DOCSLIB.ORG

The Face of the Law School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Face of the Law School The University of Virginia School of Law UVALawyer Fall 2004 The Face of the Law School The University of Virginia School of Law contents UVALawyer Fall 2004 Vol. 28, No. 2 Departments 3 Dean’s Message 4 Law School News 22 Faculty Briefs 4 57 Class Notes 82 In Memoriam 84 In Print 88 Opinion: 32 Corporate Diversity is Invaluable and Incomplete Charles Tribbett III ’80 Features 32 A Man for the Season: Don Yee ’87 Cullen Couch 38 38 Center Sparks Dialogue on Race and Law Denise Forster EDITOR Cullen Couch 42 Behind the Scenes of Brown: E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr. ’53 ASSOCIATE EDITOR Denise Forster Cullen Couch CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Margaret Heritage, Earthen Johnson, Luana Mendes-Martinez, 48 Bakke Revisited Mike Marshall, Mary Wood John C. Jeffries, Jr. ’73 DESIGN roseberries 52 Klarman Offers New Argument on Origin and Effects of Brown PHOTOGRAPHY Tom Cogill Cullen Couch ADDITIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY Ian Bradshaw, Cullen Couch, Susan Baker Kalergis PRINTING Schmitz Press Department text starts here after head 2 Spring2004 dean’s message The Face of the Law School I John C. Jeffries, Jr. ’73 This issue of UVALawyer celebrates diversity in the Law School. Diversity, of course, has many dimensions. Perhaps the most important — and certainly the most disputed — is use of diversi- ty as a factor in admissions. At the Law School, assessments of individual applicants begin with intellectual aptitude and academic achievement. We also look for accomplishments and experiences that predict success. These include significant achievement in extracurricular activities, meaningful work experience, successful military service, and contributions to campus or community through service and leadership. Also important are personal qualities, such as a history of growth in response to challenge or differences among our students are far less the ability to meet and overcome disadvantage. prominent than the commonality of the Finally, we seek diversity of all sorts — experience that unites them. The civility, geographic, racial, ethnic, social, economic, and mutual respect, generosity, and affection that ideological. have long characterized the Law School The inclusion of race and ethnicity among community remain vital and vigorous today. In the factors that can influence admission is, of that environment, diversity actually works — as course, deeply and durably controversial. It it should — not to divide or separate but to divides the Supreme Court (with a majority enhance and enrich the education of all. approving our current practice) and the nation at large. My own views are expressed in an Lillian BeVier’s “Charge to the Class” excerpt reprinted elsewhere in these pages, but I Also noted in this issue is Lillian BeVier’s am fully aware that many disagree. Some think “Charge to the Class of 2004.” The idea for this we go too far in seeking diversity among our event came from the students. They asked students; others think we don’t go far enough. Lillian to speak to them about their To the critics of our admissions policy, I opportunities and responsibilities as Law offer one comment. No one should ignore the School graduates. To my knowledge, the class sincere and heartfelt convictions that lay on meeting held for this purpose was the first such both sides of this difficult issue, but I believe event in the history of the Law School, though that concerns about affirmative action generally members of the Class of 2004 hope that others would be substantially allayed by familiarity will follow their lead. with its actual operation here in the Law In any event, you will be interested — and School. Unlike the experience at some other perhaps inspired — to hear what Lillian had to institutions, our students do not divide say. And you will be proud to welcome these themselves into hostile factions. The racial, fine young lawyers as the newest members of ethnic, economic, social, and ideological our alumni family. UVALawyer 3 law school news On the Occasion of the Retirement of Stanley Henderson Law Alumni Weekend — May 1, 2004 Stanley Henderson will always be known — and At the meeting of the Alumni Association, Dean John C. loved — for his success in the classroom. Jeffries, Jr. ’73, introduced the featured speaker: retiring For those of you who had Professor Law Professor Stanley D. Henderson. The Dean’s remarks Henderson in first-year Contracts, you don’t need as well as Mr. Henderson’s address are featured here. my help in recalling the thrill of that experience. For those of you who did not have Stan, you I John C. Jeffries, Jr. ’73 — if you were lucky — had someone like him. Perhaps that person was Hardy Dillard or perhaps IT IS WITH GREAT PERSONAL PLEASURE — Charlie Gregory or perhaps someone else. and also a little sadness — that I rise to But if you were lucky, you had someone introduce Stanley Henderson. who taught you far more than Torts or Stan and I arrived here on the same day. I Contracts. You had someone who taught you was a first-year student — in other words, law — or to put it more conventionally — intellectually a tabula rasa. In contrast, Stan was someone who taught you to think like a lawyer. already an experienced teacher, but new to this The key word in that sentence is not institution. He had graduated from law school “lawyer” but “think.” — at the University of Colorado — in 1961. For many of us, when we learned to “think After clerking for a year, and private practice like a lawyer” was the first time we learned to for two, he entered teaching at the University of “think” much at all. To be sure, we learned to Wyoming in 1964, and rose to the rank of full think in a particular intellectual tradition and professor. He visited Virginia in the fall of 1970, with a particular set of raw materials, but was immediately offered a permanent position, mostly we learned how to think. and has been here ever since. And for that — above all else — we thank Stan is an accomplished scholar. He is the Stan Henderson. author of Dawson, Harvey & Henderson on No one has done it better, or with greater Contracts, now in its eighth edition and one of grace. No one has done it with more civility, the top-10 selling casebooks nationally. with more down-to-the-ground decency in his By the way, the fact that the casebook is dealings with students. And no one has been still called Dawson, Harvey & Henderson is rewarded with greater admiration and affection testimony to Stan’s modesty. Messrs. Dawson than Stan Henderson. and Harvey have long since gone to their Let me quote Stan on law teaching: reward, and Stan has produced the last five “Teaching law is essentially about passing editions of the casebook by himself. on the intellectual culture, especially the It seems to me, Stan, that it is high time inquiring element. that the book be called Henderson & Somebody “It is the business of engaging legal rather than Somebody & Henderson. materials, of doing something with a vast and He is also the co-author of a casebook on untidy body of cases, statutes, and concepts. Labor Law, and if he keeps on schedule — and “My task is to prepare the students for a if you know Stan, you know he will — in 2005 lifetime of self-education.” he will produce a treatise on Labor Law, to be Well, there you have it. That’s as good a published by Foundation Press. short statement of what legal education is — These are very considerable achievements, and should be — as you will ever see. and I don’t mean to diminish them when I say And, Stanley, at that task, we are here to that no matter what fame he enjoys as a scholar, say, you are the master. 4 Fall2004 law school news style, and we thank you for that. We thank you a lot. Worn and weary old Clark Hall, and the Spartan, “no- name” quarters that were the original North Grounds, are — to borrow from Simon & Garfunkel — “but a dream to me now.” Second, there is the make-up of the student body, and the faculty. When I left law school in 1961, there was at best a sprinkling of women and minorities in the nation’s professional schools, including the top law schools. In my first Contracts class at Virginia (John Jeffries’s class), 120 students in all, there were two black men and eight women, Dean Jeffries and reunion attendees demonstrate their affection for Stan one a black. Henderson after his address. To be sure, the constraining norms of our nation’s earlier times were gradually eroded. Led by Al Reflections on a Career Turnbull (and faculty like Charlie Whitebread on the Admissions Teaching the Law Committee), we worked very hard to make law study here a more I Stanley D. Henderson attractive option for those who had found it unattractive. Our classes I DIDN’T INTEND TO GROW OLDER AND FACE have for some time now looked more and more retirement. It has all happened by accident. It like the people who live in America. Yet the wasn’t supposed to happen to me, only to others. struggle to build a stable consensus for diversity I met my wife Dee many years ago in a continues. This school, going back to Dean college Speech class. Based on that encounter, Ribble’s fight against “massive resistance” in the she first thought I was destined to be a 1950s, has demonstrated that it will stand on preacher. That was not in the cards, but I the right side of any debate over whether eventually became a teacher.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Bibliography for the United States Courts of Appeals
    Florida International University College of Law eCollections Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1994 A Bibliography for the United States Courts of Appeals Thomas E. Baker Florida International University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Courts Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Thomas E. Baker, A Bibliography for the United States Courts of Appeals , 25 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 335 (1994). Available at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications/152 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at eCollections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCollections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A BmLIOGRAPHY FOR THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS· by Thomas E. Baker" If we are to keep our democracy, there must be one commandment: Thou shalt not ration justice. - Learned Handl This Bibliography was compiled for a book by the present author entitled, RATIONING JUSTICE ON ApPEAL - THE PROBLEMS OF THE V.S. COURTS OF APPEALS, published in 1994 by the West Publishing Company. That book is a general inquiry into the question whether the United States Courts of Appeals have broken Judge Hand's commandment already and, if not, whether the Congress and the Courts inevitably will be forced to yield to the growing temptation to ration justice on appeal. After a brief history of the intermediate federal courts, the book describes the received tradition and the federal appellate ideal. The book next explains the "crisis in volume," the consequences from the huge docket growth experienced in the Courts of Appeals since the 1960s and projected to continue for the foreseeable future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007
    American University Law Review Volume 56 | Issue 4 Article 1 2007 Price of Popularity: The ourC t of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007 Jay S. Plager United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr Part of the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Plager, Jay S. “Price of Popularity: The ourC t of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007.” American University Law Review 56, no. 4 (February 2007): 751-760. This Foreword is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Price of Popularity: The ourC t of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007 Abstract This year marked the twenty-fifth nniva ersary of the establishment of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The nniva ersary was acknowledged with appropriate ceremony, including an en banc session of the court on April 2 attended by various luminaries in the judicial and political branches of the United States. The somewhat tongue-in-cheek title of this essay is intended to suggest an important idea about the court today: with increased visibility, significance, and impact have come consequences, some desirable, some not. This essay undertook a brief review of how the court got where it is, and a look at what these consequences may be.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisitions of “Nascent” Competitors
    the antitrust source Ⅵ www.antitrustsource.com Ⅵ August 2 0 20 1 Acquisitions of “Nascent” Competitors Jonathan Jacobson and Christopher Mufarrige Virtually every day we hear about how “big tech” has gotten “too big.” Congressional inquiries of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple fill the business pages regularly. 1 The FTC is investigat - ing, 2 the Justice Department and State Attorneys General are reportedly about to file suit, 3 and enthusiastic academics and politicians are positing expanding antitrust as a way to “rein in” the activities of these firms. One of the most discussed approaches is using antitrust to prevent (or at least inhibit) large technology platforms from acquiring promising start-ups—based on the theo - ry that at least some such acquisitions of these “nascent competitors” eliminate important future Vcompetition. 4 Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and the U.S. Federal Trade Com - mission recently blocked the planned merger of Illumina and Pacific Biosciences on just that basis. 5 Other investigations are reportedly pending, 6 and there even have been some reports of revisiting long-consummated mergers, such as Facebook/Instagram or Google/YouTube. 7 We believe these efforts are largely misguided. “Nascent competitor” acquisitions tend to add useful new features to products consumers already love, eliminate little or no current competition, supply the acquired firm’s users with far greater support and innovation, and provide a valuable exit ramp for investors, encouraging future investments in innovation. Consumer harm is at best Ⅵ speculative. And most importantly, critics have identified no instances in which meaningful com - Jonathan Jacobson is a petition has been lost or consumers harmed.
    [Show full text]
  • PLESSY V. FERGUSON (1896) ORIGINS of the CASE in 1892, Homer Plessy Took a Seat in the “Whites Only” Car of a Train and Refused to Move
    PLESSY v. FERGUSON (1896) ORIGINS OF THE CASE In 1892, Homer Plessy took a seat in the “Whites Only” car of a train and refused to move. He was arrested, tried, and convicted in the District Court of New Orleans for breaking Louisiana’s segregation law. Plessy appealed, claiming that he had been denied equal protection under the law. The Supreme Court handed down its decision on May 18, 1896. THE RULING The Court ruled that separate-but-equal facilities for blacks and whites did not violate the Constitution. LEGAL REASONING CALIFORNIA STANDARDS Plessy claimed that segregation violated his right to 11.10.2 Examine and analyze the key events, policies, and court cases in the evolution of civil rights, including Dred Scott v. equal protection under the law. Moreover he claimed Sandford, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, that, being “of mixed descent,” he was entitled to “every Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, and California Proposition 209. recognition, right, privilege and immunity secured to HI 3 Students interpret past events and issues within the context the citizens of the United States of the white race.” in which an event unfolded rather than solely in terms of pres- Justice Henry B. Brown, writing for the majority, ruled: ent-day norms and values. “ The object of the [Fourteenth] amendment was LEGAL SOURCES . undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law, but . it could not have LEGISLATION been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Jew Taboo: Jewish Difference and the Affirmative Action Debate
    The Jew Taboo: Jewish Difference and the Affirmative Action Debate DEBORAH C. MALAMUD* One of the most important questions for a serious debate on affirmative action is why certain minority groups need affirmative action while others have succeeded without it. The question is rarely asked, however, because the comparisonthat most frequently comes to mind-i.e., blacks and Jews-is seen by many as taboo. Daniel A. Farberand Suzanna Sherry have breached that taboo in recent writings. ProfessorMalamud's Article draws on work in the Jewish Studies field to respond to Farberand Sherry. It begins by critiquing their claim that Jewish values account for Jewish success. It then explores and embraces alternative explanations-some of which Farberand Sheny reject as anti-Semitic-as essentialparts of the story ofJewish success in America. 1 Jews arepeople who are not what anti-Semitessay they are. Jean-Paul Sartre ha[s] written that for Jews authenticity means not to deny what in fact they are. Yes, but it also means not to claim more than one has a right to.2 Defenders of affirmative action today are publicly faced with questions once thought improper in polite company. For Jewish liberals, the most disturbing question on the list is that posed by the comparison between the twentieth-century Jewish and African-American experiences in the United States. It goes something like this: The Jews succeeded in America without affirmative action. In fact, the Jews have done better on any reasonable measure of economic and educational achievement than members of the dominant majority, and began to succeed even while they were still being discriminated against by this country's elite institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • How Did the Civil Rights Movement Impact the Lives of African Americans?
    Grade 4: Unit 6 How did the Civil Rights Movement impact the lives of African Americans? This instructional task engages students in content related to the following grade-level expectations: • 4.1.41 Produce clear and coherent writing to: o compare and contrast past and present viewpoints on a given historical topic o conduct simple research summarize actions/events and explain significance Content o o differentiate between the 5 regions of the United States • 4.1.7 Summarize primary resources and explain their historical importance • 4.7.1 Identify and summarize significant changes that have been made to the United States Constitution through the amendment process • 4.8.4 Explain how good citizenship can solve a current issue This instructional task asks students to explain the impact of the Civil Rights Movement on African Claims Americans. This instructional task helps students explore and develop claims around the content from unit 6: Unit Connection • How can good citizenship solve a current issue? (4.8.4) Formative Formative Formative Formative Performance Task 1 Performance Task 2 Performance Task 3 Performance Task 4 How did the 14th What role did Plessy v. What impacts did civic How did Civil Rights Amendment guarantee Ferguson and Brown v. leaders and citizens have legislation affect the Supporting Questions equal rights to U.S. Board of Education on desegregation? lives of African citizens? impact segregation Americans? practices? Students will analyze Students will compare Students will explore how Students will the 14th Amendment to and contrast the citizens’ and civic leaders’ determine the impact determine how the impacts that Plessy v.
    [Show full text]
  • LDF Mourns the Loss of Congressman John Lewis, Legendary and Beloved Civil Rights Icon Today, LDF Mourns the Loss of the Honora
    LDF Mourns the Loss of Congressman John Lewis, Legendary and Beloved Civil Rights Icon Today, LDF mourns the loss of The Honorable John Lewis, an esteemed member of Congress and revered civil rights icon with whom our organization has a deeply personal history. Mr. Lewis passed away on July 17, 2020, following a battle with pancreatic cancer. He was 80 years old. “I don’t know of another leader in this country with the moral standing of Rep. John Lewis. His life and work helped shape the best of our national identity,” said Sherrilyn Ifill, LDF’s President & Director-Counsel. “We revered him not only for his work and sacrifices during the Civil Rights Movement, but because of his unending, stubborn, brilliant determination to press for justice and equality in this country. “There was no cynicism in John Lewis; no hint of despair even in the darkest moments. Instead, he showed up relentlessly with commitment and determination - but also love, and joy and unwavering dedication to the principles of non-violence. He spoke up and sat-in and stood on the front lines – and risked it all. This country – every single person in this country – owes a debt of gratitude to John Lewis that we can only begin to repay by following his demand that we do more as citizens. That we ‘get in the way.’ That we ‘speak out when we see injustice’ and that we keep our ‘eyes on the prize.’” The son of sharecroppers, Mr. Lewis was born on Feb. 21, 1940, outside of Troy, Alabama. He grew up attending segregated public schools in the state’s Pike County and, as a boy, was inspired by the work of civil rights activists, including Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Lgbt Power List S
    Photos courtesy of Jeremy Lentz, Teaneck INSIDER NJ’S 2020 INSIDER OUT 100: LGBT POWER LIST S We’reHere making it easierwhen to get the care you you need, like chatting with a nurse or having a virtual doctor needvisit 24/7us at no most. cost. NowHorizonBlue.com/Coronavirus and always. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. The Blue Cross® and Blue Shield® names and symbols are registered marks of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. The Horizon® name and symbols are registered marks of Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey. © 2020 Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey. Three Penn Plaza East, Newark, New Jersey 07105 2 F Magenta, Yellow, Black Message from the Author 2020 LGBTQ POWER Welcome to InsiderNJ’s 2020 OUT 100 Power List, our 3rd annual tribute to politically influential LGBTQs in New Jersey politics. This year’s list let’s us venerate some amazing, brilliant LGBTQ people, veterans of the AIDS crisis, harnessing and channeling wisdom and expertise to battle P.O. Box 66 COVID-19. Verona, NJ 07044 Politicians are listed separately this time. Since we like to keep things fresh, the [email protected] 2020 OUT 100 Power List includes over 20 newbies. So if you don’t see your www.InsiderNJ.com name this year, I’ll say thank you for making room for new faces and tomorrow’s faves. Many of the names below were called to action by America’s indifference to the AIDS pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolerated Use
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 2008 Tolerated Use Tim Wu Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Tim Wu, Tolerated Use, COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF LAW & THE ARTS, VOL. 31, P. 617, 2008; COLUMBIA LAW & ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER NO. 333 (2008). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1534 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Center for Law and Economic Studies Columbia University School of Law 435 West 116th Street New York, NY 10027-7201 (212) 854-3739 Tolerated Use Tim Wu Working Paper No. 333 May, 2008 Do not quote or cite without author’s permission. This paper can be downloaded without charge at: The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=1132247 An index to the working papers in the Columbia Law School Working Paper Series is located at: http://www.law.columbia.edu/lawec/ Tolerated Use Tim Wu† Introduction “Tolerated use” is a term that refers to the contemporary spread of technically infringing, but nonetheless tolerated use of copyrighted works. Such patterns of mass infringement have occurred before in copyright history, though perhaps not on the same scale, and have usually been settled with the use of special laws, called compulsory licensing regimes, more familiar to non-copyright scholars as liability rules.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Timeline 1970S and Before
    NJ Election Law Enforcement Commission- A Historical Timeline By Joseph Donohue, Deputy Director (Updated 10/2/17) 1970s and Before October 16, 1964- Governor Richard Hughes enacts New Jersey’s first lobbying law (Chapter 207). It requires any lobbyist who makes $500 or more in three months or spends that much to influence legislation to register with the Secretary of State. Trenton attorney John Heher, representing American Mutual Insurance Alliance of Chicago, becomes the state’s first registered lobbyist.1 New Jersey Education Association, historically one of the most powerful lobbyists in the capitol, registers for the first time on December 15, 1964.2 September 1, 1970- The interim report of the bipartisan New Jersey Election Law Revision Commission concludes “stringent disclosure requirements on every aspect of political financing must be imposed and enforce at every election level….If there were full public disclosure and publication of all campaign contributions and expenditures during a campaign, the voters themselves could better judge whether a candidate has spent too much.” It recommends creation of a 5-member Election Law Enforcement Commission and a tough enforcement strategy: “withhold the issuance of a certificate of election to a candidate who has not complied with the provisions of this act.”3 November 13, 1971- A new lobbying law (Chapter 183) takes effect, repealing the 1964 act and transferring all jurisdiction to the Attorney General. It requires lobbyists to wear badges in the Statehouse for the first time and file quarterly reports that list the bills they are supporting or opposing. April 7, 1972- Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 requires disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures for federal candidates.4 June 17, 1972- Break-in occurs at the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate office complex in Washington, DC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Women's Project Resource Guide.Pdf
    THE WOMEN’S PROJECT HEALTH RESOURCE GUIDE The Women’s Project is funded by Providing court-involved women with excellence in integrated healthcare and employment services. 1 Women in prison have long suffered because prisons and jails have often been designed by men for men. In addition, women’s healthcare—as applies to medical, behavioral, including mental health and addiction, and particularly OB/GYN—has often been ignored at best or at worst been a source of maltreatment and malfeasance. We are most grateful to the strong leadership and support of Senate President Stephen Sweeney and Assembly Speaker Craig Coughlin or their sponsorship and ongoing support of the Women’s Reentry Commission. Thank you to Governor Murphy for his commitment to reentry, supporting legislative enactments that expand reentry accountability, and providing for greater prisoner releases during the Public Health Emergency. Particularly, we are indebted to the members of the Commission, who have steered The Women’s Project to today’s resource directory, integrated healthcare delivery system, and navigation & case management referral. Through the clear and powerful support of women’s state legislative leadership, the Women’s Reentry Commission Report was issued as a critical pathway toward improving the conditions for women in prison and upon reentry. The Women’s Project is an outgrowth of that report, specifically answering the need for integrated women’s healthcare. The Resource Guide provides a comprehensive survey of medical, mental health, and addiction treatment services in each of the eight (8) New Jersey Reentry Corporation county sites. Working with the leadership of The Women’s Reentry Commission, NJRC case management staff, and our women’s health navigators, our goal is to provide the best healthcare for women leaving incarceration and reentering the general community.
    [Show full text]
  • Nascent Competitors
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 2020 Nascent Competitors C. Scott Hemphill New York University School of Law, [email protected] Tim Wu Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Internet Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation C. Scott Hemphill & Tim Wu, Nascent Competitors, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, VOL. 168, P. 1879, 2020; NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW & ECONOMICS RESEARCH PAPER NO. 20-50; COLUMBIA LAW & ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER NO. 645 (2020). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2661 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE NASCENT COMPETITORS C. SCOTT HEMPHILL† & TIM WU†† A nascent competitor is a firm whose prospective innovation represents a serious threat to an incumbent. Protecting such competition is a critical mission for antitrust law, given the outsized role of unproven outsiders as innovators and the uniquely potent threat they often pose to powerful entrenched firms. In this Article, we identify nascent competition as a distinct analytical category and outline a program of antitrust enforcement to protect it. We make the case for enforcement even where the ultimate competitive significance of the target is uncertain, and explain why a contrary view is mistaken as a matter of policy and precedent.
    [Show full text]