and There are big challenges to deliver the performance of advanced battery systems. Complemented by its required for advanced lithium-ion cells, not just initial lithium-ion battery research group at the Technology performance but durability and long term safety, as well Centres in Sonning Common, UK, and in Singapore, as cost. Good cell design and effi cient manufacture are the Battery Technology business of Johnson Matthey critical elements but the functional materials used are sits within its New Business Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Studentthesis-Michele Blagg 2013
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ The Royal Mint Refinery, a Business Adapting to Change, 1919-1968 Blagg, Michele Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 07. Oct. 2021 This electronic theses or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ The Royal Mint Refinery, a Business Adapting to Change, 1919-1968 Title: Author: Michele Blagg The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement.
    [Show full text]
  • Description Holding Book Cost Market Price Market Value £000'S £000'S
    DORSET COUNTY PENSION FUND VALUATION OF PORTFOLIO AT CLOSE OF BUSINESS 31 March 2017 Book Market Description Holding Market Value Cost Price £000's £000's UK EQUITIES MINING ACACIA MINING 33,000 147.93 4.502 148.57 ANGLO AMERICAN ORD USD0.54 270,390 2,804.18 12.27 3,317.69 ANTOFAGASTA ORD GBP0.05 74,500 151.50 8.355 622.45 BHP BILLITON ORD USD0.50 436,926 2,401.54 12.395 5,415.70 CENTAMIN EGYPT LTD 226,000 349.07 1.732 391.43 FRESNILLO 35,500 88.20 15.52 550.96 GLENCORE XSTRATA 2,412,543 5,662.91 3.141 7,577.80 HOCHSCHILD MINING ORD GBP0.25 49,000 108.90 2.765 135.49 KAZ MINERALS 53,600 89.80 4.551 243.93 PETRA DIAMONDS 106,900 169.67 1.329 142.07 POLYMETAL INT'L 53,800 514.30 9.945 535.04 RANDGOLD RESOURCES ORD USD0.05 19,250 485.32 69.7 1,341.73 RIO TINTO ORD GBP0.10 (REG) 250,150 2,876.49 32.185 8,051.08 VEDANTA RESOURCES ORD USD0.10 18,500 75.07 8.11 150.04 Total MINING 15,924.89 28,524.69 OIL & GAS PRODUCERS AFREN PLC 218,000 215.93 0 0.00 BP ORD USD0.25 3,948,100 13,177.95 4.5885 18,115.86 CAIRN ENERGY ORD GBP0.06153846153 119,207 236.32 2.048 244.14 NOSTRUM OIL & GAS 17,700 84.36 4.796 84.89 ROYAL DUTCH 'B' ORD EUR0.07 1,642,961 20,190.09 21.945 36,054.78 TULLOW OIL ORD GBP 0.10 188,500 789.92 1.99026 375.16 Total OIL & GAS PRODUCERS 34,694.58 54,658.45 CHEMICALS CRODA INTL ORD GBP0.10 26,995 211.15 35.77 965.61 ELEMENTIS 99,000 130.23 2.899 287.00 JOHNSON MATTHEY ORD GBP1.00 40,357 446.31 30.82 1,243.80 SYNTHOMER 57,665 118.87 4.751 273.97 VICTREX ORD GBP0.01 17,000 111.61 19.02 323.34 Total CHEMICALS 1,018.16 3,087.91 CONSTRUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 64, Issue 3, July 2020 Published by Johnson Matthey © Copyright 2020 Johnson Matthey
    ISSN 2056-5135 Johnson Matthey’s international journal of research exploring science and technology in industrial applications Volume 64, Issue 3, July 2020 Published by Johnson Matthey www.technology.matthey.com © Copyright 2020 Johnson Matthey Johnson Matthey Technology Review is published by Johnson Matthey Plc. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. You may share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. You must give appropriate credit to the author and publisher. You may not use the material for commercial purposes without prior permission. You may not distribute modifi ed material without prior permission. The rights of users under exceptions and limitations, such as fair use and fair dealing, are not aff ected by the CC licenses. www.technology.matthey.com www.technology.matthey.com Johnson Matthey’s international journal of research exploring science and technology in industrial applications Contents Volume 64, Issue 3, July 2020 234 Guest Editorial: Johnson Matthey Technology Review Special Edition on Clean Mobility By Andy Walker 236 Powering the Future through Hydrogen and Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells By Bo Ki Hong, Sae Hoon Kim and Chi Myung Kim 252 Exploring the Impact of Policy on Road Transport in 2050 By Huw Davies 263 Sustainable Aviation Fuels By Ausilio Bauen, Niccolò Bitossi, Lizzie German, Anisha Harris and Khangzhen Leow 279 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Drivers and Future Station Planning By Scott Kelley, Michael Kuby, Oscar Lopez Jaramillo, Rhian Stotts, Aimee Krafft and Darren Ruddell 287 Battery Materials Technology Trends and Market Drivers for Automotive Applications By Sarah Ball, Joanna Clark and James Cookson 298 Adaptable Reactors for Resource- and Energy-Efficient Methane Valorisation (ADREM) By Emmanouela Korkakaki, Stéphane Walspurger, Koos Overwater, Hakan Nigar, Ignacio Julian, Georgios D.
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE UK 100 ESG Select
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE UK 100 ESG Select Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Constituent Index weight (%) Country Constituent Index weight (%) Country Constituent Index weight (%) Country 3i Group 0.83 UNITED KINGDOM Halfords Group 0.06 UNITED KINGDOM Prudential 2.67 UNITED KINGDOM 888 Holdings 0.08 UNITED KINGDOM Harbour Energy PLC 0.01 UNITED KINGDOM Rathbone Brothers 0.08 UNITED KINGDOM Anglo American 2.62 UNITED KINGDOM Helical 0.03 UNITED KINGDOM Reckitt Benckiser Group 3.01 UNITED KINGDOM Ashmore Group 0.13 UNITED KINGDOM Helios Towers 0.07 UNITED KINGDOM Rio Tinto 4.8 UNITED KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.65 UNITED KINGDOM Hiscox 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM River and Mercantile Group 0.01 UNITED KINGDOM Aviva 1.18 UNITED KINGDOM HSBC Hldgs 6.33 UNITED KINGDOM Royal Dutch Shell A 4.41 UNITED KINGDOM Barclays 2.15 UNITED KINGDOM Imperial Brands 1.09 UNITED KINGDOM Royal Dutch Shell B 3.85 UNITED KINGDOM Barratt Developments 0.52 UNITED KINGDOM Informa 0.56 UNITED KINGDOM Royal Mail 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM BHP Group Plc 3.29 UNITED KINGDOM Intermediate Capital Group 0.44 UNITED KINGDOM Schroders 0.29 UNITED KINGDOM BP 4.66 UNITED KINGDOM International Personal Finance 0.02 UNITED KINGDOM Severn Trent 0.44 UNITED KINGDOM British American Tobacco 4.75 UNITED KINGDOM Intertek Group 0.66 UNITED KINGDOM Shaftesbury 0.12 UNITED KINGDOM Britvic 0.19 UNITED KINGDOM IP Group 0.09 UNITED KINGDOM Smith (DS) 0.4 UNITED KINGDOM BT Group 1.26 UNITED KINGDOM Johnson Matthey 0.43 UNITED KINGDOM Smurfit Kappa Group 0.76 UNITED KINGDOM Burberry Group 0.62 UNITED KINGDOM Jupiter Fund Management 0.09 UNITED KINGDOM Spirent Communications 0.11 UNITED KINGDOM Cairn Energy 0.05 UNITED KINGDOM Kingfisher 0.57 UNITED KINGDOM St.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Results for the Year Ended 31St March 2021 Robust Performance and Growth Opportunities Driven by Sustainable Solutions
    News Release th Thursday 27 May 2021, 7.00 am Preliminary results for the year ended 31st March 2021 Robust performance and growth opportunities driven by sustainable solutions Robert MacLeod, Chief Executive, commented: Our employees have done a tremendous job adapting to new ways of working through COVID-19, whilst still delivering for our customers. It is thanks to their hard work that we have delivered a robust set of results which, in the context of a pandemic, is especially pleasing and testament to their efforts. Following a challenging first half, we recovered strongly in the second half helped by a strong recovery in our end markets and higher precious metal prices. We are delivering our efficiency programme, tightly managing working capital and generating cash from our more established businesses which we are continuing to invest for growth, particularly in battery materials and hydrogen. In the year we made good strategic progress. We began entering into partnerships to advance the commercialisation of eLNO and secured new customer wins in Fuel Cells. Our investment in sustainable technologies builds on our existing expertise and will enable the transformations in transport, energy, decarbonisation of industry and a circular economy that the world needs to reach net zero – transformations that are at the heart of achieving our vision of a cleaner, healthier world for today and future generations. It is in this context that we’ve launched our new sustainability goals which will result in Johnson Matthey being a net zero business by 2040. Our sustainability agenda relates not only to the way we run our own business, but underpins our strategic focus on the current and future technologies we sell to our customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Holdings As of June 30, 2019
    Investment Holdings As of June 30, 2019 Montana Board of Investments | Portfolio as of June 30, 2019 Transparency of the Montana Investment Holdings The Montana Board of Investment’s holdings file is a comprehensive listing of all manager funds, separately managed and commingled, and aggregated security positions. Securities are organized across common categories: Pension Pool, Asset Class, Manager Fund, Aggregated Individual Holdings, and Non-Pension Pools. Market values shown are in U.S. dollars. The market values shown in this document are for the individual investment holdings only and do not include any information on accounts for receivables or payables. Aggregated Individual Holdings represent securities held at our custodian bank and individual commingled accounts. The Investment Holdings Report is unaudited and may be subject to change. The audited Unified Investment Program Financial Statements, prepared on a June 30th fiscal year-end basis, will be made available once the Legislative Audit Division issues the Audit Opinion. Once issued, the Legislative Audit Division will have the Audit Opinion available online at https://www.leg.mt.gov/publications/audit/agency-search-report and the complete audited financial statements will also be available on the Board’s website http://investmentmt.com/AnnualReportsAudits. Additional information can be found at www.investmentmt.com Montana Board of Investments | Portfolio as of June 30, 2019 2 Table of Contents Consolidated Asset Pension Pool (CAPP) 4 CAPP - Domestic Equities 5 CAPP - International
    [Show full text]
  • List of Electric-Vehicle-Battery Manufacturers - Wi
    List of electric-vehicle-battery manufacturers - Wi... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_electric-vehic... List of electric-vehicle-battery manufacturers 1 von 6 13.04.21, 21:10 List of electric-vehicle-battery manufacturers - Wi... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_electric-vehic... List of largest EV battery manufacturers Production Used in Battery Year Type of Still in Notes capacity production manufacturer founded battery operation (GWh) vehicle Killacycle motorcycle, General Motors (Chevrolet Spark EV), Fisker Automotive (Karma PHEV), Daimler Buses North America (Orion VII), now defunct Smith Electric Vehicles electric trucks, Chery Auto, Kandi, Navistar electric trucks, ALTe Powertrain Technologies extended-range EV lithium-ion powertrains, VIA Motors (lithium A123Systems extended-range VTRUX, 2001[1] 1.5 (2018)[2] Yes Yes iron three cars with Shanghai phosphate) Automotive Industry Corp.'s Roewe brand (an EV, a PHEV and an HEV), BMW (ActiveHybrid 3 and ActiveHybrid 5 hybrid electric vehicles), Mercedes- Benz High Performance Engines (Formula One racing kinetic energy recovery system (KERS), Buckeye Bullet land-speed racer We engineer, develop, and manufacture high-quality American Battery lithium-ion batteries and Solutions Inc. (htt battery systems to serve the p://www.american growing demands in electric 2019 lithium-ion Yes batterysolutions.c vehicles (EV), electrified om) transportation, motive, industrial, and commercial markets. AESC Nissan vehicles 2007 lithium-ion Phoenix Motorcars, Lightning lithium- Altairnano 1973
    [Show full text]