POSS Feasibility Study, the Technical Framework Hereafter Is Based on OSS, Although We Do Not Consider This Requirement As a Technical One

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

POSS Feasibility Study, the Technical Framework Hereafter Is Based on OSS, Although We Do Not Consider This Requirement As a Technical One POOLING OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE An IDA Feasibility Study Interchange of Data between Administrations European Commission, DG Enterprise Authors: Patrice-Emmanuel SCHMITZ Sébastien CASTIAUX June 2002 © European Communities Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The IDA programme IDA (http://europa.eu.int/ispo/ida ) is a European Commission driven strategic initiative using advances in information and communication technology to support rapid electronic exchange of information between Member State administrations. The objective is to improve Community decision-making, facilitate operation of the internal market and accelerate policy implementation. Its mission is to co-ordinate the establishment of trans-European telematic networks by: Promoting implementation of sectored networks in priority areas Developing network interoperability measures Extending network benefits to EU industry and citizens Co-operating with Member States authorities and Community services Promoting convergence towards a common telematic interface. If you would like to comment on this report or related issues, please e-mail to [email protected]. This report has been prepared under the sole responsibility of the contractor (Unisys Management Consulting Team). It does not necessarily reflect the view of the European Commission, nor does the Commission accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of information contained herein For more information, please contact the author: [email protected] Pooling Open source Software – Feasibility Study 3 - For IDA, by Unisys Management Consulting Table of Content Management Summary.......................................................................................................... 6 Pooling Open source Software? .................................................................................................................6 The Study Summary ..................................................................................................................................8 1. Processes and Resources Analysis ................................................................................... 15 Objectives................................................................................................................................................15 The processes ..........................................................................................................................................16 The resources...........................................................................................................................................27 2. Legal Framework analysis............................................................................................... 31 Foreword .................................................................................................................................................31 The Terminology .....................................................................................................................................35 A legal approach of Open source software ...............................................................................................38 Five license groups ..................................................................................................................................42 The License agreement qualification........................................................................................................46 OSS licenses conformity to copyright ......................................................................................................51 Conformity to patent law .........................................................................................................................54 The Contractual framework .....................................................................................................................57 The choice of a license process ................................................................................................................60 Liability issues.........................................................................................................................................65 Conclusions regarding the legal framework..............................................................................................68 3. POSS Functional Requirements ...................................................................................... 70 Objectives of the chapter..........................................................................................................................70 Objectives of the POSS Portal Site...........................................................................................................70 Providing Useful Solutions ......................................................................................................................71 Creating a Community.............................................................................................................................77 Promoting the Use of the POSS Portal Site ..............................................................................................78 POSS Portal Site services.........................................................................................................................80 4. Technical Design Framework.......................................................................................... 93 Objectives................................................................................................................................................93 The technical framework of standards......................................................................................................94 The framework of tools requested to be integrated to answer requirements...............................................99 Set up of the POSS ................................................................................................................................108 Existing illustrations of such possible architecture..................................................................................111 5. Maintenance and Interaction......................................................................................... 114 Objectives..............................................................................................................................................114 Pooling Open source Software – Feasibility Study 4 - For IDA, by Unisys Management Consulting Principles of a cooperative service management.....................................................................................115 The service roles....................................................................................................................................115 Maintenance process..............................................................................................................................117 The data integrity...................................................................................................................................127 Possible contributing organisations ........................................................................................................127 6. POSS Costs and Financing ............................................................................................ 128 Objectives..............................................................................................................................................128 Understanding the Cost and Business models.........................................................................................129 Cost estimation ......................................................................................................................................131 Prototyping / Pilot phase ........................................................................................................................133 Deployment phase .................................................................................................................................135 Operation and Maintenance (yearly) ......................................................................................................136 Funding the POSS .................................................................................................................................137 Conclusion about financing the POSS....................................................................................................139 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 140 The notions............................................................................................................................................140 The legal framework..............................................................................................................................140 The requirements ...................................................................................................................................142 The Technical design .............................................................................................................................143 The Maintenance ...................................................................................................................................143 The Costs ..............................................................................................................................................144
Recommended publications
  • Encouragez Les Framabooks !
    Encouragez les Framabooks ! You can use Unglue.it to help to thank the creators for making Histoires et cultures du Libre. Des logiciels partagés aux licences échangées free. The amount is up to you. Click here to thank the creators Sous la direction de : Camille Paloque-Berges, Christophe Masutti Histoires et cultures du Libre Des logiciels partagés aux licences échangées II Framasoft a été créé en novembre 2001 par Alexis Kauffmann. En janvier 2004 une asso- ciation éponyme a vu le jour pour soutenir le développement du réseau. Pour plus d’infor- mation sur Framasoft, consulter http://www.framasoft.org. Se démarquant de l’édition classique, les Framabooks sont dits « livres libres » parce qu’ils sont placés sous une licence qui permet au lecteur de disposer des mêmes libertés qu’un utilisateur de logiciels libres. Les Framabooks s’inscrivent dans cette culture des biens communs qui, à l’instar de Wikipédia, favorise la création, le partage, la diffusion et l’ap- propriation collective de la connaissance. Le projet Framabook est coordonné par Christophe Masutti. Pour plus d’information, consultez http://framabook.org. Copyright 2013 : Camille Paloque-Berges, Christophe Masutti, Framasoft (coll. Framabook) Histoires et cultures du Libre. Des logiciels partagés aux licences échangées est placé sous licence Creative Commons -By (3.0). Édité avec le concours de l’INRIA et Inno3. ISBN : 978-2-9539187-9-3 Prix : 25 euros Dépôt légal : mai 2013, Framasoft (impr. lulu.com, Raleigh, USA) Pingouins : LL de Mars, Licence Art Libre Couverture : création par Nadège Dauvergne, Licence CC-By Mise en page avec LATEX Cette œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 France.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Issues and Opportunities (Powerpoint Slides)
    © Practising Law Institute INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Course Handbook Series Number G-1307 Advanced Licensing Agreements 2017 Volume One Co-Chairs Marcelo Halpern Ira Jay Levy Joseph Yang To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at (800) 321-0093. Ask our Customer Service Department for PLI Order Number 185480, Dept. BAV5. Practising Law Institute 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 © Practising Law Institute 24 Open Source Issues and Opportunities (PowerPoint slides) David G. Rickerby Boston Technology Law, PLLC If you find this article helpful, you can learn more about the subject by going to www.pli.edu to view the on demand program or segment for which it was written. 2-315 © Practising Law Institute 2-316 © Practising Law Institute Open Source Issues and Opportunities Practicing Law Institute Advanced Licensing Agreements 2017 May 12th 2017 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM David G. Rickerby 2-317 © Practising Law Institute Overview z Introduction to Open Source z Enforced Sharing z Managing Open Source 2-318 © Practising Law Institute “Open” “Source” – “Source” “Open” licensing software Any to available the source makes model that etc. modify, distribute, copy, What is Open Source? What is z 2-319 © Practising Law Institute The human readable version of the code. version The human readable and logic. interfaces, secrets, Exposes trade What is Source Code? z z 2-320 © Practising Law Institute As opposed to Object Code… 2-321 © Practising Law Institute ~185 components ~19 different OSS licenses - most reciprocal Open Source is Big Business ANDROID -Apache 2.0 Declared license: 2-322 © Practising Law Institute Many Organizations 2-323 © Practising Law Institute Solving Problems in Many Industries Healthcare Mobile Financial Services Everything Automotive 2-324 © Practising Law Institute So, what’s the big deal? Why isn’t this just like a commercial license? In many ways they are the same: z Both commercial and open source licenses are based on ownership of intellectual property.
    [Show full text]
  • O'reilly Books
    Intellectual Property and Open Source ,ip_roadmap.18464 Page ii Thursday, July 3, 2008 10:38 AM Other resources from O’Reilly Related titles Applied Software Producing Open Source Management Software Hackers & Painters The Cathedral & the Bazaar Open Sources Understanding Open Open Sources 2.0 Source and Free Software Licensing oreilly.com oreilly.com is more than a complete catalog of O'Reilly books. You'll also find links to news, events, articles, weblogs, sample chapters, and code examples. oreillynet.com is the essential portal for developers inter- ested in open and emerging technologies, including new platforms, programming languages, and operating sys- tems. Conferences O’Reilly brings diverse innovators together to nurture the ideas that spark revolutionary industries. We specialize in documenting the latest tools and systems, translating the innovator’s knowledge into useful skills for those in the trenches. Visit conferences.oreilly.com for our upcoming events. Safari Bookshelf (safari.oreilly.com) is the premier online reference library for programmers and IT professionals. Conduct searches across more than 1,000 books. Sub- scribers can zero in on answers to time-critical questions in a matter of seconds. Read the books on your Bookshelf from cover to cover or simply flip to the page you need. Try it today for free. main.title Page iii Monday, May 19, 2008 11:21 AM Intellectual PropertyTomcat ™ andThe Open Definitive Source Guide Jason Brittain and Ian VanF. Darwin Lindberg Beijing • Cambridge • Farnham • Köln • Sebastopol • Taipei • Tokyo Intellectual Property and Open Source by Van Lindberg Copyright © 2008 Van Lindberg. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE) Dl INDONESIA
    IMPLlKASl HUKUM LlSENSl COPYLEFT TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN PERANGKAT LUNAK SUMBER TERBUKA (OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE) Dl INDONESIA TESlS Disusun sebagai salah satu syarat untuk mendapatkan gelar Magister Hukum pada BKU Hukum Bisnis Magister Iimu Hukum Oleh: IKA RlSWANTl PUTRANTI NIM : 06912205 BKU : HUKUM BlSNlS MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM PROGRAM PASCA SARJANA FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS ISLAM INDONESIA TAHUN 2009 LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN TESISMAGISTER ILMU HUKUM PROGRAM PASCA SARJANA FAKULTAS HUKUM UNlVERSlTAS ISLAM INDONESIA IMPLIKASI HUKUM LlSENSl COPYLEFTTERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN PERANGKAT LUNAK SUMBER 'TERBUKA (OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE) Dl INDONESIA Telah disetujui dan diterima oleh Dosen Pembimbing untuk diajukan pada Tim Penguji Sidang Tesis Program Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Indonesia. Hariflanggal Sabtu, 7 Februari 2009 Yogyakarta, Kamis, 5 Februari 2009 Pembimbing I Pembimbing I1 Nandang Sutrisna, SH, M.H, LLM, Ph.D Budi Agus Riswandi, SH. M.H. Mengetahui, Ketua Prograq Pascasarjana TESlS MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM PROGRAM PASCA SARJANA FAKULTAS HUKUM UNlVERSlTAS ISLAM IN DON ESlA IMPLlKASl HUKUM LlSENSl COPYLEFTTERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN PERANGKAT LUNAK SUMBER TERBUKA (OPEN SOURCE SOFWARE) Dl INDONESIA Oleh : Nama : IKA RlSWANTl PUTRANTI NIM : 06912205 BKU : HUKUM BlSNlS Dipertahankan didepan Tim Penguji Sidang Tesis dan dinyatakan diterima pada tanggal 7 Februari 2009. Tim Penguji : 1. Nandang Sutrisna, SH, MH, LLM, Ph.D. ............................................... 2. Dr. Siti Anisah SH, MH. f/ 3. Budi Agus Riswandi SH, MH. ...............................................- Yogyakarta, 9 Februari 2009 Mengetahui, F7Ain4inq Is the Aardest wora thore is, wAicA k probaO8y tho reason I I why so few engage in it". ~#mfyFufdf "Skccess kska88y comes to tAose wAo are too 6ksy to be 8oo4ing for it". (#~fy~au/a'7Aaf&akf "&very maw's dive end in tAe same way.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing New Open Sources, Resources, Risks, & Rules
    ACCA’S 2003 ANNUAL MEETING CHARTING A NEW COURSE 710:Is Open OK? Managing New Open Sources, Resources, Risks, & Rules Henry W. (Hank) Jones, III Attorney Heather D. Rafter General Counsel Digidesign, a division of Avid Technology, Inc. D. C. Toedt Vice President, General Counsel, & Secretary BindView Corporation Mark H. Webbink Senior Vice President & General Counsel Red Hat, Inc. This material is protected by copyright. Copyright © 2003 various authors and the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC). Materials may not be reproduced without the consent of ACC. Reprint permission requests should be directed to James Merklinger at ACCA: 202/293-4103, ext. 326; [email protected] ACCA’s 2003 ANNUAL MEETING CHARTING A NEW COURSE Faculty Biographies Henry W. (Hank) Jones, III Henry W. (Hank) Jones, III is an information technology lawyer and businessperson who operates both a solo law practice and a consulting practice, based in Austin, Texas. His varied roles have included commercial, licensing, and intellectual property law, open source software consultant, intermittent second-chair litigator or expert witness trainer, part-time product manager, and risk manager. He particularly works in software, e-commerce, Internet issues, networks, data, hardware, procurement, print publishing, and other markets. He assists software users, vendors, and intermediaries in open source software counseling, product planning, licensing, risk assessment, policy creation, and training. Mr. Jones formerly served as both head in-house counsel and a utility senior management infielder for QMS and Ashton-Tate and as vice president., intellectual property development for U.S. Robotics. He also worked in-house at Accenture and Arthur Andersen, handling licensing, e- commerce, Internet issues, outsourcing, alliances, systems integration, new services development, marketing, publishing, training, and other projects, and in private practice in Austin, Atlanta, and Memphis.
    [Show full text]
  • L'évolution Des Licences Libres Et Open Source : Critères, Finalités Et
    L’évolution des licences libres et open source : critères, finalités et complétude ? Benjamin JEAN Au premier regard, l’intérêt d’une étude historique ayant pour objet les licences libres n’est pas évident et l’on tend généralement, avec raison, à considérer que la véritable valeur du Libre réside dans les projets qui le composent (GNU-Linux, Firefox, LibreOffice, Wikipédia, etc.). Ainsi, complexes et hétérogènes, les documents contractuels associés ne seraient qu’une formalisation nécessaire, une attache obligatoire du Libre au sys- tème légal conséquente à la juridicisation de la société actuelle. Une telle approche nierait la place toute particulière des licences au sein du mouvement du Libre en cristallisant les tensions constitutives du sys- tème, assurant l’équilibre d’une équation aux multiples variables. Dès le départ, les licences libres se positionnent en rupture avec les usages tradi- tionnels attirant un nombre important d’« amateurs » (au regard de l’im- portance qu’ils y attachent et de leur grande connaissance du sujet, la plupart étant par ailleurs non juristes), une image qui dénote avec l’aus- térité souvent associée aux documents contractuels et remet en cause le monopole du juriste (lui-même souvent dépassé par la complexité d’un document aussi juridique que social). L’usage du droit s’éloigne donc de la technicité qui le caractérise aujourd’hui pour renouer avec sa mis- sion première d’organisation des relations sociales : formalisant les règles 277 278 Benjamin JEAN relatives aux rapports entre les contributeurs d’un projet et entre les com- munautés, assurant sécurité et une pérennité à leur collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Turpeinen Timo.Pdf (1.285Mt)
    AVOIMEN LÄHDEKOODIN OHJELMIA PAIKKATIETOAINEISTON KÄSITTELYSSÄ Turpeinen Timo Opinnäytetyö Tekniikka ja liikenne Maanmittaustekniikka Insinööri (AMK) 2017 Opinnäytetyön tiivistelmä Tekniikka ja liikenne Maanmittaustekniikka Insinööri (AMK) Tekijä Timo Turpeinen Vuosi 2017 Ohjaaja(t) Jaakko Lampinen Työn nimi Avoimen lähdekoodin ohjelmia paikkatietoaineiston käsittelyssä Sivu- ja liitesivumäärä 30 + 3 Tässä opinnäytetyössä on tarkasteltu yleisimpiä avoimen lähdekoodin lisensse- jä sekä avoimen lähdekoodin ohjelmia paikkatietoaineistojen käsittelyyn liittyen. Ensisijaisesti on keskitytty QGIS-ohjelmiston toimintaan ja sen käyttökelpoisuu- teen. Opinnäytetyö on syntynyt tekijän oman kiinnostuksen pohjalta avoimen lähde- koodin ohjelmiin sekä avoimeen aineistoon. Työssä on pyritty selvittämään tar- jolla olevia ohjelmistoja Open Source Geospatial-paikkatietoportaalista ja tes- taamaan ohjelmia käyttämällä avointa aineistoa. Työssä havaittiin QGIS-ohjelmiston laaja-alaisuus ja skaalattavuus eri käyttö- tarpeisiin, etenkin jos on valmis panostamaan ohjelmien koodaamiseen. Ohjel- man haittapuolena voidaan toisaalta pitää sen monipuolisuutta, joka vaatii pal- jon perehtymistä. Avainsanat avoin lähdekoodi, OSGeo, QGIS Abstract of Thesis Technology, Communication and Transport Degree Programme in Land Surveying Bachelor of Engineering Author Timo Turpeinen Year 2017 Supervisor Jaakko Lampinen Subject of thesis Open Source Software for Processing Spatial Data Number of pages 30 + 3 This study concentrated on the most common open source licenses and open source software for handling spatial data. The main focus was on the viability of the QGIS software and its functions. The study was done because of the author’s own interest in the open source software and open data. The aim was to study the software available in the Open Source Geospatial portal and run tests using open data. In this study it was found that the QGIS software can be applied for wide spec- trum of different tasks, especially if someone is prepared to learn coding pro- grams.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Material of OSS/FS
    A Compendium of Material on Open Source Software / Free Software OSS/FS Definitions, Licences, and Implications The Open Source Initiative http://www.opensource.org/ Copyright © 2004 by the Open Source Initiative Open Source Initiative (OSI) is a non-profit corporation dedicated to managing and promoting the Open Source Definition for the good of the community, specifically through the OSI Certified Open Source Software certification mark and program. You can read about successful software products that have these properties, and about our certification mark and program, which allow you to be confident that software really is "Open Source." We also make copies of approved open source licenses here. The basic idea behind open source is very simple: When programmers can read, redistribute, and modify the source code for a piece of software, the software evolves. People improve it, people adapt it, people fix bugs. And this can happen at a speed that, if one is used to the slow pace of conventional software development, seems astonishing. Recommended Reading • Open Source Citizenship • Technology trends that will affect your business and how you do business. • Shared Source: A Dangerous Virus • Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS)? Look at the Numbers! • A Business Case Study of Open Source Software • Our own Halloween Documents. Where will Microsoft try to drag you today? Do you really want to go there? • Yahoo! and FreeBSD: a co-founder of Yahoo! explains why they gave up on closed Internet platforms and made Yahoo! a success with FreeBSD. The Open Source Definition Version 1.9 The indented, italicized sections below appear as annotations to the Open Source Definition (OSD) and are not a part of the OSD.
    [Show full text]
  • ETSI-OSS Standards
    European Telecommunications Standards Institute Open Source impacts on ICT standardization Final Report – Analysis Part - VA6 December 12, 2005 Hervé Rannou Jean-Baptiste Soufron ITEMS International 46 ave Pierre Brossolette 92240 MALAKOFF Tel: +33 (0)1 4985 0326 Fax: +33 (0)1 4985 1407 [email protected] www.items.fr - ETSI - SOMMAIRE 1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 5 2 Open Source Software............................................................................ 6 2.1 Definitions ..................................................................................................... 6 2.2 SUN, MICROSOFT, BSD, GPL and others .......................................................... 10 2.3 Open Source Business Models ........................................................................ 12 2.4 Typology of Open Source Licenses .................................................................. 13 2.5 Typology of SDO IPR..................................................................................... 13 2 3 Copyright Open Source and IPR ........................................................... 15 3.1 Open Source is Copyright IPR......................................................................... 15 3.2 Open Source IPR or Patents IPR...................................................................... 16 3.3 Open Source IPR and Patents IPR ................................................................... 17 4 Open Standards...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Specification Version 2.2
    Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX®) Specification Version 2.2 SPDX Specification – Version 2.2 Table of Contents The Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX®) Specification Version 2.2 ................................... 7 1 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Charter .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Definition ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Why is a common format for data exchange needed? ................................................................ 8 1.4 What does this specification cover?................................................................................................... 8 1.5 What is not covered in the specification? ........................................................................................ 9 1.6 What does “Package” mean in the context of SPDX? ................................................................ 10 1.7 Format Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 10 1.8 Conformance ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Is Not Public Domain: Evolving Licensing Philosophies
    OPEN SOURCE IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN: EVOLVING LICENSING PHILOSOPHIES BRAD FRAZER* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: “OPEN SOURCE” DOES NOT MEAN “PUBLIC DOMAIN”........................................................................2 A. Introduction................................................................................2 B. Copyright Basics ........................................................................3 C. Who can Claim Copyright .........................................................4 D. What is not Protected by Copyright?........................................5 E. Copyright Secured Automatically upon Creation....................6 F. Copyright Registration ..............................................................7 G. Copyright Infringement ............................................................7 II. OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE...........................................................9 A. Introduction................................................................................9 B. Definitions ................................................................................11 C. Examples of Open Source Licenses ........................................14 III. OPEN SOURCE LICENSING .......................................................17 A. Introduction..............................................................................17 B. Licensing Methods ...................................................................17 C. The Katzer Case.......................................................................18 D.
    [Show full text]
  • SPDX 1.0 Specification
    Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX®) Specification Version: 1.1 Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX®) Specification Copyright © 2010-2012 Linux Foundation and its Contributors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (reproduced in its entirety in Appendix III herein). All other rights are expressly reserved. With thanks to Adam Cohn, Andrew Back, Ann Thornton, Bill Schineller, Bruno Cornec, Ciaran Farrell, Daniel German, Debra McGlade, Ed Warnicke, Eran Strod, Eric Thomas, Esteban Rockett, Gary O'Neall, Guillaume Rousseau, Jack Manbeck, Jaime Garcia, Jeff Luszcz, Jilayne Lovejoy, John Ellis, Karen Copenhaver, Kate Stewart, Kim Weins, Kirsten Newcomer, Marc-Etienne Vargenau, Mark Gisi, Marshall Clow, Martin Michlmayr, Martin von Willebrand, Michael J. Herzog, Michel Ruffin, Peter Williams, Phil Robb, Philip Odence, Philip Koltun, Pierre Lapointe, Rana Rahal, Scott K Peterson, Scott Lamons, Shane Coughlan, Steve Cropper, Stuart Hughes, Tom Callaway, and Thomas F. Incorvia for their contributions and assistance. Official SPDX® Specification 1.1. Copyright © 2010-2012 Linux Foundation and its Contributors. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 Unported. All other rights are expressly reserved. Page 2 of 66 Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX®) Specification TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 RATIONALE.....................................................................................................5 1.1 CHARTER...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]