DOCSLIB.ORG

Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF) Ref. Ares(2012)873788 - 17/07/2012 EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Environment and Sustainability H08 Sustainability Assessment Unit Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF) Guide Deliverable 3 and 4B to the Administrative Arrangement between DG Environment and Joint Research Centre No. N 070307/2009/552517, including Amendment No 1 from December 2010. European Commission (EC) Joint Research Centre(JRC) Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES) Authors: Nathan Pelletier, Karen Allacker, Simone Manfredi, Kirana Chomkhamsri, Danielle Maia de Souza Project Leader and main reviewer: Rana Pant Action Leader and reviewer: David Pennington Approved by: Constantin Ciupagea CONSOLIDATED VERSION Ispra, Italy, July 17, 2012 Organisation Environmental Footprint Guide - CONSOLIDATED VERSION This page is left intentionally blank. 2 Organisation Environmental Footprint Guide - CONSOLIDATED VERSION Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 7 Context ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Objectives and Target Audiences ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Process and Results ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Relationship to the Product Environmental Footprint Guide ............................................................................... 9 Terminology: Shall, Should and May ................................................................................................................................ 9 1. General Considerations for Organisation Environmental Footprint Studies .......................................... 11 1.1 Approach and Applications ....................................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 How to Use this Guide .................................................................................................................................................. 13 1.3 Principles for Organisation Environmental Footprint Studies ................................................................... 13 1.4 Phases of an Organisation Environmental Footprint Study ........................................................................ 15 2. Role of Organisation Environmental Footprint Sector Rules (OEFSRs) .................................................. 16 2.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.2 Defining the Sector that is Subject to the Organisation Environmental Footprint Sector Rules .. 17 3. Defining the Goal(s) of the Organisation Environmental Footprint Study ............................................. 19 4. Defining the Scope of the Organisation Environmental Footprint Study ............................................... 21 4.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Defining the Organisation (Unit of Analysis) ..................................................................................................... 21 4.3 Product Portfolio ........................................................................................................................................................... 22 4.4 System Boundaries for Organisation Environmental Footprint Studies ................................................ 23 4.4.1 Organisational Boundaries ............................................................................................................. 24 4.4.2 Organisation Environmental Footprint Boundaries ....................................................................... 25 4.4.3 System Boundary Diagram ............................................................................................................. 27 4.4.4 How to Deal with Offsets in an OEF ............................................................................................... 27 4.5 Selecting Environmental Footprint Impact Categories and Assessment Methods ............................ 28 4.6 Selecting Additional Environmental Information to be Included in the OEF ....................................... 30 4.7 Assumptions/Limitations .......................................................................................................................................... 33 5. Compiling and Recording the Resource Use and Emissions Profile (Inventory Phase) ........................... 34 5.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................................... 34 5.2 Screening Step ................................................................................................................................................................ 35 5.3 Data Management Plan (Optional) ......................................................................................................................... 36 5.4 Resource Use and Emissions Profile Data ........................................................................................................... 37 5.4.1 Direct Activities and Impacts .......................................................................................................... 38 3 Organisation Environmental Footprint Guide - CONSOLIDATED VERSION 5.4.2 Indirectly Attributable Upstream Activities .................................................................................... 38 5.4.3 Indirectly Attributable Downstream Activities ............................................................................... 39 5.4.4 Additional Resource Use and Emissions Profile Requirements ...................................................... 39 5.4.5 Modelling Transport Scenarios ....................................................................................................... 41 5.4.6 Modelling Scenarios for the Use Stage ........................................................................................... 42 5.4.7 Modelling End-of-Life Scenarios ..................................................................................................... 43 5.5 Nomenclature for the Resource Use and Emissions Profile ........................................................................ 44 5.6 Data Quality Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 45 5.7 Specific Data Collection ............................................................................................................................................... 54 5.8 Generic data collection ................................................................................................................................................ 55 5.9 Dealing with Remaining Data Gaps / Missing Data ......................................................................................... 56 5.10 Data Gathering Related to the Next Methodological Phases in an Organisation Environmental Footprint Study. ..................................................................................................................................................................... 57 5.11 Handling Multi-Functional Processes and Facilities .................................................................................... 59 6. Organisation Environmental Footprint Impact Assessment .................................................................. 63 6.1 Mandatory Steps: Classification and Characterisation .................................................................................. 63 6.1.1 Classification of Environmental Footprint Flows ............................................................................ 63 6.1.2 Characterisation of Environmental Footprint Flows ...................................................................... 64 6.2 Optional Steps: Normalisation and Weighting .................................................................................................. 65 6.2.1 Normalisation of Environmental Footprint Impact Assessment Results........................................ 65 6.2.2 Weighting of Environmental Footprint Impact Assessment Results .............................................. 66 7. Organisation Environmental Footprint Interpretation ......................................................................... 67 7.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................................... 67 7.2 Assessment of the Robustness of the Organisation Environmental Footprint Model ...................... 67 7.3 Identification of Hotspots (Significant Issues) .................................................................................................. 68 7.4 Estimation of Uncertainty .........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Environmental Microbiology
    Reviewers Andrzej Noworyta Zdzisław Szulc The publication was prepared based on delivered materials © Copyright by Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław 2006 ISBN 83-7085-880-5 Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 53-370 Wrocław http://www.oficyna.pwr.wroc.pl [email protected] INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY The INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY has been developed by academic teachers from Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland in the frame of international project Socrates Minerva CELL TALK–88091–CP-BE-2000-Minerva-ODL realized together with partners from Belgium, Ireland, Bulgaria, Portugal and Netherlands. The project was coordinated by prof. Chris van Keer from Katholieke Hogeschool Sint Lieven in Gent, Belgium. The book is addressed to students of environmental engineering, biology, biotechnology, biochemistry and to students of other specializations interested in increasing their knowledge about microorganisms living in environment and in solving environmental problems with the use of microorganisms capable of degrading xenobiotics. Authors Barbara Kołwzan graduated from the University of Economics in Poznan, the Food Commodity Science specialization. She received her Ph.D. at the Wroclaw University of Technology, the Institute of Environment Protection Engineering. She worked as a research assistant at the Toxicology Laboratory at the Institute of Environment Protection Engineering and as a research and didactic assistant at the Biology and Ecology Group. At present she is a head of Research associate at the Biology and Ecology Group, Institute of Environment Protection Engineering. barbara. [email protected] Waldemar Adamiak received his M.Sc. degree in biology from the Wroclaw University. Now he works as a lecturer on the Department of Environmental Engineering at the Technical University of Wroclaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil from View of Bioremediation Process
    █████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ANALYSIS OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL FROM VIEW OF BIOREMEDIATION PROCESS R. Mračnová1, L. Soják1, R. Kubinec1, A. Kraus2, A. Eszényiová3, I. Ostrovský1 1Chemical Institute, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynska dolina CH-2, 842 1 5 Bratislava (Slovakia), e-mail: [email protected] 2Institut of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry, Martin Luther University, 061 20 Halle (Germany) 3Slovnaft Ltd., Research Institute of Petroleum and Hydrocarbon Gases, Vlcie hrdlo, 82412 Bratislava (Slovakia) ABSTRACT The pollution of the environment by petroleum hydrocarbons is the most often pollution of them all. Nevertheless, hydrocarbons present in environment can be not only of petroleum or anthropogenic origin, but of biogenic as well. Typically the hydrocarbons are presented in the environment as very complex mixtures of individual compounds with very different chemical structure, wide range of the boiling points ( ≈ 800 oC) as well as with the wide range of the number of carbon atoms. Immediately they are spread in any environmental matrix the complex physical, chemical and biochemical reactions start. A lot of methods have been developed and new are permanently in progress for the monitoring and control of petroleum hydrocarbons contamination and/or soils bioremediation. Generally, all methods by whose the hydrocarbons contaminants are determined in GC-FID system do not satisfied recommendations for enough accurate and precise results. Hyphenation of capillary gas chromatography and mass selective de- tector operated in the selective ion monitoring mode essentially allows detai- led specification of non-polar extractable hydrocarbons. Isoprenoid alkanes, alkylhomologues of aromatic hydrocarbons and polycyclic alkanes hopanes- like were investigated as markers for recognition of petroleum and biogenic contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Soils and Plants on Two Selected Research Areas in the Smołdzi Ński Las District Within the Słowi Ński National Park
    Characteristics of soilsBaltic and plants Coastal on two Zone selected research areas… 121 No. 9 Institute of Biology and Environmental Protection (121-132) Pomeranian Pedagogical University 2005 Słupsk CHARACTERISTICS OF SOILS AND PLANTS ON TWO SELECTED RESEARCH AREAS IN THE SMOŁDZI ŃSKI LAS DISTRICT WITHIN THE SŁOWI ŃSKI NATIONAL PARK Jan Trojanowski, Agnieszka Parzych Department of Chemistry, Institute of Biology and Environmental Protection, Pomeranian Pedagogical University of Słupsk, ul. Arciszewskiego 22, 76-200 Słupsk, Poland [email protected] Abstract The soils studied are situated in the northern part of Gardno-Łebsko Lowland, which is part of the Słupsk Plain. For laboratory research two parcels were chosen, with the area of 0.5 ha, situated in protected district of Smołdzi ński Las. The research of the selected parcels shows great differences in the construction of soil and flora profiles. What they have in common is the high level of groundwater, which is influenced by slight changes during the vegetation season. The investigated soils have the acid reaction in all parts of their profile. The lowest values observed in levels of moulder differed from 3.56 to 3.74 pH H20 . Key words: forest ecosystem, soil, flora, ground water, organic carbon INTRODUCTION The Słowinski National Park (SPN) is located on the Gardno-Łebsko Lowland within the middle coast of southern Baltic. The park is characteristic for its excep- tional – on a national scale – history of bedding, flora and soils. The SPN location, neighbouring large lakes and the Baltic Sea, influences the hydrologic ratio (Fig. 1). Its soils were created in various periods, forming the paedosphere on the old water- glacial formations of the last Vistula glaciation as well as on the geologically younger areas created as a result of waterside processes, Aeolian occurrences, and on different-age formations of biological origin (Tobolski et al.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Earth
    History of Earth The history of Earth concerns the development of planet Earth from its formation to the present day.[1][2] Nearly all branches of natural science have contributed to understanding of the main events of Earth's past, characterized by constant geological change and biological evolution. The geological time scale (GTS), as defined by international convention,[3] depicts the large spans of time from the beginning of the Earth to the present, and its divisions chronicle some definitive events of Earth history. (In the graphic: Ga means "billion years ago"; Ma, "million years ago".) Earth formed around 4.54 billion years ago, approximately one-third the age of the universe, by accretion from the solar nebula.[4][5][6] Volcanic outgassing probably created the primordial atmosphere and then the ocean, but the early atmosphere contained almost no oxygen. Much of the Earth was molten because of frequent collisions with other bodies which led to extreme volcanism. While the Earth was in its earliest stage (Early Earth), a giant impact collision with a planet-sized body named Theia is thought to have formed the Moon. Over time, the Earth cooled, causing the formation of a solid crust, and allowing liquid water on the surface. The Hadean eon represents the time before a reliable (fossil) record of life; it began with the formation of the planet and ended 4.0 billion years ago. The following Archean and Proterozoic eons produced the beginnings of life on Earth and its earliest evolution. The succeeding eon is the Phanerozoic, divided into three eras: the Palaeozoic, an era of arthropods, fishes, and the first life on land; the Mesozoic, which spanned the rise, reign, and climactic extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs; and the Cenozoic, which saw the rise of mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Beginning of Life Beginning of Life Extinction Dinosaurs
    Biohistory Emaki 1/2 birth of human beings Cainozoic Extinction 1 of dinosaurs Modern life 2 common 3 ancestor of mammals fungi angiosperms animals gymnosperms present day hundred million years ago mammals (China) 1 pteridophytes protists plants (Argentina) bryophytes (England) chordates (China) sponges (metazoa) insects archaea eubacteria (primitive fungi) (Namibia) chytrids (Canada) land plants common ancestor of metazoa and fungi (USA) (Gabon) seaweeds common ancestor of plants 5 sponges common ancestor of protists eukaryotes prokaryotes 10 hundred million 1 years ago 5 10 20 30 38 multicellular algae present day beginning of life colonial organisms Estimated age of the first appearance archaea protists fungi 20 eubacteria plants animals (Canada) traces of eukaryotes and algae by DNA study (Greenland) 4 30 microfossils side│History of evolution of life viewed from DNA and fossils Comparing DNA sequences between species tells changes in DNA accumulated biogenic substance after the two species were divided. These changes estimate the age when 38 these species arose. This method calculates the age older than when they really Time of the oldest fossils found appeared, because it shows the time when they were first divided. Fossils tell beginning of life us the shape and the living age of ancient lives. Combination DNA and fossils estimates the age of old life more accurate. references : Bioinformatics vol.22 2971-2972(2006) 5 TIMETREE http://www.timetree.org back│Genome size and body size Genomes contain many genes, however, genome size does not depend on the number of genes but the size of regions without genes. The relationships between the organisms and their genome size remain an open question.
    [Show full text]
  • The Connection Between a Suspended Sediments and Reservoir Siltation: Empirical Analysis in the Maziarnia Reservoir, Poland
    resources Article The Connection between a Suspended Sediments and Reservoir Siltation: Empirical Analysis in the Maziarnia Reservoir, Poland Maksymilian Cie´sla* , Renata Gruca-Rokosz and Lilianna Bartoszek Rzeszów University of Technology Department of Environmental and Chemistry Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture Al. Powsta´nców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland; [email protected] (R.G.-R.); [email protected] (L.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 February 2020; Accepted: 10 March 2020; Published: 11 March 2020 Abstract: This paper presents research on the influence of suspended sediments on selected aspects of a reservoir’s functioning. As the amount of sediment suspended in water (SS) there was found to correlate significantly with sedimentation rate (Us), it was possible to develop a function allowing the rate of accumulation of sediments to be predicted by reference to known amounts of suspended sediment. The latter factor was also shown to correlate significantly with the content of organic matter in suspension (OMSS), in sediment captured in a sediment trap (OMS), and of bottom sediment (OMSB). Analysis of amounts of suspended sediment can provide for estimates of total loads of organic pollutants deposited in the sediments of a reservoir. A further significant correlation with SS was noted for the concentration of total phosphorus in water (TPW), confirming the importance of internal production where the circulation of this biogenic substance in a reservoir ecosystem is concerned. Analysis of stable carbon isotopes in turn showed that entrapped sediments were depleted 13 of—or enriched in— C, in line with whether concentrations of total P in those sediments (TPS) were at their highest or lowest levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemoorganotrophic Bioleaching of Olivine for Nickel Recovery †
    Minerals 2014, 4, 553-564; doi:10.3390/min4020553 OPEN ACCESS minerals ISSN 2075-163X www.mdpi.com/journal/minerals Article Chemoorganotrophic Bioleaching of Olivine for Nickel Recovery † Yi Wai Chiang 1,2,*, Rafael M. Santos 3, Aldo Van Audenaerde 3, Annick Monballiu 4, Tom Van Gerven 3 and Boudewijn Meesschaert 2,4 1 School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada 2 Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, KU Leuven, Leuven 3001, Belgium; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven 3001, Belgium; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.M.S.); [email protected] (A.V.A.); [email protected] (T.V.G.) 4 Laboratory for Microbial and Biochemical Technology (Lab μBCT), KU Leuven @ Brugge-Oostende (Kulab), Oostende 8400, Belgium; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-519-824-4120 (ext. 58217); Fax: +1-519-836-0227. † Note: Contents of this paper also appear in the conference proceedings of the MetSoc of CIM’s 7th International Hydrometallurgy Symposium, Victoria, BC, Canada, 22–25 June 2014. Received: 8 May 2014; in revised form: 11 June 2014 / Accepted: 12 June 2014 / Published: 20 June 2014 Abstract: Bioleaching of olivine, a natural nickel-containing magnesium-iron-silicate, was conducted by applying chemoorganotrophic bacteria and fungi. The tested fungus, Aspergillus niger, leached substantially more nickel from olivine than the tested bacterium, Paenibacillus mucilaginosus. Aspergillus niger also outperformed two other fungal species: Humicola grisae and Penicillium chrysogenum.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations
    4.5.2013 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 124/1 II (Non-legislative acts) RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (Text with EEA relevance) (2013/179/EU) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, (4) The Conclusions of the Council on "Sustainable materials management and sustainable production and consumption" of 20 December 2010 ( 3) invited the Commission to develop a common methodology on Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European the quantitative assessment of the environmental Union, and in particular Article 191 and Article 292 thereof, impacts of products, throughout their life cycle, in order to support the assessment and labelling of products. Whereas: (1) Reliable and correct measurement and information on (5) The Communication from the Commission to the the environmental performance of products and organi­ European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and sations is an essential element in the environmental Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions decision-making of a wide range of actors. "Towards a Single Market Act - For a highly competitive social market economy. 50 proposals for improving our work, business and exchanges with one another" ( 4 ) (2) The current proliferation of different methods and outlined that possibilities would be explored for estab­ initiatives to assess and communicate environmental lishing a common European methodology to assess and performance is leading to confusion and mistrust in envi­ label products, to address the issue of their environ­ ronmental performance information. It also may lead to mental impact, including carbon emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Air-Sea Gas Flux Climatology; Progress and Future Prospects
    Air-sea Gas Flux Climatology; Progress and Future Prospects Science Workshop - 24-27 sept. 2013 1. Abstracts for oral presentation Dr ARDHUIN Fabrice, IFREMER, France Dissipation source terms and whitecap statistics F. Ardhuin, F. Leckler, J.F. Filipot, A. Mironov Whitecaps are the main sink of wave energy and their occurrence has been related to the steepness of the waves. Recent parameterizations of the wave dissipation in numerical models are based on this property, but wave models have seldom been verified in terms of whitecap properties. Here we analyze and adjust the breaking statistics used in two recent wave dissipation parameterizations implemented in the spectral wave model WAVEWATCH III® and now used operationaly at NOAA/NCEP. For dominant breaking waves, the reduction of breaking probabilities with wave age is well reproduced. Across the spectrum, the parameterizations produce a reasonable distribution of breaking fronts for wave frequencies up to three times the dominant frequency, but fail to reproduce the observed reduction in breaking front lengths for the shorter waves. Converted to whitecap coverage, the breaking parameterizations agree reasonably well with the classical empirical fits of whitecap coverage against wind speed and the global whitecap coverage estimated from space-borne radiometry. Dr ASHER William, University of Washington - USA The effect of surfactants of near-surface concentration fluctuations due to turbulence and wind stress W. Asher, M. Tavakolinejad, A. Jessup Experimental evidence has shown that increasing divergence of the flow field very near the air-water interface is correlated with increases in the air-water transfer velocity of sparingly soluble gases. Additionally, it has been shown that the rate at which near-surface concentration fluctuations of carbon dioxide occur is also correlated with the surface divergence.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Marine Environment Report for the NOWPAP Region (SOMER 2)
    State of the Marine Environment Report for the NOWPAP region (SOMER 2) 2014 1 State of Marine Environment Report for the NOWPAP region List of Acronyms CEARAC Special Monitoring and Coastal Environmental Assessment Regional Activity Centre COD Chemical Oxygen Demand DDTs Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane DIN, DIP Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen, Dissolved Inorganic Phosphorus DO Dissolved Oxygen DSP Diarethic Shellfish Poison EANET Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia EEZ Exclusive Economical Zone FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FPM Focal Points Meeting GDP Gross Domestic Product GIWA Global International Waters Assessment HAB Harmful Algal Bloom HCHs Hexachlorcyclohexane compounds HELCOM Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission HNS Hazardous Noxious Substances ICARM Integrated Coastal and River Management IGM Intergovernmental Meeting IMO International Maritime Organization 2 JMA Japan Meteorological Agency LBS Land Based Sources LOICZ Land-Ocean Interaction in the Coastal Zone MAP Mediterranean Action Plan MERRAC Marine Environmental Emergency Preparedness and Response Regional Activity Center MIS Marine invasive species MTS MAP Technical Report Series NGOs Nongovernmental Organizations NIES National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan NOWPAP Northwest Pacific Action Plan OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic PAHs Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PCBs PolyChloro-Biphenyles PCDD/PCDF Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins/ Polychlorinated dibenzofurans
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2018/108611 Al 21 June 2018 (21.06.2018) W !P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/108611 Al 21 June 2018 (21.06.2018) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, A61K8/81 (2006.01) KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG). (21) International Application Number: Published: PCT/EP201 7/0814 17 — with international search report (Art. 21(3)) (22) International Filing Date: 04 December 2017 (04.12.2017) (25) Filing Language: English (26) Publication Langi English (30) Priority Data: 16203549.7 12 December 2016 (12.12.2016) EP (71) Applicant: CLARIANT INTERNATIONAL LTD [CH/CH]; Rothausstr. 61, 4132 Muttenz (CH). (72) Inventors: FISCHER, Dirk; Bahnhofstrasse 70, 55278 Hahnheim (DE). KAYSER, Christoph; Am Bangert 16b, 55 127 Mainz (DE). STARKULLA, Gundula; Schubert- strasse 26, 55 130 Mainz (DE). (74) Agent: HOLMES, Rosalind; Industriepark Hochst / G 860, 65926 Frankfurt am Main (DE). (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Insoluble Carbonaceous Material in Atmospheric Particulates by Pyrolysis/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Procedures
    Characterization of insoluble carbonaceous material in atmospheric particulates by pyrolysis/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry procedures Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Kunen, Steven Maxwell Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 09:17:40 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565415 CHARACTERIZATION OF INSOLUBLE CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL IN ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATES BY PYROLYSIS/GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY PROCEDURES by Steven Maxwell Kunen A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 8 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Steven Maxwell Kanen_________________________ entitled Characterization of Insoluble Carbonaceous Material in Atmospheric Particulates by Pyrolysis/G as Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Procedures be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy__________________________________ /6 ///zsy'l '7 7 8 Dissertation Director Date As members of the Final Examination Committee, we certify that we have read this dissertation and agree that it may be presented for final defense. // s /,\77 8 • S k " L \\cr\% Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense thereof at the final oral examination.
    [Show full text]