DOCSLIB.ORG

The Napoleonic Wars, 1803-1815 Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Napoleonic Wars, 1803-1815 Ebook THE NAPOLEONIC WARS, 1803-1815 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK David Gates | 336 pages | 04 Jul 2003 | Vintage Publishing | 9780712607193 | English | London, United Kingdom The Napoleonic Wars, 1803-1815 PDF Book Lists with This Book. However, Villeneuve's fleet had just spent months at sea crossing the Atlantic twice, which supports the proposition that the main difference between the two fleets' combat effectiveness was the morale of the leaders. Rise of the British Empire as the Dominant World Superpower [6] Establishment of the United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway , [7] and the United Kingdom of the Netherlands [8] [9] Rise of Prussia as a great power [10] Beginning of the Risorgimento [11] [12] and the Unification of Germany [13] Widespread rise of nationalism and liberalism in Europe [14] [15] Major population loss [16]. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Retrieved on 12 July Showing Esdaille rejects that explanation and instead says that it was a good time to stop expansion, for the major powers were ready to accept Napoleon as he was:. The French Continental System was largely ineffective and did little economic damage to Great Britain. Nelson's chaplain, Alexander Scott , who remained by Nelson as he died, recorded his last words as "God and my country. Main article: Duchy of Warsaw. Wikimedia Commons. After the Napoleonic period, nationalism, a relatively new movement, became increasingly significant. Bonaparte had annexed Piedmont and Elba , made himself President of the Italian Republic , a state in northern Italy that France had set up, and failed to evacuate Holland, as it had agreed to do in the treaty. Dutch troops fought against Napoleon during the Hundred Days in The Poles supplied almost , men for the invasion force, but against their expectations, Napoleon avoided any concessions to Poland, having in mind further negotiations with Russia. He attended Nelson's funeral while a captive on parole in Britain. Migration as a travel business. Napoleon rather studied his enemy via domestic newspapers, diplomatic publications, maps, and prior documents of military engagements in the theaters of war in which he would operate. Napoleon entered Berlin on 27 October A tactical draw at Eylau 7—8 February , followed by capitulation at Danzig 24 May and the Battle of Heilsberg 10 June , forced the Russians to withdraw further north. Villeneuve had drawn up plans to form a force of four squadrons, each containing both French and Spanish ships. However, when the storm blew up, many of the severely damaged ships sank or ran aground on the shoals. Wikimedia Commons has media related to Trafalgar Leading the northern, windward column in Victory was Nelson, while Collingwood in the gun Royal Sovereign led the second, leeward, column. The main Russian army retreated for almost three months. Cambridge University Press. The fourth first-rate carried guns. The British seized on this to demand satisfaction and security before evacuating Malta, which was a convenient stepping stone to Egypt. The plan had three principal advantages. By Oct the exasperated Prussians have gone to war and been humiliated at Jena less than 2 weeks later, Napolean marches into Berlin in triumph. Archived from the original on 1 April The Napoleonic Wars, 1803-1815 Writer There was no way for some of Nelson's ships to avoid being "doubled on" or even "trebled on". This faced an initial coalition force of about ,— although coalition campaign plans provided for one million front-line soldiers, supported by around , garrison, logistics and other auxiliary personnel. Europe at the height of Napoleon's Empire. Far from his supply lines, he faced a larger Austro-Russian army under the command of Mikhail Kutuzov , with the Emperor Alexander I of Russia personally present. Denmark joined the war on the side of France, but without a fleet it had little to offer, [85] [86] beginning an engagement in a naval guerrilla war in which small gunboats attacking larger British ships in Danish and Norwegian waters. The battle did not mean, however, that the French naval challenge to Britain was over. To lessen the time the fleet was exposed to this danger, Nelson had his ships make all available sail including stunsails , yet another departure from the norm. What's more, in many areas the detail undermines the stated purpose of the book, which is to provide an all-encompassing synthesis of the period; yet, a large chunk of the book is tactical minutiae, and even that is hard to follow due to the poor quality of included maps. Fearing that his inexperienced officers would be unable to maintain formation in more than one group, he chose to keep the single line that became Nelson's target. Nelson joined the fleet on 28 September to take command. Such a surprise attack would either produce a devastating effect on morale, or force him to weaken his main battle line. Todo a Babor in Spanish. Aerial surveillance was used for the first time when the French used a hot-air balloon to survey coalition positions before the Battle of Fleurus , on 26 June New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Views Read Edit View history. The French occupied Spain and formed a Spanish client kingdom , ending the alliance between the two. Napoleon subsequently defeated Russia at Friedland , creating powerful client states in Eastern Europe and ending the fourth coalition. Napoleon rather studied his enemy via domestic newspapers, diplomatic publications, maps, and prior documents of military engagements in the theaters of war in which he would operate. The wars are often categorised into five conflicts, each termed after the coalition that fought Napoleon: the Third Coalition , the Fourth —07 , the Fifth , the Sixth —14 , and the Seventh The Congress of Vienna redrew the borders of Europe and brought a period of relative peace. The ability and quality of the land forces governed these operations. The gunners were forced back below decks by French grenades. France produced the second-largest total of armaments, equipping its own huge forces as well as those of the Confederation of the Rhine and other allies. The French Revolution made every civilian a part of the war machine, either as a soldier through universal conscription, or as a vital cog in the home front machinery supporting and supplying the army. The remainder of imperial forces came mostly from the Confederation of the Rhine, especially Saxony and Bavaria. While this book purported to be a summary, it contained a much greater level of detail than what I was looking for, or needed. Napoleon's impact on Poland was huge, including the Napoleonic legal code, the abolition of serfdom, and the introduction of modern middle class bureaucracies. An informative book. The order of sailing, in which the fleet was arranged when the enemy was first sighted, was to be the order of the ensuing action so that no time would be wasted in forming two lines. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. The Trafalgar Companion. The European total may have reached 5,, military deaths, including disease. The Napoleonic Wars were a continuation of the French Revolutionary Wars led and dominated by Napoleon Bonaparte since and kick-off the start of the 19th Century. War of the Third Coalition. David Gates. Ben Petersheim rated it really liked it Apr 20, During that time Russia waged war against Sweden — and the Ottoman Empire — , and nominally against Britain — Napoleon, as well, fell short of the dogma of war serving just as a mean to achieve a political aim, and not an end it itself. Retrieved 18 November One, the Walcheren Expedition of , involved a dual effort by the British Army and the Royal Navy to relieve Austrian forces under intense French pressure. Many of the injured crew were taken ashore at Gibraltar and treated in the Naval Hospital. Archived from the original on 1 June Many a time I would have given the whole group of our capture, to ensure our own This section has an unclear citation style. Warfare and Society in Europe, — BBC News. Jeff rated it really liked it Nov 26, The results vindicated his naval judgement. The Napoleonic Wars, 1803-1815 Reviews Heavy British involvement soon followed. Archived from the original on 1 April Warfare and Society in Europe, — Kagan argues that Britain was especially alarmed by Napoleon's assertion of control over Switzerland. At first, Villeneuve was optimistic about returning to the Mediterranean, but soon had second thoughts. Zeittafel der Rechtsgeschichte. Retrieved 7 November Nelson's plan was indeed a gamble, but a carefully calculated one. Although Trafalgar meant France could no longer challenge Britain at sea, Napoleon proceeded to establish the Continental System in an attempt to deny Britain trade with the continent. The latter, conceiving that it was probably intended for her, hauled down her colours, and was taken by HMS Donegal , who anchored alongside and took off the prisoners. McLynn argues that Britain went to war in out of a "mixture of economic motives and national neuroses — an irrational anxiety about Napoleon's motives and intentions. The French Continental System was largely ineffective and did little economic damage to Great Britain. After failing to fight his way through, he decided to break off the engagement, and led four French ships, his flagship the gun Formidable , the gun ships Scipion , Duguay Trouin and Mont Blanc away from the fighting. Britain was the largest single manufacturer of armaments in this period. It ended in disaster after the Army commander, John Pitt, 2nd Earl of Chatham , failed to capture the objective, the naval base of French-controlled Antwerp. Napoleon abdicated on 6 April. In Napoleon created a powerful outpost of his empire in Central Europe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ICV20 Tomlinson.Pub
    The virtual battle: Flags in Georgian marine paintings Barbara Tomlinson Abstract The 18th century saw the development of an English school of marine painting following the example of the Dutch in the previous century. When representing naval battles, artists needed to handle numerous technical details including the depiction of British squadronal colours, distin- guishing flags and signal flags. This paper examines selected actions painted by Samuel Scott (1701/2-1772), Nicholas Pocock (1741-1821), Thomas Whitcombe (c.1752-1827) and William Anderson (1757-1837) and ask - how accurate were these artists, how did they research their paintings, how did they display flags for dramatic effect and who was their intended audience? The resources of the National Maritime Museum’s collections used to illustrate this subject in- clude prints, drawings and documents. The British maritime victories of the sailing navy era were immortalized by contemporary artists. Originally a Dutch genre, by the middle of the 18th century, marine pictures were also produced by British painters who specialised in these scenes. I would like to consider the relationship between the reality and the representation with particular reference to the way the artist shows British flags, concentrating on some of the less well-known battles. One painter who took considerable pains to include accurate detail was Nicholas Po- cock. A sketchbook survives compiled by Pocock during the Battle of the Glorious 1st of June when he was able to observe the action directly from the frigate Pegasus. These small and indistinct views remind us that in contrast to the way vessels are shown in marine paintings, in reality, everything would have been much more spread out and much further away.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptive List of the Papers of Admiral Sir John Thomas Duckworth, Bart
    DESCRIPTIVE LIST OF THE PAPERS OF ADMIRAL SIR JOHN THOMAS DUCKWORTH, BART. (1748-1817) GOVERNOR OF NEWFOUNDLAND, 1810-1813 PART IV Acquired by an exchange in 1986 from THE OSBORN COLLECTION OF YALE UNIVERSITY'S BEINECKE RARE BOOK AND MANUSCRIPT LIBRARY Note The page numbers given in the following list and index are those arbitrarily assigned to the unnumbered pages of the documents themselves. They are not the page numbers of the finding aid. OSBORN DUCKWORTH PAPERS SERIES I PARKER FAMILY PAPERS - Personal Correspondence of Sir John Thomas Duckworth and Lady Duckworth with members of the Parker family of Almington, Staffordshire Reel No. M-7771 Order of Unnumbered Place & Date Author Recipient Description Pages H.M.S. ORION, J.T. Duckworth, George Parker, 1 - 3 Spithead Captain Litchfield 2 March 1793 H.M.S. ORION, J.T. Duckworth George Parker 4 - 6 Reel No. M-7771 Order of Place & Date Author Recipient Description Unnumbered Pages Stoke, J.T. Duckworth George Parker 10 - 13 Plymouth Dock 29 Oct. 1793 Stoke, J.T. Duckworth George Parker 14 - 16 Plymouth Dock 2 Nov. 1793 Stoke, J.T. Duckworth George Parker 17 - 19 Plymouth Dock 4 Nov. 1793 Stoke, J.T. Duckworth George Parker 20 - 23 Plymouth Dock 8 Nov. 1793 H.M.S. ORION, J.T. Duckworth George Parker 24 - 27 Spithead 4 March 1794 Stoke, J.T. Duckworth George Parker 28 - 31 Plymouth Dock 2 July 1794 H.M.S. ORION, J.T. Duckworth George Parker 32 - 34 Plymouth Dock 19 July 1794 H.M.S. ORION, J.T. Duckworth George Parker 35 - 36 Plymouth Sound 19 July 1794 H.M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Professional and Cultural Memory of Horatio Nelson During Britain's
    “TRAFALGAR REFOUGHT”: THE PROFESSIONAL AND CULTURAL MEMORY OF HORATIO NELSON DURING BRITAIN’S NAVALIST ERA, 1880-1914 A Thesis by BRADLEY M. CESARIO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2011 Major Subject: History “TRAFALGAR REFOUGHT”: THE PROFESSIONAL AND CULTURAL MEMORY OF HORATIO NELSON DURING BRITAIN’S NAVALIST ERA, 1880-1914 A Thesis By BRADLEY M. CESARIO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, R.J.Q. Adams Committee Members, Adam Seipp James Hannah Head of Department, David Vaught December 2011 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT “Trafalgar Refought”: The Professional and Cultural Memory of Horatio Nelson During Britain’s Navalist Era, 1880-1914. (December 2011) Bradley M. Cesario, B.A., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. R.J.Q. Adams Horatio Lord Nelson, Britain’s most famous naval figure, revolutionized what victory meant to the British Royal Navy and the British populace at the turn of the nineteenth century. But his legacy continued after his death in 1805, and a century after his untimely passing Nelson meant as much or more to Britain than he did during his lifetime. This thesis utilizes primary sources from the British Royal Navy and the general British public to explore what the cultural memory of Horatio Nelson’s life and achievements meant to Britain throughout the Edwardian era and to the dawn of the First World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of National Biography
    Calder 241 Calder rarest books in three papers contributed to any part of the ministerial function. When ' ' ' i. a the Gentleman's Magazine for 1834 (pt. new edition of the Cyclopaedia' of Cham- of bers pp. 59, 195, 284). Caldecott had views was proposed, he was engaged as ten- his own on Shakespearean editing. Dibdin tative editor, and besides drawing out a describes him as ' the last of the old breed of plan wrote some articles. One of the articles Shakespearean commentators of the school was submitted to Dr. Johnson, who excised of Johnson and Steevens,' and he certainly large portions, expressing the opinion at the had characteristic contempt for Malone, Stee- same time that the 'redundance' was not ' ' ' vens, and the Shakespearean scholars of his the result of inability but of superfluous own day. After many years' labour he pub- diligence.' In the discussion which ensued lished privately in 1832 a volume containing with the publisher, Calder, in the opinion of ' ' like elaborate Dr. Hamlet' and As you it,' with Johnson, displayed an improper degree ' notes. This was intended to be the first in- of turbulence and impatience,' and, declin- stalment of a final edition of Shakespeare. ing to accede to the wishes of the publisher, But the compilation proved singularly feeble was deprived of the editorship, which was and was not continued. Caldecott was well conferred on Dr. Rees. In 1776 Calder drew ' ' acquainted with honest Tom Warton and up a plan of a periodical work called the Bishop Percy, and entered heartily into the 'Selector.' He also projected a 'Foreign In- former's quarrel with Ritson, whom he styles telligencer.' While at Alnwick he made the ' in a letter to Percy that scurrilous miscreant.' acquaintance of Thomas Percy, afterwards of whom he assisted in viii.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Incompatible Incentives in the Age of Fighting Sail
    Explorations in Economic History 39, 204–231 (2002) doi:10.1006/exeh.2002.0783, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on The British Navy Rules: Monitoring and Incompatible Incentives in the Age of Fighting Sail Douglas W. Allen1 Simon Fraser University The British Navy during the age of sail was systematically successful against its opponents, most notably the French. This paper documents this success, shows that it cannot be explained by superior ships, training, or other naval capital, and puts forth the hypothesis that the British Navy governance structure provided better incentives to fight than those of their opponents. The hypothesis is tested by examining the structure of the rules and then contrasting them with the rules governing privateers, the army, and the navy over time. The paper concludes with a discussion of why the French did not copy the British strategy. © 2002 Elsevier Science (USA) He asked who the stout man was who had just been so ceremoniously disposed of. “He was an admiral,” they told him. “But why execute this admiral?” he enquired. “Because he had not enough dead men to his credit,” was the reply; “he joined battle with a French admiral, and it has been established that their ships were not close enough to engage.” “But surely,” exclaimed Candide, “the French admiral must have been just as far from the English as the English admiral was from the French!” “True enough,” was the answer; “but in this country we find it pays to shoot an admiral from time to time to encourage the others.” Voltaire,p.
    [Show full text]
  • Manxmen in Nelson's Navy
    MANX NATIONAL HERITAGE LIBRARY Manx Manxmen in National Heritage Nelson’s Navy Eiraght Ashoonagh Vannin Public Information Sheet No.9 October 2005 This guide provides some information on A select bibliography gives references to Manxmen who served in the Royal Navy during modern histories of the Royal Navy at the time the Napoleonic Wars. Some sixty six sailors and of Trafalgar. It also provides references to three Royal Marines of Manx birth are believed required reading about Captain John Quilliam to have fought at Trafalgar and included in this RN who served with Admiral Lord Nelson. guide is the ‘Manx Trafalgar Roll of Honour’. ILLUSTRATION: Midshipmen at rest in their wardroom. 1 Manx links to Trafalgar John Quilliam James Brown Snr (alias Cato) The most famous Manxman to James Brown senior, the father of James Brown, founder have participated in the Battle of the Isle of Man Times, claimed to have fought at of Trafalgar was Trafalgar. He claimed to have been born a slave, and John Quilliam, First that his original name was Cato (which fits with the Lieutenant of the Victory. fashion for giving slaves Roman names), before he Information about his changed it to Brown. No James Brown is shown on the early life is sketchy, but roll of HMS Victory at Trafalgar, but interestingly there he was born at Marown in is a James Caton, aged 28, whose place of birth is 1777. He was apparently the shown as Brazil. son of a farmer, but was impressed into the Royal Navy in 1794. Quilliam showed great potential and rose through the ranks, eventually receiving a commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Professionalism and the Fighting Spirit of the Royal Navy
    Title Page Professionalism and the Fighting Spirit of the Royal Navy Rules, Regulations, and Traditions that made the British Royal Navy an Effective Fighting Force during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1793-1815 by Nicholas James Kaizer Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honours in History Acadia University April, 2015 © Copyright by Nicholas James Kaizer, 2015 Approval Page This thesis by Nicholas James Kaizer is accepted in its present form by the Department of History and Classics As satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honours Approved by the Thesis Supervisor ___________________________________ __________________ Dr. Paul Doerr Date Approved by the Dean of Arts ___________________________________ __________________ Dr. Jeffrey J. Hennessy Date Approved by the Chair of the Honours Committee ___________________________________ __________________ Dr. Anthony Thomson Date ii Permission for Duplication Page I, Nicholas James Kaizer, grant permission to the University Librarian at Acadia University to reproduce, loan or distribute copies of my thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats on a non-profit basis. I, however, retain the copyright of my thesis. ___________________________________ Signature of Author __________________ Date iii Acknowledgements To my significant other, Maggie Chapman, for her constant support and companionship, and for putting up with my historical ramblings. To my family for supporting my academic decisions, and for their never-ceasing assistance throughout the last four years. Thanks to my supervisor, Dr. Paul Doerr, for his help and guidance and patience throughout the year. I am especially grateful for the very useful primary sources which he scanned for me while in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • MOORE, JOSEPH S., Ph.D. Irish Radicals, Southern Conservatives: Slavery, Religious Liberty and the Presbyterian Fringe in the Atlantic World, 1637-1877
    MOORE, JOSEPH S., Ph.D. Irish Radicals, Southern Conservatives: Slavery, Religious Liberty and the Presbyterian Fringe in the Atlantic World, 1637-1877. (2011) Directed by Robert M. Calhoon. pp. 488 This dissertation is a study of Covenanter and Seceder Presbyterians in Scotland, Ireland and the American South from 1637-1877. Correspondence, diaries, political pamphlets, religious tracts, and church disciplinary records are used to understand the cultural sensibility, called herein the Covenanter sensibility, of the Covenanter movement. The dissertation examines how the sensibility was maintained and transformed by experiences such as the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, the Glorious Revolution, the 1798 Irish Rebellion, the American Civil War, and Reconstruction. Critical issues involved are the nature of religious and political culture, the role of moderation and religious extremism, the nature of Protestant primitivsm and church discipline, and the political nature of radical Protestant religion. This dissertation looks at Covenanter movements broadly and eschews an organiZational history in favor of examining political and religious culture. It labels the broad groups within the Covenanter movement the Presbyterian fringe. In Scotland, the study examines Covenanter ideology, society, church discipline, cell group networks of praying societies, issues of legal toleration and religious liberty, the birth of the Seceder movement and anti-slavery rhetoric. In Ireland it examines the contested legal role of Presbyterian marriages, the controversial arrival of Seceders in Ireland, as well as Covenanters’ involvement in the Volunteer movement, the United Irishmen, and the 1798 Irish Rebellion. In America it studies the life of John Hemphill, the retention of exclusive psalm singing and primitive Protestantism, the American ColoniZation society in South Carolina, interracial religious transfers, and Reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CHAIRMAN's DISPATCH Engage The
    2 THE CHAIRMAN’S DISPATCH Engage The Trafalgar Festival more closely! The Trafalgar Festival is underway! Four months packed with events up and down the country began spectacularly on 28 June with the International Fleet Review and culminate in October with the Trafalgar Weekend for which more than a thousand events have now been registered. For Nelson, 200 years ago, there was not the same sense of anticipation, excitement or certainty. For two years he had been trying to bring the French fleet and subsequently the Combined Fleet of France and Spain to action in order to secure a crushing victory. In July 1805 he was down hearted. ‘Cape Spartel in sight, but no French Fleet nor any information about them: how sorrowful this makes me.’ he wrote after his 3,459-mile dash across the Atlantic and back. His efforts had once again been frustrated. The Great Chase after Villeneuve ‘as far as Trinidad’ and back had ended without a battle. Nevertheless, in a dispatch sent by the fast brig Curieux under the command of Captain George Bettesworth, who arrived at the Admiralty on 8 July, he had given the astute Lord Barham, First Lord of the Admiralty, time to issue a decisive order. Barham instructed Admiral Sir Robert Calder to raise his blockade of Ferrol and to cruise between Ushant and Cape Finisterre, in order to strengthen the defence of the south western approaches to the English Channel. On 22 July Villeneuve ran straight into Calder’s squadron some 120 miles off Cape Finisterre. Barham’s cunning and strategic instinct had paid off.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRAFALGAR ROLL the Captains and Their Ships Thomas
    THE TRAFALGAR ROLL The Battle of Trafalgar 21st. October 1805 The poop­deck of HMS Victory, noon, 21st October 1805 The Captains and their Ships Thomas Hardy Victory Charles Bullen Britannia Thomas Fremantle Neptune Richard Grindall Prince William Hargood Belleisle Francis Laforey Spartiate Philip Durham Defiance Israel Pellew Conqueror James Morris Colossus Henry Bayntun Leviathan Edward Codrington Orion Lieut. John Pilford Ajax *** Robert Redmill Polyphemus Edward Berry Agamemnon Thomas Capel Phoebe * William Prowse Sirius * Edward Rotherham Royal Sovereign Eliab Harvey Temeraire John Conn Dreadnought Charles Tyler Tonnant Robert Moorsom Revenge George Duff (D) Mars ** Charles Mansfield Minotaur Richard King Achilles George Hope Defence John Cooke (D) Bellerophon William Rutherford Swiftsure Lieut. John Stockham Thunderer *** Henry Digby Africa Henry Blackwood Euryalus * Thomas Dundas Naiad * * Frigates, not engaged. ** On the death of Captain Duff, the First Lieutenant, William Hennah, took command. He received the Thanks of Parliament, Gold Medal and Sword from the Patriotic Fund, as did all captains, and he was, himself, promoted to Captain. He also received the unusual honour of a Letter of Commendation from the ship's company. *** Lieuts. Pilford and Stockham were acting in the absence of their captains. Both received the honours bestowed on all captains. The Commanders Vice Admiral Viscount Nelson of the Nile and Burnham Thorpe KB, RN. Commander in Chief, Mediterranean Fleet HMS Victory Captain Thomas Hardy Vice Admiral Sir Cuthbert Collingwood KB, RN Second in command, leading the Lee Column HMS Royal Sovereign Captain Edward Rotherham Rear Admiral the Earl of Northesk KB, RN Third in Command, followed Nelson in the Weather Column HMS Britannia Captain Charles Bullen The Battle of Trafalgar Fought on the 21st.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership in the French Navy During the Revolution and Empire
    CHAPTER EIGHT Leadership in the French Navy during the Revolution and Empire. The Optimist and the Pessimist: Louis-René de Latouche- Tréville (1745–1804) and Pierre Charles de Villeneuve (1763–1806) Rémi Monaque Marine française The Revolution of 1789 brought about a profound and lasting disorganisation of the French navy. Its officer corps, mostly consisting of nobles, was forced to take part in a massive emigration. Some of them, due to family traditions, considered their fidelity to the King more important than their fidelity to the Nation, but many, although open to new ideas, left the country just to save their lives. The awful atmosphere that existed on board ships made it impossible for them to exercise authority over their crews who had lost all confidence in the ‘aristocrats’ whom they suspected of betrayal. Some rare noble officers man- aged to stay in service for a while. However, by November 1793 they were all dismissed. After the Reign of Terror, which ended in 1794, successive govern- ments started the reintegration of the old noble officer corps but this procedure How to cite this book chapter: Monaque, R. 2017. Leadership in the French Navy during the Revolution and Empire. The Optimist and the Pessimist: Louis-René de Latouche-Tréville (1745–1804) and Pierre Charles de Villeneuve (1763–1806). In: Harding, R and Guimerá, A (eds.). Naval Leadership in the Atlantic World. Pp. 99–106. London: University of West- minster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book2.j. License: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 100 Naval Leadership in the Atlantic World concerned only a limited number of individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Controversy and Scottish Society, C.1679-1714 Alasdair J. N
    Religious Controversy and Scottish Society, c.1679-1714 Alasdair J. N. Raffe Ph.D. The University of Edinburgh 2007 ii Abstract This thesis analyses religious controversy in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth- century Scotland, examining both the arguments of the educated elites and those of ordinary people. Defining religious controversy as arguments between members of rival religious parties , the thesis concentrates on disputes between presbyterians and episcopalians, and within presbyterianism. In the main, these arguments did not focus on Church government, but embraced a broad range of issues, including allegations of ‘persecution’ (discussed in chapter two), ‘fanaticism’ and ‘enthusiasm’ (chapter three) and the reputations of rival clergy (chapter four). Incidents of crowd violence, the subject of chapter five, provoked controversy, and also promoted the objectives of the religious parties. Chapter six illustrates the significance of debates over the National Covenant and the Solemn League and Covenant, before and after the revolution of 1688-90. Chapter seven then discusses the arguments that gave rise to presbyterian separatism in the years after 1690. As chapter eight explains, the union of 1707 proved highly contentious for presbyterians, and led to a series of political blows to the presbyterian Church. Chapter nine surveys the role in religious controversy of concerns over English theology, new philosophy and atheism. Finally, chapter ten concludes by examining the consequences of controversy for Scottish society. As well as printed pamphlets, satirical verses, sermons and memoirs by elite authors, the thesis draws on the petitions, diaries and correspondence of ordinary people, their testimony to church courts, and evidence of their involvement in crowd violence and separatist worship.
    [Show full text]