DOCSLIB.ORG

Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our Journey 2017 - 2021 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our Journey 2017 - 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey 2017 - 2021 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey 2017 - 2021 Acknowledging our partners Vision Zero performance update Purpose 2020 road safety key facts and Lives and serious injuries saved by Auckland Council ward outline Safe Speeds so far Aucklanders’ support for speed change An update on Auckland Transport’s Vision Next phase Zero and road safety Rural roads performance. Schools Discuss and seek guidance on the next Rural and marae tranche of AT’s Safe Speeds programme. Causes of road deaths and serious injuries in Tāmaki Makaurau Looking ahead on Vision Zero Key Vision Zero actions delivered 2018-2020 1 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey 2017 - 2021 Acknowledging partner actions Restraints, impairment, distraction and speed enforcement aligned with education campaigns. Key partner on home free to reduce Working in impaired driving near Christmas. Auckland Regional Public ACC $5M partnership partnership Health Service supporting agreement funding Te Ara public conversation on Haepapa, safe school streets, safe speeds . Sharing mobile phone detection trial, best practice from health walking business case, micro- sector to transport mobility risk assessment. safety system change. Tāmaki Makaurau Transport Safety Road to Zero Strategy Chair Tāmaki Makaurau Road Tackling Unsafe Safety Governance Group. Speeds Programme. Partners Financial penalties review. Hosting Safety Collective Tāmaki Safe Networks Programme. Makaurau which is successfully Shared forward programme pipeline tool. working to include transport Enhanced funding rate for road safety. safety in local board plans. Auckland Plan Vision Zero 2050 goal. 2 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey 2017 - 2021 Vision Zero 1000 performance update 800 64 Overall road deaths and serious injuries are 764 715 667 reducing and we’re meeting our targets 768 47 644 600 54 608 53 626 40 595 568 567 37 ATAP targets 37 489 400 446 Vision Zero strategy targets 200 Deaths 0 Serious injuries / 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 figure provisional 3 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey 2017 - 2021 2020 road safety key facts 2020 compared to 2019 Speeding1 was a 11% increase in deaths factor in 51% of road and serious injuries where speeding deaths in 2020 51% 11% was a factor Increase 16% increase in deaths Alcohol/impairment and serious injuries suspected, confirmed involving young drivers or blood results aged 15-24 on restricted pending in 35% deaths 35% 16% or learner licences Increase L 57% deaths were 24% decrease in deaths people travelling and serious injuries outside a vehicle involving people on 57% motorbikes or mopeds 24% Decrease 1 Speeding: This means the police officer completing the traffic crash report selected the category ‘Inappropriate speed.’ 4 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey 2017 - 2021 Lives and serious injuries saved Lives and serious injuries saved: by Auckland Council ward: ? 2020 compared to 2017 This map shows the difference between 2020 compared to 2017 2020 provisional fatal and serious injury results and 2017 results. 40 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 12 Rodney Albany Ward Fatal 4 2 1 6 8 1 2 Albany Serious Injuries 22 46 38 45 44 46 37 Franklin Ward Fatal 3 14 8 8 8 4 6 33 Serious Injuries 37 52 60 69 63 64 44 North Shore Howick Ward Fatal 4 2 3 5 6 3 0 Serious Injuries 20 32 22 40 32 38 23 Manukau Ward Fatal 5 2 5 11 4 4 4 Serious Injuries 49 65 74 98 68 60 67 10 Waitematā Manurewa-Papakura Fatal 2 1 5 0 3 6 3 9 and Gulf Ōrākei Ward Serious Injuries 32 54 45 88 56 62 52 North Shore Ward Fatal 3 2 2 3 1 1 1 37 Serious Injuries 27 32 54 55 38 30 24 16 Rodney Ward Fatal 8 11 12 14 13 4 5 20 14 Albert-Eden- 22 Puketāpapa Maungakiekie- Serious Injuries 60 60 82 86 70 49 55 Howick Waitākere Whau Tāmaki Waitākere Ward Fatal 3 7 2 2 5 4 4 Serious Injuries 35 46 48 78 38 34 56 Whau Ward Fatal 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 Serious Injuries 27 12 24 30 19 23 17 38 27 Albert-Eden- Fatal 2 3 3 6 1 1 1 Manukau Franklin Puketāpapa Ward Serious Injuries 50 58 63 67 38 65 35 Ōrākei Ward Fatal 0 1 2 2 1 5 0 Serious Injuries 19 32 30 30 44 31 22 33 Waitematā And Gulf Fatal 1 2 0 2 1 2 3 Manurewa-Papakura Ward Serious Injuries 32 49 33 38 44 36 28 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Fatal 0 4 2 4 0 5 1 Ward Serious Injuries 34 24 45 41 35 26 28 5 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey 2017 - 2021 Preferred investment** Eligible for part funding Component Output Road Safety (21/22-27/28) from Regional Fuel Tax Speed $193M 1,900 km Programme management High risk $120M 60 intersections Business Case intersections High risk $68M Transforms 34 km preferred corridors programme Vulnerable road $35M Targeted pedestrian, cyclist user and TDM and motorcyclist infrastructure 2018-2028 Enforcement $45M Additional road policing and safety cameras Red light cameras only Estimated to reduce annual deaths Education $22M Additional co-ordinated and serious injuries on Auckland’s education and awareness campaigns roads by 63%*, preventing more than 1,760 deaths and serious Policy $8.5M Co-ordinated policy and regulatory interventions injuries over 10 years. with partners Other $113M Includes land acquisition, Opex directly supporting costs design/engineering fees, supporting capex only monitoring, maintenance *Compared to 2017 deaths and serious injuries total. **Road Safety PBC preferred investment programme was issued in September 2019 and does not take into account Covid-19 impacts. 6 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey60 2017 - 2021 Highly 40 80 Achievement Winner commended Bronze 5. 80 ENZ 3M 3M-ACRS More than 60 Traffic Diamond PRINZ Safe Speeds so far 600 roads Safety Road covered Innovation Safety Award Award Award 6. 80 40 30 2020 2020 2020 2020 30 7. 30 8. 9. 80 60 10. Rodney Albany 40 2. North Shore 30 60 City and town centres 30 Howick Franklin 1. City centre 30 80 1. Ōrākei 18. 8. Orewa town centre Waitematā 11. 30 and Gulf Maungakiekie- 9. Torbay town centre 60 60 Albert-Eden- Tāmaki Manurewa- 10. Mairangi Bay town centre Puketāpapa Manukau Papakura 14. 11. Ōtāhuhu town centre 4. 30 12. 13. Whau 17. Rural roads 2. Whitford / Maraetai 60 15. 3. Glenbrook/Kingseat/Patumohe/Karaka 3. 4. Helensville/Riverhead/Waimauku 16. 5. Pakiri /Leigh 6. Sandspit 80 7. Mahurangi West Waitākere 60 Residential areas 12. Rosehill / Papakura 13. Te Atatū 30 Speed limit 14. Manurewa Urban roads 15. Albionvale road Raised 16. Huia Road crossings 17. Pukaki Road 18. Highbrook Drive Area wide speed calming Map only shows selected highlights of more than 600 roads (around 800 km) implemented in 2020 7 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey 2017 - 2021 Aucklanders’ support for speed changes Overall support for 2020 speed changes 61% Pasifika and South Auckland residents significantly more likely to support lower speed limits Near schools and kindergartens 86% In local town centres or shopping streets 72% On rural roads with high crash rates 71% In urban areas with high numbers of pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists 69% Area wide speed calming makes residential areas safer* 79% *Feedback from residents of Te Atatū South and Rosehill, Papakura following installation of area wide speed humps and tables. Sources: Customer feedback to Speed Limit Changes Market Insights and Voice of Customer, July 2020. Attitudes towards speed limits on Auckland roads, Kantar, July 2019. Auckland Transport Road Safety Perceptions Survey Research Report, Gravitas, 2020. 8 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey 2017 - 2021 Estimated impact of changes in average speed on number of Small changes deaths and serious injuries in Tāmaki Makaurau in average speed change many lives -5 km/h 0 +5 km/h ‘Only a little bit over matters’ exceeding the speed limit by 3km/h is associated with a 25% increase in crash risk. Almost half of seriously injured 50+ lives 50+ deaths drivers failed to brake pre-crash. and serious -5 +5 and serious injuries injuries/year saved/year km/h (10%) (10%) To achieve similar reductions through engineering improvements would cost more than $500M Source: Estimated impact of average speed changes based on advice from Colin Brodie Consulting 2019. Original calculation assumed 120 rural DSI and 560 urban DSI with existing average speeds of 85 km/h rural and 55 km/h urban. Applied Elvik 2009 fatality and serious injury coefficients (10%/90%) to have rural coefficient of 0.036 and urban 0.021. Based on above, 5 km/hr reduction in operating speeds across the network would result in an overall reduction of 76 DSI (11%) and similar reductions through engineering improvements estimated to cost around $700-800M. Given DSI in Auckland has decreased since the original calculation, this has been conservatively applied to reach a lower minimum level of DSI change of 50. Facts on left hand side from Monash University, 2020, Enhanced Crash Investigation Study. Estimate of cost of engineering improvements is based on delivering 10 DSI/$100M. 9 Vision Zero and Safe Speeds: Our journey 2017 - 2021 Preparing for the next phase Monitoring data, Guiding principles developed; AT Board Public public feedback, maximise safety, community endorsed consultation Implementation government policy acceptance, outcomes for recommended and Covid-19 impacts people travelling outside option Proposed Proposed vehicles and strategic August/ mid 2022 alignment. Minimise resources Sept 2021 and meet legal requirements Lessons Dec learnt Principles 2020 Stream 1 June Candidate Shortlist By July 2020 work- options streams 2021 Stream 2 Ten long-list options including: Seek • Return on investment
Recommended publications
  • Ward Councillors

    Ward Councillors

    Ward councillors Albany Ward - confirmed Candidate Affiliation Candidate no Votes received Rank WATSON, John Putting People First 225 19,324 1 WALKER, Wayne Putting People First 224 17,938 2 WHYTE, Lisa Auckland Future 226 15,926 LOWE, Graham Auckland Future 223 15,549 BENSCH, John Independent 221 5,126 HENETI, Alezix 222 1,538 INFORMAL 227 74 BLANK 228 3,852 Albert-Eden-Roskill Ward - confirmed Candidate Affiliation Candidate no Votes received Rank CASEY, Cathy City Vision 321 19,256 1 FLETCHER, Christine C&R - Communities & Residents 322 16,925 2 HARRIS, Rob Auckland Future 323 10,000 HAYNES, Peter City Vision 324 9,935 LEE, Benjamin C&R - Communities & Residents 325 9,070 MCKEOWN, Greg Independent 326 8,472 SOKRATOV, Boris Independent 327 2,879 SULLIVAN-TAYLOR, Bridgette 328 1,177 INFORMAL 329 78 BLANK 330 3,867 Franklin Ward - confirmed Bill Cashmore was elected unopposed. Howick Ward - confirmed Candidate Affiliation Candidate no Votes received Rank STEWART, Sharon Independent 388 17,923 1 QUAX, Dick Independent 387 15,516 2 YOUNG, Paul Independent 389 7,046 HAY, David Independent 382 5,757 ZHU, Julie Green Party 390 5,732 CROSS, Matthew 381 5,034 MONTGOMERY, Olivia 386 4,409 KUMAR, Gyanandra Labour 384 3,129 MAMEDOV, Tofik Labour 385 2,743 IRELAND, Ian Colin 383 1,120 INFORMAL 391 164 BLANK 392 1,878 Manukau Ward - confirmed Candidate Affiliation Candidate no Votes received Rank FILIPAINA, Alf Labour 403 17,327 1 COLLINS, Fa'anana Efeso Labour 401 16,500 2 CORBETT, Brendan Respect Our Community Campaign 402 7,738 MUA, Sooalo Setu
  • Auckland Progress Results

    Auckland Progress Results

    Progress Result Issue: Mayor (1) Date: 09/10/2010 Auckland Council Time: 12:23:00 Candidate Affiliation Candidate No Votes Received Rank AUSTIN, Aileen Independent 101 1552 BANKS, John Independent 102 161167 BARR, Marlene Independent 103 692 BRIGHT, Penny 104 2529 BROWN, Len Independent 105 2213651 CHAPMAN, Hugh Independent 106 1878 CRAIG, Colin Independent 107 40483 DAVE, Nga Independent 108 840 FONG, Harry Independent 109 1434 GILLIES, Shannon 110 467 KAHUI, Vinnie 111 1120 MCCULLOCH, Alan Independent 112 1520 MCDONALD, Steve Independent 113 643 NEESON, Vanessa Independent 115 2885 O'CONNOR, Phil Christians Against Abortion 116 1209 PRAST, Simon Independent 117 3578 PRESLAND, Raymond 118 278 ROSS, Mark Independent 119 3076 VERMUNT, Annalucia Communist League 120 427 WILLIAMS, Andrew Independent Progressive Leadership 121 3813 WILLMOTT, David Roads First 122 519 YOUNG, Wayne 123 553 INFORMAL 124 1261 BLANK 125 3752 Progress Result Issue: Rodney Ward (1) Date: 09/10/2010 Auckland Council Time: 12:23:00 Candidate Affiliation Candidate No Votes Received Rank ASHTON, Tom Independent 201 3941 PEREIRA, Vincent Independent 202 444 ROSE, Christine 203 5553 WEBSTER, Penny Independent 204 8063 1 INFORMAL 205 21 BLANK 206 701 Progress Result Issue: Albany Ward (2) Date: 09/10/2010 Auckland Council Time: 12:23:00 Candidate Affiliation Candidate No Votes Received Rank BALOUCH, Uzra Independent 221 736 BELL, Rodney Independent 222 3151 BRADLEY, Ian Independent 223 5273 CONDER, Laurie Independent 224 1419 COOPER, David Independent 225 2821 COOPER,
  • Meet Your New Local Board Representatives! Stephanie Mclean –Harcourts Pohutukawa Coast

    Meet Your New Local Board Representatives! Stephanie Mclean –Harcourts Pohutukawa Coast

    18 October 2019 Issue 1323 Meet your new local board representatives! Stephanie McLean –Harcourts Pohutukawa Coast Stephanie Mclean Licensed Agent REAA 2008. Sales &Marketing Specialist M 021 164 5111 Hoverd&Co. Want your business to have ultimate exposure? ADVERTISE HERE! Phone 021 026 14467 or From left: Vote counts from early this week put Lance Gedge, Angela Fulljames and Malcolm Bell as the top three preferred [email protected] choices for Franklin Local Board’s Wairoa Subdivision. The final election results are expected to be confirmed by this Friday. Second fill site in Brookby gets green light A panel of Auckland Council’s independent hearing com- or mitigated. missioners has given the green light to P&I Pascoe’s appli- The approval allows P&I Pascoes to receive approximately cation to establish a ‘stage two’ filling operation within a 902,000m3 of ‘managed’ fill over a 20 year period, and means FIRTH second gully at its Twilight Road site in Brookby. that 240 truck movements (120 in and 120 out) per day will PAVERS A number of local residents and the Brookby Environment be allowed on weekdays. Protection Society (BEPS) spoke at the recent council hear- On Saturdays, 130 truck movements per day will be allowed, NOW ing, expressing concerns about roading, traffic and stream/ limited to 40 per hour (20 in and 20 out of the managed fill AVAILABLE wetland loss. activity) on Saturdays until appropriate width sealed shoul- Submitters also raised concerns about the stability of the ders are provided on Brookby Road and Whitford Park Road.
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online

    Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online

    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 1 Ambiguous migrants: contemporary British migrants in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand Katie Wright Higgins Doctoral Thesis PhD in Human Geography UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX August 2016 2 Abstract A bicultural approach to the politics of settler-indigenous relations, rapidly increasing ethnocultural diversity and its status as an ex-British settler society, make Auckland a fascinating and complex context in which to examine contemporary British migrants. However, despite Britain remaining one of the largest source countries for migrants in Aotearoa New Zealand, and the country’s popularity as a destination among British emigrants, contemporary arrivals have attracted relatively little attention. This thesis draws on twelve-months of qualitative research, including in-depth interviews with forty-six participants, photo-elicitation with a smaller group, and participant observation, in order to develop a nuanced account of participants’ narratives, everyday experiences and personal geographies of Auckland. This thesis adopts a lens attentive to the relationship between the past and the present in order to explore British migrants’ imaginaries of sameness and difference, national belonging, place and ‘the good life’ in Aotearoa New Zealand.
  • Ward and Local Board Boundary Maps and Relevant Population

    Ward and Local Board Boundary Maps and Relevant Population

    Current ward population. This is based on population statistics provided through the Local Government Commission for the purpose of reviewing our boundaries. The statistics are a 2017 estimate based on the 2013 census. The council has proposed changes to the Local Government Commission to reduce the non- compliance in the Waitematā and Gulf ward Per cent Population Difference difference per from from Ward Population Members member quota quota Rodney Ward 64,300 1 64,300 -18,560 -22.40 Albany Ward 169,800 2 84,900 2,040 2.46 North Shore Ward 156,800 2 78,400 -4,460 -5.38 Waitākere Ward 176,500 2 88,250 5,390 6.50 Waitematā and Gulf Ward 119,100 1 119,100 36,240 43.74 Whau Ward 84,700 1 84,700 1,840 2.22 Albert-Eden-Roskill Ward 172,200 2 86,100 3,240 3.91 Ōrākei Ward 91,500 1 91,500 8,640 10.43 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Ward 79,700 1 79,700 -3,160 -3.81 Howick Ward 150,200 2 75,100 -7,760 -9.37 Manukau Ward 168,900 2 84,450 1,590 1.92 Manurewa-Papakura Ward 148,900 2 74,450 -8,410 -10.15 Franklin Ward 74,600 1 74,600 -8,260 -9.97 Total 1,657,200 20 82,860 Current local board population Statistics supplied through the Local Government Commission. Population Board Population Members per member Rodney 64,300 9 7,144 Hibiscus and Bays 104,500 8 13,063 Upper Harbour 65,300 6 10,883 Kaipātiki 94,000 8 11,750 Devonport-Takapuna 62,800 6 10,467 Henderson-Massey 122,300 8 15,288 Waitākere Ranges 54,200 6 9,033 Great Barrier 1,000 5 200 Waiheke 9,630 5 1,926 Waitematā 108,500 7 15,500 Whau 84,700 7 12,100 Albert-Eden 109,200 8 13,650 Puketāpapa 63,000 6 10,500 Ōrākei 91,500 7 13,071 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki 79,700 7 11,386 Howick 150,200 9 16,689 Māngere-Ōtāhuhu 81,100 7 11,586 Ōtara-Papatoetoe 87,800 7 12,543 Manurewa 94,500 8 11,813 Papakura 54,500 6 9,083 Franklin 74,600 9 8,289 Total 1,657,330 Local board subdivisions The following table shows those boards with subdivisions, and their current population.
  • Auckland Council ALUPIS Mario

    Auckland Council ALUPIS Mario

    ID Council Issue Last Name First Names Affiliation 3764 AC Mayor - Auckland Council ALUPIS Mario <none> 1537 AC Mayor - Auckland Council AUSTIN Aileen Independent 6141 AC Mayor - Auckland Council BRIGHT Penny Independent 6156 AC Mayor - Auckland Council BROWN Patrick Communist League 1385 AC Mayor - Auckland Council CHEEL Tricia STOP 211 AC Mayor - Auckland Council CRONE Vic Independent 2597 AC Mayor - Auckland Council GOFF Phil Independent 420 AC Mayor - Auckland Council HAY David Independent 6131 AC Mayor - Auckland Council HENETI Alezix <none> 663 AC Mayor - Auckland Council HOLLAND Adam John Auckland Legalise Cannabis 1416 AC Mayor - Auckland Council MARTIN Stan Independent 6181 AC Mayor - Auckland Council NGUYEN Binh Thanh Independent 703 AC Mayor - Auckland Council O'CONNOR Phil Christians Against Abortion 1622 AC Mayor - Auckland Council PALINO John Independent 398 AC Mayor - Auckland Council SWARBRICK Chloe Independent 1370 AC Mayor - Auckland Council THOMAS Mark Independent 1239 AC Mayor - Auckland Council YOUNG Wayne <none> 1618 AC Albany Ward BENSCH John Independent 6130 AC Albany Ward HENETI Alezix <none> 6214 AC Albany Ward LOWE Graham Auckland Future 1389 AC Albany Ward WALKER Wayne Putting People First 688 AC Albany Ward WATSON John Putting People First 6213 AC Albany Ward WHYTE Lisa Auckland Future 1629 AC Albert-Eden-Roskill Ward CASEY Cathy City Vision 432 AC Albert-Eden-Roskill Ward FLETCHER Christine C&R - Communities & Residents 1433 AC Albert-Eden-Roskill Ward HARRIS Rob Auckland Future 2579 AC Albert-Eden-Roskill
  • Monitoring Market Research Report

    Monitoring Market Research Report

    Market Research Proposal Research Report Prepared for Auckland Transport Proposal Prepared For New Zealand Police May 2015 2015 Auckland Region Manual Cycle Monitor NEW ZEALAND POLICE CITIZENS’ SATISFACTION RESEARCH - Regional Summary - (TN/10/19) Presented By Gravitas Research and Strategy Ltd 26th February 2010 Gravitas Research and Strategy Limited Level 12, Wellesley Centre, 44-52 Wellesley St, Auckland PO Box 3802, Shortland St, Auckland tel. 09 356 8842, fax. 09 356 5767 e-mail. [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Need For Reliable Cycle Trip Data ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Cycle Monitoring Locations ....................................................................................................... 2 2. REGIONAL SUMMARY OF RESULTS .............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Aggregated Total ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Morning Peak .......................................................................................................................... 19 2.3 Evening Peak ........................................................................................................................... 30 2.4 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) Estimates .....................................................................
  • February 2021

    February 2021

    Pub Charity Limited Declined Grants - February 2021 App Requested Approved Originating TLA Org Name App Purpose Outcome Outcome Amount Amount Code Awanui-Waipapakauri Pony Club Incorporated Equipment Maintanance $558.26 $0.00 Declined [F] 001 - Far North District Total $0.00 001 - Far North District Count 1 The Ruawai College Board of Trustees Uniforms, OTher $15,022.00 $0.00 Declined [B] Motivate Community Trust Operational Equipment $5,100.00 $0.00 Declined [A] 003 - Kaipara District Total $0.00 003 - Kaipara District Count 2 Mercury Bay Netball Incorporated Salaries and Wages $4,800.00 $0.00 Declined [C] Thames Rugby and Sports Club Incorporated Building/Facility Maintanance $11,623.00 $0.00 Declined [B] whitianga sea scout group Accommodation, OTher $271,191.36 $0.00 Declined [B] 011 - Thames-Coromandel District Total $0.00 011 - Thames-Coromandel District Count 3 Sunset Beach Lifeguard Service Incorporated Equipment Maintanance $13,830.00 $0.00 Declined [B] 013 - Waikato District Total $0.00 013 - Waikato District Count 1 Central North Island Kindergarten Trust Operational Equipment $15,000.00 $0.00 Declined [B] 019 - South Waikato District Total $0.00 019 - South Waikato District Count 1 The Whakamaru School Board of Trustees OTher $15,000.00 $0.00 Declined [B] 021 - Taupo District Total $0.00 021 - Taupo District Count 1 Waipuna Hospice Incorporated Transport $115,187.40 $0.00 Declined [A] Eastern Districts Rugby & Sports Club Incorporated Uniforms $3,690.00 $0.00 Declined [A] 022 - Western Bay of Plenty District Total $0.00 022
  • 2019 Local Elections Preliminary Results – Mayor, Local Board

    2019 Local Elections Preliminary Results – Mayor, Local Board

    Result: LGE 2019 - Preliminary Result Type: Preliminary Candidates sorted by: Votes Generated on: Sunday 13 October 2019 Elections: Auckland Council Election: 01 - Auckland Council Issue: Mayor - Auckland Council Number of vacancies: 1 Candidate Voting ID Candidate Name Affiliation Votes Received Rank 105 GOFF, Phil Independent 176599 1 118 TAMIHERE, John JT for Mayor.co.nz 79551 111 LORD, Craig Independent 29032 108 HONG, John Independent 15965 109 JOHNSTON, Ted 15401 119 VAUGHAN, Peter 6127 102 COOTE, Michael Independent 5530 101 CHEEL, Tricia STOP Trashing Our Planet 4013 114 O'CONNOR, Phil Christians Against Abortion 3917 110 KRUGER, Susanna Justice for Families 2840 104 FORDE, Genevieve 2824 115 SAINSBURY, Tom Independent 2804 116 SNELGAR, Glen Old Skool 2576 117 STOPFORD, Tadhg Tim The Hemp Foundation 2380 107 HENRY, Jannaha 2356 103 FEIST, David John LiftNZ 2259 112 MADDERN, Brendan Bruce Independent 1430 121 YOUNG, Wayne Virtual Homeless Community 1388 120 VERMUNT, Annalucia Communist League 1030 113 NGUYEN, Thanh Binh Independent 941 106 HENETI, Alezix 507 122 Informal 1558 123 Blank 6982 Election: 01 - Auckland Council Issue: Albany Ward Number of vacancies: 2 Candidate Voting ID Candidate Name Affiliation Votes Received Rank 224 WATSON, John Putting People First 28073 1 223 WALKER, Wayne Putting People First 24371 2 222 PARFITT, Julia Independent 19884 221 HENETI, Alezix 3167 225 Informal 23 226 Blank 2989 Election: 01 - Auckland Council Issue: Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa Ward Number of vacancies: 2 Candidate Voting ID Candidate
  • Monitoring Market Research Report

    Monitoring Market Research Report

    Market Research Proposal Research Report Prepared for Auckland Transport Proposal Prepared For New Zealand Police May 2014 2014 Auckland Region Manual Cycle Monitor NEW ZEALAND POLICE CITIZENS’ SATISFACTION RESEARCH - Regional Summary - (TN/10/19) Presented By Gravitas Research and Strategy Ltd 26th February 2010 Gravitas Research and Strategy Limited Level 12, Wellesley Centre, 44-52 Wellesley St, Auckland PO Box 3802, Shortland St, Auckland tel. 09 356 8842, fax. 09 356 5767 e-mail. [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Need For Reliable Cycle Trip Data ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Cycle Monitoring Locations ....................................................................................................... 2 2. REGIONAL SUMMARY OF RESULTS .............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Aggregated Total ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Morning Peak .......................................................................................................................... 19 2.3 Evening Peak ........................................................................................................................... 31 2.4 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) Estimates .....................................................................
  • Activities and Services of Auckland Council Introduction

    Activities and Services of Auckland Council Introduction

    Part II: Activities and services Introduction PART II ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES OF AUCKLAND COUNCIL INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW Auckland Council provides a range of goods and services. These are detailed in the following sections where the activities undertaken by the council and its CCOs are described. Each section includes details of the expenditure, the projects and achievements together with the levels of service which were provided and details of the performance measures. The performance measures describe either what we set out to achieve or levels of customer satisfaction. Results show performance against the standard (target) we set ourselves. The sections provide information about: • the groups of activities undertaken by Auckland Council. Activities are grouped together because of their connectivity with each other • individual activities undertaken. Individual activities are goods and services delivered to the community – for example, the provision of facilities, providing grants and the performance of regulatory and other functions. Note that some activities are provided by the CCOs. While each set of performance measures, results and commentaries cover the full activity provided by the council and Group, only the portions funded directly by the council are covered in the financial statements. A summary of the total expenditure of the CCOs is covered in the CCO section. Following the sections about the council’s activities, there is coverage of the activities of the 21 local boards, and this is followed by the CCO section. The council has 11 groups of activities: • Community • Lifestyle and Culture • Economic Development • Planning and Regulation • Environmental Management • Solid Waste • Water Supply and Wastewater • Stormwater • Transport • Commercial and Investment • Governance Auckland Council Report 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 52 Part II: Activities and services Introduction EXPLAINING OUR GROUP ACTIVITY STATEMENTS Each group activity statement is broken down into the following headings: OVERVIEW Why the council is involved.
  • Summer Time Is Hammer Time! Don’T Pay for an Auctioneer, We Don’T Charge You for Our Auctioneers, and for a Limited Time We’Ve Waived Any Documentation Fees

    Summer Time Is Hammer Time! Don’T Pay for an Auctioneer, We Don’T Charge You for Our Auctioneers, and for a Limited Time We’Ve Waived Any Documentation Fees

    DELIVERED FORTNIGHTLY IssueIssue 23 –1 –February 15 March 7,2019 2020 AN INDEPENDENT VOICE Local board chair’s Takapuna Cricket Fears as Takapuna Library’s potential conflict... p2 triumphs in T20 comp... p3 future reviewed... p4-9 Coronavirus scare fazes home-stay families Fears about coronavirus are spooking summer holidays, many having visited Another family pulled out of the pro- international students’ homestay fami- China in the break. gramme altogether. lies in Takapuna and Milford, with some At Westlake Girls, temporary ac- “It’s been all hands to the pump” for unwilling to host students during their commodation had to be found for four the international students’ team, media two-week quarantine period. international students for the two-week spokesperson Christina Pollock says. Local high schools had a busy time quarantine period before their homestay last week as students arrived back from families were happy to host them. To page 2 Tots get taste of high-flying lifestyle The living is breezy... A council kite-flying day at Kennedy Park drew a young crowd, including Aoife Main (14 months). Photo: Keeley Watson. More photos, pages 10 and 11 Summer time is hammer time! Don’t pay for an Auctioneer, we don’t charge you for our Auctioneers, and for a limited time we’ve waived any documentation fees. And speak to us about exclusive offers for readers of the Rangitoto Observer. Milford 09 489 5049 • [email protected] barfoot.co.nz/hammertime THE RANGITOTO OBSERVER PAGE 2 FEBRUARY 7, 2020 Board members claim chair faces conflict of interest The chair of the Devonport-Takapuna Another member, Jan O’Connor, was ad- chair’s property, at that stage he might look at Local Board, which is considering developing amant Bennett should not be involved in any whether that’s a perceived or actual conflict,” several council buildings in Takapuna, lives discussions about the Mary Thomas Centre Darby says.