Venture Capital for Educators II. the Boston Plan for Excellence in the Public Schools, 1993

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Venture Capital for Educators II. the Boston Plan for Excellence in the Public Schools, 1993 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 366 690 UD 029 712 AUTHOR Cilley, Pamela, Ed.; Gibbons, Charles H., Jr., Ed. TITLE Venture Capital for Educators II. The Boston Plan for Excellence in the Public Schools, 1993. PUB DATE 93 NOTE 40p. PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Cooperation; *Educational Development; *Educational Improvement; *Educational Quality; Elementary Secondary Education; *Grants; Program Descriptions; *Public Schools; School Business Relationship; *Student Financial Aid IDENTIFIERS *Boston Public Schools MA ABSTRACT The Boston Plan for Excellence in the Public Schools is a partnership among teachers, students, parents, administrators, and business leaders with the common purpose of restoring the Boston Public School System to its former position as a national leader in education. This publication examines the programs and activities, school by school, that were funded by The Boston Plan for Excellence during academic year 1992-1993. The programs provide students with academic, financial, and personal support. Several specific programs are highlighted. In kindergarten through third grade, the Support for Early Educational Development (SEED) Program, created in 1987, is designed to foster excitement about learning and the value of education. During the middle school years, the Hancock Endowment for Academics, Recreation, and Teaching (HEART) program provides grants for academics and innovative projects which enhance the academic curriculum, provide student leadership opportunities, and encourage staff development and parent involvement. Project Action enables high school students to become grantmakers in their own communities. Finally, the Access Program helps high school seniors find the money to pay for college as well as last minute scholarship financing that attempts to make up the difference between the actual cost of college and what a student has been able to raise from other sources of financial aid. (GLR) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** IQSIQN litLAN FOR EXCELLENCE IN THEPUBLIC.SCHOOls u.s.D(PmmmunaFgoucAT.,, Mors ot Educator* Researchend ImproverneM EDUCAPONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) reproduced as Medocument has been Mewed from the WW1or organization orronalinp be* made to *prove 0 Minor Chenps he* rePrOducton quality stated on th4 docu- Points of vow or options mint do not necesurdyrepresent &Wel OM positron or PolOY. REPRODUCE THIS -PERMISSION TO BEEN GRANTEDBY MATE_BIAL HAS Au.joidIa.1-; RESOURCES TO THEEDUCATIONAL CENTER (EMU" INFORMATION Venture Capital For Educators II 2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE TRUSTEES OF THE BOSTON PLAN FOR EXCELLENCE IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1993-1994 Mr. William L Boyan Mr. Ronald Homer President & Chief Operations Officer President & CEO John Hancock Financial Services Boston Bank of Commerce Dr. John A. Curry Mr. John Larkin Thompson President, Northeastern University Of Counsel, Nutter, McClennen & Fish Ms. Jane C. Edmonds Dr. Sherry Penney President, Jane C. Edmonds & Associates Chancellor, UMASS Boston *Mr. Robert B. Fraser Dr. Robert Peterkin Chairman, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar Director, Urban Superintendents Program, Harvard University Mr. Ernest T. Freeman Graduate School of Education President The Educational Resource Institute Ms. Loretta Roach Executive Director Mr. Charles K Gifford Citywide Education Coalition President, Bank of Boston Dr. C. Scully Stikes Mr. John P. Hamill President, Bunker Hill Community College President, Fleet Bank of Massachusetts Ms. Jean Sullivan McKeigue Dr. Lois Harrison-Jones (Exofficio) Director, Office of Community Affairs Superintendent, Boston Public Schools Boston College Mr. Harold Hestnes * Current Chairman Senior Partner, Hale and Dorr Researched and Edited by: Pamela Cilley, Program Officer Charles H. Gibbons, Jr., President & Chief Operations Officer Design: Claire E. Introini Table of Contents Boston Plan for Excellence Trustees Inside front cover Foreword 1 SEED Grants (Support for Early Educational Development) 2 James Condon Elementary School 3 Joseph J. Hurley Elementary School 4 BANK OF BOSTON SCHOOL 1NMATIVES GRANTS PROGRAM 5 Samuel Adams Elementary School 6 Agassiz Elementary School 7 William Blackstone Elementary School 8 Brighton High School 9 Carter School 10 James Michael Curley Elementary School 11 Sarah Greenwood Elementary School 12 Joseph J. Hurley Elementary School 13 Hyde Park High School 14 Patrick J. Kennedy Elementary School 15 Josiah Quincy Elementary School 16 Charles Sumner Elementary School 17 Maurice J. Tobin Elementary School 18 William H. Trotter Elementary School 19 Joseph P. Tynan Elementary School 20 West Roxbury High School 21 HEART GRANTS (Hancock Endowment for Academics, Recreation and Teaching) 22 Joseph FL Barnes Middle School 23 Grover Cleveland Middle School 24 Clarence R. Edwards Middle School 25 Patrick F. Gavin Middle School 26 Martin Luther King, Jr. Middle School 27 Solomon Lewenberg Middle School 28 Lewis Middle School 29 Robert Gould Shaw Middle School 30 Phillis Wheatley Middle School 31 Woodrow Wilson Middle School 32 Project ACTION 33 ACCESS 34 Boston Plan for Excellence Trustees Emeriti 35 Staff 35 4 FOREWORD The Boston Plan for Excellence in the Public The programs of The Boston Plan for Excel- Schools is a partnership among teachers, stu- lence provide students with academic, financial, dents, parents,administrators and business lead- and personal support. In the early childhood ers with the common purpose of restoring the years, kindergarten through third grade, the Boston Public School System to its former posi- SEEDProgram fosters anexcitement aboutlearn- tion as a nafional leader in education. ing and about the value of education. The Bank Created in 1984 with a $1.5 million endow- of Boston School Initiatives Grants Program ment from Bank of Boston, The Boston Plan was enables elementary and high school teachers to one of the first community-based endowments give students the self-confidence and the moti- for public education in the United States. Contri- vation to succeed in school, college and the work butions help to fund innovative educational force. During .the middle school years, the ideas, creating programs for students in kinder- HEART Program provides grants for academic garten through high school andbeyond through and innovative project opportunities which en- the undergraduate years. hance the academic curriculum, provide stu- The Mission of The Boston Plan is fairly dent leadership opportunities, and encourages straightforward: to support innovations and im- staff development and parent involvement. provements in public schools; to expand oppor- Project ACTION enables high school students to tunities for students through the disbursement become grantmakers in their own communities. of private funds; and to strengthen the base of Finally, the ACCESS Program helps high school community support for the public schools by seniors find the money to pay for college. It promoting greater awareness and understand- provides, within guidelhies, the all-important ing of their importance. Also, The Boston Plan "last dollar" scholarships that attempt to make for Excellence advocates for children in the pub- up the difference between the actual cost of lic policy arena. college, and what a student has been able to raise The Boston Plan for Excellence and its pro- from other sources of financial aid. ACCESS grams have received wide financial support provides ongoing financial and moral support from the corporate and foundation communi- for the four to six years it takes to complete ties. In addition to the founding gift, the Bank of college. Boston has become a national model for corpo- This publication is a look at the programs rate philanthropy through their involvement in and activities funded by The Boston Plan for public educationand in the lives of Boston school Excellence during academic year 1992 - 1993. It children. Bank of Boston has contributed over is our hope that by sharing these innovative $10 million to the Boston Plan, establishing a projects and ideas that the programs will be healthy operations endowment, and providing disseminated through the Boston Public School for additional programmafic initiatives. Other System and beyond. Every program described substantial grants have come from The New in this publication provides creative opportuni- England, John Hancock Financial Services, the ties to experiment within public schools and is law firm of Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, The Bos- replicable in other settings. ton Foundation, and American Student Assis- To get more information about The Boston tance Corporation (formerly Massachusetts Plan frr Excellence, please contact us at One Higher Education Assistance Corporation). Boston Place, Suite 2400, Boston, MA 02108 (617- These gifts plus contributions from some 75 723-7489). other private sources have helped to endow programs and provide for ongoing operations. 1 SEED GRANTS Support for Early Educational Development Supported by the law firm of Goodwin, Procter & Hoar SEED was created in 1987 by the partners of the law firm of Goodwin, Procter & Hoar in recognifion of the firm's 75th anniversary. This $1 million permanent endowment fund rep- resents an important response from a member of the business sector to the challenges society has posed to public education and the
Recommended publications
  • Users As Co-Designers of Software-Based Media: the Co-Construction of Internet Relay Chat
    Users as Co-Designers of Software-Based Media: The Co-Construction of Internet Relay Chat Guillaume Latzko-Toth Université Laval AbsTrAcT While it has become commonplace to present users as co-creators or “produsers” of digital media, their participation is generally considered in terms of content production. The case of Internet Relay Chat (IRC) shows that users can be fully involved in the design process, a co-construction in the sense of Science and Technology Studies (STS): a collective, simultaneous, and mutual construction of actors and artifacts. A case study of the early de - velopment of two IRC networks sheds light on that process and shows that “ordinary users” managed to invite themselves as co-designers of the socio-technical device. The article con - cludes by suggesting that IRC openness to user agency is not an intrinsic property of software- based media and has more to do with its architecture and governance structure. Keywords Digital media; Communication technology; Co-construction; Design process; Ordinary user résumé Il est devenu banal de présenter l’usager comme cocréateur ou « produtilisateur » des médias numériques, mais sa participation est généralement envisagée comme une production de contenus. Le cas d’IRC (Internet Relay Chat) montre que les usagers des médias à support logiciel peuvent s’engager pleinement dans le processus de conception, une co-construction au sens des Science and Technology Studies : une construction collective, simultanée et mutuelle des acteurs et des artefacts. Une étude de cas portant sur le développement de deux réseaux IRC éclaire ce processus et montre que les « usagers ordinaires » sont parvenus à s’inviter comme co-concepteurs du dispositif.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardware Mechanisms for Distributed Dynamic Software Analysis
    Hardware Mechanisms for Distributed Dynamic Software Analysis by Joseph Lee Greathouse A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Computer Science and Engineering) in The University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Professor Todd M. Austin, Chair Professor Scott Mahlke Associate Professor Robert Dick Associate Professor Jason Nelson Flinn c Joseph Lee Greathouse All Rights Reserved 2012 To my parents, Gail and Russell Greathouse. Without their support throughout my life, I would never have made it this far. ii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I must thank my advisor, Professor Todd Austin, for his help and guid- ance throughout my graduate career. I started graduate school with the broad desire to “research computer architecture,” but under Professor Austin’s watch, I have been able to hone this into work that interests us both and has real applications. His spot-on advice about choosing topics, performing research, writing papers, and giving talks has been an invaluable introduction to the research world. The members of my committee, Professors Robert Dick, Jason Flinn, and Scott Mahlke, also deserve special gratitude. Their insights, comments, and suggestions have immea- surably improved this dissertation. Together their expertise spans low-level hardware to systems software and beyond. This meant that I needed to ensure that any of my ideas were defensible from all sides. I have been fortunate enough to collaborate with numerous co-authors. I have often published with Professor Valeria Bertacco, who, much like Professor Austin, has given me invaluable advice during my time at Michigan. I am extremely lucky to have had the chance to work closely with Ilya Wagner, David Ramos, and Andrea Pellegrini, all of whom have continued to be good friends even after the high-stress publication process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Copyright Crusade
    The Copyright Crusade Abstract During the winter and spring of 2001, the author, chief technology officer in Viant's media and entertainment practice, led an extensive inqUiry to assess the potential impact of extant Internet file-sharing capabilities on the business models of copyright owners and holders. During the course of this project he and his associates explored the tensions that exist or may soon exist among peer-to-peer start-ups, "pirates" and "hackers," intellectual property companies, established media channels, and unwitting consumers caught in the middle. This research report gives the context for the battleground that has emerged, and calls upon the players to consider new, productive solutions and business models that support profitable, legal access to intellectual property via digital media. by Andrew C Frank. eTO [email protected] Viant Media and Entertainment Reinhold Bel/tIer [email protected] Aaron Markham [email protected] assisted by Bmre Forest ~ VI ANT 1 Call to Arms Well before the Internet. it was known that PCs connected to two-way public networks posed a problem for copyright holders. The problem first came to light when the Software Publishers Association (now the Software & Information Industry Association), with the backing of Microsoft and others, took on computer Bulletin Board System (BBS) operators in the late 1980s for facilitating trade in copyrighted computer software, making examples of "sysops" (as system operators were then known) by assisting the FBI in orchestrat­ ing raids on their homes. and taking similar legal action against institutional piracy in high profile U.S. businesses and universities.' At the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Solutions Guide for Every Linux/Windows System Administrator!
    Integrating Linux and Windows Integrating Linux and Windows By Mike McCune Publisher : Prentice Hall PTR Pub Date : December 19, 2000 ISBN : 0-13-030670-3 • Pages : 416 The complete solutions guide for every Linux/Windows system administrator! This complete Linux/Windows integration guide offers detailed coverage of dual- boot issues, data compatibility, and networking. It also handles topics such as implementing Samba file/print services for Windows workstations and providing cross-platform database access. Running Linux and Windows in the same environment? Here's the comprehensive, up-to-the-minute solutions guide you've been searching for! In Integrating Linux and Windows, top consultant Mike McCune brings together hundreds of solutions for the problems that Linux/Windows system administrators encounter most often. McCune focuses on the critical interoperability issues real businesses face: networking, program/data compatibility, dual-boot systems, and more. You'll discover exactly how to: Use Samba and Linux to deliver high-performance, low-cost file and print services to Windows workstations Compare and implement the best Linux/Windows connectivity techniques: NFS, FTP, remote commands, secure shell, telnet, and more Provide reliable data exchange between Microsoft Office and StarOffice for Linux Provide high-performance cross-platform database access via ODBC Make the most of platform-independent, browser-based applications Manage Linux and Windows on the same workstation: boot managers, partitioning, compressed drives, file systems, and more. For anyone running both Linux and Windows, McCune delivers honest and objective explanations of all your integration options, plus realistic, proven solutions you won't find anywhere else. Integrating Linux and Windows will help you keep your users happy, your costs under control, and your sanity intact! 1 Integrating Linux and Windows 2 Integrating Linux and Windows Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McCune, Mike.
    [Show full text]
  • Análisis Forense De Sistemas GNU/Linux, Unix David Dittrich
    Análisis Forense de Sistemas GNU/Linux, Unix David Dittrich [email protected] Ervin Sarkisov [email protected] Copyright David Dittrich, Ervin Sarkisov. Se otorga permiso para copiar, distribuir y/o modificar este documento bajo los términos de la Licencia de Documentación Libre GNU, Versión 1.1 o cualquier otra versión posterior publicada por la Free Software Foundation. Puede consultar una copia de la licencia en: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html Miles servidores corporativos están siendo comprometidos diariamente, Gbytes de información privilegiada se transfieren cada día por los los canales de comunicación, las corporaciones informan de miles y millones de pérdidas. La mayoría de las investigaciones de casos similares, estén realizadas por parte de las empresas especializadas o por parte de las agencias gubernamentales, precisan un estudio forense previo para recoger todas las pruebas encontradas en los equipos y determinar los factores claves para reconstruir los hechos transcurridos, antes, durante y a posteriori del posible acceso no autorizado al sistema. Todo ese trabajo puede ser complicado por múltiples razones, siendo una analogía directa la ciencia forense tradicional en los casos criminales, dónde la escena del crimen es el servidor comprometido y cualquier equivocación o descuido puede causar la pérdida de información vital que podría desvelar algún hecho importante sobre el "la víctima", el "criminal", el "objetivo" o el "móvil". Los intrusos permanentemente mejoran sus técnicas, sean de acceso, ocultación de pruebas o de eliminación de huellas, siendo difícil, o en algunos casos imposible de reconstruir el 100% de los eventos ocurridos. Los forenses de hace varios años tienen dificultades adaptándose a las nuevas técnicas ya que no solo son necesarios los conocimientos de la materia sino experiencia en campos que tienen bastante poco que ver con la ciencia forense - ingeniería inversa, criptografía, programación en lenguajes de bajo nivel.
    [Show full text]
  • Beat Back the Botnets
    Beat Back the Botnets The Automation of Computer Network Attack David Dittrich The Information School/ Center for Information Assurance and Cybersecurity University of Washington Overview Where did “bots” come from? How do they work? How botnets are built How are they used for attacking? How do you defend against them? Botnets in action! Where did “bots” come from? 1 IRC chat (mirc client) http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/ircii/ircii.gif IRC commands http://www.newircusers.com/ircmds.html DCC commands http://www.newircusers.com/ircmds.html 2 Internet relay chat http://www.newircusers.com/network.html IRC bots http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/misc/botfaq.html#1 Original (benign) uses for bots Keep track of channel users Transfer files automatically Enforce kick/ban lists of “bad” users Protection from channel takeovers 3 How do bots work? “Net split” attack (before) Owner “Net split” attack (after) Owner DDoS Attack Attacker 4 “Net split” attack (defense) Owner Bot Bot Bot Bot Eggdrop config file Encrypted communications 5 My how these bots have grown… Increasing attack sophistication Attack sophistication vs binary encryption Intruder Technical Knowledge “stealth” / Tools advanced scanning techniques High denial of service packet spoofing distributed sniffers attack tools Intruder www attacks Knowledge automated probes/scans back doors GUI disabling audits network mgmt. diagnostics hijacking Attack sessions Sophistication burglaries exploiting known vulnerabilities password cracking Attackers Low password guessing 1980 1985 1990
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain-Based Command and Control for Next Generation Botnets
    Blockchain-based command and control for next generation botnets Mengidis Anagnostis SID: 3307160007 SCHOOL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science (MSc) in Communications and Cybersecurity DECEMBER 2018 THESSALONIKI – GREECE -i- Blockchain-based command and control for next generation botnets Mengidis Anagnostis SID: 3307160007 Supervisor: Dr. Georgios Ioannou Supervising Committee Mem- Assoc. Prof. Name Surname bers: Assist. Prof. Name Surname SCHOOL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science (MSc) in Communications and Cybersecurity DECEMBER 2018 THESSALONIKI – GREECE -ii- Abstract This dissertation was written as a part of the MSc in Communications and Cybersecurity at the International Hellenic University. This work will try to address one of the main issues that modern botmasters face, which is the takedown of their Command and Control infrastructure. After establishing the scope of the problem, we will propose our solution. Mengidis Anagnostis 7/12/2018 -iii- Contents ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. III CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... V 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BOTS AND BOTNETS .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 AIM
    [Show full text]
  • DEFENCE STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS the Official Journal of the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence
    Volume 2 | Spring 2017 DEFENCE STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS The official journal of the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: PRACTICAL TRAPS AND ETHICAL PUZZLES ‘HACKING’ INTO THE WEST: RUSSIA’S ‘ANTI-HEGEMONIC’ DRIVE AND THE STRATEGIC NARRATIVE OFFENSIVE THE RUSSIAN PERSPECTIVE ON INFORMATION WARFARE: CONCEPTUAL ROOTS AND POLITICISATION IN RUSSIAN ACADEMIC, POLITICAL, AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE EXAMINING THE USE OF BOTNETS AND THEIR EVOLUTION IN PROPAGANDA DISSEMINATION PUTIN, XI, AND HITLER—PROPAGANDA AND THE PATERNITY OF PSEUDO DEMOCRACY THE SIGNIFICANCE AND LIMITATIONS OF EMPATHY IN STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS BRITAIN’S PUBLIC WAR STORIES: PUNCHING ABOVE ITS WEIGHT OR VANISHING FORCE? A CLOSER LOOK AT YEMEN WEAPONISED HONESTY: COMMUNICATION STRATEGY AND NATO VALUES 1 ISSN 2500-9478 Defence Strategic Communications Editor-in-Chief Dr. Neville Bolt Managing Editor Linda Curika Editor Anna Reynolds Editorial Board Matt Armstrong, MA Dr. Emma Louise Briant Dr. Nerijus Maliukevicius Thomas Elkjer Nissen, MA Professor Žaneta Ozoliņa Dr. Agu Uudelepp Professor J. Michael Waller Professor Natascha Zowislo-Grünewald Defence Strategic Communications is an international peer-reviewed journal. The journal is a project of the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence (NATO StratCom COE). It is produced for scholars, policy makers and practitioners around the world. It does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO or NATO StratCom COE. The views presented in the following articles are those of the authors alone. © All rights reserved by the NATO StratCom COE. Articles may not be copied, reproduced, distributed or publicly displayed without reference to the NATO StratCom COE and the academic journal. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence Riga, Kalnciema iela 11b, Latvia LV1048 www.stratcomcoe.org Ph.: 0037167335463 [email protected] 2 3 FOREWORD ‘The world is a mess.
    [Show full text]
  • “Botnet: Survey and Case Study,” 2009 Fourth International Conference
    2009 Fourth International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control Botnet: Survey and Case Study Chao Li Wei Jiang Xin Zou National Computer network Research Center of Computer National Computer network Emergency Response technical Network and Information Security Emergency Response technical Team/Coordination Center of China Technology Team/Coordination Center of China Beijing, 100029, China Harbin Institute of Technology Beijing, 100029, China Harbin, 150001, China E-mail: jiangwei @pact518.hit.edu.cn Abstract—Botnet is a hybrid of previous threats integrated IRC - Internet Relay Chat, a chat system that provides with a command and control system and hundreds of millions one-to-one and one-to-many instant messaging over the of computers are infected. Although botnets are widespread Internet. Each network has a “channels” for various topics. development, the research and solutions for botnets are not mature. In this paper, we present an overview of research on B. Botnet Evolution botnets. We discuss in detail the botnet and related research Historically, the bots can be traced their roots to the including infection mechanism, botnet malicious behavior, Eggdrop bot created by Jeff Fisher for assisting in IRC command and control models, communication protocols, channel management in 1993 [2]. The Eggdrop was well- botnet detection, and botnet defense. We also present a simple known and widely used of the time as non-malicious IRC case study of IRC-based SpyBot. bot. However, IRC bots with more malicious purposes emerged. Keywords-security; survey; botnets; bot; C&C mechanism The first malicious bot was GT-Bot that we could find were in the April, 1998[3].
    [Show full text]
  • Secrecy Versus Openness — Internet Security and the Limits of Open
    SECRECY VERSUS OPENNESS Internet security and the limits of open source and peer production Andreas Schmidt Open source and peer production have been praised as organisational models that could change the world for the better. It is commonly asserted that almost any societal activity could benefit from distributed, bottom-up collaboration — by making societal inter- action more open, more social, and more democratic. However, we also need to be mindful of the limits of these models. How could they function in environments hostile to openness? Security is a societal domain more prone to secrecy than any other, except perhaps for romantic love. In light of the destructive capacity of contemporary cyber attacks, how has the Internet survived without a comprehensive security infrastructure? Secrecy versus Openness describes the realities of Internet security production through the lenses of open source and peer production theories. The study offers a glimpse into the fascinating communities of technical experts, who played a pivotal role when the chips were down for the Internet after large-scale attacks. After an initial flirtation with openness in the early years, operational Internet security communities have put in place a form of social production that resembles the open source model in many aspects, but is substantially less open. ISBN 978-90-8891-988-6 Image Copyright Rafal Olbinski, Courtesy Patinae, Inc. www.patinae.com SECRECY VERSUS OPENNESS Internet security and the limits of open source and peer production Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. ir. K.C.A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Malicious Bots : an Inside Look Into the Cyber‑Criminal Underground of the Internet / Ken Dunham and Jim Melnick
    An Inside Look into the Cyber-Criminal Underground of the Internet KEN DUNHAM JIM MELNICK Boca Raton London New York CRC Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business AN AUERBACH BOOK Auerbach Publications Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC Auerbach is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4200-6903-7 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher can- not assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Linux IRC Mini-HOWTO
    Linux IRC mini−HOWTO Frédéric L. W. Meunier v0.4 7 January, 2005 Revision History Revision 0.4 2005−01−07 Revised by: fredlwm Fifth revision. This document aims to describe the basics of IRC and respective applications for Linux. Linux IRC mini−HOWTO Table of Contents 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Objectives.........................................................................................................................................1 1.2. Miscellaneous...................................................................................................................................1 1.3. Translations.......................................................................................................................................2 2. About IRC........................................................................................................................................................3 3. Brief History of IRC.......................................................................................................................................4 4. Beginner's guide on using IRC......................................................................................................................5 4.1. Running the ircII program................................................................................................................5 4.2. Commands........................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]