DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 Other Sites in South Lakeland That Have Been Considered 497 Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 1 Other Sites in South Lakeland That Have Been Considered 497 Site Site Allocations Policies Regulation 27 Consultation December 2009 - Cumbria Minerals & Waste Development Framework 497 Site Assessments and Maps 4 Other sites in South Lakeland that have been considered 498 Cumbria Minerals & Waste Development Framework - Site Allocations Policies Regulation 27 Consultation December 2009 4 Site Assessments and Maps SL24 Lindal former ore mill sidings, Lindal 4.911 This site was not included in the 2007 consultations. It has been included in South Lakeland District Council's consultations for possible development sites. It was put forward for consideration as a possible waste transfer station site. It is not a preferred site. Summary of comments from previous consultation stage 4.912 This site would not appear to be suitable for waste treatment, given its history of subsidence, presence of underground limestone and one workshop, which may have left a legacy of pollution. The site might also be regarded as too close to houses for waste treatment use, and would be better used for light industry, reflecting its historic use. Environmental assets 4.913 There are several County Wildlife Sites (CWS) in the locality - Dalton and Lindal Mining Area CWS is around 725 metres away; Little Urswick Crags, Stone Walls & Bower Wood CWS is 1.4km; Flat Woods CWS is 1.5km; and Dalton Railway Cutting CWS is 1.6km. Ancient Woodlands in the area - Heaning Wood, also semi-natural woodland UK priority habitat, is 920m away; Flat Woods is 1.5km and Bower Wood is 1.6km. An area of calcareous grassland UK priority habitat is 1.6km away. 4.914 There are records of badgers, noctule bats and brown hares in the vicinity. 4.915 National cycle route 72 runs adjacent to the north west boundary of the site. Enhancement potential 4.916 Potential for habitat creation/enhancement. 4.917 Information needed on historic industrial remains - mitigation may be required. Flood map zone 4.918 No identified flood risk Safeguarding 4.919 The site is not within a safeguarding area, but the Ulverston to Barrow Transco gas pipeline runs 330m away. The Green Lane former landfill site is 150m away. Agricultural Land Classification 4.920 Grade 3. Sequential approach 4.921 Although this is described as former sidings, the use was so long ago that the site should be regarded as greenfield. It is not at a town or Key Service Centre. Site Allocations Policies Regulation 27 Consultation December 2009 - Cumbria Minerals & Waste Development Framework 499 Site Assessments and Maps 4 4 Site 500 WASTE MANAGEMENT SITE SCORING MATRIX - SL24 Lindal former ore mill sidings, Lindal Cumbria Assessments Site Description/ Characteristic Score Comment/ Explanation/ Issues Relevant SA Objectives SA Criteria Relevant selection MWDF criteria Policies Minerals 1. Proximity Within 5 miles of the centre of main towns* NR4 – Manage mineral resources Will the option: CS1, to waste or of Key Service Centres** sustainably and minimise waste CS7, arisings (by GDC1 & Within 5 - 10 miles of the centre of main - reduce waste miles by road and promote the and road) NR1 – To improve local air quality and movement of waste by rail and limit or reduce the W towns or of Key Service Centres aste reduce greenhouse gas emissions emission of climate change gases and other air Greater than 10 miles from a town or Key pollutants as a result? Maps Development Service Centre SP5 – To improve the health and well being of people 2. Access to existing rail facilities NR4 – Manage mineral resources Will the option: CS1 Accessibility sustainably and minimise waste Framework Access to existing primary road network Detail of site access could be an issue. - improve access to recycling and composting SP2 – To improve access to services, services, where possible within local communities Potential for rail access x Adjacent to railway but unlikely to have facilities the countryside and open spaces using sustainable transport choices? the potential for a new siding. - Access to proposed primary road network - reduce waste miles by road and promote the Site movement of waste by rail and limit or reduce the Allocations Good local road accessibility emission of climate change gases and other air pollutants as a result? 3. Previously developed land (Brownfield) NR4 – Manage mineral resources Will the option: Policies Sequential sustainably and minimise waste approach Greenfield xx Although previously developed, the site is now regarded as a greenfield site. - include measures to avoid soil degradation and NR3 – To restore and protect land and soil pollution? Regulation Allocated for waste management or employment use and at a town or key - encourage the siting of waste management facilities service centre on brownfield land? Allocated for waste management or xx SLDC considering employment use of the 27 - seek to protect good quality agricultural land and employment use a but not at a town or key site in LDF. Consultation service centre Greenfield sites as far as possible? - account will have to be taken of the proportion of brownfield land in the assessment December 4. No owner objection ? No directly related SA objectives No directly related SA criteria Deliverability Owner objection exists 5. Flood Zone 1 or no flood risk NR4 – Manage mineral resources Will the option: 2009 Risk sustainably and minimise waste Zone 2 Site Description/ Characteristic Score Comment/ Explanation/ Issues Relevant SA Objectives SA Criteria Relevant selection MWDF criteria Policies Site NR2 – To improve water quality and - alleviate flooding and flood contamination of water Allocations Zone 3a resources resources? Zone 3b (functional floodplain) EN3 – To improve the quality of the built - be in an area at risk from flooding and/or be likely environment to create a higher risk of flooding elsewhere? Policies 6. Other land Conflict unlikely with other land use Subject to detailed mitigation measures. No directly related SA objectives No directly related SA criteria uses Regulation Conflict likely with other land use 7. Large enough to accommodate more than NR1 - To improve local air quality and - Will the option: Co-location one facility reduce greenhouse gas emissions 27 potential Not large enough to accommodate more xx - minimise loss of green field sites or areas of open Consultation than one facility NR3 – To restore and protect land and soil space NR4 – Manage mineral resources - Will site location criteria minimise the need for sustainably and minimise waste transport December SP5 - To improve the health and sense of well being of people 2009 8. Proximity No houses within 250 metres NR4 – Manage mineral resources Will the option: to Housing sustainably and minimise waste Houses within 250 metres xx Houses adjacent to site boundary. - - Will the plan ensure that local air quality is not Cumbria NR1 – To improve local air quality and adversely affected by pollution reduce greenhouse gas emissions - limit the negative impact on people’s health and well Minerals SP5 – To improve the health and well being? being of people Site & 9. European/National sites, species or habitats NR4 – Manage mineral resources minimise adverse impacts on species and habitats W aste Environmental sustainably and minimise waste through human activities and development? Assessments Assets Potential to enhance Development No impact EN1 – To protect and enhance biodiversity -ensure continuity of ecological frameworks such as river corridors, coastal habitats, uplands, woodlands Indirect adverse (site outside designated EN2 – To preserve enhance and manage and scrub to enable free passage of specific habitat area) landscape quality and character for future dependent species? generations Framework Direct adverse (site directly within - take account of the impacts of climate change on designated area) biodiversity? Will the option: and Local sites or priority species/habitats - protect and conserve habitats and species especially Maps Potential to enhance where these may be rare, declining, threatened or 501 indigenous? 4 4 Site 502 Site Description/ Characteristic Score Comment/ Explanation/ Issues Relevant SA Objectives SA Criteria Relevant selection MWDF Cumbria criteria Policies Assessments No impact ensure biodiversity sustainability by enhancing conditions wherever necessary to retain viability of Minerals Requires mitigation/ compensatory the resource? measures - Indirect adverse (site outside designated area) & and Requires compensatory measures for W Direct adverse impact (site directly within aste designated area) Maps Development 10. Visual Site not likely to impact on nationally NR4 – Manage mineral resources Will the option: and designated landscape areas sustainably and minimise waste landscape - protect local landscape quality, distinctiveness and Impact Site likely to adversely impact on nationally designated landscape areas EN2 – To preserve, enhance and manage character protected from unsympathetic landscape quality and character for future development? Framework generations - maintain the remoteness and tranquility of EN3 – To improve the quality of the built landscapes? environment - - protect the appearance of world heritage sites, Site designated archaeological sites, historic parks and gardens, battlefields and their settings? Allocations - protect areas of high archaeological and historic landscape sensitivity?? Policies - factor in anticipated impacts of extreme weather events on landscape character and other valued assets? Regulation - conserve features of historic and architectural importance? 27 - promote energy efficiency,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baycliff Limestone Walling
    BAYCLIFF LIMESTONE WALLING BAYCLIFF HAGGS QUARRY IS SITUATED ON LIMESTONE ROCKS OF CARBONIFEROUS AGE THE EAST SIDE OF THE FURNESS PENINSULA (AROUND 350 MILLION YEARS OLD) FORM A BETWEEN BARROW AND ULVERSTON AND BROAD SWATHE TO THE SOUTH OF THE OLDER HAS BEEN WORKED FOR LIMESTONE FOR CORE OF THE LAKE DISTRICT MOUNTAINS. CENTURIES. LIMESTONE This band of limestone outcrops in the Furness Peninsula continuing Baycliff is an extremely hard, durable limestone which has HAS BEEN A under the Leven/Crake estuary into the Cartmel Peninsula and up been used for generations to create beautiful building facades, FUNDAMENTAL a broad lode that follows the Kent estuary up to Kendal as well as boundary walling and masonry features of every conceivable turning down into the Arnside and Silverdale AONB. size, shape and form. Typical of the stone from south Cumbria, AND DEFINING it is a distinctive off white colour and its use provides a BUILDING Penrith consistency and cohesion with the existing building vernacular of the area. Whether used as a facing stone, boundary walling, Cockermouth MATERIAL IN Workington quoin, lintol, cill or masonry feature, Baycliff creates distinctive THE SOUTH OF yet subtle architecture that will enhance your project, letting Keswick you make a statement of quality and permanence. erwentwater CUMBRIA Ullswater hitehaven Borrowdale The limestone from the south of Cumbria is often praised as one of the loveliest rocks to be found in the whole district with its distinctive off white colour differing from the darker grey, browner and yellower limestones from further afield. Natural England has described the effect indermere that the consistent use of such a unique local material has on the built environment, explaining that the widespread use of a specific colour of stone as a building material Coniston Kendal ensures a visual coherence in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • SLACC Statement of Case
    TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 Application by West Cumbria Mining Ltd Development of a new underground metallurgical coal mine and associated development at Former Marchon Site, Pow Beck Valley and area from Marchon Site to St Bees Coast Planning Inspectorate Reference: APP/H0900/V/21/3271069 Local Planning Authority Reference: 4/17/9007 Date of Inquiry: 7th September 2021 STATEMENT OF CASE of SOUTH LAKES ACTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE TOWARDS TRANSITION (SLACC) 7 May 2021 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Lack of clarity about the proposal that WCM will promote at the Inquiry 5 3. Planning Policy 7 4. SLACC’s Case: Current and Future Need for Coking Coal in UK and Europe 10 5. SLACC’s Case: Climate Change Impacts 14 6. SLACC’s Case: Environmental and Amenity Impacts 20 7. SLACC’s Case: Economic Impacts 26 8. SLACC’s Case: The Planning Balance 29 9. List of Documents 31 2 1. Introduction 1.1 South Lakes Action on Climate Change - Towards Transition (“SLACC”) is a registered community- based charity, of 92 Windermere Road, Kendal, LA9 5EZ. SLACC brings together people who want to act to address the climate and ecological crisis and promote a more sustainable lifestyle. 1.2 SLACC is part of the global Transition Town Network, and our aim is to decrease the dependence of the South Lakes community on fossil fuels, reduce carbon emissions and help build local resilience in key areas such as economics, energy, transport and food. SLACC also campaigns and raises awareness on local, national and international climate change issues. 1.3 SLACC made objections to the application and also to the Secretary of State, examples being the following letters: ● Letter from Richard Buxton Solicitors 6th December 2019; ● Letter dated 21st June 2020, together with appendices; ● Letter dated 1st October 2020, together with appendices; ● Letter from Richard Buxton Solicitors 7th January 2021; and ● Letter from Richard Buxton Solicitors 29th January 2021 with appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 Tour of Ulverston
    www.ulverstoncouncil.org.uk visitulverston.com www.visitulverston.com ending at the Coronation Hall Coronation the at ending changes, errors or omissions, or any inconvenience arising therefrom. arising inconvenience any or omissions, or errors changes, gentle walks, starting and and starting walks, gentle going to press, Ulverston Town Council cannot accept any responsibility for any any for responsibility any accept cannot Council Town Ulverston press, to going town of Ulverston with six six with Ulverston of town Whilst every effort was made to ensure that information was correct at time of of time at correct was information that ensure to made was effort every Whilst Explore the historic market market historic the Explore and mountains and • Fairtrade Town Fairtrade a a Respect the countryside the Respect ULVERSTON Proud to be be to Proud around Ulverston around • surrounding fells fells surrounding Protect wildlife, plants and trees and plants wildlife, Protect 2016 • Partnership Partnership Bay and the the and Bay Safeguard water supplies water Safeguard Six gentle walks gentle Six Community Community & keep to paths across farmland across paths to keep & of Morecambe Morecambe of & Ulverston Ulverston & • Avoid damaging fences, hedges hedges fences, damaging Avoid Town Council Council Town extensive views views extensive © Ulverston Ulverston © • Keep dogs under proper control proper under dogs Keep 03 Ulverston with with Ulverston • Leave all gates as you find them find you as gates all Leave walk around around walk • Guard against the risk of fire of risk the against Guard • 11 mile circular circular mile 11 Leave no litter no Leave PLEASE REMEMBER PLEASE known it known www.visitulverston.com to go please events, or accommodation famous son, would have have would son, famous For enquiries about transport, booking booking transport, about enquiries For FURTHER INFORMATION INFORMATION FURTHER Laurel, the town’s most most town’s the Laurel, cost 10p plus network extras.
    [Show full text]
  • South Copeland Coast Economic Plan
    SOUTH COPELAND COAST ECONOMIC PLAN Author : Eric Barker Supporting the development and delivery of projects that stimulate and Copeland Borough Council underpin economic growth and sustainability in the South Copeland Community Regeneration Coastal Communities and the Western Lake District. Officer 01229 719657 [email protected] P a g e | 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary 2 2. Membership of the Team 4 3. The Plan 5 SCCCT Mission: SCCCT Vision: Strategic fit with other Copeland focused plans Strategic Themes 6 SMART Objectives 8 Desired Outcomes 10 Core Projects to Deliver the Plan 11 Action Plan – Short, Medium and Long Term 12 Associated Partner Projects 15 4. SWOT Analysis 18 5. Background and Context 20 The Local Area and Coastal Communities Information Map of South and Mid Copeland Coastal Plain 22 5.1 South and Mid Copeland - A Demographic Snapshot 23 5.2 Context – The South and Mid Copeland Partnership 26 Evidence to Support the Plan 29 The Economic Impact of Leisure and Tourism Cycling 30 The Benefits of Cycling Tourism on Health and Wellbeing 30 Direct Job Creation as a Result of Cycling Tourism 31 Tourism Data What the Community said 6. Potential Barriers 34 7. Resources Required to Deliver the Plan 34 8. Potential Funding Sources 34 9. Communications 35 Communications Future Consultations Communication with community 10. Support, structure and sustainability of SCCCT 35 P a g e | 2 Contents Fig. Index 1: South Copeland Coastal Communities Strategic Themes 2: Objectives 3 Desired Outcomes 4: Core Projects for SCCCT 5: Action Plans to Deliver the Core Projects 6: Medium and Long Term Goals 7: Long Term Goals 8: Project Pipeline 9: SWOT Analysis 10: Related initiatives in the region which will influence the economy of the region 11: The Economic Impact of Leisure and Tourism Cycling Summary.
    [Show full text]
  • North West River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the North West River Basin District
    North West river basin district Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 to 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the North West river basin district March 2016 1 of 139 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2016 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 139 Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 8 1 Sub-areas in the North West River Basin District ......................................................... 10 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 10 Management Catchments ...................................................................................................... 11 Flood Risk Areas ................................................................................................................... 11 2 Conclusions and measures to manage risk for the Flood Risk Areas in the North West River Basin District ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urswick Parish Plan 2006
    '" U-rswick PC1-rish Ncrl::ul"e's hand blessed this pal"ish with a beautLl and chamctel" which few can l"ival. Good fortune then favoul"ed us with fOl"ebeal"s whose cal"ing hand - and fol" ~ a few, with the ultimate saC1"ifice- .J ~I I passed on to us the splendoul" .. f I that we now shal"e. Let us not be found wanting in OUl"l"espect fol" what those who I went befol"e have left: behind, 01"in OUl"dutLl to those who will succeed us. MaLI theLl in theil" tU1"nl"evel"e it as a home, which compels theil" affection, and is worthLl of theil" ca1"e. .J1£//\Y)! f,~ ~ (/h"fii ) :J'Y"') ~ .I.{f G...J_~J/f URSWICK PARISH PLAN EDITION 1 2006 Contents I Introduction I 2 Spiritual Expression and Development 4 3 Listed Buildings in the Parish 5 4 Educating the Junior Citizens of the Parish 6 5 Employment in the Parish 6 6 Services IIIthe Parish 8 7 Parish Amenities 9 8 Community Groups and Associations 10 9 Surveys of Parish Residents' Concerns and Aspirations 12 10 ConcernsandActionPlans- Parishwideitems 14 11 ConcernsandActionPlans- Bardsea items 19 12 Concerns and Action Plans - Urswick villages items 22 13 ConcernsandActionPlans- StaintonwithAdgarleyitems 25 14 Acknowledgements 27 OISWICI PARISHPLAN 1 Introduction Located to the east of the A590 trunk road on the Furness Peninsula in Cumbria, the border of Urswick Parish is 1.7 miles south of Ulverston town centre and 3.4 miles north of Barrow in Furness town centre.
    [Show full text]
  • 3904 Hw Man Plan Aw Pt1-5 Online:1
    Frontiers of the Roman Empire inscribed on the World Heritage List in 2005 Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site Hadrian’s Wall Management Plan 2008-2014 Banks East Turret, Hadrian’s Wall © Roger Clegg Management Plan 2008-2014 Preface Andy Burnham, Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport iv Foreword Prof Peter Stone, Chair, Hadrian’s Wall Management Plan Committee v Acknowledgements vi How to use the Plan vi Part 1: Introduction 1.1 The World Heritage Site 2 1.2 The need for a Management Plan 2 1.3 The WHS Management Plan Committee 3 1.4 The Interest Groups 4 1.5 Preparation of the 2008–2014 Management Plan 4 1.6 The role of the Plan 4 1.7 The status of the Plan 4 1.8 Hadrian’s Wall Heritage Ltd (HWHL) 5 1.9 The vision for Hadrian’s Wall 5 Part 2: Hadrian’s Wall WHS and its landscape setting 2.1 The Roman frontiers 7 2.2 The boundaries of Hadrian’s Wall WHS 7 2.3 The Buffer Zone 8 2.4 Hadrian’s Wall and its associated archaeological remains 8 2.5 Geology and topography 10 2.6 The landscape 10 2.7 The survival and condition of the resource 12 2.8 Finds and collections 15 Part 3: Interests in the WHS 3.1 Introduction 18 3.2 International interests 18 3.3 National government interests 19 3.4 Other national organisations 20 3.5 Regional organisations and local government 20 3.6 Cultural and academic interests 21 3.7 Economic and recreational interests 22 3.8 Local communities 23 3.9 Ownership pattern and management roles 23 Part 4: Values and significance of Hadrian’s Wall WHS 4.1 Assessing values 26 4.2 The OUV of Hadrian’s
    [Show full text]
  • Story by Diane Daniel Photos by Wessel Kok
    CYCLING HADRIAN’S WALL Story by Diane Daniel Photos by Wessel Kok The National Cycle Network, which opened in 2006, was routed using mostly country roads and bikepaths. Save for a few spots, it is well signed. For walkers, there is the 84-mile Hadrian’s Wall Path National Trail, which opened in 2003. In early October, we met our friends in Newcastle, then paid for private transpor- tation across the island to the Cumbrian coast. (Because of prevailing winds, most cyclists ride west to east.) My husband and I rented bikes, whereas our friends brought their tandem. We carried all our gear and winged it with lodging, but shuttle provid- ers are available for those wanting baggage transfer and nightly reservations. We were braced for bad weather but got only a couple of cloudy days and a mere hour of rain. What I hadn’t mentally prepared for was cycling on the opposite side of the road, a challenge, particularly through roundabouts. The route begins without fanfare (some of the signage in the route’s first stretch is not yet up) in Ravenglass, a tiny coastal community and former Roman port on the western edge of the Lake District. The start is at the well-preserved ruins of the Glannaventa Roman bathhouse. We left Ravenglass by a northern coastal trail dur- kay, you can stop staring now,’’ I following my every move. miles from the North Sea to the Irish Sea, of the wall are visible, ongoing excavation ing a tide so low that boats sat mud-locked called out between labored breaths.
    [Show full text]
  • Broughton Moor Broughton Quarry Moor
    STONE: Broughton Moor Broughton QUARRY Moor As its name suggests the quarry is situated on Broughton Moor, mid-way between Broughton-in-Furness and Coniston and has been worked since the middle of the 19th Century. Broughton Moor is a mid green stone, often highlighted by contrasting white veins and beautiful tone Broughton Moor can be extracted in a variety of green tones to add a dark and light green contrast to surfaces yet purvey the beauty of its natural markings. Broughton Moor has been used for generations to provide walling, flooring, cladding, cills, worktops, and stairs. The richness of Broughton Moor makes it ideal for use in interior furniture and fittings, whether in traditional or modern design schemes. Penrith Cockermouth Workington Keswick Derwentwater Ullswater Whitehaven Borrowdale Elterwater Windermere Brandy Crag Bursting Stone Coniston Kendal Broughton Moor Kirkby Ulverston Baycliff Barrow-in-Furness Broughton BURLINGTON STONE Moor The benefits of Burlington Natural Stone Reasons to use Burlington Stone Burlington Stone is one of the finest most durable stones in the world. • Low maintenance costs Due to the outstanding technical properties of the natural stone, it is a material that is extremely practical, hard wearing and easy to clean and • Low water absorption maintain. The character and natural beauty inherent within Burlington’s stone • Tried and Tested - Established 1843 allows it to be used for both internal and external applications, for example, flooring, external and decorative wall cladding and swimming pools. • A British family owned business with long traditions and values Dense and durable • Certified to ISO14001 and aiming to utilise Colour-fast 100% of the rock extracted Chemically inert • Harvested rain water used in the production Stain resistant • Aesthetic beauty of the stone Non combustible • Work closely with the BRE and The National Parks Authority • International pedigree of landmark bespoke projects • High performance characteristics, suitable for both internal and external use in construction projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumbria Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment
    Cumbria Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment for Allerdale Borough Council, Barrow Borough Council, Carlisle City Council, Copeland Borough Council, Cumbria County Council, Eden District Council, Lake District National Park Authority, and South Lakeland District Council Final Report November 2013 Main Contact: Michael Bullock arc4 Ltd Email: [email protected] Website: www.arc4.co.uk ©2013 arc4 Limited (Company No. 06205180) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 7 Study Components .......................................................................................................... 8 Phase 1: Literature/desktop review and stakeholder discussions .................................... 9 Phase 2: Survey of Gypsies and Travellers across Cumbria ........................................... 9 Phase 3: Production of report .......................................................................................... 9 2. Methodology ....................................................................................................... 11 3. Legislative and Policy Context ............................................................................ 14 Legislative background .................................................................................................. 14 Policy background ......................................................................................................... 14 CLG Design Guidance ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN TRANS-PENNINE ROUTES STRATEGIC STUDY Stage 1 Report
    NORTHERN TRANS-PENNINE ROUTES STRATEGIC STUDY Stage 1 Report 25/02/2016 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Revision 4 Remarks First Issue Revision 1 Draft Revision 2 Draft Revision 3 Draft Final Draft Date 18th Dec 2015 12th Jan 2016 8th Feb 2016 9th Feb 2016 25th Feb 2016 Prepared by Richard Jones Richard Jones Richard Jones Richard Jones Richard Jones Checked by Tim Lund Tim Lund Tim Lund Tim Lund Tim Lund Authorised by Helen Murphy Helen Murphy Helen Murphy Helen Murphy Helen Murphy Project number 3511985BQ 3511985BQ 3511985BQ 3511985BQ 3511985BQ Report number NTPR-D2 NTPR-D2 NTPR-D2 NTPR-D2 NTPR-D2 Revision 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 i Northern Trans-Pennine Routes Strategic Study Stage 1 Report 25/02/2016 Client Highways England / Department for Transport Piccadilly Gate Store Street Manchester M1 2WD Lead Consultant WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Limited Tel: 01904 615 227 www.wsp-pb.co.uk Registered Address WSP UK Limited 01383511 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF Integrated Delivery Team Contacts Helen Murphy – [email protected] 01904 615 224 Tim Lund – [email protected] 01132 208 236 Richard Jones – [email protected] 01904 615 227 Project number: 3511985BQ Dated: 25/02/2016 ii Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Study Objectives ......................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Objectives .................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Area ............................................................................. 3 1.4 Study Stages and Programme ............................................... 6 1.5 Stakeholder Reference Group ............................................... 9 1.6 Stage 1 Objectives ................................................................ 9 1.7 Stage 1 Report Structure ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Statement June 2021
    South Lakeland Local Plan Review: Consultation Statement June 2021 www.southlakeland.gov.uk Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Purpose of this document ..................................................................................... 4 1.2 South Lakeland Local Plan Review....................................................................... 4 Context ....................................................................................................................... 4 The timeline for the Local Plan Review ...................................................................... 5 2. Overall approach to consultation and engagement ..................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Engagement Methods ........................................................................................... 7 3. Early Engagement – February to September 2020 ................................................... 10 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 10 3.2 How did we engage? .......................................................................................... 10 3.3 How did people respond, and how many people responded .............................. 14 Who responded?..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]