DOCSLIB.ORG

Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON APPELLATE RULES Washington, DC April 13-14, 2004 Agenda for Spring 2004 Meeting of Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules April 13-14, 2004 Washington, D.C. 1. Introductions II. Approval of Minutes of November 2003 Meeting III. Report on January 2004 Meeting of Standing Committee IV. Action Items A. Proposed Amendments Published for Comment in August 2003 1. Rule 4(a)(6) (clarify whether verbal communication provides "notice") [Item No. 00-08] 2 Washington's Birthday Package: Rules 26(a)(4) and 45(a)(2) [Item No. 00-03] 3. New Rule 27(d)(1)(E) (apply typeface and type-style limitations to motions) [Item No. 02-01] 4. Cross-Appeals Package: Rules 28(c) and 28(h), new Rule 28.1, and Rules 32(a)(7)(C) and 34(d) [Item No. 00-12] 5. New Rule 32.1 (citation of unpublished decisions) [Item No. 01-01] 6. Rule 35(a) (disqualified judges/en banc rehearing) [Item No. 00-11] V Discussion Items A. Item No. 00-07 (FRAP 4 - time for Hyde Amendment appeals) (Mr. Letter) B. Item No. 03-06 (FRAP 3 - defining parties) (Mr. Letter) C. Item No 03-08 (FRAP 4(c)(1) mandate simultaneous affidavit) (Mr. Letter) D. Item No 03-09 (FRAP 4(a)(1)(B) & 40(a)(1) - U.S. officer sued in individual capacity) (Mr. Letter) E. Items Awaiting Initial Discussion I Item No. 03-10 (new FRAP 25.1) - privacy protections) VI. Additional Old Business and New Business (If Any) VII. Schedule Dates and Location of Fall 2004 Meeting VIII. Adjournment ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON APPELLATE RULES March 2004 Chair: Honorable Samuel A. Alito, Jr. Sanford Svetcov, Esquire United States Circuit Judge Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP United States Court of Appeals 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 357 United States Post Office San Francisco, CA 94111 and Courthouse 50 Walnut Street Mark 1. Levy, Esquire Newark, NJ 07101 Kilpatnck Stockton LLP 607 1 4 th Street, N.W., Suite 900 Members: Washington, DC 20005-2018 Honorable Carl E. Stewart Solicitor General (ex officio) United States Circuit Judge Honorable Theodore B. Olson United States Court of Appeals U.S. Department of Justice 2299 United States Court House 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 5143 300 Fannin Street Washington, DC 20530 Shreveport, LA 71101-3074 Douglas Letter, Appellate Litigation Counsel Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr. Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice United States Circuit Judge 601 D Street, N.W., Room 9106 United States Court of Appeals Washington, DC 20530 333 Constitution Avenue, N.W Washington, DC 20001 Reporter: Honorable T.S. Ellis III Professor Patrick J. Schiltz United States District Judge University of St. Thomas School of Law United States District Court 1000 La Salle Avenue, MSL 400 Albert V Bryan United States Courthouse Minneapolis, MN 55403-2015 401 Courthouse Square Alexandria, VA 22314-5799 Advisors and Consultants: Professor Carol Ann Mooney Marcia M. Waldron Vice President and Associate Provost Circuit Clerk University of Notre Dame United States Court of Appeals 237 Hayes-Healy Center 601 Market Street Notre Dame, IN 46556 Philadelphia, PA 19106 W. Thomas McGough, Jr., Esquire Reed Smith LLP 435 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15219 March 22, 2004 Projects ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON APPELLATE RULES (CONTD.) Liaison Member: Honorable J. Garvan Murtha United States District Judge United States District Court 204 Main Street Brattleboro, VT 05301 Secretary: Peter G. McCabe Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure Washington, DC 20544 March 22, 2004 Projects JUDICIAL CONFERENCE RULES COMMITTEES Chairs Reporters Honorable David F. Levi Prof Daniel R. Coquillette Chief Judge, United States District Court Boston College Law School United States Courthouse 885 Centre Street 501 1 Street, 14 th Floor Newton Centre, MA 02159 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Samuel A. Alito, Jr. Prof. Patrick J. Schiltz United States Circuit Judge University of St. Thomas 357 United States Post Office School of Law and Courthouse 1000 La Salle Avenue, MSL 400 50 Walnut Street Minneapolis, MN 55403-2015 Newark, NJ 07101 Honorable A. Thomas Small Prof Jeffrey W. Morris United States Bankruptcy Judge University of Dayton United States Bankruptcy Court School of Law Post Office Drawer 2747 300 College Park Raleigh, NC 27602 Dayton, OH 45469-2772 Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal Prof Edward H. Cooper United States District Judge University of Michigan United States District Court Law School 11535 Bob Casey U.S. Courthouse 312 Hutchins Hall 515 Rusk Avenue Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215 Houston, TX 77002-2698 Honorable Edward E. Carnes Prof. David A. Schlueter United States Circuit Judge St. Mary's University United States Court of Appeals School of Law United States Courthouse, Suite 500D One Camino Santa Maria One Church Street San Antonio, TX 78228-8602 Montgomery, AL 36104 Honorable Jerry E. Smith Prof. Daniel J. Capra United States Circuit Judge Fordham University United States Court of Appeals School of Law 12621 Bob Casey U.S. Courthouse 140 West 62nd Street 515 Rusk Avenue New York, NY 10023 Houston, TX 77002-2698 March 22, 2004 Projects a Co en o 0 V 4) o ~) a 4-) - - - 4) c~ 4) 444) t C 44t 44 c~ a- 2 4 C1C~cO - tic] C~ 0 2 ~a2 ~ 0 00t~0 4.0 - - - 4) -~- t t Cxt ~ 44 44 t- osI*- 0 0-~0 U 009 ~ 0t0-~-~ 4 a) S 5Z5 44c~44 4444~ 44~ c~444)44 e 4) t-~ 44 ~ -e-t-~ 44E ~ 44 44 C44~ 4)4)4)4) 4) 4)~ 4-fl 4)'~4)4)t4)E 0 44444444 444444 44~4444D~44L. 44 4444~ ~ 44 ~ .0 C44C440 C 4 4 0 ~ C 4 4 ~ g~ Looco 2o~ 9oo~ 5 9o~ -~ 9ooo~ S 'V ~ ~tttoEt ~ ~ 5~a ~- - - t~)~ 4 ) 4 ) 4 4 4 ) ~ ~ tt 4 ) 4 ) o - - - ~ I- -, 0 4) 44 -v C~ -- v-v-v-v ~t S 'V ~44~ Ct-v ~-t ~ .. t-vt ~ t44C44C4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ~440 .~44t4) -- C- 44 C C44~t 5444~~C~ ~ 44444444~~t~ 4-n ~5~-v*~ 44 *~C~"~ bD~44 ~- ~ 0~ 440000 4400 440 Q~ ~ 440000>0 ~ 44 oa - - - b~U a U <~0Q0 <~ <C~~~< ~~Q0~Z <~~C0 < z ~ .4- 4) *~44 4) S -t -c E ~- N 2 0 0 4) 0.0 4444 4444 ii 4) C'll-~ -s -½ C C~ 0 44~ 44Q 0 0 0 O4.~ g 0~ 4) 44 C*4~ 0 a ~QE 44~ -~r 0 ~ >~ 4)4.) 4)9 -- I- 44 ~0 440~~ 44~-~ ~'4)E - '0 '-'C 0t< 4)0 -v 4~44 4-~ >4 ~i Ii! ~C 4)0 ~ 4)S V 0 0 ON 0 en en en en 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 4) 0) 4) 4) t 4) 0) 0) -U - 4) ~t - - - -~ 0 ~ COO ~~CO0 COO ciCO CC 0 CO ,~-4I..,Cl CO C1C'I CO .4' Cl en 0 o~oE oca9 0 0 Xt0~ S - 000 - 0 0 00 0. - "' '0 CO C C to to CE ~ ~.0 bE) ~ .0 bE) ~ ~.0 0) >~ E § >~ 9o-too~ C 0 -~ ~ 0 .0 9o~o~ g oo~ g 9oU~ 4o~) ~ - Cb ~4),~en ~ Cl C~ ~ ~ 4 ) t-~ - - C.) 0~~0 0 C 0 C.) tZ'Uo.)o)0 t -oz-~zZ -g '~ 0 4 ) 4 ) 0 -S~-~ -e~2 -~ - ~ 4) ~ 0- 0- 0- -t - ~- -~ a ~ 0*~ ~C-U-U~ ~- ~ a ~~t'3~ --Uc~~>4) CO ~ - k. 04)¼- ~ CCQO 4 ) ¼- ~ C~¼- C 4)4) ~E)4) - -U-U a~ E~0u,0- 4) > e C~4)CE E~~E> ct <CC < <C C 4) - CI- 4) 0~ (~) - 0- t -. 4 4) 0- 4) .0 0 >~ 4) 4) C -~ -d 4)C 4)C a o 4) C.) ~Z~'-.4 4) 0- C 0 C) Cr CO 0 .0 .0 -U 4) -~ 0 C ~ 4)'~ 4)4) .0C C)0 a -~ C 0-4) 00 4) 4- C ¼- 0 >-. 0.0 -~ C) 0 ~ at C~ t ~0 4--c -~ 0-.CC) '' ~- t4) aCb ~4) 0o4)~ C ~ 0 C 4)0 en5& 4) ~4) Cl Cl> d0 Cl 4)4) ~o C ~bE) za t),4)0-4) C 0- 4)4) A - <~ .~? ii 4)S Cl 0 0en 0.~ - O Cl Cl 0 0 0 0 0 en 4) 0 0 0 t~ ~(A -~ ~ -~ S 4) - .- 4) ~ 0 4) ~ e~4) ct 5 4) ~4) CC rfl-,Cfl~ en en.-, -. 4)~ 0 ~ ~0~ me - 00 ~ - C~4) t ~o.0 4)~ ~ ~-e~4 ) 4) ~c-t~~ C) ~~4)~4)C o9o~ cfl 0 ~ (A - - .~ - 1 - - (A - S ~ S~2~> ~ E~2 S ~t4)t 4) 2 - C C 4) - (AC (A ~ - - S~t I- -- C <0C~ 0CC) 0 <00d 0~ ~ <0~'0C C) >0 <0C) <0~c'4 0> <C 4) 4) 0 1 0 (A 0 .0 C CC '4-~ 2 C I- 4) C 0 5 < 4) U r 6.5 -c C C) 0 C o > - C - C: CC 0 0 CC CC (A .4- CS >~ CZ C) 4)0 t~(A4) 4)~ (A 00 ~0 - AS ~4) -~ ~OC CO 00 4)QN 4)'~ C ~Cfl ~ 4) 4 ~0~ 04) ~4) ~o.0 0~- 4)0 C' '''5 ~ 00 C '4 '-~t . en ~*~C 4 o Cfl m ~ ~t ~ 4) ~4) ~ 4) C CC 4- 4) C ~ 4)0 ~> t Z-~ S 4) V Co 0' a - 0 0 0 0 - en en en en en o C C 0 0 0 DRAFT Minutes of Fall 2003 Meeting of Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules November 7, 2003 San Diego, California I. Introductions Judge Samuel A. Ahto, Jr., called the meeting of the Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules to order on Friday, November 7, 2003, at 8:25 a.m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Judges 1985–2017 Notre Dame Law School
    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Annual Moot Court Showcase Argument Conferences, Events and Lectures 2017 List of Judges 1985–2017 Notre Dame Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndls_moot_court Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Notre Dame Law School, "List of Judges 1985–2017" (2017). Annual Moot Court Showcase Argument. 1. http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndls_moot_court/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences, Events and Lectures at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Annual Moot Court Showcase Argument by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. List of Judges that Have Served the Moot Court Showcase Argument 2009 to present held in McCarten Court Room, Eck Hall of Law Updated: March 2017 Name Yr. Served ND Grad Court Judge Alice Batchelder 3/3/2017 U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit Chief Justice Matthew Durrant 3/3/2017 Utah Supreme Court NDLS 1992 Judge John Blakey 3/3/2017 BA-UND 1988 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Chief Justice Matthew G. Durrant 2/25/2106 Utah Supreme Court Judge Alice Batchelder 2/25/2016 U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen Kelly 2/25/2016 BA-UND 1983 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Judge Joel F. Dubina 2/26/2015 U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit Chief Judge Frederico A. Moreno 2/26/2015 United States District Court - Miami, FL Judge Patricia O'Brien Cotter 2/26/2015 NDLS 1977 Montana Supreme Court Judge Margaret A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007
    American University Law Review Volume 56 | Issue 4 Article 1 2007 Price of Popularity: The ourC t of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007 Jay S. Plager United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr Part of the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Plager, Jay S. “Price of Popularity: The ourC t of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007.” American University Law Review 56, no. 4 (February 2007): 751-760. This Foreword is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Price of Popularity: The ourC t of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007 Abstract This year marked the twenty-fifth nniva ersary of the establishment of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The nniva ersary was acknowledged with appropriate ceremony, including an en banc session of the court on April 2 attended by various luminaries in the judicial and political branches of the United States. The somewhat tongue-in-cheek title of this essay is intended to suggest an important idea about the court today: with increased visibility, significance, and impact have come consequences, some desirable, some not. This essay undertook a brief review of how the court got where it is, and a look at what these consequences may be.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Proceedings of the Judicial Conference
    -REPORTOF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES MARCH 16, 1999 WASHINGTON, D.C. JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES CHIEFJUSTICE WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST, PRESIDING LEONIDAS RALPH MECHAM, SECRETARY REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES March 16, 1999 Contents Call of the Conference........................... ......... ....4 Reports ...................................... ........ ....4 Elections...................................... .......... ....4 Executive Committee............................ .... ... ...4 Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance ........ .......... ....5 Budgetary Matters......................... .... .... ..6 Federal Courts Improvement Legislation ......... .... ... ...6 Miscellaneous Actions...................... ......... ....7 Committee on the Administrative Office .............. ......... ....7 Committee Activities....................... .......... ....8 Committee on Automation and Technology ........... ......... ....8 Courtroom Technologies .................... ...... ... 8 Long Range Plan for Information Technology. ....... ... 8 Access to Internet Sites .................... Committee on the Administration of the Bankruptcy System .............. .9 Bankruptcy Judgeships ................................... .9 Bankruptcy Estate Administration ........................... 10 Committee on the Budget....................................... Committee Activities..................................... Committee on Codes of Conduct.................................
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Government Manual 1997/1998
    The United States Government Manual 1997/1998 Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration ?1 Revised May 30, 1997 Raymond A. Mosley, Director of the Federal Register. John W. Carlin, Archivist of the United States. On the Cover: Jackie Robinson as a Brooklyn Dodger infielder (from the holdings of the National Archives and Records Administration's Still Pictures Branch, 306±PS± 50±4370). The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) joins the Nation in celebrating the 50th anniversary of Jackie Robinson's breaking the color barrier in major league baseball. NARA's mission is to ensure access to essential evidence that documents the rights of American citizens, the actions of Federal officials, and the national experience through its nationwide system of repositories, public programs, and Federal Register publications. Records from NARA's holdings reflect that Robinson's contributions extended well beyond the playing field to the larger field of law and government. Every American President who held office between 1956 and 1972 received letters from Jackie Robinson expressing the passionate and, at times, combative spirit with which Robinson worked to remove the racial barriers in American society so that all citizens would receive rights guaranteed by the Constitution. For more information on Jackie Robinson's legacy as seen through Federal records, visit NARA's Digital Classroom exhibit, Jackie Robinson: Beyond the Playing Field (Internet, http://www.nara.gov/education/), a collection of correspondence, photographs, and three lesson plans that focus on civil rights history, character education values, and civic responsibility. Special thanks to CMG Worldwide and the Robinson family for their cooperation and permission to use the Jackie Robinson image and the 50th anniversary logo on this year's Manual cover.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002-2003 Year in Review
    Oregon Lawyer 2 0 0 3 UNIVERSITY OF OREGON SCHOOL OF LAW Since 1884, Oregon’s Public 2002-2003 Law School YEAR IN REVIEW NEW STUDENTS Academically Impressive, Geographically Diverse— and More Applicants PROFESSORS Federal Prosecutor, Corporate Attorneys Join Faculty PROGRAMS Appropriate Dispute Resolution and Environmental Law Programs Expand, Portland Business Program Grows. Public Interest/Pro Bono Champs Again! PICTURES Four Seasons at the Knight Law Center, 2003 Commencement and Frohnmayer Award Banquet KUDOS Volunteers Transform Law Students into Lawyers WWW.LAW.UOREGON.EDU U O S C H O O L O F L A W MESSAGE FROM THE DEAN NEW FACULTY AND ADMINISTRATORS, are using our new space in the Portland Center STRENGTHENED PROGRAMS AMONG building owned by the UO for summer school FIRST YEAR ACCOMPLISHMENTS classes, student recruitment, and career services activities. It has been an exciting and eventful first year, and We continue to add energetic new faculty with I am very pleased with the steps forward that the impressive academic and practice credentials to law school has taken. our ranks. Tom Lininger, who previously worked This year we had 1,900 as a federal prosecutor in Oregon and with the applicants for 180 places law firm of Skadden, Arps in San Francisco, will in our entering class, be teaching evidence and legal profession. Judd and the students we Sneirson, who previously worked for Willkie, admitted as the Class of Farr & Gallagher in New York and as a law clerk 2006 are among the best for a federal judge, will be teaching contracts credentialed and most and business associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 32 Issue 4 Article 14 2005 Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals Michael E. Solimine [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael E. Solimine, Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. (2006) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol32/iss4/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW JUDICAL STRATIFICATION AND THE REPUTATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS Michael E. Solimine VOLUME 32 SUMMER 2005 NUMBER 4 Recommended citation: Michael E. Solimine, Judical Stratification and the Reputations of the United States Courts of Appeals, 32 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 1331 (2005). JUDICIAL STRATIFICATION AND THE REPUTATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS MICHAEL E. SOLIMINE* I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1331 II. MEASURING JUDICIAL REPUTATION, PRESTIGE, AND INFLUENCE: INDIVIDUAL JUDGES AND MULTIMEMBER COURTS ............................................................... 1333 III. MEASURING THE REPUTATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS . 1339 IV. THE RISE AND FALL OF
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Johne\Downloads\ALA Court Memorial Program.Wpd
    OPENING OF COURT UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Cathy A. Catterson FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Circuit and Court of Appeals Executive Special Court Session in Memory of PRESIDING and OPENING REMARKS The Honorable Sidney R. Thomas Chief Judge THE HONORABLE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ARTHUR L. ALARCÓN REMARKS The Honorable Dorothy W. Nelson Senior Circuit Judge United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit The Honorable Deanell R. Tacha Dean, Pepperdine University School of Law Chief Judge Emeritus, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Retired) Richard G. Hirsch, Esq. Partner, Nasatir, Hirsch, Podberesky & Khero Thursday, June 4, 2015, 4:00 P.M. The Honorable Mary E. Kelly Courtroom Three Administrative Law Judge, California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board Law Clerk to Judge Alarcón, 1980 - 1982, 1993 - 1994 RICHARD H. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING The Honorable Gregory W. Alarcon Superior Court, County of Los Angeles 125 South Grand Avenue Pasadena, California ADJOURNMENT Reception Immediately Following 1925 Born August 14th in Los Angeles, California 1943 - 1946 Staff Sergeant, Army Infantry. Awarded multiple honors for battlefield bravery and leadership 1949 B.A., University of Southern California (USC) 1951 LL.B., USC School of Law Editorial Board Member, USC Law Review 1952 - 1961 Deputy District Attorney, County of Los Angeles 1961 - 1964 Legal Advisor, Clemency/Extradition Secretary and Executive Assistant to Gov. Edmund G. “Pat” Brown 1964 - 1978 Judge, Superior Court, County of Los Angeles 1978 - 1979 Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal 1979 - 2015 First Hispanic judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
    [Show full text]
  • JCUS-SEP 98, Pp
    REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES September 15, 1999 The Judicial Conference of the United States convened in Washington, D.C., on September 15, 1999, pursuant to the call of the Chief Justice of the United States issued under 28 U.S.C. § 331. The Chief Justice presided, and the following members of the Conference were present: First Circuit: Chief Judge Juan R. Torruella Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., District of New Hampshire Second Circuit: Chief Judge Ralph K. Winter, Jr. Chief Judge Charles P. Sifton, Eastern District of New York Third Circuit: Chief Judge Edward R. Becker Chief Judge Donald E. Ziegler, Western District of Pennsylvania Fourth Circuit: Chief Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III Chief Judge Charles H. Haden II, Southern District of West Virginia Fifth Circuit: Chief Judge Carolyn Dineen King Judge Hayden W. Head, Jr., Southern District of Texas Judicial Conference of the United States Sixth Circuit: Chief Judge Boyce F. Martin, Jr. Judge Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr., Middle District of Tennessee Seventh Circuit: Chief Judge Richard A. Posner Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr., Northern District of Indiana Eighth Circuit: Chief Judge Roger L. Wollman Judge James M. Rosenbaum, District of Minnesota Ninth Circuit: Chief Judge Procter Hug, Jr. Judge Lloyd D. George, District of Nevada Tenth Circuit: Chief Judge Stephanie K. Seymour Judge Ralph G. Thompson, Western District of Oklahoma Eleventh Circuit: Chief Judge R. Lanier Anderson III Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges, Middle District of Florida 40 September 15, 1999 District of Columbia Circuit: Judge Laurence H. Silberman1 Chief Judge Norma H.
    [Show full text]
  • District Clerk
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ,.p.l I r r " 28 2 5 1.0 :: 11111 . _ 11111 . 3 2 I IIIII~~ n~M1. 11111 - . 3 6 Ik\ 11111 . BOO 4 0 Ii'-2. 001,I~. • 0 I• I :ij'",li IIIII~~ 111111.8 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 150mm ->-----~-..... 6" UNI,TED STATES COURT. DIRECTORY Sf March 1, 1986 U.S. DepFrtment of Justice Natlonallnstitute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originallng it. Points of view or opinions staled in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this ~l:lted material has been granted by • • Publlc DOmaln Lnllted States Court Directory to the National Criminal JUstice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ " ) sion of the epp.y.ri:ght owner. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 I 053 03 • UNITED STATES COURT DIRECTORY Issued by: The Administrative Office of the United States Courts Washington, D.C. 20544 Contents: Personnel Division Office of the Chief (633-6115) Printing & Distribution: Administrative Services Division Printing & Distribution Facility (763-1865) • • The information in this Directory is current as of March I, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS Supreme Court ...................................................................................................................... • United
    [Show full text]
  • Ones Used by Judges in 16Th-Century England. Is Edged in Purple
    Law School graduates receive hoods that mimic the ones used by judges in 16th-century England. The hood is edged in purple, representing the discipline of law, and lined in maroon and white, the colors of the University of Chicago. The hood represents the completion of the study of law and the entrance into a learned profession. IIWe expect great things of this class" On June 11, 1999, for the first time in its history, the Law School marked graduation with a spe- Remarks by Richard Helmholz a for us This is a happy occasion and happy day for law students. Just after 11 a.m., the Univer- cial hooding ceremony immediately following are on the faculty as well as you who graduating. realize we may not fully it, faculty sity Convocation, faculty and alumni hooded the Class of 1999 in Rockefeller Memorial Chapel. Although you members take pride in your abilities and your followed a wel- The ceremony began with the procession of graduates and faculty, by accomplishments, both past and future. We join We with you in celebrating today. anticipate­ coming address by Dean Daniel Fischel, '77, who reflected on the implications of this final indeed, we expect--great things of this class. over the gathering together of the entire class. "After spending so much time together past I believe there is very little-really nothing-I Even if I were to could say to spoil this occasion. the three this is the last time you will be all together in one place," he said. "Over years, ask Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Members by Circuit (As of January 3, 2017)
    Federal Judges Association - Members by Circuit (as of January 3, 2017) 1st Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Bruce M. Selya Jeffrey R. Howard Kermit Victor Lipez Ojetta Rogeriee Thompson Sandra L. Lynch United States District Court District of Maine D. Brock Hornby George Z. Singal John A. Woodcock, Jr. Jon David LeVy Nancy Torresen United States District Court District of Massachusetts Allison Dale Burroughs Denise Jefferson Casper Douglas P. Woodlock F. Dennis Saylor George A. O'Toole, Jr. Indira Talwani Leo T. Sorokin Mark G. Mastroianni Mark L. Wolf Michael A. Ponsor Patti B. Saris Richard G. Stearns Timothy S. Hillman William G. Young United States District Court District of New Hampshire Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Joseph N. LaPlante Landya B. McCafferty Paul J. Barbadoro SteVen J. McAuliffe United States District Court District of Puerto Rico Daniel R. Dominguez Francisco Augusto Besosa Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr. Jay A. Garcia-Gregory Juan M. Perez-Gimenez Pedro A. Delgado Hernandez United States District Court District of Rhode Island Ernest C. Torres John J. McConnell, Jr. Mary M. Lisi William E. Smith 2nd Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Barrington D. Parker, Jr. Christopher F. Droney Dennis Jacobs Denny Chin Gerard E. Lynch Guido Calabresi John Walker, Jr. Jon O. Newman Jose A. Cabranes Peter W. Hall Pierre N. LeVal Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Reena Raggi Robert A. Katzmann Robert D. Sack United States District Court District of Connecticut Alan H. NeVas, Sr. Alfred V. Covello Alvin W. Thompson Dominic J. Squatrito Ellen B.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Federal Circuit Jurisdiction Paul Gugliuzza Boston University School of Law
    Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship 6-2012 Rethinking Federal Circuit Jurisdiction Paul Gugliuzza Boston University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Courts Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Paul Gugliuzza, Rethinking Federal Circuit Jurisdiction, 100 Georgetown Law Journal 1437 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/168 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES Rethinking Federal Circuit Jurisdiction PAUL R. GUGLIUZZA* Thirty years ago, Congress created the Federal Circuit for the overriding purpose of bringing uniformity to patent law. Yet less than half of the court’s cases are patent cases. Most Federal Circuit cases involve veterans benefits, government-employment actions, government contracts, and other matters. Al- though existing literature purports to study the Federal Circuit as an institution, these projects focus largely on the court’s patent cases. This Article, by contrast, considers whether the court’s nonpatent docket might affect the development of patent law and whether the court’s specialization in patent law has conse- quences for how it decides nonpatent cases. These inquiries result in two primary contributions. First, drawing on institu- tional-choice theory, this Article suggests that certain litigants—particularly military veterans but also government employees and government contractors— should not be forced to litigate appeals in a specialized court in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]