The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook Anti-Government Movement Guidebook The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook The National Center for State Courts 1999, National Center for State Courts Anti-Government Movement Guidebook This guide was developed under a grant. Award No. SJI-96-02B-B-159, "The Rise of Common Law Courts in the United States: An Examination of the Movement, The Potential Impact on the Judiciary, and How the States Could Respond," from the State Justice Institute. The points of view expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the State Justice Institute. Anti-Government Movement Guidebook STAFF Managing Editor Mr. Chuck Ericksen Acting Executive Director Institute for Court Management National Center for State Courts Contributors and Primary Researchers Mr. Chris J. Wesser, J.D. College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia Mr. Dov M. Szego, J.D. College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia Project Staff National Center for State Courts 300 Newport Avenue Williamsburg, Virginia 22185 (757) 253-20000 Ms. Catina N. Burrell Senior Administrative Specialist Ms. Amanda C. Murer Intern Research Assistants Shawn Shurden Koran Singh Stuart Turner Funding Agency Ms. Cheryl Reynolds, Grant Manager State Justice Institute 1650 King Street, Suite 600 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 703-684-7618 i Anti-Government Movement Guidebook PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mr. Chuck Ericksen State Judicial Educator Office of the State Court Administrator Olympia, Washington Mr. Peter Haskel, Esquire Assistant Division Chief, Financial Litigation Division Office of the Attorney General Austin, Texas Honorable Joanne Huelsman State Senator Madison, Wisconsin Honorable Jeffrey H. Langton Judge, 21st Judicial District Court Hamilton, Montana Mr. Thomas McAffee Professor of Law Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois Mr. Nick Murnion, Esquire District Attorney Garfield County Prosecutor's Office Jordan,Montana Ms. Cheryl Reynolds State Justice Institute Alexandria, Virginia Mr. Stephan W. Stover State Court Administrator Supreme Court of Ohio Columbus, Ohio ii Anti-Government Movement Guidebook Table of Contents Preface.................................................................................................................. viii Acknowledgements.............................................................................................. x Part I Common Law and Uncommon Courts: 1 An Overview of the Common Law Court Movement ................................................ 1 The Posse Comitatus........................................................................................... 3 Avoiding Legal Authority................................................................................... 5 "Hidden History" as Justification........................................................................ 6 The Posse and the Common Law........................................................................ 9 The First Wave of the Common Law Movement............................................... 14 Decline and Resurgence...................................................................................... 19 The Future of Common Law Courts?.....................................................…......... 29 Part II Tactics in the Courtroom.............................................................................................. 31 Subpart 2.1 - Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction.................................................... 32 A. The Gold-Fringed Flag Issue..................................................…................... 32 B. Typical Responses to the Flag Objection...................................................... 33 C. Additional Authority..........................................................…........................ 34 Subpart 2.2 - Challenging Personal Jurisdiction............................................................... 35 A. The "Sovereign" vs. the "Corporate" Citizen....…........................................ 35 B. Typical Responses to the Personal Jurisdiction Issue.................................... 36 C. Additional Authority............................. ........................................................ 38 Subpart 2.3 - Demanding Use of "The Common Law"...............…................................. 39 iii Anti-Government Movement Guidebook A. Demanding a Strict Interpretation of "Common Law"...…........................... 39 B. Typical Responses to the Common Law Demand.......….............................. 40 Subpart 2.4 - Significance of "The Bar"..................................…..................................... 42 A. Refusing to Enter the Bar....................................................…....................... 42 B. Typical Responses to the Bar Argument............................…........................ 43 C. Additional Authority............................ ......................................................... 44 Part III Disrupting the Operation of the Court....................................................................... 46 Subpart 3.1 - Refusing to Speak/Identify Oneself............................................................ 47 A. Refusal to Identify Oneself............................................................................ 47 B. Typical Responses to Refusals to Identify..................................................... 48 Subpart 3.2 - Silence/Filibuster......................................................................................... 50 A. Party Chooses to Remain Silent or Party Chooses to "Filibuster"................................................................................................. 50 B. Typical Responses to Silence/Filibuster.............................……................... 50 C. Additional Authority...............................................…................................... 51 Subpart 3.3 - Demanding "Counsel of Choice"................................................................ 52 A. Party Requests to be Represented by a Non-Lawyer..................................... 52 B. Responding to Requests to be Represented by a Non-Lawyer........................................................................................... 53 Subpart 3.4 - Verbal Threats Against the Court............................................................... 54 A. Party Makes Verbal Threats Against the Court............................................. 54 B. Responding to Threats Made by Members of the Movement........................ 54 Subpart 3.5 - Hunger Strikes............................................................................................. 56 A. Party Begins a Hunger Strike......................................................................... 56 iv Anti-Government Movement Guidebook B. Responding to a Hunger Strike...................................................................... 56 Subpart 3.6 - Attempts to Disqualify the Judge................................................................ 57 A. Judicial Disqualification.....................................................…....................... 57 B. Typical Responses to Judicial Disqualification or Recusal.....…….............. 58 Subpart 3.7 - Forms of Pleadings...................................................................................... 60 A. Party Files "Odd" Documents/Uses Antiquated Pleading Forms.............................................................................................. 60 B. Responding to Unusual Documents............................................................... 61 Subpart 3.8 - Refusal to Sign Documents......................................................................... 63 A. Party Refuses to Sign Documents..................................…............................ 63 B. Responding to a Party's Refusal to Sign Documents..................................... 63 P IV Tactics Outside of the Courtroom........................................................................... 65 Subpart 4.1 - Interactions with the Clerk.......................................................................... 66 A. Appearance at Office/Window/Counter of Court Clerk................................ 66 B. Clerk Responses to Members of the Movement............................................ 67 Subpart 4.2 - Actions Against Court Personnel................................................................ 69 A. Service of Process/Personal Suits Against Court Personnel....…...….......... 69 B. Responses to Service of Process/Personal Suits...........…….….................... 69 C. Additional Authority...................................................................................... 70 Subpart 4.3 - Threats Against Court Personnel...........................…................................. 72 A. Threats Against Court Personnel................................................................... 72 B. Clerk/Personnel Responses............................................................................ 72 Subpart 4.4 - Violent Actions........................................................................................... 74 v Anti-Government Movement Guidebook A. Members of the Movement Become Violent................................................. 74 B. Clerk Responses............................................................................................. 74 Part V Trial Court Performance Standards............................................................................ 75 Relationship
Recommended publications
  • American Organic Law and Government. Form #11.217
    American Organic Law By: Freddy Freeman American Organic Law 1 of 247 Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form #11.217, Rev. 12/12/2017 EXHIBIT:___________ Revisions Notes Updates to this release include the following: 1) Added a new section titled “From Colonies to Sovereign States.” 2) Improved the analysis on Declaration of Independence, which now covers the last half of the document. 3) Improved the section titled “Citizens Under the Articles of Confederation” 4) Improved the section titled “Art. I:8:17 – Grant of Power to Exercise Exclusive Legislation.” This new and improved write-up presents proof that the States of the United States Union were created under Article I Section 8 Clause 17 and consist exclusively of territory owned by the United States of America. 5) Improved the section titled “Citizenship in the United States of America Confederacy.” 6) Added the section titled “Constitution versus Statutory citizens of the United States.” 7) Rewrote and renamed the section titled “Erroneous Interpretations of the 14th Amendment Citizens of the United States.” This updated section proves why it is erroneous to interpret the 14th Amendment “citizens of the United States” as being a citizenry which in not domiciled on federal land. 8) Added a new section titled “the States, State Constitutions, and State Governments.” This new section includes a detailed analysis of the 1849 Constitution of the State of California. Much of this analysis applies to all of the State Constitutions. American Organic Law 3 of 247 Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org Form #11.217, Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention?
    How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention? Mary Sarah Bilder* ABSTRACT The official records of the ConstitutionalConvention of 1787 have been neglected and dismissed by scholars for the last century, largely to due to Max Farrand'scriticisms of both the records and the man responsible for keeping them-Secretary of the Convention William Jackson. This Article disagrees with Farrand'sconclusion that the Convention records were bad, and aims to resurrect the records and Jackson's reputation. The Article suggests that the endurance of Farrand'scritique arises in part from misinterpretationsof cer- tain proceduralcomponents of the Convention and failure to appreciate the significance of others, understandable consideringthe inaccessibility of the of- ficial records. The Article also describes the story of the records after the Con- vention but before they were published, including the physical limbo of the records in the aftermath of the Convention and the eventual deposit of the records in March 1796 amidst the rapid development of disagreements over constitutional interpretation. Finally, the Article offers a few cautionary re- flections about the lessons to be drawn from the official records. Particularly, it recommends using caution with Max Farrand's records, paying increased attention to the procedural context of the Convention, and recognizing that Constitutionalinterpretation postdated the Constitution. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1621 A NOTE ON THE RECORDS .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rodney S. Webb: United States Attorney for the District of North Dakota from 1981 to 1987
    North Dakota Law Review Volume 78 Number 2 Article 12 2002 Rodney S. Webb: United States Attorney for the District of North Dakota from 1981 to 1987 Lynn E. Crooks Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Crooks, Lynn E. (2002) "Rodney S. Webb: United States Attorney for the District of North Dakota from 1981 to 1987," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 78 : No. 2 , Article 12. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol78/iss2/12 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RODNEY S. WEBB: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA FROM 1981 TO 1987 LYNN E. CROOKS* I. INTRODUCTION Rodney S. Webb served as the United States Attorney for the District of North Dakota from 1981 until he was appointed by President Reagan to be a United States District Court Judge for the District of North Dakota in 1987. During his term as United States Attorney, the State of North Dakota experienced one of the highest profile murder cases in its history. The reports of the murders and the subsequent trial became one of the most intense news events in modern North Dakota history. Indeed, the intense news coverage became one of the principal issues on appeal and was the subject of a dissent by Chief Judge Lay from the opinion affirming the convictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Officer Safety- Sovereign Citizens- Supplemental Information
    Officer Safety- Sovereign Citizens- Supplemental Information Domestic Terrorism The Sovereign Citizen Movement 04/13/10- FBI Domestic terrorism—Americans attacking Americans because of U.S.-based extremist ideologies—comes in many forms in our post 9/11 world. To help educate the public, we’ve previously outlined two separate domestic terror threats—eco- terrorists/animal rights extremists and lone offenders. Today, we look at a third threat—the “sovereign Some examples of illegal license plates citizen” extremist movement. Sovereign citizens used by so-called sovereign citizens. are anti-government extremists who believe that even though they physically reside in this country, they are separate or “sovereign” from the United States. As a result, they believe they don’t have to answer to any government authority, including courts, taxing entities, motor vehicle departments, or law enforcement. This causes all kinds of problems—and crimes. For example, many sovereign citizens don’t pay their taxes. They hold illegal courts that issue warrants for judges and police officers. They clog up the court system with frivolous lawsuits and liens against public officials to harass them. And they use fake money orders, personal checks, and the like at government agencies, banks, and businesses. That’s just the beginning. Not every action taken in the name of the sovereign citizen ideology is a crime, but the list of illegal actions committed by these groups, cells, and individuals is extensive (and puts them squarely on our radar). In addition to the above, sovereign citizens: Commit murder and physical assault; Threaten judges, law enforcement professionals, and government personnel; Impersonate police officers and diplomats; Use fake currency, passports, license plates, and driver’s licenses; and Engineer various white-collar scams, including mortgage fraud and so-called “redemption” schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Involvement with Law Enforcement
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1989 A Comparison of Selected Old and New Right Wing Groups: Involvement with Law Enforcement Elvin W. Keith Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Criminology Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Keith, Elvin W., "A Comparison of Selected Old and New Right Wing Groups: Involvement with Law Enforcement" (1989). Master's Theses. 1095. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1095 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMPARISON OF SELECTED OLD AND NEW RIGHT WING GROUPS: INVOLVEMENT WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT by Elvin W. Keith III A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Political Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1989 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. A COMPARISON OF SELECTED OLD AND NEW RIGHT WING GROUPS: INVOLVEMENT WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT Elvin W. Keith III, M.A. Western Michigan University, 1989 This study has determined that current right wing extremist groups in the U.S. have no greater propensity for damage to the national security than older right wing groups. Although rig h t wing groups are dangerous due to the popularity of conservative causes and the proliferation of modern weaponry, an examination reveals that dedicat­ ion and increased military capability are offset by more efficient law enforcement response and lack of support by the general populace.
    [Show full text]
  • the Lawmen: United States Marshals and Their Deputies
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. - . - --- ,-. - .- I. '. ., ~ ., •• ~~~'r,I. ... ... " \~\~"5cc .. ,.~ . The Lawmen: ~~ United States Marshals j, and Their Deputies hIt " " '0 1789 to ,the. Present L· -r = - t~. ' - -~ The Lawmen: United States Marshals t"" <t I .. " • I " and Their Deputies Ne3RS by \ MAR 12 1981 Frederick S. Calhoun, Historian, U.S. Marshals Service ACQUISHT10NS An overview of the origins and colorful history of the Nation's oldest, most distinguished federal law enforcement organization "For more than a century after the establishment of the fed­ eral government in 1789, U.S. Marshals provided the only nationwide civilian police power available to the president, Congress, and the courts. For two hundred years now, U.S. Marshals and their deputies have served as the instruments of civil authority used by all three branches of government. Marshals have been involved in most of the major historical episodes in America's past. The history of the marshals is. quite simply, the story of how the American people govern themselves. " This is an excerpt from the forthcoming official history of the U. S. Mar­ shals by Frederick S. Calhoun, Historian, U.S. Marshals Service. Mr. Calhoun, who received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago, is the author of Power and Principle: Armed Intervention in Wilsonian Foreign Policy. 104856 J u.s. Department of JUstice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution from a Legislative Toward a Judicial Model of Payment, 45 La
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 45 | Number 3 The 1984 Revision of the Louisiana Civil Code's Articles on Obligations - A Student Symposium January 1985 The iH story of Claims Against the United States: The volutE ion from a Legislative Toward a Judicial Model of Payment Floyd D. Shimomura Repository Citation Floyd D. Shimomura, The History of Claims Against the United States: The Evolution from a Legislative Toward a Judicial Model of Payment, 45 La. L. Rev. (1985) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol45/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HISTORY OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES: THE EVOLUTION FROM A LEGISLATIVE TOWARD A JUDICIAL MODEL OF PAYMENT Floyd D. Shimomura* TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ......................................... 626 I. THE "LEGISLATIVE MODEL" (Colonial Period-Civil W ar) ............................................. 627 A. Development-The Colonial Legislative Tradition 627 1. The Seventeenth Century ................... 627 2. The Eighteenth Century .................... 630 3. Articles of Confederation (1781-1789) ....... 634 B. Triumph-Congress over Court in the Early R epublic ..................................... 637 1. Early Struggle (1789-1794) .................. 637 2. Congressional Adjudication (1794-1838) ...... 643 C. Decline-Inundation of Congress by Claims ..... 648 1. Dissatisfaction (1838-1855) .................. 648 2. Advisory Court (1855-1860) ................. 651 It. THE "HYBRID MODEL" (Civil War-World War 653 II). ................................. ............. A. Development-Congress Seeks Court Assistance.. 654 1. Congressional Request (1860-1863) .........
    [Show full text]
  • WAR in the WEST the Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right
    WAR IN THE WEST The Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right A Special Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama JULY 2014 southern poverty law center WAR IN THE WEST The Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER is a nonprofit organization that combats hate, intolerance and discrimination through education and litigation. Its Intelligence Project, which prepared this report and also produces the quarterly investigative magazine Intelligence Report, tracks the activities of hate groups and the nativist movement and monitors militia and other extremist antigovernment activity. Its Teaching Tolerance project helps foster respect and understanding in the classroom. Its litigation arm files lawsuits against hate groups for the violent acts of their members. MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES Mark Potok or Heidi Beirich Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, Ala. (334) 956-8200 www.splcenter.org This report was prepared by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Center is supported entirely by private donations. No government funds are involved. © Southern Poverty Law Center. All rights reserved. southern poverty law center about the report Written by Ryan Lenz and Mark Potok Edited by Heidi Beirich Designed by Russell Estes, Shannon Anderson and Sunny Paulk Cover photos by Jim Urquhart/Reuters/Corbis and Ryan Lenz southern poverty law center table of contents Executive Summary 5 Guns of April: The Bundy Standoff 8 Backgrounding Bundy: The Movement 18 Land Use and the ‘Patriots’: A Timeline 22 southern poverty law center After the climbdown: Militiamen and other support- ers of Cliven Bundy head for the corral where govern- ment agents were holding the Nevadan’s cattle.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Room Books by Date
    Boise Public Library - Idaho Room Books 2020 Trails of the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness Fuller, Margaret, 1935- 2020 Skiing Sun Valley : a history from Union Pacific to the Holdings Lundin John W. 2020 Sky Ranch : living on a remote ranch in Idaho Phelps, Bobbi, author. 2020 Tales and tails : a story runs through it : anthologies and previously Kleffner, Flip, author. 2020 little known fishing facts Symbols signs and songs Just, Rick, author. 2020 Sun Valley, Ketchum, and the Wood River Valley Lundin, John W. 2020 Anything Will Be Easy after This : A Western Identity Crisis Maile, Bethany, author. 2020 The Boise bucket list : 101 ways to explore the City of Trees DeJesus, Diana C, author. 2020 An eye for injustice : Robert C. Sims and Minidoka 2020 Betty the Washwoman : 2021 calendar. 2020 Best easy day hikes, Boise Bartley, Natalie L. 2020 The Castlewood Laboratory at Libuyu School : a team joins together O'Hara, Rich, author. 2020 Apple : writers in the attic Writers in the Attic (Contest) (2020), 2020 author. The flows : hidden wonders of Craters of the Moon National Boe, Roger, photographer. 2020 Monument and Preserve Educating : a memoir Westover, LaRee, author. 2020 Ghosts of Coeur d'Alene and the Silver Valley Cuyle, Deborah. 2020 Eat what we sow cook book 2020 5 kids on wild trails : a memoir Fuller, Margaret, 1935- 2020 Good time girls of the Rocky Mountains : a red-light history of Collins, Jan MacKell, 1962- 2020 Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming 100 Treasure Valley pollinator plants. 2020 A hundred little pieces on the end of the world Rember, John, author.
    [Show full text]
  • Mango Languages
    Connections VOLUME 2 ∙ NUMBER 7 ∙ JULY 2019 MANGO LANGUAGES Not-So-Frequently Asked Questions 2 Submitted by Angie Houser New E-Books and E-Audiobooks 3 New Titles Available 3 Mango Languages is the newest database added to our online Book Review 5 library resources. It is also one of the most fun and interactive Universal Class Course of the Month 5 databases! Mango is a language learning database that can be used on both a desktop and through an app. There are 75+ languages to choose from, but the user doesn’t have to pick only one. Multiple languages can be set up in the Subscribe account at one time. Each language comes with a set number of to our newsletter! units, chapters, and lessons that will take the user from the basics of the language to the more advanced part. Each lesson begins with the goals for the lesson in both conversation and grammar. Some languages just have the basics (i.e. “hello”, “my name is…”, etc.) available while others have robust units that will help you gain fluency. Not only does it have what you need for using the language, many languages also have specialty courses that give you a lesson on specific subjects like slang, superstition, or English loan words. Every language is different, and all lessons are learned at your own pace. Sign up for a The second great part of Mango languages is the English Library Card! Language Learning courses. When choosing these courses, the user chooses what their native language is in order to learn English.
    [Show full text]
  • The Posse Comitatus and the Office of Sheriff: Armed Citizens Summoned to the Aid of Law Enforcement
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 104 Article 3 Issue 4 Symposium On Guns In America Fall 2015 The oP sse Comitatus And The Office Of Sheriff: Armed Citizens Summoned To The Aid Of Law Enforcement David B. Kopel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation David B. Kopel, The Posse Comitatus And The Office Of erSh iff: Armed Citizens Summoned To The Aid Of Law Enforcement, 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 761 (2015). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol104/iss4/3 This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/15/10404-0761 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 104, No. 4 Copyright © 2015 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. THE POSSE COMITATUS AND THE OFFICE OF SHERIFF: ARMED CITIZENS SUMMONED TO THE AID OF LAW ENFORCEMENT DAVID B. KOPEL* Posse comitatus is the legal power of sheriffs and other officials to summon armed citizens to aid in keeping the peace. The posse comitatus can be traced back at least as far as the reign of Alfred the Great in ninth- century England. The institution thrives today in the United States; a study of Colorado finds many county sheriffs have active posses. Like the law of the posse comitatus, the law of the office of sheriff has been remarkably stable for over a millennium.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Power and Rural Resistance in the Arkansas Ozarks
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2014 Dynamics of Defiance: Government Power and Rural Resistance in the Arkansas Ozarks J. Blake Perkins Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Perkins, J. Blake, "Dynamics of Defiance: Government Power and Rural Resistance in the Arkansas Ozarks" (2014). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 6404. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6404 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dynamics of Defiance: Government Power and Rural Resistance in the Arkansas Ozarks J. Blake Perkins Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Kenneth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D., Committee Chairperson Elizabeth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D. Joseph Hodge, Ph.D. James Siekmeier, Ph.D. Brooks Blevins, Ph.D. Department of History Morgantown, WV 2014 Keywords: Ozarks; Arkansas; rural; government; liberal state; populism; resistance; dissent; smallholder; agrarianism; industrialization; agribusiness; liberalism; conservatism; economic development; politics; stereotypes Copyright 2014 J.
    [Show full text]