DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultation Responses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consultation Responses 30-Jan-13 Croydon OAPF consultation responses MET police response Hammersons response Westfield response Gatwick response General Comments The plan is too prescriptive Changes to the OAPF have been made. The level of detail included is considered to be appropriate for this type of OAPF. General Comments Local Context should be moved in the Change made. arrangement of the document to prior to Land Uses to make the document easier to follow Chp1 Introduction The vision section is still too weak Changes made. As part of the flexible end state plan Changes made to better reflect the and this should be bulked up more 'In for Wellesley Road the text in aspriations for Wellesley Road and order to encourage investment'. paragraph 1.12 should reflect the these are now consistent across the following: 'each proposed Plan. development on or affecting Wellesley Road should be supported by transport testing and modeling provided by the applicant. Moreover, emphasis should be placed on all parties (including TfL, the Council and developers) working together to reasonably move towards a ‘flexible- end-state’ through careful and considered discussions, rather than one party being expected to deliver all the modifications to Wellesley Road'. Chp1 Introduction Support for student housing, hotel Noted. and the release of outdate office. Chp1 Introduction Remove figure 1.1 and 1.2 Changes made. Chp1 Introduction Amend Figure 1.3 to say Retail Core - Change made. Retail led mixed use area including resi and leisure and reflected in Figure 3.3 Chp1 Introduction Paragraph 1.2 should cross reference Change made. those maps show the location of New Town. Chp1 Introduction Paragraph 1.12 Further detail on the Changes made. Wellesley Road flexible end state is needed. Chp 2 Location of the COA There is limited information on the six Additional information included - new Amend the Purley Way map to also Not required, the purpose of this map character areas. applications will be expected to include Beckenham and the A23 to is to highlight the relationship provide their own detailed assesment central London. between the COA and Purley Way - of how their proposal relates to the which are currently operating as surrounding character area. competitors and they should not be. Beckenham is not part of this relationship. Chp 2 Location of the COA A consistent term for Civic and Change made. Cultural or Fairfield and Mid Croydon should be adopted Chp 2 Location of the COA Fig 2.3 need to clarify where the Change made. figures for turnover for the Town Centre and Purley Way have come fromand this needs to be referenced Chp 3 Land Uses Emergency services: In order to Change made to text:Croydon There is no reference to the need for There is no aspiration to prepare a The existing retail floorspace is set at Change made. ensure that the Crodyon Town Centre Council will work alongside the a masterplan for the retail core area. detailed masterplan for the retail core 195000 and this figure should be remains a safe and secure place for Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime as is the case with the other referenced as the Experian GOAD residents and visitors, it is important and the Metropolitan Police Service masterplan areas, the OAPF includes report for central Croydon sets this that the diverse nature of policing to ensure the delivery of necessary some guiding principles that figure at 218457 (Nov 11). needs as a result of development and policing facilities in Croydon Town applicants should use as the starting intensification can be met. Centre so that the impact of new point for their plans. In the future it develompent upon policing can be may be appropriate to prepare a appropriately mitigated. masterplan for the retail core and the OAPF allows for this to happen. Page 1 of 40 30-Jan-13 Croydon OAPF consultation responses MET police response Hammersons response Westfield response Gatwick response Chp 3 Land Uses Fig 3.2 change the key and update Change made. The vacancy rates appear inaccurate Change made. the map i.e. it should not be mixed and should be clarified - OAPF says retail but rather just retail. 11% but the GOAD says 18%. Chp 3 Land Uses Clarification needs to be provided for Change made. The retail core section of text should Change made to support qualitative the land use figures in Fig 3.1. be updated to read “support the development and that the quantity is development of at least 28,000sq.m less important so long as a of additional retail floorspace (in reinvigoration is achieved. addition to a full scale department store)”. Chp 3 Land Uses The inclusion of reference to the Change made. Paragraph 3.8 should be revised to Change made. Westfield assessment of the impact read “Focus growth in comparison of town centre shopping centres on retail within the retail core in surrouding high streets should be particular along North End and in removed. Whitgift and Centrale shopping centres”. And this may also need to be updated in chapter 2 as well Chp 3 Land Uses The 24 hour route should not state Change made and the route no Paragraph 3.8 should note that the Not required, as it is too prescriptive that the route is 24 hour through longer runs through the cinema. only realistic location for a new and it is impossible to forecast with Centrale cinema and the routes department store is in the Whitgift certainty what could happen over the should be made clearer to respect Centre. twenty years, although reference is this in the text and the diagram. now made to this general south eastern area of the retail core. Chp 3 Land Uses Paragraph 3.9 states that the overall Change made. Para 3.9 should be amended to say Change made. aim of the OAPF is to deliver housing that residential led development is - we should not state that this is the not the main priority of the OAPF - overall aim of the OAPF as there are but that it is one of them and that the other mixed uses that are also primary aim is meet modern important so alter this text to say - commerical need. one of the aims is to bringing new resi into the centre. Chp 3 Land Uses Paragraph 3.15 should reflect the fact Change made. Support the inclusion of the Mayor's Noted. that Centrale is unlikely to be and Council's support for redeveloped. comprehensive renewal of the retail core and the text sould go further stating that this option is needed to ensure the area can be revitialised. Chp 3 Land Uses Paragraph 3.17 should remove Change made. Paragraph 3.15 should be amended Inappropriate comment. reference to Westfield evidence. to recognise that the redevelopment of the Whitgift centre is a priority over that of Centrale. Chp 3 Land Uses Paragraph 3.24 needs to be Change made. Paragraph 3.27 needs to be Change made to support qualitative amended and addressed in light of amended to note that “need for a new development and that the quantity is Hammersons objections, we could full scale department store, together less important so long as a include some aspirations ie, better with at least 28,000sq.m of additional reinvigoration is achieved. entry and improved footfall and better retail floorspace”, east west route and it also needs to reference the existing permission. Chp 3 Land Uses The OAPF should make reference to Change made. Paragraph 3.3 needs to recognise Change made. the fact that the office buildings in the that Centrale may not be part of a Whitgift Centre are stand alone and comprehensive redevelopment and that, subject to redevelopment of the that it already has a planning bigger plot, these could potentially be permission. redeveloped. Chp 3 Land Uses Paragraph 3.25- the Allders bullet Change made. Figure 3.6 - the key and map for the Change made. point should be removed and set as a location of amenity spaces in retail stand along as Allders is not part of core are not accurate (brown and Whitgift - also this building could be green). subdivided rather then redeveloped by a single occupier. Chp 3 Land Uses Paragraph 3.32 - Guiding Principles Change made. The guiding principles for the retail Change made. should include 'where feasible to the core need to more accurately reflect connection to district heating.` that the retail core area could accommodate 1100 homes and this could be on a range of sites across the area not just Whitgift and Centrale. Page 2 of 40 30-Jan-13 Croydon OAPF consultation responses MET police response Hammersons response Westfield response Gatwick response Chp 3 Land Uses Figure 3.5 - The Centrale shopping Change made. Paragraph 3.42 should not require Change made. centre does not own those units on securing an agreement with RSL's North End that are directly accessed but to engage with them early is fine. from North End and the map should The text could be amended as be amended. follows;“Engage with Registered Providers at the earliest time alongside the planning authorities, to discuss affordable housing details”. Chp 3 Land Uses Figure 3.5 - the red routes should Change made. include the link onto Keeley Road. Chp 3 Land Uses Figure 3.6 and key should say that it Change made. is approxiamtely 1100 units so as it can be more flexible. Chp 3 Land Uses Paragraph 3.38 should include Change made. suggestions for improvement to North End as per the other high streets.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Area Map Bus Map
    East Croydon Station – Zone 5 i Onward Travel Information Local Area Map Bus Map FREEMASONS 1 1 2 D PLACE Barrington Lodge 1 197 Lower Sydenham 2 194 119 367 LOWER ADDISCOMBE ROAD Nursing Home7 10 152 LENNARD ROAD A O N E Bell Green/Sainsbury’s N T C L O S 1 PA CHATFIELD ROAD 56 O 5 Peckham Bus Station Bromley North 54 Church of 17 2 BRI 35 DG Croydon R E the Nazarene ROW 2 1 410 Health Services PLACE Peckham Rye Lower Sydenham 2 43 LAMBERT’S Tramlink 3 D BROMLEY Bromley 33 90 Bell Green R O A St. Mary’s Catholic 6 Crystal Palace D A CRYSTAL Dulwich Library Town Hall Lidl High School O A L P H A R O A D Tramlink 4 R Parade MONTAGUE S S SYDENHAM ROAD O R 60 Wimbledon L 2 C Horniman Museum 51 46 Bromley O E D 64 Crystal Palace R O A W I N D N P 159 PALACE L SYDENHAM Scotts Lane South N R A C E WIMBLEDON U for National Sports Centre B 5 17 O D W Forest Hill Shortlands Grove TAVISTOCK ROAD ChCCheherherryerryrry Orchard Road D O A 3 Thornton Heath O St. Mary’s Maberley Road Sydenham R PARSON’S MEAD St. Mary’s RC 58 N W E L L E S L E Y LESLIE GROVE Catholic Church 69 High Street Sydenham Shortlands D interchange GROVE Newlands Park L Junior School LI E Harris City Academy 43 E LES 135 R I Croydon Kirkdale Bromley Road F 2 Montessori Dundonald Road 198 20 K O 7 Land Registry Office A Day Nursery Oakwood Avenue PLACE O 22 Sylvan Road 134 Lawrie Park Road A Trafalgar House Hayes Lane G R O V E Cantley Gardens D S Penge East Beckenham West Croydon 81 Thornton Heath JACKSON’ 131 PLACE L E S L I E O A D Methodist Church 1 D R Penge West W 120 K 13 St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vanguard Way
    THE VANGUARD WAY (NORTH TO SOUTH) From the suburbs to the sea! SECTION 1 Croydon to Chelsham Common (6th edition 2019) THE VANGUARD WAY ROUTE DESCRIPTION and points of interest along the route SECTION 1 Croydon to Chelsham Common COLIN SAUNDERS In memory of Graham Butler 1949-2018 This 6th edition of the north-south route description was first published in 2019 and replaces previous printed editions, published in 1980, 1986 and 1997; also the online 4th and 5th editions published in 2009 and 2014. It is now only available as an online resource. Sixth Edition (North-South) Designed by Brian Bellwood Published by the Vanguards Rambling Club 35 Gerrards Close, Oakwood, London, N14 4RH, England © VANGUARDS RAMBLING CLUB 1980, 1986, 1997, 2009, 2014, 2019 Colin Saunders asserts his right to be identified as the author of this work. Whilst the information contained in this guide was believed to be correct at the time of writing, the author and publishers accept no responsibility for the consequences of any inaccuracies. However, we shall be pleased to receive your comments and information of alterations for consideration. Please email [email protected] or write to Colin Saunders, 35 Gerrards Close, Oakwood, London, N14 4RH, England. Cover photo: St Mary’s Church, Farleigh, Surrey – cc-by-sa/2.0. © Marathon. Vanguard Way Route Description: Section 1 SECTION 1: CROYDON TO CHELSHAM COMMON 11.0 km (6.8 miles) Route overview This version of the north-south Route Description is based on a completely new survey undertaken by club members in 2018. The route sets off through the residential outskirts of Croydon (where Park Hill Recreation Ground is worth a detour), but you soon reach open space in Lloyd Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Joram Makondo Information Team Law & Governance Division
    Information Team Joram Makondo Law & Governance Division Resources Department 7th Floor, Zone C Bernard Weatherill House 8 Mint Walk Croydon CR0 1EA FOI Reference: 3082193 Date: 11 March 2021 Dear Joram Makondo Environmental Information Regulations 2004 Your request has been considered under the provisions of the above legislation. Please accept our apologies for the delay in responding to you. Specifically, you have requested the following information: I would like to request information relating to the contributions paid towards the Section 106 Agreements (S106) at the following sites: Altitude 25, land adj to Croydon Park Hotel, Altyre Road, Croydon (Dated 27/04/2006 + 19/06/2008). (REF : 04/04685/P and 07/01387/P) Former Randolph and Pembroke House Site, Wellesley Road, Croydon (Dated 21/10/2010). (REF: 10/02175/P) Lenning House, 2 Mason's Avenue, CR0 (Dated 27/09/2005). (REF 04/03575/P) 19 Commerce Way, Purley (S106 date not available). (REF 01/02776/P) Please provide me with amounts and dates of: - Monies received; - Monies spent and evidence of what the funds were spent on; - Any amounts allocated; - Any amounts unspent; - Any amounts unspent that have been repaid. Please find the requested information on the attached spreadsheet. Please quote the reference number 3082193 in any future communications. If you are dissatisfied with the way the Council has handled your request under the Freedom of Information Act you may ask for an internal review. This should be submitted to us within 40 working days of this response. You can do this by outlining the details of your complaint by: Email: [email protected] Writing: Information Team London Borough of Croydon Bernard Weatherill House 7 th Floor - Zone C 8 Mint Walk Croydon CR0 1EA Any requests received after the 40 working day time limit will be considered only at the discretion of the council.
    [Show full text]
  • Document.Pdf
    WELCOME TO RUSKIN SQUARE. THIS IS ONE OF LONDON’S MOST SPECTACULAR NEW deVelopments, 1,980,000 SQ FT of commercial offices, residential and retail, BUZZING WITH EXCITEMENT, CONNECTED TO THE WORLD, BALANCING LIFE, WORK AND LEISURE. TRAIN STATION INCLUDED… 04 Welcome 06 Croydon Stories 12 Aerial 14 The Vision 20 Westfield/Hammerson 22 Space to Live 24 Space to Work 26 Space to Play 28 Connectivity 30 A transport hub 32 Local occupiers 38 First phase offices: Building One 42 Summary specification 46 Floorplans 54 Architects 56 Developer 58 Funder 60 Project team 01 RUSKIN SQUARE LONDON Ruskin Square — proposed Building 1 Ruskin Square Welcome We’re creating a brand new quarter in London. Croydon is already one of Europe’s largest commercial centres, but the completion of Ruskin Square, with up to 1,250,000 square feet of new, grade A office space, 625 contemporary new homes, retail, cafés and restaurants will take the area to a whole new level. You might want to travel from Ruskin Square to central London. You may need to head out to Gatwick Airport. Whichever way you’re going, just allow 20 minutes. That’s how connected Croydon is. We’re not in the centre of London – it’s even better than that. Close enough to do lunch. Distant enough to have our own identity, with a name adopted from one of Croydon’s most famous sons, the philanthropist and social thinker, John Ruskin. His view was that, “The measure of any great civilization is in its cities, and a measure of a city’s greatness is to be found in the quality of its public spaces, its parks and its squares”.
    [Show full text]
  • Croydon Council Meeting: Monday 7 December 2015 Public Question Time Written Questions from Members of the Public
    CROYDON COUNCIL MEETING: MONDAY 7 DECEMBER 2015 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME WRITTEN QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC Welcome to a meeting of Croydon Council. Attached are the questions from the public and the replies which will be taken at this meeting. WE WOULD ASK THAT YOU COLLECT THE PRINTED QUESTIONS/RESPONSES AND THEN MOVE INTO ROOM F4 ON THE FIRST FLOOR, RATHER THAN GO STRAIGHT TO THE PUBLIC GALLERY. A MEMBER OF STAFF WILL REGISTER YOUR NAME WHEN YOU ARRIVE IN THE ROOM SHOULD YOU WISH TO ASK A SUPPLEMENTARY QUESTION AND THEN ASK YOU TO PROCEED TO THE PUBLIC GALLERY. Public Question time is usually towards the beginning on the meeting and the process for this item is as follows: ♦ The questions will be taken in the order in which they were received by the Council; ♦ The question and the reply will be taken as read; ♦ The person who asked the question, if present, will then be invited to ask a supplementary question, (if they wish) to clarify a point related to the reply they have been given in the written answer. The length and detail of such a question should be brief and at the discretion of the Mayor, allowing for the time available and the number of other questions which need to be dealt with; ♦ Public question time is limited strictly to 15 minutes - if all the questions and answers have not been reached at the end of that time, the other replies will be taken as read and there will be no further opportunity for asking supplementary questions at that meeting; and ♦ Questions will not be carried over to the following meeting, but it is of course in order for questioners to ask another question on the same or another topic before the next meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Character Appraisal London Borough of Croydon
    BOROUGH CHARACTER APPRAISAL LONDON BOROUGH OF CROYDON - DRAFT 21 September 2015 This information should be used as evidence base for the Croydon Local Plan CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Aims Of The Document 4 Scope 4 The Sixteen Places 5 Borough Landscape 6 SECTION 2: THE APPRAISAL Addington 8 Addiscombe 14 Broad Green & Selhurst 20 Coulsdon 26 Crystal Palace & Upper Norwood 44 Kenley & Old Coulsdon 50 Norbury 56 Purley 62 Sanderstead 68 Selsdon 74 Shirley 80 South Croydon. 86 South Norwood 92 Thornton Heath 98 Waddon 104 SECTION 3: GLOSSARY 111 2 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 3 This information should be used as evidence base for the Urban Design & Local • Access and movement in the Place – the degree of accessibility to the Place Character and Heritage Assets and Conservation and Places of Croydon policies and open spaces within it and what modes of transport are available. The within the Croydon Local Plan – Detailed Policies and Proposals. information for the Land use, and movement mapping is derived from the Space Syntax IValueL Study 2009 and is reprinted with their kind permission. AIMS OF THE DOCUMENT • Landscape and Open space Character – landscape character and the type The purpose of the appraisals is to identify and analyse the character of the of open space - defined by its statutory planning designation if applicable Places in Croydon, considering a number of key aspects that contribute to the way - Green Belt, Metropolitan Open Land, Local Open Land or Educational these Places are today. This document will form part of the evidence base for the Open Space. Types identified also include play areas, recreation grounds, Council’s Core Strategy determining the spatial vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Leisure Investment in Central Croydon M1 A406 Location M25 2 2
    GRANTS ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE 12-32 HIGH STREET CROYDON CR0 1RE PRIME LEISURE INVESTMENT IN CENTRAL CROYDON M1 A406 LOCATION M25 2 2 M40 HARROW 1 A1 Croydon is London’s largest borough by population, totalling 363,400 (2011 census) and a 1A/16 1 A10 A12 WEMBLEY major commercial centre and considered the most connected urban location in the South East. A406 A5 UXBRIDGE A40 The town is located 10 miles south of Central London and 10 miles north of the M25. LONDON SLOUGH EALING A40 Croydon’s superb transport links to key destinations in London and the South East make it a 7 6 CHISWICK A4 4 M4 HAMMERSMITH SOUTHWARK thriving commercial and retail hub. Rail links between East Croydon and Central London are fast 15 3 2 5 1 CHELSEA FULHAM – only 16 minutes to London Victoria; 12 minutes to London Bridge. Gatwick International Airport WINDSOR 14 A202 HEATHROW HOUNSLOW AIRPORT A205 is just 14 minutes away. A20 RICHMOND DULWICH 13 A316 A205 Croydon has a retail catchment population of over 2.5m making it the 13th biggest centre in the WIMBLEDON A3 A23 UK. The town is expected to provide an additional 19,000 homes by 2026. A308 M25 1 SIDCUP STAINES KINGSTON BECKENHAM MITCHAM BROMLEY 2/12 A24 A309 CROYDON M3 11 SUTTON ORPINGTON 3 million people live within WEYBRIDGE A232 A232 A3 PURLEY a 10 mile radius of Croydon. EPSOM 10 A24 BANSTEAD A237 WOKING 9 A22 24 LIVERPOOL ST A320 MIN LEATHERHEAD M25 A3 CATERHAM A246 7 INVESTMENT SUMMARY LONDON 8 6 SEVENOAKS VICTORIA WATERLOO BRIDGE CANARY WHARF REDHILL A25 A25 • Central Croydon’s only dedicated leisure scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Altyre Rd, Croydon, Cr9 5Aa Croydon Park Hotel Croydon Park Hotel
    7 ALTYRE RD, CROYDON, CR9 5AA CROYDON PARK HOTEL CROYDON PARK HOTEL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exceptional opportunity to purchase a prime freehold hotel in the centre of Croydon’s Commercial District. Substantial 137,000 sq. ft. full-service hotel with 211 guestrooms, car parking, food and beverage facilities, conferencing and event space and fitness and leisure facilities set on a1.54 acre site. The purpose-built Hotel opened in 1984 and was previously operated under an international hotel brand before operating independently until the hotel’s closure in 2020. Available with vacant possession, unencumbered by brand, franchise or management, providing optimal operational and development flexibility with substantial potential to increase value. Prime town centre location in the heart of Croydon in close proximity to East Croydon station, one of London’s busiest stations with 25 million passengers in 2019. Croydon has benefitted from significant recent investment and is set to benefit from further significant investment to regenerate the town centre. Croydon’s strategic position and excellent transport links make the town attractive to key corporate occupiers that have established Croydon as a premier business location in south London. Extensive asset management opportunities including: hotel repositioning; extension of the existing property; or redevelopment of the site to increase the massing and change of use (subject to obtaining the necessary planning and all other consents) to potentially superior alternative use values. The Hotel is situated in the Croydon Metropolitan Centre, the Croydon Opportunity Area and the ‘Edge Area’ for tall buildings, all of which are supportive in principle for additional massing on the site and for alternative uses, potentially unlocking more accretive development proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA 30 July 2015
    PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA 30 July 2015 PART 6: Development Presentations 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This part of the agenda is for the committee to receive presentations on proposed developments, including when they are at the pre-application stage. 1.2 Although the reports are set out in a particular order on the agenda, the Chair may reorder the agenda on the night. Therefore, if you wish to be present for a particular application, you need to be at the meeting from the beginning. 1.3 The following information and advice applies to all those reports. 2 ADVICE TO MEMBERS 2.1 These proposed developments are being reported to committee to enable members of the committee to view them at an early stage and to comment upon them. They do not constitute applications for planning permission at this stage and any comments made are provisional and subject to full consideration of any subsequent application and the comments received as a result of consultation, publicity and notification. 2.2 Members will need to pay careful attention to the probity rules around predisposition, predetermination and bias (set out in the Planning Code of Good Practice Part 5.G of the Council’s Constitution). Failure to do so may mean that the Councillor will need to withdraw from the meeting for any subsequent application when it is considered. 3 FURTHER INFORMATION 3.1 Members are informed that any relevant material received since the publication of this part of the agenda, concerning items on it, will be reported to the Committee in an Addendum Update Report.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST Croydon Masterplan
    WEST CROYDON MASTERPLAN EAST ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES MACCREANOR LAVINGTON ARCHITECTS GVA GRIMLEY DAVIS LANGDON TEAM PROJECT BOARD MEETINGS EAST CROYDON COUNCIL 2009 Dann Jessen Emma Peters 16 Oct Purespace surgery Daniel Nordh Finn Williams 21 Oct Croydon Urban Summit 1 Margaret Dewhurst Mike Kiely 22 Oct Church surgery Priscilla Holness 22 Oct Project Board meeting ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES Tony Antoniou 30 Oct Network Rail surgery Malcolm Turner Vincent Lacovara 30 Oct PSH/Barratt surgery 30 Oct TfL surgery MACCREANOR LAVINGTON DESIGN FOR LONDON 04 Nov Vision workshop Richard Lavington Charlotte Kokken 10 Nov CBRE surgery Prisca Thielmann Paul Harper 11 Nov Croydon Council surgery Robert Chandler 11 Nov Mapeley surgery BARRATT HOMES 17 Nov Stakeholder feedback GVA GRIMLEY Alison Tero 19 Nov Project Board meeting Chris Hall Caroline Harper 25 Nov PSH surgery Mike Nisbet 25 Nov Whitgift meeting DAVIS LANGDON 09 Dec Croydon Urban Summit 2 Howard Spurgin CBRE INVESTORS 14 Dec Church surgery Hannah Andrews James Routledge 14 Dec DfL surgery Vanessa Clark 14 Dec Croydon Council surgery 14 Dec Network Rail surgery HOMES & COMMUNITIES 14 Dec TfL surgery AGENCY 15 Dec English Heritage meeting Chris Plume 15 Dec Croydon Council surgery Henry Kennedy-Skipton 15 Dec PSH/Barratt surgery Simon Powell 15 Dec Purespace surgery Sue Gray 15 Dec Whitfgift basement visit 17 Dec Project Board meeting MAPELEY Ben Robinson 2010 Richard King 14 Jan Croydon Council meeting 04 Feb Project Board meeting NETWORK RAIL 26 Feb TfL Transport Mini Summit James Ashman
    [Show full text]
  • Section C Estimates the Level of Energy Demands of Potential Customers Now and in the Future
    AECOM Croydon Decentralised Energy Study 28 Capabilities on project: Energy Environment Section C Estimates the level of energy demands of potential customers now and in the future From the interim study, the Croydon town centre boundary has been agreed, which defined the scope of the decentralised energy study. This boundary embodies 4 main quadrants, as shown in Figure 1, which corresponds to key development areas: - Wellesley Road/Park Lane - Wandle Park - East Croydon - West Croydon West Croydon East Croydon Wandle Park Wellesley Road/ Park Lane Figure 1 Town centre quadrants as defined by the council These quadrants contain the majority of the earmarked developments to take place over the next 10 years in-line with the Urban Regeneration Vehicle and Croydon’s aspiration to be ‘London’s Third City’. For the final report, a total of 30 Energy Clusters have been established to provide spatial indication of the heating, cooling and electrical annual peak and energy demands in the town centre zone. These Energy Clusters are as shown in Figure 2. AECOM Croydon Decentralised Energy Study 29 Capabilities on project: Energy Environment 2424 2525 2121 18 20 1919 18 20 2323 2626 1616 1717 2828 22 22 1515 1414 27 27 13 14 5 5 29 12 3030 29 4 4 1111 66 7 7 8 9 8 10 9 10 3 3 2 11 Figure 2 Map showing Energy Clusters (1 to 30) defined for the town centre area Each Energy Clusters will indicate the sum of energy and peak demand in MWh and MW respectively of buildings identified within them as being relevant within the scope of the study.
    [Show full text]
  • NLA London Tall Buildings Survey 2017 #Nlatallbuildings
    Annual Update NLA London Tall Buildings Survey 2017 #NLATallBuildings Produced in association with Powered by data from London Tall Buildings Survey Foreword Peter Murray, Chairman, New London Architecture Each year the NLA London Tall Buildings Survey has generated a healthy debate about the benefits, as well as the negative impacts, of tall buildings. It has given a voice to those that propose them as well as those that are more critical. At NLA we remain of the view that in a growing city, well designed tall buildings in the right place are appropriate, a view reiterated by the Mayor of London at his Question Time on March 23. This year’s data will assist the Mayor as he prepares his new London Plan, with drafts expected this autumn. We are encouraged that the Mayor is now actively pursuing the idea of a 3D computer model of London, something we have been pressing for since our first survey in 2014. Developers will be able to place virtual images of their buildings into the wider model so that planners, the public and the Mayor can fully understand their impact. All too often the debate takes place without a clear understanding of the individual and the cumulative impact of proposed tall buildings. The City of London has been using such a model for the past year to great effect. The French technology company Dassault Systems will launch the Virtual Singapore project later this year which will show what the future city will look like, as well as containing comprehensive data about the city’s management.
    [Show full text]