DOCSLIB.ORG

Pratylenchus Loosi * / / / / .

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pratylenchus Loosi * / / / / . * ** * ++++ (())() %%% ""%%& & ''"%& ' $$$$ """" ### !!! *//..00/.0/.0.... """ ( Pratylenchus loosi))) Biology and population dynamics of tea root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus loosi) in Iran ** 45 4455 45 0055 ''05 ' ### 3 3 3 3 &&& ..00 .0 ((%%22(%2 (((( .0. ..00.. .0. .0..00.0 1111 ? ; ;<& => /.0& : 0& 6 9+'." # +7 68+'." ! 6#0 /.0& %+7 8!A26 ? ; ;<& @ !"%& ' /I/I G0H2 DEFB//B 3 " 666 6 8*8*8*8* Pratylenchus loosi * + () % "%& ' $ " # ! " OP Q.0! " M N 2 ? /.0. " * 6 .A& ) K 1 L0J /.% 1 .30 .0T "% 9+ S Q.0! " L * ( # 6"%S * R . 8 / 0 )." K9'. /.% 1 * + () % "%& ' 0 L. : .0 + /"07 J. 2 . "%) 3 0&W # ".0 J' " B V ) " K 1 Z 6" # YJ> L #W "%& ' L. " . ' X#0! * L @ + /#" # V ) " (>& ?%5 [ O \ /S '.H / J # ! 6 76 "%S '.H / J '.%& A ' Z "%& ' # ^ * L #W ?%5 # . 6 7 H]& $" # 0 "%& ' L. 0 `8& .0 _ " 7 "." / +' 9+ S ? . ' S cS # 0 ( >& b04& _ " # 6"% ".0 J' " I & IaN% 9+ S Q.0! " '% L. ' K 7 )0* .! ".0 J' " d 5" #" # # & B #W YJ> L # d & B (>& b04& 6#" K ! # & : 0& 6 9+'." 6! e.. M#. 6' 9' 0Jf" . +> * O& g M%h ** ii ... + () % "%& ' $ " # ! N 2 0 . j'. M%P # A (>& / & Z "%& ' ' 6#" k#. * & .." "%& ' L. 7 "." / +' OP Q.0! " $ " ?.0 ]& J) 4. / S # %0! 0 & +O". 6 l" m M " J / +' M N 2 P " ?.0 ]& /% 0 Aj& .! (V ) " # 'W T. L ."." "%# ?.0 ]& '# # ' # V ) " L ." . 7 "." ?%5 " # J!." "%& ' L. $ " " 0&( =;' V ) " K 1 #" L. '# L. " ." 0 no& 7 K 1 L #" /.% 1 ' K 1 L. /"% c% ".". $$$$ """" ### !!! Pratylenchus loosi * ** * ++++ (())() %%% ""%%&& ''"%& ' ::: : 77 66pp..## 66p.#p.# ;;; #A #0. # . 6"07 6" 4J. /S . 0+ 7 . ' !%' L0& T * " ! * /.% 1 /S +> ^.S 0n. 0 6#r1 .! / " !%' L0&M #.J # "%! 6" 4J. 0" # p J>2 .H\ ?r8! ? O 0 ! 8. !%' # t 7 /S '." L\# . /S 0 6#r1 .. YJ> .H\ s ' . O L *( .(James 1983) "%! 6" 4J. :; / 8 3 u' . L '%2 " mJT. # ' " M%m< L. # . * 61 / 7l0 m . 8 /.0. %+7 " M%m< L. +7 0 w ."." .6 v# 6 9 %+7 M ! 6v# '.0. 6".%' ) J8 .A B "#t %+7 M ! " 0J% 7 a x01 # 0J% 7 IBa M%P .%' . 5" * "#t / . 5" $ "#t /"% .." %+7 .! . / * %& 5" / Q;3 # . 6"." y mJ). "%) . / * K7 l0m "%! L o& ?.".# z0P . * l0m . '.#.03 => K " L .! .." # .%) / G.A L0)S : . 0 0{ t M t " .(Ookhovat & Vakili 1998) ! L& .A mJ+ # /% #" "#t / " $+) * %& /.A (FAO)' .(FAO 2005) . L& .A Ba "#t ' %& .; L. /.0. ( 7 /. g # .0 D|| 6".%' ) . Pratylenchus loosi Loof 1960 1 ^ ' * + () % "%& ' * R " (Gadd) " Q%& "r a M " L #. .0 Pratylenchidae "0 G.A (Loof) l% Q%& "r a M " # 6 + 8'W 0 .( .( Sivaplan 1967) . YJ> %+7 " } Ia zJ K9'. "%& ' '% a . = /% 7 & ~%0 ? ) L0&W 6! G.A '% ".& L. L . 7 . 6! G.A * # L0& ( . 8 '% L. 7 %P ! (P. loosi) * + () % "%& ' G"r9 # L2.p L * / J# 8'W 0 /%* %+7 " * .A& ) K.%1 # L* ^% % r _ ? O70 * /%* ' # . "%& ' L. .! ! /S 5 mJ). / A * L8 # 6"0 G.A 0 Y1 '% L * L. # G.A ' A 9'03 ?%& # . "%& ' L. / A .L 0 6#r1 .(Compos et al. 1990) .(Mohotti 1998) . 6! 30 "%& ' Y { / A /.% 1 6 " L2.p %+7 . * &.".# M ' # 0 M " "%& ' L. /.0. " "0 G.A d M " # 6 + (^0.) K8 Y! 7 * ? ; ;<& 6 9J. " (=. / J0! " /r / J. 0!) %+7 M ! * R "%S .(Maafi 1993) &% + # V ) . ."0 '%' .(Baruoti & Alavi 2002) ! 6 + dI M 6" . "%& ' Ba & Ba ".& k.0>J. 0j '"% 6"07 /.A) [.0`7. 7 "%S V%8+ .( .( Ookovat & Vakili 1998) "0 V ) ^0 Baa . "%& ' aa & aa # + ^0 . %+7 M ! * R .A& ) K 1 L0& ( * + () % "%& ' / ! /.A 7 %P 6"%' ".# M%m< L. %& K T ? ) 'W 7 3. M%m< /.A 0 # ) ! " j. '.%& ^1 1 # J3 = 7 [.! 6"%S .( .( Maafi and Mirhoseini Moghadam 2001) "." ! OP Q.0! " * + () % "%& ' 0 `8& # 3 V ) _ " " J3 W K7 ?. /.A 6"%S * &% " # ! ".0 J' " I & .(Sivapalan & Gnanapragasam 1975 ) = 7 (A .; &% L " 7 t D|D ... + () % "%& ' $ " # ! L " 7 * 6"%S + K)." " / A c \ " * + () % "%& ' ?! ( Gnanapragasam et al. 1988) ' 6' M * & ? . 6' T K.%1 # .% # cS Q.0! V ) 3 0 u' .%1 K ;J ?.0n. "%& ' L. "%S /"% W # 6"% _ ' +8 V ) " ? ) L0J+ ."." 1. "%! .A K 1 L. ? ) +& 1 A ' V ) J . .( .( Gnanapragasam 1987; Gnanapragasam & Sivaplan 1991) Q < # 0 /S ! # 6! G.A A ' /.% & " * # . P. loosi '% Q.0! " /S 0 `8& c% " .. 6"0 N% 1% m +7 # 6! /.% 1 ".0 J' " A ' (>& b04& .0 # ".0 J' " Ia 9+ S . 6! 07 # & B 9+ S Q.0! " '% L. ' )0* .(Wu et al. 2002) .. J309' ?%5 /S "% " '. * ? ; ;<& %+7 " "%& ' L. . (\ 1 ( %+7 " (P. loosi) * + () % "%& ' /"% .? ) "%# L * ( ? ; ;<& A ' %+7 L. " L2.p # 8'W 0 L * / J# /%* ( '" A ) * M ! * R " "%& ' L. . %& .. 6+' ^ j'. /S "% " '# J30 ?%5 z ;<& L. /S $ " # ! . 3 7 XrP. ^1 # %+7 .. 0000 GG##G# R ) z ;<& L. " + S T # = S "% R . ."0 '%' ::: : ."0..""00."0''%%'' '%''%' Y.YY..Y. (0 0J aaa t %+7 * ? ; ;<& A70 r. ! & ; ;<& * 6"% (Sub sample) '%' A 6" . K8+J '%' 0 .30 ?%5 _70 # 3" m& ?%5 ( ' # $ /# * T%P . 0J J' Ia 5 3 # 0J J' IB & B z1 . 7 M ;J'. 6 9+ S ^W ? m>+ On . # #S * + ^0 6" # ^0 % 7 .! 6"." /. g # .0 D| A 8 G# zOP V ) . * + () % "%& ' . ::::"%& '""%%&& ''"%& ' k.k.00>>JJ..k.0>J. cccc # L%7 G# : . 0 + . . # p% 40J' # $. 6" 4J. (Jenkins 1964) .30 ?%5 (Coolen & d'Herde 1972) "0 " G ! r. %' %8#08 . 6" 4J. "%& ' G ! .0 ::::"%& '""%%& & ''"%& ' GG !!G ! kkkk .! 6" 4J. (Counting slide) # 0 ! # ' "% "%& ' +7 # 0 `8& ::::"%& '""%%&& ''"%& ' ++77+7 """" Q%& 6! e.. G# zOP N% $" . 9+ S Q.0! " 1% m +7 Q < .(Pourjam 1998) "0 6" 4J. ?.0 ]& 0mJ> (Moody et al. 1973) /. 8 # "% 9+ 99++ 9+ S SS S QQQQ.0!..00!!.0! """ * ** * ++++ (())() %%% ""%%&& ''"%& ' !!! # 0 "%& ' 9+ S Q.0! " 0 `8& " L0&_ L & %u L . "%& ' a N% $" # t $J+& 0 ") ! 6"." +7 N% $ " %& %8'. K)." .08& N 2 '%' / ( %P # (Z "%& ' # #W YJ> '.# 6 #" ? # 6"." .0T ".0 J' " II # I Ia " YJ> . "0 .08& = S L. ) /' KT.t . J30 .0T " "% .! 6" 4J. (Wu et al. 2002) /. 8 # ## G# . (>& b04& _ " L & %u 0 " # J30 0u' " ".0 J' " # d B " %& %8'. N 2 .J. .0T (>& "1 aa $J+& 0 " # 5" #" S cS +7 Q < # t $J+& N 2 " }2 .'! .9' K 7 8 & " J4 ? y ) " %& %8'. 0 .! 6"." ") & 0 " .08& $ 84& 6! b04& (>& ".& 6! L & / P . L. " .! .08& 0J+ T" A ' = S L. # "0 G ! (YJ> A ' 0' # 6" "%& ' O' L & (>& b04& " L & 0 6#r1 = S $J+& 6! b04& #W (>& b04& . }2 0. L. ^ j'. ."0 ^ j'. /#" J4 N 2 ? KT.t # 6! 6"." M ;J'. 6 & N% K0J. $ " # t = S L. ."0 .9' (".0 J' " I & Ia ) 0 `8& " %& %8'. ?%5 k.0>J. K1 ^W / !H . }2 .! ^ j'. .08& N 2 OT = S + .'! G ! $ 84& Z "%& ' # J30 D|E ... + () % "%& ' $ " # ! J YJ> Kt.0 L & L *( # "%& ' ' K 7 )0* L & %u # M P " (Z "%& ' # #W YJ> L (>& b04&) $ 84& ' K 7 )0* O = S 0 " .! ^ j'. .08& .%J %' " + S $ " # 0 . "%& ' .J. = S ^ j'. ."% (>& "j K 8+& & (>& . $J+& # 0 # #S '.# ?%5 6! %& (>& # 6"." +7 N% " " .08& # ($J+& 0 " L ( (>& a ".&) 6"." M ;J'. N% $" # t & 6! P / ? '.# 0 .! 6"." .0T %& %8'. " ".0 J' " I & Ia # #W YJ> L % / '.# " } ."0 !."" ( >& b04& 0 6#r1 ."0 L & #W YJ> L /"07 P ^W / # !."" Z "%& ' . # !."" Q < " ( >& "j 6 + / & Z 6" "%& ' % / L. .! 6" 4J. (>& & (>& . ' K 7 )0* O < %7H ? 1rP. OPOOPPOP QQQQ.0!..00!!.0! """ * ** * ++++ (())() %%% ""%%& & ''"%& ' !!! ### $$$$ """" ((((#### L T OP Q.0! " "%& ' ! # $ " .0 * Z &% aa K ! 0 0Jaa t T 0 ) + () % "%& ' 6"%S ' . } .! J30 0u' " %+7 * ? ; ;<& A70 r. ! * R " (6"%S $ J4 #" 0 _&0 %P (B M M#. ' / 2) M N 2 ? a M ^#" } .! #S + S ? T . (&% a . KT.t) + # V ) _70 '%' "0 " # L%7 # (Jenkins 1964) A 8 G # . 6" 4J. _ &0& G ! r. 6" 4J. # k.0>J. + # V ) . "%& ' (Coolen & d'Herde 1972) "%& ' ".& O' 3" m& G ! L * G ! 0 6#r1 .'"0 " = S ^ j'. M%P " ."0 L & A ' V ) '%' " 6v# 6" # 0' Z ?.0 ]& : . 0 .! 0 6.'. + S ? T " A ' ' /.A # V ) ?.0t M%P " .! L & OP Q.0! " "%& ' J $ 2 ' # m3 / J 6%<' '%' A 'S # 08 ."0 '%' # YJ> M / J M%m3 . 6" 4J. ."%' ( 0& # 6 "." A 'S . }2 ."0 >+ A ' %7H "%& ' '.H # M 0 " J $ 2 L & "%& ' $ " S .A3. ^0' /. g # .0 D| .30 .0T 0 "% ' /.A # V ) " / S ~ O&. <<< ### jjj j J'J'J' J' 0 OP # 9+ S Q.0! " * + () % "%& ' ! Aj& # N% $" # 0 P. loosi "%& ' 6%O'. %& c% " ."0 & Ia " "%& ' L. 0 `8& " L0& c% 7 "." / +' /S 6 "." S K <& # /. 8 # ## Q%& 7 'S 6S " j J' .! ".0 J' " I "." ; [r 7 '. 6"#S " /.% & " "%& ' L. y%m) " (Wu et al. 2002) .( M#) " 7 "." / +' 9+ S Q.0! " (>& b04& " L0& c% = S N J' T L. N J' .(I M#) . 6! b04& (>& ".& L0J+ ".0 J' " d " " /S "%& ' L. y%m) " (Wu et al. 2002) /. 8 # ## 'S A ' z ;<& . d " " . " / +' lrJ). ".0 J' " $ (".0 J' " ") '. J3 b04& ( >& . 5" / ".0 J' " " " # 5" d/ ".0 J' " w " &.0t & L ." lrJ). 7 "." / +' }' .# Aj& N J' .'. 6! b04& ( >& = S L. " .(IM#) "." "%# ( >& b04& .0 5" $ M Jt. O' L & # 6! 6"." M ;J'. +7 Q < # * . }2 6! " I & Ia) 0 `8& " " J4 N 2 ? R% . }2 6" # 0' "%& ' 5" d/Ia O' L 9' "." / +' K5 t N J' .'! .9' (".0 J' " O' L. 7 t " (d :I) ! 0' "%& ' 5" IB/a K ; " 6" "%& ' 6"% ?# 4J YJ> M " T. Q.0! # ."0'%' Km3 J OP Q.0! "%& ' 5" d/I OP Q.0! " 6! 0 '%' " O' L 9' .. 6" 4J. O' L. ; .(dd :I) ! 0' "%& ' 5" I/a K ; " 6" (α =) ." lrJ). dd # d L *( # I # I ".1. L 7 "." / +' t /%S M#. " OP # 9+ S Q.0! " Z "%& ' O' N J' .".' "%# D| ... + () % "%& ' $ " # ! (>& . 5" dB "#t 9+ S Q.0! " 7 "." / +' N J' L *( .. 6S # " .H\ 0;3 0n. " . L8 j J' L. 7 '%! KO& Z "%& ' 6! b04& A ' .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Article (PDF)
    OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 240 Stlldies on plant and soil Nematodes associated with crops of economic importance in Gujarat QAISER H. BAQRI PADMA BOHRA ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 240 RECORDS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA Studies on plant and soil Nematodes associated with crops of economic importance in Gujarat. QAISER H. BAQRI AND PADMA BOHRA Desert Regional Station, Zoological Survey of India, Pali Road, Jhalan1and, Jodhpur - 342 005 Edited by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Dr. BAQRI Qaiser H. & Dr. BOHRA Padma., 2005. Studies on Plant and Soil Nematodes Associated with Crops of Economic Importance in Gujarat of the Zoological Survey of India, : Rec. zool. Surv. India, Occasional Paper No. 240 : 1-48 (Published by the Director, Zoo I. Surv. India) Published : July, 2005 ISBN 81-8171-076-2 © Govt. of India, 2005 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, el~ctronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent, resold hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher's consent, in an form of binding or cover other than that in which, it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page. Any revised price indicated by a rubber stamp or by a sticker or by any other means is incorrect and should be unacceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • Genus Pratylenchus Filipjev: Multientry and Monoentry Keys and Diagnostic Relationships (Nematoda: Tylenchida: Pratylenchidae)
    © Zoological Institute, St.Petersburg, 2002 Genus Pratylenchus Filipjev: multientry and monoentry keys and diagnostic relationships (Nematoda: Tylenchida: Pratylenchidae) A.Y. Ryss Ryss, A.Y. 2002. Genus Pratylenchus Filipjev: multientry and monoentry keys and diag- nostic relationships (Nematoda: Tylenchida: Pratylenchidae). Zoosystematica Rossica, 10(2), 2001: 241-255. Tabular (multientry) key to Pratylenchus is presented, and functioning of the computer- ized multientry image-operating key developed on the basis of the stepwise computer diagnostic system BIKEY-PICKEY is described. Monoentry key to Pratylenchus is given, and diagnostic relationships are analysed with the routine taxonomic methods as well as with the use of BIKEY diagnostic system and by the cluster tree analysis using STATISTICA program package. The synonymy Pratylenchus scribneri Steiner in Sherbakoff & Stanley, 1943 = P. jordanensis Hashim, 1983, syn. n. is established. Con- clusion on the transition from amphimixis to parthenogenesis as one of the leading evolu- tionary factors for Pratylenchus is drawn. A.Y. Ryss, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St.Petersburg 199034, Russia. Identification of nematode species is difficult diagnostic system, and by the cluster tree analy- because of relative poverty and significant sis using STATISTICA program package intraspecific variability of diagnostic characters. (STATISTICA, 1995). The genus Pratylenchus Filipjev is an example of a group with large number of species (49 valid Material and the basic information sources species, more than 100 original descriptions) and complicated diagnostics. The genus has a world- The collections of the following institutions wide distribution and economic importance as were used in research: Zoological Institute, Rus- its species are the dangerous parasites of agri- sian Academy of Sciences; Institute for Nema- cultural crops.
    [Show full text]
  • 193 Molecular, Morphological and Thermal Characters of 19 Pratylenchus Spp. and Relatives Using the D3 Segment of the Nuclear Ls
    MOLECULAR, MORPHOLOGICAL AND THERMAL CHARACTERS OF 19 PRATYLENCHUS SPP. AND RELATIVES USING THE D3 SEGMENT OF THE NUCLEAR LSU rRNA GENE Lynn K. Carta, Andrea M. Skantar, and Zafar A. Handoo USDA-ARS, Plant Sciences Institute, Nematology Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Carta, L. K., A. M. Skantar, and Z. A. Handoo. 2001. Molecular, morphological and thermal charac- ters of 19 Pratylenchus spp. and relatives using the D3 segment of the nuclear LSU rRNA gene. Nem- atropica 31:195-209. Gene sequences are provided for the D3 segment of the large subunit rRNA gene in Pratylenchus agilis, P. hexincisus, P. teres, and P. zeae. They were aligned with the closest comparable previously pub- lished molecular sequences and evaluated with parsimony, distance and maximum-likelihood meth- ods. Different outgroups and more taxa in this study compared to a previous D3 tree resulted in improved phylogenetic resolution. Congruence of trees with thermal, vulval and lip characters was evaluated. A tropical clade of Pratylenchus with 2 lip annules was seen in all trees. Maximum-Parsimony and Quartet-Puzzling Maximum-Likelihood trees, with ambiguously-alignable positions excluded and Radopholus similis as an outgroup, had topologies congruent with species possessing 2, 3 or 4 lip annules. An updated sequence for Pratylenchus hexincisus indicated it was an outgroup of P. penetrans, P. arlingtoni, P. fallax and P. convallariae. Pratylenchus zeae was related to P. neglectus in a Neighbor-Join- ing tree, but was equivocal in others. The relatives of P. teres were P. neglectus and Hirschmanniella belli rather than morphometrically similar P. crenatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Molecular Characterisation of the Root Lesion Nematode, Pratylenchus Curvicauda
    Biology and Molecular Characterisation of the Root Lesion Nematode, Pratylenchus curvicauda This thesis is presented by FARHANA BEGUM For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre (SABC), Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia July 2017 Declaration I declare that this is my own account of my research and contains as its main content, work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary educational institution. FARHANA BEGUM ii Abstract Australia is the driest inhabited continent with about 70% of the land arid or semi- arid, and soils which are geologically old, weathered, and many are infertile. This is a challenging environment for agricultural production, which is further impacted by biotic constraints such as root lesion nematodes (RLNs), Pratylenchus spp. These soil-borne nematodes cause significant economic losses in yields of winter cereals, and in other crops, particularly under conditions of moisture and nutrient stress. RLNs are widely distributed in Australian broadacre cropping soils, and losses in cereal production are greater when more than one RLN species is present, a situation which often occurs in Western Australia (WA). Hence, to develop appropriate management regimes, accurate identification of RLN species is needed, combined with understanding the biology of host-nematode interactions. The initial aim of this research was to extend the molecular and biological characterisation of P. quasitereoides, a recently described species of root lesion nematode from WA. Morphological measurements of two important characters, tail shape and the per cent distance of the vulva from the anterior end of the nematode body, were made from nematodes collected from the four locations of WA.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Plant Parasitic Nematodes in the Soils of Tea Estates in Ceylon
    DISTRIBUTION OF PLANT PARASITIC NEMATODES IN THE SOILS OF TEA ESTATES IN CEYLON M. T. Hutchinson and M. K. Vythilingara Summary The spiral nematode, Helicolylenchus dihystera (Cobb) Sher is more widely dis­ tributed in tea soils than is the "meadow" or root-lesion nematode, Pratylenchus loosi Loof, despite the fact that tea, Camellia sinensis (L) O. Kuntze, is either not a host or a very poor host plant for H. dihystera and is a very suitable host for P. loosi. Other plants, interplanted with tea, particularly the "dadap" tree, Erythrina litho- sperma Blume, appear to be the primary hosts of H. dihystera. Of the several other nematodes that occur in tea soils, only the pin nematode, Paratylenchus curvitalus van der Linde, and the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne brevicauda Loos, seem to be parasites of tea. Introduction The distribution of Pratylenchus loosi in tea soils has been summarised by Hut­ chinson and Vythilingam (1963), and the pathogenicity of this nematode to tea was demonstrated by Hutchinson (1963). Root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne have been found in roots of nursery tea plants and in the roots of Tephrosia Vogelii Hook, and of Erythrina lithosperma for many years, and the literature is sum­ marised by Visser (1959a). Spiral nematodes are parasitic upon E. lithosperma and are therefore commonly found in tea soils, but are unable to thrive upon tea roots, according to Gadd (1943 and 1947). However, Gadd (1946) found pin nematodes of the genus Paratylenchus when examining tea roots for P. loosi and presumed that they were parasitic upon tea.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA PREVELANCE and PATHOGENICITY of ROOT LESION NEMATODE, Pratylenchus Spp. on BANANA (Musa Paradisiaca L
    UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA PREVELANCE AND PATHOGENICITY OF ROOT LESION NEMATODE, Pratylenchus spp. ON BANANA (Musa paradisiaca L.) IN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA ADAMU SAIDU PAIKO FP 2016 25 PREVELANCE AND PATHOGENICITY OF ROOT LESION NEMATODE, Pratylenchus spp. ON BANANA (Musa paradisiaca L.) IN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA UPM By ADAMU SAIDU PAIKO COPYRIGHT Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science © May 2016 COPYRIGHT All material contained within the thesis, including without limitation text, logos, icons, photographs and all other artwork, is copyright material of Universiti Putra Malaysia unless otherwise stated. Use may be made of any material contained within the thesis for non-commercial purposes from the copyright holder. Commercial use of material may only be made with the express, prior, written permission of Universiti Putra Malaysia. Copyright © Universiti Putra Malaysia UPM COPYRIGHT © DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my beloved parents; late mother Mallama Jummai Ibrahim, my father Alhaji Adamu Saidu Jazu and my bestowed kids; Abdullah, AbdurRahman, Isah and young M . UPM COPYRIGHT © Abstract of thesis presented to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia in fulfilment of the requirement for the Degree of Master of Science PREVELANCE AND PATHOGENICITY OF ROOT LESION NEMATODE, Pratylenchus spp. ON BANANA (Musa paradisiaca L.) IN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA By ADAMU SAIDU PAIKO May 2016 UPM Chairman : Associate Professor Kamaruzaman Bin Sijam, PhD Faculty : Agriculture Root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus spp.) cause considerable damage to banana plant (Musa spp.) globally. Even though, it has been reported in Malaysia, it disease prevalence and severity of infection has not been attended to.
    [Show full text]
  • Symposium Abstracts
    Nematology,2002,V ol.4(2), 123-314 Symposium abstracts 001 Bursaphelenchusxylophilus and B.mucronatus untilthe recent identi cation in Portugal. It is felt that if inJapan: where arethey from? introducedthe nematode would establish populations or interbreedwith endemic non-virulent species. This ban 1; 2 Hideaki IWAHORI ¤, Natsumi KANZAKI and hashadmajorconsequences on theNorth American forest 2 Kazuyoshi FUTAI industry.Recently many new species of Bursaphelenchus 1NationalAgricultural Research Center for Kyushu Okinawa havebeen described from deador dyingpines throughout Region,Nishigoushi, Kumamoto 861-1192, Japan Europe.Because morphological characters are limited 2 KyotoUniversity, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan inusefulness for speciesdescriptions and cannot be ¤[email protected] usedto differentiate populations, molecular taxonomy hasbecome important. W ewilllook at the accuracy Geographicaldistribution and speciation of Bursaphelen- ofmethods used for speciesidenti cation and at what chusxylophilus (pinewoodnematode) and B. mucrona- criteriamight be used to de ne and differentiate species tus were inferredfrom molecularphylogenetic analysis of Bursaphelenchus whenconsidering import and export andchromosomal number .Severalisolates of B. xylop- bans. hilus and B.mucronatus inJapan and from someother countrieswere usedfor DNA sequencingof the ITS re- 003Mitigating the pinewoodnematode and its gionsin ribosomalDNA. Publishedresearch on thenum- vectorsin transported coniferous wood berof chromosomesof selectedisolates was usedto iden- tifya
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Pulse Crop Fields of the Canadian Prairies
    Survey of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Pulse Crop Fields of the Canadian Prairies by Fernanda Gouvea Pereira A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Soil Science University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba Copyright © December, 2018 ABSTRACT Gouvea Pereira, Fernanda. M.Sc., University of Manitoba, December, 2018. Survey of Plant- Parasitic Nematodes in Pulse Crop Fields of the Canadian Prairies. Advisor; Dr. Mario Tenuta. The current distribution of economically important plant parasitic nematodes is relatively unknown in the Canadian Prairies for pulse crops. The majority of previous surveys were done several decades ago and may now be suspect as a result of recent molecular identification methods; as has been the case with the quarantine pest Ditylenchus dipsaci (Kühn) Filipjev. The nematode species Ditylenchus dipsaci can constrain export markets for economically important crops, such as peas. However, a more recent study has revealed that previous identifications of D. dipsaci in yellow pea (Pisum sativum L.) exports have actually been the non-quarantine species Ditylenchus weischeri Chizhov, Borisov & Subbotin. To further our understanding of these issues, a survey was conducted in three major pulse crops growing regions of Canada (Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba) to determine the occurrence of plant-parasitic nematodes associated with pea, chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris L.). A total of 465 plant and soil samples of pea, chickpeas, lentils and creeping thistle (Cirsium arvense L.), plants from 93 fields were analysed. Recovered nematodes were identified to genus by morphological features.
    [Show full text]
  • Importation of Citrus Spp. (Rutaceae) Fruit from China Into the Continental
    Importation of Citrus spp. (Rutaceae) United States fruit from China into the continental Department of Agriculture United States Animal and Plant Health Inspection A Qualitative, Pathway-Initiated Pest Risk Service Assessment January 14, 2020 Version 5.0 Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Pest Risk Assessment for Citrus from China Executive Summary The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prepared this risk assessment document to examine plant pest risks associated with importing commercially produced fruit of Citrus spp. (Rutaceae) for consumption from China into the continental United States. The risk ratings in this risk assessment are contingent on the application of all components of the pathway as described in this document (e.g., washing, brushing, disinfesting, and waxing). Citrus fruit produced under different conditions were not evaluated in this risk assessment and may have a different pest risk. The proposed species or varieties of citrus for export are as follows: Citrus sinensis (sweet orange), C. grandis (= C. maxima) cv. guanximiyou (pomelo), C. kinokuni (Nanfeng honey mandarin), C. poonensis (ponkan), and C. unshiu (Satsuma mandarin). This assessment supersedes a qualititative assessment completed by APHIS in 2014 for the importation of citrus from China. This assessment is independent of the previous assessment, however it draws from information in the previous document. This assessment is updated to be inline with our current methodology, incorporates important new research, experience, and other evidence gained since 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Pratylenchus Penetrans P. Loosi (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae)
    Plant Pathology Bulletin 18: 247-262, 2009 Pratylenchus penetrans P. loosi (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae) 1, 6 2 3 4 5 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. [email protected] +886-4-2330-2803 99 3 31 . 2009. Pratylenchus penetrans P. loosi (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae) . 18: 247-262 2007 10 9 (Pratylenchus spp.) 5 P. penetrans (Cobb, 1917) Chitwood & Oteifa, 1952 4 P. loosi Loof, 1960 SEM (morphometrics) 5.8S ITS-1 ITS-2 18S 28S DNA (ribosomal DNA, rDNA) P. penetrans P. loosi rDNA GenBank 916 bp 1238 bp 80.9 % DNA Pratylenchus penetrans Pratylenchus loosi (1964) (23) Toung (1962, 1963) (39,40) Hung (1966) (26) Wu (root-lesion nematode, Pratylenchus (2002) (44) Filipjev, 1936) 19 (cortex) (3, 30) (35) (root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne spp.) (scanning electron microscope, SEM) P. P. coffeae P. brachyurus (26) P. coffeae (25, 44) P. loosi (43, 44) P. penetrans penetrans P. loosi P. zeae Chen (26, 44) P. pratensis (23, 39, 40) P. zeae (11) 6 (2009) (11) P. pratensis P. brachyurus Hu Chu 248 18 4 2009 Pratylenchus spp. Secernentea von Linstow, 1905 (class) Tylenchida Thorne, 1949 (order) Hoplolaimina Chizhov & 1 Berezina, 1988 (suborder) Hoplolaimoidea Filipjev, 1934 (Paramonov, 1967) (superfamily) Pratylenchidae Thorne, 1949 (Siddiqi, 1963) 4 100 (family) (37) Pratylenchus (flat) (stylet) (basal knot) (intestine) 20-80 70-80 % (3, 37) (species) 30-50 (genomic DNA) 2% (formaldehyde de Man's formula solution) SEM (morphometrics) (valid species) 49 (17) 55 (2) 63 (19) (32) (entomopathogenic) (21, 22, 33) (5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 16, 20, 27, 28, 34, 38) (ribosomal DNA, rDNA) 3-5 200 2007 10 400 (excretory pore) (hemizonid) (median bulb) 5 (populations) 1000 4 (stylet) (spicule) SEM (orifice of dorsally esophageal gland) rDNA (phasmid) Chen (4) P.
    [Show full text]
  • Int. J. Biosci. 2014
    Int. J. Biosci. 2014 International Journal of Biosciences | IJB | ISSN: 2220-6655 (Print) 2222-5234 (Online) http://www.innspub.net Vol. 5, No. 9, p. 37-46, 2014 RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS Reported some new species of plant parasitic nematodes from rhizosphere of tea plantation in Iran S.N. Mirghasemi1, A. Seraji1, S. Jamali2, A. Hosseinikhah Choshali3* 1Plant Protection Department Deylaman, Guilan, Lahijan, Iran 2Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran 3Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Key words: Tylenchomorpha, nematoda, Camellia sinensis, Iran. http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/5.9.37-46 Article published on November 10, 2014 Abstract Tea (Camellia sinensis) is one of the most important produce in Guilan province that most feild is allocated to this produce after rice in this province. In order to identify the plant parasitic nematodes of Tea plantation, 340 samples of soil around the roots of Tea were collected from different parts of the Tea plantation in provinces of Guilan and Mazandaran, during the summer and fall of 2011. After extraction, killing, fixation and transferring to anhydrous glycerol, the nematodes were mounted on permnanent microscopic slides and nematodes species identified by using light microscope, equipped with digital camera, based on morphological and morphometric characters using valid keys. In this study 22 species belonging 12 genera of nematodes infraorder Tylenchomorpha were identified, that before just 6 Species are reported from rhizosphere of Tea in Iran. others species are reported from rhizosphere of Tea in Iran from first reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Identification and Characterisation of Meloidogyne and Pratylenchus Species
    Molecular identification and characterisation of Meloidogyne and Pratylenchus species Christopher Andrew Bell Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Biology Faculty of Biological Sciences September 2018 i The candidate confirms that the work submitted is their own, except where work which has formed part of jointly authored publications has been included. The contribution of the candidate and the other authors to this work has been explicitly indicated below. The candidate confirms that appropriate credit has been given within the thesis where reference has been made to the work of others. The work in Chapter Three of the thesis has appeared in publication as follows: BELL, C. A., ATKINSON, H. J., ANDRADE, A. C., NGUYEN, H. X., SWIBAWA, I. G., LILLEY, C. J., MCCARTHY, J. & URWIN, P. E. 2018. A High-Throughput Molecular Pipeline Reveals the Diversity in Prevalence and Abundance of Pratylenchus and Meloidogyne Species in Coffee Plantations. Phytopathology, 108, 641-650. The work in Chapters Four and Five have been formed into an article that has been accepted for publication in Plos Pathogens: BELL, C. A., LILLEY, C. J., MCCARTHY, J., ATKINSON, H. J. & URWIN, P. E. 2018. Plant-parasitic nematodes respond to root exudate signals with host-specific gene expression patterns. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgment. © 2018 The University of Leeds, Christopher Andrew Bell ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank both Prof Peter Urwin and Prof Howard Atkinson for their help over the last four years; each have offered unique guidance and knowledge in all aspects of my work.
    [Show full text]