It's Time to Celebrate Grand Calumet River and Roxana Marsh Cleanup

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

It's Time to Celebrate Grand Calumet River and Roxana Marsh Cleanup It's time to celebrate Grand Calumet River and Roxana Marsh cleanup In northwest Indiana, life may just be a little more hopeful than it used to be. The Great Lakes Legacy Act (GLLA) project to remove contaminated sediment from portions of the Grand Calumet River and adjacent Roxana Marsh is done. Unlike before the cleanup, these waterways will now likely attract birds, aquatic life, and people. “This river was lifeless,” said Cameron Davis, senior advisor on the Great Lakes to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson. “Today, because of this effort, you can see the Grand Cal working and fighting to come back to life, and with it, the community.” A celebration and press event in June to mark this moment brought together many play- ers and partners involved in the process. And, thanks to work done by Caitie McCoy, Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant (IISG) social scientist, local school children capped off their semester-long learning expe- rience about the restoration project by planting native seedlings along the marsh’s shores. “Legacy Act projects provide oppor- tunities for residents to get involved in the river restoration process and learn about local water issues,” said McCoy. “As the Grand Cal project moved for- ward we have been ensuring that this includes local students too.” McCoy and Nishaat Yunus, a fellow in the U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO), worked closely with students in two northwest Indiana schools, engaging them in Bringing AIS information to Page 2 hands-on water monitoring activities and other boat ramps learning opportunities. Yellow perch diet depends Page 3 At the Hammond Academy of Science and on where they are Technology they accompanied about 80 ninth Natural lawn care at a Page 6 Continued on page 4 retailer near you Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Volunteers bring AIS information Two States Caring for One Great Lake Brian Miller, Director down to boat ramps 374 NSRC, 1101 W. Peabody Urbana, IL 61801 Investing in the stock market can be a risky venture, but investing 217-333-6444 your time to improve the environment has no uncertainty, and benefits Lisa Merrifield everyone. IISG and the Northeast Illinois Assistant Director Invasive Plant Partnership (NIIPP) are seeking volunteers to assist with Stop Aquatic Hitchhikers! Clean Boats Crew, which aims to inform boaters that they The may be accidentally transporting aquatic HELM invasive species. “I think of volunteering as an investment Irene Miles in the future—protecting and preserv- Editor ing ecosystems for future generations of Michael Peterson humans as well as native organisms,” said Cathy McGlynn, the NIIPP Writer coordinator. “I also think environmental education and outreach are es- sential to raising public awareness about not only invasive species, but Susan White also the fact that everyone's actions can have far-reaching consequences. Graphic Designer Humans are interconnected with every other organism on this planet.” Printed on Recycled Paper Last year, the program started in Lake County, Illinois and Lake County, Indiana. Volunteers talked to boaters on site at boat ramps about how to prevent the spread of AIS. Boaters can easily transport AIS unknow- IISG online: ingly in wa- ter found in iiseagrant.org bait buckets, lakesideviews.blogspot.com kayaks, ca- twitter.com/ILINSeaGrant noes, and boat facebook.com/ILINseagrant motors. Other youtube.com/iiseagrant species can get caught in boat trailers and fishing tackle and be moved Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant is one of more than to new loca- 32 programs of the National Sea Grant College Program created by Congress in 1966. Sea Grant tions. is a partnership of universities, government, business, and industry that addresses marine and Great Lakes needs to enhance sustainable coastal “It’s really all about getting out to where the boaters and anglers are, economic development. Funding is provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oce- and talking with them about how their actions can make a difference,” anic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA said Sarah Zack, IISG aquatic invasive species specialist. “Our Clean Grant # NA10OAR4170068), Office of Sea Grant, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Boats Crew site leaders are very good at educating people about aquatic Purdue University. The University of Illinois and invasive species, and how easy it is to stop their spread with a few Purdue University offer equal opportunities in programs and employment. simple steps.” O D ATM SPH N ER A E During the first year, volunteers talked with more than 900 people IC A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N Continued on page 7 U . E S . C D R E E P M A M RT O MENT OF C IISG-12-24 2 www.iiseagrant.org Location is key to yellow perch diet and success Whether Lake Michigan’s yellow perch survive their recent years. Invasive species, such as the round first winter may depend in part on their food source in goby have been introduced and native species, the fall. And this can depend on where they live. including yellow perch, mottled sculpin, longnose sucker, and various invertebrate prey, have declined. University of Illinois graduate student Austin Happel studied the diet of juvenile yellow perch. He found “Our objective is to describe the nearshore food web that those on the rocky structure and how this varies with location, season, western shores along and bottom substrate,” said Czesny. “We are also Illinois and Wisconsin interested in how invasive species interact with native have a healthy diet of biota, which will ultimately help us manage this unique invertebrates whereas ecosystem that is Lake Michigan,” added Czesny. perch on the sandy east Courtesy of Austin Happel side have a skimpier diet The larger results of the study are still to come, but of zooplankton. smaller aspects of the project, such as Happel’s work with yellow perch, are beginning to tell a story. For “Perch are generalists—they eat what is available,” example, Happel found that there isn't much overlap said Happel. “The rocky habitat along the western in the diet of yellow perch and round goby, but that, coast provides a better environment for invertebrates again, is location dependent. “On the west side of to thrive than the sandy eastern Michigan shores.” Lake Michigan, zooplankton is limited so the perch and gobies are more likely to both prey on inverte- Happel’s study is part of a much larger research brates.” project to document the food web in the coastal zone of Lake Michigan using a comprehensive approach. The nearshore food web study is a collaboration of Scientists at several institutions in the region are researchers at the Illinois Natural History Survey, exploring food web linkages by analyzing the diets Purdue University, State University of New York, and of a number of fish using three techniques: stomach the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Great Lakes contents, fatty acid signatures, and stable isotopes. Water Institute (through Illinois-Indiana and Wisconsin Sea Grants, and U.S. EPA Great Lakes Restoration “Each of these methods reveals a different time Initiative). frame of information about a fish’s diet,” said Happel. “Stomach contents reveal what the fish are eating at the exact moment of capture while fatty acid signatures allow us to tease apart what they have been consuming over several weeks. Stable isotopes provide a picture of an even longer time frame.” “All these approaches have unique advantages, which, when combined, provide detailed informa- tion on the nearshore food web structure,” said Sergiusz Czesny, Lake Michigan Biological Station director. Most food web studies in the past have focused on the open waters of Lake Michigan—this one is Researchers are getting ready to sample in the nearshore of Lake Michigan as designed to describe the nearshore region. There, part of a Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network research initia- the food web has undergone dramatic changes in tive. (Photo courtesy of Sergiusz Czesny) www.iiseagrant.org 3 Cleanup celebration for all ages continued from page 1 grade students from Amanda Miracle's science class- es on a field trip to the river. Students took water samples to monitor water quality in restored sites— the results were shared with EPA and GLLA project partners. The students have gone back to the river to view progress on the restoration project. They have also learned data analysis, data reporting, and how scientists use data to make project-level decisions. At the East Chicago Lighthouse Charter School, about 50 fourth grade students from Andrea Bock's science classes grew native plants, provided by EPA. These plants were brought to Roxana Marsh to put in the ground as part of the celebration. McCoy and Yunus engaged students in key concepts associated with habitats and restoration projects. The children de- signed their own Roxana Marsh habitat by construct- ing a colorful classroom mural. McCoy is working with IISG’s education team— Robin Goettel and Terri Hallesy—to package the classroom programming developed through these efforts. This programming will be ready to apply at other GLLA sites, hopefully in conjunction with Sea Grant programs in other states. Altogether, more than 600,000 cubic yards of polluted sediment were remediated from 2.5 miles of the Roxa- na Marsh and Grand Calumet River. The project’s $52 million cost was shared by U.S. EPA and the state of Indiana. But there are many players in this project— EPA GLNPO, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Our Great Rivers Confidential Draft Draft
    greatriverschicago.com OUR GREAT RIVERS CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT DRAFT A vision for the Chicago, Calumet and Des Plaines rivers TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments 2 Our Great Rivers: A vision for the Chicago, Calumet and Des Plaines rivers Letter from Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel 4 A report of Great Rivers Chicago, a project of the City of Chicago, Metropolitan Planning Council, Friends of the Chicago River, Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning and Ross Barney Architects, through generous Letter from the Great Rivers Chicago team 5 support from ArcelorMittal, The Boeing Company, The Chicago Community Trust, The Richard H. Driehaus Foundation and The Joyce Foundation. Executive summary 6 Published August 2016. Printed in Chicago by Mission Press, Inc. The Vision 8 greatriverschicago.com Inviting 11 Productive 29 PARTNERS Living 45 Vision in action 61 CONFIDENTIAL Des Plaines 63 Ashland 65 Collateral Channel 67 Goose Island 69 FUNDERS Riverdale 71 DRAFT DRAFT Moving forward 72 Our Great Rivers 75 Glossary 76 ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT OUR GREAT RIVERS 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This vision and action agenda for the Chicago, Calumet and Des Plaines rivers was produced by the Metropolitan Planning RESOURCE GROUP METROPOLITAN PLANNING Council (MPC), in close partnership with the City of Chicago Office of the Mayor, Friends of the Chicago River and Chicago COUNCIL STAFF Metropolitan Agency for Planning. Margaret Frisbie, Friends of the Chicago River Brad McConnell, Chicago Dept. of Planning and Co-Chair Development Josh Ellis, Director The Great Rivers Chicago Leadership Commission, more than 100 focus groups and an online survey that Friends of the Chicago River brought people to the Aaron Koch, City of Chicago Office of the Mayor Peter Mulvaney, West Monroe Partners appointed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel, and a Resource more than 3,800 people responded to.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened & Endangered Species
    State Form 4336 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INDIANAPOLIS EPA Renins e r> OFFICE MEMORANDUM """"""""' ''''^" DATE: March 12,2008 TO: Jaworski, IVIark, OLQ SI THRU: Vdmire, Beth, OLC Hauer, Gabriele, OLQ SI FROM: Smitfi,Uira'R:rSlJ^NRDA / SUBJECT: USS Lead Site, East Chicago, Lake County, Indiana The Indiana Department Environmental Management (IDEM) Natural Resource Damages Program was asked to provide information relative to the use of USS Lead site by Threatened and/ Endangered Species. This MEMO attempts to summarize information collected on or near the USS Lead site relative to habitat quality and use by State Listed species. I preface the following discussion with these facts: 1). Endangered Species are identified and protected by law in Indiana at: IC 14-22-34 Chapter 34. Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation IC 14-22-34-1 "Endangered species" defined Sec. 1. (a) As used in this chapter, "endangered species" means any species or subspecies of wildlife whose prospects of survival or recruitment within Indiana are in jeopardy or are likely within the foreseeable fiiture to become so due to any ofthe following factors: (1) The destruction, drastic modification, or severe curtailment ofthe habitat ofthe wildlife. (2) The overutilization ofthe wildlife for scientific, commercial, or sporting purposes. (3) The effect on the wildlife of disease, pollution, or predation. (4) Other natural or manmade factors affecting the prospects of survival or recruitment within Indiana. (5) Any combination ofthe factors described in subdivisions (1) through (4). (b) The term includes the following: (1) Any species or subspecies offish or wildlife appearing on the United States list of endangered native fish and wildlife (50 CFR 17, Appendix D).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Fill Deposits in the Calumet Region of Northwestern Indiana and Northeastern Illinois
    Characterization of Fill Deposits in the Calumet Region of Northwestern Indiana and Northeastern Illinois U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4126 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY INDIANA Characterization of Fill Deposits in the Calumet Region of Northwestern Indiana and Northeastern Illinois By ROBERT T. KAY, THEODORE K. GREEMAN, RICHARD R DUWELIUS, ROBIN B. KING, and JOHN E. NAZIMEK, U.S. Geological Survey, and DAVID M. PETROVSKI, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4126 Prepared In cooperation with the U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY De Kalb, Illinois Indianapolis, Indiana 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director The use of trade, product, industry, or firm names in this report is for identification or location purposes only, and does not constitute endorsement of products by the U.S. Geological Survey, nor impute responsibility for any present or potential effects on the natural resources. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey 221 N. Broadway Branch of Information Services Urbana, IL61801 Box 25286 (217)344-0037 Denver, CO 80225-0286 District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 5957 Lakeside Boulevard Indianapolis, IN 46278-1996 CONTENTS Abstract..................................................................^ 1 Introduction....................................................._
    [Show full text]
  • Health Consultation
    Health Consultation GARY DEVELOPMENT LANDFILL GARY, LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA AUGUST 8, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Health Consultation: A Note of Explanation A health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partners to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. In order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions, such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies; intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for health care providers and community members. This concludes the health consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the Agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov HEALTH CONSULTATION GARY DEVELOPMENT LANDFILL GARY, LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA Prepared
    [Show full text]
  • East Chicago CLC Roxana TOD Plan
    City of East Chicago ROXANA TOD PLAN The Arsh Group Inc. Applied Real Estate Research Robinson Engineering ROXANA TOD PLAN CITY OF EAST CHICAGO STAKEHOLDERS Anthony Copeland .................................................... Mayor Don Babcock ..........................................................NiSource Monsi Corsbie ........................................... E.C. Solid Waste Marino Solorio .......Director, Planning & Economic Dev. Gregory Crowley .............................E.C. Sanitary District Richard Morrisroe .......................................... City Planner Lenny Franciski ....................................... Roxana Resident William Allen .................................................City Engineer Winna Guzman ....................... E.C. Building Department Eman Ibrahim ............................................................NIRPC EAST CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL Paul Labus ..................................The Nature Conservancy Lenny Franciski .............................President, 2nd District Tim Matthews ..............................................Club Ki-Yowga Christine Vasquez ................ Vice-President, 4th District Susan MiHalo ...........................The Nature Conservancy Carla Morgan .................................. E.C. Law Department Myrna Maldonado ............................................ 1st District Michael Noland ........................................................NICTD Brenda Walker .................................................. 3rd District Fran Nowacki ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • We're on Our Way to Making East Chicago The
    EAST CHICAGO YOUR LOCAL SOURCE FOR EAST CHICAGO NEWS AND EVENTS 2020 EAST CHICAGO INAUGURATIONlife “We’re on our way to making East Chicago the most liveable, workable, lovable city” It was a packed house that came out January 4 to hear about the state of the city — what we’ve accomplished and what we plan to do over the next four years. My heart swelled with pride to see 400 enthusiastic resi- dents spend time with us. They are excited with what we have planned. I hope you are too! RENTAL In 2016, I made a promise that our The Honorable Judge Calvin D. Hawkins administers REGISTRATION city would look very different in four the oath of office to East Chicago Mayor Anthony DEADLINE short years. Here is a glimpse at our Copeland during the inauguration ceremony Jan. 4. first-term report card: East Chicago We are beginning 2020 with a $36 ✓ Crime: trending down for the sev- requires landlords million balanced budget and a $32 enth year in a row. to register every million surplus, which keeps us on occupied rental ✓ Parks: a $6 million investment has solid financial footing. property. The cost made East Chicago parks the finest The city’s bond rating is a solid A. is $5 per unit in Northwest Indiana. through April East Chicago department heads are ✓ Washington Park Greenhouse: 15 and $105 per working with me to develop an ambi- Seeing is believing! Go see for unit after April tious agenda to continue the North yourself how fantastic it is. 15. This annual Harbor Development area as well as registration is ✓ Roads & Streets: $50 million development citywide that will touch not optional.
    [Show full text]
  • ECI STF and WTF Basis of Design Report (30%) Update
    ECI STF and WTF Basis of Design Report (30%) Update East Chicago Waterway Management District Public Meeting February 19, 2020 woodplc.com Grand Calumet River AOC Background • Canal constructed 1888 • Grand Calumet River Area of Concern (AOC) identified in 1987 – AOC includes the River, Indiana Harbor Canal, and Lake George Canal – Project location: Lake George Canal Middle and East sections and adjacent Former ECI Refinery Site • Great Lakes Legacy Act (GLLA) uses public-private partnerships to accelerate clean ups • USEPA Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) administers GLLA • Atlantic Richfield Company (ARC), BP Products North America Inc. and East Chicago Waterway Management District (ECWMD) are non-Federal Sponsors • United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) providing design and construction projects on behalf of USEPA GLNPO 2 A presentation by Wood. Grand Calumet River AOC – Lake George Canal GLLA Projects Middle and East [GLLA] Indiana Harbor Canal, Lake George Canal West Junction Reaches (East and West) EBGCR Phase 2 WBGCR - Reach 6, 7 WBGCR - Reach 1,2 WBGCR -- Reach 3,4,5 “Roxana Marsh” EBGCR - East Branch EBGCR – US Steel Reach “West Branch” ECI Parcel Layout . 4 A presentation by Wood. Project Background Basis of Design Covers • South Tank Farm (STF) – Barrier wall system being designed to: • Minimize potential for legacy ECI STF Site contamination to reach Canal • Stabilize STF bank to help facilitate upcoming USACE dredging activities • Provide for redevelopment of parcel by City of East Chicago • West Tank Farm (WTF) – Bank stabilization system designed to: • Minimize potential for legacy ECI WTF Site contamination to reach Canal • Tie into planned USACE sediment capping 5 A presentation by Wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure [PDF]
    GrTahne d Calumet River Revitalized magine a Grand Calumet River safe for I people, fish, birds and wildlife to utilize and enjoy. With the latest clean up efforts, performed under the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative's Legacy Act by a team of scientists and engineers, such a vision is closer to being realized than ever before. Since 2009, 2.3 million pounds of contaminated sediment have been dredged (removed) or capped (isolated from the environment). The team has restored acres of wetland habitat along the river with native trees, grasses, and other plants, providing food and shelter to local fish and wildlife. As a result of this work, a cleaner Grand Calumet River will run through the globally rare dune and swale habitat found in northwest Indiana. For more information, contact Caitie McCoy at (312) 886-1430 or [email protected]. June 2013 SEDIMENT CLEANUP OPERATIONS 1. What kinds of contaminants are being removed from the river? Sediment contaminated with heavy metals, oil, grease, and chemicals like PAHs and PCBs is being removed from the river. Because the contamination is so deep, deeper layers of sediment will be capped with a chemical-physical barrier. A lot of the pollution was created by industrial processes and discharged into the river. 2. How long will the work take? Work started in 2009. The next phase of the cleanup from Kennedy Ave to Cline Ave started spring 2013 and will take approximately three years. The rest of the river will be cleaned in phases, and could take about 10 years, assuming non-federal sponsors can help fund phases that have not yet been addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • MARKTOWN UPDATE a Publication of the Marktown Preservation Society December 2006 Christmas in Marktown - 1953
    MARKTOWN UPDATE A publication of the Marktown Preservation Society December 2006 Christmas In Marktown - 1953 80,000 Calumet Residents See Yule Display The Youngstown Sheet and Tube Office building. At the east end of Christmas Today Company's annual Christmas tree is the building was an illuminated church Needless to say, Christmas is not gone but its memory lingers on. and on the top of the building was a celebrated by industry today as it had For two full weeks the brightly il- cutout of reindeers pulling Santa in his been in the past. But then again, none luminated tree revolved in all its beauty sleigh. More than 2,500 lights were of the major companies appear to be to entertain probably 80,000 Calumet used for the exhibit. owned domestically. Youngstown district residents. More than 16,000 Every seven minutes the large Sheet & Tube and Inland Steel are both cars loaded with travelers stopped at tree made a complete revolution. As now Mittal Steel and that's a foreign the plant to see the tree and listen to it revolved Christmas carols filled the held company. the music. air with music. When many of us grew up, Stan- From December 19 through New There was a good crowd to see dard Oil would decorate a portion of Year's Day the tree was illuminated the tree every night it was illuminated. their refinery with Christmas lights and from 4 p.m. to 1 a.m. And on the three And there has been much comment large white stars atop a particular unit days before Christmas - Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Calumet River Area of Concern
    Great Lakes Areas of Concern (AoCs): Grand Calumet River| Great Lakes | US EPA Great Lakes Area of Concerns Share Recent Additions | Contact Us Search: All EPA This Area You are here: EPA Home Great Lakes > Areas of Concern (AOCs): Grand Calumet River Great Lakes Home Grand Calumet River Area of Concern Basic Information Interagency Task Force Interested Parties US Agencies States Canada Background Tribal Nations Beneficial Use Impairments Others Delisting Targets Federal Programs RAP Development and Status Significant RAP Milestones Legacy Act RAP Implementation Grand Calumet River AOC Boundary Map Policies & RAP-Related Publications (PDF 91kb, 1 page) Strategies Community Involvement (click on map to view in separate window) Partners and Stakeholders Grand Calumet River Shape File Monitoring & Contacts Indicators Ecosystems NOTE: Most links on this You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as Toxics Reduction & page are pointers to other a free download, to view some of the files on this Pollution hosts and locations in the page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about Prevention Internet. This information is PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader. Funding provided as a service; however the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not endorse, approve or otherwise support these sites. Background The Grand Calumet River, originating in the east end of Gary, Indiana, flows 13 miles (21 km) through the heavily industrialized cities of Gary, East Chicago, and Hammond. The majority of the river's flow drains into Lake Michigan via the Indiana Harbor and Ship Canal, sending about one billion gallons of water into the lake per day.
    [Show full text]
  • MARKTOWN UPDATE a Publication of the Marktown Preservation Society March 2005 Snow Snarls Region but Not Tiny Marktown Or E.C
    MARKTOWN UPDATE A publication of the Marktown Preservation Society March 2005 Snow Snarls Region But Not Tiny Marktown Or E.C. Like a Currier of Ives painting of the early part of things. of the last century, snow once again blanketed the On Saturday night one of our young residents Calumet Region, East Chicago and yes, tiny little had left to visit her mother at St. Catherine Hospital. Marktown. Soft gentle drifts of pure white snow cov- Upon her return she recruited the assistance of the ered virtually everything in site. As the winds in- Rodriguez boys to clear out her parking place for creased so too did the size of the snow drifts in the her. But again, that's what has happened in Mark- yards, parks and streets of our neighborhood, remi- town for the past 85 years. People pitching in to help niscent of days long people. Neighbors ago when a snow fall helping neighbors as if such as this would they were family. close streets, schools About six and governmental of- years ago in mid fices for a day or two. March, the area had The week of been struck by a major January 20th brought ice storm. Marktown the first major snow suffered a power loss storm to the Chicago that lasted several area in a number of days. As a result, the years, and with it came pumps went out at the a test; a most important pump station and our test of the viability of a basements backed up new city administration. with ground water and While we did not ven- sewage.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Water Pollution in Indiana Table 9
    E NVIRONMENTAL Dishonorable W G TM ORKING ROUP Table 9 Discharge Toxic water pollution in Indiana Companies reporting toxic discharges to water (1990-1994) City: Anderson, Indiana Facility: Delphi Energy & Engine Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 50 55 50 50 205 Zinc compounds White River 40 40 40 40 160 Aluminum oxide (fibrousFall Creek 5 5 5 5 20 Copper White River 5 5 5 15 Cobalt Fall Creek 5 5 Copper compounds White River 5 5 City: Attica, Indiana Facility: Harrison Steel Castings Co. Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 22 28 505 505 1,060 Nickel Wabash River 12 17 250 250 529 Chromium Wabash River 6 8 250 5 269 Manganese Wabash River 2 3 5 250 260 Phenol Unknown 2 2 City: Attica, Indiana Facility: C & D Charter Power Sys. Inc. Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 43 34 15 33 20 145 Lead compoundsWabash River 38 29 10 28 20 125 Sulfuric acidWabash River 5 5 5 5 20 City: Auburn, Indiana Facility: Auburn Fndy. Inc. Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 710 1,341 191 100 133 2,475 ManganesePeckhart Ditch 500 586 15 2 2 1,105 Aluminum oxide (fibrousPeckhart Ditch 496 496 CopperPeckhart Ditch 50 65 155 88 118 476 ChromiumPeckhart Ditch 110 129 1 1 1 242 NickelPeckhart Ditch 50 65 115 Aluminum (fume or dust) Peckhart Ditch 20 9 12 41 Source: Environmental Working Group.
    [Show full text]