Galaxy Masses St´ephaneCourteaua, Michele Cappellarib, Roelof S. de Jongc, Aaron A. Duttond, Eric Emselleme, Henk Hoekstraf, L.V.E. Koopmansg, Gary A. Mamonh, Claudia Marastoni, Tommaso Treuj, Lawrence M. Widrowa aQueen's University, Department of Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy, Kingston, Ontario, Canada b Sub-department of Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK cLeibniz-Institut f¨urAstrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany dMax-Planck-Institut f¨urAstronomie, K¨onigstuhl17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany eEuropean Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, 85748, Germany and Universit´eLyon 1, Observatoire de Lyon, Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon and Ecole Normale Sup´erieure de Lyon, 9 avenue Charles Andr´e,F-69230 Saint-Genis Laval, France fLeiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands gUniversity of Groningen, Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, P.O.Box 800, 9700 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands hInstitut d'Astrophysique de Paris (UMR 7095: CNRS & UPMC), 98 bis Bd Arago, F-75014 Paris, France iUniversity of Portsmouth, Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, Dennis Sciama Building, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth, UK jUniversity of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Physics, Santa Barbara, CA Abstract Galaxy masses play a fundamental role in our understanding of structure formation models. This review addresses the variety and reliability of mass estimators that pertain to stars, gas, and dark matter. The different sections on masses from stellar populations, dynamical masses of gas-rich and gas-poor galaxies, with some attention paid to our Milky Way, and masses from weak and strong lensing methods, all provide review material on galaxy masses in a self-consistent manner. Keywords: galaxies: dark matter | galaxies: evolution | galaxies: formation Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 From light to mass: modelling the stellar M ∗/L ratio 6 2.1 Modelling galaxies and their Stellar Populations, a Historical Introduction. .6 2.2 Basics of Stellar Population Models . .8 2.3 Stellar Mass from M ∗/L vs Colour Diagnostics . 13 2.3.1 Effect of Star Formation History . 15 arXiv:1309.3276v2 [astro-ph.CO] 28 Apr 2014 2.3.2 Stellar Initial Mass Function . 20 2.3.3 Model ingredients . 21 2.4 Data Fitting Techniques . 23 2.5 Robustness of Stellar Mass Derivations . 24 2.6 Future Prospects . 26 Preprint submitted to Elsevier April 29, 2014 3 Dynamical Masses of Gas-Rich Galaxies 27 3.1 Mass Estimates from Rotation Curves . 28 3.2 Inner Parts . 31 3.3 Mass Modeling . 33 3.3.1 Mass Modeling Limitations . 35 3.4 Other Galaxy Mass Constraints . 36 3.4.1 Maximal and Sub-maximal Disks . 37 3.4.2 Velocity Dispersion Measurements . 38 3.4.3 Scaling Relations Residuals . 39 3.4.4 Fluid Dynamical Modeling . 39 3.4.5 Gravitational Lensing . 39 3.4.6 Two-body Interactions and the Mass of the Local Group . 40 3.5 Future Prospects . 41 4 Dark Matter and Mass Models of the Milky Way 42 4.1 Introduction . 42 4.2 Multicomponent Models for the Milky Way . 42 4.3 Further Observational Constraints on the Milky Way Potential . 47 4.3.1 Circular Speed at the Sun's Position in the Galaxy . 47 4.3.2 Local Escape Speed . 47 4.3.3 Kinematic Tracers . 48 4.3.4 Vertical Force and Surface Density in the Solar Neighborhood . 49 4.4 Future Prospects . 51 5 Dynamical Masses of Gas-Poor Galaxies 52 5.1 Introduction . 52 5.2 Simple Mass Estimators . 53 5.3 Methods based on Dynamical Modelling . 56 5.3.1 Jeans Analysis . 57 5.3.2 Spherical Modelling . 58 5.3.3 Axisymmetric Modelling . 59 5.4 Distribution Function Analysis . 61 5.4.1 Spherical Distribution Function Modelling . 61 5.4.2 Towards Flattened Systems . 62 5.4.3 General Orbit-based Modelling . 63 5.5 Results . 64 5.5.1 Integrated Stellar Light: the Inner Regions and the IMF . 64 5.5.2 Globular Clusters and Planetary Nebulae: the Outer Regions . 66 5.5.3 Other Tracers and Combined Approaches . 67 5.5.4 The Mass-Anisotropy Degeneracy . 68 5.5.5 Discrete Star Velocities for Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies . 68 5.6 Future Prospects . 72 2 6 Weak Lensing by Galaxies 73 6.1 Introduction . 73 6.2 Theory of Weak Lensing . 74 6.3 Shear . 75 6.4 Magnification . 76 6.5 Galaxy-Mass Cross-Correlation Function . 77 6.6 Properties of Dark Matter Halos . 79 6.7 Halo Shapes . 81 6.8 Future Prospects . 82 7 The Dark and Luminous Mass Distribution of Early-type Galaxies using Strong Gravitational Lensing 84 7.1 Introduction . 84 7.2 Basic Lensing Theory . 84 7.2.1 The Thin-Lens Approximation . 85 7.2.2 The Lens Equation . 86 7.2.3 Axisymmetric Lenses . 87 7.2.4 Lensing & Stellar Dynamics . 88 7.3 Observational Results . 90 7.3.1 Sloan Lens ACS Survey (SLACS) . 90 7.3.2 The Density Profiles of Early-Type Galaxies (ETGs) . 93 7.3.3 The Stellar IMF and Dark Matter Fraction in ETGs . 94 7.3.4 Mass Substructure in ETGs . 95 7.3.5 Luminous Dwarf Galaxies . 96 7.3.6 Dark Substructures . 97 7.4 Future Prospects . 101 8 Acknowledgments 102 3 1. Introduction The distribution of matter in cosmological structures is a fundamental property of nature as the mass of a system is likely the major driver of its evolution. This is especially true for stars whose evolution depend almost fully on their initial mass (and chemical composition) on the main sequence, as embodied by the (idealistic) Vogt-Russell theorem. Mass also plays a fundamental role in galaxy evolution. Galaxies have largely been shaped through mergers and galaxy interactions in hierarchical fashion whereby small systems merged into bigger ones. At early times, star formation was most effective in massive galaxies but as the Universe aged, star formation was likely quenched in those massive systems but continued in smaller galaxies, a phenomenon now called \downsizing". Oldest stars are thus found in the most massive systems. The complex interplay between star formation efficiency and quenching is likely modulated by a galaxy's total mass. Measurements of the distribution of matter in the Universe enable a variety of tests of structure formation models on different scales. For instance, the distribution of galaxy masses on all scales enables the closest possible, though not direct, comparison of predicted mass functions for baryonic and non-baryonic matter in the Universe. The relative fraction of baryonic to non-baryonic matter is also indicative of fundamental, yet poorly understood, processes in galaxy formation which typically give rise to tight scaling relations based on the stellar and dynamical masses of galaxies. Because galaxy masses play such a critical role in our understanding of the formation and evo- lution of cosmic structures, we wish to review the variety and reliability of mass estimators for gas-poor and gas-rich galaxies and discuss our ability to derive from those estimators meaning- ful constraints of theoretical galaxy formation models. While certain techniques enable only the measurement of galaxy masses on large scales, others allow the decomposition of individual mass components such as gas, stars and dark matter at different galactocentric radii. The latter meth- ods probe the gravitational potential through the dynamics of visible tracers where baryons are (sub-)dominant. Although many galaxies may be safely assumed to be virialized, uncertainties in their mass estimates remain, for instance due to anisotropies in the velocity distributions. Further- more, baryon-dominated regions remain poorly understood, which complicates a direct comparison of galaxy formation models to observational data. Many techniques exist for the determination of galaxy masses. The most popular involves the measurement of Doppler shifts of nebular and/or stellar atomic lines due to internal dynamics. Stellar motions can also be resolved in the closest galaxies, such as our The Milky Way, Andromeda, and other Local Group stellar systems; galaxy masses of more distant systems otherwise rely on integrated spectra. Another mass estimator consists of converting the galaxy light profile into a mass profile using a suitable stellar mass-to-light ratio (usually derived from stellar population models). A more global approach has also involved the mapping of gravitational lensing effects, both strong and weak. This list is not meant to be complete, as we review below. However, in all cases, galaxy mass estimates account for matter encompassed within a specified radius and are thus always a lower limit to the total galaxy mass. This review has evolved from discussions which took place during the celebrations of Vera Rubin's career at Queen's University in June 20091. All the authors of this review were indeed present at that conference. While each section of this review was initially written by separate teammates, the final product reflects the full team's imprimatur. This review was inspired by, and 1See http://www.astro.queensu.ca/GalaxyMasses09 for workshop presentations and photographs. 4 is meant as a modern revision of, early treatises on the masses and mass-to-light ratios of galaxies by Burbidge & Burbidge (1975) and Faber & Gallagher (1979), respectively. The review is organized as follows: we first present in x2 the central topic of stellar M=L determinations from stellar population models. This is followed by a discussion of the mass estimates for gas-rich galaxies in x3, including the special (resolved) case of the Milky Way in x4. Gas-poor galaxies are addressed in x5 and weak and strong lensing techniques are presented in x6 and x7, respectively. Conclusions, with a view towards future developments, are presented at the end of each section.